Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 8, 2022 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:31:20

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #367

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters.
	I don't know if you've gone live or not.
	We have?
	Oh, we actually have.
	Sorry, Callum just needed to handle the Sardong for a moment.
	No, John decided to go live early.
	Anyway, so, today we're going to be talking about the MSNBC being effing scum, and I do mean that in the strongest possible terms.
	I really dislike what they've done, and we'll go through why.
	Also, the religion of no remorse.
	They really don't care.
	Also, I'm Harry, by the way.
	Oh, sorry.
	Just in case you might be a stranger, you know, I'm new here.
	Harry, nice to see you.
	Most people know.
	But also, as you say, the religion of no remorse.
	And also, the West Falklands are whining again.
	And I thought we'd enjoy having fun at their expense, if nothing else.
	So, let's get into it.
	We'll start off with MSNBC being utter scum.
	I think you're going to enjoy this.
	Yeah, I mean, mainstream media, utter scum, colour me shocked.
	Well, I'm going to prove MSC are absolute scum.
	And you may be thinking, oh, come on, all corporate media are scum.
	And I really like Michael Maas' version of this, which he's like, no, corporate press are essentially tobacco salesmen, and I will prove it with clips from MSNBC in response to the Hunter Biden laptop story.
	That's a clip a friend of mine sent me yesterday, and I don't watch this crap because, you know, I want to have a life and not cry about how crap the mainstream media is.
	But this is so egregious I have to show it.
	So we'll start off here by plugging just a premium video that Carl and Josh did together going through the life and times of Hunter Biden and the absolute mess of a human being he is.
	It really does go down into the depths of just like, okay, this isn't even funny.
	This guy's messed up.
	I've not watched this, but from what little I do know of Hunter Biden, he seems like he fits more in skid row than Washington.
	Anyway, let's go to the next one.
	Lawrence Fox is playing him in a movie coming up, so look forward to that.
	So, just to mention here, before we get into the video, to keep in mind, remember the big guy?
	Remember 10% for the big guy?
	Remember this story?
	So as you can see here, this is the son going with Hunter Biden emails, names Joe Biden as the big guy, who'd get 10% share in a deal with Chinese energy firm.
	Keep that in mind.
	If we go to the next one, of course, we also have Donald Trump referencing this at campaign rallies leading up to the election, saying, I wonder who the big guy is.
	Joe Biden.
	Who else is it going to be?
	Obviously.
	Yeah.
	So, something to keep in mind.
	Because MSNBC will try and deny that anyone knows who the big guy is.
	Who is it?
	I don't know.
	Could be anyone.
	I don't know.
	Kamala Harris?
	Yeah.
	If we go to the next one, we'll also see that apparently in the investigations now, Hunter is being asked this question, and I presume we'll get an answer to who the mysterious big guy is.
	Witness is asked to identify the big guy who would get kickback in deal with the Chinese energy giant after former associate claimed it was the president.
	I like that it's just a...
	Oh, who could it be?
	It's this big...
	No, we know who it is.
	Yeah.
	If we go to the next one here, this is the video clip a friend of mine sent me, which is just the reporting, what is this, like two days ago on MSNBC, because the story of Hunter Biden's laptop, of course, has been confirmed a million times by a million outlets at this point.
	Like, it's accepted canon, it's gone from conspiracy theory to canon, like everything does at this point.
	Conspiracy theorists, fortune tellers, what's the difference?
	Yeah.
	And I thought we'd go through this because it is unreal how just how scummy these guys are.
	And you can see they really do not want to talk about this.
	Anything but this, please.
	So it's completely full of just like U-turns in which they try and say, well, actually, this shows that Trump is bad.
	How I... It doesn't follow.
	Just massive cope and also whataboutisms.
	So I guess we'll enjoy this tobacco salesman trying to sell us their tobacco.
	But we'll start with clip one, which is them actually pointing out what is the facts of the case.
	The facts of the case just look terrible for the Dems.
	Let's play.
	New reporting from the Washington Post is shining a light on high-level business dealings between Chinese executives and the younger Biden.
	It began as an examination of whether he paid all the taxes he should have on income from his work for foreign companies, including Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company.
	This email from a former business partner, for example, found on a laptop computer Biden used, said he failed to disclose $400,000.
	That laptop, which he took to a Delaware shop to get repaired but never reclaimed, was seized by the FBI, but not before Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani got a copy of its hard drive, which he shared with congressional Republicans.
	Documents they've made public show that accounts linked to Biden also received nearly $4 million in consulting contracts from a Chinese energy company, according to an analysis by the Washington Post.
	But during the campaign, then-candidate Biden denied there was a China connection.
	My son has not made money in terms of this thing about, what are you talking about, China.
	Senate Republicans say the documents also show Hunter Biden signed an agreement to represent an official of that company, Patrick Ho, for a million dollars.
	Ho was later convicted in a US court of trying to bribe government officials in Africa.
	The Republicans say that shows Hunter Biden had close ties to the Chinese government.
	I mean, there you have it.
	I mean, just endless corruption.
	I mean, frankly, just taking bribes from Ukrainian or Chinese Communist Party associates for, well, the board of Burisma or that guy for the energy firm.
	So that what?
	Well, for free?
	Because I just love Hunter Biden, he's such a quirky guy?
	Oh yeah, I'm sure it's just because he's so nice.
	Yeah, no, it's corruption.
	It's so they can get access to Joe Biden and then get their policies through the American political system.
	And you can also see the fact that he just didn't disclose any of this, because that's what you do when you're innocent.
	Well, that would look pretty bad, wouldn't it?
	Yeah.
	And then just lying straight to the public and the media, and then also just the very fact that Hunter Biden is dumb enough to have left his laptop there and gone like, ah, nothing important on there.
	Crack addict, so...
	Yeah, not surprising.
	But also just the fact that we now have on tape, as you can see there, well, even MSC, NBC had to admit, that yes, Joe Biden was openly lying in the debates, as with a lot of other things, but he openly lied about the fact that my son never made money from China...
	Millions of dollars.
	Like, millions of dollars.
	We have it all in writing now.
	We had the laptop as real, everything about it was real, and you guys suppressed it during the election.
	Why?
	Because it made you look absolutely terrible.
	And that's just the facts of the case.
	That's the intro to this segment, right?
	From MSNBC. Clearly making them look terrible.
	So how do they do this?
	Well, they then try to start whining about the left-wing media, which is very based, but they whine about them as in, like, why didn't the left-wing media do something about this?
	I think.
	If only you knew someone who worked in left-wing media.
	If only we had lied better.
	That's blank.
	Turns out that it seems that at least a lot of what was on that laptop is true.
	And here's where the problem is from the left-leaning media perspective, which is, why didn't they make any effort to try to verify it?
	In particular, the moment that Hunter Biden admits that he's under federal investigations, So now we're in December of 2020.
	It's really just in the last month or so that the mainstream or the left-leaning media have begun to say, yeah, you know, what was on the laptop, a lot of it really seems to be true.
	The question is, why did it take so long?
	And we know.
	But also, look who's talking.
	Yes.
	MSNBC, the major left-wing media, is like, hmm, if only the left-wing media had done something.
	And even more so than CNN, MSNBC are quite far-leaning, far-left-leaning.
	Like, open about it, quite frankly, at times as well, which I can somewhat commend as in, like, well, at least you're honest.
	But to be such scumbags, you're like, well, if only the left had done something.
	Anyway, moving on.
	Like, you are the left!
	If anyone else is going to be the mainstream left of the Dems, it's MSNBC. And in mentioning that, why didn't the left do anything?
	Maybe you should just ask yourself why it was that you didn't feel the need to verify any of this, seeing as it turns out it's all true.
	What could we have done?
	The left is like, hmm, maybe we did something wrong.
	Don't know who did that, though.
	You.
	You're the ones who did it.
	But we'll go to the next clip in which they also admit that the censorship was a mistake.
	A mistake how and for who is the question you've got to think, though.
	Let's play.
	There's no question that it was an embarrassment to the social media giants that this was banned from being shared, right?
	It was declared misinformation.
	I mean, there's no question that that's a shameful moment that they isolated this piece and said, oh, you know, you can't.
	Share this.
	This is disinformation, etc.
	Because there was no evidence that it was disinformation.
	Now, it is true that when you think about the story at the time, it sounds insane, right?
	Oh, Hunter Biden goes to some random computer shop and just happens to leave his computer there and forgets to pick it up.
	Rudy Giuliani picks it up.
	Rudy Giuliani picks it up.
	I mean, the story is a bit, you know, hard to believe, but that doesn't mean that the mainstream media, A, shouldn't have done more to try to see is this true or not, and B, the level of censorship that it got...
	On social media.
	Oh, on social media, etc., was clearly a mistake.
	Why?
	Why was it a mistake?
	Because you got caught.
	Yes.
	Not because you're actually worried about the truth, because if you were, then you would have ran the story like everyone else.
	You would have spoken about the story.
	You wouldn't have at least suppressed it.
	Actively suppressing it.
	This whole thing has the tone of somebody confessing to all of their crimes while still desperately trying to fob it off on someone else's problem.
	Yeah, it's like my brother did this because he's got the same last name.
	I was like, no.
	You guys did this.
	It's like when you're a teenager or something, someone goes, well, my friend really likes this person.
	What do we do?
	My friend may have lied to the national public, but what do we do about that?
	Actively suppress the story which made your guy look bad because he is bad.
	I mean, the facts were all there.
	The emails were all there.
	All the names of the companies, the individuals who gave the money, the amounts of money...
	The 10% for the big guy.
	Don't know who that is.
	I guess we'll find out.
	And yet it was still...
	Nah, this can't be real.
	Why?
	It's far-fetched.
	What's far-fetched about it?
	Some crack addict left his laptop at a repair shop and didn't pick it up.
	Far-fetched.
	Incredibly far-fetched.
	No crack addict would ever leave his laptop.
	I always thought crack addicts had the best judgement.
	Crack addicts.
	Brilliant time managers.
	Brilliant organisers.
	No.
	There's also the question in my mind of just like, imagine if the right ever got away with anything like this.
	I mean, just covering up a story of a candidate and just being like, yeah, it's not even allowed to be shared on social media.
	We would return to the riots of the mid-2020 if something like this came out about the right.
	Exactly.
	How many more people would have died in 2020 if the right had gone away with such a thing?
	I mean, they trashed Donald Trump for ages just about a joke that he made about, oh, you're grabbing by the blah-de-blah.
	That wasn't a confession.
	That was a joke that he made in private that was being recorded.
	This, we have actual evidence of corruption.
	Eh, what do we do about that?
	Eh, just cover it up.
	And we'll go to the next clip, which is some of the defense from the other people on there.
	And this lady here, she tries to defend it by saying, there isn't a family in America who doesn't have a crack child, who does international corruption, I suppose.
	She's taking the critical race theory approach, is she?
	Is my right to have a child on crack?
	Let's play.
	Hunter Biden has made some serious mistakes trying to use his father's position to make money in a way that was wildly irresponsible.
	Number two, Hunter Biden himself has said, I'm an addict.
	I had serious substance abuse problems.
	And by the way, all during this time period.
	And you can see by the facts of this case, who leaves their laptop at this place in his situation and never comes back to pick it up.
	Who does that unless somebody is clearly not functioning at a level?
	And three, Joe Biden loves his son.
	Now, are those three connected?
	Yes, but no.
	And I don't think anybody, I think everybody when they voted for Joe Biden knew Hunter Biden was a problem.
	He's a little bit like when Bill Clinton got elected, right?
	But he knew Bill Clinton was not as pure as the driven snow when it came to his personal life.
	But they said that's his personal life.
	And I think when they voted for Joe Biden, they said that's his son.
	And there's a family in America that doesn't have dysfunction around this issue.
	This is amazing.
	Every family has a son who's so on crack that they just leave their laptop full of their own pornography.
	How do we reform the image of Hunter Biden?
	Ah, well, you're all on crack anyway!
	I mean, you voted for Biden, so you must be on crack.
	For the left American elite, I suppose there are everyone's son who's involved in shady going-ons, maybe Epstein-ing themselves, or engaging in international corruption on a daily basis because what family doesn't have those problems?
	This is like watching a magician fail to escape a straitjacket.
	Any minute now!
	I just can't get over it.
	There's this newsroom full of people who are so guilty of actively suppressing a story to the point...
	I mean, such an international story as well.
	It's just like, yeah, we've got the son engaging in international corruption for his dad, who is running for president, now is the president.
	Still ignore it.
	Suppress it, even.
	Go even further.
	Literally censor the ability to share the story.
	And they're trying to cover up their tracks by being like, yeah, well, come on.
	Who doesn't have a son that's on crack?
	Ah, I'm sure all these people do, so...
	And we'll go to the last clip here, which is the main guy here deciding...
	I can't remember his name.
	No, Joe.
	And he decides to go with, well, this is just a chance for the right to engage in whataboutisms.
	So...
	What, the right to distract from all of their children on crack?
	I presume so?
	But he decides to evidence this by doing a bunch of whataboutisms, which is, again, just a guilty man, clearly.
	Let's play.
	And Claire, it also provides many on the Trump right a wonderful opportunity to engage in whataboutism.
	You look at the corruption of Donald Trump, you look at the crimes committed that he appears that he's going to get away with, whether it's the Manhattan D.A. not having somebody to go after.
	Look what happened with Trump Hotel.
	We could go down the list, but it does provide, many on the Trump right, a wonderful opportunity to engage in whataboutism.
	That does not excuse the media for not aggressively going after this story.
	That does not excuse social media for banning this story at a critical time during the campaign.
	But if people want to know why they're pushing this so hard, that's one of the reasons.
	Yeah, but let's look at the difference between Trump and Biden in this situation.
	Trump's kids are out there making all kinds of money off his name.
	The point is, is that if Donald Trump was in this situation, you know what he would have done?
	He would have fired that U.S. attorney in Delaware.
	And he would have shut down this investigation, or tried to.
	What did Joe Biden do?
	Joe Biden not only has been hands-off in this investigation, he's allowed the Trump appointee that is handling this investigation to stay in place.
	That's the difference between integrity and corruption.
	Poor reasoning.
	I think my head's going to explode.
	Look at the level of cope going on.
	Jesus Christ!
	So, the president's son is not only a drug addict, that's one thing, but the main thing is the fact that he's openly taking bribes from enemy states.
	I mean, the Chinese Communist Party paying him a million dollars to do...
	Four million dollars?
	Yeah, and...
	Do something.
	He didn't declare it either, which is a sign of guilt, but that's nothing to worry about.
	Why?
	Because this story really shows the integrity of Joe Biden.
	How does that follow?
	I don't know.
	The logic being, it shows the integrity of Joe Biden because Joe Biden didn't intervene personally like Donald Trump would have.
	An action she's made up in her own head.
	Yes.
	Even if you could make that argument, yes, maybe he didn't step in personally because he knew he already had all of the media institutions on his side that would do that for him.
	Which they did.
	So, your son is a corrupt piece of ass who literally takes bribes from the enemy for you, okay?
	But this shows that you're a man of integrity because you're better than this action I've made up, this phantom strongman.
	You're better than that, therefore.
	And also, being a crack addict taking money from the enemy, again, is morally equivalent, if not better, than being a businessman using their parents' wealth to continually make wealth within the family.
	Yeah.
	It's like, I'm sure there are criticisms of Donald Trump's kids, don't get me wrong, there are criticisms of Donald Trump's business practices, such as this abuse of eminent domain, for example.
	That's an argument made.
	None of that is taking money from the Chinese Communist Party.
	These are very different things.
	I can't believe we're having to clarify this.
	Yeah, that's their take on this.
	Absolute cope.
	But at the same time, just throughout all of that, and go watch the full thing if you've got the time.
	It's like 17 minutes long.
	I couldn't play at all, obviously.
	Unless you could have taken that all.
	There's them constantly being like, well, you know, the left-wing media had done something back in the day.
	Who is the left-wing media?
	MSNBC. So I went back and checked.
	What was your reporting on the situation?
	Were you slightly concerned about the truth of this matter?
	No, of course not.
	They endlessly whined about how this is Russian disinformation and we shouldn't take it seriously.
	Also, suppress it now.
	And I'm going to demonstrate it.
	Let's go for this first one.
	This is a clip in which they were debating the story in October.
	Let's play what the current coverage was at the time.
	It's Biden, corruption, Ukraine, without any details of what the content is.
	So it's exactly the same.
	And what I think Vladimir Putin wants is he wants polarization.
	He wants delegitimation.
	He wants us not to hold a free and fair election that the majority of Americans will recognize.
	And this is part of achieving that ultimate objective.
	Congressman, I want to turn to you because in your capacity as a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, what do you think the Russians are trying to get out of stoking these disinformation campaigns?
	Well, clearly, they want to endanger our democracy.
	And that's what said, stay here.
	The democracy of the United States of America and people's integrity and trustworthiness into our elections.
	And they think that they want to stoke at that.
	I mean, 100% fake news.
	I mean, yeah.
	I mean, the framing, the content, the accusations, all of it is completely fake news.
	Honestly, given the way the left has co-opted the term, I'm beginning to just hate democracy now.
	Our democracy.
	Our democracy.
	I've decided I'm a monarchist again.
	Well, you should be.
	You're British.
	Well, I know, but more so now.
	Yeah, but also just the headline of that segment was the Hunter Biden Ukraine story linked to Rudy Giuliani as an obvious Russian plot.
	That was MSNBC's coverage at the time.
	Source?
	Trust me, bro.
	Trust me.
	We think it is.
	Why?
	It was revealed to me in a dream.
	I mean, what a difference two years make when they're just openly saying, yeah, no, it was all true, and we're the people who covered this up.
	Yeah, you are.
	I wonder how long it'll take before, maybe after Joe's presidency has ended, we'll have some more reveals of the truth.
	There's also this article here, why Trump's desperate Biden-gate Hail Mary keeps backfiring, which they try and claim that, again, it's all misinformation, it's all Russians.
	It's just the best efforts of the Republican-led Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee to carry out work failed to find anything substantive that showed that Joe Biden used his role as vice president to improperly benefit Hunter in Ukraine.
	Well, that was obvious nonsense.
	We now have all the evidence.
	It's a complete lie.
	He's referenced directly in the emails.
	Yeah.
	His latest attempt came from a New York Post story Wednesday morning with the headline, Smoking Gun Email Reveals How Hunter Biden Introduced Ukrainian Businessmen to VP Dad.
	We're not linking the piece.
	MSNBC, right?
	Just not going to.
	Just not even going to.
	We don't feel like it.
	No.
	But given the uncertainty in the materials used in the reporting.
	So we're not going to link it because we're true journalists.
	You were part of the Conspiracy of Silence.
	Directly.
	Your own articles say that we're not linking the piece.
	Why?
	Because we just don't like it.
	Once again, if they're talking about our democracy, Thomas Jefferson promoted a free press for the sake of the people hearing the truth.
	If you're going to talk about conspiracy, this is a conspiracy against the general public of America.
	I don't think any of the founding fathers have ever seen this circumstance.
	No.
	Where so much of the corporate media, the tobacco salesmen that they are, decided all to remain silent to protect their product.
	That's all it is.
	And the story being censored from even being shared among everyone, thanks to the Tech Monopolies.
	I mean, that could not have been predicted in 1776, that's for sure.
	They definitely couldn't have seen that one coming.
	How convenient it is that the laptop's contents just happened to pop up weeks before the election, and as Politico's Kyle Chaney noted on Twitter, even if this email is real, which we can't verify just yet, there's no evidence that a meeting between Joe Biden and Poroshenky ever actually happened, other than the real evidence in the emails.
	Even if this is completely true, I mean, that is written evidence, an email from him saying that it was lovely to meet your dad, Hunter.
	Here's $400,000 for that.
	Hunter Biden.
	They might as well have just gone, it was lovely to meet your dad, Joe Biden, because you are his son, Hunter Biden, and your father is Joe Biden.
	And I paid for this meeting in money!
	There's no evidence other than that email.
	In which the guy says that exactly that happened.
	Fantastic.
	They continue on this.
	I don't have time to go through all of this one because it's just mad.
	But if we move on, we can go to the fact that the tech censorship also happened.
	Sorry, this is the point that he said.
	It was Giuliani who first pushed Shokin's false claim that he was fired to prevent an investigation to Hunter Biden in Burisma.
	Completely false claim, except from the video evidence.
	You may remember this.
	This is Joe Biden bragging that he got shook and fired, the investigator in Ukraine.
	Oh yeah, I remember this as well.
	Because he was investigating Hunter Biden and Burisma.
	He seems pretty proud and happy of having done that as well.
	Yeah, so MSNBC, at the time that article was published, when the story broke, just openly denied that this had taken place, even though a year before the footage was out.
	So they sit there and claim, well, you know, the left kind of failed because they didn't investigate it.
	Yes.
	So MSNBC at the side is just going, why would Vox do this?
	What's Vox?
	It's you guys.
	You are the evil people in this story.
	You are the ones who failed to investigate open information.
	As you see, this video, 2019, million and a half views of Joe Biden bragging that he got away with it.
	If we go to the next one, we also have the tech companies, of course, complicit in the conspiracy.
	We can't complete this request of you posting the link because this link has been identified as Twitter or our partners as being potentially harmful.
	Who are your partners?
	The Democratic Party.
	That's not f***ing out.
	And also, it's potentially harmful.
	To who?
	To Joe Biden's campaign.
	That's what it was.
	You sensed it on the basis that it would hurt Joe Biden's campaign.
	If we go to the next one, we have, of course, Facebook did the exact same.
	We're reducing its distribution on our platform.
	I mean, I'm sorry, but I know I hark on about the story, but I just can't get over how this was able to be gotten away with in 2020.
	I mean, some people really should be looking at jail time.
	They were waving it in people's faces as well.
	And if you want to destroy the American political system, not being able to share information on a candidate because, well, that would be bad against our candidate.
	To the point that it's censored from all mainstream discourse.
	I mean, that is evil.
	The Chinese Communist Party does do this on a regular basis.
	Censoring bad news about the CCP. And we laugh and call them bad for it.
	Whereas the same thing is happening over here.
	It's a human rights abuse when it happens in China, when it happens in the US. Fortifying elections.
	Well, hopefully this sort of thing Elon will be able to sort out.
	Fingers crossed if he can actually exert any influence over Twitter.
	We'd love to see it.
	If we go forward, I'll only have time to read the headlines of these ones.
	As you can see, this is more...
	Reporting from MSNBC at the time, things go from bad to worse for Giuliani's anti-Biden gambit.
	Against all fake news folks, don't look too far into it, says MSNBC. If you go to the next one we have, will most voters even get Trump's conspiracy theory attacks about Hunter Biden?
	Conspiracy theory.
	It was just a conspiracy theory.
	Because the next one as well, we also have...
	What was this one?
	Hear what happened when NBC News tried to report on the alleged Hunter Biden emails, and then they list in here about how, yeah, they just ran into a bunch of nonsense.
	There's nothing true to it.
	Even if that statement was made talking about the emails of the meeting, it says very little about how much Joe Biden knew, and nothing about whether he was involved.
	The quote being, This is Tony, Dad, the individual I told you about, that's helping us with business and working with the Chinese.
	Even if that's all true, that doesn't show that Joe Biden knew anything about the business with China, or that he was directly involved.
	Literally, here's my dad, Joe Biden.
	Hi, Dad.
	Hi, Chinaman.
	That won't prove that Joe Biden knew anything.
	The Biden campaign has denied that Biden knew about the venture or stood to profit from it.
	I mean, it is literally unbelievable that a journalist would lap up such S. I mean, here's the email.
	Biden met Chinaman.
	Chinaman then gives a million dollars to Biden's son.
	There's no evidence that Joe Biden knew what was going on.
	No one believes that crap.
	Obvious bull.
	But also, of course, there is to mention that MSNBC are not just terrible on the fact that they are actively trying to destroy the United States.
	We also have them trying to destroy it through the race war as well, from Joy Reid here.
	Love this clip.
	We don't have time to apply it, but it's Joy Reid interviewing some lunatic, as Dave Rubin says, from the asylum.
	And the lunatic decides to go with, Elon Musk is building a racist company that gives him nostalgic memories of apartheid South Africa.
	What?
	Like, seriously, what?
	I have no idea where this has come from.
	Is this guy on crack too?
	Is the entirety of the mainstream establishment left in America just on crack?
	I can only assume.
	There is no other explanation for how you can come to such conclusions.
	Just, yeah, this entire story, all the evidence, even if it's true, is wrong.
	Why?
	Because I said so.
	But also, Elon Musk is running an apartheid state in Tesla.
	He also goes on to say that Twitter is the worst place for women of colour, its hostile environment, which makes me laugh hilariously because, of course, all the rightists have been banned.
	Well, yeah.
	Leftists among leftists.
	Women of colour most affected by such a degree.
	It's quite self-reported.
	Yeah, and there's also, of course, Joy Reid, who then decided to spend the day, because it's another day, promoting a race war.
	By this one, promoting the diversity higher nonce being put in power in the Supreme Court.
	What a wonderful day for America.
	As you say, it's a victory not just for black women and black history, but for America to have a nonce sympathiser in the highest court of the land.
	I mean, this is the absolute state of MSNBC. I think they really are just effing scum.
	Move on.
	Sorry, but that whole thing wound me up in no end.
	I understand why you chose to title it so harshly, because that wound me up as well.
	Yeah, I just...
	I'm bloody angry now!
	You've got me.
	Time for Islam.
	Time for something that's going to calm everybody down.
	Let's talk about the religion of peace.
	Oh, sorry, the religion of no remorse.
	Islam, of course.
	Before we get into this, it's probably good to throw a plug at this recent interview.
	Actually, it was back in February, so less recent now, that Bo did with Gavin Bobby, or is it Bobby?
	Bobby, I believe.
	Gavin Bovey, who is part of the Mosquebusters team, is a solicitor who goes around trying to prevent the opening of mosques in various cities of the UK. Very interesting interview.
	Give that a watch, because it is relevant.
	So, with this segment, I'm going to be discussing a few things that are relevant to things that happened a few months ago.
	I just want to point out that there are people in the UK who are Muslims, like Majid Nawaz, who do very good work, who are rational, reasonable people, but there does seem to be a sizable contingent of Muslims within the UK who hate us, I think.
	Everybody can recognise this.
	Hate our culture and want it replaced with their own.
	We shouldn't be standing for this.
	We shouldn't sit down and just let it happen.
	But the institutions in our country are pretty desperate on ignoring the problem or pretending like it's a good thing and then actively persecuting those who point it out.
	I laugh because that's so true.
	It is.
	It is.
	I mean, not obviously in England, but you guys covered that article from CNN, was it, last year, that was like, the browning of America is happening, and here's why it's a good thing.
	I was talking about race, but of Islamisation, you get it so often in the UK, being like, yes, look, the first mosque is opening in this town in the middle of nowhere.
	We now have the Imam of Dhibli.
	Look at how diverse and multicultural we are.
	This is a good thing, and only a good thing that leads to good outcomes.
	Oh, except for when someone blows up, or somebody, as was the case with David Amos back in October, who got stabbed to death.
	He was the Conservative MP for his constituency.
	We covered this quite in depth at the time, but just for a reminder for anybody who didn't know, he was doing a constituency surgery in Leon C. in Essex on October 15th, And while he was doing that, a man called Ali Harbi Ali walked in and stabbed him 20 times to death.
	Beautiful British name.
	Yes, very British name.
	So here's some reminders of who Ali is, which came out after he had already committed the murder.
	So first, he is the son of Harbi Ali Kulain, a former advisor to the Somali Prime Minister.
	So this is not some destitute random name.
	Who got converted to extremism through isolation and desperation.
	No, this is a pretty well-to-do guy.
	They're all still in Somalia.
	Because they can't afford to get here.
	Yes.
	This guy, his parents were pretty well off.
	Had a very good life.
	There are other reports of him having a full and loving home life.
	And yet he still ended up murdering an innocent man.
	For no reason.
	It must have just been a complete...
	Act of random violence committed by a madman.
	No, we know why he killed him, and he admits it, which is what we'll be getting to in a moment.
	The other thing is that he was previously referred to prevent a government anti-terrorism plan to stop radicalization.
	Ali did not spend much time involved in the anti-terrorism group, yes, because like all else done by the government, it seems, for the most part, for all the examples I see of people going through it, pretty useless.
	Because any time I hear about Prevent, it's when somebody has committed a big terrorist attack.
	Whenever you hear about Prevent, it's because Man went and killed a bunch of people, and he was on Prevent's watch list.
	Yeah, they were really keeping a close eye on him.
	They were in the bushes with binoculars as they were watching him stab someone, going, hmm.
	That's good arm work there.
	We might be onto something, lads.
	I've got a good lead.
	Yeah, so Ali is currently in the middle of his trial for murdering David Amos.
	I mean, I think it's a pretty open shut case.
	There was like 20 other people there who all saw him, and he seems pretty happy to admit that, yeah, I killed him.
	What of it?
	But it turns out that he's actually an incredibly honest Islamist, because he's just completely open about why he did it, his motivations, and even at one point brands himself a moderate Muslim, which...
	Fair play for the honesty, I suppose.
	So let's go through and just analyse some of the stuff that he's said.
	So the alleged terrorist killer of Sir Damien...
	I don't know why we're having to say alleged.
	Once again, everybody saw him.
	He's admitted it already.
	We're just waiting for the verdict now.
	The killer of David Amos has told a court that he wanted to kill a politician to stop him from harming Muslims in Syria.
	Ali Habi Ali, 26, told the jury at the Old Bailey that he wanted to make Hijra to travel and fight for the Islamic State, but he found it too difficult to get there.
	So this man is an extremist.
	The only reason that he didn't join ISIS is because he found it a bit too hard.
	But...
	A bit too hard to join.
	Not because they're too radical.
	Yeah, a bit too hard to get over there.
	To be honest, if it was anything to do with migration or anything like this, some guy like this wants to get himself out of our country and go cause trouble in the Middle East on a different country, let him.
	As long as it's not here.
	A lot of the Muslim world did do this in the Afghan-Soviet war, so they got all their troublemakers and were like, hey boy, you know you should do your Islamic duty and go and fight in Afghanistan.
	And Algerians and Moroccans and so forth were like, that's a good argument, Mr.
	Government.
	They left, got to Afghanistan, and immediately the Algerian-Moroccan government or whoever else just went, right, that's wonderful, citizenship.
	You can never come back.
	There you go.
	I think, you know, I think we should be taking some advice from that.
	I think the Muslims have got good policies on that one.
	Yeah, they really do.
	I never thought I'd be saying that.
	But, yeah, as long as they're not here, I'm fine with it.
	Whatever.
	At least these kinds of extremists.
	He is accused of stabbing David Amos, Conservative MP, more than 20 times, blah blah blah, and giving evidence on Thursday for his own defence.
	Or lack thereof.
	Ali said that he decided to kill OMS because of his voting record on foreign policy, including airstrikes in Syria.
	I decided to do it because I felt that if I could kill someone who made decisions to kill Muslims, it could prevent further harm to those Muslims, Ali said.
	He voted previously in Parliament, not just him.
	I decided if I couldn't make Hijra, then if I couldn't help the Muslims in Syria, I would do something interesting.
	Here, so he considers himself a warrior fighting a war.
	International Islamist.
	Also notable, yes, international Islamist.
	He does not consider himself a constituent of England or Britain.
	He does not consider himself on our side, despite...
	Despite being raised here and living here for a very long time, he considers himself part of the international Muslim community.
	He does not see himself as anything to do with us.
	And that's how quite a few of these sorts of people consider us.
	Incredibly common.
	I mean, Al-Qaeda leading up to 9-11, their primary source of recruits were Muslims living in foreign lands?
	Yes.
	Because, well, there was a disconnect.
	They're not.
	They don't have any allegiance to those lands they're living in.
	They only have allegiance to Islam.
	Muslim first.
	That's how they saw themselves.
	Mm-hmm.
	So Ali was asked why he had a note on his phone about plans to kill Michael Gove.
	That was plans I had to attack and hopefully kill Michael Gove at the time, Ali said.
	He's just so open about it!
	Why do you have plans to kill Michael Gove?
	Well, I was probably going to kill Michael Gove, mate.
	Yeah, I mean, I suppose it's good to get it straight out of the horse's mouth, I suppose.
	What was he going to say?
	Well, I was planning on playing tennis with him.
	Well, I was going to change my mind, maybe.
	I believe he was someone who was a harm to Muslims.
	I thought if I couldn't go join the Islamic State, I should try and do something to help Muslims.
	Here, this seems to be, once again, a very repeating motif.
	But also, there's a point there, which is it basically could have been anyone, any government official, any government minister, any member of parliament.
	If he decided that you were against him, then you were a threat, and he needed to neutralise you.
	Weren't part of the Party of Islam, Then you're not on his side.
	Then you're an enemy.
	I do find it interesting, because there are plenty of Labour MPs, you could say, approved such actions, maybe such as the war in Iraq, would be a great one, or the war in Afghanistan.
	But he didn't go for any of them, did he?
	Also voting on the Syrian intervention as well, but none of them got targeted.
	Something to keep in mind.
	Yes, something definitely to keep in mind.
	So that means if you're a smart Muslim, then you'll be going over to Syria to fight, presumably.
	This happens a lot.
	Yes.
	Like, the guys at the top of Al-Qaeda, all of them had, like, doctorates or high-level degrees.
	They are, academically speaking, very intelligent, or at least very well-graded, I suppose you could say.
	Well, they also run their religion to its logical endpoints because, well, they're smart, educated people who do such things in every other part of their life, so why, when it comes to their faith, would they not do the same?
	The alleged terrorist, I still don't get why they keep using the word alleged, said that he was interviewed by police who asked him about Twitter accounts and how he felt about the government.
	I would just nod, say yes, and they'll leave you alone afterwards, and they did, he said.
	He told the jury that he was supposed to have two meetings, but the police were happy with the first one.
	This is how useless our institutions that are designed specifically to combat terrorism are at actually combating terrorism.
	These guys, they know all the motions that they need to do.
	You just nod along, you say yes, officer, and they'll let you go.
	No questions asked.
	It's completely useless.
	Asked by the prosecutor whether he was utterly shameless, he replied, I wouldn't use the word shameless, but no, I don't feel any shame.
	I mean, distinction without a difference, but okay.
	If I thought it was something wrong, I wouldn't have done it.
	Murdering an innocent person, there's nothing wrong with that.
	Asked whether he regretted stabbing Amos to death, he said no.
	Okay, there we go.
	This is not someone with a mental illness.
	This is not someone who's confused.
	He's thought about this.
	He's thought this through.
	And under the internal logic of being an Islamist, being a person who takes Islam seriously, he came to that conclusion.
	And, well, this is something to keep in mind whenever we talk about immigration from the Islamic world.
	Refugees welcome.
	You don't get this with Ukrainians.
	Shockingly enough, you don't, do you?
	No, but do you remember also there was that Danish man last year who was in Norway and murdered a bunch of people with a bow and arrow?
	He wasn't Arabic.
	He was a white guy who was from Denmark, but he was Islamic.
	There's a through line here, isn't there?
	Ali told the court he had been prepared to die fighting for ISIS in Syria and that he would not have minded if the terrorist group had claimed responsibility for the attack.
	He said, if you encourage someone to an act of jihad, it's a good thing.
	Asked whether he was proud of his actions, he said, to be proud of an act of jihad is a dangerous thing.
	Ali said that he carried out the attack for Islam and that if the Islamic State didn't exist, I would have done the same thing.
	Earlier he said he would not describe the killing as murder because I don't think it's unlawful.
	No, it's according to man-made law that it's unlawful, but according to God's law, Allah's law, Islamic law...
	On the chariot, it's perfectly fine, which is why nutters like this don't really have a place in our society, because we have objective laws that we want to adhere to, they have different ones, and they don't see ours as legitimate.
	But on the money.
	I mean, it's a very simple thing.
	Like, if you think that God's law takes precedent, as in Islamic law takes precedent over the man-made law of Parliament, then we can't coexist?
	I mean, just on a fundamental basis?
	Because if you don't accept the law of the land, then, right, off to prison?
	What are we supposed to do with you?
	I mean, literally, all we can do is put you in prison or deport you.
	I mean, what else are you meant to do with someone who doesn't accept the law?
	Yes.
	But there was more information that this article left out.
	So if we move along, there was the Sky News article, which had a bit more interesting information.
	So Ali confirmed that the note on his phone described plans he had to hopefully kill Michael Gove.
	He went on to admit going to Mr.
	Gove's house, armed with a knife in his rucksack, and later hanging around outside Parliament.
	So hanging around outside Parliament, that's a public area that you can go around.
	So we're honestly lucky that he didn't just decide to go on a...
	Bloody killing spree.
	Been two other Islamist attacks on Westminster Bridge, so...
	Yeah, we're lucky we didn't have a repeat of that, even though he did end up going on to kill someone anyway.
	Ali said that he had no regrets over the attack of his actions.
	Would kill Sir David again if he were to relive the day of the attack.
	Once again, it's just interesting how open and honest he is about this.
	He seems perfectly of sound mind in an objective sense.
	He has his own internal logic and he's sticking to it.
	He's...
	Rational.
	He's not completely insane.
	He's just...
	He's not even slightly insane.
	He's completely sane within his own worldview, which is Islamic doctrine.
	He's taken...
	There is no way this guy has not memorised the Quran, frankly.
	Probably gone through the Hadiths, has gone through all the arguments and gone, right, yeah, to be a good Muslim...
	This is what I've got to do.
	To be a good Muslim is to live as the Prophet.
	Well, what did the Prophet do?
	It wasn't very peaceful.
	It really wasn't.
	And he didn't have any remorse.
	Nope.
	At times smiling and leaning casually on one arm as he spoke, he described himself as a moderate Muslim.
	If I thought I did anything wrong, I wouldn't have done it.
	I consider myself a Muslim who went out and killed someone who killed Muslims.
	Prosecutor Tom Little asked, You don't regard yourself as a radical?
	Ali replied, I am a moderate Muslim.
	So this guy isn't the worst of what we could be getting if we had all of these radicals in our country, which...
	I'd love to know what he thinks a radical Muslim is.
	Like the killer.
	I'd love to ask him.
	Probably someone...
	Someone who murders kids?
	I don't know if he wouldn't have done that if he felt the need to as well.
	They're also non-believers, so...
	Yep, so Ali describes his childhood in South London as full of love and care, but said that he felt obligated to do something after seeing coverage of the Arab uprising against Syrian President Bashar Assad in the 2010s.
	The trial was adjourned until Monday for closing speeches.
	So, I think it's a pretty open shot.
	He said that he did it.
	He said that he would do it again.
	LAUGHTER If he got the chance.
	I don't think we're in any doubt of this one.
	Yeah, I don't know why we have to wait till Monday, but...
	Again, I bring up my argument about the death penalty.
	This chap.
	Right.
	I know what's going to happen already.
	We know what really will happen, which he'll go to prison for the rest of his life and cost us tens of thousands of pounds every year.
	Right.
	Why can't we kill him?
	Why can't we give him the death penalty?
	The proper British death penalty being, of course, being hung by the neck until dead.
	And by his own logic, he would be getting to his promised land or whatever quicker.
	That's wonderful.
	Great for him.
	It's great you live in that fairy tale.
	Yep.
	Goodbye.
	Good riddance.
	Yeah, this is where the whole argument for the death penalty makes a lot of sense to me because it's not even like, oh, we might have the wrong guy.
	No, he's very happy to admit it.
	Even if we have the wrong guy, quite frankly, I'm not worried.
	Yeah.
	Like, we've also, I mean, even if it's the wrong guy, okay, it's not, but let's just assume this guy is literally openly saying, yeah, and if you release me, I'll just kill again.
	Alright then, I guess you've forced my hand.
	But we've also got a few other things that's happened in the past few days, including the Manchester Arena bombing had a memorial put up earlier this year.
	Everybody watching will probably remember the Manchester Arena bombings in early 2017, which affected a lot of people.
	Being from the north, I actually knew people who were there.
	Not particularly nice.
	And the memorial has been vandalised by, I can only assume, a British man.
	Some pole, maybe?
	Yeah, maybe.
	Ukrainian refugee?
	Well, let's go through.
	Just as a reminder, 22 people were killed and hundreds more injured when bomber Salman Abedi detonated a homemade device.
	Children.
	We should hit on that point.
	Well, if you scroll down to the image there, John...
	The bomber specifically targeted defenceless children.
	Yeah, it was an Ariana Grande concert, and we know the kinds, the sort of demographic age range that go to those.
	This person, Salman Abedi, knew the sorts of people he was targeting.
	The monument was conceived as a living memorial, a peaceful garden space for remembrance and reflection featuring plants which grow naturally in the UK countryside, and was selected to provide year-round colour and echo the changing seasons.
	Anwar Hseni, 24, very strong Manchester name, Anwar.
	Is that Spanish or Italian?
	Yeah, might be Portuguese.
	Maybe?
	No, no, don't get many Anwar's around there.
	Caused £10,000 worth of criminal damage to the White Marble Halo, bearing the names of the people who were murdered in the attack.
	the magistrates told him the case was too serious to be dealt with by them and sent it to the city's Crown Court.
	So no mention of why he might have done this, but I think we all know why he's done this.
	Anwar Hseni is not just some yob acting out of violent rage or just yobbishness just wanting to deface things.
	He probably sees the fact that we are paying memorial tribute to these people as an insult to the memory of his good friend.
	Tom, I mean, absolutely.
	I would imagine.
	The Islamist hero is a hero in his mind because he killed kafars.
	Don't worry about the fact that they're literally defenseless children, the guy is a child murderer.
	That doesn't factor in to the Islamist worldview.
	No.
	But of course, the media's been trying to avoid mentioning anything to do with his name in headlines, or mention anything to do with his...
	This headline right here, Yob causes £10,000.
	Is that what it is, Daily Express?
	Screw you, Daily Express, because you know that that is a lie.
	The description of the suspect is, uh, Yob.
	He's a British Yob.
	Uh, man.
	Is that what we should start referring to Islamic terrorists from now on?
	British Yobs?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, there we go.
	And...
	Oh yeah, the Express was bought out by the Mirror, so that explains the massive leftist bias there.
	And just as a reminder that the majority of British Muslims that we have come from Pakistan, here's a nice story that came out of Pakistan a few days ago, where three women were killed by, well, The three women kill teacher after a 13-year-old dreamt of her blasphemy.
	Pakistan Tuesday saw yet another killing over allegations of blasphemy, this time of a 21-year-old female teacher in Dera Ismaili Khan.
	But what is rare about this murder is that all accused are females, and they allegedly committed the crime based on the dream of a 13-year-old.
	It makes as much sense as anything else in Pakistan.
	Yep, there we go.
	There's a reason I'm very much on the Pakistan to learn to S bandwagon.
	Yep, she was murdered by female colleagues and two students outside the school over difference of opinion on religious issues, according to the police.
	What do you mean different?
	It's a dream.
	Yeah, fantasize differences.
	I dreamt that you disagree with me.
	Step, step, step.
	Yep.
	A 13-year-old female relative of one of the accused dreamt of the victim committing blasphemy, and hence she was ordered to slaughter.
	The relative who had the dream has also been arrested.
	You've been arrested for having a dream because your dream has now caused your relatives to murder someone.
	What a sane and peaceful country, eh?
	Chad's like, believe all women.
	Yeah, we need more of these people, don't you know?
	So, the dream was the prophet had directed them to slaughter the victim as she'd committed blasphemy against the prophet, explaining what differentiates Tuesday's killing from many others reported every year in Pakistan.
	I know, I know.
	A journalist said, Pakistani women jumping on the blasphemy wagon and or endorsing religiously motivated lynch mobs is not unprecedented, but women committing murder themselves using Islam as an excuse is new.
	This is not an excuse.
	Look, they're all following your own...
	Your own canon, alright?
	I mean, there is a reason I joke, well, not joke, about Pakistan's Atlanta S. We should have no relations with Pakistan, even diplomatic in my opinion.
	Absolutely, when you hear about this sort of...
	Because, I mean, look at the parts!
	This is barbarous!
	I mean, we're all living our lives.
	We're all down the pub having a pint, and meanwhile, that's going on.
	Like, people are killing each other over dreams they had.
	I would much rather keep it over there than import it over here.
	I love the chat, it's just like, you know, the police are interrogating her.
	What's your source?
	Trust me, bro.
	It came to me in a dream.
	Yeah.
	Literally.
	Literally.
	So, from 1980 to 1982, several clauses were incorporated into the blasphemy law, including one wherein blasphemy against the Prophet Muhammad led to a penalty of death or imprisonment for life.
	A member of the Pakistani People's Party had introduced a private bill in 2010 to amend the blasphemy law.
	The bill sought to revise procedures of religious offenses, and it went on to a higher parliamentary committee.
	It was later withdrawn in 2011 after pressure from religious forces.
	We know what they were.
	They're in our country now.
	And these religious forces are happy to terrorize us for engaging in our own national interests.
	We should not be importing this.
	We should not be bringing it over.
	The people that prevent are attempting to prevent always end up going and committing some atrocity.
	We need to get this out.
	Have I sold you on Pakistan?
	Yes!
	No, Pakistan sold me on Pakistan.
	I don't need to sell anyone anything.
	All I need to do is look over and go, nope, don't want that.
	Checking in with Pakistan today.
	That's convinced me.
	Pakistani watch.
	Moving on.
	We'll move to the West Falklands.
	Yes.
	So the West Falklands are reeing about the fact that they lost still, and I thought we'd enjoy a bit of a meme segment.
	I need it.
	You need it after the hell we went through.
	Something to cheer people up for the weekend, which is the totally white country of Argentina is whining.
	I know we have some subscribers from Argentina.
	I'm not whining at you guys necessarily, but definitely Buenos Aires, who seem to be just mad at not being able to accept reality.
	We shall start off by me just plugging- You know they say no bueno.
	No bueno!
	We'll start off with this video here, the mother rule parliaments, which I thought I'd plug on loneseeders.com.
	Please do go over to subscribe to support us over there.
	And of course, this little clip here of the fact that that's the British response.
	Upon the call coming out that the Argentines had surrendered, I don't know if you've seen this clip, No, I haven't.
	This chap here, I don't know what part of the army he was in, but he just sits there and goes, Oh, blub it, Mardalus.
	That's a British response.
	Moving forward, though, we shall see the British news on this.
	Of course, the British version of events being that this time of year is also a chance for an opportunity for joy or remembrance, depending on how you're dealing with the subject matter.
	Of course, as you can see there, there's a big-ass statue there of one of the...
	Yomper?
	Yomper.
	Young Officers March, blah blah blah blah blah.
	I've not been in the army, so I can't remember the fly acronym.
	Me neither.
	But it's very nice, and makes you feel proud to be British.
	Well, if we go to the Guardian, who of course have their own view on this.
	Who are not proud to be British.
	No, actually hate Britain.
	And we can see here, with their article, 40 years after the Melvedia...
	Malvinus.
	God, are you English?
	No, no, we shall not use the Argentine phrase.
	Oh, okay.
	After the Falklands War.
	That's a good point.
	I'm not using the Spanish.
	Yeah, sorry.
	Forty years after the Falklands War, Britain still acts as if the dispute is settled.
	It isn't.
	Right, the Guardian here.
	You may wonder, as I did, why on earth there being an open propaganda outlet for Buenos Aires.
	The reason being that this article isn't written by a Guardian writer per se.
	It's written by the Argentine foreign minister.
	I was going to say, that's not a very British name I'm seeing there.
	No, Santiago...
	Salty.
	So, this man, being very salty, but then you have to wonder...
	Salty McSaltface.
	Yeah, Salty McSaltface has written something, and the British response, because this is a newspaper in Britain, would obviously be, who cares about this man's opinion?
	Like, Salty Man continues to be salty.
	But no, the Guardian was very interested in making sure that they had the, well, literally, hostile powers opinion in your face.
	I'm sorry, can you imagine in, like, 1944, like, Britain thinks it might be winning.
	Goebbels has something to say on this.
	But that's the thing, like, I'm not opposed to having foreign propaganda open so we can see it.
	We've mentioned about Russia today.
	Like, I'm happy to have that.
	But we recognise Russia today for what it is, which is an arm of the Kremlin.
	I don't know if The Guardian is happy to be an arm of Buenos Aires.
	I know we do.
	The Guardian is not necessarily an arm of any of those particular things.
	The Guardian is an arm of the internationalist leftist agenda.
	That's how I see it.
	Well, apparently Buenos Aires is something they can use in that furtherance.
	So the guy, the Mr.
	Salty McSaltface, so writes, my country's pursuit of sovereignty didn't end in 1982.
	Did, you lost.
	I urged the UK, in line with the UN resolutions, to resume negotiations.
	And he goes on to just make this weird argument where he's like, yeah, well, before the war, we were negotiating the situation.
	And then the war happened and we lost, but ignore that part.
	But we were negotiating before, therefore we should continue.
	You know, lots of wars started in peace talks, or negotiations, and then they escalate to war, and that kind of solves it.
	Mr Salt, my friend...
	Bueno.
	No bueno, in fact.
	You lost.
	It's over.
	And I thought we'd have a summation of how this all went, so if we go to the next one, we can see, if you can click on that second image, I'm going to say that is the official British diplomatic response to Mr.
	Salty's request that we give him the islands.
	We just sit back with a nice cup of tea and enjoy ourselves.
	I also thought we'd go through a quick recap of the last several years of diplomatic relations we've had with Buenos Aires.
	We'll start off with the, well, recap of the war, as you can see there.
	Go get him!
	Oh, no, you lost.
	Yeah, I mean, the general has lent you down the wrong path.
	You lost.
	You lost to the sheepherders.
	The Chad Sheep Herders, yes.
	Go to the next one, we can see the referendum, an artist's interpretation of how that went, which is new.
	And you lost the referendum.
	I believe it was, what was it, 98% of the islanders voted to stay with Britain?
	I don't know much about the details of the whole conflict, if I'm perfectly honest, sadly.
	This is what the summation is for.
	Oh, well, this is better education than I got in high school, actually, to be fair, so thank you.
	I'm very glad.
	Moving forward with our education lesson, the lecture, we shall move to the negotiations ever since, which has been this.
	Here you go.
	Just to remind you, it's called the Falklands.
	All history should be educated in memes now.
	Yeah, and if we go forward again, we can see Argentine politics ever since this negotiation.
	Man frantically yelling, Argentina is white!
	Argentina is white!
	I'm sure it is.
	You may wonder what all the white stuff is about.
	Yep.
	It's mostly, like, no one cares in Britain, of course, about skin colour, but apparently Argentinians, or at least Buenos Aires, does about this.
	So it's just a funny meme.
	Oh.
	Look at all these white people!
	It's just funny to do.
	If we go to the next one, of course, we can see the British response to them in future has just been ignore Argentinian posts and ignore Argentinian threads.
	Except when they publish it in the British newspaper, I don't know why they thought, well, the Guardian thought they'd get away with this.
	It's the Guardian.
	It's the Guardian.
	I also love the white pride look.
	Again, I love the memes.
	It's good memes.
	If we move forward, we can also see the fact that these memes are actually quite relevant because, of course, there's the sun on the flag of Argentina.
	It's a soy face.
	Do you notice?
	It is a little bash.
	Yeah.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Literal soy jack.
	Literal salty soy jack.
	That's the flag of Argentina.
	That's the look when you see all of your men getting battered.
	Wasn't expecting that one.
	We should go back to the article to engage in Mr.
	Salty Mook's salt face further argumentation.
	Is that the face of Santiago?
	That's Santiago himself there.
	In which they argue that Argentina should have sovereignty because Gibbs.
	No Gibbs.
	You lose...
	Bye.
	No Gibbs, we Gibbs.
	Bye.
	Anyway, so, but the article in here I also wanted to go through because it's full of weird cell phones.
	These things tend to be.
	I assume because he wrote it in Spanish, and in Spanish it probably sounds like a dunk on the British, but when they translate it into English, oh god it did not.
	Quotes from this.
	The UK and my country are both vibrant democracies with relevant economies...
	We're relevant, dammit!
	Once again, insert PewDiePie.
	The Argentina economy is still relevant, goddammit!
	He actually wrote that.
	He then decides to continue.
	Argentina is not a threat to anyone.
	We know.
	That's why you lost.
	We proved it.
	We know for a fact that you are not a threat.
	And will continue to not be a threat.
	Further quotes: Again, we know!
	We continue this because you can't be trusted.
	And we know that because, well, last time we thought you could be trusted and negotiated with you, you just immediately, well, declared war.
	So...
	It's a form of negotiations, I suppose.
	We will continue with those restrictions.
	Again, it's not an own.
	This doesn't make us look bad.
	This looks like we have, well, power over you, which, whatever you do.
	Continuing, quote, I would stress that the UK reserves restrictions of this nature for countries responsible for serious human rights violations.
	Yes, such as Argentina, who tried to restrict the human rights of white Falklanders, unlike the mainland.
	We'll move to the next quote, which is, Who's that a warning to?
	Do you think they're warning us that we need to resolve the dispute by peaceful means?
	I mean, he said that they're not a threat.
	We know that they're not a threat.
	But also, it's just like, did you know the UN is insistent on peace?
	I'm sorry, are they like, please don't make us make you kick our asses again?
	You know the Simpsons.
	Do you remember when they tried to get Sideshow Bob to leave Springfield and they hired that PI and he just goes to the bar and he's like, come on!
	Go!
	I'll be your best friend!
	That's this.
	That's the Argentinian position.
	Please give it back.
	We'll be your best friend, guys.
	The UN calls for peace.
	Who are they talking to?
	You think they're talking to us?
	We're not shooting.
	Like, we never invaded the land.
	Like, if we wanted to go to the West Falklands, I'm all for it, but apparently we're not in the mood right now.
	However, the sovereignty dispute over the Falklands, South Georgias, and South Sandwich Islands on the surrounding maritime areas remain unresolved.
	Yes, you are still a salty bee.
	We know.
	We're still aware.
	We don't care.
	Like, none of this is a discussion ever in British politics.
	You're having to appeal to us by writing into one of our own newspapers.
	Because you don't own any of the lands.
	Never will.
	I mean, this is the thing.
	Like, I'm not trying to, like, labour the point for any of our Argentinian subscribers.
	It's just that this needs to end, and we don't care in the slightest of the Argentinian, well, the Buenos Aires position, because it's over.
	It ended in the war.
	Well, it's not the British position, so why should we care?
	Quote, pretending that it does not exist or that it does not create obstacles in our bilateral relationship is naive.
	Yes!
	You are the problem!
	I mean, you, Minister, Mr.
	Santiago here, like, you are the one making up the problem here.
	We don't have one.
	It's over for us.
	No Argentine government will cease in its pursuit of this sovereign claim.
	Thank you for admitting you are the problem in this regard.
	But the Guardian then decided to republish this plea on his knees as news.
	If we go to the next one here, you can see the Guardian writing that, hey, in the Guardian, we have an article in the Guardian.
	This is a real thing they did, because they're a serious outlet.
	Thanks for the warning, Guardian.
	Writing in the Guardian.
	I know what to avoid.
	On the 40th anniversary of the Argentine invasion of the islands, Santiago was salty.
	The Guardian wrote.
	I didn't write that last bit.
	I made that up.
	We'll go to the next links, though, because I also wanted to just talk about, like, I didn't know.
	Auckland's is doing really well.
	Oh, really?
	Like, really well.
	GDP per capita.
	77,000 US dollars.
	That's not bad.
	That's pretty good.
	That's more than double the UK. It's fantastic!
	If we go to the next one, we can see the Argentinians who are doing one-seventh of a Falklander per person.
	$10,000.
	Fantastic.
	If we move to the next link, we can also see that the BBC decided to button on this.
	Now, credit where credit is due.
	BBC's English service, I have no idea.
	I think they didn't respond to this at all.
	But the BBC Spanish service did actually go over this and explain, well, in detail what happened with the history of the Falklands.
	And I was like, alright, pretty fair.
	I also love that in here they mention the referendum, which, well, it was like 98% of the foreigners said, we'll stay with Britain.
	And they explained the Buenos Aires position on that referendum, because you would have thought that would be the end of it.
	We asked the inhabitants.
	They want to stay in Britain.
	I mean, generally speaking, I would imagine that what probably happened was they looked at all of the countries in Africa and most of the other countries that were occupied by Britain and saw what happened when they left and things just went completely to S. And went, we don't want that.
	The British seem to know what they're doing.
	But also the Falklands is operated by, well, British people.
	As in, like, ethnically English and Scottish and Welsh and Irish.
	And this is actually their contention.
	I'm not joking.
	The Buenos Aires position is that even though everyone on the Falklands wants to remain in Britain, it doesn't matter.
	Because that's a rigged vote.
	Because the people who live there are ethnically British.
	As if we should ask the phantom population of Argentinians who live on the islands instead.
	What about my imaginary friends?
	They don't want to be with Britain at all.
	That's actually their position.
	It's embarrassing.
	But speaking of the BBC, I thought we'd mention some other BBC news.
	also because I don't know where else to put it, but I thought we'd enjoy some other good news for the weekend.
	All right.
	BBC replacing June Sarr Prong's 2,670,000 a year diversity job in bureaucratic perch.
	Oh, alright.
	Yeah, no, I remember hearing about this when it all came out.
	It was absolutely ridiculous.
	Does that mean that they are going to be clearing her out and just getting rid of that job entirely, or is it just that they're reducing the salary?
	It seems that they're just reducing the salary, but quite substantially.
	So there is some good news there.
	There's some good news, but it doesn't go nearly far enough, as far as I'm concerned.
	No, the whole BBC just needs to die, frankly.
	Yes.
	Gone era.
	So Miss Sarpong was appointed the BBC's first director of creative diversity in 2019.
	The reason for that, I've watched the parliamentary inquiry about this.
	The head of the BBC was asked, why?
	Reasonable question!
	His response was, he's now reached two black people on the board...
	So he's reached his target.
	That's a direct quote.
	He had an N-word target.
	As in, literally, he was like, yes, I just want two of those blacks.
	Like their Pokemon trading cards or something.
	Look, these have got the shiny foil on them, see?
	That's how he thinks about the discussion.
	There's a white guy, in case you're wondering, of some progressive guy.
	I mean, obviously.
	Get me some of those damn blacks on the board.
	And now I've got two.
	I can do what I want.
	Unironically, go and watch the clip.
	He comes off awful.
	And the MPs don't have a good enough job of calling him up on that.
	Where he just treats black people as literal tokens.
	Like, literally, you were just a token to me.
	I mean, you've just described the progressive position, yes.
	Yeah, well, that is what he said.
	So she has since unveiled a $100 million television fund for inclusive content.
	Again, more corruption.
	Not good content.
	Inclusive content.
	No quality mentioned whatsoever.
	Not engaging content.
	Nope.
	The diversity boss is now set to leave her quarter of a million pound job.
	With the BBC, it is understood that the broadcaster is creating a new, cheaper position to replace her role.
	The corporations advertise for a newly created position of Director of Diversity and Inclusion, which is below 150 grand, so they don't have to declare publicly how much.
	So they've at least saved 100 grand.
	Yeah, but it's still far too much money for such a ridiculous position.
	But it is nice to have an admission that the position was literally a joke.
	Like, it was literally, you wanted a black person and were willing to throw as much money as possible because she was black.
	You had no value in her whatsoever.
	Like, her achievements?
	Not valuable.
	That is your own words, because you hired her because she was black and nothing else.
	I mean, from the parliamentary inquiry, that is literally what you said.
	The role will be combined with inclusive targets for all BBC staff along Miss Sarpong's current remit of boasting on-air representation.
	The person who takes on the role will have to improve not only racial inclusion but also ensure 25% of staff by 2027 are from low-income backgrounds.
	Question on my mind.
	Is June one of them?
	She may be on a quarter of a million for the last, what, three years.
	But is she from a low-income background?
	You know, I don't know.
	Yes.
	Oh really?
	If we go to the next one, she can actually take up one of those roles, because the BBC decided to define what low-income backgrounds were, as in who is poor enough to actually have a leg up here, because they might need it.
	The corporation has explained that its employees fall into this category if they were 14, lived in a household in which the main parental earner had an occupation in a low-sitio-economic or working-class category.
	So it's based off blood.
	So even though for the last few years she's been paid more than, well, 0.1% as the British public...
	She is still part of the low-income background.
	So you now have the privileged blood.
	Yes.
	Fantastic work.
	We're not going to be hiring any of those filthy mudbloods around here.
	No.
	If we move forward, we also see that the article also mentions her here on the Exodus of Talents.
	The amalgamated role emerged after Miss Sarpong's decision to leave and exit of Miranda Weyland, her de facto deputy.
	So it's not just her that was getting paid all that.
	It was a deputy as well.
	Presumably on 100 grand.
	And as well as the departure of Anne Foster, who last year swapped her position as diversity boss for the BBC for a similar role at the Houses of Parliament.
	Fantastic.
	Good to know.
	There's also a position at the Houses of Parliament that pays this much money for this little work.
	Sounds good if you can get it.
	So it wasn't just June stealing all that cash.
	But, good news at least, £100,000 is not being wasted so much on this.
	Still, just the very fact and reminder that the BBC wastes so much money like this is turning this meme segment into another miserable one for me.
	Look, I'm trying.
	Doing the best we can here.
	There's the absolute waste that is the BBC. I'm not even joking, like the guy literally said in the parliamentary quiet deal, I just want a black person.
	It's just like...
	Right!
	Okay!
	That's all you see as value in such people, is it?
	Right, that's how you see it.
	At least, you know, 20 years from now, they can take the Colin Kaepernick route and just say, oh, I felt like I was on the slave markets back in the day, you know?
	They just wanted me for my skin colour!
	Like, I wouldn't be surprised if privately these guys literally used the N-word to describe June.
	That's what I mean when I say that he has an N-word target.
	Like, literally all he thought about with the candidates is not do they have any work to do, are they any good?
	He literally just wanted black people because he's a progressive.
	That's how he sees this.
	That's all it is for these people.
	But also, salty Argentinians being salty.
	Sorry to any Argentinian subscribers, but we do like to have fun.
	Yeah.
	Sort of good fun.
	Let's go to the video comments.
	Another problem with electric cars is that most households don't have rapid chargers installed on them and they're actually quite a significant load and not all households have a big enough service to actually have a rapid charger installed in the house.
	Thank you for keeping the footage of the cat going just an extra second longer because that was adorable.
	But yeah, no, that's a good point to be fair.
	I mean, how much would it cost to have the rapid charger installed, especially with electric prices going up in the first place?
	So then I have to charge up my car from my own, like, electric coming from my house anyway.
	You're bankrupt yourself doing something like that right now.
	I have no idea.
	I mean, let us know, I suppose.
	Yeah, let us know, but that's how it sounds to me, and it doesn't sound cheap, I'll give you that.
	Go to the next one.
	With leaders in both politics and business ever willing to remind us that diversity is strength, I got to thinking what is wrong with that statement.
	Diversity is a recognition of disparate viewpoints but makes no attempt to unite them.
	Sectionality merely tries to combine the weakest elements to attempt to explain a nebulous concept of oppression.
	Diversity is weakness.
	The Clarion call should be versatility.
	The versatile can come together from disparate viewpoints to work to common cause.
	They have varied skills, not identities, that can complement each other.
	Very interesting point there.
	Very succinctly put as well.
	Fair enough.
	I don't have anything more to say.
	That's just a great point.
	Yeah.
	Hello, Ludus Theaters.
	Mr Archaeology Man here again.
	Regarding the Northern Ireland election, my constituency of Belfast West, I'm afraid it's rather slim pickings.
	We have two unionist parties, the DUP and the UUP. They're generally not worth voting for at all.
	Sinn Féin are running four candidates out of a, well, a constituency which carries five seats.
	They will get four.
	And one can't bring oneself to vote for them, which leaves the rest a smattering of Trotskyites and actual communists.
	It's rather grim and I fear out of our abomination storming the legs.
	Goodbye.
	Well, sad to hear.
	Right.
	I do occasionally try and have a look at Northern Irish politics, because I do find it interesting that it's, like, their constituencies seem to be so, like, tight as well.
	Like, very little change happens.
	And also, I don't understand what's happening with the UUP and the DUP. We're both Northern Irish-British unionism, but we're split for God knows what reason.
	I mean, I understand that the UUP are meant to be, like, the Conservatives, and the DUP are meant to be, like, proper Conservatives, but I don't know.
	Yeah, I don't really know enough about Irish politics, Northern Irish politics, I should specify.
	But yeah, elections suck, and every candidate you'll be expected to vote for will suck.
	You know, there are good guys out there.
	There are plenty of people to vote for in British politics, I can think of.
	But in Northern Ireland, I have no idea.
	85-90% of the candidates put forward will suck.
	I still can't get over Sinn Féin.
	They seem to still dominate in areas of Northern Ireland, but...
	Not my side of the pond there.
	So, for the people asking about the name, like, how did I come up with the Winsorian for the satire news website?
	To make a long story short, I come from the part of America that is known as New England, which pretty much everything in that area is either named after a Native American tribe or something English, like 80% of it English, like 20% of it Native American.
	The towns in the area I grew up in, there was an East Windsor, a South Windsor, Windsor Locks, just plain old Windsor, and so the Windsorian just sounded like a good name to me.
	Interesting.
	Fair enough.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Hey guys.
	I'm throwing you guys a laugh out of my comment yesterday, but I did want to clarify that I wasn't joking.
	As part of the performance, the host constantly referred to his childhood and how he was gay and not understood because he just loved Disney princesses.
	He would make little jokes that went over the heads of all the kids, but the adults all understood.
	I'm just saying that if I were hosting a kids concert and made a bunch of jokes about plying my wife's field, people would probably be upset.
	Yeah, I agree.
	Yeah, I don't have context for the comment from yesterday.
	He went to Disneyland and one of the main performances was just a guy talking about how much he loves cock.
	No grooming here, guys, we swear.
	Yeah, I also agree.
	I don't think that's appropriate in a kid's setting.
	Yeah, and if it was a woman standing up talking about how much she loved cock, making it thereby heterosexual, I still wouldn't have a problem.
	I also would still have a massive problem with that, yeah.
	A Silver Longing by Fox Reno Having recently launched audio versions of articles for Silverture members to great celebration, Oklahoma-area data's Chad Dead said of the project, It's a welcome new edition.
	I just wonder why more articles don't have it.
	Could it be they don't have enough vocal talent for the workload?
	The patriarch went on to state that he would be happy to assist voluntarily, but knows better than to apply and draw the ire of Lotus Eater media owner Carl Benjamin, who would not appreciate applications from outside Swindon, and likely would find his American accent to be rubbish anyways.
	I'm also reading the rest of that mispronouncement.
	Yeah, yeah, I'm also.
	Total lack of respect for the letter U. That's not just you, though, thank you.
	That's just your people.
	What do you mean, you people?
	Americans.
	Yeah, I don't know what the reasoning is for that.
	It's not my department.
	We're not in charge of hiring.
	No, just writing in general is not my department.
	I do some writing.
	Generally speaking, it's only on premium articles that get the audio tracks, so the free articles don't get them because it's a bit extra for the premium subscribers.
	Oh yeah, it's meant to be for solvers anyway.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, let's go to the next one.
	Guten Abend and greetings from Germany.
	Now, we finally got our Freedom Day on the 2nd of April, but they were still going to vote about mandatory vaccination today.
	For everyone.
	But they sort of peddled it back, said, you know, we'll do it from 60.
	And today they voted, and they voted in nothing.
	So it looks like three months of nonstop protesting.
	Over three months.
	Paid off.
	We still need to get rid of the stuff for the doctors, but for now, cheers!
	Yeah, cheers to you!
	Bravo, my friend!
	It's always wonderful to see someone out there reclaiming their freedom.
	Honestly, at this point, we've been sort of outside of that for so long that everything kind of feels like it's gone back to normal for the most part here.
	I have also seen a lot of the footage coming out of Germany of the anti-restriction protests and They're always heartwarming, so it's also great to see that it is having an effect.
	The next one.
	Tony D and Little Joan with another Legend of the Pines, the Eglinton Cemetery in Clarksboro, New Jersey.
	This is a continuously operating cemetery since 1776.
	It is full of ghosts and a group by the name of Precision Paranormal has some of the recordings of their ghostly noises.
	Check out their website if you'd like to hear it.
	And if you'd like to see me, I will be at the Showboat Casino for the New Jersey Horror Con this Friday, Saturday, and Sunday.
	Nice.
	Interesting.
	Go check that out if you're interested there.
	So, what are you laughing at, Callum?
	When he said it's full of ghosts, I was like, of course it is.
	Because in my mind, I was half expecting him to go, yeah, since 1776, people have been buried there.
	No ghosts in this one, though.
	This is going to be like, ironically, I know, I know, I'm shocked as well.
	Every square inch of New Jersey is haunted except the cemeteries.
	Well, they all left the cemeteries to go and occupy houses.
	Yeah.
	Obviously.
	God, use your brain.
	Tony and Little Joe dropping straight facts.
	That's all that is.
	Go to the next one.
	So what you're seeing me do right here is essentially tightening down all of the bolts that needed to be tightened.
	I actually went down and torqued these a second time.
	This is just me putting them down into the head.
	And there's a sequence to it so that way the head doesn't get warped when you tighten it down.
	And eventually you'll see this is the final product, the head I sent out to get done.
	And as you can see, I've done the entire timing, so not too bad of a job if I say so myself.
	Nice one.
	Looks like you give some pretty good head right there.
	I couldn't resist.
	I couldn't resist.
	Fair enough.
	No, that was really cool, though.
	Very interesting.
	The more I watch your content, the more I see things you've said coming true.
	For me, there's a truism when dealing with the political left.
	When you don't have proof, simply wait for them to provide it themselves in good time.
	It's hard to prove things that aren't obvious and immaterial, such as moral virtue, but the degradation of self-worth and notions of privacy is apparent to most people at this point.
	If some don't believe in moral virtue but just material pleasure, then maybe those people being driven to despair by their own short-sighted desires will paint the picture they desperately need to see, as sad as that may be.
	I'm It's certainly true if you want to accuse the left of something, just wait and they'll give you the evidence for it.
	Yeah.
	Also, as proud as I am to be like, yes, we do make accurate predictions, the fact that those predictions are oftentimes quite pessimistic doesn't feel great that they do come true.
	But yeah, in terms of moral stuff, it's quite interesting because if you watched the premium livestream I did on Wednesday with Thomas where we were talking about what exactly leftists are teaching kids in schools, it wasn't just that it's brainwashing them into all thinking, you know, they're trans or something.
	It's the fact that just the values outside of that that they were teaching as well all seem to be purely in the basis of you need to feel good now.
	Everything needs to be hedonism.
	Everything needs to be...
	You don't need to put anything off for the sake of your future.
	You only need to live purely in this very moment and feel good at all times or else.
	And these are not good values to be teaching kids.
	Interesting, because this has been much the criticism of the American education system for quite some time.
	Of course, remember back to the participation trophies.
	They were a big joke in the 2000s and then became like a thing.
	And are still internationally mocked.
	Are you American?
	You want a participation trophy?
	Lots of leftists seem to think it's an own to go like, oh, people have been complaining about participation trophies since the 90s.
	And it's like, yes, and it's still a legitimate and valid complaint to make.
	Have you ever seen that?
	I can't remember the video.
	This video is like...
	Like American Factory or something like that.
	I haven't butchered the name.
	I can't remember what it was.
	But the premise is that a bunch of Chinese communists decide to run a factory in America for some reason.
	I think because it's the topsy-turvy world.
	Cats and dogs living with each other.
	They start reforming the place, of course.
	So firstly, they get rid of all the break rooms and whatnot because they're just like, just work.
	Idiot.
	Breaking is pretty bougie.
	And he just gives this lecture where he's just saying that the Americans need constant reinforcement, constant compliments how well they're doing, even for doing the bare minimum.
	So you should learn to deal with this because they are lesser than us.
	They need guidance to get better as well as we are in China.
	And...
	Some of that is true.
	I was going to say, the best jokes have a nice, healthy sprinkling of truth over the top of them.
	It's not just the United States either.
	I mean, we all kind of have it as the West.
	I think in the Anglosphere, it's become pervasive, to be fair.
	Yeah, like, oh, you turned up?
	Here's a handshake and a trophy.
	I mean, that is just the mean version of a problem that we have.
	But I can't remember the movie, but some people have to go find it.
	MSNPC says, comment from there, Shaker Silver says, the current White House propagandist, Jen Psaki, is going to be leaving her post to work at MSNPC. There you go.
	Tobacco salesman.
	Professional tobacco salesman.
	A pretty naked show of how bad they are, how in bed they are with the establishment.
	Robin Hood says, and now the big guy is in the White House, you are allowed to talk about the China and Biden connection.
	Well yeah, now that he's already won.
	It's like they're gloating.
	It's like, yes, we literally own the White House.
	Yep.
	They think they own you, because this is our democracy, and in our democracy you are all of our property.
	I can't remember which commentator it was.
	They used to call themselves Xiao Biden, but I need to change the name back.
	Matthew Hammond says, Can the left not be more transparent in trying to force Biden out of office?
	I don't know.
	I don't know if that's what they're wanting to do.
	Maybe, because I know that lots of leftists are trying to complain that Joe Biden's actually a secret center rightist, because he's not for UBI and stuff.
	But at the same time, I think it's just...
	Perhaps to me it came across like the mainstream media trying to put on a veneer, a skin suit of being actual journalists.
	The left do infight way more than we do, and I think it's probably safe that we kind of ignore all of their infighting in general, unless we're getting close to, say, an election or a big event, because that's when they close ranks.
	Yes.
	You must remember, Joe Biden, how did that inspire loads of people to close ranks?
	It's just because of the nature of the law.
	No, the only thing that inspired them to vote for Joe Biden was the hatred the media ramped up for Donald Trump.
	Anthony S says intelligence agency front New York Times and Washington Post are confirming the laptop now for a reason the deep state is warning Biden who is in control maybe maybe Free Will 2112 says the reason True.
	China is where it is at for corporations and their political hangers-on, and for people to whom money is got.
	We can hardly expect them in many cases to put their country's interests first and their own second.
	This equally applies to the UK. Yeah.
	A lot of truth there.
	You can make the comparison with the conservative MBs being in bed with the housing developments and then bringing all these extra immigrants so we constantly need a new supply of housing.
	There's Johnny Harris.
	He's a left-leaning Democrat.
	He used to work for Fox, but I keep up with him because I love his editing style.
	Like, on the technical side, I'm an appreciator of what his skill is, right?
	But he made a video recently about Afghanistan.
	It was called Who Gets Rich Off Afghanistan?
	And there was a very good argument in there as well, because it was cross-party levels of corruption.
	Like Nancy Pelosi was one of the main ones, where you just invest in stocks, and then you vote on a bill to give that company loads of money, and your stock goes up.
	All's well in the world.
	Yep.
	How was it she made that $250 million again?
	Yeah, I think she was invested in Raytheon and a whole bunch of other defense contractors who got loads of contracts that were clearly overinflated and then made all the profit.
	It's not just her.
	I think Ted Cruz was invested in a few.
	There are loads of others, just no name.
	Senators, of course, all have their stocks involved.
	I don't know how that's legal.
	Well, it's not for us.
	Not for them.
	It'd be a conflict of interest, wouldn't it?
	Lee B says, imagine if Trump got off as easy as Biden did from the media for things in his personal life.
	I can't.
	Yeah, I made that comparison already.
	He makes a joke about how compliant certain women are in a certain situation.
	Media goes crazy!
	The question was, could you imagine it?
	It's just no.
	Yeah.
	In no world can I imagine that?
	Joseph Smith says, how on earth do these people still think Putin is so unbelievably powerful he couldn't even conquer Ukraine?
	Yeah, I mean, some of this, I know, is kind of a meme for the Russians.
	Like, they love to engage in this meme that they can control everything.
	I bet they would as well.
	Because it's good for them.
	I'd post pictures of myself sat in front of a crystal ball if I were Russian.
	Well, they do, because...
	Just like me when I'm controlling your economy.
	And this isn't just speculation on my part.
	We went through the book club Active Measures by Thomas Ridd.
	And one of the greatest parts in that is the 2016 hacks of the DNC and then the campaign online in which they had memes that were pro-Trump from the Internet Research Agency.
	All documented.
	All the amount of money.
	I mean, millions and millions of dollars.
	This Russian oligarch spent on it.
	Crap results.
	Reach no one.
	Like, really pathetic performance.
	I mean, the only person who did anything with the information about John Podesta's emails was Wikilinks' Julian Assange.
	Like, the Russians could not get that story out there without his help.
	And he only got involved because he knew it was a good story.
	As in, this is relevant to the campaign.
	So, the Russians' ability to actually control everything in the West is sad.
	Can't target memes.
	Memes have to be grown naturally.
	That's what I read here, so...
	Lee B says, MSNBC, gunshots.
	MSNBC, why would left-wing media do this?
	Someone make that meme.
	Yep.
	Like, why would Vox do this?
	Why would Vice do this?
	Want to move on to the next one?
	Yes, the peaceful religion being peaceful in their sacrifice of blood for the blood god.
	Agent000 says it is some kind of dark comedy when Europe welcomes the fanatics who are too bad even for their Muslim homelands.
	Just why?
	I don't know.
	Ross Diggle says, Good
	God, that whole thing just sounds...
	This is how useless our institutions are in the UK of actually trying to solve very, very real problems.
	Because we do not want this, shockingly enough.
	I don't want them to be walking down the street and think, am I going to be the victim of a terrorist attack?
	Well, Prevent supposedly doesn't really care that much.
	Every time I go to London now, especially when you go to Westminster, you're showing someone the house's apartment or something, you'll constantly be like...
	Yeah, you've got to look over your shoulder.
	We're leaving.
	We're leaving immediately.
	Keep an eye out on all the local exits, because we will need to get out of here if that happens.
	Student of history says, cops, are you a terrorist?
	Ali, nope.
	Cops, seems good to me, and just in time for tea.
	Yeah, pretty much.
	No.
	It's just like, shifty eyes, like, no.
	Seems legit to me.
	I think that is a question on, like, one of the, I don't know if it's been changed, but I remember there being a meme of someone showing the American, like, immigration forms, being like, are you involved in terrorism?
	No.
	This is like, in American schools now, it's supposed to be in the applications for teachers.
	Are you a groomer?
	No.
	That's good enough.
	Yep, that sounds good to me.
	Just in B, they have to say, I understand that, but we've got direct quotes from him admitting to it.
	I understand that they have to do it legally, and obviously I will say as well he's alleged, but he's admitted to it multiple times and said that he would do it again if given the chance.
	So I understand the actual legal reasoning behind it.
	He stabbed David, stood there with blood on his hands and just waited for the Colts to find him.
	In front of the constituency?
	Yeah.
	They all saw him.
	He's happy to admit it.
	So, yeah, I think it's obviously a foregone conclusion.
	Could you imagine one day if it turns out not to be the guy?
	He was just some lunatic who's just admitting it for kicks.
	Maybe.
	Even in the situation where someone is confessing they could be found to be someone falsely claiming it, they'll just be stuck in avoiding the lawsuit mode.
	I understand all that.
	Paul Neubauer, I know how to pronounce his name now, that the Islamists who hate Britain and the West in general are products of the academies is not surprising considering how our Marxist institutions indoctrinate everyone against the West.
	Good point if you make everybody hate the West in the West and they'll be bringing over people from the East and going, show us your beautiful ways, show us how to live our lives peacefully.
	That's what happens.
	Yes, true.
	Kevin Fox, I'll read one or two more, says, He said he did it.
	He said he'd do it again if given the chance, given the right judge and jury.
	Six-month community service with time spent in jail deducted.
	Off home you go, Ali.
	It's the goofy meme.
	I'll do it again.
	You've seen that clip.
	Yeah, I have seen that clip.
	Alright, Omar Awad says, We have a conservative government, but I think we'd be lucky if they so much as implemented a Sweden-style how-not-to-rape-women leaflet campaign for terrorism.
	So, what Sweden has done in that is actually take the feminist line of, we need to teach the men not to rape.
	Shockingly, it doesn't work.
	No, well, it doesn't work with people who already know rape is bad.
	Well, yeah.
	You're making a presumption there, and in the West, that's why it doesn't work sending out leaflets being like, hey, fellas, don't rape.
	Everyone knows.
	It doesn't work.
	There's got no effect because we already know it's bad.
	We think of it as bad.
	When you've got guys who don't think it's bad because, in fact, you're raping someone outside of the religion, therefore they're not worth anything.
	This is Islamist logic.
	Well, yeah, you kind of do have to remind them and be like, hey, hey, buddy, no, not here.
	Still doesn't seem to be that effective, though.
	Well, it did need to be done.
	I know the Swedish government are a meme for doing that, but it's because they're reacting to a real problem in that case, which is, you did actually have to remind them that, yeah, this isn't allowed.
	The real solution would be to just never let them in.
	There's better solutions, though, isn't there?
	They treat Islamists like animals that are incapable of civility or overcoming barbaric savage impulses.
	Under current leadership, you'd be more likely to end up on a no-fly list by making mean comments on social media.
	That is very true.
	I also don't know how effective telling Islamists that raping kafars is wrong is because they're Islamists.
	They'll just go, no it isn't.
	The Quran says so, boy.
	Or at least the life of Mohammed does.
	So, well, at least it's orders to his generals.
	Student of history on the Falkland says, what is any of that?
	That's all in Spanish.
	I can't read that.
	Lo siento to my Argentinian amigos, however it is settled.
	You came, you saw, you got smacked in the dick and sent home.
	Now find something else to do.
	Ta-ra.
	Thank you.
	Goodbye.
	Moria Matsi says, you lost, it's over, is a perfect response.
	The Falkland Islands are British, as are the islands.
	Falkland Islands is a British as far as the islands.
	I just love that they don't accept the referendum and the basis being that, well, it's rigged.
	Why?
	Because all the people there are British.
	You asked them?
	Okay.
	Who else are you meant to poll?
	Didn't you ask somebody else Jesus to send?
	I don't consent.
	If you poll Buenos Aires, everyone thinks that the islands are Argentinian.
	What if we poll Chile?
	Maybe that'll help.
	No, they'd vote British.
	Just to annoy the Argentinians.
	Joseph Smith says, Personally, I want the British just to sail a carrier past the Argentine coast just to tell them to piss off.
	Yeah, it would be fun.
	Don't have a carrier.
	What are they going to do?
	Cope and seethe.
	M1Ping says, The lesson from Argentina is to win wars so you have less to whine about decades after.
	And also you have some good memes out of it, which you look good.
	LeeB says, Is anyone of those idiots arguing in favour of Argentina here going to ever consider what the residents of the Falklands think about the situation?
	The peaceful negotiation happens in the form of the referendum on the island about sovereignty, 99.8% of the...
	So it's even more than you said originally.
	The wall got 10 feet higher in that form.
	The vote was in favour of remaining an overseas territory of the United Kingdom of Her Britannic Majesty.
	Certainly did.
	Daniel Culler says, Happy Friday from America.
	Just subscribed.
	Love you guys.
	Thanks for your work.
	Well...
	Thank you very much.
	Welcome, Daniel, to joining the club and we hope to stay with you.
	We hope it's all worthwhile.
	And to everyone else who subscribed, thank you immensely as well.
	That's how we run the show.
	Otherwise, we're out of time.
	If you want to subscribe, of course, go over to lotuses.com, get access to all the premium content.
	And speaking of premium content, we'll be back at 3.30 today, UK time, because I can't want to do a live hangout with the premium members in which we will be discussing the dystopian cyberpunk future in which we currently live.
	So...
	Just learn to code, bro.
	Come back and enjoy that.
	Otherwise, well, we'll be back at 3.30.

▲