All Episodes
Previous Next
May 2, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
58:32
The Lindell Report (5-2-23)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
To get a MyPillow or not, you need to get the brand new MyPillow 2.0!
Call or go to MyPillow.com now!
Use your promo code and for a limited time when you buy one, you'll get a second one absolutely free!
You're sleeping even better!
And cooler too!
And you're looking good!
Feeling good!
I knew you would!
Visit MyPillow.com This is the Lindell Report.
Bringing you news combined with hope by offering practical and achievable action points
to assist you in defending and preserving faith and freedom.
MyPillow.com And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
All right, welcome to broadcast.
Glad you are with us.
Brandon House in for Mike Lindell.
I just hung up with Mike.
He is planning on being with us on Thursday night for a special broadcast and a special report.
We're going to have a very important interview coming up at about 6.30 Central Time with Jeff O'Donnell.
We'll have a video and a report to push you to that is about almost 300-page report that is absolutely vital that we start disseminating this information everywhere.
Before we go to Rebecca Terrell and then Frankie Stokes with the National File and then we'll go to Jeff O'Donnell, let me show you this report tonight.
This is it here on the screen.
I'm sorry, I don't have my computer plugged in, but this is it here.
We'll get my computer plugged in.
It's called The Fingerprints of Fraud.
The Fingerprints of Fraud.
This has just been released.
We're going to get to it in about 30 minutes.
Evidence and analysis of a multi-state conspiracy to defraud the 2020 election.
This is volume one.
There will be more to follow.
Again, fingerprints of fraud, evidence and analysis of a multi-state conspiracy to defraud the 2020 election.
And we're going to go through this in just one minute.
I think you ought to have it on the screen now, guys.
Throw that up there because this is going to be available to you in just a few minutes.
We're going to show you how you can get access to this report.
And as you can see, as I start scrolling through this report, There are a lot of diagrams, a lot of graphics, a lot of hard evidence.
For all of those people saying, where's the evidence?
Where's the evidence?
This is a 282-page report, and it is Volume 1.
There is more to come.
Again, here is the headline.
The headline of the report, Fingerprints of Fraud, Evidence and Analysis of a Multi-State Conspiracy to Defraud the 2020 First up, however, is Rebecca Terrell of The New American.
Rebecca is going to talk to us about a few things.
Maggie Raccoon will join us in about 25 minutes. First up, however, is Rebecca Terrell of The New
American. Rebecca is going to talk to us about a few things.
Here, of course, Michael Indell is known for talking about what? Machines and vaccines.
Machines and vaccines.
Mike's also known, as am I, for being very strong pro-lifers.
Mike has appeared in a movie and helped to fund a pro-life movie a few years ago.
Many of you might remember he made a cameo appearance in that movie.
So the pro-life issue is very close to Mike's heart as well.
Well, Rebecca Terrell has been writing on a few of these issues, and so I thought it'd be appropriate with the machine, vaccines, and the pro-life issue being very near and dear to the heart of the host of this show, Mike Lindell, we'd get her on for a quick update on some very important articles she has just recently written.
Rebecca, welcome to the broadcast.
Thanks for joining us.
Thank you so much.
It's good to see you.
Good to be back.
You too, Rebecca.
Glad to have you back as well.
You have an article I want to get to right away over at thenewamerican.com.
Blacklist of unvaccinated.
Blacklist of the unvaccinated.
Is Big Brother tracking you?
There is ample evidence suggesting that vaccines are being used as part of a biosecurity-based totalitarian control grid.
Mike likes to talk about machines and vaccines.
Well, here we are.
Vaccines, those that haven't gotten vaxxed, are they being tracked, Rebecca?
That's right.
Well, actually, we do know this for a fact because they've created new codes.
You know, whenever you go to the doctor, you have diagnostic codes.
And that he sends those to Medicare or Medicaid or to your insurance, and that's the way they pay.
So they've made new codes that specifically say whether you've received the COVID jab, whether you've received the boosters, and if you are otherwise under vaccinated, for other diseases, too.
So we know that this is absolutely happening.
We know that the reason they're doing it is to track individuals.
They're already denying people treatments and especially transplants based on vaccination status.
We have ample evidence of that.
We also know that it's the World Health Organization, wouldn't you know, that keeps track of this list, these lists of all these codes that are used.
And they expressly say that this is for tracking who has received the COVID vaccine.
Not only who has received, but why, if they haven't received the vaccine, why they haven't received it.
So they might label you as an anti-vaxxer and then, of course, that's going to start heading toward your social credit score.
Exactly.
And of course, the excuse for this, of course, is public health, because you can't be against public health, can you?
And that's the excuse for everything.
Public health is the excuse for restricting our guns.
It's the excuse for all this transgender nonsense in the schools right now because, oh, all these transgender children who are, you know, if it's a boy forced to live as a boy and he's really a girl, then he's more prone to suicide.
And so, you know, it's always public health.
That's the little umbrella term that they use for pushing all this on us.
So when you go to the doctor, I haven't gone in years, and this is one reason why, but I'm told, and I think I did go many years ago, everybody started carrying around their little iPads, right?
So they come in there and they start shooting questions at you and writing things down or poking things down or handwriting things down however they do it there are these little iPads and they're asking intrusive questions like do you have guns in the house now and I've had people tell me that this is what they're asking of course the response should be that's none of your business but now they're gonna ask you things like have you been vaccinated do you have the you know your boosters all of this this is all going somewhere if it's being coded clarify for me who's put out the code is this the federal government
It's actually CDC that came up with these codes and applied to the World Health Organization maintains the list.
And so it's CDC and their National Center for Health Statistics.
So when you say the WHO maintains the list, you're saying China, Bill Gates, those kind of people, the United Nations.
The United Nations is the WHO.
So the United Nations is tracking who's vaccinated, who's not.
We know we're going to have the pandemic treaty coming up this month.
I don't know if they'll do anything with it.
You know, James Rogoski thinks maybe they're going to slow walk this thing because we, the collective we that, you know, is covering this for the American people in the world, have brought so much attention to this, negative attention, that they may need to slow this thing down for a little bit.
But eventually, we have read over at the Brownstone Institute, you know, an article I think titled over there, the worst treaty ever, Yes.
You're an enemy of the state.
a pandemic, an emergency, a state of emergency, anytime they want, even if there's no evidence
of one, just a perceived one or the fear of one, they could declare that to be the fact
that we're not vaccinated, therefore we're now the emergency threat.
It could be that we have guns.
You're an enemy of the state.
Right.
Right.
And then they can drag you off.
They can drag you off according to this WHO international treaty that we would give our
sovereignty to under the Biden regime.
They could drag you off and have you examined and treatment.
Do you understand this to be the truth?
Is that an accurate report?
Oh, absolutely.
And Joe Biden tried to do that last year.
He tried to hand it over.
They're working on this pandemic treaty.
So they said no.
That's the only reason they said no.
But think about this too.
I'm a nurse.
I have an inactive license.
This makes doctors and nurses and healthcare practitioners agents of the government.
The government has no business in the exam room.
The government has no business in the hospital.
Healthcare is just like any other service.
We don't apply to the government to get lawn care or to have our dry cleaning done.
Why do we allow the government in this most crucial area of our lives?
You know, you were saying how these doctors ask intrusive questions.
A doctor and a patient should be able to talk about extremely personal issues without intrusion from a third party, especially a federal bureaucrat, or in this case, as you said, an international bureaucrat.
You also have an article over at the New American by Rebecca Terrell here.
Republicans exit Eric, citing voter fraud potential.
So the good news is you're reporting now seven states in total that are exiting this Eric voting system, correct?
Isn't that great?
And we're getting to them so badly that if you go on the Eric website, there is front and center a letter from the head of Eric saying, no, no, no, we're not bad.
We're not bad guys.
Stop the hemorrhage here.
But we do know that they're bad guys.
You covered this a lot on your show about Eric.
So I assume that your listeners are very educated and they know that we're talking about the Electronic Registration Information Center.
Membership organization for states.
They volunteer to get in, but once you're in, it's one of those Hotel California things.
Good luck getting out, right?
And so you can't just withdraw.
It's, uh, I think depending upon what kind of membership you have, it can be 90 days or even longer where you have to go through this process of withdrawal.
So some of the states aren't quite there yet, but yeah, those seven and let's hope there are going to be more.
Yeah, absolutely.
hope. All right let's go back to another article on The New American that you've written.
DOJ, I report this on my news tonight coming up in about 45 minutes,
Department of Justice attacks Tennessee's defense of minors against gender mutilation. The Department
of Justice, the Biden regime, you mean Joe Biden who goes around acting very strangely with small
children and...
And by the way, tonight on Brandon House Live, I'll be sharing congressional testimony from April 26th before a committee on the massive trafficking of children, of minors.
And one HHS whistleblower says the government is perhaps the largest middleman in the trafficking of children, your US government, under the Biden regime.
So shocker of all shockers, the Biden administration, regime, and DOJ wants to make as a 14th amendment right I don't know where they're coming up with this.
A 14th Amendment right for little children to have sex change operations, puberty blockers, their genitalia cut off, all of that.
That's now a 14th Amendment right according to the Biden DOJ.
You're reading this as well.
I don't know if you got into the 14th Amendment part of it in your article, but that's what we're reporting tonight on the news in 45 minutes.
They're invoking the 14th Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause, but they're also invoking the Due Process Clause, saying that these laws restrict the rights of parents to dictate what medical decisions are made for their children.
I don't know if you're familiar with the term, the Munchausen syndrome by proxy, where parents keep their children sick for attention.
Yes.
And people are speculating that that's what, you know, in North Carolina right now, they've got two bills, one in the Senate, one in the House, to combat this gender mutilation of children.
Because Duke University is treating kids for gender dysphoria as young as two years old.
And the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, they have a gender clinic that's servicing children as young as three.
These are toddlers.
So, you're talking about parents who are looking for attention here.
And of course, the umbrella term, it's for public health.
We have to service these children because we can't make them grow up in these bodies that are not who they believe they are.
It's demonic.
Absolutely demonic.
And what you said about that human trafficking, I think that these two things are very linked because we've got the Biden administration.
We know the Florida grand jury just recently came out with their scathing report about the Biden administration
openly practicing helping the Mexican drug cartels foster this human trafficking in Florida.
And then on the pro-life issue, you're reporting tonight, here's some good news.
We do like to share that when we can.
North Dakota's new pro-life law bans most abortions.
Okay.
Yes, yes.
And we have more and more, more and more states are Realizing, hey, we have our own say here now because of SCOTUS's decision, their Dobbs decision last June to overturn Roe v. Wade, that removed federal protections for abortion in all of the states.
And you know what?
Family Research Council has a fantastic map of the United States, and they keep it up to date daily with everything that's going on, legal challenges to the trigger laws that occurred last June.
When Roe v. Wade was overturned and the advances that the state legislatures are making protecting unborn, protecting unborn children from that lethal murderous blade of the doctor.
It's just incredible.
But actually, it's funny.
In North Dakota, there's only one clinic that remaining that that offered abortion.
So there's only one clinic that's affected by this law.
The trigger law in North Dakota was there was a stay put on it by A judge in North Dakota, and now the legislature has come behind him and said, nope, we're pro-life.
So it is good news.
It's very good news.
And then finally, of course, the tragic shooting in Nashville, Tennessee, leaving three Christian school employees dead and three young children dead by the transgender.
Where are we at with the release?
You have an article here on that.
You put out April 12th.
Where are we at with the release of this manifesto by this trans?
It seems as though there must be some very damning information in there because they are really slow walking this release.
Yeah, that's ridiculous.
You know what?
I haven't looked it up this week.
I need to do a better job of keeping my finger on the pulse of that.
But it seems like we would know if they had released it.
It's a scandal that they haven't.
And you can see a cover-up.
You know, you just smell it, you just smell a cover-up.
I don't have proof of that, but come on, you know, doesn't take a rocket scientist.
Absolutely, absolutely.
And then in closing, we've got so many bad laws now that are just infringing Washington State, Oregon.
I'm reporting in my news tonight, one of these states is making it where Christian parents cannot be adoptive parents.
Or foster parents, family resource parents, unless they accept and value the LGBTQ lifestyle.
Can you believe this?
This is where we're at in our country now?
I can believe.
I can believe it.
Because a long time ago, you know, in government and in our schools, we said, we don't need you, God.
We can do it ourselves.
And so chaos is ensuing.
And we got to get back to that attitude of submission to God, that the earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof.
And we're gonna do it.
Yeah, let's pray we do, because we're running out of time.
Rebecca Terrell, she writes over at TheNewAmerican.com.
TheNewAmerican.com.
Rebecca, as always, thank you for joining us tonight.
Wonderful to see you.
Thank you.
Rebecca Terrell checking in.
Check out her articles over at thenewamerican.com.
We're going to go to Frankie Stokes here in just one second with The National File with some very big news over at The National File.
And one of them is related to the Biden family and China.
We also have some information related to Rupert Murdoch and China.
Some very important articles being broken over there at The National File.
But before we go over there, I would like to point you to, well, how you can help us keep this going and support the work of Mike Lindell.
Let's take a look at this.
MyPillow 2.0.
The MyPillow 2.0 is out.
It has the new cooling technology that was not out when Mike first invented the original MyPillow.
You can get buy one free.
Get one, buy one free when you use that promo code L77.
That denotes you're watching the Lindell Report and you want to help.
Keep the Lindell Report going, Lindell TV, and specifically the work of Mike Lindell.
We also have slippers, sandals, and slides as low as $19.98 with that promo code L77.
Again, these all make great graduation gifts, housewarming gifts, wedding gifts, Mother's Day, Father's Day.
Here you go.
Great gifts, great products, and support a great cause.
Well, actually several great causes all at the same time.
Luxurious Giza Dream Sheets.
The Dream Bed Sheets save 50% as low as $29.98.
Again, a lot of young people graduating.
Get them something practical.
Get them some great Giza Dream Sheets they can take with them off to college.
You can get the mattress topper to go with that as well.
The 3-inch coil hybrid mattress topper, 2.0.
Logan got one about a month ago.
He loves it, he says.
So again, send these kids off to college.
They're graduating from high school now.
Give them stuff they need to go ahead and start filling up their college dorm with that they're going to use every day and remember you.
Of course, any couple getting married, they can certainly use these items.
But of course, mom, dad, these make great Mother's Day, Father's Day gifts as well.
A big time of the year for gifts.
So do some shopping, would you please?
At MyPillow.com.
Use that promo code L77.
It denotes you Like the Lindell report, you'll want it to keep going, and you want to support the work of Mike Lindell.
Joining me now is Frankie.
Frankie Stokes is with the National File.
Frank, welcome back to the broadcast.
Thanks for joining us.
Hey, Brandon.
Thanks for having me.
It's great to be here.
Great to have you with us.
Great to make you a regular.
Your second appearance here.
I went over to the nationalfile.com today.
It's just nationalfile.com, folks.
I went over there and I had an article that caught my eye right away.
Here it is by our guest, Frankie.
Could a $100 million loan from Chinese State Bank to Rupert Murdoch explain Tucker's ouster?
Frank, what'd you find out?
So Rupert Murdoch of Fox News, of Fox Corp, of News Corp, he, in 2022, he took a massive loan, multi-billion dollar loan.
There were a lot of different creditors involved in this, you know, some very ESG-friendly creditors on the American side of the deal, as well as $100 million of this deal that came from the state-owned, state-affiliated, CCP-run Bank of China.
This was out of the bank's New York branch.
You know, as I'm sure the audience is quite familiar with, there has been some serious instances of Chinese Communist intrusion in New York, and they have multiple large branches of the state-owned Bank of China in New York, which are increasingly wooing the U.S.
elites, wooing the U.S.
business sector, playing an increased role in American politics, banking, and capital.
So, Rupert Murdoch, as part of this deal, took $100 million from the Chinese Communist Bank This was as he was floating the idea of of remerging Fox Corp and News Corp that ultimately didn't go through because it was determined to be bad for the shareholders or the shareholders would disagree with that deal.
So it ultimately did not go through.
But regardless, there are 100 million dollars floating out there.
Rupert Murdoch, you know, longtime ties to China.
You see him in the picture there.
He's shaking hands with Chairman Xi.
So Murdoch is being funded by Communist China at this point.
Uh, being funded by the Bank of Communist China.
This is, is absolutely, uh, really astounding when you consider just how many American, uh, news publications are, uh, are a party to News Corp.
Um, and then you have the entire Fox Corp operation on the other side, and we all know what's, what's, uh, what's being run out of Fox Corp is Fox News.
But with, uh, with Murdoch's News Corp, you have, uh, major publications, you know, Wall Street Journal, New York Post, places like that.
Who are apparently directly receiving funds from the Chinese Communist government.
And this begs the question, did Tucker Carlson's ouster from Fox News have anything to do with Murdoch's ties to the Chinese Communist Party?
It sure seems like it could.
You know, Carlson has been one of the most vocal opponents of the CCP on cable news, and his massive audience has been rapidly awakened to the CCP problem.
Yeah, exactly.
Well, tell our audience what this is, because this is linked in your article at nationalfile.com.
What is this right here?
This is the actual document showing the loan itself.
It's quite a long read.
In the document, also included in the article, is a screenshot of the table that shows lenders, who's involved in the deal, and highlighted on it, highlighted on the National File version of the image, Absolutely, it's not not conspiracy at all.
the communist-run, state-run Bank of China.
That's the table right there.
And as you can see, the Bank of China, New York branch, has taken part in this deal, good for $100 million.
So this isn't conspiracy.
I mean, you've got the paperwork right here.
Anyone could go look it up, right?
Absolutely, it's not conspiracy at all.
You know, it's truly amazing what can be found by doing a little digging, doing a little bit of research.
You know, it really is.
Is this a video of Tucker?
Does that play?
Can I play that?
It does, that's a great video.
All right, let's see what Tucker said about China.
Is this what got him in trouble, in part?
China is a problem that is very hard for the United States to solve.
It's not clear how we do solve that problem.
By problem, I mean sort of giving hegemony over the world to a country that doesn't believe anything, really, that we believe.
It would be a massive change in the way the world operates, in the way that we in the United States live.
I mean, having China in charge of the world would be very different from what we have now.
That's a huge concern, a legitimate concern, I think.
And we're not meaningfully dealing with it.
And I think you often hear people on the right say, well, that's because they're all taking money from China.
Yes, that's true.
Our former Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, who's like a moron, by the way, but got rich effectively But I think the deeper problem has nothing to do with commerce.
Many others in our diplomatic corps have done the same.
That's a straight up sellout.
Hollywood sells out, the NBA sells out.
They're controlled by the Chinese government.
Everyone knows that.
But I think the deeper problem has nothing to do with commerce.
It just has to do with the terrifying nature of this threat.
Wow.
You know, what's interesting is that a lot of people are trying to figure out what got Tucker fired.
I mean, the list is rather long, the things he has said, that you never seem to hear too many other folks at Fox say.
So it maybe isn't one, but a collection of things.
But this did certainly have to be on the top of the list, I would think, right?
Oh, yeah, absolutely.
And, you know, Tucker was really, especially as far as cable news hosts go, at the forefront.
Of asking questions about the CCP's involvement with COVID, with biolab potential for that spreading, for the prospect of a deliberate biological attack on the world.
Tucker's show has opened up to guests who are willing to talk about these things.
I think that once Chinese money starts getting thrown around the equation, it becomes a serious, serious problem.
And it becomes a problem for free speech and the free press in the United States.
With China coming in and buying up more and more of our media, of our press, it jeopardizes the free press in the United States to a great degree, just as much as the Chinese purchasing massive amounts of farmland jeopardizes our food production.
These things all synergize to equal out to the Chinese Communist Party, really unrestricted warfare on the United States and directly against the American people.
What are your thoughts on China influencing our elections, and particularly the 2020 election?
We know that the DNI, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, came out with a report, which we have the PDF of, January 7th of 2021, warning about the influence of China in our elections.
What are your thoughts on that?
I'll bring up that PDF while you're talking.
Yeah, I think that China has played a major role in influencing American elections.
You know, in a lot of ways, everything that the corporate media, that the Uniparty has accused countries like Russia of doing, of actually, you know, practically hacking into the brains of Americans.
The communist Chinese have done this.
They've done it through TikTok.
It's designed to throw this Marxism into the face of its users.
It's designed to throw, you know, content that's pretty friendly to the Democrat Party into their agenda.
in front of the faces of its users.
Beyond that, China has played an absolutely massive role in the industry at this point
of unregistered foreign agents and of registered foreign agents.
But their influence operations go very, very deep.
They go very, very wide.
One in particular that National File has covered to a great extent on our website is the Humpty
Dumpty Institute.
This is really a uniparty organization.
They have members of Congress of both parties sitting on their congressional advisory board.
They have ties to Ukraine.
They have ties to Brazil.
So this is a group that has a vested interest in keeping the uniparty in power in Washington.
And there's many more like them.
There are very many more like them.
And they are all over.
During the Trump administration, I think that's when we really first started to hear publicly talks about these malign foreign influence operations of the Chinese Communist Party.
And they are deep.
They go all over the country.
We've seen the Chinese national who was connected to phony election software.
I believe they were using that in Michigan.
So this is a major thing.
The Chinese communists are 100% in bed with the election thieves in the United States, in Latin America, all over the globe.
And there's no doubt in my mind that there was influence from the Chinese Communist Party in our 2020 election.
Let's talk about this real quick.
Two more articles.
TheNationalFile.com, NationalFile.com.
This is a topic that our audience knows I've been studying for years and is of great interest to me.
RFK Jr.
says his father and uncle were fighting the military-industrial complex before their murders.
Well, indeed they were, particularly JFK.
You know, he said he was going to destroy the CIA and bust it into a thousand pieces and throw it into the wind.
He put a kibosh on, what was it, Operation Northwinds, which was going to have... Northwoods.
Northwoods, thank you, which was going to have the military going out and carrying out terrorist attacks in the U.S., blaming on Cuba to give the pretense for going to war with Cuba.
Makes us wonder again how much of the terrorist attacks we've seen in America around the world have been done by our own government as a pretext for war.
And of course, RFK Jr's father, RFK, said if he became president, he was gonna start, you know, he was gonna do some stuff when it came to exposing who murdered his brother.
So he had to go too.
I think there's overwhelming evidence the CIA murdered both of them.
What are your thoughts?
Oh, I absolutely do.
And I've believed that for quite some time now.
I've always been fascinated by the Kennedy presidency and by all that went into it and all that went around it.
My grandmother was a major supporter of John F. Kennedy, so maybe I get it from her.
But R.F.K.
Jr.
really hit the nail on the head when he spoke up on this.
You know, the military-industrial complex, we were warned about it when Eisenhower left office.
And as R.F.K.
Jr.
said during his interview with Piers Morgan, When the military industrial complex killed John F. Kennedy, killed Robert F. Kennedy, and I truly believe there's ample evidence that they did.
You know, you look back through all of the declassified files over the years, you see time and time again the same sort of CIA assets coming up, you know, the same sort of deep staters coming up.
And after they took out the Kennedy brothers, the United States really, really went down a nasty road of what you could only call fascism, the merger of the corporation and the state.
You know, when Mussolini, the creator of fascism, he said many times, I should have called fascism corporatism because it's truly a merger of the corporation and the state.
And that's what we saw when the Kennedy brothers were taken out.
You know, they had a wonderful populist, you know, pro-America message.
You know, it's not that I agree with the Kennedys on everything.
It's that I look back and I see these were anti-communist American patriots who were standing up To the Federal Reserve, to the CIA, to the wider military-industrial complex, and they paid the ultimate price for it.
I think that RFK Jr.
being in the Democrat race in 2024 adds a major layer, just for the sheer force alone, that his actual Kennedy family ties can bring to this.
You know, the Democrats have misused the legacy of the Kennedy brothers for years.
They've painted them to be leftists, they've painted them to be You know, almost cultural Marxists.
No, no, they were strong, they were strong anti-communists.
I mean, I know, I know that politicians are politicians, but for the most part, they were staunch anti-communists, at least certainly JFK was.
Absolutely.
And they, you know, their, their ties to, to Senator McCarthy.
So these, these guys were American patriots.
They were anti-communists and the Democrats have abused and misused their legacy now for a generation.
Joe Biden himself does it on a regular basis.
You know, he, He talks of his admiration for the Kennedys and how these were two, you know, liberal brothers.
They're living in a fantasy world and I'd love to see RFK Jr.
blow the lid off of it.
Yeah, that's exactly right.
Okay, finally, let's end your interview here before we go to Jeff O'Donnell with some good news.
Look at this story you're reporting tonight at nationalfile.com.
Paraguay has triumphed!
Jesus has triumphed!
Paraguayan patriots defeat the World Economic Forum and the CIA election coup!
We were warning the other night, we were very concerned about the machines over there, because they don't have paper, correct?
They only use machines, correct?
Yes, sir.
Yes, sir.
So how did they do this?
How did the CIA keep from putting in the Marxist over there?
So it's truly become a fascinating situation.
You know, there was big voter turnout.
The people of Paraguay were in tune.
They were plugged in.
They were aware of what's going on.
But there was a dark horse candidate who, you know, it's really amazing the way the American corporate press is framing this, because while my sources on the ground in Paraguay are calling the dark horse candidates, his name was Paraguayo Cubas, They're calling him an anarcho-communist.
They're telling me that he's affiliated with, you know, the sort of secret society into political things in the country, while the American media is calling him a right-wing extremist.
He does appear to be an anarchist, and he appears to have mobilized in the aftermath of the election, you know, major unrest, Antifa types.
I have a source telling me there's people pouring in from Argentina, you know, easily the most liberal country in Latin America.
Pouring into Argentina to raise havoc, to join forces with the Cuba supporters.
They are now claiming that the election was rigged on behalf of the Colorado Party, which is the right-wing, the center-right party in the country.
This is the candidate who was being opposed by the WEF, the Colorado Party candidate, was being opposed by the WEF, opposed by the CIA.
hacks that were in Paraguay, the European Union.
And really, the people of Paraguay stood up, voted for him, but he didn't win by a sheer majority.
He won a plurality of votes, around 47% of the vote.
And I am hearing from folks in Paraguay that there's a wider thought
that when the established order realized that the Colorado party was gonna come out victorious,
that the people of Paraguay were gonna step up, defeat the WEF election coup,
that no matter how much rigging they could do with the machines, that it was going to be obvious
on the ground that the people had stood up and that they had defeated this,
that Paraguay FQS jumped into the race to split the left-wing vote,
shave off a few votes from the right, and turn this into a controversy.
That's how a lot of folks are looking at this down there.
The Colorado Party won a clean sweep of the federal election, so they are in control of the entire federal government.
And the streets in many areas have been taken to by left-wing mobs, by really anarcho-communist mobs is what I'm being told that they are.
And they're practicing Antifa-style tactics.
So I have heard, you know, some of the mindset on the ground is that this is a last-ditch effort to destabilize the country, that this resembles previous states of unrest in Latin America that we've really seen over the years.
So are you saying this was only done by machines, no paper ballots, but the whole reason the good guy won and defeated the World Economic Forum and CIA agenda to put in the communists was because there was a third candidate running that split the vote between the left, allowing this guy to slip in, and there were so many people that showed up, it overwhelmed the algorithm?
Is that correct?
Yeah, there were so many people showed up.
There was no way that they were going, I'm not sure if it actually overwhelmed the algorithm, but that it overwhelmed the narrative.
You know, there was going to be no way that they could steal this election and convince the people of Paraguay that more than, you know, half of them or that 47% of them showed up and voted for the PLRA, you know, WEF backed candidate.
There is some thought that the third-party candidate came in deliberately to sow unrest in the aftermath of the election when it was realized that the WEF-backed candidate was going to lose.
This is all really fluid.
It's all developing and playing out, so we're going to continue covering it at National File.
This is a fascinating situation.
It's a big domino in South America.
Absolutely.
Please keep us posted.
Now, Frankie, am I saying your last name correctly?
Is it Stokes?
Stocks.
All right.
Yes, sir.
Yeah, just pretend the E's not there at the very end.
All right.
Stocks.
All right.
Frankie Stocks.
Well, thank you, Frankie.
It's your second time.
You'll be back.
You're doing a great job writing and you're good on TV.
So you've got it all going for you.
So we'll be having you back on.
You can count on that.
Thank you, Brandon.
I appreciate it.
I love coming on here.
It's a good time.
Great platform.
Well, good.
We'll have you back.
You can count on it.
Thank you for all you're doing.
Yes sir, thank you.
Frankie Stocks, checking in.
Check out his work, nationalfile.com.
All right, joining me now with big breaking news is Jeff O'Donnell.
We're going to talk with him about, look at this, this brand new report that is now out.
We're about to tell you where you can get it.
On Thursday night, Mike is planning to be back and go through this report in greater detail.
It's entitled, The Fingerprints of Fraud.
Evidence and analysis of a multi-state conspiracy to defraud the 2020 general election.
It's 282 pages, I believe.
If you go over to frankspeech.com right now, you'll find it.
In fact, let me do that and I'll show it to you.
Go to frankspeech.com.
Let's hope it's there because I just got text.
It was there.
Let's see where I can find it.
Let's find it.
I was told it was here.
Uh, anyone else sees it?
If you guys see it, let me know, but I was told it was gonna be up here.
Oh, there it is, there it is.
Here it is, there it is.
Raccoon Army presents the Fingerprints of Fraud, alright?
Let's play this quick little video, because right below it...
It's supposed to be.
There it is.
Click here to read this vital report now, so you can get the whole report.
But first, I want to play for you this little video to set it up.
All right?
So watch this, and then we're going to bring on Jeff O'Donnell.
Watch and listen to this.
This is a video of the news.
♪♪ ♪♪
Excellent.
Excellent.
Joining me now is Jeff O'Donnell.
In fact, let me show you real quick.
If you go to frankspeech.com, you can find that.
Now, look at this.
At the bottom of the screen, click here to read this vital report now, and voila!
Look, it's taking a minute to open because it's 282 pages, if I remember correctly.
So it's going to open this big file up, and we're going to go through it here with Jeff O'Donnell.
I want to thank, by the way, Annie Cyrus, who got this up for us right away tonight with about 30 minutes notice.
She got the video up, she got the title up, and then she embedded right at the bottom there a link to this PDF that is now going to open.
So you see, that's a big report.
It is 282 pages.
Jeff, welcome to the broadcast.
Thanks for joining us.
Thank you, Brad, and always a pleasure.
Always.
Glad to have you.
All right, give us the big picture.
We got, you know, about 17 minutes, 18 minutes here.
Give us the big picture, what this report's going to show, because so many people are saying, where's the evidence?
Where's the evidence?
Well, as I scroll through it, and this is volume one, so obviously you've got more coming, there are so many charts and graphs.
Yes, yes, thank you.
This represents, you know, there have been two years I've been waiting for this.
So many patriots out there who went to their counties and their states and got data.
This is volume one of the report showing the results, abnormal results, from the cast vote records.
Nine states are included in this first volume.
California, Colorado, Oregon, Idaho, New Jersey.
I missed one.
It's in there.
Oh, Ohio.
I think I missed Ohio.
There's 202 counties of all those states that we receive cast load records for.
And those of you who don't know, we've identified a completely unnatural pattern, which I call the Mesa pattern, because it was Mesa that put it all together.
And they show an unnatural pattern of voting.
The report tells you why it's unnatural, it gives you the details, and then lists every single county.
Of those 202 counties, over 160, that little video you saw had 18, I believe, of them just plotted together.
And there are actually 160 of these first 202 counties which are included in this report.
Uh, well, yes.
Uh, this, uh, in my opinion proves the algorithm.
And, uh, it is, like I said, the first of three to come.
them when you had them before. Algorithm, eh? Well, yes.
This, in my opinion, proves the algorithm and it is, like I said, the first of three to come. There
are 27 states that we receive cast vote records from, so we're doing it in three volumes.
Volume one will have the first nine, volume two will come out in a little bit and we'll have another nine, and then volume three will have the last nine states that are out there.
So let's look at this report real quick.
Here we have cast vote records, the definition.
Give us the definition of a cast vote record for those who maybe don't know what this means.
Yes, most election computerized election systems can put together a simple list of Uh, in some formats that I mentioned in the report, that basically lists every ballot, and that should be in order that they were processed, every ballot and the votes that were on that ballot, and a little more information like the precinct it was from, and if we're very lucky, the number of how it was voted, whether they voted in person and mail-in.
It's important to understand that this report specifically looks at mail-in ballots, because mail-in ballots should be by their very nature A somewhat random or very random pattern.
Thus, we can detect very easily when things go out of that pattern.
And these are not going a little bit out of that pattern.
These are impossible breaks from that pattern.
And it goes across all these states.
It goes across the different vendors.
This is truly a multi-state effort that's happening to our elections.
All right, so let me ask you this.
Have you been subpoenaed, or what has kept you from being, you think, subpoenaed or sued?
Have you been sued by any of the machine companies for what you've been putting out?
No, no.
No, I haven't been, and I think that's because everything that I've done and said has been supported by data.
Uh, you know, the report, you know, I was the primary author of the Mesa Report 3 that proved that there was manipulation going on behind the scenes that the clerks didn't know anything about.
Well, still, it's been a year and two months since that report came out.
There's been nobody who can refute the actual data that's in there.
People will argue about the conclusions, I think, wrongly on their part, and disingenuously.
Uh, but you know, I think that if you, if you put out the truth and, uh, you, you put that with data, you know, to attack me, they've got to attack the data.
And yes, who produced this data, Brandon?
It was their machines.
So I'm assuming, and I don't want to speak out of school here, but I am a reporter so I ask questions that you don't have to answer.
I would assume that you're going to be under depositions for some lawsuits for people defending themselves.
I would think if I were the attorney for Tina Peters, you'd be one of the first people I would be putting under deposition and then having in my trial if I were her.
Because you went through her data, correct?
I did, and it was absolutely crucial.
The MESA data is crucial to everything that's in that report.
And I guess I would use you to say, A, the state law, apparently the state law says she's supposed to be backing this step up, so how did she break the law by following the law?
That'd be my question.
B, why is she being prosecuted and persecuted?
I would bring you in to say, because she followed the law and backed it up, she's exposed what?
She noted, it took her until after the actual municipal election in 2021 to really take note of it.
But when she noted some things in the 2020 election, and suddenly remembered some things from the 2020, she got the definite feeling that something was wrong.
Something wasn't working right in the system.
There were things that just didn't add up, didn't make sense.
At that point, it was her duty to make sure that there was an adequate record of all of that data.
And that's exactly what she did.
And it's for her and people like her and other people who are fighting the legal battles all over.
I mean, they're the ones I had in mind when I was writing this.
I want to give them as much help as I can.
And there's not much more that I could think of that could be helpful than this.
And you worked with Dr. Walter Doherty on a lot of these Mesa reports as well, correct?
Yes.
So Mike Lindell was the one that was calling people to send in cast vote records.
So all these people sending cast vote records from around the country, is that what helped you put together this Volume 1?
Heroes.
Every single one of them.
Absolutely.
We received So many cast vote records, and what's interesting is that we were receiving, of course, multiple.
If you remember, the clerks were all complaining because they were getting so many requests to do their job.
Well, what's interesting is that we actually got multiple ones, and that helped also because not all of the cast vote records Uh, we're, uh, shall we say valid?
Uh, and there are a number of cases where, uh, people, you know, we got three or four and, and, uh, we were able to figure out which ones, uh, you know, were, were, were true and which ones, I don't know if a mistake was made when they did it or whatever like that.
So everybody who requested, uh, and you know what, even those who didn't get it, thank you.
Well, let's show this.
Let's show this graphic.
This thing is loaded.
I told you on the phone this afternoon, this thing is loaded with beautiful graphics and a lot of what looks like hard scientific documentation.
Now, that doesn't mean a lot to me as a layperson, but it does because as a TV host, I have interviewed you and Dr. Walter Doherty enough to know In part, what I think I'm looking at, if I remember our interviews, but explain to our audience what this graphic right here alone shows.
Well, yes, this is when we're discussing the randomness that I spoke of and how we determine if the mail-in ballots for a county have indeed, are randomized, as opposed to sorted, pre-sorted.
We do what's called a precinct distribution, and that lovely blue box there It's an example of a fairly random precinct distribution.
It goes in and out, up and down.
There's no... Later on, I show what an example of a non... Like there.
These are all sorted.
You can see they did one precinct, then went to another, then went to another, then went to another.
You see the difference between those two graphics.
So you're saying this graphic right here shows there's manipulation going on?
Well, no.
Actually, this one shows... Well, yes and no.
I would like to know why The cast vote record shows the sorting by precinct.
That's not the norm, at least certainly not in the nine states that are covered here.
That is not the normal way to do things, so I'd be interested to know why that happened, because those counties that show that sorting, we can't test for the Mesa pattern because they're obviously sorted, so they're not in the order they came in.
We discussed the coin flip, what you'd expect with a coin flip.
I want everybody to go out.
I know it's daunting that it's a 282-page report.
The first 23 pages or so, maybe 22, are the report.
In other words, you'll see the findings, the explanations, the summary of what's going on.
Uh, everything after that is a specific analysis.
I analyzed every single one of those 202 or whatever counties, and you'll see the graphs for them.
You'll see, you know, my comments on them.
You'll see whether they fit into the Mason pattern or not.
You'll see whether there were election night, uh, reporting anomalies.
Uh, you'll see if there's an unnatural number of consecutive votes for candidates.
That is something that we've not talked about a whole lot yet, but now we have the ability to do that.
And it shows that in a lot of these counties, in what is supposed to be a random assortment of mail-in votes, you can get 60, 70, 80 straight votes for a candidate.
You'll see that in a report, it actually assigns some percentage Correct me if I'm wrong, so the audience understands.
And many of these are one in a thousand elections or more.
So for the audience to make sure they're correct me if I'm wrong so the audience understands,
a cast vote record tells you who they voted for and the time that that mail-in ballot
came in, correct?
Actually, there's no times on cast vote records.
There's not?
Okay.
With one exception.
There's sequence, though.
There's sequence numbers.
Okay.
So if a thousand people vote, you'll be able to tell 1, 5, 10, 30, 800, whatever.
Yeah.
You can replay the election, ballot for ballot.
Basically, in real time.
Yeah, as much as you want.
You can even run them backwards if you want, and that's something I'll get into in volume two.
And what you're saying then is, let's just say you have a thousand people voting.
You would not have, mathematically, all of a sudden a hundred of the first votes are all Joe Biden.
That's not statistically correct.
Uh, or, or it's interesting as you look at the report, you'll see that there are vote runs.
Uh, most of them, most of them do tend to be for Biden, but you'll see that there are unnatural vote runs for, for, for Donald Trump as well.
And when you look at that, you might say, Oh no, what does that mean?
Uh, well actually given the fact that they are, they're sorting and manipulating.
This these these votes, these ballots that produces that curve that we show with a Mesa pattern, you're going to get that and you're going to get you're going to get strange runs of votes for any candidate because evidently, you know, the algorithm is not checking to make sure it's not it's not one of the things that they obviously that they're checking for.
It's like, oh, make sure we don't show 40 or 100 straight votes for a particular candidate.
I cannot think of a single way.
That's another thing that just falls out of the analysis as, yeah, it's manipulated.
It's a computer algorithm.
And there's no way it could be anything but a computer algorithm.
Is that what you're saying?
I cannot think of a single way.
It could not be a computer algorithm.
Could it be that this algorithm was put...
Could it be the algorithm was put onto the machine without the machine company even knowing
In other words, could the CIA be doing this with a backdoor without even leaving a footprint and fingerprint?
The machine companies have no idea?
That's the best question I've been asked in a long time, Brandon.
Thank you.
Think of this, I think of this like your typical Bond movie, James Bond.
As James goes through solving the case, finding the bad guys, one of the things in the movies is you find a bad guy or a bunch of bad guys and you think this is it, and then you beat those bad guys and you find out, no, no, they're actually working for somebody above.
And I'll say this, if all of the major vendors all show the same Incredibly similar manipulation.
What does that tell you, Brandon?
It means that there is somebody above there that set this up.
So, are the machine companies useful idiots that don't know what's going on?
Are they been trapped and duped and they're going, wait, we didn't do this, we didn't do this, or you're saying horrible things about us?
I can't imagine this being developed, whatever, without some people in the voting booth.
In other words, how would you deliberately leave open these massive holes, be told about these massive holes by people on the right and the left and still leave the massive holes and the ability for the machines to be hacked or have internet or parts made in China?
Why would you keep doing all that if you're just an innocent bystander?
Is that what you're saying?
Yes, absolutely.
There is little doubt to me that somebody, and somebody's is more likely, in these companies had to know.
They had to know what's in their own software.
If they say they don't know what is in the software that they deliver and install in a county, I can't imagine The level of criminal neglect that that would be.
So I can't imagine a case where they're the victims here.
I would love them.
You know what?
We could clear this up in a month or a couple months.
You know what?
Just let someone examine the source code that actually matches 100% what's in Mesa County and these other counties.
Just let us evaluate the source code.
You know, have some... So they could bring you in.
They could bring you into one of their headquarters.
Have you signed a non-disclosure agreement as far as not releasing any details that would compromise their code, but let you in, see it, and you could walk back out of the building, come on TV, and say, uh, Houston, we have a problem.
This is legitimate.
Or, no, there was no fraud.
I've seen the evidence.
The code's clean.
Everything's fine.
You could do that and not compromise their intellectual property, right?
Absolutely.
So if they're really innocent bystanders, why would they not want to have someone like you look at it so you could go out and testify to the truth of the matter, if it exonerated them?
That question has its own answer in it.
There is no reason why they would not want, I mean, if they're selling a product, if they're just a capitalist company wanting to sell their product, Uh, and somebody says something bad about it.
I mean, if somebody came out and said they got poisoned by Wheaties, you better believe that the company that makes Wheaties would immediately send all of their stuff to test the glass.
Let me ask you this, the music's playing, but being that you have released so much data that's now available at frankspeech.com and you're releasing more, do you worry about your physical safety with all you're now uncovering?
Yes, yes I do.
I bet you do.
Yes I do, but I've got my own My own son providing my personal security, which is the safest thing in the world.
And, you know, whatever God wants, God will do.
That's kind of how I look at it.
Wow.
Well, you're a great guy.
We've enjoyed getting to know you, and I appreciate all you're doing.
I want to again point people right here.
Look at this.
The Fingerprints of Fraud.
It's available now at frankspeech.com.
Just go to frankspeech.com, scroll down the page,
▲
Export Selection