Nov. 11, 2018 - Loomer Unleashed - Laura Loomer
02:03
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Might if I ask you a couple of questions? | |
| We're on a live stream. | ||
| There's 2,000 people watching. | ||
| So you said your name is? | ||
| Leonard Samuels, counsel for the Florida Democratic Party. | ||
| So given your own personal opinion, and as a lawyer, of course, do you think that it's appropriate for Brenda Snipes to be overseeing this, given the fact that a judge ruled that she already destroyed ballots in the race between W. Wasserman Schultz and Tim Canova? | ||
| I mean, doesn't that seem a little unethical for her to be overseeing this? | ||
| Of course she should oversee it. | ||
| She was appointed by a Republican governor, Governor Jeb Bush. | ||
| She's been re-elected several times by the voters of Broward County. | ||
| He made that having all the information possible on the ballot. | ||
| There's been not one iota of fraud. | ||
| There's been not one iota of corruption. | ||
| There has, though. | ||
| The judge ruled that she destroyed ballots in the race between W. Wasserman Schultz and Tim Canova. | ||
| So how can you say that there's not any sharp evidence for corruption when she destroys ballots? | ||
| I mean, if you are an election supervisor, shouldn't destroying ballots be an automatic disqualification for you to oversee an election? | ||
| I don't qualify that as fraud or corruption. | ||
| You don't qualify destroying ballots, legitimate ballots, as fraud or corruption? | ||
| It was way, way after the election. | ||
| W. Wasserman Schultz won that election. | ||
| You're a lawyer for the Democrat Party? | ||
| I do not believe right now in this process here today there has been any evidence of fraud or corruption. | ||
| No, but I'm not talking about that. | ||
| My question was, should she or should she not be overseeing this given her record of corruption and destroying ballots? | ||
| I don't agree with the premise of the corporate. | ||
| You're a lawyer. | ||
| You're saying that there's no corruption or fraud to destroy ballots. | ||
| That is the definition of corruption and fraud when you're destroying ballots. | ||
| I don't agree with you. | ||
| You're saying there's been no evidence of any fraud or corruption. | ||
| The judge in Florida ruled that she destroyed ballots. | ||
| Can we do an interview? | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Yeah, I'm doing an interview too. | ||
| I don't know if you think you're like more important than me or something. | ||
| He's finished. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| I appreciate it. | ||
| I'm done, man. |
Export Selection