The Advancing Use of Incitement to Quell Problem Speech
|
Time
Text
When uncertainty strikes, peace of mind is priceless.
Dirty Man Underground Safes protects what matters most.
Discreetly designed, these safes are where innovation meets reliability, keeping your valuables close yet secure.
Be ready for anything.
Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off today and take the first step towards safeguarding your future.
Dirty Man's Safe.
Because protecting your family starts with protecting what you treasure.
Disaster can strike when least expected.
Wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes.
They can instantly turn your world upside down.
Dirty Man Underground Safes is a safeguard against chaos.
Hidden below, your valuables remain protected no matter what.
Prepare for the unexpected.
Use code DIRTY10 for 10% off and secure peace of mind for you and your family.
Dirty Man Safe.
The storm is coming.
Markets are crashing.
Banks are closing.
When the economy collapses, how will you survive?
You need a plan.
Cash.
Gold.
Bitcoin.
Dirty Man safes keep your assets hidden underground at a secret location ready for any crisis.
Don't wait for disaster to strike.
Get your Dirty Man safe today.
Use promo code DIRTY10 for 10% off your order.
Good day.
Good day.
A good and a hallowed day to you.
Dear friend, thank you.
Let me start off by saying the titular, please like this.
We need algorithms.
We need your support.
We need you to tell people that you are behind us.
It is something which I think is very important.
I take this very seriously and I take your support very seriously and I need your help.
And I thank you for this.
I want to talk to you about something.
About what I do.
But I want you to be the same way.
I want you to be like me.
No, no, no.
I want you to be like me.
I want you to have absolutely no political label.
There is no label to what I think.
There is no label to what I think.
I don't know what you call this.
Conservative liberal.
But I am an absolute fan of this.
Our Constitution.
Notice every time we have our little votes, I get my stamps and I put them up there.
I love this.
I'm so proud of our country.
Not our government.
Not the people in charge.
This is not about Trump or Biden or whatever.
This is who we are.
This is it.
It's almost like we have our marriage license framed.
I'm so proud of it.
Because it's like, that's my legal connection.
This is my marriage license to liberty.
I know it sounds corny.
This never changes.
Everything else changes.
They come, they go, whatever.
This is it.
It's not perfect.
And it's deliberately, it's deliberately, what's the word?
Vague.
Very vague.
In some respects.
It really is.
It's very vague.
Or it doesn't say anything at all.
Which is great, too.
Let me give you an example of something.
Years ago.
Number one.
When I was a prosecutor years ago, years ago, I started, I think, in 30...
37 years ago?
And we did not have a law Against stalking.
We used to have this.
It was the worst thing.
These poor women would come and they would say, well, this guy is bothering me.
Is he an ex-husband?
No.
Is he?
What is he?
I don't know.
It's this weird, creepy guy and I'm scared.
And then the laws were very, very limited in terms of what they could or couldn't do.
You probably didn't know this.
Because we had the freedom of association, the freedom of travel, the freedom of all this stuff.
And consequently, we enjoyed this.
You can't say, hey, listen, hello, Mr. Barksdale?
Yes, you have to stay away from Miss Framingham.
Why?
Because you're creeping her out.
I'm creeping her out.
Yes, you are.
You are creeping her out.
You're a creepy, creepy guy.
And you better stay a month.
Why?
Now you're going to laugh at this now.
You're going to say, because you're, I haven't even said anything.
Yeah, but every time she comes out of the store, there you are.
Well, so what?
So what?
I go to the ball 50, 60, 100 times a week.
And I always go to the Cinnabon.
And I always look at that, whoever is at the cash register.
Well, that's different.
Why is that different?
I'm not bothering anybody.
I'm creeping them out.
This is what we went through before.
That changed.
Now it's like, of course.
Stalking.
You know, menacing.
It changed completely.
What about this one?
If you harassed somebody.
We didn't even have anything called harassment.
Calling somebody on the phone.
Did you, you know, you can't call.
Yes, these poor women would come sometimes.
It's normally women.
They would come to the office, the prosecutor's office, and they would say, he's calling me.
And it had to be sexual.
Is he threatening you?
Well, no.
Well, now it's, interestingly enough, by virtue of phones, we don't have any of this stuff anymore.
Nobody even gets obscene phone calls and that sort of thing.
Things change.
Hate speech?
Didn't even know what that was.
What's that?
Well, you said something hateful.
So?
He said misinformation.
So?
You mean he was wrong?
Yeah.
I kind of like days like that.
I really do.
Not everything is actionable.
Not everything is actionable.
I'm sorry.
Today is different.
Today is a different story.
Now, let me just say something.
I do like the fact that Oh, oh, oh!
And harassment?
Oh, you're going to love this.
The harassment statute that we used to have, the only time it was even actionable was if it was in a letter!
Because then we could maybe impose or involve the federal government in some kind of a mail.
I mean, it was...
But you know what?
Now it's different.
Now we live in a world that's, well, we are going to cover everything.
Everything is covered.
Everything, everything is actionable.
Everything.
Did you see misinformation?
Well, we'll take care of that.
Who decides?
It doesn't matter who decides.
We decide.
I'm telling you, I wish I could have known what I am seeing now.
I can't believe this.
But let me tell you what's happening.
And let me tell you where we're going.
And just as the laws change, things will change.
One of the issues that we're going to be talking more and more about, and I want you as a person to recognize, by the way, before I forget, I know more people very, very, very ill, not hospital worth, but really knocked out.
Because of COVID.
Have you noticed this?
I'm not going to cross-examine.
You mean a PCR?
No, I don't mean positive test.
I mean out of commission.
Have you noticed that?
I'm noticing more and more.
Next, everybody I know is...
Not everybody I know.
I shouldn't say this.
Excuse me.
More people than I know are dying.
I get this email yesterday.
Remember so-and-so?
Yeah, he's dead.
What?
What?
What happened?
Death always affects me very, very...
I go into this philosophical thing like, whoa, whoa.
And then you go to Facebook and they're alive.
It's like Facebook doesn't know he's dead.
Does Facebook know he's dead?
He hasn't said any...
Is anybody going to close this up?
Did you ever get a birthday?
So-and-so's having a birthday.
Well, theoretically, but...
Very, very strange.
Very, very odd.
And speaking of laws, by the way, Mrs. Eldon and I are talking about something.
By the way, I cannot tell you how you must support her lens warriors, how important this is.
We're talking about sexual abuse registries.
They want to get rid of these.
So if you move into an area, you don't know that your neighbor across the street, or down the block, Has had a criminal record.
What?
Well, it's Megan's law.
Based on what Megan can't get.
They want to get rid of this because they're saying it's too much of a stigma.
I remember the old days before Megan's law.
Now they want to get rid of it.
And I can see some limitations to it.
Believe me, I see all sides.
This drives people crazy.
Because I see both sides.
I had a guy one time, I had a client.
Who was investigated by state agency for abuse, abandonment, or neglect.
Anyway, charges were dropped.
It was closed.
But his name was still on the list.
And I said, hey, this case was closed.
Oh, no, no, no.
He was investigated.
I said, but it was closed.
You can have arrest warrant.
Records sealed and expunged.
You can have criminal convictions.
Well, if there's no conviction, there's a withhold or whatever.
But why this?
I said, excuse me, he can't get a job now because his name's in there.
Well, it's okay.
It's not a criminal offense.
It's departmental.
Departmental that everybody can get.
Okay, so I understand that argument.
Believe me, I get that.
But what about people who were convicted, who went to prison?
They want to get rid of that?
If you sell a house and there was a death, or if it was haunted, you've got to report these.
Anyway.
The laws then, the laws now, everything's changed.
But listen to what I'm saying.
Listen very, very carefully.
The stories, the stories that we have.
And by the way, here's a brand new video I just put up.
The bombshell questions never asked in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
She just had a big...
Well, they just published this interview.
Make sure you know this.
Oh, and also, if I could, by the way, please, I'm not trying to...
This isn't merely just promotion.
But there was a very, very good one I did called What They Don't Tell You About the Alex Jones trial.
See, they don't tell you enough about this.
Let me explain to you why.
Because they don't have enough time.
They don't have enough time.
Let me say this again.
They don't have enough time.
They do not have enough time, by the way.
That's the Alex Jones thing.
Now, this is very, very important.
Very, very critical.
And what I want to do is, I want you to understand fully the issue of something.
The issue.
You know when you go to a doctor and the doctor says, look, let me explain this procedure to you.
This may not be life-threatening, but it's important.
And I want you to understand the negative parts, the pluses, the minuses.
That's what I want you to know.
That's the purpose.
I want you to think.
I want you to be the best informed.
And I want your critical thinking skills to be sharper than ever.
If you know how to critically think, you can handle anything.
What's the issue?
What's the rule?
Analyze it.
Conclude.
IRAC.
No matter what it is.
Now let me tell you what's going on right now.
And this is the most important.
Rule number one.
What is the law?
Rule number one.
What is the law?
How do I look that up?
You look that up.
In the state of New Jersey, they have a statute.
Which they kind of use as a throwaway.
If they pull you over for, I don't know, speeding or something, and the cop wants to give you a break, he gives you this charge.
I think there's no points involved.
It's not a moving violation per se, but anyway.
But it says this.
If this is your...
A license, your license tag, this.
Every bit of wording has to be unobstructed.
So if it says New Jersey here, but your frame that your dealer gave you with your car, or that, you know, Go Buccaneers, or whatever you have, Marine Corps Veteran, if any of that.
In any way impedes upon any part of this.
Even though you can clearly say New Jersey, I can see the numbers.
But anything, it's a violation.
They even have rules against hanging lanyards or handicapped, not stickers, but those, you know, those tags from your rearview mirror.
Wait a minute.
One statute says, This is where you put them.
The other one says, you can't do that.
So what does this mean?
It means read it.
It means read it.
Read the statute.
Read it.
Whatever you get, read it.
Do you have, in your town, do you have speeding cameras?
Do you have speed cameras?
Do you?
Okay.
Did you ever get one of those?
Yes.
What's your first inclination?
Eh, pay it.
No points, whatever.
Okay, fine.
Isn't there somebody that has to say, that's you?
That's you?
He was driving.
If I give you my car, it's a Yugo, it's a stretch, but if I give you the Yugo to drive, and you're pulled over for speeding, What do they do to you?
License and registration, license.
You get the ticket, right?
I don't get the ticket.
It's my car, but you get the ticket.
But yet, when you see a car that's driving in a camera, they don't know who's driving it.
Now, chances are.
It's you driving it.
But it could be your wife or your son or your kid or whatever it is.
When did that part, when did that become suspended?
Ah, research it.
Think.
What's the issue?
The issue is, must they prove identity of the driver?
Okay.
It's that simple.
And they're going crazy over this.
Anyway, so when I tell you something, if I tell you, this is what the law is, don't say, well that's crazy because we have these ideas of what the law is.
How many times have you heard people say, they robbed his house?
Did you hear about Jerry?
They robbed him.
Robbed him?
Well, no, they robbed his house.
You can't rob a house.
What do you mean?
You only rob a person.
You can burglarize a house, but you don't rob a person.
Really?
Really.
Oh, okay.
Well, why do we say that?
Because we do.
We just say these things.
So I want to explain to you how we're going to be using incitement, sedition, Kanye West, how we could prosecute him for hate crimes, and how you, daring to challenge an event, a la Alex Jones, could very well lead to lawsuits, civil and criminal liability.
Things that would have never, 40 years ago, 30 years ago, if I would have even suggested that, they'd say, you're out of your mind.
Not anymore.
Things are changing drastically.
Drastically.
Now, let me say something very, very quickly.
Very, very quickly.
And listen to me like you've never listened before.
My dear friend, and I consider you my friend, the entire world, everywhere, is experiencing food shortages.
And all you have to do is just read headlines.
Just read the entire world, everywhere.
It's not regional.
Supply chain breakdowns.
Domino effects.
Remember, food production.
When you affect planting and Farmers now, you will see this later on.
Farmers can't plant as many crops because of fertilizer shortages, forest regulations, high fuel prices.
You've heard of ESG constraints.
Remember that.
Remember Germany, Canada, Italy, Poland, the Netherlands, Sri Lanka, climate change regulations, farm closings, cattle being sold off.
Let me say this again.
Fertilizer shortages?
Because they're being outlawed?
This is going to cause incredibly painful food shortages when we run out of the food that we're eating now.
It takes time to grow.
When farmers don't plant, months later we don't eat.
That's why you need to prepare for an increasing number of food shortages.
And the best way...
It's the perfect hedge against skyrocketing prices and shortages.
You can save, right now, $250 on each three-month emergency food kit that you purchase.
The best price since 2019.
Prepare with Lionel.
N-E-L.
Somebody one time says, I can't find it, because he's spelling it Lionel, the two L's.
Preparewithlionel.com The best price of 2019.
So what are you waiting for?
No one will make you do this.
No one will order you.
The police won't come and say, have you prepared it?
No.
You've got to do it on your own, and you will, because you're smart, and you're wise, and you're listening.
And these wonderful people support us, and we support them.
As we protect ourselves and our family.
PrepareWithLionel.com PrepareWithLionel.com PrepareWithLionel.com Now, I mentioned this the other day and I said this.
Kanye West is going to be the focus of this.
Watch Kanye West.
Watch the Alex Jones case.
Why is that important?
Irrespective of...
Whether people like these people or not, or the motivation behind that.
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, arguing no, let's assume that you do not believe there was a moon landing.
Let's just assume this.
You do not believe it.
You don't.
You never have.
Now, is that your right to believe that?
Do you have a right to believe that no humans, not just Americans, nobody, well, we're all Americans that landed, but nobody landed on the moon, ever.
From 1969 all the way through whatever.
Nobody did.
Can you believe that?
Is there anything impeding that?
It's crazy, right?
It's misinformation.
It's disinformation.
It's false.
It's been, I mean, Neil deGrasse Tyson has cleared that up, and Bill Nye, the science guy, everybody knows this.
Can you believe that?
Yes.
Okay.
Can you say that?
Can you say that?
Can you go on some, go outside, excuse me, as long as you're not disturbing the beast, I just want everybody to know, I don't believe this.
Can you do that?
Are you allowed to do that?
Are you allowed to go outside and say this?
But it's wrong.
It's misinformation.
It's disinformation.
It's crazy.
It's lunacy.
Come on.
We got pictures.
Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Hello.
Neil deGrasse Tyson.
And even Chuck Nice.
There you go.
What more do I have to tell you?
Bill Nye.
Everybody.
One small step for man.
Where were you?
Come on.
Come on, man.
Come on.
Now, can you go on a platform, a public platform, let's say this.
YouTube or Parler, which Kanye West is going to buy.
Did you hear that?
Anyway.
Can you say this?
Can you every day say this?
It's misinformation.
You've been debunked.
You're a skeptic?
You're a lunatic?
You're a conspiracy theorist?
Can you say this?
Can you go and say this?
Can they do anything to you?
Well, they'll most probably demonetize you, but that's...
They can put maybe some kind of warning or something, but can they shut you down?
Not just in terms of this, but charge you, sue you, bring you to court.
Can they?
For saying this?
Normally you would say, no.
Okay.
And this is what I discussed in the Alex Jones case.
Listen to me carefully.
And there it is right now.
That's the YouTube, I believe that is it right there.
Let's see if we understand this very, very carefully.
Let's say somebody goes to...
Who's living now?
Is Michael Collins living?
Michael Collins is...
No, not...
No, I'm sorry.
I'm thinking of the Irish astronaut.
Michael Collins, astronaut.
Michael Collins...
No, he died.
He died.
I'm sorry.
2021.
Did not know this.
How about Buzz Aldrin?
Buzz Aldrin dying.
Buzz Aldrin.
Buzz is with us.
He's 92. 92. I didn't have a Buzz Aldrin high school in Montclair, isn't it?
Huh?
Middle school.
Right.
Buzz Aldrin.
Okay.
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, arguendo, don't forget, not an innuendo.
Innuendo is an Italian suppository.
But let's assume that you go on TV.
Or go on your platform.
And you say, this is wrong!
And these people like Buzz Aldrin espousing this lunacy.
It never happened.
It's crazy.
It's...
Shall I continue?
It's nuts!
This is a false flag.
Kubrick did it.
Whatever you did.
But, but, instead of you talking about it, you start pointing fingers at Buzz Aldrin.
And then you say, Buzz Aldrin was a part of it, and Buzz Aldrin is part of this false flag, and Buzz Aldrin conspired with NASA, and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Okay?
Now, all of a sudden, Buzz Aldrin says, what are these people outside my house?
These people are driving me crazy.
I had to move three times.
And not only that, not only are you telling me that you don't believe it happened, you're telling me that I, me, I was a part of this, that I, you're defaming me.
This is defamation.
This is a statement of fact.
Of an event, which is false, which I believe, but you're making as a statement of fact.
This is not an opinion.
You're saying, I, Buzz Aldrin, did this!
And now, I have to move, and my family members have to move.
So, see what happens?
Let's go back.
Let's say you said, I don't believe in the Gulf of Tonkin.
I don't believe that.
Well, it turns out the NSA, pretty much later on, Verify this.
But anyway, let's assume that Westmoreland's alive.
And Westmoreland's, they're coming at me, and you were a part of this.
You see what happens?
In the old days, invariably, when you opine, say something did or did not happen, oh, oh, oh.
The Kennedy assassination.
The Kennedy assassination never happened.
Okay.
And the Kennedys were a part of the cover-up.
They could have done something.
Now wait a minute.
Hold it.
RFK.
Name it.
Whatever the story is.
It involves a person.
Whatever it is.
Mary Jo Kopechny and the Kopechny family.
Name it.
Tell me one issue.
One story.
Oh!
And by the way, don't think...
What about this public figure thing?
What about this...
Okay.
Fauci.
Fauci comes along and says, you terrorized me and my family.
It's one thing for you to say you don't believe in COVID, but now, my family.
But it doesn't work always the opposite.
For example, what about, remember a while back when all of a sudden people were going to the homes of Supreme Court justices?
Remember that?
Whatever happened to that?
It just stopped.
Another example of it just kind of went away.
Just kind of went away.
Goodbye!
Well, do you think that maybe Kavanaugh's family?
Or Gorsuch?
Or Clarence Thomas?
Because this is what you've done?
Can Ginny Thomas?
Well, theoretically, you can argue whether she would have the same audience of such.
But do you see where this is going?
Now we look at incitement.
And this is the thing which I wanted to bring to your attention.
This is the most fascinating.
Incitement.
And this is a federal statute.
Listen to this one.
And by the way, there's a statute that specifically deals with people Harassing, bothering judges and the like.
Anyway, whoever, with the intent that another person engage in conduct, constituting a felony that has an element, that has as an element, excuse me, the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against property or against the person of another.
In violation of the laws of the United States, and under circumstances strongly corroborative of that intent, meaning something that aids about, this is like the accomplice statute, so to speak.
If they, whoever solicits, commands, induces, or otherwise endeavors to persuade such other person to engage in such conduct, shall be imprisoned, not more than one half.
The maximum term of imprisonment, fined not more than one half of the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the crime solicited.
Or both, or if the crime solicited is punishable by life or death, shall be imprisoned not more than 20 years.
So what this means is, and by analogy, if you solicit, command, induce, or otherwise endeavor to persuade somebody, To threaten the use of force against somebody.
What does that mean?
Well, let me tell you what could very well and most probably will happen next.
It is not enough.
It is not enough that you said this or whatever it is.
No, we're not going after what you said.
It incited people.
Don't you understand?
It incited.
Alex Jones, let me go back to this, remember, he defaulted on his case, meaning, it was alleged and proved by two courts at least, that he did not comply with requirements and orders of the court to provide information regarding financial records or the like.
So, he defaulted.
And everything in that complaint is admitted.
So, whatever they said, When you default, because you don't file an answer, it's...
You got it?
That's important.
Now, we then go to the next trial, which is what you saw.
This is the damages.
This is how much do I get?
We've already established liability.
Now we talk about damages.
We never get to what he did, what he didn't do, what he meant, how many times he apologized.
It doesn't matter.
It's done.
It's a weird case.
You don't see this often.
You don't see a default.
But, so what you're seeing right now is something very different.
So when people say, and this was, and I'm not going to mention this.
I'm not going to mention this.
And again, I'm not, listen, this is not about Alex Jones per se.
This is about the subject.
Somebody said, to think that somebody could be charged with an opinion.
Just expressing an opinion.
What today's juridicature, whatever it would suggest, is that this isn't about an opinion.
This is about something that incites.
Let me give you an example.
Years ago, Morris Dees and the Southern Poverty Law Center, when they brought lawsuit against the Klan, against the Tom Metzgers and others, they said, this is our opinion.
And they used a Brandenburg case, which is another issue, which I went through yesterday very, very, very carefully.
Listen to my YouTube, my latest one, on Alex Jones.
But what they're saying is, in effect, that this is not an opinion.
This is an incitement.
This is different.
It's also, it's defamatory against me.
So, if you say the CDC conspired with so-and-so to provide false information regarding COVID, that's one thing.
If you say the CDC and Fauci, and Fauci's wife, and the Fauci family, now, you're going to see people saying, wait a minute, this is incitement.
Let me give you another example, and nobody wants to hear this.
When you talk about Trump on January 6th, Nobody wants to hear about sedition.
Because in their mind, they have this idea of what sedition is.
They have this idea.
And they will never refer to a statute.
They will never look at a statute.
They just don't.
They don't...
And what's weird about...
Let me show you this one.
And you are charged with this, by the way.
You are charged with this.
But seditious conspiracy.
Let me give you an example of this.
But first.
But first, first, first.
I want to mention our good friend, Mr. Mike Lindell.
And, that's right, you heard me.
And MyPillow.com.
Have you gone and supported this man yet?
See what he's done for people who need help and support?
And he's brought thousands of dollars worth of...
Blankets and pillows.
The man's a mensch.
But right now, if you use promo code LINEL, they've got the MyPillow Giza Dreams sets as low as $39.98.
MyPillow Percale sheet sets $29.98.
And the overstock sale?
Dear God.
Dear God.
Please, if anybody has a pacemaker or is under doctor's care, please, before you open this, make sure you check with them because you are going to be...
Gobsmacked by what we have here.
My slippers, towel sale of the year, $24.98, three-piece towel set, $24.98.
My pillow sandals, my pillow's as low as $19.88, only with promo code Lionel.
And all those other promo codes, forget them.
Also, you get a free gift.
A free gift!
First is a gift you pay for, which I know, the redundancy.
Is it tautological?
No, it's oxymoronic.
But I digress.
MyPillow.com.
Promo code Lionel.
Do it now.
Okay?
Now listen to me carefully.
Remember, I'm trying to tell you the facts.
I'm not telling you facts or news that makes you happy.
I'm telling you the truth.
Here's something very interesting.
What is seditious conspiracy?
Not insurrection.
Seditious conspiracy.
And there's one thing John Adams hated.
Sedition.
Oh dear God.
If two or more persons in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States if two or more persons conspire to overthrow put down Put down or,
listen to me carefully, overthrow, put down or destroy by force the government of the United States or those who levy war against the United States or to oppose by force the authority thereof.
Now, this is the next one because up till now it's like, come on!
Think about January 6th.
What are you talking about?
Listen to this one.
Or, by force, if two or more persons, by force, prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize,
take, or possess any property of the United States, Contrary to the authority thereof, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years.
That is 18 U.S.C.
2384, seditious conspiracy.
Hinders, prevents, delays the execution of any law, certification of votes, whatever it is, seize property, seize property, take or possess any property.
This is sedition!
It's a seditious conspiracy.
Now you can sit there and say, that's crazy.
I don't care what you think.
I don't care what you think.
That's the law.
That's what you've got to think about.
Now there are other people involved in this.
I don't know who they are.
Proud Boys, Boogily Boys, Hardy Boys, the Foggy Mountain Boys.
I don't know who they are.
Oak Ridge Boys.
And they're going to claim they were involved in...
Okay, fine.
Whatever.
But understand what we're talking about now.
And very frankly, what happens is a lot of times, and I will tell you this much, I will be the first one.
I don't think anybody ever sat out to say, this is what I want to accomplish.
But if it does, let me explain something to you.
And I'm going to exclude present company.
I'm going to exclude President Company.
But listen to me very carefully.
We have some people in this world who are demented.
And please don't take this the wrong way.
Please, I ask that you not take this to heart.
I'm not saying you.
But there are people who believe in this 1776 stuff.
That's great.
And I love the idea.
I told you I've got my Constitution.
I've got my...
We go to...
Oh, my God.
I even have my...
Look at this.
I've got my...
I got this in the Constitution Center.
This is my American Traders Collection.
This is my musket rifle pen.
All my various pieces of, you know, stuff.
Regarding the revolution and that sort of thing.
I love it.
And the Gadsden flag, live free or die, don't tread on me, whatever it is.
It's nice.
But there is no revolution right now.
And there may be figuratively, there may be spiritually, there may be by analogy.
But I do not believe in taking by force.
Thomas Jefferson, the Liberty, the Tree of Liberty, the bloodshed is fertilized and all that.
I mean, that's...
Listen, I understand what they said.
Tippy Canoe or Tyler, too.
Huh?
A chicken in every pot.
Huh?
Loose lips sink ships.
There's a lot of things that we say.
But there are people right now who are so out of it that if you were to even suggest to them that it is their duty, They will be on the plane and they will show up and they will wear tricorder hats and they will think that they're Samuel Adams and I'm sorry, but it's true.
And I think people can be easily worked up.
I think people can be whatever.
And that's why, that's why, from now on, you will hear this.
You will hear this.
You will see disclaimers.
You will hear people start off just like, have you ever heard this?
Hi, thank you so much.
Please like this video.
I think, what's the matter with this guy?
You've seen this?
You always start off with, I kind of wait to the end before I tell you.
At least I try to.
But you're going to hear people say, we in no way advocate or proclaim or suggest or aid about counsel, procure, hire, encourage, insinuate, blah, blah, blah, blah, any kind of violence or violence against people or whatever, because that's where they're going to go next.
It's going to happen.
And it's not liable anymore.
It's not opinion anymore.
They're not going to be talking about the opinion.
That's the thing.
Can you not see?
I see clearly.
Me and Johnny Nash.
I can see clearly now the rain has come.
I'm telling you.
And this is something that everybody has to understand.
And everybody has to recognize that there are people in the world who will say things to...
Have you heard what Roger Stone is saying lately?
No.
Okay.
Roger's got to ask himself.
And you must understand something.
Ladies and gentlemen, I want to go back a little bit.
And you've heard me say this to the point where I'm sure you're tired of this.
But it's true.
My life...
I have like sort of red pill moments maybe.
But one of them was human...
behavior by watching professional wrestling.
And Roger Stone is a work.
Now, I'm not saying he's not sincere.
I'm not saying that.
I'm not saying he doesn't believe in it.
But Roger Stone is about Roger Stone.
Roger Stone comes from the days of Donald Segretti, Lee Atwater.
And if you put a camera on him, he'll never let you down.
And this is not meant as a slam.
I'm not saying this.
But he and everybody else have to realize, be careful of what you say.
And be careful of how you say things.
And it will be incumbent upon you to say, wait a minute.
Now let me give you this much.
And this is the most important thing I can possibly tell you.
And this is it.
And I'm going to...
Brandenburg versus Ohio.
Remember this.
Remember this holding.
Remember this holding.
This was the case.
Where Brandenburg, remember him?
This was 1969.
He was the leader of the Klan.
And he made a speech at a rally.
And he was later convicted under this Ohio, quote, criminal syndicalism law.
And the law made illegal anybody who advocated, quote, crime, sabotage, violence, or unlawful methods of terrorism.
As a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform.
As well as assembling, quote, with any society, group, or assemblage of persons formed to teach or advocate the doctrines of criminal syndicalism.
Wow!
Oh my God!
Think about that.
It's almost like RICO.
You see, the reason how they get most of the mob, I don't know if you...
Love Mob podcast.
I think they're actually, I've changed my mind, every kid who even thinks about being a mobster should listen to this.
But under racketeering, it would prosecute people for being a part of the mob.
Not for doing anything, just being a part of it.
A lot of people would say, you know what, I don't want the button, I don't want the badge, I don't want to be straightened out, not interested.
But what this says is, so if you're a member of the Klan, just a member?
Alright.
Supreme Court in 1969 said, nope, nope.
In the per curiam PCA case, the court said that this two-pronged test to evaluate speech was as follows.
Listen carefully.
Number one, speech can be prohibited if it is, quote, directed at inciting We're producing imminent.
Some people say eminent.
Imminent lawless action.
So directed at inciting imminent, soon, right now.
And, two point, and, not or, and, is likely to incite.
So I intended it, and it was likely.
That's it.
The Criminal Syndicalism Act made illegal the act Advocacy and teaching of whatever a doctrine was, while ignoring whether or not the advocacy or the teaching actually incited anything.
Now think about that.
You can incite, or you could be charged into this, for seeing stuff that's nuts!
Nobody would ever follow it.
It doesn't matter.
And the failure to make this distinction...
Render the law overly broad.
Okay, fine.
This is 1969.
And the citation is 395 U.S. 444.
By the way, you go to volume 395, the United States reports, page 444, 1969.
That's the citation.
Okay.
This is so critical.
So critical.
Every lawyer, every...
Journalists, everybody should be going crazy right now because they should be able to see what is happening.
Let me also tell you, have you ever noticed how everybody's going crazy about Julian Assange?
Overnight, all these people, everybody jumping on the Julian Assange bandwagon.
Why?
Publicity.
Not everybody, but you know the usual suspects.
Oh, I'm Julian Assange.
Julian Assange, under United States law, is innocent, is not guilty of anything because he was a journalist.
Bartnicki, this is First Amendment protected.
He didn't steal anything.
He published it.
He did what the New York Times did.
He did what the Washington Post did.
Whoever, Chelsea Manning, whatever, she, Was Ellsberg.
That's it.
That's the issue.
Not whether he's, you know, the future of the...
No, no, no.
I mean, that's great.
That's the issue.
That's our law.
See, this tells you the answer, and the theories around this, irrespective of whether you're a Democrat, a Republican, it doesn't matter.
And sometimes you have to say, you know what, that speech is a little bit...
And people are going to be talking about the sexual abuse registry.
They're going to be looking at that to see.
And I want to hear the arguments made.
Maybe it is unconstitutional.
Maybe the way it's enforced.
Maybe it's void for vagueness or whatever it is.
But that's the way we work in this country.
That's it.
And if you don't like it, leave.
There is a rule that says the tennis court is this boundary.
And if you think, I think that's too small.
I think a pickle ball or whatever that thing, everybody's going crazy over this.
I think that's the best.
No, no, no, no.
This is tennis.
You know what?
I can't reach that basket.
I can't dunk.
I want you to lower that.
Because times are changed.
Because, you know, basketball should be more equity.
It should take into account equity.
And people like me, I can't jump that far.
So lower it.
So you get more of a diverse...
What the hell are you talking about?
So sometimes that argument works, sometimes it doesn't.
That's all I'm going to say.
My friends, preparewithlionel.com Go there right now, preparewithlionel.com Get ready!
For your family, for you.
Emergency food.
Prepare with Lionel.com.
And MyPillow.com.
MyPillow.com.
Promo code Lionel.
Also, this right now, this is the brand new, brand new.
This is the questions I have, and I've talked to you about this, regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
And the issues that need to be addressed regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
And it's not what you think.
Again.
As usual, it's not what you think.
That's not it.
And also, it is incumbent upon you, incumbent, to follow Mrs. L at Lynn's Warriors.