All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 28, 2024 - Lionel Nation
49:46
Nathan Wade's Lawyer Terrence Bradley Masterfully Combines Sheer Stupidity With Bumbling Incoherence
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Disaster can strike when least expected.
Wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes.
They can instantly turn your world upside down.
Dirty Man Underground Safes is a safeguard against chaos.
Hidden below, your valuables remain protected no matter what.
Prepare for the unexpected.
Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off and secure peace of mind for you and your family.
Dirty Man Safe.
When disaster hits, security isn't optional.
The storm is coming.
Markets are crashing.
Banks are closing.
When the economy collapses, how will you survive?
You need a plan.
Cash, gold, bitcoin.
Dirty Man Safes keep your assets hidden underground at a secret location ready for any crisis.
Don't wait for disaster to strike.
Get your Dirty Man safe today.
Use promo code Dirty10 for 10% off your order.
When uncertainty strikes, peace of mind is priceless.
Dirty Man underground safes protects what matters most.
Discreetly designed, these safes are where innovation meets reliability, keeping your valuables close yet secure.
Be ready for anything.
Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off today and take the first step towards safeguarding your future.
Dirty Man Safe.
Because protecting your family starts with protecting what you treasure.
I'm sorry.
I'm going to tell you that today's Terrence Bradley testimony was simply...
I'm still trying to figure out what I saw.
How could this be?
How did this man...
Graduate from law school?
How did he pass the bar?
How does he drive?
Is he allowed to hold sharp objects?
I have never seen a Jadruel like this in my life.
I thought to myself, nobody can be worse than Fannie Willis.
Then comes Nathan Wade.
Nobody can possibly be worse than Nathan Wade.
Then comes...
The gold standard.
Terrence Bradley.
I'm going to give you the absolute best appraisal of what happened.
Not step by step, bit by bit.
There were some funny moments, obviously.
But I'm talking about the big picture.
What does this really mean?
And why is it important?
Well, the first reason why it's important...
It's a great reason to be important.
It's because you just don't see anything like this.
You don't see anything like this ever.
I don't even know what it is.
One time I saw there was a sewer that was clogged.
And these people dragged a tire attached to a chain On a tractor through it.
I don't know how they did it.
And unplugged the crud and the crap and the whatever it was.
And it opened up.
And I was fascinated.
I'm watching a sewer being unplugged.
That's what this was.
I don't even know why.
What am I getting out of this?
I've never seen people like this testify ever.
This baby, this guy who's sitting there in this suit barely fit.
It just doesn't look comfortable.
You know some people, they wear a suit and they look like they don't wear a suit often.
He couldn't button his tie.
He just didn't look comfortable.
And he's sitting there drawing.
Checking, doing the pen, and he's drawing.
It reminded me of like a little kid.
Sad to say, a little kid who's testifying about bad things that happen.
Sometimes we've seen this.
Sometimes you've seen kids, and they sit there, and they do something just to, you know, as they're trying to recall.
It was incredible.
It was absolutely mind-blowing.
It's boggling.
I've never seen anything like it in my life.
But here's the story of stories.
None of this has to be the way it is.
None of this had to be even the case.
There was no need for this.
None of this.
None.
I still don't know what So I'm going to go through it.
I'm going to explain a few things.
But to give you a different take, a little different than what others have said, because it's one thing to sit there and go through the obvious.
Yes, you should be disqualified.
Yes, he lied.
Yeah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
But you don't want to miss the big story.
So first, let me ask you, subscribe to the channel.
Make sure you like the video.
You know the routine.
You know the metrics and metrics.
By the way, as somebody said, I need 3,000 likes tonight.
I need 3,000.
Get to it right away.
3,000 likes.
That's it.
We're going to be here until we get 3,000 likes.
But before we start, let me just tell you right now.
Listen to these great words.
And by the way, after you're done, make sure you go to mypillow.com, promo code Lionel.
Check out the new...
The new graphics, the new website that's changed since I did this.
Well, it is time yet again, my friends, to hail and salute our great friends at MyPillow.com.
And if you use promo code Lionel, you'll get a free gift.
No purchase necessary.
Yes, I know, a free gift.
It's a tautology, so sue me.
But first, please listen.
What are we talking about here?
Down comforters, flannel sheets, Giza...
Dream bed sheets, MyPillow 2.0 sheets, slippers, percales, towels, quilts, bedspreads, mattresses, mattress covers, mattress toppers, linens, kitchen towels, bathrobes, name it!
Literally name it!
Items to help you luxuriate and relax.
And they're monster sellers.
Slippers.
My slippers.
That's right, slip-ons, moccasins.
Think about it.
What do they do at MyPillow?
They make things real soft and plush and comfy.
How perfect.
Here's the link.
MyPillow.com promo code Lionel or MyPillow.com slash solidus or virgule slash Lionel or call 800-645-4965 and watch how fast Mike answers the phone.
MyPillow.com promo code Lionel.
Promo code Lionel.
Simply And absolutely the best.
Now dear friends, those of you who are members of this channel, you can receive, you can read right now and watch right now my latest video that will drop at 8.30.
That's one of the perks of this.
And I want to go through a couple of things.
Let's start off from square one.
Let us remind ourselves of what we are here to do.
Fannie Willis is the district attorney for Fulton County, Georgia.
She, for reasons no one can figure out, decided it would be a good idea to charge President Trump with, get this, racketeering.
Racketeering.
It's absurd.
It's absurd.
Racketeering RICO is normally what you charge the Gambino crime family, drug cartels, motorcycle gangs, people who are coordinated and confederated in this racketeering enterprise, committing predicate acts.
Well, these people didn't even know each other.
That being said.
And there's a story as to the people who are inside her office pushing this, you know, on loan from the Biden administration, the Justice Department.
Okay, fine.
Okay.
So.
One of the lawyers, one of the defendants is a fellow named Michael Roman.
Michael Roman's very, very good lawyer, Ashley Merchant, who was, I believe, the president of the State Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, filed a motion either with or, they've argued successfully, a fellow named Mr. Sadow, who represents...
Rudy Giuliani.
There's about 15 or 16 defendants, including President Trump.
So, the motion was made to disqualify Fannie Willis because she was having an affair.
She was romantically involved with Nathan Wade, who was the special prosecutor.
Hired by her to help with the case.
It was alleged that this man who is not normally associated with this type of complex case, who does wills and personal injury and that sort of thing, he does things like...
Oh...
He really is not familiar with this.
So anyway, they made about...
It was alleged that he made about...
Almost a million bucks over a period of time representing this, probably the biggest client he's ever had.
And at the same time, it was alleged that he and Fannie Willis, his boss, who appointed him special prosecutor, were enjoying these lavish trips and going out on cruises.
Going to the Napa Valley and Napa wine tasting, just jaunting about, perambulating, peregrinating the world.
And it might have been alleged that they were using the funds, the fees, the special prosecution fees that he's received.
Either it's not ill-gotten gains, but unjust enrichment, whatever the particular theory you want.
And that somehow she should be disqualified from This because of the fact that, well, whatever, I guess.
And we'll get to that in a moment.
So anyway, that was the argument.
She should be disqualified because she and he, Mr. Wade, were having an affair.
He was appointed special prosecutor, and I still don't really get it.
And it could have gone like this.
State your name for the record.
Fannie T. Willis, I believe.
Are you having an affair with your special prosecutor?
Yes.
And did you put him on the payroll after you started schnupping him?
Yes.
And did he make a lot of money?
Yes.
And did you go on lavish trips with him?
Yes.
And did you use the proceeds of monies that he necessarily would have received as a special prosecutor?
Yeah, I guess.
Sure.
Does this in any way affect your decision to prosecute President Trump and others?
No.
Do you have a stake in this prosecution?
No.
Does this in any way violate your office staff?
Do you have rules in your office that would prevent this?
That you would prohibit or preclude other people from doing this?
We have anti-nepotism statutes, but we may or may not have one regarding inter-office romances, but yeah.
And did your decision to seek an indictment of President Trump and others have anything to do with your romance with Mr. Wade?
Nope.
Mr. Wade, state your name for the record.
Nathan Wade.
Were you stooping her?
Yep.
Did you go to Nava Valley?
Yep.
Cruises?
Yep.
Were you married at the time?
Separated.
He could have said that.
What the hell has separated me?
That's one of my favorite terms.
Separated?
Separated.
Well, I separate on the weekends.
Come back Monday.
I separate on the weekends.
Anyway.
Did you stoop?
Yep.
Yep.
If we were to do a cell hawk check, would we see booty calls?
Oh, not only booty calls, from midnight to 41, absolutely.
You'd see that.
Text, phone messages.
We were a thing.
Are you thinking anymore?
Sadly, no, but we were.
Okay.
Did this in any way have any effect on your relationship or on your prosecution of President Trump?
Nope.
Do you have a stake in this game?
Nope.
That's it.
And you may or may not get to Terrence Bradley.
Terrence Bradley.
What's her name?
Terrence Bradley?
What are you doing?
I was a law partner with Mr. Wade and I represented him for a while in the divorce matter.
Did he?
And you wouldn't need Terrence Bradley because nobody would be contesting.
They would have said, yeah, I did it.
Yeah, we did it.
And I'd say, Your Honor, Judge, Judge McAfee, yes.
Why must the case be disqualified?
There is a conflict if she has a stake in the prosecution.
If she's, you know, maybe she's prosecuting maybe somebody who's one of the defendants used to work for her, or maybe...
If she was prosecuting Mr. Wade or something, but what difference does it make?
If Wade comes or goes or they go to Napa Valley or they don't have sex or whatever, he's still getting prosecuted and it doesn't make any difference.
What the hell difference does it make?
That's what he could have argued.
And you know what?
It'd be hard-pressed to answer it.
Act like nothing's like, oh yeah.
Yep.
I'll never forget one time, one of the best answers I've ever heard.
The radio station that worked years ago, there was a guy who he and this other woman were kind of seeing each other, and they eventually married.
And he was technically her boss.
I mean, nobody really brought up any complaints.
This was before all that stuff.
Anyway, so somebody brought up the fact that he did it, and interestingly enough, I found that interesting.
He said, oh, by the way, why do you think it wise to have a relationship with somebody you work with?
He says, look, I work all the time.
I'm here almost 20 hours a day.
Who the hell else am I going to meet?
But people I work with.
We have a lot in common.
She's a great lady.
We work together.
That's all I know.
This is my job.
This is all I do.
And I'm sorry if I fell in love.
And I'm sorry, but I think I have a better job because we have something in common and we work together.
It was a great answer.
That's the way this could have been a great answer.
What difference does it make?
What difference does it make?
But no, not Fannie.
Fannie had to lie.
Fannie had to say, oh no, Fannie had to ask, pissed off.
How dare you?
You're lying, and you're lying, and I don't know.
What are you lying about?
What are you talking about?
She starts digging herself in a hole.
Remember, you find yourself in a hole?
Stop digging.
She started doing it.
And I don't know.
Well, I paid him back in cash.
I paid him back in cash.
You paid him in cash?
Oh yeah, I got cash.
You've got cash?
Wait a minute.
That's line number one.
What do you mean you got cash?
Well, it's a black thing.
That's my father.
Yeah, it's a black thing.
It's a black thing.
It's a what thing?
By the way...
A lot of black folks here.
How many of you have cash?
$16,000, $20,000?
No.
I don't have money.
What?
You have a safe?
Remember that story?
It started.
And then the father gets on.
Well, you know, one time when I was in a restaurant, one time I had an American Express, and the bill was $10, and they pulled out my American Express.
Okay.
And they didn't take it.
And then they would have a Visa card.
They wouldn't take that.
They had traveler's checks.
You know, they call them traveler's checks.
In the old days, they didn't take that either.
So I told my daughter, I said, remember one day, I got a $10.
I told my daughter, I said, don't you ever go out without having money because it's a black thing.
It's a black thing.
And we care, man.
And we have cash.
And we care.
What?
Wait a minute.
What?
Already.
The thing just started.
They carry cash.
How many thousands?
How much does she make?
And then they start going into it.
Wait a minute.
How old is it?
Who is this woman?
Who is this guy?
Nathan Wade.
Yeah, he's getting into divorce.
You mean he's not divorced yet?
Do we find out who was divorced?
Who's representing his wife?
Joycelyn.
Joycelyn.
This woman, what's about that?
Well, she's a single mom.
Her health is bad.
They've been married for 25 years.
She was a single mom.
He's out philandering.
Wait, wait, wait.
Does she know about the money he made?
Does she know about a million bucks he made in cash from her that he's spending with this other woman?
Because they're still married.
They're still married.
All of this wouldn't have even been brought up had she just said, yeah, tell the truth.
But no, not Fanny.
No, no, no.
She's digging.
And that, I mean, she starts.
And they told her, we're going to invoke the rule of sequestration.
Please go outside.
Do not listen to the testimony.
All of a sudden, she starts storming in.
Oh, I'm going to testify.
Oh, I'm going to clear something up.
Wait a minute.
Were you listening?
Uh, no.
Lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie.
Simon and Garfield, right?
Then...
Nathan, who every time he answers, he does it like he's passing some hockey puck bees or just hurting, hurting, just squeezing, just miserable.
I can't answer these I can't answer these questions I can't God All right.
And this is getting to say, who is this guy?
Now we're finding out that he may have changed, allegedly changed, his statement in an interrogatory.
One of the pleadings in his divorce case was set under oath that he had not had any type of sexual congress with any other woman during the course of his divorce.
Well, he's lying about that.
He's lying about everything.
I mean, this guy won't stop.
It's unbelievable.
Then we get into the best one.
And I didn't think you could get better than anything, but the best of the best of the best.
Terrence Bradley.
Terry.
I kept watching this guy, and I mean he didn't remember or recall anything.
Now, that may work.
That may work if you, I don't know, if you're maybe a Mafia Don or you're Joey Gallo or something.
You know, maybe you could take the fifth instead.
This guy had, all he had to do was answer some questions.
Mr. Bradley, from 2018 until 2021, you represented Mr. Wade as a defense lawyer.
I mean, a divorce lawyer, right?
Yes.
Did he ever talk to you about a relationship he had with Fanny?
And he would be so still that I would look at the, I thought maybe the zoom or the camera froze.
I'm looking at him.
Is he okay?
Is he moving?
He wouldn't even like blink.
He would just stare.
Okay, Mr. Any time, Mr. Just, you know, did you have a conversation?
No.
Wouldn't answer, then he'd say, I don't remember.
After all of that time.
Now, here's the story.
You know what you're there to answer, right?
You know what you're there to testify to.
You know it.
You're there for a reason.
You're there to answer questions about this.
It comes down to...
Whether your client, whether Mr. Wade, had sex with Fannie Willis at any time during 2022, prior to 2022, because they said we never had any kind of relationship until 2022.
That's it!
Not only that, when you were given the motion, motion, I said at the top, motion to...
To disqualify, you know exactly what this is about.
And he's writing things like, sounds good to me.
So he's basically providing, he didn't do that, he didn't go through that nonsense of, no, he was fine.
He remembered.
Since then, his memory's gotten worse.
Since then, instead you think, I've been asked this question a million times.
And the answer is, no, I don't remember.
Yes, I remember.
Yes, I did.
No, I didn't.
I know the answer.
I've been giving this answer now.
I've been asked this question a million times.
Every time you ask him a question, it's like he's never heard it before.
It's like he's never heard it before.
Nathan Wade?
Nathan Wade?
Oh, oh, oh, Mr. Oh!
Yeah, I forgot.
Fanny Willis.
Fanny.
Section Sexual Congress.
What is that?
Does that include intercourse?
Intromission?
Coitus?
Ah, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, I remember.
I don't recall what intercourse is.
I don't know.
It was a joke.
And I'm thinking to myself, I cannot believe what I'm saying.
I can't believe what I'm saying.
He can't answer anything about anything.
When he's been asked this question at least 50 times.
You think he's here for a million times?
Yes, I have answers.
I know what I'm here for.
I know what I'm here for.
I'm here to answer the question specifically.
Whether I know.
Whether these two were having a relationship prior to 1920.
I mean, to 2020.
To 2022.
And that's it.
Our good friend says, eternal recursion, that it has been suggested that Bradley has been threatened.
If so, maybe he's trying to construct an answer that won't get him whacked.
Well, I don't know about that, but maybe they could have had something maybe in camera.
That means in the chambers of the judge.
Maybe they could have.
But here's the thing, and by the way, Eternal, thank you so much for that.
Here's the thing that I think is interesting.
The judge.
The judge seemed almost to be as pained by this as possible.
And I bet you the judge is thinking of himself like this.
Now let's see.
If I grant this motion, he's probably thinking of himself, if I grant this motion to...
This motion to disqualify her.
My future in any kind of democratic politics in Fulton County or Georgia is done.
Maybe, maybe, I don't know.
If I do this, I was thinking maybe before, you know, Supreme Court judge, maybe federal judge, who knows, somebody plays it, right?
Maybe DA one day.
Maybe governor.
You know what I mean?
What would happen if I were to grant this disqualification?
What would happen?
What would happen, dare I say, to me?
What would happen?
To my future?
If I don't grant, if I say no, I'm going to find out.
That's absurd!
Because the whole world is watching this.
And they don't know what they're watching.
They're just watching lying.
And lying is somehow this extension of...
This concoction of...
I don't know what the word is, but people are just...
They're just watching the lies.
And they're thinking, oh my...
God, this is horrible.
And you're saying, no, the lies have nothing to do with me.
You've got to do something.
No, no, no.
It's just a motion to disqualify.
It doesn't matter.
You better find, you better kick her off that she's a liar.
And if you don't, then you're a liar and you're crooked and you're awful and you're going to be the next Judge Ito.
He's thinking about that.
How in his right mind does he not do this?
How does he say, you know, I've been sitting here and even though everybody has lied about everything up to and including their name, no, I don't think they're going to, because the issue is, is there a conflict, not did they lie?
But in the court of public opinion, you've got everybody and their mother is commenting today during the court.
I mean, everybody, everybody, they're watching this and they're thinking, I can't believe what I'm, I can't believe what I'm saying.
That's what got me.
The judge.
His hesitancy.
Here's another thing.
When you're in a jury trial and you want to keep, you know, people.
Oh, look at this.
Thank you, sir or madam or they.
Whatever your particular pronoun.
Thank you for that.
When you have a jury trial, sometimes you want to keep as much of the bad stuff away from the jury as possible.
And you want to object.
Objecting is okay, because objecting, you don't want to be a dick, but you've got to both preserve the record and you've got to do the right thing.
And what...
Means is this.
Preserving the record means if you're going to appeal something later on, the first thing the appellate judge says is, before I decide whether to grant you this as an appellate, did you object to trial?
Did you object?
Did you give the judge the chance to maybe cure this?
Fix this?
Or did you waive any objection?
Did you waive it?
Did you waive it?
Did you object?
Did you preserve the record?
See, there's so many things at trial you have to object to, unless, if you don't, you waive it on appeal.
I had a case one time where there was something called the best evidence rule.
The best evidence rule is one of the rules that nobody knows about.
Nobody, at least in Florida.
Well, based on the federal rules.
And this fellow goes up and says, I'm holding you.
I'm going to show you an exhibit.
Excuse me.
Objection.
May I see that?
Yes.
I object.
Why?
Best evidence rule.
Where's the original?
Where's the what?
Where's the original?
You have to explain why you didn't bring the original one.
The original receipt?
Yeah.
You can't do a copy of something.
You've got to explain why.
And they said, what?
Anyway, we went through this whole thing with the best evidence.
Screwed up everything.
And I was right.
I was right.
I was 100% right.
And he couldn't introduce the thing that the whole case was based on.
Anyway.
So if you don't object to certain things, but that's okay for jury trials.
When it's the judge, let me tell you the way it is.
The judge will say, I'll note your objection for the record.
Okay?
I'll note this.
But this is a hearing without the jury.
I'm the judge.
I'm not going to let you tell me something that is wrong so that you can appeal me.
I mean, there's exceptions.
But normally...
With a judge, you sit there and say, look, can we get to the bottom of this judge?
Because he's a judge.
He knows.
He knows.
You can cut through stuff.
And they're doing this objection, asked and answered.
Oh, I hate that.
Excuse me, schmuck.
There's 15 defendants here, 16. They may have asked it like last Wednesday, but this is a new defendant, and he wants to know from this person based upon his lawyer.
So don't give me that...
Ask and answer business.
That may work with one witness, one defendant, but when you've got 15, you're going to ask the same questions over and over again.
That was one.
And they said this one, argumentative.
Argumentative doesn't mean you're being mean.
Argumentative is that you're making an argument, as in a final argument.
Not that you're being argumentative.
That's cross-examination.
You have opening statement, closing argument.
An argument is when you put things together.
An argument is when you tell either a jury during opening or you talk to a witness and you say, and therefore, because he didn't have the capacity to enter into the contract, he could not have later on.
Wait a minute!
Stop!
Objection!
This is argumentative.
He's making an argument.
He's like, this is his closing argument.
He's explaining what this means and what this means.
Argument is when you say what the evidence means.
You weigh it.
You put it together.
You give your theories of the case.
That's for the end.
Not now.
That's what argumentative means.
Not that you're being a dick.
It's kind of what he said.
And everybody goes, I mean, he's an objection argument.
No, he's not an argument.
This is cross-examination.
You can be as sarcastic as you want.
It's up to the judge.
This is your...
The only time you're getting the chance to talk to the other witness, you can say virtually, I mean, or anything, you can say stuff that's real sarcastic.
Are you listening to what you're saying?
Objection.
What?
You read it in the transcript.
Are you listening to what you're saying?
What's wrong with that?
Well, it's the way he said it.
The way he said it.
That's half of the battle.
Are you sure that's your testimony, Mr. Bradley?
Objection!
And they don't do it in the transcript.
Stenographer doesn't do that.
Of course it's like that.
This is your chance.
This is their witness.
You're not going to get stuff out of them by being nice.
But the whole thing was ridiculous.
It was just this weight.
I mean, the judge could have said easily, remember, there's no jury there.
A judge could have turned over and said to him and said, are you kidding me?
Are you kidding me?
Do you see me here?
This is for my benefit.
You see, there's nobody in that jury box.
You see, and Mr. Brown, the counselor, there's nobody in that jury box.
This is for me.
This is a motion to disqualify.
This is a judge.
This is a bench motion.
This is for me.
And you're lying like that in front of me?
The jury, I can understand, but me?
I swear to God, they should be referred to that.
You don't ever want to give up your ticket, your law, your license by lying in court?
Lying?
I don't care what it is.
Wade already screwed up by changing his testimony.
He might have been lying during the defense.
And I know you're not supposed to say this, but during a divorce, rather, okay, I know he's lying, but you're right.
But you're the party and you're pleading.
Okay.
It's like when Bill Clinton...
When they say, do you have sex with him?
He lied to his wife.
Who admits to having an affair?
I'm sorry, I know you're supposed to, but nobody does, especially in public when you're the president.
What do you want people to do?
Anyway.
This turned into nothing.
This could have been over with him.
Yeah, an affair with him, that's it.
Now, Friday's a big summation, a big whatever it is.
And this judge is thinking, he's probably talking and saying, what do I do?
What do I do?
Do I keep...
I don't know if he's the...
I guess he's the trial judge.
I would imagine he's not doing this to be assigned somebody else.
He's the trial judge.
He's going to hear this piece of dog.
Now, the only thing...
The only thing I would have hoped for.
The only thing I would have wished for.
There's no way I could have done this because there's no way, if this goes to trial, President Trump is not going to be testifying.
He's not going to take the stand.
He's not going to do that.
He cannot take the stand in a criminal case.
Sorry!
But if he could, and if through some magical way of thinking, if somehow, if she could do the...
Fannie could have done the cross-examination of Trump.
I would have said, you are not giving the Academy Award to Killian, what's his name, or to Mr. Downey.
You're going to give it to these two.
This would have been sheer magic.
I could see him just...
I can just, I mean, I could just, just, and he could risk it.
But imagine this.
Imagine this.
Trump takes a stand.
Fannie Willis asks a question.
And she gets to cross-examine him.
And he says, well, well, well.
Fannie Willis.
She would lose her mind.
And the judge would say, objection, I'm sorry.
Proceed.
She would absolutely she would go berserk.
That would be my dream to see that.
My dream.
Now let me tell you something.
There's one thing about old Mr. Bradley.
He probably did a little bit better than by not remembering anything.
I know it sounds crazy, but that's different.
Everybody knows that's complete, total horseshit.
I don't remember.
Okay, fine.
That is different than saying something.
But these other people, they lie.
And please, if you have children, please bring them.
All they had to do was say, yeah, in the fair.
What's your point?
Years ago, There was a show called West 57th Street.
You may not remember this.
It was a show called West 57th Street.
And I think it was Meredith Vieira.
Well, she was on it.
There was a guy named John Ferruja and these other people.
It was West 57th Street.
Remember he had that Harry Reams mustache?
Ask your kids.
Harry Reams, friends.
Anyway, so there was a An evangelical, kind of a preacher, kind of a shady, earnest angel-y type.
And he, apparently, he was a faith healer.
And he could hear, he could hear the, what am I trying to say?
He could hear the words from God.
He could hear from God.
And what happened was, his wife would go, hear me out.
His wife would go out to the audience at a time and talk to people.
And they had microphones.
And she said, oh, what are you here for?
Well, my husband has sugar diabetes.
Does he?
Yeah.
Yeah, he said, we've tried everything.
Uh-huh.
So she makes a note of it.
Now, he has a hearing.
He has an earpiece.
The wife is talking to him, and the amazing Randy is picking this up on some kind of a receiver.
And you can hear this.
Fourth row, third from the left, lady with a red sweater.
Her husband has sugar diabetes, even though it's redundant.
And he says, I'm feeling the word of the Lord.
Wait a minute.
Hang on now.
I'm thinking, you, you're here for a loved one.
You're someone you love, perhaps a spouse.
Spouse, yes, yes.
That'd be warm reading versus cold reading.
And he has, wait, wait, wait.
Sugardob 80s.
How did you know?
Because the Lord has directed me towards you.
Anyway, so they record this.
They get this.
I think it was Meredith Vieira.
Maybe not.
But I remember this preacher was there and he goes, Mm-hmm.
Yeah.
Reverend Thompson?
Yes, ma 'am.
We'd like to talk to you.
Yes, ma 'am.
I want you to watch this in the video.
Is that you?
Yes, ma 'am.
That's you on stage, right?
Yes, ma 'am.
Listen carefully.
And they superimposed.
They dubbed his wife speaking to him.
And you hear it.
Fourth floor.
Fourth row.
Red sweater.
Sugar.
And you can hear what he's hearing.
And they nail him.
They nail him.
Got him.
This is what he does.
So, Reverend, it wasn't God who was speaking to you, but your wife.
He said, yes, ma 'am.
So you didn't hear from God, did you?
No, ma 'am.
It was your wife?
Yes, ma 'am.
And you're a fraud?
Yes, ma 'am.
That was it.
It was just, I mean, no Mike Wallace, no get out of here, nothing.
He just said, yep, that's it.
Let that be a lesson to you.
Let that be a lesson to you.
Now, that doesn't work all the time.
Sometimes there are some lies you must maintain, because once you say it, you're through.
But, this is the absolute cluster of all time.
And I want you to go back and just listen to this preposterous statement of this.
Now, the good news about this is that it's finally good news for President Trump.
Finally, finally, there's some good news.
By the way, my friends, speaking of good news, good, good news, you understand this?
You understand what I'm saying to you?
Good, good, good, good, good news.
In the event you have been looking for and have been thinking about what to do in the event of some type of an emergency, especially when it comes to food and the like, I have just the answer for you.
Let's talk about a very serious subject, emergency food.
That's right, emergency food.
I know, I know.
At first blush, it's difficult for most people to think about something that they just take for granted, ever-reaching emergency status.
We're used to stores always being open, deliveries always made, no supply chain disasters, no ransomware catastrophes, none of that stuff.
Nothing shutting down our gas stations, right?
No trucking strikes, no war, no protests from farmers, nothing catastrophic in terms of weather.
Nope.
That can't happen to us.
Uh-uh.
And I understand it's a defense mechanism that we have because the idea of ever not being able to eat or locate food is seemingly incomprehensible.
Well, it's not.
That's why it's time for you to go to my site, preparewithlionel.com.
Preparewithlionel.com has the deal of deals for you.
Now, take it as a starter set.
You've been putting off emergency food for too long.
Some people still have a thing about prepping.
As though preparing for emergency is foolish.
And right now you can save $60 on a four-week emergency supply kit.
This is unbelievable.
16 varieties with a 25-year shelf life, 2,000 calories a day in two beautifully modular buckets that weigh 38 pounds total.
These are waterproof and they're perfectly stackable.
Four weeks, a month.
Now be honest, could you go a week without any trips to any store?
I'm not talking about having stuff in your cabinet.
I'm not talking about banana chips and jerky.
I mean food.
Real food.
So go right now to preparewithlionel.com.
Right now.
Right this moment.
Preparewithlionel.com.
Preparewithlionel.com.
You'll thank me.
Trust me.
Indeed, my friends.
Indeed.
By the way, just to let you know before I forget, in the event I forget, because sometimes I want to forget every now and then.
Not really, but every now and then.
Tomorrow we'll be doing real early, 6 a.m., a 6 a.m. show, because I've got a little, shall we say, a little court duty.
I must attend to myself.
So I don't want to forego this, because this is too important.
But this, my friends, is...
Oh, so that's tomorrow at 6, before I forget.
By the way, another thing, too.
Remember this.
When you testify in court, When you testify in court, make sure that when your lawyer is asking you a question, when your lawyer is asking you a question, get that answer out.
Get it out before the other side can object.
Don't think in Hemant Hall.
Get it out.
Because your lawyer wants you to answer that question.
Get it out.
If the other side is asking a question, wait so your lawyer can object.
Remember that.
Very important.
Testifying is something that they should call it test-a-lying sometimes.
Some cops would be really bad at this.
They would do this.
How you tell the truth is you just know when somebody's telling the truth.
You just know it.
And there's nothing better than somebody who just admits to something.
It diffuses it.
Now, what's going to happen, ladies and gentlemen of the jury?
First of all, they're going to disqualify her.
They're going to have to.
There's just no...
This man...
Everybody...
Listen, remember, most people do not know...
Look, this is not about...
They don't even know what this case is about.
Most people don't even know it's about Trump prosecution.
They think he's on the stand or Fannie Willis.
Yes, she is.
This is not about...
Oh, by the way, she's going to use this as she will be the next DA.
Anybody else would be completely, you know, run out of town, but she's going to use this.
Oh, look at that.
They're coming after me because I'm a proud black woman or whatever she did.
And they're going to say, you're right about that.
You stand...
Who knows?
She's got that.
This is a very, very, very powerful Democratic stronghold.
But in any event, they don't know what this is about.
Americans don't know.
I don't know if this is a motion to disqualify.
I don't know what that is.
All I know is she's a liar, he's a liar, and he's a liar.
And I hate these people.
And I want them to go to jail.
No, no.
She's the prosecutor.
What?
She's the prosecutor.
She's the prosecutor.
I want her to go to jail.
Well, Auntie, she's going to go to jail.
She could, if she's proved to be lying.
I mean, does anybody here not believe they're lying?
No!
This is where this case is so bad.
In fact, Judge McAfee would say, I'm doing a favor to the people of Fulton County, because remember, she represents them.
They have a stake in this, theoretically.
They're bringing a prosecution on behalf of the people of Fulton County, and their lawyer?
This idiot?
And her boyfriend and the ex-law, they're not going to get their day in court.
So the judge says, listen, I've got to be fair, not to you necessarily, certainly to the defendants, but also to the other party.
This case, this is, there can be no justice.
I have no faith in anyone here.
Nobody has faith in anybody.
This is a complete disaster.
Out of the interest of justice, and certainly these individuals, I cannot allow this to go on.
This has been derailed.
I cannot in any way.
In fact, if I were the people of Fulton County, I would say, you want this elsewhere, because if this matters to you, if you care about this, you will want this tried by somebody else, because this team can't do it.
I mean, it is just unacceptable.
Be-lievable.
You understand what I'm saying?
Good.
Anyway, dear friends, 830 is the drop.
My latest, my review of this.
Let me tell you how much I appreciate being with you.
Let me tell you how much I love being with you.
Let me tell you how much you enrich my life and how great and glorious you are.
Anelmech, thank you so very much.
An eternal recursion.
Thank you for your kindness, your contributions to the cause, and thank you as well.
Let me also remind you to follow Linz Warriors.
Please, the interviews are incredible.
Linz Warriors and Linz Warriors on X. And by the way, please watch a great, great interview, one of the scariest interviews I did with a great friend of mine, Diane Diamond, about...
Of all things, a subject that you would think would be kind of rather dry, but it's anything but.
Conservatorships and guardianships.
That's up on this as well.
Anyway, thank you so much, my friends.
6 a.m. tomorrow.
Set your alarms.
We're going to be doing it early, early, early.
6 a.m.
And until then, have a great and glorious night.
Thanks so much for being with us.
Don't ever change the meaning of that sincerely.
And remember, until next time, my friends, the monkey's dead.
The show's over.
Sue ya.
▲
Export Selection