All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 24, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
02:06:44
BBN, Sep 24, 2025 - Trump reverses course and says Ukraine can DEFEAT RUSSIA
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Okay, buckle up, folks.
Welcome to Brighteon Broadcast News for Wednesday, September 24th, 2025.
I'm Mike Adams.
Thank you for joining me.
We've got some important developments here, and I also have a featured interview with Michael Jan coming up, where we cover the latest developments about war, about the Charlie Kirk assassination, and who is likely behind that, and also who benefits from that assassination.
We'll get into all those details.
Plus, we'll cover routes and resources all around the world and why the Suez Canal is so critical, and also why Israel was founded in the first place.
That is modern-day Israel, not the biblical Israel, but modern-day Israel, which is something completely different.
We'll get into all of that.
Plus, I've got a special report about plunging into World War III.
And then let's talk about gold and silver just briefly, because, of course, the prices continue to skyrocket.
That's because everybody knows something big is about to happen.
Something really huge, actually.
And kind of a clue about that is the fact that Trump posted on Truth Social a shocking statement.
Now, Trump also spoke at the UN, and he said some very harsh things that are true, like telling all the people at the UN that climate change is a hoax and that weaponized migration is a threat to all Western countries.
That's all true.
And he said a lot more than that.
But then he posted, or actually, what I'm told is someone else wrote this and posted it on his account that this was not written by Donald J. Trump.
Rather, it's written by one of his neocon warmongering staffers.
Well, not a low-level staffer, but a higher-level person that's in the defense intelligence portions of the White House will say.
I'm quite sure I know exactly who the person is.
But we'll see in the days ahead.
But the following message was posted under Trump's account.
Again, I don't think it was written by Trump, but here it is.
And this is what's shocking everybody.
Trump says the following, or at least his account says, quote, after getting to know and fully understand the Ukraine-Russia military and economic situation, and after seeing the economic trouble it caused Russia, I think Ukraine, with the support of the European Union, is in a position to fight and win all of Ukraine back in its original form.
With time, patience, and the financial support of Europe, and in particular, NATO, the original borders from where this war started is very much an option.
Why not?
Russia has been fighting aimlessly for three and a half years a war that should have taken a real military power less than a week to win.
So, I mean, this is astonishing if you think Trump wrote it, because Trump welcomed Putin in Alaska just a few weeks ago, and Trump has been demanding that Ukraine accept a deal and saying that Ukraine was going to have to give up territory, etc.
So that's why I believe Trump did not write this.
It's someone else who's trying to start World War III.
It's a war hawk in the Trump administration.
And actually, I think it's somebody who works for MI6, is a traitor to America.
But anyway, the post goes on.
This is not distinguishing Russia.
In fact, it is very much making them look like a paper tiger.
Yeah, that's funny.
A NATO country calling Russia a paper tiger when all of NATO couldn't stop Russia, no matter how many weapons were sent and how many super secret tanks and missiles and everything.
Anyway, it goes on.
When the people living in Moscow and all of the great cities, towns, and districts all throughout Russia find out what is really going on with this war, the fact that it's almost impossible for them to get gasoline through the long lines that are being formed and all of the other things that are taking place in their war economy,
where most of their money is being spent on fighting Ukraine, which has great spirit and only getting better, Ukraine would be able to take back their country in its original form and who knows, maybe even go further than that.
All right, so this is all completely insane.
There are not long gas lines in Russia.
Russia has plenty of energy, plenty of gasoline, as well as, you know, hydrocarbon gas, right?
Natural gas.
Russia has oil.
Russia has an abundance of energy.
So this reminds me of that lie from a couple years ago when the West was saying that, you know, Russia had run out of missiles and they're having to rob circuit boards out of washing machines in order to build more missiles.
And the only reason they're using hypersonic missiles, we were told, is because they've run out of the other missiles.
And it's almost depleted.
They're almost totally done.
And Russia is going to go home with their tail between their legs because the morale has collapsed and all the soldiers on the front line are fleeing, you know, on and on.
Nothing but lies.
That's what this sounds like here.
And it's not Russia that is spending all its money on war.
It's America.
It's America that has a trillion-dollar war budget with the Department of War, as it's now called.
It's America that is $37 trillion in debt.
It's America where you have massive inflation on food prices, whereas in Russia, groceries are so affordable, they're about one quarter the price of what you pay in the United States.
You can eat in Russia for a quarter of the price.
And that includes restaurants as well.
You can buy land for less than a quarter of the price, especially in certain areas.
You know, Russia is far more affordable than the United States because the U.S. keeps printing money to fund its war machine.
And that is a tax on the American people.
It's the American people that are waiting in the food lines trying to get food rescue because they can't afford to buy food in the grocery stores.
That's not happening in Russia.
That's happening in America.
Anyway, he says Putin and Russia are in big economic trouble.
And this is the time for Ukraine to act.
In any event, I wish both countries well.
We will continue to supply weapons to NATO for NATO to do what they want with them.
Good luck to all.
Okay, so first of all, I don't even believe this was written by Trump because it doesn't have the all-caps format that Trump is famous for.
Trump will use all caps words from time to time.
That is not the case in this text at all.
Secondly, this is a complete 180 from what Trump said just a month ago or so.
A complete 180.
So I don't think that Trump even believes the things that are in this particular post.
That Russia is in so much trouble, that Russia is essentially about to collapse, and that Ukraine can take back all of its territory, plus even go further, which means he meant go farther, but go farther into Russia and take more territory, like start to take Russian territory and make it part of Ukraine.
So is he saying that Ukraine should wage a war of aggression and seize Russian territory?
Because that's what this post says.
So after all this time of NATO saying that Russia is wrong to invade Ukraine and take Ukrainian land and Russia is the aggressor.
Now in this post, Trump is saying that Ukraine should be the aggressor.
See, that's why I think this is not Trump.
This is somebody else in his administration.
Again, I'm pretty sure I know who it is.
It's a warmonger.
It's an irrational traitor who apparently got access to Trump's truth social account and started posting this nonsense, coordinated with MI6, the British government, and also governments of other European nations who are saying that they're going to stand up against the aggression of Russia no matter what.
Yeah, okay, great.
You and what army?
That's the literal question of the day.
You and what army?
When you have EU leaders or German leaders or British leaders and they say, we're going to stand and fight.
The relevant question is you and what army?
Because you don't have an army.
So, you know how we've been talking about the assassination of Charlie Kirk and we're given all this nonsense about this magic bullet and Charlie Kirk being the man of steel whose neck stopped a 30 odd six round like magic.
And it's all nonsense, just completely made up BS.
That's what NATO does on a daily basis.
They just make up nonsense.
And that's what the warmongers do every day.
They make up nonsense like what we just saw in this post.
Nonsense that claims things like, well, Ukraine can just take back all its territory.
Okay, how?
What, you think they haven't been trying to do that?
You do know that soldiers are dying to try to do that, right?
And that apparently 1.7 million Ukrainian men have either died or have fled, leaving behind, you know, far fewer people to even attempt to engage in such a battle.
How are you going to take back Ukraine?
Much less invade and start seizing Russian territory.
How are you going to do that?
Because don't tell me the answer is, oh, we're going to have new super secret weapons from the UK, or we're going to have long-range missiles from Germany.
We're going to have missiles from France.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Every time they try that, Russia knows where the assembly plant is located, typically in western Ukraine.
And then Russia launches a barrage of drones and missiles and just completely blows it all up, blows it to smithereens.
So how is Ukraine going to defeat Russia?
And the answer is they're not going to.
They're not going to because Russia has battlefield dominance.
Russia has military tech dominance.
Russia has air power dominance over Ukraine, right?
Or at least eastern Ukraine right now.
People who think that just because they say something out of Donald Trump's account or just because they say it in a NATO press release, they think that makes it real, but they're delusional.
Saying it doesn't make it real.
Just like saying that, oh, Charlie Kirk's neck stopped a high-powered rifle round that can be used to hunt rhinoceros, you know.
Just because you say it doesn't make it real.
And I tweeted out, I said, here's a radical thought for the day.
All bullets must follow the laws of physics, period.
What a bizarre thing to have to say, that all bullets have to follow the laws of physics, because we are now living in an era where a lot of people, they dismiss the idea that anything has to follow the laws of cause and effect or physics or economic reality or kinetic reality or whatever.
And they just think they can make up everything, especially America and NATO and Western European countries.
They think they can just talk and make it real.
Well, talk is cheap, but building tanks and artillery and missiles is expensive and difficult.
And guess who's doing the best job of building all those at scale?
That's Russia right now.
That's Russia.
Russia is out producing all of NATO in terms of munitions and drones and missiles and nuclear weapons also, in addition.
So again, you can say it doesn't make it real.
And war is a reality check.
So if you're Kier Starmer, you can say things like, oh, we're going to march to Moscow and we're going to seize Moscow.
Yes.
And okay, great.
Let's see it.
So you can start marching to Moscow and you can probably march partially across Ukraine and just line up all your soldiers there and have a long march.
And you might be able to march into certain parts of the Donbass region, but at some point, when your march hits the front lines of the Russians and the Russian military, then your march gets blown to smithereens by artillery and drone fire and missiles and tank rounds and everything else.
So your march turns into a massacre, which Kier Starmer wouldn't say, oh, we're going to get massacred on the way to Moscow.
No, he says we're going to march on Moscow.
I mean, he hasn't said that, actually.
I'm just saying as a thought experiment.
If he did say that, then people would buy into that and say, yeah, we're going to march to Moscow and we're going to take it back.
No, you're not.
You're going to get massacred on the way to Moscow.
Like Germany found out or Napoleon found out, you know, you're going to get massacred on your way to Moscow.
And that's the reality check.
To say, oh, yeah, you know what?
Your mouth is writing checks that the rest of your body can't cash.
You know, talk is cheap, but getting things done is very, very difficult.
So I think that this post from Trump is a coordinated attempt to try to invoke World War III.
And it's another attempt to provoke Putin into an overreaction response because they really, really want Putin to launch some, even a nuclear weapon or something big.
They want Putin to attack like an air base in Poland or some military base in Romania or something like that.
They really want Putin to do that.
So then all the Europeans can say, see, we warned you.
He's coming for us all.
That's why they had to launch their own drones in the sky the other week.
Say, oh, Russian drones have violated our airspace.
And they're not even Russian drones.
It's all completely made up.
And they just do that.
That's what NATO is really good at is just making things up.
It's kind of like the way the FBI is just fabricating evidence to try to say that Tyler Robinson is guilty when he's clearly the Patsy.
So instead of actually doing anything useful or investigating who really killed Charlie Kirk, the entire focus of the FBI is on fabricating evidence to try to convince a jury to convict Tyler Robinson so they can give him the death sentence, kill him off, and shut him up.
That's what this is all about.
And NATO works exactly the same way as the FBI.
NATO spends all its time fabricating fake violations and fake provocations or false flags.
That's really what NATO is focused on.
And of course, fake press releases and things like that.
And that's why I think even this post from Trump is also completely fake.
It's not really something that Trump wrote.
All right, we've, let me just shift gears here.
We've got some other things taking place.
In Eugene, Oregon, an Antifa crowd is building up around a federal building there, and they are trying to intimidate the federal workers there.
That's not going to go well for Antifa, having just been designated a domestic terrorist organization.
It's like I said yesterday, we're going to see warfare in American cities.
And maybe Eugene, Oregon is the first place.
I mean, Eugene's a great small town.
Well, it's not a small town anymore.
It's a great town in Oregon, but it's filled with liberals.
And some of them are completely unhinged, insane lunatics, and they think they can attack a federal building.
Well, I guess we're going to find out what happens.
So that's one thing that's going on.
Second thing that demonstrates just the total brain rot of the radical left is that since Trump and RFK Jr. announced, well, two days ago now, that Tylenol was a major cause of autism when it's taken by pregnant women.
And, you know, I talked about that yesterday.
I think Tylenol is a distraction from vaccine-induced autism.
But nevertheless, liberal women who just completely deranged and they just hate Trump so much that they are filming themselves and posting online videos of them being pregnant and chugging Tylenol and saying basically F you to Donald Trump.
So that's how insane the radical left is.
They will swallow like poisonous levels of over-the-counter painkillers that can really cause damage to their unborn children.
And they will do that to give the finger to Trump.
And I wonder what they're going to say when their children are born with deformities.
Are they going to blame Trump for that too?
Or are they going to take responsibility for the fact that they stupidly were chugging acetaminophen during pregnancy as some kind of insane protest?
I mean, again, this is how completely unhinged these leftists are.
You know, it almost makes you wonder if Trump said that we all deserve Second Amendment rights, would some of these leftist women like put a gun to their head and say, you know, take that Trump and pull the trigger and blow their heads off as a form of protest?
Probably yes.
They probably would do that because that's kind of what they're doing with Tylenol.
It's like, oh, you say Tylenol is bad.
I'm going to chug it.
I'm going to just chug Tylenol all day.
It's like if RFK Jr. announced that mercury is bad for pregnant women, which it is, you can see these pregnant women going out and like, where can I find some mercury?
Start chugging mercury.
It's like, yeah, I love that mercury.
Yeah, the HG.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, they're just completely insane.
What do you even say to that?
All right.
In other news, the president of Indonesia, which has a massive Muslim population, has pledged 20,000 military troops to be sent to Gaza to defend the Palestinians there against Israel.
I mean, wow.
20,000 troops.
I wonder if other Muslim countries would start sending troops, and then Israel would have a real problem on its hands.
So I don't know if this Indonesian president is just talking.
Is he just a big talker?
Or does he mean business?
Well, I guess we're going to find out.
Related to that, by the way, the flotilla of dozens of ships that's on its way to Gaza, it has been attacked now by five different, apparently drone attacks.
And one of the ships has been destroyed called the Zafiro.
It's been completely destroyed.
I don't think anybody died in that.
I think they were rescued by the other ships.
But it's clear that the flotilla is under attack.
And gee, I wonder who would be attacking it.
Could it be the same country that attacked the USS Liberty?
Oh, who would that be?
Oh, dare not say the name Israel.
Or, you know, demon ambassador Mike Huckabee might pee his pants or something because he's such a traitorous loser.
Okay, anyway, look, situation is, of course, spinning completely out of control.
In the world, war is coming.
I want to jump to a special report here that I recorded just a few hours ago called Plunging Into World War III.
And then following that, we're going to have the interview with Michael Jan, which is a bombshell interview.
And it's a bit longer than usual.
But man, we covered the really important things.
Before we jump into the report, just want to give credit to our sponsor today, the satellite phone store, sat123.com.
And don't forget they have backup power systems, which are solar generators with built-in charge controllers and lithium-ion batteries and solar panels that are available as well.
Plus, they have Faraday bags to protect your electronics from solar flares and EMP weapons as well.
That's sat123.com.
And then HealthRangerStore.com, thank you for all your business, all your support.
We are working hard to bring you more developments in AI, free AI tools for you with platforms and downloadable versions and so much more.
We're also constantly improving Brighteon.com, Brighteon Social, etc.
So we do that.
We fund that with your support.
So thank you for all your support.
And I know that you love clean food as much as I do and clean supplements, lab tested, certified organic.
And when we get moved into our new lab, I'll be giving you a new video tour of our new laboratory that will blow your mind.
So I can't wait to bring you that coming up soon.
So again, shop with us at healthrangerstore.com to support all our efforts.
All right, now we're just going to jump into the special report, followed by the interview with Michael Jan.
So enjoy all of that, and I'll be back with you tomorrow.
So it's very clear now that we are all being dragged into World War III.
And this war is almost certainly going to get kicked off by the United States attacking Iran on behalf of Israel, of course.
And once that attack takes place, then all bets are off as to how the war expands or who gets involved.
But sooner or later, it will almost certainly involve Russia and China might involve Pakistan.
Of course, Israel will be involved, but Turkey is going to be involved.
And it's not even clear sort of where Turkey is going to stand on all of this at the moment.
Egypt may get involved.
Afghanistan will, there will be important plays from Afghanistan.
India will have to make some major moves, etc.
And the Gulf states, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, etc.
This is going to be a world war.
And the world war, the conflict is shaping up into the Western countries versus the non-Western countries, which is, you know, the rest of the world.
And most of the world, most of the population, most of the GDP, most of the industrial output is on the side of non-Western countries.
The West used to be dominant in all these areas, but that's no longer the case.
Today, the West has fallen behind China, of course, in industrial output.
It's fallen behind Russia in terms of military output and military technology.
And the West has fallen behind even countries like India in terms of having personnel who are willing to work.
Where the West still maintains dominance is in its Navy.
The U.S. Navy is still the most powerful Navy in the world by far.
And the United States still has outstanding satellite technology, surveillance technology, and of course, a competent nuclear weapons inventory.
But those weapons are not modernized.
They're a couple of decades out of date.
And Russia's weapons, such as the Oreshnik systems, are far more advanced.
So Russia and China have far better technology than does the United States.
And even the F-35 fighter jet is obsolete compared to China's new fifth-generation fighters and the technology that Russia is rolling out, including hypersonic missiles.
The U.S. lags far behind China and Russia on drone technology.
And the U.S. lags way far behind China in terms of robotics and especially the ability to scale robotics industrially speaking.
You know, China can scale manufacturing in a way that the U.S. cannot.
The U.S. claims to be leading in AI technology, but that's debatable.
China is right up there with the U.S. on the most advanced AI engines.
And China has a much greater ability to scale AI because it's not limited by energy infrastructure in the same way that the United States is.
So if you really try to compare East to West, the West is in a losing position.
The West doesn't have the rare earth minerals that China has.
The West doesn't have the military technology that Russia has, etc.
Doesn't have the working population that India has.
So the West is actually in a hurry to try to start World War III in order to weaken the non-Western countries like China and Russia and Iran before the West is made further obsolete.
That's what you're actually looking at here is World War III acceleration by the United States.
The U.S. wants to hurry up and start World War III in order to have this fight while the U.S. still has an advantage in naval forces and while the U.S. still has its global dollar hegemony, although the use of the dollar is dwindling rapidly worldwide and the dollar is losing tremendous value, which is also obvious in the rising prices of gold and silver.
But understand the U.S. wants World War III right now because it sees the other countries as gaining in power and capabilities, and the U.S. wants to hobble them, damage them before they become stronger.
So even though Trump may be himself talking about peace, the actions that Trump is taking are promoting war.
For example, sending more weapons to Ukraine, sending more weapons to Israel, supporting Israel's bombing of other countries in the Middle East, such as Qatar.
So Trump says one thing, but his actions are the opposite.
And the actions are all pointing in the direction of escalating things towards World War III.
And you'll really know when the U.S. wants to kick off World War III, when there is a false flag operation in the United States, some kind of terrorism action or large-scale event, 9-11 or bigger, that is blamed on Iran or blamed on a terror group that is materially supported by Iran.
And once that attack takes place, and once the American population is convinced that, oh, it's Iran's fault, then Trump can launch an invasion of Iran.
And you'll hear all the rhetoric on Fox News, like, we have to stop them now, or they're going to be a danger to us forever.
If we don't stop them now, they'll be terrorists.
They'll be bombing our cities.
I mean, it's all the same thing that you heard during the Gulf War in the early 1990s about Saddam Hussein, etc.
All exactly the same script, just search and replace the names.
But they're going to roll out the same script for a whole new generation of people.
But it's the same script.
And a lot of sort of weak-minded Americans will go along with it and they'll say, yeah, you know, hoorah, we got to go kick some ass in Iran.
And they're going to get all behind it and get all emotionally rallied and, you know, patriotic fervor.
And then the U.S. is going to try to invade Iran, and the U.S. is going to get its ass kicked by Iran, almost certainly, because invading Iran is an incredibly stupid idea.
It's almost as bad of an idea as trying to conquer Russia with a land war.
History has shown that's a bad idea, too, in both cases.
With very few exceptions, I mean, all throughout known history, what we call Russia today, or what we call Iran today, the Persian Empire, has almost never been defeated.
Same thing with Russia.
Almost never been defeated.
And when there were defeats, they were, you know, short-lived and overturned relatively quickly.
But mostly, leaders like Napoleon or Adolf Hitler, they failed in their attempts.
And they could not defeat Russia or Persia.
And they found out that it's much more difficult than it looks.
So the real question that you and I should be asking is not whether the United States is going to go to war with Iran.
That seems to be a certainty.
And Israel is going to be all cheerleading that.
The real question is, what happens when America is defeated by Iran?
And there are only a couple possibilities, really.
One is that the U.S. goes nuclear, gets really desperate, and starts dropping nukes on Iran.
If that's the case, then as Michael Yan just told me in a recent interview, he said that the United States of America would probably be nuked in retaliation, nuked either by China or Russia.
And then that just unleashes a full-blown global thermonuclear hellscape.
The other possibility is that the U.S. walks away, you know, basically retreats and gets out of that theater of war entirely.
And then the result is that Iran emerges as the power in the region.
Iran, having defeated the United States, you know, the great Satan or the Great Empire, whatever they call it, Iran will be seen by the Gulf states, such as Saudi Arabia, as suddenly incredibly capable,
incredibly powerful, especially if Iran demonstrates more advanced weaponry during this conflict, because Iran has advanced ballistic missiles, Iran has advanced drones, and on top of that, I think Iran will have nukes.
And so if Iran ends up defeating the U.S. military by doing something like nuking its own territory, where let's say the U.S. military achieves some kind of deep incursion into Iran, like gets into some mountainous region along the western border.
And then Iran says, well, guess what?
We're just going to nuke that whole division by nuking our own mountains.
Well, that's going to achieve a couple of things.
It will show to the world that Iran has nuclear weapons.
Also, the rest of the world will not be able to accuse Iran of nuking some other country when, in fact, Iran had only nuked itself.
You see?
But Iran would be nuking the foreign invaders that were occupying its land, showing that the United States military is, in fact, not immune to nuclear weapons, obviously, and that the U.S. military is not capable of conquering Iran because Iran is willing to nuke itself.
I mean, that's just one scenario out of many that should be strongly considered if the U.S. tries to invade Iran.
And again, I think it would be an incredibly foolish thing for the United States to attempt to do because it will almost certainly lead to a military defeat at the hands of Iran.
But the U.S. military leaders suffer from overconfidence and they think that they can do this.
At least that's my current perception of where they are.
And you need to understand the intelligence community in the United States, the way it works.
Ray McGovern talked about this, you know, former CIA, that the intelligence community tells the leaders what they want to hear.
Currently, it wasn't always this way, but it really started to change after Ronald Reagan.
Whereas today, the CIA, when they brief the president, they cater their intelligence to fit the narratives that the president wants to hear.
And Trump really wants to surround himself with yes men.
Trump wants intelligence that supports his current beliefs.
So if Trump believes the military is the strongest in the world and can conquer Iran and defeat Iran and force regime change, then that's what the CIA tells him, is all the intelligence that backs that up, even though that may contradict reality.
As a result, leaders like President Trump, they can end up in a situation where the intelligence community is just giving them self-reinforcing information that is not factual.
And it can lead to overconfidence and it can lead to bad planning that does not take into account the full picture.
For example, the resilience of the Iranian military or the partnerships between Iran and other countries like Pakistan that are nuclear capable.
And so oversight or a lack of good information or overconfidence, these are all things that can cause your defeat in war.
You know, it's classic sun tzu, as people say in English, or suenzi in Chinese.
Classic suenzi, which is that you can use your enemy's overconfidence against them.
And that the art of war is really the art of deception.
Like the art of war is appearing weaker than you are, showing weakness when you actually have strength, which is what Iran is doing at the moment.
And then the failures of war in the West are believing you have more strength than you actually have, showing a lot of strength and a lot of bullying and coercive behavior publicly, but not being able to back it up in terms of actual competency, weapon, technology, or troops on the ground.
In either case, no matter how you think this is going to go, and this war could be initiated easily in 2026.
In any case, the cost of energy is going to skyrocket globally.
Obviously, because of supply chain disruptions involving the Strait of Hormuz, you know, the Arabian Sea, the very high likelihood that some of Iran's oil fields will be hit by weapons, and even some of Saudi Arabia's oil fields could be struck by Iran, possibly.
And anyway, there are many other possibilities there.
Even Qatar and its gas fields could be subject to disruptions or damage in such a conflict.
So world energy prices will skyrocket.
That will put even much more pressure on Western European nations that are already crumbling under the rising cost of energy, which is causing deindustrialization of Germany.
And it's causing, you know, an economic chaos in the UK and a lot of hardship in France and other countries as well.
So imagine what the world is going to look like if then energy sources become even more scarce than they are right now.
And guess who has plenty of energy?
Well, Russia, of course, has a massive amount of energy.
Venezuela has abundant energy, which is why the U.S. is harassing Venezuela right now.
The U.S. itself has a very large amount of energy.
But China just did a deal with Russia to build the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline that will pipe 50 billion cubic meters of gas per year from the Yamal gas fields in northwestern Russia across Mongolia into northern China to power China's industrial base and its AI data centers and robotics manufacturing.
So China is going to be able to actually power its wartime industry and to scale up production of weapons and robots and even AI, which can also be weaponized.
China will be doing that by using cheap Russian energy.
And cheap Russian energy is just as good as anybody else's energy, you know?
I mean, energy is energy.
Hydrocarbons are hydrocarbons.
It doesn't matter if it comes from Russia or not.
It's still going to be very effective for China.
China will get it on the cheap, which means that China will be able to scale up at a cost efficiency that Western countries can't replicate.
Now, of course, Trump tried to threaten China with secondary tariffs to say, hey, we're going to put 100% tariff on you, on all your exports, if you buy energy from Russia.
And China told Trump to go pound sand.
And so did India, actually.
So Trump is now trying to get the EU to put new sanctions on China and India.
And that's not working either.
In other words, the world is rejecting Trump's coercion tactics.
The world is saying we no longer take orders from you, America.
We're going to buy energy from wherever we want to buy it.
And as a result, China and India are going to get all kinds of energy very cheaply with incredible abundance to power their economies and their war machines while Western Europe crumbles and the United States of America implodes in financial bankruptcy, burdened by debt, the world abandoning the dollar currency.
You're going to see a debt implosion and an abandonment of the dollar used in global trade, which means plummeting demand for the dollar.
And that's going to lead to also plummeting demand for dollar debt, which would be treasuries.
And as fewer and fewer buyers around the world are interested in purchasing treasury debt, it means that the Federal Reserve is going to have to print money itself, you know, created digitally in order to buy our own debt.
And that's going to lead down a path of hyperinflation, which means, of course, that U.S. consumers are going to see prices just absolutely skyrocket everywhere.
At the grocery store, purchasing health insurance, car insurance, etc.
Prices are going to go through the roof on appliances, you name it.
So getting ready for this, I mean, I've taught preparedness for many, many years.
And most of you listening, I think, are prepared in one way or another.
And some of you are very well prepared.
And that's very wise.
But this is a time to check your preparedness, shore up any gaps in it, make sure you've covered all the bases.
And the one area where I'm not well enough prepared, and you probably aren't either, is in electricity.
Because the technology is not good yet.
You may be aware I'm waiting for sodium ion battery systems to be able to be installed in your home or on a ranch or a commercial building to have a large amount of power available through a sodium ion system.
And that's just now beginning to emerge.
That's the area where most of us don't have a good plan.
Now, I have a fairly large diesel generator that I can power for a long time, like months, you know, based on how much diesel I have.
But diesel generators themselves, being mechanical devices, as you know, they also have oil filters and they have belts and they have fuel filters and they have maintenance.
And if you don't do the maintenance on them, then they stop working.
And some of this maintenance has to happen every roughly 250 hours, which is only 10 days, let's say, of running a generator.
So every 10 days that you run a generator, you got to turn it off, let it cool down a little bit, swap out the oil and the oil filter and some other parts, and then fire it back up.
So you need a big supply of engine oil.
You need a supply of oil filters, because if you wait for World War III, the supply chains are going to be wrecked and you're not going to be able to get those things.
So purchasing a generator right now actually requires that you stock up on all these extra parts, where I would much rather have a big sodium ion battery and then a bunch of solar panels and I can use the sun to recharge the sodium ion.
But sodium ion technology isn't very good yet, or it's just not mature yet, I should say.
I mean, the tech is good, but the products just aren't available at the scale that I'm looking for.
I want a megawatt hour battery made out of sodium ion.
That's personally, that's my goal.
That's what I want is a megawatt hour.
Just one, just one megawatt.
I'm not asking for a gigawatt hour.
I only need something one 1,000th of that.
Just a megawatt hour.
That's all.
And it'll probably fit in a small container, like maybe a 10-foot by 8-foot, you know, like a small shipping cube.
You know, it'll probably fit in that.
And that's what I'm looking for.
So wherever you are with your preparedness, think about energy.
You may want to get a small solar generator like the ones that the satellite phone store sells.
You may want to get a diesel generator.
I don't know.
There's a number of options.
None of them are great at the moment.
They're going to get better, but we might be in World War III before that industry becomes very mature.
But I'll keep you posted.
In the meantime, stay prepared in every way that you can.
Gold and silver are very wise, I believe, to start stacking or expand your stack.
And even though the prices are seemingly among the highest we've ever seen, it's probably going to go much, much higher is my guess.
But don't take it as financial advice.
Do your own research, et cetera.
But when you're ready for gold and silver, you can find our recommended partner at metalswithmike.com.
And that takes you to Battalion Metals.
And you can use discount code Ranger to waive the shipping insurance fee if you purchase from them.
For other preparedness items, shop with us at healthrangerstore.com for storable food, iodine.
We've got tools from Dawson Knives, you know, different kinds of ranch knives, utility knives, machetes, hatchets, all made out of either MagnaCut or CPM3V.
Very high-end metals that are just like space age materials.
We've got even more than that, water filters, gravity filters, etc.
A lot of great stuff available right now at healthrangerstore.com.
And as long as we can keep the supply chain running, we'll keep providing these items for you.
But I just don't know how long.
I don't know how long the world that we know is going to function.
Honestly, I really don't know.
I mean, in some ways, it's already been severely compromised in the post-COVID era, but it could continue to still get a lot worse.
Well, I think it's going to.
All right.
It's also a pretty good time to buy ammunition, by the way, because ammunition prices have not skyrocketed yet.
So that's something to consider as well.
And firearms purchases have not taken off.
So it's also a pretty good time to purchase firearms.
If you've been needing to add something to your collection, maybe you need a giant elephant gun or something.
No, I mean, don't hunt elephants.
Elephants are calm, peaceful, intelligent, vegetarian creatures.
So don't shoot elephants.
But maybe you need to shoot invaders or something.
I don't know.
You know, there might be a situation, civil war.
We might be invaded.
I don't know.
But if you're thinking about firearms, this is a pretty good time to take a look at those as well.
Backup communications, satellite phones.
You know the drill.
Just double check all your preparedness supplies.
Make sure you're all set.
And thank you for listening.
I'm Mike Adams, the HealthRanger of Brighteon.com, naturalnews.com, and healthrangerstore.com.
And I pray for peace, but I don't think peace is coming.
We're going into a war phase.
Fourth turning type of stuff.
Long-term kinetic war lasting many, many years with economic devastation.
Sad to say, that's just where we are.
So do your best to navigate it.
And thank you for listening.
Take care.
I think we know who killed Charlie Kirk.
And interestingly, and I'm going to say it, it's obviously Zionists.
Charlie Kirk was clearly a puppet.
Sometimes the puppets just stay puppets for the rest of their life.
Happy puppet, happy relationship.
But he's now starting to move.
He's going against Israel.
He's going against the genocide in Gaza.
That's my assessment of what actually happened, and it got him killed.
That's my assessment, right?
Okay.
And I think that's what actually happened.
I think the evidence would support or does support that.
Welcome to today's interview here on Brighteon.com.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Bration.
And today we're joined by a friend and just an incredible analyst whose information I've really come to respect over the years.
He has been right about every single thing that we've talked about for the last three or four years.
It's Michael Yan.
He joins us right now from overseas.
I believe he's in Japan at the moment.
So welcome, Michael Yan.
It's great to have you back on today.
Thanks for having me on.
Actually, Misako and I have come over to Thailand looking at similar.
Yep, looking at similar issues.
It's the same story everywhere we go.
For instance, dope stores all over the place here now in Thailand.
And we went into one of the dope stores tonight looking at it.
And they had a celebratory little poster there that is three years that and it actually said, I think something like celebrating three years of weed leak being legal.
I sent you a photo of that.
I just sent it to you.
Oh, okay.
Yeah.
Well, it's just, yeah, there's clearly under attack, you know, that they're attacking Thailand just like they're attacking other places with drugs.
Yeah.
Well, our whole world, I mean, human culture is under attack right now by these globalist entities.
And I want to ask you to start off with here about one of the other attacks, you know, the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
And now we are being told this obviously made-up cover story that claims that Charlie Kirk was shot with a high-powered hunting rifle with a 30-otix round that just barely penetrated his skin.
Apparently, it was found under his skin.
And they said that his neck, because he is the man of steel, that his neck stopped the 30-otix round, and that's why we don't have an exit wound.
Now, you, as a very accomplished war correspondent, you've seen right up close.
You've seen people shot and killed.
You've seen people shot and live.
What is your assessment, your professional assessment, about could a human neck stop a 30-ott six round?
That's a joke.
You know what I mean?
And you know that because you're very knowledgeable about rifles yourself.
Yes.
And I mean, so you already know that, but we're talking for the benefit of people that don't know much about rifles and specifically, let's say, the 30-otix.
My father had one when I was a child, and obviously that thing whoomps when you shoot it.
And interestingly, Masako and I last year, we were in, I've told you about this bear hunter in Japan before.
We were up at his house.
He had a 30-out 6.
There's a lot of bears in Japan, by the way.
A lot of people don't realize that.
And they're very dangerous bears.
So he had a 30-ott 6.
That's what he uses to hunt bear with.
And interestingly, I talked with a woman a couple of days ago, an American woman.
She killed two bears with a 30-odd 6, right?
So, I mean, this is a bear rifle, quite literally.
Right.
And that round is used to hunt elk.
It's used to hunt very large animals, moose, even alligators, even it can be used to hunt hippos, although larger rounds are typically preferred for something like that.
I would say it's too big for an alligator, actually.
I used to hunt alligators.
I'm serious.
I mean, I used to hunt alligators.
I mean, and I mean, the biggest alligator I ever killed was when I was 14 years old.
That's funny that you bring that up because that's a good thing to bring up.
And I killed it with a 20-gauge shotgun, not a 12, but a 20 and a 22.
So it was a 22 caliber rifle.
And it was an over and under, you know, those over and under rifles that are 12 gauge 22.
It was 20 gauge 22.
That's what I shot it with.
I shot it at close range.
Oh, yeah.
And I've got a put a photo in it of my first book, Danger Close.
You can see me holding the Gator tail.
I was 14 years old.
The Gator was bigger than I was.
It was 12 feet three inches long.
And so that was just a 20 gauge and a 22.
A 30 odd 6 is, I would say, roughly twice as powerful as an M16, roughly, maybe more.
It's certainly not, it's not even in the ballpark of M16.
It's like, it's on the, it's on somewhere, I would say, about twice as powerful as an M16.
Well, I mean, I looked up the ballistics on it, and the typical 30-ott 6 round leaves the muzzle with about 3,000 foot-pounds of energy, which is extraordinary.
I mean, imagine if you were laying on your back on the ground and you took like a steel rod the diameter of a pencil and you put that steel rod on your neck while you're lying down and then on top of that you put a 3,000-pound car.
Would your neck, would your neck stop the car from, you know, from, and the rod from going through your neck?
No.
I think we know who killed Charlie Kirk.
And interestingly, and I'm going to say it, it's obviously Zionist, right?
Just like people ask me all the time, or used to ask me all the time, who destroyed Nordstream.
And I'd say what I've said to you many times.
It was either the United States or it was space aliens, right?
And it's the same with Charlie Kirk.
It was obviously Zionists that did it.
I mean, let's just skip past all the nonsense here, right?
In fact, that state, because, you know, the guy on the roof, he didn't take down that stage and get rid of the evidence, right?
Just like the so-called Trump assassination attempt, the shooter on the roof, alleged shooter on the roof who was killed, he didn't take down that stage at the Trump day either, right?
Or let's say the October 7th event that's been used as causes belly in Israel, that evidence also was quickly removed.
9-11, the evidence was quickly removed.
There's a certain fact pattern here.
And, you know, the people that did the 9-11 attack, they didn't quickly remove the evidence and put it in a landfill.
Whoever fired the bullets on the day of the Trump alleged assassination attempt, they didn't take down the evidence and get rid of it.
And anybody else who fired those shots from a distance or up close, did they take this stage down and that trap door that was on?
Did they pave over it?
Obviously not.
You know, actually, whatever hit Charlie Kirk, if something hit him, these are the type of people that run Hollywood, right?
I mean, they can do a lot of things.
The actual, if it were a ballistic weapon, which it may have been, it could have come from the stage itself, right?
Yeah, from behind it.
It could have been part of the state.
It could have been, it would be easy to put a weapon in the stage.
I mean, that's child's play, right?
We're talking serious people here.
Right.
People who know how to do things like make pagers explode.
Right.
And or it could have been in another camera or that sort of thing.
If they had access to the stage, right?
You know, Charlie Kirk was saying on one interview that, you know, that the Israeli bodyguards are the best in the world, that sort of stuff.
I don't know if you saw that video.
And maybe they were, but who were they guarding?
Were they guarding Charlie Kirk or were they guarding the Zionists, right?
And so, I mean, obviously the Israeli security obviously wasn't so great on October 7th, was it?
And it wasn't so great when he got killed.
Or maybe it was.
I don't know.
But it's, let's face it, let's just skip to the real part.
They're wasting, they're distracting us, and they obviously killed their boy who was running off the plantation.
The narrative, though, has been, of course, that Tyler Robinson was the shooter, even though, as far as I can tell, there's actually no hard evidence linking him to pulling a trigger of any rifle.
There's not a single photo or frame of him carrying a rifle on campus, on the roof, off the roof, nothing.
There's no muzzle flash of a rifle from the roof.
There's nothing.
I mean, I would imagine his attorney would tell him to plead not guilty because reasonable doubt seems very likely at this point for him.
But the narrative is that they have to blame him and tie him into leftists and furries and transgenders because that will get the American people behind President Trump's war on the left, where he just designated Antifa a terrorist organization and he's going to go after the money networks and so on.
So it seems to me that this lie of Tyler Robinson being the assassin is what is necessary in the minds of the White House to justify their domestic war against the left.
Do you agree with that or do you have a different explanation?
I've been watching your post.
I mean, you're dead on.
I mean, it's obvious.
I mean, that's not even vaguely hidden.
It's clear.
And by the way, it's also clear.
And you, you know, in your ex, the things that you're saying are dead on.
And there was a, somebody sent me one of the three-hour videos that you just did today, but I couldn't watch it because we were out on the streets in Bangkok today researching here.
But the things that I've seen that you're posting, I think are exactly on target.
They're trying to put us in the civil war.
Now, the narrative for the Zionists is collapsing.
That much is obvious.
The support for Israel is just going out.
I mean, it's going out like on an ice float and it's not coming back.
Keep in mind, Charlie Kirk was obviously a construct of the Zionists.
He was a clear puppet.
That's obvious again.
He's talked about it many times.
And at some point, Charlie Kirk's base was starting to go away.
The whole Epstein thing, the Gaza genocide, which you've talked about so many times, the Iran attack, which is just attacking Qatar, all these different things.
And his base can't pay the bills while we send them hundreds of billions of dollars.
His base can't pay any of their own bills.
They can't have families, children, or any of that stuff because they can't afford it.
And meanwhile, they expect, let's put this into just brass tax here.
Well, and let me interject.
Max Blumenthal is just reporting that the last major wealthy Jewish donor halted donations to Charlie Kirk three days before the assassination.
I just saw that.
I just saw that just minutes before we came on.
So you got to keep in mind, Charlie Kirk was, he was a big investment for them.
And he was the bridge of, you know, because the Zionists are losing a lot of respect.
They don't have any respect left, really, actually.
They've got wild-eyed supporters left, but those are even going out.
Those are even going out with the ice flow.
So Charlie Kirk was the bridge.
He was their puppet.
He was their puppet on strings.
And like Pinocchio, by the way, Pinocchio, I'm going to publish something on Substack about my Pinocchio about Pinocchio soon.
And I bought a Pinocchio last year or so in a German antique shop just to talk about things like this.
Pinocchio, by the way, is the third most translated book in the world.
Really?
Number one is the Bible.
Yeah.
And number two is probably the little prince.
And number three, apparently, is Pinocchio more than Harry Potter, right?
Why is I've been talking with an anthropologist about this?
Why is Pinocchio, why does it resonate so deeply with people that it would be so far translated?
I mean, it's a massively, you know, of course, Disney did their book and their movie in 1940, but the Pinocchio story came out in about 1881, right?
And then the book came out in 1883, which I have, right?
So it came out in 1883.
And so, and then, you know, what did Pinocchio do?
Pinocchio was a piece of wood.
He may have gone getting ready to go to the fire, but a carpenter said, Hey, I'll make a table leg out of Pinocchio or this piece of wood.
And the piece of wood screams, ah, you know, don't hit me so hard, that sort of stuff.
And so, you know, the carpenter says, wait a minute, this piece of wood has a life in it.
So he gives it to a puppet maker.
The puppet maker then makes a puppet.
And, you know, and the next thing you know, as soon as Pinocchio has enough life to him, he kicks the puppet maker and runs down the street and plays victim.
Pinocchio plays the victim and gets the puppet maker in trouble and this sort of thing.
He's totally, he's totally a predator, right?
Pinocchio is.
Anyway, long story short, what we see in real life in so many forms is puppetry, right?
Whether it's various governments setting up puppet governments or whatever, right?
Speaking through people and that sort of thing, right?
And so Charlie Kirk was clearly a puppet.
Sometimes the puppets just stay puppets for the rest of their life.
Happy puppet, happy relationship, right?
And they've basically sold themselves and sold their soul.
And then there's other puppets that get a life of their own.
And remember, those strings go both ways, right?
If the puppet gets big enough, the puppets pulling the strings, right?
And that was happening with Charlie Kirk.
He was getting big enough.
And his, remember, Charlie Kirk is only worth something to his Zionist bosses if he can herd his, you know, the herd that he's designed to herd, right?
Which is millions of young people, right?
But that millions of young people, they have a soul and a mind of their own too.
And they don't like what they see in Gaza, and neither do I, and neither do you.
And we don't like what we saw in Iran.
And you don't either.
I don't either.
We agree with the young people big time.
And the Epstein Island, same story.
Charlie Kirk's base that he was designed, and I mean designed, that's the word that I meant to use, that he was designed, recruited, and designed to herd, that base was moving away from him.
So the strings that are holding Charlie Kirk, you know, are also attached to the herd loosely because the puppet is also puppeting, almost like one of those Russian nested dolls, but it's on strings, right?
And the base, Charlie's base was moving away.
So, you know, Charlie's got a choice here.
He can't seem to stop them.
So what's he going to do?
Is he going to get ripped in half?
Because if his base moves away, then Charlie is of no use to his puppet master anymore.
He'll just become a normal blogger, right?
But if he goes with the herd, well, you know, he knows who he's dealing with.
And he intimated before he might get killed.
Something might happen to him, right?
He knew he was dealing with serious people.
And that would be, he knows Charlie knew all the inside of baseball.
He had been to all the parties and all that stuff.
He knew what was going on.
And so, but he's now starting to move.
He's going against Israel.
He's going against the genocide in Gaza.
He's doing all these things.
And now Charlie's in this zone here.
He doesn't have the power to actually control the puppet master and he doesn't have the power to control the herd.
So what's Charlie going to do?
He went with the herd.
That's my assessment of what actually happened and it got him killed.
That's my assessment, right?
And I think that's what actually happened.
I think the evidence would support or does support that.
Well, I completely agree that the evidence shows he wasn't killed by a 30 out 6 round from a rifle, right?
And Tyler Robinson is the Patsy, obviously a Patsy.
And if they're lying about the bullet, they're probably lying about everything.
But I want to ask Cui Bono, who benefits?
And you already mentioned some of the benefits that Israel might experience from this, you know, silencing a voice that was turning against them.
And perhaps the Israel-connected wealthy donors really felt betrayed by Charlie, and they wanted to do something about that, possibly.
But I also want to mention that the Trump administration benefits tremendously from Charlie's death.
And you saw that on Sunday with the massive rally, which really turned into a giant political rally with fireworks and everything, which is a very bizarre way to supposed to have a wake in honoring the life and contributions of an individual.
It became like a WWE show for recruiting people to the conservative cause.
And it accomplishes a couple of things.
Pete Hagseth is talking about now they're going to have a military recruitment drive nationwide in Charlie's name, which is unbelievable that they would exploit his death to send more young men off to die in war.
And then on top of that, the Trump administration is able to justify this war against the radical left, a war that will involve extreme censorship from the right-wing, you know, right-wing censorship to censor voices that are critical of Israel, such as the Free Palestine voices.
So, Michael, speak to that.
Isn't it true that the Trump administration derives tremendous political benefit from the death of Charlie?
Oh, absolutely.
And, you know, they weren't playing capture the flag.
They were playing capture the microphone.
And no sooner was Charlie dead.
I mean, he probably wasn't even cold yet.
And they were already talking about who's going to take over the show, right?
Ben Shapiro was talking about what?
Taking the bloody microphone or whatever that clown said.
Bloodstained microphone.
Yeah.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, exactly.
These people, I mean, it's very clear that, and, you know, I've told Israelis this for more than 20 years.
I traveled with them extensively in India and Nepal and Thailand and other countries.
And they were often, I got along great with them, but I would see how they would abuse people that were like waitresses or taxi drivers or that sort of thing, hotel staff.
They were very abusive often.
That's why you'll see signs here in Thailand, no Israelis.
It has nothing to do with Jews.
It's totally about no Israelis, right?
And that's been for at least 20 years.
Now, in the last week or so, more videos are coming out of Israelis.
A lot of the Israelis are up in a place called Pai.
It's near Chiang Mai on the way to Burma.
I've been there before.
That's a place where a lot of the Israelis go and they go up there and do a lot of drugs.
And they've been causing a lot of problems up there, like huge.
And some Thais want to kick all the Israelis out of Thailand because of the abusiveness that they, and I've told Israelis, I've said before, people like me from my culture, I'm from Florida, right?
I come from a southern culture.
I'm not from Miami.
I'm not, I am of Scots-Irish culture, right?
When I see people abusing people that they see as less than them, I don't like it, right?
And your support base in the United States is people like me.
I supported Israel for many years openly, right?
So it's easy to verify that.
It was in the open at great cost to me over the years.
And now it was obviously an error.
I can't believe I ever supported them.
This must be how the jab pushers feel, right?
I used to support Israel and then I went to neutral.
And when I finally said, that's enough, like, period, that was the jab pushing days when Netanyahu was pushing the jab and the Americans had to get the jab to go to Israel.
I'm like, have fun, Israel.
I'm out, right?
And since then, it's only gotten worse.
They're doing the genocide and that sort of thing.
They want to get rid of our First Amendment.
The Zionists openly wish to get rid of our second and first.
Who are they?
Right?
I mean, you know, and according to Ambassador Huckabee, Israel is the moral foundation of Western civilization.
He said, That's some pretty muddy ground right there.
Muddy and bloody.
I mean, let's face it, Israel, as you know, Theodore Herzl was the so-called father of political Zionism, and he did that in his papers in 1896.
He wrote them in German, of course.
And then in 1897, he came out with that book, right, about the Jewish state, right?
And in that, he lays out how he, keep in mind, the reason Israel exists, the reason Israel exists is not to go back to the Holy Land.
It's because the Suez Canal opened in 1869, and that was called the spinal cord of the British Empire.
The British Empire was the greatest empire in all human history, right?
And nothing still has topped it, right?
And of course, it reached its peak in about 1921, at least its territorial peak in 1921, right?
But back in 1869, the Suez Canal opened.
There was a lot of British that did not want to, they didn't want the Suez Canal to open because they thought what is now happening would happen.
And they were saying it, right?
They thought they couldn't control the Egyptians.
The French and the British would go to war over the canal and that sort of thing, right?
Because it would become, the Suez Canal would become the most important piece of real estate on planet Earth at that time, right?
And anyway, eventually they did open it in 1869.
And then it was on, sort of the great game Suez chapter, right?
And so now we get to the 1890s.
Keep in mind, in 1887, the United States did the Dawes Act, where we would, you know, anyway, I'll save that for another time.
But in the 1890s, the British were getting really nervous because they were losing control over the spinal cord of the British Empire, the Suez Canal.
They were losing that.
So what mechanism did they use to try to get the Suez Canal under their control?
They used Theodore Hertzlo.
He was sort of their Charlie Kirk of the day, right?
So Theodore Herzl writes the book.
He's the father of Zionism.
Of course, the Zionists watching this are now having heart attacks and taking out hit contracts on me, right?
And they'll say, we're not a killer.
We'll kill you for saying that, right?
I mean, we're not a killer.
Watch out, you know?
And so, but Theodore Herzl was used by the British.
Now, in 1899, they started issuing shares in a London bank, right?
I mean, I've got one of the shares.
I found it in an antique shop down in Panama City, Panama, and I grabbed it and I framed it.
Actually, it's one of the, it's a Yunischer Stadtstein.
It's in German, right?
And they're issuing in British pounds these shares to take Palestine, the state of Palestine.
This is 1899.
You can get it.
They even say Palestine on the documents.
Right on the, right there.
Palestine, right?
Yeah.
I know the Jewish people are taking over Palestine.
And it's, yes, in German.
And so, again, that was a mechanism that the British wanted to use to gain control of the Suez Canal.
Because remember, the Suez Canal was the spinal cord of the British Empire.
It's that important, right?
And just like now, Panama Canal is that level of importance to us, and China is clearly taking it, right?
Despite what Trump says.
This is why the UK continues to provide military and intelligence and financial support for Israel to this day.
And then the U.S. found its own reasons for wanting Israel to do, you know, to assert power over energy in the Middle East, in particular.
Not only the waterways, but also energy and the Strait of Hormuz, as you and I have talked about as well.
But all that's changing now with the bombing of Qatar and all the Gulf state nations there realizing that the United States can't protect us from Israel.
That's changed overnight.
It has.
Qatar is a big deal.
And, you know, the Qatar ambassador down in Panama, he's always wondering what's happening in the Darien Gap and that sort of thing.
You know, Qatar has been an, I've been to our, you know, I've been to our base in Qatar and in the Fifth Fleet headquarters over in Bahrain and all that stuff.
Actually, Secretary Gates took me there.
He took me to the headquarters there in Bahrain.
And the admiral there in charge, what was his name, Gourtney or something like that.
He gave us a briefing and all this stuff.
You know, I mean, I've seen a lot of the operations over there.
It's quite interesting.
And so, but let me get to this point.
Look at 9-11.
What happened on 9-11?
We then attacked Afghanistan and Iraq.
I spent four years in those wars.
I spent two in Afghanistan and two in Iraq, right?
Why did we go after Iraq and Afghanistan when they had zero to do with 9-11?
And I mean, zero with a big zero, not 0.0001.
It was nothing to do with it, right?
And Al-Qaeda used Afghanistan as somewhat of a base, but they launched their attack out of New Jersey, Florida, right?
I mean, so seriously.
And so, and who was Al-Qaeda, by the way?
And by the way, Petraeus just messaged me hours ago because I saw him talking with that Al-Qaeda guy, you know, commiserating with him.
And I'm like, what are you doing?
I messaged to him, you know, earlier, you know, maybe 12 hours ago now, like, what are you doing with the Al-Qaeda dude?
You know, I messaged the Petraeus.
And, you know, and I'm like wondering if he's been, what's wrong with him?
He's like mentally off his rocker, right?
He's gone completely woke.
I mean, he wanted the military bases renamed and all that stuff.
And he messaged back something like, don't worry about me or something like that.
I'm like, they've captured a lot of our, he was the director of CIA, right?
He was, I knew him because, you know, during the wars, I knew him quite well in Iraq and Afghanistan.
And then he went off to become director of CIA and I, you know, kept in contact with him.
And at times, I'm like, what are you doing?
You want to rename Fort Bragg and all this stuff?
I mean, what side are you on?
Anyway, at the end of the day, he was just meeting with the Al-Qaeda guy.
It's all over the news now.
And the same guy who was designated a terrorist a year ago.
Yeah.
And so anyway, when we attacked Afghanistan and Iraq, why did we do that?
Because Afghanistan and Iraq border Iran, right?
They border.
This is very important when it comes to Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, Saudi, the Emirates, and Iraq, actually, right?
Because what does, okay, two countries, key countries that border Iran are Afghanistan and Iraq, right?
I've been to those borders, both sides of them.
I'm like, well, here we are.
We got you pinchered in here.
And if we take Iran or destate, one of the things that often happens in war is a country comes in, they stabilize it, stabilize it with their puppets, right?
They make puppets.
Government in a box is what we were calling it in Afghanistan, literally calling it government in a box, right?
And so you come in, you stabilize it, and stabilize it, and you raise up an army and you use it for the next bite that you're going to have at the table.
And for instance, the Spaniards used to talk, they talked about this like 500 years ago.
You know, they talked about launching from Philippines and China over into Japan, capturing Japan, raising an army in Japan, and then actually capturing China, right?
But the Japanese didn't go for it.
The Japanese were like, nope, and they kicked all the non-bon out, which is a Portuguese and a Spanish southern barbarians.
But what I'm getting to is this is an old strategy in war.
You take a place, you raise an army, you take the neighbors, right?
So we took Afghanistan, we took Iraq.
I spent four years in those places.
That was all about raising up and then going for Iran.
Notice when we were in Afghanistan and Iraq, it was constant.
Iran's the bad guy.
Iran's the one causing all the attacks here.
Iran's doing this.
Iran's doing that.
We were doing a lot of atrocity porn, like the EFP bombs and all this stuff.
But at the end of the day, if we took Iran, if we took the right parts of it, we would have the Strait of Hormuz, right?
The Strait of Hormuz.
The Strait of Hormuz is up there pretty much, I would say, almost on the same level as Suez Canal and Panama Canal.
It is absolutely vital.
It's one of the seven top choke points in the world.
Some people would argue, depending on what country you're from and how it would affect you, that the Strait of Hormuz is even more important than Suez Canal.
And for some things, it would be actually.
But the thing is, if you control the Strait of Hormuz, who else?
That means you can control Saudi Arabia.
You can control UAE, you know, the Emirates.
You can control Bahrain, Qatar, Qatar, right?
You can control Iraq.
Iraq only has two terminals out there called Abot and Chaot.
I've been on those terminals.
I went out with the British Navy and was on them, right?
I mean, that's where their oil goes out.
I mean, you could control.
If you could take Iran, you would have the Strait of Hormuz.
You could then bit by bit take countries like Qatar.
You could take Bahrain, obviously.
We got our Fifth Fleet headquarters there already.
We've got a military presence in all of these places, right?
Bit by bit, we could knock them off.
It might take 20 years, 30 years, but you could do it, right?
It might take five years.
So at the end of the day, the plan is clearly to take all the Gulf states.
The Gulf states know it.
You may have noticed that Saudi Arabia has reaffirmed their relationship with Pakistan.
Remember, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, they're already like that.
They're tight, right?
Now they're even more tight because Saudi Arabia is like, wait a minute, they just attacked our neighbor, Qatar, right?
We can't keep control of Jason with the chainsaw Israel, right?
And the fall of Syria, of course, fits right into this plan that you just mentioned.
And right now, Trump is talking about taking back, demanding back Bagram airbase.
So I want you to talk about the Bagram Air Base, which was originally built by the Soviets in the 1950s, I understand.
But Trump is demanding that Afghanistan give it back to him.
But you know about the geographic proximity of that airbase to China, not just Iran.
So talk about Bagram and why Trump is demanding it back.
Right.
I've been to Bagram many times.
A lot of people watching this have either been stationed at Bagram or have been there a lot themselves.
And, you know, how many rockets did you take when you were there, by the way?
Back when we had control of Afghanistan, I know you remember all the incoming rockets all the time and the mortars, right?
So it's not like we ever had Bagram.
I mean, we had it.
I mean, it was a major airbase, right?
And but at the same time, it was always contested.
And so it's not like you're going to just come in and take Bagram and not going to take tons of incoming rockets all the time and that sort of thing.
But that is all about, of course, you know, a lot of people don't realize this, but China has a border with Afghanistan, right?
And the train that goes over to Iran goes up that northern part at the, you know, through Tajikistan and all that, right?
So you got those northern countries, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, right?
And China borders Afghanistan as well.
But anyway, they've got that train that goes right on through over to Tehran right now.
And so, by the way, that train, one of the reasons I'm back in Thailand is that train allows China to bypass Strait of Malacca, right?
The Strait of Malacca is one of the most important.
Now, it's up there with Suez.
It's up there with the Strait of Hormuz, Strait of Malacca.
Like two days ago, I was at the Conchinaburi World War II in Thailand.
People who've been to Thailand know what Kanchaniburi is.
That's where the Death Railway was, right?
Where the Japanese were building that railway so that they could attack through to attack through Burma and get to the British in India, right?
For Imphal and all that.
But what I'm getting to is the reason the Japanese needed that train was to bypass straight of Malacca, right?
And that was back then, you know, 1942-ish, three-ish, four-ish, right?
And so it was in that time period.
They started in 1942.
And so, but anyway, I was just at it again.
Occasionally, every few years, I go out there and restudy what's going on.
This routes and resources, nothing has changed.
So, what I'm getting to is if somebody ends up taking Iran, which would be the Zionists, obviously, and this is a big Zionist versus China war.
There's different oligarchs involved, of course, the Russian oligarchs as well.
So, it's not just Zionists versus Chinese, but Zionists versus America, Zionists versus, and they've gone very far and damaged America a huge amount.
The Zionists have been hugely one of the main factors behind the invasions of the United States.
Even as Trump gives his United Nations, I just watched his speech.
I don't know if you saw it, but he's doing the corner clowning, right?
Coming up shortly.
But yeah, but get back to Bagram.
Like, what does that give Trump in this effort to try?
I mean, because I think it gives him air defense against China while we try to take Iran, which will probably fail, is my guess.
But, you know, you know a lot more about that area than I do.
Bagram is easily mitigated.
I mean, again, I was on many bases around Afghanistan.
I was there for two years.
So, like Kandahar Airfield and Bagram, they were taking rockets all the time.
Now, keep in mind, and Kabul, the first time I landed in Afghanistan was 2006.
I left Iraq and went to Afghanistan.
I landed and was walking down the steps and we were taking incoming rockets.
That was my introduction to Afghanistan, literally walking down the steps on the airfield at Kabul at the capital, and we're taking incoming rockets.
And so, I mean, that's just it was like that for the rest of the two years I was there, right?
And so, I mean, the so if you if you take Bagram is all about going for Iran, that's what this is about, because then you're going to have air bases there, right?
Right.
You're going to have air bases, but they, but it won't be uncontested.
Of course, they're going to take a lot of incoming, and people like the Russians can obviously supply all sorts of weaponry and make it.
Look, drone technology has increased dramatically since.
Oreshnik would just take out Bagram Air Base with a couple of Oreshnik missiles.
It's done.
Yep.
I got the hypersonic missiles.
They've got, but those drones, I mean, they can train.
The Afghans are smart.
You can train those Afghans and they'll fight.
I mean, they have buckets of courage.
I mean, Afghans come to the battlefield with courage, right?
And they know how to fight, and they're very good fighters.
You teach them how to run the drones.
That'll take a couple of weeks.
And then the next thing you know, you got drones with AI landing on our aircraft, setting them on fire, right?
I mean, this is easy.
It's going to be difficult to just go and take Bagram, right?
As if we're going to go take some, they can't even take, you know, Los Angeles, much less Bagram.
But even if they do, even if the U.S. Air Force sets up base there, this idea of being able to conquer Iran, which clearly that's the goal of the United States and the warmongers and also Israel.
Israel wants U.S. to do the fighting.
And now, again, Charlie Kirk's death is being exploited by the DOD to recruit young American men to go die in the mountains of western Iran, probably.
I mean, this idea that the U.S. military can defeat Iran, I think is a fairy tale.
It's like transgenderism.
It's just this delusional thinking.
But what's your take on it?
I mean, Iran is not Iraq or Kuwait or, you know, or even, I don't know, Lebanon.
I mean, Iran is a whole different ballgame here.
But what's your take?
Well, first of all, as they start a fight here with Venezuela, right?
And of course, when I say that, some people say, no, they started it with us.
Whatever.
At the end of the day, we're losing the Panama Canal, which is in our backyard.
We are losing it.
I don't care what Trump says.
I'm down there all the time.
I assure you, China is slowly taking the Panama Canal.
They are absolutely, not just Panama Canal.
They are slowly, slowly, intergenerationally taking Panama.
Straight up.
I've been all over that country.
And I spent a year there inside of Panama since Biden was installed.
So while we run off and play with the Zionists who are bleeding us to death like a bunch of herd of ticks, right?
We're being, they're parasitoids.
I mean, we're being bled down while they fight.
How many countries have they attacked recently?
Is it seven?
Seven.
And so the so it's not a problem.
Well, eight if you include Charlie Kirk.
Right.
Yeah.
The United States, they've attacked us, obviously, in many different ways, and whether it's drugs or whatever.
But now, when it comes to Iran, the problem set for taking Iran is enormous.
And first of all, you're not going to be able to get a lot of Americans to hate Iranians because when you meet Iranians, people tend to like Iranians, actually.
And that's a problem for the Zionists because, you know, generally speaking, Americans and Iranians get along well.
And it's hit and miss with those Israelis, right?
As you can see.
And to put it mildly these days.
And so that actually is a component of this.
But the Iranian, Iran, the problem set there geographically, demographically, remember, when you're talking war, these people that are always just counting tanks and counting ships and all that, they're the most useless analysts that you can see because they're not taking into account things like, well, let's talk about the Houthis for a minute.
We've got this incredible Navy and Air Force and all these sorts of things.
And the Houthis had not, right?
And they closed the Baba Mandeb with their sandals and rockets and drones, right?
Because of what?
Because of their friends, right?
So you have to count the friends or their allies, let's say.
So when it comes to Iran, this is super important what I'm saying now.
When it comes to Iran, they have serious allies with train that comes all the way from China.
They have serious allies in China.
They have serious allies with Russia, right?
They have others.
And Saudi Arabia is that tight with Pakistan, right?
That tight.
They are really close.
And they just reaffirm that relationship because Saudi Arabia is highly concerned, and they should be, that the United States is going to come for them at some point because the Zionists are going to want them, right?
Yep.
And so, I mean, so it's part of the Greater Israel Project.
Right.
I mean, you could easily see, again, I keep mentioning it.
You could easily see the Strait of Hormuz closed at any time, right?
And I actually would not doubt if the people who closed the Strait of Hormuz would be the same people who magically made the Nord Street bubble to the surface, right?
And then blame it on the Iranians, right?
Because you've already seen the information.
Information campaigns precede wars like heat comes with the noonday sun, right?
I mean, information radiates from wars before they start, right?
Or in major actions as well.
And you can see that the U.S. and the Zionists keep saying that the Iranians may close the Strait of Hormuz.
Meanwhile, we didn't touch their Navy.
If they're going to use their Navy to close the Strait of Hormuz, why did we not even touch it, right?
Because if anybody's going to close it, it would probably be us blaming it on the Iranians.
And then, you know, most Americans would just be like, wow, the Iranians closed the Strait of Hormuz, which they're like the last people on the earth that will close the Strait of Hormuz.
You know what I mean?
Yeah, but it hurts them.
I agreed.
But I'm more concerned about a false flag in the United States that will be blamed on Iran as a justification for launching a full-blown attack.
I mean, it's just like 9-11, right?
So World War II.
Yeah.
Short of nuclear weapons, we're not going to defeat Iran.
And if we use nuclear weapons on Iran, hey, say goodbye, folks, because the Russians at that point and the Chinese, they got nothing to lose.
And if we start unleashing nuclear weapons on Iran, I would expect incoming.
I mean, that would be it.
The fun times are over and your lights are going out, to put it mildly.
Yeah, I agree.
But let's suppose that the U.S. believes that they can defeat Iran without using nuclear weapons.
Now, again, I think that's a delusion, but we have delusional leadership right now in terms of the military capabilities.
So I think Trump is still living in the 1980s in terms of his assessment of U.S. military dominance.
And Pete Hegseth is a clown.
He's not qualified for that position at all.
But he's another puppet.
Yeah.
He's a loyalist to the Zionists, and that's why he's there, period.
But if the U.S. has this posture of arrogance and sort of overconfidence and they go into Iran and then they get defeated, isn't that a scenario that Iran itself wants to see?
Because that would then establish Iran as the dominant regional power if they can defeat the United States military.
And keep in mind, Iran would be supported by China and Russia.
Absolutely, they would.
And that's a huge, huge deal.
And then they would end up in control of the Caspian Sea.
All of the neighbors in the Gulf states would be at critical risk.
Including Saudi Arabia.
Oh, yeah.
And so, but, you know, Pakistan has nuclear weapons.
Of course, Saudi Arabia would instantly have them.
And, you know, that would take all of what, like one day, right?
I mean, and so, and the Saudis are very smart people.
They're very sophisticated people.
And they are culturally mature insofar as they have tactical patience and strategic patience.
But the Zionists, one of the things I've noticed about the Zionists, as time goes on and you get more and more experiences like in places like Iraq and Afghanistan, or experience I did not have because I was too young would be Vietnam.
We were able to go.
The Vietnamese wanted to come on our side.
I mean, they were, Ho Chi Minh straight up wanted to be an American ally.
He was very clear about it.
Just like the Japanese wanted to be an American ally.
The Americans only know about it from look at what they did at Pearl Harbor and all this stuff.
The Japanese straight up wanted to be an ally, and they were very clear about it.
Crystal clear.
And so did Vietnam.
Crystal clear.
But that's not what we wanted.
We wanted to destroy Japan and we wanted to destroy Vietnam, right, for various reasons.
And look how successful we were not.
I've been to Vietnam quite a few times, going looking around all over the place.
And the Vietnamese defeated China.
They beat China at their back door, right?
They beat the United States and they beat the French, right?
And so we were able to get into that war, lost, what, about 60,000 people roughly, and others, you know, and drained us, drained our treasury, drained our prestige and confidence.
Then we run off to Iraq and Afghanistan, which the wars I was, the more recent wars that are more significant, and we lost.
I mean, and there's no reason why we should, and we weren't trying to lose.
It was clear that we were trying to stabilize Iraq and Afghanistan.
That's obvious.
I was all over those countries for four years.
We were trying to, but failed.
So we failed and drained us dry, right?
And now we're thinking we can go into, these are people that are delusional.
You've said it multiple times.
You say it on your ex sometimes about how delusional they are.
I mean, it's like you can't make up the level of delusional they are multi-layers.
Yeah, and I can't think of a conflict after World War II that the United States actually won.
And a lot of World War II was due, I mean, the defeat of Hitler.
Most of that credit goes to Russia or the Soviet Union at the time.
Not the Allied forces.
I mean, the Soviets paid the heavy price.
The Soviets inflicted the most casualties on the German military.
By far, it's not even close.
I mean, we're talking 20 to 50 million casualties of Soviets at the time.
Now, but there's one more thing.
Did you see that the new agreement that Iran just negotiated, I think they signed it in Cairo, but I may be wrong about that, involving the IAEA, which says that there's going to be a slap back provision now that if Iran is bombed again, then they are instantly exempt from IAEA oversight and effectively the non-proliferation treaty at the same time.
So, in other words, what this means is that if Israel bombs Iran again, or if the U.S. bombs Iran, instantly, Iran frees itself from any obligation to not have nuclear weapons.
And you know, they've got nukes deep underground.
They can just, you know, bolt them onto the missiles they already have that can strike Israel, as they proved in the 12-day conflict.
So, you know, Iran will have nuclear weapons virtually overnight.
Right.
I mean, and they could shop for them like in a bazaar.
I mean, they've got, I mean, who could they get them from?
China, Russia?
Pakistan, Russia, yeah, exactly.
North Korea, right?
That they can make them themselves.
Right.
I mean, this, we're, we're in a, we're, we've long decades ago, we've reached the point where anybody with half decent engineers can make atomic weapons.
That's right.
I mean, that's not, that's not hard.
And the Persians are no fools.
I mean, some of the brightest mathematicians in history came out of the Persian Empire.
Very smart people.
Yeah.
And why don't we get along with them?
You know what I mean?
We're not natural enemies with the Persians.
We're just not, you know.
And but obviously the Zionist thing has gone too far.
They've assassinated Charlie Kirk.
That's clear as day.
And we can clearly see it.
They were involved in 9-11.
That's clear as day.
They clearly killed their own people on October 7th.
That's obvious, right?
They clearly control Trump.
And they assassinated the leadership of Yemen and they assassinated nuclear scientists in Iran and they bombed first responders and doctors in Lebanon with Patriots.
I mean, it goes on and on.
Right.
I mean, the people now that still support Israel and Zionists, that's become about as cool as saying you believe that babies should get 86 jabs or something, right?
I mean, it's like, you know, we've long passed that point where it's acceptable to cheer genocide in Gaza.
Everybody can see it for what it is.
It is genocide, period.
And it's only about that gas off of Gaza, controlling Suez Canal, the Indo-European court, the normal routes and resources.
It's about routes and resources.
Yes.
And Guru, I don't know if they ever build it right.
It's about routes and resources.
That's why Israel even exists.
Israel exists only because of, keep in mind, all these, the company, like the company that was formed, the colonial company, it was a Judish, the Yudisha colonial bank.
Anyways, it was a Jewish colony.
I've got the share.
I'll send you a copy.
Actually, I'm going to put it on my sub stack tomorrow.
But it's one that I have on my wall in my library, actually.
It's an 1899 share that was issued to raise money to take Palestine, right, as a Jewish state.
Now, keep in mind, Britain, Netherlands, other countries, let's say Holland had been doing this for centuries.
They would make companies like the British East India Company, the Dutch East India Company, the English East India Company.
They made the Virginia Company in 1606.
That's the company my family, my mother's side came in with in 1609.
The Virginia Company was a colonial company to make to colonize the Eastern America, the Eastern America, right?
And so when my family came in 1609 with the Virginia Company, which is the same architecture for taking Israel from the Palestinians, it's the same corporate architecture, right?
They made the Virginia Company.
My family got shipwrecked on Bermuda because they got in a storm.
Then they built other ships.
They were stuck there for 10 months and they made it to Jamestown.
And that's where the first Anglo-Palaton, Palatin Indian, the first Anglo-Palatin war began, right?
And the Palatins were basically the Palestinians of the day, but the Palatina Suez Canal and they didn't have Russian buddies and Chinese buddies.
They didn't have Czechoslovakia.
Czechoslovakia used to send weapons to Egypt, right?
They didn't have all those buddies, right?
So it was basically the British Empire against some Indians, right?
And my family was involved in that war.
So, I mean, these same corporate structures have been the chartered companies, like that was by King George, actually, the Virginia Company.
He chartered that in 1606, right?
And so the so what I'm getting to is what happened with Theodore Herzl and making the Jewish state was the same sort of structure as the British East India Company or the Virginia Company or the Dutch East India Company.
It's the same thing.
And they had these all over the world, Nigeria and Ghana and just everywhere, all these colonies that were corporate entities, right?
And that's how Israel was formed.
At the expense of, well, I mean, the Nakba, 1948, the mass slaughter of Palestinians and the ongoing genocide and ethnic cleansing that Israeli leaders openly admit to now.
They're not even pretending like they're not committing genocide at this point.
They're just saying, we're going to make it uninhabitable.
We're going to bulldoze all the buildings and then we're going to build a luxury resort on the coast after we get all these dead bodies out of here.
I mean, they're not even pretending at this point.
They're just open the door.
Well, if they're as successful as we were in Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, Iraq, you know, Israel could cease to exist at some point within the next generation or so.
I could easily see that.
There's clear pathways to it.
Of course, there's people that say, no, that can never happen because my Schofield Bible written by the Zionists says that that can't happen, right?
You know, it's like, you know, it's like, I assure you, it can happen, right?
And at this rate, it probably will happen.
But we'll say, you know, we'll see because wars have this strange way like hurricanes of changing course and you never know what's next.
But at this rate, like with Ukraine, some of us were very accurate on what would happen to Ukraine.
And look what, just throw a dart at anything I've published about Ukraine, anything.
Just throw, blindfold yourself, throw a dart, pick 10 things that I published about it before the first shots were fired and see how it's turned out, right?
That's what could happen to Israel could be destroyed from this easily.
Very easily.
I mean, we're seeing increasing economic embargoes against Israel.
We're seeing even from France and different countries in Europe refusing to sell weapons to Israel, but a lot of diplomatic pressure, even from Chinese diplomats, and much more.
Frankly, also, look, look at the price of gold and silver right now.
Silver is almost $45.
Gold is almost $3,700 or even more.
The dollar is collapsing.
And without the dollar and also the British pound, the UK is fiscally collapsing.
And they may be facing a cultural revolution because of their corrupt governments.
Without the UK and the U.S., Israel cannot exist, period.
And so if you think that Israel is going to continue to exist, you have to make an argument for why the dollar maintains its global dominance.
And that's not an argument that can be made rationally, actually.
You see what I'm saying?
No, I mean, it's clear that there's huge changes underway.
And, you know, the British Empire, people used to say that, I mean, this thing will last forever, a thousand years.
Right.
And it reached its peak in 1921, at least its territorial peak.
And now it's, I mean, the UK is a dead man walking.
Yeah, yeah, totally.
And his military is a total joke.
Let me pivot here.
Trump at the UN, he gave a very fiery speech at the UN, and he said some things that I actually appreciate him saying.
One of them confirms the issue that you've been talking about for many years.
And I'm quoting, he said, the number one political issue of our time is the crisis of uncontrolled migration.
Now, you refer to it as weaponized migration, but do you find, I mean, you're vindicated by President Trump, who's now saying what you've been saying for many, many years.
And he also attacked the UN over climate change and a bunch of other nonsense.
What do you make of Trump's speech at the UN?
Yeah, I mean, you know me, I'm an action, not words.
You know what I mean?
So if he's deadly serious, and I published this many times before he got into office this time, if you're really serious and you get into office, you're going to defund the United Nations immediately.
You're going to go after HIAS, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society.
You're going to go after Red Cross.
You're going to go after Catholic charities.
You're going to go after Lutheran services.
You're going to go after doctors without morals.
You're going to go after all those people that have been invading the United States and Japan and these other countries.
And it's easy to do.
You know, when I talk with Japanese, very serious Japanese, and they always say the same thing.
We can't defund the United Nations.
I'm like, in what world can't you do that?
It's called stop sending them money.
It's easy.
And you go to their giant headquarters down there in downtown Tokyo.
I've been there.
And you unplug the electricity and you turn off their water and you cancel their visas and you get buses over there and you take them to the airport and you say, thank you for coming to Japan.
Bye-bye.
Right.
And you do it, right?
You physically do it.
Notice in Japan now, they're starting to rise up and they're starting to hit the streets about all the Japanese women that are being raped and the crime that's going through the roof and this sort of thing.
They need that.
You have to stand up.
United Nations can be taken down.
The British Empire was taken down.
The Spanish Empire was taken down.
The Portuguese, the Dutch went after the Soviet Union, right?
Yeah, you can't take down the United Nations.
I would fire any general that said that.
Like, I would say, out the door, buddy, close the door.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you for your service.
Go get your retirement pay, right?
I mean, because this is easy.
It's child's play.
You cut off the funding and you start blowing the doors off the hinges because they have been child trafficking, right?
Straight up child trafficking.
IOM, the International Organization for Migration, their office in the United States is in New York.
Amy Pope runs it, right?
Their other main office for North American operations is in Panama City at Ciudad del Saber.
I've been there many, many, many times.
I was their neighbor for months, right?
Either down in the Darien Gap, where I was, I mean, I would eat breakfast with them, right?
And up in Ciudad del Saber in Panama City.
Their other headquarters in the Asian region is in Manila, right?
I mean, they are very, very easy.
They're everywhere.
They wear uniforms, right?
And their offices are right there.
They've got signs on them.
Turn off the electricity, turn off the water, turn off the money, and get rid of them and get rid of them out of our, get them out of our country.
Lock stock and barrel.
We know how to do this.
General Petraeus told me one time during the Iraq war when we were really going after Al-Qaeda hard.
Then he just met with the Al-Qaeda dude.
Like in the last 24 hours.
But he told me one time in the Iraq war, because I was there.
We were ripping them out by the roots.
And that's what he used to call it.
We're ripping them out by the roots, Michael.
You know, we're getting their leadership.
And it's easy.
Our government does this as a matter of course, day by day.
And so if Trump is deadly serious about this, he's going to rip them out by the roots.
And that means we should wake up tomorrow and he should have cut their funding, right?
And he should be now going into their offices, seizing information about the child trafficking, which has been happening intensely down in Texas, like Brownsville at that super center, the former Walmart super center that I've been to many times, as have others.
I mean, we know the places, right?
There's databases with all the children.
Some of it has been released.
Carlos Arella has released some of that.
Anthony Rubin, Anthony Rubin, you've had him on your show.
Anthony Rubin is working on a documentary now.
He was just over in Africa and got it tracking down IOM and others.
And he was just in Paris, got attacked by, well, just a few months ago now, got attacked by some of the invaders right in front of the Eiffel Tower.
Actually, they attacked him with a toy Eiffel Tower, and his brother's head was bleeding.
He sent me photos from the police station while they were still in the police.
I mean, this is the sort of stuff that's going on.
This is easy to stop.
It's very simple to stop.
But once you go too far, which the United Kingdom has, they're dead.
Netherlands is dead.
In my view, Ireland is dead.
Luxembourg, clearly dead.
They're over 50%.
Masako and I went there and spent almost two weeks in Luxembourg.
I mean, they're gone.
Sweden, gone, right?
Germany, you're not going to make it.
Germany's talking about building up their military now so that they don't depend on us.
What are you going to build it up with?
Where'd your economy go?
Their industries.
Where'd all your colleagues go?
They just laid off another thousand auto workers in the last day or so, right?
I mean, this is that they're not going to make it.
They open their borders.
Remember in 2000, what, 14, about 15 and 16, so many of us was like, what are you doing?
You know, I lived English, right?
I speak German.
I lived in Germany for four years, right?
I lived in Europe for about six years.
And before that was Germany.
I've been all over that place, all over Europe.
And I've been all over the countries where these people are coming from.
Some fish don't mix well in the same aquarium, right?
And when some of us were saying that, like you were, what are you doing?
Close the borders.
They're like, oh, you're a racist and all that.
And I'm like, we'll get to the point where you agree with me, but it'll be after somebody takes your house and maybe kills half your family, right?
Because this is no joke.
They will absolutely murder and kill you and take your house straight up.
I've been to their countries.
This is Planet of the Apes.
This is no joke, right?
You are actually in a state of war.
If Trump is really serious about this, he's going to go for United Nations.
And I mean, they've got an army.
United Nations is no joke.
I mean, they have hit teams in the whole works, right?
They're straight up there with the Zionists.
They can go kinetic on people.
Michael, one last area.
I want your reaction to this.
Because I was sent documents from a trusted source that is, these are military gear purchase requests that amount to, and it's for the country of Turkey.
And Turkey is in the process of purchasing literally billions of dollars a month in arms.
Explosives, artillery rounds, RPGs, of course, like 762x39 rounds, like hundreds of millions, if not billions of rounds, but so much more.
And the documents that I saw, they were the line item requests, and this does not cover, you know, armored vehicles or aircraft or actual artillery pieces, but rather just the ammunition for all of those things.
And just the ammunition is billions of dollars a month.
And I asked my contact, I mean, doesn't this mean that Turkey is arming up in anticipation of a major regional war?
So, yeah.
And their quote to me was, you have no idea.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So clearly, because Turkey knows they're going to end up in a war because it all instigated Israel, the whole thing.
I mean, it's coming on.
Keep in mind, one of those seven major choke points is right there at the Bosphorus, right?
The Turkish Straits, right?
So, I mean, that's another one that the Zionists would love to control, right?
But first, they need Suez, which they haven't been able to do that.
They haven't been able to do Baba Mandeb because the Sandal wearing Houthis, you know, shot down two of our jets that were still sitting on the aircraft carrier deck.
Remember when the incoming fire was coming to the aircraft carrier apparently took a hard turn and our jets fell off, right?
I mean, you can't make out this stuff.
I mean, it's like the Houthis Houthis shoot down jets that are sitting on an aircraft carrier deck and by causing the evasive actions.
So they haven't been able to take the Strait of Hormuz.
They were unable to keep Afghanistan or Iraq.
And they're losing Panama.
And now they want to open up a front with Venezuela.
Listen, Iran and China, listen, I want to say this very clearly.
Iran and China and Russia are very thick in Venezuela with drone technology.
I first started publishing this, I don't know, several years ago.
The drones are there, right?
They can close down a lot of the traffic through that region, just as it was closed down for the Suez Canal because of Bab al-Mendeb, right?
It's easy.
It's child's play.
These sorts of things can strangle our economy, right?
While we're talking about strangling theirs as if we're the big bad wolf, I'm telling you what, we're the big bad wolf, and they got like a lot of 30 odd sixes, right?
They have the Chinese have a port right off the Florida coast in Bahamas.
You know, and Van der Stiel and Misako and I went over there.
I mean, they got a port right off the within easy drone distance of Florida, right?
Not to mention there's Cuba, you know, this thing about the Monroe doctrine.
Seriously, why does anybody even bring that up anymore?
That's like talking about the Revolutionary War.
It's the Monroe Doctrine is dead.
It's gone.
It's not coming back, period.
We've given it away.
The whole Gulf of Mexico, Antigua, the whole work, the Caribbean, all those people.
They've been, you know, so many of the islands are just filled with Chinese now, like Antigua and Bahamas, right?
And Cuba has had a relationship with the Chinese since I found one document between the Qing dynasty and the Cubans from the 1800s.
It's thick, right?
I've got it.
I found it in the same antique store that I found.
It still had the stamp on it.
I'm like, is this what I think it is?
So I sent it to a Chinese friend and I asked her to translate it.
And she's like, wow, this is the evidence that we were looking for that the Qing dynasty actually was doing business with Cuba, which was weird.
I mean, in the 1800s, I mean, because it has some historical significance to them, which is not relevant to us.
But back to Turkey, I mean, I really want your opinion on this.
You know, Turkey being a NATO member, they can acquire all these munitions from Western countries without any problem.
But if I'm looking at who they're arming up against, it's either they suspect that there's going to be attacks coming through Western-controlled Syria or Israel itself in the Greater Israel Project, which does want to occupy and take part of Western Turkey, not just all of Lebanon, but also southern Turkey as well.
So who do you think Turkey's arming up in anticipation of having to fight?
Kurds for starters, because remember, a lot of the Kurds, and, you know, I've spent a lot of time with Kurds.
I get along great with Kurds.
A lot of Kurds are actually Zionists, believe it or not.
Sunni Muslim, I get it.
A lot of people say, no, the Zionists are Jews.
Don't you understand?
It's like, no, actually, they're not, right?
And a lot of the Zionists, it looks like most of the Zionists are actually Christian Americans, right?
Now I get it.
Then Christians will say no, because they can't be Christian and a Zionist.
I get it.
I know all the arguments, right?
I've heard them all a thousand times.
But at the end of the day, let's just get down to what matters in war.
At the end of the day, all these quibbles aside, the bulk of the Zionists appear to be Christian Zionists, right?
And then there's the Jews, and then there's the atheists, but there's a lot of Jews that hate Zionists.
And then there's factional, there's factions within the Zionists, and then there are Muslims who are Zionists.
And a lot of the Kurds are actually Zionists.
I've been out with them, and they'll tell you that, right?
So like those attacks that have been happening in Iran, I don't know who's doing them.
I don't know if it's Baluch people.
I don't know.
I've been out with them quite a bit as well over in Afghanistan, but there's a lot of Baluch actually there In both Pakistan and Iran as well and California.
And I had lunch with a Baluch friend a couple of years ago down near Los Angeles.
I mean, so I mean, but this is a, there are a lot of actual Zionist Muslims and the Kurds would be one weapon.
Now, of course, the fight between the Turks and the Kurds, sometimes, I mean, I'm sorry, the Turks and the Kurds, sometimes the Turks will, you know, call the Kurds, they'll call them mountain Turks, right?
And the Kurds hate that because they're like, we're not mountain Turks.
We're Kurds.
We speak our own language, which, you know, the Kurds, the Turks have tried to, you know, erase that and all sorts of, you know, it's the normal everywhere I go in the world fight, right?
You know, when it's your fight, it looks like this is the middle of the universe and it is for you.
But it's the same fight I see everywhere, right?
It's the war with a thousand faces.
It's the same thing going on in Myanmar, all these different groups and different groups use them like Chinese use this group and the Chinese, you know, it's like, it's the same war over and over and over.
But what I'm getting to is it'll be big.
It'll be significant.
There'll be a lot of players that'll be hard to track and there'll be groups that'll form and come and go and disappear and you'll have a hard time figuring out who's doing what to whom because it's like it figuring out what's going on in the jungle.
But at the end of the day, when it's all said and done and the smoke clears, which could be five years, it could be 50 years, or it could continue for 500 years.
But I think there's a very high chance that Israel will not walk out of this alive.
There's a very high chance.
I don't know, of course.
They could maybe expand somehow and get their legs under them, but they've never shown ultimately the ability to manage anything.
They show the ability to infiltrate and destroy things and be highly self-destructive, but they haven't shown the ability to, in a mature way, in a very, they can do very sophisticated infiltrations and scams on a huge scale, right?
But they've never shown the ability to manage like nation-state stuff, right?
And that's what's happening now.
The Turks can, right?
The Turks can manage, right?
Syrians and so many others can do that.
And they all realize that the problem in the neighborhood that's bombing everybody.
So who are the allies?
You always have to count allies.
Which allies does Israel have?
Zionists in America?
That's about it, right?
Pretty much Zionist in America.
And when the gold gun runs out and that sort of thing, there's not going to be any allies.
I mean, there's no allies that say, hey, we're just natural buddies.
When the fun stops and the music stops, a lot of people that support Charlie Kirk realize what just happened.
Others don't, of course, but a lot do, right?
They realize that Charlie Kirk, they know who just killed him.
That was clearly Zionist, right?
And they're, you know, got people running off talking about 30 odd sixes and stuff, right?
But there are no regional or global allies of Israel.
Like Thailand, Thailand wants to keep relationships with Israel because Thailand is very good at keeping international relations going.
But on the human scale, the people scale, just like I see in India and Nepal and all over the place here in Thailand, people get sick of the Israelis because of the way that they treat them.
And that has a bleed up and down effect.
Anyway, bottom line is the war is going to grow.
Yeah, and it seems to me that there's a very easy escalation path to World War III involving the major players, China, Russia, the United States, etc.
I can see this going from an attempted invasion of Iran to a nuclear war in three days.
Who's going to invade Iran?
Who's going to invade Iran?
That's what I'm saying.
Yeah.
The U.S. leaders may be dumb enough to try that.
And it's going to go very badly.
And that's what's going to cause the West to leap to the use of nuclear weapons because they're going to realize their conventional attack plans are complete fraud.
Right.
I mean, I'm not sure how, but again, these are incompetent people.
And one of the things when you're trying to predict how a war could go, you can never depend on logic.
And, you know, when you see these, yeah, when you see the analysts going, well, logically, they would never do that.
And I'm like, I changed the channel because logic has nothing to do with the scrap.
You know what I mean?
That's right.
Like one battle that I covered in Thailand years ago, and I published about it called the Fortune Teller from Myanmar, I think, or the Fortune Teller from Burma.
And it was this Burmese fortune teller.
Her name was E.T., not E-T, like E-T, go home, but like E, and then space, T-H-I-E-T.
And so she's this sort of mentally off woman.
She's dead now, but E.T., she gave this, you know, she to Taxin and some others, who was a leader.
He just got put in jail a couple of weeks ago.
But Taxin, she told him that you had to do these certain things by a certain date or you'll never have power in Thailand again.
And so it was public.
He talked about it.
And, you know, he went over to Myanmar and did all the fortune telling and all that stuff.
And then they had a big battle in the streets of Bangkok, you know, and there were people killed.
I mean, I was here, right?
And it was all because this probably like 80 IQ lady, and I'm serious.
I mean, she was, there was something mentally wrong with her, but and she was all, you know, twisted and stuff.
But they follow people like that and think that they have these magical prognostications.
What I'm getting to is if you think that you can get to where this is going by using logical process, you don't know anything about war.
I mean, sometimes wars start because or a battle happens because we're waiting for the bird to land in this tree this morning.
Okay, the sun's up.
The bird will come.
If he's facing that way when he lands, we go to battle.
If he's facing that way, we stay in the village, right?
Yeah.
I mean, it's that, you know, there's no amount of computing power that can figure that stuff out.
Well, and I want to encourage people to follow you on X. Your call sign there is Michael underscore Jan.
I've got your page up here.
And then you've also got a Substack page, which is Michael Jan.
That's Y-O-N dot substack.com.
Is there anything else you want to add?
No, other than also Masako Ganaha just started her sub stack in the last 24 hours, and she's covering the Japanese issues deeply.
People are hitting me with so many messages about what's going on with Japan because these protests that are going on about the invasion by the IOM, United Nations, and all that.
It's the same people, exact same process, exact same information war.
And Masako's right in the middle of it.
Suddenly, Japanese are starting to realize that Misako is Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer who's been studying this intently in the last five years in 30 different countries.
And suddenly she's the one that the Japanese are listening to very closely, right?
And so, like, for instance, she's here in Thailand now, and she wasn't at these recent protests.
And everybody's like, where's Misako?
And she'll be right back because she's checking the perimeter.
Like, what's happening in Thailand?
What's happening in Korea?
Because this is all part of the same war.
She's been all over the United States, the southern border, Panama, Darien Gap, Colombia, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Germany, looking at these things.
And so she just started her substack and is absolutely vital to listen to for anything related to Japan.
All right.
So that's Masako Ganaha.
That's G-A-N-A-H-A, correct?
That's right.
On Substack.
Just part of their Substack.
Okay, check that out.
And by the way, did Masako have a chance to listen to that Japanese translation that I did?
Did she not send it back?
I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know if you saw it.
I just want to know if it was good Japanese or not.
I don't know.
I'll ask her.
Okay.
I'll definitely ask her.
You'll get an answer within eight hours, within six hours.
All good.
All good.
All right.
No worries.
So, Michael, I just want to thank you for your time today.
Thank you for your analysis.
And, you know, look, to our audience, you better get ready for World War III because that's the most likely outcome of where all this is headed.
But thank you for your time today, Michael.
Thanks, Michael.
I really appreciate it.
All right.
You too.
Have a great rest of your day.
Thanks for being up so early for us there.
And thank all of you for watching here at Brighteon.com.
I'm Mike Adams, and you can find more of my interviews and podcasts and analysis at brighteon.com and Rumble and Brighteon Social X, etc.
And then also feel free to use our AI engine at brighteon.ai to ask it any kind of questions because it's trained on alternative media, which means it's trained on reality.
So as you can tell from that interview, the world's about to go into a very chaotic and dark place.
And, you know, the value of the dollar is collapsing every single day.
Take a look at the gold price right now as I'm recording this gold is almost $3,800.
And as you can see, in one year, gold is up 40%.
In five years, it's up 100%.
And also, silver is a very similar story with silver here, $44.42, about to break $45.
And if you look at this chart, in one year, silver is up.
Well, actually, in six months, it's up 33%.
Look at that.
And in one year, up 36%.
When you want to get gold and silver for yourself, then check out our affiliate sponsor and our partner in this space called Battalion Metals.
You can find them at rangerdeals.com, or you can just go to Metals with Mike.
But if you click on Battalion Medals here, they will, they have real-time pricing of gold and silver at really tremendous value.
And these are high-integrity folks.
I've worked with them for many, many years.
These are the same folks of the Treasure Island Company.
But Battalion Metals is the new online presence they have with vaulting services and so much more.
And that's who I get medals from.
Highly trusted, high integrity, you know, bonded insured, all of it.
So give them a call at Battalion Metals.
And if you use discount code Ranger, then they will waive the shipping insurance fee.
And again, you can find them at rangerdeals.com.
Also, at rangerdeals.com, there are other providers that can help you be prepared for what's about to happen.
For example, Goldbacks right here, lab-verified goldbacks, satellite phones.
We've got also, if you scroll down, de-googled phones.
And then from Shield Arms, you've got folding AR-15s, custom Glocks, extended steel magazines.
Those are the steel magazines that I use in my Glock 43X.
And, you know, it goes on, you can save 10% on holsters and accessories, etc.
This is a who's who of the affiliates that I recommend and that I work with.
And the discount code Ranger works on most of the websites of these providers.
And it can save you a lot of money.
And it can connect you with products that I personally endorse and that I use myself, products for preparedness.
Even the satellite phone store has, for example, solar generators and Faraday bags to protect your electronics against solar flares or EMP weapons, things like that.
And you can find them at sat123.com.
So check all that out at rangerdeals.com and get yourself ready.
It's going to be a very difficult and chaotic time ahead, especially if the U.S. Empire wants to go to war with Iran.
That will probably fail.
It's going to be absolute, it's going to be a bloodbath.
It's going to be chaotic.
It's going to be disruptive to the world's economy, to energy supply chains.
You name it.
The U.S. power grid will be unreliable.
You're going to have rolling blackouts.
And then on top of that, you're going to have a radical left-wing terrorist rising up and sabotaging U.S. infrastructure, bombing bridges and ports, bombing power grid substations, for example, or poisoning water supplies that feed major cities in the United States.
So you're going to have domestic warfare and international warfare happening at the same time.
So now is the time to prepare.
I say prepare with metals to preserve your assets and then prepare with the other gear to preserve your life.
So thank you for watching today.
I just want to say God bless you.
Thank you for your support and do everything you can to get prepared right now.
The world is about to take a very nasty turn for the worse.
So thanks for watching.
I'll keep you informed.
I'll have more interviews and guests at Brightion.com.
I'm Mike Adams.
Take care, everybody.
Organic blueberries.
Freeze, dried to lock in nutrients and antioxidants.
Support digestion, brain health, and immunity with every bite.
Snack smart.
Only at HealthRangerStore.com.
▲
Export Selection