All Episodes
Previous Next
May 4, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
51:53
Dr. Paul Cottrell warns America about COVID lies Vaccines, PCR testing and more
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello and welcome everyone to Brighton Conversations today.
We are revisited by Dr.
Paul Cottrell, who we haven't spoken with.
It seems like it's been a long time because, you know, so much has happened, but Dr.
Cottrell and I have had a lot of good conversations about what's going on with the pandemic, the lockdowns, COVID-19 therapeutics, and now, you know, current events, elections, and so on.
We're going to cover a lot of topics today.
Dr.
Cottrell, uh, Welcome.
Thank you for joining me today.
I know you're super busy as well.
You're going through medical school.
You're also doing a lot of interviews yourself.
So how have you been and what's on your mind today?
Well, it's just starting to snow in New York, so the weather is getting a little colder, but I'm doing okay.
I appreciate your invite to talk about the things that are happening in our country at the election level and at the crisis with COVID-19.
Thank you very much.
It seems like it's even intertwined.
Maybe we could talk about that, but I don't think it's an accident that this virus hit us and then there were lockdowns and then mail-in ballots and then election rigging.
I mean, come on.
No coincidences in politics, it seems.
Exactly.
Exactly.
You know, it's interesting.
Didn't you notice in the news there were more Republicans that ended up getting COVID-19 than Democrats?
Oh, really?
Were there?
Yeah, yeah.
You know, in politics.
I'm talking about in politics, you know, in Washington.
Interesting.
But, you know, I'll tell you, they are related.
As we mentioned on many of your shows, I take the stance that this was a bioweapon that was developed in the United States and then was offshored to Wuhan for further gain of function under Fauci's That came out of the NIH under his department.
And that China released the virus.
The reason why China released the virus, from my perspective, is that Trump, with his stance on trade and preventing TPP from happening, it guaranteed that there wasn't going to be a 21st century China.
And during that time period, around event 201, you start hearing the economic hardship in China.
Then they released the virus.
This is my stance.
They released the virus to weaken the world because they were behind economically.
They had to bring everybody else down for that 21st century China to potentially take place.
Now, what is interesting, and this is how it dovetails into the electoral process in the United States, is that immediately after Biden Quote, said that he won the election.
He started giving signals that he was going to be pro-TPP. He was going to increase a war in the Middle East.
And these are all policies that are antithetical to what Trump was doing.
Trump wanted to de-escalate the Middle East, get some peace there, stop spending trillions of dollars in the Middle East, and then start pivoting and strengthening our Navy, To be able to check that hegemonic power projection that was taking place with the first island chains from China.
Now what do we have?
We have Biden that's signaling.
And in the CFR, the Council of Foreign Relations, they're all signaling, ah, Biden's are going to reach out and we're going to have a peaceful world, a more integrated world with China.
And we have to box in Syria.
We have to box in Iran.
We have to start escalating these things.
So you can see this geopolitical shift that's taking place if Biden is inaugurated.
It's a big if.
But if he's inaugurated, I think the playbook's already written in the CFR magazine, Foreign Affairs magazine.
Oh, clearly.
I mean, China has a blueprint for this, and Biden is their puppet.
The Biden crime family is completely compromised by China, no question about that.
And, you know, we even saw with this supposed recent leak of CCP members, we saw that China has 123 employees inside the three largest vaccine companies or pharma companies in the world.
And, you know, in addition, China has compromised big tech companies, most of the mainstream media, most Democrat lawmakers and quite a few GOP governors and lawmakers as well.
I mean, it seems like their infiltration is very nearly complete at this point.
And there was there was a documentary that was recently released, recently released and it was talking about the corruption between the Chinese through the Confucius Institute and how the the Ivy Leagues were infiltrated.
And the these institutions like Harvard, they need they need those donor dollars.
They need millions of dollars You know, to fund some of these programs.
So they say, you know what?
You want us to, you know, be a little toe of the line, you know, geopolitically and be more, you know, positive about China and have these, you know, Chinese programs within that university, let's say at Harvard, then they'll kick in, you know, a few million here or a few million there for actually a chair.
You know, a chair.
They sponsor a chair and then the professor, you know, sits on that chair and pontificates.
But I mean, and it's in the billions on how much foreign influence has infiltrated the U.S. universities.
And right up there is China and Saudi Arabia, the second one.
But China's way up there.
Well, and it's pretty amazing that they also infiltrate corporations and then they steal intellectual property and they replicate that domestically and try to put U.S. companies out of business.
So there are trade wars and economic aspects to this as well.
But where do you think we are in terms of this coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2?
Are you anticipating perhaps another release?
There have been rumors of COVID-21.
That may come out or other just in the wild mutations that we should be aware of.
You know, this talk of second wave and so on.
And now at this point, just personally, I don't trust any of the official numbers anymore because they're fudged and the PCR tests are so unreliable in the way that they're sampled.
They don't even have a standard way to sample someone's nostrils.
So, you know, who knows?
There's no quality control in the whole system anymore.
What do you think about all that?
There's a lot there.
I mean, you know, are we in a second wave when we look at the state level in the United States?
Yes, we're in a second wave.
New York has a lot more cases, but not just that.
What's happening is a tick up in deaths.
So I've been stating on my channel, it's not so much what is being stated on Johns Hopkins database for new cases, but What's more important is the hospitalizations and the deaths that are associated with it.
The key number is the hospitalizations.
Now, the headline number is accumulative cases.
Well, that really means nothing, really.
What is important is testing.
How many people have been tested for that day?
And how many actually tested positive?
Alright?
They don't really give you that number.
When you reach a threat...
New York is relatively good in terms of trying to give some information out.
But...
It's fudged.
I see what you're saying about the fudge factor there.
But what's important is to realize it's hospitalizations.
Hospitalizations are going up.
And for example, for example...
We have to also look at it anecdotally, not just the data that's coming out.
My sister lives in San Antonio, Texas.
Her co-worker ended up getting COVID-19.
She's now quarantined, been tested.
She's tested negative, but she has to go through this quarantine process and be retested to make sure that she's in like day four or day five of this.
And you know Texas, there's an outbreak going on there.
So, the point that I'm making is that I don't want people to think that this is not serious.
It is serious.
There's some people that say that this doesn't exist.
It does exist.
People will be harmed.
I have seen the CT scans and the x-rays of many patients because of...
Because of the ability to get access to this kind of information.
And I had a nurse that's in Arizona that ended up contracting COVID-19 and getting SARS-CoV-2 and had to be hospitalized.
She became cyanotic and she has the glass opacities.
In the CT scan.
And she was not able to get the Regeneron, the monoclonal antibody that Trump and Governor Christie was given when they contracted SARS-CoV-2.
So there's a disparity that we need to start talking about that there are therapeutics, not vaccines, but therapeutics on the shelf that should be available to all citizens, not just the uber wealthy or the uber connected.
All citizens.
And that includes the remdesivir, the vermectin, the hydroxychloroquine should be up on the shelf there, the Regeneron, and others.
You know, when mixed together in a cocktail, corticosteroids is also an important thing, but treating it early.
But she had, the nurse that went on my show, she had to go into the hospital for five days, Because remdesivir, you have to have it intravenous.
So she was in the hospital for five days.
She wanted to get out of the hospital because she knows what's going on in the hospital.
She felt safer at home.
So once the five-day treatment happened, then she went home.
But she reached out to me the other day.
Now, she contracted it December...
I'm sorry, November 4th, okay?
She contracted SARS-CoV-2.
She's had it over for a month, and she's still having breathing problems.
So, you know, she's a healthcare worker, was exposed because of, you know, being at the hospital.
Her husband also is a nurse that contracted it, but he didn't have the severity as she did.
So, you know, the issue, the point that I'm making is that there is a spectrum of how it presents itself.
It could be very mild.
You could not even know you have it, and you end up getting antibodies, like Nunes.
Nunes just mentioned that he was tested, he was giving blood, and he was tested, and he happened to have antibodies, but never shown any symptoms.
So there's many people that fall in that line where, well, they could be asymptomatic and may have the antibodies, but then there is the situation with, like, nurses that ended up getting the glass opacity.
Well, I'm glad you've explained all of this and gone through all this.
Now, you and I have never bought into the hoax theory.
You know, there are people out there that claim that there never was a virus.
In fact, I've seen it.
Some people take it so far as to say there's no such thing as any virus that can ever infect a human being.
I mean, you've probably seen some of those, too.
I'm like, wow.
We're talking about the Kauffman theory.
I don't know what it's called, but I've seen some people talk about that.
However, I've got recent information on the PCR testing that has definitely brought to my attention a lot of problems with that.
As we both have a medical science background, I have a lab science background, We were in discussions with Thermo Fisher to purchase their PCR equipment for food testing.
It was actually to test microbiology and virus contamination of food.
We used those cyclers at Harvard.
Yeah, yeah, Thermo Fisher.
Exactly.
They were actually hard to get because everybody's buying them for the virus.
But in the conversations with their salespeople, I asked the question.
I said, how do we quant?
The viral count in a food sample.
If I take a gram, let's say, of a food sample and I run it through your machine, can I get a quant like number of virus particles per microgram of the food or whatever?
And the answer is no.
There's no quant.
I'm a quant guy.
I quantitate heavy metals and pesticides.
I can tell you how many microliters per gram or things like that in a food sample.
So when I realized that there's no quant in the PCR, if you trace that back to testing humans, then you realize that the PCR test can never determine the actual viral load in the patient.
You're right.
Let me just add to that.
Okay, yeah, go ahead.
The PCR, all it is is very binary.
It's just saying, do you have a sequence that happens to fit in between the forward and reverse primer and a FAM probe that attaches to that?
It's a yes or no.
That's all it is.
It will never tell you how much viral load you have.
Now, here's the rub in this situation.
The problem is that a lot of people are saying the PCR, there's too many false positives.
Wrong.
There's too many false negatives, actually.
And here's the reason.
There are some Facilities that will do a swab test down the nasal passage.
When they're scraping, they'll scrape once.
They'll twirl it once.
You're supposed to twirl it six to eight times.
If they're twirling it once and you're getting a negative, it might have been a positive.
Yeah, you can't trust the negative.
Right, right, right.
Now, there are facilities that are doing the eight twirl or the six twirl.
Now, there's testing that's being done in the saliva, all right?
That's very problematic.
That's very problematic because the enzymes in your saliva can break stuff down.
So you're going to get a lot of false negatives.
So it's better to get the nasal, but there's a certain procedure there.
There's a nasal procedure, but I'm aware of people being tested in Texas who went in and the protocol was that if they were not symptomatic, they would only be swabbed in their nostrils.
Not nasal, but nostril.
Which is, oh, you could have breathed that in from someone else.
It could be in your nostrils because you just inhaled from someone.
You know what I mean?
So there's this lack of a standard.
As you just mentioned, some people are twirling it once and some people are twirling it six or eight times.
And when you have a lack of a standard...
As a scientist, how can I trust a positive or a negative when the standard method for sample extraction is not applied universally?
Your samples are everything.
If you don't control your sample, then you can't trust your results.
So that really concerns me.
You're right.
The standardization is just not there, unfortunately.
Anything that's not deep and getting that tissue in the back of the nasal passage there is problematic.
You have to get that tissue.
And there's so much mucus that's coated in the nose that you're going to have too many false negatives.
true positives.
So this is where the, this is where the selectivity and specificity of the test is important to pay attention to.
Right.
Um, we were told in medical school that the, the, or the, the, um, the saliva test is not, is not good.
But if, if the procedure being done in the nasal cavity, if done correctly, will give you that, that 85 to 90 some low 90% range of true positives.
If done correctly.
Right, right.
If done correctly.
But that's just saying you have SARS-CoV-2 sequence.
That's all it's saying.
Right.
That's all the PCR says.
You happen to have the sequence that they're looking for.
Exactly.
Right.
And I don't know.
Do you know how many base pairs they're looking at in that sequence right now?
The FAM sequence that does the fluorescence is about 24 base pairs.
That's it?
Just 24?
It's 24, but you're supposed to test two to three areas of the genome.
So it's 24 times 3.
I see.
So it's the probability of if you have all three or even two, the probability of accidentally getting that is...
Yeah, but depending on where they choose those... but depending on where they choose those...
So the probability of accidentally finding that is very low, very, very low.
But if it were random, but people have other coronaviruses.
That's true.
That might share some of the same sequences, partial sequences.
That's true.
Isn't that flagging some of the false positives of maybe previous infections, things like that?
There was a paper that was written.
Now, if you look at the CDC protocol versus the EU protocol, they're different.
And not only that, the cycling of the PCR is much higher, and the concentrations are much higher for the forward and reverse primers.
Yeah.
The EU protocol is problematic, and you probably have too many positives, too many false positives with the EU protocol.
Now, with the CDC protocol, it's different when you're looking at what they're scanning.
Now, the areas that they're looking at are in the areas that are Remember back in our first show when I talked about the bat SARS-like virus being inserted into the substrate and then you had the SARS being inserted in?
One is the replicase and the other one is the spike protein with the HIV homology.
They are looking at those inserts.
Now, that's the reason why you have to do two to three different areas of the genome.
Because if you happen to get the bat SARS-like coronavirus, and not the SARS-CoV-2, and you're only sequencing the bat SARS-CoV-2, bat SARS-like coronavirus, then the test is saying you have SARS-CoV-2.
But if you're checking two areas or three areas of the genome where you happen to get that insert plus the spike protein insert, then you have SARS-CoV-2 and not the SARS original insert.
You follow me?
Yeah.
So that's why it's so important.
That's why it's so important to understand that are the labs following the procedure?
And that is...
Checking the genome in two to three areas, and that the nasal swab is being twirled six times in the deep part, the nasopharynx area of the sample.
Not just the nasal, just not the anterior part of your nasal cavity.
Go for the brains, not the snot, in other words.
Yeah, you wanted the posterior.
Well, you know, what's interesting is that when you're getting geeky here, but when they put that swab in, they have to be parallel down.
They can't go upward, because if you go upward, you can actually break a little bit of that bone that's there where you actually have your senses, your smelling senses.
This is all super fascinating, Dr.
Cottrell.
What do you think about...
Dr.
Gupta recently said on MSNBC that even after people get a second dose of this vaccine, they still might get infected, they still have to social distance, wear a mask, and not travel.
Because, you know, we were all told this whole time, once the vaccines come out, that's your passport to freedom.
Like, what's going on now?
Yeah, exactly.
This is where, unfortunately, we have politicians, people that are in power that aren't really telling the full truth about what is happening.
Same thing happened during shelter-in-place.
We were told it was only going to be for 14 days.
That's right.
And then it ended up being the whole year.
And that's not an exaggeration.
So now the same thing is happening with the vaccines.
The current...
The thought with the messenger RNA vaccine is that you have your injection, And about 20 to 28 days later, you have to have the booster.
Because what is happening is it doesn't generate a high enough concentration of antibodies.
So they have to basically give you more inflammation to get you to react to their vaccine.
So it's a two-shotter.
You need a booster.
There's a booster to it.
It's around 21 to 28 days after the first shot.
All right?
Then you start creating a certain level of antibody for what they give you.
And the research is showing that the antibodies and the memory, T-cells and B-cells, seem to be lasting for about six months or so.
Maybe a little longer.
Okay?
We don't know what damage they're causing to the rest of the cellar processes, because I think that they're activating oncogenes and turning off tumor suppressor genes, but I don't have any proof of that.
I just suspect it.
But the point here is that you're getting the antibodies, but then they say, take the vaccine and therefore you're not going to get infected because you have antibodies now.
Well, why are they telling you still have to be wearing a mask and you still have to social distance if you have an antibody?
I could understand that you would have to have the mask up to the point where you do the booster shot.
Because they've already admitted the first shot doesn't do much.
It activates a little bit.
You need the second shot really to get the activation going.
So I can understand from the first shot to the second shot some sort of social distancing protocol.
But once you already have the antibody Certain concentration that's, quote, having the high efficacy, then you should not need a mask because you're already protected and you never had the virus.
Therefore, you can't give it to someone.
So if we ask the question to Fauci, is there high efficacy for the messenger RNA? He says yes.
It's around 95%, which is pretty good.
All right?
But let's just take it as face failure.
That means that you're created...
You're creating antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus with the Moderna vaccine or the BioNTech vaccine.
Then there should be no reason for you to be wearing a mask and socially distancing because you're already protected and you don't have the virus, so you can't give it to someone.
But they keep on telling people, you must obey the law and have social distancing and stay at home, don't go to work, and you can't go to your restaurant.
Those restaurant owners are going to have to go out of business and make sure you keep on wearing your mask.
There's an agenda here, and that is social control.
They're scaring people.
And getting people to the point where they're just so fed up of having to be in this lockdown and have these masks on all the time that they're willing to capitulate and get the vaccine because they believe that this tyranny will go away.
But the reality is it won't go away.
Mark my words, what's going to happen is far into 2021, we will still have masks, we will still have lockdowns, and we will still have curtailment of movement for going to the restaurant or to the movie theater or to sports games well into 2021.
Even if you had 80% compliance, you're not going to get 80% compliance, but let's just say it's about control.
They're trying to control you.
That's why I've been so...
I'm trying to wake up to people.
It's like, you have to live your life.
The virus is real.
You could get sick.
There are therapeutics that are there, and the doctors and nurses need to give it to you early, and you'll be okay most of the time.
And not to be afraid and destroy trillions and trillions and trillions of dollars of our economy.
And this is why it's so infuriating to people, and this is why people are losing faith in science and medicine, frankly.
I mean, the faith has imploded in that because we've been told.
It was kind of like a big contract.
We've been told, okay, everybody, lock down, wear your mask, then the vaccine's coming out.
When the vaccine comes out, then you're all going to be free.
And then now that the vaccine's coming out, just like you said, they're saying, well, you're still going to have to lock down.
You're still going to have to wear the mask.
And by the way, just on the mask alone, in January, the CDC says, don't wear the mask or you don't need it.
Surgeon General's like, stop buying masks.
And then they're like, oh, you got to have them.
And then lockdowns, like you said, it was supposed to be 14 days, which I was OK with that just to find out what's going on.
It was all new at that time.
We didn't know.
But now it's going to be 14 months, if not longer.
So it's it's it all looks like a giant fraud to someone who's observing this saying, well, you lied to us.
The science people lied to us.
The doctors lied to us.
The CDC lied to us.
It was all lies.
This is where I think some people take it much further and say, well, there is no virus.
You know what I mean?
They follow that and go way beyond over the edge of the flat earth.
They say there's no such thing as a virus.
You know what I'm saying?
I call it the flat earth theory of virology.
Yeah, no, it's true.
Yeah, but that phenomenon is real.
You know, the psychology of how people are responding to this.
Right.
Well, you know, the scientific community has lied, but some of them purposely lied, like Fauci.
And then, let's say, for example, my professor in my medical school We were talking about SARS-CoV-2 during one of our labs.
Well, they were promoting the zoonotic theory.
But they take it just like, well, this definitely came from a cave.
And that AIDS came from monkeys.
And this is their mindset.
Without really diving in and asking questions like, well, then why did Fauci...
sequence of that gain of function.
That's right.
It did come from a cave.
It came from Fort Detrick and the University of North Carolina.
Right.
And the last time I looked, the University of North Carolina doesn't have bat caves.
They might.
They might have a bat cave that we don't know about.
But the thing is, my point is that you have part of the scientific community that's just putting their head in the sand and just assuming that whatever they're hearing from the CDC and the NIH is gospel and that it can't be challenged.
And then when you have articles that are challenging them that are published and then pulled down, There is a loss of the record of individuals challenging the establishment.
And then there's only a one-sided narrative.
So any person like five years from now or ten years from now, anyone that's listening to you and I, and then they go to, let's say, PubMed, they'll just say, well, Mike and Paul don't know what they're talking about because there's nothing published that's saying what they're saying.
Because it's all been stripped down, right.
Well, and also think about the New England Journal of Medicine and the Lancet.
They published that completely discredited study bashing hydroxychloroquine, which is based on all of this fabricated data from this front company that just, they create fake data and sell it.
Using machine learning and doing like a simulation thing.
Yeah, yeah.
No, it was crazy.
I mean, totally fabricated.
And then how can we trust the Lancet?
It's supposed to be peer-reviewed.
They didn't care about what the peers said because there were 200 or 300 peers that said that's all fake, but they didn't care.
So the whole idea of peer-reviewed science has been thrown out the window by these science journals now.
They don't care what's real.
And...
It has destroyed careers, like Wakefield's.
You know, Dr.
Wakefield was basically the one that woke me up to the whole vaccine issue.
I mean, I was basically agnostic about the whole situation until I started listening as he was doing his interviews years ago.
And I was like, well, wait a minute, there's something here.
And then how they destroyed, you know, his career and, you know, tarnished his reputation even though he had proof that the MMR vaccine was harming children.
All right?
Here's the problem.
This is that the scientific community needs money.
And the only way they get their research money primarily is through NIH grants.
So if you go against the narrative, you're never going to be able to get research for your lab to be able to publish so you get tenure.
So if you don't toe the line, you never will be an established, quote, scientist.
Well, but what you're talking about, I would have to describe it as science communism.
Yeah.
There's a central source that controls all the money and determines what you're allowed to say.
That's the NIH. Mm-hmm.
Like, for example, as you know, I'm doing this research study with Harvard, and it so happens to be dealing with HIV-1 TAT protein.
It's using the TAT protein to be able to down-regulate the inflammation response of an autoimmune disease.
So the TAP protein is known to help with MS. So I'm investigating other peripheral nervous system disorders with it.
But what's interesting is that you can do the same thing using natural supplements.
You can bring down inflammation.
You talked about this with Wakefield.
Bring down that inflammation so you reduce the probability, you reduce the risk of having the autoimmune disorders when it comes to vaccines.
This is where this all comes from.
They're creating an antibody, but your system is not just creating the antibody for the particular substance.
It's also creating antibodies against the other adjuvants and the inflammation that it's causing to other body tissues.
And it creates other types of antibodies that so happen That cause autoimmune disorders.
So I'm focused on GBS, the Guillain-Barre syndrome.
But the bottom line here is that people need to start paying attention that vaccines, the way they work, it's pro-inflammatory.
And the way to reduce your chances of being vaccine-harmed is to start prepping your body now With lowering that inflammation.
And there is a plethora of stuff out there to do this.
And people just need to wake up and it's like, you need to go through, you need to start reducing that inflammation.
You do it every day and you actually age less.
You age less.
Much less.
Your body starts healing.
So there's the positive externality of just doing that type of protocol.
But if someone is in a situation where they have to take that vaccine and there's no way around it, my recommendation is that you need to prep your body.
Give it the 10 days of lowering the inflammation before that vaccine, and then during those 21 days, 28 days after the first, maintain that protocol of lowering that inflammation.
So when they give you that second shot, you're reducing the chance of having that autoimmune disorder.
You've just nailed it, and I've spoken about this before, too.
You're exactly right, that a person, they can load up on turmeric, there are various polyphenols and antioxidants even, astaxanthin, for example, lots of natural foods and things that are anti-inflammatory, and I've often suspected, in fact, that the people who are harmed by vaccines are those people who are right on the tipping point of a hyperinflammatory event, often because of their diet.
So they're eating a lot of fried foods, toxic foods, chemicals, and they're living a pro-inflammatory lifestyle.
They may have very often cardiovascular inflammation.
They may have inflammation of the pancreas.
They may have insulin problems.
They may have neurological inflammation already creeping up on them.
And then the vaccine is just like the straw that broke the camel's back.
But if they had chosen a different path before the vaccine, they could have taken it safely.
But the entire medical establishment is anti-nutrition.
So they won't tell you.
I mean, we see this in the cancer industry.
They say, oh, don't take vitamin C. It will interfere with the chemotherapy, which we need to poison you with, you know?
And it's like, wow.
So you're anti-nutrition, you know?
Well, here's the weird aspect to this whole thing.
The answer to trying to reduce vaccine injury is an anti-inflammatory process.
All right?
But if people caught on, they would start to realize the answer to a lot of chronic illnesses is an anti-inflammatory response.
So you wouldn't need the vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry and never-ending diabetes care and kidney disease and all this.
That's right.
There's always going to be a place for allopathic medicine.
There's going to be needs for surgery and certain diseases need to be treated.
And not everything can be put...
The solution to not every disease is in a turmeric bottle or anything like that.
That's not what I'm saying.
But the thing is that if you do the proper supplementation, you stay away from the GMO foods, you get the proper exercise, you know, You're miles ahead of trying to fight against pathogens and reduce the chances of vaccine injury.
You're right on.
It's those individuals that have those high-risk categories.
That when they spike that, because that vaccine is spiking that inflammation response with the adjuvants, that those borderline individuals, they have much higher risk of those autoimmune disorders.
And the problem with these autoimmune disorders, as you know very well, is that they can be self-reinforcing.
So it's not just, oh, you've been hit with one dose of one insulting molecule, your body has to get rid of it.
In many ways, the autoimmune disorders, you know, it can inflame certain tissues and the body says, oh my gosh, there's an emergency, I need to inflame other tissues to deal with these inflamed tissues or...
You know, processes that have a feedback loop.
And this is how you get these hyperinflammatory reactions, a cytokine storm in one rendition and other things happening, in some cases leading to death, you know.
And I don't understand.
I tell people, if you go out to eat at a restaurant and you're going to eat seafood, Tell me what's in the seafood from the table of elements.
What's in the seafood?
I'll give you a hint.
It's a heavy metal.
And they'll say, oh, maybe mercury.
I was like, yes.
So there are things that you can do before you eat the fish.
You can still go eat that fish, swordfish or whatever, tuna.
But what if you took something that filled your digestive tract with fiber that binds with mercury?
Eat apples and fruit and pears and oranges and have fruit pectin.
Then you can enjoy the fish.
The mercury goes right through.
You defecate it out, you know, hopefully not too far later down the road.
So for some people that's 10 days, but they're in bad shape.
But you can get rid of the mercury.
So you've got to think defensively.
Same thing about a vaccine.
Before you get a vaccine, what can you do if you have to get it?
I mean, like, I don't have to get it.
I'm never going to get it.
But you're going to have to get it because you're going through med school.
They're going to make you get it.
Well, if you want me to tell you what I'm going to do, I'll do it.
So what I'm doing is that four to five days right before the first shot, It's a tablespoon in the morning and a tablespoon at night of C60. C60 is a very strong antioxidant.
It calms the whole ROS, the reactive oxygen species.
And what is interesting is that if you have high ROS, you end up getting peroxides.
And they did a research study just recently where if you take catalase that actually turns peroxides into water, catalase actually reduces your chances of getting SARS-CoV-2.
Yeah.
So what I just said was that pro-inflammatory situation increases your chances of getting SARS-CoV-2.
So it brings up the point that if you lower your immune system, you lowered your chances because your body is able to fight stuff.
It's only when your body is not able to fight stuff when it's in an inflammatory situation.
So I'm taking a tablespoon of C60 in the morning and at night, taking 10 tablets of turmeric.
Five in the morning, five at night.
Then there is the iodine.
The iodine...
Five little drops, not the whole dropper, but five little drops under the tongue.
Because that's a lot.
That's pretty potent, yeah.
Yeah.
Five under the thing.
Because I want my thyroid very healthy.
Water.
Only water.
Filtered.
No fluoride.
Zero.
Zero fluoride.
That's including boiling noodles.
Make sure your water is filtered.
No fluoride.
Because that is inflammatory.
Then I'm taking these protease inhibitors.
But they're natural.
I talked about it on my show before.
But it's the birch bark.
You can also take the chaga mushroom.
Chaga mushrooms powder actually is stronger.
But the birch bark extract.
And take a drop of that each day underneath the tongue.
And the whole idea is just...
And another key part to this, and this adds to what you were bringing up, is that Dr.
Groot has the oxy-powder.
Take...
Five of those a day for four days.
Now you're in the shot zone.
So now you're cleaning out your intestinal tract and you've reduced the inflammation.
You have to repopulate with a probiotic each day.
So take a probiotic.
Alright, now you take the shot.
Now you're in the 21 days zone.
Now it's perfect.
You don't have to take that amount that I just said and have it.
Just have it.
Each day for 21 days.
Now you're taking the second shot.
Now boost it back up with the original dosage for another 4 to 5 days.
Now, you've primed your system to be low inflammation.
Then you've lowered the dosage for 21 days, but you're still using that oxypowder.
Because you're trying to cleanse out.
Because what was part of Wakefield's big contribution to MMR? It was tied to gastrointestinal.
That's right.
So clear that out with a probiotic.
And then you get that second shot.
That's when the spike happens with the inflammation, but you've lowered on a chart.
Baseline would be like this, and then you're spiked with the vaccine, the second shot.
But what we're doing is we're bringing the baseline lower.
Now when they spike, ideally, that spike is actually your usual baseline.
That's the thought process.
So you're trying to reduce, bring down that inflammation and that reaction as low as possible.
Well, that makes perfect sense.
And by the way, we're almost out of time for this.
But what you just described, it's a great protocol.
But think about the average American.
They're going to eat Kentucky Fried Chicken and some Pop-Tarts and whatever.
And then they're going to go get the vaccine.
And, you know, maybe they're going to smoke a little meth on the side, you know, or do some shake-and-bake meth little home chemistry set, whatever they're doing.
That's half the Midwest now, it seems, in this country.
But people are doing all this pro-inflammatory stuff, and they go get injected, and that's when bad things happen.
Yeah, well...
The beauty of the Oxy powder is that even if you do have a lot of fried foods that are pro-inflammatory, you're getting rid of that relatively quickly.
Because it's a colon cleanse.
It's a liver and colon cleanse that's happening here.
So it's not staying in the body for very long.
So it...
But you shouldn't be, if you're to the thought process that, my thinking is, if you're to the thought process that you're going to be doing a pro, you're doing a anti-inflammatory protocol for the vaccine, you know, pre and post vaccine, then you're probably in the mindset that you're going to eat more vegetables.
Right, right.
And less fried chicken, right?
Yeah, exactly.
So, I mean, it's like, it's the individuals that are still contemplating, should they do anything?
You know, those individuals need to realize, well, if you keep on living, because those types of individuals probably already have diabetes or borderline diabetic or, you know, have heart disease.
So, you know, you need to start...
Taking control of your health, because I'll tell you what, the NIH doesn't care.
The NIH is not going to make you healthier.
It's going to make you sicker.
No, that's true.
That's true.
All right, well, look, good information.
We're out of time today.
Give us websites where people can follow your work.
I know you've got also video channels on Brighttown and BitChute and other places.
What about your main website?
My main website is the-studio-reikovic.com.
So please go there.
You can also follow me on Brighteon.
I have my Brighteon channel, which is Dr.
Paul Cottrell.
And then I have two YouTube channels.
One is Paul Cottrell, which is my larger channel, which I happened to get a strike on because I was promoting a web conference that Judy Mikevitz is going to be doing on Saturdays.
And they actually gave me the strike and I was not able to publish anything new on the channel for seven days, nor can I go live.
So I have a backup channel on YouTube that also got the strike, but it was the first strike, so I can still publish there.
And that is Dr.
Paul Cottrell on YouTube.
So please subscribe.
YouTube is unsubscribing my subscribers and unclicking so they're not getting the notification.
They bleed me about 30 to 50 subscribers a day.
Well, that's why people should find you on Brighton because we don't take your subscribers from you.
Right.
So what I've been doing is I've been moving my catalog And I have about 145 now videos on Brighteon.
And I just put up another 10 today.
Cool.
All right.
So, yeah.
So, you know, I'm going to continue on, you know, doing this two-track route.
And I'm moving my catalog over there.
It just takes time.
Yeah.
And making new stuff, too, at the same time.
Absolutely.
But I'm getting some followers there, so I'd like for individuals that are watching the show, please subscribe to my Brighteon channel, because what will happen is that most likely my YouTube channel will go down.
Yes.
It will be terminated, just like what happened to Stefan Molyneux.
And when I embed my videos in my webpage, they're coming right from Brighttown.
So that's the safe harbor.
I view Brighttown as the safe harbor for us.
We are the safe harbor, yep.
All right, man.
We've got to go.
Thank you so much, Dr.
Paul Cottrell.
Great information today.
I look forward to joining you again.
Maybe we can talk more about current events next time.
But this was an awesome interview.
Thank you so much.
And folks who are watching this, feel free to share this video everywhere and support Dr.
Paul Cottrell's channel.
Subscribe to his channel on Brighton so he can reach you with all his other videos.
Thank you so much, Dr.
Cottrell.
Great to have you on today.
Thank you.
Thank you for having me.
Survival Nutrition is our new free audiobook that you can download right now from survivalnutrition.com.
In this nearly eight-hour audiobook, you will learn life-saving secrets of how to use food, nutrients, plant molecules, trace minerals, and chemical compounds to save your life, even in a total collapse scenario.
I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and I'm the author of Survival Nutrition.
I founded and run a multi-million dollar food science laboratory, and I'm the author of the best-selling science book, Food Forensics.
I'm also a prepper, a patriot, and a survivalist.
I can teach you how to survive what's coming by growing your own food, medicine, and antibiotics that can help keep you healthy and alive even during the worst of times.
At survivalnutrition.com, you'll be able to instantly download the full free audiobook as MP3 files.
Keep a copy of all these files on your local hard drive and print out the full guide just in case we lose the power grid.
▲
Export Selection