All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 18, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
51:59
The Lindell Report (2-17-23)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
But in one respect, I don't think they should unless of course you're talking about anything he may have signed as an employee or whatever.
But nobody should be suing anybody for talking about what we think of some company or their software because I thought that's what one could do for, you know, the purposes of critiquing, editorial, opinion.
I mean, we ought to have the right To do that, correct?
I mean, I didn't see Dominion suing Kamala Harris or Amy Klobuchar or Joe Biden or any of these other people when they were talking about the different voting machines and their concerns in, what was it, Hacking Democracy or in some of these other documentaries?
Kill Chain?
Absolutely.
And when the Chicago Cubs sucked for a hundred years, everybody was saying they pretty much stunk.
And they didn't sue anybody, it was our opinion, based on their record.
So, same logic, you know?
These guys are either messing with our free speech, they're saying what we're saying is disinformation, and then like in this situation, like every situation, the truth comes out, we've got the truth on our side, and they, even themselves, are complaining about their systems, software, teams, whatever, Knowing that this system had major league issues.
It never, you know, and Brandon, this is the point that I'll just kind of wrap this up with this.
I was a professional auditor.
I went around the world and did audits, and the fact that we can't look at this software is totally appalling.
It is not something that's going to happen in the corporate world.
Every time I did an audit on financials, I'm looking at the system as much as the end results Because I know how important those systems are to coming up and deriving those end results.
The fact that we can't look at the systems that are behind our election process is absolutely frightening, never should happen, can't believe this is happening in America.
This is how serious this is.
We have an absolute right to know what's going on in there, and there's no way we should certify any elections until we have Total comfort that these systems are doing what they're intended to do.
Absolutely.
So this paperwork that you've got a screenshot of in your article at the Gateway Pundit tonight, these screenshots, this is from, what are they from?
Are they from a deposition?
Yeah, and they're filing.
So they actually have, yes, they have, this is what they described when they presented their filing Thursday.
And even in the back, there's some additional attachments.
And I haven't read it all.
Like I said, it's like 169 pages.
There may be some other goodies in there.
But we grabbed this stuff first, just saying, wow.
Yeah, well you guys are the ones that broke... Gateway Pundit broke this, right?
Yeah, yeah.
We did this morning.
Look at this.
Look at this, guys.
Show this on the screen.
You showed the screenshot in your article at the Gateway Pundit of this court document.
that from a court document and it says quote internal doc Dominion documents
likewise confirmed that Dominion machines suffered several potential
glitches in the November 2020 election after a security expert told
the media that Dominion quote software should be designed to detect and prevent
the kind of glitches in quote expressed in Antrim experienced in Antrim County
Michigan during the 2020 presidential election Coomer told Dominion vice president Kay Stimson quote he's
not entirely wrong in quote
Then it goes on to say, Coomer emailed November 10th, 2020.
Likewise, in the immediate aftermath of the election, Dominion received complaints from jurisdictions in Georgia, noting, quote, irregularities and machine counts, end quote, that required Dominion's employees to, quote, reprogram the machines, end quote.
And then I go back up to the other one.
It says here, discovery in this case has revealed that Dominion, this is getting right out of the court Yeah.
a screenshot. Yeah. Discovering the case has revealed that Dominion's own employees expressed serious concerns about
the security of its machines. Mark Bextrand, a Dominion sales manager, confirmed that other parts, quote, have
gotten a hold of Dominion's equipment illicitly in, quote, other parties. Then it says,
It's breathtaking, isn't it?
and it gives all the information.
Beckstrain identified specific instances in Georgia and North Carolina and testified
that a Dominion machine was, quote, hacked, end quote, in Michigan.
Wait a minute.
Are you telling me that their own sales manager has admitted under oath that one of their own machines
was hacked in Michigan?
That's what this says.
It's breathtaking, isn't it?
They knew all along, and they're trying to throw this stuff on us as if we're saying
falses about their product.
They all agree.
What do you think this does for Fox's case?
Well, I think it's a killer.
I think it really destroys their case.
And what they're saying anyway is they're saying, hey, we're the press.
We can bring people on and allow them to express their opinions.
And they said, and we had every right to do this.
They even give an example.
They brought Trump on and he spoke and they had a huge audience that night.
So to suggest that this wasn't newsworthy, that doesn't hold water either.
This was absolutely newsworthy.
We all know it.
You and us and, and others, we were all on top of this.
We wanted to know what's going on and how we can prevent this stolen election from moving forward.
And so, you know, Fox did nothing wrong in their reporting in bringing President Trump on.
It's a falsehood to suggest that they were after Dominion in any way.
It's just not true.
Beckstrand confirmed, going back to the court document, that these security failures were, quote, reported about in the news, end quote.
And just weeks before the 2020 presidential election, Dominion's director of product strategy and security, Eric Coomer, acknowledged in private that Our blank is just riddled with bugs."
And then they're citing a Coomer email, October 30th, 2020.
Indeed, Coomer had been castigating Dominion's failures for years.
In 2019, Coomer noted that our, quote, products suck, end quote.
They noted again, November 5th, 2019.
He lamented that, quote, almost all, end quote, of Dominion's technology failings were, quote, due to our complete blanked up in installation due to quote due to our complete
blanked up in installation in quote and in other instances he identified
a blank looks like a word a was it he did another he identified a
something is a straight word there yes a critical critical bug leading to
incorrect Wow!
A bug leading to incorrect results.
Coomer emailed January 5th, 2018.
He went on to note, quote, it does not get much worse than that, end quote.
And while many companies might have resolved their errors, Coomer lamented that, quote, we don't address our weaknesses effectively, end quote.
Well, that could mean there could be more things that are not even represented in this document or that they know about, right?
That's right.
It really leads to more questions, doesn't it?
We'd like to get more information here.
You know, if there's other instances, we'd sure like to know what they were and what's going on.
So people should stay checking out the Gateway Pundit because it sounds like you may have more on this as you go through the document more.
Is that right, Joe?
That's right, and we've embedded the document in that piece as well.
Indeed you have.
Feel free to go out there and look at it.
Great reporting, Joe!
Great reporting.
Thank your family for letting us take you away from your Friday night meal.
Go and enjoy your Friday night meal, and thank you for your great investigative reporting and journalism.
Thanks so much, Brendan.
Appreciate it all.
Really appreciate it.
Love what you guys are doing.
That's a team effort.
Thank you, Joe.
Thank you.
Joe Hoft checking in.
Check out his brand new article over the Gateway Pundit, thegatewaypundit.com.
Here's the headline again.
Huge Fox News filing shows Dominion Voting Systems executives, including Eric Coomer, knew its voting systems had major security issues, was hacked, and was, quote, riddled with bugs, end quote.
An article over at the Gateway Pundit by Joe Hoft.
Joining me now is Steve Haugard.
Steve was the Speaker of the House in South Dakota.
He did his time.
There's a term limit on that.
He is still a state representative and an attorney and a lifelong resident of South Dakota.
Steve, welcome to the Lindell Report.
Thank you for joining us.
Brandon, thanks for letting me come on, and I have to make a correction.
I'm not serving the legislature this year, but it feels like I am because there's plenty of things going on behind the scenes.
Well, thank you for correcting that.
I thought you were still in there.
So, you were, though, the Speaker of the House.
You served as many terms as you could in that position, right?
Yep, that's right.
We termed out after eight years, and you can move to the other chamber, but this year I did run against the governor in the primary and lost to the governor.
Met a lot of nice people all across the state, and I think South Dakota might be typical of what's happening all across the United States.
People are really upset with the way things have been done for decades, and they really want to see a change and actually apply conservative principles instead of just talking about them.
Well, let's talk about that.
So you're telling me you ran against Governor Kristi Noem in the primary last year for governor, right?
Yep, that's right.
Okay, so why?
Why would you, a conservative, run against someone we're told is a Donald Trump conservative?
You know, basically the female version of Donald Trump.
Why would you, as a diehard conservative, and you and I have been friends for several years now, why would you run against someone like her?
Aren't you guys representing the same cause?
Well, we should be.
But, you know, when you look at Republicans all across the nation, I think you get them all the way from A to Z. And I would like to think that if people just read the platform and apply that when they go to vote for things and when they issue policy statements and act on policy, we'd have a pretty beautiful setup right now.
We'd be, I think, rolling in the cash as far as having a thriving economy and And businesses would do well, families would do well if you'd apply those principles, but it's just, it doesn't happen.
And so I was a speaker during the first two years that Christy was governor, and it didn't take very long to figure out we were not on the same page as far as how to run state government.
And what I see is we're just missing tremendous opportunities for advancing a conservative cause.
It would be a blessing to Everybody, whether it's education, health care, social services, corrections, you name it, you apply those conservative principles and you'll have great results.
And we're just not doing that.
We're looking for talking points and we're looking for attention, but we're not actually doing the job that I think the people want us to do.
So let's talk about the governor of South Dakota because folks out in the country, you know, are told again she's the female Donald Trump of South Dakota.
And yet when we went and did our rally at the Corn Palace a couple years ago, we had all these people handing us literature.
We got so many people handing us literature saying, you know, you guys outside the state don't realize that she's not what you guys have all been told.
And then I found this article from a couple years ago tonight in my research.
Well, it's 2021.
Who is Kristi Noem, really?
The article basically lays out that she, well, she said, first term governor has positioned herself as a conservative hero ahead of a possible presidential run, but her record paints a more complicated picture.
What is that complicated picture?
I mean, you say you were the Speaker of the House while she's governor, so you probably know her pretty well.
I mean, I'm guessing as the Speaker of the House, you were in regular communication and meetings with her, right?
We were.
It didn't last a long time as far as being on the same page, because there was a whole different agenda that she seemed to be pursuing.
And it wasn't focused on good policy for the state of South Dakota, but rather opportune, like I say, talking points and media appearances.
You know, because you look at our state and ours, I just don't think that you find a lot of difference until you get to a California or a New York where they've really got some major problems.
But South Dakota's probably much the same as probably 20 to 30 other states.
We're primarily conservative in a lot of values.
You know, all the Republicans, almost all the Republicans in South Dakota will always vote for reasonable gun bills and pro-life bills and that sort of thing.
But when it comes to the rest of the society, the socialist side of it, we're on two different pages.
So are you saying that the Rhino Republicans will vote for bigger government, corporatism, the deals that benefit their special interest group and give money to their corporate special interest groups?
Is that what you're saying?
Absolutely.
Just like always, you follow the money.
You follow the money.
You look at the campaign contributions and you look at the bills that are passed.
For example, just in the past couple of weeks, a bill was resurrected from a year ago that was We tried to put a lid on as much as possible because it was just, it was $200 million of state money that was going to go to what they called real estate infrastructure development.
Well, it wasn't anything but corporate money for developers that already, like in Sioux Falls here, every square foot of Sioux Falls is going to be developed.
There's not a question about that.
The real estate developers that are doing that They don't need the extra input from state money or federal money.
But this bill was resurrected in this year to clarify some things that we tried to cap a little bit and just made it clearly, from my perspective, when you read it, you understand how it's applied.
It's just a benefit for real estate developers and those people.
It's just a symptom and it's an example of how Republicans are either True Republicans, or they're more in the nature of business Republicans.
So let's say business Republicans, I'm talking about special interest business.
So are you saying that is that Kristi Noem was generally tended to side with the business
people that backed her?
Yeah, it's whether it was broadband, we we shoveled out the doors, I think $75 million
for broadband, and they didn't need it because we already had 96.2% coverage of the state
when that bill was being discussed.
Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
$75 million for broadband, and yet 96% of the state was already covered.
So what was the money really going for?
It was touted as Anybody that wants to live in South Dakota should be able to work from where they live.
Well, if you're going to live in a ravine out in the Black Hills, you're probably going to have some issues about your broadband coverage, and maybe you need to make some special arrangements.
And so that was one of the things that was claimed.
Or if you're going to be out in the middle of a ranch area where there isn't coverage, well, you should be able to get coverage there.
Well, that's just simply not true.
And there are certain limitations, and the state should not be advancing broadband as though that was an entitlement that we would have.
And the fact is, once you expend those dollars, it wasn't going to lower anybody's broadband bill or really get broadband to somebody that absolutely didn't have it before.
Those things are going to happen.
But the question is, who is benefiting?
In other words, Broadband companies were benefiting because they already had their systems set up and they were already putting as much cable in the ground as they could.
And this was going on all across the United States.
But I guess what I'm getting at is the broadband companies, were they backing certain elected officials?
Is this why this got done?
Yeah, if you follow the campaign contributions and you follow the people that end up at the social events in the evenings, you'd find the broadband people there if they're lobbyists.
they were getting special attention. Let's go to this here.
The article of National Review says, speaking of Kristi Noem, but even as she began to position
herself as a national contender in the first months of 2021, Noem's status as a rising
Republican star had been dampened by a number of controversies back home, most notably her
surprised style-informed veto of House Bill 1217, a law that would have banned biological males from
competing in women's sports.
It did serious damage to the young governor's star power.
Why would she veto that bill?
Well, I think the only reason she vetoed it is it just wasn't consistent with what she was expecting to be a national stage.
So that was part of it, but also she's greatly supported by Yeah, and that was part of the discussion.
And the fact is, NCAA, what are they going to do to us?
Not have a few tournaments here?
It's sort of like what Dan Bishop did over in North Carolina.
demands of the NCAA, Amazon, and the number of other powerful left-leaning corporations
that had opposed the legislation.
Yeah, and that was part of the discussion.
And the fact is, NCAA, what are they going to do to us?
Not have a few tournaments here?
It's sort of like what Dan Bishop did over in North Carolina.
He brought those bills, and he stood by his position, and I would check with him once
in a while when we were bringing these bills back each year to find out if it made any
difference in North Carolina's revenues.
And it didn't.
It's still on a growth curve.
So let's go back to the health system.
It's called Sanford?
Sanford Health?
Yes.
Is that the biggest health provider in your state, or hospital systems in your state?
Who are they?
It is, and it's nationwide now, and it has some international features to it.
It's an organization that received about a billion dollars initially from Danny Sanford, who is a man who developed a credit card system, first premier bank card systems here in South Dakota and across the United States.
He made a lot of money and he was looking for some place to put that, and the healthcare system was a place where he gave a lot of money.
So, let me try to tie her reported gutting of this legislation, House Bill 1217, that would have banned biological males from competing in women's sports.
Did she gut that because she's backed by not only, you know, and influenced by NCAA, Amazon, and a number of other powerful left-leaning corporations, as the article says.
The article says she was accused of caving to their demands.
Could it also be that this big health system in South Dakota didn't want this bill because, and I'm just asking questions I don't know the answer, Could it be because the big health systems, they know that transition surgeries and puberty blockers and hormone blockers and all this is big business?
Because here in Tennessee, we got a video of a gal over in Nashville at one of the hospitals talking last year about how much money the hospital can make from all of this and transition surgeries.
So is one reason this legislation wasn't advanced is because it doesn't fit the agenda of big healthcare?
For all the money that can be made from, as I said, puberty blockers, hormone blockers, transition surgeries?
I'm just asking a question.
I don't even know the answer.
Well, you wouldn't know the answer unless you'd get an honest response from the governor, but that's, by all appearances, that was part of it.
And whether it's that, you know, in fact, Sanford had recently, in the past couple of months, had a gender surgery, gender blocking conference here in Sioux Falls.
And, you know, the media was trying to essentially shut out from that as much as they could.
But it is obviously big money in the healthcare industry, and it's something that this organization wanted to perpetuate.
And it's just unfortunate that the governor doesn't take a strong position on something like that and stand by it.
Now, there was a bill that was brought this year, and thankfully it got enough momentum that the governor has signed that.
And it's going to block the surgeries and the hormone therapies and those kinds of things.
So I'm thankful for that.
Why did she finally agree to sign that piece of legislation and not the other?
Political winds shifted.
And when you look at what Governor DeSantis does, you'll usually see something similar crop up in South Dakota, just as a and the copycat approach to things but it's not leadership
it's uh...
following whatever will direction the political wind is blowing did she sign
that piece of legislation before the last election no that's that's just been very recently
Okay.
But again, I guess if she's got national aspirations, she better make sure she's doing the right thing, right?
Well, right.
And she's got to go toe-to-toe with Santus if she's going to compete in that arena.
Is that what you see happening?
Is that what you see happening?
Well, I think that's the dream that she has, but I don't see that as going to happen.
I just, I don't think there's, I think given the fact that she didn't apply those principles with that first bill, A couple of years ago and then consistently seems to bend in the direction of special interests.
I think people can see what actually happens here.
And for example, the argument that somehow NCAA or Amazon was going to create some sort of backlash.
Well, Amazon already had the footings poured on the building that they were building.
They weren't going to change their direction.
So there wasn't any reason to cave.
It was just a matter of Apply your principles, and then you don't have to wonder what you should do next time.
Steve, what about staffers?
Is her staff made up of a bunch of former corporate people in companies we would recognize?
Any of her staffers or chief of staff?
Well, that just varies.
It's been pretty much the establishment Republicans, and then she's brought in an awful lot of people from her contacts around the nation through Assuming through Corey Lewandowski and people like that, that she's brought people in that have been kind of revved up at the idea that this is a conservative state, and they get here and they realize what it really is, and a lot of those have moved on.
I think in the first three years, there were 27 or something like that that had moved on, because they realized what was really going on in South Dakota.
And, you know, when you look at our state, we do have primarily conservative values in many respects.
We're changing to a purple heading toward a blue state if we don't do something more significant in leadership in the near future.
Does she have any Stanford or former Stanford executives on her staff?
Sanford?
Sanford, excuse me, Sanford.
Well, you know, one of the main attorneys that she utilizes is a guy by the name of Matt McCauley.
Matt's primary, well, probably his primary lobbying client is Sanford Health Systems.
Interesting.
And so, you know, she uses his services, and I've seen some of those contracts for independent legal services for the state, which really ultimately aren't all that independent.
You know, I think one two-year period there, the contracts totaled over $400,000.
And you can imagine when somebody like Him is able to have a client like Sanford Health Systems.
I don't know what they would pay, but I'm guessing it's going to be some pretty significant six figures.
And then you look at probably 10 other clients that a lobbyist like that would have.
So there's just incredible amounts of money.
And we in South Dakota are always talking about how we balance our budget.
We're rugged individualists and all that self-supporting and so on.
We only put up about 40% of our own budget.
The other 60% is federal money.
So, you know, we don't have a lot to brag about, but we could do some great things.
We have great opportunities here.
And, you know, we should be leading the nation in agriculture and, you know, other things like corrections.
But, you know, we're going to spend a boatload of money on a new prison instead of actually hitting the core issues with corrections, which is probation and parole and Addressing issues within the community.
Because warehousing people's big money.
You know that.
I mean, many of these prisons today are owned by corporations now.
The states are turning them over to corporations.
So, building prisons and warehousing people's big money.
Well, there's part of that.
This would be state-owned initially, at least, and it's going to be a big drain of state money.
With our juvenile system, we do farm that out to a bunch of private organizations.
In our mental health applications here in the state, we have one facility in particular that used to house 1,200 people at its height back in the 1960s.
They're down to about 65 people in that facility, but we're still spending about $400,000 per person per year to keep them there instead of finding a better way to utilize that facility.
So there's just, sadly, we're missing opportunities, like I said, and it's because there isn't a broad policy that's applied and you don't make use of the talent that's within the state that could give better advice.
Instead, we're looking to the advice from, a lot of these staffers are in their late 20s, early 30s, don't have a wealth of experience, and there's not a lot of policy decisions that are made in a Long-term perspective.
And then we're also missing out on the opportunity to draw the churches into the equation.
Wow.
That's something that should be done more broadly.
Because you look at all the health and human services stuff, that is really the work of the church.
Absolutely.
And a lot of the corrections stuff should be the work of the church.
And we're no different here than we are in every other state.
Rampant drug abuse.
And then we have the complications, too, of multiple jurisdictions, where we have nine reservations in South Dakota.
And we were moving in a better direction a few years ago, but now that's been reversed just because of the conflict that seems to exist between the executive branch and the tribes.
Wow.
And that should change, because everybody, whether you're Native American or you've moved here in the past few years from some other country, everybody wants the same thing.
They want strong families.
Want to be free from addictions.
They want to address mental health issues.
But if you've got your eyes on business interests and making sure that you're friends with all the people that have money in the state, then your policies aren't going to be very substantive.
Absolutely.
Steve, thank you so much for being with us.
We really appreciate it because a lot of us are watching and wondering.
Like I said, we're hearing from people in South Dakota saying you need to do a little look and a little look-see on who the governor really is in what she's thought of in the state.
So very interesting because I do think she's got her eyes on running for national office.
Steve, if people want to find out more about you, your website is just stevehowgard.com, right?
Yeah, that's it.
There's not a lot of information there, but they can certainly look me up, and if they want more information, they can give me a call or contact me.
I'd just be glad to visit.
Thanks for the opportunity to be on tonight.
I hope you're all doing well and family's doing well too.
We are, we are.
Thank you for being with us.
Greet your family.
Thanks.
Steve's checking in tonight.
Appreciate his report.
Before we go to Colonel John Mills, let me remind you, if you appreciate all that Mike is doing, he's been in three states today in very important meetings.
And traveling around and touching down, having his meetings and taking off and going to the next one.
And if you appreciate all Mike is doing, make sure you go to MyPillow.com.
In fact, let me go there real quick.
MyPillow.com.
There it is.
And get the new MyPillow 2.0 with the new cooling technology that's a buy one get one free sale.
You can get it in king or queen size.
Be sure to Check out the fitting guide there on the page.
You can also use the 800 number and they'll help you.
It's got that brand new temperature regulating technology.
It keeps you comfortable throughout the night.
MyPillow.com, promo code L77, promo code L77.
But we not only have the new MyPillow 2.0, we've got a lot of other sales.
We got a lot of sales going on for President's Day, President's Super Day sale.
We got the MyPillow foam mattress.
As low as $349 with the promo code L77.
And we have a three-inch coil mattress, my pillow one-sided encased quilt quilted mattress.
We have the adjustable base.
We have so much available for you now with this Sale!
This new sale going on for President's Day.
Check that out.
Again, use the promo code L77.
Sheets, towels, blankets, pet beds, slippers, sandals, mattresses, mattress toppers, robes, and so much more.
Use that promo code L77.
You can also go to mystore.com and pick this up.
This is extract-gevity.
It's an all-natural energy and health drink that I developed with an FDA-approved facility several years ago.
My wife makes it for me every day.
It has bilberry extract, grapeseed extract, red wine extract, pine bark extract.
Now, you don't need to take my word for it.
Go do your own homework on those Extracts.
And this is, again, an all-natural energy and health drink.
It's available at mystore.com.
Mystore.com, the home for American entrepreneurs.
Use that promo code L77.
A bunch of it came in to us the other day.
I actually asked the guy that handles all of our shipping and everything, where is all the boxes?
And he said, oh, those already gone out the door.
I'm like, that just came in this week.
He's like, yeah, this stuff, I'm telling you, flies out the door.
It's a powder.
You mix it with water, stir and drink, stir and drink, mix it with water, check it out.
Again, I'll give that disclaimer.
This has not been approved or evaluated by the FDA.
It's not intended to treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
But again, if you're interested in checking it out, extractjevity.com.
It is over there on the homepage of mystore.com.
Joining me now is Colonel John Mills.
Colonel, welcome back to the broadcast.
Thank you for joining us.
Hi, Brandon.
Always an honor to be with you.
How are you doing tonight?
I just feel like I need to break into a little aloha from Hawaii song or something.
Hey, all you out at Indo-Indian India Pacific Command out at Camp Smith in Hawaii.
It's Aloha Friday.
Greetings to all of you out there.
Yes, absolutely!
I love the shirt.
It is Aloha Friday at Indo-Pacific Command.
You know, you wear the appropriate garb here.
So here I am.
Aloha shirt.
As Mike likes to say, hallelujah!
Very good.
All right, let's get to it.
Here's a big article that's of interest to me.
I want to get your response.
Colonel John Mills, by the way, served on the National Security Staff for two presidents and strategic jobs inside the DoD.
Here we go.
The sun, U.S.
sun, Vlad's taunt Putin deploys two, two supersonic blackjack nuclear bombers near the U.K.
in warning to West just hours after buzzing the U.S.
Colonel?
Well, this is kind of historical and routine.
And actually, I did a little bit of work on predicting these operational cycles.
The Bear Bomber, the big four prop bomber, and the TU-160.
The TU-160 Blackjack, you know, its maximum takeoff weight is around 600,000 pounds.
So actually, you know, right at a little heavier than the B-52, but it's supersonic.
And it really was inspired by the old Valkyrie bomber that we were designing, but then put into production in the B-1.
So they only have a small number of these, and I'm looking at a map of the different bomber bases.
When they're flying down by the Aleutians, they usually take off from Ukranka, which is their bomber base right above North Korea.
And on the west, they have one in the mid part of the country, Balea, But in the East, their big one is Angles.
And that's a lot of the bombing of Ukraine has come out of Angles.
That's where unknown assailants have been launching attacks, too.
So the Russians have had the war carried right to them.
Also, right above, and I've been to Estonia a number of times on official business, Soltsy is their base and also Chekhovka.
But they would fly around the top.
Come thundering in around the top of Norway and, you know, down into the North Sea.
And then, you know, if accidentally the Royal Air Force happens to have an operational fighter or two, which is pretty hard these days, they might come up and challenge them and turn them around and keep them out of British airspace.
Don't mean to knock our UK partners, but their readiness is pretty pathetic.
Not what it used to be.
But this has been done for years.
This is a model that has been going on 50 years.
The Blackjack, that is their prime bomber, but there's only maybe about 20 operational.
So when they fly two, that's, you know, essentially 10% of their operational Blackjack fleet.
Of great concern, but a big target.
And if we have a fighter aircraft up in the air.
What do you make of this one?
World War III.
NATO is preparing to fight two wars at once.
They're preparing to fight wars with Russia and China.
What are your thoughts on that?
That's over at the National File.
Yeah, I mean, those are great talking points, but the reality is, I mean, even the American defense culture gave up the two-war concept really during the War on Terror as we were Distracted by the by the war on terror, you know, but it's been traditional for many years the ability it called two or two plus strategy that America can lead the world and Fight fight a war in Europe and the Pacific and and another contingency right now You know NATO will say things like that But they're there most of their countries have atrophied to the point of almost non-existence Singapore has a lot of far larger Air Force and
A tiny city-state of 3.5 million has several hundred fast-mover jets.
Britain only has about 100 fast-mover jets, the different types, like the Typhoon.
You know, they're in a pretty sorry state.
But when NATO says things like that, I mean, it's going to take five to ten years to demonstrate any significant growth toward that objective.
Appreciate it.
It's noble.
It's wonderful.
But they have most countries have been way underfunded for decades since the since the 1991.
They saw the Soviet Union collapse.
That's it.
They walked away from securing their countries and depended on the United States.
for defense. Now I got, you know, people say, well, what does China have to do with NATO? Well,
you got to remember, there's a lot if you read the NATO agreements that China or Japan has a special
standing. Actually, I was able to get Taiwan and Singapore into some of the NATO exercises that
enrage the Chinese. But there are special arrangements. So NATO does have by charter some
touch points and contingency planning for supporting when China starts their military
moves in the Pacific.
How about this?
Reuters is reporting that Russia to call UN Security Council meeting over Nord Stream Blast.
What do you think?
What do you think the PR move or the international move is here with the National Security Council at the UN?
What do you think is the objective here with Russia?
What are they trying to accomplish?
Well, I mean, I think they're trying to bring international attention.
In the past, we're not totally clean and innocent on these things.
In 1982, Reagan ordered a destruction using advanced techniques.
I'm not going to go into it, but the The kind of leader of the group involved, you know, was kind of the, I call him the Ferris Bueller of cyber.
But their Siberian pipeline just mysteriously exploded.
You know, it really devastated the Russian economy.
But, you know, hey, you know, we were in a life or death struggle with communism.
And when Reagan came in, he said, boys, we're going to put the Soviets out of business.
And we just said, let's let's roll.
Let's do it.
And so so but these playing these Covert and clandestine games that can grow both ways.
So be careful.
In 1982, we blew up the pipeline inside the Soviet Union.
In 2009, there was a big dam explosion where somehow one of the huge 600-800 ton turbines Got out of balance and, you know, 800 tons got so out of balance and over spun, popped into the ceiling.
800 tons popped into the ceiling, destroyed the whole dam.
Don't know how that happened.
So there's event number two, 1982, 2009.
So the Russians are used to mysterious things happening.
The 82 event was, you know, demonstrably, that was a U.S.
event.
The dam?
Don't know.
But this, you know, my posit on this is actually, this is a British SBS or SAS operation, but SBS, their version of SEALs, because if they're in the lead, we don't, the President doesn't have to do a covert finding, a legal package that has to be run through the White House.
They don't have to do a covert findings package, and they can say, hey, And the gang of eight, for those who don't know, are eight specific U.S.
senators?
Oh, so eight?
Oh, okay.
and the gang of eight, for those who don't know, are eight specific US senators?
Right, right. So, you know, four, yeah. You know, there's four and four. Four from each party. Four, you know, eight
in the House, eight, you know, and so eight in the Senate.
Oh, so eight, okay. So it's divided between the House and the Senate.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
The gang aid, I apologize, is both the House and the Senate combined.
And those are the ones who are right on to supposedly everything.
Supposedly everything.
So you do a covert finding, you gotta run it, the gang aid gets informed.
So, you know, hey, put SBS in the lead, don't have to do a covert finding, and boom!
you know, things happen and we can say...
And what do you think the National...
And what do you think the National Security Council is gonna say?
I mean, it's made up of China sits on there, Russia sits on there, the United States sits on there.
I mean, what are they gonna say?
What are they gonna do?
What are they gonna do to the United States if they say, yeah, you guys did blow up?
Well, the administration needs to put heavy weights that everybody respects, like Vice President Harris
or the National Security Advisor...
Jake Sullivan, you know, um, and, uh, you know, because they're such, such heavyweights... Oh, yeah, they're intellectual giants.
Yeah, absolute intellectual giants.
Oh, yeah, yeah, they walk into the room and, uh, you know, they just, everybody, everybody stops and, and breathlessly waits for every word that comes out of their mouth.
Uh, for Harris, they have to wait a long time.
So, um...
You know, this is what goes on and the administration did this.
I mean, they're an administration of zombies.
I mean, both, you know, they're just, you know, Biden is just, you know, in many ways acted like a puppet.
Harris, a puppet.
You know, over in the Senate, Fetterman, puppet.
You know, oh, Feinstein, part of the Gang A!
You know, holy smoke!
I'm not an ageist!
She didn't even realize she'd resigned after her retirement.
Oh, did I announce that already?
It had been earlier that day.
There was a huge misunderstanding.
When Don Lemons said that she was Pastor Prime, he was really talking about the Senator, so there's been a misunderstanding who he was talking about.
I mean, God bless the Senator Feinstein, but please, no one to get off the stage!
Please!
Isn't that the truth?
How about this article here from the Epoch Times?
Chinese spy balloon had maneuvering ability and simultaneously to Google IA balloon project.
Yeah.
And similarities.
Excuse me, I didn't have my reading glasses on.
And similarities.
It had maneuvering abilities and similarities to Google.
That's what happens when I don't put my glasses on.
Now I got them on.
So there you go.
Yeah, that was an article I was interviewed in.
But yeah, I mean, a number of years ago, when I was on one of my Silicon Valley trips to help reintroduce the department to the advanced innovation of big tech, what could possibly go wrong?
You know, Google did this briefing on Project Loon.
Which was their high altitude, they were going to use advanced AI analytics to provide maneuvering capabilities to high level balloons.
We're talking about flight level 60 and above, 60,000 and above, which is way above commercial traffic.
And I said, that's absolutely genius.
But I said, this looks a lot like the CIA ran a lot of balloon programs in the in the 50s and 60s until the overhead satellite became effective.
They were known, you know, there's six or eight different programs.
Skyhook, there's two different Skyhook, not the Fulton Recovery System.
I'm talking about the high altitude balloon.
Ashcan, there were several others.
And I said, this looks a lot like you guys recycled the CIA effort.
And they said, yeah, actually we did.
The program manager had come from the government, the US government.
Google hired him at probably 3x the salary.
They FOIAed.
Freedom of Information Act requested the information from CIA and CIA handed over all the program plans.
Past 25 years, 25 years is the magic number for FOIA release for classified documents.
So Google did that.
Mysteriously, they shut it down about a year ago when it was showing a lot of promise, but the Chinese effort sure looks a lot like they borrowed, were given, Wow.
Let's cover this before we go for the night, and that is, your sheriff there in Virginia made an announcement.
What's that?
You're in Maryland, right?
It looks like the Chinese were replaying Some of our old plans against us. Wow. Let's let's cover
this before we go for the night and that is your
Sheriff there in Virginia Made an announcement. It's what's that? Yeah. Yeah, you're
in Maryland. Are you on the Maryland side?
I'm in Virginia, but San Joaquin County, California. Oh Oh, I thought it was related to the case you've been working on where you're at.
Okay, so tell us about... No, this one's in California then.
Okay, tell me about it.
Yeah, so this Sheriff Withrow and his staff have been just Relentless and incredible.
And so, Lodi City Councilmember Shakir Khan has been arrested for 2020 election fraud.
So, in addition to my case in my county where my registrar, former registrar, has been indicted and begins her trials in, I think it's in May, for 2020 election fraud.
Now, San Joaquin Sheriff has arrested Lodi City Council member who was creating and stuffing the ballot box.
So, yeah, so anybody who says there's no 2020 election fraud, this is now the second arrest in the nation here for election fraud.
My own registrar who I had a lot of disagreements with over the years, there was only one person perfect in the room and now she's facing trial in May.
Wow.
And did you hear about the article we covered tonight from the Gateway Pundit about Eric Coomer and Dominion?
No, no, bring me up to speed on that.
I had Joe Hopped on about it.
I'll show it again here.
Here's the headline right here.
News filing shows Dominion Voting System executives, including Eric Coomer, knew its voting systems had major security issues, was hacked, and was, quote, rigged with bugs, end quote.
And it's by Joe Hopped, who I just interviewed.
Here they show, right out of the case here, them talking about This.
Mark Beckstrand, a Dominion sales manager, confirmed that other parties, quote, have gotten a hold of Dominion's equipment illicitly, end quote, in the past.
And then Beckstrand identified specific instances in Georgia and North Carolina and testified that a Dominion machine was, quote, hacked, end quote, in Michigan.
Beckstrand confirmed that the security failures were, quote, reported about in the news, end quote.
And just weeks before the 2020 presidential election, Dominion's director of product strategy and security, Eric Coomer, acknowledged in private that, quote, our blank is just riddled with bugs, end quote.
Indeed, Coomer had been castigating Dominion's failure for years.
In 2019, Coomer noted that our, quote, products suck, end quote.
Well, that's a ringing stamp of approval from your own Chief Information Security Officer.
You know what CISO stands for?
It stands for, in the community, CISO.
This was in, that's pretty interesting.
That's a ringing, yeah, that's a ringing of approval from your own
chief information security officer.
You know what CISO stands for?
Stands for, in the community, CISO.
It's not chief information security officer, it's career is so over.
Oh my god.
Well, they go on to say internal Dominion documents likewise confirmed that Dominion machines suffered several potential glitches in the November 2020 election.
After a security expert told the media that Dominion quote software should be designed to detect and prevent the kind of glitches and quote experienced in Antrim County, Michigan during the 2020 presidential election.
So again, this is all in this case here.
and quote, he's not entirely wrong, and quote, Coomer email, and they excite it. Likewise, in the immediate aftermath of
the election, Dominion received complaints from jurisdictions in Georgia, noting, quote, irregularities
with machine counts, and quote, that required Dominion's employees, quote, to report, to reprogram the machines, and
quote.
So again, this is all in this case here. This is a pretty good week for, I would say, Fox News releasing this, right?
Yeah, well, we got to get Coomer on the stand to give sworn testimony on this topic.
You know, this coming Thursday, it looks like there's going to be a joint session of the Arizona House and Senate to discuss.
And you're going out there for that, right?
I'm going out there.
I'll be giving testimony.
Ivan will be there.
Are you going to wear that?
Oh, Ivan Reikland will be there too?
He's gonna be there.
Several others are gonna be there.
You know, we're gonna go through this, you know.
A lot of people don't understand, and this is an education process.
So even Republican friends of mine, some of them lifelong friends now, emailing me or texting me that, hey, this stuff about Arizona, give it up.
That's crazy talk.
They just haven't been informed, right?
Yeah, you know, kind of like George Washington at Valley Forge.
Come on!
Come on!
This is the idea of a country.
Come on!
Let's go back to our farm here.
This is ridiculous.
Come on, just release the army.
Come on, just forget about it.
No, forget that.
We're going to drive ahead.
We got two arrests.
It's an education process.
The county is the front line of defense in America under our Constitution.
to secure elections from all interference, foreign or domestic, not that not even state, not the federal government.
And that's part of this.
But what my portion of the testimony is the critical role of the county.
Everybody's been assuming the federal government is protecting us.
Well, between retired Special Agent McGonigal A very senior FBI official in charge of the Russia, Russia, Russia investigation, who was being paid by Russia, Russia, Russia.
You know, you can't trust them.
It's the county.
Wow.
All right, that's our buddy, Colonel John Mills.
He's got the brand new book out, The Nation Will Follow, at TheNationWillFollow.com.
TheNationWillFollow.com.
Happy Friday and Honolulu!
Thank you.
Aloha Friday.
Mahalo.
Thank you.
Colonel John Mills checking in.
Great patriot and friend of Lindell TV.
So there you go.
Don't forget MyPillow.com 2.0.
Use the promo code L77 to support Mike's work.
The Worldview Report begins right now.
Thanks for watching.
Take care.
You're watching Lindell TV.
♪♪ ♪♪
Looks like you've been sleeping well.
Megan!
He's back!
The MyPillow guy!
And you're looking good!
Still feeling good!
Well, just when you thought it couldn't get any better, we've got the best pillow ever!
MyPillow 2.0!
When I invented MyPillow, it had everything you'd ever want in a pillow.
▲
Export Selection