The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1353

Feb. 12, 2026 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:32:15

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1353

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
Ferris On UK Colonization 00:03:46
	Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
	Welcome to the podcast of Load Cedars for Thursday, the 12th of February, 2026.
	I'm joined by Harry and Ferris, and we've got an absolutely banging podcast for you today.
	We are going to be talking about the owner or part owner of Manchester United saying, yeah, I think Britain is a colonised country at this point, actually, because he is, of course, correct about that.
	We're then going to be talking about Keir Stalma basically turning Labour into the nonce party and that becoming the viral meme that has come out of the Mandelson affair.
	I never could have seen it coming.
	Honestly, I didn't think that this.
	I didn't think the Epstein files were going to drop and then blow up Keir Stalmer's party.
	Yeah, I'm glad that all of the Americans were like, yes, the Epstein files are going to drop.
	American politics is going to be blown wide open.
	American politics, nothing happens.
	British politics explodes in the corner.
	No one was expecting it.
	Pam Bondi going on about the financial sector.
	I only saw a few.
	She's like, you know, look at how well whatever the dollar is doing, whatever it was doing, the stock's doing.
	And it's just like, are you saying that this nonce ring is structurally load-bearing for your financial services?
	Listen, it's good for the economy.
	I mean, it's literally not the argument she's doing.
	That was literally her argument.
	Here's the bottom line, all right?
	That was literally stock market.
	Anyway, and the third thing we've been talking about is the female Canadian mass shooter that struck the other day.
	I saw the headlines but decided I didn't really want to look at it.
	And so Ferris is going to make me look at it.
	So anyway, right, let's begin.
	In fact, let me clear my throat for you, game, because I can feel it itching.
	Right.
	So I don't know who Sir Jim Radcliffe is because I don't follow football.
	But those people who do follow football think he's a very important person because he part-owns Manchester United as well as a series of chemical companies.
	And he's a self-made billionaire.
	He's born in, was it Leicester, I think it was in Lincolnshire?
	Got a degree in chemical engineering, founded companies, made himself insanely wealthy, is worth something like 30 billion pounds.
	Great.
	Lives in Monaco because the UK is basically a vampire that is here to suck as much money out of you as it can.
	At the moment, we're running at about 45% of government spending, of the GDP is government spending.
	So if you've ever made any serious money, you kind of want to get out of Britain because it's just not worth your time being here.
	Because the government will literally look at half of everything you've made and say, I should be spending that, not you.
	And so he's gone to Monaco, which is unsurprising.
	But he's obviously still a British patriot because he did this Sky News interview yesterday.
	And man, was everyone angry with it?
	Because he gave some opinions.
	Now, Jim Ratcliffe is Sir Jim Ratcliffe, actually.
	He's 72, I think it was, 73.
	So he remembers a time before the president.
	In fact, he was a middle-aged man before Blair came into power.
	So he very well remembers the country when it was in a demographically stable position.
	And when the country was honestly gorgeous and it was amazing and you'll never remember it like that.
	Sorry, Harry.
	Jeez, he always has to look.
	I know.
	I'm just genuinely sad about it.
	I do remember a better time.
	Trust me, it was great.
	Maybe not as good as you had it, but I had a better time as well that I can look back to.
	And I'm not even trying to rub it in his face.
	But anyway, and so he has some opinions on the state of the country now.
	Or he's maybe too nice.
	He's a nice.
	I mean, I know Keir.
	He's a nice one.
	I like him.
	But I didn't notice that.
	If you really want to deal with the major issues of immigration with people opting to take benefits rather than working for a living, if you want to deal with that, then you're going to have to do some things which are unpopular and show some courage.
Cockney Rhymes and Colonization Complaints 00:12:17
	And has this government done that?
	No, I think they have.
	I don't know whether it's just the apparatus that hasn't allowed Keir to do it or Or he's maybe too nice.
	He's a nice.
	I mean, I know Kier, he's a nice man.
	I like him.
	But it's a tough job.
	And I think you have to do some difficult things with the UK to get it back on track because at the moment, I don't think the economy is in a good.
	You can't afford you can't have an economy with 9 million people on benefits and huge levels of immigrants coming in.
	I mean, the UK's being colonized.
	It's costing too much money.
	It will cause.
	The UK is being colonized by immigrants.
	Really?
	So that went down like an absolute lead balloon with the political establishment.
	Now, we have been talking about this for a long time and using the term colonization, actually, because I think that is what is happening.
	And a lot of people are like, well, who's colonizing you?
	Well, the answer is the British government.
	The legacy imperial state of the British Empire is colonizing the territory controls after the rest of the empire was severed from it.
	What remains of the British Empire is occupying England, Wales, and Scotland, and it is using foreign labor in exactly the same way that the British Empire has always moved around foreign labor to other places as human capital to make sure that it had a relief of any labor shortages.
	For example, this is why there were Indians in Africa.
	This is why there are Bangladeshis in Burma.
	These were all people like the Rohingya, right?
	They are literally the British Empire transplanted a large population of foreigners from somewhere else.
	And this is what all empires have always done throughout history.
	There's a reason that Romania is called Romania.
	It's because the Romans colonized it with labor because they had conquered it from the Dacians.
	That literally goes back to the Assyrians and the transportations, the deportations they did.
	This is the reason there are no 12 lost tribes of Israel.
	They were lost by the Assyrians, who literally picked them up, took them somewhere else, and scattered them to the wind.
	And the British Empire is doing that to Britain.
	And so using the term colonization is important because it accurately describes what's happening.
	And they know it.
	And they know.
	And that's why.
	And that's why they get so angry when it's pointed out.
	Remember the poem put on the side of the London Uncle?
	We'll come to all of this.
	We'll come to all of this.
	So we've been characterizing it in this way for a long time.
	And I'm very glad to see Sir Jim Ratcliffe characterize it like this because this is what is happening.
	And we can see it because every 10 years, as Callum pointed out on Twitter, they produce a map of the colonization of Britain.
	And it's mostly England, by the way.
	There's a very small amount in Wales.
	But the dark blue bits are those bits where the English live and in Wales where the Welsh live.
	And the rest of it are where the foreigners live.
	And as you can see, you get down to areas where we're just barely there at all.
	15%, 14.8%.
	We can zoom in even more aggressively.
	You find bits where we're just barely...
	5%?
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah, during, you mentioned Callum during one of his videos where he went on tourism around English, around jolly old England, he found an area that was 0% in English and went there.
	And it was just like a little Muslim road.
	Put a moss down and everything.
	This is a ward in Leicester with 2.9%.
	That's probably one family of English people left.
	So yeah, this is colonization.
	This is what this is.
	When you go to these places, you notice that these places do not look like England.
	I mean, this is what John Cleese got in trouble for in, was it 2019 saying, well, London's not an English city anymore.
	No, good point, Mr. Cleese.
	That's a great point.
	It's not.
	And again, it doesn't look so bad when you're zoomed out, but when you zoom in, you realize, oh, right, there are entire areas, like vast swathes of cities that barely any English people live in now.
	And remember, they wanted this for the countryside.
	They want this for the rest of the shires.
	Because this, I mean, you just pick a normal place in England.
	Annette Fingolshin's sister, right?
	Exactly, right?
	Almost everyone around here is English because this is where the English are from.
	This is where the shires are.
	And so, yeah, these definitely take on the aspects of ethnic colonies.
	And they're not even homogenous in themselves either.
	So, for example, if we zoom out and then say, let's say we'll look at the Bangladeshis.
	So, the Bangladeshis are primarily in sort of North London there and east of Manchester.
	But where are the Pakistanis?
	Oh, they're in different areas.
	So, you'll notice that they've got a much more heavy presence in Manchester and Birmingham and the west of London and a bit there.
	And okay, well, let's look at the Caribbeans, Africans.
	All right, they're in the south there.
	So, they're around the south area there.
	So, the Bangladeshis are up here, the Caribbeans are down here.
	So, we have ethnic colonies that self-segregate to a rather surprising degree.
	And I just don't know how else you'd describe it.
	I once moved to a Bangladeshi area of London, which I didn't know how Bangladesh was at the time.
	And I remember people knocking on my door on a Friday asking me if I've gone to a mosque.
	You've told this story before because it's so relevant and pertinent to the things that are happening in Britain.
	In fact, speaking of mosques, this is a map of mosques run by a Muslim website called muslimsinbritain.org.
	And this is just a map of the mosques.
	Oh, look at that.
	It's very, very tightly clustered around those places where there have been Muslim ethnic enclaves, which is no surprise whatsoever.
	And this probably ignores the illegal mosques.
	Doubtless.
	But so, anyway, the point is, I just don't see how you could argue that that's not the case.
	And this has caused ethnic cleansing in England.
	So, this is a documentary that you can't watch from the BBC.
	It was made in 2016, and I watched it at the time, called The Last Whites of the East End.
	And what this is, is literally in the east end of London, the ancestral home of the Cockneys.
	Cockneys first mentioned in English in 1200, by the way.
	Even when I was growing up in college and we were doing geography and English linguistics, we were studying the Cockney as kind of a linguistic group, given their accent and the Cockney rhyming slang and such.
	And even at the time, this would have been 2012, 2013, there was discussion of, yeah, they're not really in London anymore.
	No, they're kind of ethics.
	They kind of dispersed outside of London, some into Essex, some into Kent, but most of them aren't in London anymore, if they even really still exist as a concentrated group.
	Yeah, and the BBC did this documentary just meeting the last elderly ones who just refused to move.
	And basically, it was essentially the swan song of a program of ethnic cleansing.
	Say, well, these are the last whites in the East End.
	There aren't going to be any more whites anymore.
	So those people who were Cockneys have been literally, like the Assyrian, taken and displaced to other places and their identities subsumed into Essex or wherever, in Kent or wherever.
	And so that actual living, breathing, unique sub-group of the English have been destroyed by mass immigration, by colonization.
	Again, like the Assyrian, there'll be where were the Cockneys?
	Where did they live?
	What did they sound like?
	What was Cockney rhyming slang?
	I'm not a Londoner, so Cockney Rhyming Slam was always something weird and alien and something Londoners did.
	Well, not anymore.
	And so, anyway, where's the economic growth?
	We were told that if we just colonized ourselves like all empires, this will be done for money.
	We just need labor to produce money because that's what this does.
	And unfortunately, this imperial model doesn't work.
	The previous one did work because it didn't have a welfare state.
	And so, if you wanted something, you had to goddamn well work for it.
	But instead, what we've done is just imported people who are just draining our resources, as Sir Jim Ratcliffe said.
	And this is just one example, right?
	This is just one example.
	I mean, a billion a month in benefits to people born overseas.
	What are we mad?
	Yes, we are actually mad.
	We are literally like the Roman.
	We're watching the Tiber foam with much blood.
	I mean, you saw this the other day.
	In 2025, last year, more than 700,000 immigrants registered with a GP.
	So we are paying 700,000 foreigners to have health care for free in this country.
	And they can't possibly have paid into the system because they weren't here to work and pay into it.
	And that happens every single year.
	It is definitionally true that every time we bring in 700,000 people a year, or however many it is, and we say, yeah, you can have free health care.
	Well, that is another burden of 700,000 people who can't possibly have paid into the system.
	And if we did it for one year, we'd be like, okay, well, fine, fine.
	That sucks, but we can absorb that.
	But we do it every single year.
	And we have done for decades.
	I mean, literally, since about 90, actually, it was about 2000 when the immigration really started ramping up.
	And even if they did pay into it, there's no way that we could keep up with that level of growth.
	Existence the infrastructure can't grow fast enough because it's exponential.
	And that's me assuming that every single one of these immigrants has a job.
	And like, assuming that tomorrow they start and then by the end of next year, they've paid their NHS.
	I don't think that's going to be the case.
	And another way that you can tell that you have been colonized and you have been occupied, and this will be something that I think the Indians will really resonate with, is you get two-tier justice, right?
	This is one of the main complaints.
	Oh, it's one rule for the Brits in India.
	It's another rule for the high caste people in India and then the next caste of people in India.
	And then all the way down through the various castes until you get to the untouchables, right?
	Well, welcome to Britain in 2026.
	The white English working class are those untouchables.
	The white English middle class are the Brahmin.
	And the foreigners are the ones who get all of the benefits.
	And one of the things of the benefits of this is a really soft touch when it comes to crime.
	And so you can imagine just how much crime that there is.
	You can imagine.
	I mean, this was just from yesterday.
	Just some lady called Harris.
	So far this week, we've had the rape of a 12-year-old girl by an asylum seeker, the stabbing of two boys in Brent by another in a terrorist incident.
	And now there's four counts of rape against teenage girls.
	And it's only Wednesday.
	There was another one this morning.
	I just couldn't bear to look at it because, as I said, this is literally about the hierarchy of the country.
	We are at the bottom of it.
	These foreigners are at the top and they will get light sentences as they always did, which is why Rupert Lowe is currently undergoing the rape gang inquiry.
	I mean, this just, I mean, I can't.
	We're going to read this, right?
	And imagine, imagine the levels of hierarchy in the country to come to this account.
	Rape gang survivor says, there was a circle of Pakistani nationals.
	They were pointing to children as if they were choosing them.
	The panelist says, when you were picked, what happened?
	Survivor.
	The male staff at the children's home would keep taking the children to the arcade, done up in nice clothing.
	So are you saying that the staff at home was selling you to these foreign men?
	Survivor.
	Yes, it looked very much like it.
	Something was being set up.
	They knew the names of the children.
	They were all hanging around in the back, in back-to-back taxis.
	As in, These foreigners were privileged enough to be able to literally choose children who I assume these were orphan children staying at children's homes.
	These were the lowest of the low, and these people had the privilege of being institutionally favored to the point where they could just pick a victim and then take them and use them as a sex slave.
Children For Sale 00:15:10
	It sounds like a slave market.
	It is a slave market.
	What's the difference between exactly?
	This fits the description of the ISIS slave markets.
	Yes.
	This fully fits the description of ISIS slave markets.
	They would have a bunch of men hanging around and they would bring in the girls and they would bid on them.
	Yes.
	That was.
	And this is the country that you live in right now.
	That this is what's happening to us every day.
	Every goddamn day.
	This is happening because we are under occupation.
	And the British government is the thing that is occupying us.
	The British government is bringing these people here.
	It is making you pay for them and then it is offering you up as slaves.
	This is your country.
	And the thing is, they will tell you this when they want.
	For example, this was a poem that was written by a Jamaican immigrant back in the 60s that they decided to put on the advert space on the tube.
	It's called Colonization in Reverse.
	What joyful news, Miss Matty?
	I feel like my heart is going to burst.
	Jamaica people colonizing England in reverse.
	Are you going to tell me that we're not being colonized?
	This is, it's everywhere.
	It's self-evident.
	And it's the word they use when they do it.
	And Jamaicans aren't even the biggest group either.
	No, they're by far the smallest, actually.
	They're like 3%.
	And that's, you know, they're actually a tiny group.
	see all of these posts from indians and pakistanis saying exactly that yeah they're always when sunak became prime minister they were going on about how this was uh colonization and revenge for colonization Correct.
	So you keep seeing this theme, except that when you say it, it's not allowed.
	When they say it, it's a good thing.
	Exactly.
	And in fact, that leads us on to Starma's very swift response.
	Starmer posted this, just, I mean, literally, the thing hit my timeline.
	I was like, bloody hell.
	And then moments later, Starmer, boom, offensive and wrong.
	Britain is a proud, tolerant, and diverse country.
	Jim Ratcliffe should apologize.
	Okay, no.
	The British Empire is a proud, tolerant, and diverse empire.
	It is occupying Britain.
	It is occupying England.
	It is occupying Wales and it is occupying Scotland.
	And we shouldn't apologize because this is what you have done to us.
	This is what you continue to do to us with no end in sight.
	Now, I mean, you can imagine what the responses to this were like.
	But everyone can see it.
	Everyone can see.
	And the fact that they got so angry about this, just because Jim Ratcliffe named it, shows you how vulnerable they are on this vector.
	Because it shows a breakdown in the elite consensus.
	It means that somebody who is rich enough to fund a political party, who is rich enough to fund a think tank, actually thinks this is a bad idea.
	So it's a sort of defection of the elites, which always precedes the fall of the old elite.
	But not just that.
	What Jim Ratcliffe has done here is identified the moral distance between the government and the governed.
	Because in Britain, we have always thought of ourselves.
	I mean, one of the reasons that Britain is famous for having good governance is because of a moral unity between the elites, the state, and the people.
	And this comes from World War II, frankly, that everyone was on the same side and everyone agreed, yeah, we've got to stop the Nazis because they're the Nazis.
	Okay, great.
	And then 80 years after that, the government, they have drifted so far apart from what the people of the country actually want that they can't bear to hear spoken and accurate description of the current state of the country.
	So we have to keep saying it.
	Now, he tweets out a Sky News article there.
	And, yeah, I mean, I don't know how else you'd describe it.
	I mean, look at the numbers that they give in the Sky News article.
	This is just from the ONS, obviously.
	So the UK population was 58 million in 2020, is what Jim Ratcliffe says.
	Now it's 70 million.
	But the ONS says, no, it was 67 million in mid-2020 by official counts.
	It was 58 million in about 2000, I think it was.
	So Jim Ratcliffe is 200.
	So he probably just misspoke.
	Probably, yeah.
	He probably meant 2000 rather than 2020.
	But the point is, he says now it's 70 million people.
	Well, that's correct.
	It was estimated at 70 million in mid-2024.
	But the thing is, that's definitely an undercount because that's just the census data, the legal census data.
	And this is always an estimate, right?
	These are always estimates when it comes to immigration numbers.
	It doesn't count the at least 2 million, but probably way more than that, illegals who are here.
	And it doesn't count people who overstay their visas and stuff like this, right?
	We don't know.
	We don't know is the answer.
	But it's going to be well north of 70.
	Wouldn't be surprising.
	I mean, in 2011, Tesco's thought it was 80 million that they were feeding.
	They thought the population, and if you look at the sewage system, or drive somewhere, use a train.
	How many people does it feel like are in the country to you?
	The country is rammed.
	One of the other metrics is phone contracts.
	Phone companies say the amount of phone contracts that there are is, yeah.
	I mean, don't get me wrong.
	Some people have two phones, but like, that's a lot of phones.
	Enough to almost double the amount of people who, the amount of phone contracts that would be needed.
	Exactly.
	How many people do you know who actually have two phones?
	One or two because of work?
	I don't know many drug dealers.
	No, exactly.
	But anyway, so the statistics are broadly correct.
	There is officially 70 million people in the country.
	Back when mass immigration started, there were 58 million people.
	So yeah, he's not wrong.
	That is a 12 million increase.
	That's colonization.
	And these are the official government numbers.
	This is not wrong.
	This is just the wrong date for the figure.
	But even then, it was just 20 years ago.
	Well, 25 years ago now.
	Anyway, so people were very upset by this.
	Here's the justice minister, Jake Richards, whining about his taxes.
	I hate it.
	If you didn't tax him to death, he would stay.
	Yeah, he's obviously a patriot, and he's obviously done what is necessary because of the predatory nature of the British government when it comes to taxation.
	What's Rachel Reeves' next budget going to include?
	More tax rises?
	Because that's what the last one included.
	And the one before that.
	And what about the previous budgets?
	And what happened to Liz Truss when she was like, guys, I want a really small tax cut.
	You know, you guys are a predatory empire that is here to extract our wealth.
	And anyone who makes good and has some sense leaves.
	I mean, there's a reason that Jimmy Carr, a comedian, had an offshore tax haven account and was lambasted for it.
	Because, okay, what's Jimmy Carr got £5 million, £10 million?
	Yeah, he's rich, but he's not that rich.
	I mean, read this.
	Jim Ratcliffe has moved to Monaco to save £4 billion worth of tax in this country.
	You were going to steal £4 billion from him.
	Yeah.
	It's not just that.
	It's the stupidity of it.
	It's the stupidity of having a system that turns talented wealth creators into tax refugees.
	Into literally exiles.
	Yes.
	Literal exiles.
	Like voluntary.
	And then you had a bit of space for them under the non-domiciled thing where they could spend a few months in the country and spend the money that came from them being in the country.
	And then you said, no, no, no, no, that doesn't bring about total equality.
	Let's make them leave.
	Exactly.
	And you were bragging a few months ago.
	All of these guys were bragging that closing the non-DOM status would lead to billionaires leaving.
	And that was a good thing at the time.
	Now they're saying actually it's a sign of zero patriotism.
	This is too mealy-mouthed to tolerate.
	Well, you think you're a patriot, do you?
	Why aren't you letting me tax you 100% next?
	You're not a real patriot, are you?
	Exactly.
	As if patriotism is supporting the imperial state that occupies us because of the vast and overcosted bureaucratic institutions it wants to use to control everything about your life.
	They don't want you to be a literal pay pig.
	They want to humiliate you and do things that make you worthless and take money from you for the privilege of doing it.
	While they inflict all these foreigners on you and give them your money.
	As if patriotism is paying the British government taxation.
	What an absolutely ridiculous thing.
	Anyway, the next one, Ed Davy, totally wrong.
	Totally out of step with British values.
	He should apologize.
	No, fuck your British values, right?
	They're the imperial values of the empire that seeks to use other people to replace us.
	They literally, your argument is we're going to use their labor instead of your labor.
	That's the literal imperial argument.
	And you're like, yeah, well, our British values support that.
	I don't care about your British values.
	I'm completely against them in every way.
	And all of the people that you bring here to replace us.
	How about that, Ed?
	Andy Black.
	Oh, no, we do things differently in Manchester here.
	Yeah, didn't you get cucked, though?
	Completely cucked by Stalman.
	Why would anyone want to hear from you?
	Anyway, Central Manchester Piccadilly Gardens has a big problem with foreigners hanging around trying to recruit young girls.
	So maybe you should try and sort that out, Andy.
	Well, that's part of the plan.
	That's why they've been brought here and we're given the money and we're given the status and the privilege to be able to do that.
	Anyway, you have lots of people.
	This is another football manager.
	I don't know who he manages.
	I can't remember off Hanks.
	I'm not a football guy.
	BFC Dublin, so some Irish guy.
	But he's just, oh my God, he's moved to Monaco to avoid tax and calls out immigrants as the problem.
	Yeah, but Monaco can just get rid of the immigrants if they like.
	Monaco is not really the same as us, is it?
	It's got a kind of particular arrangement with its immigrants.
	Its immigrants are a little wealthier than our immigrants, aren't they?
	Probably fewer gang rapes as well.
	Anyway, so he's upset a bunch of his peers in the football managing arena.
	And then you get, of course, the anti-racism football charity show racism red card.
	They say they're deeply concerned.
	He's giving money to these charities.
	Yes.
	Well, exactly.
	All of these football managers, I imagine.
	But they're deeply concerned because they're, of course, an instrument of colonization.
	Their job is to single out anyone who objects to the colonization and call them a bad person.
	Oh, you're a racist, right?
	Well, there we go.
	That's you.
	Picked, polarized, frozen, locked out of your networks, locked out of advancement.
	That is you made a public example of and humiliated in front of all of your peers for daring to think that actually maybe this isn't good, for daring to oppose the empire.
	This is a tool of this imperial advance.
	James O'Brien, sputtering, absolutely sputtering with fury.
	Couldn't tell him that he's wrong.
	So is he immoral?
	He's terrible.
	How dare you?
	But he couldn't say that it's not correct.
	And all he could say is, well, we're living in a country where racism is back in fashion.
	Oh, you haven't seen the hot.
	You haven't.
	We haven't even started, James.
	You don't even know what's coming, bro.
	But then you've got Ash Sarkar, a billionaire who moved his tax residence to Monaco during the pandemic.
	So he didn't have to give his money to hospitals, schools, and public services.
	Spare me.
	Well, that doesn't disprove him, does it, Ash?
	Thought you were an academic, Ash.
	I mean, A, one, you're a Bangladeshi woman.
	You are a coloniser.
	You're part of this issue.
	And two, that doesn't address anything.
	So calling him a stinking hypocrite on BBC Newsnight doesn't affect anything.
	That doesn't change anyone's mind.
	All you're doing now is saying, well, he's a bad person, as if you're not in some way a hypocrite yourself.
	Anyway, didn't she have, was she the one with the video celebrating the British becoming a minority in London?
	Yeah.
	Yes, winning cads is her famous question.
	That was her, right?
	Yeah.
	You know what?
	I forgot to bring that up for this.
	Yeah.
	But I was going to have us watch this, but basically, for the sake of time, she says, he's a hypocrite and it's not happening.
	Where is your language being taken away from you?
	Like, I mean, everywhere, actually.
	What do you mean, where is our language?
	I mean, even in the parts of London where they're still speaking English, they have this horrible bastardized version called multicultural London English.
	Yes.
	Awful.
	Personally, I would temper myself here.
	Re-education camps, maybe?
	Re-educate with mandatory elocution lessons everybody in the country who speaks it.
	Because one of the other effects of it, of course, is that if there are white British people growing up in the areas in which it's spoken, they end up speaking that way as well.
	There's this guy on Twitter called Young Bob who pops up every now and again.
	And I've seen him speak, and he's clearly from one of these areas of London.
	Seems like a nice lad.
	He seems like a nice enough guy, but he speaks multicultural London English, and you can hear him trying his best to try and speak in an RP accent, but it slips through.
	And I feel that people like that, young British kids, are having their own heritage and culture and language stolen from them with this bastardized form.
	This is not the language of Shakespeare.
	Correct.
	Anyway, so yeah, there are loads of places.
	Here's a video that The Express did only a few months ago, going to an area where literally no one speaks English.
	80% of the people I've spoken to aren't able to give me a response.
	No more English English.
	No problem.
	Thank you.
	They are living in UK, so they're still speaking English.
	So, these are colonizers, right, Ash?
	This is your, I mean, these look like Bangladeshis to me.
	So co-ethnics of yours.
	And this is where they don't speak English in England.
	This town is called North Evington.
	It's just outside of Leicester.
	And this is completely normal.
	And another thing that Ash says is, well, they're just people coming over here and starting families.
	It's like, okay, but Ash, that's a literal description of colonization.
	I just wanted to explain.
	What's wrong with white South Africans?
	It's sort of what's her criticism of white South Africans.
	They went to the city.
	What's her criticism as Israeli West Bank settlers?
	There you go.
	Well, everybody is an interchangeable individual until it starts coming the other way.
	Exactly.
	Yeah.
	Just for the sake of time, let's carry on because she says, well, they're just coming here and starting families.
	One, that is what colonization is.
	When foreigners move into an area and start families that are ethnically homogeneous, instead of integrating and marrying into the local community, right?
	That's what colonization is.
	But secondly, not really.
	This is a population pyramid of Manchester that Lander posted earlier.
	And he was like, what the hell is this?
	Well, what this is, is actually really explainable.
	They're not coming here to start families.
	Otherwise, there'd be loads more kids.
	What this is, is the nomads of globalism who are traveling around and sucking up welfare because they can.
	They move over, they get as much as they can out of the system, and then they don't retire here.
	They go back.
	They go home, which is why the sort of 20 to 40, and especially on the younger side, very, very heavy, and no children, no elderly, right?
	That's just the global, the nomads of globalism who are just swanning around our country and we're paying for the privilege.
	That's why we're so poor.
	Not only do we have stable ethnic colonies in this country, but we also have a flood of people from just everywhere.
Nomads of Globalism 00:04:33
	And you can go down basically any town high street in Britain at this point, at least in England, and see it.
	We see it all the time.
	They're not people from any one place.
	They're from absolutely everywhere.
	And it's like, what are we doing here?
	What are we doing?
	Anyway, so the people who came out in support of John Rat Jim Radcliffe Ratcliffe were surprisingly reform, actually.
	I know.
	It's hold, you know, hold your surprise.
	But actually, everyone in reform came out and said, yes, basically, the UK is a colonized country.
	Now, Nigel Farage had the softest interpretation.
	Britain has undergone unprecedented mass immigration that's changed the character of many areas in our country.
	Labour may try to ignore that, but reform won't.
	I mean, that's a bold promise, Nigel.
	You've made in a very soft way.
	Find it hard to believe.
	Okay, fine.
	I'll take it.
	It's something.
	The point is, Nigel Farage is now actually in opposition to Kier Starman when it comes to demographic change.
	This is at least something he can be held to in the future.
	Zia Youssef went on TV.
	Again, he said, look, I'm the child of immigrants, but I've come here to integrate.
	And this is not really about just, I mean, the numbers of themselves are, of course, ridiculous, but it's not just really about that.
	It's also about intention.
	What are the intentions of the immigrants?
	Why have they come here?
	And his parents came here because they actually like Britain.
	They wanted to be a part of the civilization, not just sponge off us, which I think is a fairly good argument, actually.
	Swell a braveman, again, like, comes with the based interpretation of, yeah, most of these immigrants shouldn't be here.
	And the ones that my parents, for example, came because they like this place, which is why these immigrants have found some means like first, like Stelios.
	They find themselves on our side of the argument because they like this country and what it should be and don't just want to be given to the tidal wave of eaters that come off of the boats from wherever.
	Anyway, Lee Anderson, yep, he points out no one else for mass migration.
	You know, we've had enough, so do not hide behind diversity as our strength.
	Good start.
	I'll take it.
	And even Aaron Banks was like, yep, the truth hurts.
	So great stuff.
	Obviously, Rupert Lowe had the most straightforward and direct and incisive statement that I'll let you read at your own time.
	But then, one of the guys from Dragon's Den, Duncan Bernati.
	Anatai.
	Anatai.
	I never watched Dragon's Den.
	You know the other one, the woman, is an insane woke libtard.
	Oh, yeah, obviously.
	Well, he's come out and said, yeah.
	I can only imagine the behind-the-scenes punch-ups on the set.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, but he's come out and said he's going to start retweeting Steve Laws.
	So, I mean, what a crossover.
	The point being, I realize it's gone on quite a long time, but I really wanted to lay it all out in one comprehensive place.
	The point being, this is the subject they can't bear to have spoken about.
	Like, the colonization of England.
	The disunity between the people of England who are having this inflicted on them by the government and the British imperial state that is doing this to us.
	We've been saying this for a long time, and I'm really glad to see this go mainstream because I think it's really important that we understand ourselves as a people under occupation.
	There are quite a few rumble rants for that.
	I know, I know.
	Unfortunately, for the people sending them, I'm going to have to summarise a bunch of them.
	Sigilstone says, yes, the problem of being colonized, it costs too much money.
	No other downside.
	And Jack's stare of violent disgust.
	Yeah.
	Well, yeah, the one thing I would criticise Ratcliffe for is that if he wants to worry about colonization, perhaps decolonizing his own football team should be the first thing to do.
	This is something a lot of people made.
	I forgot.
	I had one more.
	Apparently he did apologise for the choice of language that he used.
	I'm kind of mealy-mouthed.
	I'm sorry that my choice of language has offended some people in the UK and Europe.
	Yes, that's not, I'm sorry I said something wrong.
	Yes.
	I'm sorry you were offended.
	I'm sorry you're offended, you retard.
	Yes, if I was apologizing and I said, I'm sorry you're offended, people like, that's not an apology.
	This is what I say when I'm in an argument with the missus when I know I'm absolutely right, which is furious anyway.
	Well, that's right.
	I'm sorry you got offended at that.
	It doesn't help.
	I don't know that it would work.
	Hayden says, hello from Cornwall.
	Luckily my town has not been colonized yet.
	Well, trust me, it's coming.
	I used to live in Cornwall, beautiful area of the country, obviously.
	Logan says, something that's background noise for us, but I think I should say, a massive beast is walking across the Western world as the boomer brainwashing is ending at last.
	And it ever be delayed never stopped.
Peter Mandelson's Shocking Crisis 00:15:48
	Yes, and this is the thing.
	It's ideas whose times have come, frankly.
	And we just have to keep using that term.
	That's a great term, and it actually accurately describes the problem, so we should use it.
	Let's move on.
	All right, can we move on to the next set of links, please, Samson?
	Thank you very much.
	So one of the most unexpected turn of events following the release of the Epstein files has not been the collapse of the American government, which sadly has not yet happened, but was instead the shock, potential collapse of the British government, particularly the Starmer cabinet, which has completely fallen apart in the past week since a lot of this information has come to light.
	A lot of it off of the back of information that a lot of it was already known, that being Peter Mandelson's heavy involvement with Jeffrey Epstein.
	We had in September the release of a lot of the information regarding his friendship with the birthday card, some of the emails that were leaked, confirmation that they'd been corresponding while Jeffrey Epstein was in prison between 2008 and 2009,
	2010, which is something that, again, the Epstein files has made very clear to everybody, was that all of these elites, whether or not there is quote-unquote hard evidence of them being involved in a ring to traffic young girls to one another that was just organized by Epstein, but at the very least, they all knew that this guy was in prison for having groomed and assaulted a 14-year-old girl, and they were all more than happy to speak to him anyway while he was in prison and even offer condolences.
	Oh, it's so cruel that the media is so nasty to you.
	Steve Bannon and Noam Chomsky working so that they can be like, we need to reform your public image, Jeffrey.
	So bizarre turns of event going on there, but Mandelson has been the one that seemed to cause a lot of the collapsing recently, just in the past week or so.
	Here are some of the major resignations from the Labour Party and from people in high positions.
	So first of all, you had Peter Mandelson himself, who has resigned from the party.
	And while he has not forgone his peerage, has stepped down from the House of Lords.
	I thought he was having it stripped from him by the King.
	Maybe.
	I've not seen it.
	I'm pretty sure that has happened.
	Perhaps I missed that.
	I'll double check.
	Yeah, there was Morgan McSweeney, who was the chief of staff under Starmer, who was the guy who put forward Mandelson as being the ambassador to the US in the first place.
	He has resigned due to his advice for that appointment.
	And then you have other people in the crossfires like Matthew Doyle, Starma's former Director of Communications, unrelated to Mandelson, but seems to have dredged up a lot of extra stuff with the Labour Party, who is in trouble due to campaigning for a Mr. Sean Morton, a former Labour councillor convicted of possessing indecent images of children in 2016.
	Starmer also appointed him to the House of Lords in January, and he's already stepped down.
	Just a quick update on the Peter Mandelson title thing.
	Oh, yep.
	An hour ago, the Mirror posted an article explaining that the Labour Party is going to advance a new law that allows them to strip Mandelson of his peerage, because at the moment there is no legal mechanism.
	Just specifically, just specifically so they can be able to strip anyone of their peers.
	Of course, but for the purposes right now, it's so that they can.
	It is literally for the purposes of taking Mandelson's peerage away.
	Yeah, and of course, as you might expect, this is really coming back hard on Keir Starmer himself, who being the leader of the party, a lot of this ends up being centered around him.
	A lot of the decisions that were made were done with his approval.
	You know, it may have been Morgan McSweeney, his chief of staff, but ultimately Keir Starmer was the guy who said, okay, we'll go ahead with Peter Mandelson.
	He might not be Matthew Doyle or Sean Morton.
	He might not have campaigned for this paedophile back in 2017, but he was the guy who gave two thumbs up to this guy becoming a lord back in January.
	I mean, he appointed him.
	Yeah, he appointed him.
	And there's a lot more that's come out since then.
	So the party is in a place of turmoil right now, and there are questions of whether Keir Starmer, despite having said just in January a few weeks ago that he'll be sitting in this seat by 2027, in an interview he gave at the beginning of the year, there are questions whether he's even going to make it to the end of this year.
	Some are even suspecting that it might not be within the next few months.
	Now, this is a surprise to me because I was saying ever since the start of his becoming prime minister that I was not expecting him to have any troubles leading up to 2029.
	Because one thing you can be sure of in this country is that if your policies are terrible, if you screw over the country in the worst ways imaginable, you are fine.
	There is nothing that can touch you because most of the time your party will be absolutely fine with it.
	But what does take you down?
	Salacious media scandals, right?
	And that seems to be what is taking down Starmer.
	I was not expecting the Epstein files to drop and I was not expecting them to have such an impact on British government in particular.
	Because of course, it's not just that Mandelson was friends with Epstein or that he even supported him while he was in prison.
	It's also that he was trading insider government secrets with Epstein back in 2008, 2009, when he was, was he deputy leader?
	He was deputy state or something.
	He was in fact a deputy prime minister.
	His official position was something slightly different.
	Under Gordon Brown.
	Under Gordon Brown.
	But after Epstein was in jail, he stayed at his townhouse and was emailing him, when you get out, we'll have Liberation Day and go see strippers.
	And in 2024, Starmer allowed him to choose the candidates for Labour's electoral run and then do the cabinet reshuffle afterwards.
	So you can't say this, you know, long after Epstein has been convicted.
	And we've even got the emails of him cheering for when he gets out.
	And it's been made known now that Keir Starmore was well aware of their association and friendship.
	He's admitted in Parliament.
	Yeah.
	There's no way he didn't know.
	So all of this falls back heavily on Starmer.
	And as such, the party is turning against him.
	They're saying here, the bold truth now, it's hard to find anyone in Labour who convincingly agrees that Starmer's still going to be in government by the end of this year.
	Prime Minister, they say, is not responsible for Mandelson's behaviour, but it was his decision to take the chance.
	MPs are shocked and angry with Peter Mandelson, but they are also angry with the Prime Minister.
	And the whole idea that they're all shocked with Mandelson when, let's be honest, they all would have known.
	His name is Prince of Duncan.
	They all would have known.
	Is that West Streeting is signing off his messages to Mandelson with kisses?
	Yep.
	He leaked his own messages for anyone who doesn't know, thinking this would make him look better.
	And Beth Rigby was like, well, you look like the best of friends because you're literally signing off as kisses.
	I don't sign guys with kisses.
	No, I mean, how close do you have to be?
	Anyway.
	Yeah, it's very strange, but it does come across a bit like, well, I'm shocked.
	Shocked, I tell you.
	Not that shocked.
	Not that shocked.
	But according to this article, the author of which says that they have talked to MPs, ministers, party backers.
	It's getting more and more common to hear the weary conclusion that Starmore will later or sooner perhaps have to go.
	One influential figure who has backed him told me that, quote, up until this point, I would not have pushed for it, but I don't think there's any choice now.
	I can't see how his authority survives this.
	I think Diane Abbott had the best analysis.
	Weird.
	Surprise.
	Surprise.
	Which is they want him to lose the May election and then clear house afterwards.
	Be the fall guy for May election.
	Exactly.
	It's going to be brutal.
	I mean, they are already cancelling some council elections, but the ones that are going ahead, it's probably not going to be great for Labour.
	I would expect a bit of a reform sweep.
	Yeah, but it really just emphasized the point because Starmer came out and said, no, I've got the mandate from the British people as if this is something immutable and eternal, never to change.
	I was accidentally given a mandate by Farage, frankly, to be given the win by Farage.
	And therefore, I can cling to it for five years, regardless of everyone's opinion of me, as if this doesn't have second-order consequences.
	I'm sure we're going to get to him.
	And now it really is empowering all of his opponents.
	Farage himself hasn't been as hard as you would expect on this particular subject, but of all people, Kemi Badenock has come out as a bit of a warrior against Starmer because of this, saying this in the House of Commons just yesterday.
	Nobody buys it, Mr. Speaker.
	Not even, not even the Labour women, because they know he always puts the Downing Street Boys Club first.
	And how dare he criticise us?
	We want the ones stuffing government with hypocrites and paedophile apologists.
	Yeah.
	And weirdly, well, not weirdly, actually, quite unsurprisingly, the party is now starting to gain a reputation as the pedophile party.
	Just before we move on to that bit, I watched this entire debate exchange in Parliament, and Keir Starmer was furious.
	He was angry.
	Really angry.
	Ed Davey got up and said, you know, Prime Minister, appointing one is pretty inexcusable, but how did you appoint two paedophile apologies?
	And he just went straight hellfire.
	You are for austerity.
	You've brought this on this country.
	And it's just like, Keir, these are not the same things.
	these are not moral equivalent he's getting angry all the time He's like, we have this conception of Kier Starmer that he's cool, essentially, and controlled.
	In reality, he keeps on losing his temper these days.
	And you can see how much pressure he's under.
	And you can see that he's going to break at something.
	I mean, let's take a quick look in that case.
	And you can just hear that this is not a response to anything that she was saying as well.
	Prime Minister, Mr. Speaker, my legacy is changing my party and winning a general election.
	And I'll tell you this: I kicked my former leader out of my party.
	Her former leader, Liz Truss, broke the economy and has descended into bonkers conspiracy theories.
	I kicked her out of parliament.
	She's too weak to kick her out of their party.
	Yeah, he's like, I might be harbouring paedophiles, but Liz Truss is still in your party.
	What?
	These are not moral equivalents.
	And also, Keir, you could say what you want about Jeremy Corbyn.
	You could call him mad, a socialist, anti-Semitic, whatever.
	As far as I'm aware, he's not a paedophile.
	Not buddies with Mandelson.
	Yeah, he's not a buddies with Mandelson.
	Tell you who else is still in your party, though, and seems to have a weird level of authority to be able to start demanding things is Harriet Harmon.
	Female Labour MPs urged Starmer to make a woman his de facto deputy.
	Harriet.
	What are they suggesting her?
	Harriet Harmon leads calls for an appointment that would turbocharge a complete culture change and number 10.
	Is this recent?
	Let's look.
	Yes, this is yesterday.
	This was reported.
	Because they're not saying that Harriet Harmon needs to be the one.
	And he does seem to be doing this.
	They say, you know, after his performance at Prime Minister's questions, Starmer faced a packed meeting of female members of the Labour Party.
	He apologised to them for appointing Mandelson as the UK's ambassador to the US, promising action to eradicate structural misogyny.
	Now, people are the internal memo that seems to have gone out is that it seems they're trying to spin this not about as a feminist thing, a boys' club, rather than institutionalized, right?
	But that's not really going to work, especially when Harriet Harmon, for those who do not know, when she was a higher figure within Labour in the 70s and 80s, was a supporter of and associated with Pi, the Pedophile Information Exchange.
	She was literally the number one advocate in the Labour Party because they were trying, when they were trying to advance gay rights, for some reason, the paedophile information exchange was a part of that coalition.
	And Harriet Harmon was their champion in the Labour Party.
	She was saying, like, you know, maybe we've got these guys misunderstood.
	So it's interesting that Harmon is involved in these attempts to spin the subject from Blaine.
	Like, no, Ignore the paedophilia.
	Think about the women.
	You literally have a paedophile advocate petitioning Starmer here.
	And I mean, Starmer is trying to with the Starman as part of the same civil rights organization that Harmer was part of when she was advocating for Pi.
	It's all the same ideology.
	It's a group of people.
	Exactly.
	So essentially, it's not the fallacy of the slippery slope.
	It's the iron law of the slippery slope.
	Yeah, and with this spin, they are trying to rejig things where Starmer's like, well, I'm surrounded by women now.
	I don't have McSweeney or Mandelson around me.
	Like Ghelane Mask.
	McSweeney's position has been taken instead by acting joint chiefs of staff, Vidja Alaxon, Alekson, and Jill Cuthbertson.
	So two women have taken the place.
	The new director of communications is now a woman called Sophie Nazima.
	And another name linked with the role is Starma's former director of communication, Stephanie Driver.
	And he's got other women around him now.
	They say here that he has a growing Amazonian guard.
	Literally like a Dahomey Amazonian bodyguard.
	Yeah.
	I'm sorry, that's not going to change the fact that there are too many nonces in your party, Keir.
	Not just that.
	You back them up.
	Yeah, Gaddafi had that as well.
	Is he going Gaddafi mode or us?
	I mean, he seems to be refusing to accept that it's over.
	And nobody is buying this.
	Well, obviously nobody is buying this because there's these reports where Labour MPs have told Keir Starmer they've been branded as pedo lovers on their doorsteps.
	This is a story with Cutthroat, I'm afraid.
	Yep.
	People are pointing out that when he was director of public prosecutions, that Starmer did nothing about Savile.
	And everyone knew.
	And everybody knew about Savile, but Starmer never did anything about Savile.
	So this is the most effective kind of attack.
	You could say, you know, following Southport, all of the failures leading up to that, nothing really came of them.
	Obviously, public changes of perception and such, but he stayed firmly in place.
	All of the U-turns he's had over the past year and a half have looked terrible.
	The winter fuel allowance cuts, the attacks on British pubs, further migration into the country.
	All of these things have been terrible.
	They've been disasters.
	He has been a PR disaster, but he has stayed firmly in place.
	This is something that in polite society, nobody accepts.
	Actually, no, Ham.
	This is something in polite society.
	Everyone accepts.
	But this is something in basic normal society everyone despises.
	I suppose, and then there comes out with stuff like this, along with the fact that he knew about Epstein and Mandelson.
	Keir Starmer was aware that Lord Doyle backed a pedophile, which they all admitted.
	The only conclusion is that this is not disqualifying in the Labour Party.
	There is no other conclusion that pedophilia is not a disqualification for anything to win you a pretty high position within the party.
	That seems to be the trend.
	Yeah, and everybody knows this.
	Even Zara Sultana, Carl, you sent me this when you started.
	She just responded to this, like his number 10 sources, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	Nonce party.
	Now, you know, Zara Sultana, insane colonist, communist lunatic, but this was bad.
	This is just right.
	Yeah, this is just absolutely an accurate description.
	This is just everybody else in the country looking at a duck that quacks like a duck and walks like a duck and going, that's a duck.
	That's a nonsparse.
Pedophilia Tolerated In Labour? 00:05:06
	And Keir Starmer's there going like, oh, but have you not thought of the feminist implications of this?
	No, actually.
	No, I haven't.
	Bring out Harriet Harmon of all people.
	Yeah, I mean, that's impressive.
	Yeah, that's really good.
	That's a level of self-awareness that is just beyond me.
	Like, it should.
	Harriet Harmon's name should always be prefixed with noted paedophilia advocate Harriet Harmon.
	It wouldn't be inaccurate.
	Try and sue over her, I guess, Harriet.
	I mean, like, you know, what are you going to say?
	Exactly.
	And again, there's even more evidence that this goes so deep because this guy, Jody McIntyre, I'm not familiar with him.
	So, you know.
	Bit of an insane leftist, if I remember correctly.
	But this is.
	Either way, he posted this huge thread just saying about how Starmer's Labour is now infested with sexual predators and child rapists.
	So the first one that he brings up here, Labour MP.
	Sorry, before we go on, right?
	Yeah, I can't help but notice that these are the extreme lefties going after the Blairites.
	Yes.
	Morris Glassman yesterday on Sky News said, well, look, this is where new Labour leads.
	It's, you know, degeneracy and paedophilia.
	And all the radical lefties, I mean, don't get me wrong, I have many problems with them, but actually, they don't seem to be Nazis.
	Jeremy Corbyn, I don't think he's wrong.
	Well, it depends on what kind of LGBT activism they're in favour of.
	Sure.
	Sure, but like the communist types, Jeremy Corbyn.
	Yes.
	You know, they're insane, but they're not Blairites.
	And the Blairites seem to have a lot of nonsense in there.
	But sorry, it's Harry Carrick.
	What were you going to say, Ferras?
	Oh, this is Jeremy Corbyn, George Galloway versus Blairism.
	Yes.
	That's what it is.
	Yes.
	Yeah, and you can see how these connections all link up on this side as well.
	You've got this guy, Labour MP, Dan Norris, sat on the board of the Snowden Trust, supports disabled students, and the Kidscape Child Safety Charity co-wrote a book called Don't Bully Me, advising school children on how to deal with abuse, launched a booklet to educate parents about paedophiles.
	Yesterday, and this would have been the 2nd of February, he was charged with new counts of rape and sexual assault.
	His initial arrest was last April on suspicion of child sex offences and child abduction.
	Still an MP at the time when this was written.
	Mental.
	And he just, this journalist goes on to connect the dots with a few of the connections.
	He's credited.
	Norris credited Starmer's leadership for his 2021 West of England mayoral election victory.
	So there is a direct connection between this guy and Keir Starmer.
	Before the 2024 election, Starmer was warned that Norris was facing legal action, but let him stand for Labour anyway.
	The Maxes and Star Sweeney playbook in action, according to this.
	Pedophilia is something they tolerate.
	And then, of course, he goes on to trace some of the lobbyists and people who were funding him.
	And there's more to it as well, where you've got just more cases popping up every day.
	Just the other day, there was this bloke, former Labour councillor Lyren Velleman, pleaded guilty to a series of sexual offences against a 13-year-old girl.
	Vellaman sent naked pictures of himself to her and asked whether she was a virgin and at home alone.
	Who is this chap, Harry?
	He's just a, well, he just happened to be.
	He just happened to be a campaigner for Hope Not Hate.
	Oh, really?
	Is there any particular legislation that the government may have passed that he drafted?
	Well, I mean, his account.
	Oh, litigation is law?
	I think it was the Online Safety Act.
	Oh, yes, yes, yes.
	He drafted that.
	Yeah.
	McSweeney's 2008-10 bar.
	Protecting kids, folks.
	And Dagenham campaign to get Margaret Hodge elected was supported by Hope Not Hate in the 1980s whilst head of Islington Council Hodge dismissed allegations of severe sexual abuse in children's home under her watch.
	I've got all these women around me.
	They can't possibly be complicit.
	Exactly.
	You know, Harriet Harmon, what's she ever done?
	In 2003, after she was appointed Minister for Children, one of the victims went public.
	She paid him 30K and apologised.
	Oh, sorry.
	Here's some money.
	Can't give you your childhood back.
	There you go.
	Here's some cash.
	Carrying on, 2023, Tom Dewey, another labor counselor and labor-first activist, pled guilty to charges of possessing five category A images of children.
	Six days after his arrest, he was re-elected as a labor counselor.
	Prilly.
	Jesus Christ.
	They just don't care.
	2022, Labour councillor Sean Coughlin was convicted of trying to groom a 14-year-old girl, Ivor Kaplan, a former head of this and the vice chair of the LFI, was caught by paedophile hunters last January and arrested for sexual communication with a child.
	When he was arrested, his Twitter account was full of explicit images, apparently, and he was still being followed by labor frontbenchers.
	In the interest of time, I'm afraid we're not going to be able to go through all of this.
	No, of course, but it's just like you can find it in the reading link below.
	Like, it just goes on and on.
	There's just so many of them.
	And this, not to mention the Ukrainians.
	Oh, well, yeah.
	And of course, there is the weird stuff that's mentioned here as well with the Ukrainian-Romanian male models who may have firebombed cars and properties connected to Kier Starmer himself.
	They would have owned these properties or been in these properties when they were still underage.
	Probably, yeah.
	Yeah.
	It's just they don't know the details.
	How do they know?
	Nothing has been proven.
Lend Your Shoulder 00:04:14
	We're waiting for the courts.
	We don't know how they found out his addresses on his car and all of that.
	But they would have been underage at the time.
	So the interesting thing is that, yeah, the Tories always have weird sex scandals.
	And one of the ways that Labor was kind of presenting itself in 2024 was we're the return to boring normalcy.
	The adults are back in the room.
	We're not going to have affairs with one another.
	No, you're not, are you?
	No, no.
	Yeah, well, I mean, you're outside of each other's preferred age range, apparently, because all of this has come out and people have started to notice that, hold up, there's a lot of nonsery going on in Labour right now.
	And it might actually be the thing that brings Starma down if he's going down.
	Mental.
	He is.
	There you go.
	I've got a couple of.
	Do a couple because we're very if Labour managed to pass the law, can we use it to strip Starmer of his knighthood?
	Probably.
	Yeah, why not?
	That's one idea.
	I think they figured out why they keep appealing to mid-GDP while importing child rapists.
	According to Pam Bondi, they got the Dow Jones to over 50,000 and the US would collapse without them.
	Literally structurally necessary, load-bearing child rape networks.
	Mental.
	Unbelievable argument.
	Unbelievable argument.
	I'll take that one.
	Can I get my segment up, please?
	So, unfortunately, there has been a mass shooting in Canada with a number of children being among the casualties.
	Incredibly sad.
	The shooter has been identified.
	And what you see about the shooter is that the whole media was trying its best not to mention that Jesse Van Rutstiler was in fact transgender.
	And they were doing everything that they could to hide that until the very last moment.
	But in the end, they couldn't really help it.
	They had to admit it.
	And you saw the reactions from various people.
	You saw Mark Carney crying over this tragedy.
	And you saw people saying, lend your ear when someone needs your ear.
	Lend your shoulder when someone needs your shoulder.
	Give somebody a hug.
	How about we just don't give body-altering drugs to mentally ill people?
	And that's the end of that segment.
	Sorry, buddy.
	So this is, you know, they finally named him and admitted that there were six children among the casualties.
	But also among the casualties was his stepbrother and his own mother.
	And we're going to discuss that in a moment.
	But first, I want to show you where this actually happened.
	This is Tumblr Ridge.
	It's in the very north of British Columbia, around 1,000 kilometers north of Vancouver.
	The closest large supermarket is an hour and a half away by car.
	Can we zoom out a bit further just so we've got a bit more of a geographic?
	i don't know canada very well or anything so this is really if your ambition is to live in a small village away from it all and hope for sanity in a small community that's the one yeah It's got 2,400 residents.
	The school has 160 students.
	It's about as much of a small and remote rural community as you could hope for.
	So if you think you can run away from this, unfortunately, this is the kind of incident that demonstrates that you really can't.
	The internet is everywhere.
	The internet is everywhere, and that's exactly what seems to have happened because it appears that he got somehow radicalized on Roblox, and he found subreddits there.
	He ended up making a video game that involved shooting up a mole.
	When he was younger, and he was incredibly young, the shooter was 17 or 18 years old, just, you know, boy things, interested in gas masks and tanks and wars and so on and so forth.
	It seems like a community where you could go hunt and he seemed to have been excited about that.
Controversial Transitions and Tragedies 00:15:51
	And then at 15, he began transitioning, unfortunately, and was asking about what kind of drugs he would need to be on and how he would receive these drugs, pills or injections.
	So there's a missing linkage here.
	There's going to be some weird pervy subreddit or tumbler or something like that.
	Yes.
	He has fallen into a community where they in this community it's called cracking the egg, where they get them to come out of their shell and be like, yes, no, I am actually a woman trapped in a man's body.
	And a lot of them deliberately groom teenagers to grow their constituents.
	Pretty much.
	And then at some point he gets interested in...
	Sorry, I went crazy and burned my house down trying my second time on shrooms.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, so let me walk you through this.
	Oh, God.
	He's 15 and he's starting to experiment with needles and things like that to transition.
	Was he getting these through prescriptions or was this something he was getting illicitly on?
	I don't fully know yet.
	Because there are networks of people who will illegally send them these hormones and drugs.
	Sometimes they'll manufacture them out of their own bathtubs.
	Yep.
	So you see the guy and then unfortunately he got out of the psych ward after having burnt down his house and he was diagnosed with a bunch of mental illnesses and given heavy doses of SSRIs and other drugs as well as hormones.
	And he was doing things like 5-MeO DMT, which is a particular kind of psychedelic.
	He's been experimenting with other psychedelics and he ended up burning down his house.
	I see Peter Hitchens.
	I also smoked quite a decent bit of weed there.
	Yep.
	Yep.
	Peter Hitchens vindicated.
	Sertraline, I've known people to take it.
	I think Surtrilline is one of the really bad ones that makes you want to kill yourself for the first month of taking it.
	I actually don't know anything about drugs.
	I don't know any of these things.
	Probably for the best.
	Sadly, in my generation, you know a lot of people who torture SRIs immediately.
	It was just weed and cocaine when I was a kid that people could get.
	So, like, all of these weird sounds.
	Yeah, yeah, it's just really.
	Oh, now you can get diagnosed with ADHD, and they'll basically micro-dose you with meth to keep you calm.
	Yeah, that's what, like, the amphetamine drugs are for people with ADHD.
	Right.
	Okay.
	Adderall and things like that.
	That's the one, yeah.
	Yeah, so you see the wider trans community, quote-unquote, supporting him and giving him advice on how to do this and telling him what kinds of drugs that he can be using and things of that nature.
	He tried to burn down his house with a can of aerosol.
	Intentional fire, he says.
	And like, at this point, you should say, no, you should be in a mental institution for a very long time.
	And apparently, he was in one briefly, but since transgenderism is not recognized as a mental illness for reasons that I don't understand, this did not happen.
	I didn't tell you exactly why.
	It didn't register at first.
	He was going to take DMT.
	Yes.
	DMT is like one of the insanely heavy psychedelic drugs.
	Like you hear Joe Rogan.
	Yeah, this is the Joe Rogan one.
	It's 5 to 20 times more potent than other regular mushrooms and psychedelics.
	And it's found in nature on the back of a frog.
	And whatever that frog has, you don't want it.
	Like evolution gave them all kinds of crazy poisons for a reason because they're not good for you.
	I mean, it's the one where you hear people talk about the effects of it only last like five or ten minutes, but it feels like it takes thousands of years and they meet demons when they take it.
	Just to be clear as well, it was in 2013 when transgenderism was removed from the psychological.
	The DSM, DSM, DMV.
	Sorry about that.
	That's right.
	The DSM.
	For political reasons, obviously.
	Yes.
	In the same way that another thing was removed for political reasons.
	And you see him going on about how there are transphobes in the gun culture, and he's embedded in the gun culture because that's what you do in rural Canada.
	That's exactly, you want your kids to grow up to know how to use guns, to know how to use weapons to defend themselves.
	You're going to deal with all kinds of dangerous things in the wild.
	But because the internet is everywhere, this was in no way enough to actually isolate him.
	And he was going to gun rages that were three hours away and were being driven there by his mother.
	And I think this is one of his own posts, actually, which had previously, way back when, featured on Males Elfreddit a now kind of inactive account.
	And this is him saying that he's been a pre-hormonal treatment, probably on other medications, fantasizing about being like the characters in anime and wanting to look like them more and being very sad that he's not getting there and how he can transform himself to look like anime characters.
	I mean, this justifies my prejudice against anime, frankly.
	Yes.
	This is really sad because this is his mother.
	And his mother is posting on Instagram in defense of transgenderism.
	good people don't spend their time harassing marginalized communities this kind of implies that his mother was influential in him going from loving guns and tanks and stuff to she was also driving him to the gun range but she was encouraging transgenderism and saying that we should educate ourselves before spewing bs online and so on and so forth yes
	And then she goes on to say all kinds of other things, defending Charlie Kirk's murder, essentially, and saying that, you know, you shouldn't assume that his mental illness had anything to do with his actions.
	And she's posting with cats, which is, you know, at least that's healthy.
	The ADL came out to describe the shooter.
	They mentioned that he was involved in white supremacy and interested in gore and guns.
	Oh, yeah, I bet his posts on white supremacy are white supremacy is bad and we should shoot them all.
	In fairness, he seemed to have been interested in some kind of the great campaign to the north to conquer the Canadian North.
	But they don't mention at any point that he himself was transgender.
	Right.
	And I'm sure it was white supremacy that motivated him going to shoot up a school full of children.
	And his own mother and half-brother or step-brother.
	And then, of course, Reddit, because it believes in transparency and it wants us to learn how these people operate so that we can absorb the lessons and not keep having this kind of mayhem and murder deleted pretty much everything to do with his account.
	Sorry, how many kids was it that was shot again?
	10, dude.
	Six children.
	Six children.
	And I believe his mother and stepbrother.
	Jesus.
	But this is the thing.
	Who was also a child?
	Anyway, sorry, Karen.
	So this is the kind of thing that you see, basically.
	I'm not 100% sure if this was him.
	Right.
	But it is being reported online that it was.
	And he's explaining how he is addicted to violent content and drawn to it and so on.
	And admitting that it clearly affects him.
	And that he's drawn to drugs and substance abuse and so on, which obviously led to him literally burning down his house.
	But then you have to sort of identify the pattern here.
	And the pattern here is that in terms of shootings, there is a huge over-representation for this community.
	It happens way too frequently, mass shootings.
	And so does sexual offending.
	And we should know about the profile of these people in a lot more detail so that we can be honest about this risk.
	Because that's the kind of thing that they post.
	Sorry, just look at this.
	I mean, just to read this, remember to always keep a positive mindset.
	Don't think that being trans sucks, I should kill myself.
	Do think being trans sucks, I should kill everyone.
	I mean, it's a mental one.
	Well, again, from everything that we already know about these people and have learned since they became more widespread through society and these events started to happen, it all makes perfect sense from any kind of profiling, the kind of profile that you can make of these people.
	They are all mentally ill from the start.
	They have comorbidities with a number of different psychoses.
	They have a complete detachment from reality.
	They all have a much higher rate of suicidal ideation and a lack of...
	They don't see life as being important.
	No.
	So all of those are huge risk factors for these kinds of mass shooting incidents.
	But people in power and authority just want to sweep it under the rug and ignore it for political reasons.
	Yep.
	Absolutely.
	And the kind of posts that you see in that community are genuinely disgusting.
	This guy's saying that he envies and despises children.
	And I don't actually hate children, even though I did for the longest time.
	But ContraPoint's newest video about envy really kind made me realize that I don't actually hate little kids, but I'm envious of the childhood that I never had as my actual gender.
	So the mental illness here is very self-evident and it's not really in dispute.
	Yeah.
	Except if you're a fan of Kiera Starmer or Zach Polanski.
	Contra points.
	Or ContraPoints.
	Nobody else thinks that this is normal.
	Everybody knows that this is a real problem.
	And we've seen a bunch of these shootings.
	We saw the Nashville school shooting in a Christian school, essentially, where you had a younger of some sort.
	They had a diary where they were saying, I think this is the one where you had a female-to-male transitioner who ended up going to her own school and shooting up a bunch of people, including, you know, kids that she knew, kids that she didn't know, and just shot herself.
	You see this kind of thing a little more regularly.
	We had the same at a Catholic church where another transgender went and shot up a Catholic church in Minneapolis.
	And this keeps on recurring because these people are taught things that make them resent themselves in ways that you cannot imagine.
	And not just themselves, they resent other people.
	They resent the society itself for allowing them to become like this.
	Yes.
	In a way, they kind of are victims of society because we have been tolerant and permissive to the idea of encouraging people with mental illnesses to believe in the illness.
	Yep.
	And after the Audrey Hill shooting, I mean, the president's spokeswoman said that LGBTQI kids are resilient, they are fierce, they fight back.
	So in a way, essentially encouraging.
	Yes.
	There's no other word for it.
	There's a couple other words.
	Exactly.
	That's basically true.
	Exactly.
	There is also, frankly, this might be controversial among some.
	I do think there is a weird romanticization of this kind of behavior among some parts of American media and the kind of media that these people will be engaging in.
	So I don't think that I don't think anime is the problem.
	However, have either of you, and I will be very unsurprised if you haven't.
	Have either of you ever watched American Horror Story?
	No.
	I think my wife likes that though.
	Yeah, so I've been subjected to it, and in the first series, one of the characters... I think I have watched a little bit of it.
	Yeah.
	Sorry, Karen.
	In the first series, the characters are part of this haunted house and it's being haunted by one particular spirit that the young girl becomes friends with and she strikes up this friends and he's oh he's so um you know kind of romantic And he's this young teenager who died before his time, and there's a mystique to him, and he's so sympathetic.
	And at the end of the show, the first series, the big twist is that he turns out to be a school shooter who killed all of his load of his classmates and then came back and then killed himself.
	And whether or not the show is ultimately condemning him in the 10th, like whatever the last episode is, there's still about nine episodes of bringing him over to his side so that you can sympathize with him.
	And afterwards, he was the guy who was wearing that shirt that started spreading around everywhere after the show first came out that said, Normal people scare me.
	So the fact that he was wearing a shirt that became kind of a pop culture shirt that people would just wear normally, you were being brought into his mindset and being told, like, yeah, he did something awful, but really he had his own reasons for doing so.
	So there is a weird kind of American media that has sympathized with this archetype.
	Yes, absolutely.
	Absolutely.
	And you can tell that it's engineered and that it is imposed from the top and that the people at the top are the problem.
	The police referred to the shooter as a gun person because they didn't want to say that he was transgender.
	And this is typical, is it like it's when they're like trying to get penny-wise as a gay ally?
	It's like, but that's a murderous demonic clown.
	Pretty sure the guy who runs American Horror Story, Ryan Murphy, I think he might be gay.
	Right, okay.
	And he does a lot of other programs as well.
	But the point is, for some reason, horrific, immoral things like murder, mass murder, fine, misgendering.
	Exactly.
	And you see that pretty much the entirety of the media is doing their best to cover it up.
	So this guy is one of our followers, and he's sort of saying that pretty much, you know, he's in Canada and pretty much all the Canadian media are doing this.
	And they're trying to cover it up.
	And this grooming of minors is really at the heart of the issue.
	And you see that you can just go to any online forum or any of a range of online forums and get advice on exactly what you were mentioning, Harry.
	How can you get these hormones that will obviously mess with your head and destroy your brain and destroy your bone density and keep you from developing as a normal human being and try to help you acquire this illegally behind your parents' back and help you administer it yourself.
	I mean, this is a genuinely sick culture.
	And you see this community reacting, saying that the shooter essentially is a victim and trying to.
Sick Culture Advice 00:05:14
	That's how they are with the 2023 one.
	They said there were six victims when she shot five people and shot herself.
	Yes.
	And so they're essentially counting her as a victim of it.
	Yes.
	Yeah, the message they try and push is: well, if society had just treated them better, this would never have happened.
	But this person was clearly insane from the get-go.
	Look, we don't know.
	So there were some posts about him being a bit of a violent kid when he was young, which I think is normal for boys.
	I mean, boys can be quite boisterous and violent.
	And saying that, oh, he'd laugh when he'd hurt one of his siblings, but have a lot of sympathy when somebody else was hurt.
	Right.
	My question is.
	That's normal.
	My question is going to be: in this scenario, right, we've seen the mother.
	Where's the father?
	Yes.
	Where is the father in this situation?
	Well, here's the thing.
	It seems that she was engaged in various lawsuits to try to separate herself from the father, and that she was living what was described in court documents as a nomadic lifestyle where they were moving all the time.
	And so she ends up in Tumblr Ridge in the middle of nowhere somehow with a stepson.
	That's what's being reported as rather than a half-brother.
	And at some point, this boy started breaking.
	And instead of helping him, she encouraged him to be pumped full of drugs because she thought that she was doing the right thing.
	And it literally cost her her own life.
	and the life of both her sons.
	What's that?
	Munchausen syndrome.
	Is it like reverse Munchausen syndrome?
	No, no, the sort of straight white woman Munchausen's where it's like, oh, I'm going to give my, no, you are trans.
	Play with the doll.
	Well, I imagine, yeah, part of it is that.
	But I imagine it's like, oh, this boy's a little too boisterous.
	He's a bit violent.
	Well, that means that he's a defective person.
	I know if he becomes a girl, then that'll solve all of these problems.
	It's genuinely sick.
	And so you see this kind of comment.
	One trans person gets pushed over their limit.
	And people wonder why the suicide rate is so high in the trans community.
	It's because we've got to deal with so much hate and discrimination.
	We don't hate you.
	We want what's good for you.
	And what's good for you starts with the truth.
	And is denied help on too many occasions.
	Yeah, you have.
	There is no help.
	It should be that there are proper procedures in place saying, no, look, you need to understand that your mind and your body, your consciousness, a product of your body, and your body is how it is.
	And therefore you can't be trapped in the wrong body.
	All of this is not true.
	You need to adjust to reality.
	You need to develop your body.
	You need to be a normal teenage boy.
	Instead, encouraging them to transition is exactly the problem.
	And the fact that these people are so far from the truth, I mean, this is one of them who did a DNA test.
	And in the DNA test, well, he had XY chromosomes.
	And he was apparently upset by this.
	Like, the reason for this is not lack of tolerance.
	It's tolerance that's the cause of this.
	Intolerance here is the virtue.
	And it's not actually intolerant to speak the truth.
	And we've seen that this kind of thing has kept on escalating continuously.
	And the dam really broke after Obert fell, after the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States.
	And instead of this actually leading to a new settlement and closure and appeasement, we went down the slippery slope.
	I hate to do this, but for the sake of time, we are.
	Yep.
	And I'm going to end this.
	Just look at your screen.
	That's really what I want to say.
	I mean, that is genuinely an accurate description of what has happened.
	Yeah, you described it as before.
	It's not the fallacy.
	It's the iron law.
	It's the iron law of the slippery slope.
	That's pretty much what happened.
	Sigilstone says Munchausen syndrome by proxy was coined by Dr. John Money.
	Oh, Jesus Christ, really.
	Same man that coined transgender.
	Actually, Magnus Hirschfeld coined transgender.
	John Money was just instrumental.
	John Money was big into it.
	And also, I wouldn't suggest looking up the experiments that he did because they are vile and disgusting.
	Demented.
	Anyway, let's have we've got video comments today, Samson.
	Sigilstone says, good to remind everyone that every tool used to create a trans was made, honed, and refined by creating furries.
	Yeah, furries, like there is a reason why we insist on traditional morality.
	It's because we see these slippery slopes all the time and we keep falling down them.
	Well, I mean, also on a purely consequentialist view, just look at the people behaving in this way.
	They are freaks.
	And the question is, like, did this make them freaks?
	Or were they already freaks and this is just what happens when you let freaks run wild in your society?
	We all have a bit of freak inside us.
	The key thing is to be intolerant so that you don't go crazy.
Freaks and Intolerance 00:05:51
	From the website, my gold tier subscription goes to Carl Six Cats, which is a great name, by the way.
	And Lord, do I need it?
	It's better than going to the government, isn't it?
	Well, exactly, right.
	After traveling around the UK for four years and visiting places like Luton, Lewisham, Leicester, Brixton, and Birmingham, I think it's impossible for any honest person to deny that we have been colonized.
	But there is a bright side to all of this.
	I know an Indian herbalist in Wembley who claims he can cure cancer.
	Oh, wow.
	Well, don't rely on him if it comes to it.
	Yeah, please, if anyone gets that, just get chemo.
	Although that's got a really low rate of success.
	Michael says, I remember when the various peoples of Europe would constantly deride the US for not having free healthcare.
	This is when Europe was 98% white, and they did not understand that when over 30% of your population are freeloading scum, you can't afford to give these people more freebies.
	Well, I mean, this is what everyone is discovering.
	Lattice says that James Jim Ratcliffe just apologised.
	Another person bullied into compliance.
	Well, he kind of apologised, but I'm so sorry you're offended, which isn't a proper apology, so that's something.
	Mathurin says, long live Burma, long live Rhodesia.
	Stop confusing me in geography with name changes.
	Well, there's that.
	It's like Sri Lanka.
	It's like Ceylon.
	Anyway.
	Arizona Desert Rat says, as a Christian, I've never had someone knocking on my door ask why I miss church.
	If anyone talked with me, it would be to make sure I was okay.
	Well, different community.
	Roman Observer says, any infrastructure, any form of welfare is a multi-generational effort.
	It should be reserved for the natives of the nation by right of blood.
	Yes, obviously.
	Khalain says, there's only one way this ends, but it requires, well, I'm not going to go any further.
	Hector says, why does Jim Ratcliffe look like Luca Johnson 50 years in the future?
	Because they're both men from Lincolnshire.
	Yeah, this is just.
	That's why.
	Like, it's probably like third cousin removed or something.
	You know, like, unironically, there are regional phenotypes.
	Yeah, from where I'm from, there are a few people that you might run into you'd think that are related to me.
	But as far as I know, we're not.
	Just happens.
	Anyway, Thane Scotty says, at the gym listening to this podcast, just seen the BBC, that Jim Ratcliffe apologised, wrong decision.
	Yeah, yeah, we've covered it.
	Ed Milliband harnessing Enoch's spinning grave says, can we take him?
	I love these names.
	Can we take a moment to appreciate that Labour has so many nonces that Harry literally had to skip some to finish his segment?
	And they're just the ones we know about.
	I can't believe the party with the historical connections of the paedophile information exchange would have so many paedophiles in it.
	What a fuck.
	This was the thing when Labour got rid of Section 28, where they were like, you know, oh, this is horrible oppression against gays.
	And the Conservatives are like, well, people keep complaining that they're trying to nonce our kids in schools.
	So we don't want gay rights and what not taught in schools.
	And it's just like...
	It was that thing like, what do you think we're going to try and do?
	Put loads of gay porn in the schools?
	Well, I mean, I wasn't thinking that initially, but now you've said it.
	Oh, and you are.
	Oh, okay.
	Daniel says, only the king should be able to give or remove titles.
	The politicization of titles in the House of Lords is a massive disgrace.
	I wonder how much of what has been done to us would have been possible without it.
	Who knows?
	Justin says, there are people that think the law strip peers is being pushed as a response to Mandelson, but the main aim will be to strip anyone reform puts in.
	That will be something they will do after Reform Leave, doubtless.
	I mean, it's just going to be tennis.
	Yeah.
	We're going to strip your peers.
	No, we're going to strip your peers.
	It's just a back and forth of the world.
	I suddenly understand why it was hereditary in the first place.
	Well, yeah, it makes way.
	I mean, everything that is happening sort of confirms why there were traditions in the first place.
	Yeah, and everything that's happened is a kind of band-aid plaster solution to a problem they don't understand.
	We're just imposing modernity on an institution that predates modernity.
	Yeah, a traditional contribution.
	A tradition is a solution to a problem that you've all forgotten about.
	Exactly.
	Exactly how the problem's coming back.
	White Ryder says, I'd love to hear the details of whatever mechanism this is to strip Mandelson of his peerage.
	Well, we'll find out later because it's only just been announced.
	Henry says, are Labour ever going to elect a leader who isn't completely compromised?
	Actually, yes, I think it might be Gordon Brown, weirdly, because Gordon Brown, coming from the hard left of the Labour Party.
	Well, just before we started, I saw Gordon Brown had given a report of Mandelson, something about Mandelson trafficking children in, or something connected to Mandelson, Epstein trafficking children in and out of Britain.
	Gordon Brown has made that report to the police.
	But that's literally just a lot of people.
	Well, at least in the headline, right?
	I mean, it was under Brown that Mandelson was doing a lot of these communiques with Epstein, and apparently he's absolutely furious about it.
	You know, whatever.
	You don't want to sell.
	The thing that I most remember about people talking about Brown, even to this day when he was prime minister, was, God, he's a boring prime minister, isn't he?
	But that's a virtue these days.
	But Brown's biggest selling point is, listen, I will be boring, and that is exactly what you want.
	And you're not going to hear from me, and there's not going to be any scandals, and I'm not going to disrupt your lives.
	I mean, he's going to ruin.
	He's going to ruin the economy.
	He's an insane socialist.
	Yeah.
	But he's a really insane point.
	In terms of what we would want as opposed to what Brown actually was.
	No, fair enough.
	Yeah, I mean, they're not nonces.
	I'd like to see a civil war within the Labour Party over the chances of either Lamy nationalism versus Angela Rainer nationalism.
	And you've said you'd go for Lamy nationalism because then the Prime Minister versus the shadow prime minister would just be two Africans shouting each other about England.
	Yeah, and we could say, well, what else would you look at?
	What else would you need?
	What more colonized?
	Exactly.
	What more would prove Jim Radcliffe's points?
Sixth Nuts Theory 00:02:58
	The visuals of it would be so overwhelming that the conversation would be over.
	Yeah, exactly.
	The argument would have been resolved.
	Obviously, we've been colonized, which is why we've got two Africans literally arguing over the future of Britain.
	So it's just, you know, just saying.
	Lattice says, one more Ukrainian rent boy and he'll be dancing through the streets naked, mark my words.
	His mind is close to snapping.
	Well, honestly, there's been five now.
	Five attacking his properties.
	You don't know that tomorrow there won't be a sixth.
	The sixth rent boy has hit your property.
	Yes, Mr. Starmer.
	What is happening?
	Oh, Jesus.
	I mean, just mental.
	Just absolutely mental.
	Jordi Salzman says, trust Labour to manage to find a way to turn the situation into a chance overreach and grab more power.
	It'll definitely only be used against Mandelson and no way be a weapon to start dismantling the lords in general.
	Well, that's the point.
	He's been trying to do that for a while now.
	And Starmer vowed it, basically.
	Yeah.
	It began with Blair and now it's sort of ending with Starmer.
	Sophie says, one thing I wish people would bring up is the medication these trans shooters have received.
	I'm absolutely convinced that hormone replacement stuff makes people nuts and dangerous.
	Yeah, I mean, they're already nuts and I think this makes it worse.
	And I think the environment that they're in, as you showed, well, where else are they going?
	And if there is a hormonal replacement therapy that would actually fix young men who think that they're women, unironically is testosterone.
	Oh, okay.
	You don't feel like a man?
	Well, let's make you feel like a man then.
	This has always been my argument.
	In fact, I made this argument years ago.
	It's like, well, if it, you know, you're like, I'm a man, I feel like a woman, so we'll give you estrogen.
	Well, wouldn't it work the other way then?
	Wouldn't it make way more sense as well?
	It would actually be a lot less damaging to your body overall if we didn't have to, you know, like cut your dick off as well.
	Get what you need rather than what you don't need.
	Anyway.
	And you'll start getting buff as well.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And anyway, Furious Dan says, in Canada, transgenderism was removed from the DSM, while toxic masculinity was added.
	Are you Canada?
	So a little boy who wants to become a man is mentally ill, but a little girl who wants to be a man is not.
	That's mental.
	Seriously, half the Canadian government should be Fed posted.
	Bram von Warwalk says, Okay, so we know that the mother was a crazy libtard who was totally bought into the leftist Kool-Aid and did everything she could to enable her son's delusions.
	The questions I have are: where are the father and how does he fit in?
	And this is, but this explained, I mean, who knows?
	It could well be they broke up over this issue.
	It was in Canada where a father was arrested because the mother was trying to trans the children.
	I think in that situation, it was a little girl who was the victim of the targeting of transing, but yeah, it's mental, isn't it?
	Like, Canada is full-spectrum libtard on this issue, and it's mad.
	Michael says, every living organism produces DMT, even grass, but obviously it's small levels.
	We produce it as it's the reason you forget your dreams very quickly.
	Huh.
	I always wondered about that.
Two Good News Segments 00:01:22
	Cumbrian Kulak says, May God bless the innocent and grieving, those grieving the lost bring peace to their hearts.
	Yeah, it's just terrible, isn't it?
	It's absolutely terrible.
	Mocky Day.
	Random name sent in a rumble rant saying the Twinks yearn for the gym.
	Just be forced to the gym.
	Anyway, thank you, folks, for joining us.
	I mean, at least there were two good news segments.
	You know, our segments were quite positive and jolly.
	Yeah, we're going to go.
	Yeah, the government's full of nonces.
	Good news.
	Yeah, but the point is it's destroying.
	And, you know, there's a very prominent person who's currently accurately characterizing the colonization as making more flip out.
	And we might get David Lamy his prime minister by the end of the year.
	I mean, you know, this is just good news, every positive developments in the accelerationist program.
	I think he'd speedrun the collapse in 18 days.
	I could see him sort of breaking Liz Truss's record.
	Oh, yeah.
	But just, I'd like to see the House of Commons descend into like old school African tribal warfare.
	That would be hilarious.
	Kemi would be representing the Yoruba, of course.
	This is another thing, isn't it?
	Like, if you trace the lineage of descent, well, he's got the slave ancestry.
	She doesn't.
	So she will literally at some point be like my ancestors.
	Kemi Bade Knock enslaves David Lammy live on PMQ.
	Anyway, on that bombshell, we'll see you tomorrow.

Chapters

00:00:00 Ferris On UK Colonization
00:03:46 Cockney Rhymes and Colonization Complaints
00:16:04 Children For Sale
00:31:14 Nomads of Globalism
00:35:48 Peter Mandelson's Shocking Crisis
00:51:36 Pedophilia Tolerated In Labour?
00:56:42 Lend Your Shoulder
01:00:56 Controversial Transitions and Tragedies
01:16:48 Sick Culture Advice
01:22:02 Freaks and Intolerance
01:27:54 Sixth Nuts Theory
01:30:53 Two Good News Segments