The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1223

Aug. 5, 2025 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:42:32

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #1223

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Who are the men that pig for scraps amongst the ruins of the end of history?
	You should know, because you encounter them every day.
	Between the towering buildings of a fallen empire, we find the Felahin, the historyless men, who know nothing of the turning of the cosmic wheel and find themselves outside of civilization itself.
	Cut loose from the great chain of being, they represent the loan into which our dying culture will return.
	That is, unless we choose to take up the burden once again.
	This Felahen condition is the subject we explore in issue four of Islander magazine.
	On sale while stocks last and available worldwide at shop.loadseaters.com.
	Hello, and welcome to the podcast of the Load Seaters, episode 1223 for Tuesday, the 5th of August, 2025.
	I'm your host, Luca, joined today by Bo and special guest and independent journalist Jack Hadfield.
	How are you, sir?
	I'm fantastic.
	Thank you so much for having me on.
	No, no, we're really glad to have it.
	You've been doing some wonderful work recently covering all the hotels and the protests.
	And we're going to get into that very, very soon.
	But before we do, let's also just talk about what else we're going to do today.
	So we're going to talk about why English ancestry might actually matter when we think about who is English.
	I know it's a hot take.
	But I just want you to consider it, if you could.
	Then, as I say, we're going to talk about the protests outside the hotels.
	And then we're going to talk about Nancy Pelosi's trading genius.
	Off the charts.
	Remarkable.
	Better than Dan.
	Yeah, much better.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	An incredible record.
	All right.
	So let's begin.
	So when the about five weeks ago, there was a one-day conference in London called the Now and England Conference.
	And this was set up by the Roger Scruton Legacy Foundation.
	Now, I wasn't able to attend that.
	I was here at work.
	However, I have seen a lot of videos from people that did go.
	And one of the things that was of the greatest contention you could see from the panelists, the older panelists in the audience, and the younger crowd who were chomping at the bit to really talk about the demographic question is the fact that the boomer generation and all these people that are supposed to be the authorities guiding the younger to a better future just aren't in sync with one another.
	There's a total misalignment of what the future of England should be when we get this.
	And we'll talk about that a little bit more in a second.
	But of course, I just want to bring you all to the attention that the fourth issue of Islander is now out.
	I've written in it myself, fourth article on the Lord of the Rings, so my bread and butter, but there's many other wonderful articles in there as well from Carl, the editor Rory, Ed Dutton, Morgoth, the great Morgoth, and many, many other wonderful writers.
	So if you'd like it, it's on our website, £15, two pints in London.
	And there's also a wonderful merch store as well for other things associated with Islander issue four.
	Just out of interest before we move on from that, because I genuinely haven't read it.
	What's your article about on Lord of the Rings?
	So this time I've covered Sauron.
	Okay.
	So I've talked about the Dark Horde Sauron.
	So this is the first time that I've been able to talk about a baddie in it.
	Or I've done three heroes before.
	So it's been quite a difficult one because he's 50,000 years old.
	And so I've had to write over quite a large period of fictitious history.
	that's just the sort of thing I enjoy doing.
	So let's Well, the reason why I'm talking about it now is because Robert Toombs, who was one of the panelists on the final event of the day, he was one of the ones that was in hot water for having a very unsatisfactory answer to what an Englishman is.
	Because he decided that actually it didn't really have anything to do with ancestry.
	Are we convinced by this opening gambit?
	I think that's pretty ridiculous.
	I think generally the whole idea that, you know, English has nothing to do with ancestry and isn't there's there's nothing to the people the ethnos about it seems insane because I mean one thing's first if ethnic identity exists for everybody else but English is not an ethnic identity then what am I it's it's I've got to be something right and if other people can also be this then there's got to be something different that
	am i am am i am i a meridian yeah am i a celt am i just a straight up anglo you know there's there's there is there is there is something that i have to be and if english is not it then it's got to be something else right now of course there's an ethnic element to a national identity of course there is that's it that's it of course there is he's always undebatable in the point of it but you know these people love to debate and you know put their words in the telegraph or wherever else and
	you know they'll they'll they'll write a thousand two thousand words on how this is not the case but you look into it well it's all just waffle there's no actual real decent arguments towards it they just kind of poo poo away anybody who says that there is an ethnic element to it they just have to say it because it's the bedrock of the sort of the globalist view they have to say it even if it's palpably absurd well let's start let's start cutting through the waffle shall we and
	we'll take it from there so it says uh you can't teach someone to be english called a heckler at the end of the conference last month on how to save england well of course you can i replied that's how we all learn it rubbish he called and on and on it goes and he's saying that this brief debate was unfortunately stopped by um having to go to the pub but the the debate wasn't really stopped there was it because we're still having it now and the fact is that he's had five weeks to come up with a watertight case for why he
	is right and the younger generation is wrong and as we can see there just isn't really anything there he says i should explain that my intellectual sing sin had been to praise katherine burble sing and to have commented that to see young girls in headscarves by headscarves he obviously means hijabs right um reciting kipling and singing national anthem showed that becoming english was possible on the condition
	that it was encouraged taught and indeed required and then so then we're starting to get into a question now of but this is not the same thing right all of a sudden you realize how quickly this isn't about whether you're english or not this is about whether you're monocultural right this is about monoculturalism that's not the same thing as an as an identity grounded in heritage in birthright right you can There are many,
	many academics, I'm sure, from abroad who very much enjoy a Kipling poem, right?
	Might have even wrote scholarly treatises on it, but that doesn't make them English.
	You can be born and bred in India to Indian, ethnically, racially Indian people and still enjoy a Kipling poem.
	Right.
	Right.
	And hold up a union jack and wear brogues.
	It doesn't make you English.
	It just doesn't.
	I mean, wasn't Kipling or someone else born in India?
	He was.
	English parents.
	So like, you know, does that make him Indian as well?
	That's the classic thing.
	If my parents, say, were British expats and living in Japan in 1981 and I was born in Japan in a Japanese hospital, even raised in Japan throughout my 40th years, doesn't make me Japanese.
	It makes me the son of European expats that happen to be in Japan.
	But these people, again, it would be very deliberate that he's choosing to muddy the waters and immediately give up on the actual ethnic side of it and just talk about culture.
	Of course, that's all deliberate gambit because there is no argument.
	But also what's more, it implies that, well, the prerequisite for becoming English, for learning to be English, is simply to have a knowledge of English traditions, of English culture, of the English language, right?
	It's kind of based on intelligence of the culture itself.
	And by implication, someone with two English parents, born English, born somewhere in the country, who is entirely ignorant of these things, who doesn't know Kipling, has never read a Kipling poem, is not English, right?
	Because they don't meet the criteria set down by the Indian headmistress in a London school full of people who are third generation from the Commonwealth.
	Exactly.
	And, you know, that really is the argument that makes all of this break down because if someone is English in that way, you know, has a heritage of 1,000, 2,000 years on this island, just because they don't know about their culture, does that mean that they stop becoming English?
	Again, look at Americans, for example.
	Again, Anglo-Americans, German-Americans, Dutch Americans, whatever mix they may be, whatever background they've come from, again, does that make them less American if they just don't know about anything that's happened?
	If they don't know when the Declaration of Independence was signed, does that make them less American?
	I certainly don't think so.
	And I think there's absolutely nothing wrong with having a policy of people who are here who aren't English, but could be British and live in this country.
	There's nothing wrong with saying, actually, yes, we want you to become part of our culture.
	We want you to know of the history and everything that's gone on these islands for the past however many centuries because you will fit in better here.
	But just because you can, that's a good policy to have and respect people who are still being here, that doesn't still mean that they become English.
	He's asking you to believe something that's just a liar.
	Like someone that's born a man can put on a dress and a bit of lippy and they are a woman now.
	It's like, just don't try and lie to me like that.
	Don't make me repeat your liars because that's what they are.
	And I'm not having it.
	It's just nonsense, isn't it?
	It's nonsense that there's no such thing as sort of an ethnically English person.
	Yeah, these people often like to come out with the idea of, oh, well, you know, English, well, what's that?
	That's, well, that's just a mix of the Anglos, of the Celts, of the Jutes, of the Saxons.
	You know, English doesn't exist.
	It's just a mix of all these things.
	But if you, you know, but they say the same thing about any other identity, you know, they say that, you know, well, if you then start saying, okay, it identifies an Anglo.
	Oh, well, actually, the Anglos are made up of different Northwestern German tribes.
	There is all the, you know, and they go down, okay, I identify as one of those tribes.
	That's my ethnic identity.
	Oh, well, actually, that's made up of different people who lived in this town and village.
	They're all, you know, they're all not related to each other.
	And, you know, like, just because something has a fuzzy border to it does not make it any less real.
	You know, you can't.
	It's not the border any less real.
	Exactly.
	Well, for example, you know, the greatest example of this is literally colours.
	You know, red, blue, green, purple, yellow.
	You know, red exists.
	Blue exists.
	These things exist.
	But if you go on the colour spectrum, there's points where red fades into blue, blue fades into green.
	And the actual overlap of these things, you know, like, oh, maybe that's a blue-green, maybe that's more of a turquoise.
	Oh, I can't exactly tell what that specific bit on the border case is, but you know exactly what the actual colours, the platonic ideal of those colours are.
	Well, another thing as well, Bo, is just that obviously you see it more clearly because you've actually got a bit of vitality, right?
	A bit of fight, a bit of moxie in you.
	Whereas you can see, and the reason I bring that up is because when you look at the way that this paragraph here is framed, it's like, but the question of integration and eventual assimilation is no less urgent.
	There are now, and in the future will be, many children in England who were born elsewhere or who are descended from a foreign-born parent.
	Many will have darker skin than mine.
	We have a very clear choice.
	Either we do everything possible to make them and their eventual descendants part of our nation, or we treat them as perpetual outsiders, ethnic minorities in a tribalized England.
	And this is what I mean.
	He has already determined that the future is more of this.
	There will be no reverse.
	There will be no pushback.
	There will be no reverse of mass immigration.
	That in Toombs' mind, all these millions and millions of people who have arrived here since Blair and since the 1960s, right, they're here to stay for all time, right?
	And that's the difference.
	That's why he's taking this position, because he can't even conceive of the future being anything other than...
	He's a Chatham House court historian.
	A moral coward, I would say.
	Yeah, and this argument is, it's just, it's just nonsense.
	It's just pure capitulation.
	Yeah, I mean, our ancestors would be spinning in their graves.
	And as you say, there is that argument where they say, oh, well, English is just like Angle and Saxon and Jews.
	They're from Germany or wherever.
	And the original, even if you go back beyond that, the original Britons, they're actually like some sort of Cauled Ware people that actually come from the steppe, the Russian steppe.
	And those people, anyway, come from the Levant.
	And we all come from a single black mother in the East Africa Rift Valley.
	Anyway, so it's just...
	It is crazy.
	And pure defeatism and suicidal, suicidal.
	What he's arguing for there, ultimately, is a demographic replacement, a complete, irreversible demographic replacement.
	And well, I think it is morally, I say called him a moral coward, it is morally disgusting to me that you would capitulate so profoundly, so profoundly.
	It feels very much the attitude of the conservatives in like the 50s and 60s, where they basically decided, oh, it's over.
	You know, the empire's gone.
	You know, it's after Suez.
	Oh, you know, gun to my head.
	England's done.
	So, right.
	So, like, right, managed to climb it is, folks.
	Like, there's literally no way out of this.
	So, we're just going to be the stewards who watch England slip into a lovely warm bath after.
	You know, that's the same attitude of these people.
	And then, obviously, and then Thatcher came along and completely changed and revitalized, you know, because you're basically like, oh, no, actually, no, we can just do things.
	We can just turn around.
	We can just come back.
	And all those people who were part of that were swept away and a new generation came in.
	There's absolutely no reason why this can't happen again.
	You know, it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, uh, it literally is that meme of the up and down sine wave of, it's over, we're back, it's over, we're back, it's over, we're back.
	You know, people feel when times are tough that times will always be tough, but they don't have to be.
	No, they don't have to be.
	It's entirely choice.
	As he goes on to say here, for centuries, Englishness revolved around institutions, the kingdom, the church, the common law, and the inherited rights of freeborn Englishmen.
	In quotes.
	Since the age of romanticism, many have cherished a rural vision of eternal England, shaped by Wordsworth, Constable, Turner, inspired by Italy, and Elgar influenced by Wagner.
	For others, Englishness means their hometown, their football, the fishing chips, pints at the pub.
	The one thing I just want to say about this particular paragraph is when he talks about Englishness revolved around the institutions, this is not a chicken and egg situation, right?
	Of which came first.
	No, obviously the people created the institutions, right?
	And so therefore, logically, there must have been the people before the institutions, and therefore we should not be defining ourselves by the institutions because you are English, whether, unfortunately.
	One of the other things he goes on to say in this piece is the fact that, well, we can't forget that, you know, David Cameron, Tony Blair, you know, all these traitors, they're English people.
	Yeah, they are.
	Because being English isn't defined by whether you're progressive or reactionary or anything of the sort.
	It's defined by your birth, but they are English.
	You can see Toomes' angle here, the type of person, the type of argument is that you can't mention Turner without the fact that he was inspired by Italian things.
	You can't mention Elgar without mentioning he was inspired by a German, all that sort of thing.
	Like fish and chips.
	Oh, there's evidence that people had fish and chips in ancient Jordan or something.
	Therefore, it's just clutching at straws.
	Well, it's like, you know, tomatoes are from the Americas.
	Oh, sorry, Italian cuisine is actually all American now.
	No, that's not how this works.
	The other interesting thing where the way, you know, they talk about the institutions.
	I think it is true that, you know, historically, especially for the last 1,000 years, sort of Englishness has had a more, has a quieter ethnic identity compared to those on the continent because since the Norman invasion, we haven't really had any sort of direct wars outside of people coming in to Britain.
	Whereas when you're on the continent, you sort of have been French, German, Italian, Spanish, whatever, because people will be trying to stuffle you over.
	And there was more sort of conflict on the continent.
	Whereas for English, it was like, oh, we've, well, hey, we've just been here for the last 1,500 years.
	No, nobody else is here.
	It's just us.
	There was not even a need or an idea to sort of express this.
	It was very sort of, everybody sort of knew it, but there was no reason to think of them in the way in that specific ethnic way.
	No, absolutely.
	And what's more, there's two things on that point, which is just that one, obviously, England of the nations of the British Isles has just always had more cultural might, right, to assert itself against the Welsh identity, against the Scottish identity, against the Irish identity.
	So they've always had a very strong sense of themselves because we've always had the dominant hand over them.
	But another point to make as well, when it comes to something like the British Empire, is that, of course, all empires are by their nature of being, you know, whether it's the British Empire or the Spanish Empire or the Ottoman Empire, right?
	It's your people on top and you demand how the rules are set.
	But the advantage that Britain has always had is the fact that we have been an island.
	So we could have the empire abroad, but we never really had to beyond the people who went abroad to administrate it.
	We never had to live amongst them in Britain.
	And that's not the same thing as a land empire, like the Ottoman Empire, that constantly had Greeks and Jews and all the different people in Constantinople itself, right?
	Constantly needing to figure out and question its identity.
	And so we've been very much shielded for that for many, many centuries.
	And now that all these different people have finally been brought into our island, we're having this whole existential crisis about how do we rediscover ourselves?
	How do we defend ourselves against this?
	It does reveal itself as just gaslighting nonsense when you would ask about other places in the world.
	Would Toombs argue that there's no such thing as being an ethnically Japanese person or an ethnically Zulu person or something?
	I wonder if he would.
	And if he'd have the temerity to try and argue that.
	And also when you look at when you can get your DNA checked out by things like ancestry.com or living DNA or something, well, it clearly shows that you are from somewhere and not somewhere else.
	So most people in our office have done that, living DNA or ancestry.com, showing that most of us are nearly entirely from either these islands or at least Northwest Europe.
	So what is that?
	What would Toombs reply to something like that?
	And you sequence the DNA of Rishi Sunak or Suella Breverman or someone.
	And it's not from these islands.
	It's not from Northwest Europe.
	How would Toombs square that circle?
	They just need to know Kipling.
	Yeah, right.
	It's just about drinking tea.
	Yeah.
	I think just sort of, you know, bringing up, for example, like Rishi and Suella there, there seems to be some sort of, you know, implication in either the consciousness conscious of tombs and people who put these arguments forward is that, you know, if you say, you know, English is an ethnic identity, that must mean you want literally everyone who is not that out of your country immediately right now.
	But, you know, like, I don't, you know, want to deport Rishi Sunak or Swella Brotherman immediately.
	You know, there are, you know, immediately.
	I want to gloat over it.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	No, yeah.
	There's, you know, there's lots of People who can come from other countries, can also be born here and have different ethnic identities, but who can fit in and still exist in this society while there still is an English identity as well.
	But it's almost as if they're panicking that if you do admit this, suddenly there's immediate deportations of literally everybody in ethnic cleansing.
	Well, there's no mention of deportations in this entire article.
	Yeah, but yeah, but I mean, that's sort of, I guess, what would be in their head.
	Oh, if we do admit this, then it will inevitably, everyone will definitely want this, which is not the case.
	You know, of course, yeah, there has to be, I think, some deportation and some remigration.
	But, you know, not everybody has to go.
	Well, but this is really the question, isn't it?
	It's not a question of whether anyone should go.
	Right.
	The question is now just how many need to go.
	Right.
	That is actually where the conversation is at now.
	And as my good friend here, Laurie Wastell wrote for Spectator, demographics is a new dividing line on the right.
	He wrote this shortly after that actual one-day conference itself.
	And he just lays out in clear detail the, as I say, the gulf of difference between people like Toombs and people who are more of our age and who are actually going to live for decades and decades to come.
	Right.
	With whatever future England holds.
	And not just for us, but for our children as well.
	And as Laurie points out here in a poll very kindly given by Hope Not Hate, it's been suggested that the white British people could be a minority in the UK by the 260s due to current immigration patterns.
	If this does happen, which one or two of the following words best describes how it makes will make you feel.
	Now, as you can tell there, the pleased and happy people are very, very much in the minority.
	The people who say unhappy, uneasy, disappointed are starkly higher, right?
	So Tombs can say it doesn't matter.
	For most people, it does.
	That just is the reality.
	You feel it innately, right?
	It's something that most people don't even really articulate, but they feel it.
	They feel that there is a sense of injustice here, especially as, you know, we constantly bring up this has always been against the consented public will.
	Always.
	And yet, not only is it continued, it's accelerated.
	Right?
	And so there's.
	But as I say, is it really inevitable that we're going to just have to live with ghettos and violence in Brixton and the colonization of Barking and Birmingham and Sheffield and all these places that have just set themselves up in opposition to the English people.
	And ultimately, a demographic replacement in the end.
	Right.
	So I would argue the exact opposite.
	Not only is that.
	I would say that remigration is inevitable.
	Yes.
	They must go back to the tune of millions.
	Well, as Rupert said here just this morning, just ending mass immigration is not good enough.
	We need to reverse mass immigration.
	Right?
	Something that we're all on board with at this point.
	Well, other than telegraph, writers for telegraph, right?
	But otherwise, this is where the winds are.
	Other than Ash Sarkar and Robert Toombs.
	Interesting bedfellows.
	Well, actually, actually, in the words of Ash Sarkar, yes, lads, we're winning.
	We are.
	Not yet.
	No.
	It's in the pipeline on the way.
	It's in the winds.
	Because, as you said, Bo, many, many years ago, it is inevitable.
	All right.
	Hopefully.
	Hopefully.
	I'll go through some of the Rumble rants.
	So, we've got, O Punk says, a trout born in a birdcage is still a trout.
	That's true, and would most likely get eaten by the...
	Wasn't it a Wellersley quote Arthur said?
	Right, yeah.
	I hope he did say thoroughbred as well.
	That would be a very aristocratic way of explaining it.
	Alex Adamson says, in the modern day, everyone follows the American system.
	The people are named after the land they're born on.
	Throughout history, it's been the opposite.
	Land is named after the people who lived on it.
	It's very, very true.
	There's a schism in thought between the old world and the new world on this.
	Habsification says the Anglo-Saxons, Jutes, and Frisians came and intermixed with a Britonic people, which created the English people, formed a culture and shaped this land for the last 1,600 years.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Speak to Tombs about it.
	We've got Windpill Seeker says, it's simple gaslighting.
	They don't believe what they say and don't apply it when the roles are reversed.
	They want to use a sense of fairness that they don't have against Western cultures.
	Very true.
	And Habsification says to maintain the cultural dominance, the Indigenous people of Britain need to maintain an ethnic majority of basically what it was in 1951.
	Right?
	Just what we've always been.
	Or even of that.
	I think that's still about the case of when I was born in 1996.
	Yeah, it was, yeah.
	I mean, yeah.
	I mean, I've really noticed a change in my own hometown over these decades as well.
	He says they're 95 to 97%.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	That's about the late 1990s, even of that.
	Not even that hard line.
	Look how benevolent.
	All right.
	So let's talk about all these protests that are going on, Jack.
	Yeah, so I have been covering the protests down in Epping is obviously where it kicked off, where we had this Ethiopian asylum seeker who was then, I believe he was charged with the sexual assault of a 14-year-old schoolgirl in the middle of Epping.
	And then after that, it started spiralling across to the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf.
	I've been to Norwich as well, Waterlooville, just north of Portsmouth.
	Where was I?
	I was at Stanwell on last Thursday, which is near Heathrow, Stains, West London Way.
	And of course, even further afield across the country, places I haven't been to, Wilmslow in Manchester, Ashfield in Nottinghamshire, Southampton as well.
	And there's even more protests planned for just this Friday.
	There's a national protest day on Friday, August the 8th.
	There's Aldershot as well, Back to, and then some of the other, some of these other locations.
	And they're all pretty much focused on the asylum hotels.
	And a lot of them have then been triggered because of, you know, basically just of sexual assaults done by the migrants.
	As we just saw on Tuesday, I think it was either Saturday or Sunday when it came out in Nuneaton that two Afghan men had been charged with the rape of just a 12-year-old girl.
	So I believe there's going to be a protest there on Saturday, and I'm going to be turning up to that.
	And I think we just heard about another one in, yeah, it was Wilms Owen, Manchester, I think just yesterday, where there had been somebody charged, an asylum seeker charged with an attempted kidnapping of a 10-year-old.
	And these cases, it's insane.
	It's literally every single day.
	And it seems like we've just seen one literally, I mean, over the past few weeks for sure.
	But, you know, these stories have been popping up really sort of since the Boris Wave happened.
	And of course, now, sorry, excuse me.
	We bring in the Afghans as part of the part of the Afghan resettlement scheme.
	They're just being put all across the country and either in hotels or in private accommodation, which was the case of the Nuneaton, Nuneaton charges.
	And people have just, people are just fed up with it.
	And as you can see, I've obviously been on the ground, so I think we'll be seeing some of the footage of that.
	Yes, yes, we are.
	Just let me know when you're able to move on to the next one and I can keep moving it along for you.
	Exactly.
	Yeah, because you've been covering, you've been at a lot of these protests, haven't you?
	And you've been responsible for a lot of the original footage that we've had coming up.
	Well done.
	Thank you for that.
	You're doing great work.
	Sterling work.
	It's really important.
	It's genuinely important.
	So thank you for it and do keep it up.
	Yeah, I will shout out a few of my other friends who've been on the ground.
	Emma Dunwell from eSpeaks Freely.
	Will Colzil from Resistance GB?
	Loads of Wesley Winter, the independent YouTuber.
	There's been a bunch of people who have been, I've constantly seen at these protests and also getting out the right footage.
	And Wesley, for example, he was intimidated last Sunday at Epping by one of the sort of anti-first stand-up to racism thugs who used been on court on camera.
	I think he intimidated Count Dankula and Tim Paul years ago as well, right on the streets of Westminster.
	I don't know if Dan Killer could ever be intimidated.
	Well, attempted to be intimidated.
	I should say.
	They used to be a bouncer.
	Good luck with that.
	But yeah, so pull up.
	So this was from Stanwell on Thursday.
	And obviously what's funny about this is that this was almost exactly two weeks after then.
	So this was a little bit late into the evening where they really got right up close to the asylum hotel and they started just chucking beer cans at it basically.
	And I think you won one of the other clips as well.
	Yeah, I believe would be the next one on here.
	Place it with that.
	Yeah, this was just before that, where they went right up the hotel.
	And I'll leave the audio on for this one, actually.
	Okay.
	We'll just have to listen to it.
	Save our community!
	Save our kids!
	Save our community!
	Save our kids!
	Save our community!
	Look at our watch, I'm so unstandard!
	I'm fucking rolling!
	Look at what!
	Does that make you feel good?
	Does that make you feel good?
	Yeah, so...
	Just shitting their pants.
	I tell you, it's come to this, though, hasn't it?
	Because before now, for a few years before now, if a normal person just wanted to go up and go into one of these hotels and just ask what's going on, they just stonewall you.
	Or actually, they've got bouncers or bodyguards that tell you to leave.
	You're not allowed to come in and ask a question.
	Yeah, I even saw that.
	Yeah.
	And I said, even actually, one of the guys that goes in, you know, one of the sort of auditors who've gotten in hotels, I believe it was last month or a couple of months ago when he went in.
	One of the security guards is like threw hot coffee on him.
	And the police were there and they literally just did nothing about it.
	So obviously, again, something like this was inevitable.
	But as you can see here, so this obviously, they were able to get quite close to the Asylum Hotel because this one, you know, popped up, I think it was literally like the night or two nights before, you know, this was announced.
	And this was, you know, also two weeks post the, almost the day of the first Epping protests.
	So there was no stand-ups racism, no antifa there.
	This is a very small community group.
	I actually got messaged by a few of them telling me to come down and report on it.
	And literally just me and another person, AY Audits, who was there covering it.
	So everyone who had footage from there, it was basically from like one of us two.
	And for mostly me, you know, there were no other reporters there.
	But yeah, as you can see on this one, they were able to get right up close to the hotel because there was no, you know, unlike in the Bell Hotel in Epping, the Britannia Hotel, you know, there's no, you know, ring of steel to protect it.
	So people could just go right up and start banging and shouting on the windows.
	Yeah, that was quite remarkable, especially when you saw the Epping protests and how just as a metal fences all the way around it.
	And vans and vans and vans of policemen.
	Oh, absolutely tons of them.
	I remember somebody said on Twitter over this over the past few weeks, they said that this is always a deliberate point for the police because they cannot, they can't police and control sexual assaults, robberies, muggings, burglaries, so much crime they can't do.
	So what they will do is they'll show up in force to something like this so that they can pretend that they still actually have a well-funded, easy to respond force to these sort of things.
	So a lot of it, I will say, is propaganda and for show.
	It's like, wow, here's a billion police all with riot shields, able to turn up in a heartbeat, and then you find out they've drafted them all away from all other places in the country.
	I think there were like Northumbrian police at one of the Epping protests that I attended.
	They've dragged them in from all over the place just to have those numbers.
	And then this here, there was, sorry, day after day Saturday.
	A couple days after Saturday.
	Yes.
	So you had that one that you just showed of Stanwell on Thursday.
	And then different place, different protests, different hotel on the Saturday as well.
	So what was happening in Thistle City?
	So this was, there were two protests.
	Well, actually, technically, there were three protests here.
	One, they'd been coordinated to have Stand Up for Racism, which had just done a protest six days ago in Epping, mobilized to get people out there.
	And they did the same again here.
	So they started at half 12 or meant to be just outside the Thistle City Migrant Hotel, which is the one that the police had cracked down on illegal delivery riders at just the previous month.
	So start of July.
	So there was a small anti-asylum hotel protest just around the corner that started at 1.30.
	The stand-up to racing protests started at half 12, I believe.
	Diane Abbott was there, Narinda Corps, loads of people in central London who haven't turned out to do other stuff all turned out for this.
	And I think actually they mobilized more people by flying it at Friday prayers at the mosque, the local Islington Mosque.
	Oh, really?
	So we're able to get some more people out for that way.
	Not exactly an organic crowd, the stand-up to racism.
	but the other people that turned up here were antifur as well.
	They did not have the planning, the police permission to do the protest there.
	So, they were right in the middle of the crossroads, and then it got a little bit tasty.
	So, this footage here, we have a woman who came in with a union jack and a masked man wearing an England t-shirt going up to the Antifa.
	So, this is not the standards racing crowd.
	This is the masked Antifurt in the middle of the crossroads there.
	Refugees a welcome.
	I'll just turn it down because you never know when they're going to throw out something too vulgar for YouTube.
	Yes, yeah, that certainly sounds about right.
	Um, but yeah, so uh, the police then obviously immediately surrounded uh these two.
	Uh, I don't know if they came from the other protests or they just went straight there.
	Um, what's uh, what's interesting, I've just been in touch actually recently with the guy in the English shirt there, uh, who's you know, then try to get his story out, claiming that the arrest wasn't exactly legal and so on.
	Uh, I believe she was uh interviewed just by Ben Leo from GB News at the time, who's just right around the corner there.
	Um, but yeah, so he was uh, obviously, actually, if you skip forward slightly in the footage, uh, you'll be able to see uh him getting bundled away, uh, yeah, pulling a few little bit further.
	Barbington in London, yeah, so yes, yeah, so right uh, right near there, basically.
	Uh, yeah, there you go, him just getting arrested straight away and uh actually taken to uh the police stations not doing the classic thing of you know, arrested for breach the peace, got enough gunway, yeah, it's like a dozen cops to arrest that one fella.
	Well said, it's all completely the show of force of the entire thing, um, and you know, and again, he was he was actually taken to the police station and you know, and held now on bail rather than being uh arrested and de-arrested and just moved away as you usually do when protests and counter-protests get uh get too close to each other.
	Um, so I'll see here the um so yeah, so this is this is this is the actual the state of the stand-up to racism uh lot.
	Uh, who you can tell are the state of them's never particularly good, no, uh, all middle-class, lovey, you know, white liberal types.
	Uh, this was something that uh colleague of mine, freelance uh, reporter has been covering it for unheard.
	Um, Jack, I can't remember his surname, um, but he he he noted, you know, quite rightly so, as I have, that the stand-up racism protests uh are very middle class, whereas the anti-asylum protests are very working class.
	Sure, uh, and these people will not live exactly right around the corner, whereas those protesting the hotels who are the working class, you know, salt of the earth English people, they will literally live.
	I've literally met someone in the Britannia Hotel who lives in like the building opposite.
	Um, you know, these people will come from you know, wherever else in Islington, uh, where they don't have to suffer uh from you know, the the you know, the threat of these people being being in their backyards.
	Stand up to racism may as well be stand up for sex criminals, yeah, stand up for rapists, I like to call them, you know, yeah, revolting, absolutely revolting.
	What did I think they're doing?
	What do they think they're doing?
	Uh, whether they're brainwashed or they actually are in favor of more sex criminals, what the hell it's madness to me, it's madness.
	Actually, I don't really need to play well because you can just see from the preview there just how pasty white they all are.
	Um, and uh, you know, probably need to probably need to do less avocado toast eating.
	The reinforcements from Islington Mosque hadn't quite turned up yet.
	Yes, um, but on the uh, on the next clip here, uh, this is uh what happens when uh the police actually started uh they'll go into the antifa crowd to try and arrest a couple of people, and then you know, this then is the result where it uh it got quite tasty.
	Thank you.
	Just uh and of course, all of the in the backgrounds, yeah, and uh all of the all of the press trying to get as best uh best footage as uh as everybody else could.
	Oh, the brave antifar boys, it's the new cable street, yeah, they're heroes, they're on the right side of history.
	Yeah, you can see there's one of them there just having been dragged by about the scruff of his neck by his colleague, um, hat knocked off, um, clearly.
	And what's funny about this is really, you know, especially if they knew that antifa were going to turn up.
	Now, it wasn't permitted, but you know, there had been flyers around, it was pretty obvious that these people were going to be there.
	Where is the riot police?
	Where is the you know, the guys with the truncheons and the bats and the full gear, you know, ready to completely beat these guys senseless if need if they need to.
	And clearly, that has been the reaction from Antifa.
	It's extremely, extremely violent ones, you know, literally now locking arms, holding the police, holding against the police here.
	Whereas, you know, like I've seen so many riot squads turn up to the anti-asylum protests, and yet nothing's visible over this way.
	Or the mounted police on the big horses with the giant nightsticks stuff.
	Yeah, none of that.
	No, they're all just little indicators, aren't they?
	It's just the little things all mounting together to just visibly show you which side the establishment is there to serve, which side the law is there to protect.
	Because ideally, you'd kettle everyone there.
	Yep.
	Arrest all of those.
	You know, especially because they were part of a protest that did not have permission to be there as well.
	You know, it obviously all just adds to it.
	But so now, so this, so then this was Sunday.
	And so what happened here, now, the Britannia Hotel had been quite regularly protested.
	Obviously, one of the clips that I believe was played on here previously was the green councillor who was shouted at and called a certain word.
	Yeah, and that was mine that went mega viral.
	So the Britannia Hotel has been relatively more constant.
	That first week, there were people there every night.
	And there have been people watching, which is why actually we got, I believe it was on like Thursday night, Friday morning at 1.33 in the morning when they bust in the first coachload of migrants.
	Oh, yeah, so I remember seeing that video.
	Yeah, so they have been now confirmed they're there.
	So the Britannia guy is obviously having doing quite a regular protest, same with like the guys over at Epping.
	They changed it up a little bit on Sunday and the community organized together a women's and children's march.
	So what we'll have here footage of now, we want to hear the first audio for this, so don't play it immediately.
	Is their incredible chants where they're going from the Jubilee tube station in Canary Wharf round the corner to the Britannia Hotel.
	And this is literally just women and kids in the march.
	They told everyone like there's going to be, there was a second protest scale for 3 p.m., which we'll see more of that in a few clips later.
	But this is literally women and children dressed in pink marching against illegal migration asylum seekers.
	We'll have a play with the clip.
	We'll have a play with the clip.
	When do we want the fights to stop?
	When do we want it?
	Now!
	And yeah, that has been the sentiment, you know, the boats have to stop.
	And that chance, as you can just see, so many, like at least two to three hundred maybe, you know, women and kids all dressed in pink, marching against mass migration, singing traditionally London tunes, you know, the union jacks, the England flags flying.
	This is the evil Nazi far-right, you know.
	Yeah, well, and what's more as well, one of the things that I appreciated was on the banner where they were saying, you know, not far right, but not far wrong.
	You know, like, just totally mock the label.
	Mock the label.
	Just entirely, you know, we're at the point now where it's wonderful to see that it's filtered down to just wonderful patriotic normies that they don't need to be frightened of what they're going to call you anymore.
	You are right.
	You hold every morally correct card in this argument.
	Right.
	And you can see it.
	You can see the confidence.
	You know, just the boldness on the street.
	It's wonderful.
	You can only imagine people in government in the cabinet.
	These are their enemies.
	Somebody like Emily Thornbury be aghast by seeing such a thing.
	Somebody like Lisa Nandy, this is the sort of thing that does need to be stamped out as far as they're concerned.
	It's what keeps them awake at night.
	Yeah.
	And so as we'll just see in some of these next clips, so the women and children, you know, they didn't just march there.
	They actually, surprisingly, they've, you know, resisted the police orders.
	So these ones we can play with without audio, but they literally got to Batania Hotel, started doing this stuff.
	Now, the police, you know, started telling them, oh, like, everyone, can you stay on the pavement just behind there?
	You know, where they would want them stretched out and moved slightly away from the front of the hotel.
	And the ladies said, we're not having that.
	And they decided, right, in the middle of the road, we're sitting down.
	Good luck moving us, officers.
	Again, I can't, you know, think of the optics of, you know, police, you know, six-foot guys, you know, bearded mustaches or whatever.
	Yeah, then, you know, bundling them away into police fans, you know, handcuffs behind, again, all dressed in pink.
	The headlines on every single paper, it would be so hard to deny that, you know, you're just shutting down these protests because it's terrible for them to see.
	You can see the cup there even sort of smiling, really.
	Yes.
	But yeah, like written on their flags, a save our kids, save our women.
	Couldn't ask for purer messaging.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Just pure sentiment.
	Yeah, and then if you go to the next one.
	Yeah, so this is more when the police started going through the crowd individually, talking to them, being like, clients, can you please move?
	We'll just see here in this clip, again, they don't necessarily need the audio for this one, where the officers are just gently, gently trying to persuade them that everything's fine.
	So this officer's, you know, here saying to these two ladies going, oh, well, you know, it's all about your safety.
	You know, it's like, see, see, like, you guys are in the middle of the road.
	Come on now.
	And she's responding, well, I'm pretty sure that the cars can see us.
	And also, I can look after my own personal safety.
	Thank you very much, officer.
	I do appreciate the concern, but I'm going to be staying here for a little bit.
	And this is that kind of cheeky response to them, whereas it's kind of hard for them to stop smiling.
	So I went through the crowd and you see multiple officers talking to them.
	They were at first threatened with arrest if they didn't move.
	But I think the police worked out that there's basically no chance that they were going to get them off the road.
	At one point.
	And so no chance, but there's no threat.
	Yeah.
	There's no threat towards anyone here.
	At one point, they were going to move because an ambulance was coming down the way.
	And so they all immediately started to get up.
	And then the ambulance went another direction.
	So they sat straight back down again.
	So, you know, so unlike just up oil or whoever, you know, if there was actually a legitimate emergency need to clear the road, they were like, yeah, great, cool.
	We'll move out the way.
	And then we're going to sit back down.
	But there was actually no need for them to finish it off there.
	Was this on a weekend day?
	Sunday.
	Right.
	Yep.
	Well, I worked in Canary Wolf for a few years.
	And Canary Wolf is a ghost town on weekends.
	There's hardly any residents in Canary Wolf.
	It's all office buildings, nearly.
	And so, yeah, on a Saturday or a Sunday, there's nothing going on, really.
	So it would be fine.
	It would be fine, honestly.
	So just after this, I think we'll see in the, oh yeah, this is one I pulled up because it got quite a bit of attention there.
	In the Congo.
	The Conga and the Hoki Koti.
	Yeah, and they just don't want to be sexually assaulted.
	Literally.
	that's what they want.
	Can we stop importing men from countries that are 22 times more likely to be convicted for sexual assault, please?
	Please?
	Can we just have that, please?
	No, says Kit Starmer.
	Sorry, the rapists must continue into your country.
	No, says the past, what, three governments now.
	Yeah, not even him.
	Everyone of all stripes.
	Red, blue.
	No, you must have these rapists.
	You must have these unknown illegal foreigners.
	They're economic rocket fuel.
	And also, we deserve it for colonization.
	Right.
	All the rest of it.
	Yeah.
	So just in the next clip here, this is what happens just before three o'clock where the new protest came in.
	Now, the Telegraph and other people kind of started to run with, you know, Lee Anderson posted that Antifa had turned up.
	And then they said, oh, that this protest, you know, this protest had been hijacked by, you know, massed men in Balaclava who came out with England flags and red and white smoke flares.
	They hadn't hijacked the protests.
	They were there.
	This was just as the crossover between the women and children march happened.
	And you can, you know, in the audio of this, you can hear all the women and children, you know, like shouting, you know, with joy that these guys have now turned up.
	You know, they were there, you know, turned up in Balaclav's mast.
	A lot of them said, you know, because they had jobs that they didn't want to be, you know, recognized for.
	But all that they did, unlike the masked Antifa lot, where they really, you know, fully, you know, grappled with the cops, is that, you know, they basically turned up as a show of force and saying, you know, like, look, the women and children here are peacefully demonstrated.
	And we, The men of this community are also not going to stand for this.
	So, you know, there was no punches thrown, you know, towards the police.
	There was no violence, but they got up in their faces.
	They made a scene and they said, you know, look, this is, you know, we are not going to stand for the rape and sexual assault of our wives, our sisters, our daughters.
	You know, so it's like, hey, you know, migrants at this hotel, you know, have it is kind of the attitude that you could just see to kind of see in the clip here.
	John's player.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Yeah.
	So as you can see, so while while they are all masked up, like they were just there to come and do that.
	You know, they weren't there to start fights with the police, unlike when I, or they weren't here to start fights with anybody.
	Unlike in Norwich, for example, where I was a couple of weeks ago, where three masks anti-fur literally went straight into the anti-asylum crowds and to cause trouble.
	And they were peacefully ejected.
	You know, they were sort of pushed out.
	Again, no punches thrown from the anti-asylum side.
	Just they were forced out.
	You know, obviously they were shouted at and called nonce protectors, etc.
	But they were moved back out of the police lines.
	And now we'll see the police response to these guys turning up with masks and flares.
	Okay.
	Volume's gone on that one anyway.
	Yeah.
	Not sure if they can hear it on the have you got a license for that St. George's flare.
	Yeah, exactly.
	So what caused them to run?
	Where did all this come from?
	Like the police just started going for them.
	Right, right, okay.
	Right at the lines.
	I heard somebody say, you know, like mentioned like, you know, like you've got pyrotechnics on you.
	So what happened there is I believe they were just kind of being stopped and searched, sort of.
	A lot of them then got debalaclathered and then were just allowed to join the protest.
	Right.
	So some were arrested.
	I think one of them maybe was taken away.
	But a lot of the guys that you can see there were then had their masks forcibly removed by police and then put back into protest.
	And then some of them put their masks on back on after that.
	But I think the point of this was for the police to know who these guys were primarily.
	I believe that was a primary point.
	I agree with the point that Margoth made, though, a few weeks ago, actually, that really I don't think the flares are good optics, just ever, generally.
	They give off a sort of paramilitary-esque look to them.
	And when you see that the way that women, the women are handling things, I can understand the concern from the chaps to obviously want to cover your face, given that you know that the law is against you.
	I mean, to some extent, I'm kind of splitting hairs, you know, trying to aim for perfection, but and it's just me.
	I'm not in the thick of it.
	But I'm glad that they were, you know, released.
	Yeah.
	But yeah, so just after this, this is where it started to get a little bit worse.
	So actually, this was, actually, we'll play the actually skip one.
	Right.
	Maybe what?
	Yeah.
	So this is my footage of this.
	So I'll give you a very quick rundown of what I was told by eyewitnesses this happened.
	So this is what I heard from eyewitnesses.
	The man who's being arrested here allegedly asked a police officer for his badge number from about the same distance week me and you are away, Bo.
	The police then approached him and then something happened when they got up close.
	I don't know if he threw a punch or the officer threw a punch, but the eyes claimed that he didn't do nothing.
	But I didn't see it myself.
	I can't say exactly what happened.
	All I can see here is the aftermath.
	And now, one of the eyewitnesses did say, as I said there, that he was knead in the face during the arrest.
	And as we're going to see, actually, just actually, yeah, maybe quickly back to the last clip.
	Just as a quick, it's four seconds.
	You'll just see in the kind of bottom left middle of the screen here.
	There you go.
	Punches straight on him.
	That officer right in the middle of the down, fully laying into him.
	And I'm like, how is that not police brutality?
	Providence.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	You know, and weirdly, that one had not got as much attention as some of my other clips here.
	I don't know if it's being, if it's the online, got online safety acted in some way or just, you know, taken down to the algorithm because of, you know, obvious violence.
	But yeah, so this is the footage I then got of this, where again, during this arrest in Midway, there was this little girl who ended up getting basically hit in the face by the officers, obviously accidentally when they were moved away.
	And at the other side of the road, so just basically back behind me, a bunch of the guys who were obviously who were in Balclavas, you know, tried to rush towards the police because obviously like, hey, you know, our friend's getting arrested and seemingly, seemingly assaulted by the police.
	So during that, when one of the guys was being held back by the officers, his arm got broken.
	It was like, I saw it.
	It was, there is, there is, I believe there are some images of it online, but it was pretty like, it was not a nice.
	It was obviously broken.
	I saw the blood coming down from it and he was bundled away in an ambulance after this as well.
	If you just give a little bit forward here, one thing I would say.
	Moved away.
	There's a general, there's a general debate around whether some people say, I think I've seen Morgoth say in the past, don't ever turn up to any of these things ever because you're just simply giving the state what it wants.
	I don't agree with that take.
	I think peaceful protest is good and valuable.
	But one thing I would say is never attempt to rest.
	If the police have decided they want to arrest you and there's you versus four or five cops and they're trying to get your arm behind your back to put the just let them do it at that point.
	Never ever resist arrest when they've decided they want to arrest.
	Terrible idea.
	Yeah, yeah.
	That is sort of stupid that is really stupid.
	That will never ever work out well for you.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, that's my little bit of advice.
	So you can see, you know, they were just again, you know, obviously forcibly dragged him down to the vans in order to get arrested and moving away.
	And you can see a lot of people who are pressed getting up close.
	Yeah, I saw other press get shoved away by the police.
	This woman here is just about to be just about to be shoved back again.
	They were very, you know, forceful with anyone who even got too close, even if you identified as, you know, identified yourself as press, pretty clearly as I did with my eyes, you know, badge around my neck as I do.
	Because, you know, I will say, having that, that and the suits going to these things, it basically is a big red signal to going, hey, you know, cops, you know, please don't, please don't, you know, touch me or whatever.
	I, I, you know, hey, I may agree with these things, but I'm here to, uh, I'm here straight to report on it.
	So always turn up to a protest in the suit.
	Yes.
	A big blue body armor that says press in message white letters on it.
	But yeah, so actually, I think one of the last clips here, so this is just after that.
	Now, obviously, there's allegations now.
	Now, we saw with the Tissile City Hotel, as we saw earlier.
	That was when, as I mentioned, at the start of July, there had been a specific crackdown on illegal workers there delivering for a delivery room.
	And we'd seen delivery new REITs guys come in and out.
	And I think in these cases, it's more that they have been delivering to the resident, the residents, the guests of the hotel.
	So what happened here is an Uber guy.
	I think we just play this one in the background without the audio because it goes on.
	Just goes on for a few minutes.
	And we just have that on as we mentioned this.
	He's now trying to get away from the hotel after having done his delivery.
	And everybody else is kind of not happy that he's been feeding the guys that are inside and has become complicit in that system.
	So the footage here basically shows him getting chased off by the mob and also chased off and also stopped from leaving at the same time.
	Just surrounded.
	People are calling him pedo apologists.
	All sorts of all sorts of words.
	But again, no violence.
	And that is the main theme of what I've seen here.
	There's been harassment.
	There's been intimidation.
	There is, as we saw in the Samuel clips earlier, beer bottles thrown at the hotel.
	There has not been in these protests from the anti-asylum side risen to the level of decking people in the face, smashing glass bottles around them, really going for the police officers, going for the kill.
	There has been none of that, which is the difference between what happened this year and what happened at Southport and what happened after that.
	They were trying to burn down migrant hotels.
	There was police fans set on fire.
	I saw myself.
	That was fully, just pure, unadulterated anger.
	This has been peaceful anger, just simmering the lid, like the lid of the pot is about to blow off, but it's not.
	It's still just simmering, still just boiling.
	But it's not exploded.
	And at that level, I believe, you know, these guys are going to be able to keep the protests going.
	Because I think the thing with anger, as I wrote in my critic article, it's hot.
	It burns bright, but it burns fast.
	And that's why Southport and after that was only really six days and then a couple sort of days after that.
	We're already over like two and a half weeks into this so far.
	And there's no signs of stopping.
	As I said, Friday, there's going to be more protests across the country.
	I think there's 12 locations simultaneously at 6 p.m. going so far.
	Then Neaton is going to, you know, there's going to be a protest there on Saturday.
	And there's more that just keeps constantly popping up.
	You know, like if one community, you know, tires a little bit and goes down, like two more are going to pop up to replace it.
	Like, this is the protest Hydra that we're seeing, honestly.
	And as I mentioned, if they keep it to once or twice a week, maybe once in a week day after work, and maybe once on a Saturday or Sunday, this can keep going on indefinitely.
	And it becomes a rallying point for the communities as well.
	Like, hey, once a week, once or twice a week, we all go out with our neighbours.
	We stand together against men who are, as Trump would say, bringing crime.
	They're bringing drugs.
	They're rapists.
	They're horrible people.
	Standing against these guys every week.
	And with the community, it does bring the community together.
	I imagine, I don't know how many of these people would have known their neighbors as well as they do now after regularly attending these protests.
	It does seem to be, ironically, when everything does look dark, it does create the gel that now binds communities together.
	It's been genuinely remarkable over these past few weeks to witness this spreading.
	To genuinely just see it.
	And the thing is as well, to just see it spreading so organically, grassroots level organization from just concerned mums and dads.
	Well, is it members of the community?
	So on that, there's been a couple different ways it's been organized in terms of either you've had more regularly well-known, you know, sort of organized people having experience in politics.
	So Norwich, you've got James Harvey and Sidney Jones who regularly organized protests, organized like anti-transgender protests previously in the town.
	Obviously in Epping, you have people like you have the Homeland guys who are over there who are involved in bringing some stuff together.
	But again, in Stanwell and the Britannia Hotel, these were just Facebook WhatsApp groups that were created at the Britannia.
	People just saw that this happened.
	They went down as a live streamer.
	And then that's how I found about it.
	I went down.
	Other people went down.
	And then they just started, literally, locals who've never done anything like this before in their life will just start a Facebook group, which is like X place says no to Y Hotel.
	And then, you know, it'll blow up to like 2,000 community members.
	And then everyone will just start chipping in.
	Like the Women's and Children's March.
	That was just something that somebody suggested in the WhatsApp chat like a week ago or so.
	And then it just, everyone thought, oh, that's a great idea.
	Yeah, let's do that.
	Let's bring it in.
	It's a very flat top on some of these.
	Yeah, so some of them have community organizers helping to run things and grab stuff together who have experience in a bit.
	But a lot of it is, a lot of it is just flat top hierarchy of locals in Facebook groups and WhatsApp chats.
	Well, thank you very much for covering it all as well.
	For giving us all that.
	That's great work.
	Thank you.
	It's really, really invaluable.
	Thank you.
	Let's go through some of the Rumble rants for that segment then.
	You've got Wynne Pilsika says, humble contribution to the Chainmail Fund for the cameraman.
	I wish they'd let us film in plate armour.
	I saw someone tried to sneak attack on a cop in Ireland.
	Yeah, plate armour and suits.
	Chainmail, at least a chainmail vest.
	Yeah.
	I could do one of those if I go to Antifa again.
	And then we've got Alex Adamson, 55 again says, resisting arrest only ever gets you more charges.
	Just let them do it and prove your innocence in court.
	Otherwise, you'll get put in jail for actual crimes.
	Exactly.
	And you'll get yourself hurt.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And that.
	And that.
	If they decide, if they've decided they're going to pick you out of the crowd, and five or six of them are.
	There's no point.
	There's really no point trying to resist at that point.
	Well, I said, all of this needs to remain peaceful.
	And peaceful protests involves peacefully letting yourself get arrested.
	Peacefully.
	But try not to get arrested in the first place.
	Right.
	Yeah.
	Don't do anything like that to get yourself arrested.
	That's right.
	Pardon me.
	All right, gentlemen, shall we Talk a little bit about Mrs. Pelosi.
	I'm a huge fan of her work.
	Yeah, she's been great, hasn't she?
	She's been so good.
	Fantastic.
	Some say the best.
	Some say the greatest.
	A little crooked.
	A little Pelosi.
	Nancy.
	We don't like Nancy.
	She is.
	That's great.
	Speaking of Russian.
	So yes, she's in the news cycle a bit today for her sort of fairly obvious corruption.
	Right.
	Oh, no, wait.
	That's what she was.
	Oh, yeah.
	Right.
	Yeah, that's why she's in the new cycle at the moment.
	So I thought I'd cover it because I've had a bit of a bee in my bonnet about Mrs. Paul Pelosi for a while.
	I wrote an article about it.
	I'll get onto that in a minute.
	First to mention, now the actual segment has started that Islander Part 4 is available now.
	So think about buying that 15 quid off the website.
	It's got loads of good people in it, right?
	Bargain.
	Morgoth, Ed Dutton, Ed Dutton.
	Carl, the boss.
	So yeah, do you consider buying that?
	Okay, so back to back to Mrs. Pelosi.
	It has been alleged for years now that she may well be involved in, well, insider trading.
	I mean, technically, insider trading has got quite a specific meaning, but we all know what we mean by it anyway, right?
	So the question is, is she above the law?
	Or her and Paul, rather.
	There she is.
	The great woman.
	She's been a congresswoman for California, the San Francisco area, since like 1987.
	I mean, she's old as shit.
	She's 85 now.
	I mean, honestly, look, there's a picture of her with JFK.
	Oh, gosh.
	That's how old she is.
	She didn't even look evil.
	Yeah.
	No.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, the corruption hasn't actually spread to her visage by that point.
	So, yeah.
	But everyone knows that for quite a while, she has been basically must have been giving information, insider information, to her husband, Paul, who is a trader, right?
	He's an investment bod.
	Because his trading record is absolutely remarkable.
	Really?
	He, well, her, both of them together.
	Are one of the all-time greatest investors in all of Wall Street history?
	I mean, Trump said exactly that.
	Well, it's because they're lucky, right?
	Yes, right?
	He's just a genius.
	Just knows the markets.
	He just buys the dip.
	Knows to the grindstone.
	That's all it is.
	But it is quite remarkable.
	I mean, I wrote an article a while ago, like three years ago.
	And I'm saying things like, they've definitely done nothing wrong.
	Obviously being sarcastic.
	They've definitely done anything wrong.
	If you think they've done anything wrong, that's on you.
	That's because you're mad.
	Yeah.
	If you think they should be investigated by the FTC or the DOJ or anything like that, that's just because you're crazy.
	You're some sort of crazy MAGA-loving.
	What do I say?
	A white supremacist, MAGA-loving, slack-jawed middle-American hillbilly.
	There's no other explanation for it.
	Because the Pelosi's have not done anything wrong.
	They are beyond reproach.
	There's no question that they could have done anything wrong.
	According to Pelosis.
	Right, yeah.
	There's just nothing to see here, ever.
	I'll talk about various other things she's done in the past because she's so obnoxious.
	Apart from being obviously fairly, obviously corrupt.
	Just on top of that, really, really obnoxious.
	Obviously, like the classic evil lefty Karen.
	I think my favourite Pelosi moment, was it her who was saying, thank you, George Floyd, for dying?
	Yeah, yeah, that was her.
	Oh, yeah, there's Chuck Chum in the background, of course.
	Right.
	Yeah, all this sort of...
	Yeah, it is.
	It was.
	And taking an instantly, she couldn't even stand up from that.
	People had to help her up.
	I mean, it's always funny whether she's too old to be in.
	Oh, don't ask her about term limits because she'll literally say, don't ask me about that.
	That's a waste of my time to even ask me that question.
	I won't even address it.
	She feels that way for Trump as well, does she?
	Well.
	Oh, wow.
	That's a great idea now.
	But the question is, I mean, is she above the law or not?
	Because there are already certain laws.
	There's one from 2012.
	So you're not supposed to do that.
	You're not supposed to give information to either trade for yourself or to, you know, close people, people that are close to you, certainly your spouse even.
	Because the amount of power that they hold, or she holds particularly, being very, very senior Congressman.
	I mean, she was head or she's the majority leader in the house a couple of times.
	I think she still is the minority leader in the house, right?
	So the most senior Democratic person in Congress.
	Okay, someone like that, their power is extreme.
	They can just say that they're thinking of introducing a motion.
	There's no law.
	There will not be a law for years, even if it all goes perfectly.
	But they're just thinking about doing this one thing.
	That will move, can move the market.
	The markets will react to something like that.
	And they may not even have any intention of actually doing it.
	So it's so obvious, isn't it?
	It's so easy.
	She can say to her husband, we're thinking of saying this, doing a press conference tomorrow or next week about this.
	That will move the market.
	It will make this company either go up or down in share price.
	If it's going to go down, short sell it.
	If it's likely to go up, buy a bit of it.
	It's just so straightforward.
	It's so obvious.
	And they don't even hide it all that much.
	It's not like there's some sort of complicated shell companies that Paul Pelosi is doing.
	He's hiding.
	He's hiding it in Swiss bank accounts.
	He's doing it through the Cayman Islands, through many different things.
	No, it's just him trading in his own name.
	I think one of them, wasn't it, wasn't it?
	Nvidia that she or he invested in.
	And obviously that was because at the time, yeah, it shut up because there was all the microchip and stuff going on, ReTaiwan.
	And then the US government says, oh, we're going to onshore winner.
	We're going to do stuff around this.
	And that, I believe, happened at around the same time that she invested or he invested in NVIDIA.
	I'm not entirely sure on the timeline, but I'm pretty sure that sounds about right.
	There are loads of examples.
	So it's not, this isn't just sort of a right-wing talking point.
	There's nothing to back it up.
	There's loads of receipts.
	There's not just a receipt or two.
	There's a billion receipts.
	There's loads of receipts.
	People follow what they do or what Paul trades in quite closely.
	We'll talk about that in a moment.
	Oh, look, there's Paul.
	Do you remember when he was assaulted a few years ago that no one ever talks about anymore?
	No, I've never seen that before in my life.
	Whatever came of that.
	I didn't really follow it all.
	Or the guy went to prison for life.
	Right.
	Okay.
	So one day when Nancy wasn't home, the police were called to their San Francisco home where there was some intruder with a hammer, pulled in his boxer shorts for some reason.
	He was just having a chill evening.
	So.
	Nothing to see.
	Nothing to see him moving along.
	Coming along.
	Or do you remember the time when he was drunk driving, caught drunk driving?
	No, I don't know.
	No, I know.
	I don't think that happened.
	Truly.
	There's no evidence of this anywhere at all.
	Untouchable.
	So various people, Josh Hawley, a senator, I really like Josh Hawley.
	He actually seems to be one of the good guys, right?
	He actually seems to be clean and got a conscience, it seems to me.
	One of the good guys.
	So he's want to introduce a bill.
	It won't get through, if it goes through, until the next presidential term.
	So it's a few years down the line before it's full-blown law.
	But colloquially, colloquially, they're calling it the Pelosi Act.
	Because her insider trading is so egregious and so obvious.
	So let's just let the White House press secretary say a few words here where someone asks her a question about it.
	This idea to put a ban on stock trading for members of Congress is even a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi.
	I mean, she is rightfully criticized because she makes, I think, $174,000 a year, yet she has a net worth of approximately $413 million.
	In 2024, Nancy Pelosi.
	Just to say that again, because we missed it.
	Her salary is something in the order of 175 odd 170, 180,000.
	Sounds about right, especially if you're like the speaker of the speaker of the house.
	Yeah.
	It seems a reasonable salary for being one of the most important people in America, politically.
	But it's not a fantastic amount of money.
	I mean, converted to UK, it's like 100 grand or something, yeah.
	So it's like a it's a decent salary, but it's not crazy, man.
	It's basic figures.
	Yet they're worth something in the order probably of 400 million.
	How does that add up?
	How does that make any sense?
	It's just cash ISIS.
	They've got their cash ISIS.
	They've just made use of that.
	Okay.
	I don't think they have ISIS in America, but anyway, gambling.
	Let's let her continue here.
	Approximately 413 million.
	In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio, this was a fascinating statistic to me, grew 70% in one year in 2024.
	And her portfolio outperformed every single large hedge fund in that same year and even more than doubled the returns of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway.
	So if the president stands with the American people on this, he doesn't want to see people like Nancy Pelosi enriching themselves off of public service and ripping off their constituents in the process.
	As for the mechanics of the legislation, how it will move forward, the White House continues to be in discussions.
	Okay.
	So 70% is crazy.
	It's unbelievable.
	It's like I'm quite literally, I'm using the word in a literal sense.
	It's unbelievable.
	Literally.
	I worked in asset management and fund management for quite a few years.
	I worked for JP Morgan Asset Management.
	I was never a fund manager or a trader.
	I want to make that clear.
	I never got anywhere near that.
	But I worked around fund management to the point where we were looking up prices every single day and all that sort of thing.
	So I know what is reasonable.
	Okay.
	Some funds, professionally managed funds, a fund managed by a team of JP Morgan economists, might lose money.
	It might well lose money.
	When I was there, they had a Japan fund and it would lose 2% a year or something.
	It was crap.
	If you invested in a fund that got 10% or 15%, that's good.
	That's quite healthy.
	If you get more than just what a normal bank would give you in interest, you're winning.
	So if you invest in a fund or any sort of fund and it does 15%, 20%, that's really good.
	That's really good.
	There was one, I think, for a while, for a small window of time, they had an India fund, which was higher than that.
	It was like 30%, 35%.
	So that was really good.
	Yes.
	So double that.
	You're whistling all the way to the bank if you've got that one, right?
	So, but even the very, very, very best investors, the very best hedge funds won't get anywhere near 65, 70%.
	He's again, as I say, quite literally not credible to do that.
	Well, I mean, you know what my conclusion is from this?
	Is that obviously JP Morgan should hire Paul Pelosi right now and he'll double triple their investment funds with his incredible genius brain.
	He's strategy.
	It's got JP Morgan.
	And he'll do the salary for $170,000 a year.
	Quite a cheap bargain.
	What is Paul Pelosi's strategy?
	The Pelosi strategy?
	What is it?
	I mean, I guess he can just see the future.
	I guess he's got some sort of scrying chain.
	He's an auger.
	Right.
	Yeah.
	He's an auger.
	He can read in the entrails of a sacrificed animal.
	So he's like, his pre-cog abilities are incredible.
	He, you know, outperforming, they said he outperformed Arkshere Hathaway, Warren Buffett, one of the greatest investors of all time.
	Somebody like Peter Lynch or Benjamin Graham, Benjamin Graham, an old-time oldie weldie, one of the greatest value investors of all time.
	So we'll get nowhere near those sort of returns.
	Jules Soros, a famously very astute investor.
	You might not agree with him in everything else he does, but he was an astute, good investor, wouldn't get those numbers.
	So it doesn't make sense.
	It doesn't add up.
	And we all know why.
	We all know why.
	Of course we do.
	It's because she can just say to him, we're going to do XYZ and it's going to mean Google or whatever is going to is going to go high and stay high for at least a year or two, buy a bit of it.
	Or we're going to do this, which is going to cripple this company.
	Get ready to short it.
	But as I said, as you mentioned earlier, it doesn't even need to be a fully enacted law or even or even like a daily motion, you know, like in the house.
	It just has to be a leak.
	Even just like a leak of the Democrats are going to introduce a resolution on this to maybe look towards doing a law in five years' time.
	It could just be a leak to say, you know, Politico or somebody like this.
	The motion doesn't even have to be even introduced or even debated in the first place.
	And then that will still move the markets in whatever direction they desire.
	And obviously with something like that, something so little, it's so easy to deny as well.
	Like your levels of culpability are going to be pretty hard to pin down on.
	Well, she just says, it's not me.
	I'm not investing anything.
	We know that now.
	Yeah, it's Paul, sure.
	But come on, like, what do you think we are?
	I mean, and she's been asked about it a number of times over the years.
	I mean, let's just see, this is from a handful of years ago.
	She was a speaker then, right?
	I think so, yeah.
	And someone asked her about it.
	Has your husband ever made a stock purchase or see obviously information you received from you?
	No.
	Absolutely not.
	No, absolutely not.
	Okay.
	It's the classic.
	A press conference over.
	Yeah, yeah.
	End of story.
	That's it.
	That was one of the reasons why I wrote my article.
	I say, if you think there's, there's just nothing to see here.
	There's just nothing to see here.
	And end of discussion.
	End of story.
	Next thing.
	Don't dare ask me again, almost.
	And you clearly need a segment.
	You're a white supremacist, white nationalist.
	That's Margie Marga Hillbilly.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Yeah, happily.
	With an Essex twang.
	Proudly.
	No, you're just a rube if you even ask her.
	Because of course not.
	Of course she's squeaky clean.
	She's Nancy Pelosi.
	Come on.
	And yeah, like the classic sort of Nurse Ratchet sort of obnoxious, like Uber Karen way of dealing with it.
	Okay.
	She is like Ratchet.
	You're right.
	I mean, I'll talk about the various things she's done that's obnoxious.
	I mean, does anyone remember this?
	Thank you very much.
	What a bitch.
	Yeah, okay.
	All right, lovely.
	Just sealing, molding, coping.
	God, it's good.
	I really want to know what her reaction was on November 2024 when he was back in office.
	Oh, yeah.
	Imagine being around at her house at the camera as he's watching the results come in on the screen.
	I want to know a reaction to that press conference that Levitic just gave.
	Right, yeah.
	Oh, well, we've got a bit of a reaction to that in a moment, actually.
	All right.
	But here's a more historic example of someone asking her about it.
	It was a guy from 60 Minutes ask about it.
	And this is quite old.
	I think this is like in the order of 10 years old or something, but it's a classic example of how she deals with.
	Let me see.
	I get Sky to get to it.
	I wanted to ask you why you and your husband back in March of 2008 accepted and participated in a very large IPO deal from FISA.
	At that time, there was major legislation affecting their credit card companies making its way through the house.
	And did you consider that to be a conflict of interest?
	I don't know what your point is of your question.
	Is there some point that you want to make with that?
	So that's the classic thing.
	If you ask, even if you dare to bring it up, it's just like the attempt at stonewalling, first and foremost, tempt to just try and change the subject, tempt to imply that you're crazy.
	You must be crazy to be asking this.
	I guess what I'm asking is, do you think it's all right for a speaker to accept a very preferential, favorable stock deal?
	Well, we did.
	But that isn't the case.
	There's major legislation affecting that company in the House.
	Well, first of all, let me say this.
	What we're talking about is an industry.
	What we're talking about is a Congress that passed more protections for credit card holders.
	The stock bill, you know, Carolyn Malone writed to.
	Okay, the point is she just doesn't answer the question.
	Just immediately moves on to talking about other things, just won't answer the question.
	Like an innocent person.
	Yeah.
	And again, just refusing to address it in any way.
	And again, once again, it's just so obvious.
	Nobody's fooled by it.
	Nobody's thinking, oh, maybe, maybe, like, actually, Nancy and Paul haven't done anything wrong.
	And they have just legitimately made like 70% returns in a single year and increased their fortune from a mil or two to 400 million.
	Maybe that is just legit.
	No one thinks.
	Even Hillary Clinton's looking at them like, that's a bit of a finish.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, well, I think there's the, I think it's like the Nancy Pelosi stock tracker on Twitter as well, which like throws through like all of that.
	And you can see it, like, okay, like, when they've invested in it, you're like, hmm, maybe, let me, let me whack a few cash points over there as well.
	And then, you know, if you do, you know, hey, yeah, not investment advice, but the Nancy Pelosi stock tracker is on, is, is on X, I believe.
	Yeah, there's loads of different people that track.
	I think I've got a link about that in a moment.
	But yeah, lots of different people are like, well, because that is a legit tactic.
	Yeah.
	It's that you just see what Barkley Hathaway just bought or sold, probably bought, because they're value investors.
	And she's like, well, okay.
	They obviously have got confidence in that.
	So I'll buy a bit.
	That's a legit thing to do.
	But yeah.
	So in this recent, where it's come up recently with Josh Hawley and Trump talking about it, she did go on something or other.
	Was it CNN, I think maybe, and was asked about it.
	So I think this is that.
	Oh, no.
	Sorry, this is just another.
	Another one.
	And another one.
	Another older clip where Cish asks about it.
	And she basically says here that there's nothing wrong with it.
	She pivots to that, essentially.
	Five-month investigation finding that 49 members of Congress and 182 senior congressional staffers have violated the Stock Act, the insider drain lock.
	I'm wondering if you have any reaction to that.
	And secondly, the meeting of Congress and their thousands be banned from trading individual stocks.
	So one thing I could say, people might not have been able to hear the question.
	He's saying, someone like 180-odd Congress people have been sort of caught out one way or another by this.
	What do you think about that?
	What do you think?
	Well, just your thoughts.
	No reason.
	Yeah.
	No, I don't know to the second one.
	Well, he said, should it be stopped?
	She goes, no.
	We have a responsibility to report in the stock on the stock, but I'm not familiar with that five-month review.
	But if people aren't reporting, they should be.
	Why is the President's not convinced?
	Because this is a free market and people...
	They should be able to participate in that.
	It's the free markets.
	Yeah, and because the Democrats love capitalism, free market, and a good growing economy, so they've got to let them all trade stocks.
	It's a free market.
	Paul should be allowed to buy and sell whatever he wants, regardless of any sort of insider knowledge.
	Yeah.
	That's basically what she's saying.
	But that was like three or four years ago.
	And in fact, let this guy talk.
	Just an interesting channel.
	He knows what he's talking about.
	And this is sort of some of the receipts of what's going on and the people that have noticed Paul's incredible ability to pick stocks.
	Perhaps they know something that the rest of us don't.
	And that's what brings us to Nancy Pelosi, the new stock picking genius.
	For the last three years, her stock picking strategies have consistently beat the S ⁇ P 500.
	Oh, just to mention, this video is a couple years old.
	She goes three years old.
	So this isn't a new story remote.
	You've been at it for a while.
	She's grown her wealth by an estimated $16.7 million in 2020 alone, and she reportedly has a net worth of around $100 million.
	Both her and her husband recently locked in a $5.3 million profit from Alphabet Call Options.
	They invested in Apple during the June 2021 tech dip.
	That also includes a $1 million bet into Tesla and bullish bets on Disney.
	And to top it all off, a $5.5 million investment in big tech right before the shutdown in 2020.
	Needless to say, now people believe that either her and her husband are stock-picking oracles or they have inside knowledge into the stocks and companies that are about to see explosive growth.
	And that has led to the recent controversy.
	Their first large foray into the news occurred when her husband made a $5.3 million profit on alphabet call options right before the House voted on an antitrust regulation, which was not a threat to big tech.
	When asked for a comment, Nancy explains That at the time she had no knowledge of the purchases and that she owns no stock herself.
	It's just Paul.
	It's all Paul's genius.
	Come on, no one's fooled by it.
	That isn't stopping the retail trading community from taking on a new stock strategy, and that would be copying Nancy Pelosi.
	I mean, just take a look at the latest posts on Reddit.
	Nancy Pelosi, latest trades.
	Anyone at Nancy Pelosi's latest stock options?
	Nancy Pelosi buys Roblox $200 January 23 calls along with others.
	Here's the whole list.
	Looking to copy Nancy and Paul Pelosi's trades.
	What tools or websites should I use?
	It's really not.
	Okay, okay.
	It goes.
	It's a joke.
	Where?
	Which website?
	Specific websites can I find there, right?
	Before it's hot ones.
	Those disgusting, horrible websites.
	But where are these websites?
	Yeah.
	What's the URL?
	It's freedom of speech, free market.
	I need to know.
	Yeah, so there is a thing as well that they don't have to.
	Paul, as a private investor, doesn't have to announce what he's traded for a while, a few days, like 30 days or 45 days or something.
	But then, even if he does leave it beyond then, it's like a $200 fine.
	So in other words, nothing.
	He's like trading half a million here, a million there.
	So $200 to the post to Paul Pelosi is absolutely obviously nothing.
	So this is what's going on.
	And Josh Hawley and Trump even do want her to be investigated.
	I mean, Josh Hawley said she should be, and I think Trump said, she should be not just investigated, but prosecuted because she and Paul aren't investment oracles.
	Obviously, they're not.
	No.
	Okay.
	So, yeah, this is where she was asked very written, I think, like only a day or two ago.
	Oh, wow.
	It's recently been in the news.
	And this is what she did.
	She accused you of insider trading.
	What's your response to that?
	That's ridiculous.
	In fact, I very much support the stop the trading of members of Congress.
	Not that I think anybody's doing anything wrong.
	If they are, they are prosecuted and they go to jail.
	But because of the confidence it instills in the American people, don't worry about this.
	But I have no concern about the obvious investments that had been made over time.
	I'm not into it.
	My husband is.
	But it isn't anything to do with anything insider.
	But the president has his own exposure, so he's always projecting.
	He's always projecting.
	And let's not give him any more time on that, please.
	We're going forward here, and I'm very proud of my family.
	And while he might make fun of us while somebody inspired by him breaks into our home and hits my husband in a deadly fashion, hits my husband over the head, and he thinks that's a riot.
	I'd rather not go into some of my other complaints about him right now.
	Just a complete gish gash of nonsense coming from what a compromise.
	Of course not.
	But it's only Paul anyway.
	And Trump's a bad man.
	And he tried to kill my husband.
	And he's made a madman trying to kill my husband.
	What's going on?
	And there's just nothing to see here, and it's not an insider thing anyway.
	And it's just, come on.
	I was the first like 25 seconds.
	I was like, actually, what on earth is she actually saying?
	Yeah.
	I really couldn't track it.
	It got a little bit more coherent at the end where she started rambling about Drumf again.
	Well, she would have retreated back onto safe territory, didn't she?
	Which is just Trump bad.
	Trump bad.
	Orange Band Bad.
	Yeah, Orange Band Bad, terrible.
	So it's just obvious that Nancy Pelosi is about as corrupt, financially speaking, as it's possible to get.
	To turn a salary of $175 odd $1,000 a year into a fortune of well over 400 million.
	Stock genius.
	That's it.
	That's it.
	I'll just quickly go through the last rumble rants from your segment, Bo.
	It's got, Embose Britain, confiscation of goods will be reinstated as punishment for public corruption.
	Yeah, it would be, yeah.
	Dragon Lady Chris says, Nancy and Paul, the old bat and the old batter.
	Wesley 1924 says, if you think the Pelosi home invasion video is strange, you should listen to the 911 call.
	Well, I don't know that.
	No, I don't know about that either.
	The Pelosi 911?
	Oh, yeah.
	Sorry, I thought they were talking about 9-11.
	No, actual 9-1-1.
	Okay, yeah, that is also weird.
	No, it's actually normal.
	And it didn't even happen.
	Yeah.
	What have we been talking about this last half hour?
	I can't remember.
	That's random name says, the way she moves is akin to an undead ghoul who is only animated by greed and spite.
	There is something ghoulish about her.
	Yeah, there is.
	Oh, yeah, definitely.
	And then the engaged few says, remember, Martha Stewart got a three-year stay at Alderson Women's Prison for a $50,000 trade.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, yeah.
	So if you're not powerful enough, i.e., if you're not married to Nancy Pelosi, you do have to answer for your financial crime.
	Yeah, but apparently Paul doesn't.
	Then again, maybe been married to Nancy Pelosi is all the punishment one requires in life.
	And doing the maths on that, what's that?
	Yeah, multiple hundreds of years in prison for however much money they've earned.
	If you calculate the 350,000?
	Oh, yes.
	Yeah.
	Not long enough.
	A billion years and drowned.
	All right.
	Well, let's go to the video comments, Samson.
	Thank you.
	So recently I was in the production of the musical 1776, and in there there was a line from John Dickinson, one of the founding fathers, who said it best.
	Is that all England means to you, sir?
	Is that all the pride and affection you can muster for the nation that bore you?
	For the noblest, most civilized nation on this planet.
	Would you have us forsake Hastings and Magna Carta, Strongbow and Lionhearted, Drake and Marlborough, Tudors, Stewarts, and Plantagenets?
	For what, sir?
	For what?
	In this household, John Dickinson's a patriot.
	End of the story.
	Yeah, no, good quote.
	The Online Safety Act crackdown has been swift, so I give a warning.
	Even if they don't ban VPNs, many VPN companies are data harvesting you anyway.
	If the government wants to know if you're connecting to VPNs, they can legally threaten the VPN owners to divulge your information, which they will.
	There is only one VPN that you can pay for anonymously with cash or Monero, a cryptocurrency, which is called Mulvad.
	Be safe.
	Paul have never heard of Mulvad.
	It's funny.
	You can literally go, you can anonymously drop cash at their offices in Sweden like once a month to pay for the subscription.
	Really?
	Yeah, it's literally the most secure way of paying ever.
	It's kind of crazy.
	It's literally like dropping a bag of money off and it's like write the account number on.
	It's like, okay, yep, cool.
	You're good for another month.
	It is like an intelligent services dead drop.
	Yeah, literally.
	Remember, if you can just climb up your nearest mountain, enjoy the nature.
	Just put all the crazy societal insanity behind you.
	Just take a walk.
	Touch some grass, some bark, pick some mushrooms.
	I'm picking some Huckleberries.
	Very wholesome stuff, sir.
	Yeah, very wholesome stuff.
	I advise people to get off of Twitter, get off the internet entirely for a day or two here or there.
	Definitely, definitely great life advice.
	100% you've got to, really.
	I do it.
	I do it a fair bit, particularly doing this job.
	Yeah, saturated by the internet.
	But what if I miss out on a meme?
	Some content and the TL.
	The TL needs me 24-7.
	You quite quickly do realize that it will tick along without you just fine.
	And I'm going to miss it.
	Yeah.
	I'm sorry.
	Oh, sweet God.
	but this is His mate, don't look that impressed.
	I'm glad he got tickets, though.
	Yeah, I really like Thomas, and I know he loved Oasis.
	So I'm stoked for him that he got tickets.
	Yeah, I'm sure that was an absolute pilgrimage for him.
	And thanks for sending that in.
	I saw Oasis Live at Glestonbury 95.
	Oh, really?
	Showing my age.
	I wasn't very old, but...
	Yeah.
	No, I'm glad he got to go.
	Aye.
	Yeah.
	And here we are on a beautiful Sunday here in upstate New York.
	And we're cutting some flowers.
	This is done on the honour system.
	You can see our sunflower take right there.
	Ah, to live in a society where an honor system would work.
	I'm jealous of you, sir, that you get to live somewhere like that.
	It just wouldn't work in a lot of places.
	To have a high trust society.
	I wouldn't know anything about that.
	Anyway, we should probably call it there, Sam, given how many video comments.
	Okay, we'll just do a few comments then.
	Sophie Liv from my segment says, well, you see, I like anime, so I'm Japanese.
	Just ignore my blue eyes, red hair, and 500-year-old Danish ancestry.
	Well said, Sophie.
	And George Hap says, when the leftists are telling you that demographics are destiny, the boomer conservatives choose to ignore them and not fight on that front.
	Then they wonder why they are consistently losing and seeding ground.
	Ancestry matters.
	It's the soul of a nation, and the magic soil is not real.
	Very well said, George.
	From your segment, Jack, you've got AZ Desert Rat here.
	It says, what's scary and sad about these assaults and rapes is that these girls are not likely, sorry, are likely not the first victims.
	I wouldn't be surprised if the first victims were sisters and daughters of these refugees.
	Yeah.
	Well, and of course, they do house the single men away from houses of mixed sex, you know, with fathers and mothers and daughters.
	The single men, they get to have to stay far away.
	Why?
	Yeah.
	I wonder why.
	Yeah.
	Lord Inquisitor Hectorx says, oh, kids, they don't seem to be taking us seriously.
	So today we're singing a song called Erica.
	I'm sorry, I'm not sure what that song is.
	Sorry for my ignorance, Rex.
	And then from your segment, Bo, you've got Anna E. Moss, who says, if Martha Stewart had to go to jail for insider trading, then there's no reason Nancy can't go to jail for the same.
	Obviously, it's a bit like the Rumble Rant.
	Absolutely true.
	And Thanes Scotty of Swindon says, the guy who broke into the Pelosi household was a mentally ill homeless guy who had held every extreme political position known to man.
	Trump has had literally zero effect on him, and that's verifiable by the public record.
	Okay, yeah, because I think they try to paint him as a mega Trump person.
	But according to this, he's actually a radical centrist.
	It all evens out, you see.
	And George Hap, I see your comment about my article in Island of Thor, so I thank you for that.
	Well, Jack, thank you ever so much for coming in and talking to us today about your research.
	I encourage everyone to go and follow him on X and keep up with his journalism and keep doing what you're doing.
	Well, yeah, thank you so much for having me on.
	It's been great fun.
	Wonderful.
	Right.
	Well, that really is all we've got time for today, ladies and gentlemen.
	Thank you for tuning in, and you can see us at 1pm tomorrow.

▲