All Episodes
Previous
July 10, 2025 - Loomer Unleashed - Laura Loomer
02:47:00
EP132: Blondi Botches Epstein File Release
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
There is a young female journalist, conservative journalist by the name of Laura Loomer.
If America's men acted like Laura Loomer, our problems would be fixed in about five minutes.
Chain herself.
She changed it.
Thank you.
Good evening and welcome to episode 132 of Loomer Unleashed.
I'm your host, Laura Loomer.
We have a lot to talk about tonight.
A lot to talk about tonight.
It's probably going to be a very fiery episode.
So be sure that you head on over to rumble.com slash Laura Loomer.
Rumble.com slash Laura Loomer.
Hit the follow button there.
Be sure that you download the Rumble app and subscribe and enable notifications on your phone so that you never miss an episode of Loomer Unleashed because we've got a lot to talk about.
Like get Loomered.
That will take you over to my locals page where you can support my work for $7 a month or $70 per year, or you can also make a one-time contribution to support the very important work that we do here at Loomer Unleashed.
We are also live right now on X. So please be sure that you head on over and follow me at Laura Loomer or on X at Loomer Unleashed.
Preferably both.
Be sure that you're following us on both accounts.
We're just going to dive right into it.
If you've been a longtime viewer of Loomer Unleash, then you know that I am not very fond of Attorney General Pam Blondie.
I call her blondie because she's pretty dumb.
No offense to blondes.
There's a lot of smart blondes out there, but Pam Blondie isn't one of them.
And, you know, I said this from the very beginning, that she was the first embarrassment of the second Trump administration.
I did.
I said this after Bindergate.
And I remember that so many people attacked me in the aftermath of Bindergate.
Do you remember when they said, oh, you're so jealous, Laura?
You're like a jilted lover.
Oh, you're so jealous.
You know, like you're just angry and jealous that you didn't get invited.
Why would I be jealous that I wasn't invited to some bullshit press event at the White House with a bunch of social media influencers who were given binders full of fake documents or already released documents from years ago with some crappy graphic design on the front that said classified Epstein files because Pam Blondie wanted to get attention because she's so desperate for adoration and attention that when she's not on Fox News,
she has to literally have her assistants Photoshop classified Epstein files onto a binder and parade it around the White House with a bunch of social media influencers to pretend like she's doing something heroic and releasing files that have Otherwise, already been released years ago.
So I'm not jealous.
Okay.
The only people who are jealous are the people who don't have my political acumen and my insight to call these bullshit artists out months, sometimes even years ahead of when I do.
And I'm always the first to do it.
And then I get the blowback and people say, oh, she's too aggressive.
And senators and cabinet members and members of Congress will literally call.
They call the White House and they are like, please, President Trump, get her to stop.
Please, please get her to stop.
Why is Laura Loomer attacking me?
And it's like, well, I don't even work for President Trump.
What do they think that President Trump controls me or something?
So it's kind of interesting.
But this is really true.
Not making this up.
I mean, you wouldn't believe how many times I've gotten phone calls from the White House or advisors at the White House asking me if I could refrain from attacking somebody.
I have probably received at least seven phone calls on different occasions from people in the White House asking me to not attack Pam Blondie.
But you know what?
I didn't receive any phone calls this week.
So that's good.
I mean, I received phone calls, but not as it relates to attacking Pam Blondie.
Why do I bring this up?
Because I think now the writing's on the wall.
I think that a lot of these people who work for the president now realize, wow, Laura Loomer was right.
I don't think that she was being too out of control or belligerent or unreasonable when she was attacking Pam Blondie and calling her out for all of the failures of the current DOJ, the lack of investigations, the lies, the theatrics, her addiction to going on Fox News, right?
There was a Daily Beast article the other day that came out.
I was doing an interview with Sid and Friends in the Morning.
Sid Rosenberg has a really popular big show out of New York City.
And I called her, you know, I want to be Fox News Barbie.
It's like Fox News Barbie Blondie is what I have to call this woman because she just wants to go on Fox.
And yeah, Sean, hi, Sean Hannity.
My name is Pam Blondie and I'm the Attorney General of the United States.
And let me tell you, Ainslie, let me tell you, Peter, those epstein files were delivered to my office in a dump truck, in a big FBI dump truck.
And there's a lot of real powerful men on those lists.
And there's a lot of really powerful people, I'll tell you, Sean, who are about to take private jets out of the, out of our country.
But I'm Pam Blondie, the best attorney general you've ever seen in this country.
And I'm going to hold these people accountable.
Hopeful, golly, golly, Sean, I guess I misspoke.
I guess I misspoke when I said the files were on my desk.
I guess I misspoke when I said that the files were going to be delivered in a dunk truck.
I mean, every day it's another story with this woman.
And it's not just me.
Look, I'm going to play the video clips for you tonight and we're going to go through the timeline and you're going to see yourself.
But the problem is, is we are witnessing a Fox News cabinet.
It's like a reality TV cabinet.
And everybody knows I love President Trump.
I support President Trump.
I think a lot of his cabinet picks are great people.
But a lot of these people were selected out of what he likes to call central casting.
And, you know, there's some people on there who had popular podcasts or people who had popular shows or people who have been on Fox News a lot, or maybe they posted some nice things about President Trump.
And now they're in the cabinet and they really don't deserve to be in the cabinet.
And Pam Blondie is one of those people.
Here you go.
Here's the Daily Beast article.
We have this pulled up right here.
Laura Loomer attacks Fox News Barbie Pam Blondie over Epstein List.
I was joking the other day, but I'm also not joking because it's not a joke.
It's actually real.
I try to tag her from her official government account because she actually blocked me from her personal account because she got so upset with me calling her out over Bindergate months ago back in February when she screwed up.
And it's funny because I call her Pam Blondie.
And so I have said Pam Blondie so many times that my brain just automatically goes to type in B-L-O-N-D-I.
And I'm like, where's her account?
And I'm like, oh yeah, that's right.
It's Bondie, not Blondie, but it's Blondie, right?
In my mind.
And so it's frustrating because I constantly forget that, oh, wait, her Twitter handle is actually just AG Bondie, right?
So maybe one of these days she'll change her actual handle to Blondie and then I won't have to press the delete button on X so many times.
But look, as it says, the top Trump ally has been demanding that the Attorney General be fired over the clientless letdown.
I have been saying this from the beginning.
People said you're being too rough, Laura.
Look, we can't, we, the president can't fire members of his cabinet.
It hasn't been 100 days yet.
Give her some time.
The president really likes her.
Please, please do the president a favor.
Stop talking badly about Pam Bondi.
Please give her a chance.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
How many chances is this woman going to get?
That's what I want to know.
How many chances is Pam Blondie going to get before President Trump says his favorite F word?
You're fired, right?
I really miss the days of when President Trump, who I think he's doing a fantastic job, fired people, right?
I loved when people got fired during the first Trump administration.
It's great.
I mean, it was some of the most memorable moments were when President Trump fired people who didn't belong in his administration.
But what we've now seen is like this revolving door.
And I don't know if this is a way to contain people from writing tell-all books or writing hit pieces or planting stories or running to the media or whatever it is they're going to do.
But the new Trump administration, unfortunately, for all the good that they're doing, has adopted this mindset of let's just rotate people.
If they screw up or they let the president down or they get caught leaking or they lie to the base, we're not going to fire them.
We're going to rotate them.
And so look at Michael Waltz, right?
Okay.
Michael Waltz, who obviously he got fired, was not very good at his job, couldn't even understand the concept of a security screen on his phone and couldn't even understand how Signal worked and put a hostile anti-Trump reporter, right?
We don't need to hash out Signalgate again.
Y'all know what happened there.
Michael Waltz should have been fired.
He should have just been fired.
But what did they do?
They rotated him and they put him in charge of the UN.
And now you have Elise Stephonic who's back in Congress.
She's probably going to be making a run for governor of New York, but that position should have gone toward to Elise Stephonic.
Why do I bring this up?
Same thing happened with a lot of the other people that were fired from the NSC.
And same thing has happened with other people who have been fired from, you know, for example, working with Steve Wickoff or working in other positions.
They have since been rotated into other positions instead of actually being fired.
And so you have to ask yourself, if somebody doesn't do their job and somebody lies to the MAGA base to the point where people are so mad right now, there's so many people in the MAGA base that are so angry with the administration over Pam Blondie that they're literally telling their audiences not to show up and vote in the midterms.
That would be very stupid.
We don't want President Trump to be a lamed up president.
We certainly do not want the Democrats to take control of the House.
So I would still encourage everybody to get out and vote in the midterms, even if you are dissatisfied with the Republican Party, because we need to keep the House and we need to keep the Senate.
However, you know, you can't ignore the fact that so many people feel blackpilled right now.
And they feel blackpilled because we have an attorney general who was supposed to be implementing law and order.
We have an attorney general who was supposed to be exposing corruption, pursuing criminal investigations into people who sold the election, who staged a coup.
We still don't have the Butler report.
We still don't have any information about these assassination attempts aside from the fact that they were Iranian plots, which we're going to get into tonight and talk about even more.
But you have to ask yourself, what is the benefit of having Pam Blondie in the position that she's in?
What exactly is she doing?
Was she loyal to the president?
Eh, debatable.
Some people say she was loyal.
Okay, well, she was there for the president during the impeachment.
Whatever.
She was with Jeb Bush in the primary.
There's some of us who have been way more loyal than Pam Blondie.
So I wouldn't even go ahead and say that she's a full Trump loyalist.
I think that she's an opportunist and she knows where her bread is buttered.
But look, when it comes to Pam Bondi, you have a lot of conflicts of interest that are going to get in the way of President Trump implementing his agenda.
We've discussed at length on this program how we're probably never going to see the Muslim Brotherhood get designated at this point because we have an attorney general who was once a lobbyist for Qatar.
Pam Blondie was once paid $150,000 a month by Qatar to lobby for them.
Do you really honestly think that she's going to investigate all these jihadist organizations that are backed by Qatar to assist in the designation of the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization?
No.
Do you really honestly think that she's going to be honest about the Epstein files and the Epstein investigation when you look at who was Attorney General of Florida when Jeffrey Epstein was getting away with raping kids and sexually assaulting minors in the state of Florida?
Who was the Attorney General?
Oh yeah, Pam Blondie.
Pam Blondie.
You remember?
Because I remember.
Pam Blondie was the one in charge.
And so this is stuff that really should have been covered during vetting.
But we all know that there is no vetting in this administration.
A lot of the vetting is done by me in an unofficial capacity.
And when I say in an unofficial capacity, I do it on my own accord, independently.
I don't work for the White House, but a lot of the major vetting blunders have been identified and discovered by me.
And I can't help but think about the first Trump administration when Alex Acosta had to resign as labor secretary because it was revealed during a Senate hearing that he participated in the plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein in Florida.
And it was such a blunder that he was made to resign, if you recall.
And people were always wondering how that didn't come up when he was undergoing his initial vetting to become Secretary of Labor.
That's the whole point.
There was no vetting.
And so we're witnessing the same thing, just like there was a blunder with Alex Acosta and his, you know, his admission of participating in the plea deal for Epstein, I believe in 2000.
I think it was in 2017 or 2018 when he was made to resign.
We can get it pulled up and fact-checked it.
Alex Acosta, Epstein, Trump.
But you're seeing the repeat here.
How come nobody thought to themselves, gee, you know, one of the main promises we made on the campaign trail was we're going to release the Epstein files.
We're going to declassify the JFK files and we're going to declassify the MLK files.
Hmm.
We're going to put the attorney general in charge of that.
Maybe, just maybe, it's a conflict of interest to have an attorney general overseeing the release of the Epstein files when she was the attorney general of Florida when Epstein was raping kids.
Hmm.
Why didn't Pam Blondie take action against Jeffrey Epstein when she was the Attorney General of Florida?
Hmm.
You see, like the wheels are turning and then you're like, wow, hmm.
Looks like this is something that dates back a long time.
Alex Acosta steps down as labor secretary amid Epstein controversy.
Okay, so it was 2019, right?
I get the dates blurred sometimes.
These last 10 years have gone by so fast.
You can scroll down and see for yourself.
Labor Secretary Alex Acosta stepping down after criticism over his role in a non-prosecution deal reached years ago with the well-connected businessman accused of sex crimes, Jeffrey Epstein.
Acosta appeared on Friday at the White House of President Trump and announced his resignation.
I don't think it's fair for this administration's labor department to have Epstein as its focus rather than the incredible economy we have today, Acosta said.
The right thing to do was to step aside.
Well, look, you can commend Alex Acosta for at least not allowing his ego to get in the way of him being labor secretary.
He stepped aside and he clearly said, I do not think it is fair for this administration's labor department to have Epstein as its focus rather than the incredible economy we have today.
So why is Pam Blondie not doing the same thing?
She should be saying, look, you know, the Trump administration is doing incredible things.
I don't think it's fair for the focus of the Trump administration to be my mishandling of the Epstein case.
I mean, she really honestly, I don't even know if it's mishandling, lying, or just the fact that she's totally dumb and incompetent, right?
Just the other day at the White House cabinet meeting, and we had the clips.
We're going to play the clips for you.
She said when asked by a reporter that there's no evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was an agent.
However, if you go back and you look at the plea deal documents that Alex Acosta ended up resigning over due to his failure to disclose this prior to joining the Trump administration, Jeffrey Epstein, and I posted these documents from the agreement on my ex account.
And even Elon Musk replied to it the other day, saying, interesting.
In the documents, it literally says that Jeffrey Epstein agreed to hand over information to the FBI as agreed upon.
So he was serving as an agent or some type of informant.
And here we go.
We have it right here.
As I said, 2008.
Epstein also provided information to the FBI as agreed upon.
Case agent advised that no federal prosecution will occur in this matter as long as Epstein continues to uphold his agreement with the state of Florida.
So the state of Florida, right, agreed, and Pam Blondie would have known about this because shortly after is when she would have been the attorney general overseeing this agreement, that they weren't going to pursue with federal prosecution as long as he continued to provide information to the FBI.
So obviously he was acting as an agent with a law enforcement agency.
The FBI is a law enforcement agency.
And so why do I bring this up?
Well, if Alex Acosta turned in his resignation to President Trump because Epstein became such a scandal during the first Trump administration over Alex Acosta's involvement, then why shouldn't Pam Blondie also turn her resignation in as attorney general,
given the fact that she was not upfront about the fact that she was the attorney general during the time that Jeffrey Epstein was raping kids in Florida and getting away with sex crimes, and the state of Florida was recommending no federal prosecution as long as he kept on turning information in to the FBI.
Right?
It's bizarre.
I think that she should also resign.
If President Trump isn't going to fire her, then she should resign because she has become such an embarrassment to the current Trump administration.
So we're going to get into these clips now just so that you can see that I'm being completely honest and factual about the information I'm giving you.
Here's a clip from the cabinet meeting yesterday at the White House where Pam Blandi was asked about whether Jeffrey Epstein was working as an agent with any federal law enforcement agencies.
And she gave this very half-assed answer.
And it's like, okay, are you not aware of these documents that I just showed from 2008?
Or are you lying about the documents from 2008?
Either way, it's totally disqualifying and unbecoming of the intellect that is required of somebody who wishes to be or aspires to be the Attorney General of the United States of America.
Let's go ahead and play the clip.
Sure, sure.
First to back up on that, in February, I did an interview on Fox and it's been getting a lot of attention because I said I was asked a question about the client list and my response was, it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed, meaning the file, along with the JFK MLK files as well.
That's what I meant by that.
Also to the tens of thousands of video, they turned out to be child porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein.
Child porn is what they were.
Never going to be released, never going to see the light of day.
To him being an agent, I have no knowledge about that.
We can get back to you on that.
And the minute missing from the video, we released the video showing definitively the video was not conclusive, but the evidence prior to it was showing he committed suicide.
And what was on that, there was a minute that was off the counter.
And what we learned from Bureau of Prisons was every year, every night, they redo that video.
It's old from like 1999.
So every night the video is reset and every night should have the same minute missing.
So we're looking for that video to release that as well, showing that a minute is missing every night.
And that's it on Epstein.
Epstein.
Epstein.
Obviously, Jeffrey Epstein was serving as some type of agent.
So again, they're now saying, let's just go ahead and get this memo pulled up too.
In case you're, I don't know how you couldn't be aware of this unless you live under a rock, but if you're not aware of what happened on Sunday following 4th of July weekend, when everybody was coming back from 4th of July weekend or getting ready for Monday, just quietly, right?
Without any kind of like press release, conference, whatever, just quietly, right?
Hoping that nobody was going to notice it.
Pam Blondie released this two-page memo on the website of the Department of Justice.
And she put the Federal Bureau of Investigation on it as well.
But you'll notice if you scroll all the way down to the bottom of the memo, that there's no name on it, right?
And so this prompted people to say that it was fake or that it was not a real memo because they were like, well, why isn't Pam Blondie's name on it?
How come Cash Patel's name isn't on it?
How come Diamondo's name isn't on it?
And you can see here that in this memo, right, blah, blah, blah.
You know, we had child porn.
We all knew stuff we already knew.
Through this review, we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of the materials.
And we're not going to permit the release of child pornography.
If you recall, if you watch this, this show, I told you months ago, okay, I told you months ago that they were going to say that they can't release the files because they're going to be child pornography.
If you've read Roger Stone's book, The Clinton's War on Women, he discussed this years ago, how a lot of the files were video files.
And that's why a lot of the files haven't been released is because it's child pornography.
Let's go back to the memo.
The systematic review revealed no incriminating client list.
So again, we're told that there's no client list after President Trump and JD Vance and Cash Patel and Dan Bongino all campaigned for years saying that there's a client list and that, you know, Biden was covering it up and that the Democrats were covering it up because a lot of high-profile Democrat donors were on the list and that they, you know, even when Dan Bongino had his podcast, he doesn't have his podcast anymore.
He was always saying, don't let them get away with it, you guys.
Don't let them get away with it.
And look, I really like Dan Bongino.
He's a friend of mine, but facts are facts.
And he's literally on video saying, don't let them get Away with it, you guys.
You know, they're going to try to cover it up.
They're going to try to destroy the files.
Don't let them get away with it.
Let's go back to the memo again.
No client list, she says.
There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions.
We were told for years that Jeffrey Epstein blackmailed people.
We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.
To the end, while we have labored to provide the public with maximum information regarding Epstein and ensured examination of any evidence in the government's possession, it is the determination of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.
So we were promised that these files were going to be released, but now they're telling us that they are not going to be released.
Cash Patel is the director of the FBI.
And so there's a lot of infighting going on.
You want the inside scoot.
There's a lot of fighting going on amongst White House staffers and White House advisors and officials right now because Pam Blondie is now trying to throw Cash Patel and Dan Bongino under the bus and say that they were aware of this and that they all had a meeting apparently and that everybody was aware and that the DOJ attorney was aware and that the council was aware and that everybody was aware and they were in agreement that they were going to release this memo.
But I have sources as well, members of Congress who have told me that they've had conversations with Cash Patel and Dan Bongino and that Cash Patel and Dan Bongino told these Trump officials and also members of Congress that Pam Blondie never notified them or consulted with them in advance upon the release of this memo and that they were kind of blindsided by it.
So now it's like a game of he said, she said where, you know, Pam Blondie is trying to throw Cash Patel and Dan Bongino under the bus, just like she did in the aftermath of Bindergate.
Oh, the deep state isn't giving me the files, but the files are on my desk and I'm going to release the files.
I mean, every day it's like another story, right?
If you go back to the memo here, we'll just show you the hypocrisy here.
So again, you scroll up a little bit and she clearly says, right, there's no incriminating client list.
This systematic review revealed no incriminating client list.
Okay.
So if there was no incriminating client list, then why did Pam Blondie go on Fox News and say that the files are on her desk?
The files are on her desk, right?
I mean, we have so many videos here.
I don't even know if we're going to be able to get through all these videos tonight, but I'm just telling you, right?
I have four pages here of prep and video lists of Pam Blondie going on Fox News, which is, you know, appears to be like the only thing that she wants to do these days is go on Fox News.
Doesn't want to do her job, but loves going on Fox News, talking about how the files are on her desk.
Let's just go ahead and play some of these clips.
Let's go ahead and play clip number nine.
Pam Bondi saying that she has no knowledge.
Excuse me.
Clip number seven.
Pam Blondie on Fox saying that the Epstein files and the client list are on her desk.
Let's play clip number seven.
The DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients.
Will that really happen?
It's sitting on my desk right now to review.
That's been a directive by President Trump.
I'm reviewing that.
I'm reviewing JFK files, MLK files.
That's all in the process of being reviewed because that was done at the directive of the president from all of these agencies.
So have you seen anything that you said, oh my gosh?
Not yet.
Okay.
Well, we'll check.
Is the DOJ going to release the client list, Pam?
Well, it's sitting on my desk as I sit here with you.
It's sitting on my desk.
Let's go back to the memo.
The systematic review revealed no incriminating client lists.
Let's just go ahead and play the first four seconds of that clip one more time.
The DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients.
Will that really happen?
It's sitting on my desk right now to review.
That's been a directive by President Trump.
I'm reviewing that.
I'm reviewing JFK follow.
You heard her say at the clip, the clip, the list, the client list is on her desk.
She is a liar.
Either she is so addicted to attention and clicks and likes and going on Fox News that she lied to Fox News or she's lying now.
Either way, you cannot have trust in an attorney general who lies to the American people.
We just dealt with Merritt Garland.
We just dealt with the Biden administration lying over and over again.
We don't have trust in our government anymore.
We don't have trust in our DOJ anymore.
We don't have trust in the FBI.
How are we supposed to clean house at the FBI and the CIA and the DOJ, which is, you know, we had this issue of weaponized government and distrust with government.
How is anybody supposed to have any trust in the FBI and the DOJ now?
We were told that this was the golden era, that this was the golden age, that we were going to be able to have transparency, that this was going to be the most transparent administration ever, right?
That's what we were told.
But no, she is an embarrassment.
The first big blunder of the Trump administration, and it was going so well, there was no incidents whatsoever in the first few days of the Trump administration, the first few weeks, until Pam Blondie decided to parade in a bunch of influencers with binders and made a clown show out of the Epstein foul release.
So we have a lot.
We have a lot of clips.
Let's go ahead and play clip number 16.
You can just see, let's jog your memory down memory lane, influencers pose with a fake Epstein list.
Again, at this White House meeting, she told everybody that they were getting the list, but now she's saying there is no list.
Let's go ahead and play this clip.
Let's go back.
Let's go back.
you And look, she's embarrassing other members of the Trump administration too, people who want nothing to do with this.
I think that Alina Haba, right, she is an advisor to the president.
Now, of course, she is, you know, working in New Jersey as the U.S. attorney in New Jersey.
And Alina Haba was on Fox News saying that they have the flight logs and the names that are going to be released.
So, you know, what's the backlash now for all these other members of the Trump administration or former members who were trying to do good, right?
Because they were under the belief and they really believed that they were actually going to release these names.
And now, right, they're being attacked.
Like Cash Patel is getting attacked, Dian Bongino's getting attacked, Alina Haba's getting attacked, President Trump's getting attacked because Pam Blombie decided to lie and say that the files were on her desk and that she was going to release them.
And now she's trying to gaslight everybody into thinking that the files are not there.
So let's go ahead and play this clip of Alina Haba back in February saying that they have flight logs and names are going to be released.
So if I had worked for President Trump or if I was an advisor for President Trump, I would be so damn pissed off right now with Pam Blondie because she has not just embarrassed President Trump, but she has embarrassed other advisors and officials within the Trump administration.
She's caused people to lose confidence in the midterms, in the Trump administration, in the FBI.
She's embarrassed Vice President Vance, who criticized the Democrats in 2020 for not releasing the Epstein files.
She has embarrassed a lot of people.
She's done a lot of damage.
And this is a massive stain on the administration.
I'm not saying that it's President Trump's fault, but I will say President Trump is the one who appointed her and President Trump is the person who has the authority to fire her.
And so if President Trump would like to prove to his base that, you know, he agrees with us that, and I do believe that the president is very committed to combating human trafficking and he is very committed to cracking down on pedophilia and doing the right thing and being transparent, then I think that the president should fire Pam Blondie.
Have there be some accountability?
If he's truly committed to restoring people's faith in our Justice Department and the FBI, I think that there has to be some consequences.
Somebody needs to be fired.
And the person that needs to be fired, who's ultimately responsible for this blunder, is Pam Blondie.
Let's go ahead and play this clip of Alina Haba back in February saying that they have the flight logs and the client list names and that they're going to be released.
But in this case, in Epstein's case, it is incredibly disturbing.
We have flight logs, we have information, names that will come out.
Is it going to be shocking?
I don't see how it's not shocking that there were so many individuals that were hidden and kept secret and not been held accountable.
Let's talk about the reverse.
I believe in accountability.
So you have to now go through your process.
Now, I won't say they're guilty until they go through their time in court.
But again, now it's time for accountability.
We have seen for so many years, Pierce, in this country, many investigations, subpoenas, testimonies in Congress, et cetera, et cetera.
But there's a general frustration with accountability.
We take it halfway.
We don't take it home.
And I really believe that now with Cash and Pam, there will be accountability.
There are a lot of people who said that the files were going to come out.
We're going to be joined by our guests soon.
I want to play some more clips for you.
You have Elon Musk back in 2024 doing an interview with Tucker Carlson saying that if President Trump wins the election, the Epstein list is going to become public.
Let's go ahead and play clip number 14.
You know, I think part of why Kamala is getting so much support is that if Trump wins, that Epstein client list is going to become public.
Yes.
And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are terrified of that outcome.
Yeah.
Do you think Reid Hawk?
We have Cash Patel telling Benny Johnson that Republicans can get the Epstein list out now.
Let's go ahead and play clute number 18.
This is why I'm tired of the Republican majority saying they're going to get the job done and failing.
In closing here, I want to just be very clear.
Republicans could get Epstein's list out now?
Like, how would that process work?
Simple.
One subpoena to the FBI.
Give me the list.
So this guy is just absolutely spineless.
You know, he did a complete 180 and he's clearly trying to bullshit everyone.
And him saying that there are no tapes is contradicting what the Attorney General Pam Bondi said.
She said they have thousands of videos that they're looking through.
No, no, the FBI.
Yeah, the FBI, they're reviewing there are tens of thousands of videos.
That was in 2023.
Okay, Cash, if that's the case, you're the FBI director.
So why don't you go have the Republicans who control the House and the Senate send you a subpoena and you can release the Epstein client list?
That's what he said, right?
Those are his own words.
He's now the FBI director.
So go do it.
And I like Cash Patel.
I'm not trying to get snippy with Cash Patel.
I'm not.
I like Dan Bongino.
But you cannot just go on podcasts and tell people, you know, it's that easy.
It's that easy.
Just send a subpoena to the FBI.
You know, send a subpoena.
The Republicans get it done.
Just go do it.
We have the House, we have the Senate, we have the White House, and we have Cash Patel in his FBI director.
They'll get it done, right?
But nobody wants to get it done.
So I guess people lied.
I mean, I don't think that that's a confrontational thing to say.
That is what happened.
Because how can Cash Patel say what he just said and then also say and go along with what Pam Boni said?
If Pam Blondie is lying and obstructing or preventing Cash Patel from releasing the list, then Pam Blondie should not just resign or be fired, but Cash Patel and Dan Bongino should come out on the record and call for her to be fired as well.
Let's go ahead and play clip number 20, Pam Bonte on C-SPAN on the Epstein evidence.
Yeah, the FBI, they're reviewing there are tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.
And there are hundreds of victims.
And no one victim will ever get released.
It's just the volume.
And that's what they're going through right now.
The FBI is diligently going through that.
I haven't seen that statement, but I'll call him later and find out.
Just so much bullshit every day.
Clip number 21, Pam Bondi on Fox News calling for the Epstein list to be released in February.
Well, it's July now, Pam Blondie.
Where's that list?
Well, we know he was on the plane, not only on the plane a couple times, multiple times.
He traveled internationally, internationally with Jeffrey Epstein, and he was On the plane called the Lolita Express because it supposedly had a bed in there where Jeffrey Epstein had young girls.
He has been a friend of his, a continuing friend of his, for years and years.
Contrast that with Donald Trump, who hasn't spoken to him in many years, over a decade, after he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago for bad behavior.
So that's the difference there.
And I think Americans see the two-tier justice system.
But, you know, we don't know.
They're saying Clinton has not been to his private island, but he has traveled all over the world with Jeffrey Epstein.
I want to know why A.G. Garland and the Justice Department are so quiet on this tonight.
You know, they're out there labeling parents domestic terrorists, yet they're saying nothing about this.
And these documents were so slow to come out.
Human trafficking is a multi-billion dollar business in this country.
And Jeffrey Epstein is dead.
And Gurlaine Maxwell is in prison for 20 years where she belongs.
And if people in that report are still fighting to keep their names private, Sean, they have no legal basis to do so unless they're a child, a victim, or a cooperating defendant by some chance against some potential case against Gurlaine Maxwell.
And I think Mark Darragus is a great criminal defense attorney, I'll back that up as well.
Okay.
Totally different than what we're hearing now.
Here we have Pam Blondie at our Senate confirmation hearing answering questions from Senator John Kennedy.
Let's play float number 22.
Ms. Blondie, welcome.
Congratulations.
Can we agree that legitimacy is important to America's criminal justice system?
Yes, Senator Can we agree that legitimacy is important to the Department of Justice, which in part administers our criminal justice system?
Yes, Senator.
And if Americans come to believe that our criminal justice system or our Department of Justice is acting illegitimately, that makes Americans less likely to accept the results of that system, does it not?
Yes, Senator.
And that makes Americans less likely to follow the substantive laws that we pass that are administered by the Department of Justice.
Isn't that true?
Yes, Senator.
And if that happens, we have chaos, don't we?
Chaos.
And the social contract is breached, isn't it?
Yes.
I mean, look, all these people do is lie.
Here we have another clip.
Let's play clip number 19.
Pam Blondie on Fox News saying that the evidence was delivered in a truckload of Epstein files that just arrived at her office at the DOJ.
We all did.
And the FBI handed over a couple hundred pages of documents.
But, you know, Sean, I gave them a deadline of Friday at 8 a.m. to get us everything.
And a source had told me where the documents were being kept.
Southern District of New York shock.
So we got them all by hopefully all of them.
Friday at 8 a.m., thousands of pages of documents.
I have the FBI going through them.
And Cash is also, now that we have Cash here, it's a game changer, of course.
And Cash is going to, Director Patel is going to get us a detailed report as to why the FBI withheld all of those documents.
Okay, I want to be clear, because I think people got frustrated because they were expecting more.
You were expecting more.
And you didn't find out less than 24 hours before the release, you got a whistleblower that confirmed that there were way more documents that they were supposed to turn over, and then you found out just before that.
Well, sure.
And you're looking at these documents going, these aren't all the Epstein files.
You know, there were flight logs, they were names and victims' names, and we're going, where's the rest of the stuff?
And that's what the FBI had turned over to us.
And so a source said, whoa, all this evidence is sitting in the Southern District of New York.
So based on that, I gave them the deadline.
Friday at 8, a truckload of evidence arrived.
It's now in the possession of the FBI.
Cash is going to get me and himself really a detailed report as to why all these documents and evidence had been withheld.
And, you know, we're going to go through it, go through it as fast as we can, but go through it very cautiously to protect all the victims of Epstein, because there are a lot of victims.
Well, you had identified in phase one over 254.
Okay.
Now, is that the only thing that would be redacted?
Will everything else be made public that you get in your possession?
Yeah, the FBI hasn't had, obviously they haven't looked at the thousands of pages of documents that they've just received Friday.
But Cash has a team going through them, and it's always about protecting the victim.
But you know what?
We believe in transparency, and America has the right to know.
The Biden administration sat on these documents.
No one did anything with them.
And why were they sitting in the Southern District of New York?
I want a full report on that.
You know, sadly, these people don't believe in transparency, but I think more unfortunately, I think a lot of them don't believe in honesty.
And it's a new day.
It's a new administration.
And everything's going to come out to the public.
The public has a right to know.
Americans have a right to know.
And that goes the same with the JFK files.
JFK files.
Martin Luther King.
Yep, absolutely.
What are the things that, and maybe some people don't understand the need to redact.
In the case of a victim, that should be pretty obvious to people.
What are the other things that maybe you'd have to redact?
National security?
No, of course.
National security, some grand jury information, which is always going to be confidential, but we'll see.
Let's look through them as fast as we can, get it out to the American people, because the American people have a right To know not only on that, but on Kennedy, on Martin Luther King, on all of these cases that the Biden administration has just sat on for all these years.
So, yeah, it's really, it's not sad, it's infuriating that these people thought that they could sit on this information, but they can't.
It's a new day, and we believe in transparency, and it's going to come out.
And when we redact things, Sean, what we're going to do is not just pull pages out like they used to do.
If something's redacted, you will know the line and you will know why it's redacted, like a victim's name, identifying information of a victim.
So then why did she produce a bunch of documents that had already been released years ago when she invited all those social media influencers to the White House?
And then she further redacted documents that were already redacted.
She's full of shit, man.
She is really full of shit.
We have another damning clip, clip number 17, Cash Patel to Benny Johnson.
Okay, these are all previous statements, right?
This is called accountability, where Cash Patel said that the FBI has an Epstein little black book and Bill Gates has been lobbying Congress night and day to prevent the disclosure of the Epstein list.
Well, if you're FBI director now, why don't you release that list?
That Bill Gates is lobbying Congress night and day to prevent the disclosure of that list?
And why is it that the Senate, you know, and good.
What's disturbing to me is that all these people had such a different tune.
And look, I like Cash Patel.
I like Dan Bongino, but you can't deny the fact that they all were singing a different tune years ago on their shows, years ago on podcasts, before their Senate confirmation hearings.
And now all the statements that they previously made are being negated by what they're saying now.
It's upsetting.
And Pam Blondie also is a total liar.
So look, I just hope that we'll see Cash Patel and Dan Bongino call for Pam Blondie to resign and tell us their side of the story.
Because from what I was told, my sources at the White House and also my sources at DOJ have told me that Pam Blondie is going around now trying to throw Cash Patel and Dan Bongino under the bus by saying that they were fully aware of the memo.
So I want to know, were they fully aware of this memo or were they not fully aware of this memo?
And if they were, how come nobody's name was put on the memo?
Even though we know that the memo is real.
I'm not the only person asking these questions.
A lot of people are asking these questions, even the mainstream media.
We have Peter Ducey from Fox News who just asked Caroline Lovitt, White House Press Secretary, about Pam Blondie's inconsistent statements on the Epstein files.
Take a listen.
So the FBI looks at the circumstances surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein.
According to the report, this systematic review revealed no incriminating client list.
So what happened to the Epstein client list that the Attorney General said she had on her desk?
Well, I think if you go back and look at what the Attorney General said in that interview, which was on your network on Fox News, John Roberts said, DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients.
Will that really happen?
And she said, it's sitting on my desk right now to review.
Yes, she was saying the entirety of all of the paperwork, all of the paper in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
That's what the Attorney General was referring to, and I'll let her speak for that.
But again, when it comes to the FBI and the Department of Justice, they are more than committed to ensuring that bad people are put behind bars.
They have an operation going on right now called Summer Heats, which has our murder rate trending in the lowest direction in United States history.
Their emphasis on violent crime and locking up violent criminals has led to the arrest of 14,000 violent criminals.
That's a 62% increase from the same time period last year.
So this Attorney General and the FBI director are committed to putting bad people behind bars where they belong.
They promised an exhaustive review.
That's what they did.
For any further details, I would refer you to the Department of Justice.
I mean, look, at the end of the day, we were promised one thing and we have not received that promise.
So I hope that President Trump will fix this by firing Pam Blondie and committing to have real transparency at the DOJ.
If Pam Blondie wants to be his friend or his ally on the outside, great, fine.
But we need an attorney general who's going to be a real killer.
We need an attorney general who isn't going to lie, who isn't going to be addicted to going on Fox News and who isn't going to jeopardize midterm elections and cause President Trump to hemorrhage support from the base.
I'm not saying that I'm not supporting the president.
Of course, I love, I support President Trump.
I'm just saying that there are a lot of people online right now and a lot of people in the base who are saying that they're done, that they're done because this is something that shouldn't even be a partisan issue.
And I blame Pam Londi.
I really do.
And Trump was the one who appointed her and Trump can be the one to fire her if she doesn't have enough dignity and shame to resign the same way that Alex Acosta resigned in 2019 when his own scandal regarding his involvement with the Epstein files became too big of a distraction for the Trump administration.
We're going to be joined by my guests tonight momentarily, but before we move on to the next segment, I want to take a moment to thank the sponsor of tonight's episode of Loomer Unleash, Kirk Elliott Precious Metals.
Breaking news.
Laura Loomer has been canceled.
The president of the United States has refused to take her phone calls as he suspects she is soon to be arrested.
Is Laura Loomer the most hated person on planet Earth?
We want to hear from you, the listener, and get your opinion on whether or not they're We coming for you, bitch.
We coming to your house, Laura Loomer.
We fight, we know your, we know where you live.
We coming for you right now.
We coming for your friends.
We coming for your friends, little dog.
Frankly, you know, I hope they throw her away for the rest of her life.
I hope she dies.
She is currently on the run from authorities.
She is described as armed and dangerous.
I just can't believe she's been getting away with it for this.
An angry mob appears to be forming outside the home of journalist Laura Lumer.
What is wrong with you?
Why are you not panicking?
Because I call Kirk Elliott precious metals, and I learned how adding gold and silver to my portfolio is one of the safest ways to not just grow my finances, but to also protect them from the uncertainty of the future.
So I'm fine.
Call economist Kirk Elliott at 720-605-3900 or schedule a call online at keepm.com slash Loomer to learn how you can safely grow your retirement portfolio with precious metals.
Be sure you head on over to kepm.com slash Loomer.
Again, that's kepm.com slash Loomer and find out how you can invest in precious metals today.
Be sure that you contact Dr. Kirk Elliott, 720-605-3900.
Let him know that Laura Loomer sent you.
You guys, there's a lot of instability around the world right now.
The dollar is crashing.
It's no surprise.
President Trump is dealing with a recovering economy, trying to fix Biden's disastrous economy.
But the dollar is still not doing great.
So you want to have something that is going to perform better than the U.S. dollar, especially in times of crises.
And so what's proven?
Well, gold is proven and trusted.
So be sure that you contact Dr. Kirk Elliott today.
Find out how you can diversify your portfolio, diversify your financial interests and protect yourself and your family's financial future so that you are not scrambling, wondering how much money you're going to lose when the next crisis or global turmoil hits.
Again, that number is 720-605-3900.
Call them.
Let them know Laura Loomer sent you.
They have a team of trusted professionals eager to answer your questions, eager to help you purchase precious metals, invest in precious metals.
And again, you can also fill out this contact form page and they're very quick to reply.
I've heard nothing but positive reviews.
They're not into all the high prices and all the games and all the gimmicks.
No, they're very straightforward people.
They'll answer all your questions.
And that's why Dr. Kirk makes himself available oftentimes to come on Lumer Unleash.
And you can even watch those episodes in the archives if you want to learn more about Dr. Kirk.
He's been on the show multiple times since the beginning of the year.
He was just recently on talking about the conflict between Iran and Israel and how this global conflict was causing the price of gold to rise.
So he's very knowledgeable.
And what I really like about him too is not only is he a great guy and honest guy, but he's also ideologically aligned.
And he supports what we do here at Loomer Unleashed.
He is America First.
He supports President Trump and he supports free speech, which is why he is a sponsor of Loomer Unleashed.
So he's not going to be telling me what to say, never tells me what to say, not censoring speech.
He's not trying to control what people do or what they say.
He's just here to help people make more money, invest their money, and he's here to support shows like mine so that we can keep spreading the raw, unfiltered, and uncensored truth.
So definitely check him out and support him.
If you're interested in investing in precious metals, purchasing precious metals, gold or silver, support a company that supports us.
Support somebody who's actually supporting the causes that you believe in and you support.
So KEPM.com slash Loomer.
Again, that number is 720-605-3900.
All right.
In addition to the disaster at the DOJ, another disaster of the current Trump administration that I have been talking about time and time again is the lack of vetting, especially as it relates to the lack of vetting at the State Department, where you have a lot of Biden holdovers who have still not been fired.
And, you know, if you go to Lumerd.com, you can see there's tons of articles about people who are Biden holdovers, especially in the State Department.
And recently, I released a report about an individual by the name of Joey Hood.
You can scroll up and see the title of this article, scroll all the way up.
Why Obama holdover and Iranian affairs advisor Joey Hood must be replaced as U.S. ambassador to Tunisia.
So believe it or not, a lot of the ambassadorship positions have still not been filled and they still not have selected new appointees for these positions, especially in Africa, right?
The continent of Africa.
And it's kind of funny that things turned out in terms of the timing of this story and my next guest who's about to come on to discuss these new developments at the State Department, because from today until the 11th of this week, President Trump is actually having an Africa summit.
He's actually hosting an Africa summit with five African nations at the White House.
And why do I bring this up?
Well, you go back to the article that I just had up on the screen there.
You have people who are undermining President Trump's foreign policy in the positions as ambassadors in Africa, whether it's Joey Hood or we're going to bring on Javier Manharaz, who is the founder of the Floridian, to discuss another Biden-era,
a Biden-appointed ambassador who is currently the ambassador of Liberia, who is pushing foreign policy initiatives, pro-CCP initiatives, to be quite specific, contrary to the underlying goals of America First and anti-CCP policies of the current Trump administration, but also undermining Secretary of State Marco Rubio's vision for a State Department that pushes back on CCP dominance.
So joining me now to discuss this continued subversion of pro-CCP Biden appointees at the State Department is Javier Manharas, the founder of the Floridian.
Javier, thanks so much for joining me tonight.
Laura, thanks for having me on.
We go way back.
It's so funny.
Javier is probably the first person I met in politics, believe it or not.
I have known Javier Manharz since I was 18 years old.
And I'm now 32 years old.
Yeah, it's been over a decade.
You were the first person in conservative politics and media who I met when I was the president of College Republicans at Barry University.
And so it's incredible because we've not only remained friends, I mean, obviously we're really good friends, but we've also remained professional colleagues and in touch over, you know, these last, like I said, over a decade.
But it's just funny that time flies so fast.
And when I was inviting Javier to come on my show to discuss his story, or whenever he shares his stories with me, because we frequently share each other's content online because it's of mutual interest, it's just funny to think that we've known each other for so long.
So just wanted to bring that up before we get into your story.
That's funny.
Yeah, I thought about it.
I spoke to a friend about it and I'm like, I've known her over a decade and different person over 12 years ago from where you know.
You've come a long way.
Well, I appreciate that, Javier.
But one thing has remained the same about you, and it's the fact that you're always quick to get on top of a story before the mainstream media picks it up.
And you're always covering new angles and stories of relevance and importance that a lot of other reporters miss, which is why you have such a successful media operation.
You have the Floridian.
You also have a Texas publication as well.
You have publications all across the country.
And he's one of the more well-known political bloggers, political reporters, and publishers in this sphere in our country.
And so I wanted to bring you on to talk about this story because as I said earlier, everybody knows that I do a lot as it relates to exposing the vetting crisis in the Trump administration.
And, oh, we have a visitor here.
My security detail got loose.
Wow.
Who's that?
Hi, Sienna.
Hi, Sienna.
Say hi.
She wants to talk to us about the very exciting.
Past her bedtime.
She wants to have a conversation about the very exciting topic of CCP infiltration of the State Department.
This is true.
There she is.
Okay, mommy.
Why don't you go to bed?
Sorry about that.
It's okay.
Anyways, go ahead.
She can sit on your lap.
It's all good.
We have not seen a mass firing of the Biden-appointed ambassadors who are undermining.
I think it's pretty fair to say that they are going out of their way to directly undermine the foreign policy initiatives of the Trump administration.
They use their positions to not just undermine foreign policy initiatives, but they're pushing for mass migration from a lot of these African countries, which happen to be majority Muslim countries.
They are trying to sabotage America first energy policies, and they are actively working to aid and support the CCP.
And so you have identified one of these ambassadors who should be fired.
I mean, they should have found a replacement for this ambassador.
I wanted to give you an opportunity to come on the program and talk about this and why you feel that this growing trend of, I guess, kind of like the stalling.
I guess there's two things going on here.
You have the stalling of confirmations in the Trump administration, where the Senate is taking way too long to confirm new ambassadors and new appointees.
And of course, this has contributed to the rot at the State Department, but also the way that these Biden era officials are abusing their positions of power in the Trump administration to subvert the will of the new State Department under the leadership of Secretary of State, Marco Rubio.
Yeah, first of all, like I said, let's be clear here.
This is not about the president.
This is about Secretary Rubio.
Obviously, these are just a big bureaucracy of the State Department, and there's only so much you can do at a certain time.
They've been in power, what, six months?
They've done a lot, but there's a lot of ambassadorships that need to be appointed.
Like you said, many need to be fired, including specifically those Biden holdovers.
And the person in question we're talking about is U.S. Ambassador to Liberia, Mr. Ambassador Toner.
And from our sources, we've learned that he's been pressing the Liberian government to strike a deal with an energy company or a mineral company, Ivanhoe Atlantic, to work with them as far as infrastructure, railroad infrastructure in that country.
Now, Ivanhoe Atlantic poses as an American country.
They are filed in Delaware as an American company with just a P.O. box to speak for themselves.
But their parent company and their sister and brother companies, Ivanhoe Mines and others, their ownership is not partly, but there's a good majority of their ownership is stocks that are owned by them are Chinese companies that state that they're state-owned.
They say it themselves, we are state-owned.
So state-owned, meaning they're part of the Chinese government or they're owned by the Chinese government.
And that brings alarm bells.
And I think it's an issue if the U.S. embassy is pushing this.
I don't think Secretary Rubio is aware of this.
I doubt the president is.
I think these are, like you said, holdovers that have a different agenda that are pushing their own agenda.
Maybe they're looking for a payoff somewhere down the road.
I don't know.
Right.
Well, I would agree with you.
I don't think that Rubio is aware of it.
And, you know, look, he's got, what, four, five, six jobs now?
So, you know, he's 10.
Right.
So, yeah, he's got a lot of jobs.
But at the end of the day, there should still be some level of order at the State Department.
And I'm not blaming Marco Rubio, but there is a question to be asked.
And that is, why have these Biden and in many cases, Obama holdovers, like I just showed you the story that I broke on my website a couple of weeks ago.
It's not just Biden holdovers.
They still have Obama holdovers working at the State Department.
And this is why we saw things like an Iranian spy ring take place at the U.S. State Department, right?
Things that people have not been prosecuted for, not been investigated over yet.
And now you have ambassadors, according to your story, that are, it looks to be pushing the agenda of the Chinese Communist Party and the agenda of companies tied to the Chinese Communist Party.
And you have to ask yourself, what benefit would a U.S. ambassador get in promoting a company tied to the CCP?
Well, I think the bigger question here is, what does Liberia, the president of Liberia have to benefit here?
He's allegedly, we're hearing that he's coming to the U.S. to push this deal to the president and to get, if you would, the president's approval or backing of it.
I don't know if it's come up in the meetings.
It's supposed to start tomorrow, the meeting, the Africa summit.
The summit, the Africa summit that they called last month or last week, I'm sorry.
So I don't know what's going to happen.
I'm pretty sure the White House is aware of the fact that this is happening.
And does the U.S., is the U.S. in the business of going into business with countries that work tightly with companies that have influence or are influenced by the CCP?
And from what I understand, and I've seen a lot of video clips of the president and Secretary Rubio condemning the CCP at all angles, especially Secretary Rubio, when he was senator, he filed legislation to stymie the CCP's growth around the country or the world influence in the U.S., i.e.
TikTok.
Well, we're seeing some conflicting messaging here, and it begs the question, you know, is the White House aware of this?
I know that after your report went viral, it appears that White House officials and State Department officials are now aware of this.
But you're correct.
I mean, look, we saw what happened with the Panama Canal situation where Marco Rubio went and met with the president of Panama and had a discussion about how they weren't going to allow for further Chinese encroachment, CCP encroachment in the canal zone.
The U.S. wants to take back control of the canal.
And Marco Rubio made the president of Panama give a commitment that they were going to pull out of China's Belt and Road initiative.
And so this is a focus of the current Trump administration.
And Marco Rubio's State Department is pressuring countries to not partner with China as it relates to expanding their Belt and Road initiative and their encroachment on minerals and oil.
And this, you know, we saw a really big conflict recently where the State Department, in my opinion, dropped the ball as it relates to the CCP gaining more influence in the Western Hemisphere by taking control of the largest oil reserves in the world, right?
In Venezuela, by not renewing the licenses for the American oil companies like Chevron in Venezuela, whose licenses expired on May 27th due to ongoing sanctions.
And so how much longer are we going to allow for the CCP to beat the United States as it relates to acquiring minerals, acquiring oil, and just precious resources, gold, silver?
I mean, the Chinese have their fingers in every single pot, right?
And they're offering to pay, as you reported and as I've reported extensively for infrastructure projects all across the world, especially in the developing world and places like Latin and Central and South America and also Africa, so that they can get access to these resources and infrastructure facilities.
And so have you heard anything from Secretary of State Marco Rubio about your report?
Has the State Department replied to you directly or issued any type of comment or statement about this deal and whether it's going to be addressed during the Africa summit?
No, when we wrote the story, we reached out to them, but we haven't heard back from them.
But interesting enough, I'm sorry, Secretary Rubio, he canceled his trip to Asia.
He met with Prime Minister Netanyahu yesterday, and he's in DC this week.
So I'm pretty sure he's going to be involved in those African nation meetings.
I'm sure he knows about what we reported, and if it comes up, he will address it accordingly.
But to your point, as far as how the Chinese influence has been growing in these developing countries, I've been calling it the new iron curtain that's risen in the Western hemisphere.
Yes, in Africa, in the Western Hemisphere, you mentioned Venezuela and the oil and how you mentioned how we should actually go address the CCP issue.
Well, look, President Trump has been very hard in putting economic sanctions against Maduro's regime.
But while they worked at first, they're not working anymore because Maduro has sites, has skirted around those with the help of CCP.
Iran and Russia has helped them skirt around those sanctions.
So they need to readdress those sanctions.
Yeah, they're actually recent reports and recent models out of Venezuela show that the sanctions aren't harming Venezuela at all.
In fact, they're actually selling more oil now that they've partnered with the CCP and China's moving in and getting more access to the oil that would have otherwise been sent to the Gulf of America.
So these sanctions are not these sanctions are not hurting Venezuela.
And I pointed this out when President Trump went to the Middle East and he was in Saudi Arabia and he announced in Saudi Arabia that he was going to be lifting the sanctions on Syria so that this that the Syrian government could expand their their energy development and use the funds generated from their reserves and oil for the sake of.
Building up Syria into a prosperous country and giving the Syrian people a chance at having economic prosperity.
prosperity.
And yet when you look and you compare the oil reserves in Syria compared to oil in Venezuela, there's way more, way more natural resources, way more oil, way more minerals, way more everything in Venezuela compared to Syria.
And so if we're willing to lift the sanctions in Syria for the sake of economic development and preventing China and others from coming in and taking advantage of those resources and making deals like they are, right?
We saw that the Chinese, the CCP, orchestrated a mineral deal with the Taliban.
So nothing is stopping the CCP from orchestrating deals with some of the most egregious and abhorrent people on planet Earth in all types of regions, right?
Not just Asia, but like I said before, Central, South, Central America, Africa.
And that is not America First energy policy.
That is not America First infrastructure and global development policy.
America First would be ensuring that the interests of, or I guess like in terms of the stakeholders, right, who benefit from this are predominantly American, American companies.
That would be America First energy policy or America first infrastructure policy.
But I'm afraid that because of the fact that so many of these Biden holdovers remain active at the State Department in these positions as ambassadors or advisors, we saw the same issue at the National Security Council until the president recently decided to do a massive overhaul and fire over 100 people.
You know, what type of advice is Marco Rubio getting?
What type of advice is President Trump getting?
As it pertains to these regions, if you have people who are loyal to an ideology that is contrary to that of President Trump's, right?
These are not people who were appointed by Republicans.
They were not appointed by President Trump.
They were appointed by Joe Biden.
And so obviously Joe Biden appointed these people because they felt like he felt like they were going to do his bidding or he was going to find loyalty to the CCP.
And we see that the Biden crime family is completely sold out to the CCP.
I mean, they've been investigated over and over again.
The Republicans failed to really do any substantial investigations that brought any real charges or real accountability.
Obviously, they continue to drop the ball.
But everybody knows, right?
Everybody knows that the Biden crime family is completely compromised by the CCP.
So obviously, you're going to want to remove all of the Biden appointees in these foreign policy positions, especially the ambassadorships, because these people are going to be doing the bidding of the CCP.
I think Congressman Jared Moskowitz said it best.
China, the CCP, is buying France.
I mean, that's what they're doing.
They have the repressive regime.
Look what they're doing to their own people.
So they have all this base.
So they're out buying minerals.
I mean, they're outdoing us all.
They've outdone us, outpaced us on a lot of this stuff.
And it's our fault.
We've allowed it to happen.
This goes before the Biden administration, even the first Trump administration going back to, I don't know how far back, going past Obama back, the Clinton era, even Bush, is that we've allowed this to happen.
So now we have this so-called deep state.
And how do we get rid of it?
Look, if Toner out of in Liberia is doing this, how many other ambassadors and his cronies are actually pushed the same type of agenda?
What do they have to gain by working alongside or with directly or indirectly with the CCP or companies that are backed by the CCP?
So this is obviously, we all know this is a bigger issue than just what we're talking about now.
And now we're talking about Liberia.
Well, I think for the most part, I think I don't feel that, I feel very confident that that's going to be signed.
I don't think the president is going to address support that initiative, that deal that I believe went through secretively.
I know Senator Rubia well, and I know he would not be supporting this as well and advising the president accordingly.
We'll see what happens this week.
But this is a real problem.
You have a lot of these holdovers that, and you know what?
Even some of these people are aligned with some of the same ideology as you mentioned.
Listen, again, money talks.
And a lot of these people are bought and paid for.
And they're thinking of how they're going to come out of this on top in the position they're in, knowing that if you're in the Trump administration, you have to be thinking that your days are numbered regardless of your position and how loyal you are.
It's just what it is.
You're cleaning a house.
I'm sorry, the Trump administration is about accountability nowadays, in which that's what we all look forward to.
And I think they'll be cleaning a lot more house and a lot more people get fired.
So I think people are looking out for themselves.
But in the end, at the end of the day, regardless of what administration is in power, allowing the CCP to move into our backyard, if you would, in the Western hemisphere is a real big problem.
And in Africa, people forget about Africa.
But I mean, there's a lot of enrichment that the CCP can have over the next few years, even a decade, that the U.S. is missing out because even U.S. interests there and other countries are going to fall by the wayside.
And we allow the CCP to move in and continue eating up or buying up all these minerals.
Where does that leave us?
Where does it leave Western Europe?
So we're in a pretty big bind here, but I have faith that Secretary Rubio and the president will stymie this deal and push back and make it about America First and question the Liberian president as to why he struck this deal with this company as opposed to striking with an American First company or a company that has interests, any interest in that region.
Absolutely.
And, you know, look, for people watching, they may think, oh, well, I haven't even heard about this story.
Yeah, it's not getting a lot of attention, just like the story about the CCP taking over the oil infrastructure in Venezuela didn't get nearly enough attention as it deserved.
But as people are not focused on this or as they're distracted by the Epstein files or other stories in the news, the CCP is moving in and they're putting their fingers into every single pot and they're soaking up resources all around the world.
And those are otherwise resources that we could be getting or we could be taking advantage of.
And, you know, we are in a race with the CCP.
And look, we can't pretend like U.S.-China relations are strong right now.
We have a lot of articles about this.
It's all over African media.
I mean, the U.S. media isn't really talking about this, although they should.
It should be a very big story ahead of President Trump's Africa summit.
But we have a couple articles here.
Let's just go ahead and get these up on the screen here.
We can show these articles.
Bawakai administration signed secret rail deal with Ivanhoe Atlantic amid U.S.-China tensions.
The Liberian investigator.
So you can see here the deal inked behind closed doors on Sunday, July 6th, involves Ivanhoe Atlantic, A Delaware-based company with ownership links to Chinese state-owned enterprises and promises to see the rehabilitation and expansion of Liberia's critical railway corridor, excuse me, to from, I guess it's Tokata.
I don't know how to pronounce that.
Nimba County to the port of Buchanan.
The agreement also includes the construction of new rail links into neighboring Guinea to facilitate the transport of iron from Guinea mines through Liberian ports.
And of course, those mines are tied to the CCP, and that's what, of course, the deal is all about.
You can scroll down.
Public discourse of the agreement remains non-existent in Liberia.
There was no press release from the executive mansion, no legislative debate, and no formal communication to the public.
Ivanhoe Mines' major shareholders include the Hong Kong-based Zhujian Mining Group and Beijing's China Citik Bank Corporation, both of which are either state-owned or heavily influenced by the Chinese Communist Party.
The deal has already triggered alarm bells in Washington with key Republican lawmakers, including Senators Ted Cruz and Jim Risch, questioning why the State Department, particularly its Bureau of African Affairs, appears to be endorsing projects with companies linked to the CCP.
Well, it's not really a surprise because you have an ambassador who still remains.
You have his name again.
The ambassador's name.
Yeah, you have the ambassador.
Toner.
Ambassador Toner.
Yes, thank you.
It was on the tip of my tongue there.
You have Ambassador Toner, who is a Biden appointee.
So if we know that the Biden crime family is completely sold out and compromised by the CCP, is it any wonder?
I mean, with all due respect to Senator Ted Cruz and these other senators asking these questions, we know why, right?
We know why this is happening.
So I think that there needs to be more pressure from Republicans to expedite these Senate confirmation hearings.
And it's incredible.
If you look at some of the ambassador positions that have been, you know, where nominees have already been nominated, they have not had their Senate confirmation hearing.
You had Kimberly Guilfoyle today who had her ambassador hearing for Greece.
There was barely any press coverage about it whatsoever.
I know people who have been appointed to ambassadorship positions and they haven't even been notified about when their confirmation hearing is going to be.
Some of these are held up.
And if you look at the list of the nominees for Africa, there's really not a lot because a lot of people are not really, you know, biting, you know, biting at the opportunity to go live in Africa.
I mean, I hate to say it, but it's not like, you know, you're going to be in Monaco or Paris or wherever, right?
So not that Paris is any much different from some of these African nations these days, but I digress.
The point is, is that most people are not begging President Trump and calling him up and saying, Mr. President, I would love to be your ambassador to Liberia.
I would love to be your ambassador to the Congo, right?
Like it's just not, you're not going to have the same enthusiasm to be an ambassador in an underdeveloped place as you would in a place like, you know, in Europe or some of these Asian countries, for example.
I can actually see you being an ambassador to Rwanda or the Sudan, Laura.
Yeah, well, I just want to be an ambassador somewhere where there's a really big nature reserve, you know, and then I can go hang out with all the animals and go on safaris and, you know, protect all the animals from poachers.
But no, the fact is, is that there's not enough attention placed on this.
And because so many people are not eager to be ambassadors, and let's be honest, a lot of these countries are war zones.
A lot of these countries are conflict zones, Muslim countries for the most part, where you have a lot of insurgents' violence.
You have groups like ISIS and Boko Haram and Al-Shabaab.
And you have all types of unsavory Islamic terror groups that are killing people.
And we've already seen attacks on U.S. embassies and U.S. embassy officials in the past in some of these African nations.
And so there's got to be more of an effort placed by the State Department on trying to recruit America first pro-Trump individuals to fill these ambassadorship slots in Africa so that we can make sure that the president's agenda is being implemented.
And you're not going to have people like Ambassador Toner or Ambassador Hood taking advantage of their positions to push Islamic mass migration like Ambassador Hood is, or to push for the CCP to come in and get a massive rail deal with the CCP just because, well, no one's paying attention to Africa.
So hopefully these topics are brought up during the Africa summit.
I wanted to, and like I said, we could show several other articles too if people are interested in reading about this more.
There's the article from the Liberian Investigator.
There's another article about this from Front Page Africa.
There's another article about this.
Town Hall, one of like the few U.S. publications, I guess, that covered this too.
So here you go.
Town Hall, the Floridian, your publication.
So not a lot of news coverage on this, but definitely something that people should be paying attention to because one of the reasons why China feels that they don't need to comply with President Trump or that Xi Jinping can try to dick Donald Trump around is probably because they're amassing massive wealth all around the world as it pertains to minerals deals and acquisition of oil refineries and oil reserves.
And they are in a competition to be the number one global superpower.
But also think about this, Laura, is that how many of these media companies have sold shares to the CCP?
And for the most part, they can't or they won't report in certain stories because it's not in their best interest.
You know, look at, like you mentioned, these four outlets.
One of them was ours.
We're the one that broke the story and these other outlets picked up on it, but no one else did.
And this is a pretty big story considering how it's going into this meeting tomorrow and no one else wrote about it.
Yeah, well, hopefully, people watching, you know, we have a lot of people in the Trump administration that watch my show, see my show.
Hopefully, as they go into this Africa summit, this will come up.
And hopefully, it's brought to Marco Rubio's attention as well, because this is a massive problem.
And, you know, it was a massive problem when we allowed for the CCP to essentially take over and gain access to those oil reserves in Venezuela back in May.
That was a major blunder by the current State Department, but this is also turning out to be a massive blunder as well.
So I don't want to blame Mark Rubio directly, but at the end of the day, it does fall under Marco Rubio.
So hopefully we can get some people at the State Department who can either supplement Marco Rubio or remove some people at the State Department who should not be there if they're not going to keep the Trump administration abreast to these deals and the TCP invasion, right, of Latin America, South America, and Africa.
All right.
As somebody who is in media, I really wanted to get your take on this.
Speaking of stories that are underreported.
I don't know if you saw the Tucker Carlson interview with the president of Iran.
But, you know, look, some people always, they'll attack me and they'll say, oh, well, Tucker, Tucker Carlson, Tucker Carlson doesn't like you, Laura.
That's why you don't like Tucker Carlson.
And there is this profile piece that came out about me yesterday in the New York Times.
And we can actually get it pulled up on the screen.
It's not what I wanted to talk about, but it's funny because Tucker Carlson went out of his way to give a quote to the New York Times to trash me.
And now all these publications are picking it up.
And we'll go through it right here.
You can see it.
Just do a keyword search on Tucker Carlson.
Laura Loomer, Trump's blunt instrument, right?
You can scroll down.
He gave a quote and said, she's like a child wielding a loaded firearm called Twitter, said Tucker Carlson, the right-wing media host whom Miss Loomer recently attacked on social media for criticizing U.S. military involvement in the war between Israel and Iran.
He says, I don't blame her.
I blame the adults who take her seriously.
Well, I guess the same could be said about Tucker Carlson, right?
I blame the people who take him seriously.
I mean, this guy has essentially sold out to become a mouthpiece for Islamists, whether it's Qatar or now, the Iranian regime that chants death to America and has, in fact, and President Trump has stated this publicly as well, tried to assassinate President Donald Trump on two occasions.
And so I wanted to get your take on this because, you know, you just brought up a really interesting point about how so many media companies have sold out to the CCP.
How many media companies do you think have sold out to Islamists, to Iran, to Qatar?
I mean, we talk about, we hear all the time how the Jewish lobby, the Israeli lobby is the biggest lobby and the Jews control the media, right?
The Jews control everything.
But I don't really think that this is exemplary of the Jews controlling the media.
When you have Tucker Carlson, who has one of the largest right-wing shows out there in terms of conservative political media, essentially simping for the Islamic Republic of Iran.
And I wouldn't even call this an interview.
It's almost like he scripted the questions and just allowed for these genocidal Muslims to spew their propaganda.
And Tucker didn't even push back.
I mean, if you look at Tucker Carlson from back when he had a show on Fox News, Tucker Carlson tonight, you couldn't even get a word in, right?
Because he would have these liberals on and he would have people that would come on and spew anti-American rhetoric.
And he would just look there with this dumbfounded look on his face like.
Like all these stupid ass faces that Tucker used to make.
I mean, look, it's why so many people liked him, I guess, because they would be like, wow, he's got such a funny laugh, right?
His crazy laugh.
Or, oh, wow, look at the way he's looking.
He'd have these, you know, long-faced liberals with purple hair on his program.
And he would just be looking at them like, you know, I mean, you can go look at the photos yourself and see, but it's just such a 180, right?
It's almost like he's acting.
I don't even know if we could have ever taken Tucker Carlson seriously or if he really ever was who he pretended to be.
Because I watched this interview.
We're going to play the clips and we're going to react to these clips.
And I want to get your reaction on air here.
But it's just so interesting watching these previous clips and interviews with Tucker Carlson when he used to have people on his show at Fox News.
And, you know, like you just couldn't get a word in because he was just so quick to provide a rebuttal and so quick to pound these people and call out their anti-American views and call out the way that they, you know, would associate with Islamists and communists.
And now, right, he has become the meme that he used to criticize and mock on his own show years ago.
So I don't know if you have any knowledge of this.
A couple weeks ago, I pulled the FARA documents and showed that Tucker Carlson's name was listed in the Farah documents tied to a company called Luma 8 Advisors out of Virginia that was paid $180,000 a month for the sake of doing media and scheduling media appearances propaganda for Qatar, for the prime minister of Qatar, which is, of course, you know, Qatar is a financier of global Islamic terrorism, Hamas Nezbullah.
And Tucker Carlson still to this day has not opened up his bank records and his accounts to prove that he in fact paid for his own trip.
So they have not sued me.
They have not opened up the bank accounts.
And so it just really begs the question, right?
Did he take the money from Qatar?
And if he didn't take the money from Qatar, why hasn't he shown the receipts that show who paid for his trip to Qatar?
Somebody clearly paid for him and his staff to go to Qatar.
And maybe he wasn't brazen enough to go to Iran, but he still facilitated an interview with the president of Iran on his program.
And so, I mean, what do you think?
Do you think that Tucker Carlson is taking money from Islamic regimes?
Do you think that a lot of conservative publishers, as somebody who's in the news publishing industry, how many people are taking money from Qatar and Iran?
Listen, I don't Know.
Look, I don't think we can prove it unless he admits it, but I don't know.
But back to the interview, I saw the interview and it's like 29 minutes.
And let me just tell you, it was almost nauseating how it came off because he was very respectful, even tempered.
He showed a lot of restraint, if you would, if you want to call it that.
And he allowed the president of Iran propagate his misinformation because that's what comes out of the Iranian regime.
Remember, they're a murderous regime.
But like you said, there was no pushback.
There was no pushback in comparison to the interview he did with Senator Ted Cruz just the other day, where his smugness, he was, like I said, he was smug.
He was disrespectful.
Senator Cruz questioning him, which he didn't question the Iranian president once.
This was a golden opportunity that was missed by Tucker Carlson because the Iranian regime does not allow Western interviews from the Western world.
They don't allow media outlets that are aligned with them and that will do what pretty much Tucker Carlson did is throw them softball questions.
He should have been asking, Mr. President, do you condemn what your country has done over the years and killed tens of thousands, hundreds and thousands of American servicemen and citizens, innocent citizens around the world that they have killed through their proxies, directly or indirectly?
He had the opportunity to call them out when the president of Iran said that Israel was the one to attack them.
Why didn't he countersay, with all due respect, Mr. President, you have been attacking Israel for years through your proxies, proxies, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis, and they support these groups.
It's known, it's a known fact that these are proxies of the Iranian regime.
Where was that line of questioning by Tucker Carlson?
Missed opportunity.
You can take from it for whatever you want if he just didn't feel like he should have.
But anyone, I would have asked those questions.
You would have.
I think most people that believe that the Iranian regime is murderous and it will continue to be, they are a state sponsor of terrorists, for God's sakes.
You know, why weren't these questions asked?
You know, was he afraid of the interview?
Because it's not an interview.
Right.
It's not an interview.
This is propaganda.
And we're going to play these clips so people can see for themselves.
You know, if you don't subscribe to Tucker's program or you're not on X, you may not have seen these clips.
But we're going to go ahead and I'm going to play some of these clips for you.
Some of the most egregious clips from the Tucker Carlson interview.
Okay.
It's not really an interview.
It's a softball questioning.
And, you know, it really begs the question whether or not Tucker Carlson should be monitored by the federal government and monitored by our federal agencies.
And some people will say, oh, well, how could you call for a journalist to be monitored by the feds?
Well, is this really journalism or is this propaganda for a terrorist regime that is actively trying to assassinate the president of the United States?
At what point does this, you know, blur the line between journalism and becoming an active national security threat?
Like if you are actively undermining U.S. intel agencies and actively undermining the president of the United States and our foreign policy, I mean, there are violations.
There are violations and there are rules and there are really strict punishments and penalties for people that try to influence foreign policy, right?
As a U.S. citizen at the detriment of our country, our national security, or the policies of the president of the United States.
And so I think that Tucker Carlson should be held accountable for what he's doing.
I really do think that what he's doing is a massive national security threat.
And he's glazing over the real threat of Iranian proxies and the real threat of Islamic terror and actual threats to assassinate the commander-in-chief.
I think that Tucker Carlson should be investigated by the feds.
I really do.
Well, yeah, well, I would say that the interview, if you want to call it that, did not serve American interest.
All they did was give the Iranian regime a platform to disseminate more disinformation and lies.
When they went after Israel, calling that they were committing a genocide, where was the pushback there?
He pushed back in the Cruz interview on our support or funding of Israel.
Where was the pushback against the Iranian regime?
There was no pushback.
And we're going to play these clips.
It is so unbelievable.
But we all know President Trump has said multiple times that he was threatened with assassination by the Iranians multiple times.
Just today, the Iranian state media literally put out a photo of President Trump with a bullseye around his head.
And so they're calling for his assassination.
The Iranian state media, if you recall, a couple years ago released an ad in which they showed President Trump getting blown up on his golf course at his golf club in Palm Beach.
Remember when he killed Solimani and then they threatened to blow up Mar-a-Lago?
So Tucker Carlson is clearly not a stupid person as it relates to news consumption.
He's not aloof.
He clearly worked for Fox News and was made aware of all of these viral news stories.
He's in media.
It's not like he can pretend like he's never heard of this before.
Wow, I've never heard of this.
He's being intellectually dishonest.
He's covered some of this on his own program in the previous years.
People have actually pulled the clips of him making references to some of these threats of attacks by the Iranians.
And now he's all of a sudden done a total 180.
So here's a clip of Tucker Carlson interviewing the Iranian president, blaming Netanyahu for the war and claiming that Netanyahu is the person that actually made up the claim that Iran was trying to assassinate President Trump.
Even though I have literally heard out of the mouth of President Trump's own campaign staff that some of them had to, including Chris Lasavita, had to have armed security At his private residence because the Iranians were threatening to assassinate him as well.
And so the Iranians have not just threatened to kill Trump, they threatened to kill his campaign advisors.
They threatened to kill Tom Homan.
Tom Homan also had to have private security.
A lot of people are not aware of this, but he was not given security before the inauguration by Joe Biden.
And so he had to actually privately fundraise for private security because the Iranians and also the cartels were putting hits on him and threatening to murder him and his family.
So I know for a fact that the threats of assassination were real.
And Tucker Carlson should be ashamed of himself for allowing for Islamic terrorists to push out propaganda to an American audience.
Let's go ahead and play clip number two.
Has Iran ever backed an assassination attempt against Donald Trump?
This is actually what Netanyahu is trying to insinuate and to make your people or the president of your country to believe.
But this is wrong because Netanyahu, as I said, has its own agenda.
It wants to drag the U.S. into forever wars, as I said, and to bring more insecurity, instability, and unrest to the whole region.
There are a number, some large number of Iranian nationals living in the United States.
Some have said they are, quote, sleeper cells.
They are terrorists who are acting at the command of your government.
Would you right now make a statement to Iranian citizens living in the United States not to commit acts of violence in the United States?
These things you're telling me is the first time I'm hearing them from you or from anybody.
You know, Iranians are known for their knowledge, for their science, for their courtesy, for being civilized.
Have you seen otherwise from them, any other kind of behavior from them, or any violent behavior?
Has anybody ever seen anything from them?
Yeah, as I said, this is what Israel is trying to put into your minds.
You're propagating that Iranians might be capable of doing such a thing, but this is totally untrue.
Because by nature, Iranians are pro-peace and tranquility.
And they're trying to actually somehow impact the minds of the decision makers and the people of the United States and to scare them into getting involved in a war in my region that is not going to ensure any kind of interest for the United States.
It is not to be in the interest of the United States to be involved in any kind of war in my region.
Okay, so first of all, he's nodding an agreement, which is so egregious.
Like if you're doing an interview, why are you nodding an agreement?
Did you see when he goes, oh, well, this is the first time I'm hearing about the fact that, and of course it's like translated, you know, it's translated into English.
It's not really him speaking English as a translator.
Oh, it's the first time that I'm made aware of the fact that Iran, we peaceful people, Muslims never carry out terrorism.
We know fund Hamas and Hezbollah.
We know fund Iranian proxies.
We know threaten to kill Trump.
I mean, you could go online right now and find a million articles.
I'm looking at one right now.
Justice Department files charges and murder for hire scheme targeting Trump.
Iran's government orchestrated efforts to target our citizens, including President Trump, on U.S. soil and abroad.
There are Iranian female journalists who are living in the United States.
The woman's name escapes the tip of my tongue.
But this poor woman, I believe she lived in New York, she has to have armed security because several Iranians were sent to the United States to murder her and assassinate her for speaking out and using her platform to speak out against the Islamic Republic of Iran.
So the fact of the matter is, is, yeah, they hire a lot of Iranian sleeper cells here in the United States to carry out attacks.
You could just go and scroll the DOJ's website and find a million examples of sleeper cells.
The Border Patrol literally just picked up a bunch of Iranian nationals, former IRGC terrorists or Hezbollah operatives, Hamas operatives in Michigan and Minnesota in the days after President Trump ordered the strike on Iran's three nuclear facilities.
So Tucker Carlson is just going to pretend like we don't have 2 million Iranian proxies living in our country.
I had Tom Homan on my show a couple of weeks ago.
We have 2 million gotaways in our country that came in under Biden.
And most of those people are Islamic jihadists, according to Tom Homan.
According to Tom Homan, most of those gotaways are Islamic terrorists who are likely Iranian proxies.
So Tucker Carlson should be ashamed of himself saying that there's no evidence whatsoever that Iran has carried out attacks against U.S. service members.
There have been more than 180 attacks on U.S. service members by Iran and their proxies in Hamas and Hezbollah in the Middle East between October of 2023 and November of 2024, right?
So a little over a year, a little over a year, 180 attacks by Iran on U.S. service members.
So shame on Tucker Carlson.
He likes to call himself America first.
He didn't even push back on any of this.
Tucker Carlson knows that Iran has carried out attacks on U.S. service members, that they have killed U.S. service members.
Qasim Soleimani, okay?
Are you kidding me?
Are we going to pretend like Qasim Soleimani wasn't funded by Iran?
The architect of the roadside bomb that killed thousands of U.S. service members?
Are you for real?
Yeah, it was striking the interview.
That's something I mentioned is that I don't even want to call it an interview.
It's actually like a disgrace and an abomination to real journalism to call that an interview.
That is Islamist propaganda.
That is terrorist propaganda.
That is anti-American, America-last, pro-Islamic terror propaganda.
Now, the question is: would Tucker have the same type of interview, if you want to call it that, with Benjamin Netanyahu?
Absolutely not.
Right.
It's very troublesome how, like you say, you call it propaganda, but like I said, he had a golden opportunity to call them out, to call for transparency and be transparent and call them out for their, like what you said, the murdering of maiming of hundreds and thousands of U.S. American servicemen over the years.
Remember the Beirut bombing in 83 that was conducted by Hezbollah, a proxy of Iran.
Let's go ahead and play clip number five since Tucker is just going to allow for the Iranian president to get away with saying that nobody in Iran, nobody in Iran has called for the assassination of Donald Trump.
Nobody.
Nobody.
Nobody, according to the Iranian president.
We're just supposed to take this guy who chanced death to America at his word.
They've never killed anybody.
They are just amazing people.
The Iranian terrorists, the Islamic Republic of Iran, they are so innocent.
They have never done anything, according to Tucker Carlson.
Let's go ahead and play clip number five.
Yes!
Let's go ahead and play clip number five.
Sein one fekhi da'midoran yek adam kushan panjawo panj bishat panjawo panjorna fardar gaze kushi shahid haja seme falaimani ma rokushri.
Shoma go telid boyat mujazot bishito enva ne bogi rodari se envone mufse de fela arz muhorib bauda mor rasul.
*sniff*
I mean, there they there you have it.
Tucker Carlson couldn't have done any research.
It took me five seconds to find that clip.
Tucker Carlson couldn't have done any research right there.
They called for the execution of Trump.
They called for the death to America, death to Israel, death to England.
They said that we should be punished with death for killing their martyr, Qasim Soleimani.
Like I said, Tucker Carlson is either getting paid off by Islamic terrorists or Tucker Carlson has completely lost his mind and decided to sell out his country.
And he is now participating in Islamic terrorist propaganda and he should be put on a government watch list and monitored by the feds.
Because, I mean, how can you watch that clip and honestly say and nod in agreement with the president of Iran?
Oh, we've never, this is made up, this is a Jewish conspiracy by Nets and Yahoo in Israel.
We have never said death to America.
We have never said kill President Trump.
We have never, ever, ever done anything bad to kill U.S. soldiers.
I mean, it's just absolute abomination.
All right.
Well, look, I said, well, look, the video speaks for itself.
This has been going on for decades.
And so for someone to turn the blind eye just because you get an interview, that speaks volumes of that person.
And again, I respect Tucker Cross for what he's done over the years, but he really missed the mark with this.
I don't.
I actually don't.
I think he's so overrated.
I'll just be totally honest with you.
I think he's so overrated.
I think he's so phony.
And like, so many conservatives are always kissing his ass because they want to go on his show.
I don't give a fuck about Tucker Carlson.
Like, I'll just tell you right now, I may be one of the few conservatives in media who doesn't give a fuck about Tucker or ever going on his stupid show.
Like, I have no desire.
I really honestly do not see the appeal.
Like, I've tried to be nice and cordial with Tucker Carlson, but he just makes it so difficult because he really is just so smug and dishonest and conniving.
And, you know, he tried to undermine President Trump.
His true feelings about President Trump came out during the Dominion lawsuit.
I just don't see the appeal.
I don't know what the appeal is.
So many people are so desperate in conservative media, right?
I mean, you've heard this before.
Oh, wow.
It doesn't get better than going on Joe Rogan or Tucker Carlson.
I mean, I would say that Joe Rogan has more credibility than Tucker Carlson, right?
I would.
I mean, I just don't understand what the appeal is with Tucker Carlson.
I've never really understood the appeal.
Yeah, look, again, every personality has a different following.
I'm sure there's people that follow Joe Rogan that don't follow Tucker Carlson and vice versa.
You have a huge following and there's some people that disagree with you, don't follow you.
But again, I just look at the bigger picture here is the missing of this mark of not calling, having that opportunity to call out the Iranian government for what they have done to U.S. interests, servicemen, us as a whole over the years.
No one has this opportunity and he had it and he blew it.
He just blew it.
He shit the bed.
Yeah, it gets worse too.
Here's a clip of Tucker Carlson failing to challenge the false claims by Iran's president that get this, Javier, death to America is actually peaceful.
It doesn't actually mean hostility towards America.
Okay, so I'm going to go out there and say death to Javier, but don't worry, it's not going to be hostile towards you, Javier.
It's actually something called 4D chess, you know, and you got to like trust the plan.
And when genocidal Muslims who support the detonation of roadside bombs to kill Americans say death to America, you know, Tucker Carlson is just asking questions.
He's just trying to get to the root of this Islamic philosophy, Javier.
You know, it's just so hard to understand.
And we're so blessed that we have somebody as smart and as intelligent as Tucker Carlson to help us understand how this is actually, you know, not hostile.
It's actually peaceful.
And the only person that could actually explain this to us is Tucker Carlson, because we're all just a bunch of peasants and we're living in Tucker Carlson's world.
And death to America is actually positive, Javier.
Take a listen.
Many Americans are afraid of Iran.
You say you're not afraid, but Americans are afraid of Iran.
And they believe that Iran would like to strike the United States with a nuclear weapon.
They see video of Iranians saying death to America, describing our country as the great Satan.
What is your opinion of that?
Should we be afraid of Iran?
I believe that this is a very wrong impression that anybody might have of Iran or the Iranians.
I would like to remind you that Iran has never invaded another country in the last 200 years.
When they say death to the United States, it doesn't mean death to, they don't mean death to the people of the United States or even to the officials of the United States.
They mean death to crimes, death to killing and carnage, death to supporting, killing others, death to insecurity and instability.
Have you ever heard that an Iranian killing an American?
Have you ever heard that?
Or a terrorist that was Iranian and he carried out a terrorist attack against the Americans?
No, it was I mean, have we ever heard of an Iranian killing an American?
Have we ever heard of an Iranian killing an American?
Listen, I'm talking about Carlson is just like, yeah, dude, like, yeah, you're really making some great points there, man.
Like, yeah, like, we're just asking questions.
Like, has an Iranian ever really killed an American?
I'm just asking questions.
Who's Qasem Salamani?
What's a roadside bomb?
I'm just asking questions.
Let's go back.
I mean, it's just, it's so absurd.
I cannot believe that Tucker Carlson still has a following after this interview.
Let's cut back to the interview.
It was your president who confessed that the Americans created the ISIS in our region and they were responsible for this wrong image that is portrayed of religion or the Muslims in the world.
And once again, I would like to tell you and remind you that this is not death to the American people or to the officials.
Death to crimes and atrocities, to bullying, to the use of force.
And anybody who would like to become an accomplice in the crimes perpetrated by others.
So why not say death to bullying?
Death to oppression, death to bullying?
No, you're saying death to America.
And the fact that Tucker's just like, you know, like his face like.
Yeah.
Uh-huh.
Yeah.
Do you think he was afraid to push back if he wanted to?
No, I honestly think that he has either become an Islamic terrorist sympathizer or he's getting like the biggest payday of his life.
I mean, there's, this is not normal behavior.
This is anti-American behavior.
And I don't ever want to hear Tucker Carlson criticize America or Israel ever again and talk about how people who support Israel are not America first.
And Laura Loomer is the creepiest person I've ever seen in my entire life.
Like, how is she not considered a national security threat?
Yeah, he did say that.
He's crazy.
I mean, he's absolutely insane.
He's lost his mind.
He is absolutely a complete lunatic.
And I really honestly think that there should be an active investigation into Tucker Carlson.
I think that Finson should open up his bank accounts.
I think that they should take a look at his finances.
I think that Tucker Carlson should be on a government watch list.
I really do.
And I know that I'm going to get heat for saying that.
I do not care.
I really think that Tucker Carlson should be investigated.
Here's another clip in case you haven't had enough.
Tucker Carlson fails to push back on claims that Iran did not issue a fatwa against President Trump.
So here's Tucker Carlson, who covered the war on terror for decades, pretending like he doesn't know what a fatwa is.
Okay.
He doesn't know what a fatwa is.
Basically, a fatwa is an Islamic bounty.
It's when an Islamic terrorist organization or a Sharia court decides to put a bounty on your head to be killed, right?
Because of some type of violation of Islamic law.
That is what a fatwa is.
And Tucker Carlson is pretending like he doesn't know what a fatwa is.
Go ahead and play clip number 25.
Perpetrated by others.
Two Iranian Ayatollahs have issued fatwas against Donald Trump.
What does that mean exactly?
And what do you think of it?
To the best of my knowledge, they have not issued decrees or fatwas against any individual, against Donald Trump.
And first off, it has nothing to do with the Iranian government or to His Eminence, the Supreme Leader of Iran.
What they actually meant by the fatwa was in condemnation of an insult to a religion or religious personalities.
And they were actually saying that this is deplorable, this is unacceptable.
So it was not directed towards the US president or any other individual.
And there might be people with their own ideas and opinions, but I can assure you that the meaning of this fatwa should not be construed or considered as a threat against any individual.
Has Iran ever backed an assassination attempt against Donald Trump?
This is actually what Netanyahu, who is trying to insinuate and to make your people or the president of your country to believe.
But this is wrong because Natania.
So again, we're going to get this article up on the screen.
Okay.
Justice Department files charges in murder for hire scheme targeting Trump November 8th, 2024.
Okay, so just three days after the presidential election.
Tucker Carlson is allowing for the Islamic Republic of Iran to negate findings by our own Justice Department.
Okay.
And President Trump and his own campaign.
Justice Department files charges and murder for hire scheme targeting Trump.
Iran's government orchestrated efforts to target our citizens, including President-elect Trump on U.S. soil and abroad, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York alleged.
Okay, so even Joe Biden's U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York is admitting this.
Okay.
Even Joe Biden's administration was forced to admit it.
After Joe Biden sent $16 billion to Iran and was operating an Iranian spy ring at the State Department and his own Iranian envoy was giving classified information to the Islamic Republic of Iran and he's still not in jail.
So if the Biden sympathize, if the Iran sympathizers in the Biden administration are admitting to this, Tucker's just going to deny it now too and just say, oh, well, I mean, he's going to allow the presidents of Iran to say everything.
Is the sky blue?
Well, you know, that's just really up for interpretation, right?
I mean, how much lower is Tucker Carlson going to go?
We know that Iran put fatwas against President Trump.
We know that they push out images on their state media.
Even just today, a photo with a bullseye around Donald Trump's head.
I think we have that image, actually.
We could probably get that pulled up.
Had a tweet.
Can show it to you.
Just today, this image came out.
And Tucker Carlson is entertaining the idea that these people are innocent and that they've never threatened to kill President Trump, that they've never sent a proxy to the United States.
Just totally unhinged behavior.
And we know that Iran is working with the CCP.
We know that China is one of the largest purchasers of oil from Iran, which is why the Iranian economy is able to survive at some extent.
So I guess Tucker Carlson wants to pretend like there's not an economic relationship between the CCP and Iran.
Let's play clip number 26.
Breaking news, Brooke Singman of Fox News Digital has discovered exclusively that the FBI is now investigating the former CIA director John Brennan.
Wind up in a broader war.
Could Iran, could you expect assistance from Russia and China, military and economic assistance from your allies, Russia and China?
We have always put our trust in God and in God we trust.
And we are capable enough to defend ourselves and to stand on our own to feed and to defend our country, our territorial integrity to the last drop of our blood.
As I have said again and again, we don't want wars, we don't want to develop a nuclear weapon.
And this false image, this wrong mentality created in the minds of the U.S. decision makers and officials is because of the devilish machinations instigated by Netanyahu and the Israeli regime and its policies based on war mongering.
And the U.S. president should know that another war will only spread more instability in the Middle East.
And it is not going to be in the interest or in favor of the U.S. President or the U.S. government to move in that or towards that direction.
They instead need to choose peace and tranquility, which is something that I am and my government and my country are after.
And as I said, I believe that the U.S. President is powerful enough to put Israel, to Netanyahu, in their place, to contain them and replace war-mongering bloodshed and conflicts with peace and tranquility.
Mr. President, thank you for taking the time to explain your perspective.
I appreciate it.
Thank you very much for providing me with an opportunity to tell you about what is going on in my mind and in my heart.
And I hope that peace and tranquility will prevail, not just for the people of the United States, for the U.S. officials, but for the just laughable.
Mr. President, thank you so much for lying to my audience right now and pushing your Islamic terrorist propaganda.
Reporting for duty.
It's unbelievable how laughable that is.
I mean, listen, no one buys it.
Thank you, Tucker.
Thank you, Javier, for allowing me to tell you what is in my heart.
What is in my mind?
I want to kill the Jew.
I want to kill the Jew.
I want to stamp on the head of the Jew.
But that doesn't mean that I actually want to stamp on the head of the Jew.
It doesn't actually mean that I want to kill the Jew.
I want to kill the Christian too.
But that doesn't mean that I actually want to kill the Christian.
It doesn't actually mean that we want to assassinate the Jews and the Christians.
Tucker.
You see what it means is it means that we actually want to bring peace.
We actually want to bring peace.
and we're going to bring peace by killing the Jew and killing the Christian.
It's like...
It's pretty good.
But that is essentially what just happened.
We were just gaslit for 30 minutes by Tucker Carlson, who didn't even issue any kind of rebuttal whatsoever, didn't push back at all, just allowed for a proponent, an advocate of Islamic terrorism to spew terror unchecked.
And people are going to pretend that Tucker Carlson is a serious journalist for allowing for the president of Iran to gaslight not just this administration, but the American people and to say without being challenged any bit whatsoever that Donald Trump is a liar and that Donald Trump is an oppressor and that Donald Trump is not telling the truth about who tried to assassinate him.
Well, I mean, you saw the interview, if you want to call that, but again, it's embarrassing now that you look, you see the whole interview, it's pretty embarrassing for any journalist to put the son out without, like you said, pushback on the simplest things about not hurting Americans, about Israel.
Israel's committing genocide.
Well, the people who've been committing genocide are the Iranian government through their proxies for decades and no pushback.
It's embarrassing.
Yeah, and we know that Hamas uses Palestinians as human shields so that they could try to blame Israel for civilian deaths.
And Tucker failed to challenge the Iranian president's false claims that Israel intentionally targets schools and hospitals.
No, what the reality is, is that the Palestinians and Hamas, they actually put their Hamas bunkers underneath hospitals and inside schools so that they try to prevent Israel from attacking those locations because of the fact that Israel doesn't want to kill civilians.
Let's go ahead and play clip number 27.
I mean, it really just shows you Tucker Carlson is not just an Islamic terror apologist and not just completely un-American, but he's also just completely consumed by his hatred of Jewish people.
Let's go ahead and play clip number 27.
Itself is to blame because just look at what they have been doing in the last couple of years in Palestine, in Gaza, what Netanyahu has been doing, killing women and children, bombing schools and hospitals, and the civilian and residential areas.
This is nothing short of a full-scale genocide there.
They have blocked the entry of food and medicine, any kind of humanitarian relief to Gaza.
So this has adversely impacted the way my country and the whole region looks at Israel.
And this, I mean, their own behavior and their own actions are to blame because this is unacceptable what they have been doing in my region.
And as far as I know, we have never received any kind of weapon from Israel.
And I would like to tell you, even at that time, we did not want to have weapons.
We did not want to have wars.
We did not want to fight the Iraqis.
It was the war that was imposed on us.
And just like the way that this war was imposed on us by the Israeli regime, we did not attack Israel.
They attacked us.
Can you imagine at the end of the diplomatic exchange with the United States, a world in which American companies invest again in Iran, sanctions are lifted, there is peace in the region?
Is that your goal?
And do you think it's possible?
From the very beginning of my administration, I first tried to have the domestic solidarity and unity, further unity amongst Iranian people.
Then we tried to...
Don't forget stoning people to death.
Nothing says solidarity and unity, like hanging gay people from cranes and beating women to death for showing their hair.
It's unbelievable.
But listen, this is this is, listen, it's sad to say there's actually people in this country, i.e.
Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, who actually support this kind of propaganda.
They back this.
This is anything that's anti-Israel, whether it's propagated by Hamas, Hezero.
Or pro-Iran.
And it goes to the top of the Democrat leadership.
It doesn't even have to just pertain to the squad.
We actually just confronted Senator Chuck Schumer, one of the top Democrats, okay, the Senate minority leader in Washington, D.C. today.
And we asked him whether he would condemn the flag, the Iranian flag being flown outside of the White House because you have these pro-Hamas and pro-Hezblah agitators flying the Iranian flag chanting death to America outside of the White House.
And this was just from today.
Let's go ahead and play the clip.
schumer will you condemn anti-trump protesters waving the iran flag outside the white house Are you sure you don't want to answer, Senator?
Senator?
Senator?
you you you Thank you.
So it's not just the crazy jihadis in Congress who are obviously a problem, but even the top Democrat Senate leadership refuses now to condemn this craziness because they, I guess they're afraid of the progressive jihadi caucus, the red-green alliance and the Democrat Party.
So it's very shocking.
Loomer Unleash is on the scene every day.
And again, just so people see, I'm not making this up.
Tucker Carlson's interview was two days ago.
Okay.
It was released two days ago.
And here's a tweet.
Here's a tweet from today.
A top advisor to Iran's supreme leader just threatened President Trump saying he can no longer safely sunbathe and could be killed while lying out at Mar-a-Lago.
So obviously, you know, they do incite violence against President Trump.
They have threatened to kill Trump.
And they're not just about peace and unity.
Let's get back to that image on the screen really quick.
And then you can see Trump could scroll up a little bit.
Trump could be struck while tanning at Mar-a-Lago.
Iran official says.
Okay.
So this happened today.
Look at that.
That's a bullseye in front of President Trump's head.
So again, Tucker Carlson could have pushed back on this, but he didn't.
And even just two days after this interview came out, the Iranians, top Iranian leadership officials are calling for Trump to be assassinated again.
So Tucker Carlson should be ashamed of himself.
And I really do think his activity is presenting a national security threat.
I think it's a threat to President Trump's safety.
I think it's questionable that his son is allowed to work inside the White House, given the fact that he is associating with and doing propaganda for an Islamic terrorist regime.
I think it's very concerning.
And I know that some people are going to disagree with me on this, but I think that Tucker Carlson should be investigated.
Final thoughts, comments?
Listen, unfortunately, there's, like I said, there's a lot of people in this country that believe this propaganda.
They look forward to it.
They propagate it.
And I think that's where we need to start.
I mean, Tucker Carlson is going to do what he's going to do.
But the fact that it's seated deeply this Islamization of the United States, and you see it growing with these protests.
I mean, 10, 20 years ago, we weren't seeing these people fly these flags and show allegiance to terrorist organizations.
We are now because, as we know, they're here.
It's just a matter of when they're going to strike and where.
Absolutely.
I mean, we've seen it here in Florida as well.
I mean, we've been subjected to several Islamic terrorist attacks here in the state of Florida over the last several years.
Look at the Pulse Night Club.
Look at what happened at the Fort Lauderdale airport.
Look at what happened in Ballon Isles.
I mean, there are so many examples of Islamic terrorist attacks here in Florida, just in my time living in Florida over the last 10 years.
And, you know, for Tucker Carlson to pretend like we don't have proxies and we don't have these people living here and that Iran isn't funding terrorism and that they've never killed Americans or never incited violence, it's shocking.
And this is the kind of propaganda you expect to see from the Democrats, from the squad, from the Communist Party of America, from the Party of Socialism and Liberation, from Islamic groups, right, that like to call themselves Islamic civil rights groups or 501c3s here in America that are actually supporting terrorism.
This is not something you expect to see from Tucker Carlson, who is supposed to be a leader in conservative media, conservative commentary.
But we'll see how this progresses.
I'm afraid that Tucker Carlson is only going to continue in his quest to undermine President Trump.
He says Trump sought America first.
That's what's so funny.
Trump sought America first, according to Tucker, by interviewing the president of Iran and allowing him to lie about never killing Americans is America first, right?
So that's the twisted reality that we're living in.
Javier, where do people go if they want to read your publication?
You have publications in Florida.
You have publications in Texas.
You're on social media.
Well, listen, first of all, thanks for having me on.
Anytime you need me, I'm here.
In Florida, they can go to thefloridianpress.com, texaspolitics.com.
They can follow us on Twitter at Floridian Press.
And they can follow my Twitter handle at Hov Manharris on X. Wonderful.
Well, thank you so much for coming on.
Hopefully the Trump administration takes some action following your exclusive report about the CCP expansion in Africa and Liberia.
So we'll be watching closely as this Africa summit unfolds at the White House this week, starting today, going till Friday.
We'll be watching closely, and I'm sure that you will as well.
Javier, thanks so much for coming on tonight.
I really appreciate it.
Thank you.
Appreciate it.
Oh, there you have it.
Tucker Carlson is totally on hinge.
It's just pretty scary that this is where we are in our country.
We're at a point where you can't even rely on conservatives who, I don't know, maybe you grew up watching them, listening to them.
People, Tucker Carlson used to mock all these leftists.
I just think it's so funny how he used to brand himself as the common sense conservative, right?
And, oh, well, Tucker Carlson is enforcing common sense.
He's enforcing common sense.
And now he's completely lost his mind.
It's really just totally indefensible.
Go ahead and put your comments and questions in the chat.
Before we close out, we're going to take several comments and questions.
But before that, I want to take a moment to thank the sponsor of tonight's episode of Loomer Unleashed, Kirk Elliott Precious Metals.
Let's cut through the noise.
The economy is shaky.
Banks are failing.
Inflation's eating your savings.
But gold and silver, well, they've held value through every single crisis.
But don't get burned buying the wrong kind.
Those shiny coins and ads, they carry a high price and high fees.
And when you try to sell, you're going to get less.
That's why Dr. Kirk Elliott does it differently with real bullion and no games.
So be sure that you visit kepm.com slash lumer and get the straight answers.
Protect what matters before the next crisis hits.
Head on over to kepm.com slash loomer.
That's kepm.com slash loomer.
Fill out the contact form.
Contact Dr. Kirk Elliott and his team of professionals and find out how you can invest in precious metals and secure your financial freedom.
You can also call Dr. Kirk and his trusted team of professionals at 720-605-3900.
Again, that's 720-605-3900.
Head on over to KEPM.com slash Loomer, KEPM.com slash Loomer, and let Dr. Kirk Elliott know that Laura Loomer sent you.
Before we close out, we'll take a couple questions.
Someone said, FFJB, I was late to this interview, but what I've seen was right on about Tucker lately.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
Tucker and his retarded laugh need to disappear.
Yeah.
True.
Laura is on the right side of history.
Tucker has flushed his whole credibility.
Let's see.
Conservatives can be gullible because we're thirsty for a voice, but so many puppets and grifters, be careful who you believe.
Absolutely.
Would I meet with Tucker?
What's the point of me meeting with Tucker?
Like I said, what is the appeal to Tucker?
Like, what am I going to do?
Pop some Zin?
Oh, hey, dude, let's go pop some Zin and have a manic laugh-off session.
Let's just pop a Zin in my cheek and sit there and be gaslit about Islamic propaganda.
Yeah.
What is the benefit of me meeting with Tucker Carlson?
Like, what's the benefit?
What is Tucker Carlson going to do for me?
I mean, really, what is Tucker Carlson going to give me that I don't already have?
I mean, that's really what it comes down to.
What do I need Tucker Carlson for?
Tucker Carlson is on the Alps with President Trump.
I mean, what do I need Tucker Carlson for?
What is Tucker Carlson going to do for me?
That's how you have to approach things in life.
What is somebody going to do for you?
If the answer is nothing, why would you waste your time?
What benefit am I going to get from talking to Tucker Carlson aside from having agitation and probably getting another migraine from listening to his aggravating, grating voice?
I don't really see any benefit of talking to Tucker Carlson.
I have his cell phone number.
I don't really care.
Like, I've already shown he's a liar.
He said he didn't know me.
Oh, I don't know who Laura Loomer is.
Oh, really?
That's why you've texted me before?
Got it.
He's a liar.
I don't want to engage with a liar.
What are we going to talk about?
He said that I don't have the best interests of the United States of America because I supported Israel attacking Iran.
So because I'm pro-Israel and I never called for U.S. involvement, I said that I wouldn't care if President Trump decided to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities.
Tucker says that I can't be trusted and that I'm a national security threat and that I don't serve the interests of America.
Meanwhile, he is literally pushing out Islamic terrorist propaganda for the president of Iran, the prime minister of Qatar, saying that Iran has never killed an American before.
So he's full of shit.
He's totally cooked.
You could scroll up.
Let's see what the other comments say.
Tucker can't do much for you.
You would probably look like a fool if you had a debate with him.
There's nothing to debate.
This is about moral clarity.
Everybody knows that Iran has killed Americans.
Everybody knows that Iran sponsors terrorism.
Everybody knows that Iran threatened to assassinate Donald Trump.
He's a liar.
He's a liar.
And that's not credible, honorable journalism.
There's literally nothing to debate.
What is there to debate?
Okay.
He lied.
I already showed you.
There's been more than 180 attacks on U.S. service members in the Middle East by Iran from October 23rd to November 24th, 2024.
So October 2023 to November 2024, over 180 attacks on U.S. military service members in the Middle East by Iran.
And Tucker Carlson says that that's not true.
Okay.
There's something to debate.
You're either on the side of good or you're on the side of evil.
And you're on the side of having moral clarity or not having moral clarity.
And the fact of the matter is, is that, you know, Islamic terrorism is ravaging not just the Middle East, but also now it's ravaging our country.
It's ravaging Western civilization.
And if we don't start to have an honest conversation about Islam in America, we're going to fall.
We are going to succumb to an Islamic takeover.
And Tucker Carlson is not doing anything to preserve Western civilization.
In fact, Tucker Carlson is aiding the enemy and taking over and destroying Western civilization by being a mouthpiece for Islamist sponsors of terrorism.
That's how I feel about Tucker.
That's how I feel.
You can scroll down.
Let's see.
Tucker is an example of a paid propagandist.
Yeah, it's all about the money with Tucker Carlson.
He can't be trusted.
By the way, we are live right now, so please be sure that you're reposting the live link on rumble, rumble.com slash Laura Loomer, or also click the follow button so that you never miss an episode of Loomer Unleashed.
Be sure that you're following me on X at Laura Loomer or on X at Loomer Unleashed.
We'll take a couple more questions.
Usually Loomer Unleashed is on Tuesdays or Thursdays, but because of the holiday weekend, I had to kind of shake up my schedule a bit.
So there's not going to be Loomer Unleashed tomorrow.
Instead, I'm going to likely air an episode on Friday instead.
So be sure that you're following me on X at Laura Loomer or on X at Loomer Unleashed.
And also turn your notifications on so that you'll never get, well, you'll never miss a notification when I go live because sometimes I change up the schedule depending on whether I'm traveling or whatever I'm deciding to break or cover.
Tucker is a reason why we can lose everything.
Scroll up a bit.
I think we missed a bunch of questions earlier on.
Scroll up a lot more.
Scroll up a lot more.
All the way to the middle.
Keep on scrolling.
Keep on scrolling.
Be sure that you're following Javier as well.
Okay.
Investigate Tucker.
A very good idea.
While you're at it, investigate Pam Blondie.
Yeah, look, I called for an investigation into Pam Blondie as well.
I think that she should also be investigated.
I think Tucker Carlson should be investigated.
I think that Pam Blondie should be investigated.
Thank you.
Let's see.
Scroll down, go all the way to the bottom, take two more questions.
And.
And.
Thank you.
Javier Manjaras, that's his name.
For those of you who said, I didn't get his name.
Pam Bondi is a very bad liar.
Her answer was so dumb when asked what happened to the minute of the missing video.
Yeah, she's a liar.
I mean, we showed you tonight a ton of clips that prove that people, not just at the DOJ, are lying, but also at the FBI are lying.
So yes, yes, Pam Blondie is a liar.
We know.
Now it's up to President Trump, the person who appointed her, to fire her.
Any update on the rescue dogs?
Yes, I was able to help get four of the dogs at the kill shelter in Carson, California removed from the shelter and taken to a no-kill shelter.
And they are now safe.
They were set to be euthanized and they are also, you know, adjusting in this new shelter.
And I'm going to be posting photos of those dogs tomorrow and letting you all know like the personality types of these dogs and what types of homes are best for these dogs.
They're currently located in California.
And I'm going to try to use my social media to find homes for these dogs.
So if you follow me for all of the work I do regarding animal rescue, be sure that you're following my X account because tomorrow I'm going to have some updates for those dogs that I just helped rescue out of the kill shelter in California.
One of the dogs, well, I guess it's five dogs really, who was set to be euthanized, Hercules, a beautiful four-year-old Rottweiler, has now been adopted into a beautiful home.
A follower of mine, I put out a message looking for a home for Hercules.
And there was a wonderful woman out of Oregon who's a retired veterinarian who decided to drive halfway down to California.
And so now we found Hercules a home.
So saved a lot of dogs these last few days from being euthanized.
I will be updating you all soon.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Alrighty.
Well, with that, thank you so much for tuning in to Loomer Unleashed tonight.
Again, if you want to support my work, be sure that you're following me on Rumble and X at rumble.com slash Laura Loomer and on X at Laura Loomer and Loomer Unleash.
You can also subscribe to Loomer Unleashed and support my work for $7 a month or $70 per year by clicking the Get Loomered button on my Rumble page, which will take you over to locals where you can subscribe for $7 a month or $70 per year.
With that, thank you so much for tuning in.
And I will see you later this week for another episode of Loomer Unleashed.
Have a great night.
There is a young female journalist, conservative journalist by the name of Laura Loomer.
If America's men acted like Laura Loomer, our problems would be fixed in about five minutes.
▲
Export Selection