All Episodes
Previous Next
May 13, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
57:20
Dr. Lee Merritt, former US Navy surgeon, warns of catastrophic vaccine risk to active duty soldiers
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We now have been told it's a complete sham.
Let's go back and rethink how we're treating people.
Let's quit all this fake isolation that just hurts people.
Let's go back and look at chest x-rays as if we didn't know about this thing called COVID. And let's go back and look at people's oxygen levels and how we treat them as human beings and as body systems.
And then we'll think about the fact now that, yes, and then remember, we have new treatments for virals.
What we think of as viral illnesses, whatever they really turn out to be.
That's what we need to do.
And we need to do it now.
Welcome to Bright Young Conversations.
Today we have returning Dr.
Lee Merritt.
That's right, the Dr.
Merritt, the orthopedic naval surgeon.
TheMedicalRebel.com is her website and she has been making waves by simply telling the truth about what's going on in our world right now.
And there was a clip from our previous interview that someone picked up and it went viral like crazy all over the world.
And She's here today to add any new information to her current understanding of what's going on.
Dr.
Merritt, it's an honor.
I'm so glad to know you.
You're an amazing person.
Thank you for joining me.
You are, Mike.
Thanks for having me back.
Well, I honor your courage because, see, there's not that many people, especially from traditional medicine, you're an orthopedic surgeon, so you've been in the medical system your entire professional life, and yet, could you ever imagine seeing what you're seeing right now?
Oh, absolutely not.
And I mean, you know, being an inquisitive person, and I jokingly say I'm a scientist without a lab.
You know, I absolutely hate laboratory science, sitting in a dull, dark lab doing things.
But I love learning things like I was in a lab.
So, you know, it's kind of a weird situation.
But my experience here has just been to be able to have the time and to read and to study and everything.
But in all honesty, I mean, I was an inpatient surgeon.
I lived in hospitals.
I've never seen what's going on now.
I actually just had, fortunately, it's coming out okay.
But my husband got admitted to the hospital because we both had what we wanted.
And I'm going to call it, for lack of better anything else, because right now I think the biggest issue going on this week that's kind of newer than the last few weeks is really the general understanding that we've never isolated the virus that they claim is causing all this.
That's something to talk about.
But regardless of that, there's a disease.
I was talking to Dr.
Zelenko today, and he said, regardless of whether it's been isolated or whatever's going on, There is a new clinical syndrome out there, and we're seeing it.
And I can tell you, we were both victims of it.
I'm not so badly.
He went down a little hard.
But in the hospital here, the bottom line here is that he doesn't really have COVID now.
He had it, but he has now the metabolic consequences later where, you know, I couldn't keep him hydrated and things like that.
So he needed to go in the hospital for hydration and for other things.
But no matter what you go in for now, if you test positive, you have COVID. And so here we are, and fortunately, he's not a terminal cancer patient.
He's not somebody I expected to die in the hospital.
But I had to say goodbye to him in the emergency room and never be able to see him again while he's in the hospital.
You can't stay with your loved ones in many of these hospitals.
That's their rule.
Now, it's not everybody's hospital, but that's some of them.
And, you know, think about that.
We used to think, in fact, orthopedic surgeons, we used to get beat up all the time for not being very personable at the bedside, you know, kind of hammers and nuts kind of people.
But here we have a situation, and they emphasize the healing arts, you know, that it wasn't just about giving people pills.
We were taught in medical school, and really we were, that we should actually lay on hands, that we should be, you know, considerate of the patient, that it was a healing environment.
And we've completely taken that away.
Now what we have is you can't have a family member in with anybody in the hospital to oversee what's going on.
So it's all behind closed doors.
What you just mentioned, and by the way, I'm sorry to hear that your husband's going through that, but he has the best advocate in the world in you.
So thanks.
Thank God he's got you.
And by the way, there's a lot of rain happening here right now, folks.
Love the rain.
I know.
We certainly need it here in Texas.
But One of the most important things that you've stumbled or stated here is, you know, it's the advocate, it's the patient advocate that often saves the patient from the incompetence of the hospital staff.
How many times have the hospital staff, and I'm not blaming them all, but, you know, they're overworked, how many times do they have the wrong medication or the wrong chart or they have the wrong dose, wrong labels?
It's so common.
It's like, Going through a hospital experience is almost like a death sentence in many cases.
Well, yes.
And think about the effect on older people just of isolation.
I mean, my husband's a fairly sane.
I mean, you know, but here you put somebody that has like sundowner syndrome, an older person that doesn't have all his faculties and gets confused easily.
Instead of having a loved one there at the bedside that can help keep him oriented, keep him calm, help him work through the day.
Can't have any of that.
Oh, no, no, no.
He has to be completely isolated alone.
What do you think that does for mortality?
Yeah.
It looks to me like everything we are doing is to kill people.
I mean, we are putting masks on people, making them sicker.
There's no benefit of that.
We are isolating them socially.
This hospital thing.
Oh, and by the way, another factor of what you just said, They're not enough nurses.
Like this hospital, they're on bypass a lot.
Even though they're a 25-bed hospital, they're a small-town hospital, they're on bypass a lot because they don't have enough nurses.
Why don't they have enough nurses?
Because a lot of nurses are retiring rather than take the mandatory vaccine and live in these crazy environments.
So that's adding to the problem.
And if that personnel shortage is bad right now, imagine what's going to happen if this antibody-dependent enhancement kicks in, and you've had most of the medical staffers have been vaccinated in hospitals and cities across the country.
If you have even a 10% death rate and on top of that 10% injury and debilitation rate, that's 20% of the medical staff out of the picture on top of the shortage we have now.
At the same time, the public would be experiencing antibody-dependent enhancement effects.
I don't see how the hospital infrastructure even handles that.
That was nice.
Special effects from God.
You hit the money on it right there.
No, that's exactly right.
And think about it, even in a bigger picture, we're vaccinating the military.
And I think I said on a previous show, I don't want to be repetitive, but in all the military services put together, we only had 20 deaths from COVID last year.
But now we are attempting to vaccinate the entire military.
We've already had over 80 cases of myocarditis, which carries a 66% five-year mortality.
So we've already killed more people than COVID did.
I learned this from Dr.
Zelenko, but it was actually the former, Mike Yadon said apparently recently that for every one childhood death of COVID, we've got 100 that are dying or will die from the vaccines.
That is a pathetic number.
I mean, if that's true, and he's a smart guy who's a scientist who worked for Pfizer.
So when he says things, I listen.
We're...
We're doing horrible things.
And so we're taking down the military and we're taking down our first responders.
Gosh, let's see who would benefit from all that.
But our first response, that's going to be a big issue.
And I don't know if you saw, I think his name is Bugolo, but he's a monk.
And he's saying, you know, as Christians, we are going to be left bearing the bodies because all the people, if we have mass death this year, all the people that will die...
They will be the people that would bury people.
They're the first responders, the people that pick up the bodies out of the apartments where somebody dies.
Think about this.
This could be a toll.
I mean, I'm hoping it won't happen this way, but we are already seeing, you know, people think, oh, hey, that's all nonsense.
I took the vaccine.
I'm fine.
They don't realize the long-term consequences that are popping up.
We are already seeing tumors at unbelievable rates.
And the reason for that shouldn't be surprising.
The pharmaceutical companies themselves in producing these vaccines admit they put a code in that RNA to dumb down your innate immune system so you will accept the vaccine.
Well, that immune system that you have is there not just to fight off viruses and not just to fight off foreign vaccines.
It's there to keep your DNA in check so that you don't express cancer genes and express viral genes out of your genome.
And it does it through methylation.
So now there's some things you can take, you know, methylation products like betaine or dimethylglycine that might help this.
But the point is that they designed this to do this.
And now I've had people tell me that, you know, they've seen 20 some tumors of something they've only seen twice in their whole career before this.
I mean, this is happening.
You're hearing, everybody's heard of somebody who, yeah, they had dementia, but they were doing okay, and now they're just decompensating.
These things are damaging people, and it's not always overt, like, kills you within four days.
And it doesn't always.
This is a really critical point because what people are seeing, at least those paying attention, is the near-term effects usually stemming from blood clots.
So strokes, myocarditis, loss of blood flow to extremities, right?
Amputation of legs in some cases.
But these are not...
Even close to what may be the largest long-term impacts.
So looking at neurological impacts over time, which may take several years to fully be expressed, or immunological effects, as you just mentioned.
What about cancer?
Also, what about infertility?
What about...
The spike protein effects on the vascular system that are not causing short-term acute problems, but long-term loss of vascular function, where people won't be able to even walk to the pharmacy, I mean, from their car to the pharmacy to get the drugs.
Yeah, I mean, aren't we plausibly looking at a medium or long-term scenario that could be far worse than any short-term effects?
I agree with you totally.
And I think Dr.
Hoff really hit the nail on the head here.
You know, he's the Canadian physician who works in a native tribal area, a small city.
And he knows his patients.
You know, he's a good old time family doctor type physician.
So the reason he could recognize these things, I keep wanting to say, here's a guy in a small town village Who's a family practitioner.
We're all the university boys to figure this out, but he figured it out.
And what he did was he showed that all these people that he started noticing, they were just dragging.
He said they took the vaccine and they used to be able to walk two miles into the clinic.
Now they can barely walk a block.
What's going on?
So we very presciently did a test called a D-dimer, which is a test for acute thrombosis.
Now, these were not people that had overtly acute thrombosis or blood clotting.
They didn't have the cavernous sinus thrombosis in their brain or they didn't have an MI, a heart attack.
They didn't have leg thrombosis that was obvious.
They were apparently, but 63% of his vaccinated patients had a positive D-dimer, meaning they were having small microvascular clotting ongoing.
Now, what's the implication of that?
There's a huge implication of this multiple ways.
I had a friend who just died not on the operating table, but after he was going to have an operation and coded on the operating table, they cathed him and everything.
And he's younger than me.
They cathed him and he was clean.
He didn't have any cardiac...
Stenosis.
On the other hand, he had very poor cardiac ejection fraction, which means the heart was not functioning right.
Well, I told my friend who was the anesthesiologist involved in the case, I said, please get a D-dimer.
Well, he wasn't in charge.
He couldn't do that.
But what is happening to me, they wrote it off as some kind of weird Takotsubo's cardiomyopathy or something, which is stress-related heart disease.
No, I think we need to look further than that, guys.
And here's what the problem is.
If this is true, what Dr.
Hoff has shown and what seems to be happening when you see people like this die, how many of us know somebody that just woke up dead recently?
I mean, yes, they're 60, 70 years old, but they took the vaccine and then within four days, they just didn't wake up the next morning.
What's that all about?
And we're not doing what we need to, so we're not getting the whole story.
We should be doing pathology on these people.
If this were a real pandemic, we should be treating it like William Welch did when he came out from AFIP to look at the people in 1918 at Riley Kansas.
He passed them.
He did post-mortem studies on these people to figure out what was going on, and we're not doing that.
But in any case, so what is happening to these people?
Well, one of the points that Dr.
Hoff makes, and I think this is really going to be a big number, Is that these people later, when you damage your microvasculature, it doesn't go back to normal.
There is always some damage there.
And when you do this on a microvascular way, what you're going to end up with is you're going to get right heart failure as you get pulmonary hypertension.
That's what's going to happen to these people.
And I think he's right there.
And I think we need a solid number on this.
I mean, think about this, Mike.
What if today he said 60% of all his patients have a positive D-dimer?
Somebody needs to replicate that and report it.
Because if that's really true, we have just shortened the lifespan considerably of 63% of the population.
That's really a number.
Yeah.
That's true, but look at the bright side.
When the vaccine zombie mob is chasing us down the street, they won't be able to run very far.
We'll be like superheroes in the world of the vaccinated.
Yeah, we'll have like mutant powers compared to them.
We're going to have golden DNA, by the way.
Have you seen already?
This is kind of funny if it weren't so serious.
There already is five to ten thousand dollars from sperm from men that have not been vaccinated.
You guys are going to make millions.
I have not seen that, but again, I think you brought something up about this last time.
I always warn you, never tell men that they can make money staying at home producing sperm.
The economy will no longer function.
Now there's a dollar added on paper.
Oh my goodness.
eBay listings or something, right?
Okay.
All right.
But let me ask you a question about the Pentagon.
So here we have the Pentagon announcing that they're going to run this medical experiment.
Now, you in particular, you've been in the Navy for many years.
You know the system as well as anyone and a medical doctor inside the armed services.
What could possibly be going through the mind of the Secretary of Defense Austin or others to say that, hey, let's take this experiment and try it on everyone all at once, regardless of what happens to national security?
What's going on here, in your view?
Well, I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that if the Secretary of Defense doesn't understand the national security nightmare this is, then either he's a complete idiot, which would be hard to become the Secretary of Defense with that, or he's a traitor.
Because who would benefit from this?
Cui Bono.
There were 200 Chinese scientists embedded in Moderna and Pfizer before this vaccine was rolled out.
What were they doing there, and why did we not consider that this could be, hello, a bioweapon?
I mean, if I were the Chinese army and I couldn't fight the American army head-to-head, what was the perfect way to do it?
Weaken them.
And this is a perfect way to do this.
So this should be obvious, but what's happening, like yesterday, I think it was yesterday or day before, I was asked by one of my colleagues, Also fighting the fight, you probably know, who said, could I serve on this committee?
It's an army committee, and they're looking, it's a bunch of non-medical generals, it's the line officers, trying to figure out what's going on and whether or not we should continue this vaccine program and things.
And literally, the people putting it together have very carefully, they stacked the committee.
So even my name was enough to know that they weren't going to have me on it.
You know, they weren't going to have, you know, they're certainly not going to have Simone Gold, you know, or all these other people.
But they got down to the, they thought, well, maybe we could sneak Lee Mary across.
Nope, couldn't even sneak me across.
So they don't want anybody that would speak truth to the problem here of these vaccines.
But even regardless of whether these work Or don't work.
I think we need to point out that this is against the principles that have been used for decades on military medicine.
You know, we have pilots, I think it's up to nine now, that have civilian pilots that have succumbed to the vaccine because of clotting.
We know that we have problems with passengers riding in commercial jets because of the long-time immobility sitting age, etc., clotting.
So, but yet, in spite of that, we're vaccinating military pilots that they don't have a chance to stand up.
Many of them are in single seat, ejection seat aircraft or dual seat, ejection seat aircraft.
But not only that, these people aren't flying pilots or flying passengers.
These people are flying armaments and they could be nuclear armaments.
What are we thinking?
And these are the highest screened medically people probably in the military next to maybe the SEALs or something.
These guys are not ever sick.
Their biggest fear is running into a flight surgeon and sneezing or something and so getting knocked off the flight schedule.
They never give these people experimental drugs.
And here we are giving them all a mandate to get a vaccination.
And then, by the way, go out, jump in your jet and carry a nuclear arms test.
What?
There's nothing here that's rational science.
This is not about rational science.
Whatever it's about, it's not about rational science.
Nor is it about military doctrine.
No, it really does seem like there must be some other motivation behind this.
And perhaps, as I think you hinted, it might be reducing America's military readiness.
It's as if our Pentagon is attacking our own troops.
But by the way, I've been told, I have other contacts in the military, that current vaccine uptake rates, at least in the army, are surprisingly low.
In many units, only about 10% is what I've been told.
And also that there is absolute no coming from many of the middle managers.
I don't know all the ranks or anything, but the middle managers in the military and the lower ranks of soldiers are saying, no, no, no, no.
You're not going to do this to us.
You're not going to make us do it.
We will walk away before you inject us with this thing.
So there's about to come...
Probably sometime sort of late September or that timeframe.
There's about to be kind of a civil war about this inside the military is what I'm being told.
What are your thoughts?
I think that's right.
And honestly, I don't think any of the numbers we see about people being vaccinated are right.
You know, they would like us to think that they're working on getting 70% of the Americans vaccinated.
I think this is like polling data.
You know, they want you to believe in something.
You know, this is right out of the Tavistock Institute in the 1930s when they realized that polling data wasn't just about getting people's information.
It was about changing people's attitudes because they could use the polling data to sway your notion whether you even go to the polls.
Well, we know that happens with elections.
It's happening with this, too.
You know, why are they in such high dungeon?
If everybody's getting vaccinated, why are they having to bribe children of donuts and, you know, lap dances?
And God knows what else they're bribing people with.
It's ridiculous.
And now forcing people and mandating people, you know, the carrot's gone away.
And now we've got the stick out that all the all the first responders need to get this by a certain date.
All the army needs to get this by a certain date.
So they wouldn't be doing this.
If people were voluntarily saying, oh, this is such a good thing, I really do want to have this.
That's not happening.
I think you're right.
And that may be the only thing that saves us.
That's going to save us, I think.
Yeah, well, it kind of brings up another question for you in terms of those who refuse the vaccines.
So those are people who are going to have their fertility intact because we know the spike protein attacks the ovaries and the testes.
We know we're seeing a lot of spontaneous abortions among pregnant women.
My God, why would they inject pregnant women with spike protein?
That's a crime against humanity.
But also, what about organ donors?
You know, people who've been vaccinated, how can they possibly be organ donors when we have the bio distribution studies that show the spike protein is circulated throughout multiple organ systems such as the spleen, liver, lungs, brain, you know, heart.
You know, have you heard anything?
Is the organ transplant industry talking about this?
Are they going to just transplant a spike protein colonized lung into somebody?
You know?
I mean, neither that nor have we heard from the blood people.
I mean, I don't think that they're restricting people giving blood in the future.
Now, the problem is we don't know how, of course, because they didn't do any studies long-term on humans before they rolled this out on the whole friggin' universe.
They...
We don't know how long this persists and how long you continue to make spike protein.
But we know what the FDA thinks happens, and that is that if you're older or have immune suppression, you know, you don't have a good competent immune system, that you can be chronically infected with these genetic agents and constantly shed the material.
So they do think there are some people that will be constantly shedding this stuff.
And if they're the people that become organ donors, yeah, we're in trouble.
You know, and on the other hand, of course, if we have a mass die-off from other reasons, maybe we won't need as many organs.
But it's a sad commentary on the whole medical system that this is what's happening in general.
You're right.
We're not protecting our blood supply.
We're not protecting our organ supply.
And for no reason.
I mean, this is really, you know, for a disease that is, as Dr.
Zelenko actually ran the numbers for me, and he pointed out that if treated appropriately, less than 5 million people a year worldwide would die from this.
So we are responding with a deadly agent for a disease that's not really deadly and doesn't have to be deadly.
So there's another motive at work here.
Well, along those lines, let me ask your professional medical opinion about this.
The nation of New Zealand just recently locked down the entire country because one person, who I understand was asymptomatic, tested, quote, tested positive PCR tests for COVID. Now, they locked down his region for seven days and the rest of the country for three days.
People who are, you know, many miles away have nothing to do with it.
Now, if the definition of a pandemic is now going to be expanded to the point where one person testing "positive" via a questionable PCR test for a genetic sequence of one pathogen that may only be present at one quantity, if the definition of a pandemic is now going to be expanded to the point where one person testing They don't even have a heavy viral load.
If that's the case, wouldn't all of humanity be locked down forevermore from this day forward?
And that's maybe what they want.
I'm going to say, this is what I say, and I have my little podcast on Monday nights, and I always say, if you think we're fighting a virus, you're going to act like a victim.
If you think we're fighting a war, you're going to act like a warrior.
We're at war.
This is a war against humanity.
There is no rational medical or scientific explanation to lock down New Zealand like that.
And I think the rest of the world, quite frankly, is looking to America to see what happens when they come for us.
Are they going to be able to lock us down?
If the answer is yes, we're doomed.
The whole world is doomed.
We are the last stand.
I used to think the Aussies were tough and that they would never let this happen, you know, Crocodile Dundee, etc.
But that's not true.
These other countries have given away their human rights on the name of safety over the years.
It didn't happen recently.
It happened a long time.
You know, this is government health care and various other things that, you We'll do all these things.
Well, now here's the payback.
The payback is their last vestiges of human freedom are being taken away from them, and they're looking to America to see what we do.
And I think that we better stand up.
I think we will.
I don't think they're going to come to Texas and successfully close us down again or the country.
I agree with you, absolutely.
I've got some more questions for you about that.
But, you know, Crocodile Dundee, by the way, is no more Australian than Taco Bell is Mexican food, just for the record.
Although I lived on the Mexican border, we ate Taco Bell sometimes, so yeah, I know.
Exactly.
Or Happy Panda is not really Chinese food either, you know, just to be clear.
But what's been shocking to people is how much people have been willing to put up with in Australia or even in California, for that matter.
I mean, we're not singling out the Australians or the New Zealanders.
This is happening all over the United States and Canada as well.
A lot of people are just signing up for it and saying, yes, we love the servitude.
We love to wear masks.
They'll say that on the street, you know, in interviews.
We love it.
We love to be told to take more vaccines.
We love the lockdowns.
Wow, I didn't realize that we were living in such a sheeple nation.
I didn't realize this was an obedience competition to see who could be the most.
That is true.
Isn't that sad?
Obedience competition.
I think that's a new term I'm going to remember because that's exactly what this is.
I was talking to a doctor from Canada yesterday or Monday, I guess, and he said the same thing.
He lives in Ottawa.
He said, or Dr.
Sam DeBay, he's a well-known fitness guy and journalist and stuff.
Anyway, he said he's surprised at how many people just go along with it.
They're okay with it.
They're not out protesting in the streets.
Now, you know, God love the French.
I didn't expect the French to be the first people to really stand up, but they're actually standing up against this.
And I think that they may have jumped the shark here.
I don't think the Uber lords that are doing this really expected the resistance they're going to get.
Yeah, people went wrong with it early on because they made it very confusing and they made it very science-y and everybody figures.
One of the things I really learned about this is that the reason that they've gotten away with all these lies is that science has become so technically specialized that it's been segmented and the guy over here in Department A really doesn't understand the And what Department B's whole principle is based on.
So we can't really easily, you know, criticize and figure out what's going on.
And that's what's happened.
So early on, people kind of went, well, okay, this could be a really, I mean, you and I did very early on, but we caught on pretty quick.
But it was like, very early on, it looked like, well, this could really be something bad.
And then Many of us said, no, wait a minute.
Now, it turned out not to be something bad, but a lot of people then were caught up in the whole thing because they didn't have a science background to lean on.
Well, I think a lot of those people are figuring it out.
It took longer to get many people awake, but I think there are more and more people.
And I think the problem is we don't know how many people are really awake because we have a media that is totally in the tank for the intelligence program that's being run against the whole world.
And even Dr.
Zelenko, you know, I've always heard he's a very, very lovely man who's, you know, very mild-spoken.
And he now says, this is genocide against the world.
He said, these people are out to kill us.
This is what Michael Yeadon is saying.
These people are out to kill us.
Dr.
McCullough, that when I first started talking to him about bioweapons, he thought it was just completely batshit crazy, I think.
But he's now saying, this is a bioweapon.
They're out to kill us.
So we're finally getting there where people are waking up.
Well, that's a really important point.
And I've seen this, too, where I'm interviewing other medical experts who I would have considered to be really mainstream, pro-vaccine people in the past.
And they They will say to me, without even me asking the question, hey, this is a war on humanity.
It's got to be.
There's no other motivation.
Now, my question to you, Dr.
Merritt, the last time we spoke, you were talking about your worldview and you'd come to the conclusion that this was a depopulation agenda.
So my question today, has anything added to or taken away from that opinion that you shared with us last time?
What are your current thoughts?
Oh, it's added to it.
What I guess I've learned, and I think we've all kind of learned recently, which is shocking, but there's a long history now of falsification of virology that has led to this.
Think about what we've learned from Patrick King in Alberta.
God love Patrick King, who's an oil and gas worker, not a lawyer, And brilliantly defended himself against the crown.
It actually became the queen against Patrick King.
It first started out as, you know, Dina Hinshaw, the chief medical officer of Alberta.
But he was charged $1,200, fined $1,200 for being in a group of over 10 people in Alberta.
Now, there's no disease in sight, so everybody was having a good time, but he gets charged $1,200.
And when he goes to court, he asks, he subpoenas Dina Hinshaw, the chief of the medical officer of Alberta, for evidence of the isolate SARS-CoV-2.
And guess what?
They had to admit they didn't have one.
They couldn't produce one.
They tried to talk their way out of it in court.
And he said, Your Honor, by the way, you do realize that this is the key to why we're doing all these lockdowns and social distancing and all the stuff we're being given.
If this doesn't exist or they can't prove it, you cannot force people to participate in this.
And they agreed.
So what happened, I think, and I think the brilliance of his strategy, by the way, is he recognized that our Uber lords, the people in the shadows that are unnamed that are really running this show, they don't ever put their names on the affidavits or on the pieces of They're not going to go down with this, no matter what happens, they think.
But they're going to let people like Dina Hinshaw go down with it.
So her name, it's actually Dina Hinshaw versus Patrick King.
And when it was shown to be this level of farce, she wasn't willing to take the heat and she rolled over and now Alberta is open.
I think that's what happened.
Now, that could be subject to some legal interpretation that I don't understand, but I think, in general, what's going to have to happen is we're going to have to put these people on the docket, and they're going to roll because they're not going to go down for this.
Maybe Dr.
Fauci will, but not a lot of people.
But the point I better make is that there's a farce here that not only did we find out there's no isolate of the virus, 90 countries have now admitted that.
But we also learned from the CDC these last few weeks that they didn't have an isolate to create the PCR test.
So you and I have talked in the past about the number of cycles.
You know, the two worldviews that I told you last time is the fact that You either believe that there's a mass psychosis of lab managers that they couldn't do their job and they all accidentally over-cycled the test, or you believe somebody told them to over-cycle the test.
Those are kind of the two world views.
But the other part of this is, even had they cycled it correctly, it turns out the test was never testing for SARS-CoV-2 or anything related to this disease we call COVID. People need to wake up and realize this.
When you go in and get a COVID test, you're being tested for the common cold virus.
And some human cells.
This is insane.
You're absolutely correct.
And I got to say, I, for one, was very skeptical of what you're saying early on.
And then, so what I did, you know, as a lab owner, my laboratory is ISO accredited.
We buy certified reference materials all the time.
CRMs, they're called, you know, in analytical lab science.
So we have freezers.
You know, we've got super cold freezers and then just sort of cold freezers, depending on the sample.
And, you know, we'll buy glyphosate standards and lead and cadmium and mercury, whatever, multiple element standards, THC standards, cannabidiol standards.
It's common.
So I went out and I tried to find an isolated standard certified reference material of SARS-CoV-2.
And I thought, I mean, this was my assumption, which has been proven wrong.
I thought, surely, surely you're going to be able to find a reference material.
They do not exist.
I even asked my readers, like, send me, like, can you find it?
One reader sent me one.
It's called an isolate of COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2.
It's called an isolate.
Guess what it is?
Guess what?
What they do is, and they'll sell this to you in an ampoule, it's basically a snot collection from a woman that they got off an airplane in Seattle.
This one's actually from, I think, February of 2020, Seattle.
She flew from China.
She was diagnosed as symptomatic and therefore labeled COVID. They took some of her snot.
And then they grew it in bovine serum, and the disclaimer for this, quote, standard, quote, isolate, the disclaimer says this should never be used to develop a vaccine because most of the genetic material in here is human or bovine.
Yes, yes.
So labs, and as you say, even the PCR test wasn't developed using any reference material.
So how do the labs calibrate their instruments if they don't have a reference material?
There is no gold standard.
So I think it's pretty funny.
So with my husband being in the hospital and me having been sick not too long ago, people say, oh, did you have COVID? And I said, well, let's just back up here and see what that really means.
So let's just rewind.
We have no viral isolate of COVID. And it turns out, this is the bigger lie.
This is where it goes back decades.
There's been no viral isolate of any virus that caused disease that we can find.
Dr.
Stefan Lanka put out a thing years ago for measles vaccine, for measles virus.
Prove to me there's a measles virus that costs us measles, and I'll give you this amount of money.
It was a big, big chunk of money.
And somebody tried to claim it, and he won at the German Supreme Court level.
They could not prove that measles virus exists.
There's also a deal for one – it's up to over 1.5 million euro right now – Again, for an isolate of SARS-CoV-2, I think somebody would claim that right now, you know, if it's that easy.
Somebody from the CDC would just say, hey, I'm going to grab that sample and send it in and show them.
No, because it turns out the biggest lie here is even bigger than we imagined.
And it's, again, it's because scientists in one...
I'm a physician and a surgeon and I know a lot about a small area of medicine, but I didn't know how virologists really operated.
And so once you see how they operate, you conclude that either they're not thinking very clearly or they're corrupt because what they never have done is purely isolated a virus from...
and prove transmissibility.
Without that basic scientific fact, you can't tell anything.
What are we vaccinating?
Again, what are we vaccinating?
Parents should be asking, what are we vaccinating our kids for measles against?
Using what?
If they can't prove there's a measles virus.
And this is, it just gets worse and worse.
This is the problem.
I've come to this discovery as well.
I've also had conversations with Dr.
Judy Mikovits, who's confirmed all this, that the whole world of mainstream virology is this mishmash of quack science voodoo.
And I've come to realize that if I ran my lab to those standards, that would be called fraud.
I mean, it's incredible.
Because look, you know, I run ICP-MS instruments.
I can take sample from food.
It's liquefied in nitric acid.
It goes through a plasma torch.
It blasts apart the molecules.
It ionizes the individual atomic elements.
And I have a detector that can count how many atoms of mercury were in the sample.
And it tells me the number.
I can see it in real time.
I mean, it's giving me a quantitative answer.
Virology's got none of that.
People are using that kind of precision, right?
But they're not in the virology.
And just so your listeners understand how this works, They're out there saying, well, but wait a minute.
We've seen the genome.
We've seen all the sequences of the genome from the gene bank.
Okay?
But keep in mind, that's called in silico genetics.
In other words, it's just from a computer.
So what they really did was this.
They're like three kind of gold standard papers that everybody refers to.
And they go back to these three papers, but the Chinese themselves said, we've never isolated SARS-CoV-2 from these people.
But they took, like you're talking about, they took the snot and the goo from these people's lungs and they processed it all over the place in growth factors that are toxic to begin with, to cells, and then they dip into this goo primers.
What we call now, what the PCR test really is, is a lab primer.
And a primer is simply a range of genetic code ranging from 30 to 180 base pairs in general.
That's the most it looks for.
Coronavirus.
If this really is a big coronavirus, that is technically, they claim, a 30,000 base pair virus.
So you're taking snippets of less than 200 base pairs, and then what you do is, and by the way, you look for the snippets you want.
It's not like you just put a blank tabula rasa little printable.
Probe in there like a pH meter and it goes 7.3.
No.
You say, let's look for SARS. And then you prime the primer with SARS genetic material and that's what you dip in there.
So if I wanted to Take a catfish.
If I were looking for catfish genetics, I could put primers with catfish genetics, dip it into those SARS or into those patients that came from Wuhan, and I'd find catfish genetics.
But they didn't want to do that because they knew that nobody would believe catfish were causing this virus or this disease, right?
So they picked something they thought people could cause, would believe.
That's essentially what they've done here.
And then the next step It's called Muscle.
It takes these little tiny pieces of primer DNA sequences and then it tries to overlap them.
When it overlaps, then it says, oh, okay, these are the same.
These fit here.
Okay, just like you're putting a crossword puzzle together.
I mean, a jigsaw puzzle together.
But in the areas where there's no fit, it just makes up the most probable sequence based on what you tell it.
So if you tell it you're looking for a catfish, it will make sequences that they know are known catfish sequences.
That's where we get these genetic sequences that people see and they say, oh, ACGT, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Oh, they must know everything because they've got it all spelled out.
It looks so good.
It's all fake.
Fake.
There's no better word for it.
They call it in silico, but it's made in a computer.
It is not.
It's theoretically an isolate should have.
I mean, a real genome should have an isolate to back it up.
No, what you're describing, it's extraordinary, and I'm very familiar with what you're talking about.
In mass spectrometry, there are similar algorithms.
For example, if you're studying amino acids or long protein chains, the instrument can't directly see them.
It can only see the probability estimates of some of the masses of some of the elements or some of the molecules of what that might be.
And then the software Attempts to put those data together in a way that might fit what you're looking for.
You're exactly right.
But it's not a physical proof that you've seen what you think you've seen.
And the same thing, too, with accurate mass.
You know, time of flight, mass spec.
It can give you mass down to four decimal places of Daltons.
You know, 315.4317 or whatever.
And...
The software will try to guess, well, which atomic elements, if you combine them, what molecular formula would equal that mass?
And it will give you a list.
Oh, here's like 30.
Pick one.
Pick the one you want.
Right.
Right.
So that's why you have to have a physical standard.
Right.
And that's what we're going to...
Right.
If you think you found something, you have to run it against the physical standard in the real world to confirm it.
And they've never done that with COVID. They've never done it.
So once you start going down this rabbit hole and you start studying more about this, again, this isn't my field especially, so I'm reading all sorts of new literature, you realize that they couldn't confirm transmission of influenza in the pandemic of 1918.
They tried.
They actually took, think about this, they took young, healthy guys that were like active duty at Fort Riley, Kansas.
And keep in mind, they call it the Spanish flu.
Why did they call it the Spanish flu?
Because it really started in Fort Riley, Kansas, essentially.
They did that because they don't want you looking at Fort Riley, Kansas.
Because then what really happened in Fort Riley, Kansas is the guys that died were vaccinated for smallpox.
It was one of the first military vaccine programs.
And whatever it was that then caused the sickness to everybody, the people that died were the vaccinated who'd had their immune systems damaged.
But regardless of that, what they did was they tried to prove that this was an infectious disease.
So they took snot, you know, that's a technical term that we're using today.
They took snot from these very sick and dying young men with the pandemic influenza, and they put it in noses of volunteers.
Think about that.
It takes some courage to volunteer to be in that study.
And they couldn't prove transmission.
They could not get one person sick.
So then the horses were getting sick.
So then they tried doing the same thing on horses.
And there they had a very captive audience.
They took the horse snot and they put it in like what you would feed a horse with, you know, an odor kind of thing over his mouth, over his snout.
And they put it on there and they couldn't get a horse to get sick.
So they could never prove transmissibility.
Another one, it turns out smallpox.
I went back to, I've been talking to Andy Kaufman, and I told him, Dr.
Kaufman, who's been talking about this for a long time, how viruses have never been proved to exist.
They're not really what you think they are.
It's exosomes.
It doesn't work this way.
And I finally have come around to his thinking, but I told him, I said, you've got to convince me about smallpox.
Well, Dr.
Cowan in his book on Contagion, which is an excellent book for anybody to want to read about this, he talks about this and he said it turns out there were several doctors and one particular doctor who claimed that smallpox came through bedbugs.
And again, he tried, he injected this guy, brave guy, with a disease that's 60% fatal sometimes.
He injected himself with smallpox pus, and he could not transmit it.
He could not make himself die and get sick from this.
Whatever this was, it came from the...
I mean, by injector, I mean he smeared it on himself.
It turned out that he should show where it was bed bugs.
If you didn't have bed bugs, you didn't have smallpox, regardless of the epidemic around you.
I mean, there's more to say about that, but I think we're going to have to re-evaluate our entire understanding of biology when it comes to viruses.
I think so too, especially when you have the reliance on the PCR test, which is an obvious fraud.
To push the entire case-demic that drove this whole thing with the lockdowns and the masks and the vaccines and all of it, but it's all founded on total fraud that cannot diagnose anyone with anything that's been shown to cause any disease.
And, you know, you also mentioned the base pairs, fewer than 200 base pairs.
So the nonspecificity of What is the point of this test?
You know, look, I bought online tests from, I think, walmart.com that claims to test you for COVID, right?
And I'm reading the small print of this test, and essentially the small print says, this test may produce false positives and false negatives.
And I'm thinking, what is the point of this test?
How is this?
Is this science?
Could be wrong.
Could be wrong different ways.
But I'm like, really?
Is this what it's going to be?
The clock could be right twice a day.
Now, as a lab person, and correct me if I'm wrong, normally we do have false positives and false negatives, but we quantitate it because we have a gold standard.
That's right.
It says this can produce a 0.53% false negative rate and a 0.87% false positive rate or something like that.
It tells you because if we can't quantitate the false positives, false negatives, we don't know the predictive value of the test.
And therefore, the test is meaningless.
What's even better, one of these tests, I also bought some from Amazon because, believe it or not, I'm about to go gather up a bunch of donkey poo and goat poo.
and I'm going to test it with this thing just for fun.
And I'm pretty sure it's going to be positive.
Positive, I'm sure.
But you should see all the stuff that goats eat, right?
But one of these tests even says a positive result should not be considered positive until you have a subsequent positive on the following day, and then you have clinical confirmation following that.
So what's the point of the test?
Well, I'll tell you one of the points.
If you believe what I believe and what you're talking about now, that this is a staged, programmed war against humanity and they really want to kill as many people as they can to depopulate us, I'll tell you one of the medical consequences of this testing that I have just observed and just figured out, and that is, you know, in the old days, there was a maximum in medicine when I grew up, and it was, it's okay to miss the diagnosis you can't treat, but don't ever miss treatable disease, okay?
So, let's say you go into the hospital 20 years ago, and you've got a A chest x-ray that shows infiltrates in both sides of your lungs, and you're coughing up nothing.
It's dry hacking cough, and your oxygen level is low.
What would we do?
We would treat you for pneumonia, which is an antibiotic-based treatment that can save your life.
And then, if after 5 to 10 days or however, I know this is not my specialty, so I don't know how long they would wait, but they would go a ways.
And if it wasn't getting better, then they would conclude, well, you know, we might try a different antibiotic.
But if it doesn't appear that antibiotics are making a difference, this is probably a viral pneumonia and we're stuck.
Now, fortunately, today, we've learned that whatever we call viral pneumonia, we don't know now what these are really caused by, but whatever we call it can be treated with ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, C, some other things.
So the good news is we're learning things about this.
But my point is, is that now you go in, you are automatically, you take this false positive test, which gives you a false positive, and now you're considered a COVID patient, and as has happened to my husband at the first hospital, he got...
Somebody that wasn't too up on the narrative propaganda started him like we would have 20 years ago on antibiotics.
He got dramatically better over two and a half days until the PA came around and said, well, wait, we're treating a virus.
We shouldn't be treating a virus with antibiotics.
Stop the antibiotics.
And he went downhill.
This is the consequence of believing the narrative.
And so, I honestly, with my friend taking care of my husband, what I told him was, I said, do me a big favor.
Please, treat him, not based on what everybody's telling you about these tests and everything, but what you would do 20 years ago, looking at a chest x-ray, looking at the patient, what would you do?
Please, just do that theory.
Because...
The modern theory isn't working.
And I don't want him to die.
You know, that was the bottom line.
And I think that's really what we as physicians right now need to go back to.
We need to own up.
This is amazing to me how many physicians are still talking about this as if they know what's going on.
We now have been told it's a complete sham.
Let's go back and rethink how we're treating people.
Let's quit all this fake isolation that just hurts people.
Let's go back and look at chest x-rays as if we didn't know about this thing called COVID. And let's go back and look at people's oxygen levels and how we treat them as human beings and as body systems.
And then we'll think about the fact now that, yes, and then remember, we have new treatments for virals.
What we think of as viral illnesses, whatever they really turn out to be.
That's what we need to do.
And we need to do it now.
Well, you're exactly right.
And I know you've got to run shortly to go exfil your husband out of the hospital.
Yeah.
Don't forget to bring your tactical team for that.
In the meantime, before I let you go, dare I ask you for your view on what you think we're going to see this coming winter when we have vitamin D deficiency, we may have The emergence of antibody-dependent enhancement.
I don't know how much weight you give those factors.
And it's always dangerous to predict things because there's so many unknowns.
But if you were to paint a picture of maybe what we should be on the lookout for, what would that be?
Well, unfortunately, I think, I mean, on one end of the spectrum, this just could be an unmitigated disaster, the likes of which we haven't seen since the pandemic of 1918.
However, the good news here is, number one, we do know things about treatment.
And number two, Dr.
Zelenko pointed this out.
He said, the good thing about having a worthless vaccine is it might not be producing so much antibody-dependent enhancement and pathogenic priming, because what's happening is it's not preventing people from becoming infected with the virus, apparently.
If there is a virus, whatever this is out there, they're still getting it.
So they're still getting real, honest-to-God immunity.
The problem with these vaccines, and everybody should keep this in mind, is they take away your innate immunity to COVID and give you this artificial immunity.
And in animals, when that was done, that kind of vaccination program was done, the animals died because they had an overwhelming response to subsequent contact with the virus.
They were then, you know, given the spike protein or however they did tests.
Now I'm going to go back and read those studies again to figure out what did they actually challenge them with?
Because I read them initially thinking we had a coronavirus.
Now who knows?
But when they challenged them with what they had vaccinated them against, then they died because of this weird immune reaction.
And there are two forms of it.
One's called pathogenic priming, which is kind of nonspecific.
And one of them is antibody-dependent enhancement, which is specific to the vaccination target.
Well, if that hits, we got real problems.
And the good news is maybe it won't because we really haven't been vaccinating a lot of people with anything that really worked at all.
That's the good news.
Now, the other bad news, though, is I think we're going to start.
start we're already seeing tumors neurologic diseases and um uh all sorts of weird things crop up that in greater numbers than we have so we're going to be starting we're going to be overwhelming our system not with covid completely but with tumors and things uh the myocarditis you know the heart disease the all that stuff the autoimmune disease is going to crop up and i think that's what's going to start hitting according to Just to ask you a little more on that, according to Dr.
David Martin and Robert Malone and many other people out there, at least if I'm understanding them correctly, there was temporary immunity to the first strain granted by the first wave of vaccines, but that immunity fades after about six to seven months.
And you'll note that the FDA is now about to approve these booster shots to be given after eight months.
And probably at some point that will be mandated.
So what seems to be happening is that the initial vaccine effectiveness, again, this is the world of mainstream virology that we're talking about here.
But that vaccine effectiveness fades because the initial vaccine is far too specific.
It does not offer general immunity.
And at the same time it fades, it does achieve this pathogenic priming of sorts that can lead to antibody dependent enhancement.
So in other words, the vaccinated people have the worst of both worlds.
They really do.
Their immunity is fading, and their immune system is primed to overreact.
Yeah, and it actually damaged their immune system to the virus if it exists the way it would think it does.
The one thing I would say about that, I'm not sure that they know.
I think they're conflating.
It's hard for me to argue with somebody that was an RNA vaccine developer, but...
Antibodies aren't the end-all, be-all of immunity.
And if you believe, and I think, to be honest, when I was first looking at literature, the honest players here are the Russians and the Swedes and the Finns and the Norwegians.
I mean, I would read their literature, especially the Russian literature.
And, you know, the Karolinska Institute and the lead geneticist, I think, in London, St.
Petersburg, they talked about the fact that by May of 2020, 30% of the population was immune when they did sophisticated tests of actual tissue immunity.
Not just antibody immunity, but what we get in nature.
In the old days, when we weren't vaccinated for chickenpox, we had lifetime immunity once you got chickenpox.
But now look at what happens.
You take the chickenpox vaccine, at the best you have 15 years immunity.
So now we've created a childhood disease turned into adult disease.
And that's the problem here.
Had we let the population just get immune for getting all this vaccine nonsense, these non-vaccine genetic agent nonsense, we would have had a population now that was far beyond herd immunity.
I mean, people get, and it could be lifetime immunity.
We don't really know.
All we know is that if you get the vaccine, the antibodies diminish over six months.
And if you just check antibodies in people that get COVID, yes, they will diminish over time, but that's not the same as your immunity diminishing over time.
That's, you know, the antibodies, it's like you have your strike force, you got your Marine Corps, and you got your standing army that then holds the ground.
Same thing with your immune system.
I mean, you got people, you got the part of the immune system that attacks it The first thing it gets into your mucous membranes and then, you know, it goes on.
So I don't think we are giving enough credit to the natural long-term immunity here.
And I think there's a reason because they want you to think.
And I think you've got to laugh after all the things you've said.
And I've said about this, about the non-ability of testing.
Now you go in and they tell you, oh, you got the Delta variant, but has anybody, you know, even the state labs admits they can't test for Delta variants.
So how do they know?
It's just a made-up thing.
I mean, it's the Lambda Delta Nu fraternity for morons.
It's just not making sense.
Even if there's a Delta variant, they don't have a test for it.
How long are we going to be fooled?
But it's incredible.
You mentioned chicken pox, and at some point they'll probably just say, well, anybody that tests positive for the chicken pox or even just has a symptom of a cold or a flu, now suddenly we have to shut down all of society.
And it's like, well, we know how the world ends.
It's not with a bang or a whimper, but the sniffles.
With a sniffle!
It's just, oh, somebody sneezed!
Shut down the world!
It's like, are you...
But anyway, Dr.
Merritt...
Exactly.
They've got to rewrite it.
I could not imagine that we would be in this insane world right now, but I appreciate you taking the time because you're someone that we can talk with who is sane and informed and just trying to walk us through this.
I think that's why the audience loves you as well, and so I know you've got to run.
Don't forget your TAC team.
Bring some Russians if you have to.
Maybe they'll help out.
But thank you for joining us today.
Thank you very much.
I always love coming out.
I learn more than I think I'd contribute, but thanks a lot.
Well, no, that works two ways.
I learn a lot, too.
Your website is TheMedicalRebel.com.
And Dr.
Lee Merritt, thank you so much.
We'll talk with you again.
Until then, be safe.
Take care, okay?
▲
Export Selection