All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 21, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
46:24
BBN, Sep 21, 2025 - WEEKEND BROADCAST: Man of steel? Explanations of the Charlie Kirk shooting...
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All right, welcome folks.
Mike Adams here with a special weekend edition update, Bright Town Broadcast News.
And let me apologize in advance for the topic here because we have to talk about the astonishing new narrative that's being catapulted into public consciousness regarding the shooting of Charlie Kirk.
And the narrative is so absurdly stupid and impossible, and it violates the laws of physics, ballistics, and anatomy, that we have to call it out.
But I want to say up front that it pains me to have to even cover this subject and to talk about the details here, you know, necks and foot pounds of energy and so on.
And I mean no disrespect at all to Charlie Kirk and his surviving spouse and his children or anyone around him.
And his murder was a tragic shooting that is just devastating to America.
So please understand that I want to get to the bottom of this, and I think that the best way that we can actually show respect to Charlie Kirk is to answer the question accurately, who shot Charlie Kirk.
And in order to answer that question, we have to look at the evidence, and we have to rationally examine the narrative that we're told.
And you know, that narrative has to align with the laws of physics if it is real.
You know, you you can't make up your own laws of physics or your own laws of ballistics or your own laws of anatomy in order to explain away something.
That just smacks of a cover-up.
And what we're being told right now, and I kid you not, we're being told that Charlie Kirk is Superman, the man of steel, and that his neck stopped a 30-hot six you know, hunting rifle round.
His neck stopped it because he's healthy.
That's what I mean.
I'm I can't believe it.
And again, I don't mean any disrespect to Charlie over this at all.
But we now have a post and we have this new narrative from Andrew Colvet, who's with apparently he's with TP USA, and he says that he spoke to the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital.
Quote at first, the surgeon said, quote, absolutely, the the bullet absolutely should have gone through, which is very, very normal for a high-powered high velocity round.
I've seen wounds from this caliber many times, and they always just go through everything.
This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.
But but then the guy posting this here, uh, Andrew Colvet, he says, but it didn't go through Charlie's body stopped it, he says.
I mentioned this to his doctor, and there were dozens of staff, students, and special guests standing directly behind Charlie on the other side of the tent.
when the shooting happened.
And the doctor replied, quote, it was an absolute miracle that someone else didn't get killed.
Quote, his bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he's like the man of steel.
It should have just gone through and through.
It likely would have killed those standing behind him too.
And then we're told that in the end, the coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin.
Well, then how did it sever the carotid artery then?
Um okay, different question.
And then Colvet here says, even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him.
Remarkable and miraculous.
And I'm now seeing posts from other people, mostly Christians or Christian Zionists, who say it's a miracle.
It's God's miracle.
God reached down and used Charlie's body to stop a 30-odsix round.
And that's why the bullet was found just beneath the skin.
And we're seeing these posts just a couple hours after I predicted publicly that that we're likely to start seeing people saying that Charlie Kirk is literally Jesus.
And that's already come true.
I mean, they're saying that he's Superman and that he's Jesus.
Because he can stop bullets, apparently, because he's healthy, and his body can work miracles from God himself.
Now, again, I don't mean any disrespect to Charlie at all.
But these explanations are so delusional, just completely beyond insane, that it really makes me wonder about the mental health of humans today.
That anybody could be pushing this and thinking that you're going to suspend the laws of physics.
Well, actually, you know what?
Let me back up.
Let me back up.
Let me explain the laws of physics in this, because I did the math.
So here we go.
Are you ready for the math quiz?
All right.
So a 30-0-6 rifle round typically produces around 3,000 foot pounds of energy when it's fired.
3,000 foot pounds.
That's enough energy to lift a 3,000-pound object one foot in the air, which is why it's called foot pounds.
Now that's the energy, actually, it's higher with many rounds, but that's the energy as it leaves the barrel.
That energy slowly dissipates over a very long distance.
But at distances of you know 150 yards or whatever we're being told it is, that the slowing of that velocity is really negligible for the purposes of this explanation, anyway.
So don't worry about the fact that it's slightly slowed.
It's still easily can have over 3,000 foot pounds of energy.
Now the diameter of this bullet, the 30-6 Springfield bullet, is of course 0.308 inches.
So that's 7.82 millimeters for those of you using the vastly superior metric system.
Thank you.
So almost 8 millimeters in diameter, but the thing that characterizes these bullets is they're longer than, like, for example, 308 Winchester rounds or you know 762 rounds or whatever.
They're longer, they they have a lot more mass.
So and they have a much larger cartridge, which means they have a lot more energy behind them.
And that's why a 30-hot six round is a real shoulder kicker.
Now, I think the 300 Wind Mag round may have more energy than that.
I'd have to check the charts.
But a 30-0-6 round is it's an ass kicker.
Okay, anybody who's ever fired one from a bolt action rifle knows that uh it can it can bruise you if you don't hold it correctly.
It's a lot of energy that's leaving the barrel.
Okay.
Now, if you take the diameter of the bullet, uh 0.308 inches, and you cut that in half, you know, 0.154, that's the radius, and then if you use pi r squared to calculate the area, then you get that the area of the skin that is being struck by the bullet is 0.0745 square inches.
So not even one-tenth of a square inch.
You got it?
Not even one-tenth of a square inch.
And yet, 3,000 foot pounds of energy are delivered to an area of the skin that is less than one-tenth of a square inch.
Got it.
Now, you you could say it's maybe the diameter of your pinky finger or something, that would be a close estimate.
Now, there is no bone in the human body that can survive 3,000 foot pounds of energy.
There's no skin that can stop it.
There's no muscle, there's no, there's there's nothing, there's no organ, there's no bone that can absorb 3,000 foot pounds of energy and uh remain intact and stop it.
It's not it's not possible.
Now, it is possible, and this has happened in in wars where a soldier has been hit at a very slight angle, they've been hit in the skull with a bullet that just grazed them and it could deflect off of the skull if the bullet is traveling at a very, very slight angle.
But if it's traveling into the skull, as in almost perpendicular, then deflection does not occur, obviously, then it penetrates the skull.
And keep in mind that in most wars, the rounds that are fired by soldiers are far less powerful than the 30 out 6 hunting round.
Far less powerful.
Look, the 30 out of 6 hunting round is designed to take down large game, like a moose.
You know, moose is a very large creature.
Or to take down, I don't know, in Africa, all the big buffalo or whatever they shoot with 30 out six rounds.
I mean, I'm not a hunter.
I don't I don't shoot animals.
I try to save animals as much as I can.
But this is a big game round, okay?
Much bigger than human.
Soldiers, American soldiers carry much smaller rounds at 556 rounds, or 5.56 millimeters by 45 millimeters.
That's the AR-15 round, typically, or the M4 round.
It has substantially less energy.
It's much smaller in diameter, much less energy, much lower uh foot pounds.
And yet, that kills soldiers in wars all the time.
Okay.
And then even in World War II, when soldiers had rounds like the 308 Winchester, which was a much larger round and you know, heavier, more powder, more foot pounds with the larger rifles, like the uh the M14 rifles, for example.
Uh those would kill people all the time.
And uh those bullets were delivered with far less energy than the 306 round.
Okay.
So this idea that Charlie Kirk is the man of steel who can stop bullets is beyond absurd.
If you think that 3,000 foot pounds of energy can be absorbed by one man's neck, then you know you're you're delusional.
Because here's why.
There's no exit wound.
That's been confirmed by TP USA people, it's been confirmed by Candace Owens and others.
No exit wound.
Well, by the laws of physics, that means that all of the energy of the rifle round was delivered into the neck, all of it.
So now you have 3,000 foot pounds of energy being delivered into one human neck, pinpointed into one small area.
And I'm I'm not trying to be graphic here at all.
But understand that that's enough energy to hurl a 200-pound man 15 feet into the air.
Okay?
That's that's 3,000 foot pounds of energy.
If that entered anyone's neck and if the neck stopped the bullet and absorbed the energy, that person's neck would explode.
That I mean, again, I'm not trying to be graphic, and I don't mean any disrespect.
I'm trying to get to the bottom of this.
We need to know the truth.
We owe that to Charlie to know the truth.
But we are being lied to when we are told by people that he is that Charlie was the man of steel, and now we're being told that it's a miracle.
Uh I mean, yeah, clearly they're gonna claim he's Jesus, you know, next.
They're gonna call it a miracle, God's miracle, and that Charlie's death saved the lives of the people around him.
No, I this is a far simpler explanation here, folks.
It's that we're being lied to.
The far simpler explanation is that he was not shot with a 30 out of six round.
We don't have to resort to God intervening with you know miracles and that altered the laws of physics.
Does God stop bullets?
I mean, does God stop bullets?
Seriously, uh, of all the soldiers and all the people who who've been killed by bullets and all the gang shootings and all the suicides that how come God didn't stop those bullets?
Oh, because Charlie Jesus is what we're gonna be.
I mean, again, this is becoming so absurd.
And it's it's really it's a disservice to Charlie for people to be pushing these narratives.
It's absurd.
Charlie would want us to know the truth.
Charlie would want to dig through this obvious cover-up and these obvious, obvious lies.
So this official explanation now that Charlie is Superman and he's bulletproof and he can stop bullets.
And somehow all the energy just vanishes.
It's all a lie.
And look, the way you know that is if God really were going to intervene, why didn't he stop the bullet one inch away from his neck?
Right?
I mean, come on.
If God were going to stop the bullet, why didn't he stop it before it struck Charlie?
So I want to show you this image from a body armor company called Spartan Armor Systems.
Now here, moving from left to right, we have bullets of increasing uh energy.
Well, at least bullets and cartridges, I should say.
Obviously, the powder in the cartridge determines the initial energy, and the mass of the bullet carries that energy combined with velocity.
Because of course, energy is one half mass times velocity squared, but that's beside the point.
From the left to the right, they are weaker bullets.
It starts out with the a 40 caliber uh pistol round.
And then what is it 357, 9mm, 45 ACP, all these are all pistol rounds, 38 special, typical revolver round, 357 magnum revolver round, 44 magma, that's considered the badass rifle round.
I'm sorry, uh typically pistol round, but sometimes used in lever actions.
Um all those rounds that I just mentioned, they can be defeated by body armor that is uh level 3A.
That's kind of the lowest level of body armor.
It's pretty pretty thin.
Uh it's it's wearable, you know.
It's you can wear body armor at level 3A and it's flexible.
It's not a giant plate.
Okay.
But if you get hit with then rifle rounds, which is the 762 by 39, those AK rounds, or 556 by 45, those are AR rounds, or 762 by 51, that's uh also known as like 308 Winchester round.
Uh those rifle rounds, which carry more energy than the pistol rounds, they require level three protection of body armor, which is of course thicker and stiffer, etc.
Now, uh let me just interrupt myself here and say that if what we're told about Charlie Kirk's neck is correct, then I guess the entire body armor business would have to shut down tomorrow because we've just learned that human skin can stop the highest level round.
Who needs body armor if all you have to do is be healthy?
Is what we're told.
You just have to have good bone density.
I mean, this I mean, it's insulting.
It's just absolutely insulting how stupid it is.
All right, let's go to the next level of ballistic protection.
If you suspect that you're gonna get hit with armor piercing AR rounds, which would be like the um the what is it, the 855 rounds, uh, 556 by 45 with a steel core, those are called green tip.
Uh they have a steel core that penetrates armor a little better.
You need level 3A protection, or that could stop a 30-06 round if it's just like a uh solid point, or you know, not a hunting round, not a ballistic round, not uh an armor piercing round.
So level 3a rifle protection.
But if you want to stop a 30-06 that's a hunting round, which is uh an armor piercing round or ballistics round, you need level four protection, which typically Is a very thick plate.
I mean, they can make them out of different materials, uh, ceramics or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene or steel in the old style, or a combination of materials is the way they're typically made today.
Then uh you you can have a very thick plate.
They're they're usually like an inch thick or more.
Well, depend, I mean, depends on the material, to give yourself level four protection.
All right.
Or, according to what we're being told right now, you could just be healthy, and then your neck would stop the bullet.
Now, again, I'm sorry to keep saying this, but I don't mean any disrespect to Charlie or his surviving family members.
This why do we even have to go here?
But it's because the lies are so absurd and so insane.
I mean, basically, we're being told that if you have healthy skin and good bone density, you don't need body armor.
Now, that that's news to the entire military of the United States and every military around the world, all of whom wear body armor.
Because apparently the Department of Defense has not yet discovered that healthy skin can stop bullets, including all the rounds used by you know enemy troops, which might like 762 by 39 typically, for example.
Can stop them all, other than not 50 caliber, obviously, because that would be crazy.
So why do you know quiz time?
Why do soldiers wear ballistic armor?
Why?
The answer, of course, is because human skin does not stop rifle rounds.
That's why.
That's exactly why.
Think about it, right?
I mean, this is obvious.
And, you know, I'm a food scientist.
I own a very advanced food science lab.
I'm a published scientist, patent holder, you know, published papers about food testing methodology using mass spec instruments, etc.
There's no such thing as a food that makes you bulletproof.
There's no such thing as a level of health that makes you bulletproof.
And there is no human neck in the world that can absorb the energy of 3,000 foot pounds without absolutely exploding.
It would just explode.
The neck would explode like a grenade if that much energy were delivered to it all at once.
That is, if it if it absorbed that energy.
Now, recognize that when a bullet passes through a person and exits out the other side and keeps going, well, that's actually good news because then it doesn't deliver all of its energy into the body, you see.
It carries its energy out of the body and delivers it somewhere else, whatever it hits next.
So if I said to you, like you have a choice, you know, theoretically, obviously, this is a thought experiment.
Don't try this at home.
But if you had a choice, would you rather be shot with a like an AR-15 round that went through your, let's say your calf and went out the other side and kept going?
Or would you rather be shot by the same round that stopped in your calf?
If you understand ballistics and physics and anatomy, you would absolutely say, oh, God, please let it go on through, because then it's not delivering all that energy into my calf and shattering everything there.
See, if your calf stops the bullet, then the energy goes into your calf.
Where does it go?
It goes into the bones, the tissues, you know, the blood vessels, everything.
Rupture everything.
And that's just an AR-15 round.
Now, battlefield surgeons and medics, they know, they know that all the time when people get shot with rounds that pass through, like through the calf or through someone's forearm, or you know, some other body part that's not a critical organ, that's a very treatable injury because the bullet did not deliver its energy to the body.
It took its energy with it and left.
That's good news.
Now, Hollywood, of Course distorts all this, as Hollywood always does with firearms.
According to Hollywood, if you get shot, then you keep getting injured until someone removes the bullet, and then once the bullet is removed, everything's okay.
Like the bullet keeps doing damage while it's sitting there, according to every movie and every TV show, at least that I've ever seen, they always have this scene where you gotta get the bullet out, you gotta get it out.
It's just it's causing damage.
You know, that's insane.
That's stupid.
The bullet already did its damage when it when the energy was delivered, it ruptured tissue when the energy was delivered.
If the bullet is no longer moving, it's no longer rupturing tissue, is it?
It no longer has any energy.
Getting the bullet out, you can wait a few hours.
That is not the emergency.
The emergency is to stop the bleeding.
Obviously, you don't want to hemorrhage and bleed out if it's caused a lot of internal damage and you're bleeding.
You need to stop the bleeding.
You don't have to get the bullet out.
Stop the bleeding and send the guy to the emergency room.
They could get the bullet out later.
It hardly even matters when that takes place.
The bullet is not continuing to do damage.
The bullet does all of its damage when it delivers its energy, that is, when it slows to a halt inside the body.
So every bit of that energy in foot pounds, or you know, you could call it newtons or whatever units you want.
Every bit of that gets delivered into the body, ruptures tissue.
And for every organ, for every bone, there's a certain amount of energy that's required, for example, to fracture a bone, to shatter a bone.
So that's absorbing energy.
It's just like this.
When if somebody drives a car into a brick wall, the car, you've seen the slow motion crash videos, right?
So the car begins to crumple as it's slamming into the wall.
The crumpling is actually absorbing energy because it takes energy to deform metal, aluminum and steel, etc.
So the kinetic energy of the car, its total mass times its total velocity hitting that wall, or really one half mass times velocity square, all that energy has to go somewhere.
Where does it go?
It goes into the deformations of the car's tissues, you could say, or the car's structure.
And that's why the higher your speed when you hit the wall, the more deforming of the car takes place, obviously, because that's where the energy goes.
And then car designers design cars with so-called crumple zones, which are specifically designed to absorb energy, in other words, to dissipate energy, and to make the energy of the accident move around the frame of the car and around the occupants, so that the energy doesn't get delivered to the people in the car.
And that's what airbags are all about.
So, you know, how is energy delivered to the driver?
Well, typically by the in older cars, by the driver hitting their face on the windshield or the steering wheel.
That's energy transmission.
So a seat belt is designed to prevent your face from being the thing that absorbs energy from the steering wheel being shoved into your face from a you know collision.
And an airbag is designed to decelerate your body, you know, your torso, your face, especially your head, to decelerate it within an acceptable window of survivable trauma.
That's the whole point of airbags, and and they are very, very effective.
Airbags work, airbags save lives, no question about it.
And so do seatbelts overall.
Airbags save lives, because you don't want your entire face to collide with the steering wheel at full velocity and then come to a sudden stop, because that requires then a lot of dental work to repair, and you know, rebuilding facial bones and things.
Instead, if you can have your face shoved into a pillow, even an exploding pillow that suddenly explodes in your face, but then you can decelerate over a distance of you know 18 inches or whatever.
It's gonna hurt, but you can survive that and you don't break your face.
Okay?
So car crashes are all about where does the energy go?
And rifle impacts are also concerning the same question.
Where does the energy go?
Now, for the people who are saying that, oh, this is a miracle, Charlie Kirk's body, his neck, stop the bullet.
They the reason that they are now claiming that it was a miracle, that it was God's intervention, which again makes no sense because why didn't God stop the bullet from hitting Charlie in the first place?
But the reason people are saying that is because they can't otherwise explain it away in any manner that is consistent with the laws of physics.
And if your only explanation for events is that, well, God changed the laws, you know, God intervened, it was God's hand that did that, then that's pretty sloppy thinking when it comes to forensics.
I mean, if that's the best that you can do, God just reached down his hand and stop the bullet.
You're not a very rigorous thinker, because again, why didn't God stop the bullet in front of his neck?
Now, if somebody fired a rifle round and then on camera, that rifle round stopped one inch before it hit his neck and fell into his lap and he held it up, and he was glowing with a halo, and angels sang, then I would say that's a miracle.
That's an actual doggone miracle right there.
That's not what happened, folks.
And to think that God would stop the bullet in his neck and kill Charlie Kirk is to think that God wants to kill Charlie Kirk, that God wants Charlie dead, and I don't think that's the case.
I think somebody else wanted Charlie dead, and it's not God, it's actually someone associated with Satan.
So the people saying that God killed Charlie or God caused Charlie to die, are insane.
I mean, and you know, of course, you can't you can't talk to these people about the laws of physics because they all failed high school physics class anyway, or you know, basic science.
They probably can't even do basic algebra.
They can't even calculate pi r squared, you know what I mean?
So it's pointless to try to argue or debate with people who are too stupid to know what you're talking about.
And to them, everything in the universe is uh is a mystery.
This is like some of the ancient civilizations.
It's like the gods are angry today, you know.
What causes volcanoes?
Uh, angry gods, you know, that that's all they knew.
What causes eclipses in the sky?
The gods are angry again.
We have to sacrifice like 500 children on the stairs of the pyramid, and then the sun will come back, you know, and so they they murder a bunch of children.
Sure enough, the sun came back.
See, the high priests lecture you.
Ye of little faith, we got the sun back, didn't we?
Yeah, because the eclipse ended, morons.
If if that's your only explanation, you're lost.
So the bottom line here is that what we are being presented with is an obvious cover-up.
It's obvious that Charlie's neck was not struck by a 30.6 uh hunting rifle round.
That is obvious.
And uh, you know, I I'm tempted to call on Michael Jan, who has he's seen soldiers hit with rounds, he's seen lots of soldiers get hit with rounds, and and some of them died, and some of them bled out, and some of them survived.
Michael Jan has seen it up close because he was a you know, a war journalist, you know, a war correspondent.
That's that's the term, with a with a high-end camera.
I mean, he's got photographs of these kinds of things happening.
And Michael Young will tell you, I believe, right away, that this official story is uh just complete bunk.
So it's a cover up.
So it begs the question Why are they so desperate to cover up this shooting?
What is it about this shooting where they can't just?
I mean, every explanation they offer us smacks of desperation.
There's something so incredibly fishy about this that they are resorting to censorship and all kinds of attacks on people who are asking questions like Candace Owens.
And there are threats against many of us who are daring to ask questions.
What why?
If this was really just a lone shooter, this trans lover guy, as we're told, then why all the cover-up?
And by the way, where is a single photo of that guy with a rifle?
Where's the video of him with a rifle on the roof?
Doesn't exist.
Where's his DNA on the rifle?
Doesn't exist.
Right?
Where are the cartridges with the inscriptions on them that we were told?
We haven't seen them.
Don't exist.
Where's the bullet?
Uh haven't seen it.
No, no photo, no details, nothing.
Wow.
Uh where's the autopsy report?
Where's the video footage of the supposed shooter uh climbing up the stairs?
We've seen the still frame.
What about the video?
Where's a video of him changing clothes on the roof, as we're told?
Or him disassembling the rifle on the roof.
I mean, my God.
There's really no hard evidence at all.
The the note that they claim is completely made up, fabricated, or quote, reproduced.
They reproduced a note that's such an obvious fake that the FBI is being mocked day and night by people who realize that it looks like it's written by a boomer, not by a 22-year-old or however old the guy was.
I mean, the language, the vocabulary, everything is from an older person, like an older law enforcement person, like a like a cop or an FBI agent near retirement.
That's who wrote the note.
Everybody knows it.
I mean, everything is fabricated here, the so-called text.
Well, that can be done with cell phone spoofing.
The FBI has had that technology for decades.
So, you know, it's it's laughable.
The explanation that we're being given is laughable.
It's so laughable that I believe that any competent defense attorney would have this guy plead not guilty.
Because there's no evidence that I'm aware of that links him to shooting anybody anywhere.
There's there's not even evidence that links him to the so-called rifle, which was obviously planted by the FBI.
I mean, come on.
Where that scope was mounted on the rifle, it's not even shootable in a especially in a prone position.
You gotta move the scope forward.
And why would you have a 4 to 8x magnification on a scope if you're only shooting from 150 yards or less?
You wouldn't.
It doesn't even make any sense.
And if you disassembled and then reassembled a rifle and then reattached the optics, you do know that it wouldn't be zeroed anymore, right?
So you you can't take that shot with any confidence in the accuracy.
That's I mean, for God's sake, man.
I mean, all of us who are accomplished long-range rifle shooters, we know that the reason we zero rifles is to make sure that that they're on track.
You zero your rifle at a specific range that you calculate into your ballistics curve, you know, like 200 yards or 250 yards for a lot of people will zero 556 at first at maybe 25 yards and then uh again at like 250, which happens to be, well, actually, I think 50 and 250 yards, uh, that's the same impact point because of the arc of the bullet.
Or, you know, something close to that.
It might not be exactly that.
Depends on the bullet velocity and mass, etc.
But it's something close to that.
So for my 556 rifles, I zero them at uh, I think I zero them at 200 yards typically for a number of reasons.
It just anyway, people don't even know the basics of ballistics or energy or you know, physics or math or whatever, and that's the only reason why people would even believe such an absurd narrative.
And yet we're told by the people I'm calling the low IQ narrative swallowers.
We're told that we're paranoid to ask questions.
We're paranoid to not believe the official narrative.
And we're And we're told this by many of the very same people who before Trump was elected told us never trust the FBI, never trust the government, never trust the DOJ.
People who were sounding the alarm over 9-11 and Waco and Oklahoma City and everything.
And now they're like, oh, but this time they're telling the truth.
It's all good.
Yeah.
The FBI can be completely trusted.
Right.
Yeah, sure.
I mean, it's so ridiculous.
I can't even believe we're watching this.
It's unbelievable.
So we know that the official explanation is bunk.
We know that he wasn't shot with a 30-06 round that stopped in his neck.
Well, that means that the official story isn't true, which means something else or somebody else or some other mechanism shot Charlie.
Now, my best guess, based on current information, is that he may have been shot by the camera behind him that was rigged with a special kind of mechanical internal, maybe like a like an airburst mechanism to shoot a slug out of a very short barrel at relatively low velocity.
It could be 300 feet per second, uh, just to cause the damage and make him bleed out, and that he was shot from behind at a downward angle from behind.
Uh that actually, that explanation matches the evidence that we're seeing so far.
You know, it it matches the reality that there's no exit wound in the back.
You know, it's more consistent with the videos that we've seen.
It would indicate a much closer shot.
And also, why did they hurry to take down those cameras?
You know, I mean, it's a crime scene right there.
The first thing they did was disassemble everything.
And then also, then the university like tore up the whole grounds and reinstalled, you know, all new pavers and everything.
I mean, it's like you sure are in a hurry to destroy the entire crime scene.
That's highly suspicious to anybody who's intelligent.
Because they did that after 9-11.
They bulldoze the crime scene.
Get it all out of here.
Get it out of the way.
We don't want to see it.
Yeah, you don't want anybody to forensically examine it, do you?
Because you'd find all the thermite, obviously.
I mean, it's just such an obvious, you know, psyop here.
And the story we're being told is clearly false.
Now, it doesn't mean that we know who's behind it.
We don't know.
We don't have conclusive proof, but it's somebody who's very sophisticated at assassinations.
Somebody who's got a lot of experience at killing people and getting away with it.
That would be an intelligence agency.
And there are only three in the world that I can think of that would be capable of this.
That's the CIA, MI6, and Mossad.
And so I think that at least the preponderance of evidence that we we are aware of so far points in the direction of an intelligence operation.
You know, take your pick of which branch you think it is, or maybe it's all, or two out of three.
I mean, whatever, but it's not the loan shooter Patsy.
That is abundantly clear.
And Candace Owens is right when she says the truth's going to come out on this, and they made a huge mistake thinking that they could just whitewash this whole thing with a grassy knoll explanation like JFK.
Yeah, they're not going to get away with that this time.
They've got all the audio signatures now.
I mean, we do, the public does.
We've got video, we've got ballistics experts, we've got, you know, we understand the basics of anatomy and kinetic energy and foot pounds.
I mean, we can do the math, man.
And even if you can't do the math, you can feed it into a reasoning AI engine, and it can do the math for you.
And AI will tell you that a human neck can't stop a 30-06 round and absorb all that energy without exploding.
Try it.
Put that question into any AI engine, and you'll see.
If As long as you describe the prompt correctly, you need to mention the 3,000 foot pounds of energy being delivered.
I mean, my goodness.
So we're being lied to and we're being lied to by people who think we're stupid.
And that's what's really bizarre about all of this.
They they really think we're stupid.
They think we're so stupid that we won't notice that they're lying to us.
And that's the reason I had to do this recording to point out that we're not that stupid.
And actually, we're the smart ones here.
We are the high IQ people who are asking the questions.
It's the low IQ people who are swallowing this obvious BS.
So I know you listening, you know, you're a high IQ person, or you wouldn't even be tuning in.
So you must have a lot of the same questions I have.
Who's really behind this?
We owe it to Charlie to find out.
And again, I'll I'll end with what I mentioned at the very beginning, which is that whatever your explanation of this shooting is, you can't make up your own rules of physics.
You can't invent new rules of anatomy, like, oh, he's bulletproof.
You know, you you can't just make up your own ballistics.
And if your only explanation is, oh, it was the hand of God, then that's just really lazy sloppy thinking, frankly.
That's that's that's a cop-out.
That's that's if you surrender, you have no argument.
You say it was God, you know.
God did what I say that I wanted him to do to stop it in his neck.
And it's like, okay.
You're just stupid at that point.
You know, go away.
Leave it to the adults in the room.
We got to figure this out for Charlie's sake.
And by the way, as a safety precaution, I would advise you that if you expect to be taking fire, you should wear ballistic protection because you are not bulletproof.
I guarantee it.
Ask any cop, ask any veteran, ask any soldier, ask any surgeon.
Go ask, find an ER surgeon.
Ask them.
Have you ever seen people who are bulletproof because they were really healthy?
No, I dare you.
Find your favorite ER surgeon who treats gunshots and ask him, you found any bulletproof humans yet.
Rifle rounds, hunting rounds, rounds that can take down a moose.
You found you found any of those rounds just hanging out under the skin in humans.
No.
Never.
All right, that's look, that's what I wanted to say.
But um I'm not gonna I'm not gonna put any ads or plugs in this because I do not want to monetize this topic at all.
Uh I will just say how you can follow me, though.
You can follow my podcast and my interviews at Brighton.com.
You can follow, or I'm also on Rumble, by the way, Health Ranger report.
Uh I'm on X at HealthRanger.
You can follow me on Brighton.social at HealthRanger.
And you can also use our free AI engine, which is just kicking ass, and it's getting better.
We've had a lot of breakthroughs lately, just in the last two weeks.
You can find it at Brighton.ai.
Now, that AI engine does not yet know about the tragic murder of Charlie because we haven't updated it with uh recent news.
So uh there's no point in trying to ask that AI engine about Charlie.
It won't know about it.
But it you can ask it about ballistics or you know, bullet properties or foot pounds or things like that, but it's not a reasoning engine.
So if you want to use AI to help you walk through this, I strongly suggest that you use a reasoning engine and you give it a good prompt with all the data, you know, velocity, foot pounds, bullet diameter, etc.
Ask it a good question, you're gonna get solid answers, actually.
And you will not get an answer from AI that says, yeah, humans can stop 30 out six hunting rounds.
Nope.
Nope, not unless it's hallucinating, which is what a lot of people seem to be doing right now.
I you know, it's funny when people say don't use AI, it hallucinates.
I'm like, have you talked to humans lately?
They hallucinate a whole lot more than AI.
I mean, just go on X. You want to see Mass hallucinations, man.
We're looking at it right now.
It's all over, X. The AI engines make way more sense than these people.
Oh my goodness.
All right.
Thank you for listening.
And uh look, I I pray, I pray for the soul of Charlie Kirk.
I pray for his family, his surviving spouse and children.
I pray that violence ends in our world, and I pray for the end of suffering.
And I also pray that we find out who's really behind this, because I think he was taken out.
I think he was taken out for a purpose to silence him.
And if he is in heaven right now looking down on us, he's probably his soul is screaming, find my killer and expose the truth.
So I believe we do Charlie a service by investigating this and by contributing through our knowledge of mathematics or physics or ballistics or anatomy, even though the topic is gruesome, and I apologize for that.
The effort is noble, and I do this in good faith.
I do this in good faith to help us find the real killer of Charlie Kirk.
May the truth come out.
So thank you for listening.
God bless you all.
God bless America.
May God have mercy on this country.
I tell you what.
▲
Export Selection