Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 9, 2023 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:32:18

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #606

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 9th of March 2023.
	I'm I'm joined by Dominic Frisby.
	Hello sir.
	Good to actually do a show with you for once.
	Yes, we've exchanged a lot of messages but this is the first time on camera.
	So today we're going to be talking about the fact that video evidence is very dangerous.
	Lying eyes at it again.
	Demographics, which I'm sure is going to be totally wholesome.
	And also the most intelligent leftists on earth.
	Which is who?
	I'm interested to know.
	Gary Lineker is the pinnacle of intelligence.
	At least that's what we've found out in the last few days.
	Just to start off, to mention something on the website, so if you'd like to know what's coming up, there's a premium live hangout going live today at 3.30 between Carl and Beau, talking about how do we save England.
	So if you'd like to come check that out, that'll be after the show that we're finished.
	I'm interested to know.
	I don't think there is a way to be honest, but it'll be interesting to see.
	Otherwise, let's begin.
	So video evidence is incredibly dangerous.
	It is the biggest threat to our democracy.
	At least I've been told, checking out CNN this morning.
	Because, well, did you notice that Tucker Carlson was trending a lot because he got some tapes from January 6th that weren't released yet, and was like, hang on a minute, this isn't what it was sold to us as?
	And he's got the video evidence to prove it.
	So he did a segment about it, showing people this, and it's really picked a lot of people up to be very angry, because how dare he burst my narrative.
	And he's doing a good job on it.
	In case you want to see something more on that, on lowesys.com we do actually have the Capitol Building takeover timeline, in which you can go and see if you scroll down, just Josh and Hugo back in the day when it happened, were like, okay, there's a lot of people saying this has happened, that's happened.
	Yeah, but when?
	What?
	And where?
	So there's just a complete timeline.
	I think they've had to adjust this very minimally since they first published it as well, just to add a couple of things, but... So the timeline is accurate.
	Yeah, you can go and see the reality in terms of, like, his actual stuff, instead of just fear-mongering endlessly.
	But we'll go to the January 6th committee.
	Because, okay, whatever.
	Well, United States wants to have some committee looking over that event.
	Who cares?
	Except that then you look at the people on the panel, and I'm sure everyone knows, but in case you don't, if you scroll down on this you'll see that it's all Democrats and then two Republicans.
	Look at that bipartisanship.
	Except, of course, the two Republicans aren't exactly Trump supporters, to say the least.
	OK.
	I mean, one of them is Liz Cheney, an anti-Trump neocon.
	OK.
	And then the other guy is, I forget his name, Adam Kinzinger, who now works for CNN, by the looks of it.
	Seems to be what he does with his life.
	So, yeah, again, I'm sure very pro-Trump, not just... No, it's just all Democrats and some White-O's.
	So how many Democrats are on the panel?
	I think six, something like that.
	So it's six to two, okay.
	And then the two were anti-Trump.
	So, only fair and balanced results would come out of that, no.
	Their result was that Trump was bad.
	I couldn't believe that they came to that conclusion.
	It's a shock from these people.
	But, well, then the video evidence kind of burst their bubble, at least in Tucker Carlson's case.
	Because you go to the next link, Tucker Carlson got these tapes and did a whole segment talking about what was true and what wasn't from their findings.
	And this is probably the biggest one for me and the reason I'm... We're not going to go over everything he said because it would take too long and I'd kind of be beating his words, which seems a bit pointless.
	So this is the officer who was allegedly dead upon the mob arriving on the capital, except of course there's video footage of him not being dead in the capital after the storming.
	After the storming?
	Yeah.
	Let's play this clip.
	Here is surveillance footage of Sicknick walking in the Capitol after he was supposedly murdered by the mob outside.
	That's weird.
	By all appearances, Sicknick is healthy and vigorous.
	He's wearing a helmet, so it's hard to imagine he was killed by a head injury.
	Yeah, or the fire extinguisher.
	Whatever happened to Brian Sicknick was very obviously not the result of violence he suffered at the entrance to the Capitol.
	The January 6th Committee knew perfectly well that Brian Sicknick was walking normally through the Capitol After he was supposedly murdered by Trump supporters.
	And they know that because they saw this tape.
	We can be sure because the footage contains an electronic bookmark that is still archived in the Capitol's computer system.
	They refused to release the tape to the public.
	Why?
	Because this tape would shatter the fraud they were perpetrating on the country.
	Because hiding the truth served their political interest.
	They lied about the police officer they claimed to revere.
	If they were willing to do that, then their dishonesty knew no limits.
	Lied and used him as a prod.
	True.
	Gosh.
	So when did he actually die?
	He died after.
	And how?
	I believe, um, he had, I think it was either a heart attack or he committed suicide.
	I can't remember off the top of my head.
	When you say after, like the same day or?
	I think after the incident, like after, not the same day, but the.
	And this was the main argument against the, the January the 6th incident.
	The main criticism was that a Trump supporter had killed a policeman.
	It was a key pillar of the narrative.
	The narrative being that this was a violent insurrection, which could be described as bloody, you know, people died, an officer was killed by this mob of people.
	It was like, okay, you can say that they broke windows.
	So all the video footage I saw online of that was just guys being ushered in and then sort of gently strolling around looking at stuff.
	And then one guy had a flag and another guy was dressed as, whatever he was dressed as, a wolf.
	I've seen like videos for example of people looting Nike stores or whatever and when there's a genuine... They don't wander around taking pictures do they?
	No exactly and it's you know one is a sort of mellow oh look what's happened and look where we are and so Why I'm not suggesting the whole thing is a conspiracy to usher them in and say, look, they caused a riot.
	They weren't rioting.
	They were just sort of... The whole thing just seemed chaotic, but gently so.
	Not violent.
	That's the funny thing, because of course there is the footage of people breaking glass and attacking police officers.
	That's real.
	You can see that.
	Oh, I didn't see that.
	At the start, like when they're going in.
	The thing is, those individuals, those ones haven't really been charged with anything.
	We'll get back to why.
	But, we have this being the main pillar of the argument from the committee, which is this disgusting murder of a police officer.
	You may remember the New York Times were the ones who first published this article about it, saying he dreamed of being a police officer and then he was killed by a pro-Trump mob, going after how this officer was murdered at the entrance by a man with a fire extinguisher who hit him in the head.
	None of that's true.
	I just think that's awful.
	But the thing is, okay, New York Times gets the story wrong.
	Really wrong.
	Like, demonstrably badly wrong.
	But people wonder why there's no trust in a. the establishment and b. the media.
	Yeah.
	And then here's a perfect example of why.
	But then the January 6th committee just carried on with the rhetoric of the bloody insurrection in which they murdered a police officer and it's like, but they didn't.
	That's not what happens.
	And you have the tape.
	That's the main point I find interesting from Tucker's revelation, is that you had the footage, you knew.
	But did they know that, had they seen that footage?
	Did they know it was that police officer?
	They should have, because as he mentions, it has an electronic tag saying what it is.
	In which case, I assume it had a tag saying, you know, officer should nick, or whatever, walking around here.
	Gosh.
	So there's that.
	They do have an update on this article though, that one there, if you go back, in which they say: "Update!
	New information has emerged regarding the death of a Capitol Police officer, Brian Sidnick, that questions the initial cause of death provided by officials close to the Capitol Police." Oh, they'll tell us what really happened.
	How did he die?
	Well, if you click the link, it takes you to another New York Times article.
	The Capitol Police said in a statement that Officer Signik died from injuries sustained whilst physically engaging with protesters.
	Two officers involved in response have said that they've died by suicide, the police have told us.
	I was like, that doesn't help me at all.
	So two of the officers committed suicide, right?
	That doesn't really explain anything.
	And then this guy, he's not dead from the mob, instead he died of his injuries by engaging with the mob.
	Yeah, but there's more of this, because if you go to the next one, there's just way more things that don't make sense.
	Like this is the Columbia Google over here mentioning that of the accounts, Signet was someone who was slain on January 6th in the video we reviewed.
	Proves that's just a lie.
	And then they show the footage in this one here.
	But the New York Times kept saying it was a deadly insurrection, that he was killed with a fire extinguisher, and it just isn't true.
	And Okay, like we've got them caught in one lie, well then there's a lot more, and it's not small either, because if you go to the next one here, there's people who were given prison sentences.
	You see, look, they're just gently strolling around, they're not rioting.
	Well, this guy in particular, the Q Shaman, that's him without the regalia, where he looks a bit, well, not normal, but close.
	He just looks like a dude.
	He's a funny guy, but he's been given a prison sentence that's quite long, I mean longer than violent criminals would get.
	And we don't really know what he did.
	Like, there's not any conclusive evidence as to how he got in the building.
	But we know what he did when he was in the building, which is... Well, there's the footage.
	He's wandering around, being escorted by police officers.
	At some points they start opening doors for him.
	So, I mean, they're giving him a guided tour, essentially.
	You can see them there, trying a door.
	Doesn't work.
	So they're like, okay, we'll go find another entrance.
	Surely he can appeal.
	But that's the point of these people who have been arrested.
	I mean, we look there, how many cops are there?
	Well, that poor guy's just lost his life to being framed.
	There's 11 police officers.
	None of them stop him.
	Carry on, sir, have a good day.
	Two more continue to follow him.
	He's just like, oh, don't worry, we'll find an entrance to the Capitol soon.
	Well, let's try this door.
	Yeah, yeah, go on in.
	Holds the door for him.
	He literally opened the door for him.
	Yeah.
	And then they go in and Q Shaman over there gives a prayer for the police officers who have allowed us into the building.
	But yeah, no, trust me, he broke in.
	And none of this was around before?
	That's the thing, like this footage inside, that last bit there where he's giving a prayer, that was publicly available, but the other clips were not until Tucker Carlson got this footage.
	So who gave it to him?
	The Republican leader of the house.
	But that's not the January 6th committee whose job it is to make this public.
	Why didn't they make it public?
	Because it bursts their narrative.
	So why did the Republican leader of the house give it to him?
	Because he wanted the, or he or she wanted the story out.
	Yeah, apparently there's allegations it was part of the deal to make him leader of the house.
	You remember there was some hoo-ha about would he actually get to become leader of the house, and then it ended up happening.
	But either way, that doesn't really matter.
	What matters is the truth.
	And, well, we can find the truth by looking at the video evidence.
	It's a pretty solid way of finding that.
	But either way, his life's ruined.
	A bunch of other January 6th people are in there.
	Their lives are ruined.
	And the reasons as to why are still not really known.
	Great.
	But what a wonderful system.
	Fantastic.
	Because if we go to the next one here, there's also the agent provocateur question.
	You can see Joe Rogan here just talking about it.
	The fact that there were FBI informants en masse there.
	And then the question is, FBI agents?
	How many of them?
	Specifically?
	Yeah, I mean, what about the witness reports of all those policemen that were holding open the door?
	Not relevant?
	I don't know.
	I don't know what the argument is.
	Like, there literally is nothing here.
	Because, I mean, this example here, where he mentions Ray Epps, this is a guy who was, you may have seen on video, saying the day before, we need to storm the capital.
	Keep shouting at people that tomorrow we're going to storm the capital.
	And everyone starts chanting at him, Fed, Fed, Fed.
	Because they're just like, no, you're an FBI agent.
	We're not doing what you say.
	And then on the day itself, well, I mean, there's some footage.
	If we go to the next one here, we can see some footage here.
	This guy, clad in black, he's destroying the window there.
	When he realizes he's being filmed, he stops and then starts getting in spats with the protesters.
	You may also notice he's got an earpiece and a big-ass radio.
	The radio on his chest, the earpiece up by his right ear.
	Some guy here is telling him not to do it, so he starts pushing the guy who's telling him to stop.
	Yeah, he was the aggressor there.
	Yeah, we don't know who that is.
	He's on camera.
	We know what he did.
	We can see he's part of the people actually trying to break in.
	He's not been charged with anything, so we don't know who he is.
	He is the aggressor and the other guy is not the aggressor.
	Yeah, the other guy, if you listen to the audio, is just telling them to stop.
	Because he doesn't want them breaking into the capital.
	The guy with the patriot flag there.
	The guy in black block, however, is.
	We don't know if he's an FBI agent.
	We don't know if he's an FBI informant.
	The FBI were asked about that specific individual and refused to answer.
	I just find this incredible.
	It's just, it's so funny.
	I mean, Tucker's show covers so much more, but as I mentioned... I think one of the reasons that he's so hated by his ideological enemies is that he doesn't sort of rant and rave.
	He's quite measured, he's quite charming, he's almost quite understated, he just sort of presents the facts and argues them in a pleasant Way, I mean he's quite, you know, he's got a nice voice, he's pleasant to look at and so on, and I think... Polite guy.
	Yeah!
	Polite is precisely the word, and I'm sure that's why, and because that's more powerful than somebody, you know, shaking their fist and so on.
	That's why so many people trust him, and as a result why he's loathed by his enemies.
	That's the real problem.
	Is that, no, no, you've got to trust us.
	Wait, but he's speaking sense.
	No, no, but you've got to trust us.
	But you're lying.
	But yeah, and we can see what the response was to that, because of course he did this piece and it blew up the left-wing spheres in America of like, oh boy, my narrative.
	Because we'll go to CNN, so the Rhino member of the committee.
	When you have these huge ideological arguments, you've got the guys on one side who are saying black, and then you've got the guys on the other side who are saying white.
	And you've got this huge choir, what we in Britain would call the silent majority, in the middle, who are listening.
	They're watching all the mud being slinged, they're listening to all the arguments and you know this is why it's so important to win the argument in a dignified manner because that's how you will win that undecided majority in the middle and I just think more when stuff like this comes out and the lies perpetrated by the establishment are exposed and goodness me there's no shortage of them, I don't know why they bother.
	Because, you know, oh what a tangled web we weave when at first we do deceive.
	Why would you go down that route in the first place?
	But yeah, so I'm sure that's the way to win over the silent majority, and the silent majority are getting more and more noisy.
	And it's also more and more visible.
	Yeah.
	The one side here is just caught in a lie.
	And we have here, this is on CNN, where some guys on, the guy on the right is the Reiner member of the committee over there, who is telling us Trump is definitely evil and bad because, um, trust me, we've watched all the footage.
	Can you, can you see it?
	No.
	No reason.
	Don't have a look.
	That's for us, not you.
	So he's on there, and his co-hosts are just talking about how this is ridiculous.
	Full-time liar Adam Schiff claims that the person telling the truth about January 6th, Tucker Carlson, is actually the liar.
	He then tries to turn it into a Nazi-like reference to gaslight anyone with low enough IQ to take him seriously.
	This is him talking about how this is Goebbels, is the wording he uses.
	So this is Tucker Carlson, basically Goebbels.
	Right?
	Sure.
	You know what Goebbels used to do?
	He'd find hidden video footage that the Nazi party didn't want published, and then would show the public.
	Yeah, he was known for that.
	It's not the stupidest one.
	That's a new reductio ad Hitlerum, isn't it?
	Reductio ad Goebbelsium, or whatever it would be.
	Whoopi Goldberg managed to get the stupidest one, where she said that this was 1984?
	To show people hidden footage?
	That is bizarre.
	That is amazing.
	I'm just going to play a small clip after she goes after that, just of the insufferable nature of the view.
	Because, I don't know, I think people should suffer as I did watching this crap, if nothing else.
	So, let's enjoy this.
	I'll prepare to suffer.
	You know, I don't know what he's playing at, but people saw what they saw.
	They saw what they saw.
	And they've seen what's gone down with it.
	And no matter what, you can't put this monkey back in the cage.
	You can't.
	This is, this was insurrection.
	It just was what it was.
	So people are very upset.
	He's basically saying, I don't believe what I say.
	My boss, Rupin Murdoch, he doesn't believe what I say, but I want you to believe what I say.
	That's what he's saying to his audience.
	Yeah.
	Which shows contempt for them, I think.
	It's like you say, what am I, stupid?
	I think he thinks that his audience is stupid.
	He does think that, and it's entertainment.
	A federal judge already found.
	By law, that he is not a journalist, that he is an entertainer, and that anyone that's watching should know that this is just pure conjecture and entertainment.
	Four people died.
	How dare you?
	How dare you, Tucker Carlson?
	It is beneath the dignity of any American to dismiss their experience.
	Most phony people on earth.
	Yeah, what does the V in the V view stand for?
	The party, I presume?
	Oh, okay.
	I love how they're making references to 984 as well.
	You literally have the party flag for 984 as your logo, but whatever.
	Just a side point, she mentions the four people who died.
	Tucker actually goes into that.
	All four people who died on January 6th were Trump voters.
	Right.
	And how did they die?
	Various ways.
	I mean, Ashley Babbitt's the most famous one, where she tried to get into the Capitol, and so someone shot her.
	Well, a member of the Secret Service shot her.
	She wasn't armed.
	She didn't present any deadly threat, but okay.
	The other people I can't remember off the top of my head, but he goes through each individual one, and he's like, their political affiliations obviously shouldn't matter, but they do, because every single one of those individuals the Democrats are using as a pawn.
	He's like, look.
	Look at this dead person.
	This is a martyr for our cause.
	I was like, none of them were.
	None of them agreed with you.
	So it doesn't even make any sense.
	CNN though, they- There is a dark underbelly to politics.
	Yeah.
	Isn't there?
	There is a, like, who really runs things?
	And it's just gradually the lids being lifted.
	It's nice to see it in real time though, but again, it's the fact of him showing video evidence makes him the dishonest one.
	Whistleblowers aren't usually the people who are being dishonest to us.
	Usually it's the people they're whistleblowing on.
	Yeah, I mean, this raises the whole Assange-Edward Snowden... Yeah, they're the real enemies of freedom.
	They might be the enemies of the state, but I think those two guys are heroes.
	And they're not perfect human beings, particularly not Assange.
	He's a weirdy... He's gone mental now, hasn't he?
	Who wouldn't, having gone through what he's gone through?
	But, you know, and he was probably slightly autistic and spent too much time in front of his computer in his younger days, but in many ways he's a brave and heroic individual.
	Yeah, and CNN decided to go with their version of events, which is video footage is a huge threat to our republic.
	Do you remember that meme?
	You can't un-invent the phone.
	You know, I often use this argument.
	If we'd had mobile phones in World War I, and so the soldiers had all been able to video what went on in the trenches, that war would have ended very quickly, because the population would have just stood up and gone, this cannot be allowed to go on.
	And so, you know, the democratisation of media is a force for the empowerment of the individual against the tyranny of the state.
	And therefore is a threat to the state.
	Absolutely.
	And they're absolutely right.
	Yes, this is a threat to your republic, as if like, you and your friends who run the place.
	There's the comedy shows as well, the late night funny ha-ha men who aren't funny, aren't even on late at night.
	I mean, none of that makes any sense anymore.
	But the Daily Show here decided to do a piece about it.
	Tim Paul responded, saying, how do you convince people who refuse to actually watch the videos they're being lied to?
	Uh, thing is, this host, he does actually play the video at the end of his clip, where he's like, oh yeah, Tucker Carlson is Goebbels.
	But the- What's the name of that comic?
	I don't even know.
	I can't name anyone on the Daily Show anymore.
	Okay, well, I never watch it, so I don't know, but... But isn't that weird?
	Isn't John Oliver on the Daily Show?
	That was the one that Jon Stewart... Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Okay, I've got it.
	I know.
	John Oliver's left, hasn't he?
	I thought... Yeah, yeah, no, he's got his own thing.
	Yeah.
	I don't even think Trevor Noah's there anymore.
	I think he's retired.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's... I was getting muddled.
	Yeah.
	What a joke.
	Anyway, but at the end of it, he actually does show some footage, and what he shows is some of the... The guy picking something up that's fallen over and putting it back?
	Yeah, the rioters over there cleaning up after themselves is the bit he shows right at the end where he's just then using to make fun of them.
	He says it's ridiculous that they're cleaning up after themselves.
	They're all just drifting in.
	That's not a riot.
	Yeah, but it's just the point of he wants desperately to make fun of it, but the footage he's got doesn't work for the material.
	He's going that you're not sightseeing, but they are sightseeing.
	You're literally showing footage of them walking around with their phones out going, ooh, ooh, they've been here before.
	But the last bit he shows, as I say, is him laughing at them for cleaning up after themselves, which is a typical thing of writers.
	Do you remember when the Japanese fans all cleared up their mess during the World Cup and they were internationally acclaimed for doing that?
	That was a riot.
	The Qataris were upset.
	Japanese hooligans clear up mess.
	Yeah, well we'll end it off with what does he think, well, a peaceful protest is.
	Well, we'll go to, remember what they used to call peaceful protests on the left there.
	I still can't get over how that image is real.
	Yeah, that's glorious.
	Like literal fire in the background.
	He's like, don't worry, everything is fine.
	But Vox decided to do some articles about this as well, which I thought were funny.
	This is the desperate pandering of Tucker Carlson.
	In here, they talk about how Tucker Carlson's text messages have been leaked as far as a lawsuit he's involved in, which show that privately he hates Trump.
	And they argue, well, yet, he still publicly tries to say that Trump is not as bad as the media say he is.
	There's not an attack on his character.
	It's like, the man personally hates Trump, but is still able to say, look, he's not as bad as they're saying.
	They're lying to you.
	That makes him look more reputable, in my view.
	Not less.
	I would agree.
	And, you know, he's defending the position of somebody he doesn't like.
	That takes a certain amount of character to do that, I would say.
	And that assumes that those texts saying that he doesn't like him are true.
	Yeah, but if we scroll down we can read the text.
	They're right at the top and they're not short either.
	It's just like, I hate him passionately.
	Yeah, okay.
	Okay.
	I mean, if you hate him passionately, well, assuming Vox is displaying this in the correct context, they're probably not.
	But I've texted somebody I hate so-and-so and I might hate them in that moment for something they said.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And other times I've gone, I love that guy and actually And I hear other things he said and I'm like, actually, I don't like him as much.
	But the point being that it's not a dunk to be like, hey, he even defends people he doesn't like.
	It's like, no, that's good.
	The Senate Republicans have also outed themselves, as Vox noted.
	Mitch McConnell being like, this is disgusting that Tucker Carlson's doing this.
	Why?
	You can't say why.
	Because again, the whistleblowers are the bad ones.
	Why?
	The thing is, the more they slag him off, the more people are going to want to see what he's on about.
	Yeah.
	And we'll just start this off with a meme that I saw going around.
	Someone did a voiceover for the whole thing, which was jolly good fun.
	So let's play.
	Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the U.S.
	Capitol Building.
	If you've joined us today for the insurrection, please make sure you pick up a promotional leaflet on the way in.
	Stay inside the safety cordons at all times.
	And if you get lost, speak to one of our Capitol Police officers.
	they'll be sure to point you in the right direction.
	And be sure to set aside a little time today to join us for some insurrection activities, including our photography tour, our fancy dress competition, and have a go on our climbing wall.
	But don't forget those safety ropes.
	Wherever possible, please try to clean up after yourselves.
	Don't forget to visit the souvenir shop on the way out and feel free to join us on the outdoor terrace for Nancy Pelosi's Insurrection Soiree.
	Grab yourself a light refreshment and enjoy the music of our very own Fancy Dress Competition winner.
	Yeah, not the next 9-11.
	Nothing after all is said and done about this.
	I wonder who did that voiceover.
	I'm trying to play some of his English, whoever's done it.
	You can go find him in the notes for the show.
	Otherwise, that's that.
	I think January 6th won't be remembered as 9-11-2 Boogaloo.
	I think it'll probably be remembered as some prats.
	Yeah.
	Let's go to the demographics.
	Right so we'll come to my little bit then and so I write a substack that is you know it's like the 21st most read financial substack or something and you know it's quite a popular substack but as soon as I do anything about demographics, immigration, any of those subjects The numbers go up by about 10 times.
	I get 10 times the numbers of readers and I find that just that little fact in itself very interesting.
	It shows that the subject of immigration demographics is something that people are interested in, that they want to talk about, that they want to learn more about and yet I think the subject of immigration has been hushed up for decades and One of the ways that people hush it up is by not talking about it.
	The other way that it gets hushed up is by, as soon as you bring it out, you just go, racist!
	Or it's all positive, therefore we don't need to discuss it.
	Well, that too, and isn't multicultural and glorious?
	We, you know, we have, look at the number of restaurants we have or whatever it is.
	But so it's clearly a subject that I think has reached breaking point and so I just find that fact in itself that when I talk about immigration the numbers of readers just go up dramatically.
	So I I'm not entirely... I don't think censuses are entirely accurate because a lot of people don't reply, a lot of people put stupid things on, and I think a lot of people, particularly immigrants, don't... they think they're going to get done for taxes or if they put the thing they'll get caught or whatever.
	So, you know, people who are here illegally.
	So I don't think the numbers are entirely accurate.
	But I do think if you look at how many the demographics of primary schools, you will get a much more accurate representation of not only the reality, because everyone sends their kids to school apart from the few enlightened people who home educate.
	And not only that, you get a great predictor, like the demographics of primary schools will be the demographics of the country in half a generation or a generation.
	So, I spent a lot of time last year, and this proved to be one of the most read pieces on my sub-stack, simply looking at the demographics of primary schools to see how they've changed.
	Because, and, from that you can deduce what the population, the UK population, is going to look like in, say, 2035.
	Okay?
	So, I'll just give you some stats now.
	Currently, white British make up 65% of primary school kids in the UK.
	Now, what the Department of Education calls minority ethnic makes up about 34% and there's 1% that's unclassified.
	And so minority ethnic means Asian, which is 12%, white non-British 8%, black 6% and mixed 6%.
	So bear in mind that this is the whole of the UK so you're talking it includes remote rural areas where white British is likely to be 99% yeah let's say 95% or whatever but it's likely to be very high where I I'm in the London Borough of Lewisham South East London You know, I, my kids went to the schools there, but also I just, you know, when I'm walking the dog, you see all the school kids playing, whatever.
	And I guess that white British is below 20% in most classrooms.
	And I would say in some classrooms, it's zero.
	I can actually attest to that.
	There was a friend of mine who lives in Chelsea.
	He had new kids and grew up and then he's going to go to school.
	Okay.
	So they went to visit local schools, see which one's good.
	They went into this one classroom, they opened up to see his age group.
	And there was one white kid in the entire class of four.
	In Chelsea?
	Yeah.
	Wow.
	And so they're like, huh, that's new.
	And without prompt, no one said anything.
	But the white kid might not be... Without prompt, the teacher went, that's Lucas, he's Lithuanian.
	Just had to mention, like, no one had to say anything and they were just like, okay.
	Okay, so currently this, and these are 2021 numbers, currently we're at 6534.
	In 2006, so only 15 years ago, it was 8020.
	We're at 65, 34.
	In 2006, so only 15 years ago, it was 80, 20.
	In 2002, so only four years before that, it was 85, 15.
	So there's just been this enormous, it's 70% in 15 years or 125% in 19 years, the increase.
	And that's an incredible demographic change.
	And as I say, what is primary schools will be the country in 20 years, 25 years, whatever it is.
	Now, if we were to follow that same trajectory, We would be at 60% well we'd be at roughly 38 call it 40% white British by 2035 if we keep on the same trajectory.
	Now there's the chance that it slows off and levels off there's also the chance that it accelerates.
	In other words we would be at white British minority of just 40% in primary schools by the age of 2035 and I think that is quite an incredible statistic.
	And it's where we're going.
	And, as I say, what is the case in primary schools will be the case in the country.
	I mean, you know, and these are only 2021 numbers.
	They already will have changed.
	But, you know, all these numbers are lagging.
	So this is another piece that I wrote called The Great Decline.
	And I wonder where all this is going and I think about it a great deal and, you know, just so that you know, I'm very libertarian in my politics and I wrote the Libertarian National Anthem to the music of the hymn of the Bolshevik Party, now known as the Russian National Anthem, because it's a great anthem and it was out of copyright.
	But anyway... That's the real reason.
	Well, no, because I thought it was funny having it to a recognisable piece of music and it's just funny having the Libertarian National Anthem to the hymn of the Bolshevik Party and it's also a great piece of music.
	So, but one of the lines in the thing that I call for is free movement, free minds, free markets and free choice.
	And I'm a great believer in the free movement of people.
	But you cannot have a benevolent and expansive welfare state and free movement.
	You either have to have one or the other.
	And I always argue for small government, local government, because The problem with the country at the moment is we have an unaccountable centralised government and if we're anything like as mendacious as the US government is, and I suspect we're actually worse, then centralised government is not dealing with the immigration issue in a way that local government would if local people were empowered to do what they wanted.
	Anyway, that's a rather roundabout argument, and I saw you wince as I spoke.
	No, I'm just thinking I'm not for free movement of people, even with a low state.
	Well, there is less... In fact, I've got more incentive not to let them in, because I want to preserve our low state utopia over here.
	Well, yes.
	Okay.
	Fair enough.
	It's a whole other argument.
	But I was sort of basically pre-empting what I'm about to say by saying I'm sort of for free movement.
	But the point is, if there's no state, there's a lot less incentive for free movement because you don't get the NHS, the education, this, and all the other forms of protection that you get.
	And if you're in a totally free market, like supermarkets were probably in favour of free movement because it's more people to sell products to and a greater pool of people to employ from.
	So you've got that.
	The problem with mass immigration, there's the cultural problems, the loss of the British identity, which is one major issue, but the other problem is that the state in its current form cannot adapt to the current influx of new people.
	You know, the roads can't cope, transport can't cope, education systems can't cope, the NHS can't cope, the penal system can't cope, the courts can't cope, the prisons can't cope.
	These are all state bodies and they just And that's why everything's falling apart, because you just can't cope with a sudden change in dynamics, because state bodies inherently are more inefficient and they move more slowly and they adapt less quickly than free markets do.
	Anyway, this is all sidetracking.
	I think, at great length, where is this all going?
	And we mentioned 1984 earlier and some people go we're going into a 1984 fascist state and other people go no we're going into brave new world and other people look to the sovereign individual and say we're going into a world where there's some people trapped in their own physical economies and there's going to be all these sovereign individual rich digital nomads who just sort of go from country to country and there are other people that
	Um, make the argument that we're going into, um, you know, we're experiencing the great reset and, and what, what we're seeing is, you know, all planned by the WEF.
	And there are other people who say we're going into a hyperinflationary scenario.
	There are all these predictions about where we're going in the future.
	And I kind of think we're probably seeing a bit of all of those things.
	One of my friends, you know, Bitcoin billionaire who's long since disappeared somewhere in the south of New Zealand.
	He argues that we're going into a world where everyone's just going to be sat in a sort of button or a club med type holiday camp with VR headsets on while robots do all the work.
	That's what he envisions.
	And he's been more right about everything than anyone else I know.
	So maybe he's right.
	But where I'm arguing that I think this is all going.
	And it was came up as a result.
	I had with a friend in the pub the other day, and he called it the South Africanization of everything.
	And you look at, you know, where South Africa was in the 90s and all the optimism about, you know, the new Republic, the Equal Republic, Rainbow Republic, and all that stuff.
	And then you look at where South Africa actually is now.
	And, you know, these ghettos are everywhere you go in South Africa, private security vehicles, because the police can't deal with it.
	Pretty much every state body in South Africa is corrupt.
	You know, everyone, you see all the crime in South Africa, all the violence, and
	I think we in Western Europe and to a certain extent the US are going in a similar direction and because of this constant argument about racism and just slurring racism there's a lot of people you know someone you know say of Afro-Caribbean heritage might have some historical grievance with slavery but if you're coming from Africa
	There isn't the same, you know, you weren't stolen into slavery, your ancestors weren't... Your ancestors were probably the slavers.
	Well, they might have been, but we have created this grievance.
	So we've imported a great deal of people, or a lot of people have come over, and now we've created this grievance that the white Englishmen, you know, they obviously came in because there was something about Britain that attracted them, Or their parents.
	But now, you know, I just watch what goes on in the comedy circuit with the young acts coming through.
	Everyone's moaning about racism all the time and we've created, we've sort of brought a lot of people to come over who, you know, maybe were optimistic about coming here and now they've got a grievance.
	We've created a grievance.
	It's a great fiction to excuse corruption.
	Like, all of this, I will obsess about how white people are the devil or white men or blah blah blah blah blah, you know, intersectionality being the most famous religion of our society.
	But when I look at South Africa and I look at the same here, like in South Africa the narrative was obviously apartheid blah blah blah therefore we need to do this.
	I mean you get what is the the EF still arguing that they need to steal land from white farmers in South Africa.
	It's like, why?
	You think any of this has worked?
	But no, it's just a great excuse for the corruption there.
	I think probably, yeah, there are a lot of people who believe it, don't get me wrong.
	I think probably more than half of them believe it's religious.
	But when it comes to why they're doing it... But do you buy that, like, for example, if you just take private security vehicles, You look at old pictures, you know, every now and then on Twitter, somebody will post a video of a car driving around London in the 1960s or something, and everyone's walking peacefully around, rather like they were… Someone washed off their watch in public.
	Yeah.
	There's no moped who's come and stolen it.
	They're all walking around, rather like the people in the Capitol building, you know, peacefully around.
	And then you kind of go, what happened?
	And then you kind of go, what happened?
	And that's the question, what happened?
	But now you're already starting to see private security vehicles driving around bits of London, the more expensive bits of London at night.
	In other words, and that's basically saying the police aren't doing their job, we need private security.
	And in South Africa, they're everywhere.
	And I worked in South Africa during the World Cup, and you just weren't allowed to go anywhere without a guy standing next to you with a gun.
	And I remember on the last day I was there, we had all these clothes that we'd been given, and Johannesburg gets pretty cold at night.
	And we were in Hillbrow.
	We'd been put in this hotel in Hillbrow which is like the worst area of Johannesburg apparently because the hotel we were supposed to be staying in hadn't been built.
	But anyway we were in this sort of guarded thing and I just went out with the security guard in the car and I said look I've got this bag of clothes I'm just gonna let's find some homeless people in Hillbrow and we'll give them
	to the homeless people and he said fine and he came with me and I said look there's a bunch of guys asleep there in this in the street go and give them these clothes and he was like no no no I'm staying in the car you go so and and he had a gun and I remember him like you go I will watch was his line so I got out the car and I started to pull some of these clothes out of the bag and it was like It just, so many people just jumped on me all at once.
	It was terrifying.
	And when I say jumped on me, just pulling everything, you know, like one of those scenes in James Bond where it's in Delhi or somewhere and they all jump on it.
	It was like that.
	No one queued up, did they?
	No, no, no.
	And they literally just saw, and it was the colour of my skin, they just saw a white man in a place where you You know the white man doesn't go.
	So the only way I could deal with the sudden everyone grabbing all my stuff was to take the bag and throw it in the air so that it all the clothes spiraled everywhere and everyone went for the clothes and that just gave me three seconds or whatever it was to jump back in the car.
	But it was it was a like an experience and and there was sort of the clothes that people were wearing it was it was poverty like I've never seen before.
	You know, Dickensian levels of, you know, Victorian London levels of poverty.
	And it was an extraordinary experience.
	But do you buy that?
	Do you get that narrative?
	We are going into the South Africanisation of everything?
	Oh yeah, 100%.
	I mean, there's a big difference there as well.
	People claim, oh, it's just the poverty that makes South Africa what it is in that regard.
	No, that's not true.
	Um, take Lord Miles for example.
	Are you familiar with him?
	No.
	He goes around traveling to dangerous places.
	He's, uh, been to Afghanistan and give money to the homeless there.
	Perfectly easy.
	Yeah, you give them there.
	No one swarms you.
	Maybe there's someone else who's extremely poor.
	You know, you feed some stray dogs or something.
	No one bothers you.
	There's nothing like that.
	He went to Kenya, started trying to give money to homeless people.
	Exactly the same as your situation.
	Pretty soon you just have to throw a wad of cash and run.
	Yeah.
	Because it's just civilizational collapse on every front.
	Maybe, but it, it's, you know, We need to have an open and honest conversation and we are incapable of doing that at the moment without, we're getting closer, but we're, you know, what is the right level of immigration per year?
	Is it a hundred thousand people?
	Is it half a million?
	What is the right level?
	We need to agree, but I mean, you know, 1.1 million people came to the country last year, half a million left, But 1.1 million people came to the country last year.
	That effectively means one in every 65 people you meet only came to the country last year.
	I mean it's just, it's an extraordinary number.
	And I'm not saying don't come, I'm not saying do come, but we need to at least have a conversation about it.
	When do we say no?
	Yeah, I mean, we heard this net zero immigration.
	Yeah, completely right though, because I mean, after 500,000, you know, thank you very much, but we're not accepting applications anymore.
	That's perfectly reasonable.
	There's no one who could say, how could you do such a thing?
	No, there's got to be a point at some point where you say, thank you very much.
	I don't need any more applications.
	We do it in every other part of life.
	But with immigration, suddenly it's not allowed.
	Why?
	The answer's never really answered.
	It's just, Actually it is, because eventually you do get down to it with leftists, and it gets down to revenge when you get to the ideologues or left-wingers.
	It's just like, well, you had an empire, so... I mean, I didn't.
	Like, we've got some overseas territories, that's about it for all of my lifetime.
	But no, because of the empire, your country has to be completely destroyed demographically.
	That's another thing we don't talk about, is the anti-British sentiment among immigrant communities.
	You know, for their... I guess it's a... Usually they're grandkids or kids.
	But yeah, I mean, there's a lot of people who hate the white man.
	You know, you just see the videos all the time of white people being beaten up.
	And, you know, there's a thing, we've got to impregnate the white woman.
	And, you know, there is a strong narrative that the British white man is bad.
	We saw this recently, there was a story of some guy.
	His grandparents came to England from Jamaica.
	His parents, as well, lived here.
	No problems integrating, no problems with the community.
	He had a huge problem with Britain and British culture, and was whining about, specifically the main thing he was whining about was the black boy clock in his town.
	He was like, this is disgusting, it needs to go.
	And he couldn't figure out why he wasn't welcomed among the locals.
	It's strange how your parents and grandparents were, but you're not.
	So that anti-British sentiment especially does seem to come in a couple of generations now?
	I think it's normal.
	The first generation of immigrants sort of keep their head down and get on with it and then the second one feel more patriotic about the place that they came from.
	I think that's a... and I've read somewhere it takes four generations or three or four generations to fully integrate.
	Long time.
	I'm sure I'll go fine.
	Yeah so anyway that's that's that bit covered and just to sum up that original point where you were quizzical about about free movement you know ideologically dream in a dreamland we'd have no passports and and nothing but my point is is that a small state where where a small accountable local bodies are better able to deal with Mass movement of people than a large unaccountable centralized state.
	That's my point.
	And can I just say one last thing?
	Yeah, sure.
	Migration, the mass movement of people, is only going to accelerate.
	People seem to think it's going to stop.
	It's not.
	It's going to accelerate.
	And the reason for that is technology.
	Firstly, with mass communication, everybody is seeing, you know, the wealth in America, the wealth in Western Europe, and comparing it to what they have back home.
	And so these countries look more attractive.
	And then secondly, with, you know, before the invention of the car, you'd have to, if you wanted to go around the world, you'd have to go by horse and sailing boat.
	Never mind the plane.
	Yeah, but now we have the car, the plane, the train, the high-speed speedboat.
	You know, modern transport just means it's possible to go further quicker.
	Plus, there's never been so many people in the world, and whether it's people Displaced by war or lack of water or lack of resources or simply seeking economic opportunity, whatever the motivation, there are more people than ever and more and more of them are going to be on the move and technology is enabling them to move further and faster and communication is creating the desire.
	I couldn't disagree more on the fact that it's inevitable though.
	Because I mean like, North and South Korean immigration across the border is about one a year.
	Yeah.
	If they're lucky.
	That's always bothered me because it's like, you look back at photos of the border between Gibraltar and fascist Spain.
	No immigration.
	It's because you militarise the border.
	It literally will just stop, because no one wants to go through a military checkpoint.
	They're not mad.
	So you would argue that we need... If you want secure borders, you can do it.
	It's not impossible.
	And you don't really need sophisticated technology either.
	Well, okay, if you use the North Korea-South Korea thing, South Koreans don't want to go to North Korea for obvious reasons, and North Koreans can't leave.
	My point is not become North Korea.
	My point is if you militarize a border it will end the same way it did if you look at any other militarized border.
	Like the movement of people across a militarized border doesn't happen because it's militarized.
	Yeah, I mean as a libertarian I don't like militarized borders but I take your point.
	The point is that you can stop it if you want to.
	It's an option that's on the table.
	Okay, I take your point.
	Anyway, I suppose we'll move to the most intelligent leftist in the world.
	I don't know, make a song for Gary Lineker?
	You've probably got one.
	He's in my Brexit song.
	Yeah, I was going to say.
	So, the most intelligent leftist in the world has revealed himself unto us.
	It's Gary Lineker.
	He's not the best, I'll be honest, but he is the funniest, at least in regard to some new policy in the UK, which is boats, go home.
	I think we're allowed to say that.
	The boats have to go home.
	So this isn't news to obviously the boats over the channel, which have not stopped in the slightest.
	I think they've doubled every year now for four years.
	So good job.
	Thanks, Conservatives.
	Keeping your promises.
	And just to get to it, we'll mention the census data proves Britain is not a nation of immigrants article from Carl, because you can just look at the effects of mass immigration.
	This is before we even get to the illegal immigration.
	And if you want more, go back to the last segment about demographics for sure.
	It was Kyle's article that prompted that whole previous segment.
	Yeah.
	And we'll go on to the news though, in regards to the Home Office.
	Put out a statement.
	Enough is enough.
	We must stop the boats, says Sir Willa Braverman.
	Yeah.
	If only someone had been in charge.
	I like your party.
	For the last... What has it been now?
	13 years?
	About 13 years?
	Yeah, if only someone could have done... Yeah, okay, whatever.
	Enough is enough.
	Theresa May said that about terrorism.
	But I just love the idea that, I don't know how you can be serious, like if you're going to make PR for your cause of like, now we're gonna crack down on immigration or something, you can't sit there and be like, yeah enough's enough, like you've been in charge the whole time, that doesn't work.
	Yeah, but to be fair to Braverman, she hasn't been in charge.
	Yeah, we had Preeti Patel.
	She tried?
	She was a complete wet.
	No.
	She was undermined by those behind the scenes?
	Yeah, she's not aware.
	It's just a structural problem with the party, in my view.
	That there's so much more there than just... And the ministers, you know, the ministry is there permanently.
	The minister's only there for a year or two.
	Yeah, because we'll go to the next one.
	This is the funniest thing, which Rishi Sunak put out, which is weird PR.
	Sunak put out, if you come to the UK illegally, you can't claim asylum, you can't benefit from our modern slavery protections, and you can't make spurious human rights claims, and you can't stay.
	Okay, cool policies.
	The graphic he put up was a graphic that says, if you come to the UK illegally, you will be detained.
	Sorry, denied access to the UK's modern slavery system.
	I don't think they've worded that right.
	Yeah, scholars are still trying to figure out exactly what he meant by that.
	Because I don't really know.
	I mean, like, our modern plantations are too good for you slaves from the foreign lands, is what I initially got.
	I didn't know we were operating slavery plantations.
	I think by the UK's slavery system, he means...
	British slaves for British workers.
	They're taking up slavery jobs.
	Debt slavery.
	Maybe he's referring to debt slavery.
	Yeah, I think, and we're hoping, he's talking about the fact that... He meant protection.
	Protection.
	They meant modern slavery protection.
	Hopefully.
	Maybe not.
	Who knows?
	I presume he's been jumped on for that.
	Yeah, a little bit.
	But we'll go to Nigel Farage because I just think he's right on this.
	He did a video.
	Nigel's right about everything.
	In this specific instance, he just makes the argument that, oh look, the Tories are telling you they'll stop the boats.
	Again, this is the 10th time this past two years they've said that.
	Yeah no it's not going to happen because as he points out the legislation will get introduced and then the lawyers will get a hold of it they'll take it all the way to the human rights court in the european human rights court the european human rights will say yeah it's illegal can't do that and it won't be limited so nothing will happen.
	I think he's right.
	About that, that's what will happen.
	It does feel like Sunak and Braveman are addressing it in a way that their predecessors aren't, to give them credit.
	They're proposing the right policy but they haven't left the European Court of Human Rights.
	Yeah, so.
	So it will just get destroyed.
	It will get diluted and it makes you crave an abolition of parliament and a return to a monarchical system.
	If only we had a great dictator or a king.
	But you don't need that.
	You literally just need a party in charge that can see, OK, this is going to get stopped, so we won't do it.
	Because for the Tories, my viewing of this is that they've done this forever as well.
	Brexit was a great example of this, frankly.
	Oh, they've undermined that.
	Leading up to it.
	I mean, in the sense of the Tory party structurally will sit there, say, we're going to do the thing the base wants.
	But if they actually do it, then they've got to find something else to do, so they won't want to do that.
	So instead, they say, OK, we'll do this thing you totally want.
	Oh, drat.
	The European Court of Human Rights, or the EU, or the UN, or whatever some other thing we have no actual ability to counter in terms of controlling it, has blocked us.
	Nothing we can do.
	I remember aimlessly, sorry, endlessly, you would get Tory MPs who would get constituents come to them and say, I want this changed.
	It's ruining my business, ruining my life.
	And they would say, oh, the EU, nothing we can do.
	And it's like, OK, great, then leave the EU.
	Well, hang on a minute.
	And then we actually did it.
	It's like, yeah, see, this international globalist Miriad of organizations actually aren't that important.
	You can just leave and then do whatever you want.
	And again, it comes down in this case to the HRC, where they could just leave tomorrow.
	There's nothing stopping them.
	Got all the power to do it.
	And in which case their thing that they're proposing wouldn't be stopped.
	This is why I don't like the party system as it is, because I just think we need one leader with a vision, and he just does it.
	Libertarian king.
	A libertarian king.
	I don't disagree.
	But it just annoys me every time.
	I remember there was something else under Theresa May, where she was like, well, we've signed some UN agreements, so we can't actually do the common sense thing here that the base is wanting.
	Instead, we have to do nonsense.
	Just ignore the UN?
	What's the great motto?
	It is easier to seek forgiveness than it is permission.
	If they go through the thing of trying to seek permission they're never going to get it and it takes years and it's slow and it's ponderous.
	But also who are you asking?
	The UN is what gives Parliament its right to rule.
	Of course it doesn't.
	Does the EHRC give the Parliament the right to rule?
	Of course it doesn't.
	It's the British people.
	I was having dinner with a guy who's quite influential within the Conservative Party the other night.
	I won't say who he is.
	But he said something that really stuck with me.
	If you want to get a minister or a high-powered civil servant or whoever it is, the director of the BBC or the director of the NHS, whatever it is, to do something, and you go to them, here we've got a problem with mugs, we need to fix this problem with mugs, you need to do this to fix the mug problem, nothing will happen.
	So what you have to do, if you want to get XYZ to fix the mug problem, you have to leak a story to the press going, MUG DISASTER!
	What is this?
	And then you have to go, look, there's a mug disaster going on.
	And the only way to get anyone to do something is to leak stuff to the press and for them to then face career pressure to have to do something.
	Otherwise, they will not do it.
	You know, they always take the path of least resistance, and so you have to make the path of least resistance doing something about the problem.
	And that's kind of what's happening with immigration at the moment.
	But that's the weird divide between the two left-right parties we have here, because the right-wing party in our country, there's such a lack of people who are typically called... Well, it's not right-wing, it's social democrats.
	Yeah, but my point being, just as it's normally phrased, because that party doesn't actually have any rightists in it.
	Like, what you would call an ideologue, someone who is in politics for ideological reasons and therefore has a demand to do a thing.
	You come to them and say, this is wrong because, you know, mass immigration is wrong because of right-wing reasons, right?
	And that person would go, well yeah, I agree with that, and they carry on and will deal with it.
	But the Conservatives don't have any of those people, it seems.
	Very, very few of them.
	They have instead people who, like you say, are only motivated by career pressure.
	When you get to the Labour Party- Farage should be a Tory.
	Yeah.
	When you get to the Labour Party, you actually do get left-wing Farages.
	Well you've got Jacob Rees-Mogg and Steve Baker and people like that in the Conservative Party but they have very little influence.
	And it's ridiculous.
	It's like this isn't how politics should actually operate because as you say you end up with that situation where you've just got a career risk so you have to threaten to get anything done and that's mad.
	But that's what I think, I think they are.
	It's why I think, I agree with Nigel, that nothing will happen in this actual instance.
	By the way, just coming back to we saw how corrupt US politics is over that January the 6th story that we're talking about at the beginning of the show, just seeing Farage there, you know, the way that, was it 2016?
	That election 2016 and the way they fiddled Thanet, you know, he should have won that by-election in Thanet, South Thanet.
	I think we're still allowed to say that.
	Did you know YouTube's changed its rules?
	Every U.S.
	election for all time is perfect now?
	I didn't know that.
	But only U.S.
	elections, German elections, and Brazilian ones.
	The U.K.
	ones are stopped for grabs.
	Okay, well, I'm delighted.
	I don't want to get your YouTube cancelled.
	No, but how ridiculous is that?
	Yeah, I mean, it's absurd.
	But, so you know that there is a strong... When Farrah starts talking about the globalists and the establishment, you know, they shafted Liz Truss.
	Yeah, we can name them.
	You know, the OBR...
	Data was wrong the Bank of England it was the Bank of England that did for her and you know that that explosion of bond yields happened the day before it's because the Bank of England announced that week they were auctioning bonds off and so that's that's gilts off I should say and so that's what did for the thing and then it was all blamed on Quarteng's budget so
	You know the establishment does not want any of the stuff that we are talking about to happen and it is mighty powerful and any time there's a sort of opening such as Farage getting a seat in the house of commons it stops it happening.
	Yeah and we can see this just in terms of timeline if you refresh this one this is Richard Tice just putting out of course it is you know a party piece from his party reform but it's correct which is here's every conservative prime minister talking about how they're going to stop illegal immigration And it's been quite a lot of years.
	It hasn't been six months and give them time.
	This goes back to David Cameron, for Christ's sake.
	So that's just a joke.
	And also, I'm not really sure what I'm expecting, because whenever I go and check out Conservative ministers, they do keep tweeting stupid things.
	I just say, come on, man, why'd you do that?
	Well, if we go to, I think, I can't remember if he's the chairman still, but James Cleverley over here just tweeted out, India is the future.
	You know, blah, blah, blah, why I'm working with other countries.
	But just, why do you tweet India is the future?
	Like, man, you're mad.
	I don't want, you know, patriotic British ministers or politicians being like, yeah, foreign countries.
	No, Britain is the future.
	God.
	Simple stuff.
	Simple stuff.
	I would have expected, but well, okay.
	He's kind of right about India.
	He is correct that they are going to be overtaking us.
	Uh, I think they have, you know, the most last year, you know, the most Spoken English in the world, in other words, the default English accent in the world in about 20 or 30 years will be that slightly comical Indian English accent.
	But have you seen that?
	That will be the, like, the English that we speak is, I find that really interesting, yeah.
	But also just in terms of wealth?
	But in terms of, I mean, in the global media, that will be, that sort of Indian accent will be the default English accent in the world.
	But even if there's millions of them and they're poor, they're not able to have that kind of influence over the world.
	But if you look at a GDP graph of India, it's a straight line now, just going up.
	And then you look at the UK, it's another straight line.
	Look at the demographics of tech CEOs in the US.
	That's saying too much.
	They're all Indian.
	If you see, I can't get over it, you get these graphs that are like, you know, the Irish control the world or whatever, and it's a funny joke.
	And then you see the Indians, like, if you go to Indian news outlets, they'll be posting graphs of, like, every CEO or every leader of this company or that company.
	And they're just celebrating, like, yeah, better than you.
	Yeah.
	I'm not mocking you.
	That's the attitude of many immigrants.
	But if you have that attitude as an Englishman, you're racist.
	It's ridiculous.
	But we'll go to the Calais stuff, because Care for Calais decided to put out this notice.
	Are you familiar with Care for Calais?
	I'm not familiar.
	I'm about to learn, as I always do doing this show.
	They're a comical group.
	They spend their time telling us about how everyone who's coming across the channel is an innocent victim of war or, I don't know, persecution?
	We don't know who by.
	They never were able to get that far.
	They say in here, many families will not risk their daughter's safety on a journey to Europe when asked, why are there more men in Calais?
	Just think about the sense.
	Many families will not risk their daughter's safety On a journey to Europe.
	Right then, it's a choice.
	You decide to send the men.
	The women are fine where they are.
	Otherwise you would have sent them.
	In which case, you're not a refugee, by definition, if where you are is safer than the journey.
	But you may have noticed that Ukrainian daughters are sent out of Ukraine, because being in Ukraine, you're probably going to die in the war, if you're near the front line.
	Yeah, you're a refugee then.
	But if you're in a safe place, yeah, you've found refuge.
	You don't need to go any further.
	I just find that hilarious.
	Even in their own articles now, they're admitting this is a joke.
	You know why they don't want to stay in France or Germany?
	Um, less money, and also they've been rejected.
	Most of them have English, most of them have some English.
	But when you go to... They don't have French or German, so just that little bit of English makes them want to come here.
	You know what's ridiculous?
	When you go to France, no one speaks English.
	They do a bit, but I know what you mean.
	Yeah.
	Go to Germany.
	Nobody speaks English there.
	No, but I mean, they feel more comfortable going somewhere where they have a bit of the language.
	I love it, but that's always given, at least it was in Parliament, as an argument as to why we had to have open borders.
	It was like, well, they speak English.
	I'm like, what?
	That's not really enough to be like, well, get rid of the borders then, but I get your point.
	It is true.
	But what's also funny is when we surveyed them, I can't remember which segment we did, but there was a whole bunch of them who were coming in illegally and they had the names and they were able to prove like 90% of them had applied for asylum in France and all been rejected because they were bullshitters.
	So they went, okay, we'll go to England.
	But we're moving on.
	We'll go to how welcoming these people are.
	This is a clip I just have to mention.
	This guy here, Julian, he just goes places and films legally to make the point of like filming the police.
	And that's obviously legal.
	Some police officers will get all uppity and then try and take your camera and you can sue them for money.
	It's not about the money.
	It's about the principle of you need to learn.
	We're allowed to film in public.
	So he did it with a hotel.
	Yeah, they seem to spend more time trying to shut down the guys who were filming the immigrants than they do actually, you know, because they're the Tucker Carlsons, aren't they?
	Citizen journalism is fantastic, I love it.
	So this guy engaged in some, and I thought we'd enjoy what happened because the people working in the hotels and the people in the hotels are just the most wonderful of individuals.
	Let's play.
	No, no, don't you touch my stuff.
	I'll have you arrested for touching my stuff.
	I don't, you're not giving me my permission, just record me.
	Look, you're touching me again.
	I don't give a shit.
	Honestly, I will use self-defense if necessary.
	Get off!
	Get off my stuff!
	Get off my stuff!
	Are you crazy?
	No, it's my stuff!
	Are you crazy?
	Go away!
	Are you crazy?
	Are you crazy?
	Go out now!
	Fuck you!
	Go out now!
	That's the local refugees.
	So he was assaulted by a refugee who didn't like being filmed?
	The main guy being the staff worker, but then the refugees came over to have a go as well.
	He sounded Eastern European, the guy.
	You can see all that.
	Jesus.
	Wonderful people.
	I'm sure they'll integrate fine.
	I get plenty of women and children and that's wonderful.
	He's just kicked me for the record.
	You're provoking people.
	It's a lawful activity!
	You're provoking them by filming in public.
	Well, it's just a fighter that just beat people up, isn't it?
	So was he English, that guy?
	Yeah, this guy is a complete smug prick.
	We can see, because I found a still from when he started assaulting the guys filming.
	Look at the smile.
	He's happy with it, just a bully.
	OK, great.
	But that's the situation.
	Was he the guy with the Eastern European accent I heard?
	That was the... Guys, I don't think they're Eastern European.
	They sounded Afghan to me.
	But we'll go to the opinions now, because that's the situation of where we live.
	Let's check out a Londoner's opinion.
	What does Londoner have to say?
	The first UK PM of colour, son of immigrants, stands behind a podium that says stop the boats and announces a policy that slams the door for those seeking asylum.
	Violating international law written to protect the vulnerable.
	I'm so disappointed and embarrassed.
	Not in my name.
	Calling the Prime Minister a race traitor there.
	Cool.
	Good.
	Thanks.
	A real commitment to the conversation.
	You've really advanced humanity by being like, yes, all brown people want to destroy the Western world.
	That's what they should be doing.
	And he's betraying the race by saying that maybe we should stop the boats.
	I mean, I'm always astounded by how disgusting you'll get an opinion out of, like, London leftists.
	They're so detached from the rest of society.
	I did see someone call up LBC earlier and try and do this with an LBC host, where they were like, oh, well, he's a traitor to the browns.
	I'm like, what?
	What are you talking about?
	Biggest brain.
	So if we go to the next one, which is that he's the BNP.
	Oh yeah, AC Grayling.
	Failing the BNP.
	I'm not even going to gauge, just a joke.
	But now we go to the most intelligent leftist, Gary Lineker, who came out and said, there is no huge influx, Back check false.
	We take far fewer refugees than other major European countries.
	That's Germany's fault.
	I don't intend to commit suicide like they did.
	Okay.
	This is just an immeasurably cruel policy directed at the most vulnerable people in language that's not dissimilar to the use by Germany in the 1930s.
	So were people trying to go to Germany in the 1930s?
	Or were they trying to leave?
	I think they were trying to break into the concentration camps.
	Um, and get in.
	At least, if we go to the next one, I mean, we could see... You know, I... Here's an artist's interpretation of what, uh, Gary Lineker believes the Holocaust was.
	Next time, brother, we'll break into Auschwitz.
	Yeah, no, that isn't what happened, in case you're wondering.
	I just, I can't get over how this, uh, you know, cartoonist memes never miss to actually represent their views.
	Lineker just abuses his position, doesn't he?
	I mean, the, he...
	You know, how hard is it?
	Like, the BBC seem to think he's invaluable and he's the reason Match of the Day is successful.
	People watch Match of the Day because they just want to watch football, an hour's summary of the football on a Saturday night, and it's been a cultural institution since forever.
	And it really is not that hard to look into an autocue and read an autocue and talk about football.
	And there are millions of people who could do that job.
	Yeah, I'd do it.
	I would pay to do it just for the platform that is Match of the Day.
	And I know I could do it every inch as well as Lineker.
	And just because I wasn't a centre forward doesn't mean I can't read an autocue and talk about football.
	In fact, I dare say my vocabulary is bigger than Gary Lineker's and so therefore I can talk about it better than he can.
	But there's plenty of others who would do that job for nothing.
	And the idea that you have to spend all that money Paying for a presenter is just so misguided.
	Without that money we wouldn't have such big brain takes as the Holocaust was an option.
	And it's fine if he wants to tweet this stuff and have his opinions.
	I don't have an issue with that.
	But then I have an issue with him being on Match of the Day.
	We'll go to some conversations about this.
	A Jewish Conservative Party member decided to ask Nick Ferrari if she was a Nazi.
	Imagine if Gary Lineker was going, you know, I voted to leave the European Union, I'm pro-Brexit, we need to get our borders stronger to stop all this.
	Gone!
	But that's the BBC for you.
	I just can't get over how he unironically continues to believe these things.
	Because you might think it's bait.
	Like, who's that guy who cycles and uploads every instance of him?
	Jeremy Vine.
	I mean, I believe that's bait at this point.
	Just watching every clip of him being like, whoa, how could a car be on the road?
	There's a definite lack of self-awareness factor going on.
	I mean, it's comical.
	For people who don't know, go look up Jeremy Vine's Twitter.
	It's literally just him moaning that other people are on the road except cyclists, which is funny.
	Do you think it's like, when you tweet and you just get a million, whatever it is, reactions, likes, dislikes, it's just, they're just...
	Like Piers Morgan or someone, they just get off on the attention, whether it's good or bad, they just want the attention.
	Bait posting.
	Yeah.
	But I don't, I think Jeremy Vine is bait posting.
	Like he's leaving bait for that attention, but I think Lineker is genuinely a moron.
	Well, no, but I think that, I don't think he's, even though you could interpret it as bait posting, massive trolling, I don't think he is.
	Maybe not.
	But, but do you think they just do it for the dopamine hits?
	No, I think they're generally that stupid.
	Especially Lindeker's.
	I think he actually sat there and was like, this is just like the 1930s, isn't it?
	He doesn't know anything.
	I mean, he knows about... Reductio ad Hitlerum.
	Yeah, every time.
	So, I mean, this Jewish conservative member called up LBC to be like, am I a Nazi?
	Yes.
	Yes, you are.
	At least according to Gary Lindeker's definition of Nazis, which is... You know the real bad thing about Nazis?
	So Nick Ferrari told her she was a Nazi?
	No, but by Gary's definition it would be.
	Because you know what the real problem with the Nazis was?
	Their border policy.
	No, I thought it was the other stuff that we hated the Nazis for, but that's just me.
	Apparently Gary Lineker's fine with the rest of it, but just the border policy stuff is the thing that makes them bad.
	But who was actually trying to move to Nazi Germany?
	American Germans?
	There were quite a few, actually.
	Really?
	Yeah, because they got the, like, call to the fatherland thing.
	But they were the same people, and they were welcomed, I'm guessing, as the same people.
	Well, they made bank out of it, because, of course, you know, you turn up and, um, oh, we found this house for you!
	He used to live in it, don't ask!
	Move it!
	So, there's that.
	But, getting to the next bit, Gary Lineker has decided he will keep speaking out for those who have no voice, he says.
	What, like people who voted for Brexit?
	Yeah, the ones who aren't getting what they want.
	The vast majority of this country voted that we should have hard borders.
	We have the worst borders I think we've ever had as a nation.
	The people who have no voice here are the ones not getting what they want.
	The people with no power.
	You're the one in power.
	Even though your party isn't in power, your doctrine is.
	My son, when Russia invaded Ukraine, my son was going, how good it is to be Britain because you're an island and we can't be invaded.
	And I was like, you have no idea what's going on.
	Yeah, that would stop Putin.
	Yeah.
	Is it Putin?
	God damn it!
	I love it!
	Yeah, like we can't stop boats.
	How are we going to stop Putin?
	It's not going great for us.
	But we'll go to Sheila from LBC because she's my personal favourite.
	Sheila Fogarty.
	Moronic response to all of this.
	She decided to read out that the Taliban have changed the law in Afghanistan to be in coherence with Islam.
	I didn't expect that either, that the Taliban were Muslims.
	Shock, I know.
	So they decide to do that and she reads it out and says how horrific it is that this new divorce law is the case in Afghanistan and therefore we should have open borders with the entire world.
	I didn't follow that either.
	I don't think it would make any kind of sense.
	Also, Sheila, go and ask the women of Afghanistan what they actually think of Islamic law.
	Polling this... The media just conflates legal migration and refugee status and illegal immigration and they just are so irresponsible in that regard.
	I just can't get over how she doesn't seem to know either.
	Like, I don't know if you know, but Pew polling went to Afghanistan under the American occupation and asked Afghan women on their own, do you want Sharia law?
	Detailed what it was, 99% said yes to everything.
	Okay, well you've got it.
	But that might be... they might have felt pressured to say that?
	They're on their own with a pube hauler.
	We can't get any better.
	There's nothing more we could have done.
	So there's that.
	But that's the thing, I look at Sheila over there, it's just like you... For them, the rest of the world is just unlivable.
	Nobody lives there.
	Presumably.
	She's never been, so she wouldn't know.
	You know, the people who say that Mexico is hell on earth.
	That's what I always say, when people say the UK is racist.
	Just go and travel for a year.
	Have fun.
	See the rest of the world and then come back and tell me the UK is racist.
	But I'm sure Sheila lives somewhere like our next link.
	We could have a look.
	This is, I believe this is what, Bradford?
	There's an area in Bradford that's now 5% English, 95% non-English.
	There we are, by the census data.
	Ah, Carl Benjamin, my favourite tweeter.
	But presumably, this is where Sheila lives.
	Gary Lineker doesn't, though, for sure.
	We can confirm that.
	David, our friend of the podcast, was able to confirm it.
	Apparently he knows where he lives, if you go to the next one here.
	He doesn't live too far from either.
	And the ethnic makeup of where Gary Lineker lives?
	88.9% white.
	Yeah.
	Strange.
	He lives in Barnes, doesn't he?
	weird doesn't isn't gonna have a hotel full of those refugees next to his house whereas i've got three don't know if you notice there's one over there there's one over there and there's one just over the other side now This is in Swindon?
	Yeah.
	You live in Swindon?
	Yeah.
	Literally surrounded by them.
	We go walking.
	It used to be when I first moved here.
	That's only two years ago.
	Majority of people spoke English in the town centre.
	Now when I go for a walk, I hear at least four languages every day.
	Usually some kind of French from some guys who look like they're from the hotels, and I see them every day, so I wouldn't be surprised if they're not.
	Would that be Central Africa?
	Something like that.
	Presumably Mali.
	Something like that.
	I hear Arabic all the time.
	That's fantastic.
	Polish.
	There's a large Polish community that we're already here.
	So that was the one you used to hear before.
	And then I don't think it's Arabic.
	Yeah.
	Like Farsi.
	Yeah.
	So there's that.
	What language do they speak in Afghanistan?
	Afghanistani?
	Depends on what group you're in.
	So the Taliban are now in charge.
	So officially it's Pashto.
	Okay.
	Even though most of the country don't speak Pashto.
	I gotta be honest, that's just funny.
	Otherwise, that's that.
	That's the Bill that is going to do basically nothing.
	Let's be frank.
	And the most intelligent leftist in the world.
	You know what?
	Maybe I've been... I've taken the wrong pill, but... I think Sunak, I think he'll find a way of making it work.
	He's quite pragmatic.
	Enjoy the copium.
	Okay.
	Let's go to the video comments.
	So this here is called the Soroter, which means lizard killer.
	It's this bronze spike that goes on the bottom back end of a Greek spear.
	Now frequently we use these to stick our spears into the ground so that they're ready at hand when we need them.
	When I was in Greece however, a particularly strong gust of wind blew my spear over and kind of messed up the tip.
	So today we're gonna fix it.
	Now anyone who recognizes this dinky little anvil is gonna tell me I wasted my money but Bronze and brass are a lot softer than steel, so for my purposes, it's adequate.
	Yeah, cool.
	I hadn't even thought about that.
	There we are.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Drive off in no sleep.
	Drive off in no sleep.
	Okay.
	Can we get a link to that game?
	I kind of want to play.
	Sorry, there's a link to the game.
	These are our sponsors.
	People who pay 40 quid so they'll never ever send us stuff.
	Apparently someone's made a game of us.
	Well, I'll be checking out the link tonight.
	See if it's any good.
	Do we have one more?
	No, that's it?
	Okay, we've got the written comments on the site.
	So that's who sponsors the Lotus Sears.
	Ah.
	Which are the viewers.
	Very good.
	That always works.
	So on the comments, Henry says, good to see Dominic on the pod, loved him on the Dankula roast.
	Ah.
	Which I did see, it was good fun.
	On the first segment, Andrew Narok says the entire January 6th committee need to go on trial for subverting the Republic.
	The evidence seems to show that.
	Taffy Duck says evidence is a threat to their democracy, not ours.
	Not actual democracy, not truth or reality.
	It's dangerous to the lies they use to control the normies, which is why we must push harder.
	Fodder17 says, ah yes, those illegal journalists.
	You just need to watch out at the lotus eaters.
	Illegally telling the truth.
	I bet that is a crime in some countries.
	Telling the truth?
	The illegal truth.
	The illegal truth.
	It's a good title for a book, or a film, or a podcast.
	Well, there's an idea.
	Fuzzy Toaster says, I've been against the January 6th narrative since January 7th, when I had time to go over everything I could.
	These videos coming out have done nothing but vindicate me.
	I've been collecting apologies.
	No.
	All the best.
	One can only take so much insurrectioning.
	They're insurrectioning really hard.
	So on the demographic stuff, Taffy Duck says: "The demographics of primary school kids is a good indicator of future makeup of our nation.
	Unless something happens, something probably needs to happen." I don't think anything's gonna happen.
	No.
	I think, uh, did you see there was this clip?
	Some Tory was like, oh, here's all my Tory friends in London.
	I was like, okay, how's this going?
	And she's doing a clip with them about why they're Tories.
	None of their arguments particularly interesting.
	It was all because I can make money, essentially.
	But what was interesting was the makeup of the individuals.
	And overwhelmingly, like you could tell they were either like first generation or off the plane foreigners.
	I was like, huh.
	So the Tory party to you means like international migrant capitalist.
	Which, yeah, I mean that interest is being served.
	So, it's got that going for you.
	Omar Awad says, I'm pretty sure it would be cheaper to illegally fire the home office, pay whatever fines or compensation, hire an entirely anti-immigration staff, and fly every single chancellor back first class while still being under the current spending on immigrants this year.
	He's probably right.
	Don't worry though, speed limits, Labour definitely do something about that.
	This time, just another vote and they'll totally do it.
	Vote for Team UniParty.
	Yeah.
	UniParty, yeah.
	Have you looked at the cost?
	Because the Home Office did do the costing for 2022 that came out.
	No, and it's just going to break my heart when I hear the numbers.
	Do you want to guess?
	How many millions?
	The cost of housing?
	So this was the figure for how much was spent on dealing with refugees in the year 2022.
	So that would be housing them, policing them?
	Yeah.
	And this is the annual spend or the daily spend?
	Annual.
	Two billion.
	2.5 billion.
	Okay.
	You're actually on the mark.
	Edward of Woodstock says... This is a waste of money.
	It's ridiculous.
	Dominic, you mention the reinforcement of power in local government, but it seems, even then, it seems to attract authoritarians.
	See, 15-minute cities, all the council in Clarkson's Farm.
	How do we change that?
	Yeah, I didn't... When I said local government, I I meant local rule, not centralised rule.
	Because it's more accountable, you see where the taxes are spent, whoever's in charge and whoever the citizen is, they're much closer physically, they have more interaction and so one is more accountable to the other.
	That's what I meant.
	I didn't mean we should all be governed by Lewisham Council.
	One of the things I find funny about that example though is, so Clarkson's Farm, Let's take out the restaurant.
	Have you seen the show?
	I've seen a couple of episodes and I'm familiar with the story.
	OK, so on the farm shop, you remember the process he had to go through because they were like, well, we're going to build a farm shop.
	All the changes that could bring to the neighborhood, the increased traffic, the increased people.
	Oh, my God.
	And there's this whole rigmarole of we've got to properly plan this and have contingencies to deal with the influx of people.
	And I'm looking at that and just thinking, This never happens at the Home Office.
	Yeah.
	Like, the influx of people, oh god, that might cause more traffic and more demand and it would be, well, sort of very damaging to the local area because of this that reason.
	It's just like, god I wish I could put that local council in charge of national immigration.
	I can't dare to imagine because if you go on Google Maps you can see the farm shop where it is and you just realize how little of an impact it's had on the local beauty and everything else.
	I mean they've had to build a car park which rightfully they should have and I think they actually asked for that and were denied first which again is just madness but I love how when you get to the lower levels as you're saying like the response from people is definitely not No, we're not going to happen.
	That's why Switzerland functions well.
	40% of tax revenue gets spent locally, and they vote on everything.
	I was on a boat recently with a very high-powered Swiss, and he just laughs.
	They laugh at how the rest of Europe is just destroying itself.
	And they can't deal with anything.
	The Swiss has, you know, its Canton system, all the rest of it has total accountability.
	And Switzerland has preserved itself, and it's preserved wages for Swiss people at the bottom.
	You know, there isn't anything like, even with all the money in Switzerland, there isn't the same gap between, like, you know, the postman and the CEO that there is in the UK.
	And you've got to say, I mean, it's an ultra-conservative country, and it's sort of Maybe not the most fun place in the world, but they have preserved themselves and their tradition and their heritage in a way that the rest of Europe has not.
	There will be a Switzerland in a hundred years.
	Yeah.
	And it will be very similar.
	And you think Switzerland, you know, it's exactly what, you know what Switzerland's like.
	And you, you know, what, You used to know what England was like and you used to know what France is like and we've still got in our heads, well France is like this and Italy's like this.
	There's some video evidence of it.
	Yeah, but you go there and it's just not like that anymore.
	It's even Italy, you know I used to live in Italy, I'm part Italian and I just went to Rome for the first time in maybe 15 years last year.
	I couldn't believe it.
	Just, even demographically, it's just totally different.
	Just completely foreign place?
	Foreign to what it was, yeah.
	I love, we do do some segments sometimes, like Carl will make me sit down.
	You know about all the migration up through Africa, it's got major problems, and then Italy's made itself, it's so badly run, it's made itself, it's got like the worst birth rate in Europe, I think, or maybe second worst.
	And so the Italians aren't reproducing.
	The reason they're not reproducing is they can't afford, the main reason is people can't afford to have kids because it's too expensive because they're paying so much money in tax.
	Well if they weren't paying tax they could afford to have more kids and then there wouldn't be this argument that we need to import labour from overseas to to make up for the demographic issues.
	And do you know what?
	Japan's doing absolutely fine with its demographic, everyone goes Japan's a demographic disaster but it does fine.
	That's the funny thing because everyone always says disaster and then you look at them you think Doesn't look that disastrous.
	Everyone seems to be doing fine, but the graph isn't happy.
	Yeah, but all the people are.
	Everyone's got money.
	But my graph is upset.
	It's a fantastic country, Japan, and it's simultaneously really traditional and really future.
	It's the most modern country on Earth, and it's the most traditional country on Earth.
	It's a brilliant place.
	But I'm going to disagree with you on one thing, which is, OK, well, not the Lewisham Council, but the Chadlington Council.
	Okay.
	I don't know, I think they could do a good job.
	Well, we need to get Chadlington, we need to get, we need to get the Tories into Clarkson's area and Chadlington into the Tory party.
	We need to switch them over.
	As soon as it's where you live, suddenly everyone becomes hyper-conservative.
	Yeah, well that's the point.
	That's the point.
	Bleach Demon says the January 6th fantasy, I think that's just the wrong place, never mind.
	The French victory says free movement within the confines of the country, controlled movements when borders must be crossed.
	This is true for people, goods and capital.
	For example, before the industrialization began in France, there used to be a protectionist ministry deciding whether French companies were allowed to operate in other countries.
	As soon as that was gone, all the industry left and the country started decaying.
	I don't know anything about that.
	I don't know about the French thing, but the first point is well made.
	My free movement is an idealistic thing.
	It's a world without borders or passports, but it's just not going to happen.
	So we have to accept the world as it is.
	We can't have free movement.
	Well, I just find it all, like, liberal fantasy because it's all good in saying free movement of goods and capital.
	Yeah, of course.
	You can destroy and make goods, it has no real result, it just makes things better.
	As in, like, lower prices and more availability.
	Fantastic.
	But then you get that rhetoric, and you have it from... I can't remember which economist worded it, but it's in the EU's chart now.
	Free movement of goods, capital, and then people.
	I'm like...
	People are a really odd one out in that list.
	Like, those aren't the same as goods and capital that you can destroy or move around and there's no moral quandaries or whatever.
	It's like, no, there's real issues with moving huge amounts of people or even small amounts of people to a new area.
	It's not like moving tomatoes, but...
	No one seems to think about that, especially in the EU.
	Anyway, Omar Awad says, the only thing more of these immigrants see in Britain is that they want money, resources and welfare.
	The traditional idea of good immigrants was some bloke named Raj who came here 30 years ago to start a business and is more patriotic about England than we are.
	Raj isn't forming an insular community that reflects a foreign culture.
	He's just abused the motto to protect their precious bailey of boat people.
	Criminals must be deported and election fortifying voters.
	He's right about that when you see there's a you know about weeaboos for japan right?
	No.
	The term weeaboo means like someone who's obsessed with japan usually from the west but could be from like china or russia and they'll become obsessed in a good way or you know it's too much usually But they're obsessed with Japanese culture and everything else.
	But I mean, they think Japan's really good.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And they'll end up moving there or something like that.
	And then the term has been used to describe other stuff.
	So like, Tiabu is what gets used for England.
	So people are obsessed with English culture.
	Very much the Yankees are the best example of this.
	Love the accents, etc.
	And then you get people from the former empire as well, of course, who become obsessed with it.
	And that's the ideal immigrant, at least what people have in their minds.
	When I talk to Americans and they go, it's like Downton Abbey, that England does not exist anymore, and they can't believe it.
	Gotta go searching for it.
	Yeah, that house is owned by a Russian oligarch.
	But it's just the thing of like, yeah, that kind of immigrant doesn't form an ethnic ghetto.
	No.
	Like, I can't imagine you'd end up with loads of, like, English-speaking ethnic ghettos in Japan of weeaboos, because their whole thing is learning Japanese and becoming a Japanese person.
	form an English ghetto in Japan, English people would think it was wrong.
	We do about the one in Spain, and we find it weird that the Spanish government allows it.
	It's like, just block, just move the people or block them from coming.
	I don't know why you allow this to happen to yourselves, but then the same is true of us.
	Chris Wolfe says, oh that's January 6 again, that's in the wrong place, Biggy Bigfoot says, I am white and my wife is from Hong Kong Chinese descent.
	Her family immigrated to England legally in the 70s.
	Established her own business, paid... We're literally... This is Raj from earlier, but, you know, from Qingdao.
	So, paid taxes, contributed to society and integrated well.
	As we look ahead to starting a family, I sometimes worry about the future children and how they might be viewed in comparison to those in England under less lawful circumstances.
	Yeah, I mean that is kind of funny as well.
	If you're a legal immigrant and then you're getting compared to these, frankly, piss takers.
	Yeah, it's conflated.
	Big problem.
	Not fun.
	Lord Nerevar says the heart in one thing on demographics, English people are still a majority in England.
	I recently started a job at the National Trust, and despite being mirrored with ESG political bollocks like everything else, they're physically unable to implement racial diversity quotas due to the locations of most people's properties.
	They would absolutely love to hire as many non-English people speaking Pakistanis as they could, but they simply don't exist in the Yorkshire Dales or in the Cotswolds where their properties are.
	It's still all too playful.
	It's not... Sounds like copium to me, I'll be honest.
	It's... I take his point, but... and, you know, but... and cities will change quicker than the countryside, but, you know, you wait till, you know, they start building loads of homes, it won't last.
	They won't stay in the seas.
	I mean, we've experienced that in Swindon.
	I think 25% of Swindon now is foreign-born.
	It's like off-the-plane immigrants in their lifetime.
	And what was it 20 years ago?
	I remember the graph correctly, I think 5%.
	A big change.
	I think London, what was that now?
	Trying to remember off the top of my head.
	I'll show you the graph.
	London was white minority in the early, in the mid-naughties I think.
	Yeah, but even if we don't talk about that, we just talk about foreign-born.
	Okay.
	I think it's... I don't know if it's 50% or 40% for London.
	People come to Swindon because the train links are good and it's cheap and blah blah blah.
	Less rent can get to London easily.
	Same with Reading.
	Reading's far more extreme in that regard.
	So, it's that.
	So, JJHW says, Care for Cali is under investigation by the Charity Commission.
	Deserved.
	I won't bother you with just all the nonsense they've been through.
	Andrew Narok says a return to monarchy may end up being a solution.
	Trying to back Mr Frisbee's segment, eventually the minority will become the majority and thereby have their political will in force democratically.
	I don't know, do you think we're getting the Libertarian King anytime soon?
	There's a funny guy.
	Sadly.
	Polish elections are coming up.
	Unless we can get Cornwall independent and I will be gladly, in an independent Cornwall, I'll take on the role as the benevolent dictator.
	I'd vote for you.
	And we're going to rename it Kernow.
	So there's a guy in Poland, he's called Corwin Mickey.
	Or Dumnonia.
	Are you familiar with Corwin Mickey?
	No.
	He runs a party called Confederation and they've got five seats in the last election.
	They're running again in November.
	We'll find out how far they've got.
	Really funny guys.
	They use the Confederate flag as their flag because they're called Confederation because they're Polish.
	They just don't know what the connotations are.
	But he was talking about this and we were talking with Karl and him and he's like, well, you know, Poland needs the king back and they will rule and be libertarian and we'll have the libertarian king.
	So he's asked him, well, who's going to be the king?
	And he went, well, he will reveal himself.
	We will find the king at some point.
	When Arthur is needed, Arthur will appear.
	What's the Polish for Arthur?
	I don't know.
	You know when Scotland was looking like at one point it might actually get independence?
	uh the Shetland Islands demanded independence from the rest of Scotland.
	Based.
	That is based and because if they give if Scotland won it they would have to grant it to the Shetlands and the Shetlands I think technically has the oil.
	I wonder what the Shetlands immigration policy would be as well.
	Well.
	Very Qatari where it's like well you can come here but no citizenship.
	It's quite difficult to get to.
	Yeah.
	That's the thing I love as well about the oil-rich Arabs.
	They just don't give out citizenship.
	Like, they're a minority.
	I think in Kuwait, they're about a third of the population.
	Probably lower now.
	But that's not a problem.
	Because none of the immigrants have any rights.
	Yeah.
	Because they just don't have citizenship and they're not getting it.
	Because you have to live there for 30 years and be married.
	So that's not happening.
	So, goodbye.
	Anyway, we're out of time on the show, but if people would like to see more from you, where would they go?
	Well, my sub-stack is called The Flying Frisbee, so sign up for my sub-stack and it's very good.
	And yeah, theflyingfrisbee.com.
	Oh yeah?
	If you'd like more from us, let us know.
	Otherwise, um, bye.
	What?
	I already did plug the thing.
	Alright, I'll plug it again, I guess.
	How We Save England.
	It'll be here in an hour and a half.
	Go and watch that.

▲