All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 1, 2024 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
02:22:36
BBN, Feb 1, 2024 - COVID LIES prove that modern VIROLOGY is PSEUDOSCIENCE
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Alright, welcome to Bright Town Broadcast News for Thursday, February 1st, 2024.
Yes, it's already February, if you can believe that.
I'm Mike Adams.
Thank you for joining me today.
I apologize for the background noise.
As usual, just to keep this short, I have one of the servers that's doing our language model processing in my office.
And at the moment, it's crunching away on some data pipeline tasks.
And my developers are working on it remotely.
And they need to let it run.
They're debugging some stuff.
So the noise will be up and down.
I apologize.
But the reason I like to have it in my office is because I'm a hands-on type of person.
And sometimes I'll tweak the code or tweak parameters.
And I also want to watch what's happening and do the code pulls from GitHub repos and things like that.
That's what this is all about.
All right, moving on.
There's been a lot of interesting news today for sure, but I want to tell you about the interview we have coming up because it's a very interesting interview.
It's an interview about the upcoming documentary called The End of COVID, which will be streaming on Brighton University beginning in nine days.
Yeah, February 10th.
That's a Saturday.
So you can sign up for that, of course.
It's free to watch the stream.
Go to brightu.com.
That's just the word bright and the letter U. It's short for Brighton University.
And the interview today is with Alex Zek and Mike Winner, who are the co-producers of this documentary series.
And believe me, this is a fascinating interview and conversation about the...
Well, the artificial nature of the COVID pandemic.
It turns out that the Truman Show Theater goes much deeper than most people ever suspected.
In fact, I have a special report today about how to rise above the artificial world and start living in the real world.
If you're not already, I would imagine most of you are living in the real world, but...
A lot of people are not.
In any case, this interview coming up delves into the key questions about the so-called germ theory.
Now, I know some of you are going to say, well, what do you mean?
Are you questioning the germ theory?
Well, actually, I wasn't questioning the germ theory for my entire life, especially as a food scientist and someone who runs a science lab.
Including microbiology, by the way, which is bacteria, E. coli and salmonella and so on.
And I always believed in the germ theory, and I know that bacteria are real, obviously.
There could be friendly bacteria and unfriendly bacteria.
But when you get into the world of so-called viruses, which even the medical system says are not living, they don't have cell walls and cell nuclei and You know, they're not living organisms, okay?
They don't respond to the environment like a bacterium would do.
And only because of COVID, because I interviewed people like Dr.
Christine Massey and, well, many others, Dr.
Thomas Cowan, for example, and Dr.
Andrew Kaufman, I learned slowly over time that It has never been shown.
There has never been any scientific paper or any university or any government or any agency such as the CDC or the FDA. It has never happened that they have extracted so-called viruses from a sick person, isolated those viruses, shown them to be some kind of particle that are homogenous.
Like, here's the particle and here's a bunch of them.
And then introduced those particles or viruses into a healthy person and then reproduced the sickness symptoms from the original person.
In other words, the path of infection, the so-called transmission of a disease and the infection of a new host with a so-called virus, that has never been shown to be true.
It's never been proven.
In fact, experiments that tried to prove it turned out to fail.
They could not infect people with so-called influenza viruses by taking people sick with influenza and taking their snot and so on and smearing it on these other people and hoping they would get sick.
It never works, it turns out.
And then you find out, if you listen to Dr.
Thomas Cowan and Andrew Kaufman, it turns out that the whole method, let me back up, the entire field of virology is rooted in such pseudoscience quackery that it's hard to even call it science.
So in order to detect the presence of a so-called virus, they basically murder healthy cells with a bunch of toxic chemicals.
And then as those cells rupture and you get all of this exosome material, which is like dead debris of once living cells, then they say, aha, those are viruses.
See, look, and they kill the cells.
I mean, it's crazy.
They murder cells and then they say that the remains of the cell are the viruses.
Those are the pathogens that did it.
So the whole field of virology needs to be seriously reconsidered or recalibrated.
And I don't think we'll ever understand real pandemics.
Until we get to the bottom of this, because the issue is far more complex than what modern medical science makes it out to be.
And by the way, I found this out firsthand, too, when during COVID, as the director of an ISO accredited laboratory, which is my food science lab, I attempted to acquire SARS-CoV-2 isolated standards.
Because, of course, I run quantitation methods on glyphosate and heavy metals and atrazine.
That's another herbicide.
And I know that in order to run a quantity analysis or a quant curve, as we call it, in other words, quantitation, to get a number, like how many parts per million of lead is in this food, or what's the concentration of glyphosate in this sample, for example.
In order to do that, you have to get Which means, for example, if I'm testing for glyphosate, I go to a lab and I purchase a glyphosate standard, which is a known concentration of glyphosate, which is typically, I think, what would that be, like 1,000 micrograms per milliliter is the typical, that's what standards typically come in.
And then we dilute from there, and we make a series of standards, and then we run those standards on the instrument, and then we build a quantitation curve that tells the instrument, okay, here's what one part per million looks like, here's what 100 parts per billion looks like, here's what one part per billion looks like, and so on.
And we do like a five or six or seven point curve, and we get good linearity in the curve.
Use like.99999 coefficient of linearity.
And then we run our unknown sample against that, and then we can plot our unknown sample on that curve, and then we can say with certainty, oh, well, this piece of whatever food, like macadamia nuts, let's say, contains this much glyphosate, and maybe that's like 57 micrograms per milliliter or whatever.
Maybe nanograms per milliliter would be more common probably with macadamia nuts, parts per billion, right?
I guess micrograms per mil would actually be quite a lot for macadamia nuts.
You don't even find that in beer.
In any case, that's the way you do actual science, okay?
When it comes to virology, It's all quackery, it turns out.
It's all quackery.
It's unbelievable.
So I tried to purchase standards of SARS-CoV-2, and I found out that there are no such things.
There are things that are called isolates of SARS-CoV-2, but they're not.
They're not isolated, and they're not standard, and they don't know the quantitation of any of it.
So if you go to the lab supply companies and try to buy an isolate of SARS-CoV-2, they will sell you a vial, which I call a snot sample.
So basically they say, well, we took a sample of snot from a woman that came off an airplane from China, and she was symptomatic.
So we say she had COVID.
So we took her snot, and then we added a bunch of cow blood components and albumin and whatever.
And then we added some components from some other animals, and who knows?
It's all mixed in there.
It's part human, part bovine, part whatever, part avian maybe.
And we don't know how much of anything is in there.
And we never actually isolated any viruses in this thing, but it's a sample of snot.
And you can take this to your lab, and then if you can reproduce the snot, then you have COVID, you know?
And I'm thinking, wait a second.
Number one, if you've never isolated the SARS-CoV-2 out of your snot sample, how do you know you have SARS-CoV-2?
Where are the particles?
Where's the microscopy?
Where's the chromatography?
Where's the time of flight, LC-MS, triple quad, mass spec, GC, whatever you want, any instrument you want to throw at it?
Where can you show me that you have SARS-CoV-2?
And the answer is they can't.
They never could.
They never did.
They made it all up.
It's incredible.
There's not one person who was diagnosed with COVID-19, not in America, not in Europe, not anywhere in the world, who had samples taken from them that were isolated and separated into SARS-CoV-2 particles.
That have been shown under any microscope, including an electron microscope, or shown under any instrument whatsoever, other than the BS-PCR instruments, which is only detecting dead cell debris.
So again, if I buy groceries at the grocery store, and I take them to my lab, and I ask the question, how much glyphosate is in this bag of peanuts or whatever...
I can take the bag of peanuts, I can put it through sample prep, I can use solvent extracts, which concentrates the glyphosate, the actual glyphosate molecules, and I can put the glyphosate molecules on a chromatography column, and using the right chemistry there, I can collect all the glyphosate All at one time and have it released from the column at a certain time.
Like, you know, 4.7 minutes or whatever.
And then all the glyphosate comes out and then I can see the glyphosate with my instrument.
I can see the mass.
I can see actually the ion fragmentation of it as well.
Because I blast it with ionization and it fragments in certain predictable patterns.
So I can see that.
I can see the retention time on the column.
And I can say, that's glyphosate.
I can see it, I can prove it, I can reproduce it, and I can compare it to a glyphosate standard.
You can't do that with COVID. You can't do that with any viral infection whatsoever.
Never been done.
Never will be done.
PCR is a fraud when used for diagnosis.
It's also a fraud in crime labs, by the way, for very much the same reasons.
But I'm telling you, And I'm speaking from first-hand experience here.
As someone who runs a globally recognized, ISO-accredited, audited, inspected, tested laboratory, we have to show proficiency in being able to do quantitation analysis.
And you can't do that in virology.
There are essentially no standards in virology.
There are no standards.
I mean, isolated standards.
They don't exist, okay?
So, I know that's a long explanation.
But this is important.
You need to know that when they're talking about disease X, it's fiction.
It's a scare story.
They're making it up.
And that's what this documentary, The End of COVID, is really all about.
So sign up for it.
Just go to brightu.com and you can watch the whole thing for free.
Or, of course, you can optionally purchase the full downloads if you wish, which helps support the filmmakers and helps support Brighteon.
But that's optional.
You don't have to do that.
No obligation to do that.
But check out the interview coming up today because you're going to learn a lot about this.
Also, by the way, don't be terrified of disease X. You know, it's a psychological operation.
In fact, the whole germ theory is a psyop, actually.
It's a scare story to try to scare everybody into getting injected with vaccines that cause cancer and infertility and slow cognitive lobotomies and, you know, immune suppression and so much more.
It's really something.
But the thing about disease X is they can get everybody terrified over something that doesn't even exist, or something that they can't prove exists.
It's something that does not transmit, okay?
Remember how they finally came out and admitted that the COVID-19 vaccines, number one, do not stop transmission, and number two, do not prevent infection?
And you're probably thinking, well...
Why were we using them then?
I mean, not you and I, but the public.
I mean, why did anybody take them?
Because the whole point, the whole promise, the lie by the media and the CDC and Fauci and all the rest of them was, oh, this is going to stop infection.
Even Joe Biden said that.
He said, if you take the vaccines, you won't get infected.
That was a lie.
The vaccines, as have now been admitted, never stopped transmission, never stopped infections.
So they were useless.
They were pointless.
And all those people who tried to shame the anti-vaxxers, so to speak, say, you're irresponsible in society because you're not vaccinated.
You might spread it to everybody else.
That was all a lie also.
Because the vaccines never stop transmission anyway, and at a deeper level, the whole thing was a fraud to begin with.
There isn't a virus particle that spreads from one person to another and infects them.
I mean, that's why the vaccines cannot possibly work, because the whole theory upon which the vaccines are formulated is fraudulent and false and quackery to begin with.
You know, if your product claims to stop the spread of a germ that infects people, and then you find out, well, that germ doesn't actually really exist like that, and it doesn't infect people like that, well then, what's the point of your product?
See, that's the realization that more and more people are coming to here.
Now, I'm not saying there aren't bacterial infections.
There is bacterial pneumonia.
There is obviously, you know, salmonella and E. coli and things like that.
I mean, bacteria are real and bacteria can infect a person.
I'm talking about viruses here.
The so-called, you know, the germ theory in the realm of virology.
That's all BS. But in terms of germs as bacteria and fungi and mold spores and things like that, yeah, that's all real.
You can see that stuff.
You can see it quite easily under a microscope.
I'm talking about viruses.
It's all made up.
All right, moving on to other news.
It turns out that Pink Floyd co-founder Roger Waters has been dropped by the German music company BMG. Looks like they just dropped him, dropped a contract with him, because he has dared to tell the truth about Israel's genocide.
And it's astonishing to me, I mean, if you actually listen to an interview with Roger Waters, he is one of the most humanitarian, compassionate, intelligent, and informed people that you will ever hear speak on this subject.
Okay?
Now, that doesn't mean I endorse everything that he says about every topic.
I'm just saying that from what I've heard, I've watched many of his interviews talking about Israel and Palestine and Gaza and the whole situation.
He's one of the best pro-humanitarian analysts out there.
And yet he has been savaged by even the alternative media calling him an anti-Semite, which he is absolutely not an anti-Semite.
Neither am I. I mean, I'm pro-human of all humans.
And I want to see Israel survive.
And one of the reasons I'm so critical of what Israel is doing is because I think it's going to lead to Israel's total destruction.
And that's bad.
I don't want to see Israeli people hurt and bombed to death.
And certainly I don't want to see Palestinian people hurt and bombed to death either, which is why I'm calling it out.
The violence needs to stop.
So Roger Waters has been calling for peace.
He's been calling for diplomatic solutions.
And he called for a ceasefire in Ukraine.
And yet he's been viciously attacked.
He's been called, you know, a Putin supporter and then now an anti-Semite.
And those are all distortions.
Roger Waters wants peace.
He's a humanitarian.
And so shame on BMG, okay?
Okay.
And I think that you should support Roger Waters.
I think he's got a tour going on.
I don't know if it's still going on right now.
Dark Side of the Moon tour?
I think that's what it's called.
But, you know, check it out.
Support him.
He is a compassionate, informed person, which is more than we can say for a lot of these Christian Zionists in the alternative media, or certainly the Biden regime, or the war criminal known as Netanyahu, you know, I'll take Roger Waters over any of those people any day of the week.
In fact, I will invite Roger Waters for an interview.
I'll have my producer see if we could reach out and get him on.
I mean, you know, I think it's so sad and pathetic how so many people, including publishers and alt media personalities, influencers and journalists, they're so tribal.
They have no principles.
They're just on one team or the other.
And a lot of them are just on the Israel team, no matter what, regardless of what Israel does, regardless of its actions, like having Israeli soldiers dress up as medics and raid a hospital in the West Bank to murder three hospital patients that they didn't like.
I mean, that is so beyond unethical.
I mean, that's a straight-up war crime.
And yet, so many of these alt-media publishers like Breitbart, they just excuse it.
No, totally fine with them.
Because they have no morality.
Or Ben Shapiro for that matter.
No morality.
They're just on Team Israel.
But they have no principles.
And I have no patience for people who have no principles.
I can work with principled people even if I disagree with them on certain issues.
If they have core principles that they stick to, at least, you know where they stand and you know it's consistent and you know it's based on something other than just raw tribalism.
What's dangerous to our world is all these people that just vehemently advocate for their team no matter what their team does, even if it's evil.
We're seeing a lot of that right now.
We're also seeing, by the way, A lot of controlled opposition in the liberty movement.
And the way to tell who's controlled opposition is very simple.
It's those who won't criticize Israel.
They're controlled.
They're controlled by Israel.
And it's worth mentioning, by the way, that the most intelligent people are people who operate on principles.
And the dumbest people are the tribal people.
It's true.
Think about the most intelligent people I've interviewed, like Colonel Douglas McGregor, for example.
Very high IQ, academic, achiever, individual, even though he has a strong military background, of course.
But he's a principled person.
He's not tribal.
Because he transcends tribalism in his analysis of what's happening geopolitically and militarily and economically and all these other things.
That's why I really enjoy talking to Colonel Douglas McGregor and others.
I've interviewed a lot of really high IQ people.
I mean, even think about former CIA analyst Ray McGovern, who I interviewed recently, or Matt Bracken just the other day.
So these are high IQ people, and you find that they operate with principles.
The lower IQ people are the tribalism people, who are always just cheering for their team no matter what.
That really is a sign of stupidity, which means that Ben Shapiro is not as smart as he tries to pretend to be, by the way.
At the core level, he's really kind of stupid, because he can't rise above the tribalism.
And of course, this phenomenon crosses all party boundaries.
Obviously, most Democrats are very, very tribal.
It's one of their characteristics.
They support their tribe of radical leftism no matter what.
But then there are some people who used to be Democrats that walked away from the Democrat Party.
Those are the people who have principles, generally speaking, right?
And there are journalists who walked away from radical left-wing journalism, like Glenn Greenwald is a good example of that.
And there are also just low IQ tribal lunatics on the Republican side.
Those are the neocons, the rhinos.
That's like Lindsey Graham.
I mean, Lindsey Graham is not a high IQ individual.
He's kind of an idiot who just elbowed his way into a position of power.
And Now uses his power, wields it as a weapon against everybody else who maybe threatens his power.
But it's not very bright.
So this is a really defining trait that you need to watch out for.
Are people loyal to a tribe or are people loyal to principles?
There's a key question.
Now, a lot of Christians, the true Christians, are loyal to principles, the principles of the teachings of Jesus Christ.
A real Christian would honor that and would say that it's wrong for Israel to bomb innocent human beings who are also created in the image of God, by the way.
You see, whereas a tribal low IQ Christian would say that it's OK for Israel to do whatever it wants.
And Israel needs to commit genocide because this is going to accelerate the return of Christ.
And you just have to mass murder everybody, and that way we'll summon the king back into power.
That's a really low IQ approach.
It's not thoughtful.
It's not moral.
It's not even consistent with the teachings of Jesus Christ.
I love informed, high IQ Christians who have both faith and And a thinking ability to apply faith in a way that makes sense, that is consistent.
I despise low IQ people of any religion.
And surely there are also low IQ Muslims out there as well, just as there are low IQ Christians.
You know, it spans the spectrum.
In every religion you have both high IQ people and low IQ people and everybody in between.
And I don't demand that everybody else follow the same religion that I do.
But I do exercise discernment over the intelligence of the people that I choose to interact with or to interview or help promote.
That's why, I mean, even right now I'm happy to interview a principled Muslim who would love to come on and talk about From a Muslim point of view, what's happening in the Middle East, what it means to the followers of Islam,
and if this person is a principled person, and by the way, there are a lot of high IQ, very well informed, very well read practitioners of Islam in the world who I would be thrilled to have a conversation with about what's going on, to get their perspective and their understanding.
And yet, there are a lot of people in the space of independent media who would be aghast at that, oh my, you can't interview a Muslim.
Oh my God!
They're all terrorists.
I mean, really?
Can you possibly be that stupid to think that?
I mean, you would have to think that George W. Bush was a genius if you're that stupid.
To have been driven to a state of fear about all Muslims because their religion is different than yours.
And I'm just glad that my listeners here, most of you listening, you don't fall for that garbage.
You're an independent-minded thinker.
Otherwise, you wouldn't be listening.
And whether you're a person of faith or an agnostic person or a person of a different religion, Buddhism or...
You know, Hinduism or whatever you happen to practice, that's fine with me.
And I know you practice it with your mind and your heart, your faith and your brain connected holistically.
And that's the way it should be practiced.
I don't think that Jesus Christ or Buddha or Allah or, you know, any of the The leaders of the religion, the founders, I don't know what is the right term.
I don't think that any of them wanted people to blindly follow their teachings.
They set out their teachings as a guidebook and then they said, but use your heart and your mind, use your humanity, use your love, your consciousness to apply these principles.
Don't be blind.
Be mindful.
I think that's a universal concept.
Alright, but speaking of religion and tribalism, here's a story out of the post-millennial.
A Christian veteran who beheaded the satanic statue at Iowa Capitol has been charged with a hate crime.
Can you believe this?
So the charge, Cassidy, what's his name here?
Michael Cassidy has been charged with a, quote, hate crime for beheading a statue of Satan at the Iowa Capitol.
So there's so many things wrong with this.
Number one, why is a statue of Satan allowed at the Iowa Capitol?
And I know some of you are saying, well, I thought you said you support freedom of religion.
Satanism is a death cult.
That's not...
The same thing as a religion of peace.
And all the major world religions teach peace and coexistence.
Even Islam, even Christianity, even Hinduism, even Judaism and all of it.
Ultimately they teach peace and coexistence.
Satanism does not teach that.
Satanism is not a religion of peace.
Satanism is a cult of death and destruction.
It's pure evil.
It's the very definition of evil.
There should never be satanic statues in any state capitol, in any government building, in any school.
And any government that tolerates satanic statues is itself bowing down to satanism.
So what Michael Cassidy did to destroy this statue is actually an act of of helping to protect the people from evil.
This is a defensive act and the people have the right of self-defense against the rise of Satanism.
So Michael Cassidy is a hero, but he's being charged with a hate crime.
A hate crime.
And by the way, this whole idea of a hate crime is also absurd.
It's saying, well, okay, you destroyed some property, that's a crime, maybe vandalism or whatever.
And then, when you did it, we say you were hateful, therefore it's now a triple crime or whatever.
It's like the hate addendum, the hate bonus to the crime.
Well, this is absurd, right?
Because number one, how can they know what's in the mind of the person who destroyed the property?
And by the way, since when can the state legislate your thoughts and your state of mind?
Whatever you're thinking when you might be doing some minor thing like this, I don't know, vandalism or maybe speeding.
Let's say you're speeding on the highway.
The speed limit's 70 and you're doing 80.
But in your mind, let's say, you're thinking how much you hate dwarfs or something.
Sorry to even bring that up.
It's just the FAA said they want to hire people with dwarfism.
So it's kind of been on my mind lately.
I don't have anything against people with dwarfism, just for the record.
Nothing at all.
I don't care what size or color people come in.
I care whether they can do the job.
But let's just say somebody's speeding and they're thinking how much they hate dwarfs.
Well, then if the cop gives them a speeding ticket and then asks them, well, what were you thinking when you were speeding?
And if the driver says, well, they were thinking about how much they hate dwarf people, Does the cop like triple the ticket?
Oh, that's a thousand dollar fine now because that's a hate speeding crime.
You know, that would be insane, right?
That's totally absurd.
What did you get?
I got a dwarf speeding ticket today.
That's crazy.
I was doing 10 miles an hour over, but I was thinking how much I don't like little people or whatever crazy thought this person was having.
That, I mean, come on.
And the other twisted thing about this is that the state defines hate in whatever way it wants.
So, to start with, the state can say, well, you know, hate is if you say you hate black people and you're like screaming the N-word all over City Hall or something.
Okay, we understand.
That does sound pretty hateful.
But then, you know, it's kind of a slippery slope.
And then hate becomes, well...
You don't want to say somebody's pronouns because it's all made up nonsense.
I'm not saying your stupid pronouns.
I'm just going to call you he.
Oh, and then the state says, well, that's hate.
You didn't use their pronouns.
That's a hate crime.
Hate crime.
I mean, come on.
It's getting completely ridiculous.
Because, number one, how are you supposed to know what a person's pronouns are anyway, based on just what they look like?
I don't get it.
What if they show up dressed as a furry?
I love to use the furry examples because it's so freaking hilarious.
It's like a live-action cartoon, like watching Bugs Bunny cartoons in real life.
Somebody shows up dressed as, like, Wild E. Coyote or something.
They're a furry.
And you don't know what pronouns they are.
Fox creature?
Yeah.
Coyote man!
I mean, what are your pronouns?
How are we supposed to know?
And then the thing is, the person can change their pronouns at any time without notification, right?
So they can come in and they can, in their minds, they say, well, my pronouns are she and zur, and then like five minutes later, they can change their pronouns because it's all magical.
It doesn't require any notice.
It doesn't require any name tag.
It doesn't require...
Any rationality.
It's just whatever a person wants to come up with.
Like, now my pronouns are like fairy dust and unicorn farts or whatever.
And you're supposed to read their mind.
Say, oh, hey, unicorn farts.
I wanted to talk to you about this.
But by the time you say unicorn farts, they may have changed it again.
Now they're like zebra genitals or something, you know?
So how are you supposed to read their mind in order to even go along?
And the whole idea of going along with it is insane anyway.
It's like people who have imaginary friends demanding that you interact with their imaginary friends.
Just people who have a mental illness, which is what transgenderism is, let's be honest.
People have a mental illness, and they show up and they have a friend that's imaginary also.
So they have imaginary genitals themselves, and then they have an imaginary friend who no doubt also has imaginary genitals, which could be ever-changing.
You don't really know.
And then they have imaginary pronouns.
And then their friend, their imaginary friend, might have imaginary pronouns.
And you're supposed to somehow navigate all this crap.
Like, what are your pronouns?
What's your fake friend's name?
What does your fake friend look like?
Does your fake friend have a real penis or a fake penis?
A real vagina?
Fake vagina?
Do you have a real penis?
Or is it gone?
Do you have a fake vagina?
Are you a real person with a fake friend and a fake penis?
Or are you a farting unicorn zebra genital mental case?
Because how can we sort that out?
We can't.
But all that will be considered a hate crime under hate crime legislation.
Because, well, it's disrespectful.
Have you seen what the media says about white people lately?
Or men?
I mean, if it's just disrespectful, if being disrespectful is a hate crime...
Then what would you say about the way the White House spokeswoman treats all of America?
She's guilty of hate crimes every minute of every day.
Every time her lips move, she's carrying out a hate crime if disrespectful is the definition of a hate crime.
See, it all collapses into nonsense.
So, look, the bottom line is, I'm not referring to people with all their imaginary, made-up, mentally ill pronouns and friends and genitals.
No.
If you show up in public looking like a man, I'm going to call you a he.
If you show up in public looking like a woman, I'll call you a she.
If I'm not sure, I'll ask.
I mean, usually it's pretty obvious.
But I'm not playing your silly little games.
Now, speaking of culture wars, by the way, remember how Harvard's president, I believe it was, Claudine Gay, I think she resigned after it was shown that she plagiarized a lot of stuff.
She's black.
Her last name is Gay.
She ticked off all the right boxes to just become the president of Harvard.
Didn't earn it.
No merit.
She plagiarized.
She just copied and pasted.
That's how she wrote her papers, and that's how she moved up in academia.
Well, because when you have the right skin color, you don't have to earn anything in our society today, by the way.
All you have to do is just have the right skin color.
As we heard yesterday at the FAA, if you're black and you put the right words in your resume, you'll be moved right to the front of the line.
It's little secret code words, but only for black people.
So now, guess what?
From the Washington Free Beacon, Harvard's chief diversity officer plagiarized and claimed credit for her husband's work, according to a complaint.
Now, the Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer, Sherry Ann Charleston, quote, appears to have plagiarized extensively in her academic work, lifting large portions of text without quotation marks and even taking credit for a study done by another scholar, her own husband, according to a complaint filed with the university on Monday and a Washington Free Beacon analysis.
The complaint makes 40 allegations of plagiarism that span the entirety of Charleston's publication record.
And it goes on, talks about back in 2009, she copied this section of text, and she copied this, and then she recycled much of a 2012 study published by LeVar Charleston.
Framing the old material as her new research.
And it just goes on and on, talks about this.
And then they do a side-by-side comparison.
And it looks to me just visually like it's 80% to 90% plagiarized.
It's like, okay, this isn't even a question.
You didn't just lift a sentence.
You lifted entire sections of the paper.
Without a citation, without giving credit.
So, here we go.
Another black woman, interestingly, at Harvard.
Who apparently, if these allegations are true, did not earn her position, but she is the head of the diversity and inclusion.
Now, what does diversity and inclusion actually mean in the culture wars?
It means that you elevate people who don't deserve it based entirely on their skin color or their LGBT status.
That's what it means.
That's what diversity and inclusion actually means.
It means you punish white people who earned it You pass them over, or you punish Asian people who earned it.
Instead, you move people of color to the front of the line in order to reward their skin color, even if they're serial plagiarists, it turns out.
So this is just another example of the collapse of academia.
And why these so-called Ivy League schools are actually churning out libtards, like liberal but cognitively impaired, like people who don't have the IQ to actually earn their positions.
They can't actually do the work, and so they steal it from somebody else.
So stealing academic work, if you're a white person, oh, it's the most evil crime possible.
If you're a black person, they make excuses for you.
Isn't that amazing?
They make excuses!
And my apologies to those of you listening.
If you are a black person, you know that I'm not attributing this to all black people.
There are plenty of people of color in the United States and around the world who have earned their position.
But isn't it an insult to all those who did earn it to hand these positions to people of color who did not earn it?
It's an insult to all people of color.
And actually, it contradicts and sets back the entire civil rights movement.
Because if the message out of Harvard and these other universities is to all of society, if their message is, well, because we're black, we don't have to earn it, We're going to take your job.
We're going to take your salary, your pension, your position, your CEO position at the company.
We're going to take the government job.
We're going to take it from you, even though we didn't earn it.
Just because of the color of our skin.
That is racism.
That is blatant racism.
And I believe it was even Thomas Sowell who said, you can't solve racism by continuing to carry out more racism just in the opposite direction.
I mean, I'm paraphrasing.
I don't know exactly how that quote went.
You get the point.
You can't solve racism where white people discriminated against black people by reversing it and saying, well, now we're just going to discriminate against white people and give black people positions that they did not earn and they do not deserve.
And that's happening in medicine.
And that's happening in engineering schools.
You know, good luck in those high rise buildings and those new bridges being constructed because you don't know if the engineer actually could do the math.
Right?
I mean, it's true.
It's a true statement.
Same thing with medicine.
Think about it, folks.
Look, just to be clear, I welcome people who can do medicine, people of any color, of any race, even any sexual orientation.
I don't care if a doctor is gay as long as he or she is a good doctor.
It doesn't matter to me.
But because of the DEI policies in medical schools now, That grant medical licenses to people of color and LGBT people who do not deserve those licenses, then it's going to force everybody to ask the obvious question when they see,
and I dare say, I mean, I... I don't like the fact that this situation has been created by the diversity inclusion nonsense, but when people see a black doctor, sadly, they're going to ask the question in their own mind, if not publicly, did you earn your medical license or was it given to you?
And we should not be in a society like that.
We should not be in a society where we have to ask the question.
We should be able to look at a doctor, man or woman, black or white, Asian, Hispanic, You know, tall, short dwarfism, whatever the case may be.
And we should be able to have confidence that that person earned that medical license.
And we shouldn't have to be fearful that they don't know what they're doing.
But when you look at doctors today, knowing what's happening with the DEI policies in the medical schools, you can be certain of a couple of things.
You can be certain that if your doctor is white, he or she had to work extra hard.
Because they're getting passed over by everybody else, right?
I mean, this is true.
If your doctor is white, you know all the odds were stacked against them.
Or even if they're Asian, the odds were stacked against them.
It's hard to be accepted now in universities if you're Asian.
So think about it logically if you're in a hospital and an Asian doctor strolls in the room like, hi, I'm Dr.
Chan or whatever.
You're like, oh, thank God.
I know this person earned this medical degree.
But if a transgender doctor walks in, you honestly do not know if they're qualified because of all the DEI crap.
So they are hurting themselves, the left.
They're hurting their own credibility.
They are creating questions in people's minds.
They are spreading intolerance through their process of discriminating against people Based on the color of their skin, based on the whiteness of their skin, or if they're Asian, that's blatant discrimination.
That's exactly what's happening.
So Harvard, another great example of this kind of blatant discrimination against white people and against Asian people because they have apparently a black plagiarist as the chief diversity and inclusion officer.
Couldn't have predicted that one, huh?
Right.
Now, let's shift gears here a little bit and talk about big tech and censorship and the pathetic Republicans.
Oh, and their interaction with Mark Zuckerberg.
Because there's a great story on this at informationliberation.com by Chris Minahan.
The title is, quote, Republicans achieve the impossible, making Mark Zuckerberg look good.
Republican senators beclown themselves during a hearing on Wednesday...
With the heads of big tech social media platforms, old complaints about big tech censorship of right-wing views have now been replaced with whining about anti-Israel bias, also known as allowing too much free speech, and accusing tech companies of not censoring enough.
So here we go.
Senator Lindsey Graham saying, oh, TikTok is being used to destroy the Jewish state.
I mean, Lindsey Graham doesn't give a crap about free speech.
He just wants to now censor people who are critical of Yeah, there's a clue for you right there.
Ted Cruz to the TikTok CEO, quote, In the United States, you're promoting the kids' self-harm videos and anti-Israel propaganda.
So Ted Cruz is even more concerned about Israel than he is about censorship.
This is how you know.
Tom Cotton, Senator Cotton, was also in on the action here.
And then Senators Cruz and others, and also Marsha Blackburn, They complained to Mark Zuckerberg that he's not censoring enough, and they framed it in sex trafficking conversations.
Like, oh, you really have to crack down on people because of sex trafficking.
Well, what about allowing free speech for people who aren't sex traffickers?
I mean, what about just allowing free speech for people who disagree with the Biden administration or who disagree with Trump?
You know, the satanic cult of Zionism, as currently expressed by Netanyahu, right?
What about freedom of speech to criticize evil in the world?
Well, no, these senators don't give a crap about that.
They want more censorship now.
And all it took was October 7th, the day Hamas broke through the borders there, and obviously it was all part of a planned, engineered attack.
Because the IDF stood down, obviously, in order to set up this whole current situation.
But all it took was that one day, October 7th, and then all the conservative senators suddenly became pro-censorship.
Isn't that amazing?
They don't believe in free speech at all.
They're tribal, just like I was talking about earlier.
They're tribal.
They don't have principles.
They have tribes.
And they're part of the Zionist tribe.
So...
Whatever has to be censored, they're down with that.
Anything to silence criticism of Israel's genocide, by the way.
And, you know, people like myself, I wouldn't be criticizing Israel at all if they weren't committing genocide.
I mean, I've never had anything against Israel.
I've known lots of Israelis.
I've trained with lots of Israelis.
You know, I've trained in Krav Maga for many, many years, combat training with Israelis, okay?
There's some bad dudes.
You don't want to get in a fight with Israeli Krav Maga experts, trust me, because, like I said, I've trained with them for many years.
I trained on advanced, like, weapon takeaway skills, gun takeaways, knife takeaways, edge weapons combat, all that stuff.
Believe me, they wouldn't train with me if I were an anti-Semite.
If I walked into the training and said something crazy about Jews, they would never train with me.
I've never had anything against Jews, and I don't have anything against Jews.
I don't have anything against Israel.
I'm opposed to the satanic war criminal regime that's running Israel.
That's Netanyahu.
Just like, I love America, but I can't stand the occupiers that are running America right now.
But a lot of people conflate the two.
They think when I criticize Joe Biden or the Pentagon that I'm criticizing America.
No, I'm not criticizing America.
I love what America was founded on.
The founding fathers, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the American spirit, especially the Texas spirit, all of that.
I'm going to criticize things that are getting in the way of that.
Just like I'm going to criticize Israel, well, its leadership, when it's carrying out acts of genocide.
That doesn't make you an anti-Semite.
It makes you a principled person, actually.
Now, by the way, U.S. troops are going to start dying for Israel.
Because here's a story from RT that's citing the intercept.
It says, U.S. troops told to prepare for war in Gaza...
The U.S. Air Force personnel in Iraq have been ordered to remain on standby in case of, quote, on-ground U.S. involvement in the Israel-Hamas war.
The Intercept reported this, citing a Pentagon memo.
The memo instructs an unknown number of troops to be placed, quote, on standby to forward deployment to support troops in the case of on-ground U.S. involvement in the Israel-Hamas war.
So the standby order applies to troops stationed in Iraq since last year.
The Pentagon did not respond to a request for comment.
So the White House has stated on several occasions, this is RT reporting, that its support for the Jewish state would not involve American soldiers fighting alongside their Israeli counterparts.
But, of course, that's a lie.
I can tell you that U.S. forces have been fighting in Gaza, and some of them have died in Gaza.
By the way, I mean, look, you believe all the Pentagon stories?
Oh, there was a training accident.
Seven Navy SEALs died in a helicopter accident.
It was a training accident.
Where was the training happening?
Eastern Mediterranean Sea.
Oh, you mean like right off the coast of Gaza?
Yeah.
Yeah, we don't believe you.
You're lying.
They were killed by Hamas, weren't they?
Yeah.
They were killed by Hamas, but they covered it up and said it was a training exercise accident.
I mean, come on.
Or the other day, they're talking about two Navy SEALs drowned in the ocean, in the water.
If you know Navy SEALs, you know they don't drown, okay?
One of the hardest things to do is drown a Navy SEAL. I mean, if you try to drown a Navy SEAL, they will kill you.
I don't believe it.
They say, oh, Navy SEALs drown.
No.
Another lie.
And you gotta love how the U.S. plays the victim all the time.
Like, well, they launched drones and they blew up three of our soldiers in Jordan.
Like, really?
Oh my God.
What were you doing in Jordan?
We were just minding our own business halfway around the world where we're not invited.
It's like, so wait a minute.
So you were actually probably in Syria, number one, where you're not invited.
So there's an incursion.
You have soldiers invading in enemy land, which is really an act of war, actually.
So what you're saying is you were engaged in an act of war and your soldiers got killed.
Gee, imagine the surprise.
But no, it's always a victim.
The U.S. empire pretends like we have a right to be everywhere we want to be, no matter what the locals think.
How dare they attack our illegal bases that we plop down without permission right in the middle of their country?
It's like, my God.
I mean, what would you think if China just built a base in the middle of Colorado, let's say?
China just flies in a bunch of troops, a bunch of artillery, just sets up a base in Colorado.
And then if we attack the base, China complains, why are you attacking us?
We're the victims.
What are you doing here?
Go home.
Get out.
Go away.
But, you know, again, the morons like Lindsey Graham, low IQ, not capable of seeing the world in a rational, principled way.
They're just tribal.
Like, whatever the U.S. does is the right thing to do, even if it violates all principles of law and geopolitics and war.
It's just whatever we want to do.
That's the right thing to do.
Okay.
Well, no wonder your soldiers are getting all blowed up all over the world.
Do you think that's going to stop?
No.
My goodness.
I mean, I don't want to see soldiers harmed or killed.
I want to see them brought home.
Like I said before, you want to see soldiers safe and sound?
Bring them home.
Get out of Syria.
Get out of Jordan.
Get out of the Middle East.
Just sail home.
Let the Israelis figure it out for themselves there.
They wanted to start a war?
Well, they can finish it.
They don't need us there.
I mean, it's not our business.
Alright, you know, in fact, I'm going to go to the special report here about the military draft that's coming in the United States.
Because the U.S. regime is ready to sacrifice millions of American lives for war.
They don't care how many Americans they kill.
I mean, after all, they unleashed the vaccine bioweapon.
They already killed probably at least a million Americans.
If they could kill a few million more in wars in the Middle East and...
Europe, then, you know, hey, that just gets them more depopulation bonus points on the globalist leaderboard, you know?
So yeah, they don't care how many Americans they kill.
Of course they're going to have a draft.
Of course they're going to start multiple wars and just send young Americans to die.
And of course they don't care about public opinion because they're not going to have an honest election anyway.
You think they care what the public thinks?
I mean, if they cared what the public thinks, they wouldn't be doing what they're doing now.
They don't care.
They're going to do whatever they want, no matter who dies in the process, sadly.
So that special report coming up next here about the military draft, and then that's followed by the interview with Alex Zek and Mike Winner about the end of COVID and the whole germ theory discussion, which I find quite fascinating.
Now, in the meantime, a couple of plugs here before we get to that.
Of course, thank you for your support of HealthRangerStore.com.
We have a new batch of turmeric powder in stock.
Turmeric powder, usually most of it that we've tested out there contains a lot of lead.
From my point of view, alarming levels of lead.
And so we have to reject most of the batches that we test.
Well, we found another clean lot.
It's very, very clean.
And past all our tests, including glyphosate tests, including microbiology, a lot of times...
Turmeric powder or onion powder or maca root powder, any of these root vegetables, they often have very high bacteria count, by the way.
So that's something else to watch out for.
That's why we do the microbiology testing.
But we've had this clean lot.
It's available now, healthrangerstore.com.
And turmeric, interestingly, since we're speaking of the Middle East, you know, turmeric is one of the spices that's used in, of course, curries out of India, but also places like Lebanon.
And turmeric is used in a huge number of spices that are used, you know, across Middle Eastern cuisine and Jordanian cuisine, Syrian cuisine, and, you know, all the regions of the Mediterranean, including to some extent in Israel and all the regions of the Mediterranean, including to some extent in Israel and also in So the fact that Middle Eastern people tend to eat a lot of turmeric is to their great health benefit, by the way.
The more you know about turmeric and what's actually in it, the phytonutrients that are in it, you realize why Middle Eastern people don't suffer the same way Americans chronically suffer from lots of different things.
The diet of a Middle Eastern person is rich with numerous spices.
That are medicinal.
It's not just turmeric, of course.
It's nutmeg and cumin, cloves, allspice.
They use paprika, they use cinnamon, fenugreek, all kinds of things.
Ginger, right?
It's used in a lot of Middle Eastern cuisine.
And in America, we call these things superfoods.
In the Middle East, they just call it lunch.
Really.
And this matters because if the U.S. is going to go to war with these soldiers in the Middle East, the U.S. soldiers are obese.
Because they're living on processed junk food and they lack the superfoods and nutrients that Middle Eastern people eat all the time in countries like Iran, for example, or Iraq or Kuwait or Jordan, whatever.
Afghanistan, for that matter, right?
So the U.S. soldiers living on processed junk foods and running around obese, falling over dead from heart attacks without even getting shot, you know?
If you can't maneuver and fire, you're not going to win a war.
Well, you know, fat soldiers really can't maneuver that well.
Just to say it bluntly, they're so obese, man.
It's unbelievable.
And again, because they're living on garbage.
You don't see obese soldiers in the Iranian army.
You probably will never see an obese Hamas fighter.
Haven't seen one.
Why do you think they're so nimble?
They're popping out of holes, man, putting sticky bombs on tanks, and then vanishing back down into the cave network.
How do they do that?
With their light on their feet.
They weigh, like, 110 pounds, and they just move like foxes, you know?
Meanwhile, the lumbering, obese U.S. soldier, all kitted up with 100 pounds of gear that can barely move.
And it's unhealthy to boot, you know, and also hyper-vaccinated and ready to keel over and die from myocarditis and strokes at any given moment.
Man, believe me, when we have a war in the Middle East and U.S. soldiers are deployed, you're going to see more soldiers dying probably from vaccine side effects than from enemy fire.
And I think that's all by design, frankly.
The kill shots have been given.
So anyway, get yourself some superfoods at healthrangerstore.com.
Get your backup communications at Satellite Phone Store, which is SAT123.com.
And don't forget about their two-way satellite-based text messaging devices.
Those are called bivvy sticks.
Yeah, you can send texts anywhere in the world.
On any boat, any ship, any island, any continent, as long as you can see the sky, you can send and receive texts.
Yep, you don't need cell towers.
Talk to the satellites.
SAT123.com.
And then finally, if you want real off-grid money, check out verifiedgoldbacks.com.
That's our affiliate site for goldbacks, which have real physical gold embedded in polymers.
And they're highly divisible, have high utility, a smart way to have gold that's spendable.
And you can check out all our lab tests on that at that site, verifiedgoldbacks.com.
We do earn a small percentage of sales from that site because it's an affiliate site, but it doesn't cost you anything extra.
And we thank you for your support.
We're working hard on our language model project, of course, here.
That's what's making all the noise in my office.
Although, thankfully, the fans are...
Mostly turned down right now.
We'll crank things back up when I'm done here.
So when you support us, we support you back.
We're going to be giving you tools here at the end of March that will be game-changing tools, free of charge.
You'll be able to download it and use it locally.
No permission required.
No internet required.
You can use it everywhere in the world.
And you know what?
I have not mentioned this yet, but I'll go ahead and mention it.
Should I mention it?
Yeah.
Okay.
This thing, not in the first edition, but later on this year, it's going to be multilingual.
Yeah.
You'll be able to ask it everything you want in German or French or, of course, Espanol.
I don't know if we're going to do a Chinese language model.
We might.
It just depends on how much bandwidth we have in terms of NVIDIA GPUs.
And these NVIDIA cards, they're backlogged like crazy because everybody's buying them.
It's bonkers, man.
And not only do they cost $10,000 or $15,000 each, and then you've got to wait anywhere from three to six months to get them, and it's just...
So we're doing the best we can.
All right, but if you support us, we support you in return.
We'll be giving you some very powerful tools that you can use for your own empowerment and self-reliance.
So thank you for your support.
All right, here's the special report about the military draft, and then stay tuned after that for the interview about the end of COVID. Get ready for a draft in the United States.
Get ready for a massive world war.
Get ready for U.S. troops to be deployed in various locations across the Middle East.
And I don't mean just a few troops, a few dozen.
I'm talking about 100,000 or more.
Get ready for troops in Europe as well on the front lines against Russia.
And some people say, well, no, there's no way that Joe Biden would start these wars because, you know, he needs to win the election coming up and the war is going to be unpopular.
There's no way he would do that.
Do these people hear themselves?
You think there's going to be an honest election?
We may not have any election, but if we do have an election, it won't be an honest one.
It's going to be rigged.
Just like the last one was rigged.
See, the point of rigging elections is that they don't have to care about what the people think.
They don't need to listen to the people because the people's votes don't count.
We're living under an authoritarian, warmongering regime that has already sacrificed half a million Ukrainian troops.
Half a million Ukrainian young men are dead because of Joe Biden and Victoria Nuland.
And of course, Zelensky, but he's just a puppet of the West.
And if they're willing to kill half a million Ukrainians, you think they won't kill half a million Americans or sacrifice them to the war machine?
Anything so that they can stay in power and have an emergency and rig the election?
Look, they don't care how many Ukrainians die.
They don't care how many Americans die.
As long as they stay in power.
So you could count on it.
There's going to be a massive, probably a false flag event, maybe the sinking of a U.S. naval vessel or multiple vessels, followed by a declaration of war.
Congress will be behind it.
Biden will declare himself the commander in chief.
I mean, technically he is the commander in chief, but he'll suddenly try to appear presidential.
And a lot of gullible Americans will go along with it.
Well, we have to support the commander-in-chief in times of war.
Yeah, these are the people who caused the war.
They created the war in order to stay in power.
So, if we even have an election, you should consider that to be very fortunate.
And if we have an honest election, I mean, the chances of that happening are zero.
But here's where the Biden regime is going to...
Have its delusions collide with reality.
It's going to become quickly apparent that even in a draft, you're not going to be able to find enough soldiers to have a war.
I mean, to fight an effective war against Russia or Iran or even Hezbollah, for that matter, much less China and Texas.
You're not going to be able to recruit enough young soldiers.
And even if you have conscription and you make it mandatory, you're forced to sign up.
Today's youth in America, they're not capable of being soldiers for the most part.
I know there are exceptions, but by and large, these people have no capabilities that would make them effective soldiers at all.
You know, they're not fighters or warriors.
They're snowflakes.
They're triggered.
They don't have any discipline.
They don't have a work ethic for the most part.
They don't have courage.
They don't have skills.
Again, I understand there are exceptions to this.
There are some remarkable young people in America, mostly homeschooled kids.
Kids who grew up on a ranch or in rural settings and so on, they're very capable.
They know how to do things.
But that's not the majority of today's youth in America.
So, number one, you don't have the necessary population to even recruit effective soldiers who can fight in a war.
Secondly, you don't have the ability to manufacture the munitions that are needed to sustain a war effort.
That's become apparent.
And it doesn't matter how much money you print and how many contracts you award to the munitions suppliers and the weapons contractors.
They don't have the infrastructure to manufacture that stuff.
You know, the delusional bureaucrats can declare all day long, oh, we've just awarded a contract for 5,000 battle tanks.
Okay.
In your head, that's great.
You can imagine you have 5,000 battle tanks cruising around.
But in reality, you can't make 5,000 battle tanks.
In reality, you can't make 100,000 artillery shells a month.
You know, in reality, you don't have this stuff.
It's on paper.
And that might work in your twisted world of financialization and derivative investments and pension funds and stock market, all that, but it doesn't work in the world of kinetic war.
You can't win the war on paper.
You can't beat Russia by just printing lies.
I mean, that's been tried.
They've tried massive propaganda waves The U.S. and NATO will launch propaganda, but Russia will launch Kinzhal missiles.
And missiles beat propaganda.
Just like paper beats rock, and rock beats scissors.
Right?
And scissors beats paper.
But missiles beat propaganda.
That's a whole new game.
Rock, paper, scissors, missiles, propaganda.
Guess who wins?
The missiles win.
The missiles win all that.
And then thirdly, You don't have a currency that's going to last much longer because of all the money printing and the global debt implosion and the de-dollarization trend that's moving countries away from the dollar.
So, I mean, think about these three things.
America can't assemble the soldiers.
America can't manufacture the munitions and weapon systems.
And America can't sustain its currency for much longer.
Hmm.
So tell me again, how is America going to fight a war in the Middle East and beat Iran and fight a war in Russia and beat Russia and fight a war with China and fight a war with Texas and maybe half of America and then whoever else America is going to try to bully around the world?
Look, none of these things are going to come out the way that Joe Biden thinks they will or Victoria Nuland or Anthony Blinken.
The days of the U.S. Empire being able to just march around and defeat anybody they wanted, those days are over.
But the people in charge don't realize it yet, so they're about to have a moment of reckoning that will be psychically shocking to them.
They have no idea what's coming.
In other words, America is about to suffer a massive military defeat in the Middle East, as well as, of course, with Russia.
And yet the American leaders and decision makers don't realize that.
So they think they're good.
They think that, hey, we just have a draft and call out the troops and declare war.
It's all going to be good.
No, it's not.
Not unless you're willing to use nuclear weapons.
But if you're willing to roll out nuclear weapons, then you're going to get nuked.
In other words, the U.S. would be nuked by Russia, which has a lot more nuclear weapons.
And nuked by China, probably, as well.
So, hopefully nobody takes this nuclear, at least not the U.S., probably Israel will.
But speaking of Israel, by the way, Israel's losing the war with Hamas, something that I thought was impossible.
I thought for sure IDF soldiers could defeat Hamas because Hamas have no air power, no tanks, no artillery.
Hamas are essentially trapped in a giant concentration camp known as Gaza.
It was like, at first, how could Israel not defeat Hamas?
Well, it turns out that Hamas is incredibly strong and has a lot of very brave warriors.
Now, I'm not condoning everything that Hamas stands for, just to be clear.
I'm not condoning October 7th or anything like that.
I'm just saying, soldier to soldier, A Hamas fighter is far more courageous than an IDF fighter.
IDF fighters are like America's youth, you know, woke, snowflakes, triggered, afraid, incapable of doing much of anything.
The reservists there, the IDF, they're horrible soldiers and they're getting their butts kicked by Hamas.
And there are even reports now that Hamas is returning to northern Gaza and reasserting control over northern Gaza while Israel is evacuating its military groups, or some of them, from Gaza and saying, well, we have to plan for the long war now.
Yeah, because you couldn't defeat Hamas.
That's why.
I mean, the IDF got wrecked by Hamas.
And now the IDF doesn't know what to do, so they're going to try to start a war with Hezbollah and see if they can have better luck up north.
I can tell you they're not going to have better luck up north.
Hezbollah is going to beat their asses just like Hamas did, but actually even worse.
So then where this goes next, by the way, is U.S. troops on the ground in southern Lebanon.
Or in Gaza.
That's where this is headed.
Have no illusions.
The IDF has already failed.
It's not defeating Hamas.
It's not defeating Hezbollah.
So what are they going to do?
They're going to turn to the U.S. and say, well, you send us boots on the ground.
And of course, because most of the politicians in America are owned by Israel or blackmailed by Israel, They're going to say, yes, yes, let's send soldiers, U.S. soldiers on the ground and they'll have, I don't know, 10,000, 20,000, who knows how many U.S. soldiers they'll dispatch.
And dare I say, they're going to get an ass beating by Hezbollah also for the same reasons I've mentioned here so far, which is that Hezbollah, they're warriors.
A lot of the younger American soldiers are snowflake crybabies.
They're not good soldiers.
And the training they've undergone is not good training.
Because the U.S. military leaders are still living in the 1990s.
They haven't upgraded their methods of warfare to anything modern.
That's why NATO can't defeat Russia, by the way.
I mean, what kind of lunatics just drive all your tanks into Russia's minefields?
It's like, hey, let's take all our Panzers, let's take all the Bradleys, let's just, let's take everything we've got and just drive it into a minefield.
And that's what they did.
And then when the first tanks started getting blown up, they said, okay, drive more tanks into the minefield, just drive around those first tanks.
The whole field was mined.
So those blow up.
And they're like, well, go around those dead tanks, burning tanks.
See if you can make it across with another rush.
This is the way the U.S. military conducts warfare.
And it's retarded.
I'm sorry to say.
It's a retarded system.
And it doesn't work.
And that's why the U.S. has been defeated by Russia.
And that's also why the U.S. military will be defeated by Hezbollah.
Or Iran.
I mean, can you imagine the insanity if the U.S. tried to land troops and actually have an invasion of Iran the way that Desert Storm did back in the early 1990s with Iraq?
I mean, again, this is not the 1990s any longer.
And U.S. troops, if you try to invade Iran, you're going to get slaughtered.
You're going to get sent home in body bags if they can find all your body parts, you know?
I wonder at what point the U.S. government leaders are going to realize any of this, if ever.
Meanwhile, there will be all sorts of cover-ups like, oh, you're not allowed to report on dead troops.
You can't have photos of the caskets or how many flags are coming back draped over the caskets.
You know, total censorship, which is what Israel does.
They never tell the truth about how many of their soldiers are dead.
How many soldiers from the IDF do you think are dead right now?
I'm thinking it's in the thousands.
I mean, there's no way to verify that, obviously, but if you look at hospital records there, I've seen stories looking at that, the numbers look pretty large, like 5,000 or so wounded and killed.
That's a far cry from what Israel officially says.
Officially, I think they're still saying it's maybe around 100 or something like that.
I forgot the exact number.
They're not acknowledging the thousands that have been killed.
And I think the same thing is happening in the United States.
We were subjected to a story just the other day that said that two, I think it was Navy SEALs, We're lost at sea and they drowned and one was having trouble and then another one jumped in to rescue the first one and then there was a 12-hour search or something like that and they couldn't be found and then they showed up dead.
And I mean, you have to be stupid to buy that story.
First of all, nobody knows their way around water more than Navy SEALs.
I mean, you go through BUDS training, you know how to deal with water.
And, I mean, are you telling me that these Navy SEALs did not have flotation devices, or they didn't have beacons, or they didn't have sufficient survival skills to just float in the ocean for 12 hours?
I mean, come on.
You know, I know Navy SEALs.
I did firearms training with Navy SEALs.
They're very capable dudes.
You can't tell me a couple of Navy SEALs are drowning out in the ocean and it's not even a storm or anything.
No, I'm not buying it.
Those Navy SEALs got killed in combat, is what happened.
Combat in Gaza, most likely, and then they just made up a cover story.
They're making up stories every day, like the whole drone strike in Jordan.
It didn't happen in Jordan, and it wasn't a drone.
It was a ballistic missile strike in Syria, and that's why it killed soldiers and wounded something like 30 or 40 other soldiers.
I mean, come on.
These aren't drone strikes.
But if we get into a full-blown war in the Middle East, then, oh my God, the lies of propaganda are going to get even worse.
The government-controlled media will just spew out endless propaganda every day, which is kind of what Ukraine has been doing and NATO since early 2022.
You won't be told the truth about anything.
And the only chance to have any accurate reporting will be found in the alternative media, of course, as usual.
Or independent media, whatever you want to call it.
But the bottom line is, no matter how many Americans die in these wars that they're planning and pushing, Senator Lindsey Graham is going to say, send more.
Send more to die.
Bomb more.
Attack more.
You know, you're going to get this from all the war hawks, all the rhinos, plus the Democrats, you know, the State Department, the Biden regime, all of them.
And you're gonna start to see Americans coming home, I mean, dead Americans coming home by the tens of thousands.
And that's assuming this thing doesn't go nuclear.
If it goes nuclear, the whole U.S. Army deployment or military deployment could be just obliterated all at once.
Because Iran has nuclear weapons, folks.
So does Russia.
So does Pakistan.
How do you think this thing goes?
Well, the world is tired of the U.S. empire running around like a bully, bombing everybody and claiming to be following a rules-based order, but yet abiding by no rules other than just the rule of force.
Like, we can bomb you, so we will, and we'll just make up rules as we go along.
That's the U.S. So get ready for some very treacherous, dangerous, interesting times.
And if you can, call for peace, by the way.
I'm calling for peace.
I don't want to see any of our soldiers lose their lives or limbs over in the Middle East.
What are we doing there?
We should bring them home and focus on peace and prosperity back home.
So, thank you for listening.
Mike Adams here, The Health Ranger, NaturalNews.com, and Brighteon.com.
Take care.
Welcome to today's interview here on Brighteon.com, featuring a new docu-series that will be airing on Brighteon University, which is BrightU.com, and it begins streaming February 10th, and we have the two co-producers, which is Alec Zek and Mike Winner.
Welcome to the show, gentlemen.
It's great to have you on, and thanks for joining me today.
Thanks for having us, man.
It's an honor.
It's a total honor.
I'm really excited to share what we have.
Oh, yeah.
Great, Mike.
And, of course, we interviewed Mike Winter, previously involved in the Cordal Project as well, which is decentralized content.
So you guys are both working on some really important projects.
The name of the docuseries is The End of COVID. Now, let's start with Alec here.
Alec, the establishment hopes that COVID never ends because they get so much from it.
You know, they get compliance, they get fear, they get people to line up and be injected with, you know, experimental, unsafe biological weapons.
So how can you say, I mean, it's an audacious title, right?
The end of COVID. What do you mean by the end of COVID? Yeah, so this is a really good question.
And it was cleverly named because we wanted to use language that was accessible to broad audience.
And the end of COVID is almost a misnomer because the reality is, as we show during the educational series, is that COVID never actually began in the first place.
It was all a big show and there was no...
Evidence of any material threat whatsoever.
And that's what we cover throughout the end of COVID, which again consists of over 90 pieces of original educational content and 11 modules, educating everyone on all the details that you could possibly need to know related to not only COVID, but the pandemic industrial complex in general.
I love that term.
I'm sorry to interrupt.
The pandemic industrial complex.
That nails it.
Yeah, that's what it's become is a pandemic industrial complex, especially with the sophisticated sequencing technologies that they have in viral genomes and viral genetics.
extensively during the end of COVID.
But again, the end of COVID is, like I said, a misnomer, but it's also a Trojan horse in that it's using COVID as the example to educate the masses on the pandemic industrial complex itself and how we've been misled regarding what actually causes illness but it's also a Trojan horse in that it's using COVID as the example So let me ask you for just a clarification, like a big picture as we get into this.
Because we've interviewed many other guests here.
For example, Christine Massey and others who have been involved in trying to find any evidence that That would show that, let's say, quote, viruses isolated from an infected person can be isolated,
first of all, can be identified and shown to be identical particles, and then that those particles could be introduced into someone else's body as an infection, and then that that infection would reproduce the same sickness or symptoms as the first person.
Now, as far as I can tell here, Despite all the best efforts of many experts to try to follow through that process and get any of that to ever be shown by any university, any hospital, any pharma company, any government, the answer has been, oh, we can't show that.
Am I correct in that?
And is that part of the assertion of the series here?
Yeah, you're 100% correct, and that's the approach that we take with the entire series, is we educate everyone on what happened over the last four years from the perspective that there is no evidence whatsoever that there was a submicroscopic pathogenic particle Being transmitted or contagiously passed from person to person.
And we actually feature Christine Massey, I think, in either session eight of module one or session nine, which is the beginning of module two.
But nonetheless, that's the approach that we take.
And we know that that statement comes with a lot of questions.
Well, what about this?
How do you explain the symptoms that I had?
How do you explain loss of taste and smell?
How do you explain Sally getting sick right after Johnny?
And we aim to answer all of those questions thoroughly.
We really did our due diligence first in breaking through the cognitive dissonance ourselves for those who were featured in the series, but also in putting our shoes, putting ourself in the shoes of those who still have cognitive dissonance and those valid, totally understandable questions surrounding putting ourself in the shoes of those who still have cognitive dissonance and those valid, totally understandable questions surrounding what causes the phenomenon of with COVID, especially with respect to the symptoms.
So we cover that extensively during the series, again, emphasizing that there is absolutely zero legitimate empirical evidence for the entirety of the field of virology.
Viruses have never been established to exist, nor have they been established to cause any disease.
And we actually take it a step above that.
And we have a session titled The Proof of Contagion, where we highlight a number of studies that have been conducted attempting to demonstrate that disease is spread via the fluids of a sick person.
the proof of contagion where we highlight a number of studies that have been conducted attempting to demonstrate that disease is spread via the fluids of a sick person.
And every single one of those studies failed to show that disease is spread via the fluids of a sick person.
So without even getting into the molecular details, so to speak, which we do extensively, like I said, we have a whole session devoted to electron microscopy, a whole session devoted to viral genomics.
But without even getting into that, the idea that disease is spread from one person to another via the fluids of the sick is completely unproven.
And we cover that extensively as well.
Okay.
Wow.
Wow.
Yeah.
These, these are for some of our audience, these are going to be some outlandish statements for those who are, I think, better informed.
They're going to bring up a lot of I have some questions for you, but let's bring in Mike Winter right now.
Mike, how did you get involved in this project, and what do you think is the importance of it to society?
I'm fortunate enough to know and work with one of the only outspoken and public old-school bioterrain physicians on the planet, Dr.
Dr. Bear Paul Lando, who has been a bioterrain physician for going over 40 years now.
He's retired now.
So, you know, knowing him for 20 plus years and being educated on all of this when I was in my 20s about what the true nature of disease is, what causes illness,
and what is really the true nature of what it means to be a human in this human biological and what is really the true nature of what it means to be a human in this human biological machine and the relationship to what we jokingly call what the paradigm of germ theory calls micro-terrorist, micro-essentially creating
sort of a war-like mentality around microorganisms and turning us into victims of them versus understanding the holistic nature of this divine realm that we cohabit in So, for me, this is just beyond important because this is an underlying paradigm shift.
I believe we're going into the 21st century where we're going to go beyond reductionist materialism and all that.
It's sort of funneled us in through the institutions of scientism, right, which is the belief of today.
It's the superstition of today is what we are countering.
Through true science, through logic, through reason, and through understanding actual history.
I think that is one thing I really love about the end of COVID. And it's really not even a...
I don't even know what we call it.
We were kind of like trying to figure out, what do we call this thing?
I mean, it's really terrain university, you could call it.
Because it is devised and created in a way where it takes you through the granular detail, step by step, to understand that history.
There is no such thing as a quote-unquote virus like Thomas Rivers created back in the 1930s.
this modern notion that we have a genetic material encased in a protein shell that can essentially infect a cell and then repopulate itself, even though it's not truly alive.
It's like a zombie particle that somehow can then be spit out and cause massive disease across the planet.
This whole notion is essentially superstition, superstition of scientism.
Mike, let me jump in and say one of the most remarkable things about all of this, in retrospect, was how fear was driven into the minds of almost everybody around the world over something they could not see.
No one could show it to you.
And yet people imagined all kinds of things like six feet safe social distancing.
You know, like there was an invisible bubble around everybody and then they made it a real bubble with plexiglass.
I mean, you talk about delusions, but you were safe beyond six feet.
You were in danger at five feet because of this invisible particle terrorist, as you were saying.
This microscopic little terrorist thing, but nobody could even see it.
And yet everybody believes in it.
I mean, almost everybody.
How remarkable is that?
It's remarkable if you're ignorant to the state we're in and modernity.
We are at a time where we have lost touch in who we are, what we are, where we inhabit, how nature works, how we work with nature, and actually our divine right as co-creators on this planet or in this realm.
Whatever you want to call this place we coexist in.
And we are an exciting time where we get to question everything because the actual infrastructure of scientism, not true science, is fracturing and falling apart.
Thanks in large part to COVID.
Yes.
So I think this is so important because this is a massive paradigm shift in how we as true scientists, as we are true thinkers, applying logic and reason and the true scientific method and also beyond that.
I believe we can go beyond the restrictions of inductive thinking and actually sort of expand our horizons with all sorts of other epistemological options, if you will, to really discern truth.
And that's what to me as a sort of...
What a bedroom philosopher really loves about the end of COVID is we go there.
We go into really, really deep discussions around all of this later on once we sort of set the foundation around the biochemical side and the microscopy side and sort of the political side.
We cover all those elements, but then we go deep into the philosophy of nature, what it means to be human.
And also we go into some really phenomenal discussions around the nature of technology even in our relation to that and around consciousness and all that stuff.
So this really is a deep dive into what it means to be human and how we interface not only with each other, with nature, but with our sort of higher self.
Okay, so let me tell people how they can watch this entire series at no charge, just registration only.
Just go to brightu.com.
And our editor will put in the proper screenshot there.
Just go to brightu.com, B-R-I-G-H-T, and the letter U, brightu.com.
Enter your email address.
You're registered there to watch the entire series for free.
A new module airs each day beginning February 10th, and it goes on loop For 24 hours, each module does, and then the next day a new module begins, and that goes on loop for 24 hours.
So you can catch them all day after day, or optionally, you can purchase a full digital download with a lot of extra bonus items.
All the modules, all the sections, get it instantly, watch it on your own time.
If you decide to do that optional purchase, then your funds help support the creators who we have here, as well as this platform, Brighton University.
So we thank you for your support if that's an option that you wish to choose.
Or if money's tight, you just want to watch the whole thing for free, just tune in each day.
Now, Mike, I've got so many questions for you, but let me go back to Alec for just a second here.
One of the things that became very apparent pretty early on in this whole COVID fiasco was that the so-called scientism arguments never made sense.
It's like, oh, this little terrorist particle is so tiny that you can't see it, but somehow it's large enough to be caught in these really crude fibers in a cotton mask that you wear that is a thousand times larger than the size of the so-called virus.
Like that never made any sense.
And then another thing that didn't make any sense to me as a laboratory scientist, I mean, I run multiple mass spec instruments, and I'm familiar with quantitation.
The thing that never made sense to me was, oh, we're going to use a PCR test to see if you're infected and sick.
We're going to have a diagnosis.
Based off of a partial pattern match of a genetic sequence without having any quant data, which means there's no data showing how many of these particles might be in your body, which means diagnosis is impossible.
You have asymptomatic people that are fine.
They get flagged by this PCR machine.
Oh, you're infected.
You're a danger to society.
I'm sorry, guys.
I mean, I'm sorry to use profanity, but it's all bull****.
It's complete and utter bullshit.
Well, Mike, you know, a papaya had COVID. Yeah, exactly.
It would test positive.
But Alec, I mean, how does your documentary try to make sense of this?
How is this so compelling to so many people, including doctors?
Well, because it's all resting on the foundational acceptance by both mainstream doctors and a lot of alternative leading doctors that viruses exist as pathogenic disease-causing agents.
And, of course, we could spin our wheels forever arguing on the efficacy and safety of masking, of social distancing, of the experimental vaccines, or any other vaccines, aside from the COVID ones, for that matter, because there's a lot of attention on just the COVID vaccines as if they're the problem and other vaccines are good.
But the reality is all of infectious diseases and really much of allopathic medicine rests on these foundational, unproven assumptions about health and disease and how the body works.
And that's what we cover extensively during the end of COVID. So we have a whole session.
And when I say session, I'm talking like an hour to an hour and a half long presentation.
So anytime I use session both previous to this and in the future for this discussion with you, that's what I'm referring to.
We have a whole session just on PCR, breaking down exactly what is going on with the PCR, quote, tests, in air quotes.
And we also have a whole session on viral genomics, as I said, a session on virology pertaining to the scientific method.
So sort of painting it against the scientific methods, showing that it is fundamentally, by definition, pseudosciences.
There's no clear independent variable in the entirety of virology's foundational evidence, and they don't conduct proper control experiments.
We have a session on Stefan Lanka's control experiments and also John Franklin Ender's control experiments from the 1950s, which acted as the first Tissue culture experiment in virology.
So we cover all of this stuff extensively.
And I'd like to emphasize this point, if I may, because a lot of people in the health freedom space say that this is a divisive, unnecessary topic to focus on.
Again, the reality is everything that happened over the last four years, the entire CDC vaccine schedule where we're poisoning our kids, Much of allopathic medicine, much of the pharmaceutical industry's profits rest on this unproven pseudoscientific paradigm of health.
So I don't see how this is divisive whatsoever.
We show from multiple angles how all of virology's so-called evidence, namely the in-silico genome, the PCR, quote, tests, the, quote, virus isolation and electron micrograph images, and then any other lines of evidence, especially the circular reasoning and logical fallacies that sort of uphold all virology.
We dissect all of that during the series, and it is tremendously important, especially as the alternative health or the health freedom movement is so captured by this idea that there is lab-made versions of these particles.
And outside of the end of COVID, but it is relevant to bring this up, I interviewed Dr. David Martin, and many people don't realize this, even he says there is no transmissible particle.
Outside of the end of COVID, but it is relevant to bring this up.
I interviewed Dr. David Martin, and many people don't realize this.
Even he says there is no transmissible particle.
There is not and never was a transmissible particle, agent, or virus throughout the duration of COVID.
And gain of function is just dealing with synthetic sequences for the shot.
Said that on an interview I conducted with him.
But that's relevant because all this ties back into disease X that everyone's very afraid of.
All this ties back into this purported COVID variant that was 100% fatal in mice.
And if you go read those studies, it's absolutely absurd based on unproven assumptions continuation.
We have a whole session on gain of function as well during the end of COVID from Drs. Mark and Sam Bailey.
So all that to say this is tremendously important.
It sets a major precedent for the future, especially as the alternative...
The health freedom crowd is now carrying the torch for gain of function, which is actually far scarier in idea than the natural counterparts.
But the reality is neither of the two are true, and it's a false dilemma.
Now, let me ask for clarification.
In what you're presenting here in the end of COVID, you're not saying that there aren't chemical weapons.
As I understand it, you're not saying that there isn't VX nerve gas or chemical molecules that can be dropped on people to cause illness or death.
I talked about this early on with COVID. Remember how the outbreak really happened in New York City?
And then it didn't spread to other cities as it should have, according to models, if it were really an infectious agent that was spreading from person to person.
And it became apparent to me that the way the establishment could easily cause a pandemic outbreak simulation with all the real fear is to drop a chemical weapon on a city, make a bunch of people sick, have them show up at the hospital, hospitals are filled, people are dying, and then just call it COVID. And I mean, I don't know for sure if that's what happened, but it certainly is an easy way for them to carry that out.
And when you have high-density populations with subway systems and airports and train stations, you know, you can just spread chemical weapons all over the city and just wait for people to show up at the hospital and say, oh my gosh, we're in an outbreak, everybody locked down, you know?
It's so easy for them to do that.
Yeah, and that's a valid hypothesis worth exploring, and that's precisely the issue, is that we don't explore these other possible causes for this illness and a number of other illnesses because we're so myopically focused on this unproven paradigm.
So I wholeheartedly agree with your sentiments there.
Now, I'm not going to make an assertion that I know for sure that it was a chemical weapon that caused the symptoms that are known as, quote, COVID, which is again an amalgamation of a bunch of already existing symptoms before.
Point being that we're not exploring these other possible causes of illness and other ways that the parasitic class may be poisoning us, so to speak, because we're so myopically focused on this completely unproven paradigm.
So what is your explanation then for the fact that many people, including people that I know, they did lose their sense of smell.
Some lost their sense of taste.
Some had severe symptomatic illness.
I went through something as well, although mine was rather short because...
I treated it with ivermectin and chlorine dioxide and overcame it pretty quickly.
Why does ivermectin work for whatever this is?
Why did people experience such severe and unusual symptoms during this time?
So, I mean, there's a number of ways to answer this question.
It's all coming back to the understanding that health is unique to the individual.
But of course, we could provide several explanations for what causes people, as an example, to lose loss or lose taste and smell for an extended period of time.
There could be some psychosomatic related stuff there.
And I know that makes it seem like I'm denying the experience for people.
But we have a whole session devoted to the psychosomatics as it relates to COVID-19.
And I'm not saying that exclusively applies to what's going on with loss of taste and smell.
But there's also zinc deficiency.
And then we also have the reality that there is we're swimming in a field of non-native electromagnetic fields.
And that could possibly mess with all our olfactory function and cause us to have some weird stuff going on with taste and smell.
And then also, the reality is that we live in a web of interlocking or interlocking.
We're always perpetually interacting, I guess you could say.
I have words escaping me.
But we live in a world of intersecting electromagnetic fields, and we have our own electromagnetic fields on our bodies, and we are always sharing information with each other.
We have a whole session devoted to the human biofield.
The point is, with respect to loss of taste and smell, We have other plausible explanations for what causes that.
There could have been some chemical poison, as you said, right?
But the reality is, if you're making the claim that X causes Y, then you need direct proof that X causes Y. You can't then point to Y absent of ever establishing a causal relationship with X and then claim that as proof of X. So I'll share...
Thank you for that answer That experience did not happen to them until after the vaccine started being administered in the population at large.
My theory is the vaccines, so-called vaccines, they do contain mRNA technology.
They do hijack the body's cells to produce chemical weapon molecules that were being shed from those people's bodies and then causing chemical poisoning of other people around them.
And that could explain some of the symptoms, especially the neurological symptoms.
I don't know anybody who had this before the vaccine started being administered, and yet the people that I know never took the vaccines, but they were around people who took the vaccine.
So I do want to ask you about that.
But Mike, I want to get you to chime in on this.
Do you want to address what we just covered here?
Here's another point, right?
Most people don't understand what causes disease, right?
So We just did a podcast recently on Alpha Vedic where we broke down the six causes, six core causes of disease.
And one of them is the collective miasm concept, right?
Where we have a biological adaptation as a collective species depending upon certain factors, environmental factors.
We cannot doubt today that we are more connected probably than ever in known recent history, thanks to the internet and mass media.
of frenzy around Wuhan right out of the gates, right? - Yes. - With all of that insane footage.
So one of the collective miasms that express is the traditional miasm of tuberculosis.
And tuberculosis comes from a restriction versus freedom essential concept.
This goes back to traditional homeopathy.
And, uh, that could be that we, that was also a huge function in the 1918, um, uh, Spanish flu was because of world war one and what it was the first, it was literally coined a world war, right?
And you had the same type of symptoms, right?
Upper respiratory symptomology.
Remember, COVID is a very generic symptomology for the most part.
I will say what we're talking about here with the loss of smell is very interesting.
I had that.
I actually went through the loss of smell to the point where I was eating raw horseradish.
To try to smell something.
It was trippy, dude.
And I'm a very healthy person.
And I actually got, I actually finally overcame it.
I had it for about three or four days through C60, which is interesting.
I drank a whole vial of the Alphabetic C60 that we offer.
So carbon 60, the buckyball, you know.
C60. So that being said, I do think there's also something to say about us in our electrical systems and this concept of like carry reams with line of resistance and that can interplay directly with the sense of smell.
So I think electrically there's something going on with the psychosis around this miasm that doesn't necessarily have to relate to quote-unquote shedding from A shot, because I actually do know of people that are suffering from the loss of smell right out of the gate, which is interesting, in like March of 2020.
So, once again, these are all theories that need to be properly tested, right, so that we can come to a better understanding of what the hell happened.
And I do believe, Mike, that there are operations at play, I think, in Italy, in New York.
We had some very interesting things happening up in Southern Oregon where literally there were unmarked black vans spraying in small towns here.
And then all of a sudden there was a full epidemic of COVID-like symptoms here in the southern Oregon coast, which is beyond bizarre.
Here in this small town here, just south of me on the coast here, there was a huge installment of new cellular towers.
And my wife, being a nurse at the local hospital, got inundated that summer.
It was the summer of 2021 for like three weeks with COVID, you know, a whole huge COVID pandemic.
You know, pandemic in our small town where literally the governor came up.
Of California, and it just happened to correlate, I know this is correlation, but with all these installation of cell towers.
So I do believe there are a lot of cofactors at play that we saw here, but I would say mass media is obviously a huge, huge part of this.
And if you research into this concept of miasm, it really can help illuminate why we have these quote-unquote epidemics or pandemics throughout history.
Mike, if I could make one more comment in addition to that, and what Winter just said is perfect.
I think it is multifactorial.
Another huge element here, especially within the context of the placebo-nocebo effect, and I think that's a well-established phenomenon, what happens when we're told from the very beginning, you will experience loss of taste and smell, you will experience loss of taste and smell, you will experience loss of taste and smell.
I would imagine, again, given that We've already established that the placebo slash nocebo effect is a real phenomenon in psychosomatics.
We actually can induce symptoms of illness by focusing on something, especially with perpetual fear, that that plays a huge role here.
And a stat that we cover during the end of COVID that I don't hear very often And Mike will probably laugh because I bring this up quite a bit.
But according to a study that was done by the CDC in July of 2021 on 540,000 people who were labeled, quote, COVID deaths in a hospital setting, the second strongest risk factor for death associated with COVID was fear slash anxiety related disorders.
And now, applying that to the freedom movement, a lot of people would say, well, I wasn't scared of this virus.
Sure, but were you fearful at any point of uncertainty, of government tyranny, of losing your job, of something happening to you or your kids or something like that if you refused the vaccine?
Because if that was the case, I don't think fear discriminates necessarily.
And I know I can even say for me there are elements of time where I experienced fear or just heightened fight or flight for an extended period of time.
And so the reality is fear and our belief about something plays a huge, huge, huge role in the actual physical manifestation of certain symptoms.
But again, stressing that this is just one of many factors.
It is multifactorial.
And I think that's another thing that oftentimes happens when people are so steeped into the germ paradigm is we look at one singular cause for an entire group of people that led to their symptoms, failing to realize that there are so many factors at play and they're unique to the individual. failing to realize that there are so many factors at So we can't really say for sure and we don't want to make any assertions that it is one single thing causing this.
There are a lot of factors at play and it's all unique to the individual.
Well, we have covered in the past on our website, Natural News, we've covered the – or maybe I've covered it in podcasts, but hypnosis studies.
I mean, a lot of what you're talking about here is hypnosis, mass hypnosis.
But hypnosis studies, one in particular where individuals were selected who were hypersensitive to poison ivy, and then they would extend their hand on the Like, on a table, and then a researcher would tell them, I'm going to brush a leaf of poison ivy on your hand.
And they would do that, and although it was not poison ivy, that person would break out in skin rashes.
Like, their mind made it real.
And that's part of what you're talking about right now.
Your mind can make it real.
There was another study where a researcher would pretend to put a lit cigarette out on a person's skin, even though he actually just used a pencil eraser at the end, not a cigarette.
Neither of which objects are probably found in today's office settings, by the way, but this was a while ago.
And then the person, their skin would show, it would erupt in a burn reaction because they thought it was a burn.
So the mind is very powerful, but if that is to account for some of what we saw, then that's very frightening because the power of false authority in the medical system and the media's demanded obedience to that false authority is far more powerful than most people realize.
What are your thoughts?
Well, I think this plays right into what we're experiencing right now in 2024 with disease X and everyone being so afraid that they're, quote, going to release another bioweapon upon the masses.
And again, the manifestation of symptoms, especially when in a heightened state of fear, is a real thing.
What we teach during the end of COVID, especially in three of the last four modules, is we go into great detail on the brilliance of the human body and the understanding that there is nothing out there to be afraid of.
Yes, they're poisoning us via various mechanisms.
But once we become aware of those things, we can maintain health.
And then also the understanding that symptoms of illness in and of themselves aren't bad.
It's your body doing exactly what it was designed to do to heal.
We become so afraid, even in the natural health community, of experiencing symptoms that we take supplements or other things to sort of suppress them.
And we think that it's better because it's more natural.
But the reality is it's a complete paradigm shift that we need to have.
And I'm not saying that all supplements are bad.
The point is that.
It's an internal paradigm shift that we're leading people to with the end of COVID and understanding that your body is a brilliant, intelligently designed vessel that knows exactly what it's supposed to do and has everything that it needs internally given the right environment and right nutrients to heal.
And that symptoms of illness are not bad in and of themselves.
Again, that's your body doing exactly what it was designed to do to heal.
So that's something that we lead people to at the end of COVID. It's really free of fear mongering.
It's actually intended to dissolve fear that is widespread amongst much of the health freedom crowd right now.
Can I add one thing on that too?
The other thing, too, is that, yes, we do have massive deficiencies in the modern era, especially with, like, talk about cell salts.
We talk about minerals.
Like, we don't have those anymore in our food because of mass ag, right?
So, Those supplements, like you sell, Mike, and other companies, our company, are extremely important because we are naturally deficient, so our bodies can't go through this natural progression of the pleomorphic cycle, for instance, in our inner milieu, the endogenous good bacteria that's in us that is often mistaken as a bacterial infection.
Well, that infection, oftentimes, if it gets out of hand, isn't from an exogenous attacking vector of this evil bacteria.
It's because we are deficient.
And unable to finish that natural cycle.
That's the same with cancer today.
That's the same with so many things that ail us.
And it's just a simple understanding of how this biomachine works, right?
It's going back to base mechanics of who we are and what we are.
Well, absolutely.
And that reminds me, and I'd like to get both your thoughts on this, but in retrospect, there was an earlier pilot program for COVID, and it was the AIDS epidemic.
Right?
AIDS. And there was a time, I think it was in the late 1980s and early 90s, when they said AIDS was responsible for everything.
You know, somebody...
AIDS was responsible for me staying a virgin, I'll tell you that.
Is that right?
I'm sorry to hear that.
I was so deathly scared of AIDS. Are you kidding me?
Growing up as a kid in the 80s and a huge fan of Magic Johnson?
I mean, I always grew up in LA as a Lakers fan, right?
So when they rolled out Magic Johnson has AIDS when I was in 7th or 8th grade, I was like, I am never having sex.
Well, see, but that was part of the AIDS scare story.
They were even saying that You know, hetero couples who were monogamous were going to get AIDS somehow, which totally violates the whole transmission theory.
But just, you know, like a husband and wife having sex every day, like AIDS was just going to spontaneously emerge between the sheets of their bed or whatever.
And it's like, what's going on?
Because, I mean, remember the CDC got massive funding in response to spreading the AIDS scare stories.
And I don't know if you recall, but the drugs, and Fauci was involved in this, but the AZT drugs that were pushed to treat AIDS caused the symptoms that were diagnosed as AIDS. Right?
So kind of like the COVID vaccines today.
And the other thing that you should note...
I don't know if you recall this, but I mean, I was in high school during the AIDS pandemic, so I vividly recall a lot of the scare stories.
But the other thing was that the AIDS tests, they were not biochemical or physiological tests alone.
They had questions.
They would ask questions.
How many sex partners do you have?
Do you use intravenous needles?
Are you a drug addict?
What's your lifestyle like?
You're like, wait a second.
I thought this was supposed to be scientific.
I thought you're going to see something under a microscope.
There's AIDS! We found it!
Instead of begging the question right out of the gates.
Yeah.
So it turns out that just like PCR with COVID, AIDS tests were bullshit the entire time.
Well, it relates directly to what happened during COVID, just as you said.
And we have a whole session on HIV-AIDS showing that what happened in 2020 is not new whatsoever.
And likewise, this idea that the sort of no virus side of things is a new thing is completely untrue as well.
During HIV AIDS, there was a huge dissident movement called the Perth Group that highlighted that HIV was never proven to exist.
So there is some sort of split between the group.
But nonetheless, the HIV was never proven to be the cause of AIDS.
And then many were saying that HIV was never proven to exist whatsoever.
So this is not a new thing whatsoever.
Right, right.
But isn't it interesting that Fauci was involved in both of these things?
Absolutely.
A lot of the same arguments.
If you did not believe the narrative of AIDS, you were called an AIDS denier, right?
Or you were called a scientific...
I mean, it just goes to show, Mike, how important the end of COVID is because we don't learn from our mistakes from going down these paths.
They'll just redo it again.
They're just going to keep repeat, rinse, repeat, you know...
Yeah, well, exactly.
Let me remind people.
You can sign up and watch the entire docu-series at no charge.
Just go to brightu.com.
That's B-R-I-G-H-T and the letter U. It's short for Bright Town University.
Brightu.com.
Enter your email address.
You'll be able to watch it.
It begins streaming on February 10th.
episode airs each day on a 24-hour loop so you can watch all the episodes or you can optionally purchase the full download if you wish and then watch it on your own schedule and have all the have all the files yourself i will say on the aids thing too real quick mike there's an environmental factor that they always will use as well so So obviously, AIDS came out of the gay population in New York, San Francisco.
They were engaging in a lot of, let's just say, proclivities towards partying and heavy drug use.
And of course, you had the anal nitrates or whatever, the poppers.
And so same thing with COVID. You start Wuhan, which is one of the most polluted places on the planet.
People are eating GMO foods.
They're heavily vaccinated.
They've got 5G rolled out.
So these are very toxic individuals in a very toxic place.
And that's just another thing.
Of course, we always stress with terrain medicine is the environment is extremely important.
And they know this.
They know what they're doing.
When I say they, I'm talking about the conspirators that are using this to push their agenda.
And we talk about that in the end of COVID. We don't shy away from conspiracy in this either because that's an important aspect.
So we...
We dip into, you know, the sort of the weffers, as I call them, you know, the weff and the Agenda 2030 and transhumanism and the technocratic takeover, you know, the death of the dollar.
All of that is a massive part of all this as well.
Well, right.
And importantly, and I know you know this, but just reminding our audience that there are laws and policies that are formed around these belief systems in scientism.
For example, I believe for many years in California, it was a felony to be a person who was diagnosed with AIDS, whatever that fake diagnosis happened to be.
And then if you had sex and you did not inform your sex partner, I believe you could be criminally prosecuted for giving them AIDS. Even though there could be no proof whatsoever that such a transmission even happened.
And wasn't that law just kind of recently overturned in the last couple years, by the way?
Does that ring a bell?
Yeah, of course.
I remember that quite well as a Californian.
And just more fear, right?
And we saw that with COVID, right?
you're gonna kill grandma, right?
I mean, it was such an insipid fear tactic about how, and that's the thing about germ theory in the end, is even if you take sort of like, I recently heard on a podcast someone saying, well, in a voluntarist society, germ theory wouldn't matter, but actually it's such an insipid evil concept because even in a but actually it's such an insipid evil concept because even in a voluntarist society where no harm, well, you can't help doing no harm if you're breathing, you're breathing microscopic terrorists What are you supposed to do?
Well, wear a mask.
Well, that's ridiculous.
So don't leave your house.
So then what's next?
I mean, if you just take that down to its final endpoint, it's being a virtual world outside of nature with a headset on.
Living in complete separation in a digital realm, which is where they want this to go.
That's right.
That's right.
I mean, the ultimate lockdown.
But let me share something else with you from my lab that's relevant to all this and that I want to ask for both your reactions.
But early on during COVID, we are an ISO accredited laboratory, so we're able to purchase standards.
And we buy standards for our ICP testing, which is elemental analysis, heavy metals.
We buy standards of glyphosate for herbicide testing.
We buy standards.
We handle standards all the time.
So we tried to buy a standard of SARS-CoV-2.
And we looked at all the labs, and we found, finally, one lab that offered something called a SARS-CoV-2 isolate test.
And I'm like, great!
They're going to ship us a vial of nothing but particles of SARS-CoV-2.
And then you read the description of what is their isolate, okay?
And it's filled with, like, cow blood serum...
And I forgot all the animals.
And even they give a description of how they got this isolate in the first place.
Turns out they took a lady, a Chinese lady that came off a flight from China, landed in Seattle.
She was symptomatic, so they gathered her snot.
And then they put it in with a bunch of cow serum and who knows, like human fetal cells, and then they said that's an isolate.
Seriously.
I mean, that's how junkified the science is.
It's a clown show.
That's not an isolate.
That nobody ever identified that there was any COVID in the vial, and it's certainly not isolated.
But they call it an isolate.
Are you surprised to hear that?
Can I just say one thing?
I thought they were going to send you a floppy disk.
I guess they could just send it through the cloud now.
Well, yeah, you just download the sequences now on the PCR, yeah.
Exactly.
It's just, it's a library now.
It's not even real.
In silico nonsense.
Well, and that's why this is so important, if I may, real quick, because...
I and several other people, Dr.
Mark Bailey, Dr.
Tom Cowan, Dr.
Andy Kaufman, a bunch of people that we feature during the end of COVID, have had conversations with virologists and molecular biologists, and even some of them are starting to agree that the process by which they, quote, isolate viruses has its flaws.
So what they're doing is they're just moving beyond that and moving into this whole space of metagenomics.
And that is highly relevant.
And we cover that extensively as well during the end of COVID. And it all goes back to, very simply, we learned this in elementary school, I think.
If you say that X exists and causes Y, this is simple logic.
Then you need proof.
You need evidence that X exists and causes Y. You can't point to Y, all these effects, symptoms of illness, any of these things that we refer to as proof of X absent of actually directly observing and seeing X cause Y. And that's what they're doing with virology.
And then they're just expanding upon it.
And when you bring up Virus isolation, as you might imagine, we have a whole session devoted to that showing that just as you said, Mike, they take snot from a sick person that is assumed to contain a virus, mix it with viral transport medium, which contains at a minimum antibiotics and antimicotics,
and then put it on a monkey kidney cell or another foreign cell line with all these other substances that And then the cell breaks down after it's been effectively starved and poisoned, and then they take the resultant particles and prepare them for electron microscopy, which involves its own – has its own issues and produces countless artifacts.
We don't even know what we're looking at really when it comes to electron microscopy of biological material, let alone something that has gone through what was just shared, right?
So we cover all of that.
They murder the cells.
They're looking at the – The dead membranes of cells, and they're saying there's the virus.
And I say that's snot science, actually.
That's the way I describe it to people.
But it does bring up the question, though, beyond psychosomatic explanations, and I'm not sure that I'm not convinced that that could account for all the things that people experience, especially those of us who are really independent thinkers, who are not gullible, who are not eager to be manipulated.
And I always told myself with COVID, I'm like...
I don't care if I'm, quote, exposed.
I know I can beat it.
It's no big deal.
And yet, at some point, I did become symptomatic, you know, extreme fatigue, more than I'd ever experienced before, back pain and loss of cognition for some period of time.
Those symptoms, you can't convince me that I was making those real because I was watching the news.
I know the news is fake.
So, I mean, is there another explanation for those of us who are independent-minded people?
Well, I'll just say this, though.
I'm sure you were emotionally broken down.
I know I was going through a lot of same sort of emotions on what is going on, what's going on with the world, what's going on, how do I protect my family?
So I believe, and yeah, I think we have to be honest with ourselves.
There's one thing to have the intelligence and understanding, but then are we emotionally tapped in, spiritually tapped in to understand the effects of something on a worldwide scale of this sort?
How they affect freedom fighters like us, people that are out on the front lines, we're going to have probably a pretty immense breakdown of some sort.
And that would make sense to be fatigued.
That would make sense to get broken down emotionally.
Yeah, but this is not my first rodeo, man.
I've been doing this for two decades.
I've seen crazy stuff before.
For a lot of people, this was the first big thing they've ever experienced.
Yeah.
COVID was pretty crazy, though, Mike.
I don't know.
I mean, 9-11 was pretty...
The closest thing I think I could maybe relate to COVID was maybe 9-11.
I mean, I don't know in my life, I'm 45 now, that I ever experienced a mass-wide lockdown of the world where we had a lockstep governmental reaction all in sync together and also then synced up with the local system where you're not allowed to go into businesses.
I mean, this was...
I still think people are coming to grips with what happened.
How immense and amazing and how crazy 2020-2021 really was.
How historical it was.
Especially, once again, in the modern times when we're so connected.
But yes, I believe there very well were government ops being run in certain localities.
And if you are at the tip of the spear, very much we must remember there are energetic weapons that can be put into play and target individuals.
There are all sorts of factors that can be put into play in terms of There's no question.
I have been relentlessly targeted.
But regardless of the explanation, let me bring up something else.
We only have a few minutes left.
The another truly remarkable moment in all of this was after we were all it was demanded of us that we believe in the science and we believe in the pandemic and everything else then and we believe in the jabs and believe in the masks and the lockdowns and then at some point it came out that oh yeah well the vaccines don't prevent transmission and don't prevent infection and how could they it's a respiratory virus but the the vaccine injection goes in your arm Your arm is not your lung.
So, I mean, how could it possibly?
And the establishment admitted that all the claims of the vaccines were just fiction anyway.
It's like, at that point, how come the whole world didn't say, well, why are we following any of this crap?
But people still do.
People still line up and take boosters.
What do you think, Alec?
I think it's unbelievable.
But it's also not surprising because people are so immersed in that false paradigm of health that they think that that's the way that they maintain their health is by going and lining up for these things.
And with the end of COVID, our target audience, if I'm being honest, is not those people.
But we have had feedback I think from people who shared it with their friends, one case where a story was told to us where some Harvard leftist academic types were fully on board with the whole narrative and then were sent to end of COVID and they watched it front to back and called their friends a couple weeks later and said, oh my goodness, you were correct.
You were correct this whole time because the way that we lay it out is very, very clear.
It builds context upon context upon context.
And our target audience in this, though, is much of the freedom movement who is still buying into this belief that they're manipulating viruses in a lab.
And, of course, have still all these questions that arise as you're asking here regarding loss of taste and smell.
We have a whole session devoted to that called The Symptoms of COVID, where we discuss loss of taste and smell extensively and highlight how there are plenty, not just psychosomatically, plenty of other plausible explanations happening.
For this phenomenon and the various other phenomena associated with this illness.
And then, of course, the questions of how do you explain Sally getting sick right after Jack or my kids getting sick in daycare?
How do you explain chicken pox or measles or things like this?
We have whole sessions devoted to all of those topics to cover every single question that one could ask related to both COVID and the idea that the germ paradigm is completely false.
Well, that's really great to know because that means that for those watching, you might invite another person to watch it with you.
Or if you buy the digital download, you could give them a thumb drive and say, watch this.
See what you think.
See if they get through episode one.
I've interviewed Tom Cowan and Dr.
Kaufman also here as well.
And in the interviews, I couldn't disagree with anything that they said.
I mean, very methodical, logical, step-by-step analysis and explanation.
And yet there is this rift in the health freedom movement, like you said, where certain individuals are 100% gung-ho germ theory and arguing with Cowan and others about it.
And I hope that we can have more rigorous public debates about this, but with Cowan and Kauffman in particular, do you agree with my assessment that they're just very rational and logical?
They're not pulling things out of thin air.
They're actually demanding, let's use rules of logic here.
So I'll go ahead and jump in and answer that.
And I think that they're the most rational and logical people that I know.
Andy Kaufman and Tom Cowan are two of the brightest human beings I know.
And the reality is, like Mike, like me, we just want to know what is true.
We're setting aside all of our preconceived notions.
You know, my wife reversed two autoimmune conditions, and we previously thought that her autoimmune conditions were caused by, quote, Epstein-Barr virus.
So we had skin in the game, so to speak, in thinking that the viral paradigm is real.
But when you simply set aside your preconceived notions and then, of course, learn logical fallacies and learn that pointing to effects as proof of the cause, absent of establishing a causal relationship and absent of establishing existence, is called an affirming absent of establishing a causal relationship and absent of establishing existence, is called an
And when you learn those things, you learn logic and reasoning and you set all that aside, in my opinion, you can really only come to one conclusion about the so-called evidence of virology.
Again, irrespective of whether you believe and sort of emphasizing believe that they exist or not, the evidence for viruses is just not there when you go look.
And I think Tom and Andy are incredible in uncovering that.
Yeah, I would agree with that assessment.
Mike, any final thoughts you want to add?
I mean, yeah, talk about rigorous, too.
I mean, Andy's read every single scientific paper out there about this topic.
I mean, he is no joke.
I will say this.
Um...
I don't believe that, well, one, it's germ theory.
There's no theory because there's not been the proper tests to actually formulate it as a theory.
It's just essentially the germ warfare model that they've created, germ propaganda.
I also don't believe that it's terrain theory.
That's like saying, I do farm theory, right?
No, I just farm.
I just understand health.
Health is based on the terrain.
We have a terrain.
And I'll just say this.
Some might say this is, quote, anecdotal, but if you look at the communities that have really embraced this mindset, like I do a festival called Music and Sky.
We started in 2020, and we're going on our sixth event now in 2024.
Just announced today, actually, June 20th through 24th in Mendocino, California.
But that was a huge factor, Mike, in when we started in 2020, in the heart of like the lockdowns of California, we said, no, we're going to do a festival.
We're not going to do six feet apart.
We're not going to do masks.
We're going to actually ask people, you know, you can do whatever you want, but nobody wore masks.
Nobody was concerned about getting sick and nobody got sick.
And now we are fast forward five years later, essentially.
Four years later.
And our community is thriving because people are understanding this.
It's not even just about not rolling up your sleeve.
It's about understanding who you are, what the true nature of disease is, and what true health is, and what happiness is.
And then you pair that with your average, I hate to say this, but libtard, scientism advocate in the cult.
And most of them aren't doing well.
Yeah.
They're having to pay an inordinate amount of money to go to doctors.
Or they're dead.
A lot of them are already dead.
We're dead.
Yeah.
So they're not doing well.
So you can call that anecdotal.
I say, and Dr.
Bear is a big fan, my partner at Alpha Vedic, we go with what works, right?
And I tell you what, I've known this for 20 years or more, and I don't get sick anymore.
And I don't even like to use that word sick.
I might have an occasional composting in the winter, we like to call it.
But I haven't even had that this year.
So life's pretty good when you're on this side.
So just take it from me, like going through the university at the end of COVID, you'll come out on the other end, at least understanding a lot more about yourself.
And I guarantee you're going to be moving down towards the path of greater wellness and more happiness.
Yeah, well, exactly.
Well said.
All right, folks.
So first of all, I want to thank both of you gentlemen for joining me today.
This has been a really fascinating discussion, eye-opening for a lot of people.
I want to encourage everybody to register to watch this entire series, The End of COVID. It begins streaming February 10th, but you can register now ahead of time.
Even if you see a different program on the screen at brightu.com, just register.
There's only one registration.
It counts for every program.
So this begins streaming February 10th.
One chapter airs each day on a 24-hour loop.
You can watch it all for free, email registration required, or you can optionally purchase the full digital download, get the bonus items, and help support both of us here at Brightown as well as our guests today.
So thank you both for joining me today and having the courage to put this out there and stand firm in what you've discovered.
Thank you so, so much.
Thanks, Mike.
Thanks, Mike.
All right.
Thank you both.
Take care.
And thank you for watching today.
I hope you enjoyed this interview, and I hope you watch the program and enjoy that and learn from it as well.
I'm learning all the time.
Even as a lab scientist myself, I've had to question a lot of my beliefs about how things work.
And in fact, our glyphosate method uses a column.
Chromatography column that nobody understands, not even the people who make it.
It's like, this is like chemistry magic happening here.
Nobody can explain it.
Okay, well, as long as we can reproduce it, we can test for glyphosate.
But I've had to challenge my own notions as well, and it's good for all of us to do that and keep our minds fresh and sharp no matter what our age or what our circumstances.
So keep an open mind.
Keep learning.
Thank you for watching today.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon.com and Brighteon University.
Take care.
Everything is better with butter, it seems, and we now have back in stock at HealthRangerStore.com, we have certified organic lab tested butter powder in the number 10 cans.
They're perfect for long-term preparedness.
You know, butter and cream, these are things that are typically missing from people's storable food supplies.
So check it out right now, HealthRangerStore.com.
And you know what goes great with butter?
It's pancakes and blueberries.
And we have now a new product, organic blueberry vanilla pancake mix at the Health Ranger Store.
Yum, yummy, yum with anthocyanins in the blueberries, all laboratory tested.
Check out what it's made with, organic coconut flour.
You see that?
And then coconut sugar, blueberries, vanilla powder, pink Himalayan salt.
This is an amazing recipe, super delicious.
You're going to love this.
It's great for preparedness or just for everyday use.
Now, back to what's on my desk.
We also have a new batch of ultra-clean turmeric root powder.
Now, turmeric root is often, just on the open marketplace, it's often contaminated with lead.
Lead is the most common contaminant that we find in turmeric, and it's why we have to reject sometimes up to 80% of the lots that we test.
You know, like we get samples before we purchase a lot of turmeric powder, and if it doesn't pass, then we reject it, and then that gets sold to somebody else.
Well, we have an ultra-clean new lot of turmeric root powder available right now at our store, healthrangerstore.com.
And it's the kind of thing that you don't get very often, especially in the marketplace.
And then one other thing is we have a smaller bag there of butter powder.
Just to show you, we have different formats of the butter powder available as well.
Now remember that all your purchases at HealthRangerStore.com help support this platform, Brighteon.com, which is not only providing you a platform where you can upload videos and you can speak freely, but also, of course, where we conduct interviews Thank you for your support.
You're doing yourself a favor with our products, which are laboratory-tested, ultra-clean, almost everything certified organic, and we have just really amazing ingredients, as you'll see in the pancake mix.
But also thank you for supporting us so that we can pursue our mission of helping to heal the world with clean food and empowering people with uplifting, truthful information about what's going on in our world and how you can better navigate it.
So thanks for watching today.
I'm Mike Adams of healthrangerstore.com and brighteon.com.
Take care.
A global reset is coming, and that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
So download this guide.
It's free.
▲
Export Selection