Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 7, 2022 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:30:11

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #366

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 7th of April 2022.
	I'm joined by Carl.
	Hello!
	And today we're going through how BLM decided to gloat about getting away with it on camera and then uploaded it to YouTube, which...
	They just don't care, do they?
	Not a smart move, though.
	Also, critical grooming theory.
	Seems the time has come to discuss it.
	And also, WTF happened to Jon Stewart, because Jesus Christ, he has fallen into a rabbit hole.
	And I know there's a lot of people on the right who dismiss that he's always been this way, and he's always been left-leaning, but he's never been what he is now.
	What he is now is certainly something beyond that.
	But anyway, first things to mention on the website, so we should mention...
	Do we not have those anymore?
	I've got two links at the start.
	No, we're not doing that.
	Alright, never mind.
	Never mind then.
	Right, we should get right into the news, I suppose.
	Go on, Keemstar.
	BLM decided to gloat about getting away with it, and then film themselves gloating about this in their $6 million mansion.
	The newest $6 million mansion.
	You may remember, what was it, Patrice Cullors?
	Oh yeah, before it was $1.4 million mansion, and then there was another $2 million, if I recall correctly.
	Half a million houses that she brought.
	Need some townhouses.
	And then her wife brought a place in Canada for another organization that was $2 million.
	This is all interesting.
	Your money at work, folks.
	So then the organization brought a $6 million one.
	And I want to plug first the Cultural Revolution book club that me and Harry did the other day, because there's a lot to relevance in these Marxists and the Marxists from China.
	And one of the interesting things with the Red Guards in the Cultural Revolution is they stole all the wealth It's genuinely the meme of the pool and the bordered off, fenced off area from the socialist leaders and the rest of the people who are living in slums.
	Yes, the socialists in this case, well, the trained Marxists as they call themselves, living in luxury.
	If we go forward, we can see the articles about this because they're being investigated for this as well.
	That's the relevant part.
	So if we go to the New York Post article, we have Black Lives Matter labelled delinquent by Californian AG over murky finances.
	You may remember this.
	California's Department of Justice is pursuing Black Lives Matter over its murky $60 million coffers, warning the group's shadowy leadership that it will be personally liable for any fees or fines.
	An organization that is delinquent, suspended or revoked is not in good standing and is prohibited from engaging in conduct for which registration is required, including soliciting or dispersing charitable funds.
	So where's the rest of the money gone?
	Because Black Lives Matter definitely raised about a billion dollars in total.
	That's the global movement.
	This is Black Lives Matter Global Fund, which is a specific organization.
	And as you can see, they apparently collected a staggering $90 million.
	And they just had $60 million in the bank.
	Interesting.
	BLM was given 60 days to file a tax and charity document for 2020.
	In the year it previously confirmed collecting a staggering $90 million, in which $60 million was left over after expenses and grants.
	Expenses...
	30 million dollars in expenses.
	Grunts.
	None of that going to themselves.
	I'm sure it didn't.
	100% sure.
	That fortune sparked a firestorm from its affiliates that say that they never received much needed financial help, while co-founder Patrice Cullors went on a real estate buying binge.
	Yes, that's the literal Marxist.
	Here's the next one, we can see her deciding to snag four high-end homes for $3.2 million.
	This is just in the US alone.
	I don't know if you can scroll down.
	There should be some images of some of the homes.
	As you can see, these are quite nice.
	Quite nice?
	To put it lightly, this comes with a lot of land as well.
	Quite nice with internal heated pools.
	I think this one comes with an airstrip.
	There you are.
	With an airstrip for Marxist flights.
	Quite nice.
	Callum 2022.
	I'm British.
	Patrice Collins, 37, doing well for herself.
	Also eyed property in the Bahamas.
	Of course she did!
	Of course she did!
	In an ultra-exclusive resort where Justin Timberlake and Tiger Woods both have homes.
	The self-described Marxist last month purchased a $1.4 million home on a secluded road, a short drive from Malibu in Los Angeles as well.
	And so it turns out the big bad reason they didn't return their tax returns is not just because of these homes.
	It is because of one more.
	One more home.
	But it's not a home, they swear.
	Go to the next article.
	You can see this is a six million dollar mansion in Southern California they just didn't disclose.
	I love that they're following the Fidel Castro model of socialism here.
	Well, every socialist, let's be frank.
	Every story you read about a socialist country, the same thing happens.
	They all just cough all the money into their own lives.
	It's true.
	And happening in real time in the United States.
	Again, proud Marxist.
	Black Lives Matter brought a swanky Southern California home for nearly 6 million US dollars using donation cash, according to a report on Monday.
	This report, not from themselves, this had to be leaked.
	Oh.
	They weren't happy about this being leaked.
	No kidding.
	No.
	Three leaders of the social justice movement, Patrice Cullors, Asia Garcia, and...
	That should be in air quotes.
	The social justice movement, quote unquote.
	There's plenty of social justice for those black women.
	Well, I suppose so, isn't it?
	Recorded a video last June outside the secretly brought home while miking the first anniversary of George Floyd's murder.
	They literally, for George Floyd's anniversary of him being, well, dead, they decide to clink their glasses and go to us.
	I mean, it really is superhero, sorry, supervillain-esque to George Floyd's corpse.
	I like the way it's, while marking the first time, you mean milking the first anniversary.
	That was a typo, clearly, New York Post.
	Yeah, so New York Magazine reported all of this, and if you scroll down, John, I don't know if you can see some of the images in here of the mansion where they're all clinking their glasses.
	I don't know if they include them.
	There you are.
	Oh my god.
	That's them on the anniversary of George Floyd being dead, just being like, wow, this went well.
	With a lovely little buffet there.
	Yeah.
	Champagne in the sun, probably in California, I assume that is.
	Thing is, as mentioned, they filmed all this, and that's where this is from.
	It's from a video they uploaded to their own YouTube channel, or at least I should say Patrice's YouTube channel.
	Total lack of self-awareness!
	Real estate tycoon Patrice Cummers.
	She has her own YouTube channel.
	If we go to the next one, you can see it's archived because it's private.
	Oh.
	When this was released, this news, she quickly privated the video.
	Not just this video.
	Wait, this looks bad, doesn't it?
	Yes, it does.
	Wait, everyone's pointing out that I'm a grifter, aren't they?
	Yes.
	Because they filmed this video in that $6 million mansion that they totally...
	Disclosed.
	Totally didn't...
	No, they did use donation funds for it, that's confirmed.
	So, yeah, that's where the money went.
	We go to the next one, where you can see her whole channel has been scrubbed.
	Every video she's ever made, she was like, nah, I'm gonna take that down.
	Presumably all of them are also filmed in various mansions across the country.
	You know what 410's like with triangulating locations?
	Very embarrassed is Patrice.
	Rich, but embarrassed.
	If we go to the next one, though, I found a copy of the video.
	Someone archived it and salutes in the chat to the chap who managed to do this because, as you can see, it's all there and people can go watch it.
	It's 17 minutes long and it's largely boring of them just going, aren't we so good?
	So I won't bore you with those parts.
	Haven't we helped so many black people here?
	Yes, all three of them.
	So I will play you the most important part, which is them sitting around, as I said, like supervillains, talking about how they're so great because they've gotten away with it.
	They're basically gangsters.
	It's literally like a heist movie, isn't it?
	Where at the end, they're enjoying the fruits of the heist.
	They're in the Alps, in all the Italian gold, and they're like, to us.
	Mr.
	Kane will never find us.
	Let's play.
	I'm so glad to have the both of you here and in person.
	Yes!
	It's been a really intense year and a half.
	That was a nice week.
	And I look up to the both of you so much.
	You know, you're big sisters to me, you're movement leaders, you're gangsters.
	The portal opened, right?
	And how the whole community had to rush in to save D, right?
	To save our black future, right?
	Like, that's what was happening.
	But it wasn't Hippolyta.
	It's George Floyd's spirit holding it open.
	Remember, we used to pretend like we weren't.
	Had to pretend like we weren't.
	Defund the police.
	This is a budget issue.
	And now we are talking about abolition.
	Yeah, we kind of just mean abolition.
	Wow, that is the most evil thing I've ever seen.
	Yeah.
	George Floyd there just holding open the doors so all the money can rush in so he can get these mansions.
	George Floyd's spirit to George Floyd.
	Giving us all this money.
	This mansion is great, by the way.
	That's the $6 million one they didn't disclose and then used donation money to buy.
	That's the amazing part as well.
	I've also had to mess with the audio, so sorry if it's a bit low quality, because the audio was crap in the original video.
	Because apparently money can't buy you talent, or just apparently skill.
	Why would they care?
	They're not bothered about the audience.
	This is for them to brag to people.
	Yeah, this is for them to send to their friends and be like, look how rich we are.
	Look how subversive we are.
	Oh yeah, we were talking about defund the police.
	No, we want abolition.
	I love that too.
	Nice admission.
	On tape.
	So every leftist who was like, no, no, no, or just any of the politicians actually.
	Here's what- AOC. All of them.
	Here's what defund the police really means.
	It means balance their budgets or something like that.
	It's like, no, you liars.
	You absolutely lied.
	Have it on tape.
	One of the founders of the movement, the one who got mega rich off this as well, is like, yeah, no, we were just lying.
	We were just talking about abolishing the police so then we could, well, bring in the Marxist future.
	This isn't the worst part either.
	This goes on, and they decided in the next clip to just talk about how hard it's been for them.
	It's been terrible.
	You can see.
	I bet it has, yeah.
	Let's play.
	What about you, A? I'm okay.
	I'm okay.
	I mean, I'm feeling...
	Hopeful in a way that I don't feel like I've felt in a while.
	I didn't go to one protest last summer.
	Really?
	Not one, honey.
	Tell us.
	I just I wanted to be in movement in a different role and I just made a commitment to myself just like around this concept of rest.
	What I wanted to do was lean into What I thought was on the other side of protests, right?
	Which always happens.
	You have this ebb and flow.
	And when the protests die down, you always get that conversation about, well, what rules are you changing?
	Do you know what I'm saying?
	Like, what actually comes out of this?
	And so I think the other thing, though, that happened was that I got super overwhelmed.
	I think though for me, you know, the hardest moments have been the right wing media machine.
	Just leveraging literally all its weight against me, against our movement, against BLM the organization.
	I'm some weeks out now from a lot of the noise, so I have more perspective, right?
	While I was in it, I was in survival mode.
	But so many people who I've talked to, and I've obviously talked to the two of you ad nauseam about this, but it's because we're powerful, because we are winning.
	It's because we are threatening the establishment.
	We're threatening white supremacy.
	And I think it's this piece that you named A earlier.
	It's not just a cultural shift anymore.
	Right.
	Like, things are changing for them.
	The reckoning has come to their doorstep in a way that they haven't had to reckon.
	And that is, you know, they're clinging.
	They're clinging.
	But Patrice, get this.
	We are f***ing with their money.
	Yes.
	Here you are.
	That's seriously part of the video, where they all just sit there and clink.
	I just can't get over it.
	I mean, it's literally like reminiscing on how difficult it was to hang from the ceiling during the diamond heist and avoid the laser beams.
	You know, yeah, that nearly got me there, but I managed to flip over it and then got that diamond and I was out.
	Got out of it.
	The worst part for me was the right-wing media.
	As you say, playing clips of what they said.
	Yeah.
	I mean, like, is this smear?
	Is this a smear, Patrice Gullis?
	Playing the video that you put up on your own YouTube channel and then hid as soon as people realised that, no, you filmed this in your $6 million mansion that you failed to disclose and then, well, tried to hide.
	I mean, you're actually corrupt villains.
	Like, you're actually stealing people's money.
	You're actually taking advantage.
	And you're actually like, oh, I didn't go to a single protest after that.
	Why would you?
	You've got yours.
	Why would you?
	Why would you do anything?
	Black Lives Matter is over for you.
	What a weird brag of an activist.
	I didn't go to a single protest last night.
	I love the way it's like, really?
	No, the other one was like, really?
	It's like, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Why would you?
	And she's just sat there thinking, wait, I could stop going to protest too.
	Yeah, I could also become a real estate tycoon.
	Oh, it's unbelievable.
	I'm sorry, but I just, I cannot get over just the open bragging that, as you say, not made for the audience, because that was so also, from a video perspective, So boring.
	I can't get over how mundane that was.
	Self-indulgent.
	But also just the editing aspects there.
	They clearly hired someone who had seen beauty vlogs.
	The crappy background music in which they just cut for no reason at random times.
	The bit where she's going, yeah, it's been so hard, and then they cut to a wide angle of them all with the champagne.
	I mean, unless that's a weird brag, it's a weird thing to do.
	Unless you're also just idiots.
	And I really put it down to them all being so stupid, they don't realise how bad this looks for them.
	Until, well, I can't point it out.
	It just looks so elitist.
	It's unbelievable.
	But we'll go back to the article, because they gave a defence.
	Yeah.
	Which is amazing.
	So Colors, at the time, said she was weeks removed from being in survival mode, fighting white supremacy, blah blah blah blah blah.
	We just saw that, so I won't go out with that again.
	Shadow boxing white supremacy.
	On the wall of her mansion.
	Colors and her colleagues didn't reveal any details on the upscale home seen behind them in the video.
	A 6,500 square foot spread with a more than six bedrooms, six bathrooms, fireplaces, a pool, parking for more than 20 cars.
	A lot of guests at her house.
	The property was purchased in October 2020.
	Wow.
	Two years, she's had this now.
	Remember the riots of love, all the people dead, and she was like, well, I'm gonna buy that now.
	With funds that had been donated to the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation.
	Donated funds.
	Remember when she tried to claim she didn't spend any of the donated funds?
	Well, we have you red-handed now.
	The seven-bedroom residence was purchased by a man named Dane Pascal two weeks after BLM Global Network Funds received $66.5 million from its fiscal sponsor earlier that month.
	Pascal is the finance manager for Jada and Patrice Consulting, an LLC operated by Colors and her spouse, the ones who buy all the properties all over the world.
	Ownership was transferred within a week to LLC in Delaware, ensuring the property's owner wouldn't be disclosed.
	Actively tried to cover it up.
	The residence was purchased with the intention for it to serve as a, quote, housing and studio space for recipients of the Black Joy Creators Fellowship, BLM said.
	After being asked about all this, their defense was, okay, yeah, we did buy the $6 million mansion with the donation funds, but trust us, we were going to use it as studio space for Black Joy Creators.
	Which is a fellowship they just seem to have made up.
	Such an obvious grift.
	Such an obvious way of laundering this money into their own pockets.
	Funny thing is though, I wonder who else was in on this.
	Because that term, Black Joy.
	I've heard that before.
	Have you?
	Not a fan.
	I've heard it from YouTube.
	Oh, really?
	Yeah, we go to the next one.
	Here's a video from YouTube.
	Oh, really?
	Hashtag YouTube Black.
	Voices Black Joy Like Us.
	Two million views there.
	And it was just some random YouTubers in which they tried to celebrate being black as if that's an achievement.
	It's a state of being.
	Yep.
	Not more.
	If we go to the next one, we can also see that also YouTube UK did a video about this.
	Black Joy Around the World.
	And I was like, huh, okay.
	Because I've not really heard that phrase anywhere else.
	I mean, this is pure speculation on my part, but I wonder if YouTube were also apparently engaged in this discussion of turning it into studio space.
	Los Angeles, which I wouldn't be surprised by.
	If we go back to the article, the Foundation had always planned to disclose the home's legal findings this May.
	They said, we always planned to do it, we just hadn't done it, and we also tried to hide it.
	And now that you've caught us, I guess we'll disclose it.
	Yeah, and it doesn't serve as anyone's personal residence, Bowers said.
	It's just owned by Patrice.
	I mean, I know she's got six homes, so it doesn't serve as her personal residence because she's got, well, five others for that.
	One for every workday, I suppose.
	But the statement did not spell out why little content has been produced there over some 17 months, if it was in fact intended to be a creative space, according to the report.
	Great point.
	This is content, isn't it?
	Yeah, that one video that you put on a channel.
	Content of them bragging?
	17 months doing, I don't know, Anita Sarkeesian levels of video production.
	It's just nothing.
	And also, I love the point of just you spent the six million on this.
	So not spending it on policy lobbying, local activism, campaigning materials, maybe adverts even.
	Why would they do any of that?
	White supremacy has been conquered now that they own mansions.
	Yeah, they brought the mansion for filming, bro.
	Trust me.
	Yeah, totally.
	Interesting charity there.
	But let's also mention the fact that the response to this from what I've seen from these types is endlessly like, as you saw, the right-wing media.
	The white supremacy that tries to keep her sister down in the dumps of three houses instead of six.
	And they try to claim this as white people generally doing this, trying to besmirch the good name of Patrisse Cullors.
	Yeah.
	Oh, right, okay.
	The Marxist landlords.
	But the thing is, I just Googled her name on YouTube just to see what would come up and just had a check.
	And all the videos are from black men just being like, check her out.
	Grifter.
	Yeah, as well.
	I thought it's interesting to mention.
	You can see one here.
	If we go to the next one, there's another chap here.
	It was just like, yeah, I mean, come on.
	Like, you all got played.
	Yeah.
	And you absolutely did.
	Demonstrably.
	Six million dollars at least in this one house.
	That's mad.
	Absolutely mad.
	And maddening to hear about, to be honest.
	Because none of these people deserve any money or any support.
	They're literally standing on the corpse of George Floyd with a bag open and people are shoveling money into it.
	And the other end of the bag is their own bank accounts.
	I love it.
	Everyone on the right predicted this.
	Yeah.
	And it all came true, and now we have the video evidence that it's true.
	Oh, good.
	Give these activists literally tens of millions of dollars.
	See what happens.
	Do you remember that lady, what is it, Miss Simpson, who lost her son and then was with the BLM organization, and they came down and were dancing on his grave as well, saying, please donate money because she needs legal fees, and then she never got any of the money.
	They just took it.
	That was also BLM Global Foundation.
	Oh, was it?
	It's not just one corpse, of course.
	It's all the corpses.
	Yeah, it's any corpse that they can find.
	They're going to hold out the bag, people are going to stuff money into it, and then the people who...
	The relatives of the people who died that they were standing on, they're not going to get a single penny of it.
	And that'll be bad enough, but then they go and make YouTube videos where they literally just gloat about it.
	To us.
	Actual villains.
	Yeah, literal villains.
	Don't know what more to say.
	Move on.
	So...
	We have arrived at the point where it is not enough to simply not be a groomer.
	We have to be actively anti-groomer, Callum.
	How do you feel about this?
	Yes, that's funny.
	Anti-groomer action.
	The Republicans have finally realized, wait a minute, are the Democrats busy debauching our children?
	Are they defiling the innocence of the children in the schools?
	That their left wing teachers are perverting them in some way?
	And the answer is, of course, yes.
	Why would you think they wouldn't?
	This is all these people do.
	And so we can begin by actually looking exactly at what they're teaching.
	So, on LosC's.com, we've got a premium video that if you want to support us, you can sign up and watch, because in that, Harry and Thomas go through the LGBT curriculum for Seattle Public Schools that was sent to us, which is being used, as they say, to program the next generation of queer children.
	This is about an hour on Logistics.com where they just go through just in detail what is being taught to them.
	And this will help explain and contextualize what we're going to talk about now, right?
	So anyway, moving on.
	A lot of people from the left have been like, well, hang on a second.
	As Marjorie Taylor Greene here says, the Democrats are the party of pedophiles, the party of princess predators from Disney, the party of teachers trying to transition their elementary school-aged children.
	Fact check, yes.
	Yeah, exactly.
	That's not wrong.
	And instead of saying, well, she's not correct on this and here's why, says Josh Marshall, he instead says, this is pre-genocide talk.
	Pre-genocide talk.
	The author of the 1619 project, Nicole Hannah-Jones, chimed in, replying to textbook How Fascism Works.
	Fascism is when you don't let leftists diddle kids?
	I think that carries the death penalty in quite a few American states still.
	What, diddling a child?
	No, murdering the diddlers.
	Oh, well, probably.
	Like, here's the death penalty for what you've done.
	Probably, but this is not really very related to fascism.
	No.
	At least historically.
	We don't think of the Nazis as the bad guys, because they were also pro-killing nonces.
	That's not really the reason people are upset with that.
	No, not generally.
	But anyway, so as you pointed out, hang on a second, what are you saying?
	The Democrats are ethnically pedos?
	That they're going to put on the chopping block for being racial pedophiles?
	Pedophile race, as the Dems are now calling themselves?
	Are you...
	It's a weird way of characterizing yourselves.
	So anyway, this, of course, all comes on the heels of Based Florida Man's anti-groomer bill.
	Oh, sorry, no, there was one more thing I forgot to point out.
	Occupy Democrats, Democrat activism group, 10 million followers on Facebook, paid for by the Democrat Party.
	They're actually putting out pro-groomer memes.
	Matt Gaetz, the Democrats teaching kindergartners about sex, and Michelle Obama going, yeah, probably so they know not to be in a room alone with you.
	That's a pro-groomer stance.
	Should be in the room with Michelle.
	Yep.
	And her bulge.
	And her teaching them about sex.
	Right.
	Five-year-olds.
	Why would you stand on this hill and die on it?
	I mean, I'm happy for you to die on the pro-grooming hill, but I don't understand why you'd be in favour of it.
	Like, yes, so they stay away from you, pedo!
	It's like, what?
	Imagine being in the Democratic Party for any other reason, and you're like, yeah, so the whole party has agreed.
	I was here for unions, you know?
	All of our platform, every piece of left-wing dogma or ideas is going to stand on this subject, teaching kids about masturbation.
	And if we can't have that, then we might as well destroy ourselves.
	If we can't teach five-year-olds about anal sex, then I'm not going to be in this Democrat party.
	Goodbye.
	The sane position would be, yeah, okay, you leave then.
	That's where keep calm and feel the burn find themselves.
	My Democrats are like, yeah, this is a great meme.
	Anyway, as I was saying, this all comes from, of course, Florida Man's anti-grooming bill.
	The top 1% of teachers has 90% of them.
	Anyway, going on to the next one.
	This all comes from Florida Man's anti-grooming bill, because why wouldn't you want an anti-grooming bill?
	Like, if there's nothing suspicious going on, if nothing nefarious is happening, why would you not be in favour of banning teachers from teaching sexualised content to six-year-olds?
	As the father of a six- and seven-year-old, well, seven now, but he was six obviously very recently, he doesn't need to know any of this stuff.
	It's just not on his radar.
	It's not something that's important to them or inappropriate in any way, shape, or form.
	And the only reason you'd do it is if you wanted to sully the innocence of children.
	And I don't know why it's only the Conservatives who have to be the defenders of the innocence of children, but since the Democrats are the pro-grooming party now, yeah, vote Republican.
	i mean i don't know what else to tell you i don't know if you know but also victor orban's party in hungary had a referendum recently on pretty much the same content uh the hungarian people voted what was it 93 to reject this in schools so seven percent of hungary's groomers yeah but also just the aspect of this doesn't stay in the united states you must remember like everywhere else in the world people are seeing what's going on they're like yeah keep that away from us yes
	Anyway, so this was obviously something that the Republicans have finally managed to pick up on.
	And again, this is just a quote from the anti-grooming bill, right?
	Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten or through grade three or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.
	You can't teach them sexual stuff.
	When they're in kindergarten.
	They're not sexual creatures.
	Yes, they're five-year-olds.
	You don't need to do this.
	And the Democrats are like, well, hang on a second.
	Why do you hate gay people so much?
	Big self-report, isn't it, Democrats?
	What?
	Like, what's that got to do with gays?
	There are lots of gays who are like, yeah, I don't actually want to teach children about anal sex.
	Like, I don't know why...
	I pretend gay to get away from kids.
	I mean, what's going on here, right?
	And so, Ron DeSantis' press secretary, Christina Pushaw, was tweeted out saying, look, the bill that liberals inaccurately called Don't Say Gay would be more accurately described as an anti-grooming bill.
	If you're against the anti-grooming bill, you're probably a groomer, or at least, since you don't denounce the grooming of four to eight-year-old children, silence is complicity.
	That's how it works, Democrats, and I don't make the rules.
	That's true.
	Can I start clicking my fingers?
	Yep.
	If you're not actively anti-groomer, you are pro-groomer.
	And so this leads us on to critical grooming theory.
	Oh yes, that makes sense, doesn't it?
	We have the framework of critical X theories.
	So why don't we create a systemic critical grooming theory using the internal logic of the critical race theorists or any other kind of critical theorist?
	And it works perfectly.
	As Neil here points out, quote, when some people hear groomer, they immediately apply Western individualistic lens, but they fail to realize that grooming is a systemic structural problem deeply embedded in our ways of knowing.
	And that's true.
	When I say critical grooming theorist, when I, as a critical grooming theorist, say that all progressives are groomers, I'm not saying they all personally support grooming, as defined by the dictionary.
	I'm saying they'll benefit politically from systems of advantage that harm children.
	How is that not true?
	That is very true.
	Now, this is obviously satirical from Neil.
	He is not a critical grooming.
	But it is true that if you set up a system in which you indoctrinate kids into being part of the Rainbow Coalition, as the Obama rights would call it.
	Left-wing ideologists.
	Yeah, to then elect Democrats.
	Yeah, Dens are supporters of that system.
	All Democrats are beneficiaries of it.
	In the same way that all white people are beneficiaries of white privilege and white supremacy.
	Oh dear.
	When a progressive is offended that he's called a groomer, that is a symptom of groomer fragility.
	He needs to sit with his discomfort and do the work to understand the lived experience of children and de-trans folk who are harmed by systemic grooming.
	How is that wrong, progressives?
	A lot of progressives think there is a category of not-groomer, but one is either groomer or anti-groomer.
	Being not-groomer is just a way to perpetuate systemic grooming.
	This is exactly right from literally the critical theorist perspective as well, because if you are not being actively anti the status quo, the power structures that are creating the problem, then what you are doing, even by saying, I'm taking a neutral position, well, that favors the status quo, because that favors the perpetuation of the system that's currently in place.
	So by their own logic, that's exactly right.
	If you don't want to actively strip out all of this grooming nonsense from the classrooms, then you are pro-groomer.
	Glorious.
	Got them by the balls.
	Grooming is one of many interlocking systems of oppression.
	Prove them wrong.
	One cannot be anti-groomer if one is a communist.
	One cannot be anti-groomer if one is a feminist.
	To be anti-groomer is to recognize the intersections of your communist, feminist, progressive privilege.
	This is so good.
	This is just so good.
	That's exactly right.
	All feminists, all communists, all progressives are innately pro-groomer.
	By their own logic, they are condemned.
	Superficial change is insufficient.
	CGT shows that systemic grooming has been baked into the supposedly neutral objective ideas like expressive individualism, identity and social justice from our nation's founding.
	I love where this is going.
	Dismantling it requires fashions.
	He says, Kenney, D'Angelo, Adams, Collins, etc.
	Critical social justice is fundamentally flawed, cynical, and deconstructive.
	It is a universal asset.
	However, satire is a form of argument, and this argument makes a really good point.
	Really, really strong point.
	And again, Tim Pool points out, it's like, look, if there wasn't some sort of systemic problem with progressive ideology, you can get to the next one.
	Why would this be happening in every single state, in the same circumstances, everywhere this ideology happens?
	And not only that, though, if it wasn't an interconnected web of systems, why is it when you pulled on one thread on one side, that on the other side, something apparently unrelated starts ringing, right?
	He's like, it's weird that people shouldn't have sexual conversations with children in secret, and the left is like, yo, why do you hate gay people?
	So what's the systemic connection that connects those two from the left?
	You know, how is that?
	Because they think of homosexuals as part of the alphabets, and therefore part of their block that belonged to them.
	But they also would encourage teachers to have secret conversations away from their parents in order to pervert them, basically.
	And we've got lots of examples of this.
	I mean, like, vocal distance has been just...
	I mean, these are just unreal.
	Thankfully, they've been blurred out because what you can see there is literally K-12 library of oral sex, gay oral sex.
	It's like, sorry, is this appropriate for any child in school of any age?
	No, the answer is no.
	If you can go to the next one, you can see just two naked men in bed kissing.
	In case people don't get the point either for heterosexual as well.
	Why are you showing this to kids?
	Don't show a girl giving a blowjob in a children's book either.
	No amount of actual sexual content like that is appropriate.
	This is just obviously not appropriate.
	These people are pedo-groomers.
	That's why you would have this.
	And then you've got the activist teachers who are just actively grooming kids to come out as queer or trans against the wishes of their parents or behind the backs of their parents.
	If you can go to the next one, Karlyn Borisenko points out, there's loads of video of this and things like this, where it's like middle school students, here's a 7th grader coming out in 5th grade with the help of her school guidance counsellor.
	As in they're encouraging them to be like, yeah, yeah, yeah, you're gay, yeah, you're definitely gay.
	And it's all disgusting stuff, right?
	And so we've got a great example in the UK of how this grooming obviously manifests itself in Brighton.
	What's Brighton like, Callum?
	It's the green leftist capital of the UK. Yeah, it's the San Francisco of the UK. It's a joke.
	One fashionable Brighton school has 40 children who are trans and another 36 who are gender fluid.
	Very fashionable.
	In one school.
	This is less than 1% of the population, but like 20% of the students.
	It's like, this is not normal.
	Dorothy Stringer School in Brighton was previously praised by Tatler Magazine for its liberal vibe and having the perfect balance between work and fun.
	The head teacher, Richard Bradford, has revealed that the figures were found in a council survey, and they are the highest at any school in the country.
	Probably the highest at any school in the world.
	But this is not normal, and obviously the product of the institutionalized grooming of children that is going on in left-wing circles.
	But I don't think this is something that's new.
	If you get to the next one, you can see that this is...
	I just posted this on Getter, but if you want to get the second picture there, John, what do you think this is?
	This is grooming children to accept a man dressed up as...
	Satan's wife.
	I'm not entirely sure.
	Slaanesh.
	Yeah, the Slaaneshi cultist, the Slaaneshi demon, in fact, demonette, in a library with subversive literature to present it to children.
	This is grooming.
	This is grooming them to accept that this is normal, that this is right, that this is as equal and decent as any other kind of moral instruction, which it's not.
	It's perverse.
	It's perverting children.
	And so, it gets worse though, right?
	Because once you get onto this sort of level where everything is equal, everything is justified and everything is right and should be given to kids, you get, okay, why don't we just start paying people to be transgender?
	I mean, let's just up the incentives.
	As Fox News report about Palm Springs in California...
	The transgender individuals in Palm Springs are to be given $900 a month solely for identifying as transgender or non-binary.
	This is the systemic nature of critical grooming theory at work.
	What are they going to spend the money on in their minds?
	Presumably it's just a cash incentive.
	Being trans!
	Who knows?
	Who cares?
	This is just a monthly donation, no strings attached.
	Do you even have to do anything?
	No, you just have to identify as trans.
	And John points out the NHS is also paying GPs to prescribe trans hormones.
	Good point, I forgot about that.
	But again, the amount of...
	The amount of evidence that proves systemic grooming across the Western world into left-wing ideological positions or becoming trans or LGBT, whatever it is, these are just so inculcated and embedded in our systems now that it is a systemic problem.
	And it's no wonder that things like trans-trenders are a thing.
	It's no wonder at all.
	Trans trainer for anyone who doesn't know is just someone who wants to claim to be trans even though they're not trans because it's cool and fashionable and supported by all of the major institutions such as Hollywood, such as corporations, such as the schools, such as the governments, such as wherever.
	Where doesn't support this?
	I've just seen the chat being like, well, you know, I'm not trans, but I did wear my husband's coat once, and $900 is $900.
	$900 is $900.
	And that's the thing, right?
	If you're in a place that is offering this, you walk down there in your finest suit with your biggest, bushiest beard, and you look them square in the eye and say, yes, I'm trans.
	Hand over that money.
	Lawrence Southern literally has put a baseball cap on.
	Literally malicious compliance.
	You take them for everything they're worth.
	You know, you make sure you're at your most masculine when you go down there and claim that you're a woman, and you take this money.
	Screw them.
	If they're going to do this, you take advantage, right?
	So anyway, again, where isn't this present, right?
	Adverts?
	Oh no, adverts.
	I mean, like, forget the next one.
	You see LGBT marketing campaigns that prove love is love.
	And what I found interesting about- Does it prove that the burger is tasty?
	Well, exactly.
	Burgers?
	It's not burgers, right?
	It means now more than ever, it is safer to cater to this niche audience without the risk of alienating a more traditional target.
	It's not about selling burgers.
	Catering to a niche audience of like 1 or 2% of the population isn't...
	More than gay people by McDonald's.
	Yes.
	I wager that's probably true.
	This is about promoting a system of values.
	And the worry is, oh, you're going to alienate the traditional audience.
	As in, the audience who aren't gay would be like, why are you doing this?
	And we've got to the point where this is so normal that it doesn't alienate people.
	They're just used to it.
	I love how that's written as well, as if the traditional audience are all, like, Iranians.
	No, it's not that.
	It's that when you watch the burger adverts, you expect them to be telling you how good the burger tastes, and then you'll be like, yeah, go buy a burger.
	But when they just tell you, yeah, did you know people are gay?
	I'm like, what?
	It's not that you don't like the gay people, you're just like, what the hell does this have to do with a thing?
	Two gay people kissing, and then in a blurry background there's a burger somewhere.
	Yeah, like if Games Workshop started making more and more advertisements that are about, did you know that gay people exist?
	You'd be like, yeah, but I'm here for the models.
	I'm not buying Slanesh, what do you want?
	So anyway, this of course shows in the Disney gay agenda, which Chris Rufo managed to brilliantly make mainstream, because Latoya Ravenu openly bragged about, on a private Zoom call or whatever it was, In the internal Disney workings where, oh yeah, we're just regularly, it's a not at all secret gay agenda and is regularly adding queerness to children's programming.
	Direct quotes.
	So that was just interesting and so this obviously kept going because this isn't, you know, that's not one thing in Disney.
	Oh no, no, no.
	This Disney's production coordinator, Alan March, who says his team is committed to exploring queer stories and promoting trans, bisexual and gender non-conforming characters and says that kids are getting all this information from the media.
	There's a lot of power to that.
	That's the important thing.
	Yeah, there is a lot of power to that.
	There's a lot of power to control children's minds and sexuality, but there's no accountability to that.
	You know, this, when you've transitioned a bunch of kids and now they've gone through hormone therapy, and maybe they even have parts of their body permanently removed, or they have various other, you know, bone diseases or something like this in 10 or 15 years time, how is accountability going to be made on any of this?
	But also you can see it's active grooming.
	It's not even passive.
	Oh yeah, God, it's totally active.
	It's not even just happening because this is where this leads.
	No, it's completely active.
	I mean, the words they're promoting as well, instead of accepting.
	Why are you not accepting tolerance of these things?
	Yeah, tolerating these things.
	That's a passive way of looking at acceptance, right?
	No, no, no.
	This is active.
	These people want to promote it, as you say, because there's a lot of power to that.
	It's about ideology.
	It's not about being tolerant in the slightest.
	And it's exactly...
	I mean, look at the...
	You can tell what that guy's voice is going to be like, right?
	Oh, come on, that's me.
	No, but you can.
	Yeah, I can.
	You absolutely can.
	You can tell that's exactly the kind of people who are doing it.
	Yeah.
	You know what's going on here.
	Anyway, you might think, well, okay, at least the Disney high-ups are going to be like, oh, God, I didn't know about this.
	Oh, you'd be wrong.
	You'd be so goddamn wrong.
	Right, if you get to the next one, right?
	Disney corporate president Kari Burke says, quote, That's organic.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Exactly.
	What are the odds that you just happen to have a transgender and a pansexual child?
	What's a pansexual child?
	Pansexual child.
	He doesn't discriminate against groomers of all ages.
	Groomers of any persuasion or orientation or any gender.
	Anyone can groom that child, apparently.
	What are you saying?
	There's no such thing as a pansexual child.
	The sexual child part is the wrong part.
	Don't even worry about the pan bit.
	But she supports having many, many LGBTQIA characters in our stories and wants a minimum of 50% of characters to be...
	Gay or queer or whatever it is.
	Alphabet.
	Yeah, alphabet and racial minorities.
	Well, including the rich minorities of Yuka McMurse, so they're part of the Alpha as well.
	It's unbelievable that this is institutionalized grooming.
	Active, institutional grooming.
	Deliberate.
	On purpose.
	They know they're doing it, and they're doing it for a reason.
	Again, if you go to the next one, it's the Federalist talking about, it's been like, look, this is nothing new, but their openness about this is the new thing.
	This is...
	Shocking that they're just so open about it.
	And so let's go to, okay, well, can we see the consequences of the grooming?
	And the answer is, of course, yes.
	The consequences of the grooming is measurable.
	We'll get to the next one.
	Here's a Statista poll and a set of polls of people who identify as gay per generation.
	As you can see, in 2012, boomers were 2.7%, Gen X were 3.2%, and millennials were 5.8%.
	In 2020, boomers go down.
	They're like, miss me with that gay ass, right?
	Down to 2%.
	Don't talk to me and my boyfriend ever again.
	We're not part of the ultimate.
	Exactly, right?
	Gen X went up 3.8%, so barely moves on the Gen X front.
	Millennials nearly doubled to 9.1%.
	Nearly twice as many millennials.
	Like, yeah, I do like that at the rear.
	You know, good point.
	Good point, Disney.
	But Zoomers...
	Sorry, imagine that being in the next Disney movie.
	I mean, it wouldn't surprise me.
	It wouldn't shock me at all.
	But Zoomers have come in at 15.9% LGBT. I didn't even see that.
	That's...
	Boom.
	Nearly 16%.
	Of Zoomers are like, yeah, I'm gay.
	Of course I'm gay.
	I watch Disney.
	Of course I'm gay.
	Why wouldn't I be, right?
	And then we've got to go to the next one, which is the Gallup polling, which found that 21% in their polls of Generation Z were, which identifies LGBT. Half of these identify as bisexual.
	Obviously, Paul, as well.
	Exactly.
	It's like, in your own life, one in five people that you meet are part of the alphabet.
	No.
	No.
	It's just nonsense.
	But again, it's the grooming.
	It's the continual incentivization and persuasion into this from people and authority, the media that they watch, and the repression of any counter-argument, as in, you're a bigot, you're a bigot, you're a homophobe, you're this, you're that, you're the other.
	Oh, I don't want to be a bad person.
	Well, we've stigmatized literally opposing us as being a bad person.
	So this is why.
	But anyway, yeah, so they, since 2017, say that the proportion of Gen Z people who identified as LGBT has doubled since 2017.
	So in five years, it's nearly doubled.
	That's mad.
	Like, this has to be the consequence of grooming.
	This is absolutely not organic.
	Otherwise, why would it be that the Gen Xers and the Boomers aren't doing the same thing?
	If it's just society no longer stigmatizes, I mean, A, it wasn't stigmatized when I was young.
	It's been promoted my entire lifetime.
	Not even just acceptance, like promotion.
	My entire life.
	Exactly.
	When I was young, it just was accepted.
	It was just like, well, we just don't care.
	I also love the baby boobers who are just like, they've gone down.
	I love the idea that you're a gay guy and you're just like, I'm just going to answer no because I don't want to be in that outfit.
	I just don't want to be associated with those people.
	I mean, I do hate women, but...
	But anyway, so at this rate...
	If the grooming continues as it is, everyone in America will be gay by 2047.
	Are they all going to be, or is it bi, where you don't have to do anything?
	Well, LGBT, sorry.
	Yeah, yeah.
	So everyone will be a form of LGBT by 2047 at this rate.
	Amazing.
	I mean, this is definitely not the product of grooming, is it?
	Right.
	Obviously, obviously.
	But anyway, so people will complain, ah, well, Republicans are in favour of grooming children too, and they're like...
	Not really.
	At least not in the same way.
	Otherwise, why are the percentage of LGBT not going down?
	The Republican stance is ultra and the opposite.
	The Democratic stance is to sexualize kids of all ages.
	The Republicans is to no sex before marriage.
	And marriage is at like 21 or whatever.
	See, and that's where they get you.
	It's like, yeah, but no marriage.
	If we don't put an age limit on that, then the Republicans agree.
	This is...
	The one thing that I saw people trying to push back on, right?
	So this is the Tennessee GOP proposed a bill that...
	The bill wasn't about eliminating age requirements for marriage, so the framing of this is wrong.
	The bill, HB 233, was scheduled to be heard, and it would establish common-law marriage between one man and one woman, but it does not include a minimum age requirement.
	Okay, that's fair.
	It doesn't have minimum age requirement.
	Now, the state already has a minimum age requirement for marriage, which is 17, on a different bill.
	So, I don't see why...
	It wouldn't change it, if there's no actual change in the law.
	No, it wouldn't change it, as far as I can tell, no.
	That's just an open lie, then.
	It's more a half-truth.
	Well, legislatively, if it doesn't supersede that previous bill, then...
	Well, I don't know if it does or doesn't supersede it, but this is what they're saying.
	Okay, yeah.
	So this...
	I mean, I don't know whether the Republicans in Tennessee are actively trying to facilitate child marriages.
	Well, that's the obvious bull in the next paragraph, where he says, currently, child marriage is legal in 44 states.
	Do you remember the fact that we just have endless child marriages in the United States?
	Ah, now you have to understand how they're defining child marriage.
	If you go down a little bit in this, what they're using is the UN definition of anyone under 18.
	So when it says you can get married at 16 with your parents' permission, that's child marriage now.
	Right.
	That's the same.
	That is morally equivalent of the Democrats in Florida showing, you know...
	A four-year-old.
	A four-year-old.
	Here's how they do a blowjob.
	Yeah, exactly.
	That's the same.
	It boggles the mind, but that's how they view it.
	Well, it's time to be anti-grooming.
	I think so.
	We should move on to John Shutt.
	I'm going to enjoy this.
	Oh, yeah.
	So I thought we'd ask, what the hell happened to Jon Stewart?
	And you may have seen a lot of his output over the years.
	I certainly, I know you did enjoy him back when he did The Daily Show.
	Yes, when I was in my late 20s and early 30s, I was a big fan of Jon Stewart.
	I'm rather embarrassed about that now, I have to say.
	I remember him chewing out Tucker Carlson and the other guy on Crossfire, and now I'm a massive Tucker Carlson fan.
	Well, I think there was actually some criticisms of Crossfire the show, which were relevant.
	And his criticism, if you remember, was actually that you guys just divide the country for no real means other than just because for the show.
	And that's the argument he's given.
	Or at least, you know, purely for ideology, you want to be an extremist.
	Partnership is hurting America.
	But the same thing has happened to Jon Stewart, and we can demonstrably show this.
	And I thought I'd plug here the premium podcast we did, The Origins of Intersectionality, because, well, clearly, Stewart has been bitten over the head with this argument again and again to get where he's at now.
	He's been totally brainwashed by the Kimberley Crenshaw's of the world because this is a hegemonic view of the left now.
	You can't be a left winger without being an intersectionalist.
	And this podcast explains why.
	Yeah, if we go to the next one, I also want to mention Matt Walsh did some nice responses to this.
	And in here, he mentions mentions a point which i think should be made again which is you occasionally see like john stuart will say maybe the virus came from a lab and there are elements of the writer were like yes based and it's like no no no no no no no right like why No, like, leftist sometimes agrees with the right as a point of, look, there's consensus.
	It doesn't mean the leftist is based.
	And you'll see this with occasionally, like, Bill Maher will say, don't you know Republicans aren't all Nazis?
	The right are like, yeah, oh my god, base man is like, okay, no, I'm past this.
	Like, this needs to stop in that regard.
	Like, they are behind the times by, like, a year.
	So it's not anything interesting, even relevant, in those points.
	I hope Bill crawls out of that.
	If we go to the next one, we can see where this goes, though.
	Which is, we start off with Jon Stewart on his show, The Problem with White People.
	I like the way his show is just called The Problem with Jon Stewart.
	I mean, I agree.
	What is The Problem with Jon Stewart?
	It's amazing that you've got such an unselfaware show.
	So deep.
	And this one, he decides to be The Problem with White People, as you can see on the screen there.
	And I look forward to changing that and doing the next episode, The Problem with Black People.
	And then The Problem with, insert point here, that he'll never make.
	The Problem with LGBT people.
	We'd love to see that.
	It's gotta be a funny episode.
	No, of course he's not doing that.
	So, this is MythSys, sorry, MythInformed, making the point that he's fully brought in to woke orthodoxy, and we can see it in real time.
	I mean, we'll play the first clip here, in which he says that the United States prioritizes white comfort of a black survival.
	The problem with white people.
	I'm just gonna...
	For however sincerely we want to reckon and listen, the truth is America has always prioritized white comfort over black survival.
	Black people have had to fight so hard for equality that they've been irreparably set back in the pursuit of equity.
	And any real attempt to repair a ton of That damage.
	Reparation.
	It's irreparable drama.
	You just said it.
	Sets off white people's they're coming for our s*** alarm.
	Which we would know ourselves had we actually been listening.
	My feeling is white people have a very, very serious problem.
	And they should start thinking about what they can do about it.
	Take me out of it.
	I can't get over just how ridiculous this whole thing is.
	I mean, it's such a wayward thing from what he used to do.
	I mean, start off just with the first point about how we prioritize black, sorry, white comfort over black survival.
	Why do we let black male teenagers into majority white neighborhoods then?
	Like, if this is a white supremacist country, genuinely, we would have an apartheid in that regard, surely?
	Why was integration something that the white community was in favor of?
	But, like, the South African apartheid government wouldn't have done anything the United States does.
	Explicitly on the grounds of white comfort.
	Yes.
	So, no.
	Just blatantly, obviously, no.
	Okay.
	But then the point he makes about that it's irreparable damage has been done to blacks and black Americans.
	Okay, well, I'm not going to try and fix it, then.
	You've literally defined it as unable to be repaired.
	I love this.
	It's not black Africans who come to the United States.
	They do very well.
	But black Americans.
	Okay.
	Nothing can be fixed, except perhaps the leaders of BLM and their multiple million dollar mentions.
	Things are going great for them.
	I mean, that's an example of how you could get loads of money in the United States if you're black, or, I don't know, Obama, or blah blah blah blah, name any celebrity or well-to-do black American.
	You could go for any of them.
	I suppose you could argue Obama is technically closer to black African, considering...
	He has more lineage there than to the black Americans at all, genetically.
	But then says that, well, he plays that clip in which it's just like, yeah, black folk don't have a problem.
	White folk got a problem.
	It's their problem.
	Is it?
	What problem?
	If it's intolerance, I mean, that's gone.
	I'm upset.
	That's your problem.
	Oh.
	That's good for you.
	Bye!
	I don't know what to say.
	It's just ridiculous.
	If we go to the next one, we can see John Stewart also, as mythicists in his method form say, going for a woke here in another scene in his little podcast now in which he had a guy on and was just unreasonably rude to this chap.
	And I think we'll see why.
	We'll play the first one.
	I do have some criticisms of his argumentation as well.
	But we'll play this just to see how it went.
	We have an awful history.
	It's remnants are still felt today.
	You also have a great history, John.
	Say it again?
	But you also have a great history.
	But I think you're minimizing it.
	You're suggesting that because of...
	I think by calling today white supremacy, you are minimizing actual white supremacy.
	You have an incredible diversity.
	To condemn all American history as racist...
	I disagree that they're generalizing all white people.
	The systems that were racist that were put in place...
	Systems?
	Yes.
	The systems that were put in place.
	I'd like you to explain exactly what they are.
	Well, I thought I explained it earlier about the GI Bill and about the New Deal.
	That's one thing.
	I want to know about these systems.
	I just explained it.
	Housing, food...
	That's one, and I've agreed that.
	Andrew, you're not living on the same planet we are.
	Honestly.
	I really don't think you are.
	I think you are not living in the planet most Americans are, which is why this kind of extremism, this anti-white extremism, is losing popular support, is creating a backlash, is going to elect Republicans and undo a lot of the good you think you're doing.
	Oof.
	Oof.
	I mean, great points by him there.
	I did want to mention, I did have one criticism, though, of him, which is that he could have, I think, won more people over if he was just like, well, yeah, here's the racist laws of the American past.
	You know, you've got blah, blah, blah, blah, Jim Crow legislation or blah, blah, blah, blah, right?
	You know, slavery, all the rest of it.
	But then, you know, make that point and then be like, yeah, so what systems?
	Because you're going to talk about the Constitution, aren't you?
	And say the entire founding of the United States is itself racist, because that's woke dogma.
	Not the individual laws you can point to and then repeal.
	No, the entire structure of a free, liberal, democratic society is white supremacy to you people.
	Like, I think he should have made that more clear.
	And he should have demanded how he explained that some black people are billionaires and some aren't.
	A white supremacist system wouldn't permit that.
	But he makes the great point there at the end, though, which is that your anti-white extremism is literally losing you popular support.
	I mean, demonstrably.
	Shock and surprise.
	Out in the polls.
	And getting Republicans elected, and good.
	I mean, you've said before we started, more of this.
	More of this on mainstream TV. Jon Stewart.
	Double down.
	It's like, okay, now the problem with all white people.
	That's what I want to hear next, Jon.
	I know, he does that in this clip.
	I mean, he literally just said, I'm not generalising all white people.
	Oh, aren't you?
	I know.
	He'll do it in literally a minute.
	Okay.
	And I also wanted to mention the chap that was invited on there.
	He was invited on and he was asked, oh, we're doing a show on whiteness.
	And he was just like, I'm not joining a show just to be called Racist.
	No, thanks.
	And then the PA was like, oh, no, no, no, no, no.
	It won't be a debate.
	It'll just be a one-on-one with Jon Stewart.
	And he was like, oh, sure, fine.
	And then he's like logged on.
	And then he's told there's two other people.
	Oh, great.
	So it is a debate.
	And also the show's called The Problem With White People.
	Just open liar from Jon Stewart's team there.
	Yeah, but this is nothing new.
	This is nothing new.
	They used to do the same thing back when it was the Daily Show with him.
	And Gavin McInnes had a thing where he recorded behind the scenes and they chopped it all up and then made him look...
	i mean don't worry on gavin mckinnis is a pretty extreme uh comedian and so you know he he deliberately is provocative and they just totally misrepresented his position this is nothing new for them no just absolutely open and smear merchants in this regard so if we go to the next clip we can also see the the lady next to him as you can see was getting very flustered decided to go on some racist rant saying that all white people are responsible for all american history as in like you know all the jim crow stuff is your fault all democrats are groomers callum Let's play.
	What happens when white people don't talk about it is you have racist dog whistle tropes like this that actually perpetuate and perpetuate and perpetuate.
	And I did not come on this show to sit here and argue with another white man.
	That's one of the reasons that we don't even engage with white men at Race to Dinner.
	I'm out.
	You know, because quite honestly, if white men were going to do something about racism, you had 400 years.
	You could have done it.
	I'm shutting you down right now.
	White women be quiet challenge.
	How about that?
	Do we need to hear from another white woman on anything?
	Certainly not that one.
	I love the points.
	Again, I don't engage with white men.
	The way you come on a show with white men.
	John sat opposite you.
	Two white men sat there.
	And then one behind you in the box who's going to be smeared the whole time.
	But also, white men have done nothing for 400 years.
	There are no black people in the audience, obviously, because they're not allowed.
	They're too busy on the plantation still, because white men have done nothing for 400 years.
	Nothing at all.
	Absolutely not.
	Didn't fight a war for this.
	She's sitting there going, yeah, well, it was white men's job to stop black men from selling each other in slavery.
	I mean, it actually was.
	The British went down and stopped the Africans from selling them to the slaves.
	And as far as she's concerned, that hasn't happened.
	Well, I mean, it's still going on in Libya.
	Sure, but again, it's the white man's job, and she's castigating white men for not having prevented this.
	And it's like, you are an open white supremacist yourself, you just don't realise it.
	But also, Andrew, in the back there, was racist because he's engaging in racist tropes.
	The racist trope of asking for specific systems.
	Asking for proof.
	Yes.
	Evidence.
	That's a racist trope.
	Yes.
	I suppose so.
	She's not done.
	Asking for proof that they're not groomers is groomer supremacy.
	She then decides to go off and say that all white people are responsible, and she means it.
	She doesn't mean white men.
	She means all white people.
	All of you.
	All of you are wrong.
	All of you are evil.
	Let's play.
	All of us white people do this.
	I don't care if we say we're abolitionists.
	I don't care if we say we're progressive.
	I don't care if we're literally members of the KKKK. Every single white person upholds these systems and structures of white supremacy.
	And we have got to talk about it.
	If I could fingersnap, I would fingersnap right now.
	Let's remove it then from the...
	You've been doing a pretty good job with it yourself there.
	What?!
	What did he say that was racist?
	That is amazing!
	Literally nothing.
	That is amazing!
	Like, Jon Stewart has gone full critical race theory.
	Yeah, he's full on board in the ideology.
	That is mad.
	That is absolutely mad.
	The whole environment is insane.
	The woman is literally sat there going, look, I don't distinguish between an abolitionist and a KKK member.
	The West Africa squadron and the Nazis.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Basically the same.
	There's literally no distinction between them at all, in my opinion.
	And Jon Stewart's like, yeah, and this guy's like, yeah, she's calling me a race, and Jon Stewart's like, you are.
	It's like, what?
	For what?
	Name it!
	Well, it's for not opposing the United States.
	That's what it is.
	But then John presumably is in there as well.
	I also just need the audience.
	I can't get over that.
	Well, John reckons the audience are fake, and they might be.
	No, I genuinely think they're real, because this has happened many times before.
	You may remember, what was it?
	One of the other late-night ha-ha men who decided to just go, white people, and then the audience just started like doing it.
	Jimmy Kimmel, I think it was?
	Yeah.
	Oh, no, no.
	And there was another one, like, white people are set to become a minority in America, and it was like cheering.
	That's the one.
	Oh, God.
	Jimmy Kimmel's audience went mad with clapping and applauding and whooping, and it's just, okay, I can't believe that this is the genuine audience of these people.
	I mean, these things are filmed in California, so yeah.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, but we move on, because then Andrew Sullivan here, the chap who was on, who was being smeared, and was, well, misled as well, he wrote a big article, of course, calling it The Problem with Jon Stewart.
	Yeah.
	Accurate.
	And he lists in here how the production team were just sneaky and just deceitful to him as well, which is horrible.
	So there's another point as to why Jon Stewart has gone mad.
	I read through this.
	It's really good.
	Yeah.
	But then he also mentions that lady there.
	Stewart invited on and fawned over a woman named Lisa Bond, who runs an organization called Race to Dinner.
	She charges white women $2,500 per dinner to be harangued for their racism.
	Everyone's got a fetish, Cameron.
	I can't get over there are white women in America willing to pay that money, but I guess as a fetish, they run high.
	And if you believe, as the vast majority of Americans do, that racism is a pejorative generalisation about a whole group of people solely because of their skin colour, Lisa Bonn is unequivocally a racist, and by the way, a sexist.
	See, now this is why it's actually pertinent to bring up the link to the podcast we did about this.
	Because this is what is known by Kimberley Crenshaw as the narrow definition of racism.
	Racism as procedure.
	Accurate one.
	Yes.
	Well, the liberal way.
	They call it the narrow definition because narrow sounds bad.
	Can't be good if it's narrow.
	She has the expansive definition of racism where racism is the consequence of structures and systems.
	Therefore, nobody's intent matters whatsoever.
	Also, the narrow definition would apply to a narrow percentage of the population, as in a banishingly narrow percentage.
	That's true, yes.
	And therefore, she couldn't get paid, well, $2,500 to tell white women they're racist.
	And you wouldn't be able to call abolitionists the moral equivalent of the KKK? No.
	And I wanted to compare this, because I know there's a lot of criticism, or at least skepticism, that John Stewart and Ed has ever said anything remotely different from this, or at least he's always been left-leaning.
	I'll grant that, absolutely.
	And he's always been, apparently, a bit of an asshole with regards to being deceitful to people on his own show.
	Yeah, but that was stuff they only found out, honestly, with the advent of the internet.
	I think it was Nicky Hassan or whatever his name is, the moron.
	Mehdi Hassan?
	Mehdi Hassan.
	No, it's not Mehdi Hassan, that's another guy.
	But he did a show on Saudi Arabia and then had it pulled because, well, how dare you insult the glory of Saudi Arabia?
	Anyway, but back in the day, Jon Stewart did actually do things that were more sensible by a country mile.
	As you can see here, this is the rally for sanity.
	The rally to restore sanity.
	Yeah, and there's a clip in here which he literally just calls out himself from the future.
	Which is just like, yeah, people who can't distinguish between actual racists and average people need to be kept out of politics.
	Let's play it.
	Not being able to distinguish between real racists and Tea Partiers or real bigots and Juan Williams or Rick Sanchez is an insult, not only to those people, but to the racists themselves who have put in the exhausting effort it takes to hate.
	My God!
	I know, right?
	Oh my God!
	I'm going to distinguish you.
	I'm going to call that chap John Leibovitz, and the other chap John Stewart, because John Leibovitz, this chap here, you could imagine that being said and him campaigning there at a Republican rally.
	Oh yeah.
	All those American flags...
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	The MAGA guys in the audience cheering him on going, that's absolutely right, bro.
	You can see this is before he adopted, and back in 2010 this was, like you can see this is before he adopted critical race theory as his organizing principle of reality.
	And so now the United States is an entirely intrinsically racist project because it's the expansive definition.
	He was referring specifically there to the restrictive definition.
	Mm-hmm.
	I mean, Mr.
	Leibowitz here being a good guy, the kind of guy that every proud American could cheer on and be like, that's a good point, I stand with you.
	Yes, it was a good point.
	Denouncing Mr.
	Stewart.
	Who, 12 years later, can't distinguish between the KKK and abolitionists.
	Unreal.
	Unbelievable.
	And if we move forward, we can also see the experts.
	Remember the race to dinner people?
	Oh, yes.
	That Andrew Sullivan was talking about.
	Well, MythInformed also have loads of clips of them, and I don't have time for them, so we won't play them.
	Also because they're a bit weirdy.
	But as you can see, in this one, they have Jon Stewart's race experts claiming that every immigrant group believes they are superior to black Americans.
	So, gloomily, we need to build a wall to keep out all that racism that's pouring into the country.
	They didn't realize that.
	Immigrants are racist.
	Yeah.
	Also, I don't know how you say her name.
	Sario?
	Oh, Sahiro...
	Sahiro.
	I can't remember her name.
	Samira.
	Sahiro says that she asked who was racist in the room at her conferences, and she's the only one that ever raises her hand as well, and then complains about that.
	Sahiro Rao, I think her name is.
	It's a base Rao.
	Yeah, and she says that she's the only one at a conference there when asked who's racist in the room.
	She's the only one who puts her hand up, and she was whining about that, because other people aren't honest in her opinion.
	No, the rest of us just aren't racist, love.
	It's just you.
	If we go to the next one, we can also see them whining about white women again.
	I don't know why they decided to make white women their enemy.
	Oh, I don't blame them.
	Brilliant move.
	A good start.
	White women aren't trustworthy with anything, and also white women who are married to black men will never be accepted by black women.
	Why is that the white woman's problem?
	Damn, white women.
	They give the reason, which is that 55% of them voted for Donald Trump, and therefore they can't be trusted ever.
	I agree.
	Interesting.
	And if we move forward...
	Based white women.
	If you don't know who Ms.
	Rao is, I thought we'd enjoy just literal anti-white extremism.
	Oh, she's a lunatic.
	It's mad.
	Her saying here, being in a predominantly black space is devastating and violent and not safe.
	Did I say black?
	I meant white.
	So that's the thing as well.
	If you change any of these, and I'm going to, white for black, holy crap, it comes out as the KKK, doesn't it?
	Being in a predominantly black space is devastating, violent, and not safe.
	Move forwards.
	Black men with machine guns don't make me feel safer.
	Jesus, Raoul!
	Okay, yeah.
	Okay, the next one.
	Black feelings are responsible for so much death and destruction.
	Oh!
	Oh!
	Oh, okay.
	Twitter account verified.
	Yeah, that's a spicy take.
	I had to get away with them.
	And for the next one, we did not make everything about race.
	White people did, she says, as I showed.
	All of our activism is about white politics, white identity politics, and black identity politics.
	There's also the fact that this is a bit that you've run into before.
	Yes.
	Go to the next one.
	We can see that debate as it went.
	And we'll enjoy a clip from that, which is her realising that she's an idiot.
	Because you pointed out that at the time of recording, the Queen was a woman, the Prime Minister was a woman, the Home Secretary was a woman, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	The Scottish leader of the Parliament was a woman, so the whole country was being ran by women.
	Therefore, I'm being institutionally oppressed as a man.
	How did she respond?
	Let's play.
	That might be the greatest quote of all time.
	I don't feel like I have institutional power as a white man.
	Okay.
	Well, all the institutions seem to be ruled over by women.
	Okay.
	So does this make me oppressed?
	Oh my god.
	I can't even answer that.
	And then she got butthurt and left.
	The answer to that is, of course, yes.
	According to intersectional logic.
	I suppose I'd also end this off with one more thing from John Stewart, because I don't know if you remember this.
	Remember this story?
	Anti-white COVID rescue plan from Biden?
	Oh yeah, because it was due to privilege black people.
	If you were white, you were at the back of the queue for receiving funds.
	So the funds would run out, tactically, before it ever got to a white recipient.
	So it was a way of legalising racial discrimination amongst the Biden campaign.
	29 billion US dollars would likely be distributed before Greer and other white male applicants made it to the front of the line.
	It's a direct quote.
	I mean, it is unbelievable they tried to do this, and it just went under the radar.
	Like, I didn't see this becoming like, holy crap, what the hell is going on?
	Because this is Zimbabwe levels of insane racial politics going into the money supply, and it's the food supply here.
	Here's the next one.
	Jon Stewart was whining about this with Cory Booker, in which he was like, how dare white people shut this down?
	And even Booker himself is like, wait, no, Jon, no, it's not white people who have done that.
	It's the Supreme Court.
	Ha!
	John Stewart's like, nah, it's the white people, isn't it?
	I don't want you two races for Cory Booker.
	But he's broke as well.
	Cory Booker's like, hold on a minute.
	I'm not blaming all white farmers for this.
	And John Stewart's like, no, denounce them.
	Denounce them.
	They're white.
	They've done this.
	Very few black farmers are existing.
	Sorry, God.
	Yeah, so that's too racist even for Cory Booker there.
	And if we go on to the next one, we'll just have a last thing here, which is some other racial propaganda in which some lady's just like, yes, if you're white, you is bad.
	All of you.
	Again, from all the way from- It's Leslie Jones!
	Yeah, from being a- Ghostbusters.
	A clan member to an abolitionist.
	Again, as you can see.
	Yeah.
	She's just like, yeah, all of you are bad.
	All of you are racist.
	All of you are evil people.
	What degree of racism are you?
	Yes.
	The racism spectrum.
	Thanks, Ghostbusters.
	Right.
	That's the levels.
	And what was John Stewart's response to this?
	Boston!
	Boston is extreme racism.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I mean, there's a bit of satire in there, but the messaging is consistent.
	If we go to the next one, we can see John Stewart responding to this, which is just killed it.
	Fantastic.
	John, why did you decide to go woke?
	I don't know.
	Something happened to that man, and clearly it was being indoctrinated, or falling for it, or just, I don't know if he was on this trajectory for always, but he certainly wasn't back in the day when he was giving those speeches.
	No!
	Back in those days, that's a MAGA speech.
	He was a reasonable liberal back in the day, and then he became a communist.
	If anyone watches us from the MAGA campaign, please take that clip and just play it behind Trump at some rally.
	Yeah, oh god, yeah.
	Because it will cause mayhem, if nothing else.
	I agree with 2010 Jon Stewart.
	Yeah, if you know anyone in the MAGA campaigning groups as well, just send them this idea.
	Let them do it.
	The clip will be available somewhere, and you'll be able to find it easily.
	But otherwise, we'll end that there.
	Go to the video comments.
	I did tell you you would find my story entertaining as all hell, and you're probably wondering who this is.
	Carl, remember when you said you wished there was a Dojo Wars episode on Mad Lads?
	Count Dante, one of the people with the highest body count in the Dojo Wars of one person, supposedly, He did claim more, but that's as far as we know for sure on record.
	This being said, what was his actions in the Dojo Wars?
	To self-proclaim himself the deadliest man who ever lived, and if you questioned him, he'll just kill you with his bare hands to prove you wrong.
	I thought he claimed more.
	You ever watch an interview with convicted criminals?
	No.
	And they'll talk about the other stuff they were accused of and they've clearly done it.
	But they'll word it and be like, I was accused of this.
	Never did it.
	Never did it.
	They know there's a joke there.
	Yeah.
	But like a criminal to just be like, yeah, I killed more.
	They just never got me.
	Kind of implies that he's making it up.
	Maybe.
	But also he might just be that insane.
	I mean, he is a literal murderer.
	Well, it might be self-defence.
	Some lunatics break in with knives or something?
	Maybe, you know.
	Harry said that they broke into dojos with swords and just stabbed people.
	In self-defence.
	He might be stabbing in self-defence.
	The dojo was coming right at me.
	So I walked down ten blocks.
	I need to see details.
	Anyway, let's get back on.
	Hey, it's your patriarch, Chad Dad, from Oklahoma.
	I just want to say how awesome it is to see the Lotus Eaters and what it's becoming.
	I feel like it was just yesterday that Mr.
	Avakad was doing This Week in Stupid and got me hooked.
	And now he's got, what, ten of you working for him in a professional studio?
	Our little emperor grows up so fast.
	Yeah, I can't.
	They've all got copyright claims on the panel.
	They've got copyright claims.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Are you not in the music?
	No, no.
	I assume that he had signed a contract with someone or something like that who did have the rights to it or something like that because then they were claimed it.
	I presume you had a license, though.
	I have no idea.
	Oh, okay.
	Well, that's a shame, but that's that.
	Yeah.
	Memories.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Coming up on the 12th of April is Songkran here in Thailand.
	Thai version of Chinese New Year.
	Everybody has big parties, gets drunk.
	Water plays a big part.
	It's like a national wet t-shirt competition.
	After two years of being banned, it can go ahead.
	However, No big parties.
	Little parties.
	No problem.
	Water sprinkling is allowed, which basically means the monks can sprinkle water on people to bless them for the new year, like monks are immune to COVID, which is running rampant here.
	We're getting like 80 plus deaths a day.
	They can't sell alcohol.
	They do this every time there's an election.
	All alcohol sales from supermarkets are banned.
	No alcohol.
	No water fights.
	No big parties.
	Yay!
	Come on, New Year.
	Four days of sitting at home and watching Netflix.
	Man, I hope you managed to move to, what was it, Columbia or whatever you said?
	I had to cancel it because of the pension reasons.
	Oh, right, yeah, yeah.
	It's just amazing that you get reminded that some parts of the world still are living in madness.
	Oh, yeah.
	It's just normal.
	Same as continental Europe, though.
	They're still mental over there.
	I can't get over the idea.
	I don't know what to make of that.
	For the elections, alcohol is banned.
	Everyone must vote sober.
	It's just bizarre.
	Weird.
	Yeah, I suppose send us some of the best pictures from the wet t-shirt competition.
	Let's see the next one.
	Gasoline vehicles operate more efficiently the lower the RPMs.
	You can oversize the motor and then gear it in such a way that you can maintain low RPMs at roadway speeds.
	However, with an electric motor, it operates most efficiently at high RPMs, so you actually don't want to oversize the motor because then you're going to get diminishing returns at low RPM. I did not know that.
	I assume that wears it out faster.
	No idea.
	Next one.
	A martini.
	I know that, Colossus.
	you Just be patient.
	Just watch.
	See, I just poured the vermouth in here.
	Now I'm going to pour some gin over the ice.
	Just like this.
	And an olive.
	Why don't you look under the perfect martini?
	This is a very esoteric in-joke that I'm not familiar with.
	Yeah, I don't know what to say either.
	I assume it's because Chad's dad was showing off his bar.
	Right.
	He's making martinis and whatnot.
	Sorry, presumably there's a reference to that.
	Not very good martinis, by the sounds of it.
	No.
	Very upset.
	Probably too much.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Hey guys, with Disney in the news, I thought I'd share a little experience we just had.
	This year for Christmas, I bought my family tickets to the Disney Princess concert.
	And so we just got to see the show recently.
	It was fantastic.
	There were four women who sung all the classic Disney tunes, and it was great.
	My son loved it.
	My daughter loved it.
	that the only problem was the host referred to himself as the fairy god fairy and couldn't quit telling us how much he liked sucking dick imagine right imagine going back three years right and this video comment comes in and you just watch it like what the hell is he talking about But the thing is, that makes perfect sense now, and it's completely believable.
	Oh, God.
	But you just wouldn't have expected it.
	You've been to Disneyland, haven't you?
	Yeah, it wasn't.
	It was a couple of years ago, and there was nothing gay there, or, like, LGBT, or...
	Trans.
	Small world.
	By the way, I love dick.
	No one, none of the performers appeared to be weird and subversive.
	I didn't see any evidence of grooming when I was there.
	So it's just like, okay.
	I don't know what to tell you.
	This is all very new.
	A bit of the French one.
	Yeah, I have, actually.
	There's no gays there.
	It's all in Arabic.
	That's true.
	There were armed soldiers on the streets.
	Still is.
	That's just every day in France now.
	Yeah, I know.
	So for those Lotus Eaters out there that are debate pros, you know, you just like to argue with people on the internet about random stuff, usually politics and culture, but pretty much anything, there is a Facebook group that I think you will like.
	It's called That's a Weird Hill to Die On, But At Least You're Dead.
	It has a couple thousand members and it is great for just arguing about literally anything that you want.
	There is always going to be a hill and someone defending it.
	Secondly, I want to give a huge shout-out to Tony D for writing this article about Disney employees protesting parental supervision.
	It's hilarious.
	Good.
	Is this satire or not?
	I'm assuming yes, from Tony.
	But then again, I don't even know.
	No, who can tell?
	Like, the levels of ridiculousness going on with Disney.
	Yeah.
	Well, anyway, go and check it out.
	That's Disney Employees Protest Parental Supervision.
	No idea where that's hosted, but...
	Winsorin.com.
	There we are.
	Winsorian.
	Winsorian.
	Chad Dadd, your Patriarch of Oklahoma representing today.
	Hey Bo, I have a question for you, our local history nerd.
	I wonder if you could give me the very short two-minute version of the Winged Hussars.
	Supposedly they're the most amazing thing in the world that people still write songs about them today.
	It's one of the few things I know about Poland, but I would like to know more.
	Tell me, what is so amazing about these Winged Hussars?
	What do they do?
	Right, okay, so I spoke to Beau about this before the podcast, and he said that we will do an epox on the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, which will, of course, detail the window of SARS, but it won't be for a few weeks yet because we've got a bit of a schedule lined up.
	But we will indeed get to it, I promise.
	And it will be remarkable as well.
	I mean, I don't want to spoil it, but, like, did they actually have anything that was, you know, combat-wise unique, or were they just...
	Oh, yeah, oh, yeah.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Do you know anything about Alexander the Great?
	A little bit.
	What do you know?
	Lots of horsies.
	Well, no, the most important thing about Alexander...
	Companion cavalry.
	No, the phalanxes.
	Giant phalanxes.
	People with, like, 20 feet long pikes in packed-in rows.
	I thought everyone had this.
	No, no, no.
	It was Philip of Maston's innovation.
	And now imagine if you put those people on horseback, and so you've got the phalanx marching forward, but instead it's charging forward at about, you know, 30 miles an hour.
	Is that what the companion cavalry were?
	That's what the wing to Sars were.
	Oh.
	And, like, we'll do an epox on it.
	It's epic.
	It's terrifying.
	Yes, well, that's why literally, like, 5,000 winged hussars would rout, like, 20,000 or 30,000 men.
	But it's mad.
	It's absolutely mad how powerful the hussars were.
	We'll talk about it another time, but we will do it.
	Go for the next one.
	The weather's been getting nicer, so time for more large-scale mech shenanigans.
	Hopefully this anti-groomer stuff is where the line is drawn in the sand, because any more compromise with progressives is just gonna get downright weird.
	Well, weirder.
	I'll identify as a space marine and make the bigots pay for my power armor.
	Against the assault of laughter, nothing can stand.
	Mark Twain.
	I mean, if we can't draw the line of debauching children, then there is no line that can be drawn.
	There is no point in the right.
	Yeah, exactly.
	There's no point in the right-wing movement at all.
	If it can't be, you're not allowed to pervert a child.
	There's nothing.
	I'm laughing, but imagine losing that fight.
	Well, the thing is, I'm actually worried we will.
	We'd better not.
	I'm already seeing the Turfs are starting to win their battles.
	They are.
	They're starting to turn it around in Britain, which is good.
	Well, not just turn it around, dominate.
	Yes, but...
	No, no, you say dominate, but the thing is, all of this stuff is still in place.
	Like, all of this stuff, like, it still exists, and they still have activist groups, and they're still embedded in the system.
	No, when the TERFs are literally rooting them out and casting them into the street, then they'll be winning.
	So we got to this position by these people taking over the legal institutions, political institutions, and then they were in a position to just start attacking stuff and moving into places.
	Yes.
	Whereas the Turfs are now completely taken over those things.
	So I'm expecting over the next 10 years, the rooting out, the clearing them out, is actually going to happen.
	That's what I want to see, Turfs.
	Just doing a quick after-work shout-out for Malsy Price the 98, which is basically a combination of Master and Commander and Treasure Planet.
	And for a first time publication, it's a pretty decent read.
	It actually has some interesting twists and turns, although it kind of jumps from plot to plot.
	It might bother someone, but if you like Master and Commander, you'll understand it.
	On the subject of Master and Commander, will Carl or Bo ever do an Epochs of the Lotus Eaters about it?
	It's basically just kind of a pseudo-documentary of the life and travails of Thomas Cochran.
	You know what?
	I have never seen that film.
	I've had so many people saying, you've got to watch this film.
	There's not a single woman in it.
	Ah, okay.
	I can see why you're advertising it.
	Isn't there a list somewhere that's just, like, based movies?
	And there's just lists with women not in it at all?
	I don't know.
	I'm pretty sure Master Commander is the top one.
	But apparently it's a good film on its own, right?
	And I've never watched it, and I really should.
	But yeah, I'll see if we can do a movie review with Bo at some point about that.
	Go to the next one.
	So my last comment here was back in November where I had announced I was beginning a sequel to my second novel, Starship Halcyon Per Aspera Ad Astra.
	Well, this past weekend I finished it.
	The first draft of Cassus Belli is done and dusted.
	I've started on editing, but really I need some other pairs of eyes to look at what I've got.
	I could really use the help.
	If you're interested, contact me on my blog at goodwoodwrites.wordpress.com.
	Thank you and have a nice day.
	Cool.
	Fair enough.
	Well done.
	Good words.
	Doing a good job.
	See you on the next one.
	Dr.
	E. Frankel's Man's Search for Meaning.
	It's recommended to me by Mr.
	Crow, who threatened to take away my shiny things if I didn't read this book.
	Illustrated quite a few things in my own personal journey finding meaning.
	Perhaps the most profound is the following passage.
	What was really needed was a fundamental change in our attitude towards life.
	We had to learn ourselves, and furthermore, we had to teach the despairing men that it did not really matter what we expected from life, but rather what life expected from us.
	I wasn't able to pay attention to that because I was just looking at the river and the road that's been dug through the mountains.
	I'm thinking, really, is it easier to drill through the mountain or build a bridge over the river?
	And they were like, yeah, we're going through the mountain, bro.
	You've got to replace the bridge.
	Drill through the mountain.
	Well, good.
	You think it's not going to need maintenance?
	Not as much as the bridge.
	Do you know about the...
	I don't know what time it was made.
	I love it.
	We completely can't stop it.
	There's a story.
	I can't remember which one.
	I think it's the bridge over Wales or the one in...
	Seven.
	Seven, right?
	Where you paint it on one side.
	By the time you finish painting at the end, you have to go back to the start.
	Oh, I thought that was the Golden Gate Bridge.
	I can't remember which one.
	I think it's that one.
	Anyway, that's just the myriad of problems I imagine you have on the bridge.
	I was also just thinking, do you remember when we were in Gibraltar?
	Yeah.
	I don't think we ever got around to it, but there's like a big tunnel through the rock.
	Yeah, we never went to it.
	Damn.
	And there's also, there's some guys there who got permission by the government because there's loads of tunnels because when the war was on, they were like, right, quick, hide everyone inside.
	Yeah.
	So when Jerry comes and they take it over, there was actually a plan to have like seven guys with a little peephole right at the back of the rock watching all the sea traffic.
	So there's a myriad of tombs in there.
	It's amazing.
	And they're opening it up and turning it into a bunch of restaurants at some point.
	Oh, right.
	So I'll be able to go back and do that.
	Sorry, completely got off topic from whatever we're actually meant to be doing.
	But I'm also looking at those caves being like, yeah, I want to go back there.
	Sorry.
	Let's go to the next one.
	So we get to the protest, and there's a Green MP bitching about the energy prices, and I'm just stood here thinking, yeah, no sh**, you're the assholes that pushed for the tax rises for green energy.
	And then, they start saying that the Tories wasted money on useless PPE in the test and trace system.
	Bitch!
	If it weren't for you dipe-wearing dips, getting your panties out of water every time some pensioner croaked of a slightly different disease than our annual flus, and saying the government needs to act now, we wouldn't be in this f***ing mess to begin with.
	I've been Zenchan.
	God f***ing speed.
	Not a bad impression.
	He didn't try the American accent though.
	But I do love Razor Fist.
	You can tell he's having fun doing it as well.
	Go to the next one.
	Tony D and Little Joan with another Legend of the Pines, Lucille's Luncheonette, otherwise known as Lucille's Country Cooking.
	A place in the Pine Barrens where it's said you can see the Jersey Devil.
	You can certainly see their statue outside.
	It's located in Barnegat, New Jersey.
	It's been open for 48 years, celebrating their 48th year.
	You can get waffles with blueberries and of course the Jersey Devil cheese steak, which is cheese steak with chili and fried onions.
	I don't actually know what a cheesesteak is.
	It's literally chopped up bits of steak with cheese on it.
	It's delicious.
	So it just sounds good, doesn't it?
	I was expecting something else.
	No, why would you?
	I was expecting a huge steak with cheese lined into it.
	It's cheese.
	Oh, is it?
	American cheese?
	Yeah, of course it is.
	Oh, right.
	So it's plastic and steak.
	Yes.
	Right.
	Still quite nice, though.
	Sounds good.
	I'd still eat it.
	Not above that.
	I already mentioned about Albanese being the next Prime Minister, but I didn't explain why he will become the next Prime Minister.
	The simple reason is that the Liberal Party, which is our Conservative Party, is too divided.
	I cannot agree on anything due to ideological alliances.
	There are both centre-right and right-wing elements within the party.
	Mainly involving how much people don't like Scott Morrison because he's inept.
	To answer Harry's question, I don't think it will make a lick of difference if Al Bernese gets in.
	I'll pass that along.
	I mean, it certainly looks like Australian politics is a bug of desires.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, Baron von Warhawk says, on one hand, it's quite scummy what BLM is doing.
	On the other hand, thank God, they're only corrupt.
	Can you imagine what these trained Marxists could be capable of with that amount of cash if they actually had an ideological commitment to their revolution and were not just doing it for the grift?
	That's a great point.
	It's not true, though.
	They do have both.
	Like, they still do spend money on, well, organising riots that kill people.
	Yeah, but not much money.
	Thankfully, not all of it, I suppose.
	But then again, it's also just true of all of the socialists.
	Like, as soon as they get a large amount of cash, they do the same things.
	Yeah, but I think he's raising a good point.
	Casey says, is there anything more bourgeois than having champagne and co-curture platter in your mansion while talking about how you're too important to protest with the proletariat?
	I mean, it is ridiculous.
	It's absurd, isn't it?
	I actually, I didn't include one clip at the end, because the audio was just, again, butchered.
	Mostly because of Patrice's cackling laugh.
	But the girl on the right there, Abdullah, she mentions that, oh man, it's been so tough, and then she starts smiling and going, I've had a lot of champagne.
	It's just, it's ridiculous.
	It's been a hard life.
	Trent says, I can't believe that Lotus Eaters is denying these BLM ladies their due reparations.
	I don't think we've got any influence on whether they get those reparations or not, and it seems that they've cashed in, doesn't it?
	It's all Microsoft's money, it's not ours.
	Yeah, Google paid for reparations.
	Marcus says, it seems to be pretty normal for people to solicit donations under the guise of socialism, and then spend it on themselves, which is true.
	Kind of socialism.
	Yep.
	And Chris says, It's mad.
	It's absolutely mad.
	I got the idea of George in his car before the police came, just being like, for Patrice.
	SmallLibertarian says, I listened to the premium podcast in the car with my 20-year-old apprentice while on a long drive today.
	By 20 minutes in, he was disgusted, and by the end he was like, I don't have kids yet, but I want to commit some violence.
	The podcast about the groomers, this is.
	Oh, right, okay.
	That they did.
	I was thinking that BLM wasn't that bad, was it?
	No, no, no, no.
	I mean...
	But the point is the deliberate perversion of children.
	So well done, Harry, because that was the point.
	If you're not angry about them literally teaching your children to be what they are, then you're not paying attention.
	Robert says, Carl, they're not teaching children about anal sex.
	They're teaching them how to engage in anal sex.
	That's a good point.
	I don't know why I was so slovenly with my distinction there.
	There's a huge difference.
	And worse, they're convincing the children to keep this instruction a secret from their parents.
	Why would you give someone the instructions for IKEA furniture unless you wanted them to build the furniture?
	Point.
	The very nature of them trying to keep this hidden from their parents is what makes it so unbelievably obvious that they know they're doing the wrong thing.
	End of story.
	Stefan says, regarding the grooming, I dropped nonce flicks over cuties and never looked back.
	I have no hesitation about dropping Disney for opposing based Florida man.
	Fight the degeneracy wherever you find the opportunity.
	Beatings will continue.
	The beatings will continue until morals improve.
	Good.
	Justin says, a lot of the progressive rhetoric seems to be about keeping themselves in a perpetual state of childhood where everything is done for them.
	I wonder if that explains their fascination with sexualizing children.
	There is little difference in maturity between themselves and children.
	Yeah, there's a lot to it, I think.
	Probably write to me about this at some point.
	Anyway, going on to Jon Stewart because we're running out of time.
	BaldEagle1787 says, It's unfortunate that what's happened to Jon Stewart.
	I remember watching the Daily Show and the Colbert Report to get my news.
	Now, Stewart was full of the victim of the too-big-to-fail mindset.
	After he left the Daily Show and saw it turn to crap, he started building the mentality that he was the Daily Show and can't do anything wrong.
	and what we see now is the horrid results.
	George Hap says, "John Stewart hasn't changed.
	"He's always pandered to the left, "and when challenged on his lies, "he used the 'I'm a comedian' defense.
	"Him attacking his fellow white people "is sadly typical for a certain demographic of SJWs." I think he has changed.
	I think we can actually, demonstrably, as Callum showed with the clip, map how he's changed his definition of what a racist is.
	So that before, he was like, look, actual racists and people you're calling racists are not the same thing, whereas now, KKK and abolitionists, there's no difference in John Stewart's To say he's of the left, so he hasn't changed.
	Yeah, he's always been left-wing.
	To say he's of the left consistently, that's true.
	But it's, again, the left has changed a lot.
	And we can look this back, not just in John Stewart, but, I mean, Bill Clinton's speech is about immigration.
	Yeah.
	Well, his speech is about America.
	Bill Clinton built a war.
	Anything from Bill Clinton actually doesn't match up with today's Democrats.
	You know what's amazing, though, is that Donald Trump's platform is essentially identical to Bill Clinton's platform.
	On foreign policy, yeah.
	On a lot of things.
	Yeah.
	But I'm not even joking.
	How do we defend ourselves from the foreigners?
	Yeah.
	But no, it's not just that.
	There are other things where Trump is basically a Clintonite.
	A 90s Democrat, basically.
	Well, also on the fact that we don't need all our troops over there, Clinton did bring back some of them to try and reduce from the world.
	And the criticism was that we weren't there to stop Bin Laden.
	I will show you.
	I'll go through Clinton's platform at some point.
	Anyway, I think we're out of time.
	Also, I'm going to make some of those cheese sticks.
	I've sent you a recipe.
	Sounds good.
	Now I'm hungry.
	Anyway, we're out of time.
	If you'd like more from us, please go over to lodaciers.com and subscribe to get access to all the premium content and help fund the show.
	To those who are, thank you immensely.
	We wouldn't be here without you.
	Otherwise, we'll be back tomorrow at one o'clock.

▲