All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 23, 2022 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
01:00:17
The Lindell Report (12-23-22)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
An organic grassroots movement.
You heard I just said?
Is there an organic grassroots movement to recruit Donald Trump to be Speaker of the House January 3rd?
Is the support for Kevin McCarthy collapsing as we speak?
We have a stunning video clip we're going to play for you.
It's a collection of clips put together by our buddy Ivan Reikland.
Ivan will join me around the 6.20 Central Time mark.
You've got to see the video and hear what's developing as we speak.
First, we'll be joined by Michelle Swinnick with breaking news out of Arizona.
About the 6.40 Central Time mark, we're going to go to Tom Littleton.
Tom is going to share with us, sadly, about a growing movement within the evangelical world, and that is basically a world economic forum for so-called Christians.
Well, do you know what the World Economic Forum is all about?
The Great Reset, right?
But it's more than about the Great Reset.
It's also about digital ID.
And their own graphics are talking about what?
You will not be able to vote unless you have a digital ID.
You won't be able to vote unless you have a digital ID.
That's what they say on their own graphic.
I'll show it to you again tonight.
Why am I stressing this point?
Because, wait a minute.
We're on a campaign to get rid of the machines.
We're on a campaign to get rid of the machines and go to paper.
While a bunch of globalists who are wanting to destroy the free market system, a bunch of globalists who are openly stating they want a private-public or public-private partnership, that's corporate fascism, big government, big business, They're openly saying, wait a minute, we want you to have to have a digital ID to get on the internet, to be able to do banking, to travel, to vote.
Folks, are you aware of the global forces that we're dealing with here?
We'll get into that with Tom Littleton.
So, big lineup tonight on the Lindell Report.
Let's start out first.
From Arizona, Michelle Swinnick with Breaking News out of Arizona.
Oh, wait a minute.
Thank you, Logan.
Let me first go to what Mike has asked us to play.
And that is to remind you that at one point the Democrats were calling for the same thing that, well, Mike has become the leading voice on.
Getting rid of the machines, right?
Watch this.
I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable.
The research has repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting
systems are susceptible to tampering.
Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools, and resources are able to breach voting
machines in a matter of minutes.
In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates
or switched votes from one candidate to another.
The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101.
Directing that you install remote access software which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers.
These voting machines can be hacked quite easily.
You could easily hack into them.
It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact three companies are controlling this.
It is the individual voting machines that pose some of the greatest risk.
There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines.
Right?
Which are vulnerable to being hacked.
Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine.
It was possible to switch votes.
43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, including back doors.
We know how vulnerable now our systems were.
We know, I know the hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly.
I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues.
Here at the Capitol, where we brought in folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines.
Those that are being used in many states.
Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software, like Windows XP and 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest methods of cyber attacks.
In a close presidential election, they just need to hack one swing state, or maybe one or two, or maybe just a few counties in one swing state.
I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through.
Wow.
Well, there you go, my friends.
We're going to play that regularly, as Mike promised you last night.
And we're keeping our word.
There you go.
Joining me now is Michelle Swinnick out of Arizona.
She has breaking news tonight.
Michelle, thanks for joining us here on The Lindell Report.
Hey, Brandon, good to see you again.
Thanks for having me.
You as well.
Good to see you.
Merry Christmas.
All right, Michelle, you have breaking news tonight.
What is it?
I got two things.
And this one of them is what I had kind of preempted to you on one of my last appearances here.
But I said I needed to get a couple of things confirmed.
Well, I happened to talk to another, to one of the inspectors at a nearby polling location, because as you know, I was an elections judge at the Islamic Center here in Scottsdale, Arizona.
So what put a fire in my belly Yesterday was when I was watching the trial and I said, oh my gosh, they're doing it again.
The county, people work at the county, this is what, it was in Scott Jarrett's perjury case, basically.
He committed perjury like three times during yesterday's testimony.
But what they end up doing is they create the scenario after it happened and then Maybe create supporting documents or act like, oh, this is part of the process that we normally have.
And I went, wait a minute, that's what they did with the check-in, check-out.
Now, do you remember?
What a big deal, this whole checking in and checking out.
They made a big deal of it the day of because Board of Supervisors Gates said something that he shouldn't have said in front of the cameras.
And then they tried to cover it up later.
Richard jumps in.
They had like a joint deal between the two of them saying that you can go to any place you want.
You just got to go in through the check-in, check-out.
Procedure.
And me and other people that work the polls are like, check-in, check-out, what is that?
So when I was talking to Leo, who's the attorney that came on with me when we were talking about the inactive voters, Leo D'Onofrio, he asked me about the check-in, check-out.
And I said, we never learned anything about that.
There was never training on it.
And they made a big deal about it afterwards.
So what we went through and we went back through the procedures manual.
There's no mention of check-in or check-out in our training manual.
There's no mention of it in the actual book, the Election Procedures Manual that Katie Hobbs puts together.
So what happens, he stumbles across an article, which is the one that I sent, the one I sent Logan, dated the 17th of November.
Where they're boasting and bragging about their check-in, check-out procedures.
And meanwhile, there's actually like quite a few things that have to go along with this check-in procedures and check-outs.
Is this it right here?
146?
Yeah.
So this, yeah.
So this, this article, now if you go down through the article, it actually gives you a link so you can pull the three page document that apparently all of these, all of this, I think it's just the next one down.
The next, look, keep going down.
So, it'll say in there, it's the document that was provided to the poll workers.
Okay, here's the beauty of it, okay?
So, this is what they said, according to the article, the county uses a process outlined in a guide given to lead poll workers known as the inspectors to check out a voter out of the system.
And they said that they gave this to the Inspectors who are one level above the judges that run the centers prior to the election.
Meanwhile, my training was on the 3rd of November.
No mention of check-in, no mention of check-out.
It was never a topic of discussion.
It's not in the books.
So then what they did on the 17th, now pull up the two PDFs that I sent you.
All right.
They're screenshots.
But I want you to go back to that window because you're going to see something really unbelievable.
Okay.
So which one do you want to do first?
Number one.
Do number one.
So when you go on, when I went on to this document, I'm like, what is this three page document?
We've never seen any of this.
There was no mention of it.
And, um, yeah, the one that says number one for the, for the PDF over the PDF.
No, for the, for the, I'm sorry that, uh, the screenshots that I sent, there's two screenshots.
One's labeled number one voter can't check in or cancellation and number one's number two.
So When I clicked on the property section of that document, I pulled it up and it said that it was created on the 16th.
The article was done on the 17th.
What happened was when I clicked on the link for the article, it actually is linked to the guy who runs, yeah.
See, look at the date, created and modified, 11-16.
So I was like, wait a second.
The election was the 8th, right?
Okay.
So let's just pretend, let's just say that that date, because that date wasn't, you could change this date because it's not a secure document, but they never changed the date.
So see where I'm going with this?
So this document was created afterwards.
Then they had somebody, one of their cronies who writes for the VoteBeat Arizona, do an article Blow up in the article saying how we have this process and this is what we normally do and all the inspectors got this document before the election so that way they could review it with their teams so that way we had a flawless system of checking in checking out and then on the next one that you're going to pull up because that document is linked directly to the server for the guy who runs the publications which is his cloud
So then I started going through this going, oh my God, this is this guy's cloud.
So I went all the way back to the date where he uploaded the document.
He uploaded the document on the 17th, because he got it on the 16th.
For an election, it was on the 8th.
So when I talked to the inspector today and I said, hey, did you ever get the three-page document that they were boasting and bragging about, about their check-in and check-out procedures?
She goes, no, we never got any of that.
We never had a check-in, check-out procedure.
It was never a topic of discussion.
So it confirmed what we were saying that the document and the process was created afterwards.
Now, keep in mind, they also used when the when the attorney general sent that letter initially to the county and said, here are the things that we want to want to want you guys to address.
And that was on the 19th of November.
They mentioned in there the checkout procedures, right?
They mentioned it.
They mentioned it quite a lot.
And they referenced that.
And then the county, when they did their response, which was on the 27th, that huge response with the exhibits, they actually included that document as exhibit number nine of just their standard process and policies and procedures, except it's nowhere in, the word checkout is not even in the elections procedures manual that's Katie Hobbs that wrote that everybody references.
So you have, You have a system that was in place afterwards to cover their rear ends for what happened on election day because somebody opened their mouth, Gates and Richard.
But it just lays it right out there because there's no reference to it here.
They double down on everything, right?
And they always go backwards to try to cover, but nobody questions them.
But when you read through, you catch them and you're like, wait a second, because we What I learned again from the trial was they love to say that these are all their policies and procedures, right?
That's what a lot of them were saying.
But the thing is, it doesn't match what happens in actual real life when they're due in the election.
So most of the stuff that came out of Scott Jarrett's mouth yesterday, about 90% of it wasn't true because what was in the procedures was not what we did the day of.
And it was different for each center.
They each had different policies and procedures.
Wow.
Does that make sense?
Yeah.
Now, here's another one.
Here's another whopper.
See what happens when people talk to each other?
You wonder why they wanted the lockdowns during the political propaganda pandemic called COVID?
They didn't want people talking to each other, because when they start talking to each other, then all of a sudden we start listening away.
You too?
Me too?
Wait, what happened with you?
So the other inspector and I talked today.
We just haven't had a chance to talk, but I saw the same pattern where they make stuff up afterwards, and then they create a process and procedures.
Because if you were watching yesterday, First they called it, when they were talking about the 19-inch ballots versus the 20-inch paper.
First it was called fit to print.
Then it was called fit to paper.
Then all of a sudden, within a 20-minute span, it was now shrink to fit.
And in the beginning, when Jared was talking, he said the first time we learned about it was just days after the election.
Literally 15 minutes later, he goes, oh yeah, you mean the shrink to fit process?
That happened.
In August of 2020, November of 2020, August 2022.
Which one?
So in 20 minutes, it was the first time you heard about it, had three different names for it, and then he kept switching in between.
And then they must've settled on shrink to fit because that's when the attorney used that later on.
And then all of a sudden it became something, oh, this has been going on for years, so we know about it.
And you're going, well, you can't have both.
You can't have either one of them, no less both.
Listen to what we also learned today.
This is another one.
This one actually you think that this doesn't matter this is little stuff but it's not because you're talking about you're talking about like lying and misrepresentation and your policies procedures suddenly broad beyond belief I mean this is just a whole nother layer so this one's actually kind of really big because there's a there's a there's a And I don't want to go into detail with people because I don't want to get in the weeds, but when you have provisional ballots and the regular ballots and what really matters depending on when things can be counted and all that kind of stuff, and with the inactive voters that Leo was talking about and how ballots are issued, it's a big deal.
It's a really big deal.
I don't understand all of that stuff myself, but it's a really, really big deal.
Well, in the procedures manual for the state, You could spoil two ballots, but if you cancel them out, you get a third real ballot, right?
So we established that.
Now, when we checked out a bunch of the county training manuals, same thing.
Maricopa County, which I call Mayor of Corruption County for a reason, it says you could only get two ballots after you spoil and your third ballot becomes a provisional.
Now, if you remember when I was on your show, I said on our center, it wasn't like that.
Because the one lady, she was adamant that she wanted to cancel out her ballot.
And I said, I think you're going to get a provisional.
And I said, you don't necessarily want one of those.
She's like, no, I don't want a provisional.
And then there was a discrepancy.
So the people that had worked at the centers before said, no, no, no, you only get two.
The third one will be a provisional.
It won't be a traditional ballot.
And why is that a problem?
Why'd you tell the lady you don't want a provisional?
Why'd you tell her that?
Because there's a chance that it may not be counted, right?
Because it's not a traditional ballot.
It's treated differently.
So I said, it's up to you, but there's a difference between the two ballots.
So I didn't actually say it like that, meaning you don't want this.
There's just a classification between the difference between a traditional ballot and then a provisional.
It's treated differently in the system.
Okay.
So I said, but we can give you that if that's what you want, right?
In the computer, we had it running through the computer.
I said, but here's the thing.
If we push that button, you don't get a chance to go back and then say, oh, well, I want the other one.
So you have a final decision.
So it's up to you.
And so there's some people in the center said, no, I think you get a third ballot.
And some people were like, no, no, no, I think it's provisional.
So the lady goes, I don't care.
I'm so mad that my ballot didn't go through.
This is a third time.
Push the damn button.
Let's see what happens.
So we pushed the button and it gave her a real ballot.
So everybody, the people that thought it was the other way were shocked.
Because that's what it says in our training manual.
In only Merritt Corruption County that you get You know, that third ballot is not a traditional one, it's a provisional.
So it's the only county, but when I talked to, so I did it multiple times.
And the reason that's important, the reason that's important is because on the third try, it went through as her ballot.
As a traditional ballot with no provisional.
But if you were to believe you only got two tries, then you would say, oh, okay.
And you go to provisional and provisional ballots get treated differently, which means it may not get counted at all, right?
Correct.
So again, theory, you could take a bunch of Kerry-Lake votes that got put as provisional and never count them.
Correct, correct.
So then here's the best part.
So not only is the The training manual in Maricorruption County say that the third one becomes a provisional.
The Hobbs manual for the state says you get that third one as a real one.
The other counties say you get that third one as a real one.
So they were changing the rules.
Ours is only different.
Ours is the only one that's different in the book.
And your county is the biggest county in the state.
Correct, but here's what I just learned today.
So not only, because I did this multiple times for people, I gave them that third ballot, because the computer does it all on your own.
We don't do anything.
You just push the button to say, do you want to proceed?
So it happened a lot, because remember, we were in that line.
90% weren't going through, so people were pissed.
They were like, oops, sorry.
They wanted to make sure that their ballot counted, right?
Most of them were foreigners, which is always interesting, because the Americans didn't care as much as the people that came from other countries that knew what they were actually losing, which was their freedom.
So when I talked to the inspector today, I asked her about that.
I said, so were you guys able to, when you spoiled the second ballot, were you getting a provisional or were you getting a traditional ballot?
She goes, no, that's the rules.
You get a provisional on the third try.
I said, we didn't.
We were giving out, the computer gave out traditional ballots on their third try.
I don't know.
I can't say the word that she used on the air.
Okay.
She was in shock.
And she's done this for quite a few times.
This is not her first rodeo as an inspector.
And so how many ballots do you think that were cast for Kerry Lake that through this different rule for Maricopa County that was not the same for all the other counties, therefore, how many were marked provisional that perhaps did not get counted for Kerry Lake?
That would have been the difference.
I mean, could it have been the difference of victory?
It could have been, but here's the thing.
Her center spit out a provisional.
My center did it.
So that means the machines are pre-programmed based on the demographics of what they want those to do, because I never ran into a provisional issue all day, and I did a lot of third ballots.
Her center We're supposed to have the same, right?
We're not 10 minutes away from each other.
We're in the same county.
We didn't have the same rules for the voter.
So if you came to my center, you got your third ballot.
You went to her center, you only got two, then you got your provisional.
So that means they can predetermine or control during the day The site books and the machines that are only supposed to be on their preferred and secured server only for themselves because we just proved it because you can't have both!
It's algebra!
You can't have both!
And in my news report tonight, I'm reporting on some of these sinners that seem to have been treated differently based on the fact they knew what the trends for voting were at those centers.
Well, and the thing that's interesting is that her center And my center are geographically and demographically similar, very similar.
And we also had the same problems in the report, the 23-page report that Mark, who was one of the guys that testified, the attorney that testified yesterday, wrote.
That was the one that they did with Harmeet and Cleta Mitchell.
Now, in that report, their statistics were similar to ours.
That 90% were not going through for the majority of the morning.
They had printer issues though.
We didn't have any printer issues at my center.
So if I have no printer issues, I don't have a 1920 issue ballot versus actual piece of paper.
My machines, 90% weren't going through for the first three hours, then it was 80%, then it magically got better.
By what?
We didn't change anything with the printers.
So in certain centers, they might've done the printer issue, But on certain centers, they didn't.
So we were machine manipulation, because we magically just got better during the day.
And don't forget, the tech didn't get there between 3.30 and 4, then magically everything was fine.
But otherwise, we're at an average of 40% non-acceptance all day, because we were so heavily loaded in the morning.
So two centers, two similar graphics, because she said about 70% of her votes were going for Carrie Lake.
She said about 70% were going for Carrie Lake from her center.
And I would say about ours is the same, maybe a little bit higher, probably a little bit higher.
So two similar things, two completely different methods of what the actual day turned out to be, purely by manipulation of the people in control of the system.
Nothing to do by chance, because I just proved it with those multiple scenarios.
Two centers, two same things.
All right, and then let me read to you what I'm reporting in my worldview report tonight.
The Gateway Pundit reports that one week ago, Maricopa County officials squirmed, and this is on video, when Kerry Lake's team requested to inspect the Maricopa County ballots from Election Day.
Now we know why, apparently.
The Maricopa County team was afraid they would get caught intentionally using the wrong size ballots to sabotage election day votes.
On Wednesday at the Kerry Lake trial in Maricopa, it was revealed that the Maricopa County Tabulation Election Center, headed up by Kerry Lake hating operative Stephen Richer, Kept a GOP heat map on it on its wall before the 2022 election.
The dark red areas of Republican voters just happened to include the voting centers where the tabulators and printers were not working on election day.
And then we were in tonight we provide the graphic Yeah, and I would say that if that's 84%, I would say that's about right of what machine problems.
I would estimate it a little bit higher.
It literally was every center.
Two were in leaning red districts, four were in leaning blue districts, five were in solid
blue districts.
So 17 out of 20 voting centers with machine problems were in deep red district.
That's 84%.
Yeah, and I would say that if that's 84%, I would say that's about right of what machine
problems I would estimate a little bit higher.
It literally was every center.
So some were printers, some were machines, some were a combination of the two.
But like I said, the situation if you're talking about disenfranchised voters, right, if that's kind of your big things, I just gave you like slam dunk no ifs ands or buts explanations and proof of disenfranchised voters just based on the fact that if you went to her location, which is less than 10 minutes away from mine, you couldn't get your third opportunity to vote because their machines were not working.
And they weren't running the tabulators were not accepting those and keep in mind as soon and it's according to the process and procedures of the manual.
The APM that Katie Hopps is says if a machine malfunctions, you must immediately.
Repair, replace those machines, and then you have to notify everybody before they come in the center that our machines are not working, and we're going to actually just go ahead and issue the paper ballots, and then they're going to be sent to another center, or sent down to the MC Tech Center, and if you want to go somewhere else, you can.
They're supposed to be told that at the door, and you're immediately supposed to stop using the machines.
They did not.
Within 15 minutes, you know, in the very beginning, we were running it through four, five, 15 times.
So what makes there any guarantee that that faulty machine was now reading any of those ballots properly all day?
There's no guarantee.
And the election should have been shut down within the first 15 minutes because the machines were not operating properly.
And that's what the manual even says.
Wow.
Does that make all sense?
Absolutely.
All right.
This is huge.
It is huge stuff.
Absolutely.
What is your website, Michelle?
I want them to go to savemyfreedom.us.
That's the whole subsect thing.
I'm going to link all this stuff.
I'm going to show you the links.
We're gonna put all this together.
I'm gonna make sure that that is your Christmas Eve present from me, savemyfreedom.us.
Make sure you go to that, and I'm gonna add more stuff over the weekend, because there's even more stuff.
But those are the two major things that need to be talked about.
Because if you wanted to show disenfranchised voters, I just showed you between the two centers.
And all of that's against the law.
Wow.
That's against the law.
SaveOurFreedom.us.
Great reporting.
Thank you, Michelle.
Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas to you too, Brandon.
Tell your wife I said hi.
I will.
Michelle checking in.
Wow.
Wow.
All right, folks.
Before we go to Ivan, remember, if you appreciate all we're doing here, all Mike is doing, Don't forget, go to MyPillow.com.
Use that promo code L77 for savings and to support Mike's work.
Also, MyStore.com.
Same code works, L77.
Looking for that last-minute Christmas gift?
MyPillow.com, L77.
MyStore.com, L77.
Don't forget, at MyStore.com, you got the My Coffee.
Light, medium, dark roast, non-GMO, organic, not sprayed.
And you get a subscription.
You can give a gift that gives every month, all year long.
You can go buy it now and tell them, hey, you're gonna start getting the My Coffee in the mail.
Give them a card and tell them, this is what you're gonna start getting.
So if you're looking for that last minute gift, there you go, My Coffee is the way to go, I think.
Use that promo code L77.
All right, we still have Tom Littleton coming up here on the fact that we have a World Economic Forum that's now been started for Christians.
Well, that's a real problem because one of the things the World Economic Forum wants is everyone to have to have a digital ID to vote.
Among many other things.
Fits right in with our theme of trying to get rid of these machines and the computer manipulation, does it not?
We'll get to that, but first, Ivan Reikland joins us.
Is there a movement afoot?
Is there a grassroots movement afoot?
A movement from the people?
Have Donald Trump selected, elected as the Speaker of the House January 3rd, 2023?
Before we get to Ivan, I have a video to play for you that I guess Ivan put together today.
This is a fascinating video.
I think the support for Kevin McCarthy is crumbling.
Hmm.
You want to play that video, Logan?
Here we go.
That's kind of the magic number.
I don't think he's going to get to 218.
What we're trying to do is not just to get a better Speaker in the short run, someone other than Kevin McCarthy, which we are going to do.
He's not going to be Speaker.
There was a bunch of the members that got together and said, Kevin, we need to empower all members of Congress.
They're trying to keep this power consolidated within the Speaker and the rules.
By the way, there's many more than five people.
The five of us who are publicly resolved not to vote for him, we are not going to cave or give in.
There were seven people that came out last week.
There was another individual that came out this week.
From the beginning, I have said my hard line is vacate the chair.
Our number is more like 20.
There were 36 members that voted against Kevin in Congress.
We will defeat him on the House floor on January 3rd, and then in subsequent votes, you will see us put forth our true challenger.
We have a consensus candidate who's going to decentralize Uh, authority and power away from leadership and put it back in the committee process and allow members to legislate.
You do not have to be a sitting member of Congress to serve.
That's right.
It will be, it will be apparent in the coming weeks, uh, who that person, uh, will be.
And it'll, it will, I will tell you, it'll, it will be interesting.
Doesn't have to be a member of Congress.
That's right.
Donald Trump for Speaker of the House.
Why wait till 2024?
I have to be a member of Congress.
That's right.
Wow.
Joining me now, the guy that put that together, Ivan Reikland.
Hey, Ivan.
I can't lay claim to everything, but there was a lady by the name of Melissa from Florida that did 99% of the work.
I just happened to put in some of the numbers, and then changed the kind of sequencing of it.
So, can't really take all responsibility for that beautiful video.
Well, it looks like Kevin McCarthy's support is crumbling.
Yeah, absolutely.
I mean, these aren't my words, right?
All of that content that you saw in there is legitimate content from the individuals that are mentioned, and they're all members of the House of Representatives who happen to be the ones that will vote for the Speaker of the House.
I just want to kind of frame it for folks.
You know, Michael Lindell's been fighting for the last two years to make sure that we have one day voting on paper, hand counted, in person.
Well, guess what?
We have that opportunity to do that on January 3rd.
We have 430.
We know how many registered voters there are in the totality of the ecosystem to vote for Speaker of the House.
And that's 434 because it's not 435 because one passed away.
Several weeks ago from cancer in Virginia's 4th congressional district.
That election is going to be the special one in February 21st.
We'll talk about that later.
But so we have 434 registered voters, and of those, all you need is 218 to secure a victory.
34 registered voters and of those all you need is 218 to secure a victory.
And as you saw there, those members 5, 10, no actually 5 and then 6 and then 20, Bob
Good says, and then 36 voted against Kevin McCarthy.
He clearly does not have anywhere near the number of votes necessary to be the Speaker of the House, nor do the Democrats.
Whoever they decide to put forward, I don't see a situation where there's a single Republican that will vote for a Democrat.
So the whole thread of, oh, it could be a Democrat if you don't support Kevin McCarthy.
is a total non-starter.
That's a total false premise.
And that's coming from folks like Sean Hannity, from Mark Levin, from other conservative Inc.
players.
Not even close to being realistic.
And while it may be true that maybe one, two, up to five members of the Democrat Party that are in safe districts will actually cast their vote for Kevin McCarthy if that's all that he needs, the problem is that that's not all that he needs in order to become Speaker.
It's 32 Democrats.
As of today.
And that momentum is growing to go against Kevin McCarthy.
The other thing I'll say, Brandon, I just released earlier today, a few hours ago, my number 5 in the 13-part series in my sub-stack, known as the Counterintelligence Investigation into Kevin McCarthy.
Here it is.
Let's go.
There we go.
Kevin McCarthy, part 5, subject of Counterintelligence Investigation, Personal Conduct.
Personal conduct, and you can see if you click on that, I think I gave you full access, if you don't mind.
Yeah, Kevin McCarthy.
So let's look at the headline.
One of his mentors, Kevin McCarthy's GOP mentor, scolds him in scathing comments to the New Yorker.
He lies, he'll change the lie if necessary.
The reason why it falls into this category, remember, there are 13 adjudicative guidelines that the Director of National Intelligence uses to determine somebody's eligibility for a security clearance.
And personal conduct talks about the holistic totality of the circumstances and the whole person concept.
Meaning, are they trustworthy?
Are they liars, essentially compulsive liars?
And that sub-stack goes through the list of just a few of the key things that he was caught in a lie that had massive consequences to it.
And one of the components, the sub-components that it talks about to determine whether or not somebody is at risk to national security, right?
is if they're going to be holding a role of fiduciary responsibility.
I can't think of a position in our entire system that has a higher responsibility of fiduciary responsibility to the country than the Speaker of the House.
Why?
Because the $6.2 trillion budget that the House begins with, and by the way, constitutionally, It's the House that starts anything related to revenues with our government.
So $6.2 trillion and the Speaker of the House is the one individual that has the most influence and power over how that budgetary process begins within our governmental system.
So with that, I mean, another adjudicative guideline that Kevin McCarthy clearly does not come even close to passing because he violates it on so many fronts.
So bottom line assessment.
Not acceptable.
He is a national security risk to our entire country.
A walking time bomb if he gets even close to that gavel seat.
So what are you hearing?
What are you hearing?
This seems to be an organic grassroots movement to bring Donald Trump into Washington as the Speaker of the House.
When these people say, on January 3rd, we will present our challenger to McCarthy.
On January 3rd, 2023, we will present our challenger to McCarthy.
We heard a couple clips like that.
They're not saying who that challenger is.
Yeah, that's coming from Congressman Good, that's coming from Congressman Norman from South Carolina, and that's coming from Congresswoman Lauren Boebert from Colorado.
Those three that were just in that clip alone.
Who's tied closely was on video there with Matt Gaetz who's been talking about this for like months and months and months.
So I'm asking you, I'm asking you.
Is there a movement afoot when they say we're gonna present our challenger on January 3rd?
Do they really mean we're going to present Donald Trump?
Is that what they're saying without saying it?
I would have to say out of the, let's just come up with three hypotheses, right, on who could possibly they be referring to.
My number one most probable hypothesis to answer your question, Brandon, is absolutely President Donald J. Trump.
Now, long shot, second hypothesis would be somebody like Lee Zeldin, because his term will end on January 3rd because he ran for governor.
That election didn't result in a victory.
And then notice how I said, I didn't say he lost.
That election did not result in his victory.
The other person that really comes to mind would be a Devin Nunes, who used to be a Congressman, but he would be in the best position with all of his knowledge and experience by serving as the chair of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of going back and disclosing and rebutting everything that occurred since then.
As it applies to spying on Trump 2016, all the FBI shenanigans that have been going on that have been exposed through the Twitter files, etc.
So I would say those would be my top three hypotheses as it applies to we would present somebody that would then become Speaker of the House.
Okay.
So it sounds like President Trump had no interest in this.
That's what we were being told.
Maybe that's his way of playing the PR game.
Ask how you want it!
know without I guess violating confidence are you hearing that President Trump real
does let me put it this way does President Trump ask how you want it I'll handle the
question Brandon I'm a big boy does President Trump realize the benefits to being speaker
what you have told us is and you're a constitutional attorney on top of being a former commander
the Green Beret a constitutional attorney you're telling me he gets immunity right a
speaker of the house he gets immunity right so a lot of this stupidity stops all this
stupidity stops The DOJ's stupidity goes like, wait, where do I aim my booger?
Yeah, which by the way, all the money you're spending on attorney fees stops, right?
Yes.
That's it.
That's a motivation.
And you don't need to spend a penny on campaigning because you're going to do what Lizzy Cheney and Mike Pence just did with the J6 cover-up committee.
That will be your free campaigning.
You'll be at the epicenter of the political conversation.
Until you decide to relinquish the gavel, which I argue is going to be when you reinstate yourself.
Sorry, I interrupted.
Which means he can hold all the committee investigations he wants and it'll be like, get the popcorn, it'll be Watergate hearings, Iran-Contra hearings on steroids, which is millions and millions of people.
You don't have to go stand in a freezing cold rally.
Millions and millions can watch him For free!
24-7 on C-SPAN!
1, 2, 3!
24 seven on C-SPAN. One, two, three. Lindell TV, RSVN, One America, right? Where else? Truth Social. And it looks like
it's not going to get censored on Twitter, Twitter either.
Getter, Frank Social, Frank Speech. I mean, all of them.
So, so can you imagine?
But keep going, Brandon.
I guess you kind of know how this is going to play out.
I'm listening to you.
They can subpoena, they can subpoena, uh, uh, what's his face and his lover, Peter Storm Strutt?
Yeah, yeah.
So, uh, they're going to determine whether or not Peter was Stroke was doing something to Lisa's page.
Yeah, so there we go.
So they can subpoena them and have hearings and I, and I, you know, wow.
I mean, they can subpoena.
We'll find out whether or not Peter was stroking Lisa's page.
It's a family show.
It's the night before Christmas Eve.
We could also, we could also have people.
I'm horrible.
You are, you're a bad guy.
You could also have subpoenaed Bob Mueller.
Yeah!
Robert!
Roberto Muller!
Jim Comey!
Christopher Wray!
Jim Comey!
Mike Pence!
All right, and then let's add to it.
You know what?
I volunteered to test it.
Actually, I volunteered to be the sergeant at arms to release the 14,000 hours of tape.
That's where I was going.
Then we get the 14,000 hours of tape released and see what really went down.
And if there was any, ready?
FBI, confidential, confidential, human, I'm talking to the mirror, Brandon.
It's almost as though you're saying what's in my brain.
Sorry, keep going, I'm listening.
Inside the Capitol in Trump-MAGA gear before the doors were opened, right?
I'm talking to the mirror, Brandon.
It's almost as though you're saying what's in my brain.
I'm just going to look at you and listen, because I'm enjoying myself.
And then guess what?
We're totally on the same sheet of music.
Then we could take the FBI whistleblower who was here in studio yesterday.
Thank you, there you go, exactly.
We can take him, we can put him under oath and let him say all he wants.
We can put him, listen now, with a congressional committee Behind closed doors, give him whistleblower protection, and as he said, I can tell them where the gold is in the hills.
There is gold in them hills, and I will tell you where you need to investigate.
So he can tell Jim Jordan, get whistle protection, whistleblower protection, and say, you need to be looking into this, this, this, and this.
And voila!
Guess what?
All of a sudden we have hearings on this, this, this, and this, and subpoena the right people.
Yeah, and then this person and this person and this person and these are the questions that you ask them.
Wait, do I have that back here somewhere over to the side ready to go when that happens?
Probably, Brandon.
You think I've just been whistling Dixie back here for the last two years?
The other thing I'll add now that the popcorn has run out, I'm gonna have to get another batch.
So here we go.
Other whistleblowers that haven't been out there publicly.
Who, by the way, who, by the way, are waiting.
They are waiting.
Yes, there are whistleblowers in waiting right now.
Did he tell you about that yesterday?
Stephen Friend, live on camera, said there are whistleblowers waiting and they are waiting to see how I get treated.
And if I get treated correctly and I get the protections that I need, then they will come out as well.
Yes, I know personally some of these whistleblowers, Brandon.
And absolutely.
The story of January 6th is going to be, I mean, it's going to be great.
Because then we're going to investigate and actually criminally charge and prosecute and convict all of the murder of all four and possibly five of those that died.
Actually, four that died at the hands of Capitol Police and Metropolitan Police.
Which, by the way, no police officers died that day.
That is a lie.
He talked about that.
Right, there was one that died the following day, and we're not sure if it was from Pfizer or Moderna that died.
And I'm not, like, I'm not saying that jokingly.
That could be one of the reasons why, or the reason why he died, because it was due to a blood clot, right?
It was due to a stroke.
What is the stroke caused by?
Blood clot, maybe?
Pfizer, maybe?
Moderna, maybe?
Because the J&J wasn't out yet at the time.
So it was either one of those two.
Wow.
Wow.
OK, so there you go.
That's just the beginning.
I know, but I got another guest, so throw it quick.
All right.
So January 3rd.
We just gotta, you know what, all I want for Christmas is Speaker Trump.
If I can get some of your listeners to go ahead and post a video, go to my Telegram, anywhere, get it on my, get my attention, and then I'll share it.
I want to see like a five second video.
All I want for Christmas is Speaker Trump and then hashtag it Speaker Trump on whatever platform you like, as long as it's a free speech platform.
So the more that McCarthy collapses in his support, the greater the chances of a Speaker Trump.
I'll use this as my last statement.
If two weeks ago you asked me what the chances are of Speaker Trump, it was about 1 in a trillion.
If you were to ask me today, it's about 1 in 100.
And tomorrow it's going to be 1 in 50.
But based on, let me just put it this way, when we get Kevin McCarthy to pull out of the Speaker's race, that number is going to be an even chance coin flip.
And that's just not me saying stuff.
It's based on the phone calls that I'm getting from the inner circles.
Wow.
The inner circles?
Yes.
So this is a movement that is growing in the inner circles.
Well, I have the contact information for a lot of people to include almost all of the 222 Republicans in the congressional Republican delegation.
So when I come up with a new substack, like we talked about earlier today, I not only talk about it publicly, but I happen to maybe I happen to send it via text message, like I sent to you earlier today and to their personal email addresses, personal cell phones, personal email addresses.
Meanwhile, we have a grassroots effort trying to contact their offices about this.
I think we'll be able to get it on their radar, and for those that don't know specifically of all the risks that Kevin McCarthy brings to the table, that originally wanted to vote for him, I think by the end of the 13-part series they're gonna be really deliberating seriously on whether or not they want to attach their name to Kevin McCarthy.
So in other words, the higher the numbers go in your substack, IvanRaklin.substack.com, the higher the numbers go, the more toxic the sludge.
Yeah, I mean it's going to be harder and harder for people to justify voting for Kevin McCarthy.
Isn't that strange how that correlation occurs?
Wow.
So he might consider himself better off to just go ahead and do what he did once before you've told me and that is withdraw.
He may want to withdraw.
Otherwise, I'm only going to continue to escalate my research and deep dive into him.
And guess what?
We haven't published it yet, but that FTX money?
There's way more to be disclosed about that than has been published by any outlet yet.
I have a team looking into it.
And it's going into Ukraine, FTX, individuals in FTX, which PACs and affiliated PACs and who manages those PACs and their link analysis relationship to Kevin McCarthy and how that all ties in.
And then it's not just going to be, oh, this is my conclusion.
It's not.
Here are my receipts, buddy.
So, Kevin, you may want to do a Paul Ryan and just say, you know what, I'm going to go work for Fo News because I'm not stopping.
Wow, wow, wow.
And by the way, I do have his phone number, too, so ultimately, as we get closer to January 3rd, I'll probably be texting him.
Ivan!
The entire 13-page, or 13-part report.
Wow.
Ivan!
Ivan Reikland, thank you for being with us, and Merry Christmas!
Brandon, Merry Christmas.
I love you.
And the comment, the pejorative-ish comment that I made about you the other day, I don't know, because we're getting close to Christmas, we got to love one another.
And one of the folks that works with you or for you, whatever you want to call it, a little birdie told me that she may have been slightly offended because she's so defensive of you.
I said it.
This is locker room talk.
And in a way that I absolutely adore and love as a brother, Well, you're very kind.
You didn't have to do that.
One of my associate producers, who's very defensive of me, said, he wasn't belittling you, was he?
I said, no, that's the way he shows affection.
And she's like, all right, I want to make sure.
But she's kind of protective of me.
No, otherwise he wouldn't have invited me back on the show.
I told her, I said, no, no, he's a former Green Beret commander.
That's how he shows affection.
No, you're fighting the good fight, man.
I'm happy to be here alongside with you.
Absolutely.
We might have even bigger plans for the new year with a documentary or something, right?
Once you watch it, January 6th, if Brandon agrees to it, we might be exclusively airing a January 6th rebuttal documentary video to the J6 Cover-Up Committee.
I'm going to be watching it over the weekend.
Oh yeah.
Merry Christmas, my friend.
Thank you.
Merry Christmas.
Ivan Reikland checking in.
There you go.
So next time, tomorrow maybe?
Yeah, absolutely.
Hey, when there's breaking news, we break in, as they say.
All right, joining me now quickly is Tom Littleton.
Tom Littleton joins us on a brand new article he's written over at 30piecesofsilver.org.
Tom, welcome back to the broadcast.
Thanks for joining us.
Good to be with you.
Merry Christmas to you, the crew, your family, to Mike and all you hard-working guys over there.
Love what you're doing.
Appreciate you so much.
Thank you.
You as well, Tom.
Let's take a look at this screenshot here.
This is from the World Economic Forum.
We've showed it many times.
Digital identity.
And we were warning about this in early 2020.
I think we were the first national show to ever show the interactive wheel.
The interactive wheel from the World Economic Forum in early 2020.
And here's another one they put out.
We've shown many times.
You're gonna have to have a digital identity.
And notice it says over there in the far left, e-government for citizens to access and use services, file taxes, vote!
So here's Mike Lindell and others working hard to get rid of these machines, and these globalists are saying, oh, we're going to double down.
You're going to actually have to have a digital ID to get a bank account, to travel, to get online, to get on social platforms, and to vote.
Now, it's bad enough we're battling these folks, these globalists.
But now, you write over at 30piecesofsilver.org, there is a so-called Christian version of the World Economic Forum.
Correct?
Right.
And we covered that a while ago, but what we've just recently uncovered is how much the evangelical organizations are openly serving as feeder programs into this ideology.
That being, on this article in particular, Just released from the World Evangelical Alliance is their Roadmap 2030.
And as you know, the Great Reset, the World Economic Forum, everything that the UN, these organizations are pushing for, has been dubbed Agenda 21.
Then later, 2015, it was renamed Agenda 2030.
So we have the World Evangelical Alliance, which has probably close to 150 Evangelical organizations, regional organizations, and over a hundred different independent ministries that are involved with it is releasing this roadmap.
Well, let's look at it.
Here it is.
You've hyperlinked it in your article at 30piecesofsilver.org.
So the roadmap for 2030 executive summary.
There it is.
The World Evangelical Alliance established in 1846.
Wow, they've been around a while.
So you're telling me we now have a, quote, evangelical group pushing the UN convention, the UN, I mean, Sustainable Development, Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, which is global governance by their own admission.
It's global government.
It's the World Economic Forum.
It's the Mark of the Beast technology because it calls for everyone in the world to be counted and digitized, correct?
Correct.
And so, you know, I remember when you were first showing this World Economic Forum A wheel, you were pushing this thing out and nobody was talking about it.
But you and I have tracked for a long time that there were significant evangelical partners who are driving this whole narrative for the church to embrace this stuff as the gospel, as the mission or vision of the church.
And this World Evangelical Alliance, they see themselves as defining what it means to be evangelical.
So they work with sister organizations they've spawned like the Lausanne movement that was started in really 1974 and continues now to push a social justice equity narrative.
They have openly embraced through Lausanne this whole agenda 2030 UN Sustainable Development Goals.
So we're seeing this across the board that these sort of top tier evangelical organizations are bringing in An open endorsement of the whole World Economic Forum UN agenda.
Here it is.
Roadmap 2030.
This is a stark reminder to us that if you want to measure what makes a country a third world country by corruption, the institutional church is quickly becoming a third world country.
This kind of corruption, these partnerships, this collaboration, This top-down takeover of our seminaries, you and I have tracked that.
The woke culture that is seeping in, and you may want to read some of the things from that executive summary that you pulled up.
Because that's what they're talking about here, is collaboration.
Well look at this, here's one right here.
We have a unique opportunity to affect the global narrative on critical issues in both sacred and secular halls of power with this group, World Economic Group.
World Evangelical Alliance.
World Economic Alliance, existing spheres of influence such as our special consultative
status in the United Nations.
I mean, again, they're openly telling you, look, we're in partnership with the UN, which
is about as anti-Christ of an organization as you can get.
We know how they feel about Israel.
Of course, they're the ones telling Israel, get rid of your nuclear weapons, of which
Israel never talks about, by the way, but they're not saying diddly squat to Iran about
their nuclear weapons, right?
So they're telling you where they stand, they're with the UN.
We will be bolder and more effective in speaking to global platforms of power.
As a global network, we can learn from each other to gather and influence laws and policies
affecting religious freedom, justice.
Of course, by justice, I'm gathering from having gone over their documents, they mean
social justice, socialism.
Social justice.
Social justice. Social justice.
Social justice and a push toward equity, economic justice, climate change.
That is a big part of their agenda.
As a matter of fact, they openly embrace climate change and have a World Evangelical Alliance sustainability Twitter page and website.
So they're rolling this stuff out shamelessly to push us into this global narrative.
And with it comes everything you're talking about.
That they want to inflict upon us with the World Economic Forum.
Well, here's a statement.
This is a screenshot in his article at 30piecesofsilver.org.
Statement by faith leaders.
Urgent call for higher ambition at COP 27.
Wait a minute.
COP 27 was the group that just came out with the alternative to the Ten Commandments.
Good grief.
Right.
Mother Earth worship.
And there they were.
There was the Secretary General of World Evangelical Alliance attending.
I mean, if this isn't the formation of the false dominant church that we read in Revelation 17 verse 1, the woman or the harlot that sits on many waters, which is separate from what John the Revelator sees a few minutes later, which is a woman that rides a beast.
Those are two separate entities.
I can tell you in Revelation 17 verse 1, the harlot that sits on many waters is a false dominant church, a false religious system, and these guys are helping build it.
Right.
And this is apostasy on an institutional level, on the top tier.
But they designed this organization and those who cooperate with it to trickle down into your local church.
And see, that's one of the problems.
You mentioned in the opening that there's now even a Christian Economic Forum.
Well, these guys are operating through these donor advised ministries to get you to give your money, even leave your estates to this global agenda.
What they have to do is they have to sell this false social justice gospel, the same thing that destroyed most of the mainline denominations back in the 70s.
And they are pushing this now into the even the conservative, you know, remnant of the church that exists and those who've held on to a biblical vision and mission, the Great Commission of Jesus.
So this thing is saturating the church on a whole new level.
They've already taken A deep dive into our seminary since 2009.
Now we see, and as you and I have reported on World View Weekend and on your radio program, they're actually going after children's ministries and they're targeting them to make global citizens out of our children right inside our own churches and inside our own homes with their curriculum, with all of this hard sell for this woke gospel.
And global equity and the idea of global citizenry, they're not shy at all about promoting that as a Christian value.
So it's a false dominant church setting up the Antichrist system and a one-world religious system and going along with world government, open borders, the UN, etc, etc.
Look at this.
Another screenshot from his article at 30piecesofsilver.org.
National Association of Evangelicals.
You say that they are now pushing the COVID vax, right?
And they worked with Facebook to do this?
Yeah, they got Facebook funding in order to do this.
And this was a while ago, 2021.
And the National Association of Evangelicals is sort of the state, the American version or partner of the World Evangelical Alliance.
These guys all move in unison.
They're pushing the pandemic narrative.
They're pushing interfaith narrative.
They're pushing the merging of science with faith, evolution with faith.
And all these convene together so that they can become the operatives from things like the Pandemic Express, which rolled through in March and April of 2020.
So you had evangelical leaders getting money from Facebook, the same guys who paid for that John Hopkins event 201, which was the practice run, the dry run for the pandemic.
And then here are evangelicals jumping on board and telling everybody, oh, you got to follow these protocols, shut the churches down.
And once the vacs rolled out, then they're telling you, an evangelical trusted faith leader telling you, you need to get the vaccine and get your family, get your kids vaccinated.
Which, of course, has led to blood clots, according to many, many prominent global doctors.
Blood clots, infertility, suddenly dying.
I mean, it's a mess.
And here we have so-called trusted evangelical leaders pushing it and trying to convince skeptical Christians to get vaccinated.
Again, it's really the fulfillment of Bible prophecy, seeing a false global dominant church.
And I go back to the fact that If they're going to work with the World Economic Forum,
that means they're also pushing the idea, as we saw from the opening screenshot, you're going to have
to get a digital ID to even vote.
So here we are on the Lindell report saying, look, we got to get rid of these machines,
go back to paper. And we got evangelical leaders so-called that are basically saying, no, we're
going to go with the World Economic Forum and double down, and we want you to have a digital
ID to go vote. Right. And of course, the work that you and Mike are doing, the work of this
network is so vital because there are people waking up, people want to know.
This stuff is moving so quickly and it's moving into every area of our lives, including your faith and including your home church.
Indeed.
30piecesofsilver.org.
Merry Christmas to you, Tom Littleton, and your family.
You too.
God bless.
You too.
Check out his article.
All the footnotes.
We just scratched the surface.
It's all in his article with screenshots and everything and hyperlinks.
30piecesofsilver.org.
Hey, if you appreciate all we're doing here, support Mike Lindell.
Go to mypillow.com, mystore.com.
Use that promo code L77.
Don't forget about the lindelllegalfund.org.
Lindelllegalfund.org.
Remember, he's the one that funded the Carrie Lake case.
Why not send Mike a Christmas present and yourself a Christmas present by helping him fight for liberty and freedom in our courts by going right now to LyndellLegalFun.org and making a contribution.
Thanks for watching.
On behalf of Mike Lyndell, I'm Brandon House.
Merry Christmas.
Take care.
You're watching Lyndell TV.
Hello, I'm Mike Lindell and I'm excited to bring you my biggest bedding sale ever, just in time for Christmas.
Get my Giza Dream Bedsheets for as low as $29.98.
A set of pillowcases, only $9.98.
Rejuvenate your bed with a MyPillow Mattress Topper for as low as $99.99.
We also have blankets in a variety of sizes, colors, and styles.
We even have blankets for your pets.
▲
Export Selection