Loomer Unleashed - Laura Loomer - Lawyer For Democrat Party of Florida "Destroying Ballots Isn't FRAUD/CORRUPTION"
Aired: 2018-11-11
Duration: 02:03


=== Evidence of Corruption (01:48) ===

[00:00:15]  Might if I ask you a couple of questions?
[00:00:16]  We're on a live stream.
[00:00:17]  There's 2,000 people watching.
[00:00:18]  So you said your name is?
[00:00:20]  Leonard Samuels, counsel for the Florida Democratic Party.
[00:00:24]  So given your own personal opinion, and as a lawyer, of course, do you think that it's appropriate for Brenda Snipes to be overseeing this, given the fact that a judge ruled that she already destroyed ballots in the race between W. Wasserman Schultz and Tim Canova?
[00:00:36]  I mean, doesn't that seem a little unethical for her to be overseeing this?
[00:00:39]  Of course she should oversee it.
[00:00:41]  She was appointed by a Republican governor, Governor Jeb Bush.
[00:00:44]  She's been re-elected several times by the voters of Broward County.
[00:00:47]  He made that having all the information possible on the ballot.
[00:00:50]  There's been not one iota of fraud.
[00:00:53]  There's been not one iota of corruption.
[00:00:55]  There has, though.
[00:00:56]  The judge ruled that she destroyed ballots in the race between W. Wasserman Schultz and Tim Canova.
[00:01:01]  So how can you say that there's not any sharp evidence for corruption when she destroys ballots?
[00:01:05]  I mean, if you are an election supervisor, shouldn't destroying ballots be an automatic disqualification for you to oversee an election?
[00:01:11]  I don't qualify that as fraud or corruption.
[00:01:13]  You don't qualify destroying ballots, legitimate ballots, as fraud or corruption?
[00:01:18]  It was way, way after the election.
[00:01:20]  W. Wasserman Schultz won that election.
[00:01:24]  You're a lawyer for the Democrat Party?
[00:01:26]  I do not believe right now in this process here today there has been any evidence of fraud or corruption.
[00:01:32]  No, but I'm not talking about that.
[00:01:33]  My question was, should she or should she not be overseeing this given her record of corruption and destroying ballots?
[00:01:40]  I don't agree with the premise of the corporate.
[00:01:42]  You're a lawyer.
[00:01:43]  You're saying that there's no corruption or fraud to destroy ballots.
[00:01:46]  That is the definition of corruption and fraud when you're destroying ballots.
[00:01:49]  I don't agree with you.
[00:01:50]  You're saying there's been no evidence of any fraud or corruption.
[00:01:53]  The judge in Florida ruled that she destroyed ballots.
[00:01:55]  Can we do an interview?
[00:01:56]  Thank you.
[00:01:57]  Yeah, I'm doing an interview too.
[00:01:58]  I don't know if you think you're like more important than me or something.
[00:02:00]  He's finished.
[00:02:01]  Thank you.
[00:02:01]  I appreciate it.
[00:02:02]  I'm done, man.