BBN, May 9, 2023 - Robert Kennedy's vision for HEALING a fractured America
|
Time
Text
Welcome to Brighton Broadcast News for Tuesday, May 9th, 2021.
I'm Mike Adams.
Thank you for joining me today.
And joining all of us here shortly will be Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is, of course, running for president on the Democrat ticket.
And the Democrat Party is trying to silence him because, you know, that's part of their inclusive stance is to not include RFK Jr.
in any debates whatsoever.
So we are including him and he's including all of us in a conversation today.
I think it's going to be rather fascinating.
I have a lot of, I think, intriguing questions for him.
And he's obviously a very bright, very informed individual, very courageous.
I've called him a hero for America.
For what he's done on COVID and the vaccines and authoring the book about Anthony Fauci and so much more with Children's Health Defense and so on.
So I'm really honored to have him as a guest today and I think you'll find this to be truly fascinating.
So don't go anywhere.
The interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
is straight ahead right here on Brightown Broadcast News.
Welcome to today's interview on Brighteon.com, the free speech platform.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon, and today I'm joined by a very special guest, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is, of course, running for president on the Democrat ticket, and I have previously called Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
an American hero for his work on Fauci and vaccines and the book and children's health defense and all of that.
He's done extraordinary things for America, and now he's stepping up.
To run for President of the United States.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Sir, welcome to the show.
It's an honor to have you on.
Thanks for having me back, Mike.
Well, it's great to have you here.
And as you probably know, my audience tends to run on the conservative side.
And yet every person I've spoken to about your candidacy has said they support you regardless of their party affiliation.
So my first question to you today is about that.
Are you getting a lot of support from people regardless of party affiliation?
Yeah, I'm getting an outpouring of support among independents, among Republicans, among conservatives, and also in the Democratic Party.
I mean, the polls that have come out, as you have seen, have been now at 20 or 21 percent.
Among Democrats who are likely to vote.
So that's, you know, that's strong.
And I'm actually, our in-house polling is showing us even stronger among Democrats, but really strong among independents and Republicans, which have not been publicly polled.
Yeah, that's fascinating because I think should you achieve the nomination on the Democrat ticket, you would, of course, already have the support of most Democrats just by party affiliation, and then you'd get a lot of crossover support from other parties based on your stance on issues that people care about.
I mean, I think that you can actually win this.
That's what I think.
Yeah.
I mean, the hardening thing to me, Mike, is how many people have said to me And sending me letters and notes and emails and tweets, etc., saying, I don't agree with everything you say, but, you know, I believe that you're going to protect free speech and that you're going to protect the essential values of this country.
And, you know, I'm willing to cross party lines for the first time in my life.
Yes.
To vote for somebody that I trust to do that.
And that's...
You know, the idealism that still is kind of burning hot in the American press on the left, on the right, in the middle, is really inspiring to me.
Well, can I add that I think one of the reasons so many conservatives trust you and trust your judgment is because you were subjected to the kind of censorship and defamation and deplatforming that has traditionally now here targeted a lot of conservatives.
Just the fact that you have been dragged through that fiasco by a dishonest media and a dishonest government actually means that you understand, I think, what real Americans are going through.
Your comments?
Yeah, I mean, also, I mean, who's ever going through this is wrong.
I mean, even like back in the 70s, most of the liberals I knew understood the support of the ACLU and its decisions to defend the rights of Nazis.
March in Skokie, Oklahoma, or Skokie, Illinois.
Even though they were appalled by the viewpoints that were being expressed by those people, they understood that it was important for every American to be willing to die for their right to say it.
It shouldn't matter to anybody, whether it's Republicans or Democrats or conservatives getting censored.
It's offensive to our Constitution.
It's offensive to our country.
We have to rise above the tribalism that is absolutely tearing this country apart and find the things, the values that we share in common, which are basically a start with our Constitution and our Bill of Rights.
Well, exactly, and that's why I am even describing you as the healing candidate, because you do tend to bring people together, you find that common ground, but also you don't compromise on the core values.
For example, you believe in freedom of speech, and along those lines, how infuriating is it for you that the Democrat establishment doesn't want you to participate in debates?
It's not very democratic.
And it's a time, and one of the points that I've made is we're living through a time when everybody is, from both parties, are worried about the integrity of our democratic process.
You know, in 2001, most Democrats in this country were Believed that the election was stolen by George Bush from Al Gore.
And even the New York Times reported that that was true.
In 2005, I wrote an award-winning article in Rolling Stone that showed how the manipulation of the vote through the voting machines in six Ohio counties had stolen the election from John Kerry.
And whether you believe that or not, I believe it and I wrote it and Democrats applauded it.
And in 2016, Hillary said that the election had been manipulated against her.
Bernie Sanders, his followers, believed that the election was manipulated against him.
We can't say it's off-limits to criticize the integrity of our electoral process.
We have to acknowledge there's problems with the electoral process, and the possibility that elections get stolen is out there.
People aren't crazy when they say that, and as you know, there's a large number of Americans who went to Capitol Hill and engaged in the January 6th demonstrations And, you know, with the violence and everything else, because they believe that our elections would be stolen, and the response to that should not be, oh, you're unpatriotic, you're un-American, for saying that elections can be stolen.
Elections can be manipulated in this country, and we need to fix that.
We all should just stop talking about whether this one was stolen or that one was stolen, and say, how are we going to fix this?
There's a Las Vegas, Nevada is is a city that was almost completely built on the capacity to build machines that can count and never make mistakes.
Yes, exactly.
And we have ATM machines on every corner and every city in our country and never give you more money than you ask for.
So we ought to be able to build a voting system that works and it should be a combination of machine counting systems.
But also we need paper ballots and you need paper ballots in every jurisdiction so that if there are questions, they can be hand counted and you can have those, you know, you can give that assurance that every American, whether you like the results of the election or not, you know, everybody knows that it's not being stolen.
Agreed, completely.
And yeah, Bernie Sanders was railroaded out of the picture.
And in a sense, I think that you are being railroaded by the DNC at the moment for not allowing debates, because I thought inclusivity was supposed to include candidates like yourself, who I think America wants to hear from.
Let me finish, because I was making a larger point there, which is, Whether you like it or not, whether you believe that elections can be sold or not, there's a large percentage of Americans who believe that they can.
And what the Democratic Party ought to be doing right now is showing the public that our election system is not rigged, that it's real democracy, that we're going to have real candidates that are out talking to people, engaging in debates, in town halls, conducting retail politics, and that.
It's not going to be fixed by getting rid of the primaries that you don't like.
It's not like a Soviet system where the party picks the official who's going to run.
And then everybody stands in line.
We shouldn't have that in this country.
We ought to actually have democracy within the Democratic Party where, you know, the people get to decide, not the party.
Well, I agree.
But let me ask you a couple of technical questions.
Shouldn't we also have serialized ballots?
Every ballot has a unique serial number, so it can only be counted once.
Or what do you think about nationwide voter ID, that idea?
You know, I need to look at both of those ideas.
I really don't know anything about the serialization of the ballot and whether that would then be, you know, identity protected, which is an important part of the electoral process.
Protect the identity.
And then I believe that there should be some solution to voter IDs and we may have to know that.
I mean, classically, the Democratic Party has made the point That a lot of the poor people in this country don't have driver's license, particularly in urban areas, and it's more difficult for them to get IDs.
And there's some places where, in Texas, for example, where the closest DMV is 75 miles away, and it's difficult for minorities to get into the DMV to get it if they don't drive.
Elderly, etc., that It's biased against them.
But, you know, I think it's really important at this point in history that we have elections that everybody has faith in, and that may be one of the solutions that we have to figure out.
Okay, all right.
Yeah, fair enough.
And by the way, I want to mention you have a popular podcast.
It's called the RFK Junior Podcast.
I've heard a couple of your interviews on there, by the way.
And I really appreciate the fact that you're doing this.
And people can find your podcast, what, on all the popular platforms, Apple and, what, Spotify?
And where else can you find that podcast?
All of them.
All the platforms.
Okay.
Anything you want to mention about that podcast?
Oh, I appreciate the plug.
I have a really good interview up there right now with Colonel McGregor.
Yes, I was listening to that this morning, actually.
And I think it's very eye-opening about the Ukraine for people, and it's short...
And I think anybody who listens to it won't feel that they've wasted any time because it's very quick and there's a lot of information.
It's very, very important information for Americans to understand.
Well, I agree.
It gives me a really positive sense about your knowledge of the world when you conduct interviews like that and you are listening to Colonel McGregor about Ukraine, the history of Ukraine, and the interaction with Russia right now.
The thing is, you are so informed on so many issues.
You know, health care, mercury in the environment, microplastics, pollution, pesticides, you know, GMOs, all of these issues that affect us, geopolitics, and it's a breath of fresh air, in my view, because so many of our elected officials have such a narrow knowledge base, they don't understand these issues, like just mercury.
Or that mercury can come from coal-fired power plants and settle on trees, and then when trees burn, it re-releases the mercury into the environment, things like that.
So I just want to congratulate you for being well-informed.
Well, thanks, Mike.
You know, one of the things that I talked about in my speech, in my announcement speech, was one of the kind of five issues that I dealt with was chronic disease in children.
And this is irrespective of vaccines.
We have had this explosion of chronic disease in this country that nobody's ever seen in history before.
We've gone from 6% of children having chronic disease to now more than 54%.
And these are these neurological diseases like ADD, ADHD, speech delay.
You know, we've got the whole generation on Adderall.
Autism rates have gone from 1 in 10,000 in my generation to 1 in 34 kids today.
And we have an NIH that is supposed to be looking and saying, okay, why is this happening?
I mean, we have the highest death body count in the world for COVID. And we know that the reason people are dying, one of the reasons they were dying excessively in our country, is because we have the highest level of chronic disease on Earth.
This is the sickest generation on Earth, and we are the sickest country in the world.
Why is that?
It has to be an environmental toxin.
And it has to be an environmental toxin that became ubiquitous around 1989.
And there's a bunch of things that happened then, But there's a limited number of culprits.
There's about 10 or 12 culprits.
It could be PFOAs.
It could be glyphosate, which is in Roundup.
It could be neonicotid pesticides.
It could be cell phones.
It could be vaccines, which went from 372 vaccines during that period.
So we ought to be, NIH's job should be to look at that.
Agreed.
This expenditure we have in our country now, we're spending $4.3 trillion on health.
And 80% of that goes to treating chronic disease.
Why are we looking and saying, here's a way we can give better quality of life to Americans to protect our children and reduce the expense of government dramatically?
We pay far more for healthcare.
In any country in the world, and we're 79th in terms of health outcomes.
We're behind, you know, Cuba and Costa Rica.
Well, exactly.
And you will be happy to know.
You, among all people, will appreciate this.
But, you know, I run a food science lab, and we just recently received shipment of dioxin testing equipment for our mass spec instruments.
I'm getting trained on that in a few weeks.
And we have soil samples from Ohio.
And from Pennsylvania, the Amish farms there, we're going to be doing independent testing of dioxins out of our lab in Texas because the EPA refuses to do more than two samples.
We need hundreds of samples.
And there are times where we're doing testing that the FDA refuses to do.
So my question to you, sir, is...
Haven't these government agencies utterly failed at the very thing they're supposed to do, which is to protect the public?
They're not even doing the most basic things, and it turns out that private labs are doing a better job than they are.
Yeah, I mean, the accident, I'm representing 600 plaintiffs in East Palestine, and I've been down there and just seeing the devastation.
And, you know, a lot of those Amish farms and the Mennonite farms in Columbia and the county are farms that have fiercely protected their organic status for generations.
And people go there because they want food that's not tainted by chemicals, and all of a sudden, you know, this explosion that is putting the most toxic chemical in the universe that we know of, that is, other than mercury, actually, on their food.
There's nothing that we know of that's more toxic than dioxin.
No, there is nothing.
And so even a molecule of it, it causes cancer and all these birth defects and everything else.
And, you know, we basically, that East Palestine explosion basically rained down dioxin on that county and beyond.
And I'm so happy that you're doing that.
You know, it's very expensive, as you know, to test dioxin.
A lot of times you have to destroy the equipment after you test with it because it's so hideously toxic.
But those people have a right to know.
If Norfolk Southern put dioxin on their property, Norfolk Southern needs to absorb the cost of removing it down to the last molecule.
100%.
If Norfolk Southern wants dioxin in its soil, it should add it at home and its executives, but it's a trespass to do that to other Americans.
I love the fact that I can talk contamination science with you about food and soils.
And, you know, honestly, a lot of Republicans, a lot of conservatives don't understand the science of food and soils and ecology and water systems and so on.
And, you know, that's for them to get up to speed on.
However, my question to you, on the Democrat side, there is, you know, the whole climate change topic.
And you wrote a really excellent article about how we protect our environment, which I really agree with what you wrote.
But, of course, on the Democrat side, there's this obsession with carbon dioxide above all else.
I've seen so many groups just focus on CO2, which is necessary for photosynthesis, but then they forget about the mercury.
They forget about the GMOs, the glyphosate, the neonicotinoids, the dioxins, all of this.
It's like, I thought the environmental movement was supposed to focus on environmental toxins.
Not just one molecule that plants actually need, you know, to grow.
How do you find, you know, balance on this issue of climate versus pollution versus environment?
Well, you know, I believe that carbon does cause climate change, cause global warming.
But I'm not going to insist anybody else believe that.
And I think all of the things that we need, and this is what I've said for 40 years, I focused on the toxic impacts to communities because, you know, I worked for commercial fishermen for most of my career, Mike, and, you know, they cared deeply about the environment.
They cared about the fisheries.
They cared about safe food, about clean places to bring their children.
It was hard to get them excited about, you know, graphs and projections 30 or 40 years from now.
Yes.
But habitats, protecting habitat to me is the most important thing that we can do.
Habitats actually stabilize climate in ways, in so many ways that we're learning today that there's nothing more important than that.
And people will...
People on both sides, Republicans, we need to find consensus on these issues.
We need to protect these, you know, our Purple Mountains Majesty, the waters, the airways, the landscapes of this country, because we love them as Americans.
And the climate issue in many ways has been hijacked by the kind of crowd at Davos who is using that issue As an excuse, as a pretense to clamp down totalitarian controls and to impose geoengineering solutions to which they own the IPs in many cases, like Bill Gates with all these carbon capture.
I don't think that's the way to do it.
I think we need free market capitalism, which will end the subsidies to the carbon incumbents.
And, you know, if we end those subsidies, we get $5.2 trillion a year to carbon.
And if we end those subsidies, they couldn't function in the marketplace.
Many of those are environmental subsidies.
So, for example, the coal industry has cut down the 500 biggest mountains in West Virginia.
They've leveled an area of our Purple Mountains majesty to the size of Delaware.
They have poisoned or destroyed 2,200 miles of rivers and streams illegally.
The coal, when you burn it, it's mercury, and every freshwater fish in America now has mercury.
The waterways, these pristine waterways on the high peaks of the Appalachian are now all sterilized from acid rain, and coal-burning power plants amid ozone particulates that cause about a half a trillion dollars of healthcare costs a year.
So, if that industry, if coal was forced to internalize those costs, nobody would be burning coal.
We would be looking for cheaper energy.
Today, it costs about a billion dollars to build a gigawatt of solar power.
To build a new coal plant costs about 3.5 billion a gigawatt.
And once you build a coal plant, now you've got to pay for the fuel and you've got to build, fortify the roads and create all of this destruction.
Once you build that solar plant, it's free energy forever.
So, what we ought to be doing is fortifying our grid, building out our grid, making it easy for the cheapest forms of energy to dominate in the marketplace.
I believe in free market capitalism.
I believe markets inspire, promote efficiency.
Efficiency means the elimination of waste and pollution is waste.
In a true free market, you can't make yourself rich without making your neighbors rich.
What polluters do is they make themselves rich by making everybody else poor.
In a true free market, we would be forced to properly value our natural resources and it's the undervaluation of those resources that cause us to use them wastefully.
You show me a polluter and I'll show you a subsidy.
I'll show you a fat cat using political clout to escape the discipline of the free market and force the public to pay its production costs.
I think our energy policy should be based upon forcing all of the polluters to internalize their costs, including the cost of cleaning up their mess, which was a lesson we were all supposed to learn in kindergarten, and then Then allowing the public to choose the cheapest, most efficient form of energy that suits their own, you know, and preserving personal freedoms.
You make a lot of good points there, especially about the externalization of the cost, but I would add that in the long term, I think you and I both agree, hot fusion energy is probably where things are going, perhaps decades ahead.
Fusion would be an excellent solution.
For all of us.
It doesn't produce nuclear waste.
And it's, you know, essentially limitless energy using a very small amount of mass.
But that's going to require a massive power grid to build out to be able to handle that.
And right now I'm seeing stories.
Actually, I saw the...
The energy commissioner of FERC, just saying, hey, our power grid's failing.
We're going to have rolling blackouts, high risk nationwide.
There are copper shortages necessary for the wire.
There's aluminum shortages, disruptions in minerals because of the Ukrainian conflict.
And it's like, I think we're 25 years behind building a power grid.
What do you think about that?
You know, we need...
We don't need nuclear fusion.
We've got enough...
We have enough wind energy just in North Dakota, Montana, Texas, to provide 100% of our power grid in this country, and then we got enough solar in Arizona, I think a 75 square mile place in the desert southwest, to provide the entire energy grid for all of North America.
The problem is You can't use variable power efficiently unless you have an energy grid that allows you to distribute it across the country during peak production.
And we don't have a power grid that can efficiently...
Every farmer in North Dakota, if you're a corn farmer in North Dakota, you're paying about $300 an acre for land.
That's the value of that land.
If you put a wind turbine on that, on a corner of that cornfield, that acre goes up to $3,200 acre.
So every farmer in North Dakota wants to build a wind turbine or multiple wind turbines on their property.
The problem is they can't get their energy to Cleveland or Chicago or New York or to the big urban centers Because we don't have an energy grid that can carry it.
If we built out an energy grid the way that we built out the ARPANET grid, when we built the ARPANET grid in this country, the cost of information of bits and bytes went to zero.
And we built a grid for the telephone, for telecom, the cost of telephones, I mean, you know, when I, 20 years ago, I was paying $75 for a phone call to Europe.
Today it's free.
And if we build an energy grid that efficiently distributes energy, the cost of energy will also go to zero.
And that's what we need to do.
We turn every American into an energy, every home into a power plant, and every American into an energy entrepreneur.
So you can put solar panels on your roof, and when they're producing more energy than you use, You ought to be able to sell that back to the grid, efficiently ship it anywhere in the country, and get the same price that the utility is getting.
And there's nowhere you can do that.
Right, right.
And I think we need some really cost-efficient storage, energy storage technologies.
I know some of those are under development right now.
But let me shift gears just for the time we have left.
Next tough question.
And you may not know this, by the way, but I'm married to an immigrant from Taiwan.
And so I believe in legal immigration, and I think that legal immigration is critical for our country.
And yet, I'm also living in Texas, and we have this border situation that is a true crisis.
You've spoken about this somewhat.
How do we solve this if you're president?
You know, how do we stop...
Just endless, uninvestigated, you know, just anybody just walking across the border, including with weapons and drugs and whatever, and yet respect legal immigration.
How do we do that?
Yeah, I mean, if I'm president, I'm going to make the border impervious, whatever it takes, because by making it so easy to cross the border now, we are actually causing a humanitarian crisis.
We're inviting people to that border and that is a humanitarian crisis now.
We ought to open up legal immigration and make that, you know, easier according to America's best needs and best interests.
But we need to close down the border and not allow that crisis to continue.
Any idea how that could even be accomplished?
I mean, would it just take the White House announcing to the world, hey, we're going to have a secure border from now on, we're going to enforce that?
I mean, what do you do?
Yeah, you know what, I don't know exactly, you know, what, because I need to go down there and study it, but my commitment is that whatever it takes, I'm going to, that's what I'm going to do.
That's my objective as president.
Okay, all right, fair enough.
Next question, I believe I've heard you say in other interviews that you support criminal investigations into some of the actors responsible for gain-of-function research, you know, funding.
What appear to be illegal programs, perhaps malfeasance on the part of the FDA. Can you repeat for our audience here what you support in terms of potential criminal investigations into some of the key actors surrounding COVID and the vaccines?
People who lied to the American public should be prosecuted.
People who defrauded the American public and people who should be prosecuted.
People who were injured by these products should be compensated.
And the entire field of gain-of-function study should probably be shut down altogether.
You know, I will shift funding From virology and infectious disease and direct NIH to direct its funding instead to studying chronic disease, because that's really the epidemic that is hurting our country.
The fact that we've got millions of kids, one out of every 34 kids now has autism in our country, is a much worse threat than COVID ever was.
You know, these are young kids at the beginning of their lives, and we're ignoring that, the big problem.
The explosion of autoimmune disease, of juvenile diabetes, of rheumatoid arthritis, of lupus, all the 100 different autoimmune diseases that have suddenly appeared and gone epidemic.
All of these allergic diseases that suddenly appeared around 1989 and went epidemic.
The eczema, peanut allergies, and all the neurological diseases that have a generation of kids hooked on Adderall.
And SRIs and all of these, we need to find out what's wrong with our kids and we need to put an end to it.
Yeah, I completely agree.
I'm really glad you understand the importance of that because I think with nutrition and clean foods and healthy foods, you know, we can prevent, we can save how many hundreds of billions of dollars a year in health care costs and keep kids healthier and happier and have better fertility and better lives, all of that.
It's 80% of our health care costs now going to chronic disease.
The medical and digital complex wants to keep us sick.
We're spending $4.3 trillion on healthcare.
80% of it is going to chronic disease.
And, you know, Anthony Fauci says the big threat is these infections that are popping up, which almost all of them, you know, our laboratory created.
The Lyme disease was a, you know, military weapon.
I've got to lose from the Plum Island lab.
And there are many, many others like that.
The cost-benefit analysis of doing this kind of research is not redounding.
toward the medical cartel in that industry.
We need to shut them down, and all the other countries in the world want to shut it down.
Yes.
The only one that's refused is the United States.
Everybody else has agreed to shut down all of this bioweapons research.
Yeah, it's incredible.
I want to give out your website.
I know you have to take a phone call in three and a half minutes.
Your website is kennedy24.com.
Is that the best site where people can join your email list?
Yes.
Kennedy24.com.
Also, what can people do to help support you?
Because, look, people are very enthusiastic about you running for president.
They want to help you.
I've even said publicly, I may temporarily switch parties to vote for you in the nomination process.
I very well may do that.
Yeah, so what can people do to help you right now?
You know, they should go to the website and volunteer.
If that's what you can do, we need volunteers.
And if you can send money, send a check, even, you know, $3 or $4 and $5, do that.
We need to raise for the campaign, we have to raise $5 million by July 1st in order to qualify for the debates, if there are debates.
But if I don't, you know, if I don't hit that metric, it's not that easy because the maximum contribution is $6,600.
And we started, most people who come into a race like this are senators and governors who have a big war chest with 20 or 30 million in the bank when they step in and they can put an organization together overnight.
We were not legally allowed to raise any money until the beginning of last month when I filed with the FEC and we now have Three months, two months left to raise that $5 million metric.
So if anything that you could send at this point would be good.
Okay, so that's the number one goal, folks.
I want you to share this interview.
Post it everywhere.
You have our permission.
I want you to go to Kennedy24.com.
Sign up there.
Volunteer and ask other people as well.
Get them involved.
And everybody sends some donation checks.
You can find the instructions.
There's a donate button on that website.
And I just want to thank you for sharing time with us today, and we greatly appreciate you.
You should know that you are loved and you are appreciated across America, across political parties.
You are a pro-human being.
You are a pro-human human being yourself, and we love you for that.
Thank you very much, Mike.
I really appreciate it.
Thank you.
Well, thank you.
And we'll talk again soon.
And best to you.
And thank you for joining me today.
And I know you have a phone call, so we'll let you go.
But thank you so much.
Thank you.
Talk soon.
Okay.
We'll talk again.
And that's the interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., folks.
Again, the website is Kennedy24.com and well worth your time to support this man who is putting it all on the line for America.
Thank you for joining me today.
Mike Adams here from Brighteon.com.
All right, I hope you enjoyed that interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
I want to give you some additional website resources.
And there's also, by the way, a super PAC that now exists that I've learned about.
And that super PAC, which is not affiliated with the campaign, is called American Values 2024.
And that website is AmericanValues2024.org.
It's got a picture of Joe Biden wondering where he is.
But anyway, this is a super PAC that I think corporations can donate to.
You can donate, I think, quite large amounts to this super PAC that is simply fighting for American values.
And we're going to have a guest on probably in a week or two who's behind this super PAC or at least involved with it in some way.
But I just wanted to give that out so that if you have a business and you want to make a donation to a cause that's helping restore America's values, that website is available.
American Values 2024.
Now getting back to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., his website is again kennedy24.com.
And we are launching, by the way, rfk.news.
It's not yet live, but it will be shortly, rfk.news.
In the meantime, go to kennedy24.com.
Join the email list right here.
And then also, if you can, as he said during the interview, make a donation for his candidacy.
He's got to raise about $5 million, he said, within the next couple of months.
Now, I want to be clear about something, too.
I have an open door if anybody from the Trump administration or the Trump circle wants to come on.
I'd be happy to interview you.
I've interviewed Kash Patel before, by the way, and that was an excellent interview.
I'd welcome him back.
Maybe we'll reach out to him.
But anybody from the Trump team that wants to come on and lay out Trump's campaign plans and Trump's positions, you are 100% welcome to do so, and you can reach me through other people that you probably know.
We probably know a lot of the same people.
But I just want to be clear.
I invited Robert F. Kennedy on to talk about the issues and ask him a couple of tough questions there.
And it's the same policy with Trump's people, so they're welcome as well.
And then finally, this is critical to state as well.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., I know that he does not agree with everything that I say or that I've ever said.
And I don't agree with every single thing that he says either.
And that's okay.
Because the way America used to work was that you could disagree without blacklisting each other and censoring each other or vilifying each other or attacking each other.
You know, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
is a thoughtful, intelligent, compassionate human being.
And we don't have to agree with every single thing that he might believe in, such as, for example, you know, carbon dioxide.
He and I probably have very different views about CO2, and it's okay.
It's okay.
We share enough critical core values and principles, and we believe in the things that matter the most for America right now, which is restoring election integrity, protecting the border, Ending the criminal cartels running the gain of function and the bioweapons.
And many other issues, by the way.
We agree on these core principles that are necessary for America to be restored, I mean, to be saved, frankly.
And that's why I support Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s candidacy on the Democrat side.
Also, plus, they're trying to censor him and make sure that he doesn't have a voice at all, which is something I'm quite familiar with since I've been censored, obviously, by the Democrats and the tech giants for many years now, like seven or eight years.
And so we don't all have to agree, but we do need to value humanity, human lives.
We need to value our planet.
We need to get the toxins out of the environment, out of the food supply, get the heavy metals and the glyphosate and the dioxins out of the food and stop this mass pollution.
And yeah, we need to live in a way that's very conscientious about the world around us and how we're interacting with other species and forests and so on.
I'm all in with that.
I want to grow clean food.
I just don't want the authoritarian tyrants ordering us what to do.
And I think that RFK Jr.
agrees with me on that point.
In fact, I think he stated that in the interview.
So, right now, my position is I support RFK for the Democrat nomination, and I support Donald J. Trump for the Republican nomination.
And isn't it interesting that both of those candidates...
are being blocked by the establishment in their respective parties.
Isn't that interesting?
The DNC is trying to silence RFK, and the RNC is trying to silence Donald J. Trump.
Which tells you something, doesn't it?
That both of these men offer something very critical for America's future.
They want to bring America back to we the people, and that terrifies the establishment.
So this election, if we make it to the election, if we actually have it, this is not about party.
This is about humanity.
This is about America.
And for this election, I almost have to mentally obliterate letters, the D and the R and the I and whatever, and just think about the people, the men and women that share our values, that want to help restore this country.
That's who I support, regardless of what party they might be with.
Both of the party establishments are You know, anti-America, frankly.
That's even the Republicans.
That's what it's come to.
So those are my thoughts on the subject.
All right, now we're going to cover some news here, some breaking news headlines.
And of course, my go-to source for this is censored.news.
And remember, I post headlines here from all across the web.
And you can also scroll down and you can see the spidered, auto-spidered headlines from the Epoch Times, Natural News, LifeSite News, Infowars, Blacklisted, and so on and so forth.
Climate Depot, 100% fed up.
Gateway Pundits on here, Children's Health Defense.
Oh, look at this.
Is banning meat part of the global cabal's plan to control the food supply?
Yeah, we've got to take a look at that article.
But anyway...
I've already pulled up some fascinating articles and some other things that are taking place.
Let me show you this right here.
This is from whycharts.com.
And this, let me kind of see if I can zoom in on that.
This shows you that Bitcoin transactions, the price has now exploded to $19.21 per transaction.
And you notice that it used to be a whole lot lower like Bitcoin.
What?
Under $2 or whatever.
Now it's $20.
So Bitcoin is becoming incredibly expensive to clear any transaction.
I mentioned this in my podcast yesterday, but it's worth repeating and showing you the graph here, that Bitcoin has become slow and expensive, almost as expensive as doing a wire transfer from a bank.
But not even as fast as a wire transfer, by the way.
So Bitcoin has become slower than banks, maybe more expensive than banks, and there's no privacy in it because it's a public blockchain.
So Bitcoin, this congestion that's taking place right now, it's caused Binance to even halt Bitcoin withdrawals.
And this congestion is apparently caused by ordinals from these crap meme coins that are using the Bitcoin blockchain.
This is breaking the Bitcoin ecosystem right now.
And it's not even an attack.
It's not a DDoS attack on Bitcoin.
It's just people using it in, I guess, a frantic demand for, you know, crap coin, meme coins, whatever.
And the system has just slowed to a crawl and it's become crazy expensive.
As much as I support decentralized cryptocurrency, clearly Bitcoin is not up to speed with what it needs to be to function today in an affordable, private, efficient manner.
Fortunately, there are many other projects out there.
There's a lot of things going on.
There's Polkadot as a Layer Zero infrastructure relay.
What else is out there?
Solana is out there.
There's a bunch of projects, a bunch of different things that are much faster than Bitcoin, that have more privacy than Bitcoin.
There's the privacy-oriented coins and things that are faster and more affordable.
Bitcoin is showing its limitations right now quite, you know, publicly.
And yet other coins and other projects are coming on board that I think really show very strong promise for the future.
I'm doing a lot of due diligence into that.
I'm looking at a bunch of different projects.
I'm going to be interviewing someone here from Cordal coming up pretty soon, maybe in two weeks or less.
Talk about that platform.
I'm going to be looking at, what's it called, Cordana and some other platforms.
Just kind of see what's out there, Web 3.0, things like that.
Because I do believe that the future of computational platforms is going to be in decentralized architecture.
And also the future of money.
Will be decentralized money.
So I'm very much, you know, thumbs up on privacy-oriented decentralized money.
And even decentralized applications that are known as dApps or dApps.
And decentralized finance.
I think that is our future for human freedom.
But the people working on those projects, I hope you hurry.
That's all I'm saying.
Because things are breaking down in the banking system, and also Bitcoin is breaking.
So please hurry and come up with your stuff as soon as possible so the rest of us can use it.
Because...
The FedNow program is being rolled out in the next two months, and very soon after that, you're probably going to be forced into a central bank digital currency system, which is an Orwellian nightmare of surveillance and control over everything that you do with your money, plus built-in restrictions on your money, withdrawal limitations, bank freezes, Automatic taxation, automatic penalties, limits on where you can buy things, even geographic limits.
Oh, too far from your home.
You must have driven a car.
It's bad for the planet.
You can't shop there.
Things like that.
Yeah, those are some of the joys to look forward to under CBDCs.
But anyway, Bitcoin is cratering right now.
Hopefully they'll resolve that problem.
Now, speaking of things that are falling apart, check out this video.
This is from the UK Daily Mail.
Here's the headline.
Shocking images show the two-mile-long vehicle encampment made up of people living in RVs, trucks, and trailers along Highway 101 north of San Fran as low-income people are pushed out of the housing market.
Let's see, the average household income is $131,000, but that's not enough to live on because, of course, all the money dumped into the system.
So check out this video.
This is it.
All these RVs parked along the side of the highway here, people living there.
Because they've been kicked out of their homes.
Look at this photo.
They're living there.
Oh, this looks like a wonderful backyard party happening right there.
Uh-huh, yeah, invite the guests over.
It's right next to the railroad tracks.
What could possibly go wrong?
Here's another beautiful rendition of America's future right here.
This guy's got, like, yard signs.
I mean, like, keep out.
He's got flags identifying his yard, okay?
And he's got a tarp on top of his RV. So yeah, this is like full-on Breaking Bad right here.
And he's got the spare tire still attached.
That's amazing.
I don't mean to mock this, by the way.
I'm very saddened by this.
America is going broke.
People are going to lose their homes.
They're going to lose everything because of the mad money printing, because of the food inflation, because of the economic destruction, which has been carried out by a deliberate plan under the Biden regime to destroy America's economy, destroy America's culture, destroy America, destroy America's military.
And this plan is proceeding as the blueprint, as the script outlines it.
And if you think this is bad, what you're seeing right now on Highway 101, wait until we have the next collapse of the banking system, which is building up right now.
And you're going to see homeless people by the millions in cities all across America.
It's going to get way worse than what you're seeing right now.
And by the way, Michael Snyder then talks about this in his article here.
Homeless encampments are exploding in size all over America as rents soar and evictions surge.
So this is a great article by Snyder.
He's talking about the same thing along San Francisco's Highway 101.
And we can take a look at that.
It is just mind-blowing.
This is a drone view.
Over this, again, these are people who, many of them have jobs even, and they still can't afford to live in a home.
Many of them might have worked for big tech, and guess what?
They're being replaced by AI. Many of them may have been even patriotic Americans, but they've been squeezed out of the system.
Wow, this guy, they're on both sides of this road.
I guess they're going to just line both sides coming up soon, and then what?
Where are people going to go after that?
You're going to have entire tent cities, shanty towns, camping town cities, all up and down the coast of California and many other cities across America.
This is where America is going.
This woman thinks it's heaven.
This right here, this is heaven, she says.
Yeah, she's 53 years old.
She's living on the side of the road.
I remember when it wasn't considered heaven to be living in a van down by the river.
Remember that on Saturday Night Live, some of you?
Remember that?
And here we go.
Okay, so anyway, that's one other piece of news.
Now, just to make things worse for white people, by the way, here's a Colorado councilwoman.
She wants to tax white-owned businesses to atone for stolen land.
Right.
Okay, so it's a Denver councilwoman.
Her name is Candy whatever, a Democrat socialist, said that they should tax white-based businesses here for stolen land even though those businesses didn't steal anybody's land.
So she's not even claiming that there's any business that went out and stole somebody's land and then set up a business as a running business on that land.
She's just saying, just as a general principle, the land is just stolen from whoever before.
I guess she says it's stolen from black people or stolen from Native Americans.
She just wants to punish people for being white and she wants to punish white businesses.
So this is just part of the reparations punitive phase of our collapsing society where they want to say that if you're white, you're automatically bad.
And therefore, make you pay extra money.
Now, taking that concept even to an even more extreme, here from Breitbart.com, activists demand $200 million for each and every African American in California.
Wow!
$200 million, and they want it in direct cash deposits, by the way.
They've demanded this.
This will cost $800 billion.
Which is more than twice the entire state's annual budget.
And California can't print money, by the way.
So the question is, where are they going to get this $200 million per person is what they want.
These reparations are, of course, insane.
And understand that if they actually attempt to pass this and make this law, every person in California is going to say that they self-identify as African American.
And technically, and I've stated this before, my heritage is Afro-Irish Native American.
Because in my history there are Africans in my ancestry, there are also Irish, and there are also Native Americans.
And so does that mean if I move to California and I can collect $200 million?
Because every person there...
In fact, technically, according to mainstream science and anthropology...
All human beings living today have ancestors that came from Africa because the whole world population almost died off and the only survivors were in Africa.
This is, you know, obviously many tens of thousands of generations ago or whatever the anthropologists say.
And so we're all descendants of Africans.
So does that mean California is going to pay $200 million to every person in the state of California?
And they can't deny people based on the color of their skin Because that would be racist.
And if a white person comes in and says they identify as black, well, the California government can't deny that because they've already agreed that a man can pretend to be a woman and say, I self-identify as a woman, and they have to accept that.
So if you can pretend to be a woman, then can't you pretend to be any color, any ethnicity, anything?
You could pretend to be another species.
So these reparations are going to go to people, if they're even past, they're going to go to people who are just pretending to be black.
Or you could say they're not pretending because they all have African heritage or ancestry anyway.
All of us do.
So what is this?
What is this other than just virtue signaling fiscal insanity on the part of a bunch of woke liberals in California who just want free money?
And if California agrees to this, where are they going to get the money?
Are they going to tax, I mean, more taxes for the property owners?
Are they going to tax real estate?
Are they going to tax businesses?
Are they going to have a sales tax?
Are you going to have a 100% sales tax to pay off people who are pretending to be black?
Is that what's coming in California?
And then if that does happen, how quickly will everybody leave California, anybody who's got any assets at all?
They will flee California in record time because they're not going to sit around just have their assets confiscated to pay a bunch of people who were never slaves And by the way, the people being taxed were never slave owners.
There's nobody living in California today that was a slave.
California even entered the Union as a non-slave state.
It was a free state from day one.
California never endorsed slavery.
And there are no people living in California today who were slaves.
And there are no people in California who are slave owners or who ever owned slaves or who would even endorse slavery.
So, if you're going to pay reparations, I have an idea.
Why doesn't the state of California pay reparations to all the vaccine-damaged people, black and white and Asian and people of color, who were poisoned and maimed or disabled or injured by the vaccines, pushed by the government?
How about that?
By the California government.
By a gruesome newsome.
And, you know, SB277 in California.
You want to pay reparations to people?
Start paying for the injured children who were injured by these toxic vaccines being pushed by the government.
It shouldn't be based on skin color.
It should be based on the fact that you're injured.
Now, speaking of injuries, by the way, check this out.
Here's a new study that's showing up in this journal.
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein accumulation in the Essentially, implications for long-term neurological complications in post-COVID-19.
Essentially, what this study says is that the spike protein hangs out in your brain.
And if you go here, it says SARS-CoV-2 spike protein trafficking from CNS borders into the brain and is identified differentially.
Regulated pathways may present insights into mechanisms underlying consequences and so on and so forth.
What it means is that it goes into the brain, or at least areas around the brain, and as such, people who are injected with mRNA vaccines may be spike protein factories that end up causing neurological damage, which could include psychiatric disorders.
It could include rapid aging, dementia, even cognitive impairment, mental retardation.
And if you've ever wondered why some people might seem to be cognitively impaired after taking booster shots, well, this may be part of the answer.
Their neurons are being destroyed, or at least certain parts of brain anatomy are being destroyed or contaminated because the spike protein goes in there and continues to cause damage.
So you could boil that down and say that mRNA vaccines make you stupid.
But then again, you kind of have to be stupid to begin with to keep taking them.
So you could say, it's really like dumb and dumber.
It's like you're dumb enough to take them, and then it makes you dumber than where you even started, which is saying something, by the way.
So the people who keep taking these vaccines are brain-damaged, cognitively retarded individuals.
Think about that.
And I don't mean that as a slur.
It's a medical description that their brains are being destroyed by design.
And it's all part of the intentional dumbing down of the population.
And if you go back decades, they started this with fluoride.
That's right.
Fluoride is a poison that's dripped into the water supply to make people stupid, to zombify the nation, to dumb people down, and to cause chronic degenerative disease.
And the reason I mention that, by the way, is because coming up next we have an interview with Paul Wittenberger.
And he's the creator of the documentary called Fluoride Poison on Tap.
You see, they used to just poison you through the water supply.
And a lot of people kept drinking that, and they got a certain amount of brain damage from that.
Now they can convince people through fear and censorship and media campaigns to line up and get injected with mRNA that builds spike protein that attacks their brain and dumbs them down with spike protein.
You know, biological weapons.
So now this is the next vector of brain damage.
But understand, if you're wondering why our society is filled with people who are completely insane and incredibly stupid and who are incapable of doing basic functions like, oh, I don't know, math, the answer is all the different vectors of brain damage.
You know, the fluoride, the spike protein, the chemicals, the chemtrails, the heavy metals, all of it.
Which reminds me, before we get to the interview with Paul Wittenberger, let me tell you about what we have in our store today, healthrangerstore.com.
Check this out.
We have liposomal glutathione there.
That's what's in the smaller bottles.
I don't know if you can see that.
This liposomal glutathione is designed to be readily absorbed and to be circulated where it's needed most in your body.
And so if you want to, let's say, support your body's natural detoxification processes, that may be something you'd like to consider.
And then secondly, we have maca root there in the bags that you can see.
Maca root, we do the lab testing, we make sure it's clean.
A lot of maca is contaminated with a certain amount of lead.
Lead is the most common contaminant that we find in maca, but you can get clean maca from us at the Health Ranger store.
And if you go to our website, healthrangerstore.com, you're going to see we have a lot of other foods and superfoods, spirulina, chlorella, and so on.
And here's, you know, different number 10 cans with different kinds of stored, freeze-dried fruits.
Again, all lab tested for multiple things, including heavy metals and glyphosate and much more.
So check it all out, healthrangerstore.com.
And we appreciate your support, by the way.
Thank you for...
I mean, we couldn't do this without you.
So with that said, let's move ahead to the interview with Paul Wittenberger.
The creator of fluoride, Poison on Tap.
And remember, that documentary is running on Brighteon University starting this Saturday.
And you can find that at brightu.com.
It's a free registration.
You just register.
You can watch it for free starting Saturday.
The full documentary will repeat on a loop for about a week, and then we'll have another show for you, another new documentary the following Saturday.
So enjoy this upcoming interview with Paul Wittenberger.
Welcome to today's interview on Brighteon.com.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon Free Speech Video Platform.
And today we're joined by Paul Wittenberger, who is a free speech documentary producer and so much more, by the way.
And he's got a documentary called Fluoride Poison on Tap that will be running free starting this Saturday on our new Brighteon University website, Brighteon.
We'll tell you more about that later, but it's free starting Saturday.
Paul Wittenberger joins us to talk about fluoride and other projects.
Paul, welcome to the show.
It's great to have you on.
Thank you so much, Mike, for having me on your program.
It's exciting to talk to you.
It's been a while since I've had a conversation with you.
I know we interviewed you first back in 2011 for this film, so a long time ago I feel like Watching you all these years, I've really gotten a good chance to get to know you.
Oh, that's great.
We first met over a decade ago, and it has been a while since we talked, so this is probably overdue.
But your documentary back then has been proven correct again and again and again.
If anything, I think that...
Didn't you have The Great Calling?
Is that what it was called?
Yeah, the first...
Kind of iteration of this film was originally going to be a three-part series focusing on the toxins in our food, water, and air that we produced with InfoWars.
And we released that film, and then we decided to kind of re-release this film to just focus on fluoride.
So we re-released it as a different film, Fluoride Poison on Tap, with a bunch of new footage in 2015.
Okay, but my point is that the things that you have been making in these films have been proven true again and again and again.
I mean, you were years ahead of the curve on this.
Right.
I mean, the film holds up very well today.
I mean, I recently watched it with my children, and it's like it happened yesterday.
Everything has been proven right, and nothing in that film has been proven wrong at all.
Yeah, see, that's extraordinary.
And, you know, if anything, then the COVID years now have also, I think, opened a lot of people's eyes to what you were talking about, the great culling.
Because, you know, 10 years ago, if you said to people, hey, there's an effort to try to achieve depopulation, you know, people thought you were crazy.
Now, about half of the people are like, yeah, you're probably right, because a lot of people I know have already died.
You know, it's no longer a theory.
People are seeing it every day around them.
Yeah, definitely.
And there's 100% been a resurgency of this film.
I've been noticing all the DVD sales going way up since COVID happened because people are fed up with the nonsense that's been going on.
And they're searching for the truth.
I mean, a lot of people woke up during this whole COVID debacle.
Yeah, true.
Exactly.
A lot of people woke up and a lot of people died, and thus they lost the opportunity to wake up.
But I want to thank you, Paul, for giving us permission to broadcast your documentary.
Again, Fluoride Poison on Tap, it's a must-see documentary, and you actually interviewed me for that as well, so I've got a couple of snippets in there.
But it's going to be Streaming for free on BrightU.com.
Right now it shows Cult of the Medics, which is the show that's currently running on BrightU.com, but every one to two Saturdays, every Saturday or every other Saturday, we have a new program for you, and it's free to watch.
You just click here.
You enter your email address and you can watch it, and it's free.
And Cult of the Medics was multiple episodes, but Fluoride Poison Tap is one documentary, and so it just repeats on a loop for the whole week.
Paul, I would also invite you, we would love to run some of your other documentaries over time as well, if that's something you're open to.
Yeah, I mean, I think the COVID Land series that we just produced with Infowars would be an amazing addition to it.
I think so.
And I think that series is awesome.
It was definitely the most professional work I've ever put out.
And so, yeah, I really hope, I can't wait until you guys get that out and get that to more eyes.
Well, we'd love to do that, so our producers will, of course, coordinate with you on that.
What else are you working on right now?
Because I think the world gives you plenty of topics to choose from.
There's no shortage of fascinating topics to make documentaries about right now.
Right.
Well, I do need to finish the COVID Land series.
We have the last two parts of that series that we're still finishing up.
You know, because of all the problems that happened with Infowars, that project got put on hold for a little bit.
So we're hoping to get back to that, but I also have some different topics of interest that I get into, biblical topics and stuff that we discuss, and I'm working on a bunch of different topics.
Films and ideas right now.
Well, I'm sure that everybody has a suggestion for you, you know, because if you're a filmmaker, everybody's got a film idea.
So I'm going to give you an idea here as well.
But because, you know, I did a film called Biosludged, which was, you know, about the biosolids being dumped on the farms and everything.
And I thought if I did another film, and maybe this is something your team might consider long term, it would be called like Gender Benders.
And it would be about the gender-bender chemicals, the plastics, the atrazine, the chemical castrators, the hormone disruptors, the soy, everything that's actually contributing to gender-bending.
You have anything on your slate looking at maybe gender issues?
Well, I've wanted to make a film on all this woke garbage, but I've never thought about doing one on specifically what you just talked about, but I'm not against it.
Yeah.
Well, that would be like the chemical approach, right?
It's saying that a lot of these people are actually victims of chemical contamination where their hormones get all screwed up because of exposure.
You know, it's almost an environmental documentary.
But anyway, it's about gender.
Yeah.
Crazy times.
Okay, so what else is on your mind?
Anything that you can tease us with after COVID land?
I don't know.
I'm trying to just work on one project at a time right now.
I feel like I've been working on COVID land for so long now that that's really all I've been thinking about.
Okay, well what about your website, framingtheworld.com?
What do you have going on there that people can tune into?
Other than, I see your documentaries here and so on, but what else do you have there?
You can check out...
My archive on Rockfin as well, which you see there.
I'm just trying to, you know, get out there to different alternative websites.
Of course, I'm on Brighteon, BitChute, stuff like that, because YouTube is totally censored everything I've ever done.
And so it's just, yeah, just trying to get out there to alternative platforms right now.
Okay, well, I think you're doing a good job of that, and more and more people are tuning in to alternative platforms to get the truth about everything.
But let's go back to fluoride, actually, because fluoride, I believe that fluoride also alters people's neurophysiology in some ways.
So it changes people's behavior in certain ways.
What did you find when you talked to all these experts about how fluoride is impacting the psychology or the behavior of the population?
When I first started looking into this, I didn't realize how much fluoride affected all aspects of our life, from our IQ to just every part of our daily life.
You know, when I did this film, we interviewed tons of doctors and scientists and activists and really went down the rabbit hole on all the ways that fluoride affects you in a host of different ways.
And I think that this film does a really fantastic job at explaining each one of those issues and going through all those different issues in a clear, concise way.
But also then, I think you found this, you know, talking to the experts and doing your due diligence on the film, but the people pushing fluoride at a high enough level, they also know this.
They know that fluoride is linked to, you know, fluorosis.
They know it's linked to bone cancers.
They know it's linked to, in some cases, psychiatric disorders.
They know this at a certain level.
Am I wrong on that?
Do you think they know it, or do you think it's an accident?
They have to know.
There has been at least 64 tests showing that children's IQ is lowered as a result of fluoride.
There's study after study after study done that has proven that fluoride is toxic to your body.
So yeah, they have to know.
It's just...
The propaganda has made it that people refuse to accept it.
So then, if they know it, what do you...
We have to think about what's the motivation.
Why are they putting it into the water supply?
Because this is a mass poisoning of the population.
It's deliberate.
And they're using the water supply as a vector.
What, do you suppose, are their goals in doing that?
Well, you know, it can't just be money.
You know, obviously that is part of it.
You know, money is a key factor in this waste product, getting it out there.
But it's more than that.
I really do feel like there are powers out there that have been playing the long game and dumbing down the population.
And fluoride is the perfect chemical to do that.
Okay, so dumbing down the population, it seems like we've arrived at this point in America where the craziest things are happening and people are just zombified.
It's like they're oblivious to what's happening, and they're highly suggestible, too.
So do you think, or do any of the experts that you interviewed, do they think that fluoride makes people either zombified or more suggestible, or both?
Yeah.
I think there's a lot of evidence that points to that.
And you've got to go back to where fluoride began.
I mean, fluoride was historically used as a rat poison.
And, you know, so if you go back to that and realize that it is a highly toxic substance, it's obviously going to cause a lot of problems with you.
And they have successfully put that in the water already.
So then, okay, let's take this forward to the next logical step.
They want people dumbed down, they want people zombified, they want people tranquilized.
While something else happens that people would otherwise react to.
Or respond to.
You know what I'm saying?
What is happening in the world right now that people would otherwise be outraged about?
Or maybe they'd be marching in the streets or something.
Or what is about to happen?
That they need everybody medicated down into drooling status.
Do you have a guess on that?
Well, I mean, this whole COVID hoax, I think, plays into it.
We can look at how the population went along with all the draconian lockdown measures and everything.
You know, the slow accumulation of fluoride in the population, I think, played a large part of how they were able to basically take over the world.
Yeah, good point.
The fluoride made people perhaps very compliant with the COVID lockdowns and the masks.
I was, number one, I was very shocked about the immediate compliance for something that no one can even see, right?
So you're supposed to imagine that this COVID virus is floating in the air everywhere and it's getting on everybody unless they're six feet apart.
It's all in your head to imagine this, but they were able to create such fear that people just immediately complied with lockdowns and masks and then vaccines.
It was shocking to me to see that compliance.
Was it to you?
Yeah.
Yeah, absolutely.
And it's sad.
I thought, you know, after...
After this, I was like, no, people aren't going to shut down their business.
And then immediately, everybody just shut down.
It was crazy.
They used fear perfectly as a weapon to take over the entire population instantly.
Well, and maybe this was, I mean, I think it was a test run, actually.
I think they were testing for something much bigger that's still coming.
And since you're still working on finishing COVID land with more episodes, are you covering any of that, that maybe the next pandemic?
Because, you know, they've openly talked about more simulations, more things coming, you know, from Bill Gates to Fauci and others.
They're openly saying, hey, there's a bigger one coming.
What do they know that we don't?
Right.
So episodes four and five is going into the fourth one is going into propaganda and the fifth one is going into the Great Reset and how they are actually trying to reshape the world.
And so, yeah, I mean, I definitely think that that is the end goal here.
So when are those two episodes coming out, by the way?
I don't know.
Right now we're in talks with InfoWars trying to figure everything out.
It's been put on hold right now.
So hopefully it gets on schedule.
All right, well, yeah, we hope that gets back on schedule, too, because I think your work is really important for the world, and I'm very glad that Infowars is supporting your work.
I hope that can get back on track as soon as possible.
In the meantime, I want to mention to folks, just go to brightu.com to register to watch Fluoride Poison on Tap.
That begins on a repeat loop, begins this Saturday.
What would this Saturday be?
That would be May 13th.
uh, 2023, in case you're watching this later, uh, just go to bright you.com register.
You can watch it for free just with registration required.
And then of course we'll have Paul back for other documentaries as well over time.
Now, what can people do Paul to help support your work right now?
I mean, can, can they purchase COVID COVID land films or how do you support yourself?
Yeah.
The biggest way to support me and my work is just to go to framing the world.com, get the, get the movies, get the books and help spread the message, especially with this re-release of fluoride poison on tap at Brady on university.
I mean, I really encourage people to go to that website, get the down...
Download the DVD or download the digital file, get the DVD, share it with your friends and family.
It is a powerful tool to wake up your friends and family.
People don't realize, I think a lot of people out there, they don't get excited about fluoride for some reason, yet today in America, over 70% of the water is fluoridated.
So this problem is not going away.
Where I live in Michigan, 90% of the water is fluoridated.
It is a serious issue, even today, and people need to wake up their friends and family over this mass medication of the water supply.
It's the only drug that is put into the water to treat you, not the water.
This is an important topic that people need to hear about.
I want to talk about that because you hit upon a really critical point.
This is a medication that is dosed to everybody without a prescription, which violates the Hippocratic Oath, violates medical ethics, and there's also no consideration for how much fluoride people are getting through other sources.
So people are already getting fluoride through things like toothpaste or even green tea in some cases or bottled water.
Some of it has fluoride added into it.
So how can a city...
Drip fluoride into the water and literally medicate the population without knowing whether some people are already overmedicated and also without a diagnosis of a fluoride deficiency.
I mean, you talk about total blatant violation of medical ethics.
I mean, this is a criminal act, in my opinion.
What's your take?
Right.
I mean, how do you control the dose?
Everyone drinks a different amount of water.
Everyone uses toothpaste.
So the majority of people use fluoride toothpaste.
So you get the fluoride from the toothpaste.
You get the fluoride from your bottled water.
You get the fluoride from your tap.
I mean, and everyone drinks these amounts differently.
So one person can drink, you know, four of these, which they get, you know, a pea-sized amount of toothpaste in every one of these.
And, you know, kids will get different amounts of fluoride.
They don't weigh as much.
So how do you control the dose?
It is a huge issue to mass medicate indiscriminately the water supply.
And, you know, there's a lot of health problems that are coming from it that people can see every day.
I mean, just look at everyone's teeth.
Most people have fluorosis of some level.
And, you know, it's sad.
And that's the other thing.
If you wanted to treat teeth with fluoride, you know, you would go to your dentist and they would give you, it's like a little bite thing, and then you put fluoride in that, and then you bite down on it, and the fluoride touches your teeth, and then you rinse it out and you spit it out.
If you really wanted to treat everybody with fluoride, you would do that.
You wouldn't make them drink it.
It's like, you know, I mean, what's a good example of this?
It's like telling people to drink sunscreen to protect their skin from the sun.
It's like you wouldn't put sunscreen in the water supply because that would be insane because it's a topical treatment.
Well, fluoride is a topical treatment for teeth, even in conventional dentistry.
It's just they want to put it on your teeth and then rinse it out and spit it out.
So why would they even think that everybody should be swallowing this medication?
Right.
Yeah, and what's crazy to me is that the chemical that they're adding in the water is not just, it's not fluoride.
It's hydrofluorosilicic acid.
It's an actual industrial waste byproduct of the phosphate industry.
And, you know, when you tell people that, they kind of glaze over.
But it's real.
I mean, you can go to your city council meeting, and they give the minutes.
I have this memorandum here.
And I want to show you on the screen here.
This is from the city of Dallas, their water supply.
They just re-upped a two-year agreement in September of 2022 for $1.3 million of hydrofluorosilicic acid with Univar Solutions.
And so who is Univar Solutions?
Well, if you look at who Univar Solutions is...
This is one of the biggest distributors of fluoride.
They have 120 locations throughout the nation.
And if you look at the MSDS sheet for fluoride, for this hydrofluorosilicic acid, what they even say that they're putting in the water supply, it is an industrial chemical.
It is harmful.
If you look at the MSDS, it says harmful as swallowed.
It causes severe skin burns and damage.
It causes severe eye damages.
It says, do not eat or drink or smoke.
If swallowed, call the Poison Control Center if you feel unwell.
So, I mean, it's just crazy that they would add this stuff to our water supply and then just act like it's normal.
And look, real quick, back at this.
It says at their meeting, they had two open mic speakers that spoke in opposition to community water fluoridation, claiming such practices constitutes medicating the public without their consent, which is true.
They further objected to the use of hydrofluorosilicic acid as a use.
uses of fluoride sources stating that it is industrial waste.
More recently, reported fluoride in the drinker represents neurological risks to children.
So, which is all true.
Then if you look down here, this is their justification.
Well, you know, the American Water Works Association approves it.
The American National Standards Institute approves it.
The National Sanitation Foundation approves it.
So it's fine, you know, but it's not.
I mean, look at the MSDSG. It's an industrial waste byproduct of the phosphate industry.
But see, now that we've all been through the COVID years and the COVID vaccine being pushed on us, the whole fluoride situation makes even more sense because we know, yes, they want to harm you.
They want to cause disease.
They want to poison you, like with mRNA injections or with gain-of-function research and then releasing that onto the world.
It's like fluoride was a chemical weapon.
Where now we're subjected to biological weapons and even genetic weapons.
So the only thing that's really changed is that the weapons have become a lot more advanced.
But the fluoride chemical weapon is still there, still being dripped into the water supply.
And you're right.
It is an industrial waste.
And I'm struck by the fact that if you or I, Paul, if we took a bag of hydrofluosilicic acid and we dumped it into a river, we would be arrested and charged with environmental terrorism by the EPA or law enforcement.
But when a city does it, it's called public health.
Isn't that crazy?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah, and that's what I love about our film, Fluoride Poison on Tap, is that we actually go to Florida and we go to these phosphate plants, we film them from the sky and show not only the environmental devastation this is causing, but we show that this toxic byproduct, you know, eats through the, I mean, creates like sinkholes that are huge.
They just go right down in the groundwater.
It is a serious, serious issue that instead of, you know, disposing of this chemical, this hydrofluorosalistic acid, which costs millions of dollars to dispose of, they're just repackaging it and selling it and making a profit out of they're just repackaging it and selling it and making a profit I mean, if you look back at that memorandum, they're paying $1.3 million a year, the city of Dallas.
And this company has 120 locations.
How much money are they making every year just on selling this hazardous byproduct?
Well, right.
And this is, it's parallel to bio sludge.
So bio sludge is all the human feces, the waste, everything flushed down the toilet.
And then, for example, in Texas, the city of Austin takes all that human sewage.
And they ship it off to this place that bags it, and they call it Dillo Dirt, and then they sell it at the gardening stores as garden dirt, which is insane.
But they're doing the same thing with this hydrofluosilicic acid.
It's a toxic industrial waste.
They just bag it.
They put a label on it and say, oh, now it's public health treatment, and these cities pay millions of dollars for it.
It's like you can actually get paid to dispose of toxic waste.
I mean, it's crazy.
Yeah.
Yeah, and somehow the population is just like, yeah, safe and effective.
Hook me up.
When it's like, what are you doing?
Like, the dentist that we just got, we're new to this area, and we went in to go check out a local dentist.
It wasn't like an IAOMT dentist or anything.
It was just a normal dentist.
They only had fluoride toothpaste.
They didn't have any other.
We're like, all right, time to find new dentists.
Yeah.
It's crazy.
Right, right.
I mean, they want you to brush with it and then drink with it and feed it to your children.
Have you seen the infant bottled water that has extra fluoride in it?
Criminal.
Criminal.
And when they would give that to a little baby, how do they sleep at night knowing that that has caused serious harm to children?
It's crazy to me.
Well, we're living in a crazy society, a death cult, as I call it, by the way.
They're just looking for all kinds of ways to commit suicide.
Fluoride is just one of many.
So folks, go to brightu.com and register to watch fluoride poison on tap.
And by the way, you can register here early.
You can register for Cult of the Medics.
And then when you come back, see, just enter your first name and your email address.
And then you'll be able to watch Fluoride Poison on Tap this Saturday, or if it just asks you to re-register, just enter the same thing, and you'll be able to watch actually every episode that we have on this.
Paul, I really want to thank you for making this available.
Any final thoughts before we wrap up this interview?
Yeah, I mean, I just want to encourage people to go out and speak at your local city council meeting.
Do something about this.
It is a serious issue that people need to stand up.
On that paper, it said two people spoke out against it.
If we had a line of people out the door in Dallas that spoke out against this issue, maybe they would take it more serious.
But instead, two people show up, they're like, whatever.
But, you know, 274 communities have stopped fluoridation since 2010.
It is happening.
The number is lowering.
Since the film was released, less communities now are fluoridating their water supply.
So spread the message about this film, Fluoride Poison on Tap.
Get a copy of the DVD. Share it with your friends and family.
And let people know about these important issues.
Okay, well said, Paul.
And I want to give out your website one more time, framingtheworld.com.
People can find your other films and they can purchase DVDs and downloads there as well.
And again, brightu.com to register to watch the documentary beginning this Saturday.
A couple of great resources for folks to check out.
And thank you, Paul.
And I look forward to working with you on some additional films and keep us posted on COVID land also because we'd love to help bring some buzz to that project.
And, you know, just keep me in the loop on it.
We'll help you get the word out.
Awesome.
Thank you so much, Mike.
I appreciate it.
Thank you, Paul.
It's always good to talk with you.
It's been far too long.
Let's do this again.
All right.
Okay.
All right.
Well, that was Paul Wittenberger, everybody, from framingtheworld.com.
A really creative and inspiring filmmaker.
A lot more coming from Paul Wittenberger, by the way, so stay tuned.
You know, in the months ahead, he's a productive guy.
He's working on some cool stuff.
And thank you for watching today.
I'm Mike Adams here, the founder of Brighteon.com.
And as always, feel free to repost this interview on other platforms and channels.
And more importantly, be sure to register at BrightU.com to watch this documentary at no charge beginning this Saturday.
Thanks for watching.
I'm Mike Adams.
Take care.
Today's interview is brought to you by healthrangerstore.com.
And did you know we now have organic lab-tested macadamia nuts?
Yeah, I've got them here on my desk.
Mac nuts are super delicious, highly nutritious.
And as with all our nuts and seeds, we've got raw cashews there too.
And you see almonds and what is that, coconut milk powder?
Plus the mac nuts there in the sort of blue package.
With all our nuts and seeds, we do aflatoxin testing in addition to the other glyphosate testing, heavy metals testing, and soon coming up, dioxin testing as well.
So this is the cleanest, greenest food that you can find anywhere on the planet, and it's certified organic, and it's available now at healthrangerstore.com, and that's just a small portion of what we have available today.
If you go to our website, you can see we have these number 10 cans of freeze-dried organic fruits.
We've got mango pieces and we've got palm sugar and strawberries and whole raspberries and blueberries.
I know some of these are out of stock right now.
They are back in stock frequently.
We're always producing more.
We've got goji berries, again, certified organic, lab tested, and so much more.
Check it all out at healthrangerstore.com, and we thank you for your support, because without it, we couldn't do what we do here at Brighton.com.
Thanks for your support.
A global reset is coming.
And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.