Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 22, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

01:52:33

Situation Update, Nov 22, 2022 - WHO pandemic treaty in FINAL stages...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to the Situation Update for Tuesday, November 22nd, 2022, and And wow, do we have some bombshells for you today.
	We have an exclusive interview with Dr.
	Francis Boyle, who just finished studying and reviewing the new proposed WHO pandemic treaty.
	It is in draft form and as Dr.
	Francis Boyle describes it, it is a roadmap to unleashing a global medical science dictatorship to enslave and terrorize humanity.
	And this is going to put the WHO in charge of your doctor, your hospital, your clinic, your governor, your city council, your president, your Everything you can imagine.
	The WHO is about to take it all over and have total control through a medical dictatorship right before the release of the next bioweapon pandemic that is also coming, as you will hear in my interview with Dr.
	Francis Boyle.
	That's the interview coming up here later on in this episode.
	So today we're going to talk quite a bit about this WHO pandemic treaty.
	It's known as WHOCA +, CA like the abbreviation for California.
	I don't know why they call it that.
	But it's WHOCA +, if you want to search for it.
	I have a copy of the draft in PDF form, and it is some nebulous information.
	Language written by a bunch of attorneys.
	And that's why I invited Dr.
	Francis Boyle on to help decode this because he's the expert who writes treaties and also reads them and analyzes them.
	And he is a law professor who also teaches human rights law.
	So he's the perfect person to understand this.
	And he told me in the interview, as you'll hear, that That's almost an exact quote.
	I mean, I'm paraphrasing, but you'll hear him describe this later on in this podcast.
	We're also going to go through 10 important things that you need to know about this pandemic treaty, and that's brought to us courtesy of James Roguski at Substack.
	It's James, R-O-G-U-S-K-I, jamesroguski.substack.com.
	He's got a list called 10 Things Everyone Should Know About the Proposed Pandemic Treaty, and we're going to go through that here shortly, and it is mind-boggling.
	It is mind-boggling the level of authoritarian tyranny, the medical dictatorship that they're trying to roll out worldwide.
	And you just know that there are more pandemics coming because they need this framework in place in order to exert control over everyone's lives and to force people into lockdowns, masks and vaccines and keeping children home from school and forced isolation and social distancing masks and vaccines and keeping children home from school and forced isolation and And of course, mandatory injections, not just one vaccine, but multiple vaccines forever.
	So we're going to get into that here shortly.
	But first, we're going to cover some other breaking news items, starting with this one.
	You know the mass shooting that was in Colorado Springs at the Gay Bar, I think?
	Or what was it called?
	Club Q. It was an LGBT event.
	And, you know, this mass shooter went psycho.
	22-year-old kid started shooting people.
	Well, that shooting was stopped.
	It turns out, yes, a U.S. Army veteran who says he went into, quote, combat mode to disarm the gunman.
	This is reported by dnyuz.com.
	His name is Richard Fierro, and he was at Club Q, reportedly, with his wife and daughter and friends.
	Watching a drag show, which, that's an odd introduction to an article.
	I didn't realize that these were, quote, family events or whatever, but that's beside the point.
	We're glad he was there, because he's had four combat deployments as a U.S. Army officer.
	He's been in Iraq and Afghanistan, and when the gunfire began, he had everybody hit the floor, and then he went after the gunman.
	Okay, now this guy's 45 years old.
	He reportedly left the Army in 2013 as a major, and he was suffering from some of the trauma of combat, and so this is probably the last thing he needed, but he went into action, and basically he got behind the gunman and dragged him to the ground,
	and then the rifle clattered to the floor, and this guy, Fiero, he took the pistol from the gunman and practically beat him to death with his own pistol, which That gets a thumbs up, by the way, in terms of tactics of how to stop mass shooters, beat them to death with their own firearms, if that's what it takes to stop the carnage, you know?
	Seriously!
	I mean, the guy wants to turn a club into a war zone?
	Well, guess what?
	A U.S. Army veteran can bring the war to you.
	Like, right in your face, it turns out.
	So he practically beat this guy to death.
	And I'm sorry to be so graphic, but this is what happened.
	And so Mr.
	Fierro was covered in blood when the police showed up and they arrested him and handcuffed him and stuck him in a patrol car for an hour until they sorted this whole thing out.
	You can imagine just the trauma of what this guy, this hero, what he was going through.
	Because, you know, he saved the day.
	He saved lives.
	And he was trying to figure out if his own wife and daughter were okay and the police wouldn't do anything and just keep him in handcuffs.
	But I just want to say, Mr.
	Fierro, we celebrate you and your action.
	And even if you had beat that guy to death, I don't think anybody would judge you for it.
	Because the guy was...
	I mean, come on.
	The guy turned it into a war zone.
	You do what you have to do in moments of crisis to save innocent lives.
	And I think it's wonderful that a United States military veteran was there and did that.
	So, I wonder...
	You know how in the media they always try to say that veterans are...
	They try to imply that they're all psychopaths and suffering from PTSD. And they try to give veterans a bad name, you know, all the time.
	I think...
	We should give veterans a whole lot more credit because that combat experience was put to good use.
	And this guy stopped a mass shooting.
	Now, there's one thing that I've noticed, too, by the way, as someone who has trained for literally thousands of hours in firearms and different combat scenarios and so on.
	Is that people who aren't familiar with or comfortable being around gunfire, they either, number one, do not recognize it.
	So firearms start popping off, and they don't recognize it because the only gunfire they've ever heard is on TV, and that's not what guns sound like at all.
	Not even close to that.
	I don't know, the TV gunfire, it's all fiction Hollywood stuff.
	So, number one, people don't recognize it.
	They think firecrackers are going off or something.
	And then secondly, if they do recognize it, they're terrorized because the media has taught people to be incredibly fearful of gunfire.
	Which, frankly, in some ways, gunfire is less dangerous than someone with a knife slashing around because a gun can only shoot in one direction at one time.
	It's like a line through the air, whereas a knife is an entire edge slashing through the air.
	So those of us who have been around a lot of gunfire, We recognize the sound and we get curious, like, who's shooting and why?
	What's going on here?
	And I think that's what this guy, this U.S. Army veteran, Fiero, I think he immediately recognized it and he's like, what's going on?
	What's the situation?
	How do we stop this?
	And he went to work and he got it done.
	We need more people like that, even in the gay bars.
	This is why I've always supported, by the way, gays with guns.
	And that group, I think it's called Pink Pistols.
	No, seriously, I think that's what it's called.
	It's a group of gay people who are pro-Second Amendment and do a lot of gun training and so on.
	Would have been great if somebody even with a gun had been in the club, right?
	A law-abiding, concealed carry LGBT person.
	Right?
	That's why, again, I support Second Amendment for everybody.
	Doesn't matter to me whether you're gay or straight or trans or bisexual or trisexual or whatever.
	If you are a law-abiding citizen and you believe in defending innocent lives against crazy violence, then get some training, get a firearm, carry it legally, get a license if you have to, if it's required, but get the training and we can all help protect each other from lunatics as our society goes increasingly insane.
	But anyway, U.S. Army veteran, stop the mass shooting, but you won't see that headline Hardly at all across mainstream media.
	They don't want to give veterans credit for this.
	Oh, and by the way, one more thought on all this.
	Apparently this shooter was a very heavyset individual wearing body armor, and I don't know how armored up this person was, but one thing that you should know, and frankly that all Americans should know, because some people do lose their minds and they're on psychiatric medications or they've been MKUltra or whatever the case may be,
	You should know that the more armor somebody has on, number one, the less peripheral vision they have, so you can pretty easily scoot around them, get up behind them, drag them to the ground or kick them in the nuts from behind or whatever it takes if they're shooting people.
	The other thing is that the more gear they have, the slower they are.
	So, you don't have to...
	I mean, this is just me.
	I can't tell you what to do in this scenario, but you don't have to cower in fear as if somebody with a bunch of body armor and a rifle is somehow invincible.
	They're not.
	They're very vulnerable by themselves in that situation.
	In fact, in the military, the only way that soldiers are effective is in teams.
	They cover each other.
	They look out for each other.
	As they move, they move in a pattern that's a cover and they provide suppressing fire while the other team moves and so on.
	Or one guy's in the back covering the rear.
	There's all kinds of different patterns and different ways to clear buildings and so on so that they support each other.
	A lone gunman is a vulnerable gunman.
	I just want you to know that if they're by themselves, they are very, very vulnerable to civilians or anybody else around like a concealed carry holder who could quite easily engage them and take them down.
	And that's exactly what happened.
	So it's worth remembering that.
	Something weird is happening in the job market, and this was covered by CNBC in a story with this title, Layoffs Mount and Main Street Still Can't Find Any Workers to Hire for Open Jobs.
	This is a weird story.
	It says the latest NFIB monthly small business confidence and jobs report show that Main Street is still looking to hire even as economic sentiment continues to decline, right?
	So the economy is getting bad.
	But the vast majority of open positions, 90%, are seeing few to no qualified applicants apply, even as layoffs mount throughout the economy.
	You might wonder, why is that?
	Why is nobody applying for these open jobs?
	Where is everybody?
	And that's kind of the question I wanted to present here.
	Where is everybody?
	Where are the people going?
	Exactly how many are dying, in other words?
	Because I think that...
	Part of the reason we don't have enough workers to run most businesses, have you noticed?
	Workers are always missing now.
	There's nobody to answer the phone.
	There's nobody in customer service.
	There's nobody in the warehouse.
	There's not enough workers everywhere.
	I think part of the answer is because they've been killed by vaccines.
	We've seen a lot of deaths.
	Even just based on the numbers from Ed Dowd, it's about 900,000 Americans a year are being killed by vaccines.
	And it's millions more who are disabled and removed from the workforce.
	So just in two years, you might argue that something like perhaps seven or eight million Americans are no longer in the workforce because of vaccines through either deaths or injuries.
	So that's part of the answer.
	That's why everybody that has a company, you know, has help wanted signs and now hiring and so on, but nobody's showing up to fill the positions because they're dead or disabled.
	Now, do you recall me predicting that vehicles would fall in price?
	Yeah, and especially as a lot of people, sadly, are killed by these vaccines, that there would be a glut of vehicles in the supply chain, and you would start to see that towards the end of this year.
	Remember that?
	I'll just wait until you see what happens next year.
	But here's a story from FreightWaves.com.
	Used truck prices fall as OEM supply chain clears.
	So the story says the trend is clear.
	Used truck prices continue to fall across almost all years and models as new truck manufacturers gain an upper hand over supply chain disruptions.
	So those who purchased a used truck at a sky-high price a few months ago could be feeling buyer's remorse, especially as spot freight rates have tumbled with contract rates falling right behind them.
	So there are a couple of things happening here.
	Again, not as many people buying trucks.
	We're talking about transportation rigs here.
	So the used rigs are getting cheaper.
	But there's also plummeting demand for consumer goods.
	And this is also being seen in ocean freight rates, which are just falling off a cliff to the point that freight companies are in a, quote, panic about how low the prices are going to go.
	And this is that whiplash effect on the economy where...
	A year and a half ago, rates were through the roof and you couldn't find any containers.
	They were all occupied.
	They were all booked.
	Now, there's a glut of containers, there's a glut of trucks, a glut of ships, and there's not enough consumer demand to fill the supply chain with sufficient goods to keep everybody busy.
	So the whiplash has begun.
	So used vehicle prices are going to continue to fall throughout 2023.
	That's my prediction.
	It's already starting to come true.
	And remember I said, if you want to buy a vehicle, just wait.
	Just wait a little bit.
	Also, as interest rates are rising, you're going to see a lot of vehicles turn back into banks or repossessions of vehicles that are out on loans now.
	And a lot of people just going to abandon the loans and take the vehicles back and so on.
	So you're going to have throughout 2023, a glut of used vehicles, both in trucking and also just regular consumer markets.
	So you'll be able to actually start to negotiate with car dealers again in 2023, probably.
	Whereas for the last two years, there's been virtually no negotiation.
	They've added on extra bonus fees, like market adjustment fees or whatever.
	Here, just give us another $5,000.
	Well, those days are coming to an end.
	Speaking of days coming to an end, the crypto ecosystem looks like it's falling out of the sky like a meteor or something.
	Here's a story from CNBC. Grayscale is an asset management company that Grayscale refuses to share proof of reserves due to, quote, security concerns, as shares trade at a 45% discount to the price of Bitcoin.
	So think of this.
	Grayscale is supposed to be valued at the amount of Bitcoin it says it has.
	It's kind of like a mutual fund that just buys Bitcoin.
	But apparently the free market out there doesn't believe that Grayscale has the Bitcoin they claim to have.
	And so you can buy Grayscale shares at a 45% discount off the price of Bitcoin.
	What does that tell you?
	I mean, that's the public voting thing.
	on Grayscale not having the assets they claim to have.
	Well, Grayscale, like a lot of other crypto companies, says that they can't submit to an audit, they can't share any details because of security concerns or privacy concerns.
	So this is hilarious, right?
	They, Basically, they're saying, well, we're a black box.
	I mean, we're called Grayscale, but we're actually a black box.
	And it's going to be completely opaque.
	You can't see anything.
	It's just inner workings, whatever we say it is.
	You just have to trust us.
	And yeah, you want to buy some shares?
	That's Grayscale.
	And by the way, that's also Tether in a similar way.
	Tether, the stablecoin.
	Has failed to produce an actual audit year after year after year, although they've promised they're going to produce an audit.
	Like, we promised we're going to produce an audit, and then they never do.
	And what they produce are these attestations, you know, which is statements that just claims we have this snapshot of assets today, right?
	So a lot of people in the crypto space right now are coming to realize that maybe you should verify everything.
	Trust, but verify.
	That's becoming the overall attitude in crypto, which makes a lot of sense because a whole lot of people lost, you know, well, at this point, over $2,000 billion.
	That's right.
	$2 trillion plus has been evaporated out of the crypto space.
	So think about all the people who lost some portion of over $2,000 billion.
	That's crazy.
	That's crazy amounts of money they thought they had and it's been vaporized.
	So now they're starting to ask questions like, hey, do you really have the reserves you claim to have?
	And these crypto companies are like, we're not going to tell you.
	And you're like, why not?
	Because we don't have to, you know?
	Well, that's the answer.
	Take your money out.
	Along these lines, by the way, I'm not going to spend a ton of time on this, but Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX, the guy who still thinks he never did anything wrong, even though he vaporized $32 billion in valuation and looted his customer funds to give himself a billion-dollar loan, by the way.
	This is a classic, just left-wing, immoral, self-righteous, virtue signaling.
	He was a vegan.
	He believed in climate change.
	He gave money to the Democrats.
	And somehow, even though he talks like a high school valley girl...
	I mean, this guy is a soy boy leftist of the worst kind.
	Listen to him talk.
	It's so annoying.
	And somehow he managed to convince all of these VC funds to give him hundreds of millions of dollars, even though he talks like a valley girl.
	Seriously.
	He uses the word like all the time in the same way that AOC does in explaining something.
	You know, it's like, this person said like this, you know?
	And everything ends in a question kind of tone.
	Even if it's a statement, you ask them, like, what is 2 plus 2?
	Well, like, you know, 2 plus 2 is 4.
	No, that wasn't a question.
	But this is the way they talk.
	Apparently, this is what venture capital firms are looking for.
	Sequoia, SoftBank, Tiger, BlackRock, all of them.
	They're looking for virtue-signaling, just idiotic-sounding leftists who, I don't know, fit the bill of whatever checkboxes they want to check off on social justice or whatever.
	And this was one of those guys.
	But if you listen to him talk, it's utterly annoying and he doesn't sound smart at all to me.
	He sounds like a moron, frankly.
	He sounds like just a fast-talking, scammer, moron, leftist.
	Which is pretty much what Elon Musk concluded as well and a lot of other people who talked to him.
	He's just a scammer.
	So there's a lot of sissy moron scammers in this space and they all sound exactly like that.
	So if you just listen to the way they talk, you can pretty quickly ascertain that they are neck deep into the, I don't know, the soy boy snowflake triggered liberal leftist virtue signaling ecosystem of lunatics.
	Probably think men can get pregnant too.
	But by the way, from me covering this, I've had some people contact me and actually several people and say, well, what about this other project over here, this other coin or this thing?
	Like this one, you know, is better.
	This one has all these integrity checks built in and all this redundancy built in.
	You know, you should really look into this other coin, this other company, this other exchange, this other thing.
	And I've replied to these requests with something I just want to share with you.
	And I arrived at this conclusion after watching how many people were hoodwinked by FTX, including Tom Brady, by the way.
	And here's my conclusion.
	When it comes to assets and jumping on a bandwagon and anything that might be like FOMO, fear of missing out or anything like that, here's my rule of thumb.
	Okay?
	Here it is.
	Very simple.
	I don't trust any system created by man.
	And the reason that's important to understand is because people say, well, this system has all these special checks and balances and voting and consensus and redundancy.
	Well, yeah, because somebody wrote that code, right?
	It was created by man.
	Well, it could be women writing the code, but I use the word man in a generic sense.
	Somebody built it, right?
	Right.
	So that means somebody can change it, right?
	Oh, yes.
	Somebody can change the code, right?
	Somebody can put in back doors.
	Somebody can crash the servers.
	You know, somebody can just steal everything, loot the whole system and run away, which is what Sam Bankman did and his company.
	If it was built by man, I don't trust it.
	You know what wasn't built by man?
	Gold and silver.
	And the dirt beneath your feet, the land.
	That's why gold and silver, you can always trust them because nobody can change the rules of the laws of physics.
	See, people say, well, Bitcoin is the one thing that's going to outlast all these other coins.
	Like, all those other coins I'm hearing now lately, those other coins are crap coins.
	It was Bitcoin all along, only Bitcoin.
	Bitcoin's the good one.
	Bitcoin has the best.
	It's going to be around forever.
	It's the original.
	Like, was it written by man?
	Yes.
	I don't trust it because it can be changed.
	Bitcoin is not digital gold.
	Bitcoin can be altered.
	Bitcoin can be forked.
	Bitcoin can be hacked, crashed, attacked.
	I mean, quantum computers can break the encryption and so on and so forth.
	You can't change the rules of the laws of physics that describe the atomic element of gold or silver or platinum for that matter.
	You can't do it.
	And that's why I know gold and silver can be trusted, because I don't have to trust a person to keep their word, you see?
	And what Sam Bankman proved with FTX is that you can't trust people, especially young, inexperienced, left-wing virtue-signaling morons who have their hands on billions of dollars and think that they're going to run the world.
	You certainly can't trust them.
	But frankly, you can't trust anybody who builds a system that wants you to put all your money into their system, and then they say they're going to protect your money.
	You can't trust it.
	You can trust physical gold and silver in your hands.
	That is, if you believe that we live in a 3D universe made of, on the physical realm, atomic elements that become matter, right?
	I mean, they are matter.
	If you believe in the laws of physics, then you don't have to have special faith to understand that gold and silver are going to be here.
	Now, throughout history, of course, a lot of people tried to hack the laws of physics and they tried to create gold out of lead with transmutation.
	That's kind of the same thing as a software hack of a blockchain cryptocurrency, right?
	It's a physics hack or an attempted physics hack.
	If you apply these sound waves or whatever, you can turn lead into gold.
	A lot of people have tried that for a very long time.
	Nobody's done it.
	I mean, alchemy, back, I mean, centuries ago, they started this.
	They thought, maybe we can figure out a way to make gold, and then we can just basically create it and print gold, right?
	Which would have destroyed the value of gold, by the way.
	So we should be thankful nobody figured out how to do that.
	And it turns out it's very difficult to hack the laws of physics.
	Very difficult.
	And even if you were able to hack the laws of physics, do you know that if you add just a little bit of mass to gold, you know what you get?
	You get mercury.
	That's right.
	You get mercury.
	So it goes from atomic number 79 to 80, and that's mercury.
	Or if you lose a little bit of mass from gold, if you go down two atomic mass units, essentially you get platinum.
	Which is, I mean, that's no great transmutation, but you can't achieve it anyway.
	So any system that sets up artificial rules in a construct, you know, in a digital space or in a cloud, it's like, oh, we built this system, we set up these rules, we created this logic, we wrote this code.
	Guess what?
	All that can change.
	And it will if it becomes powerful enough or influential enough or, you know, just has whatever enough value that For the wrong people to get greedy or to be infiltrated or to be blackmailed or what have you.
	So just remember that rule of thumb.
	Don't trust any system created by man, which includes, by the way, the banking system.
	Yeah?
	It includes the banking system.
	It includes the Federal Reserve.
	It includes search engines or social media websites that are engaged in a lot of censorship.
	Yeah, built by man.
	So they bend the rules.
	They cheat.
	They censor.
	They lie.
	They steal.
	Do not trust systems created by man.
	In fact, if you look at my, what is it, kind of a meme where I was talking about different forms of gold.
	I said, what, black gold is like compost and blue gold is water and white gold is fertilizer.
	I'm talking about different forms of gold, you know, beyond just gold and silver.
	The thing that all of those have in common, and I talk about other forms as well, like green gold is fresh sprouted plants and things that you can grow yourself, actual food and vegetables and herbs you can grow yourself.
	All these things are real in the 3D world.
	They're all physical.
	And so they're not created by man.
	They're created by God and expressed through Mother Nature.
	And so they will always be trustworthy.
	You don't have to trust a seed because a seed is not going to cheat you.
	If you plant a tomato seed, it's not going to grow an okra plant, right?
	It's not going to hack itself.
	It's not going to cheat.
	It's not going to steal from you.
	If you have a bucket of water, it's a bucket of water.
	The water's not going to change magically into hydrogen molecules and fly away.
	It doesn't work that way, because the rules of physics are not going to cheat you.
	That's one thing in life, for sure, that you can trust.
	Because, well, God set the rules, and He's not here to hack your life.
	He's here to actually save your life, come to think of it.
	But just remember this.
	People ask you to buy into something or to trust something.
	Just remember, if it's created by man, you can't trust it.
	And by the way, speaking of water and things that are real and growing your own food, here's a story out of RT. Stock up on bottled water and canned food, officials tell Germans.
	This is from the Civil Protection Agency head of Germany.
	It's called the BBK, and it means the Federal Office for Civil Protection and Disaster Relief.
	And the guy, Ralph Teisler, has warned in an interview, quote, we have to assume that there will be blackouts this winter.
	And by that, I mean a regional and temporary interruption in the power supply.
	Thank you for defining that, Mr.
	Tesler.
	This cause will not only be energy shortages, but also the targeted temporary shutdown of the networks by the operators with the aim of protecting the networks and not endangering the overall supply.
	Like, what?
	What did you just say, Mr.
	Tiesler?
	He said they're going to shut it down on purpose to protect the supply.
	We're not endangering the supply.
	What he means is they're going to shut down the power grid in order to not use all the energy they have.
	That's what he's saying.
	And so when he says we have to assume there will be blackouts, he's saying that because he's going to order them.
	They're the ones causing the blackouts because they don't have enough energy to last through the winter.
	So he says that German citizens should be ready by stocking up on supplies.
	Quote, primarily water.
	Several crates, he says.
	Crates?
	They have crates of water?
	What are they talking about?
	And canned food...
	That would be enough for 10 days.
	He says 10 days.
	That's what my agency recommends.
	Right?
	Right.
	Wink, wink.
	If the government says prepare for 10 days, you should probably prepare for 10 weeks or something.
	Or at least 20 or 30 days.
	Our message is prepare in the first place.
	Be prepared for possible crises.
	Don't assume that everything will be readily available all the time, he stated.
	And that in addition to food and water for several days, residents should purchase battery-powered radios and candles.
	That's it.
	Okay?
	And they put out a list of stuff that German people should buy.
	Wow.
	So...
	Are you telling me that the government of Germany, suddenly they've all become preppers now?
	Where are the apologies to all the preppers that have been telling people to do this forever and to do much more than this, by the way?
	Because as we know, the governments of the world, even the U.S. government, when they tell you to prepare, they talk in very watered-down terms, like, have enough for a three-day emergency weekend, like a storm or something.
	Meanwhile, the government itself is like stockpiling underground cities and caves and tunnel complexes with a decade of food and medical supplies and emergency ammunition and everything else.
	They've got underground cities and you're supposed to have a weekend supply.
	With a couple of crates of water, just in case, right?
	Pretty much they're saying, you civilian people, you might die, and it's okay with us.
	We're in our bunkers.
	That's the message.
	It's so hilarious.
	Notice there's almost nothing in that advice about heat.
	What are you supposed to do for heat?
	Well, the German people are already clear-cutting forests all across the country.
	They're way ahead of the government on this one.
	They're preppers already, cutting down trees, making firewood, getting ready for the winter.
	And by the way, one more thing before we get into the analysis of the WHO pandemic treaty.
	There's some kind of fashion group, a fashion house that's been associated with the Kardashians.
	It's called Balenciaga.
	And apparently they put out a couple of creepy ads of little young girls holding stuffed animals that are dressed in bondage.
	I mean, it's creepy.
	We're not going to show you this, but this is written up at the New York Post.
	It says, Valencia under fire over creepy ads of kids with bondage outfits.
	And then in the photo shoot, there's a document that if you zoom in on it, it's a document that talks about, it's a court document discussing virtual child porn.
	So they put this in the shot on purpose, along with children holding stuffed animals wearing bondage gear.
	And, of course, people are not happy about this.
	It's basically child porn.
	The child bondage is very satanic stuff right out in the open as part of a fashion company.
	I mean, I don't know.
	Is this surprising to anybody?
	One user on Twitter responded to these photos, frightening how many adults must have been involved in this.
	Parents, photographers, creative directors, copywriters, web designers, design agency staff, producers, managers, advertisers, and not one of them thought, hang on a minute.
	You got kids with stuffed animals in bondage gear?
	And this is your fashion statement?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, full-blown pedo creepiness going on there.
	Why are we not surprised they were associated with Kim Kardashian, right?
	This is all part of so-called BDSM attire.
	I don't know if you're familiar with that acronym, BDSM. I think it means bondage, demons, sick minds is what that all stands for.
	By the way, Balenciaga is the company name there.
	Yeah, if you want to get, you know, a bondage dressed, I don't know, BDSM attired stuffed animal teddy bear for Christmas for somebody, there you go.
	Apparently that's where you can get that.
	All right, let's get back to the World Health Organization Treaty here.
	That's really the emphasis of today's podcast.
	And then we're going to jump into the interview with Dr.
	Francis Boyle.
	And that interview will blow your mind.
	And he specifically asked me to ask you to help share that interview because he's got to get the word out.
	This is a huge deal.
	But here we go.
	Ten things everybody should know about the proposed pandemic treaty.
	Now, before we get to the list, I want to remind you, Dr.
	Boyle told me that there's specific language in this treaty.
	That would give it power over the U.S. Constitution.
	And it would even overpower states and states' rights and sovereignty and everything else.
	And I was taking a look at this.
	I'm not sure if this is a section he's talking about, but Article 30, entitled Ratification, Acceptance, Approval, Formal Confirmation, or Accession, Point number two.
	I just want to read this for you because this may be what he's referring to.
	Any regional economic integration organization which becomes a party to the WHOCA +, without any of its member states being a party, shall be bound by all the obligations under the WHOCA+. In other words,
	if Joe Biden signs this, but Ron DeSantis, governor of Florida, says no way, Then according to this agreement, Joe Biden and the United States would still be subject to all of these rules no matter what, even if the states try to reject it.
	There's probably more language about that throughout the agreement, but that's just a hint of what's coming.
	So here it is, top 10 things that are pretty freaky.
	Number one, a massive power grab.
	The WHO, through this treaty, wants to be in charge that they've mentioned Three separate times how they need to be in charge of all decisions.
	Like they talk about a central role of the WHO as the directing and coordinating authority in global health.
	And they talk about directing and coordinating international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system.
	And they also use a lot of left-wing virtue signaling terms like fostering multilateral cooperation in global health governance.
	Which means they want to be in charge of everything.
	All right, point number two, they have a lot of undefined words in this agreement.
	They use the word pandemic, for example, 112 times, but they never define it.
	They use the term response 106 times, but they never define it.
	Say, oh, what if there's a pandemic?
	Then we have to have a coordinated response.
	But what does that mean?
	Well, since they don't define it, it can mean whatever they want it to mean.
	They use the term preparedness 74 times.
	They never define it.
	And then they use the word equity.
	That's a favorite word of the virtue signaling left.
	Equity must be social justice equity, which means basically to bash white people and require everybody to be obedient mind slaves.
	Well, they use equity 32 times, but they never define it.
	And they have pandemic response products.
	Yeah, PRPs.
	That's their new acronym.
	They use that phrase 27 times, but they never define it.
	It probably means vaccines and masks and, you know, forced ventilators and things like that.
	Okay, so point number three.
	This WHO treaty ignores some things that should have been mentioned.
	For example, they never mention the word vitamins.
	They never mention herbs.
	They never use the word natural.
	They never use the phrase early treatment.
	They don't even mention the word doctor.
	And they don't use gain of function or essential medicines.
	So, hmm, it's all about control, but not about, you know, nutrition or herbs or anything natural or early treatment or prevention, anything like that.
	All right.
	Let's see.
	Number four, point four here.
	In Article 7 of this treaty, it supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved.
	You know, moving at the speed of science, like that Pfizer spokeswoman said.
	We had to move at the speed of science!
	By that, she means we didn't have time for testing.
	Just had to move at the speed of science.
	So this is what the WHO wants, basically.
	No testing, no clinical trials, no safety, no studies, nothing.
	It's just, it's an emergency!
	We've got to have pandemic response products, PRPs, in record time.
	Approve them all!
	Okay, point number five, more simulations.
	This is in Article 12 of this agreement.
	By the way, when I cover this on naturalnews.com, I'll have an article about this later today.
	I'll link to this for you, so you can find the link there.
	They advocate for regular simulations and, quote, tabletop exercises.
	You know, the Bill Gates simulations.
	Why do they need so many simulations?
	Well, they want to practice what they're about to release, of course, obviously.
	That's number five.
	Okay, number six, compliance.
	They advocate in Article 12 for a, quote, global peer review mechanism to essentially audit every nation's preparedness.
	So in other words...
	The United States could be audited by the UK government or France's government or, I don't know, some United Nations troops come in and see if we're doing it correctly according to the treaty, you know?
	It even says that the governing body of the WHO will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance.
	So, you see, whatever you think you want to do locally in your own country, well, the WHO is going to come in and rewrite that for you.
	You have to do it their way, which is all about vaccines and big pharma and depopulation and mass obedience to a global system of criminal cartels and everything else.
	Alright, number seven, point seven, censorship.
	Of course, there's going to be a lot more censorship under this treaty.
	Article 16 sets up a ministry of truth that is, quote, tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation.
	Which would be anything that tells the truth, obviously.
	And they're also going to, quote, strengthen research into the behavioral barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures.
	In other words, they're going to try to hack your brain so that you can't say no.
	Let's see, they're going to improve confidence and uptake of vaccines, the use of therapeutics, and trust in science and government institutions, because they can't figure out why you don't trust the government.
	You know, the government that's trying to mass murder you and achieve global depopulation.
	So they want to play all kinds of mind games to convince you to trust the government that's exterminating you.
	Oh, and you need to trust in science, too, you know, because that way when they move at the speed of science, you need to think, oh, that makes sense.
	Because it's science, you know?
	You're supposed to think that.
	So behavioral barriers, they say.
	They have to take down the behavioral barriers.
	People saying, heck no.
	You ain't jamming that thing in my arm.
	Hell no.
	They're going to work on you.
	You know, they're going to target you.
	Okay, point number eight, more drugs.
	Article 17 describes a national One Health Action Plan that, quote, By that they mean pharmaceuticals.
	Diagnostic tools, that means PCR tests.
	Vaccines, that means mRNA death jabs.
	And other interventions, except they never mention nutrition, you know, vitamins, herbs, nothing like that.
	This is about using taxpayer money to hand over billions of dollars to big pharma to get people to take more injections that are designed to kill them.
	That's what this is.
	It's all about more money for pharma, more depopulation of humanity.
	Point number nine, a massive money grab.
	Article 18 says that if the WHO CA plus is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide, quote, pandemic response products.
	And we go to PRPs yet again.
	What would PRPs be?
	So PRPs could be PPE, right?
	And PRPs might be PCRs.
	That's a possibility.
	I'm pretty sure that PRPs would not be BDSMs, though.
	Or bring out little teddy bears in bondage for all the sick children they're murdering in the hospitals or something.
	I don't know.
	They're sick, twisted bastards.
	Who knows what they'll come up with.
	But...
	Whoever makes PRPs is going to get a bunch of government handout money.
	Pretty sure PRPs are vaccines and masks and personal protection equipment and latex gloves and other things you might find at a gay bar.
	Okay, moving on.
	Point number 10, bureaucracy.
	Article 19 institutes a new bureaucracy for the WHOCA plus that would duplicate the World Health Assembly with a governing body that's ruled over by two presidents and four vice presidents.
	I mean, imagine four Kamala Harris's.
	It's a quadruple Kamala.
	And a conference of the parties, which pretty much looks like the same way, the same structure they use now to promote climate change.
	So if you love the way the globalists are pushing climate change responses, then you'll love the new WHO pandemic treaty.
	Oh, yeah.
	The WHOCA plus.
	What's not to like?
	I mean, it's only authoritarianism, censorship, banning vitamins and herbs, probably.
	Approving dangerous toxic injections without testing.
	Handing out money to pharmaceutical companies, right?
	And then taking away your sovereignty, your authority, your freedom.
	Hey, what's not to like?
	It's just another chapter in the new globalism, right?
	And by the way, there's nothing in that pandemic treaty that honors individual rights or health freedoms or individual choice or anything like that at all.
	Nothing.
	Or even recognizes the immune system as something that should be supported with nutrition.
	No.
	This is about shoving vaccines and toxic pharmaceuticals down your throat or jabbing it into your arms.
	We're putting you on a ventilator.
	This is about global depopulation.
	This is total medical tyranny.
	And it's going to go into effect, most likely, Dr.
	Boyle explains this, early next year.
	So look for this in the first quarter of 2023.
	And then what happens?
	Once this is in place, they will release another bioweapon.
	So you can count on it.
	There will be another pandemic in 2023.
	Remember, Fauci promised us it would happen.
	I think Bill Gates promised as well.
	They've got these ready to go.
	I mean, the U.S. government is engaged in biological weapons research.
	They've been using the weapons labs in Ukraine.
	The Pentagon runs them.
	It's DOD labs.
	They built the bioweapons.
	They're going to release them.
	Or maybe venom peptides, right?
	Aerosolized or contact surface treatments.
	Who knows what they're going to do?
	But they're going to poison you, they're going to make you sick, and they're going to force you into this treaty compliance situation.
	And if you're in a Democrat state like New York, Governor Hochul is going to lock you down, going to throw you into a concentration camp if you don't comply, right?
	So Even in the red states, there'll probably be quite a lot of compliance with this at first until the backlash builds, but definitely make sure that you're in a red state, not a blue state, when this goes down, because they don't plan for any survivors.
	Put it that way.
	This is the depopulation, you know, the global population control agenda.
	This is the blueprint for it, right here.
	If Joe Biden signs this, he is once again a traitor to America.
	He basically surrenders America to the WHO.
	He surrenders the United States of America to a foreign enemy.
	And then we would be subjugated by the WHO.
	They would control your hospital, your doctor, your local pharmacy.
	They would control everything.
	They would control your schools.
	They would dictate what you are required to do in order to be in compliance with these globalist bureaucrats and all their four vice presidents and everything sitting on this board trying to rule the world from Brussels or wherever they operate out of these days who are.
	Who knows?
	Maybe it's a secret Dr.
	Evil submarine under the Arctic ice or something, right?
	They're broadcasting from a depth of 2,000 feet.
	All right, now, I can't promise you any big, amazing solutions for all of this.
	We're going to jump into the Dr.
	Boyle interview here.
	And the way he describes it is way scarier than the way I just described it, by the way.
	So buckle in, buckle up, I guess that's the right word.
	Buckle yourself in.
	The ride's going to get bumpy.
	But I don't have any big solutions to promise you.
	The only thing I can offer you today is just simple preparedness items.
	We do have freeze-dried organic kale in number 10 cans at our store.
	I know, that was like my good news of the day.
	Like, we have kale!
	It's back in stock.
	Awesome.
	We do have a lot of preparedness foods.
	They're freeze-dried, certified organic, lab-tested, in number 10 cans, including things like mango dices, and we've got fruits and vegetables.
	In the number 10 cans, you know, sealed for long-term storage.
	And now we have kale.
	I know it sounds very ordinary because I know Sam Bankman and FTX promising, you know, crazy things like, you'll get rich forever!
	You could be a billionaire too, you know, and it was very exciting while the Ponzi scheme lasted.
	All I can offer you is cans of kale, mangoes, things like that.
	That's it.
	Although in my defense, it's real.
	It's really there.
	You'll really get it.
	You can really eat it.
	It's physical.
	It's real.
	You know how I said earlier, I don't trust anything created by man, any system created by man.
	When you get storable food...
	You don't have to trust that somebody's going to give it to you one day.
	It's not like you're buying credits in a blockchain food supply chain system with future delivery dates.
	You're not buying ETFs and contracts and options.
	No, you're just getting the kale, man.
	You're getting the apples, the strawberries, the blueberries, the mangoes, whatever it is.
	You're getting it.
	HealthRangerStore.com We sell ordinary stuff in an extraordinary way because we lab test it and we make it, we pack it ourselves in Texas, you see.
	Ordinary stuff in an extraordinary way.
	Well, I guess technically it's not so ordinary given that we do reject in some cases about 80% of the batches that we test.
	So I guess the stuff is more extraordinary.
	For example, we find a lot of lead in turmeric.
	Did you know that?
	We find lead in turmeric.
	We find glyphosate in lentils.
	And we find aflatoxins in nuts like cashews.
	So just a little taste of some of the things we find in the food supply, which we reject, right?
	And then what we do take in and what we package and sell.
	I guess it really is extraordinary because it's tested.
	It's clean food.
	It's certified organic and we handle it ourselves.
	We don't trust any other packers to do it for us.
	We don't trust their ingredients or their excipients or their flow agents or anything like that.
	We just don't trust it.
	I guess the bottom line is I've come to not trust Most systems, most organizations, most companies, most schemes, and that's a pretty good position to be in, by the way, if you're a critical thinker and you're skeptical about all these promises that everybody's making out there, you know, including election promises, like, yeah, elect us, you know, and we'll restore racial unity.
	That's what Obama said, right?
	And then he tore the country apart with hatred.
	I just don't trust any of these people anymore.
	The things I trust come from God and nature.
	I trust water.
	I trust vegetables.
	I trust gold and silver.
	I said that earlier.
	I trust molecules in the air.
	I trust oxygen.
	O2. Hard not to trust it.
	It's a very reliable molecule right there.
	Try to take it apart.
	It just goes back together.
	O2 once again.
	This is laws of chemistry.
	I don't trust banks and I don't trust elections.
	I don't trust big tech platforms.
	I don't trust the fake news media, that's for sure.
	I don't trust most things.
	I don't trust grocery stores.
	I still don't know what those mirror-like objects were that were found in the ground beef from Tyson Foods.
	I really don't trust that.
	Not sure what that could be.
	And I'm still wondering about the meat guards that I mentioned yesterday.
	Why are there meat guards at the grocery stores?
	Hmm?
	Something's going on.
	But I do trust Mother Nature.
	I do trust in God.
	And I trust gunpowder and primers.
	I trust the physics of ballistics.
	I believe in gravity.
	I believe the Earth is a sphere.
	And I believe that humanity is here for a reason that we have not yet fully expressed because too many people live as slaves under a mind control herd management system.
	And that's what this WHO treaty is all about.
	So, all right.
	With all that said, we're going to jump into the interview with Dr. Francis Boyle.
	One last note.
	I've also interviewed Doug Billings, by the way, who has a very optimistic message about how we take back America, how we re-found America, how we get through this current nightmare.
	And he doesn't believe America is going to fall.
	He thinks that we're going to bounce back from this.
	So that interview is being posted also, I believe, later today.
	If not, it'll show up tomorrow on my channel.
	So be sure to check out that interview with Doug Billings.
	But here's the interview with Dr.
	Francis Boyle.
	Audio only, and it's a little scary, honestly, but we had a great conversation.
	He's a heroic, courageous individual for blowing the whistle on all of this, and of course, he's censored everywhere by the mainstream media, so you won't hear this interview in any other media except alternative media.
	And of course, that's why I built BrightTown.com, so we can have these kinds of conversations.
	So here we go, Dr.
	Francis Boyle.
	Alright, welcome folks.
	Mike Adams here, the founder of Brighteon.com, and today we have a very special guest, someone who is key, just pivotal to the debate and the history of bioweapons and dual-use research into biological weapons.
	You know him.
	His name is Dr.
	Francis Boyle, and he is the author of the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 that was signed by President Reagan.
	And he has been very active in researching and communicating about these issues that face humanity in the years since, especially since the COVID came upon us.
	So, Dr.
	Boyle, it's an honor, sir, to have you on the show.
	You have done extraordinary work.
	Welcome and thank you for joining me.
	Well, thank you, Mike, for having me on in my best to your listening audience.
	And I did want to state that I called for and drafted the U.S. domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was passed unanimously known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was passed unanimously by both houses of the United States Congress and signed into law by President George Bush Sr. with the approval of the United States
	Oh, wow.
	Okay.
	So your research into this spans quite a bit of the existence of the technology, and yet what we're seeing now are new technologies such as CRISPR and gene editing that did not even exist when you first wrote that.
	So what are your concerns now, especially regarding Joe Biden's recent executive order?
	Right, Mike.
	In fact, what got me involved in the opposition to biological weapons was that DNA genetic engineering had just come into its infancy back in those days.
	And it turned out that the Reagan administration and his neoconservatives were abusing DNA genetic engineering for the purpose of developing offensive biological warfare weapons.
	So what I wanted to do with my legislation was first to to stop that and then second any other forms of research development testing on biological weapons Including synthetic biology, which is in my statute as well.
	That was anticipated and it clearly said criminalized synthetic biology, which would be gene editing analysis.
	So, as a matter of fact, at the first convention of the synthetic biologists, one of their primary recommendations was to repeal my Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act because they fully intended to get into Using gene editing, CRISPR, etc.
	for biological warfare purposes.
	In fact, if you study the public record, Mike, you will find out that the whole field of synthetic biology was set up and funded by the Pentagon by its agency DARPA. Defense Advanced Research Program Agency.
	They set this whole thing up.
	And so, whenever you're reading about the miracles of CRISPR gene editing, remember the Pentagon is behind this.
	You know, that's a really important point, and our audience is quite sophisticated in this realm, and they understand that throughout these past few decades, the neocons have weaponized many different technologies and have used them against civilian populations, for example, in Iraq and in many other areas around the world.
	It has been an abuse of this technology, at least in my opinion.
	What This is kind of a wild card, but have you followed the accusations of biological weapons research facilities run by the United States in Ukraine?
	Yes, I have.
	And remember, those facilities were set up by the Pentagon.
	They were not set up by Mother Teresa and the Sisters of Charity.
	The Pentagon specializes in killing people.
	And from what I have read, all the evidence that has so far come into the public record, yes, indeed, they are consistent with offensive U.S. biological warfare weapons and programs throughout Ukraine, yes.
	Do you have any sense of whether research milestones were achieved in those facilities, or was it suspended because of the conflict there, or did weapons come out of that over the years that are now in freezers somewhere, or what was the upshot of that?
	Well, it does appear they were developing weapons, right?
	And it does appear some of those weapons at least leaked out of those facilities, setting off exotic types of diseases there.
	I'm not saying that they were actually used.
	I don't even think the Russian government said they were actually used.
	And yes, when the Russian government blew the whistle on these programs, They were shut down and all of their biological warfare agents were shipped somewhere else to do the best they could to cover up.
	Right, right.
	Well, that brings up another question.
	Do you find that the The information environment today, both from mainstream media but also online and big tech and so on, do you find it shocking how much censorship there is now about even talking about these subjects that you and I have done interviews about before?
	But, you know, I mean, in the 1980s you could talk about these things and it was covered in the media and now there seems to be this denialism that any of this is really going on, doesn't there?
	Well, all I can do is speak about my personal history here, Mike.
	I was the first person to blow the whistle on the fact that the anthrax attacks of October 2001 came out of a U.S. biological warfare program and lab.
	That was November 2, 2001.
	At a convention for the Council for Responsible Genetics held at Harvard Divinity School.
	And as I was walking into the Div School there, there was a Fox News camera there who interviewed me.
	And I said, well, sure, this was...
	That could only have come out of a U.S. biological warfare weapons program and lab.
	And I have a list of them all back in my office.
	Back in those days, they were a matter of public record if you look for them.
	And then I went in at the conference.
	I was leading a workshop on biowarfare, and I said the same thing.
	And Professor John King, founder of Council for Responsible Genetics, agreed with me.
	Then I came back here in my office.
	I gave an interview to Pacifica Radio Network to the same effect.
	And then later that week, I was on the BBC podcast.
	Saying that clearly this is an offensive biological warfare weapon that came out of a U.S. program and lab.
	And then an order was given, and I was never interviewed again by any Western news media source on biological weapons, biological warfare.
	That then goes back to, I would say, the first week of November 2001.
	So, of course, yes, there's massive...
	Censorship, disinformation, everything you can imagine out there.
	Sure.
	Well, hence the reason that these alternative platforms like this one, Brighteon, are so crucial for this.
	And you've been very gracious, Dr.
	Boyle, in doing interviews with many alternative or upcoming media platforms.
	And in fact, today I'd like to get into the main topic that you mentioned before we began here about the new WHO treaty.
	You have a real warning for humanity.
	I'd like to give you the floor on that.
	I'll jump in with questions, but go ahead with that.
	What's your primary concern?
	Well, Mike, as I mentioned before we went on the air, I first wanted to talk about the Biden executive order on advancing biotechnology, which President Biden himself signed in the White House.
	Last September.
	And I won't go through all of it here.
	The critical language comes at the very end.
	It sort of snuck in there.
	And let me quote for you, Mike, this language, Roman numeral seven.
	Develop and work to promote and implement...
	Resources bilaterally and multilaterally to facilitate appropriate oversight for life scientists, dual-use research of concern, and research involving potentially pandemic and other high-consequence pathogens, and manufacturing related to research and development globally.
	Now, Mike, let me break that down for you.
	All right, so develop work to promote and implement dual research of concern.
	Dual research of concern.
	They are admitting, Mike, that Biden is authorizing and approving, in a presidential executive order, biological warfare weapons.
	Dual research means it's offensive and defensive at the same time.
	And to have an effective biological warfare weapon, first you need the weapon, and then you need an alleged vaccine or antidote to protect your own people from blowback.
	So whenever you see dual research of concern, that's even a term of art adopted by the United States government, you know they are going to develop biological warfare weapons, again, using DNA genetic engineering, synthetic biology, gene editing, CRISPR-Cas9, etc.
	Right.
	That's exactly what they're doing here, Mike.
	And then notice this.
	And research involving potentially pandemic and other high consequence pathogens.
	So they admit they are doing dual use research involving pandemic and high consequence pathogens.
	They admit that.
	That's what they're doing.
	This is where the behind team comes from, Mike.
	As I've said before, it is an offensive biological warfare weapon With gain-of-function properties that was developed by the University of North Carolina Biosafety Level Lab 3 in conjunction with the Wuhan Biosafety Level Lab 4 lab, which is China's Fort Detrick.
	And I should point out, if you read that UNC BSL-3 contract, not only is the Chinese Bat Queen on there from Wuhan BSL-4, but Fort Detrick, our own Fort Detrick is involved.
	So they are going to do more of this, Mike.
	We have to understand how serious they are.
	They are not stopping.
	They are doubling down.
	They are tripling down.
	And we can then expect more pandemics like COVID-19, Mike.
	If you're reading the news, watching the news media, reading the news media, they're all saying, well, another pandemic is coming.
	Right.
	It's coming as a result of their programs.
	That's exactly right.
	That's how they know another pandemic is coming, Mike.
	Clearly, yeah.
	Clearly, they're...
	But this is an executive order.
	It's a presidential order.
	It's not just an executive order.
	It comes right out of the White House, signed by President Biden himself, and is currently being implemented by any federal agency or contractor with the United States federal government.
	Yes.
	Doesn't this contradict existing restrictions and regulations at the NIH, the NIAID, FDA, DHS, and so on?
	I mean, the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 that you authored and so on, don't we have treaties in place that would disallow this kind of activity, or supposed to?
	Of course, the Biological Weapons Convention prevents it, and my Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 criminalize it with life imprisonment.
	The Department of Justice wanted to put the death penalty in there.
	I resisted that because I'm a lifelong abolitionist.
	I put life imprisonment.
	The problem, Mike, is that these are all United States government federal agencies and the War Department and the CIA are working on this and funding it.
	So, of course, the Department of Injustice is not going to enforce any of these laws, including my own law.
	That's the problem here.
	Wow.
	Okay, so we've now entered a realm where this current administration, much like previous administrations, by the way, is actively seeking to overrule or violate laws prohibiting this research, and they are admitting they're engaging in dual-use research, which is the development of biological weapons, And out of that, as you're saying, you believe we will have more pandemics.
	Is that from accidental release, deliberate deployment, enemies getting their hands on it?
	Or what kinds of mechanisms do you think would result in...
	Well, it would be both, Mike.
	Well, all three, but...
	In the case of the anthrax attacks, that was super weapons grade anthrax that came out of Fort Detrick and that was done deliberately in order to ram through the USA Patriot Act through Congress that sets up an American police state and also to provoke and justify a war against Iraq.
	In the Other cases, I believe the Wuhan BSL-4 COVID-19 was a leak.
	From all the evidence I've seen so far, it was a leak.
	All these BSL-3s and BSL-4s leak, every one of them, if you study the history here.
	That is why in the documentary film Anthrax War, By Cohn and Nadler as far back as 2009, which you can find online.
	I served a consultant to them, and at the very end I say, this is a catastrophe waiting to happen, these BSL-3s and BSL-4s.
	And then, again, in 2015, I gave a very lengthy interview.
	You can find it in my new book, Resisting Medical Tyranny, where I said this is all a biocatastrophe waiting to happen.
	It was a statistical certainty as I saw it as, you know, even before 2009.
	So these military-grade weaponized pathogens...
	Can be used for lots of purposes, as you said, with the anthrax scare.
	It can be used to justify an attack on another nation.
	It can be used to push a narrative, or they can escape unintentionally and cause havoc.
	They could also be deployed against nations like Russia, let's say, or China, for example.
	Is there any way to stop this?
	Are there any legal efforts underway, lawsuits to try to prevent this executive order or presidential order from taking shape?
	Right, Mike.
	The military industrial complex, the CIA, they've used these weapons against us, the American people.
	We have to understand there is a stockpile Of that super-weapons-grade anthrax that has been called Amerithrax still out there.
	My best estimate is it's at Dugway Proving Ground right now.
	They'll use it again against us if they decide it's necessary.
	Let's look at monkeypox that just came out.
	That clearly was a biological warfare weapon.
	That came out of a lab.
	It had 30 mutations over and above the wild type monkeypox in Africa.
	And there it was.
	It was released all over the world.
	So that was done.
	Why?
	I think it was done to scaremonger states of the world into adopting the World Health Organization regulation amendments that were then under consideration in Geneva to be followed up by this World Health Organization treaty.
	So whenever it suits the interests of the deep state, call them what you want, they'll use biological warfare weapons even against our own people, as they have done before.
	Yeah, good point.
	so the, the elements of the government are in fact, the biological terrorists and the, and they use these as leverage to get what they want.
	Namely one of those outcomes is a global medical police state where no one and certainly no local government and no doctor would have an individual right to speak out against the narrative.
	Uh, That really brings us to the WHO pandemic treaty.
	I know you've done a lot of research on that.
	What do you see that treaty?
	And you told me earlier that's in a preliminary draft form currently.
	What are the big red flags in that treaty that you see?
	Right, Mike.
	Well, I had read a previous edition, and then the near-final edition just came out, which I read in preparation for this interview today.
	It literally is a totalitarian medical scientific dictatorship For the entire world that will be set up under the auspices of the WHO,
	which is really a front organization for the American CDC, Bill Gates, the drug industry, Big Pharma, the biological weapons industry, and the Chinese Communist government.
	And the connection here is quite clear.
	We know, for example, Tony Fauci is Biden's White House scientific advisor on all of this, including this recent biotech order I just went through you with, saying it's going to be full speed ahead on dual-use research of concern.
	Even into pandemics, okay?
	Well, guess what?
	President Trump pulled us out of the WHO. Biden put us back in.
	And then he appointed Tony Fauci as the U.S. representative on the WHO executive committee.
	So it's clear what is happening then.
	It's because of resistance here in the United States across the board to these totalitarian orders coming out of the United States federal government, both under Trump and even more so under Biden.
	Fauci and the others have tried to do an end run Around the United States Constitution, state, local health authorities.
	Under the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, public health is considered to be part of the police powers of the states of the Union, not the federal government.
	So you can have opposition, for example, in several of governors here We're just not taking any more orders from the CDC or Washington,
	D.C. In light of all this resistance that has now developed during the past two years of this pandemic, Fauci and the rest of the men have decided to do an end run on that, go to Geneva,
	get this treaty, And then the treaty will be the supreme law of the land under Article VI of the United States Constitution and a very famous U.S. Supreme Court case, Missouri v.
	Holland that will be binding here in the United States of America on all state local health authorities and even your medical doctors.
	Your personal physicians will have to take orders from the WHO given to the CDC and then straight down to you.
	So Tedros there, Tedros there, who's not even a medical doctor, and Bill Gates and the drug industry and big pharma and the Chinese communist government will be determining your personal health care given to you by your primary care physician. and Bill Gates and the drug industry and big pharma That's how dangerous this is.
	It reads like Hobbes' Leviathan, which I lectured on in my law students in my course on jurisprudence.
	That is a horrifying scenario you're laying out there.
	But let me ask you this.
	For a treaty to be officially ratified, doesn't the U.S. Senate need to give it a two-thirds majority vote?
	Or can they try to bypass that and say, well, we're just going to accept it without a Senate vote?
	Right.
	That's what is really devious about this treaty, Mike, the WHO treaty.
	At the very end, it says that it can provisionally come into force upon the mere signature of the treaty.
	Thus, avoiding and usurping and circumventing any role the Senate might play in the ratification of the treaty.
	Yes, personally, Mike, I am unaware of any other multilateral treaty that the United States government is a party to that has such a provision.
	Indeed, the U.S. Senate has taken the position officially rejecting any notion of treaties provisionally coming into force.
	But it's right in there.
	So obviously, whoever drafted this treaty for the WHO had professional competence in both U.S. constitutional law and international law to bring this treaty into effect immediately.
	So the moment this treaty is finalized, Biden or Blinken can sign it.
	And the treaty will provisionally come into effect immediately.
	And then Biden can issue another presidential executive order ordering the implementation of this treaty.
	Yes.
	So it's extremely dangerous.
	And it was deliberately drafted and designed to circumvent and usurp the role that the Senate plays in giving its advice and consent to treaties.
	I haven't read every treaty that the United States government is a party to, but I've read most of the multilateral treaties, and this is the first time I've ever read a provision like this.
	It is truly sick and demented, the lawyers who drafted this, and it seems to me it was probably U.S. State Department lawyers.
	Remember, Fauci is at the White House, so he can get access to State Department lawyers to do his dirty work there at the White House and also at the WHO. Clearly, whoever drafted this knew about the technicalities of the U.S. treaty ratification process and designed to circumvent it.
	Okay, right.
	That's the key.
	Design is circumvented, yet, you know, I mean, so many questions.
	You're a professor of law, and surely, surely people would raise the question, how can a foreign document self-proclaim the usurpation of the authority of a sovereign nation and get away with it?
	Right?
	Because I can't just go to Somalia and write up a document that says this supersedes the United States Constitution if I can get Biden to sign it.
	This treaty will supersede the constitutions of every country in the world and their democratically elected officials.
	So, you know, if you have a governor saying, well, I'm just not going to do this, what will happen is the federal government could go into a federal court and get an injunction and mandate that they carry it out.
	On pain of a massive fine or civil contempt or criminal contempt, put in jail.
	Right.
	And doctors who do not comply, like my friend, Dr.
	Merrill Nass, can be subjected to disciplinary proceedings and have their licenses suspended or revoked and their living source of income deprived.
	Right.
	That's exactly what's going on here.
	But what you're laying out is rather horrifying.
	That is, if somebody anywhere in the world can write up a document that contains similar language and could say any crazy thing, like everybody has to commit suicide for depopulation, if Biden signed that, then what you're saying is that would go into effect and everybody would have to...
	I mean, wouldn't at least 24 governors in the United States tell the WHO to go pound sand on something like this, and you'd have an outcry from the Senate and so on?
	Wouldn't there just be a massive backlash in the U.S.? Well, let's look at the frankenshot mandates that came right out of Biden.
	I mean, Trump developed them, warp speed.
	Even Kamala Harris said, well, I wouldn't take any so-called vaccine produced by Trump, and yet allegedly she did.
	Biden came in here and mandated, I call them frankenshots, they're like frankenfoods, All over the country and everyone rolled over and played dead and proceeded to order everyone to take these frankenshots.
	And now we're having massive deaths and disabilities even reported here in the United States by VAERS and the European Health Agency that is more truthful on this.
	And the carnage has just begun.
	So yeah, you've already been ordered to go in and commit suicide.
	Millions of Americans have just gone along with it.
	Mike, what can I say?
	You make a really good point.
	In fact, what, 12.5 billion injections have been given worldwide.
	Over 5.5 billion people have taken them.
	Obviously, some multiple shots.
	And in the United States, I don't know what the uptake number is, but it's well over half the population, it seems.
	So, getting to the nitty-gritty...
	And by the way, Mike, I just want to...
	Deal with casualties here.
	I helped defend Captain Dr.
	Yolanda Hewitt Vaughn, who refused to give the experimental medical vaccines for the biological warfare weapons anthrax and botulin in Gulf War I. And, you know, in violation of the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation.
	To make a long story short, Those Frankenshots that she opposed, starting I think was December of 1990, I came to her pro bono defense in February 1991 through the court-martial and etc.
	But of 500,000 US military personnel, given those two Frankenshots, a minimum of 11,000 were murdered.
	As Dr.
	Hewitt Vaughn and I regretfully figured was going to happen.
	Right, and that doesn't count the injured and maimed.
	100,000 We're disabled.
	There we go.
	That's 20%.
	And those figures are lowball figures because the Pentagon still lies about the Gulf War sickness, which it is.
	It's the Gulf War sickness.
	I still hear today from veterans suffering from the Gulf War sickness and asking me for my advice where they can go and get proper treatment because they can't get it from the VA. The VA have been told to tell them, well, it's all in your head.
	And they just can't get proper medical treatment there.
	So Mike, that just gives you an idea of the floor.
	Of death and disability, we're facing here with this new round of COVID frankenshots.
	That's a floor, a minimum estimate.
	And I think a realistic estimate is going to be far superior to that.
	And certainly, you know, within the next year to two, we're going to be seeing a humanitarian catastrophe here as a result of these COVID frankenshots.
	So, one of my previous guests, I'm sure you're familiar with him, Mr.
	Ed Dowd, has done a rather rigorous study of U.S. Labor Department data as well as insurance industry data, and he has a couple of statisticians that he works with and has concluded that excess mortality in the post-COVID vaccine era is running 32% across the general population.
	So, Normally, pre-COVID, about 7,700 people a day would die in the United States.
	If you add an extra 32% to that, that's 2,462 people, I believe, is...
	That's the number that are dying each day, each day in America right now.
	It's almost a 9-11 scale, you know, genocide or whatever you want to call it against the American people, but it's every day.
	And these are, in essence, I would say biological weapons against us.
	They are.
	If you look at the MRNA technology, used by Moderna and Pfizer BioNTech.
	It was developed and bought and paid for by DARPA, the Pentagon's DARPA. Right, that's where that came from.
	So, yes, it is a biological warfare weapon.
	And all these frankenshots so far give you particles of COVID-19.
	They're injected right into you.
	So, in other words, they are actually giving you An offensive biological warfare weapon with gain-of-function properties that has come out of China's Fort Detrick, right?
	You're getting those cells, right?
	And remember, they also came from Fort Detrick.
	Right, right, exactly.
	The origins with extra gain-of-function in Wuhan.
	Wuhan and the UNC BSL-3 with Fort Detrick right there working with the UNC BSL-3.
	They're all in cahoots together.
	Right.
	So then, and by the way, that comes to 900,000 Americans dead in one year from this shot.
	So almost a million.
	And getting to the WHO pandemic treaty that you mentioned, so if they're able to enforce this all the way down to the local level, Then the WHO, which got everything wrong about this pandemic, by the way, they could issue an alert.
	They could issue a level five.
	They could mandate vaccines.
	They could mandate no one can use ivermectin.
	They could mandate quarantines.
	They could turn the whole planet into a pandemic police state on command.
	That's correct, Mike.
	That's my reading of the treaty.
	That's what I do professionally.
	Right.
	You know, I've been reading treaties since I was a student at Harvard Law School, and some of the top experts in the world taught me how to read treaties.
	And I draft documents like this, not terrible, pernicious, genocidal-type documents, but that's my read of what's going on here, right?
	So if they're setting this up, clearly they plan to use it.
	Pardon me?
	Since they're setting up the language.
	The problem, Mike, by reading of this treaty, this is almost finalized.
	They're talking about finalizing it after the first of the year.
	And once it is finalized...
	If Biden signs it, then they'll implement it by means of a presidential executive order.
	We could see all this unfolding at the beginning of next year, right?
	So then we're one scare away from total global medical police state tyranny under this treaty.
	Well, certainly here in the United States, Mike, what other countries do if they become a party to it, I guess that is their business.
	But again, in my reading of this, given the involvement of Fauci, given the fact that the drafter knew all about the US treaty ratification process, this treaty is primarily directed against us, the American people.
	And they're going to try to impose it upon us as soon as they possibly can, Mike.
	So I would then expect...
	Very quickly after this is signed, guess what?
	Another pandemic, another outbreak, another variant, and then another mass media campaign to scare people into abiding by whatever is commanded by the WHO. You know what's so frustrating about this, Dr.
	Boyle, is that, of course, none of these people were ever elected.
	They're not representatives of the United States.
	This is completely extrajudicial.
	It's extraconstitutional.
	It contradicts everything that should define the sovereignty of a nation.
	That's right, and it was drafted for that reason by experts on U.S. constitutional law.
	Again, I'm just speaking here for the United States because it's clear Fauci et al.
	want to ram this through here in the United States, and it will usurp our Constitution and our democratically elected officials.
	And also, if you read the treaty, of course, it has a propaganda component in there to control the media, to control the message, to prevent people like you and me from talking about it.
	Right.
	It will be all be officially authorized propaganda by the WHO.
	Right.
	So under this system, there's no end to authoritarian tyranny and control, because any time a population starts to get out of line, they can just release another pathogen, lock everybody down, separate everybody, say, well, it's the WHO.
	If you read the treaty, that's clear.
	And not only that, it sets up an entire international organization to supervise that treaty, which is unique.
	There are very few treaties.
	So it's not just a treaty.
	They set up an entire international organization that will supervise this treaty, right?
	Does the treaty mention specific local actions such as lockdowns, quarantines, isolation, things like that?
	It gives the WHO authority to do whatever they think they want to do.
	Right.
	So if they want lockdowns, it mentions vaccines.
	Yeah, they can do whatever they want.
	Sure.
	Well, what if they decide that the only way to eliminate the threat of the pandemic is to eliminate the number of living people?
	Well, isn't that the agenda?
	Isn't that the sub-Silenio agenda?
	Agenda behind all of this, Mike.
	I mean, they don't come out and say that per se in those words.
	But it's clear that, you know, this is an implementation process.
	On a global scale of the Nazi doctrine of useless eaters.
	Right.
	Well, we hear every month or so, you know, we follow food industry news quite closely.
	About every month there's a mass slaughter of chickens because there was an outbreak or a mass slaughter of pigs because there was an outbreak.
	And it seems like we are we are the ranch animals now and they can put an outbreak into the population and then just call for culling.
	And basically treat us the same as farm animals, and I think that's what they've been doing for the last couple of years.
	I don't see how else you can conclude, Mike.
	That's my assessment of the...
	Since I was the first person to blow the whistle that COVID-19 was an offensive biological warfare weapon with gain-of-function properties that leaked out of the Wuhan BSL-4, I did that in a worldwide alert on COVID-19.
	January 24, 2020.
	And that's my assessment of what's been going on, right?
	Yeah.
	Thank you for that reminder.
	You're absolutely correct.
	I had almost forgotten that you were the first whistleblower to go public with authority about the origins of that.
	And you are still here blowing the whistle on what's coming.
	Now, let's talk about...
	Possible solutions, or how do we resist this?
	Is there any way to pressure our lawmakers or our representatives?
	I mean, this is so crazy.
	How does a nation fight back against this kind of tyranny?
	Well, Mike, I discussed this in my new book you can find there at Amazon called Resisting Medical Tyranny.
	And I won't go through an entire book here.
	But the bottom line is this.
	I think, and I'm just talking about we the American people, okay, what we can do to resist.
	And in my book, I outline that everyone involved here at the highest level is guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder, either for their involvement in the research and development of COVID-19 Or for their research, development, and imposition of the Frankenshots.
	And I was originally hired here to teach criminal law for several years before I moved over to teach international human rights law.
	And I go through the Anglo-American common law definition of murder that applies in every state of the union except Louisiana that has civil code system down there and parse out in my book that the people involved here are guilty of murder.
	So what I recommend in my book then Is that you go in to your state or local prosecutor.
	The feds are all in bed with each other, so it's a waste of time.
	And the federal courts are all bought off.
	They're part of the system.
	But you go into your state or local prosecutor's.
	district attorney, state's attorney, attorney general, and demand that they convene grand juries and get indictments for murder and conspiracy to commit murder for everyone in their territorial jurisdictions and demand that they convene grand juries and get indictments for murder and conspiracy to commit murder for everyone in their territorial jurisdictions that have died
	And I outlined that whole strategy in my book.
	And indeed, since then, I did have a 45-minute conversation with the attorney general of Louisiana, which is not Anglo-American But I did go through his homicide statutes with me, and he agreed with me on the legal theory.
	So, you know, it's basically a political question.
	And then I had a 30-minute conversation with the Deputy Attorney General of South Carolina.
	And again, he agreed with me on the legal arguments, but admitted this is a political problem.
	So state and local prosecutors are elected by us, and we pay their bills.
	We pay their salaries.
	And we can also...
	Diselect them.
	Make that clear.
	So my advice, and I have people working on this now in Texas and Georgia and Florida, is to get together with your friends and your neighbors.
	Get the names of people in your area who have died from COVID-19 or the Frankenshots and go in and demand grand juries be convened.
	As I see it, if we can get even one indictment for murder and conspiracy to commit murder of any of these people, I think the whole house of cards would collapse.
	So that's what I'm recommending to the American people.
	Now, different states, you know, there's different strategies, different countries around the world that I could discuss elsewhere, but we'd be here a long time.
	Well, that's...
	It's extraordinary that you mention that, and I've heard other rumors of similar actions underway, but nothing gaining tremendous traction at this point, although I would suspect even A.G. Paxton in Texas might be open to a discussion, and I'm thinking of Schmidt in Missouri and a few others around who might be We're good to go.
	And it's going to continue.
	And what does that do to not just the human rights violations and the families of the victims, but also from a state level, the economic condition of the state, the costs of people suffering and the disability of former state employees who are collecting medical benefits and pensions and so on.
	I mean, there are economic implications of this beyond even the human or the humanitarian angle.
	Do you think these states will eventually wake up and realize what's happening?
	Well, I would hope so, but that depends on us, the people, Mike, right?
	I mean, we still have democratically elected governments here under the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
	It makes it very clear all powers not given to the federal government remain in the hands of the states of the Union and the people.
	That's us.
	So we are going to have to apply political pressure, just like the American people have done on other grassroots campaign, you know, civil rights for African Americans.
	That was all a grassroots campaign.
	I've been involved in grassroots campaign for most of my life, my career, ending the Vietnam War.
	That was a grassroots campaign.
	So we need grassroots campaign here.
	To bring pressure to bear on state and local prosecutors to get these indictments, right?
	That's what we need.
	Right.
	Well, a key distinction that's really important here, if you compare this to the civil rights movement in America, although there were there were some murders, but nothing on the scale.
	So most of the victims of civil rights discrimination, let's say in the 1960s, for example, most of those victims were still living and could march across the bridge and could voice what had happened to them.
	Whereas today, all the victims of this humanitarian crime, they are dead and and thus they are silenced.
	Their voices no longer are able to be expressed, and it's only the rest of us who are still living that must speak for the dead.
	This is how the genocide, quote, wins, is they kill those who are the victims.
	Right.
	That's what's going on.
	The victims are dying or being severely disabled and not in a position to speak out for themselves.
	So it's up to the rest of us to do that for them and also to save ourselves in the process because we're on the list.
	Exactly.
	Well said.
	We're on the list, and I guess the bottom line is, folks, demand action from your local state AG, or we will all eventually be annihilated or at least targeted for annihilation at some level.
	And at some point, the WHO is going to try to make sure that you can't say no to the vaccine.
	That's right, to the frankenshots.
	There'll be more of them coming along.
	They've made that clear.
	In the Biden executive order and also in the WHO pandemic treaty, there'll be more warp speed type of frankenshots that they're going to impose upon you.
	Right.
	Yep.
	Well, one last comment and then we'll wrap this up.
	But I saw the White House offering in conjunction with retailers like pharmacies, CVS, Walgreens and so on.
	Twenty dollars in grocery store credit if you take the jab.
	So we have food inflation.
	We have the poorest Americans.
	Very much unable to afford the food they used to be able to buy.
	In desperation, they may agree to this jab.
	Now, project this forward.
	Food gets more and more expensive.
	The economy is not doing well.
	More and more jabs are offered.
	At some point, it might be here.
	Here's $100, $200, $500.
	Whatever it is, the government can just print the money.
	And the people can't afford the food.
	And so this is an attack on the poorest Americans.
	Right.
	It's, as I said, the Nazi philosophy of useless eaters that was condemned in the Nürnberg judgment in 1946.
	The Nazis, the poor, the oppressed, the downtrodden people of color.
	Gays, etc.
	Sure.
	They'll be wiped out.
	Right.
	That's the agenda here as I see it.
	That is.
	Absolutely.
	That is the agenda.
	Well, Dr.
	Boyle, I hope we get a chance to talk again because there's so much to go into, but you've given an enormous amount of information here today.
	I want to encourage people to get your book, Resisting Medical Tyranny.
	And also, you don't have a website or channels, but people can find your interviews or search for you online.
	Is there anything else you'd like to add that we failed to cover?
	Yeah, I think there's one other point.
	People can understand the severity of what's going on here, Mike.
	I want to read to you the definition of a crime against humanity.
	Under the Nuremberg Charter that we, the United States, used to prosecute the major Nazi war criminals after World War II. And it says quite clearly, and this is customary international criminal law,
	it says, crimes against humanity, namely murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the countries we're perpetrating.
	That's exactly what is going on here.
	Murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population.
	And the history here, Mike, is this.
	That language was put in there specifically for the purpose of criminalizing the Nazi persecution and extermination of their own Jewish citizens in Germany.
	That's why it was put in there.
	This is exactly what is being done to us.
	American citizens of the United States government.
	Our own government is subjecting us to Nuremberg crimes against humanity.
	And as that article makes clear, it's completely irrelevant that any of this is authorized by U.S. domestic law.
	And of course it isn't under my Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act But that gives you an idea of how historically unprecedented this is.
	The last time we confronted anything like this was the Nazi persecution and extermination of the Jews.
	Right.
	That's what we're seeing.
	Right, right.
	And another important distinction is in that time, a Jewish victim was aware that they were being rounded up and transported and taken for extermination or put into a prison camp or a labor, slave labor camp to die of starvation and a Jewish victim was aware that they were being rounded up Yet so many people today who are being exterminated, they go along with it.
	They think they're being helped.
	It's as if the...
	Whoever's running all this, they've figured out a way to trick people into self-extermination.
	And so many of those taking these jabs or going along with everything that's happening, the medical tyranny, they think they're good.
	People are doing good things.
	They think they are the moral ones in society.
	It's shocking.
	Well, it's sort of like that movie Soylent Green, right?
	Where people go in and suicide centers.
	I don't know what else to say, Mike.
	There it is.
	History is repeating itself.
	Well, I hope there are enough of us left to write the history books on this one, but it's going to be a whopper of a psychological trauma mystery of how they terrorize so many people with psychological conditioning to convince them to exterminate themselves.
	It's just extraordinary.
	Well, I did write my book, Resisting Medical Tyranny, to provide people with ammunition they can use to fight back.
	It's in plain English, not a lot of legal mumbo jumbo.
	And then before that book, I have an earlier book, Biowarfare and Terrorism, that goes through the history of U.S. biological warfare weapons programs from the Reagan administration until the time that book went to press around 2003 or so.
	And then Resisting Medical Tyranny brings it up to date.
	All right, perfect.
	Resisting medical tyranny, folks, you can find that at book retailers everywhere.
	And Dr.
	Boyle, let me just say on behalf of our audience, we are so thankful for you and your voice and your courage and the work that you're doing.
	No one else can interpret this as well as you, and you're blowing the whistle, you're sounding the alarm.
	We thank God that you're here and helping humanity in this time.
	Thank you so much.
	Well, it's nice of you to say that.
	Mike, and yeah, I mean, we have to keep faith alive, right?
	That we're here, we're in the struggle of our lives.
	We have to fight back.
	We have no alternative, as I see it.
	That's right.
	Well said.
	Well, thank you for joining me and spending all this time.
	We greatly appreciate you.
	And for those of you listening, again, this has been an interview with Dr.
	Francis Boyle, and you are free to repost this interview on your own channels.
	Or other platforms, please do so.
	Spread the word, sound the alarm, and take the actions to try to hold these people responsible for their crimes against humanity.
	You know, the legal investigations and grand juries and so on that Dr.
	Boyle mentioned.
	So thank you all for listening, and thank you, Dr.
	Boyle, once again for joining me.
	It's been a pleasure.
	Sure, Mike, and keep up the good work.
	We shall do our best.
	A global reset is coming.
	And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
	It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
	You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
	I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
	I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
	So download this guide.
	It's free.

▲