Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 28, 2024 - Lionel Nation

14:27

More Bad News for Fani Willis: Nathan Wade's Former Law Partner Testifies As to the Liars' Lies

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	The storm is coming.
	Markets are crashing.
	Banks are closing.
	When the economy collapses, how will you survive?
	You need a plan.
	Cash, gold, bitcoin, dirty man safes keep your assets hidden underground at a secret location ready for any crisis.
	Don't wait for disaster to strike.
	Get your Dirty Man safe today.
	Use promo code DIRTY10 for 10% off your order.
	When uncertainty strikes, peace of mind is priceless.
	Dirty Man underground safes protects what matters most.
	Discreetly designed, these safes are where innovation meets reliability, keeping your valuables close yet secure.
	Be ready for anything.
	Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off today.
	And take the first step towards safeguarding your future.
	Dirty Man Safe.
	Because protecting your family starts with protecting what you treasure.
	Disaster can strike when least expected.
	Wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes.
	They can instantly turn your world upside down.
	Dirty Man Underground Safes is a safeguard against chaos.
	Hidden below, your valuables remain protected no matter what.
	Prepare for the unexpected.
	Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off and secure peace of mind for you and your family.
	Dirty man safe.
	When disaster hits, security isn't optional.
	Got some real bad news here for the Fannie Willis side.
	Maybe.
	Well, no, maybe not.
	But maybe.
	Well, it depends.
	Let me explain.
	Terrence Bradley.
	One of the many befuddled witnesses called to testify was, at one particular point, the law partner of Nathan Wade.
	Nathan Wade, as you know, is the peregrinating paramour of Fanny Wallace, who, at one particular point, was her booty collar.
	As evidenced by the cell phone tracking system called CellHawk.
	Are you familiar with that?
	So, what happens is he, as you know, claimed, no, no, we met in 2019, Fannie and Mr. Wade, and didn't involve ourselves in anything amorous until, wow, 2022.
	This is when the eyes rolled back with such a ferocity.
	The migraines that most probably were induced would be enough to fell most people.
	Oh, please, in any event.
	So at one point they called this fellow Mr. Bradley.
	Terrence Bradley.
	And Terrence Bradley, the law partner and divorce lawyer, sort of, for Mr. Wade.
	Was able to testify or tried to testify or attempted to testify or couldn't testify regarding information that he had indicating when Mr. Wade and Ms. Willis commenced their relationship, when they stopped at one particular point.
	Why is that important?
	Is the sex life of Fannie Willis Of any interest to anyone?
	Not really.
	But what is interesting to note, more than anything else, what is interesting to note is as follows.
	Fannie Willis said, in no uncertain terms, I have not had a relationship with Mr. Wade until 2022.
	That's it.
	None of your business.
	Shut up.
	You're a liar.
	And now all of this became interesting and became a part of this case.
	All of this became subject to discussion, subject to interest.
	All of a sudden, this thing, which could have been handled very, very, very simply by maybe just, I don't know, stipulating at least initially to some facts or something.
	Oh, no, no, no, this thing blew out of proportion.
	With her father saying that it's a black thing, most people pay cash, we're not going to go through that again.
	So, Mr. Bradley, realizing, I don't know what to say, I think wisely and carefully, he said, I cannot answer this question because of the attorney-client privilege.
	You see, while I was a law partner at the time, and while I was privy to a lot of the information that many people had, I am not able to discuss this because of my unique situation, which still survives, and that is the privilege that I hold regarding the attorney-client privilege in confidential communications told to me by Mr. Wade.
	So I would love to discuss this, but I can't.
	He was trying desperately just to get off the stand.
	You don't need me.
	I'm leaving.
	Get me out of here.
	You could tell.
	The man looked like he was having a colonoscopy and a root canal simultaneously reversed.
	Okay, so in any event, he played it by ear.
	Everybody knew it.
	You make a blanket statement.
	You say this.
	I cannot speak because I don't want to say something inadvertently.
	I'm just going to say, look, unless you compel me.
	I'm not going to mention anything about this.
	Now, in the meantime, this is the strangest thing.
	This was the weirdest of the weird.
	You would think, you would think that Fannie Wilson, well, I keep saying Wilson, Fannie Wilson, her office, would say, great, let him sit down, go away.
	Maybe, Maybe Judge McAfee will go along with this and he won't be yet again the umpteenth witness who will testify that they were doing the Horizontal Mambo prior to 2022.
	But no.
	What they did was they started attacking this guy.
	Isn't it true that you left this office, sir?
	Not of your own accord, but because of you were the fact, this is Bradley now, that you were accused of some kind of sexual battery, some kind of sexual misconduct, and he's looking at her like, what?
	Isn't it true?
	Isn't it true that you left?
	Well, you know, maybe, but I, uh-huh.
	I'm thinking to myself, wait a minute.
	Why are you throwing your witness under the bus?
	You want him.
	You want him to testify correctly.
	You want him to say.
	And you want him to be a part of this thing, if you will, that deals with helping, corroborating the idea that they did not have a relationship until 2022.
	Now what you're doing is you're enraging and incensing this man, this...
	Confused person.
	I don't understand him.
	So then they said, well, you left because of this.
	Well, no, I didn't.
	He said no, then yes.
	And the lying, if this were any other court, any other judge, they would say, are you saying no?
	They would say no, and then in the next sentence they would say yes, and then they'd say no again, and then they'd say yes.
	Nathan Wade, one of the worst.
	Who would say, did you have sexual relations with another woman during your marriage?
	Well, no.
	And then later on he says, well, not when I was happily married.
	Not when I felt committed to the boss.
	I say, you're lying.
	Nobody gets that.
	They get away with murder.
	And Fannie, forget it.
	I mean, I don't even know what to tell you about that.
	So the thing is, is that Mr. Bradley could have been, very well could have been, Forced to testify now, by the time you see this, on Tuesday, which is today, he might have been forced to testify.
	He could be compelled to testify as soon as today.
	By the way, the judge's decision followed a closed-door meeting between the judge and Mr. Bradley on Monday that lasted an hour and 20 minutes.
	As you know, Defense lawyers for Mr. Roman and President Trump are seeking to disqualify Fannie Willis and her entire office from this because of a variety of reasons.
	Well, at first, at first, me thinks it might have been a little bit exaggerated.
	It's like, well, why does she necessarily have to be, why is there a conflict of interest?
	If she's unethical, if she violated some...
	It's not a nepotism statute because they weren't related, but some inter-office rule that prohibited relationships or whatever.
	Why would that necessarily disenable her from being a prosecutor?
	I don't know.
	That I don't know.
	But as this started, and the lies and the anger and the compounded Perjury and suspicion of perjury and evidence of perjury.
	Not to mention, there's a new group of people, you haven't heard too much of them, but there's some whistleblowers a lot in the office who are willing to come forward and say, oh no, no, she treated us like dirt, up to and including one woman who was dismissed for bringing up, somehow it was recorded,
	bringing up the fact that federal funds or some type of grant that was provided to her office for youth, something or other, Was going to be used and nabbed by the office of buying new Macintosh computers and Mac computers and whatever.
	Did I say Macintosh?
	Yeah, Mac.
	Anyway.
	And she said, you can't do that!
	That's wrong!
	And you can hear in this, and she is just a snotty fan.
	I can understand, but I want you to hear what I'm saying and understand my, she's just this tyrant, this imperious tyrant.
	I want you to hear it from my point of view and the way I see this, and I want you to listen to me carefully.
	Kind of like saying, shut up.
	Unbelievable.
	It's truly, absolutely, incredibly, Unbelievable.
	That's all I have to say.
	It is unbelievable.
	That is it.
	Now, my friend, I ask you the question that I want you to think very carefully about.
	What is the relevance of this?
	What does this have to do with?
	This is important.
	What does this have to do With President Trump's guilt?
	President Trump's culpability?
	Well, the answer is that it has nothing really to do with his alleged guilt.
	What it has to do, however, with is whether he can receive a fair trial.
	And whether Fannie Wilson...
	By the way, her office has been disqualified in the past.
	And what does that mean?
	That means everything stops.
	The entire case is then shifted to another...
	Georgia prosecutor, the prosecutor's office, reassigns this, almost like a recusal.
	This new prosecutor cannot decline, cannot say, I don't want this.
	But he can drop it, which I think might be politically disadvantageous depending upon whether you're a Republican or a Democrat, sad to say.
	He could pare it down.
	He could maybe...
	Expand upon or whittle the arguments, or he can do some other things of interest.
	He might want to enter a plea, provide pleas, handle it, dispose of it in some way other than was anticipated initially.
	There's also some suggestion, as I have suggested to you, that this Jeff DeSantis and others who are themselves Involved in the office, those individuals who are part and parcel of this, were supposedly and theoretically brought in to act as kind of liaisons for this.
	Basically crafting the racketeering indictment and the like, coming from the Biden administration, from the Biden DOJ.
	Could be.
	We'll see about that.
	But this, this case, I'm telling you right now, Judge DeSantis will rule that she is disqualified.
	There is just, this is run the gamut.
	This nobody, but nobody, put it this way, this judge who's going to run for re-election will forever be the new Judge Ito.
	If he were to allow this monstrosity of a case to continue, he muster the right thing out of an abundance of caution, not dismiss it, that would be politically injurious, but just shift it to ensure the rights, not of President Trump, but to the 15 or so additional defendants.
	And that's the way that is.
	I never thought it would get to this point this fast and this far.
	Now, my dear friend, I ask you, please, please like this video, subscribe to the channel, hit that little bell if you know what's good for you, so you're notified of live streams and new videos.

▲