Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 8, 2023 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:31:51

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #605

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast The Lotus here for the 8th of Wednesday.
	8th of Wednesday? 8th of March.
	It is a Wednesday? Yeah, it is, yeah.
	Showed by Carl. Hello.
	A man who also knows when Wednesday is.
	I do not. Actually, I don't.
	I have terrible dates. What do you mean you don't know when Wednesday is?
	Well, like, if you chose a date on the calendar and was like, what day is this?
	Well, that's fair, but I mean, you know where Wednesday is.
	What day is it today? Whatever.
	Alright, a man who doesn't know where Wednesday is.
	They all bleed into the next when you're at my age, Callum.
	I'll be Saturday again. So today we're talking about International Women's Day because it's an International Women's Day special, folks.
	We're going to talk about... See, that's how I mark my dates on the calendar.
	What progressive day of the year is it?
	Oh, it's international. Right, okay.
	I know what time of the year it is. That's true, but I wouldn't join that.
	Michael Knows has caused a little bit of controversy.
	Yeah, it's good. And having fun.
	And also, Women Plus, the new movement.
	Atheism Plus is dead.
	We are now on to Women Plus.
	I like how that's expanded.
	So, okay, we're going to begin small with, like, atheism and then expand it to literally half of the human race.
	Don't think it includes women, I'll be honest.
	Okay, maybe it goes smaller.
	Also did Atheism Plus, really.
	We shall begin. It is International Women's Day!
	Crack out your Hanukkahs, or whatever women do.
	What? I don't know. I don't celebrate International Women's Day, do you?
	Crack out your tampons? I don't know. Different religions for different people.
	Yeah, no. I'm definitely an atheist when it comes to this holiday.
	Well, the actual origins of International Women's Day are communistic, so I'm not part of a communist religion.
	So, there we are. We'll start off just by mentioning something on lettersis.com, being the interview with Posey Parker, a women-enjoyer.
	I think we can describe her. She's a fan of women.
	Definitely one way of describing Posey, yeah.
	Yeah, that sounds a bit lesbian actually.
	No, she's a fan of women having rights and existing.
	Yeah, the fundamental disagreement I have with her.
	She's a lovely person, but you know.
	Yeah, I don't know what she does for International Wednesday.
	Probably nothing these days, considering that, well, that movement's been taken over.
	And we're going to talk about it, because the big thing that people saw was the vomit chocolate people at Hershey's.
	For Americans who don't seem to know, your chocolate will taste like vomit.
	The reason for that is because your chocolate tasted like vomit because they had to transport the milk.
	And now you've all gotten used to it and you still eat vomit.
	And I'm disgusted by it.
	It's ridiculous, isn't it? I used to live on a military base out in Germany and there was like a small American base there.
	And so they had the American BXs.
	And we thought, oh, this would be good.
	You know, we're like 13. We're going to get some American chocolate.
	This will be exotic and interesting.
	It's tasted like absolute...
	Eating sick. It's just the powderiest, grossest thing in the world.
	I don't even want this to be the main subject, but now that I've mentioned it.
	No, but English chocolate is just so superior.
	Not even English. Belgian, French, German, Russian chocolate is better than American chocolate somehow.
	Even Russian chocolate? Yeah.
	The Alinka stuff is their highest quality.
	Not very good. Still better than vomit.
	I don't believe it. Anyway, whole other conversation to have in the comments.
	I'll be down there arguing. But today, well, a little while ago, Hershey's decided they would propagandise everyone, even with the chocolate bars.
	Look, it says her and she in it.
	Oh god, it's so progressive.
	Yeah, this isn't the only thing they did, of course, which is they decided that, no, we're not just talking about pronouns, we're going to talk about the people with pronouns.
	Put them front and center.
	Because if we go to the next one here, we can see Faye.
	These are all archived.
	Faye decided to protect his tweets.
	Who's Faye, exactly? Faye was the newest face of Her4She.
	A campaign by Her4She.
	Yeah, Faye... Is a man.
	Oh right, okay. Yeah.
	Who says they're a woman and has done the whole thing of putting on a wig and some clothes.
	And she is for she.
	Yes. So he says here...
	Hang on, this is great because the he for she movement didn't really take off.
	Men, don't you want to just sacrifice everything for women?
	Men are like, nah, nah. Transgenders!
	Do you want to sacrifice everything for women?
	We want to become the women.
	Where's Emma Watson when you need her?
	Women need to give up everything. I mean, you could read that the other way, which is that the hers, the women, are giving everything up for the she-hers.
	Well, now that is more accurate.
	Anyway, so the chocolates out in wrapper, honoured to be featured in this campaign by Hershey.
	Canada for International Women's Day.
	Alongside four brilliant sisters and change makers.
	We had enough change.
	The changemakers...
	I'm not going to go through them because most of them were boring.
	One of them was... I was able to find a speaker for the Liberal Party in Canada.
	I imagine all the rest of them are Liberal Party.
	Yeah, it's Trudeau's party. Yeah.
	And, well, man on girly chocolate bar for girly chocolate day...
	International Women's Day was a bit weird.
	I do want to know what the Russians think of this.
	I just genuinely...
	It's like, what's wrong with...
	Like, I don't know. Unironically, everywhere I went recently when I was there, I'd run into someone we'd get to, and eventually the topic we'd get to saw that transgenderism stuff in the West, and there's a smile on their face.
	And they're like, it's not real, right?
	I mean, that's definitely one perspective that we'll be exploring later on in this podcast.
	Yeah, they all unironically just assume that the Kremlin is lying to them, and actually, it's not happening in the West?
	This is just Kremlin propaganda?
	Obviously, government lies, I mean, surely.
	Yeah, and I had to sit there and be like, no, I pull out the articles and show them, and the smiles disappear, and then they're like, oh.
	This is the one thing on which Putin is telling you the truth, actually.
	Yeah, it's... Fun game to play if you're ever in Russia.
	Do we have to allow dictators to be the bearers of a certain kind of truth?
	I sure hope not. But we'll move forward, because you may have seen that she's posting about the fact that it's all out, you can buy, there's a specific chocolate for each one of the sistas.
	So, this sistas over here.
	Pasta. Tell us about the sistas.
	We'll get to the turf cartoonists who did a no-no, which is they drew the subject in a cartoon, which is disgusting.
	How could they do this? You know, in the 90s, there's a chocolate bar in the UK called Yorkies.
	Not for girls? Yeah. Literally, the advert was not for girls.
	Very based. Not for Hershey's, either.
	Not for women. For trans women.
	I mean, it was literally misogynist chocolate.
	We'll go to her face just to see.
	I mean, they butchered her looks.
	And it's disgusting they would do that.
	Hello, fellow women. Let's move to Hershey's, because they started trending.
	Boycott Hershey's was trending in the United States.
	It ended up trending, I think, number one at one point.
	Only 1,600 tweets, though.
	And I blew up way more after this.
	It's just someone noticing that it happened.
	And then we go to the website, because we can see a bit more of a her for she.
	This is a thing. This is real.
	It's not just one advert.
	They decide to get a web dev in to make all this for some reason.
	All the different chocolate bars there.
	We go to Faye. She's got her own part of the website.
	2SLGBTQIA+. Who's spirit LGBTQIA6 and...
	Ally? Anal? Asexual, I think.
	I'll go with anal. I always forget that the two S is a thing until we come back to Canada.
	Yeah. That's because they're preposterous.
	Yeah. A bit of a mad person as well, it seems.
	Oh, really? Who could have imagined looking at that bio?
	Yeah. Of course, some opinions.
	The opinions of Faye is, you can read it in your own time, is literally just shut up the opposition.
	No, no, not just the opposition.
	Shut up TERFs, which means women.
	But that's the opposition, which is women existing.
	Those bio-femmes. All women deserve prison.
	Literally at the end there, shut them down.
	I mean, I couldn't agree more, but different strokes for the reasons.
	I think I've responded to all of this.
	Women are talking.
	After it came out that local man's opinion was, shut up all the women, I am the women now, look at me.
	Well, they made a response.
	The reaction to my inclusion in, I don't think anyone, whatever, as a trans woman in the Hershey's Canada International Women's Day campaign shows just how far...
	International Women's Day campaign? Women, maybe they should shut up.
	Yes. Says man in dress.
	Just, okay. I am the women now.
	Actually, what happened? Shows how far we still have to go.
	That's true, but I love this.
	I'm not going anywhere. I'm not shutting up.
	Well, all the women have been shut up, so what does that make you?
	All the women need to shut up, but I'm not.
	Very interesting. Yeah, I will always stand up for women and girls, cis and trans, as I tell them to shut up.
	Shh! The men are talking.
	I'm in favour of women's rights.
	Yeah. I do love...
	I mean, it has become... It's so comical.
	I mean, the world of the left can be summed up as, I hate sexism and women.
	It's totally true. We'll go to Oxfam because they decide to jump in for some goddamn reason.
	We're like, we stand with Faye! Help us raise more money for charity.
	I don't know. I don't know either.
	I'd rather run Oxfam, who's just mad.
	So, I mean, this could be Oxfam Canada, one thing.
	But then International Women's Day starts today.
	Surely telling TERFs to shut up is misogyny from the feminist perspective.
	We stand with Faye Johnson and all trans folks who stand up against misogyny and transphobia every day.
	This seems to be an overflowing font of misogyny, and that's coming from me, a misogynist.
	Yeah, I was going to ask, are you actually running Oxfam Canada?
	Yeah, well, I'm not. Get a job there.
	Women, shut up. Make room for the women plus.
	You know if I was running it because women would have an asterisk in it.
	If you go to the next one here, you have the fact that Oxfam International, of course, jumped in to say, on International Women's Day, it's time we amplify the power of all women, especially women of colour, queer and trans women, disabled women, and refugees and migrants.
	Refugees and migrants, now a category of women.
	There's no women in them are refugees and migrants, but...
	But all of these special terms, the special groups, were always there because, baby, I was born this way, therefore I don't get a choice.
	We had the black race.
	Okay, that's a race.
	Queer race, a bit weird.
	The woman race. The trans race, disabled race, refugee race, and a migrant race.
	I love the race of refugee.
	Technic characteristic. Should we check on...
	Whenever they say community, they really just mean race.
	Yeah. One thing I noticed is that there's a little bot now that'll tell you whether a company pays its men and women the same.
	Oh, is there? Yeah. And on International Women's Day, I'm proud to bring you that Oxfam does not pay its men and women the same.
	In fact, women get paid 4.6% lower than men, according to this bot.
	We'll get back to that later, because that bot is very funny.
	But moving forward with International Women's Day celebrations, we had another weird take from this account here.
	Some checkmark. Legacy checkmark, in case you're wondering.
	Maybe notable. In light of growing violence against lesbians, trans people, and women who don't fit into gender and sexual orientation norms across Europe, on International Women's Day, we reiterate our campaign towards overcoming the structural oppression of all women.
	One thing I didn't notice in there is they say, like, women and then trans people.
	Well, I mean, they mean trans women to men, right?
	I think they do. Well, they must...
	I think... Oh, well, hang on a second.
	That would be transphobic. Yeah.
	Because that would imply that they're not real men.
	But what's funny is that all people who are transgender, regardless of which way they've gone or where they started, are all women now.
	So the trans men aren't really men?
	They're oppressed women. And trans women are not men who are dressing up as women.
	They're oppressed women. Yeah. What a wonderful world.
	And refugees. Matt Walsh has done a response to all this, which of course blew up a bit, where he says, Hi Faye, I will personally donate $20,000 to the charity of your choice if you can provide a coherent definition of the word woman.
	He's still searching. Unless they've blocked them.
	Yeah, blocked them immediately.
	Seeing as you identify one, I'm sure this will be no problem.
	I do kind of love the idea that Matt is not actually hanging up the hat.
	He's still out there. He's gone to more African tribes to be like, please, just tell me.
	No, no, we'll cover more of this later because the guys at the Daily Wire are doing a good job on this.
	One of the wonderful things that came out of that whole situation was, of course, that Jeremy's Chocolate has now been launched from the Daily Wire.
	Oh, yeah. Ever eager to make a buck, and rightfully so.
	It's just like, I'm launching Jeremy's Chocolate.
	We have two kinds. He, him, and she, her.
	And if you want to know which one has nuts, you should know.
	On the plus side, at least, we can be assured of the Daily Wire's commitment to capitalism.
	Yeah, that was absolutely awesome.
	But we've thought on that because Hershey, getting back to them, did actually know what a woman was a whole 12 months ago.
	Really? Yeah. Some moons ago.
	They were like, hang on, it's International Women's Day, let's put up some women.
	Mothers, sisters, daughters, granddaughters, aunts, nieces, goddaughters, godmothers.
	Yeah. They're all forms of woman.
	Yeah, certainly were. It's not even the new one.
	If we go back, even more in time, we can see more of this.
	This is the old, old advert.
	The most popular person in the world.
	Yeah. Look at this. Woman holding chocolate.
	And she wants to eat it because she's a woman and women like chocolate.
	I look forward to Hershey's International Men's Day with he.
	Yeah, I don't think that's going to happen.
	Because one of the things is, I don't know if we go to the next one, I don't know if there's another one of these adverts.
	Oh, there is. So, I mean, the point being that they knew up until five minutes ago, in case you were confused.
	But International Men's Day, you bring it up, obviously it's not really a thing in the West.
	No. We celebrate International Women's Day in media, but we don't have a day off.
	Well, we celebrate. Yeah, well, I wanted to remind people, I mean, like, in the Soviet Union, it was a national holiday.
	You got a day off. And so, obviously, well, people started realizing that was a bit sexist.
	Aren't we communists?
	Good point. So, men were actually giving a day.
	It was Defender of the Fatherland Day, or Soviet Army and Navy Day.
	And if we go to the next one here, just, they actually did have that recently.
	So, this is in Moscow.
	I think in Ukraine and other Eastern European ex-Servient countries.
	It's still a holiday. That's actually more conservative than we are in the West, though.
	Yeah, they actually provide, it's a day off work.
	Defender of the Fatherland.
	Yes. It's a very honourable position.
	Well, it used to be Soviet Army and Navy Day, and then after the Soviet Union went, they called it Defender of the Fatherland Day.
	It's wholesome. Because they're not retarded.
	It's like, who's defending the Fatherland?
	Who'd you think? Exactly.
	Men in dresses? A friend of mine, actually, he got a gift.
	Like, the women in their lives have to give gifts to men.
	Oh, that sounds great. At International Women's Day, the women get gifts from the men.
	Yep. Which was actually quite nice, but...
	Here's some terrible Soviet chocolate.
	But getting back to International Women's Day in the West, because of course it's half a joke.
	We don't even have a holiday. It's just a day for feminists.
	Or at least it was. I mean, it literally is just a feminist day.
	It was though, wasn't it?
	Oh yeah. This is what Julie Bindle was whining about a couple of years ago.
	Poor old Julie. My day has been stolen from me.
	Yes. I mean, you are correct in that assessment.
	Yeah, I mean, that's not wrong. I do want to have the conversation about how dumb it is.
	But she does make a good point in here, which is talking about why there should, if you're going to make this argument, be a day for men and women, in which we can talk about that.
	She says, Female genital mutilation, forced marriage, rape and sexual assault, sexual harassment in the workplace, unwanted pregnancies, domestic violence and everyday casual sexism happens to women and girls because they were born female, not because we identify as such.
	Great point. Yep, that's fair.
	All the unique problems men face and all the unique problems women face can only be shown because they are men and women.
	They are tied directly to the biology of being a man or a woman.
	It's funny how whenever you hear people who are transgender argue for transgender women being women or so forth, you can't actually bring up any of those points.
	So you've never faced a forced child marriage, have you?
	Never faced a forced pregnancy, have you?
	No. Female jealousy mutilation?
	Has that happened to you? Recently?
	No, it's strange.
	I mean, men can talk about the fact that they had junk insulation, every Yankee, but I'm not letting that up.
	70% are Yankees.
	Yeah, but we'll mention some other things, because I just, I love it.
	I love how International Women's Day is now.
	I mean, Hershey's is just the newest thing, but it really is in the toilet.
	So, I mean, you can be glad all the whining of International Women's Day in your career is now dead.
	Yeah, but that's half my content.
	Why? LAUGHTER There's this example where very recently there was a flag put up.
	This is in 2020. It said adult human female for the definition of woman.
	Hostile transphobic dog whistle.
	I don't think it's a dog whistle. Yeah, no, it's not even a dog whistle.
	Dog whistle for the illiterate, maybe.
	If I can't read it. I'm surprised he didn't say it was fascist, actually.
	Yeah. There's also Womixen Day.
	That was tried back in the day.
	If you go forward, there's that, which didn't really go anywhere.
	Womixen. Some university.
	We also got Munro Bergdorf.
	I want to get into a conversation she had a while back.
	Munro Bergdorf would like you to keep your vaginas out of his feminism.
	Brother makes a good point. Fascinating.
	I'm just reminded of the Scottish turfs who just lifted up their skirts and pointed at their vaginas.
	Yeah. No, we're not keeping our vaginas out of your politics.
	This is literally all we're talking about.
	I just find that funny because you're in a room of people who've forgotten what arms are and have all chopped off their arms.
	You would just pull out your arm and be like, are you mad?
	There's no such thing as arms.
	No one's ever had an arm. She's there like, no, I have one of them.
	But Monroe finishes off by saying, centering reproductive systems at the heart of this demonstration on International Women's Day is reductive and exclusionary.
	Yeah. Get your vaginas out of here.
	Don't want to see that. What being a woman is, Mr.
	Bergdorf. I just love all gay men have overtaken International Women's Day.
	It's like, none of those. Get those out of here.
	Not a fan of that. Vaginas. Yeah.
	We'll go to the Aussies as well.
	Men in dresses. Because there was this thing a while back that Julie mentions, which is a bunch of women went on International Women's Day March.
	I love that International Women's Day were just vagina exclusive, very much.
	Don't want to... Not today, love.
	So these vagina enjoyers went for a march.
	Oh yeah. And they were met by people who were not vagina enjoyers.
	He started chanting Nazi scum off our street.
	Ah yes. Because they had vaginas.
	Yes. Average Nazi.
	Yeah. Also I just want to mention Time magazine can't believe that the cancel culture of the damn right who are not buying Hershey's chocolate bars How's that cancel culture?
	If you don't buy the product I'm serving, you're cancelling me.
	Good point. Sign up to Lotases.com or you're cancelling us.
	Could you imagine going to the market and someone's like, well, I should be selling meat.
	I am a butcher. But today I've got a special service on human excrement I'm selling.
	You can buy that, two for a fiver, two for a fiver!
	And then no one buys it.
	Cancel culture. Add it again.
	Quote, The backlash is the most recent attack by conservatives.
	Okay. Literally standing on a rake.
	How could you have done this to me, Conservatives?
	He's there eating the chocolate like, what?
	So, against the brands who are too woke...
	Also, Hershey's, your chocolate sucks! Just fix it!
	Yeah, stop putting vomit in it for one thing.
	Oh, God. But the Conservatives are saying the chocolate's too woke.
	In this case, it's raising women, say Conservatives.
	Yeah, the Conservatives are saying that.
	I just really love the idea that if I don't buy your human excrement you're selling...
	No, it's cat vomit, not human excrement.
	Yeah, sorry, the cat vomit. The Hershey's want you to eat.
	They're like, well, you've cancelled us. Damn right us.
	Yes. Yeah, we'll take that.
	Deal with it. We'll get back to that bot I mentioned.
	Right when cancel culture has arrived.
	This is the best thing of 2023 International Women's Day.
	It's my absolute favourite.
	It is a Twitter bot which is meant to, as it describes itself, if a company tweets about International Women's Day.
	This bot will retweet it and tell you what the pay gap is in the company.
	Which is obviously rather funny.
	Yeah. Because, well, none of them want to look that way.
	No, that's fantastic. But what I like about this is clearly a feminist-oriented bot as well.
	As in, you should be doing this, but you're not.
	Unbelievably feminist, in fact.
	And we can go and check it out.
	Because if you go to the website, which is associated with the bot, and give it a good old scroll to see who's behind the bot, it's a power couple.
	It's a feminist power couple.
	A woman and a man.
	Now... Well, don't read it.
	Don't read it, Carl. I'm not going to, but I know what's going to happen.
	Who do you think wrote the bot? The man.
	Can't believe you would say such things.
	Yeah, so the woman here, she's a social media manager.
	When I'm not writing code, I like to blah, blah, blah, yeah.
	The man is a software engineer.
	Really? Who could have imagined? Yeah, who could have seen that coming?
	The man in question, actually, he has a master's in physics.
	Oh yeah, good for him. Yeah, they went on to be a software engineer his whole life.
	So, I mean, this was a piece of piss for him, I imagine.
	10 minutes. For some reason, he gets paid more than his girlfriend.
	And they've not been able to figure it out between them.
	If only the patriarchy wouldn't stop holding her down.
	Yeah, if you can click on her LinkedIn, actually.
	Just up there. So, at the bottom of her account, there's a LinkedIn.
	Because, you know, he had a Master's in Physics, I checked from his LinkedIn.
	He's done a lifetime of coding, software engineering.
	Her, there we are, University of Manchester.
	Social Media Manager. I don't know if you want to hide your messages, John, before you put that up.
	Might have to edit that out.
	But if you scroll down after you've done that, then we can see her life in question, which is beautiful.
	She has done a lot of writing.
	That is about it, mostly.
	But if we get to her education, we can see, well, you know, why would she not earn as much as a master's in physics software engineer?
	What does she do? She has a degree in English and French literature.
	Right, okay. I don't mean to be especially cruel.
	I'm not trying to be. Whatever. I mean, J.K. Rowling probably has a degree in English literature.
	Yeah, pronouns in the bio. So she could make a lot of money if she wrote a book.
	Possible. But my point being, how do these two individuals sit down, write a bot about the wage gap, and not think for a minute?
	Well, I think that the answer is contained in the premises there.
	Hello, we have created a feminist bot.
	We didn't think for a minute.
	I know, but you know how we were watching those clips of those people who clearly have never thought about anything?
	Yes. I mean, at what point in writing, well, she didn't write the bot, but at what point in him writing that bot did he might think?
	I think, love, I might know why I make more money.
	No. Absolutely no point.
	Yeah, but then Shudo and I are like, right, you're sleeping on the sofa.
	Yeah. Anyway, we'll end it off just with the funniest thing that Bot did, which is you have Scottish widows here who are complaining that women aren't getting paid the same.
	I love all of these complaints are basically women are lazy and need to work harder.
	Yeah. Yeah, but the bot is like, well, look at you Scottish widows, you pay women less as well, 14%.
	It's such feminist BS. I mean, to get back to the old feminists before the new feminists.
	Just shaming women for not working as hard as men.
	Yeah, the detailing here is like the pensions gap.
	Women live longer, therefore that's a problem.
	Weird conclusion. So they live longer, therefore their pension doesn't cover as much.
	You know who's really being oppressed in society when they've got the longest lifespan.
	Yeah. I also love the idea that the real problem is because they live longer, that money that they've saved doesn't last as long for the men because they die sooner.
	And that's oppression of women.
	LAUGHTER Men die young, the bastards.
	They're so lucky. Yeah, and then they're complaining about payment.
	And yeah, funny thing from the bot there.
	But I do find it funny that just every level of feminism is completely dead.
	I mean, the intersectionals have killed it.
	I told you they would. To give them the credit.
	I literally said this in 2015.
	Yeah, and I think you can actually sit on the mound of corpses and plant your flag, Carl.
	I will. In 2023 and just be like, it's over.
	It's all over. Feminism is absolutely dead.
	And I think this International Women's Day, that's the true celebration.
	You know, you do have a point.
	It is actually dead, though.
	Like, as in no one...
	There were a bunch of feminists a couple of years ago going, why doesn't anyone talk about women's rights and feminism anymore?
	With a point. It's gone. Yeah, it's absolutely gone.
	They've liquidated it.
	Now we're talking about transgenders and refugees.
	The ghettos have been liquidated, Carl.
	That's getting cut. Disavow.
	No, but I love it how literally the intersectionals came along stormtrooping.
	Yeah. I mean, I did actually have a flag for that, but you wouldn't let me show it.
	No, it's a hate crime. Well, yeah, but I mean, I think it is true that they are the Third Reich in this case.
	I don't disagree, but it's still a hate crime because we're ruled by the Third Reich.
	Or the Fourth Reich, even. Anyway, Michael Knowles has caused something of a controversy by stating...
	No one. It's just a little one.
	But there's an interesting aspect to this, that the backlash has not really been very strong, even though, by rights, it probably should have been stronger, right?
	Basically, he went to CPAC, he gave a speech that we'll look at in a second, and I think he knew what he was doing.
	Not a stupid guy. He knew what he was doing by the framing that he approached this way.
	But anyway, before we begin, if you want to support us, go to loci.com, sign up, and watch my latest symposium with Stelios about Oakeshott's conservatism.
	I'm a big fan of Michael Oakeshott and the way that he approaches the world from a conservative lens, and this is a really good hour and a half discussion between me and Stelios on how we should frame things, which is more important than the things themselves, I feel.
	Because all arguments are won and lost in the framing, basically.
	And the framing is what is important about Michael Noll's speech at CPAC. So let's watch, shall we?
	There can be no middle way in dealing with transgenderism.
	It is all or nothing.
	If transgenderism is true, if men really can become women, then it's true for everybody of all ages.
	If transgenderism is false, as it is, if men really can't become women, as they cannot, then it's false for everybody too.
	And if it's false, then we should not indulge it.
	Especially since that indulgence requires taking away the rights and customs of so many people.
	If it is false, then for the good of society and especially for the good of the poor people who have fallen prey to this confusion, transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely.
	The whole preposterous ideology at every level.
	Now that's the kind of dialectic advancing speech I like to see.
	Because, you know, the left always do this.
	We want the abolition of capitalism.
	You're not going to get that. Okay, well, let's have a social welfare statement.
	Okay, fine. We'll have the social welfare statement.
	The dial is incrementally ratcheted towards the left.
	Well, Michael Knowles is doing the opposite here.
	He's like, no, no, we need to get rid of transgenderism entirely.
	Okay, well, you can have the male and female bathrooms.
	In public life. And you can see that's a good swing back the other way.
	I view this as local American says maybe we should do what the rest of the world is doing.
	I don't know why we went down this route.
	No one else is. I mean, sincerely, I just find it mad that this is controversial.
	Well, it is mad, that's why. This is not for debate.
	This is absolutely bonkers.
	And it doesn't have any bearing on reality.
	And so, you know, when he points out that, look, you know, if transgenderism is false and men can't become women, which I agree with, then we shouldn't be indulging it.
	He's not wrong. And he's also not wrong that this shouldn't be the main topic of political discussion in public life.
	This is nonsense. We don't need to talk about 0.05% of the population.
	You're the only culture that's done this to yourself.
	And it's been snowballing, sure.
	But no one else has experienced what you're experiencing.
	It is entirely your thinking that has put this in this place.
	Just think something different then.
	It's that simple. And we'll get to how this is just a bunch of thoughts that are being overlaid on reality.
	Reality actually doesn't really care about the things you think a lot of the time.
	But you can see the reaction if we go back to Scott Weiner, a California state senator.
	Transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely.
	These words were in a speech by a major right-wing figure.
	Hey, bluffing up Knowles, a major right-wing figure.
	Good job, mate. At a National Conservative Conference.
	It's a straight-up call for genocide.
	That's what this fight is about.
	They want us gone. If you look at his bio, he's a CA state senator, housing committee former chair, legislative LGBTQ caucus, housing, transit, climate, criminal justice, reform, health, Democrat, pride flag, Jewish flag. Okay.
	No pronouns, that's a bit weird.
	Yeah, right? I don't even know whether he's a he or a she.
	Who can tell? So this...
	This is genocide.
	You're going to make us think differently. You can see that's got 7 million views.
	All his pronouns are housing transit.
	Anyway, so this attitude started snowballing.
	If you go to the next one, you've got a journo here going, Michael Knowles is openly calling for genocide against trans people against CPAC. Transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely.
	But where does he say people?
	No, genocide. I mean, I agree that, for example, after World War II... The denazification of Germany was a very good idea.
	The eradication of Nazi ideology.
	But no Germans died post-World War II in the denazification, apart from the people who were hanged for war crimes.
	It would be really weird.
	Denazification of Germany is the killing of all Germans.
	The true German is a Nazi.
	Says the Nazi party member.
	And also... Okay.
	I mean, you get the same thing.
	It's like, oh, your decommunization of Russia.
	That's genocide of Russians.
	What? What sense would that make?
	The next one, this is not just genocide.
	It's genocidal fascism, by the way.
	Just casual genocidal language about eradicating transgenderism from public life from Michael Knowles.
	How about we eradicate fascism from public life instead?
	I mean, I think it actually has been eradicated.
	You can tell this moron's just added the word fascism because they just want to make it sound more evil, right?
	Well, I'm not a genocidal fascist.
	I'm a genocide liberal. I'm progressively genocidal.
	I don't know what you're talking about. But that's the thing.
	I think fascism actually has been eradicated from public life.
	I actually can't think of a single major...
	I can't think of a minor figure.
	I mean, well, a minor figure, but Richard Spencer, maybe?
	Is he a fascist? Well, I don't know if he's actually a fascist.
	Like, he's a broad tent, maybe?
	A broad, very irrelevant tent.
	I mean, sincerely, though, we've read the doctrine of fascism, we went through it, and whatever.
	I can't think of any actual, genuine human being who could be accurately defined as the fascists to find themselves.
	There are a few small Oswald Mosley stan accounts on Twitter.
	I don't think they're in public life, though.
	No. That probably was where transgender ideology was 20 years ago.
	Yeah. That's exactly it.
	That's where it should return. It should just be a bunch of weird people on Twitter.
	And the thing is, there's nothing inhibiting about that.
	You're free to be a little transgender Twitter account.
	It's no problem. Yeah, you can still talk about it.
	You go on Tumblr. You get meetings.
	Exactly. Meet up with your fellow irrelevant activists and do whatever horrific thing you want to do to your own body.
	It just doesn't have to be a part of the public discourse because it's irrelevant.
	But anyway, moving on.
	Let's get back to Hitler.
	I mean, literally, this is what this video game journalist has called him.
	I do love it. Some guy on Joe Rogan's podcast recently, I forget his name, just mentioned the phrase Hitler of the month.
	Yeah. So true. Yeah.
	Michael Knowles is now Hitler of the month.
	We need to set up some sort of awards.
	12 Hitlers of this year.
	Yeah, he publicly says he wants to eradicate transgendered people.
	I don't think he did say that, actually.
	That's some Hitler-Nazi-Germany-Genocide-S. Is it, though?
	Moving on, we get to the people who want to castrate children say that this is, in fact, dangerous, hateful, and fundamentally evil.
	Evil, say the people who don't believe in good news.
	I mean, ask them, where does the term, the moral impetus for declaring something good or evil derive?
	And they'd be like, well, it's not from God, is it?
	So it's just about preference, really.
	You don't have a statement here.
	But anyway, moving on. What happens if we just order 66 Michael Knowles instead?
	Sorry, so they're proposing to murder him?
	Yes, they're proposing to murder him.
	Seems proportionate? Yes.
	That's normal? This is from someone who puts in their bio, quote, anti-fascist.
	Okay, so they're not kidding? Nope.
	That's why I can take from that. But Michael Knowles obviously saw a bunch of these headlines going on, because of course it didn't just end on Twitter, it got a bunch of articles, some of which we'll go through because they're funny.
	This is a libelous headline.
	He demands, calls for transgender people to be eradicated.
	Nope, he did not say that.
	No. He didn't listen.
	As they say, they changed the headline, if you can go to the article, because their lawyers must have been like, hang on a second, it's actually not true.
	And you are actually going to get sued because the Daily Wire probably had lawyers.
	And so they changed it to CPAC Speaker Calls for Eradication of Transgenderism, quote, and somehow claims he's not calling for the elimination of transgender people.
	Well, that's because zero people would be eliminated.
	And you know he's not, that's why you changed the headline, not to get sued.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	But it's Rolling Stone.
	Yeah. But they've committed.
	They know they're lying and they don't. They know they're lying.
	And they're still lying.
	During his speech on Saturday, Knowles told the crowd, for the good of society, transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely, the whole preposterous ideology at every level.
	So even in this, they quote that he's talking about a set of ideas and not individuals.
	Erin Reid, a transgender activist and writer, tells Rolling Stone that it's an absurd distinction.
	What?
	I mean, the idea that you can't distinguish between an idea and a person suggests that no person has ever changed their mind.
	That's brilliant, though. That's actually how they think.
	Think about it. What do they think the race of transgender is?
	They think it's a group of people, and the reason why is because they've had an idea.
	Yeah. They say they are one in the same and there's no separation between them.
	So the physical being of a transgender person is ideologically constituted.
	But we can do that with every other ideology?
	Exactly. It's literally a communist genocide.
	It's literally a conservative genocide.
	The right-wing race will rise.
	Yeah, exactly. The conservative race is currently being genocided by the trans activists.
	Every time they're kicked off a social media account, that's a form of ethnic suppression.
	Exactly. It's a form of ethnic cleansing.
	Obviously, what they're trying to say is there's an ontological category of a trans person, as in the person is constituted, the category is constituted by our ideas, and the person fits into the category.
	So if we abolish the category, then the person themselves is something different, and therefore that's the genocide.
	That's what they're going for. It's, I mean, technically kind of true, but that's not genocide.
	Yeah. Also, there's no ethnic group.
	Well, we'll get to that.
	She carries on. If you try and separate us from all the things that allow people to experience the world, that does amount to banning transgender people's existence, says Reid.
	You can't go your whole life without using a bathroom, without telling a joke on stage in front of friends, without your medicine.
	All of that amounts to a ban on transgender people.
	But they would not be denied any of those things.
	Michael Knowles is not saying, look, anyone who claims to be transgender is no longer allowed to go to the toilet.
	It's have to use the toilet that matches their birth sex.
	Like a normal person.
	Literally every person under the sun.
	Every country on Earth. Since the dawn of bathrooms.
	Three quarters of humanity doesn't have any of this.
	These confused men can still exist, just not in women's spaces, is what Michael Knowles is saying.
	Jeff Wetrowski, the HRC's National Campaign Director, says: Interesting.
	Fighting back.
	As if you guys said nothing in advance of all of this.
	And Michael Knowles just said, you know what I hate today?
	Trans people. Who are they? Oh, there's a little group I've identified.
	They started complaining.
	The Twitter activists started complaining that, of course, the lawyers got involved.
	And Rolling Stone's lawyers were like, yeah, you better change that.
	And it's just rolling over for the right-wing mob.
	Rolling over. And this happened with the Daily Beast as well, who changed their lovely headline.
	The transgender community must be eradicated.
	Again, not true, but what can you do?
	If we go to the actual article, you can see...
	Again, this isn't Michael Knowles just pulling fake headlines or something.
	Michael Knowles says the transgender community must be eradicated.
	This is genocidal, is the tagline.
	Even then, it wouldn't be a general sign.
	They updated it to reflect the truth, which was fun.
	And if you go to the next one, you can see, you know, transgenderism must be eradicated.
	And at the bottom of this, if you scroll down to the bottom, they've got a great little editor's note right at the bottom of the page.
	This headline has been changed to more literally reflect the words Knowles used.
	This is what he actually said.
	Our lawyers were like, you better actually print what he really said, rather than extrapolating to your insane perspective.
	Solana obviously called him a genocidal maniac as well.
	I mean, literally, look at the byline there.
	Michael Knowles, host on the Daily Wire, targeting the trans community with genocidal comments.
	But he claims it doesn't exist, which is interesting, because he is saying that the ontological category of transgenderism is not really real, it's fiction, doesn't map onto reality, and so therefore transgenderism itself as a concept doesn't really exist, and therefore the ideology doesn't need to be percolating around the public space, which he's not wrong on, but they're trying to make out that there's a contradiction here when there's not.
	And it doesn't work. But some outlets, some very...
	Sorry, go on. Your example of fascism was entirely correct.
	Yeah. It's like, it doesn't matter what to reality, it doesn't make any sense, therefore it shouldn't really exist in the public sphere, it doesn't.
	And we don't have to talk about it.
	It's all good. Well, we do have to talk about it.
	It's a bloody day. No, people bring it up, but they don't know what it is.
	Oh, yeah. We don't actually have to sincerely combat fascist people in every part of the media.
	There are not fascist representatives going to the White House telling you about why fascism is something you should be teaching your kids.
	You put it in the school curriculums, actually, to make sure your kids understand all the fascist jargon, for example.
	That's not what we have to deal with.
	No, that's good. And that's how things should be.
	That's genocide. Yeah, and that's been the fascist genocide.
	But some outlets still have people in the title.
	Conservative pundit calls for trans people to be eradicated.
	I'm going to get the lawyers onto this one, Michael, because...
	Jezebel? I mean, again, I haven't been to Jezebel in years.
	Did they get sued for the Hulk Hogan thing?
	Was that them? No, that was Gorka.
	Jezebel was a subsidiary of Gorka.
	Well, time for another skull.
	That's all I'm saying. That's all I'm saying.
	What I love about this is a quote.
	Unfortunately, like the war on abortion, this one also comes at the expense of people's lives.
	Abortion famous for not taking any lives.
	No one dies during an abortion.
	I can't make that. No.
	The rhetoric is fascist and genocidal.
	It's being accompanied by actual laws that kill people and destroy their lives.
	Again, we killed all the Germans.
	I'm sorry about that. That's genuinely what you believe if you think that saying an idea shouldn't be in the public life is genocide.
	Italy was depopulated.
	Only half of it. Media Matters posted this.
	Daily Wire host says there can't be a genocide of trans people as transgender people is not a real ontological category.
	Didn't say that. No, no, he did say this elsewhere in his show following up on this.
	And he's not wrong, frankly.
	Like, you know, I don't disagree with him, actually.
	Just don't think media matters right, always.
	Distrust. Yes, yes.
	But what I find interesting is they've quoted him accurately, because of course they don't want to get sued, and he makes good points, right?
	Nobody's calling to exterminate anybody because the other problem with the statement is that transgender people is not a real ontological category.
	It's not a legitimate category of being.
	There are people who think they're born the wrong sex, but they're mistaken.
	They're laboring under a delusion, and so we need to correct that delusion.
	Another quote. So banning transgenderism, what that would mean is telling people who are a little confused that they need to get psychological help, they probably need a little bit of spiritual help, and they need to be normal.
	Be normal. I think that's my main political message these days.
	Radical. Genocidal fascist.
	Michael Knowles. Be normal.
	You might need a bit of mental help if you think you're a man in a woman's body.
	Like, don't feel afraid to ask for mental help.
	He's got the message of a pretty normal charity that's trying to help people.
	They're like, well, that's hell enough.
	The genocidal message.
	It's okay to seek help.
	Yeah. Get a bit of mental help.
	You're a bit confused.
	You are a man wearing a wig.
	You don't have to suffer alone.
	Yeah, exactly. Crazy, radical.
	Knowles went on Tucker after this blow-up.
	But again, it blew up, but it didn't have teeth.
	You could see that they were like, oh, look, he's being terrible.
	But there was no venom in the bite.
	Everyone was just like, I did notice one of those articles had 119 comments, but I bet zero of them were against him.
	But you can see he's having a great time.
	I don't even need to play the clip because he can barely express it.
	He got the reaction that he was looking for out of this.
	And so he did a follow-up podcast and just explained exactly what he was...
	What does it mean to remove transgender ideology from public life?
	What does that mean? How do we eradicate it?
	What are the consequences? Let's watch.
	Put simply... Eradicating transgenderism from public life would mean behaving as American society did before, say, 2015.
	Crazy.
	Around 2015.
	We did not have any acceptance of transgenderism in public life.
	And it started to be introduced into public life around 2015 when Barack Obama instituted transgender military policies and some liberals in North Carolina decided to invite men into the women's bathroom and pass all sorts of weird ordinances about bathrooms.
	Pretty simple. Doesn't require death camps.
	Literally go and watch the Family Guy episodes.
	The South Park episode, Mr Garrison.
	Was life unlivable during 2006?
	I don't think there were any Americans who were free in that year.
	It's crazy. And Matt Walsh posted a clip explaining why they...
	Because one of the defense reactions...
	Why do you care about this? We're going to continue defending ourselves.
	What are you talking about? You've been attacking every aspect of society for the last five years, since you conquered feminism, in fact.
	Piss off is basically the theme.
	Let's watch. You see, the rest of us were living our lives.
	We were minding our own business when you came along and demanded that we abandon everything we know about fundamental physical reality for your sake.
	That's what you did.
	You claim the right to walk into whatever bathroom you want, whatever locker room, whatever sports team.
	Nobody else has ever had that right.
	Nobody else has ever had that right to just do whatever they want, go anywhere they want.
	But you wanted it.
	You came after our children, seeking to suck them into your suicide cult just to make yourselves feel better.
	You tried to restructure human society to make it affirming to you personally.
	You wanted to force the whole world to bend to your narcissism.
	You tried to put words in our mouths.
	You tried to control how we speak, even when you're not in the room.
	Your ego is so out of control that you even tried to take possession of parts of the English language, like you can own them as a pet.
	You waved that hideous, ridiculous flag in our face and wouldn't stop waving it.
	You demanded not just tolerance but celebration.
	You did all of that.
	That was you.
	And now you cry victim because some of us have simply answered no?
	I thought it was a great little speech.
	What's great about that is if you muddle it a little bit, he could be talking about anything.
	He could be talking about communism.
	He could be talking about fashion.
	You can make it black and white and have him talking in the 1920s Weimar.
	You need to go.
	Well, that is interestingly...
	How your meme turned out.
	Yeah. Just wanted to raise my kids, bro.
	Just wanted to be a dad, bro.
	And finally, I just thought it would be worth pointing out that this was all a big conversation about nothing, because definitely you can't genocide transgender people because they're just not a nation or a race.
	I mean, this is...
	Sorry, go to the next one, John.
	The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
	I think they would know what a genocide is.
	I think they might. Genocide is an internationally recognised crime where acts are committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.
	Tell me, transgenders, which one of those categories do you fall into?
	Is it the religious group?
	Aren't you a secular country?
	Is there a place for religion in public life?
	I'm not sure there is.
	I agree with you, actually, when you're talking to the Christians about your religion.
	We'll leave that there. I think it's a great place to end.
	Which category do you fall into?
	There's certainly another category they could fall into there.
	I see. I haven't been looking into this at all.
	I've seen the term Woman Plus on my tour timeline, but I've ignored it.
	Just so we can cover it now.
	I don't know what we're getting at. It's time for Women Plus.
	They've finally risen up.
	The alphabets are all dead.
	We're giving up on all that instead.
	Matt Walsh was successful. Women Plus is now the movement, which doesn't include a lot of women.
	But that's not besides the point, because that's not what it's really about.
	We'll start off just by mentioning the Origins of Intersectionality podcast on OCS.com, of course, being the origins of, oh, what if we get all the minority groups to come together under a rainbow flag and then we can out-throw the majority groups of a position of power.
	Literally the communist attack on civil society.
	Actually, what they planned. But we'll go into the news of Women Plus, because local lawmaker, can't pronounce the name, she, her, one of the congresspeople of all time, decided to tweet out, Women's History Month must include trans women.
	Yippee. I don't even know what women...
	I think we've been told before, but I forgot that Women's History Month was a thing in America.
	What a stupid idea. Women's History Month.
	Black History Month is done already.
	We need a month for the race of women.
	Yeah, the oppressed women race.
	But I also just love the idea.
	You can so obviously see that it's Americans who are just like, oh, another ethnic group.
	When's Refugee History Month?
	Great question. Actually be a thing.
	Transgender History Month is also going to be a thing.
	There probably could be a case under the intersectional auspices to have a Refugee History Month.
	Yeah. Actually, unironically.
	You know, this person tweeted that, which was, you know, gold.
	Thanks. Really advancing society.
	I just want to know why. Why must it include trans women?
	Yeah. Because they would say trans women are women, but I don't agree.
	Speaking about Black History Month, though, someone did notice that's true, that Women's History Month must include trans women, in which case Black History Month I can see those eyes.
	Let's go to it. Rachel Dolezal!
	There should be another link in there, John, if you can load it up.
	But NWokeness decided to point out that, yeah, Black History Month.
	Including Sean King and Rachel Dolezal.
	Yeah, and I don't disagree.
	I don't disagree at all.
	Because, yeah, this one you can see there in which...
	Oh, sorry, I just had the wrong one.
	Not wrong! Why isn't she part of Women's History Month?
	It's a great point. But we'll go back because James made a joke in which he pointed out the future of women's movement is women's plus.
	Which is true. I mean, there's literally the position we're in now because the women's movement is dead.
	Because they abolished the definition of what a woman was.
	And James has made a funny joke there and we will return to the joke.
	Because jokes aside, it's 100% real.
	What? A lot of people thought James was joking.
	Yeah, that's how I saw this.
	James is not joking. Here's the New York Times reporting here.
	Donors pledge $55 million for the Smithsonian's new museum of American women.
	Define women. No, but I love how it's American women.
	Oh, yeah. That's racist.
	Yeah, I hearken on about the United States being a very unique and strange place to the rest of the world very often.
	But it is true. And I'm sorry, but someone's got to set up the University of American Women.
	What do you think? It's going to be men.
	That's what I mean, because they do do it.
	Average Russian, is the government lying to me again?
	Yes, seriously, if you take this to some, you know, Tatiana in Rostov, she's going to be like, what?
	That's not true. I love the idea that Putin sat around with a bunch of speechwriters and they're like, Got this line, got this line.
	Is this bit like, no, this bit's actually true.
	It's like, well, we're telling some truth, are we?
	That's interesting. The West is run by pedophiles, and we can't go that far.
	It was like, well, you know, I've got the flight log.
	So they say in here, there is no monolithic experience of womanhood, says the museum runner.
	Emphasize that her museum would not attempt.
	Whenever they say women are harassed, I'm just going to be like, there is no monolithic experience.
	I, as a man, my experience of womanhood has been totally the opposite, and I'm sick of it.
	Trans women very rarely wolf-wistled.
	Not sexually harassed like you guys, so there is no monolithic.
	She's not going to construct a singular narrative, or even attempt to construct such a singular narrative.
	That's another great line for when I'm being told I'm bad because I'm a man.
	There's no singular narrative of womanhood.
	There's no monolithic experience, no singular narrative.
	You've got no complaints. She says she plans to include transgender women who have been subject to increasing harassment and violence at a time when there is this national discussion and deep partisan divide about the acceptance of a woman.
	Who brought the conversation up?
	Yeah, Matt Walsh correctly pointed out.
	Look at the Family Guy episode.
	Look at the South Park episode. You can see American culture wasn't like this, and now it is.
	Who did that? Because that was a change that was brought upon it.
	But it's not just at the university of...
	Sorry, the museum over here that's like, we're going to define what American woman is.
	It's a man. Which is...
	Oh, God. But the universities jumped in on this.
	This was a while back. The term Women Plus, this is the origins of it.
	Because initially, it was a feminist thing.
	Right, yeah, yeah. And of course, it's now died a death.
	Because it was a statement of, well, we're going to get women into those jobs they've been so oppressed by.
	You know, they've been able to apply for them and those degrees for a long time.
	They just don't. So, presumably, it's oppression.
	What I love about this, Sam, is the defense already works.
	There's a marker dedicated to the elimination of misogyny-based violence.
	Okay. It's women. So it's like, well, there's no one singular narrative.
	Women aren't a monolith. There's not.
	But this was them talking about violence there.
	But if you go to the University of Michigan, they had a definition in which they defined Women Plus, the Centre for Education of Women Plus, which it sort of sounds like women need special ed.
	That statement, but...
	No, no, it sounds more like, what is it, the sort of $6 million man or whatever.
	We took a woman.
	We have the technology.
	We can rebuild them. So this Centre for the Education of Women Plus is a comprehensive centre with three major objectives.
	The first one being to monitor and address the challenges and issues uniquely faced by women.
	Women are kind of substandard.
	We can do better. Especially women of colour.
	Okay. I didn't say that.
	No, you didn't. University of Michigan were like, well, they need some upgrades.
	So that's their position.
	Harvard went a step further.
	I think women were just fine as they were.
	They really do. No, we've got Women Plus now.
	That's the misogynist position.
	Women were fine. I want Women Plus, the new upgrade, the platinum model of women, which is opposed to women negative.
	Once again, it feels like shaming.
	Women, you're not earning as much as men.
	Women, you kind of suck and we need to improve you.
	Well, Harvard had the opinion. And then you've got the misogynists who are just like, hey guys, maybe just drop it.
	The Harvard Physics Women Plus of Colour Project...
	Oh boy. The founder who founded the women...
	Oh no, now we're getting the gradations of women.
	Women plus of colour. The Asian women are doing too well.
	It was made to increase the representation of black, indigenous and Latinx women in STEM graduate subjects.
	See? No Asian women. No white women.
	But this is back when feminism was...
	Women have been ranked.
	And these women have been found wanting.
	But it had that strange wobble, didn't it, originally?
	We're here to make sure women are earning more.
	They should be doing these jobs because we say so, not because they want to.
	And then it was like, hang on, women of colour are oppressed.
	Okay, well the women of colour should especially be...
	And then what about trans women?
	Oh god, now the movement's dead.
	And MIT are the ones who put the nail in the coffin in Women Plus over here.
	They say the language of Women Plus indicates that WIC Plus...
	Okay, great. Women in Chemistry Plus.
	Yeah. Welcomes anyone who identifies with our mission, which may include cis and trans women, non-binary people...
	Well, they're not women.
	I mean, literally, non-binary means not a woman and not a man.
	In their own parlance.
	And others. So men, presumably.
	Just normal men as well.
	Things that are women, things that are specifically not women, and whatever else.
	Exists, I don't know, some third category.
	My dog, you know.
	Women and dogs are welcome to...
	I don't know what they were thinking.
	Who are marginalised on the basis of their gender.
	Cat gender is cake gender.
	They're all welcome. Non-binary is a non-gender category, surely.
	Yeah. We welcome allies to also join the centre in the voices of whose gender identities are underrepresented in chemistry.
	I don't think any genders are represented in chemistry.
	My roommate took chemistry.
	Oh yeah? He was a bit strange, but he never told me about the genders of the chemicals.
	It wasn't a thing. Never came up.
	I'm just thinking back to my time in GCSE chemistry, looking at the periodic table, wondering what the gender of oxygen was.
	Oh god, but you know what the French would though.
	Well yeah, they would. I bet they would. Yeah, yeah, great point!
	I bet the French would, yeah.
	Oxygen, it's a woman. Le gold, la titanium, or something, you know.
	Steel, man. Steel's not an element.
	Yeah, that's true. You know about Starlinium?
	No. It's this meme where it's just like, yeah, our steel is so heat-treated, it's Starlinium.
	The thing is, if you heat-treated it as much as the Soviets did in the war, it makes it crack.
	So, whatever. Side joke.
	But I also love how in here the whole thing is about subsidizing women, also welfare for women over here.
	They need it. At least according to every university in the United States.
	Up until Women Plus took the stage.
	The University of North Dakota goes further.
	They say Women Plus, or UCW Plus, promotes equity for women and other people with traditionally marginalized gender identities.
	So there we are. It's firmly in that trait.
	They talk about them like they're disabled.
	The thing I want to know, though, is why, if it's all the same and fine, is why calling a normal woman transgender is an insult?
	Tell you what, I've been thinking about doing that.
	If I wanted to be really rude to someone on Twitter, like, someone was like, you know, I'm not going to sleep here or something, I would be like, don't worry.
	And that would be really insulting.
	Why is it, though, if trans women and women are the same?
	That's a great question. Another frag mine for people to play with.
	Anyway, so going to the consulting agencies, because this might have been a funny joke on the college campuses.
	It'll just stay on the college campuses, guys.
	Oh, yeah. Remember all that? Oh, I did predict that it wouldn't.
	Here comes the consulting agencies.
	Women Plus Beyond the Binary writes this.
	Women's Plus is inclusive of different identities pertaining to gender.
	So Women Plus entails trans women, fems, gender fluid people, cis women and more.
	Oh, it's nice that cis women get to be included.
	I don't know what fem is. I haven't figured that out.
	I googled it. Read it.
	Can we click on that link, John?
	I don't know if it works as a link.
	You want to right click. New tab, probably.
	No, it just takes us to a... Yeah, no, no.
	What feminism... Let's have a quick look at that.
	I remember reading this. I didn't get it.
	Yeah. I'm not signing up for your crappy fem article.
	Go away. Have you ever wondered if you're fem?
	Have you been circling around fem identity?
	Fem is a beautiful, complex identity.
	What it looks like means and encompasses is different for...
	Right, so it's nothing. It's different for each of us.
	Well, it's nothing then. I'm sure many fems, there is a sense of resistance at my attempt to categorize their density.
	LAUGHTER Saying what it is is a crime against the ideology.
	Right, so it's nothing.
	It doesn't exist. That was worth time.
	So we'll get back to clearly sane person who's writing about things that can't be defined.
	I mean, gender fluid is at least more coherent than the concept of fem there.
	They say, there are still issues which women plus being judged on, what they wear, how they look, what they say, what they believe, who they date, how they identify, what they do for a living, etc.
	Only women plus get judged.
	Who doesn't get judged?
	No, only women plus, which is not women.
	We want you to not judge a certain group of people.
	It's like, why? I love the last bit here though.
	Another difficulty women plus face is being compared negatively or in competition with each other instead of fostering encouragement and collaboration.
	This is amazing.
	Like, the idea that this political movement is seeking to deprive you of your faculties of judgement.
	Yeah. But also, you shouldn't be able to compare women plus to women.
	Because that fosters competition.
	That's the whole transgender woman experience.
	They literally spend all their days looking at pictures of women and then saying, how can I be that?
	How can I look like that? It's true.
	And if you couldn't compare them...
	But the only way this works is if they deprive the regular person of their capacity to make judgements.
	It makes me want to reread Brave New World.
	I know it's a cliche to be like, oh, it's just like that horrific book.
	But it is.
	But that's one of the things that John the Savage actually had on his side, is the ability to discern between good and bad.
	That was literally the core of his character.
	The author writes, from my experience as a cis black woman, okay, it is essential to reframe what I was told from society, inner community, family, and friends to determine who I am as a cis black woman.
	I love that. All of the wisdom of countless dead, you know, building up all of civilization, you stand on the soldiers of those giants, and then turn around and go, none of that.
	Just going to reframe it all. Just...
	Don't want any wisdom in my life.
	You know what? I know better. I'm a femme.
	What's that? I have no idea.
	Where am I? Who am I? My experience is only one experience, though.
	So it essentially... Yeah, not monolithic, you see.
	So it is essential to consider diverse narratives of Women Plus.
	Different narrative for each woman.
	Take a moment to ponder what narratives of Women Plus you need to learn, unlearn, and relearn from your more exclusive and supportive...
	What? Actual re-education.
	Yeah. Oh, this has been a long-running theme for them.
	The ranging difficulties for Women Plus are evolving, nevertheless.
	In 2019, Wemixin accomplished great things.
	Oh, good. This is clearly like they haven't decided what the word is yet.
	They've literally got a self-imposed barrier.
	It's like, but we overcame this barrier, so good for you.
	But also they can't decide, is it Women Plus or Womixin?
	I'm still not sure. Oh yeah, good point.
	It's just great.
	They then have some links to the UN talking about Womixin and Women Plus.
	What, how they're formless, limitless, void monsters.
	Time magazine has an article about how monsters have taken up the world and are forcing us to say things.
	They're new religions. The links that feature Women Plus accomplishments in 2019 are not comprehensive of Womixin hoods beyond the binary.
	We're mixing hood beyond the bi- What am I reading?
	Which raises the question, what can companies, schools and people individually and collectively do to advocate for diverse women plus?
	I mean that is one question that is raised from all of this nonsense.
	Proactively that centers mindfulness on the shifting needs of intersectionality.
	Finally we get to it.
	Because the thing about intersectionality, the religion that it is, it's got shifting needs.
	For it to prop up.
	Finally, they do admit, the reason there is endless garbledy gook and endless nonsense you have to take on.
	I'm getting visions of Muhammad receiving a revelation from God when his wife's like, have you washed the dishes?
	It's like, God says I don't have to wash the dishes.
	Oh, well, if God said it. Well, that's revelation from the prophet, you see.
	I think it happened, what, about at least 200 times?
	Yeah, there are plenty. Recorded.
	It's very sus. Just like, should we be able to take sexual slaves?
	Give me a moment. I'll be back, lads.
	I thought you were supposed to have four wives.
	Well, well, I'm really...
	God said... God said I'm the prophet, so I'm allowed to have more.
	And, um, I believe Mohammed.
	Just as much as I believe the intersectionals.
	There we are. But I almost thought this was a troll, except there's more of these cancers.
	I mean, there's this Facebook account here, which is another company that works on consulting companies to tell them about Women Plus.
	There's a good grift. Yeah, also Sainsbury's.
	Tell us about Women Plus. Well, we don't have a definition...
	Like fens. Yeah.
	We can't define it, but just pour the money in.
	I love the idea that electricity turns up and you're just like, see, can you fix it?
	I don't have a definition of electricity.
	What? What? So we'll go to Sainsbury's, because Sainsbury's, they started selling these pads, which is apparently, you know, good for periods.
	Yeah, probably. Seems normal.
	Except they write in here, developed by understanding of women's plus anatomy.
	What? So this is transgender period for...
	Men? Men and women?
	I don't know.
	Intimate anatomy, the body form V protection pads are for women plus.
	The core shaping elements and wings of those body form pads for women plus allow the maximum adaptability.
	Two men, presumably.
	I don't know. Sometimes you might have to make space for extra materials that are in that area.
	Is that in the front?
	Yeah, yeah. Specifically in the front.
	Something else there that might be taking up room from your...
	Like, you know, an average woman.
	Yeah, the thing is, I mean, I shouldn't be shocked because, I mean, it's Ollie London.
	He's detransitioned from being Korean.
	Oh, good. But he noted that, of course, well, I mean, men have been getting tampon sponsorships for years now.
	This is the face of a woman's tampon brand.
	Don't scroll down on that. I mean, I just...
	I tell you what, right? Let's go back to the conversation about representation.
	Ladies, do you feel represented?
	How could you not? Exactly.
	It's a woman, isn't it? Yeah, he's got a mustache just like you.
	Yeah. Look at that beard stubble.
	Does she not represent you ladies?
	Got earrings and a dress.
	What more could you want? And look at the eye makeup.
	Well, you wear eye makeup, don't you?
	I love the idea that if a woman isn't wearing a dress and earrings and...
	A receding hairline, just like you.
	Average woman. But you know what I mean?
	The people who say they're trans women make a very special effort to be as feminine as possible.
	Every possible adaptation they can do.
	Whereas women obviously don't.
	No, they don't need to because they're actually authentically women.
	And yet, men will still go for them.
	Amazing. But what I love about this is the aesthetic is all put together.
	But you've got the man...
	Sorry, woman. Holding the tampons, and it's like, you literally have no use for that.
	You can use everything else.
	Well, no, you'd have a use for tampons if you were a man, which is you get shot, you put it in the bullet wound.
	He's holding pads!
	There's literally nothing! Yeah, good point.
	Literally useless. I mean, unless you're going to sit there holding it or something, I don't know.
	It's just utterly ridiculous.
	But going back to James' joke...
	Is that even good? Surely they're designed to draw out blood?
	I don't know. I got told that if you put tampons in a bullet room, it works.
	I honestly don't know.
	I've never been shot. I've never used a tampon.
	Americans, let us know. Yeah, people have been shot.
	Apparently, all your men are using tampons and all your people have been shot.
	I'm sure there's a lot of Venn diagram.
	But getting back to James' joke, which inspired all of this, because it's more true than you think.
	Promote women plus at work, not women for equity.
	Totally true. There's more.
	There's another one from him, which he points out.
	Girls need to learn how to be feminine from strong women plus.
	Not toxic cis women who are not allies.
	That's a great point. They're not going to hire Posey Parker that's going to be an advisor, are they?
	No. Wouldn't actually teach her how to be a real woman plus.
	Yeah. There's the last one here from him as well, in which he just points out, why support women when you should support women plus?
	Great point. I do actually love the campaign, like the actual campaign, but...
	Yeah. Again, fundamentally, I just look at this image and I'm just reminded of that phrase, which is, I hate sexism and women.
	And really, that is the rallying cry of all of these people, but...
	There we have it. Happy International Women's Day, folks.
	I wanted to do a nice little special for it, and I think we succeeded on all fronts.
	I just love how the intersectional community has found a way of improving on women.
	I wonder what the gender pay gap between trans women and men is.
	That's the thing about that bot from earlier.
	Because it was saying Oxfam doesn't pay women.
	What's a woman? Yeah.
	I mean, those two are too retarded.
	They haven't even figured out why he earns more than her.
	But I wonder if trans women have a remarkable work ethic.
	Maybe they do. Maybe they do.
	We'll find out on the data shore soon.
	Soon, I'm sure. God, I'm losing my mind.
	Let's go to the video comments. It's kind of strange that Clarkson can't dig a ditch without getting government approval, but these antifa and leftists can run a soup kitchen in the middle of a city without any government oversight.
	Also, who's voting for or hiring these city councils?
	Where do they come from? I'm an American.
	Maybe there's something I don't know about. Kind of reminds me of the Golden Kamui series where the Meiji Japanese would ban the native Ainu from hunting or living off the land to force them to live in the cities and towns.
	Seems weirdly similar to how our Western governments nowadays operate.
	Yeah, so the local council of Chipping Norton is elected by the village of Chipping Norton, making them very important people, and people who have been watching Clarkson's funeral.
	So they clearly are not prepared for the level of scrutiny that they are going to receive from the public.
	Jeremy Clarkson, literally millions and millions of people watching this.
	At the Council of Chipping Norton, maybe a dozen people would have been watching what they were doing.
	It's not Chipping Norton, it's Chadlington.
	They're the council that got the say over it.
	Chipping Norton's just where Caleb's...
	Oh, right, right, okay. But yeah, so it's like a very small local council who are not very important people at all.
	Jeremy Clarkson, literally millions of people watching this stuff.
	And they are obviously being total dicks.
	I love it. You can go on Google Maps and find Diddley's got a farm.
	Oh, yeah. You zoom out a little bit.
	You see the farm as pixel.
	Yeah. And then just reminded of the comments about how it would destroy the countryside.
	Yeah. I'm pretty sure Farm Shop belongs in the farmlands.
	Yeah. But, okay.
	Yeah. I'm enjoying it, though.
	It's really good. Didn't think I'd enjoy it.
	I'm actually going to see her and just be like, go and watch Clarkson's Farm.
	Yeah, yeah, no, it's actually really good.
	It's really wholesome. Don't know who's not.
	And one of the things I like about it most is that Clarkson seems to be really enjoying it.
	He seems to actually be enjoying doing it.
	Did you see the episode where he meets with the locals?
	Mm-hmm. The local farmers?
	No, but he gets free wine and cheese and it's a bunch of people who have been complaining about how awful he is.
	And he just sits with them and they're like, oh, you're not a real farmer, are you?
	He's like, no, I genuinely love farming.
	This is the happiest I've ever been.
	And it's so wholesome because you can see he's finally found something he's happy about.
	The real downside is that, as he explains in a few interviews, it's worthless.
	It makes no money whatsoever.
	I mean, this is really just a hobby of the rich.
	David Cameron lives next door to him.
	He borrowed his tractor, broke his tractor.
	You can find his house as well on Google.
	Big. It has a helipad.
	No, I just mean you can see rich people in the UK have these big farms.
	They're important people. It's clearly fun.
	It's not about subsistence.
	No, it is kind of fun.
	It's a luxury fun, yeah.
	Whereas actual farmers who are trying to make money out of it, you'll be screwed.
	I like the fact that Clarkson's invested in it and has ideas for it.
	He's like, look, we're going to make a little farm shop where it's all local projects.
	This is a great idea. Very wholesome.
	The council is like, no, you can't do that.
	That might be good for the local area.
	There's a funny point about the subsidies as well.
	So they used to get 80 grand for the field.
	But the argument was from the government.
	It's like, well, people won't pay the actual price of bread if we give them the real market price of it.
	So we have to subsidize it.
	And then you think from it, you think, yeah, that's retarded.
	Why are we living under socialism? Yeah.
	Like there was some Tick was mentioning during the pandemic.
	He asked a guy in Tesco's, well, everyone's buying a toilet paper.
	Just put the price. People buy less.
	Stabilisers. He says we can't do that because there is actually government price mandates on basic goods in the UK. Breads tagged.
	If you're selling the basic bread, you can't raise the price above a certain amount.
	Same with toilet paper, same with eggs, basic stuff.
	So we actually live under a command economy?
	Yes. I didn't know that.
	It's silly how we live our lives and people just don't think about it.
	I didn't know that.
	See the next one.
	Death Row, Canada.
	Where am I going to Canada?
	For people listening, we're watching a video game adaptation of Office Life in Swindon.
	I'm happy to fight the zombies. It's alright.
	Drive off in their sleep. Drive off in their sleep.
	Okay. Can we get a link to that game or can we play?
	Let's go to the next one. In a sensible country, that will bring down the political leader that supports it, like Nicola Sturgeon.
	You know what, that kind of makes me...
	Not that we're a sensible country.
	Let me get this out. Yeah. Or you interrupt.
	Alright, so I kind of wish there was a rapist podcast.
	Because you know how people will talk about the manosphere and like, oh, they're all messed up.
	Some of them are. But like a sincere podcast channel, right, that was literally like male rapists who could sit around and talk about what they'd want in society.
	I mean, this is what they'd think of.
	It'd be like, I wish we could just get away with it by saying we're women.
	So I could point to them and be like, yeah, that's what the rapist, you know.
	Well, I mean, it unironically is what they want.
	I'd like to be put in the female prison police.
	It's like, well, of course you would.
	You're a rapist.
	But it's so annoying.
	If you actually had a focus group of rapists who wasn't...
	I don't know. That was their hobby or something, right?
	Messed up people. What do we want in society?
	That's sort of the rights they want.
	Which is like, oh, I'd like more access to women in prison, please.
	Yeah, so the women literally can't escape.
	Messed up. Yeah, it's terrible.
	I always celebrate Women's International Day.
	I celebrate the most important man in my life.
	Happy birthday, Dad!
	Thank you, Sophie, and thank you all friends, and have a nice Women's Liberation Day.
	Sorry, Dad.
	But how wholesome. I stand for Women's Liberation under the burqa.
	It was a little bit ISIS. She's going to show him like that.
	Sorry. She's going to come back in the next video comment just in a hijab and be like, damn it.
	RudeTheDay says, congrats on the Babacal.
	Truly on turbo mode. Much health to your family.
	Can't wait to see how she soon does your nut in.
	Yeah, I've been warned that I'm going to be experiencing an emotional tyrant.
	She reached about two or three, which is probably true, but it's fine.
	Thankfully, last child.
	Everyone I've met who's sort of in their 50s or something, who's had lots of kids, they always tell me girls are harder than boys to race.
	I mean, it's possibly true, but my two-year-old really is a terror at the moment.
	He just likes throwing stuff.
	I suppose we'll wait until they get to the teenage age and then we'll come back to you.
	Yeah, yeah, I suppose. But my oldest son, he's a Andrew says, Of all the people to present on International Women's Day, you choose the arch-misogynist himself.
	Don't you know Carl Benjamin hates women so much he married one and had children with her?
	Truly a monster. All true.
	Yeah, I mean, I did do this on purpose.
	I was saying before we started, I was kind of thinking about if we could sit there with cigars or something.
	Yeah, but unfortunately we live under socialism.
	Baron Von Warhawk says, Again, the chocolate companies are caught using child slave labour on the Ivory Coast.
	The companies that are virtually signaling for women's rights using black children as slaves.
	I didn't even know that. Yeah, pretty much every chocolate you buy is a slave.
	Nestle's the worst one. Well, I only sugar-free chocolate.
	Is that slave chocolate? Depends, probably.
	Well, it comes from, like, some hippie health food store in town.
	Yeah, but they'll buy the cocoa just internationally, I imagine.
	And they'll all get mixed in with the slave cocoa.
	I feel bad about my sugar-free chocolate.
	Well, there is a chocolate bar, it's called, like, Tony's or something, that advertises itself, like, we're the slave-free chocolate and they make a special effort to do that.
	We're the only chocolate on the market that doesn't use slaves.
	Yeah, but it's five quid a bar. That's why they don't use slaves.
	That's why all the others do use slaves.
	Nestle's a really messed up one. You know about them killing kids?
	They, in the 50s, gave formula to a bunch of African women.
	Right, right. And then took it away just in time that they'd stopped producing breast milk, so they would be dependent on it.
	And then, of course, African women can't afford to buy formula every day, so a bunch of their kids died.
	But it was all in the A, because they made a net profit.
	Oh, well, that's okay then.
	Jacqueline says, Happy International Whamans Day, ladies.
	On this special day, we get to be more selfish and entitled than usual.
	Oh, look, I didn't say that.
	That's just genuinely Jacqueline's comment, right?
	It's lovely. The children yearn for the minds.
	They yearn for the fields. I hope my wife isn't watching.
	Supreme Duck says, Men probably live shorter lives because they work so much.
	Gender pay gap argument there.
	Kieran says, excuse me, my female penis was mutilated against my will as a baby.
	Yeah. No, I agree with you.
	It's fucking barbaric. Sorry to swear.
	I hate it. Hmm.
	Alexander says, circumcision and Muslim females genital mutilation is a perfect example of how no one cares about men.
	Muslims cut off little baby girls' clits.
	The West, oh my god, this is barbaric.
	Just as a quick thing, it's not always when they're babies either.
	No. Like, sometimes it's when they're like 10 or 12.
	I mean, don't worry, it's horrific at any age.
	The West is like, Oh my God, this is barbaric.
	Western doctors strap baby boys down and cut off the tip of their penis while they scream the most horrific sound ever.
	The West, this is fine.
	Women prefer the look of the cut anyway.
	Yeah, I despise circumcision.
	I can't even imagine.
	I don't know if I've told the audience before. But in South Korea, all South Korean men are circumcised.
	North Korea, 0% of men are circumcised.
	That's because during the Korean War, American doctors were training the Korean doctors.
	They taught them to do it. So they just carried it on and it's culture there.
	The real messed up thing about that is South Korean babies' foreskins are not used in South Korea.
	They're taken, mashed up, and turned into paste for American women.
	Yeah, to put on their faces. There's de-aging cream.
	Which is... I mean, if you wanted to...
	If the North Korean government wanted to portray the evil Yankee devils as oppressing the South Koreans, I mean, they're stealing their penises and wiping it on their faces.
	Well, the government's lying to me again.
	Yeah. Trust me, that can't be happening in the West!
	Exactly! That's just preposterous, isn't it?
	Yeah. Well, this was always the complaint that the sort of anti-materialists would make.
	Look, you're desacralizing the human being, so you're just turning it into mere nature.
	This is like C.S. Lewis's argument.
	It's just mere nature. Therefore, it's fine to be wiping baby foreskin...
	Cream on your face. It's like, but actually, I really don't want to wipe baby foreskin cream on my face, and I don't think you should be either.
	He's pulling a child apart in front of yourself.
	We're going to harvest stem cells from abortions.
	It's like, yeah, but that's evil.
	He digs into his baby burger that he's made from stem cells.
	What are you doing?
	Human beings aren't just meat, are they?
	Is there not something a little bit spiritual about a human being?
	It's like, no, now get out of my way.
	I've got to get myself youthful.
	It's just disgusting. Anyway, Connor says, you don't have to include migrants on International Women's Day.
	They're all fighting age men. They're women now.
	Kevin says, what is it with all these non-binary and trans characters and the ring through their septum?
	Is it for the same reason that farmers put a ring through a bull's nose so you can lead it where you want to go more easily?
	Possibly. Alphabeta says the patriarchy in the dress is still the patriarchy.
	Good point. Martin says feminism is dead.
	Will you post a picture of yourself planting the flag on the mountain of feminist corpses?
	Also, how about a video on the politics of the game Deus Ex?
	Have you ever played Deus Ex? No, I never went around to it.
	No, I never did as well. In clips.
	Yeah, I tried playing it and I literally couldn't get past the intro bit and I was like...
	Was it boring? No, I was just shit.
	I shouldn't swear, but I was just really bad at it.
	Did you play Destroy All Humans?
	No, it was good. Real good.
	It was a remake. It's on Steam.
	Or other legal outlets.
	Second one, can't stand it.
	Don't know why. What do you do in it?
	You play as an alien who...
	Some alien got taken down in Roswell.
	Typical story. So you turn up to destroy all the humans.
	Then he turns up and...
	What is the main theme of the damn thing?
	You end up taking on the secret anti-alien agency, and then you transmorph into the president and enslave all the humans in the United States.
	Right. But then the alien in the sequel is just like, hang on a minute, I quite like it here.
	It just starts having sex with women and taking drugs.
	It's the 60s. Right, yeah.
	Whatever. It's a weird thing to explain, but once you see it, you'll...
	Right, okay. The letter M says, this Hershey's thing is literally the punchline.
	It's some cheesy joke about being the pronouns of someone that identifies as chocolate or something.
	Oh god, that's poetic.
	It is, isn't it? This chocolate bar identifies as a woman, now what?
	Yeah, but her and she are idiots.
	How much can it really generate in extra sales?
	Sales. Yeah, exactly.
	You know, there must be some marketing executive being like, right, this is going to get our names in all the papers.
	We're going to get an uptick of sales if we just cynically go like, it's Hershey.
	It's like, come on.
	I watched the Day to Day.
	There was a sketch earlier from the 90s where they interviewed some guy from a Matchbox factory.
	They come up with this advert in which there's this woman and she's there and then she explodes and all these other women come out of it or some other bollocks.
	And she goes, how much did it raise sales figures?
	It says, well, you know, we didn't get much.
	But I suppose it's because we didn't really say buy the matches in this sort of Anglo-Saxon way.
	We've got to say buy the matches.
	Yeah, that was it. LAUGHTER Gender ideology.
	Never at any point do you say, buy the chocolate.
	No. I mean, it really is that stone-tossed comic.
	It doesn't miss.
	Alpha of the Beta says, Alcoholics Anonymous is genociding alcoholics.
	That's literally right.
	It actually is.
	Base Ape says, That's such a good observation.
	This is how the left think of the right.
	They think of them as fundamentally bad people for their ideas, not people with bad ideas.
	Criticizing left-wing ideas is a personal attack on that individual.
	They can't differentiate between a person and an idea.
	We need to find a name for this so we can call it out.
	That's a great point, because I saw the other day...
	Do you remember there was a viral video of just some...
	Ugly, redneck kid crying in a car or something, right?
	Because he'd been beaten up and bullied and stuff like that.
	Why are people so mean? And I saw some leftists been like, yeah, he was beaten up for being a racist.
	He's like, So it's okay that a group of people beat up this 14-year-old and made him cry in the car.
	Because he had the wrong idea.
	And as if this idea is harmonized with him, so they're synonymous.
	He is forever this idea.
	But also you can see the ethnic hatred there.
	The way he views the child as some kind of...
	It's not a person with ideas, even if he did.
	It's like he's a gypsy, and they're just like, well, I deserved it.
	Okay. But yeah, you are right.
	We need to... Well, think about this.
	We will need to have some method of making it so they can't distinguish.
	Like, calling out that they can't distinguish the person from the idea.
	Because it is a kind of dehumanisation.
	We could just declare ourselves a race.
	Rightest race. Conservatives are a race.
	Yeah, but they'd be like, good, we want to eradicate you.
	Yeah, but at least we're into their zone.
	Then you look at them and be like, you're retarded.
	Someone online says, not lying on demand isn't genocide.
	Great point. SH Silver says, for as unserious as these gender activists are, I see the Daily Wire is similarly unserious by making this as the main plank of their content.
	With their capitulation to YouTube on issues actually worth censoring, it shows that they are more interested in having cultural pissing match with progressives while the Great Reset is happening regardless of who wins.
	I mean, that is an argument, but to be fair, anyone who uses YouTube has to capitulate.
	We do, so...
	Well, you upload there has to be censored.
	Yeah. Or you don't get to go there, and at which point...
	The reality of that...
	I mean, picture, there's 7 billion...
	Let's say 6 billion people on the planet, to make it simple.
	3 billion of them are on YouTube.
	So, I mean, do you want to speak to the entire planet or not?
	I don't see this as a particularly strong criticism, because it's not like the transgender issue isn't important.
	The thing is, a win on this ground allows for further wins on other grounds that feminists have taken.
	So it's essentially all using the same logic, is that the idea is more important than the person.
	It's like, no, that's not true. The person is way more important than the idea, and that's what we're winning on here.
	So we need to keep forcing this, I think.
	But I mean, I don't disagree with the Great Reset's happening.
	Obviously, we've done a lot of work on the Great Reset, you know.
	I do wonder, what if we all identify ourselves as a new made-up ethnicity?
	Flimflams or whatever, right? Yeah.
	And then when they start denying it, would you just call it genocide?
	Kextamos. Oh, yeah.
	Sad that didn't make it in the census. Yeah.
	Kevin says, we have to accept the left have reached the point where there is a black race, some brown races, and everyone else, which is the White Reich, I don't agree to that.
	No? Women plus would be in the White Reich.
	Why would they be? They'd be part of the brown race, surely.
	I don't think there are many... I think this whole transgenderism is a very white thing.
	No, that's not true. It's the Anglo-Saxon part of the world that's doing this.
	There are lots of black transgenders and they're the ones getting killed by black men who take them back drunk.
	Yeah, you're thinking America. I'm thinking the whole world.
	Oh, well... Well, no, no, that's not true.
	Like in Persia, in Iran, they've got lots of non-white transgenders.
	Okay, that's a very small number.
	That's just people who have been charged with being homosexual.
	That's correct. There's not a lot of them.
	Charged with being gay? Well, you mean a woman?
	Or rape victims. Ah, you're also a woman.
	They don't have a very high opinion of women.
	Imagine that happening to you. I mean, by the end of it, you'll just be like, can I get a break, please?
	Can I just have one thing nice happen in my life?
	Oh, now I've got to marry Ahmed over there.
	Yeah, because, oh god, you can't stop, can you?
	No. Because you've then got to find a husband.
	And then it's just more of...
	Why don't you have children?
	Well, I wonder why! But what cracks me up is that, like, imagine, like, Iranian men just being so undiscerning.
	I could have a wife, and therefore I'll take Bob there, who got raped.
	Or he's gay. He'll do.
	Really? That's just it, is it?
	The Middle East, magical place.
	Very progressive in that way.
	Cynthia says, surely transgenders are genociding themselves by removing their genitalia?
	I mean, that's not how they frame it, Cynthia.
	But I mean, there definitely is an argument there, actually.
	Because... It is kind of the subsection of the population that can't be transmitted into the future.
	So they are, like, removing their ability to have children.
	If you look at the Holocaust Memorial's definition, removing or castrating is definitely a part of it.
	Preventing them from breeding is a...
	Well, actually, there is an argument that has been made from the LGB movement, which is that they're genociding the next generation of homosexuals.
	Yeah. Hmm.
	S.H. Silva says, Yeah, but I don't think we can have one until the transgender issue is defeated.
	I do appreciate that there are levels of importance to various issues.
	But I do also think this is something that has to be dealt with.
	What's funny is, as AA knows, the globalists are using this, but even they're backtracking?
	Slightly. I think he's overstating this.
	I don't think he's on it, to be honest.
	I think he's overstating it. He's like, oh, they're not going to let Hamza Yusuf win?
	Hamza Yusuf is going to win. I haven't heard him saying that.
	I'm not agreeing to that. He has said that.
	I mean, like, Tony Blair and...
	Sure, Tony Blair's like, yeah, this is crazy.
	We need to fucking dump this.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah. And Keir Starmer will in the Labour Party, actually, which means, essentially, we should join the Labour Party.
	We should insist the Labour Party's gone far right.
	Just to drive Navarro Media crazy, actually.
	Yeah, that's right. It's our Labour Party.
	Look at me, we are the Labour Party.
	I have an interview with the Labour leader, you don't.
	So Keir, what is a woman?
	Oh, an adult human female.
	Brilliant. Interview over.
	George says, Women Plus is presented as an attack on women, but in fact is men playing into the gynocentric system where the image of a woman is more important than biology and truth.
	This is something that feminists have been pushing for decades.
	Yeah, that's true. You know, deification of the ideal of woman and allowing non-women to fit it.
	Casey says, looking forward to Women's History Month, celebrating nothing but mentally ill men in dresses and makeup.
	Yeah. We're there, we're here.
	This is the future now, you understand?
	Yeah, it's March, enjoy it.
	Yeah. There's got to be something else we can discuss politically, right?
	This is the thing, it's like... This has to be an issue they lose on.
	It just has to be. Yeah.
	I mean, to be fair, this is International Women's Day.
	There's a reason this came up. Yeah, yeah.
	This wasn't just arbitrarily picked, yeah.
	SmallerLLibertarian says, Women plus going beyond the binary.
	But they don't mention men.
	We are the plus. Like, we are actually destroying the category of man, or is it just going to be women and the women plus?
	Or the better women, if you will.
	Double plus women. Women 2.0, the release model.
	That is a great point about the Orwellian.
	Do you know what's really interesting?
	The etymology of woman, think about it, it's an addition to man.
	You've got man and a woman.
	So linguistically, it's not actually unique that the term has changed, right?
	And so, yeah, it could be that men just become known as women plus, but that will still take on all of the connotations of men at the end of it.
	I'm trying to look up the...
	Man plus Wu, yeah.
	I'm trying to look up what the etiomeneology actually is, because I wonder what it is.
	Is that going to come up? Sophie says, honestly, all of this is the fault of women.
	Kind of. But it's also the fault of men for allowing it to happen, isn't it?
	I hate that. What?
	It is! Well, men's...
	Yeah, but this sort of...
	It's not happening in Saudi Arabia, is it?
	This ends up with the point of like, well, you should be the man of the house and not permitting women to have ideas and campaign.
	Great point. The Nolan knows point.
	Yeah, you know, all men in the 1990s should have turned around and go, hang on a minute.
	Yeah. Saudi Arabia.
	I don't think that's a serious position to...
	Well, it didn't happen, but we should have done.
	It's not really serious to be like, men, your fault.
	Yeah, I mean, we could have...
	You get what you tolerate. Goddammit.
	Definition. Sorry, we're out of time, but if you want to...
	Are we? Sorry, I was just looking up...
	If you're really that interested in the definition.
	I kind of do. I mean, a lot of people aren't interested in the definition of a woman.
	I'm just looking at where it came from. Is it not?
	It's not on here? Google, you have failed me.
	Well, never mind. We will never know where women come from.
	Do not know where babies come from.
	Do not know where men and women come from.
	God, I love the West. What a wonderful place.
	Anyway, more from us. This is.com.
	Not more from us. Not there.

▲