Welcome to the podcast, The Lotus Eaters for Friday, the 10th of March, 2023.
And I didn't even look at the date on the computer.
I don't remember that.
Today we're going to be talking, I'm joined by Harry.
Hello!
And today we're going to be talking about fragile celebrities who are better than you.
One of the worst things I've ever seen happen in England.
Everything about this particular event we're going to talk about.
I just hate every single layer of it.
And how the elites are planning for you to be a minority in your own country.
And they're not being quiet about it either.
Which is nice.
So, let's begin.
Yeah, so as we all know, celebrities are just inherently better than us.
They take every opportunity to let us know and to virtue signal it all over social media, all in our faces.
They learn to just get up in our face and go, do you remember I'm better than you?
But there is a little secret trick to this, which is in fact that they are all incredibly insecure.
Why else would you be taking a career In which you are going to be at the forefront of the public eye at all times and make sure that you stay in that public eye at all times.
Just a quick thing, right?
No commentary on our jobs there.
No, no, no, no.
But we're not celebrities, right?
No, of course not.
Just before we go on, I've noticed this.
Who was it the other day who was saying, look, there are no movie stars anymore?
I know what you're on about.
Yeah, because you'll get a franchise, and a bunch of big names will be in it, but then they'll go off to do other things.
And in my youth, that meant that the things that these actors would do would become big and successful, because it was the actor that people wanted more of.
But you don't get that anymore.
And I think that social media has done this.
I think that just being exposed to the opinions of celebrities has completely demystified them.
It's removed all the magic.
And so one of the few people who seems to have actual star power is someone like Henry Cavill, who isn't really on social media.
He's not on Twitter being like, here are my political opinions.
Whenever he does show up, it's always still through that veil of journalism, where the journalists are kind of curating the image that you have of them.
So, for instance, like back in the day, all that you'd seen of Al Pacino in his day-to-day life is what you get through the media.
Whereas now you can get a deep insight, and you can even argue with these people on Twitter.
And the mystique kind of goes away once you've had an argument with them on Twitter.
It does.
And so I think a lot of modern celebrities, quote-unquote, are on Twitter purely to get constant affirmation.
That's the only reason they do it.
You are right, because as well as that, there are still kind of the holdover celebrities who are still big names in themselves, and I think they've managed to do that because they stay away from the big franchises.
So somebody like Brad Pitt doesn't star in Marvel films, unless there's been some contract signs that I'm not aware of.
Leonardo DiCaprio doesn't do that.
Well, didn't Nicolas Cage say this the other day?
Did he?
Yeah, there was something like, why aren't you in a Marvel film?
It's like, because I'm Nicolas Cage.
He literally- That's kind of based!
That's really based!
Exactly, it was just like, ooh, okay.
That's some steady shots fired there.
Yeah, you are right, though, because now it's the franchise that makes the actor, and not the other way around.
Like, Daniel Day-Lewis, you would not see him playing, I don't know, Vlaga Blaga, in the latest Marvel garbage that they're releasing, that they're shoveling down your throat.
If anything, it's actually kind of embarrassing that a big-name actor would want to be in a Marvel film.
I mean, I hate Marvel.
I mean, to be fair, that first Iron Man was made by Robert Downey Jr., and now he doesn't need them anymore, and he doesn't want them anymore, until they probably offer him, like, $50 million to show up again.
Sure, they need him, but he doesn't need them.
And it shows you the dynamic at play.
You are right, he helped make the franchise.
Although I'm not aware of anything good that he's been in since he left those films.
Anyway!
He's probably too rich to need to worry about it.
Yeah, true.
Anyway, we've got some great content on the website, as usual.
Stelios's premium content, and I do mean premium, in the symposium.
He's had a recent discussion with Connor that almost went for two hours where they were talking about what love is, and Connor is already saying that this is possibly the best thing that he's ever done with us so far, and that's just the quality of content that Stelios can get out of people.
I've had a few discussions with Stelios.
Oh yeah, I've had a few.
It's amazing.
They're absolutely fantastic.
They're really fascinating.
He really gets you to dig deep into your thoughts.
Stelios was a professor of philosophy before he started with us, so he knows what he's talking about, and he knows how to get the best out of people.
So, yeah, this is really good quality stuff.
I'm really pleased with that.
Remember, for premium membership for the website, it's as little as £5 a month.
That's a really low barrier to entry.
There's barely anything.
So, even with crisis or living, £5 a month.
You can get rid of that Netflix.
Help us keep the lights on.
Come on.
Yeah, you can get rid of that Netflix subscription.
They hate you.
We love you.
As this premium podcast will show.
And we'll be able to explain exactly what love is when we say we love you.
Yes, but moving on.
So this is a video that came up recently that's got a bit more traction again recently, which is actually, I found out from a clip all these celebrities did with the Refugee Council last year in March of 2022, presumably so that they could convince everybody to let Ukrainian refugees and such in.
But it's interesting that it always has to be the celebrity actors.
So, this is, like, the sort of one thing I can actually forgive them, because there is actually a war in Ukraine.
Like, look, I mean, I'm not actually against us taking Ukrainian refugees.
Why?
Because their country actually has been invaded, and the Ukrainian government's like, look, men aren't leaving the country, only women and children are leaving.
Okay, that's a sensible policy.
That's fair, but I do think it says something about our culture that we exist in right now, that people won't take a crisis or an actual tragedy that's going on in the world as seriously as they will, as if you don't have a celebrity face plastered all over you.
I think the problem is that, really, we've been crying wolf for so many years, right?
Oh, we've got to let all these climate refugees in.
They're economic refugees now.
They're in France.
They're not refugees.
They're in a safe country.
Everything's fine.
We're being taken advantage of.
And so when, like, an actual A group of people who are actually refugees from a war say, look, we actually need some help, can we have some help?
People are very cynical.
Well, I'm very cynical because I know even if it wasn't a Ukrainian war where you can point to something and go, there's something actually going on that's really wrong in the world, I know these people would still be making the same video.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Again, which is why I'm cynical about it, but anyway.
Yeah, let's just play the video and let the cynicism wash over us.
You're a mother fleeing with your toddler and a baby from bombs falling on your home.
You're a criminal.
You're an elderly grandmother, you have trouble walking, and you're trying to reunite with family.
You're a criminal.
You're heavily pregnant, trying to escape with nothing but the clothes on your back.
You're a criminal.
You're a teenager and you don't even know where your family is, or if they're even alive.
You're a criminal.
You're a diabetic, you've lost your medicine, you've not eaten for days.
You're a criminal.
You're in a wheelchair, trying to escape the dangers of war.
You have to cross streets strewn with rubble and muddy fields.
You're a criminal.
You desperately need to find a safe place.
I can't find an officially sanctioned route.
You're a criminal.
This government wants to criminalise desperate refugees for taking what they see as the wrong path to safety.
It's not always possible to take the right path when you're running from bombs.
No matter where you're from or which war you are running from, your life matters.
No refugee trying to find safety should be treated like a criminal.
Aren't they just so much better than us?
I mean, on the plus side, at least they have a genuine constituency in the Ukrainians.
Well, this time.
Yeah, exactly.
This time.
But every other time when it's like, oh, who's this?
This person's from Morocco.
OK, what was going on?
They're from Albania.
Let the boats in.
It's like, no, no, these people aren't refugees.
These are grifters who are coming here to get money.
At least the Ukrainians actually have a legitimate claim to being refugees.
But the message is always the same every time, excuse me.
Sorry about that.
Yeah, it's always the same, and this is why everyone is so unbelievably cynical about it.
It literally is the boy who cried wolf.
It just uses that language as well, you're a criminal, you're a criminal, and you know it's that same language that they use when they say, look, no human is illegal.
Well, but the actions that a person can take can be illegal.
But again, I just can't hammer this home enough.
This is what you get when there are loads and loads of people who are not refugees, and you call them refugees, and you make people deeply cynical and not really interested in helping people who are actually refugees.
Because as you say, it's just the same rhetoric, manufactured, like repurposed again and again and again.
And it's just, it doesn't tug at my heartstrings anymore.
No, I will point out, one of the people in that video is a woman called Emma Thompson, who is one of the most insufferably woke actresses out there.
She has appeared numerous times in, say, Extinction Rebellion videos.
She's big in her climate.
She is one of the only actors that I'm aware of, and one of the only refugees welcome types.
Harry, Harry, we're meant to be traditional.
She's an actress.
Actress, sorry.
Gender roles.
Sorry, apologies, apologies, I'm sorry.
Uh, I'll be whipping myself over the weekend for that slip-up.
No, but she's one of the only ones who actually puts her money where her mouth is.
And it just kind of hammers home how strange these people are.
Because when you see it put into practice, it just comes across as so weird and performative, and like she is doing it just so that she can have somebody to hang on her arm for photoshoots.
Because what she did, her and her current husband, informally adopted a Rwandan orphan and former child soldier named Tindy And personally, I wouldn't be one to invite a former child soldier into my home.
I'd see that as a bit of a risk.
But this is what she did.
Does she have other children?
She does have other children as well.
Very strange.
We'll see the pictures in a moment.
It just looks really gross.
Like I say, it's like a fashion ornament, a fashion accessory.
They met at a Refugee Council event when he was 16.
So he was already 16 years old, former child soldier.
She's like, come live with me.
She said, he became a sort of permanent fixture, came on holiday to Scotland with us and has become part of the family and he became a British citizen in 2009.
And like I say, there's a real... She talks about him like he's a pest.
Yeah, there's a real air of, look at my boy, look at my boy, and let's look at the pictures, because I just find it very funny.
There she is, with her adopted son, making sure to get him in the limelight, because if you adopt a child, you don't actually need to get him in front of photo shoots and in cameras and such, and I always find it very strange.
The next one as well, there was one of them with the big family.
I mean, I suppose on the plus side... Once again, at least she's putting her money where her mouth is.
Yeah, at least she's not like a Gary Lineker about it.
I live in a palatial mansion, but I'm not taking any refugees.
But they're all welcome.
At least she's taken one.
She's taken one.
But in demonstrating what it is, it demonstrates to me the strangeness of it.
Yeah, it is.
Just the kind of absurdity of it.
I'm going to take in a 16-year-old former child soldier into my home.
I mean... I mean, for the vast majority of people, outside of someone like Emma Thompson, Following that path is not going to end well for them.
And it's not really possible, probably, as well.
No, of course not.
It's like all of those videos that you see of the refugees welcome rallies that they have, and I've seen a few where they... Do you want to sign up to take one?
They're like, no.
No?
I mean, I don't have room for them.
Well, who does have room for them?
The government will sort it out, won't they?
Yeah, exactly.
Okay, if you say so.
And then I saw this as well, which was something that actually came out in the past few days, which is...
Very, very manipulative.
Oh, hang on.
Before we go on, sorry.
This is my message to anyone who's chosen the path of hate.
Ah, yes.
Who are they?
Oh, that's it.
Me.
I chose the path of hate.
I was like, love or hate?
And no, I prefer hate.
That's right, Arnold.
That's the correct assessment of what people who disagree with you believe.
They just hate.
And they're like, yeah, we're the pro-hate movement.
That's what they say.
No one thinks that.
It's pretty based.
I'm a hater.
Professional hater.
Right here.
Just hate things, Arnold.
Don't like anything.
Hate everything.
It's brilliant.
You should try it.
Like, it's so embarrassing, it's such a caricature, and no one on the other side takes you seriously, and that's what makes this a virtue signal.
I haven't even watched it, I already know what it's going to be.
Well, that's the thing.
There is an element to this, and the message that he's giving, that I do think is agreeable, and I think works for people on the right as well, which is what makes the message really so insidious, because I've seen some people compare this, and we'll watch a little clip from it that'll demonstrate what he's going on about, to the Yellowstone meme, if you've seen that recently.
The Yellowstone is a television show where it's set in Yellowstone.
It's following like, oh, badass ranchers and people like that.
And people have noticed that it's taking a conservative aesthetic and conservative language.
Oh, I have seen this!
Yeah, and putting liberal messages in through that.
Don't they call it the Hicklib?
Yes, I think so.
That's what they refer to it as.
And what Arnold is doing here is he's taking these very pro-regime, pro-globalist order messages and putting the language and aesthetic of conservatism in them.
Because Arnold is a big strong man and Arnold doesn't want you to be weak, he wants you to be strong and hit the gym.
And he wants you to take personal responsibility for yourself.
Those are all messages that I can get behind, you know?
I think you should hit the gym, you should get stronger, you should do what you can to better yourself and take responsibility for yourself.
But it's reading between the lines where I see what's actually going on here and how Arnold, a fan of freedom, if we remember back to a few years ago where he said, F your freedoms regarding the lockdowns.
Where Arnold is not our friend, Arnold is not somebody who wants the best for us, really.
The Germanic in the Austrian just comes out there, you know, no, no, we shall be free.
He just can't help but let it out.
I mean, his dad was a Nazi, so... He's German, so... Yeah, but let... well, Austrian, so... Yeah, but Austrians are German.
That's true.
That's true.
But let's play a bit of the clip, and I think, once again, there will be parts of this that are agreeable, and even I can agree with.
But try and read between the lines, and especially look at the imagery that's being played here.
And you'll see there is even reference to certain imagery which has been debunked and proven as being just a 4chan prank.
The editors, whoever edited this, seems to be taking seriously.
I think all of us hold some prejudice.
There's no doubt about that.
And we have to fight it our whole lives.
I know this is not the path of least resistance.
It's easier to just throw around some bogus science claiming that you're superior to someone else than it is to actually work on becoming better yourself.
It's easier to make excuses that the Jewish people conspired to hold you back than it is to admit that you just needed to work harder.
It's easier to hate than it is to learn.
It's easier when someone challenges you to get hurdy feelings and to go and find some echo chamber that will tell you that you're right and they're wrong.
But remember, easier isn't better.
It isn't.
When you spend your life looking for scapegoats, you take away your own responsibility.
You remove your own power.
You steal your own strength.
Nobody who has chosen the easy path of hate has gotten to the end of that road and said, oh, what a life.
No.
They die as miserably as they lived.
No matter how far you've gone, I want you to know that you still have the chance to choose a life of strength.
But you have to give up your war against everyone that you hate.
Let's give up that war.
Whether you hate them because of their color of the skin, or their religion, or their gender, or their sexual orientation, it doesn't matter.
Give it up.
Give up that war.
You know the war that you have to really fight?
It's the war against yourself.
I mean, I agree with him, but why is he recording in the year of our lord 2023 a video message for Adolf Hitler in 1939?
Yeah, where has this come from?
Where is this directed at?
Because all of the imagery that you see there was stereotypical evil right-winger imagery, and we know that the mainstream definition of hate is disagreeing with the current social trend.
Sure, disagreeing with being leftist, but like, this is a message for Adolf Hitler.
Like, literally, this is what he's talking about!
We're not talking about, like, Nazi Übermensch ideology or Jewish, like, ruining Germany and Jews ruining Germany and stuff like that.
It's like, yeah, but, like, I was going to call him Adolf.
Arnold, I'm not in any way, like, I'm not animated by any of those concerns.
I just noticed something.
Did you notice that portrait in the background?
It's not of Hitler, is it?
No, no, no.
I would love if it was, just for the joke, just for the meme.
But no, it was a picture.
I just noticed it was a painting or a portrait, and I assume this is Arnold's actual desk, of Arnold from the 70s, topless, ripped, posing.
To be fair, I can understand why he'd have that.
He's old and it's like, look, this is what I was like when I was young.
This is what I used to be like.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
He's like, what, 60-something now, whatever?
So I don't blame him for that.
But the way that I interpret this, and I think the accurate way to interpret this, is that given that the mainstream interpretation of hate is just disagreeing with the current social trends, if he is saying you have chosen a path of hate, that is such as the things that we do.
I don't know, I don't feel attacked by this at all.
I don't know, obviously when he's referring to- I mean he probably would say that, but like, None of this seems to appeal or apply to me in any way, shape or form.
I don't know, this seems- Hey, stop thinking you're the master race and hating Jews.
It's like, what?
Well, this seems to me- I don't know, I'm just going to the school to pick up my kids.
To me, perhaps, this seems to be another one of those things that is suggesting if you are doing anything that is against the current thing, you have chosen the path of hate, you have one step closer to the evil mid-century Germans.
Which is most of what the messaging that we experience these days tends to be.
That's clearly the spectre that's haunting the back of his mind, and, you know, because he's German, I can understand why.
I mean, that's fair, but I summed it up in a tweet as being the classic ploy.
Here's the classic workaround of how you work it.
I don't know if you wouldn't mind moving to the next one, so... John.
Thank you.
Scroll down so that we can see my second tweet here.
I just put it as this.
Step one, you get agreeable celebrity mouthpiece.
Step two, you reference the Nazis and then you play emotional music for step three.
And then step four, you must support the current thing and mass immigration as well, or else you choose hate.
And it works every single time.
That is how this goes, and that's what I see this going towards.
Generally speaking, if I see somebody, a big celebrity, with emotional music behind it, referencing Nazis, I just hear them going, you right-wingers, you stop it now.
You stop it.
You be good.
Calm down, boys.
Settle down.
That's what I hear.
It's interesting though, because generally I agree with what he's saying.
You know, your own sloth and taupo is the real villain you have to fight in order to be successful in life.
He's completely right with that.
But, like, Arnold, I'm not going to become a Nazi because I'm racist against Germans.
I'm not going to do it.
I just can't stand, like, Nazism because it's cringe and foreign.
I just see it as, if I disagree with Gender propaganda in the schools.
I'm not one step closer to the mid-century Germans.
I'm not like that.
That's exactly right.
That's what I see that as.
This really is just such a weird thing because it's laden with swastikas and stuff.
That's the flag, Lionel.
Now, can we talk about- And I keep seeing the pictures of the people painting swastikas everywhere as well.
They don't tend to be of the Aryan master race.
There are a lot of false flags, shall we say.
But no, it's not Nazism to be concerned about the problems that we have in the modern era, and I don't really think that it's going to lead to a genocide.
Neither do I. But you know that celebrities would support this next thing that I've got up here, which is the plans for multi-million pound refugee homes in Shropshire.
Look, if you don't pay for Afghans and Ukrainians to come and live in Shropshire at your expense, that's basically Nazis.
I mean, that's literally what this is.
It's £7.2 million on Home for Refugees, 26 properties allocated to Ukrainian families.
You know, once again, we can say that they at least have a reasonable cause.
Hang on, but no, no, but even then... Okay, yeah.
So we bring in Ukrainian refugees, right?
And if I was a refugee to a country, I wouldn't be like, right, now build me a home in the countryside.
Give me a house.
Exactly.
I wouldn't be thinking that, but I came here, you know... And if they did, I'd be pleasantly surprised.
Yeah, I'd be like, wow, brilliant, thanks.
But, like, you know, I'd expect them to put me up in maybe a hotel, or maybe some sort of refugee camp, or something.
I hate using the word camp, because we've just been talking about Arnold.
I understand.
But, you know, just... Hopefully you're smart enough watching this to understand that's not what we're referring to.
Yeah, somewhere that is, you know, where I can live for a reasonable period of time until the war is over in my home country, upon which time I will return.
That's what I would be expecting.
That is.
But no, they're being put up in houses.
While the UK itself is going through a housing crisis, and we've got the cost of living crisis, the UK government and councils are putting up 3.2 million of government grant money, and the council borrowing the other, what, 4 million needed?
This is your money that's pissing away.
Could this not go on natives?
Could this not go on actual English people?
Could they just not take our money?
Before we look after the rest of the world, could we not look after ourselves first?
I tweeted about this, and I was basically like, look, I don't consent to having my tax money taken like this.
And in fact, it's starting to resemble a form of theft.
And all I had was libertarians and the cops going, yes.
It's like, no.
No, we're not going that way.
I can hate taxes without going full libertarian.
I just don't like the government stealing my money.
That's simple as.
Stop stealing my money and giving it to foreigners.
After we've gone through all of that, demonstrating how celebrities constantly are so much better than us, let's remind ourselves of just how pathetic Most of these people really are.
I saw this article and I just had to talk about it because Seth Rogen decided to do a podcast appearance where, one, he started to brag about how happy he is that he doesn't have children in his 40s.
You know, if you're happy, Seth, you know, I'm happy as well.
I don't want more little Rogans running around.
I was going to say, no, Seth, your happiness is more important than the happiness of my own children.
I'm glad you're happy, Seth.
But also, negative reviews for his terrible stoner comedies with their fart and butt and sex jokes are so devastating for him.
I've got to say, man, Pineapple Express was hilarious.
I enjoyed Pineapple Express.
But he made that, like, 20 years ago, so... I really enjoyed Pineapple Express when I was a teenager.
Yeah, exactly, yeah.
And then I watched it again in the past few years, and the most it got out of me was the... That.
That's all the reaction I got.
Yeah, it was probably funny when I was, like, in my 20s or something.
But, um, what I find funny about this, I can't help but think of a conversation with Seth Rogen where you're like, Seth, look, everyone's their own biggest critic.
He's like, no, they are!
Sorry, Seth!
It feels, apparently, getting bad reviews feels like a very personal rejection.
As if he's trying to wine and dine these reviewers, and they're just, no, no, not interested.
Bro, don't look at the comment sections.
Yeah, I think if most critics knew how much it hurts the people that made the things they're writing about, they'd second guess the way they write these things.
I wouldn't.
In fact, if I was a film reviewer, and I have done a few film reviews in my time, that would encourage me.
Knowing that you are going to curl up... I'm hurting them!
I've chosen the path of hate against actors!
Well, look, Seth Rogen hates me, right?
It's just like Darts in Germany!
I know that Seth Rogen hates me.
Probably, yeah.
He chose the path of hate.
Yeah, he chose it.
You chose this path, Seth.
I'm just finishing it, okay?
And you're not owed good film reviews.
If you make a terrible film, it's nobody's obligation.
When you make a terrible film, it's nobody's obligation to stroke your ego and make you feel better.
Like, he talks about Green Hornet from 2011.
Does anybody remember Green Hornet from 2011?
No.
No, and rightfully so, because it was a critical flop and it bombed.
But then he talks about, oh, the reviews were really bad, people hated it, it seemed like people were taking joy and disliking a lot, and there can be a lot of joy.
Yeah, but Seth, maybe people are aware of the way that you talk about, frankly, non-Jewish people on social media.
You seem to take a lot of joy.
And just anybody remotely right-wing of yourself.
Yeah, and anyone remotely right-wing.
You seem to have a lot of hate in your heart, and you seem to take joy in crapping all over the things that they like, like Christmas.
Do you remember crapping all over Christmas, Seth?
I remember.
No, we were not good goys there, if I remember that old advert that he did.
Yeah, yeah, not shabbos goys.
I think it was the, that some goy was the thing.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That felt like a major insult.
Yeah, but anyway.
But he says, life goes on, after he's whined about a few other films that he did that were not very good, nowhere near as funny as they should have been, and didn't do as well as they could have.
I'm getting a lot of joy out of Seth Rogen right now.
Yeah, he says, oh, life goes on.
You could be making another movie as your current movie is bombing.
It's bittersweet, but you know things will be OK.
You're already working.
If the fear is the movie bombs and you won't be hired again, well, you don't have to worry about that.
And it's so nice.
So nice to hear that there are some people out in the world that are so shielded from their own failures.
Yeah, I couldn't fail.
I mean, Jesus Christ, just saying that is just an extra salt into the wound.
You're not a rich Hollywood celebrity, and I can continue to be terrible at my job and get hired and paid millions for it.
Also, if you get robbed in LA, that's just the privilege of being in LA.
Just buy another car, bro.
Just get another car, bro.
It's no problem.
I'm not attached to worldly material things.
Oh, well, I bloody am, alright?
I don't want to get robbed.
And this was so terrible, this was such a stupid interview that he did, that even the Guardian felt the need to respond to it.
The Guardian responds to their own interview, Seth Rogen.
Sorry Seth, good film reviews won't mean much if bad ones weren't allowed.
Great point actually!
This is a great point, but even this goes into the realm of self-pity and victimization.
Oh really?
Because the reviewer says, we've now had expressions of protest from both violent and non-violent wings of the anti-bad review movement.
This is a violent wing of the anti-bad rumour.
Yeah, because this is an incredible little anecdote here.
The Hanover State Opera's ballet director, Marco Goch, confronted the Frankfurter Algemeen ballet critic, Wieb Huster, in the theatre foyer and smeared dog extra in her face.
I didn't know the ballet industry was so bloody violent, Christ!
I had no idea!
And it ends up saying, ah, being criticized or mocked is not an agreeable experience, and for what it's worth, critics themselves are regularly monstered on social media.
So this is like the, ah, No more Brother Wars.
We're both so victimised by the public.
And what I find hilarious about this is they both team up to then go and monster the public for not liking the film or the critique of the film.
It's like, well, look, we all hate each other, okay?
Yeah, you're all pathetic.
Hollywood is its own separate universe at this point.
I mean, when was the last time Seth Rogen didn't call a critic of his an incel?
Or a man-baby.
Or a Nazi.
Or whatever.
You know?
When was the last time you made a good film?
Well, again... Pineapple Express, maybe?
Yeah, it's the only one I can think of, actually.
Superbad?
I heard that was alright.
I've never watched it, though.
I don't think I watched it.
Nah.
But there are some people who are not entirely insane, and I just wanted to end this segment off on a little white pill, which is that Michael Caine heard that The Prevent had named Zulu, a classic 1964 film that he was one of the main stars of, He just said that's the biggest load of BS I've ever heard.
So at least there are some people out there.
I mean, he's 90 years old, but at least he's still relatively sane.
What I love about this is like, yeah, so like 30 years ago, Zulu was just an absolute classic.
Everyone loves Zulu.
It's a good, good, good old fashioned British film, you know?
And what was interesting about Zulu is it's not disrespectful to either side.
You know, everyone in it is actually quite well represented.
And now that makes you a Nazi.
Well, it certainly could put you on the path to white supremacy.
But Michael Caine, thankfully, at least is one of the few.
I mean, he's probably going to die soon, sadly.
But at least... He's 90 years old!
Sorry, Mr. Caine!
Sorry, Mr. Caine, I'm a big fan of your work, but I'm just telling the truth.
But at least you're still sane for the time being.
So, there's that.
Let's move on.
Okay, well... Okay, fine.
God save Michael Caine.
Anyway, so I wanted to talk about a particular event that happened in England recently, which is a kind of microcosm of all of the problems that we talk about on this channel.
Everything about this event is just awful.
There are many layers to it, and every single layer is a dramatic policy failure On the part of our government, on the part of our society, on the part of the culture that pervades everything that we have to deal with.
And it's really insufferable and it's just an example of why England is just circling the drain and just who knows what the end result of this is going to be.
I don't think it's looking positive, actually, because yesterday, Bo and I did a Hangout talking about the current state of England and what we can do to make things better.
I definitely do recommend you go and watch this on literacies.com, because it's a very well-measured and well-thought-out piece, which I think is actually quite applicable to what we're about to talk about now.
So, this is the article from the Daily Mail, and we're going to go through this in depth, because this is just remarkable.
As you can see from the title, What a headline!
Bloody hell!
Iraqi immigrant, 28, stabbed a university student, 18, in a bid to be deported because he was disillusioned with life in a taxpayer-funded hotel after arriving on a small boat and racking up a string of convictions.
What a headline.
Bloody hell.
Doesn't that just have everything?
So we put this guy up in a taxpayer-funded hotel.
He decides- He breaks into the country.
Yeah, after he breaks into the country.
We give him money, and he's like, I need to get out of here, I know what I'm gonna do, murder someone.
But he's also committed, apparently, a string of offences before this.
So, we didn't deport him when he decided to willingly break the law before, in a means to get deported.
So, he had to resort to murder.
This is how far immigration has gone, that people who don't want to be here anymore, when we are putting them up in taxpayer-funded hotels, decide that they need to literally murder people to get deported.
Yeah.
Brilliant.
Let's go through the details, shall we?
Right, so there's a video in here.
They say, this is a horrifying moment.
An Iraqi immigrant who arrived in Britain on a small boat stabbed a student in a bid to be deported.
Rabez Mohammed, 28, has been jailed for six years.
Only six years for stabbing a random guy in the street.
Only six years.
I'm not saying that we should give in to this guy's demands or anything.
No, we should hang him!
Why don't we?
We could hang him.
Or, why don't we just deport him then?
No, we should hang him.
You know, you walk up to someone in the street and stab them because you think you're going to get what you want out of stabbing them.
Square in the back, this kid got a punctured lung and nearly bled out and died.
Thankfully he was saved.
Spoiler alert.
But this, in my opinion, is attempted murder.
Well, it is attempted murder.
Surely, if you're stabbing someone square in the back with a massive carving knife, you think you're going to kill them?
So he should be hanged as an example to the rest, right?
But, uh, so he's been, uh, he walked up to Ellis Wheeler, who's 18, to ask him a question before knifing him in the back.
So he even got the guy to drop his guard to, you know, it's like, Hey man, how you doing?
Blah, blah.
Chunk.
Right?
Muhammad has a string of previous convictions, including a prison term.
Uh, and then he chased the student off who managed to run away before passing out.
So why are you chasing?
What are you going to do?
Stab him again?
Of course you're going to stab him again, because you're trying to kill him.
And this is the kind of person that is illegally crossing.
You don't hear anything from Gary Lineker about this.
Oh, I'm a refugee's welcome.
Well, what war is going on in Iraq right now?
None.
So he's not a refugee.
And if he's a refugee from Iraq, why is he so desperate to get back there?
The whole point of this is, as they say, Southampton Crown Court heard that Mohammed carried out the attack, hoping it would get him deported from the UK where he had arrived illegally by crossing the Channel in a small boat.
He had grown disenchanted with life in taxpayer-funded Bournemouth Hotel, complained of having no work or money, the court heard.
It's not enough that he was allowed to stay in this country.
We were not giving him enough money.
Because I don't know how much they give him every week, like 60 quid a week or something.
He's like, well, that's just not enough.
I mean, they always seem to be able to afford really nice brand new pairs of shoes anyway.
Well, exactly.
Look at his gear.
He's not exactly wearing sackcloth and rags, is he?
No.
He's wearing the latest sort of clothes.
So it's like, OK.
Mad, absolutely mental, I'm going to break into your country, you're going to give me money.
But you're not giving me enough money, so I want to go back to the place that I've claimed to be a refugee from.
Also, I deserve the work.
If you're not going to give me the money, you just need to hand me out a job, which could be going to an English person.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely.
Right?
And so, we weren't giving him enough free money or opportunities, and so he's like, right, yeah, so what I need to do is murder someone in the street so they send me back to the place I claim to be a refugee from.
Everything about this is awful.
This all lies on the part of the alleged refugee, the criminal migrant.
So going on, CCTV footage showed the Iraqi stopping him to ask him if he knew anything about kickboxing.
So he tries to get his defence down by trying to engage him in a conversation about a hobby or something like this.
And then he pulled up a kitchen knife from his coat and plunged it into the teenager's back, puncturing his lung.
So, he tries to lure him in, and you can see that this must be a premeditated attack because he has the massive kitchen knife on hand to pull out to stab him.
Well, I don't carry one of those around casually.
No, weirdly, I don't carry one around either.
It's just strange.
So, this is completely malevolent, completely premeditated, and done with an intent to gain personal benefit to the murderer himself.
What is not awful about this?
This, of course, ruins the kid's life.
Now, unsurprisingly, right?
Ellis was taken to hospital where he had surgery.
A heroic friend put pressure on the wound while calling 999, and was thanked and rewarded by the judge for saving his life.
The judge gave him 250 quid, which is nice.
Ellis, of course, then, he's a student, he misses his exams, and now he can't sleep because of anxiety attacks.
And I'm sure that he's definitely not a racist now.
I'm sure there's one fewer racist maid.
If I were either of those people, the friend or the actual victim, I wouldn't want £250.
I would want the man's hand, gifted to me, on a plaque.
That's what I would want.
I mean, thank God he survived this attempted murder.
But, I mean, it's ruined his mental health, probably damaged his academic career.
And he's only 18 years old, so, tortured longer than 18 years old, how are you going to recover from that for the rest of your life?
Yeah, and may have long-lasting, life-changing, you know, he may have been, he was in sports or something, that he might not be able to do.
That's ruined?
Who knows?
You know, there's so many, so many questions.
And this man would have you believe that we drove him to do this, for not being as generous as we already are.
The mail online asks the Home Office whether Mohammed will be deported, and if so, when?
It's like, no, no, wrong question.
When will he be hanged?
That's the question.
Because that's what this man deserves.
This is a totally, utterly immoral thing for him to have done.
I mean, think of the contempt that Mohammed here must have for the people who took him in and gave him money.
Right.
He lied to our faces and we were like, oh yeah, okay, come on in.
Here's a hotel room in a four-star hotel and here's money every week.
He's like, wow, these absolute suckers.
And after long enough being here, he's like, yeah, you know, I'm getting bored now.
I'm not getting enough.
I want more money.
This isn't fun.
I want to go back to Iraq, but I can't afford the plane ticket.
So I'm just going to murder one of my hosts.
And then I'll expect them to give me the money for the plane ticket.
The contempt that Mohammed has for England and its culture and its people, and the generosity we have extended to him, just drips off of this.
I can't stand it.
This is driving me mad.
And then I'll see Gary Lineker tweeting, refugees welcome us.
Take Mohammed into your house, Gary.
I dare you.
Maybe Emma Thompson can.
But again, at least Emma Thompson has taken a refugee, right?
There's one thing, I suppose.
Yeah, like, okay.
I mean, it's look at the draw.
She's lucky she didn't get a Mohammed, but still.
Sure, but at least she has put her money where her mouth is.
Unlike Gary Lineker, who is getting paid 1.3 million a year by the BBC, as in people like me who have to pay the BBC TV license, to sit there and say that you are some sort of bad person for not wanting liars and attempted murderers like this breaking into your country.
This drives me mental.
I can't stand this, right?
So the motive, as the Daily Mail say, is that Mohammed apparently felt a grief that he had no money to get home.
Or maybe if you hadn't spent it on all those fancy clothes, Mohammed, right?
You didn't need to come here in the first place.
You want to get home, you didn't have to come here.
You're not a refugee if you so desperately want to go back to the country that you are a refugee from.
I saw an article the other day that said something like 75% of refugees in Sweden had been taking holidays back to the countries that they were refugees from.
Really?
That's amazing.
I mean, I have heard as well that Sweden is thinking about just paying migrants to just go home.
Here, take this fiver and... Why pay them?
Just deport.
Just literally put them on the plane and send.
Well, I suppose if you start deporting them willy-nilly, the UN will probably get involved.
At least if you're paying them off, you're gonna have like a smoke screen of... I don't care.
I'm not interested in the UN's opinion.
The UN have like the Saudi Arabian run the Women's Council and things like that.
It's like, no, I don't care.
You've got no moral authority.
None of you do.
You're all awful.
Anyway, so anyway, Mohammed was like, I'm annoyed that I can't get home.
So hoped that a very serious crime would mean the British government would fly him back to Iraq immediately.
Now, doesn't that just go to show you how much of a bloody soft touch they view us as?
It's like, look, if I murder someone, maybe the British government will send me back to Iraq.
It's like, really, that's amazing, because if you went back, say, 70-odd years before 1965, then you wouldn't have refugees thinking that.
They wouldn't be like, oh, I'm going to commit a serious crime, and then they'll do what I want.
Because if they committed a serious crime, they would be hanged in public.
That's why.
They would have respect for the British judicial system, The British public, and they would know that we actually enforce laws with prejudice.
We do not sit there and go, oh yeah, well, you stabbed someone to death, right?
Okay, well, we'll send you where you want to go.
No.
A murderer, an attempted murderer, should not get the things they want.
Andrew Houston, prosecutor, said Mohammed had spoken to people who knew the immigration system ahead of the attack.
So people in the immigration, or someone who knew about the immigration system, possibly his fellow refugees, were like, well, if you do something really serious, I might send you back, mate.
Good point.
I'll go get a kitchen knife.
Unbelievable.
I mean, you say how much of a soft touch the viewers are having.
I don't see it as being inaccurate.
They don't respect us.
They don't respect us, and we don't give them any reason to respect us, because he didn't even get deported, he's not been hanged, like you say, he got six years.
Six years, and let's be perfectly honest, he will probably get out in fewer than six years.
Yeah, he'll get out in three years with good behaviour.
For stabbing a kid in the back, in the middle of the street.
for his own agenda.
But what I love, so to be clear, right?
He's not afraid for his right to life in Iraq.
He's not a refugee.
He is an adventurer looking for plunder.
And that is the root of his concern.
He came here illegally looking for money and he didn't get enough money.
And so now he wants to go back.
And also maybe if I commit a crime, Ha ha ha.
Not effing likely, son.
Is it?
Really?
If you go to the next one, here's the Home Office's own statistics, and we'll just get that in large, John, just so you can see, right?
We used to, in 2010, deport about 15,000 and then another 30,000 would voluntarily leave for being in the country illegally.
So this is probably the last vestiges of Blairism.
No, it's the last vestiges of conservatism, but I mean Blair probably would have done this too.
But as you can see, by 2021 we are forcibly deporting maybe two and a half thousand, and then another five thousand might self-deport, and these are illegals.
Well I did see a Twitter post from the Conservatives recently saying that we've deported 690 so far this year, Wow.
I mean, they also say that 45,000 came across this year.
So, brilliant job, Conservatives.
Again, Tony Blair would just be making this happen.
I can't believe we're praising the name of Blair.
But he would actually make this happen.
That's the thing.
He didn't let in a million immigrants a year, and he would have got rid of these people.
He was evil, but he was competent evil.
Yes, that's exactly it.
He was evil, but he was competent.
But I love Mohammed's optimism here.
Maybe if I commit a serious crime, they'll deport me.
Pfft, good luck.
We'll be trying to get them to deport serious criminals.
You'll get a knighthood by the end of the decade, don't worry.
Yeah, you'll be in the House of Lords by the end of this, mate.
I fucking hate this country sometimes.
Anyway, returning to the article, right?
So they say, it has emerged before the knife attack that he had already been cautioned for criminal damage and battery in May last year.
So he's already a violent criminal.
He's already smashed stuff up and he's beaten someone up.
And he was jailed for 12 weeks for racially aggravated harassment and stalking.
So he, on top of all of this, he is also a racist.
Lineker, anything to say on this?
Come on, any progressives care that someone was jailed for three months for racially aggravated harassment and stalking, probably of a woman, right?
It's not gonna be stalking of a man that they're gonna jail a guy for, for three months, is it?
Right?
He's a racist, he is a misogynist, he is an attempted murderer, and Gary Lineker's like, what?
What?
No.
Refugees welcome, mate.
Don't know what you're talking about.
Oh, these walkers are delicious, aren't they?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Buy my crisps.
It's unbelievable.
Right?
He's a psychopathic adventurer who's here to rape, murder, and loot.
That's what he's done.
Today he starts his six-year prison term after pleading guilty to grievous bodily harm with intent and possessing the knife blade.
So, uh, what I like about this is my solution would be this man deserves the death penalty and the progressives would be like, yeah, but how do we know we're not hanging the wrong man?
Well, actually in this case, we know we're not hanging the wrong man.
Like we've got, we've got the evidence of his fingerprints on the gloves.
We've got the, um, Genetic evidence of him doing all of this.
We've got the footage of him doing it.
We've got multiple eyewitnesses because he did it in the middle of a crowded street.
And we've literally, as I said, we've got CCTV footage.
And he has admitted to doing it.
We can categorically state that it could not have been any other human being on Earth.
Oh, but it would just waste taxpayer money on appeals.
That's an excuse I've always heard.
Don't let him appeal, then.
No, no, no, because we'll let him appeal, the appeal will be denied, and then we'll hang him, and we need swift justice as well.
This is a totally justified use of the death penalty, and we don't have it because of the Labour government in 1965, so you can thank them for that.
The judge said, when sentencing Mohammed, Judge Brian Forster said he berated him for inflicting the horrific injuries to achieve his own end.
He said, when anyone carries out an attack with a knife, it is down to chance.
This was an indiscriminate attack.
Any member of our community could have been the victim.
You were willing to inflict a serious injury with a weapon to achieve your own end, you could have killed the victim.
Which is way more charitable than I would have been.
Is this what we've come to?
We've given him an incredibly mild dressing down.
Yes.
Slap on the wrist, mild dressing down, six years.
But what I find interesting is this could have been any member of our community.
It's like, so what is it?
Like, that's the... It's not that he stabbed Mr. Ellis.
It's that it could have been anyone.
I mean, it was Mr. Ellis, which I don't care.
But it could have been any one of us.
It's like, yeah, but he stabbed that guy.
That guy has a right not to be stabbed by an illegal immigrant.
It doesn't matter that it could have been any of the community.
It was him and he did it.
There's some weird abstraction there that I don't understand.
I think what goes on is that the people in these positions, like judges and such, they don't live typically in the real world among the other people.
So they have to address it by, oh, what if it happened to me?
No, you don't need to do that.
You can just be like, well, I don't want it to happen to anyone.
Yeah.
And especially if it happens to this particular person, that counts in and of itself.
Exactly.
It was wrong that it happened to this young man, and it should never happen again.
And to make sure that it doesn't happen again, and as Lee Anderson rightly pointed out, there's a very low recidivism rate when the death penalty is the consequence, This is not going to happen again.
But in six years' time, or three years' time, if he gets out on good behaviour, how do we know he's not going to be like, right, okay, I'm still in Britain.
I'm literally a criminal who broke in and I was trying to get deported.
I nearly murdered someone trying to get deported.
I've still not been deported.
I've still not been deported and I'm still in Britain.
What are my options here?
Why won't he commit another crime like this?
What is stopping him?
I don't know, but what's the recidivism rate on poltergeists, though?
Not very high.
Oh, excellent.
Anyway, the worst part about this, right, is that he is not even the first illegal migrant to the invader, shall we say.
Someone who broke into the country to get bored and dissatisfied with the amount of money that we're giving them and murder someone or attempt to murder someone in order to get deported.
I don't know why the migrants think that murdering someone will get you deported, because like we've shown, virtually nothing gets you deported.
But six months before the attack, an Afghan man called Lawaghin Abdul Razamazi, someone like that, 21, murdered Thomas Roberts during an argument over an e-scooter.
He was convicted of murder in Bournemouth.
And apparently when he was arrested at the scene, oh no, sorry, that was the other guy.
So this guy was just a murderer.
Sorry, I got that bit wrong.
My mistake.
This guy was just a murderer.
The knife obsessed criminal.
Do you remember he'd murdered someone in Serbia and so he'd fled to the UK?
And we were just like, come on in.
Would you like a four star hotel?
Why do we keep doing this?
You've pointed it out so many times over history, England has just been a refuge for radicals who've just come here... These people aren't even radicals!
If he was like, yeah, I was doing it for Allah or something, I'd be like, okay, fair enough, at least he's mental.
But this guy is just a pirate.
That's literally what he is.
Like, he's not even a radical.
So anyway, yeah.
So this is not the first time, of course, someone has been murdered by one of the boat people.
What a surprise.
But, I mean, you will be glad to know that his defence, Mr Richard Tutte, All is forgiven.
No, hang him.
Muhammad had been making what efforts he could to be deported.
Had no work and no money.
But it's believed from what he had been told that he needed to commit an offence that was serious enough.
Who told him that?
But he presents a very naive person.
He has experienced remorse, or at least sorrow.
What if he's sorry?
I'm sorry.
All is forgiven.
Nearly murdering you didn't get me deported from the country.
I'm just really sorry.
That's what I thought.
I mean, I was given bad advice, bro.
No, hang him.
He needs to be hanged.
Is that all we've got to say?
Yeah, well that's the appropriate penalty.
The appropriate punishment for what he has done is the death penalty.
No, I absolutely agree.
But let's move on.
As if that previous segment wasn't making it clear enough, our political leaders absolutely despise us, they hate us, they want us to be overrun, and it's becoming more and more clear that they will just outright say it, that they want us to become minorities in our own country so we can have who knows how many Mohammeds deciding that we're not giving them enough and then stabbing people indiscriminately on the street.
I'm just trying to get deported, bro.
Yeah, don't worry about it.
I'm really sorry, man.
I didn't want to do this.
Yeah, we recently had an article from Beau that was excellent where he called it fascism over the mercy, which was talking about the supposed new rash of fascists in Liverpool, which was a development that, having visited Liverpool a number of times, doesn't seem to line up with me, but apparently people deciding that they want to protest migrants in hotels going out and raping the locals is far-right fascism.
So Beau always has quite an acerbic wit and way with words, He's always well worth a read and with this, if you're a Silver tier subscriber, you can even hear him read the article for himself.
One of the things that anyone who's not familiar with Liverpool might need to know is that it's infamously leftist to the point where at their football games you'll see communist flags.
They're notorious for chanting things like, we're not English, we're Scousers, they have a very independent spirit.
All the Irish colonists.
Well, yeah, and that independent spirit is inevitably massively communist.
Like all Celts, they're incredibly commie.
Yeah, and it's strange, once again, that it was labelled as far-right fascism as soon as they go, we don't want immigrants raping our people.
I mean, but that's just how it goes.
Not an unreasonable position, to be honest, but apparently that's Flash, isn't it?
No, a very far-right position, though, supposedly.
But let's take a look into the minds of our political leaders and how they see us, because this isn't just saying becoming a minority, this isn't just something that's in the air, this isn't just something that we've plucked out of thin air, this is something that the EU is actively working on.
Right, so this is becomingaminorityproject.eu.
Yes.
This is funded by the European Research Council through an ERC-Advanced grant, and that is literally just receiving money from the EU.
And what this is doing is it will look into the lives of people without a migration background.
What's a person without a migration background usually called?
They used to have a term for it, called natives.
Or indigenous?
Or indigenous, but I'm pretty sure they only apply that term to people who look like American Indians these days.
Yes, the Sami being the only indigenous people in Europe.
Doesn't really hold much water for me.
I do love it.
People without a migration background.
Well, it's just so insidious, isn't it?
They know how to manipulate language.
And the manipulation of language will manipulate the way that you think.
So instead of thinking of yourself as native, somebody tied to the soil, somebody with ancestry and history going back a thousand, at least, if not thousands of years in a particular land... Somebody with investment.
You're just somebody who didn't migrate here.
Yeah, exactly.
There's no value judgment involved in someone who's just arrived, just got off the boat, off the illegal boat, who's about to stab you, and you, who has been part of a lineage, a continuation of families for literally like a thousand years, who have built the land and the country to what it is now.
There's literally no moral difference.
Yeah, and that's what they're trying to do with the way that they change this language, because the more that you get people to accept terms like that, once again, the more it's going to affect the way that you think.
And, you know, two generations from now, your grandchildren are going to be thinking, well, I'm just someone without a migration background, which certainly isn't how I want my grandchildren to be thinking.
But they give examples in this, because this is, like I say, is a larger project.
They do lots of research into the effects of migration into Europe because that's the only way that they're really focusing on this and they take a look at integration and the effects of that and the way that integration should be going because they notice that there's this strange feeling that people without a migration background in these countries want people migrating to integrate into the local culture.
That's not right!
That's Nazism.
Yeah, basically.
That's literally what Hitler was saying.
We need these Jews to integrate.
We need all of these minorities who have immigrated into 1930s Germany to just integrate to local German culture.
I'm pretty sure that was what Kristallnacht was.
Yeah.
No, but it gives examples.
So it says, in a city like Amsterdam, today only one in three youngsters under the age of 15 has two parents born in the Netherlands.
Amazing.
Stated without value judgment, just... I mean, you know that the person typing this was typing it with one hand.
I mean, in London it's 40%.
40% of people are immigrants in London.
And once again, if you start to actually take it down into the age demographics, for the young people in London, it probably will be worse than 1 in 3.
Yeah.
And the number of English left in London is 37%, so there are more first-generation immigrants in London than there are English people these days.
Well, you'll see the Becoming a Minority project, you'll see their solution to the idea of white people and native English people wanting to get away from their newly colonised cities and just, you know, go and live somewhere where they can all go and be English.
You'll see their attitude towards that.
Oh yeah, okay, I look forward to it.
They say here, this situation where everybody belongs to a minority, Now that everything has been flattened down, and we're all minorities... Hang on, there might be an advantage to that.
Surely then, the English community, as the largest minority in a democratic society, deserves primacy about considerations towards their interests.
Well, in a democratic society, and I know for one, I for one, voted for this sort of thing to be going on.
I recall being asked about this in all of the elections I voted in.
It was the top of the agenda on every single manifesto.
Pretty sure this is what Boris campaigned for.
Yeah.
2019, he said, we need to- English minority in their own country!
We need to become the minority.
Conservatives 2020.
They point out, rightly, that this situation is becoming more and more common in many neighbourhoods of large Western European cities, which is probably why people don't like living there anymore.
For example, 40% of the neighbourhoods in Amsterdam, people of Dutch descent, are now a numerical minority.
I'm sure the Dutch are thrilled by that.
You know, when I used to think, oh, it would be really nice to go and visit Amsterdam and visit the local culture, now I just get a variety of local cultures to choose from, apparently.
That's just what I want.
And like I say, this is funded by the EU, so this comes very much across as a, we created the problem, so now we're doing the research on how to keep the problem...
Going, and make it even worse, and make people possibly more comfortable as they get pushed out of their own countries.
And they get to pay for it, too.
Oh, yeah, that's always the most fun part.
But let's take a look at some of the papers that they link on the website, and just see the demonic... because that's the only word I can... I'm going to sound like Connor a little bit here.
This is a truly demonic attitude that our political leaders and the people that they employ to do their research for them.
The way they look at these situations.
So this next paper is one that, once again, is linked on the website.
Shifting the Focus of Ethnic Villages.
Oh yeah.
So this is taking the idea of, we know that there are ethnic enclaves in cities like London.
If you go to, what was it, Tower Hamlets is what, 95% non-native English now?
And that's probably just the bits that aren't Canary Wharf.
Everywhere around it is just 95% Muslim, or something like that.
Well, we shouldn't focus on...
Tower Hamlets probably...
Well, yeah, and then you've got places like Hackney, where there's like 60% Caribbean.
And I've seen a recent article from the BBC where they were praising a town, a small corner of Yorkshire, which is basically just no English people there anymore.
That was in 2016 as well.
Was that 2016 that they started bragging about?
I mean reporting on that.
Yeah, yeah.
Very interesting.
Well, we need to stop.
We need to shift the focus.
We need to shift the framing that we're doing this for, because the frame game is king.
In the mind of the public, your average Dino watching television, watching the BBC, they'll be a bit sus of some things, but if they see the reporting going in one particular way, as long as you've got the frame game right, you've got the slogans right, most people just go along with it.
Well, Dino doesn't need to critically think about anything.
No, he doesn't.
He just needs his pure gym subscription.
He needs his new Nikes or Airsoft or whatever they are.
Go down for a breakfast at the local pub and everything's fine.
Yeah, Connor understands this, being a Dino himself.
Well, they're addressing the Dino question over the weekend, and I'm aware I've been named Dino, all because I do go to Pure Gym.
I don't think anyone who works here is a Dino.
No, neither do I. But yeah, the name of the paper says it all, what they're trying to do, but let's clarify what they're doing here.
So, they say, this made me wonder, after looking into that idea that I just explained there, do people without a migration background, that just really love hammering home nap tip, this is how the people behind closed doors are talking about you.
Fellow Englishmen watching this video, you are just a person without a migration background.
You are just an economic unit to be shifted from one place to another.
In highly diverse cities, don't they cluster just as much as people with a migration background?
And if so, why is this segregation of people of white native descent rarely problematized in public discourse?
At least they're usually native then.
At least they did there, but I can tell that they really didn't want to.
Is it problematic that when being edged out of their own cities, they move to areas with other English people?
Where they can presumably retain English traditions and customs, or even just English attitudes towards things.
So, you know, you talk to an English person, you know that they're going to have a certain attitude and even just way of being.
It's nice to be around people who share those ways of being with you.
Customs and habits.
It makes life a bit more predictable.
And I think nowadays, when everything is so unpredictable and we're being told constantly we need to constantly be on the verge of change and upheaval, just a little bit of consistency is nice.
But I just think it's interesting that they're addressing this from how do we make the phenomenon of native people in their own country sticking together and not integrating into foreign populations, how do we make that a problem?
Really?
That's it?
Why?
Why is that an issue, I wonder?
I wonder.
I mean, I personally don't think we should be under any obligation to integrate with foreign cultures that are moving into our country on our taxpayer money.
You would think the obligation would be the other way around.
Yes, but they bring up some examples.
Today, more than 54% of the inhabitants of Vienna have a migration background.
Oh, right.
So 54% of Vienna is immigrant.
Yes, and this means that the capital of Austria, could you even call it that at this point, does not host an ethnic majority anymore.
There's just a sense of victory.
This feels like a victory lap when they can start making papers like this, like, yes, we've done it boys, we've driven the Europeans out of their own cities.
Ethnic Austrians being another numerical minority on the city on the neighbourhood level.
Yeah, and within this city, the composition of ethnic Austrians varies across districts and neighbourhoods, and we can see that they also do cluster in ethnic villages.
Well, so do the immigrants.
Why is it not a problem when the immigrants do it?
Well, that's the question.
They're saying that the evil, backwards, bigoted, normal people, the plebs on the ground, notice this and they problematise it, so we need to make them a problem back.
That just sounds like bigotry to me.
If you're talking about these minority groups such as Austrians, and you're saying, no, no, no, the way they live their lives is wrong, no, that's racism.
It is, it is, and they say here that there's an example of Peer Albin Hansen, settled in the otherwise greatly diverse 10th district of Faveriton.
So the greatly diverse, the greatness, the diversity is our strength.
So what these communities are, they're just weaker, just from the fact that they're more homogenous.
They're weaker, presumably.
Well, I mean, I wouldn't want to take that approach to, say, the Muslim community, or the black community, or the Bangladesh community, or the Indian community, or, you know, that's just really racist to say that a community, because it's an ethnic enclave, is weaker and lacking in some way.
Yeah, but despite all of that, the Per Albin Hansen settlement is hardly recognised as an ethnic village, nor problematised by the public and scholars, apart from these scholars.
Instead, some residents label the settlement the most beautiful neighbourhood in Faveriton, which it, let's be honest, probably is.
I wonder why.
But so, why is it okay, in quotes, for people of white, native descent, I love the brackets for white, like they're saying it under their breath, white, native descent to cluster, but not for non-natives?
Well, because they're non-natives.
You've answered your own question in the question.
Because there was supposed to be integration of foreigners into our culture, which didn't happen.
And as someone who believes in the right of the freedom of association, I think people do have the freedom to associate with people that they want to.
And if this is just how things happen, then we shouldn't have political leaders in their stooges deciding how they can change everything.
This view emphasises the idea that the people of native descent, or whites in general, are ethnicity-free, and the undesirable effects of segregation do almost exclusively apply to the other.
And that's a very internationalist way of looking at it, because I don't think Europeans see themselves as without ethnicity.
No, of course we have ethnicity, that's why we call them Austrians.
But why...
Why does that apply to the European, the natives, and not the non-natives?
That surely is exactly something that can be applied both ways.
You'd think so.
It might also explain though why the clustering of white, once again in brackets, why have they kept it in brackets every single time?
Why not just people of native descent?
Why do you have to bring up the fact that they're white?
Yeah, the clustering of white people.
And the thing is, like, okay, so let's take London as an example.
There are hundreds of thousands of Europeans living in London.
They're not of native descent, but they are white.
I still don't want them there.
I still like London to be less metropolitan, cosmopolitan, globalist, let all the world soak in.
No, I want it to be an English city.
Yeah, there are literally millions, well not millions, hundreds of thousands of French and German and Polish and various other European ethnicities who are non-native but are white.
Why do you have to use the word white?
Yeah, but they say that these people, these white people without a migration background, is seldom seen as a problem.
Just because they are the majority on the country level, does it mean that cultural integration is a one-way street in highly diverse cities?
As if we have to ask the people funding and writing this research for permission.
For permission to form our own communities and live among people that we actually want to live among, rather than be, you know, graced with the presence of the Mohammeds of the world.
And if you want evidence of why exactly people tend to cluster in these neighbourhoods, just look at the previous segment.
Yeah.
There you go.
Continuing to exclude white ethnic villages from the segregation discourse reinforces the idea of whiteness and the native... Hang on, okay, right, okay, I see.
So the segregation discourse, the discourse is, oh, it's a problem that the immigrants have come over and self-segregated into their local communities.
That's a problem they're working on, presumably.
But we never talk about how the indigenous white people are self-segregating.
That's a problem too, right?
And I suppose if you literally want to create this globalist, homogenous soup of culture where literally no one is from anywhere, And no one, if you're the atomized individual, like, you know, nanites just wandering around in a giant megacity, in your 15-minute megacity, just cooming all day.
That probably is a problem.
You're going to love which megacity they want to base all of this off as well.
But no, no, first we'll look at the next article, because this is another one linked on the Becoming a Minority project page, where they're talking about, okay, what do we do then?
What do we do, seeing as we've got all of these evil white enclaves set up, how do we integrate Well, in their defence, I mean, they also think the brown enclaves are evil.
Oh, well, we need to just get everyone together.
We need the beige future.
Yeah, we're never going to get the atomised beige future that they want without racial integration on every single level.
But they say what we need to do is we need to dismantle the way in which we do integration, which inevitably means we as the native populations need to become the foreigners.
Okay, yeah.
Fair enough.
Whether in research or policy making, which would also go hand in hand with dismantling the nation state.
Oh, brilliant.
I don't remember signing up for that, but okay.
I'm sure the polls are going to be very on board with this.
And I love the phrasing of this next clause in the sentence.
And I don't think that's a task we are up to, brackets, yet.
Amazing.
This is a very anti-Semitic article, I must say.
How dare they be so opposed to Israel?
But you've got to be honest, folks.
This is the agenda and the goal, and they will just openly tell you this, right?
They want to dismantle the nation-state and dismantle any kind of ethnic differences, and this is where liberal ideology leads to.
It only views a person as an individual.
They're not part of a continuum of culture, and so they can't understand Why there might be a value difference between one culture and another.
And this value difference is shared by both of these people in these cultures, which is why they self-segregate like they do.
That's all it is.
And the liberal bigotry against the culture itself prevents them from being able to engage And once again, that's the insidiousness of this whole project, which is, excuse me, they've had the mass migration, they've had who knows how many cultures and different peoples flooding into the European countries, and yet people still choose to associate with who they associate with.
And that's the problem.
This all is predicated on one of the false assumptions of liberalism that I wrote about recently, which is the universal man.
They think that they can create a kind of universalized man.
There's no such thing.
There never has been such thing.
And they never will be, and this is the result of it.
And they're still trying to get to that position.
And the fact of the matter is that 99% of these people choosing to associate with who they choose to associate with are doing so entirely peacefully.
Yeah, there's no fault on their part for doing that.
But it's just a complete moral condemnation from our political leaders.
And on the basis of the city that they want to base it off of, we've got this article on superdiversity from the University of Birmingham praising Birmingham As a place with an unprecedented variety of cultures, identities, faiths, languages, and immigration statuses.
Birmingham is one of the UK's most diverse, and therefore most bestest, cities, and soon to be one of the several so-called minority-majority cities, which means that you, as the native population, are no longer the majority.
Well, the English are a minority in Birmingham.
Yep.
Exemplifies the changes associated with the emergence of superdiversity.
Would we like to go into a bit more detail about those changes associated with it?
I bet they wouldn't.
Well, I mean, they leave that part out.
Oh, do they?
They leave it out.
So what they're basically just saying is they want the entirety of the EU, the Europe, and England included in that, to be a gigantic globalist open-air Birmingham.
That doesn't sound too appealing to me.
But weirdly, that's just the first stage on the mission, right?
Because even if you get the gigantic open-air Birmingham, you've still got the segregation of these cultures.
So then they're going to have to start breaking down the barriers, the cultural differences between these things.
So eventually, you just have the homogenous soup of Coomber individuals walking around, buying the latest iPhone or whatever.
Well, as long as they're happy with all of their OnlyFans subscriptions, knowing that their daughter's earning a good living serving those kumas, then, you know, there you go.
That's all the globalist elites really care about.
That's happiness, don't you understand?
Oh, and happiness is the true meaning of life.
Well, it kind of is, but the question is, what's the true meaning of happiness?
It's a very gross, modern interpretation of happiness, isn't it?
Yes, it's a very materialistic, liberal interpretation of happiness.
And they just rub it in at the end here.
Much of Europe and the developed world have already become super diverse, and super diversity is here to stay.
That's right, we've ruined your countries and there's nothing you can do about it.
Nah nah nah nah nah.
That's literally what that means, yeah.
That's the message.
So, it's absolutely ridiculous, and I thought I'd end this on a bit of a meme, because I did find this article showing the results of superdiversity, what we, as the people without migration background in these countries, can expect and are getting nowadays.
Somehow we're still hurting the minorities.
Yes.
LA, as everybody knows, is a superdiverse city, and one that we should all think of as an ideal to strive for and you can see that the messaging always ends up going in one particular direction which is this amazing LA Times article saying how white and affluent drivers are polluting the air breathed by LA's people of color and this is obviously something that has only been caused by the segregation inherent within these communities and probably could be solved by greater integration
But the actual solutions put forward are always the same ones.
So this person is basically just whining, oh, people of colour, they live in communities where they're always next to freeways, they get bad air, whereas I, as an affluent white person, feel so terrible driving through those communities every morning on my way into work.
I try my best to get the train, but sometimes I just have to get the car.
As if he's waving a confederate flag outside his window as he's driving through Compton or something.
I have to drive through here!
And he's just pointing out, when these people, when they drive through, these commuters are coming in and shopping in these communities and patronising restaurants.
It's probably not, and I don't think the locals would probably like them doing that.
Isn't it interesting, the American view is we need more segregation.
That's a very American view.
Yeah, we have to abolish so green.
You're not allowed to live anywhere.
But the solutions are everything that you would expect.
We need electric cars, we need to ban fossil fuels, we need climate justice, all these sorts of things.
That's the American view.
But the European view, of course, is that our political leaders hate you, and they want you to become a minority, and they don't want you to be able to choose the communities that you live in, because screw you.
Well, on that note, let's go to video comments.
Happy Friday, everyone!
Yeah, I hope you're having a great weekend!
All right, let's talk about this California native in my garden, the Laelia platygelosia, also known as the titty tips, which I know is scandalous.
This one is one that just kind of grows on the coasts usually, and it grows inland a little bit.
It does really good in gardens, and the reason why it's often used in mixes is because it grows easily And it likes a lot of sun, a lot of water.
So it's a good one.
It's one of my favorites in terms of the yellows.
So definitely recommend.
Looks lovely.
Hang on, hang on.
There was a kind of sad desperation about that Californian plant.
Was there?
Yeah.
It was struggling to eke out a meagre existence in the barren deserts of California.
Desperate for water.
Surely there's everyone in California, isn't there?
Tired of sunlight.
Well, sure, but like, the poor old plants.
I'm sorry, it's just... Californian vegetation just makes me sad.
I'm on a jihad against California's natural beauty.
Oh, fair, fair.
For some reason.
I don't know why, it's just funny.
But no, that was pretty, alright.
Let's move on!
The most terrible attack on democracy, January 6th, was perpetuated without F-16s, nukes, or even firearms.
That really reflects the strength of the democracy.
Nobody tell them that the White House was burned down in 1812.
Good point.
I love that you've got a sword for that now.
Yeah, I love the fact that this is actually resembling a suit of power armor now.
This is really cool.
This is how we get to 40k.
One man in his garage.
Oh, sorry.
All right.
Liberty Prime says, finally gotten to see one of these live.
Want to say just thanks for such a great podcast.
Giving me hope in such a crazy world.
Special shout out to Dan, who's managed to convince my lifelong Tory voted dad that the Tories have zero idea what to do financially.
Keep up the good work guys.
And that's, that's the best thing as well.
You know, make your parents watch the things we do.
That's exactly the thing.
We've got to explain to the boomers, look, they're all idiots or malevolent, and they're ruining things on purpose or because they have no idea what they're doing.
And that's the way to go.
And as far as I know, the boomers still own most of the financial capital, so if we can get through to the boomers, difficult as it can be, maybe something could happen.
Charlie says, I think we need to see the opinions of movie stars with the same lens as the ancient Greeks, Romans and Byzantines did.
That with utter contempt.
Now shut up and perform, monkey.
Also, these idiots are a bunch of spoiled pampered brats, the kind of people that get blisters from pointing.
Good point.
Robert says, isn't it a shame that there are so many bombs dropping in France?
Yeah.
Yeah.
I always wonder about that.
Yeah.
Jonathan Crowe says, I'm really chuckling at these celebrities.
It sounds like they're reading out creative writing prompts.
Quick, write a short story about fleeing a war, but also you're a criminal.
I will just point out that Connor, our own Connor, left a comment here that's been highlighted saying Michael Caine partnered with the UK government to make a promo video for the COVID vaccine.
Good Scrooge, bad Alfred, not our guy.
That's fair.
Yeah, but the thing about the COVID thing is that I don't actually blame any of them, especially the boomers, for being pro-vaccine.
I mean, they were old and probably the most in danger.
Well, yeah, exactly.
I mean, like, you know, a lot of them had polio, right?
And so, like, polio vaccines actually saved a lot of people from terrible, like, crippling disabilities and stuff like that.
I mean, sadly, people like Peter Hitchens and even someone like Pat Buchanan in America jumped on the vaccines.
Exactly, and I think it's a particularly boomer thing.
Because when they were young, actually there were loads of diseases that were either deadly or left you with lifelong injuries that you did want to get vaccinated against.
And so, you know, the vaccine was an unvarnished good then.
There wasn't a massive vaccine industrial complex that was connected to like, you know, some sort of globalist New World Order takeover that we actually have to be deeply skeptical of.
Unlike now.
And so the boomers have no idea about what I think young people are actually facing when it comes to these vaccines.
They don't know that people are just dropping dead on football pitches and stuff.
They don't know.
And they didn't know that that would be the consequence.
And so I actually am not resentful of Michael Caine being like, oh, I'll do my part for vaccines.
Vaccines are good.
Of course he thinks that.
It's not really his fault.
I think that's a fair take on it.
Anyway, Rad Checker was right, says, Why doesn't Nicolas Cage in any MCU films?
Because he was Ghost Rider.
And Marvel Disney doesn't have the balls to make a character who kills murderers and rapists by literally burning their souls on righteous fury for Samuel and Tell in the mainstream movies.
I forgot how based Ghost Rider is in that way.
I mean, the film's a bit rubbish.
It's a mid-2000s Nick Cage superhero film, so it's not great.
It's gotta be great.
Well, it's entertaining.
He gives an entertaining performance.
The film is like, eh.
But no, you're right, Ghost Rider, putting him like that, that's pretty based.
Trent says, you should definitely accept refugees from the war in France.
You have no idea how long Cali will last before enemy forces overrun it.
I mean, all I'm thinking is the Hundred Years' War, right?
England vs France?
We didn't get loads of French refugees.
They weren't like, we're gonna flee to England.
It'd be weird to take refugees from the country that you're at war with.
Yeah.
That would be very strange.
It'd be weird that those people are like, yeah, I'm just gonna flee to their country where they'll look after me.
I would say that would show a sign of military weakness.
Perhaps.
Well, yeah.
Colin says, well, if all of these celebrities are saying that people fleeing across the channel are escaping the hellhole of Europe, I guess I'll have to accept it.
Yeah.
Kevin says, the war in Ukraine is about to enter a horrific stage.
The suffering will be unbearable.
Nothing to do with Putin, Bono and Geldof for doing live aid for Ukraine.
Oh no!
Not Live Aid 2!
George says, Seth Rogen is the ultimate subversive.
And I have to stop you there.
That's giving him way too much credit.
That is just giving him way too much credit.
Seth Rogen is an overgrown child and doesn't understand his own position in the universe, right?
He carries on.
One would think that people would have learned after Santa Inc, but now he has to destroy Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
I avoid anything... He's not doing something... I have no idea, this is the first I'm hearing of it.
I avoid anything this permanent teenager is involved in, and that's exactly right.
He's a permanent teenager.
He's not actually the ultimate anything.
He's actually really pathetic.
That's something to always reinforce.
Always reinforce with these people, you're paid to play pretend.
Yes.
Gregory says, Harry, I'm starting to see that moustache coming in.
We know what you're doing, stop it.
You look much better clean-shaven.
Why?
What's with the moustache, Harry?
What is?
Well, I just decided I wanted to change.
I wanted to go with a moustache again.
I've got a moustache going, trying sideburns, and I've got a little bit of a soul patch going on as well.
I'm trying the zapper look, okay?
But why?
You just felt like it.
I just felt like it.
I just thought, why not?
Okay, fair enough.
I mean, you know, possibly because mothers are below God.
Come over this way, darling.
Don't go near that weird man with a moustache.
I mean, my mum's not a fan of it, but I don't need her permission for everything.
Fair enough, fair enough.
It's your face, after all.
I'm not sure if you've read the comments yet from yesterday's Hangout, Carl.
I've read some of them so far, but I haven't checked them today.
But I think what I might do is ask Beau if he wants to do another Hangout talking about some of your commentary on it, because there was a lot of really well-informed comments when I checked yesterday.
But he carries on.
Yeah, I agree.
Yeah, I agree.
I've been calling it soft colonization, but to distinguish between the hard colonization of military conqu...
The hard colonization of military conquest, But early stage colonization is another way of putting it. - Yeah.
But yeah, we do.
You are absolutely right.
We need to develop our own language.
Which is one of the things that we're doing.
Sorry, Connor's just sent it to me.
Seth Rogen is rebooting Ninja Turtles with Black April O'Neil.
Which is, of course.
Oh, is this the Fat April O'Neil?
Wait, is she black and fat?
Is it Liz O'Neil?
John, can you look up the new April O'Neil?
It really is the Liz O'April O'Neil.
And it's just, it's such an insult.
It's like, yeah, so we've got an attractive white woman or a fat black woman.
It's like, don't you feel represented black women?
April O'Neil's a redhead as well.
This is just another one of the redhead ginger genocide.
Yeah, it is, yeah.
Every single time.
Gregory says, Harry... Oh, no, I read that one.
Baystapes says, Harry, don't listen to Gregory.
Bring the stache back.
It makes you look like an 80s rock'n'roll sex god.
There you go!
That's the kind of support I need.
What the hell is that?
What on earth?
And she doesn't look as fat as I was expecting.
But that art style's really weird.
Yeah.
You're a racist if you don't like it, apparently.
I guess... Oh, God, no, actually, full body picture, yeah.
Dumpy black girl.
Okay.
Thank you.
I'm sure the black community feels very represented.
That's what Hollywood thinks of you.
That's what they... When they think, oh, we need a black woman to replace April O'Neil, they're like, yeah, she's gotta be fat.
Like, that's not my view, that's their view.
No black woman has ever been slim.
Yeah, exactly, you attract a black woman, we don't think so.
You know, okay, well, that's what they think.
What's that?
That looks... Oh my god, there's a terrible YouTube animation, I think it's Potato Canishes, that that animation style reminds me of.
Really?
Anybody who's seen it will understand what I'm saying.
Matt P says, Mohammed will be out in a year to open up another space in prison for the next one.
Yeah, yeah.
And then, you know, what's to stop him from stabbing someone again?
Well, absolutely nothing.
So, good news.
Lord Nerevar says, I'm starting to believe the only real solution to the immigration issue is to impose a form of repatriation.
We can impose all the immigration controls we like now, but after the fact.
But the fact remains that foreign colonies already exist here.
I don't trust our government to even get the immigration controls right, though, if this is anything to go by.
Well, you know, none of it's going to happen, is it?
The Conservative government is going to continue to allow a million people a year to pour in, they're going to continue to allow people to invade across the southern border, and they're going to just build them houses.
That's it.
That's what's going to happen.
Paul says, foreign groomers walk freely while native children live in fear of being arrested for tweets.
Yeah, that's true.
Jason says, hey Kyle, this is more of an open question.
I was wondering, with the US dropping its restrictions on unvaccinated people visiting the states, are you considering a visit any time soon?
I didn't realise they'd dropped the restrictions.
Let me know when they're doing that.
I think that's April.
Right, is it?
Right, OK.
I know there have been a number of votes done on it, and it was majority Republicans voted for it, there was one or two Democrats voted, but I think it did pass.
Okay, good.
Yeah, I definitely would be happy to come and visit for the first time in a few years.
I wasn't getting the vaccination.
I wasn't going to go where I couldn't go, obviously.
I'd love to come to America.
Never been there before.
It'd be a really interesting adventure.
Ru The Day says, here's a question not enough people ask, where are the English supposed to go exactly?
And if there is a place, where are the natives of that country supposed to go exactly?
Are we all just expected to slide to the left by one square?
Doesn't that happen in New Guinea?
Yeah, my plan was to negotiate with the residents of New Guinea, to just exchange islands.
On the entire island of New Guinea, half of it's owned by Indonesia, but I think we can purchase it from them.
There's 14 million people, and you're going to have loads of space, there's going to be loads of houses, everything's going to be super cheap.
It's an economic supercentre, don't you know?
It'll be brilliant for you.
It's very diverse.
You'll be accepted.
There are something like 39 million English people and about Three or four million Welsh people will take the Welsh with us, obviously.
Yeah, why not?
We're not going to leave them to be stuck with the diversity.
The Scots can stay, though.
I think the Scots will do fine.
Yeah, you'll be fine, Scotland.
But basically some sort of just, you know, population switch, where we just say, look, just give us the island in the terrible state it's in now.
It's terrible.
There's hardly anything built up there.
You can have Britain, which is built up wonderfully, and we'll shake hands and call it a day.
Yeah, there you go.
And then we never have to communicate or touch each other ever again.
No, exactly.
And they get a nice, you know, modern 21st century island, and we get to go back into the woods, which would be wonderful.
As we are all yearning to do.
I think at this point we are, yeah.
Yeah, we can go Uncle Ted lifestyle, just cabin in the woods.
So the New Guinea option is the one I'm putting on the table.
If anyone's got any better ideas, you let me know.
To be fair though, it is a good question, and that's a question that I've been using with my friends recently, because some of my friends, because they know that I'm involved in this, but they don't watch the podcast because I'm afraid that they think that the wrong think will leak into their minds and they'll start thinking bad things as well.
Given who it will, that's... Yeah, exactly.
Exactly.
But some of them have started asking me political questions and say, Harry, can you explain this for me?
Can you explain this for me?
And I do.
And the most recent time I did, one of my friends, I brought up immigration and he went, but what's so bad about immigration?
And I went, well, that's a big, big question that I can't answer in one go.
Pulled out the list and it flapped down, rolled down, right.
So number one.
Yeah, the list of Jericho.
And I just, one of the things that I brought up to him was like, okay, right, these people come over here, they cause all of these problems, they take advantage economically, and they get their gibs from the government, okay?
They literally cost us billions.
That's the first.
If they, or at least part of the agenda that they're part of, ends up bringing this country down economically, or culturally, or whatever, they can just go home.
Because they have somewhere to go back to.
And I just said, where do- They just need to stab someone in the neck!
Yeah, and I just go, where do we have to go back to if this country fails?
And they immediately go, not thought of that.
Yeah, of course you haven't, because the TV didn't tell you to, because the BBC and the Guardian didn't say, well, where do we go if this country fails?
And that's the only reason these people don't think of it.
Yeah, and that's a good way of kind of short-circuiting their NPC minds as well, Harry.
Very good.
It is, thank you.
Very good.
Jan says, I've lost hope for Europe altogether.
These segments just underline the conclusions that I came to years ago.
At this point, I don't think there is anything that will make people and politicians act.
I was considering going to work on cultural and political change on my country, but after careful analysis, that is not possible for me.
Given how there is pretty much anti-patriotic campaign going on during my upbringing, I just don't have enough patriotism to go for it.
So I'll do what I can in my personal and professional life.
Since I can handle and love living in Japan, I'm now working hard to be able to move there later this year.
Well, good luck.
Honestly.
Fair play.
I honestly think Japan has one of the best immigration policies, which is mainly no foreigners.
Yeah.
Just, we're not letting anyone in.
So good luck trying to get in there.
And even if you do come and live here, you're not Japanese.
And they're very, very happy to keep it that way.
Yeah.
I mean, I don't begrudge Peter Hitchens by saying, look, just go somewhere.
You know, go somewhere you'll like.
I don't begrudge him saying that.
It's not the advice that I think we should be giving.
Obviously, we should be, you know, choosing a base party that's like, look, we're just going to do everything.
We're just going to fix everything.
But, outside of that possibility, I can understand the urge to go and move somewhere else.
And if you do at the moment have the opportunity, if a country like Japan is actually shockingly saying you can come in, which is incredibly rare for them to do, I don't begrudge you for taking that choice.
If I recall correctly, Hungary was offering English people to go and live over there.
Oh really?
Yeah.
So perhaps Hungary can become the European refuge Yeah, maybe.
Because the Hungarians, understandably, were like, this actually might benefit us.
English people seem to be good at things.
LaFrenchie says, so we went from tribes to nations then opened the borders and now going back to tribes.
Each with their own beliefs, culture, slang and ethnicity.
Tribe wars are coming and there can be only one.
Yeah, that's what's happening.
Christine says, Sami's the only indigenous people.
Pisses me off.
They're not even the only indigenous people in Scandinavia.
They're not even indigenous to Scandinavia.
That's what's most annoying about it.
Like they literally, I think it was about 2000 years they arrived.
They've been there 1,500 years, so they've been there a while.
But, like, they are from the Asian steppes.
They're not from Scandinavia.
Once again, it's because they look exotic enough.
Yeah, exactly.
Because they look like a tribal people.
They're like, oh, they must be indigenous.
Tribal people move.
Like, cemental.
They say, yeah, I've been rooted in spot because I'm a tree and I can't move.
Before the Romans got here, the Britons were a tribal people, if you want to put them that way.
And then we became civilised.
Well, the English migrated from Northern Germany over to here.
Oh, you're right, the Scottish aren't civilised yet.
Well, they came from Ireland.
Oh, yeah.
Like, you know, tribal people's movement.
Was it Wales the Britons went to?
That's the remnants of the indigenous, like, the Antediluvian.
So they're not quite there yet.
No, not yet.
Robert says, how quickly will London empty out when we finally get into a hot with China?
Oh very, very.
I mean, me and Callum were in London a while ago.
I was just sat watching people in the street and I was just like, Callum, none of these people are going to fight for this.
Like the second anything, because they're all mercenaries.
They're just there to get paid, and they're all like, you know, renting a single room, childless, making as much money as they can before they leave.
So, okay, well, you know, at least when the economic collapse comes, they're just gonna leave.
Fingers crossed for war with China soon.
London will empty out, although Bradford will probably remain.
Manchester will empty out.
Birmingham?
Yeah.
Small Isle Libertarian says, imagine taking the city then complaining that the locals are segregating themselves in the castle.
Yeah.
No, no, you've got to come and live with these foreigners, so why do I have to?
Why am I compelled to do that?
Because it's terribly racist of us not to, apparently.
Omar says, it's sad that black people can't get their own characters and stories.
Yeah, it's even sadder that, at a time when black women are more represented than ever, women aren't allowed to be beautiful.
Yeah.
Black female representation is now a dumpy lesbian teenager.
Yeah.
I think I pointed out in a recent weekend segment, though, that we always say, oh, if you could do a story based on an actual African history, that would be interesting.
And then they did The Woman King.
So they even messed that up.
Yeah.
We want this story on African history.
Great.
Let's go for a slave trader.
Well, it'd be difficult not to do that.
I knew that.
Wuhan Wetmarket says, Speaking of Islam, have you guys seen the train crash that is Destiny versus the Religion of Peace on Twitter?
I don't think I've ever seen that many death threats in such a short period of time.
What did Destiny say about Islam?
Have you not seen it?
No.
Is he a fan?
No.
People were making fun of him because his wife, who he's got an open relationship with or something.
Stelios is the expert on this thing.
I think Stelios is eyeing her up.
She's been videoed trying to kiss or licking the face of some Arab guy and then people were posting it at Destiny saying like, lol your wife's a whore.
So he posted a picture of Muhammad.
Oh no!
At least it wasn't me.
Oh no, now we are!
Okay, Destiny.
Alright, okay.
And then I think he posted a... Yeah, his current PFP, as we can see, is possibly him photoshopped as Muhammad.
I mean, that is funny.
It is really funny.
You will get people literally trying to kill you for that, Destiny.
You know, like, if this is the path he wants to take, you know, go for it.
On that note, we're out of time.
So thank you for joining us, folks.
If you want more, go sign up for Lowceys.com, help us keep the light on, and have a great weekend.