Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 15, 2023 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

02:13:16

BBN, Sep 15, 2023 - Apple CEO Tim Cook releases ad calling for complete EXTERMINATION of life...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to Brighton Broadcast News for Friday, September 15th, 2023.
	I'm Mike Adams.
	Thank you for joining me today.
	And the title for today's broadcast is not a typo.
	Indeed, Apple, under eco-terrorist Tim Cook, Apple has released an ad calling for literally the complete terraforming extermination of all life on Earth.
	Plants, animals, and humans, the total destruction of human civilization, the complete collapse of the biosphere, which would kill every living creature that we know of on this planet.
	Apple is now calling for this.
	I'm going to play the ad for you so that you can hear it for yourself.
	This is the result of the climate cult run amok.
	And also, of course, LGBT corporate CEOs who don't know anything about reality or science, real science or atmospheric science for certain, and who are now exploiting their power, their influence and their technology to carry out a planetary scale their influence and their technology to carry out a planetary scale holocaust against the human race and every living creature on this Tim Cook is a demon.
	Tim Cook is an ecological terrorist.
	Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple, is working for Satan and clearly wants the total destruction of planet Earth and human civilization.
	You're going to hear this, and it is mind boggling.
	I mean, right now, every person who owns Apple products should sell them exclusively.
	Sell them into the used market.
	Do not buy Apple products ever again.
	Apple and Tim Cook are both clear and present dangers to the very future of all life on this planet.
	Not just humans, but elephants, dolphins, kitty cats, armadillos, everything.
	All the birds and the bees and the insects and the pollinators, all the plants and the trees and the ferns and the fauna are all at risk because of Apple and Tim Cook.
	Apple is a corporation now at war with life on our planet.
	And Tim Cook is an eco-terrorist who is funding this effort to destroy all life as we know it.
	We'll get to that so you can see it for yourself.
	It's mind-blowing.
	Now, we have a real treat for you today in terms of the interview.
	You're going to love this.
	I was able to interview Professor Michel Chosudovsky, who is, of course, with the Center for Research on Globalization.
	His website is globalresearch.ca.
	He is a professor of economics with the University of Ottawa, and he is an extraordinary thinker.
	and has for decades monitored and analyzed and written about the situations on our planet, economics, geopolitics, nuclear war in particular, where a lot of his expertise is found, but also the fake pandemic, the fear-mongering but also the fake pandemic, the fear-mongering campaigns, the psychological operations against humanity.
	And in this interview today, which you will absolutely want to stay tuned for, Professor Chostodowski, he and I have a really intriguing, in-depth conversation over an hour, and yet barely scratching the surface of what we probably need to talk about. and yet barely scratching the surface of what we probably So he's agreed to come back, and we're going to continue this conversation at a later date, but you've got to hear this conversation.
	We start out with the Black Sea, the risk of a false flag operation carried out by the United States against its own naval assets as part of this Black Sea, what's called Sea Breeze 23 operation, which is a cover story, no doubt, for some nefarious activity that the Navy is involved in, potentially planting something like a nuclear weapon in the Black Sea.
	Or at the bottom of the sea or attached to a buoy that they plan to resurface and detonate at some future date in order to blame Russia and to pull America into World War III, which would be devastating for our world.
	And, you know, think about just the two things we've talked about here so far and what they have in common.
	Apple, Tim Cook, they want to exterminate all life on planet Earth as we know it, in their own words.
	And, at the same time, the United States military-industrial complex, the arrogance of the State Department and the Department of Defense, the Pentagon, the Navy, also want to carry out actions that risk the ending of life as we know it, all human life, or nearly all human life in the Northern Hemisphere, should they succeed in launching a nuclear war, a nuclear exchange with Russia.
	So whether it's the corporations or the governments...
	They share the same goal, which is extermination of the human race.
	You see?
	Depopulation is here.
	It is here.
	Now, we've got a couple other stories to cover first, and then we'll circle back around to the main story here.
	One announcement, by the way.
	Jonathan Emord, the attorney who is nicknamed the FDA Dragon Slayer, He is holding a telethon, a fundraising telethon because he's running for the United States Senate for the state of Virginia.
	And believe me, Jonathan Emord would be an outstanding senator.
	His philosophy is very much along the lines of, let's say, classic Ron Paul.
	You know, Jonathan Emord, he has the mentality of a founding father of this nation.
	He's brilliant.
	He's absolutely brilliant.
	I interviewed him, I don't know, a couple of months ago for Decentralized TV. And anyway, we have a telethon that we're live streaming for him.
	It's coming Monday at 3 to 6 p.m.
	Eastern.
	So it's a three-hour telethon.
	It's on brighteon.tv.
	And I will be a guest along with many other top guests who are all there to support Jonathan Emord and his run for the United States Senate.
	Now, if you want to learn more about Jonathan Emord, you can go to his website.
	It's emord, E-M-O-R-D, F-O-R-V-A So go there.
	You can find out more about him.
	You can see the endorsements.
	Indeed, Ron Paul has endorsed Jonathan Emord.
	Not at all surprised about that and many other important people as well.
	And Jonathan Emord can use some funds and he can use some publicity, which is why we are doing this on his behalf, using our infrastructure to help give a voice to this extraordinary man who has a vision for America that is Absolutely top-notch, and it's rooted in individual liberty.
	And Jonathan Emord supports, of course, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, self-custody of cryptocurrency, gold and silver, you know, freedom of religion, all these things that matter.
	And he has, in fact, fought for these things for decades as a top-notch, a brilliant attorney.
	So, again, Monday, this coming Monday, brighteon.tv, just go to that website, beginning 3 p.m. Eastern.
	Robert Scott Bell is hosting this event.
	I'll be a guest with many other guests, and I can't wait to participate in that.
	I'm really looking forward to that Monday afternoon.
	Now, Darren Beatty at revolver.news has put out a really important story. You know how shoplifting is rampant. It's out of control in California. And you know, well, I hope you know, that Californians voted for the law that legalized shoplifting many years ago.
	In fact, it was like 2016, no, 2014 was when that law, it was called Proposition 47, a ballot measure.
	And the majority of the California citizens voted for it, which legalized shoplifting.
	So you know how we're talking about recently, one of the themes is that we're seeing Democrats get the tyranny they voted for over and over again in many different cases, right?
	Even like New York City.
	It's being destroyed by illegal immigration according to Mayor Eric Adams.
	Who inherited this problem, but he's a Democrat too.
	And it's Democrats that created the sanctuary city status that is leading to now the downfall, the total destruction of New York City as we know it.
	Well, Democrats voted for that.
	They begged for it.
	Same thing happening in Chicago.
	Same thing happening in LA and San Francisco.
	Democrats voted for it.
	So every time there's more shoplifting, more rampant crime, it's like, you voted for that.
	What are you complaining about?
	Well, so as reported on Revolver.News, Governor Gavin Newsom...
	Kevin Grusome announced a $267 million investment against organized retail crime.
	Funds are going to go to 55 cities and counties' law enforcement agencies across California.
	This is going to be voted on, well, looks like yesterday it was voted on.
	Now, what use is more money in the hands of law enforcement when the laws on the books of the state of California are Allow legalized shoplifting.
	You notice they won't repeal the stupid law.
	They won't repeal the insanity.
	They just say, well, let's throw more money at law enforcement.
	Maybe they can do something about it.
	Have you noticed the cops aren't arresting the shoplifters because they're not allowed to?
	Up to $950 in petty theft is legal in California.
	And I keep wondering, by the way, is this per incident?
	Because I'm pretty sure it is where a person can steal $949 from this store and then go next door and steal $949 from that store.
	And then a third store and a fourth store.
	In a day, they can just shoplift $10,000, $20,000 worth of loot and then just sell it on eBay, obviously, which is, of course, the hub for stolen goods.
	Or just repackage it and sell it on Amazon.com as a third-party seller, which also happens.
	And they can't be prosecuted.
	So what good is it going to do to give more money to law enforcement when law enforcement is forbidden to enforce the law?
	It's just, it's incredible.
	As Darren Beatty asks, the biggest question is, why would politicians bother to even address this issue when it's exactly what the citizens voted for?
	What did California residents expect when they essentially decriminalized shoplifting?
	Did they believe everyone would just smile and sing kumbaya and hug it out?
	Actually, that's probably what most liberals anticipated, he writes.
	But once again, reality has intervened and exposed the dangers and foolishness of liberal policies.
	The people of California are experiencing the consequences.
	I know, that's such a difficult word for liberals to hear.
	Consequences of their irresponsible and idiotic choices at the ballot box.
	Which also, by the way, and I don't mean any disrespect because these people were victimized, but Hawaii.
	The Hawaiian people keep electing Democrats and the Democrats just carried out what I believe is an act of government-sponsored terrorism warfare against the people of Maui.
	But again, the people of Maui voted for those Democrats.
	I mean, maybe they will never do that again.
	But they did over and over and over again.
	And the people of Chicago voted for Democrats that are destroying their city.
	And the people of New York and the people of Seattle and the people of Portland and so on.
	If you keep voting for Democrats, Democrats who are committed to the destruction of the rule of law and the destruction of your country, Economic opportunities and the destruction of your nation, your flag, your Constitution, your Bill of Rights, your human rights, your health freedom.
	They are committed to destroying everything that matters, everything of value in your life, including your children's genitals, for God's sake.
	If you vote for these people, don't be surprised when they do what they're committed to doing, which is, you know, ecological terrorism, cutting off the genitals of children, Carrying out economic sabotage, rigging elections, on and on and on.
	You're getting exactly what you voted for.
	If you vote for tyranny, and if you put up with tyranny, you're going to get tyranny in spades.
	Here's another story by Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit.
	It's back.
	Providence hospital system imposes draconian mandatory COVID vaccine.
	Again, vaccine mandates are back for healthcare workers.
	Noncompliance results in unpaid leave and potential termination.
	Jim Hoff writes, do not comply.
	Providence hospital system has just dropped a bombshell on its employees in a move that can only be described as Orwellian.
	The healthcare giant announced on its app that all workers, including those who are vaccinated and boosted with previous shots, are now required to receive the latest COVID-19 vaccine, which, you know, Kathy Hochul, the governor of New York, talked about yesterday.
	Remember how she said, oh, if you have these older vaccines, they don't work anymore.
	You're going to need all new vaccines.
	This is a whole new vaccine.
	Oh, yeah, and we found out from Newsweek, by the way, this new vaccine has only been tested on eight people Mice.
	Eight mice.
	Not even eight people, but eight mice.
	And do you realize, by the way, that even those eight mice were inoculated against their will?
	They had to be held down.
	Even the mice say no to the vaccine.
	But stupid, obedient humans line up to be injected with something because Governor Hochul said it's good for you?
	And all the stuff you previously took doesn't work anymore?
	You realize that people who keep taking vaccines at this point are dumber than mice.
	Seriously.
	I mean, rodents are smarter.
	Rodents try to get away.
	From the needles.
	Rodents, you know, again, they have to be contained in little Mickey Mouse FEMA camps or something.
	They have to be contained and held down with their little paws and tails while they're squeaking and jabbing them, you know.
	Humans are so stupid.
	They line up and say, yeah, just jab me.
	I'll take another one.
	I'll be obedient.
	It must be good.
	Government says so.
	My goodness.
	Dumber than mice.
	I've said it before.
	I've said it before.
	You know, field mice do not spray food with poison before they feed it to their children, but humans do.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Field mice do not intentionally murder their offspring.
	Humans do routinely.
	Leftists.
	So this Providence family of organizations, this is a group of healthcare organizations across the USA. It's a Catholic healthcare system.
	Yeah, Catholic.
	Over 50 hospitals, 1,000 clinics, 120,000 employees across Alaska, California, Montana, Oregon, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming.
	And all the employees are now required to provide proof of vaccination by November 30th.
	And those who don't get vaccinated, those who do not comply, says the Gateway Pundit, will be removed from the schedule, placed on unpaid leave, and may be subject to termination.
	So yes, the vaccine mandates are coming back.
	And this is, again, an unproven vaccine.
	Never approved by the FDA. Never subjected to clinical trials.
	No safety, efficacy, or biodistribution studies in humans whatsoever.
	This was given the green light under emergency use authorization, which is a total fraud because there is no emergency.
	This is a complete fraud.
	Frankly, this is a criminal racketeering cartel of big pharma and big government and big corporations pushing this on people.
	Hopefully, people will say no.
	Hopefully, all the employees of this hospital system, this Catholic system...
	Catholic system, yeah.
	You notice how many Catholic hospitals are now performing gender mutilation surgeries on children?
	Yeah.
	Because, you know, Pope Francis is a woke demon.
	Yeah.
	He doesn't represent real Catholics any more than Satan represents Christians, you know?
	So it's either jab or lose your job once again.
	I can't wait for the lawyers to jump on this one because I'm pretty sure this has already been decided in other cases over the last couple of years.
	A lot of victories against these vaccine mandates.
	So I would advise all these workers to do not comply.
	Push back.
	Say no.
	Say, in fact, hell no.
	And, in fact, if you get fired or unpaid leave, sue them.
	Sue them for discrimination, for violating your human rights and your health freedom.
	But now let's get to the main story today which is evil Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple.
	Apple and Tim Cook together are ecological terrorists who are clearly now, through what you're about to see, through their own paid advertising, they are absolutely committed to the complete terraforming extinction of all life on planet Earth, plants, animals and humans.
	And I'm going to play a segment for you, but let me give you a little backdrop on this.
	Tim Cook tweeted out this five-minute ad, which has a black woman auditing Apple and Apple's compliance with globalist climate agendas and narratives.
	As part of this ad, Well, what he really means is that he is deeply committed to exterminating the human race,
	And obeying his globalist demonic masters to mass murder billions of human beings.
	And he admits this, or I should say his ad, admits this in the following clip.
	I'm going to play it for you.
	It's only 17 seconds.
	And in the first part of this clip, one of the Apple employees that is being interrogated by this auditor says, To find out, you know, have you done enough for the climate?
	This Apple employee says, quote, And yes, she means of Earth.
	Our aim is to permanently remove all carbon from the atmosphere.
	Okay, let's listen to that so that you know...
	I mean, I'm not making this up.
	This is insane.
	This is what Apple is now committing to, the total destruction of all life on planet Earth.
	Give it a listen yourself.
	Grasslands in Kenya.
	Why?
	Our aim is to permanently remove carbon from the atmosphere.
	What about your water usage?
	We've reduced it.
	By how much?
	63 billion gallons.
	63 million?
	Billion.
	All right, so did you hear that?
	Quote, our aim is to permanently remove all carbon from the atmosphere.
	Now understand, this is Apple bragging that that is their goal.
	They are, they're not confessing.
	In this video, to a crime against life on Earth.
	They are bragging about it.
	They're bragging about following globalist orders to achieve global depopulation.
	Now, you and I know this, and any honest scientist in the world, if there are any left yet to be found, would admit that if you remove all carbon from the atmosphere, you end life on the planet.
	You end it.
	Number one, of course, carbon dioxide is necessary for photosynthesis.
	CO2 is the single most important molecule for life on Earth because of photosynthesis.
	And obviously, without photosynthesis, you have a total collapse of the aquatic biosphere.
	All life in the oceans dies.
	Without photosynthesis, all food crops fail.
	All forests fail.
	All land plants fail.
	And, of course, then you get a total die-off of everything.
	Insects, animals, humans, human civilization, pollinators...
	And even, of course, you know, aerobic microbes and so on.
	Everybody dies.
	The planet is dead.
	That is what Apple is bragging about achieving.
	Understand?
	And this is a cosmic level, like an extraterrestrial alien invasion level of terraforming against planet Earth to strip carbon out of the atmosphere, which would turn the planet into a frozen ice planet, By the way, it would freeze Earth.
	It would plunge the level of the oceans much, much lower.
	And it would, of course, destroy life as we know it.
	So that's that's what would happen if they get their goal.
	And again, they're bragging about this.
	And this is positioned as a good thing for planet Earth.
	Now remember that Bill Gates is now buying up 70 million acres of trees in order to mass exterminate the trees in the name of climate change.
	Because now the left says that mass murdering trees is good for the planet.
	And now Tim Cook says that mass murdering all plants and animals and humans is also good for the planet.
	I mean, it's...
	People, it's right out in the open now.
	They're no longer pretending.
	They're not beating around the bush.
	Their agenda is the extermination of planet Earth or life on planet Earth.
	This is a terraforming operation.
	And many of you know I gave a speech, a presentation, back in 2019 called Oblivion Agenda, where I laid out this exact blueprint to prepare Earth for what I even called at the time a post-human future.
	That is a future without human beings living on the planet.
	And part of the operation would involve the release of biological weapons.
	I said this in, what was it, September of 2019.
	And the other part of it would involve terraforming operations to alter the atmosphere, to strip carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and shut down photosynthesis, and also operations to block the sun through stratospheric aerosol injection, which is also being advocated and also operations to block the sun through stratospheric aerosol injection, which is also being advocated by the White House, to block the sun and achieve global dimming, which they say would cool
	And a few years ago, it was called a conspiracy theory now.
	Now it's all in the media that the White House is all over this and White House scientists or scientists that are advocated by the White House want to run this operation and pollute the skies and dim the sun, darken the skies.
	And so think about this, folks.
	Think about the radical left, which now has taken over the corporations, Apple being, I think, the wealthiest single corporation on the planet.
	They've taken over governments.
	They've taken over public education.
	They've taken over pop culture.
	They've taken over, quote, science and technology and speech platforms and everything else.
	What are their admitted goals?
	To darken the skies.
	To exterminate all life on the planet.
	To mass murder millions of acres of trees.
	They're not hiding it.
	They are telling you what they intend to do, which is genocide against the planet.
	So, a couple of things that we all need to do in response to this.
	Number one, you can tweet Tim Cook on Twitter, or X as it's now called.
	It's at Tim underscore Cook.
	And I tweeted Tim Cook, by the way, because I actually do have an account on Twitter still.
	They haven't banned it recently.
	And I said, Tim Cook, you are an insane ecological terrorist.
	You know, your plan would destroy all life on Earth.
	And yet, here you are bragging about it.
	You think it's great.
	You should tweet Tim Cook.
	And you should tell him what you think about this.
	I mean, obviously, don't threaten violence.
	Or anything of that nature.
	But tell him what he is.
	In your own words.
	In your own view.
	Because, again, in my view, Tim Cook, I mean, it's clear.
	This is just a matter of fact.
	Tim Cook is a planetary-scale, genocidal, ecological terrorist carrying out crimes against humanity and bragging about it in public ads.
	There's no debate about that.
	There's also no debate about the critical role of carbon dioxide for life on Earth.
	Because photosynthesis obviously uses three inputs, as you know, sunlight, carbon dioxide, and water.
	And you notice that the globalists are trying to dim the sun, you know, block sunlight, and then also eliminate carbon dioxide.
	So they want to shut down two out of the three inputs for photosynthesis.
	Well, how are trees supposed to live?
	Well, they're not.
	Under the new green cult, the climate cult of the left, trees are supposed to die.
	And so are you.
	See, that's the system.
	You're all supposed to die under Tim Cook and Apple and all the other globalists that are pushing for global depopulation.
	But there's no debate about the role of carbon dioxide among any honest scientist.
	I mean, I learned about photosynthesis in high school.
	High school science class.
	Tenth grade, I think it was.
	Photosynthesis.
	These are the inputs.
	These are the outputs.
	And it produces metabolic energy for plants, by the way.
	Plant sugar, basically, for the plants.
	Chlorophyll, obviously, is involved in this process.
	And the outputs of photosynthesis include, if I recall, water and oxygen, right?
	Both things that are actually good for us.
	And if we don't have plants producing oxygen, how are we supposed to breathe, by the way?
	How are we supposed to breathe, LGBT Tim Cook?
	Have you ever thought about that?
	Do you want to asphyxiate billions of human beings on planet Earth and make them die in suffocation because the plants can no longer carry out photosynthesis so they can't produce oxygen?
	I mean, it seems so.
	I can imagine their next video, they'd be bragging about how many billions of humans they've murdered.
	You know, Apple!
	Garden of Eden, Apple!
	Take a bite!
	You know, join the serpent!
	Right?
	Like, Apple!
	We're with Satan!
	And we seek the total destruction of planet Earth.
	That would be an accurate corporate slogan.
	And yet, this is one of the most powerful corporations in the world.
	And their phones, by the way, spy on you constantly, always spying on you and reporting on you, reporting your positions and metadata and everything else that they turn over to the government.
	So Apple is not your friend.
	Apple is the enemy of humanity, as evidenced in this ad.
	Now, it doesn't mean you should do anything violent against Apple, not calling for that, but you can make a consumer choice.
	You can reject permanently all Apple products.
	Which is probably going to save you quite a bit of dough since all their products are overpriced anyway.
	Just say no to the iPhone.
	Get yourself a de-Googled phone, by the way.
	We have an affiliate sponsor in that space.
	It's called AbovePhone.com slash BTV. Yeah, go there.
	Get yourself a de-Googled phone.
	It runs on Android.
	It doesn't have Google in it.
	It doesn't have Apple in it.
	It protects your privacy.
	And you can even use data SIM cards that you purchase with cryptocurrency so that you don't have a credit card tied to it.
	Seriously, it's a great option for privacy.
	AbovePhone.com slash BBN, which stands for Brighteon Broadcast News.
	Did I say BTV earlier?
	Yeah, use BBN or DTV. Either one of those will work.
	AbovePhone.com slash DTV. Try that.
	Don't buy Apple products unless you want to support mass extermination of the human race, because that's what Apple stands for.
	Now, in addition to boycotting Apple, you can also, of course, you can express your views, and you should do so, about this issue.
	Again, no violence, no threats, nothing like that, but you should tell Tim Cook and you should tell people who use Apple products exactly what Apple stands for, which is mass death, suffering, extermination, genocide, a planetary holocaust that, understand, would be over a thousand times larger than the Nazi holocaust carried out against the Jews in World War II. That victimized six million people, according to history.
	Well, Apple, if they succeed in permanently removing all carbon from the atmosphere, they would mass murder over 6 billion people.
	That's over a thousand times larger.
	It's a thousand holocausts.
	Tim Cook is more evil than Adolf Hitler.
	He wants to carry out a thousand holocausts against not just Jews, but people of every ethnicity across the entire planet.
	thousand hitlers live in the dark heart of tim cook a thousand holocausts actually more than a thousand because there are more than six billion people there's eight billion people on the planet right now so like you know 1300 holocausts or whatever that comes out to you this is pure evil tim cook is pure evil i think tim cook this is just my opinion i think he's infested by satan but that's just my opinion i'm I can't prove that.
	But through his actions, you can clearly see he's not on the side of God.
	He's not pro-life in the sense of any life.
	He's pro-death of the entire planet.
	And you can't tell me that Apple, the corporation, doesn't know this about carbon dioxide.
	Apple is supposed to employ the smartest engineers and the smartest scientists and the smartest people in the world who can build the most amazing devices.
	It is impossible that they don't know about photosynthesis that I learned about in the 10th grade.
	Of course they know carbon dioxide is critical for life on Earth.
	They absolutely know it.
	But they've declared war on carbon anyway.
	And by the way, you are made of carbon.
	So when they say they want to remove all carbon from the atmosphere, they also want to remove all carbon from the surface of the Earth, which is you.
	You're made of carbon.
	Oh, and by the way, where'd the carbon come from that's in your body?
	That's the most common element in your body.
	Where did that come from?
	Well, indirectly, it came from the atmosphere.
	But it's because you consume foods that are made of carbon from the atmosphere, and then the carbon in the food became the carbon of you.
	So you are made indirectly of CO2 also.
	So if they take CO2 out of the atmosphere...
	In their war on carbon, they also kill off everything made of carbon, which is all of us.
	Understand, the war on carbon is the war on life on planet Earth.
	And again, there's not a single scientist who's honest who would dare say that you could eliminate all carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and everything would be great.
	If any honest scientist would tell you that this is an extremely dangerous idea, I mean, it's beyond dangerous.
	It's suicide.
	That if you were to remove all carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, you would collapse life on Earth.
	Any scientist should know that.
	So why aren't they speaking out against this?
	Well, you know, guess what?
	1600 scientists have signed a declaration declaring that the whole climate change cult to be a massive hoax.
	And it is.
	It's a hoax.
	But why isn't every scientist speaking out at this point?
	You know they're building giant carbon-sucking machines across the continental United States right now to actually achieve this planetary genocide that Tim Cook is advocating for?
	They're building these machines.
	They're called carbon sequestration machines.
	And using tremendous amounts of energy, they suck CO2 out of the atmosphere, and they liquefy it under pressure, and then they pipe it through pipelines into underground storage facilities.
	Basically, they pump it deep underground and they hide it from the atmosphere so that trees and food crops can't have access to the CO2. And in doing so, they starve the trees and starve all the plants and the grasses and the flowers.
	They starve all the plants of CO2. It is a mass botanical starvation genocide agenda, carbon sequestration.
	And of course then they call for censoring anybody who tells the truth about this online.
	And you've seen this from the radical left.
	Oh, we have to censor, you know, anybody who disagrees with our assessment that the climate change is the greatest threat to life on Earth.
	No, you are the greatest threat to life on Earth.
	You and your lunacy, your climate cult of ecological terrorists and criminals and genocidal maniacs like Tim Cook carrying out over a thousand holocausts against humanity.
	You are the danger to planet Earth, not carbon dioxide.
	If you want to declare war on carbon, start with yourself.
	You want to get rid of some carbon?
	You know, throw yourself into a fire pit like Moloch from the Old Testament or something.
	You know, at least save the rest of us from your insanity.
	And by the way, even that wouldn't get rid of the carbon.
	Because carbon's an element.
	It would get rid of you, but the carbon would still be around.
	But don't tell them that.
	Maybe they'll think that it might work.
	What's astonishing to me in all of this is to realize that our planet, I mean, the systems of control and so-called authority and governments and science and everything that rule our planet are truly insane death cultists.
	And they've convinced themselves that carbon is bad, even when they are made of carbon themselves, even when they should know better, even when they know about photosynthesis and they know what would happen.
	But somehow they convinced themselves that carbon is bad.
	And this leads to horrifically dangerous policies like launching pollution flights to darken the skies, which is what they want to do.
	They want to darken the skies.
	You realize how insane this is?
	I mean, it sounds like a science fiction movie.
	What did they do?
	They darkened the skies.
	What?
	Why would they do that?
	And they chopped off the penises of their children.
	What?
	Are you kidding me?
	Who the heck would do that?
	And they said men can have babies.
	What?
	Are you kidding?
	No.
	No, that's...
	It must be idiocracy that you're talking about.
	Yeah, and they watered the plants with Brondo.
	I mean, I can actually see a day where they say, you know, toilet water is bad for plants.
	It's that insane to say that carbon is bad for the planet.
	That's how insane it is.
	It's idiocracy-level stupidity.
	But in the hands of powerful, wealthy corporations like Apple...
	This stuff gets turned into reality to where they actually are building giant suicide machines that they call carbon sequestration devices.
	They are suicide machines to destroy life on Earth.
	And if they succeed, then they're going to sterilize the planet.
	Like the way they sterilize fields with glyphosate, you know, to kill off all the plants and just leave dirt.
	This is what they're doing to the whole planet, or attempting to, with carbon sequestration.
	You know, remember when environmentalists used to put spikes in trees so that the tree-harvesting people with their chainsaws would ruin their chainsaws on the spikes and they wouldn't be able to cut down the trees?
	Of course, today...
	The environmentalist left wants to cut down trees, but I can imagine there's probably going to be a new, true environmentalist movement that I'm just guessing.
	I'm not calling for this.
	I'm not advocating it.
	This is just me guessing what's going to happen.
	I think there are going to be people that want to not die that run around probably sabotaging the carbon sequestration machines.
	That's just my guess.
	And I don't know how that would be done because, you know, I don't know how those machines work exactly.
	I haven't really looked into it and I'm not here to try to lay out plans for such an activity.
	I'm just saying that I think that people who don't want to die would probably at some point realize, hey, these machines are sucking the carbon out of the atmosphere.
	And that's killing the plants and the food crops and causing global famine and starvation and it's reducing the amount of oxygen produced by plants.
	My God!
	They would probably conclude they need to tear down the machines.
	And, I mean, again, I don't know how these machines work, but it's probably not that difficult to stop them.
	It's just my guess.
	They probably have a power supply, you know?
	They probably...
	They need parts or whatever to function.
	It's probably not that hard to stop them.
	But I'm just wondering, do the people that run these suicide machines, the carbon sequestration machines, do they really think that they're going to be able to run them as more and more people find out the truth about all this?
	I mean, what are they going to do?
	Like, post armed guards around these machines in order to stop people from wanting to live?
	You know, what if you built a bunch of machines that sucked oxygen out of the atmosphere on a planetary scale?
	And, you know, what if the White House declared war on oxygen?
	Like, oxygen's bad!
	And the press was like, oh, oxygen is causing climate change.
	We have to get rid of all the oxygen.
	Would people support giant oxygen-sucking machines?
	Even as they asphyxiate, people start dying off as oxygen levels drop from, what is it now, like 19% or so in the atmosphere, drops down to 17%.
	And people are like huffing and puffing.
	How come it's so hard to breathe?
	Well, now you see them giant oxygen-sucking machines over there in them fields?
	Yep, that's why you can't breathe there, little pal.
	I wonder if people would tear down oxygen-sucking machines or if they would just put up with it.
	No, we have to be obedient.
	I can barely breathe, but we don't want to be going against the government.
	And I took some vaccine shots, too.
	It makes it even harder to breathe.
	You know, it's crazy, right?
	But when they build carbon dioxide-sucking machines, the left applauds it.
	They just stand by like, yay!
	Yay!
	Let's alter the atmosphere and kill all the plants and kill all the trees.
	And instead of the earth being green, it would be, you know, brown and gray because everything would be dead.
	But then, yay!
	Everything's dead!
	Finally!
	Finally!
	You know, as they're chopping up their own babies in the background, we're going to chop the babies and kill the trees!
	This is what these people stand for.
	They're demonic, lunatic terrorists.
	I mean, these are beyond just crimes against humanity.
	These are crimes against an entire planet.
	They're terraforming planet Earth.
	These are cosmic level crimes.
	I'm sure even the extraterrestrials are looking at this like, wow.
	We've never seen a species turn into such a suicide cult.
	We're going to have to update the Drake equation on civilization's survival across the galaxy.
	Add a new factor.
	A libtard suicide factor.
	Minus 12.
	Planets that kill themselves off because they become dominated by woke libtards.
	You know the Drake equation, right?
	That's the equation that estimates how many advanced civilizations exist in the universe or at least in our galaxy, the Milky Way.
	And it's a complex equation that kind of has to suppose all the different ways that civilizations commit suicide, like thermonuclear war, which is pretty easy for civilizations to eventually stumble across the ability to destroy themselves.
	Or, like, the local sun goes supernova.
	If you lose your sun, you know, you don't have a planet anymore.
	I mean, you don't have, obviously, you don't have solar energy anymore.
	I'm sure the libtards would celebrate that.
	Yay!
	We blew up the sun!
	Finally darken the skies!
	Right?
	If they could blow up the sun, they would.
	Trust me.
	Al Gore would probably lead that mission.
	It'd be Al Gore in the cone of a spaceship.
	We're going to blow up the sun, you know?
	They'd have, like, Glitch McConnell on board, too.
	He'd be like...
	I think we should launch both of those people at the sun just to try the mission, see if it works.
	I've said this.
	There's a bunch of people that we could probably invite to be part of that mission.
	Just launch them at the sun.
	It's like, go for it.
	Yeah.
	Good luck.
	When you get there, send us a postcard.
	No, but seriously, you know, the extraterrestrials are like talking to each other in orbit.
	They're like, wow, look at this.
	Hey, remember the Abbott and Costello constellation?
	Yeah, a bunch of clowns over there.
	Even they weren't this stupid.
	This is Earth.
	It's run by woke libtards who are on a suicide mission.
	And the rest of them are going along with it because they want a virtue signal and they don't want to be disliked on social media.
	So they're all agreeing to kill themselves.
	This is amazing.
	Document this.
	Hit record.
	We gotta show this to the other aliens back home.
	Darren Beatty was writing about this Apple ad, again on Revolver.News, and he said, It's so comical that we found it to be indistinguishable from satire.
	Yeah, except it's all real.
	This is what Apple actually believes.
	This is their virtue-signaling bubble of delusion, the climate cult, and ecological terrorism.
	Which is now equivalent to the climate lunatics.
	I mean, they are the terrorists at this point.
	Now YouTube will only allow video content that agrees with the eco-terrorists.
	That's a fact.
	If you question the climate lunatics, you're going to get banned and, you know, deplatformed or shadow banned, what have you.
	But did you know there's something else here, too?
	This is by Larry Johnson that was published on the Gateway Pundit.
	YouTube is now censoring evidence of Ukrainian troops embracing Nazi symbols.
	So you know how there's this Nazi fringe, like the Nazi bone-faced guy who was really like a deep state-run Nazi puppet, by the way.
	Laura Loomer exposed him.
	But there is a contingent of Nazis that are actually part of the Ukrainian military.
	And there are lots of videos where they're bragging about it, but you can't post those.
	On YouTube, they get banned.
	So YouTube is now covering up for Nazis, for actual Nazis.
	Unless you want to talk about American Nazis.
	So if you have a video of some fringe Nazi group in America, oh, that can be on YouTube.
	But if you have videos of a fringe Nazi group in Ukraine, that gets banned.
	You can't talk about that.
	Isn't that interesting?
	If you want to know who's in charge of the world, just remember, just ask yourself who you can't criticize.
	You can't criticize Ukrainian Nazis.
	You can't criticize transgenders.
	That's because that's who's ruling over you.
	Notice that?
	Now, speaking of Ukraine, by the way, here's a story out of the UK Daily Mail that is important.
	Putin warns Britain of, quote, serious consequences and says Rishi Sunak doesn't understand the risks as he accuses the UK of trying to disrupt Russian nuclear power plants.
	So I don't know if you saw this the other day, but there were sort of Ukrainian sabotage teams there.
	That went into Russia to try to sabotage the Russian nuclear power plants and to cause a nuclear meltdown in Russia, a nuclear accident in Russia.
	Now, the Kremlin has claimed that Britain's elite forces trained these Ukrainian troops because when these troops were captured, they were interrogated.
	And reportedly, they said that, oh, yeah, we were trained by the British government.
	So Putin says, Now,
	by the way, of course, this information comes from Putin and Russia, and not everything out of Russia has been accurate, obviously.
	So you can choose whether you believe this or not.
	Maybe it's the fog of war.
	Maybe it's a made-up story.
	But even if you don't believe that this is what happened, Putin's quotes did happen.
	Putin did say these things, which is a threat to the United Kingdom.
	So the threat is real regardless of whether Ukrainian troops were actually trained by British troops to go in and sabotage nuclear power plants.
	So Putin continues, he says, are they provoking our response at Ukrainian nuclear sites, nuclear stations, or what?
	Does the British leadership or the prime minister know what their special services are engaged with in Ukraine?
	He continues, do they have no clue at all?
	I assume this is possible too.
	I assume it is possible British special services act on the orders of the Americans.
	Either way, we know the final beneficiary.
	But do they realize what they are playing with?
	I'm afraid they simply underestimate.
	I know there will be howling that starts after my words like, quote, these are threats, nuclear blackmail and so on.
	He says, I know some can say they will say anything under a gun, but this is not true.
	He says, and the leadership of the British special services knows I'm telling the truth, but I'm not sure the leadership of Great Britain understands what what's going on.
	So, anyway, he goes on and on.
	It's clear that he is saying that he believes that these sabotage teams were trained by the British military, and that he is...
	In essence, saying, you know, they're playing with fire because this puts the British government, you know, in the crosshairs of potentially a retaliation from Russia.
	And by the way, I would not be surprised at all if the British government were engaged in this because the British government is run by lunatics, just like the U.S. government at this point and the Canadian government and so on.
	Well, let's just keep going.
	You know, Germany, France, right?
	Just on and on.
	So many of these nations are run by absolute lunatics.
	Australia, New Zealand.
	Keep going.
	So I wouldn't be surprised.
	But is it wise to try to sabotage another nation's nuclear power plants to cause another Chernobyl type of accident?
	Because that seems incredibly dangerous.
	Right?
	Incredibly unwise to toy around with nuclear material in a war attack, you know, a wartime sabotage effort, almost begging for nuclear retaliation, knowing that Russia has the Poseidon underwater drones, knowing that Russia has the Poseidon underwater drones, the 100 megaton warhead drones that they've parked off the coast of the United Kingdom, of Britain in particular.
	And also that are parked off the coast of the East Coast of the United States and the West Coast.
	I mean, why would you provoke a nation?
	That could destroy you with one detonation in a radioactive tidal wave of nuclear-contaminated ocean water that inundates and destroys your nation.
	Why would you risk that?
	And the answer has got to be that the leaders of Britain and the leaders of the United States, they're suicidal, oblivious morons.
	I mean, they're like children with nukes.
	They have no idea what they're provoking.
	They're poking the bear in this case or poking the hornet's nest or whatever metaphor you want to use.
	And they're risking everything in the potential response.
	And once again, they're placing all of our lives at risk.
	Now, one of the people who knows the most about what would happen in the aftermath of a nuclear exchange is, in fact, our upcoming guest that we're going to go to here shortly.
	Professor Michel Chosudovsky.
	Again, he's with the Center for Research on Globalization, and globalresearch.ca is his website.
	And he told me in our interview today, he's been posting my story since 2009, he said.
	Which I wasn't even aware of that he's been posting for that long, but I'm glad he is.
	Obviously, welcome to it.
	But Professor Chosudovsky knows what happens if a nuclear exchange begins.
	And the short answer to that is that we all die.
	Even most of us who are preppers, by the way, we all die, or nearly all of us die.
	But notice how consistent that outcome is with what Tim Cook wants at Apple.
	Mass death, mass genocide of every living system on the planet.
	Or notice it's also consistent with the outcome of the climate cultists who want to chop down all the trees or darken the skies and block the sun, who've declared war on carbon.
	So nuclear war, which is what the West is clearly trying to provoke, trying to get Putin to launch a nuke, probably at the naval vessels in the Black Sea right now, but nuclear war would also achieve the global death of That the West wants to achieve because the West or the leaders of the Western nations are clearly demonic,
	infested Satanists who are trying to achieve total destruction of human life on Earth because humans are created in the image of God.
	They are anti-life, in other words.
	They hate God's creation, which includes Earth, obviously, and every living thing on it.
	So nuclear war is just one way they can do it.
	Biological weapons is another way.
	Economic collapse...
	Darkening the skies, cutting down all the trees, sucking all the carbon out of the atmosphere, setting off maybe like an EMP weapon.
	There's all kinds of ways that they can achieve mass death, and it seems to me that they're pursuing them all.
	They're pursuing them all simultaneously.
	They are shutting down the food supply.
	They are sabotaging food hubs.
	They're shutting down energy.
	They're trying to provoke World War III, provoke a nuclear exchange.
	They're building more bioweapons.
	They're mandating vaccines again, like we just covered.
	And they're going to try to enslave and then exterminate the entire human race under central bank digital currencies, biometrics, food rationing.
	Surveillance systems which are already in place.
	This is about global enslavement and extermination.
	That's exactly what is happening right now, right in front of us.
	And the CEO of Apple brags about it.
	He's bragging about it.
	Now, we're going to go to that interview with Professor Chosodovsky here in just a minute.
	A couple of programming notes.
	First of all, at our online store, healthrangerstore.com, we had a surge in demand for our 5G defense product.
	And for about 12 hours, it was out of stock.
	And if you were trying to purchase it from us and it was out of stock, we were able to produce thousands, a few thousand more units over the last 24 hours and get those back into inventory.
	You can check it out now at healthrangerstore.com and see if we have them remaining at the moment.
	We are going to produce more coming up, but it's going to be several weeks before we can get the next round of supplies in, in order to manufacture that.
	And as you recall, that's the product that contains superoxide dismutase, which is an enzyme that helps counteract the peroxynitrates that are formed in the body upon exposure to 5G cell phone radiation.
	And peroxynitrites are dangerous free radicals that are associated with chromosomal damage, DNA damage in human cells.
	They're very toxic free radicals and it's important to counteract them.
	And 5G defense, which is a powder, helps you do that.
	It helps you do that because of the SOD ingredient, superoxide dismutase.
	So that's one thing I want to let you know.
	Secondly, we recently released the interview with the founder of Bastion, which is the decentralized peer-to-peer social media platform that has no central servers and there's no censorship whatsoever.
	And I want to bring this to your attention because we are going to be using Bastion as the emergency alert channel.
	In case the internet kill switch is activated that takes down domain name servers or DNS root servers, it would take offline all the domain names that the government doesn't want you to see.
	For example, naturalnews.com or brightown.com.
	No doubt you would still be able to go to apple.com because he's a globalist.
	Tim Cook, or you'd probably still be able to get to Google.com because there's official health information, but you wouldn't be able to get to any truth sites that are actually telling the truth.
	So Bastion is, being a decentralized system, bypasses DNS. You can use Bastion.
	By the way, you just go there right now and download the app and install it and start using it, B-A-S-T-Y-O-N.com.
	It's free to use.
	And my channel there is HealthRanger, and I'm going to be using that as an emergency alert channel.
	I do post to there every day, by the way, just like this podcast, you know, the news or other stories, things like that.
	I'm doing that right now.
	But in case of emergency, if the internet kill switch is activated, you can find me on Bastion.
	Not Bastion.com, because that'll go down too, but rather the Bastion app, which uses peer-to-peer So, but you have to download and install this app before the internet kill switch is activated.
	Otherwise, you won't be able to download it.
	So go to bastion.com, B-A-S-T-Y-O-N, download the app, install it, set up your own username, it's free, and start following my username there, HealthRanger, and we also have Brighteon and Natural News, but we're not posting that much under those channels yet.
	But follow my channel there and then if things start to hit the fan, then just launch that app and you'll be able to start getting emergency messages from me.
	Also, in terms of emergency communications, don't forget about the satellite phone store at sat123.com because that's one way you'll still be able to make and receive phone calls or send and receive text messages even if the cell towers are down or if there's an attempt at local censorship don't forget about the satellite phone store at sat123.com because that's one way The satellites will very likely still be functioning because satellites are used by the military and the government and United States senators and so on.
	So having a satellite phone as a backup comms option is very wise, especially in these dark times.
	SAT123.com is the website where you go to find out more about the satellite phones.
	All right.
	With that said, let's jump into the interview with Professor Michel Chosudovsky.
	And I think you're going to find this to be quite fascinating.
	So here we go.
	Welcome to today's interview on brighteon.com.
	I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon, and today we're joined by a first-time guest here, an extraordinary individual, a voice of truth and courage in our world.
	His name is Professor Michel Chosudovsky, and he is a professor of economics emeritus at the University of Ottawa.
	And he also runs globalresearch.ca, which is an extraordinary resource for geopolitical, economic, and public health analysis around the world.
	He joins us today for what I think will be an intriguing, in-depth discussion of world events.
	Welcome, Professor.
	It's an honor to have you join us today, sir.
	Well, I'm delighted to be on the program.
	I must say that this morning I read your...
	Well, I viewed...
	The statement that you made on the dangers of World War III pertaining to a false flag which was to be conducted in the context of these war games in the Black Sea.
	And I think that this is of course historical in your understanding and how you compared it to Pearl Harbor.
	And I think that That is, I think, is the topic of discussion today.
	It's the statement that you made and the significance of that statement.
	And of course, ultimately, our objective is to undermine any kind of World War III perspective.
	Absolutely.
	Well, you have put out many warnings over the years about the consequences of nuclear war, and I've seen some videos based on your research, for example, and it's absolutely devastating.
	You know, human civilization cannot function in the aftermath of a nuclear exchange among families.
	First world nations here, or superpowers, I should say.
	And yet, I believe, and you are free to agree or disagree, but I believe we find ourselves now in a situation where the U.S. empire in particular is run by insane lunatics who do not consider the consequences of nuclear war, who do not understand history, do not understand geopolitics, and they have a kind of arrogance and a bully tactics A point of view that makes them dangerous because they do not understand the limits of their own power.
	And that's the context from which I made that statement, if that makes sense.
	Does any of that resonate with what you're thinking?
	It certainly does, because I think the problem is that the decision-makers, they're not necessarily specialists in nuclear war.
	They believe their own propaganda.
	That's fundamental.
	And in fact, decision makers are really the victims of propaganda.
	And at the same time, they create propaganda.
	But I recall when I started working on nuclear weapons, I've been doing research on nuclear weapons for more than 20 years.
	But what struck me Was this nuclear posture review under the Bush administration, which was published, actually, was published in 2002.
	But really what it entailed is that public opinion was led to believe that nuclear weapons, particularly the so-called mini-nukes, were harmless to the surrounding civilian population because the explosion is underground.
	And consequently, they are safe for civilians.
	I'm almost quoting the Pentagon documents there.
	In other words, the irony is it's a little bit like a pack of cigarettes and you say smoking is good for your health.
	That's what they did.
	They changed the label.
	They said this bomb is good for your health.
	Go ahead and use it.
	And that was entrenched In the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review, and at the same time, it recategorized nuclear weapons so that the nuclear weapons could be used in the conventional war theater, and they did not require The permission of the commander-in-chief.
	It could be a three-star general.
	Now, that, I think, is the beginning of this whole process.
	And that puts us in very dangerous waters.
	And just for the audience to get up to speed, what you are referring to, my Black Sea warning, that was a podcast that I did that...
	Warned that the naval exercises that are currently being conducted in Operation Sea Breeze 23 in the Black Sea, they could be used as a cover story to plant a nuclear weapon or to detonate a nuclear weapon in the same way.
	That, of course, the Balt ops, the Baltic Sea operations were used as a cover story to plant the explosives that blew up the Nord Stream pipeline, which was a civilian infrastructure target that has devastated the industrial economies of Germany and other Western European nations.
	So it's not like this is a wild theory.
	This is something that the U.S. has done before, and I'm very concerned that they may do it again.
	Apparently, you share some of my concern, at least, in that area.
	Well, absolutely, because I would say that the greatest threat of nuclear war doesn't come from the Russians.
	They still believe in mutually assured destruction, and they have a defensive deployment of nuclear weapons.
	But let's say the United States First of all, the United States has invested in a $1.3 trillion nuclear weapons program, which in effect goes into the pockets of the military industrial complex.
	But it also points to the fact that nuclear weapons are on the table.
	They're not something which are there as a weapon of last resort.
	And then there's also this belief that they can actually win a nuclear war.
	No, a nuclear war is not winnable.
	So that, in a sense, what you reviewed as the possible false flag, comparing it, let's say, to Pearl Harbor.
	Well, Pearl Harbor was the destruction of U.S. Navy, which was in the port.
	And that was used as a pretext to ultimately to wage war on Japan.
	That's right.
	And what you're saying essentially is that an incident in the Black Sea resulting from this exercise and deployment of military hardware could lead to a false flag Which would then trigger World War III. And I think your understanding is absolutely impeccable.
	And it has to be, we have to analyze that.
	And we have to refute, we have to reveal it.
	But there's a whole history behind that.
	And now I think you mentioned, of course, you mentioned Victoria Nuland in your interview.
	And Victoria Nuland, when she says, fuck the EU, she really means it.
	She means it because you also said it's a war on the European Union.
	There's no question about it.
	This is a war on the European Union because it is coupled with devastating economic measures which are literally destabilizing the economies of major powers, including, of course, Germany and France and the United Kingdom already with Brexit.
	But there we are.
	And And at the same time, the leaders of the European Union are complicit.
	In fact, they're completely subordinate to Washington.
	Now, you know, the chancellor, the German chancellor, was supportive of the action on Nord Stream.
	Despite the fact that this was devastating as far as the German economy is concerned.
	Well, you mentioned some really critical points here.
	Victoria Nuland in particular, I believe, in my opinion, she is one of the most dangerous figures in the history of the United States of America.
	And she clearly has ethnic hatred toward people of Russian ethnicity or descent.
	And she seeks the total destruction of an entire ethnic group, which is the kind of mindset that we saw before, obviously, with the Nazis and the Third Reich.
	And it's astonishing to me that her obvious hatred is allowed to run amok across U.S. foreign policy.
	And it's this kind of thing that leads me to believe that out of sheer desperation to destroy Russia, that the United States is willing to set off a nuclear weapon against its own naval vessels if necessary.
	In a Pearl Harbor-like incident, like you were mentioning, in order to gain public support for full engagement with Russia in World War III, which would be absolutely devastating for our planet.
	Deranged woman, in my opinion, who has a history of her grandfather with Russia and so on, and she wants to take it out on an entire nation.
	This is a very dangerous thing to allow to have influence over our foreign policy.
	Well, I think that Victoria Nuland is an instrument of their powerful entities behind her, which stay in the shadows.
	I think you're absolutely right, but it's not necessarily by removing Victoria Nuland that things are going to change from one day to the next.
	Good point.
	It's not going to help, because the discourse is such.
	But I mean, Victoria Nuland is in Africa.
	She's all over the place, as far as...
	As far as regime change is concerned.
	But I think the history of the Ukraine war is absolutely fundamental.
	Because I recall, and I've written on that, is that Stoltenberg, the Secretary General of NATO, in other words, he made a statement a few months back Saying, very textually, the war started in 2014.
	Now, when he made that statement, he didn't realize, most probably didn't realize the implications because everybody says it's the Russians that started it, you know, in 2022.
	In February 2022.
	But then he said, no, it didn't start.
	It's there.
	He said very clearly, and it's on record.
	It was an interview with the Washington Post.
	It started, he says, the war didn't start in 2022.
	It started in 2014.
	Now, that is obviously a statement which has devastating implications from a legal point of view and so on and so forth.
	And then, of course, when you start to look at the history of that war, starting in 2014, Victoria Nuland was there, associated very closely with the two Nazi parties, the right sector and Svoboda.
	And also complicit in atrocities which were committed during the Maidan, the so-called Euro Maidan.
	I followed through on that and she has links with Nazis all over the place, you know?
	And so one has to label things, one has to To understand that there is a neo-Nazi agenda which is embedded in U.S. foreign policy.
	And when I look at the project of the new American century, it has also a certain doctrine behind it.
	When they say, we are going to wage a long war, They use the term the long war, and we will wage a whole series of theater wars.
	That's the statement at the beginning.
	And we will also modernize our weapons system and so on.
	But the thing is, those wars are simultaneous.
	That's also something which we find in, of course, Newland must have been also involved because her husband, Kagan, was one of the authors of this project of the New American Century.
	But when they say, they don't say consecutive wars, they say simultaneous.
	And that defines the situation we are in today.
	In other words, they're threatening, essentially they're threatening China, they're threatening Russia, they're threatening Iran, and they're obviously also threatening the European Union.
	And they're sanctioning a hundred other nations.
	Exactly.
	But the thing is that it is a global, it is an act of global warfare.
	Yes.
	And the question is, are they in a position to do these, to undertake these operations simultaneously in China on the one hand and in Eastern Europe or another?
	Well, clearly, no.
	I mean, clearly the U.S. economic situation, the industrial situation, I mean, our industry is not a shadow of what it was post-World War II, right?
	And we don't have a willing labor pool in the United States.
	And we're funding everything with a money-printing machine that's out of control and is devaluing the dollar rapidly, of course, while other nations are looking at their own clearing currencies, BRICS nations, and so on.
	But you're hinting at something here that's a point that you have written and spoken about a lot.
	I want to ask you...
	The phrase is peaceful coexistence.
	And why is it, do you think, that the United States in particular does not believe in the peaceful coexistence or even the existence of other nations that are sovereign nations?
	The U.S.? Well, it certainly is.
	I've been looking at World War III scenarios for quite some time.
	Some of them are declassified, and one which is very important, it's always four countries which are targeted in a World War III scenario.
	Actually, when they give They create names in these scenarios which are run by the Pentagon, or by some think tank associated with the Pentagon, like Rand.
	But there's one which is quite revealing, and it's very detailed.
	There are four powers, four countries, Churya, China, Rubik, Russia, Namazin, North Korea, and Irvingham, Iran.
	Those are the four countries, okay?
	It may sound ridiculous, but they have it all programmed, and those are the targets.
	And it is always those four countries which are considered to be the object of Of simultaneous targeting, okay?
	Which is, I mean, there may be other countries around the world, but those are the countries that they consider as a threat, so-called threat to U.S. national security.
	So that kind of ideology has been there, and I think it's been there even before Victoria Nuland became active in politics.
	It goes back to the 90s, or to the mid-90s.
	and there's always a sequence of military operations.
	We saw that in regards to the Middle East.
	Absolutely.
	Desert Storm and Libya taking out Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein and so on.
	Yeah, I mean, it was all part of the same thing.
	This doctrine of, you know, you either become a puppet state of the U.S. or we will destroy you and assassinate your leader.
	And let us not forget, I know you know this, Professor, but just reminding our audience, you know, the U.S. intelligence community fabricated the existence of weapons of mass destruction to justify waging an illegal war against Iraq.
	It was completely fabricated.
	And yet the U.S. never faces consequences for its international crimes committed against other sovereign nations.
	Never consequences.
	Well, I mean, you know, the propaganda ploy is there, but it's also the fact that you have people who claim to be progressive and who support U.S.-led wars.
	I mean, you have Professor Falk, Richard Falk at Princeton.
	He's a member of the Council of Foreign Relations and not A couple of weeks after the war in Afghanistan was launched on the 7th of October 2001, he said, this is a just war.
	It's a just war.
	And it was published.
	And then it became a label.
	First of all, people didn't want to recognize the 9-11 truth.
	People on the left denied it, and of course then they believed ultimately that Osama bin Laden was a terrorist and leading a war against the United States, etc., etc., with a refusal to even enter into any kind of discussion.
	Now, I think Many of us have covered the 9-11 attacks, and I think what is revealing is the Taliban government said, if you want to extradite Osama bin Laden, we're prepared to send him off to the United States.
	And that was made through diplomatic channels twice.
	It was never revealed.
	They said, yeah, here he is.
	If you give us...
	We'll enter into negotiations on his extradition.
	And they did it on two occasions.
	Now, everybody should know that...
	Oh, yes, of course.
	That's where things...
	That's where the whole thing went into high gear is when on the 12th of September...
	The Atlantic Council invoked Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, which is collective defense, and saying we've been attacked by a foreign power.
	They don't mention who the foreign power was, but there were no Afghani planes in the skies of New York that particular day.
	But they pegged Afghanistan as As a foreign power which had attacked America.
	Of course, that's absolutely nonsensical, whatever was the interpretation of 9-11.
	It was a terrorist attack and there was no proof that the foreign government was behind it.
	And then that foreign government sends a message through diplomatic channels saying, Here we are.
	If you want to extradite the alleged mastermind of 9-11 tax, we're willing to collaborate with you.
	And the US wasn't interested in that?
	Oh no, no, absolutely not.
	Because they wanted to wage a war.
	They wanted to justify the war.
	And you know how, you've heard the term narco-state describing Colombia, for example, that it was at one time, maybe even to some extent today, a government captured by the narcotics industry.
	Well, America is a war state.
	And perhaps arguably a pharma state.
	So the United States government has been captured by the war machine to the point where perpetual warfare is absolutely necessary for the U.S. government to maintain power and control over its own people through expansion of surveillance powers, for example, which at one time were said to only be used against terrorists.
	And now it's used against the American people.
	But more importantly, the financial racketeering of the industrial complex, you know, the military industrial complex, and the money printing that takes place, the kickbacks, the bribery, the fraud, the money that's being sent to Ukraine, supposedly 110 billion dollars how little of that actually ends up buying anything for soldiers on the front lines of Ukraine
	rather it ends up in the pockets of wealthy elitists living in mansions in Virginia or you know around the Washington DC beltway and it's it's the United States is captured by this perpetual warfare racket and it doesn't seem like there's any way out of it I
	I mean, even conservatives keep voting for war and more funding, and no one has, or very few people have the courage, perhaps Ron Paul or Senator Rand Paul have the courage to stand up and say no.
	But we're captured, are we not, by the military machine?
	Well, what I've noticed as an economist is that the United States is not interested in winning the wars But is essentially interested in appropriating the wealth and, in fact, imposing the neoliberal agenda from an economic standpoint.
	Now, that was the case of Vietnam.
	Theoretically, Vietnam won the war, but had to pay war reparations to the United States.
	That's one thing, but in the wake of some form of normalization, I went to Vietnam on several occasions after the war, and then they had to pay reparations to the United States to normalize, and then they imposed neoliberal policies.
	Neoliberal policies, which literally led to the impoverishment of that country.
	And that is the objective.
	They destroy one country after the other, and then they pick up the pieces.
	And that, of course, means that the war has to go on for a long period.
	Now, with regard to Ukraine, we already have projects.
	It's the BlackRock, JP Morgan project, literally to privatize the entire country.
	And it's on record.
	They say, we're coming to the rescue.
	Of course, the debt goes fly high.
	And that country becomes a property Of the largest portfolio investment firm on the planet.
	So that really is the endgame now.
	And to some extent, even the enemies, so-called enemies of America, are complicit in the neoliberal model.
	China's It's a cheap labor exporting economy with the wages that are the lowest are very, very low.
	I've done research on China.
	I started in the 80s, but I'm amazed when people say, oh, China is a socialist country.
	Nonsense!
	It's not a socialist country.
	When you When you try to minimize the wages of workers.
	And there's a 72-hour working week in China.
	It's called 699.
	Now, it means six days a week, nine in the morning until nine in the evening.
	Yeah, I've heard that.
	Leo Zhou Zhou, right?
	Yeah, that's...
	I mean...
	I've heard that phrase.
	But, you know, I think really what characterizes the geopolitics now is a very complex system of alliances and also alliances with both enemies and friends.
	But in fact, the friends are invariably transformed into enemies.
	Now, obviously, that's true.
	If you look at NATO, There's no such thing as collective security, because the United States controls all these countries.
	And the U.S. bombed the infrastructure that provided natural gas energy to NATO. I mean, if you have friends like the U.S., you don't need enemies because the U.S. is bombing your – the U.S. is destroying your industry.
	And I can't help but think that part of that is currency wars.
	But can I ask you – can we shift gears a little bit into COVID and public health?
	Well, certainly.
	Absolutely.
	It's – In a sense, it's related.
	Yeah, that's because you're a big picture thinker connecting the dots globally.
	So I want to ask you, what's the role you think of this COVID pandemic?
	And now we see it's coming back.
	We see the FDA granted emergency use authorization for a new batch, a whole new vaccine that Newsweek just admitted has only been tested on eight mice.
	That's it.
	No human trials.
	No safety data.
	No efficacy data beyond eight mice.
	Governor Hochul of New York is telling everybody to take the new vaccine because the old vaccine doesn't work, she says, anymore.
	Too bad.
	Sorry if you took that one.
	And we see this push now.
	And we see how the media...
	Just wages of propaganda war against the American people, how hospitals are turned into homicide centers to literally murder patients so that they can crank out the COVID fatality numbers that the media can pounce on in order to spread more fear and drive more people into more vaccines.
	So in your picture, in your view, what's the role of this as we are facing potentially World War III? Well, you know, I've been investigating this COVID crisis right from the beginning, and I've looked into the data.
	I can say, first of all, that the pandemic never existed.
	There was no threat of an epidemic.
	Because when it started, they had only 83 cases.
	That was on the 30th of January of 2020.
	And when they declared the lockdown, they had something of the order of 44,279 cases, cumulative cases worldwide.
	I looked into the data when it was announced on the 11th of March, 2020, for Canada.
	And on that particular day, there was only 125 cases throughout Canada for a population of 38 million people.
	Now, I can say that when they announced, when Tedros announced that The imminence of a pandemic, that was on the 20th or 21st of February, and he made a very powerful statement.
	He said, the windows are closing, we're very close to a pandemic, and this is a very serious situation.
	You know how many cases there were worldwide out of China, 1,076 cases.
	Now, I've documented that first stage.
	Now, on top of that, Those figures are meaningless because they are all relying on the PCR test, which does not under any circumstances detect the virus.
	We know that.
	Agreed.
	It's a complete fraud.
	So it's a complete fraud, but yet it is being used to wage a fear campaign.
	And it is also being used to justify the launching of a solution to a non-existent pandemic, which is the vaccine.
	Now, I can say, concerning the vaccine, the vaccine was launched in November of 2020.
	People should look at the history.
	I just mentioned I wrote out a book on the COVID crisis, which anybody can go and download.
	It's free.
	It's 15 chapters.
	What's the title of the book?
	The Worldwide Corona Crisis Engineered Coup d'État.
	The other element is, first of all, that The vaccine was launched in November 2020.
	Well, it was initially launched, but then it was implemented more or less as of mid-December.
	Now, the smoking gun behind that is the Pfizer report, which was supposed to be confidential.
	And it's a report based on mortality and adverse events between the middle of December until the end of February, two and a half months.
	That report, it's an internal report.
	It has a relatively large sample of something like 45,000.
	And the thing is, that report It has been released under Freedom of Information.
	It was released in October 2021.
	In other words, that was quite a while back.
	And anybody who reads this report will come to the conclusion that this is a killer vaccine.
	And it's not a peer-reviewed analysis of Of the vaccine or whatever.
	It comes from the horse's mouth.
	It is their report.
	It is their data.
	And on the basis of that, what I've stated with regard to the vaccine is that inasmuch as Pfizer put forth a killer vaccine and went through the process of Of documenting it in a report which is now available to everybody.
	The media don't mention it.
	But everybody can go and look at that.
	And it's thousands of adverse events.
	It's all documented.
	It's all there.
	We don't need to have anybody.
	We don't even need official data.
	Now, the thing is that if you look at it from a legal point of view, it is homicide up until February 28th.
	After that, it's manslaughter.
	After that, it becomes murder.
	After that, it becomes murder.
	Because the data were known at that point.
	The data is known to them.
	And it's known also to the governments which are supporting them.
	This was confidential, but the CDC and so on, they all had access to that.
	And the governments have access to it.
	It was confidential as far as the public is concerned.
	Now, anybody can go and read that report.
	Now, what I'm saying is that this is a criminal undertaking from the very point of publication of that report because, first of all, it doesn't It has a track record of mortality and morbidity, which is then documented by a whole series of other studies.
	Okay?
	Yes.
	But what I'm saying is, after February 28th, it becomes genocide.
	Because knowingly, they know that this is a killer substance.
	And it can no longer, and it never was a cure No, it's not even today.
	The establishment doesn't even claim that it prevents transmission or infections whatsoever.
	Their claim is that it minimizes symptoms of someone who gets infected.
	And this is why all the people, even Joe Biden and Jill Biden, boosted, injected multiple times.
	They keep, quote, catching COVID, right?
	But then what do you think was the point of this to commit genocide against your own population, right?
	While at the same time waging war or escalating war against other targeted nations that we've already mentioned like China and Russia.
	What is the big master plan of this?
	Well, I mean, if one looks at the statements of the World Economic Forum and some of those are public statements and if one looks at the Treaty of Rome and There is a depopulation agenda worldwide.
	It's clear now, and it's confirmed by very powerful people.
	They don't hide it.
	They say, well, we have to reduce the world population.
	Now, I've looked into my latest piece is to look at the chronology of this vaccine Which now has been what we have now worldwide.
	This is a worldwide process.
	We're going on 14 billion doses have been administered.
	Yes.
	14 billion doses have been administered more or less in more than 190 countries.
	There's only one major region of the world, which is Sub-Saharan Africa, where the actual process, the figures are much lower.
	But for most countries in the world, it's up to 75% of the population have at least taken two doses.
	And that's going on.
	Now, I must say there are two things.
	First of all, the lockdown was not a public health emergency.
	It was an act of economic warfare.
	Absolutely.
	Completely agree.
	And I must say, I haven't seen a single economist actually say that.
	Many of my friends, they will say it's the virus.
	It's the virus that did it.
	This is a critical point.
	If you're going to, as a globalist, achieve global depopulation, then that has to be tied to economic sabotage.
	And also, by the way, I think the linchpin of it is energy.
	So energy sabotage is what really brings down the economy as well, not just the lockdowns, but energy sabotage.
	Because, of course, as you know, everything requires energy, farming, food production, transportation, manufacturing, all of it.
	And you notice that then the climate agenda is a very convenient cover story to say that we have to shut down all sources of energy production, which affects food and economies and increases poverty and desperation, makes people more obedient to things which affects food and economies and increases poverty and desperation, makes people more obedient to things like vaccine mandates so they It's all tied together, isn't it?
	Well, it is all tied together.
	There are complexities and there are overlapping agendas.
	But I mean, to get back to the issue of stating that the lockdown was an act of economic warfare, I would say that this is simple 101 economics.
	I'd ask my students, I'd say, what happens if you confine the workforce?
	The entire workforce is confined, right?
	And the workplace is frozen.
	Now, anybody who is taking a first-year course in economics who hasn't been indoctrinated will say, it's obvious.
	It's going to trigger a crash in real economic activity.
	Now, That's really what happens, and it triggers bankruptcies, it destroys small and medium-sized enterprises, and it results in mass unemployment and rising debt, okay?
	Rising debt, which is also an instrument of controlling people's lives.
	Now, I had great trouble there because nobody really understood that, and the medical doctors They got into the debate, but they got into the debate much later with the vaccine.
	They didn't really get into the debate with the lockdown.
	I can say that the lockdown also had an objective to reduce population because it creates mass poverty worldwide.
	And that, I've spent a good part of my life analyzing the impacts of food prices on, let's say, on morbidity.
	It's obvious.
	I mean, if you don't have enough to eat, you develop It affects your health, obviously.
	That's very clear.
	Those relationships are very clear.
	Particularly in countries where the lockdown, like India, where they had the lockdown, but 50% of the urban labor force doesn't have a home.
	That's what happened.
	And then Prime Minister Modi says, go back to your villages.
	How far is that?
	About a thousand miles away.
	And I can say, I spoke to people in India, they died on the road.
	But there was a massive media blackout.
	They wouldn't even talk about it.
	But in India, Talking about poverty, since you brought it up, in the United States right now, we're seeing people who used to shop at Target now shop at Walmart.
	Those who shopped at Walmart are shopping at the dollar store.
	Those who used to shop at the dollar store are now shoplifting from the dollar store.
	So we're seeing a rapid downgrade of the economic circumstances for many Americans, many millions of Americans.
	The dollar is losing value because of the devaluation effects of money printing.
	Food inflation continues to skyrocket.
	We had new consumer price index numbers just released, I think yesterday or today, that are rather alarming and inflation is back upon us yet again.
	Aren't these the kinds of events historically that lead to social destabilization and in many cases, you know, revolts and uprisings?
	When people can't afford to eat, they tend to take to the streets, do they not?
	Well, I think you're absolutely right.
	It does create hardship, it's divisive, but at the same time, these global financial elites control the protest movements.
	I've looked into that.
	In other words, you have people who are in climate, then you have people who are involved in issues of racial discrimination and so on and so forth.
	And what is distinct in this crisis is that we don't really have a mass movement which can go against it.
	Because they say, well, no, we need to push forth the climate agenda.
	And you can see the massive protest movements taking place all over the world.
	These are fake protests.
	Well, I'm not I think that the grassroots is being manipulated.
	Yes.
	But we're not able to mobilize people against this agenda of impoverishment and depopulation.
	There's a lot of divisiveness and people are confused as to the causes of this crisis.
	They still believe, of course, that the virus is responsible for their demise.
	Now, another aspect, and now we're gearing into a new fear campaign, as you pointed out.
	I think that that fear campaign also has another purpose.
	It's more or less to distract people from the dangers of nuclear war.
	In other words, they're saying, well, there's a new...
	A virus which is developing, which is similar to COVID or whatever, with variants and sub-variants.
	Now, all that discourse and the various pandemics which are being planned ahead of time is based on a fundamental fraud and falsehood.
	And maybe I should Take a couple of words, you know, I'll try to summarize it rather briefly.
	Sure, go ahead.
	First of all, people have to understand, I mean, we've been inundated with Omicrons and Deltas and sub-variants of Omicron, etc., etc., etc.
	Okay?
	Now, that is all fraud.
	And the reason is as follows.
	When the WHO started up in January, initially they said, we must identify the virus.
	Now, there was a novella virus.
	It was presented in early January of 2020, it was presented as a new virus.
	In fact, what happened is the WHO, and Bill Gates was involved in that, they said, we're not able to isolate and identify the new virus.
	That is an official statement of the WHO. They said, we are not able to isolate or identify the new virus.
	And then they had a report.
	It wasn't from the Wuhan Institute.
	It was from the Berlin Institute.
	It was a report commissioned by Bill Gates to the fact that because the new virus could not be isolated, they recommended using another virus, which dates back to 2003.
	And they said, well, they're similar.
	So that, in effect, they were taking SARS-2-0-3, which was then renamed as SARS-CoV-1, and then they said, oh, the new virus is similar to the other one, and then they named it SARS-CoV-2.
	Now, people don't really understand that there were changes in names from one Period to another.
	But what is taken as a point of reference in the PCR test is not the novella virus.
	It is a virus which resembles the novella virus, which is a 2003 virus.
	And that is where you have this 2.
	Nobody really says, why is it 2?
	Well, It's called SARS-CoV-2.
	That means that, in effect, the virus that we consider as a threat to humanity is considered to be a variant of a virus which existed 20 years ago.
	Yeah, extraordinary.
	Now, that was all fraudulent, and I suspect that That it was there with regard to intellectual property rights and patent.
	So that you have a whole sequence of concepts.
	There was this tabletop simulation back in October of 2019.
	They came up with the name of a virus.
	It was called And then WHO comes up with exactly the same name as the simulation, which was exactly the same name.
	They inverted simply the date.
	And then after that, a couple of weeks later, they came up with SARS-CoV-2.
	They come up with SARS-CoV-2.
	Where does the two come from?
	It's a variant of a virus which they take as a point of reference in the PCR test, which is totally meaningless, which goes back to 2003.
	So that when you say, oh, beware of the Omicron, which is supposed to be a variant of SARS-CoV-2, It's a nonsensical statement, but first of all, the PCR test doesn't identify neither the viruses nor the variants,
	but the point of reference that they're using is a virus which was used To customize the PCR test, which dates back to 2003, and which in the meantime has hundreds of thousands of variants, okay?
	Right, right.
	In the last 20 years.
	Well, that's the revenue model.
	They can always roll out another variant because they've got lots to choose from.
	Well, when they say Omicron is a variant of SARS-CoV-2, well, my answer is saying SARS-CoV-2 is not the original virus.
	It's a virus which existed 30 years ago.
	That's the point of reference.
	And in any event, the PCR test doesn't detect the viruses.
	Everybody knows that.
	So this is a fraud.
	These variants, first of all, they can't be detected.
	And I've checked I've checked when they give the data, they come up and they say, according to somebody coming back from Africa, and he was tested at the airport with a PCR test, the PCR test doesn't detect anything.
	It detects genetic sequences.
	So there we are.
	We have this fraudulent emphasis on variants, and each time the variant is announced, You have movements on the stock markets, okay?
	I've been following that.
	It's a money-making operation because on the one hand it creates fear and on the other it also leads to movements in the Let's say in the values of big pharma.
	Well, and Professor, they've created the perfect crime cartel because the WHO now has been given dictatorial control over the allowable window of speech across big tech platforms.
	So anyone who disagrees with the WHO, and the WHO is of course all in with big pharma and this racket that you're talking about, but if you disagree with the WHO, your content...
	is removed or penalized or shadow banned and you're deplatformed.
	So there is now no mechanism by which anyone can question these false narratives.
	You know, quote, the science.
	It's not self-correcting anymore.
	There's no dissenting view that is allowed to even be stated publicly on any of these controlled platforms.
	And, you know, that's why this platform is so crucial, Brighteon, because, you You can't say these things.
	We can't even have this discussion on YouTube without being deplatformed.
	So they've locked the whole system up.
	It's a self-reinforcing global fraud tied to big pharma profits, government control and depopulation.
	And if I were to put a label on the whole thing, I might call it a worldwide IQ test.
	See who is obedient enough to go along with all of this without asking common sense questions like, where are the safety tests of this?
	Or how does a PCR test determine the concentration of viruses in a person's blood?
	Because it doesn't.
	It doesn't at all.
	So it can't diagnose anybody with anything.
	PCR cannot diagnose anything.
	Well, but that's it.
	I mean, but even without the PCR test, there was no...
	Assuming that the PCR test is valid, there was no justification for the lockdown, okay?
	Right.
	Because the numbers were so trivial.
	But on top of that...
	Now, of course, they boost up the numbers the moment they start testing people, and the fear campaign boosts up the numbers.
	But as you say, the actual PCR test doesn't detect anything.
	It detects, it could be seasonal influenza, common cold, And so on and so forth.
	In other words, when a person tests positive, it doesn't mean that they've got COVID-19.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	But people don't really know that.
	But the thing is even far more serious because they make us believe now that there are a whole series of variants and sub-variants of the deadly virus, which has never been identified.
	I mean, the absurdity is to say even this particular new virus resembles the one 2003.
	It's like a blind date because you can't even, if you haven't done the isolate, you can't say she looks, you know, you can't identify her.
	Sorry for the analogy, but it is.
	If the 2003 virus is taken as a point of reference, which is similar to the new one, but the new one we can't even identify, well, we don't even know what we're talking about.
	That's right.
	The thing is, people are led to believe that the Omicron and the Delta and all that is a new, and the sub-variants of those labels there constitute a threat, and then they go and they get vaccinated.
	But I mean, here we are.
	I think really if we're going to wage a campaign, or we are waging a campaign, we have to inform people.
	First of all, we have to tell them that this is a scam right from the beginning.
	There was no pandemic.
	And secondly, we have to tell them that the vaccine, based on the Pfizer report, is absolutely clear that this is genocide.
	Because we have all their figures.
	Well, no question about it.
	And Professor, we're almost out of time here, but I want to point out the similarity between what's happening in Ukraine and what we've just been talking about here in the United States.
	So, you know, the Ukrainian government has, since 2014, fired artillery against its own citizens.
	In the Donbass region, right?
	They have waged kinetic warfare against civilians in the Donbass region.
	In fact, that is still happening today.
	But the American empire, the U.S. empire, which I would argue does not represent real America.
	This is an occupied enemy regime in power that violates the spirit of America.
	But they wage biological warfare, economic warfare, psychological warfare against the American people.
	So here we have two countries that are both at war with their own people just using different kinds of weapons to achieve that warfare.
	And here we are.
	We thought that...
	I mean, the average American thinks their government is protecting them from COVID or protecting them from Russia.
	Russia is no threat to the United States if not provoked by the U.S. You know, it's...
	Well, you know, the irony, to get back to the issue of the lockdown, 190 countries, including all the alleged enemies of the United States, they endorsed the consensus, okay?
	And that, from my standpoint, the lockdown is an act of war against humanity.
	It's 190 countries.
	Now, how is it all these countries, including Russia, endorsed something which is a falsehood?
	And they have tons of scientists and doctors which could have revealed it, what we're discussing now.
	And how is it that...
	That the Russians also then entered into the vaccine business and so on.
	There's not a single country on earth which did not actually refute.
	Well, there were a few, and mainly in the Caribbean and in Africa, but again, China was a partner, Russia was a partner, Cuba was a partner, and that Lockdown is an act of global warfare, and it's an act of warfare against your own people as well.
	So what's your explanation of why those countries did that, specifically China and Russia?
	Why would they go along with this?
	Well, first of all, I think that the leaders of those countries, they have a lot of Trojan horses all over the place, right?
	I can answer much better the case of China because I've done research on China for more than 30 years, but if you have allies within China,
	the business communities, the fact is that the Chinese economy is very much embedded into The systems of global trade and so on and so forth.
	But at the same time, the Chinese CDC, which is headed by George Gaofu, he's a buddy of Fauci.
	Fauci is his mentor and so on.
	They have their people within the Chinese establishment And then you have the Chinese billionaires there, which are complicit as well.
	So I can say that ultimately they are supportive in a sense of the economic agenda.
	There may be divisions with regard to the geopolitical agenda, but when I go to China, and I've been going to China back and forth for many, many years, I find, first of all, the intellectuals, And the business people are very pro-US. And it's pro-US establishment.
	It's not...
	I mean, they're good people, but they...
	They believe the narratives that the US pushes, especially surrounding pharmaceuticals.
	Well, they are...
	You know, without China, they never would have been able to implement this project because all the...
	All the products, let's say the vaccine doses and all that, they're all done in Chinese companies.
	That's right, the swabs, the masks.
	The whole massive trade.
	But at the same time, the COVID crisis was used to destabilize The Chinese economy.
	Yes.
	But it was also being used, it's also because there were people in China who went along with that.
	When they had zero, what was it called?
	Covid zero campaign, which was implemented first in Shanghai and various industrial cities.
	And it was all based on ridiculous data where people were confined to their homes.
	So that happened about a year ago.
	Professor, I'm sorry to interrupt.
	We're going to have to wrap this up.
	We're almost out of time here.
	I can't believe it's been well over an hour.
	We'll have to do this again.
	But any final thoughts you want to offer to wrap this up?
	Well, let's put it this way.
	I think that, as you pointed out, we're dealing with a very complex process, but we should not divorce the war in Ukraine from the restructuring of the social fabric throughout the world,
	which is the consequence of the COVID crisis, both Both the fact that the lockdown triggered what I would consider the most serious economic and social crisis in world history, because it's generalized, 190 countries.
	And secondly, the vaccine, which is an act of, which is a criminal act, because it is known, we know it, that it kills people.
	And in that regard, It has had a certain relationship to the military agenda.
	And then, as you mentioned, it's also the manipulation of energy prices.
	And we're not living in a free market economy.
	All these prices are manipulated, and they're very often manipulated on the stock exchanges, on the commodity exchanges, and so on.
	So that's another element and I think it's a very complex but it's also coherent because it's ultimately leading to depopulation and impoverishment at a worldwide level and a process of enrichment which is limited to a handful of billionaires and so on and so forth and I think Ultimately,
	what we have to do is to develop a worldwide movement which addresses these various dimensions.
	It's both anti-war, it's anti-COVID, and so on and so forth.
	And that, of course, revealing the truth, but the truth has to be spread.
	And, of course, the major obstacle there is the fact that we have censorship and we have a media which prevents us from revealing that truth.
	Indeed.
	Indeed.
	Well, we're going to have to leave it there, Professor.
	This has been an extraordinary conversation, and I hope the first of many, we've got to get together again and discuss what's going on.
	even in more detail.
	Let me give out your website.
	GlobalResearch.ca is the site to go to, folks, to check out the work of Professor Chosodovsky and others there.
	And Professor, I just want to thank you for taking the time to speak with us today.
	This has been really enlightening.
	Well, we are very much...
	Your message, your analysis, going back, I think...
	To 2009, it's been about 14 years that you've been contributing to global research.
	Is that right?
	Your analysis is absolutely impeccable and people are reading you all over the world.
	So we look forward to collaborating with you.
	And as you said, we're living in a very complex context.
	We have to address the complexities, but we also have to address common sense.
	- Yes. - And people, if the vaccine, which let's start with the vaccine, If the vaccine is a killer vaccine and we can prove it, there we are.
	Pfizer proves it itself.
	Then it's not a question of even negotiating whether it's going to be compulsory or what.
	It has to be eliminated immediately.
	Yes.
	It has to be cancelled.
	Agreed.
	All right, well, we will speak again soon, and I appreciate you, your voice of courage and truth, and just want to remind people that...
	This is brighttown.com, and yeah, I'm one of the most censored people in the world, by the way.
	You can't find me anywhere on the mainstream tech platforms, so we only reach a tiny fraction of the population that we should be reaching.
	But for those who are able to connect with us, you're going to have a much better chance of surviving this global depopulation effort that is well underway.
	So, Professor Trostudofsky, it's been a pleasure, sir.
	Thank you for joining us today.
	It's a pleasure.
	Bye for now.
	Okay, goodbye.
	And thank all of you for watching.
	And as always, feel free to repost this interview on other platforms and channels.
	And be sure to visit the professor's website, again, globalresearch.ca, out of Canada there.
	And share the word.
	I mean, spread the word.
	Share this news and share this video.
	And pray for humanity, I tell you what.
	Thank you for watching today again.
	Mike Adams here, the founder of brighteon.com.
	Take care, everybody.
	Today's interview is brought to you by HealthRangerStore.com and our wide variety of storable food and really high nutrition products.
	I've got some on my desk, some of my favorites.
	The one in the center there is coconut milk powder, which is really super delicious.
	It's mineral rich and it adds a fatty, creamy, luscious, delicious taste to it.
	Lots of recipes, including smoothies.
	We've got quinoa there on the right, which, of course, is a gluten-free...
	It's kind of a grain.
	It's not technically a grain, but people use it like a grain.
	It's really delicious in a lot of recipes.
	Very high in protein.
	And I remember eating this when I was hiking in the Andes Mountains.
	And the local people who helped us, they would bring quinoa and eggs and they would just get water from the mountain streams and they would boil the quinoa and eggs and we would have quinoa egg soup.
	Right there on the trail outside of our camping tents.
	That's on the way.
	I was hiking to Machu Picchu at that time and we did the long hike, not the bus ride.
	It was hiking over the Andes Mountains up to 14,000 feet and back down and we were powered by quinoa.
	Okay, then we've also got goji berries on the left there, which are, of course, from the Tibetan regions of modern-day China.
	But we do all the testing for heavy metals and glyphosate, as well as them being certified organic.
	So ultra-clean goji berries, world-class quality, available now at healthrangerstore.com, along with many other products, such as nascent iodine and also IOSAT potassium iodide tablets.
	You know, good to get that as an emergency measure.
	We've got pea protein.
	We've got organic super fruit sea powder, which is really delicious.
	I use this with blended frozen bananas and frozen blueberries.
	You can also use freeze-dried blueberries with this, and it makes a super delicious fruit smoothie.
	Throw in a couple of goji berries in there, or like a small handful, and you've really boosted the nutrition.
	Organic cacao nibs and so much more.
	Check it all out at healthrangerstore.com, and we appreciate your support.
	Thanks for watching.
	A global reset is coming, and that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audio book.
	It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
	You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
	I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
	I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
	So download this guide.
	It's free.

▲