Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 22, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:32:36

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #159

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast The Lotus Eaters for the 22nd of June 2021.
	I'm joined by Carl.
	Hello.
	And today we're going to be talking about the Juneteenth Massacre.
	The white pupils have been neglected for decades, so say MPs, and also Queer Wars, which I assume that's a follow-up to Race Wars or Race Report or whatever it was.
	Yeah.
	Sounds like another Channel 4 TV show.
	Just to quickly correct you, it's not the Juneteenth Massacre, it's massacres.
	Ah, yeah.
	Multiple.
	Because there's been more than one.
	Yeah.
	For Happy Juneteenth.
	Yes.
	So, first thing I wanted to mention was the premium video, the interview Josh did with Jeegan Park, the North Korean defector, who went through absolute hell, in my view, and then ended up in the UK. She's been here for 12 years now, and is giving her perspective on what it's like living in the UK, living in North Korea, all the rest of it, in this interview, which I highly recommend.
	I very much enjoyed this one.
	Just to give us a quick spoiler, how does she feel that the UK is going?
	Yeah, so one thing we didn't quite get the message, you know, specifically was the question you asked after the interview, which was how, you know, what is the West doing wrong from her perspective as a North Korean defector?
	And she sent me a message back, which I probably put up underneath somewhere as a quote, but she said, what was it?
	Ideologies such as feminism, anti-racism, structuralism, and so on and so forth have infected Europe, and they control the people's thoughts and actions in a totalitarian way.
	I was like...
	Well, we told you.
	It's, you know, it's embarrassing to see.
	I mean, we've had it with Yomi Park recently saying that, what is it, Yale is crazier than North Korea.
	Yeah.
	Which is true, actually.
	North Korean ideology is easier to understand.
	Yeah, North Korean defectors are like, by the way, the West is going crazy.
	Why?
	Yeah.
	But it did make me think, you know, 1984, where, you know, everywhere's meant to be totalitarian assholes?
	Like, if Winston traveled to East Asia and it was all wokest, and it was totalitarian still, but I mean, you were free to do what you want, but I mean, you can't say what you want.
	I don't know.
	Anyway, something to think about.
	So, last thing I wanted to mention was also there's a bunch of clips of this in case you haven't signed up on the YouTube channel, lotus.com.
	Words there.
	So, go and subscribe to that if you haven't and check out the clips on there if you're not a premium member.
	But please do become a premium member because that's how we fund everything.
	So, that's that.
	Also, Zoom call this Friday with Gold Tier members.
	I think that's correct.
	So, what is that?
	We usually do that about 4 o'clock till 5 o'clock.
	So, if you're a Gold Tier, come and join us on the Zoom call.
	We just take questions and hang out because that's fun.
	Yeah.
	I mean, just to be clear, we are entirely funded by people signing up and subscribing to the website, because I got accused of being funded by Russia on Mines.com the other day.
	It's like, weird.
	I mean, it makes a difference on Gab I get accused of being funded by Israel.
	Just some random account, you know.
	It's like, okay.
	Actually, why not?
	We're funded by an international conspiracy of people who all enjoy our content.
	Yeah, I mean, it probably includes a Russian or two, but we're glad to have them.
	Yeah, exactly.
	We're actually quite inclusive.
	But after the podcast, we'll be recording the new book club, which is Neither Left Nor Right, A History of Fascist Ideology in France by Ziv Sternhell.
	And really looking forward to doing it because it's very eye-opening and enlightening.
	But anyway, let's get on.
	So, yeah, let's talk about the Juneteenth Massacres.
	Now, I, not being an American, wasn't really aware of what Juneteenth was.
	And so I went to Juneteenth.com to find out.
	To be fair, I don't think most Americans are either.
	No, they're not.
	It's something that they seem to have kind of astroturfed.
	The left specifically is astroturfed.
	And we'll get to how we know it's the left that's astroturfed this at the end of this segment.
	But anyway, so Juneteenth, they say, is the oldest nationally celebrated commemoration of the ending of slavery in the United States.
	So a Republican holiday.
	That's what we're saying.
	Because remember, the Democrats were very much on the other side of that question, as well as every other racial question, until about five years ago, when they were suddenly like, oh, actually, white people are bad.
	So, hmm.
	White people.
	White people.
	They kept the brown people are inferior part.
	Yes.
	So just white people also bad.
	Yes.
	But the thing is, this change in the world, we can narrow that down.
	It's not white people, because there are lots of white Republicans who are anti-slavery.
	So actually, we can take the Republicans out and just narrow it down to Democrats.
	So anyway, from its Galveston, Texas origin in 1685, the observance of June 19th as the African-American Emancipation Day is spread across the United States and beyond.
	Today, Juneteenth commemorates African-American freedom and emphasizes education and achievement.
	It's a day, a week, and in some areas a month marked with celebrations, guest speakers, picnics, and family gatherings.
	It's a time for reflection and rejoicing.
	It's a time for assessment, self-improvement, and for planning for the future.
	No, it wasn't.
	That's all.
	It's growing popularity signifies a level of maturity and dignity in America long overdue.
	It's in cities across the country, people of all races, nationalities and religions are joining hand to truthfully acknowledge a period in our history that's shaped and continues to influence our society today.
	Since ties to the conditions and experiences of others, only then can we make significant and lasting improvements to our society.
	You effing wish that was what was going on on Juneteenth.
	You wish.
	Nothing of the sort.
	So...
	As I said, right, massacres was the worst of it, but just mass brawls was also normal.
	This was in Long Branch, New Jersey, where, for some reason, a massive brawl about beating up this one white woman broke out.
	I mean, I'm just saying, if we were talking, what was it?
	Dignity?
	I think that's something that we've thrown to the wind, isn't it?
	Just looking at this.
	What dignity are we looking at here?
	Twerking women?
	Dignified?
	Same sentence?
	Make sense?
	Are we reflecting here?
	Are we emphasizing education and achievement here?
	Doesn't look like it to me, but what do I know?
	I'm just a foreigner looking at this.
	So according to National File, this area got locked down because of riots.
	Parents are reporting their children are locked in businesses that they work in with no way to get out.
	Police reports in riot gear trying to control the scene.
	Numerous fights involving police and vandalism.
	And the video footage shows a pair of black women ruthlessly beating a white female attendee.
	Don't know why.
	Countless members of the crowd cheer on and jeer, as well as throwing their own jabs at the victim.
	Because, why not?
	Something to do, I guess.
	Something to do.
	I mean, she is white, so...
	She was asking for it.
	That's basically the message I got from it.
	But remember, maturity and dignity in America...
	Moving on, we'll actually get to the murders.
	This first one was in Flint, Michigan, where a black woman drove past the cop and took a shot at him for some reason.
	For some reason, Brianna Sykes wouldn't put her gun down.
	She missed the cop.
	I'm not going to play the video because it's actually really harrowing because this guy obviously does not want to be in this position.
	But she wouldn't put her gun down.
	She goes to shoot him again, so he shoots her.
	The car rolls off, and you just see him on the floor, just crying.
	He has an absolute breakdown that this has been forced upon him.
	But preliminary investigation, according to Newsweek, the officer, who is working at traffic point at the Juneteenth Celebration Parade, was fired upon by the lone occupant of a vehicle who drove up to him at the traffic point.
	Upon taking fire, the officer returned fire, striking the suspect, killing her.
	Why?
	Because he's a cot, and he's white, and she's not.
	That's why.
	Just to say for the police officer, he shouldn't feel bad at all.
	No, no.
	You've saved your own life and probably someone else's.
	Absolutely.
	I mean, I should have got the video just so you could see the guy's harrowing response to what he was forced to do.
	Because he was walking around the car.
	We couldn't hear him because it's being recorded from within someone else's car.
	But you can see him shouting.
	And he's obviously shouting, put the gun down, put the gun down, put the gun down.
	And she obviously doesn't.
	And then he shoots her.
	And it's like, right, okay, that's awful.
	The next one is in Aurora, Colorado.
	Reported by the Denver Post.
	A man was killed and four other people wounded at a mass shooting in Aurora at a gathering that was related to a Juneteenth celebration.
	Thanks.
	Related?
	How related?
	Well, it was a Juneteenth celebration.
	Okay.
	So therefore it's related to the Juneteenth celebration.
	Yes.
	But the one theme that seems to underpin all of these shootings is that they're not done by white people.
	The white man didn't turn up and start killing black people.
	No.
	No.
	Black people turned up and started killing black people.
	But the white man probably sold them the guns, right?
	Well, it's entirely possible.
	I mean...
	Do you remember Claudia Webb?
	That was her defense.
	Was that her argument?
	I didn't know that.
	She was like, it's still a white man's fault.
	Why?
	Because he sold the guns.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	But black people have no agency, according to Claudia Webb.
	Disavow.
	Right.
	The next one is Granger, Indiana, where one man was killed, four other people wounded.
	It is shooting at a Juneteenth celebration.
	Why?
	Why are they doing this?
	We'll get to that in a minute, actually.
	York County, South Carolina.
	York County Sheriff's Office is investigating two separate shootings that happened at the Juneteenth celebration in Clover SC Saturday.
	At least three people were shot in one shooting.
	Deputies say someone shot at a car in a separate shooting.
	So multiple shootings at this Juneteenth celebration.
	Why?
	Why are they doing it?
	Why are they shooting each other at the celebration of the emancipation of black people in America?
	A bunch of black people get together and shoot each other to death.
	Why?
	It could be Uncle Ruckus types turning up.
	Oh no, God no.
	No, no, no, no.
	That's absolutely not the case.
	The next one is Charlotte in North Carolina.
	Police released disturbing videos of two individuals in Charlotte, North Carolina, shooting multiple times during a Juneteenth celebration that left three dead.
	Shots were fired towards a crowd of 400 gathered for an impromptu street party.
	In addition to the three killed, six others were wounded.
	The video is flat-out jarring and incomprehensible, says a police spokesperson.
	You see the level of violence.
	It just takes your breath away.
	Shall we return to our mature and dignified conversation about a long-overdue reckoning in America?
	I mean, does this happen at Thanksgiving as well?
	People start killing each other in the streets in America, or...?
	Not that I'm aware of.
	This seems to be a...
	I mean, maybe.
	Maybe it does.
	But this seems to be a particular Juneteenth celebration.
	The next one is in Raleigh, North Carolina, where a Wake County MS worker was shot.
	This is an emergency services.
	This is an ambulance.
	A worker was shot Saturday evening while responding to a call at Juneteenth celebrations in Raleigh.
	So they shot someone, and the emergency services turned up, and they shot them too.
	The shooting took place just after 6.45pm, according to the Raleigh Police Department.
	How are we feeling about all this?
	I mean, that's one of the things, I think, when it's just the end of civilization in a local area.
	When you start shooting, the medics turn up.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I mean, I would have thought that people just randomly shooting into crowds of people who are celebrating the emancipation of an entire race of people, as if that doesn't signify the end of civilization.
	Would you start shooting the medics who try to save lives?
	Yes.
	It's pretty awful.
	The next one is in Granger, Indiana.
	I mean, this is just all over the country.
	All over the country in these areas.
	About 4am in the morning, so Heritage Square in Granger, a bar in the complex was a setting for a party that drew a very large crowd.
	Upon arrival, officers learned that multiple people had been shot.
	Five people hit by gunfire, four sustained non-life-threatening injuries, and one was killed.
	An hour later, a second shooting was reported at a different intersection.
	One person apparently killed by gunfire.
	They don't appear to be related, apparently, and so they're two separate shootings at these Juneteenth celebrations.
	Why are they doing this to themselves?
	Why is this happening?
	Why can nobody have an honest conversation about what's happening here?
	Where's BLM? Where's BLM? That's a great question.
	Where is BLM? Anyway, moving on to Oakland, California.
	You can imagine this one went well.
	Authorities say Monday that the mass shootings that killed one man and tore up a massive Juneteenth celebration around Lake Merritt was carried out by multiple shooters.
	Huh.
	But now we finally get a kind of...
	Why is this happening?
	They think it's connected to gangs.
	Really?
	Really?
	Gangs in the black community in America that would just have such little concern for the life of other people.
	They'd just start firing into a crowd of revelers.
	Unbelievable.
	I've never heard of such a thing.
	And then shooting the paramedics.
	And then shooting the paramedics as well.
	The individuals responsible were multiple shooters, not just one.
	We've learned over the past couple of days that several people fired weapons during this event.
	But yeah, so a bunch of people obviously died.
	One person died there and a bunch of people were hit.
	Seven people had been injured and one person was killed.
	The person was killed at 22 years old.
	Young person.
	Life snuffed out.
	22.
	While he was at a party.
	Well, whilst he was celebrating the emancipation, I'd say.
	Yeah.
	Remember Sasha Johnson?
	Yeah.
	Exactly the same thing happened to her.
	Gang feud in the black community.
	She gets shot as a bystander.
	At a party.
	This is something that happens in America and is now happening here.
	But the worst part about this, really, and I think this shows the level of absolute inhumanity that is being demonstrated, frankly, by the communities themselves, is this video of the emergency services turning up to take away someone who is bleeding, presumably badly, and the crowd doesn't let them leave, but instead Women begin twerking on the ambulance so they can't go.
	I mean...
	This is a total lack of empathy for anyone outside of, I guess, their particular bubble.
	A person is bleeding out in the ambulance, and they won't let the ambulance leave.
	And instead, they're doing something utterly degenerate.
	There's a chap who climbs on top and starts throwing a football around.
	This is a total wantonness when it comes to consideration of human life.
	They don't care.
	They do not care.
	There is another human being and they're dying.
	And they're preventing him from getting out.
	I mean, there's something to be said.
	We've spoken before about, say, take specific terrorist attacks that have been absolutely atrocious in the torture, right?
	And that being barbaric.
	I think this might be a lower level of civilization.
	Yeah.
	I think standing on top of an ambulance that's trying to leave with someone who's seriously injured...
	A black person is seriously injured in the ambulance, right?
	So if we're talking about black solidarity, Black Lives Matter, these people don't care about black lives at all.
	And you can see it.
	They're concerned with their own vanity.
	I mean, are you just a material animal who wants sex?
	Like, you're twerking on an ambulance with a guy that needs to go to hospital.
	You're actively preventing it from happening.
	It's the most disgusting thing I've ever seen in my life.
	I just can't get over it.
	The implications for the moral and ethical condition of these communities are astounding.
	It's disgusting that this could happen.
	It's beyond the pale.
	But anyway, let's move on to Chicago.
	21 people were shot that day in Chicago.
	The thing is, I don't even know if these are connected to Juneteenth celebrations because every day in Chicago, multiple people are shot.
	Mass shooting every day in Chicago.
	It's not even mass shootings.
	It's 21 individual shootings, probably.
	Because Chicago is an absolute hellhole.
	I mean, these people are literally living in hell.
	The one that really got the attention of the international press and media, not the local native media to the United States, of course, was when a Puerto Rican man was involved in some sort of No concern for human life.
	In front of his family.
	Shot his wife too, but she's probably going to live.
	Thankfully, I guess, didn't shoot the kid.
	I guess, thank God for small mercies.
	But just shot him right in front of his kid.
	Just bam!
	Just execution in the street over a bumper.
	Like, two cars bumping.
	This is unreal.
	This is just unreal.
	The total lack of consideration and concern for human life.
	Yeah, but he disrespected me by hitting my bumper.
	Probably something like that.
	I don't know.
	Or ended his life in front of his children.
	I don't know.
	But if that's the condition of the black community in America, I want to know who did this to them.
	This isn't how they started.
	The black community in America has not always had this kind of level of, like, low ethics.
	I mean, just non-civilisation.
	There is nothing there.
	It didn't used to be this way.
	Like, if you're twerking on an ambulance with someone who shot inside and killing people over nada, you don't have a civilisation.
	There is none.
	I mean, you can read Thomas Sowell.
	And in Wealth, Poverty and Politics, he goes through the things like, you know, earnings rates, marriage rates, and delinquency in the black community from 1950 onwards.
	And it's in the 70s that they bring in welfare, and then it's in the 80s that they get a massive spike in crime.
	It wasn't always like this.
	Right.
	And it's hard to, it's easy for the, you know, if you've got like, you know, white nationalists and racists on one side going, well, that's just what black people like.
	That's what they're like.
	No, this is the product of a certain set of social conditions that have frankly been brought about by the Democrats.
	And this, it wasn't always like this.
	We've got the statistics, we've got the numbers.
	This is new.
	And this is the product of, I think the sort of racial divisiveness where the Democrats said, look, black people can do nothing wrong.
	And they've always been held back by white people.
	And therefore, Nothing they do is ever their fault, and I think this is the product of that.
	It's a good thing that Juneteenth has been made a national holiday in America, I suppose, so we can have these shootings every year.
	I mean, people need the time off work, I suppose, to kill each other.
	But all the Republicans in the Senate and the overwhelming majority of the Republicans in the House joined the Democrats to make Juneteenth the new National Independence Day, despite only 7% of Republican voters supporting this.
	Weird, isn't it?
	Because this has been astroturfed, that's why.
	Why the heck would they vote for this?
	Because the Democrats can say, well, it was the Republicans who freed the slaves, and that's true.
	And so the Republicans are looking and going, hmm, we probably have an obligation to honour this, but the Democrats are obviously using this as a form of racial division, and so the Republicans have kind of blundered into a Democrat trap.
	Obviously, the sensible voting public can see that, which is why 93% of them are like, no, not even slightly, but the politicians are idiots, basically.
	But yeah, so this is awful.
	This is the condition of the black community in America.
	And I think it looks like hell on earth to me.
	I think that anyone who thinks this is a sustainable and decent thing to have done to black people in America is an evil person.
	And I honestly can't imagine living like this.
	And I don't think it's because they're black.
	I think it's because they're the victims of the Democrats.
	Just a lack of standards.
	Total lack of standards.
	Sorry, I just can't think of anything less than uncivilized to be twerking on an ambulance.
	That's disgusting.
	I mean, just shooting into a crowd over a gang grievance is just the worst thing ever.
	And then for a bunch of people to either attack the EMTs or prevent them from leaving...
	As low as that is, I can see the pathetic rationale of, like, he's disrespecting me, therefore I'll kill him, or whatever.
	I can't see the rationale for twerking on an ambulance and stopping him from leaving.
	Like, you've got to be real, special kind of brain dead.
	Genuinely psychopathic.
	Yeah.
	Genuinely psychopathic.
	And it wasn't just one, it was like ten people then.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Like ten girls all coming out, shaking their ass.
	And a bunch of guys doing it, a guy jumping on top of them, throwing a football and stuff.
	So you guys are actual psychopaths.
	You actually don't have any form of empathy or human connection to anyone else.
	And like I said, it hasn't always been this way.
	It's not because black people are genetically determined to do this or something.
	It's because excuse after excuse after excuse is made for the black community by the Democrats on the assumption they've always been held back by white people.
	The white man hasn't done this.
	The white man is not oppressing the black person, and it's not because of some sort of necessary thing about black people.
	It's just about a bunch of social conditions that have allowed this to happen, and they've got to stop.
	Sorry.
	It's not very exciting.
	It's not very funny, but it's bloody awful.
	And I just felt it's about lack of standards.
	Well, I suppose going on to some good news at least.
	So this is good news.
	I think I'll lighten you right out.
	Okay.
	So you remember the race report?
	Which was exciting because it blew the leftist narrative out of the water on race while the government's gone and done it again.
	And I think we have to give our thanks to, what is it, Tony Saul and Kevin Baden-Ock for this one.
	So, this is the front page of the BBC. I bet they love posting this one.
	Poor white pupils let down and neglected MPs.
	Now, I find this very interesting because of the timing of it, as in, Jimmy News starts, what, about a week ago now?
	And suddenly the BBC's like, oh yeah, by the way, you know, the white working class has been left behind because of diversity.
	Because of the mindset of the left being intersectionalist, so on and so forth.
	Entirely.
	Yeah.
	Viewing white people as a homogenous block that have just oppressed non-white people since the dawn of time.
	But this thing, this seems like a response to GB News.
	As in, oh, well, if you're going to make sure that that's something people talk about and GB News smashing the ratings, then suddenly the BBC is like, well, I guess we have to talk about this.
	Hang on, we need an audience too.
	Exactly.
	Otherwise they're going to pull our license, which they should do regardless of what your audience is.
	Yes.
	Anyway.
	So they're saying here, the committee's chairman, Robert Helfand, accuses the government of, quote, muddled thinking.
	Not muddled thinking, it's leftist thinking.
	in failing to target support and the disenfranchised white pupils who underachieve from early years through the GCSE's A-levels and university entry.
	He says, if you think it's about poverty, then it doesn't explain why most other ethnic groups do much better.
	At GCSE in 2019, 18% of white British pupils on free school meals achieved grade four in English and maths compared to 23% for the average pupils on free school meals.
	Sorry, whites, the poorest.
	Yeah, the free school meals thing being a measure of economic prosperity.
	Are you poor or not?
	That's essentially what the shorthand is for there.
	So, for university entry, it gets even worse.
	16% of white British pupils on free school meals get a place.
	Sorry, just to interrupt.
	Again, I hate the racialisation of this.
	I don't want to racialise the conversation in America either, but it is, so there's no getting around that.
	But again, the use of white here, what they mean is English.
	It's English pupils.
	Or Scottish or Welsh.
	They're not talking about French.
	There's a difficulty here, we'll get into it in a minute, which is with white British, that has to also include Irish and whatnot, although the numbers are not significantly different to a massive degree between English white and Irish white in this case.
	But they say for 59% of black African pupils, so pupils who are descendants of black West Africans, as in directly, get that clear, 59% of them who are on free school meals make it into university.
	59% of those from Bangladesh make it into university.
	Caribbean, 32%.
	So, West African and Caribbean, huge difference again in just the success rates.
	But exactly the same sort of, you know, people.
	Genetic stock.
	Genetic stock, yeah, but completely different outcome.
	But 32% for Black Caribbean.
	White British, 16%.
	I mean, just abject failure compared to every other group there.
	But a Labour MP on the committee, Kim Johnson, rejected the references to white privilege as trying to stoke a culture war.
	Shut up!
	And said that the report was avoiding the lacking of investment in education in local communities.
	God, the fact that a Labour MP could be like, oh, you're trying to stoke a culture war?
	Shut up!
	You are the authors of a culture war against British culture.
	Hashtag BLM. It's just so pathetic.
	Anyway, but we'll get into the...
	Hashtag trans women and women.
	The left's pathetic response to this, because they have really blown them the hell out.
	Like, they've got no defence, and it's really embarrassing.
	Good.
	So if we go to the next link here, you can see this is the House of Commons Education Committee tweeting about this.
	And then if we go to the next link, this should be the report itself, which you can go and read in your time if you wish.
	So it's titled, The Forgotten, How White Working Class Pupils Have Been Let Down and How to Change It.
	The Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities defines white privilege as the idea that there are societal privileges that benefit white people over other ethnic groups in some societies, particularly if they are otherwise under the same social, political or economic circumstances.
	They're defining white privilege there for the purposes of saying it's garbage.
	We are concerned that the phrase may be alienating to disadvantaged white communities and it may have contributed towards systemic neglect of white people facing hardship who also need specific support.
	I can't help but notice that they're capitalising the W in white here.
	Interesting, isn't it?
	That's not usual for government documents.
	No, and it shouldn't be done, in my opinion.
	And they shouldn't capitalise the B in black, either.
	No.
	I'm in agreement there.
	Well, it turns it into a proper noun.
	As if this is an actual constituency.
	And it's not.
	And I hate it.
	Anyway, sorry, carry on.
	They don't usually do this.
	I know someone in here is, I presume, having fun.
	So, some research from the United States also suggests that learning about white privilege may reduce sympathy for white people who are struggling with poverty.
	We've seen this a million times.
	You know, the Trump sport is probably the best example of it, of people who are voting Trump in 2016 because, you know, he lost jobs, blah, blah, blah, blah.
	That's the narrative.
	And yet the response from the left, what is it?
	It's like, you're a bunch of racists.
	I didn't put my earphone in.
	I don't think we have any clips anyway, so don't worry about that.
	It's more than that, though.
	It's not just, oh, it'll reduce sympathy for white people.
	I mean, it's literally framing...
	It breeds hatred.
	It's literally framing white people as the perennial oppressors of non-white people.
	So obviously that's going to be a consequence, but obviously, therefore, withholding help from white people becomes a duty.
	It doesn't just become something incidental, it's something that is good to do.
	But also non-white people and other white people should hate white people because they're oppressors.
	off that argument.
	Kemme Badenoch.
	We share concerns with the Minister for Equalities, Kemme Badenoch MP, that there is a risk of some pernicious ideology beginning to spread to organisations and charities that work with children.
	Organisations which are in receipt of taxpayers' money should have full regard for their duties under the Equality Act 2010 and should consider whether the concept of white privilege is consistent with those duties.
	So explicitly threatening charities and organisations that take government money.
	You start teaching this stuff, we're going to take your money away.
	Good.
	Which you should do.
	Our inquiry has shown that poor white pupils are far from privileged in education.
	What a statement.
	I'm glad we give the Conservatives a lot of stick.
	Occasionally when they do something like this, it's good, because they just completely destroy the left's narrative, and good on them.
	Well, it's not the Conservatives.
	Reality is destroying the left-wing narrative.
	Yeah, the Conservatives are putting in the public eye.
	They're just being brave enough to finally admit it.
	Yes.
	So free school meal eligible boys from mixed white and black Caribbean and black Caribbean backgrounds sometimes achieve similar or lower schools to free school meal eligible boys from white British backgrounds.
	Free school meals eligible girls from a white British background while scoring higher than boys are also consistently schooling lower than free school meal eligible girls from other ethnic groups.
	So that being the point there.
	That also implies that the schooling system is geared towards women, which I suppose 30 years of feminism will do that, won't it?
	So this is the point they make and the point where they point out the different gaps there.
	They mention about the men and women difference, but they're not really too sure what to do with it.
	There's no real recommendations on how to solve that, so I'm not focusing on it too much here.
	So they say in the attainment gap, 53% of, let's just say, instead of the long word of free school meals eligible, poor.
	So 53% of poor white British pupils met the expected standard of development against the average of poor pupils, 55%.
	This was the lowest percentage for all poor ethnic group or other Irish travellers, Gypsy Roma and white Irish.
	So the lowest scoring individuals there being the Irish Gypsies, so on and so forth, who are all white because they're part of the white group, but the white British, complex situation to...
	Yeah, well, the problem with the Roma community is they actively reject, like, the civilization around them.
	Yeah.
	So what are you going to do?
	There's not much you can do there.
	So then you go to the summation.
	The summation here I found disappointing, let's say, because they issue some recommendations, so the next link, in which they say, for example, that they want to channel funding to schools that struggle to recruit and retain the best staff or ensuring all pupils get the best careers advice.
	Okay?
	Like, I don't know.
	Why aren't they doing that anyway?
	They're saying they're disappointed with the government spending $18 million or something stupid.
	They should do this instead.
	That's not really amazing either.
	I would say that the best thing to do would actually be just do your advice, which is to get rid of the entire qualities department, get rid of all this interfering in race and just let people be free, and then let them achieve what they want to achieve.
	I would also question the obvious and overt institutional bias of teachers towards the Labour Party.
	Why do two-thirds, more than in fact, two-thirds of teachers in the United Kingdom vote Labour?
	Good question.
	But the thing here for me is just the endless finicketing with race.
	Like, I've seen, what was it, Trevor Phillips even talked about this?
	He's like, oh, and now white kids are performing at us.
	We should have special programs to help other white kids.
	I'm like, no, sod off.
	Just leave us alone, for Christ's sake.
	We don't need your meddling in race.
	This is what we covered yesterday with the whites need not apply section.
	So the fact that the BBC is offering opportunities that are only open to black, Asian, ethnic, diverse candidates.
	If they start opening opportunities to whites only, in an effort to help out these pupils...
	Well, if they want to equalise things...
	That would be the logical conclusion.
	I'd rather you just didn't.
	I'd rather you just sod off.
	Just let people be free, for Christ's sake.
	Also, the idea that white privilege is the thing they use endlessly in the report.
	I like that they're calling it out.
	I like that they're destroying the left's narrative on this.
	Good for all that.
	Points.
	But the idea that that's the most fundamental thing, that's the peak of an iceberg of open discrimination.
	Yeah.
	I mean, the fact that the BBC is openly saying if you're white, don't apply.
	Screw white privilege for a second.
	If you're being told by the state broadcaster your skin tone means you can't have a job, I would say that's far more demoralising.
	Anyway, so leftists mad, because leftists are always mad.
	Islamo-leftists, in fact.
	In particular.
	So the first one here, Nasir Afzal, who has done some good work on the grooming gang, so proud for him there, but on everything else, his political views are lacking.
	So here he says...
	Wow, that's such a low bar, isn't it?
	Well, he's against the institutional rape of children, but on everything else, he's got terrible opinions.
	So there's very few people who apparently are against the institutional rape of children in the UK, so he gets that brownie point.
	This is amazing, right?
	White privilege isn't that white people, especially poor working class, don't suffer, then don't bring it up.
	You agree.
	White people, especially the poor working class, suffer.
	Then white privilege is not something that they really benefit from because they're suffering.
	His argument is that they don't suffer because of the colour.
	Okay, great, but they're still suffering.
	Liar.
	Sure, but let's put that aside for a minute.
	Even within his own logic, it's not that they don't suffer.
	Okay, do they suffer?
	Yes, they suffer.
	But okay, it's not because of the colour.
	Okay, big deal.
	But they are still suffering, so who cares?
	Why did you bring it up?
	It's your divisiveness on race that has made you be able to carve out a section of white people.
	You can go, we don't care about their suffering because they're white.
	That's why white privilege is such a pernicious thing, as Kemi Badendock says.
	And again, he admits here, they are suffering, so shut up, Nazir.
	But they're also suffering because of their colour.
	Like him saying that's not happening.
	They are.
	I mean, we've got the examples of the jobs, we've got the examples of the institutionalization of this.
	Also, you work on grooming gang crime, for Christ's sake.
	You know about this.
	You can't act like you don't know that there was a racial and religious aspect to all that crime.
	Well, I suppose it depends how much you'd like to stick your head in the sand and pretend that only white people can be racist.
	Weird.
	Weird guy.
	Anyway, let me...
	Brings out the stock Labour Party response to being like, ew, it's about the Tories.
	Yeah, shut up.
	So we go to the next one here.
	This is another person complaining about this.
	And if you scroll down, there's a video from BBC a while back, which I believe you've spoken about before, in which this guy is just whining about the fact that white privilege is really the fact that white people don't suffer for their race.
	It's further down than just John.
	It's the bold guy.
	You've seen him on the BBC before.
	In which he's...
	Yeah, this one.
	Which is being brought up again.
	He posted this back in February.
	I've seen it reposted a million times.
	You can see three million views there for this nonsense.
	I'm pretty sure BBC Bitesize is designed for children, yeah.
	So they're racially propagandising children.
	There'd be another example for the white pupils, why they might be under-attaining, if they're literally being told from their own children's state outlet that they're inferior.
	Sorry, they're evil, but their counterparts are inferior.
	Yeah, not only that, they're being told this by people who don't share their skin tone as well.
	So if we're having conversations about representation, this isn't very representative.
	If that matters.
	Just an evil thing to do to children.
	It's absolutely evil.
	I mean, evil to do to adults.
	To do it to children, you're sick.
	Anyway, so then we have Paul Mason, the communist.
	He's breaking down about this because he doesn't know what to do.
	So if we go to the next link, this is him complaining.
	I've just gone through some of this, so I'm going to read out what I wrote.
	Before we do, Paul Mason is just an outright communist.
	He said, the only flag I care about is the flag of the Paris Commune.
	Yes.
	The only flag I'd have on was war.
	Yeah, he couldn't be more communist.
	He's a historic communist.
	Anyway, sorry.
	So he says, you have to understand the British elite's war on leftist ideologies as reactions, not actions.
	BLM triggers the war on woke.
	The huge Gaza El Oscar demos trigger the new attack on the concept of white privilege.
	What?
	Good.
	You think people in the British right care about Gaza?
	Yeah, but let's assume that that's all true.
	Good.
	There should be a war on woke.
	Woke is an awful racist ideology, and nobody gives a damn about Gaza, but they do care that white privilege is being used as an excuse to target white people.
	What a stupid way of thinking, like, yeah, the British right really cares about Gaza and the Alaska mosques, that's why they're talking about white privilege.
	No, it's because the government just released a report on it.
	Dummy.
	Anyway, so he says in here that soon there'll be a full-blown attempt to ban critical race theory.
	If Fox is banging on about critical race theory 10,000 times a month, but the UK, Times, and Sky are not, things feel out of joint.
	That's right.
	Certainly do.
	That's right!
	Except Sky is not owned by Fox, so I don't know what he's talking about.
	They're owned by the MSNBC Comcast.
	Yeah, but GB News hopefully should be banging on about banning critical race theory.
	As anyone should.
	So he says, So the whole Anglosphere, from Sydney to Belfast, has to jump to the rhythm of the GOP right.
	God, let's hope so.
	God, yeah.
	Sky News Australia leading the way.
	Mashallah.
	Mashallah.
	Which in turn is the willing host of fascist groups and ideologies.
	Okay, they're not.
	And Paul, I'll explain to you in great depth after this podcast, as we record, where fascism comes from, you fucking commie.
	You are the creator of fascism, just so you know.
	Sorry, Karen, I'm not going to get...
	I'm getting wound up by all of you.
	Yeah, but you're spoiling it.
	I know, sorry.
	If there's an industry in promoting the rights and achievements of ethnic minority pupils, that's because of the basic social need.
	It's just another fascist-feeding insult cocked up by the Tory racists to denigrate the efforts of migrant children and those trying to give them an equal start.
	That's right, Paul.
	I don't know anything about the words I'm using either.
	That's why I just blather on.
	You can't say Tory and fascist and think that means the same thing.
	You're an idiot if you don't see them as polar opposites.
	But of course, we've established you're an idiot, Paul.
	I mean, eventually I don't want to spoil the podcast I'm going to do after this, but you know what, actually, why not?
	Because the point here is just like, fascism has absolutely nothing to do with Tory's conservatism or anything like that.
	It doesn't make sense.
	Fascism is an inherently revolutionary ideology, and Tory means conservative, Paul.
	Revolution, conservative.
	Revolution, conservative.
	And you're like, yeah, there's no difference.
	They're the same picture.
	Idiot.
	Idiot.
	The Tories have seen the mobilising power of the anti-critical race theory movement stirred up by Fox.
	I really wish they have.
	Despite ladling time and attention to the Gammon Channel, it's not working here.
	They need angry white parents at school gates.
	Right, we have our marching orders slapped.
	Paul Mason has spoken.
	Great point, Paul.
	Great point, we do, yeah.
	The Tory report says to elderly white racists, quote...
	What framing?
	What framing is that?
	If your kids are trapped in a dead-end job on low pay in a town that's experienced social death, don't blame the hedge funds, the landowners, the corrupt politicians.
	Blame the kid with brown skin and their teachers.
	No one's blaming the kid with brown skin, Paul.
	We're blaming communists.
	The left.
	White communists, incidentally, Paul.
	People like you, who sit there and try to draw a distinction between the brown and the white kids.
	That's the problem.
	You're the problem.
	The segregationists are the bad guys, Paul.
	Yes.
	I don't know if that was clear.
	They've always been the left-wingers, Paul.
	I don't want to hear from politicians who can't state, Britain is structurally racist, its society is systemically racist because it was founded on slavery and colonialism, and the same system keeps poor white children in their place.
	Well, you got 81 likes on that, Paul, so it looks like no one wants to hit on you either.
	But I don't want to hear from politicians who aren't able to say that Britain's the worst place on Earth.
	It's founded on racism and slavery.
	What on Earth are you saying?
	Like, you so imported the American-ization narrative that you've completely forgotten what you're talking about.
	Like, Britain.
	Britain was founded on slavery, was it?
	What are you talking about?
	It's founded on the Union of Scotland into the United Kingdom.
	It doesn't make sense.
	I understand the left's narrative on this where America's founded on slavery.
	Complete nonsense as well.
	But it's just pathetic that he's taken that and just thrown it into England.
	He's like, yeah, there we go.
	Well, it makes even less sense in England because...
	Literally illegal?
	I mean, well, yeah, but William the Conqueror outlawed the slave trade because he wanted money, and we didn't have slavery in England right up until the first black slave was brought by an English colonist over to England, and William Wilberforce, this was the whole thing.
	It's like, no, the heir of England is too pure for a slave to breathe, and therefore it was like, yeah, if he comes to England, he's not a slave.
	And Paul's just like, oh, there's built on slavery.
	That just doesn't make sense, Paul.
	Britain is founded on slavery.
	The place where the air is too...
	What is it?
	Too...
	Too pure for a slave to breathe.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, so he says, I, above all, don't want to hear from any Labour MP who thinks anti-racism is a secondary issue in our core communities.
	The core communities of socialism are the communities who don't like the results of capitalism and are fighting it.
	So, posh kids in London.
	That's what it is.
	Upper class socialites, as always.
	As it always has been with socialism.
	So, I mean, just spurging.
	Just complete spurging.
	But it gets better.
	The stock Labour Party response is even worse.
	So they're saying here, the Tory MPs accused of adding fuel to culture war in an education report.
	Good.
	Just for the Tories, if any of you are listening, you can win this culture war really easily, and you should.
	You have a moral obligation to defeat the cancer that the left is promoting here.
	Kim Johnson, the Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside and member of the committee, said that she disavowed the report and has submitted her own alternative version, presumably with her own facts, I guess, that are not real, which was voted down by the Tory majority.
	Quote, I'm not happy with quite a lot of information contained in it, she told The Guardian.
	Quote, I'm not happy...
	I love that.
	She told The Guardian.
	There we go.
	That tells you everything you need to know.
	I'm not happy about the whole section on white privilege.
	The inquiry cherry-picked data.
	They didn't cherry-pick the data I cherry-picked, and I don't like that.
	I think that they're trying to create a bit of a culture war.
	Oh, no!
	Hashtag BLM! Just shut up.
	Hashtag racism, imperialism, Black Lives Matter.
	Yeah, shut up.
	They then go to someone called Maurice, who's the chief executive of think tank Race on the Agenda, who's never engaged in a culture war.
	God, I'm literally part of a think tank called Race on the Agenda, and you're creating a culture war around race.
	He rejected the report's conclusion, saying...
	Oh, what a shock.
	Today, Education Committee report is just the latest government salvo in a culture war that it seems hell-bent on stoking.
	Conservatives, embrace that you are waging a culture war.
	Say it.
	Come out and say it.
	We are waging a culture war against the divisive, critical race theory-based ideology of the left.
	You didn't start the war.
	You didn't start the war.
	They started the war.
	They invented all this.
	They brought it to our shores.
	But you're going to win it.
	Come out and just say that.
	We're going to push it back.
	Declare it.
	So they can't be like, oh, you're starting a culture war, as if you're supposed to go, no, no, we're not starting a culture war.
	No, you are.
	And you're going to win it because they're evil.
	They're wrong.
	You can do this.
	I want to see Kemi doing that.
	You're starting a culture war.
	Yes, and we're winning it.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Exactly.
	And then they are.
	And now look at the voting.
	The progressive alliance has got to form because they're like, God, we're getting crushed everywhere.
	Yes, you are.
	Because you're evil.
	So then if we go to the next link here, this is David Lammy doing exactly the same.
	The term white privilege didn't cause the neglect of white working class pupils.
	A decade of conservative austerity in education, housing and youth services did.
	Just as it destroyed the life chances of working class black and ethnic minority kids.
	Stop trying to divide us!
	How?
	How?
	What are you talking about?
	They're succeeding in education.
	But no argument.
	But there is an argument.
	They're saying austerity has destroyed the life chances of working class black minority ethnic kids.
	No, they're doing great.
	They have affirmative action hiring policies.
	They're succeeding in education above the white kids.
	And that's what the facts show, which the Conservatives are just like, well, they're the facts of it.
	And you're like, yeah, but they're destroying their life chances.
	No, they're not.
	But the interesting thing for me is the stop trying to divide us narrative from the same MP, and then David Lammy, and then there's race nonsense, in which they're just saying stop trying to divide us, stop trying culture wars, because they know they're losing.
	They're losing so bad, they're like, no, no, tap out, tap out.
	I don't want to be in this anymore.
	Because my entire narrative has shrunk to the point of nonsense, and everyone can see.
	Hang on, before we go on, John, what's Callum's reply to that, just out of interest?
	David Lammy apologizes for the racist Pope smoke.
	Oh, yeah.
	The BBC tweeted out, will the smoke from the Pope be black or white?
	You know how they choose the Pope.
	And David Lammy was like, there's no need for this racism, BBC. Yeah, David Lammy's telling us about how we need to stop dividing each other, and yet he's like, yeah, Pope smoke is racist.
	David, that's a 2,000-year-old Roman tradition.
	Don't know whether it's relevant to you or not.
	Okay, so, um, yeah, so, and I guess we'll, uh, we'll, we'll finish by talking about the queer wars that are currently going on in the queer community, I guess we'll call it.
	I don't know, but, like, anyway.
	I've got to go over how you can say that.
	Like, how did the term queer become normal again?
	I don't know.
	It used to be an insult.
	Yeah.
	I guess it was taken back.
	Anyway, so this will begin with just the idea of, I guess we'll call it gay imperialism, because this writer, Matt Cain, writing for The Independent, is furious that countries around the world aren't all as progressive on gay rights as we are.
	And to be honest with you, on that point I agree, obviously.
	You know, I don't think anyone should be persecuted for their sexuality.
	But he says there are still 69 countries around the world that legislate against same-sex relations.
	This feels like a justification for neoliberalism, doesn't it?
	There are 69 countries out there, and they're not protecting their gays.
	We need to invade.
	Say nice for 69, by the way.
	Yeah, nice, yeah.
	But, yeah, Jamaica, Tasmania, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, absolutely not safe for gay people to visit.
	But others like Morocco's and the Maldives and Mauritius prosecute local gay people but spare tourists.
	Some even have resorts and hotels that actively target queer customers.
	Yeah, I'm sure that's the sign they put up.
	Queers are welcome here.
	But should we go?
	It's a real moral dilemma for gay men and lesbians and one that just makes you feel conflicted.
	Maybe you just don't have to bring it up.
	Like, there isn't, like, you know, some sort of genetic test or something they do on entry into the country.
	They're like, are you a queer?
	You know, if you just turn up and just be normal.
	Well, you're not allowed to, like, hold your husband's hand or anything like that.
	That's a big no-no.
	Don't they hold hands in Saudi Arabia?
	I think, I might be wrong, but I think the men do, but it's always heterosexual.
	Well, if they insist.
	For any public displays of affection of being gay, you can't do those, obviously.
	Yeah, of course.
	But he says, anyway, part of me resents having such limited choice of holiday destinations and the activist in me wants to provoke change.
	I also want to do my bit to make things better for gay and lesbian people living in countries where they don't enjoy the same rights or levels of acceptance as I do.
	But what's the best way to go about this?
	Why not try this to boycott them?
	I'm sure they'll be deeply devastated.
	I think the gays are boycotting their holidays to Saudi Arabia.
	Saudis are gutted.
	They literally want to kill you.
	Yeah.
	They literally say that the gay agenda is a foreign agenda to undermine the country.
	So I don't think a boycott's going to work.
	But he says, we know that boycotts can work.
	In 2019, Brunei announced it would be implementing Sharia law.
	And what?
	Gays boycotted Brunei?
	Yeah, but doesn't that imply that there's something about Sharia law that's inherently homophobic?
	Is there anything about Sharia law that's connected to Islam?
	Yeah.
	Don't know if there is, but anyway.
	Sex between men, not to mention adultery committed by women, would be punishable by stoning to death.
	Following a mass celebrity-led boycott of the Sultan's assets, including the Dorchester Hotel in London, the Beverly Hills Hotel in Los Angeles, the small Southeast Asian nation, Arab nation, but okay, backtracked and declared it wouldn't implement the death penalty.
	Yay!
	I don't think they're Arab, actually.
	Brunei.
	Brunei, are they not?
	Oh, yeah, no, they're not.
	I don't know.
	No, no.
	I was mistaking it for Qatar and all those sort of tiny Arab states.
	Although I'm wondering, can we start replacing the word homophobia with Islamic?
	What's going to happen?
	Oh, that's very Islamic of you.
	That's a good question.
	I think that's like subversive.
	That's like, you know, women are right about it.
	Sorry, Islam is right about women.
	Yeah.
	Just replace the word homophobia in every sentence with the word Islamic.
	Just see what people do.
	Yeah, so another option would be for gay and lesbian tourists to visit these countries and hope that increased visibility helps change attitudes.
	Put a pin in that because we're going to come back to increased visibility and the changing of attitudes.
	I'm sure it would go down brilliantly in some of these ultra-conservative countries where these flaming queers come around and go, oh, we're just increasing visibility.
	We're normalizing being queer with a pride parade through...
	They don't wear suits, are they?
	They're not going to wear suits.
	But why should our holidays have to take the form of political activism?
	Well, can you do anything that's not political activism at this point?
	Why can't we just go away and relax on the beach like everyone else?
	You can, actually.
	You just don't have to do it in a jockstrap.
	We can now have to do it in Saudi Arabia.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Another issue is, as citizens of a wealthy and predominantly white country, we wouldn't want to be guilty of cultural arrogance or superiority.
	And now we get to the contradiction...
	Gay rights, pretty much an invention of the white Western world.
	We're talking about the non-white, non-Western world, and we want them to not oppress gays.
	But that's imperialism.
	Oh dear.
	Oh dear.
	I guess we're just going to have to boycott.
	I mean, just saying.
	And of course, we're bad as well, right?
	You've got to remember that just last month, a court in Devon found that a 12-year-old schoolboy had taken his own life following years of homophobic bullying.
	So he'd been bullied, presumably people calling him gay, and he committed suicide.
	Tragic.
	Don't know if that's actually a sign of the country not accepting gays.
	I mean, every poll of people who do accept gays, we were pretty high.
	Yeah.
	I mean, almost number one on pretty much every poll.
	Yeah, so going back to the gay representation changing attitudes, that's certainly happening.
	In 2019, the New York Post found that there was a report that came out that actually people are starting to turn against LGBTQ. An alarming new statistic from the annual Accelerating Acceptance Report.
	So they're deliberately trying to make...
	Accelerating acceptance.
	LGBT is meant to be accepted, and it turned out that that's not working, and people are starting to hate it.
	So...
	Well, here's the thing.
	I reckon if you did the same poll, but asked them, should we tolerate homosexuality?
	Should we, you know, criminalise it, blah, blah, blah?
	That's not really changed.
	I bet that's constant.
	Just, in the West, no, we're over that.
	You know, that's nonsense.
	But for accepting LGBTQIA +, blah blah blah blah, whatever else, that's going down.
	Yes.
	Because it's not gay tolerance, it's leftist.
	I suspect so too.
	The survey was produced by the Harris Poll in partnership with the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, otherwise known as GLAAD, the extremist organisation that found that Americans between 18 and 34 say they are comfortable interacting with queer people, fell from 53% in 2017 to 45% in 2018, even among those whom fell from 53% in 2017 to 45% in 2018, even among those whom the report considers allies to This was the only age group to show a sharp decline in overall acceptance,
	Women had a sharper decline, falling from 64% to 52%, compared to a 5% decrease among men from 40% to 35%.
	Go over to the Arab states with the accelerating acceptance agenda and see how much...
	I mean, is it possible to have a negative acceptance?
	Like, do they have it?
	This is the thing.
	You people do so much damage to the cause of accepting homosexuality and tolerating it.
	It's unbelievable.
	I mean, even in the tolerant West, you're able to make people hate you.
	Yeah.
	I mean, imagine, like, only 35% of men are comfortable interacting with someone who describes themselves as queer.
	Gay?
	Probably 90%?
	Yeah, yeah.
	I can't imagine there's anyone who cares.
	But, like, you know, if someone's going to be political about it, then it becomes an embarrassing...
	I'm not even going to go any further.
	Anyway, so the question then is, what is the future of the ally?
	Yeah.
	And it seems that it's Shari Law.
	So this chap runs the largest bisexual social club in the world.
	I had no idea that such a thing existed, so good for them.
	Always nice to support entrepreneurs.
	And it's called Ambi.
	Through Ambi, I was allowed to network with the bi community.
	I met other bi activists.
	I became a bi organizer.
	And here I am helping to produce Queer Majority.
	We tend to think of allies as straight people who support LGBTI rights.
	So what does this have to do with the ongoing struggle for dominance between moderate and radical viewpoints that marks the current state of LGBTI activism?
	I don't know, I'm going to ask my local imam about it.
	See where his view is.
	So do we want the moderate or radical viewpoints on gay rights?
	I mean, this is the difference between tolerance and let's just make everyone become transgender.
	Remember, the moderate is in the centre, the radical is one side, but there is also a radical on the other side.
	So when you say that we want radical viewpoints, be careful what you wish for, because you just might get it.
	That depends.
	Is our goal acceptance?
	Is it an escalating culture war?
	I like the fact that there's a leftist who will admit they're engaged in a culture war.
	Is it normalisation?
	If our goal is for LGBTI rights to be normalised, to just be accepted as another part of the human experience, which is where I would have thought it would have gone, I could buy that.
	I could get on board with that.
	The West has.
	That debate is over.
	The entire West is on the side of, yes, we accept, tolerate, blah, blah, blah.
	This was the liberal 90s consensus until radical communists came along and were like, actually, we can damage your society and try and bring about communism by polarizing it along identity lines.
	And that's where they find themselves.
	And they can't think outside of this schema.
	I worry that the LGBTI community triples down on trying to win some misguided culture war will signal a hostile outsider status to those who aren't LGBTI themselves.
	No kidding.
	If we treat straightness as the enemy, many straight folks are bound to return the favour.
	It looks like they already are, to be honest.
	Looks like that horse has bolted.
	There's no point closing the stable door now.
	I also want a thing to think.
	Like, we think of straights as the enemy.
	They might not like us.
	Yeah, I mean, what a surprise.
	Why are you thinking of straights as the enemy?
	Like, do you think there's a straight, like, demographic?
	You know, a voting bloc, you know?
	Like, you know, we vote for straight interests.
	God, could you imagine that?
	Like, I'm a straight...
	Well, yeah.
	Straight pride worldwide, you know.
	Straight party or something.
	Objectives keep me in the closet.
	He's worried that they're going to radicalize the moderates against pride.
	It's like, hmm, that does seem to be happening.
	That doesn't mean we should go back to hiding in the shadows.
	On the contrary, let your pride show.
	But why, though?
	Why do you need parades about this?
	It just seems to be indulgent to me.
	I mean, the idea of a straight pride parade is a meme.
	It's a joke.
	It's obviously...
	Well, it might be necessary if they see it as enemies, though.
	Well, I mean, I guess so, but I really don't want that to be the case.
	We're straight.
	We just want tolerance.
	Just please leave us alone.
	Stop going after our kids.
	All I'm saying is if our engagement with the straight world is defined by anger, accusation, extremism, and perpetually strident discourse, then we aren't really giving them a reason to want to sit at the table with us.
	Yeah, you're giving them a reason to ostracize you, in fact.
	If we want allies, then we need to stop making them feel like enemies.
	But the thing is, right...
	You only need allies when you're fighting a war, and so if you're looking for allies and you want them to work with you and not feel like enemies, what war are you fighting?
	Why can't you stop fighting?
	Can't you just be?
	Can't you just exist?
	Because, I mean, you've got all the legal protections you'll need.
	What does the peace deal look like?
	Well, yeah, exactly.
	How can we sign a treaty with the radical gay community that's currently fighting a war?
	What are your demands?
	I mean, for the liberal side of this, just toleration.
	That's what everyone wants.
	Well, you've got that.
	Yeah, that's already achieved.
	Western governments.
	So we can stop fighting.
	Yeah, exactly.
	In all Western governments, in all Western countries, you have equal rights now.
	Right up until the point of marriage.
	So it's like, okay, what do you need?
	If we want to overcome the us-them dynamic and the othering, it's important that we ourselves don't feed it.
	You created the dichotomy here.
	We didn't create the LGBTI group, right?
	The straights did this to us.
	Yeah.
	Well, we need to make the straights feel as welcome among us as we want to be among them.
	And how can that be done if you can claim that straight people are the perennial oppressors of gay people?
	When people ask, what about straight pride?
	We do not have to take that as an attack.
	There's no need to explain that straight white people don't face discrimination and therefore don't need pride.
	It just comes off as needlessly antagonistic.
	Actually, you say that.
	I mean, we do have an example of that in the UK in which a straight person did face persecution.
	Yeah.
	The police officer, he sued.
	He was a straight white male and that's why he didn't get the job.
	Yeah.
	And the thing is that you also don't have an answer for the question of, well, what if they just want it?
	Well, they just want one.
	Just feel like having one.
	No, I'm not saying it's about oppression.
	Pride's a sin.
	Exactly.
	We're just proud of being straight.
	Can't we just have a straight pride parade?
	Why not?
	What prevents it?
	The answer, of course, is nothing.
	That's why they have to get antagonistic about it.
	Instead, we should try something more along the lines of, absolutely, of course straight people can be proud.
	I like where this is going.
	This is funny.
	Sexual and romantic liberty benefit everyone, not just LGBTI people.
	Everyone should enjoy the freedom to love.
	Yeah, okay, this is going a bit too far now.
	Same Vaush moment, that's all.
	You're more than welcome to celebrate that freedom and openness with us.
	So straight pride is a go.
	That's good.
	We've got the endorsement of straight pride here.
	We are so close to the acceptance and normalization we've long sought.
	If we are going to keep up this positive momentum, then it's time to harness the power of FOMO for our cause and get the straights to join the damn party.
	Well, good luck.
	Because, I mean, it's not like the Pride parades are going very well, right?
	This is Seattle Pride have decided to charge white allies and accomplices a reparations fee to join it.
	Accomplices?
	Yes.
	As in criminal accomplices?
	As in they're committing a crime in some way, and they feel that they can accurately describe them as accomplices.
	again like the allies thing i'm not very comfortable with because it implies that i'm i'm enrolling in a war and i don't really want to enroll in a war and i certainly don't want to be the accomplice to anything like especially when all of the the legal protections you need are there so how much has the feed become an ally Oh, between $10 and $50.
	That's what it takes.
	Yeah.
	I mean, who determines this?
	Do I get an F-word passed off of that?
	I don't believe you do.
	According to the Seattle Pride, white punters, allies and accomplices attending the event will be expected to pay $10 to $50 reparations fee depending on one's ability to pay.
	Reparations for what?
	Reparations for oppressing gays, Callum.
	But usually that's for slavery.
	Well, no, that's the thing.
	It's only for white people, so it has to be a racial thing, right?
	So this is, you know, the Pride flag with the trans arrow and the black arrow?
	This is what the ethnic component to the new Pride flag is going to do.
	It's going to racialize what was otherwise not a racial concern.
	And so, yeah, white people now going to Pride, a gay event, an event for gays, will be forced to pay reparations.
	Of course, this goes to a non-profit organization, which I always love the use of non-profit.
	They all get paid working at non-profit, so is it?
	And the only difference really between non-profit and a regular company is they can't pay themselves dividends.
	It's okay, but they can pay themselves ridiculous salaries.
	Exactly.
	They don't need dividends.
	But anyway...
	But they say they're striving to create unity, honor diversity, and achieve equal human rights.
	And that means white people gotta pay.
	For equal rights, whites have to pay more.
	This will enable persons of black, brown, trans or queer backgrounds to attend the event for free.
	So again, the flag is perfect.
	The gay colours, the rainbow is being invaded upon by the trans and the black and brown people.
	And now the white gays have got to pay for the black and brown gays to attend.
	I love it though, because it's got nothing to do with Geysia.
	I mean, you've got the LGBT flag, right?
	And then you've got the QIA2S +, which is the phalanx, that's advancing into the row of...
	It's actually called the Boar's Snout, the historical formation, where you have the men lined up in a point to push through the enemy lines.
	It's called the Boar's Snout.
	They're invading.
	They are.
	It looks like a hostile takeover as part of an active culture war in which there are allies and accomplices.
	Very militarized, which is not something I would want if I was just like, yeah, I want to celebrate being myself.
	But yeah, so yeah, there we go.
	It's all go in the LGBTQ community.
	The war is hot and it's very active and it's also across racial lines.
	Join us next time on Queer Wars, in which we...
	Oh, God.
	I'd watch that.
	Like, what would it be?
	Like, a boxing match?
	In which you just, like, different parts of the alphabet fight each other?
	There was a lesbian feminist fight club that opened.
	It was embarrassing to watch.
	I'm pretty sure I could go down there and beat them all.
	That's what you're thinking while you're watching that.
	Yeah.
	Straight white man.
	Straight white man.
	Anyway, let's go to the video comments.
	G'day gents.
	Just got back from Supernova Sydney and I sold a ton and made a stack.
	I am really happy because I'm about to post my first profit.
	But a bit of a damper, really small damper, because there was a guy there who was running a store, a bit of an old guy, and he loves World War II memorabilia and he was selling that kind of stuff.
	He was selling comics depicting planes But the Nazis are from World War II.
	I think he had World War II stuff there.
	Yeah, but no, he said World War I. Oh.
	So he's got World War I planes.
	Yeah, exactly.
	So, I mean, well, I mean, obviously, I don't expect someone who's using TikTok to know the distinctions.
	I really hate people who know nothing about World War II or World War I. I mean, look at that.
	And nothing about fascism, Paul Mason.
	I mean, one of them was a cross there, the Australian cross, and then you've got the Japanese flag.
	And I was like, okay, yeah, that was fascism, is it?
	Right.
	I'm being erring at the idea of Australian planes.
	I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but did they invent any planes or did they just take the British designs?
	I don't know.
	No, but it's going to be British designs at that point, surely.
	Well, they were part of the British Empire.
	Yeah, exactly.
	So the British planes have been sent to Australia.
	So they're not Australian planes.
	That seems like an unfair distinction.
	Well, no, because they have got their own examples in the oceanic continent of the British colonies, and the best example being the Bob Semple tank.
	You ever seen the Bob Semple tank?
	It's such a meme.
	People should look it up.
	It's essentially, the guy was like, oh, the Japs are coming, what am I going to do?
	So he got a tractor and just covered it with corrugated iron.
	So he did the killdozer?
	Yeah, yeah.
	He eventually just made the original Killdozer.
	So Bob Semple Tank is what you want to type in.
	Because it's absolutely amazing.
	Because it just looks like such a stupid meme as well.
	Look at that.
	It actually is the Killdozer.
	The OG Killdozer.
	It's just the worst thing on the planet.
	Hey, what?
	I bet this worked.
	Yeah, it ran, but it's useless.
	Like, the crew have a tough time getting in and out.
	All you've got is machine guns on the sides, so it's not really a tank properly.
	Also, they took it to, like, the first march.
	Like, you see that picture there with all the crowd around it.
	And apparently it became a national embarrassment after being displayed to the public as, you know, what would defend New Zealand.
	And they were just like, this is stupid.
	Like, what are you doing?
	Oh, I think it's nice.
	I really like the guy, though.
	Like, the guy who made the sub.
	I mean, it's, you know, he's come out in the country's time of need to defend New Zealand, but he failed.
	He did fail.
	I think you're being excessively mean.
	No, the Bob Semple is a joke.
	But Australian planes.
	I mean, tell me if I'm wrong.
	I don't know.
	So, Colin, which story out of this book did you find most striking?
	For me, it was whenever there was this civilization that carved itself out of Siberia.
	It was accidentally discovered by a patrol, and they ended up sending a whole brigade to go deal with them, because they were already being persecuted anyway.
	It showed just how absolutely relentless they were.
	Curious about your response.
	I didn't quite get all of that, but I've got an abridged version from Josh.
	I've got his copy.
	I don't have the full version.
	I'm at a point where he's talking about when you get sent to your first cell and how lovely it is, because at least you're there with other prisoners, and then you've all been through the same crap, even though you're cramped and it's horrible and people are dying and whatnot.
	um the most funny story out of it so far has to be the the legendary one of the meeting which everyone goes and some guy stands up after he's like the guy in charge the chairman's been replaced by this new guy and the new guy comes out and then it's like to our comrade Stalin and starts clapping and everyone stands up and starts clapping it's that story going on and on and on it's that story i didn't know it was real i didn't know it was from the gulagal pelago and i read it i was like oh god So I got the audiobook of an abridged copy of the Gulag Archipelago,
	and it was like 35 hours, and I just remember listening to about three hours of it, and it was just constant human suffering.
	I was like, right, I think I've got the message.
	Gulag's bad.
	Like, I just couldn't bring myself to go through it all.
	Yeah.
	But it's still not the best example of why socialism is bad.
	That has to be in the Chinese one.
	Where you're just eating toddlers.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Right, okay, I mean, how many toddlers do you have to eat before you realise this wrong?
	Good question.
	Three things.
	The video from Brett Weinstein that was removed from Mew Sheep is back to one pitch shoot.
	It occurred to me when watching the premium broadcast.
	A good way to describe it also by ease is an absolute mad lad.
	I think you're looking through a video on him.
	Also, what do you think of banning porn in OnlyFans?
	It's pretty clear it's not good for anyone.
	I find it particularly disgusting when young women count on days until they're legal, egged on by an audience of simps.
	If so, how do you think that could be done, and would such a thing even be effective?
	I'm thinking back to the US prohibition.
	Right, well, I think Dank has done Mad Lads on Alcibiades, but it's not as good as our ones.
	But it is good, though.
	But I don't think there is such a thing as banning porn.
	I don't think Prohibition works.
	I think that the problem is with the culture that desires it, rather than the thing itself.
	I think that you need to keep patrolling.
	Absolutely stay on patrol.
	OnlyFans is prostitution.
	Treat it as such.
	John's just listed an article.
	Are OnlyFans going to ban pornography?
	So OnlyFans themselves are thinking about it, apparently.
	What's left?
	No, they were meant to be like a store for photographers and whatnot to get paid for their work.
	And then the thoughts turned up and ruined everything, just like Twitch.
	I was about to say, just like Twitch, yeah.
	So, it might be an idea, but they'd lose a lot of money.
	So, I suppose what's important in life?
	Being on Thought Patrol with money, the CEO of OnlyFans.
	Yeah, but basically, just shame.
	Just shame them.
	It's prostitution, and if you consider prostitution morally valid or desirable, then you're a simp and you're disgusting.
	If you are a normal person, then you should shame people who use OnlyFans.
	Yeah, I'm in agreement.
	I mean, I'm in no position of being like Bannett, but...
	It's not going to happen.
	It's not going to work.
	Especially not pornography.
	That's not going to happen at all, of course.
	And also, I'm not sure about that one, but the OnlyFans example where you're literally handing over stacks of cash, I just...
	I find it so depressing to read about.
	I just really enjoy the memes of it, though.
	Like, where, you know, women send unsolicited messages to men on, like, you know, very social media apps.
	And it's just like, you know, like, you could subscribe to my OnlyFans.
	And the guy's just like, why would I do that?
	I can Google boob and get, like, 15 million results.
	And she's like, oh, yeah, but you can talk to me.
	It's like, why would I want to talk to a woman?
	There's another one I saw in which I think some guy had messaged some woman on like Tinder or something and then they were chatting and he was like, oh, what do you do?
	Oh, I do OnlyFans.
	He was like, oh, send me a link.
	She sent the link.
	And he was like, right, we don't need to go on the date now.
	And he was like, what?
	No, I still want to go on the date.
	He was like, yeah, but why would I spend $100 on a meal when I could just get up for 20 bucks on here?
	Yeah, exactly.
	Yeah, that's the best kind of patrolling, frankly.
	Let's go for the next one.
	Ah, as promised you lads, sheer lunacy, courtesy of National Geographic.
	Prehistoric female hunter discovery upends gender role assumptions, all because female bones were discovered with hunting tools.
	Now thankfully, one or two of the anthropologists do give more obvious reasons why you'd find female bones with these tools, such as religious traditions or burial customs.
	Now listen to this BS. The team cannot know the individual's gender identity, but rather only biological sex, which like gender doesn't always exist on a binary.
	In other words, they can't say whether the individual lived their life 9,000 years ago in a way that would identify them within their society as a woman.
	One professor, Pamela Geller, from Miami of all places, adds: "There is so much mental gymnastics that go on trying to explain these things away.
	There's so much gender disparity going on right now.
	If we were to presume that there's something that biologically predisposes us, then we'd be able to justify that gender disparity.
	To me that's dangerous and completely unsubstantiated." Funny that last sentence, if you check her bio, it lists: "Strongly committed to transdisciplinary, Research interests include bioarchaeology, a new field in the social sciences in the 70s, feminist and queer studies, and biopolitics, a phrase used by the Nazis and popularized in America by Foucault.
	These people are trying to cram in a postmodernist view of gender identity on human societies that predate our earliest discovery of the wheel by about three and a half thousand years.
	Let that sink in.
	Love it.
	Love everything about it.
	If only there was some biological continuance that we could rest this assumption that she fulfilled the gender role of a woman on, but no such thing exists.
	Man, that's a dangerous idea to who my career.
	Yeah, my career as a trans feminist woman's studies major.
	That was amazing.
	Thanks for that, Israel.
	That was great.
	Yeah, I really enjoyed that.
	Let's give it the next one.
	I'm going to shill for you guys.
	This interview is excellent and well worth the price of admission.
	It's also an excellent example to tell your friends about the problems with left-wing culture and the war on men.
	When, in a class specifically designed to expose children to controversial ideas, the one idea that is so egregious that even mentioning it will get you sacked is the idea that men are not evil.
	Oof.
	Yeah.
	I feel really bad for Will Nolan.
	Like, he seems like an absolutely great guy.
	By the way, if you want more from him, he has a website and YouTube channel, Nolan Knows, which you should type in to get that, because he seems like a great guy.
	As he rightly points out, like, he just said, um, what was it?
	Men and women are what they are, and the biological role of masculine and female comes from that biological part, which is why masculinity is about men strong.
	And, like, women weak, therefore they, you know, make children, because they have the vagina and whatnot.
	That's essentially his point, which is just...
	How is that controversial?
	And therefore, it's not wrong to be a man, it's not wrong to be a woman.
	Have you considered queer feminist archaeology?
	Yeah, exactly.
	In Eton, as well.
	This is the thing.
	I'm not rich, and I've come from rich blood.
	I always thought the upper classes of British society...
	I don't know why I thought this.
	They'd just be immune to such nonsense.
	Well, I know why.
	Because of tradition.
	Tradition and propriety.
	Like, they never fall into socialism.
	That's not really been the way.
	Like, the aristocrats.
	Like, sure, the intelligentsia, but they're idiots.
	But the aristocratic types, I always expected them to have some kind of bulwark of conservatism in them that would just stop any of this nonsense dead in its tracks.
	And the fact even in Eton this can take hold...
	It just struck me in a way that I don't know how to explain.
	Yeah, it's disgusting.
	Absolutely.
	It's a moral attack against British civilization.
	That's what you're reacting to, I think.
	But anyway, let's carry on.
	So, I wanted to get you guys' opinion on the idea of the US just buying Mexico, because the cartels have already done it, and since they all want to flee here anyway, I feel like it would just make the most sense to have the border hop them.
	What are you guys' thoughts on that?
	I, too, side with our lord and masters in the enclave.
	It just strikes me as a very Trumpian solution.
	Mexicans are coming over the border.
	Well, let's just buy Mexico.
	And then deport them all to Guatemala.
	But nothing could be better for Mexico than to be bought by the United States.
	No, to become an American colony would be a pretty sweet deal.
	Yeah.
	I mean, you just...
	Something capitalism would start flourishing and everything would start to be good.
	Law and order like that tomorrow.
	Exactly.
	Cartels, I mean, literally gunned down the streets.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Literally exterminated.
	Law and order imposed.
	Common law imposed on Mexico, which would be useful.
	The institutions would be somewhat refined, I would suggest.
	And yeah, then they'd actually get constitutional rights and protections with a strong central government to enforce them.
	So that would actually be entirely beneficial for the Mexicans.
	And it would probably reduce the need for Mexicans to try and flee north.
	The state would get smaller as well.
	You'd get rid of all the corrupt Mexican politicians and replace them with an unelected American governor.
	I mean, we have experience in this field as the British.
	Yeah, we know that that can be better.
	We've gone to places that have been much, much worse in their civilizational status, let's say, and left in a much better place than Mexico is currently.
	Yeah, if I was a Mexican, I wouldn't be against the idea at all.
	To be honest, as soon as it sounds, I might actually be the best solution.
	But the thing is, it'd just be a weight on the Americans.
	The Americans could be like, we could do that or we could build a wall.
	But, I mean, we had to take on the mindset of, what, we were civilising the world, therefore it was all justified, all this money going down the drain.
	But, yeah, some of it worked.
	I mean, it would make Mexico a better place, I think.
	But anyway.
	Hi.
	As an American, I've noticed that y'all don't have an office gun.
	This is disgusting and offensive.
	But to fix that, I have found a firearm that is fully compliant with all UK laws.
	Here it is.
	This is a water gun.
	This is an AR-15 0% lower receiver.
	It is 100% legal for civilian ownership in all areas of the United Kingdom.
	But the only problem is, I don't know what address to send it to.
	Boy, is it just a block of metal?
	Is it melted down?
	If you melted the AR-15, you're like, yeah, we'll sell you this.
	Okay, I mean, I'm sure you can if you want, but yeah, we don't have guns because, yeah, Brennan, sorry, sucks.
	I would like to have the whole place covered in guns if I could.
	Sure.
	I mean, why not?
	Oh, yeah, I'm not against it at all.
	I think we should be able to own guns.
	We've got a sword, so at least we're freer than the Saudis.
	It's not saying much, though, is it?
	Freer than the Saudis.
	Well, I mean, we may have Sharia law, but at least we can own swords.
	Do we have one more video?
	Carl Benjamin claims to be a British patriot, but is he?
	Are these the words of a British patriot?
	Your neighbors don't think so.
	I don't actually speak French.
	That would be gay.
	Carl Benjamin.
	British patriot or Frenchified traitor?
	I don't know.
	Paid for by Callum, probably.
	The shekels have been deposited.
	Well, I mean, I can't even refute that, so moving on.
	Oh, that's fantastic.
	I'll post our line afterwards, that's great.
	David says, it's my birthday, so you can't ban me for today's video comment.
	Well, happy birthday, David.
	Still bad.
	I'll supply these nuts.
	Yeah, he's still bad.
	I'll tell you what, man, I'm so annoyed that I have to use these goddamn microphones again.
	Like, everyone who posted a comment is banned.
	So I'm banned, I guess.
	Azabaya Deeznut says, When I heard there had been a shooting at the Juneteenth celebration, I expect to see videos of people running or generally being afraid or angry.
	Instead, I see people twerking on the ambulance and hindering first aid efforts.
	I don't even know what's going on anymore.
	Well, degeneracy, unfortunately, is the...
	I can't make a joke.
	Nope.
	But, you know, it's about the celebration of the liberation of black people and then you're like, yeah, this is what we've done with it.
	What message do you think that gives up?
	I just can't help but feel that there was a middle ground between slavery and...
	It's working on ambulances?
	...that could have been aimed for.
	Again, I'm not a determinist at all.
	I think that these things are all about choices and about culture and about habituation.
	I don't even think genetics is any real hard determining factor.
	It gives you inclinations, I would say, like the personality you've got.
	But again, I don't think that's racial or anything like that.
	I think it's just on an individual basis.
	But even then, I think that is totally something you can deal with just by a bit of self-discipline.
	You know, I'm in no way a biological determinist when it comes to behavior.
	And it just sickens me watching the left being like, yeah, well, you know, there's nothing to see here.
	That's just what the blacks are like.
	It's like, no, it's not.
	It's really not.
	It never used to be this way.
	West Africans aren't like this.
	In my own lifetime, though, watching the American black comedians, we used to get the Fresh Prince of Bel-Air and stuff when I was 13, and it was totally normal and wholesome.
	It was totally normal.
	There was nothing unusual about it, and no one even cared that they were black.
	No one thought about it.
	But now it's just like, look at the black celebrations.
	It's just this weird, immoral, vaguely psychopathic.
	And it's just like, what the hell is going on, man?
	But anyway, Chris says, As someone who lives in New Jersey, this is surprising.
	To my knowledge, all the BLM process in New Jersey were actually peaceful protests.
	Good to see progress.
	Well, yep.
	Matthew says, Juneteenth is one year old and 400 years old and counting, much in the same way as two weeks to flatten the curve is 15 months old and counting.
	Strict adherence to concepts of time is an aspect of whiteness, I guess.
	I mean, that is literally their argument, yeah.
	Alex says, Right.
	Sounds like terrorism to me.
	CBC are excricable in their lack of duty of care towards Indigenous matters.
	They are treating them like the media in the US treats black people.
	All of this happened on National Indigenous Peoples Day.
	I love how that's become a slur, though.
	Like, they treat X like the American media treats black people.
	Yeah.
	Alistair Crowley says, Don't forget, Carl, that even in the UK where guns are not legal, a BLM activists, a black BLM activist, got shot by another black man.
	So don't be so surprised about the Juneteenth thing.
	I suppose that's a good point.
	Chris says, Pretty sure it's a war crime Pretty sure it's a war crime as well to kill medics.
	Yeah, undoubtedly.
	Harry says, are the people twerking on the ambulance the vicious people that the virtue ethicists warned us about?
	Yes, they are.
	They absolutely are.
	They do evil and they enjoy doing evil.
	That's a vicious person in Aristotle's framework.
	And the virtuous man is the man who does good and enjoys doing good.
	Be the virtuous man.
	Alexander Sjoberg says...
	Yeah, they do.
	And you are right.
	The individuals themselves are obviously responsible for their own behaviour, but...
	I get the feeling there's a point at which it's difficult to even explain to the people twerking on the ambulance why that's bad.
	I don't think they'd understand why that's bad.
	And that's been done to them by the system that has created it, that has created them.
	They didn't just spring out of the ether fully formed as psychos who will actively help someone die.
	That didn't happen.
	There's a whole network and system of essentially Democrats using them as...
	in a way and they're the product of it you know so they're terrible they're gonna have terrible lives they live in what i can only consider to be a form of hell and we can't even point out this ethical standard or lack thereof because you get called racist to his point about them being the 18th uh largest group of people on earth richest Richest group.
	Do you remember that rapper?
	I can't remember his name.
	He did a song in which I think it was called The M Word.
	It was animated.
	One of the points he makes in the middle of it is just, how can we have so much money and we never spend it on wealth as a community to try and buy land and make something of ourselves as a group?
	Why are we spending it on community materialistic commodities?
	And then he compared it to the Jews in America, being able to build themselves up.
	And then he got massive lebas that his agent dropped him because this was anti-Semitic for him pointing this out.
	He was like, no, literally, I'm looking at the Jews.
	They're doing fantastic.
	I want blacks to be like that.
	Using Jewish people as an aspirational example is anti-Semitic.
	Yeah.
	He got dropped for that.
	All right.
	Christ.
	I mean, that's wild, because I don't see why Jewish people couldn't be proud of that.
	Yeah.
	Look, we've got good education, good family structure, good businesses.
	Come with us.
	Yeah.
	Like, you can do the same thing.
	We can literally explain to you how to do it, but you've got to behave in a certain way.
	Anyway.
	But, I mean, that is a great point, though.
	So, look, if you've got all this money, why aren't you building things?
	You know, I would want to build things.
	Sam Fletch says, I've lived in quite a few countries in my time.
	I've seen real racism.
	Lived it.
	I lived in Bogota in the 90s for fiddle's sake.
	Sure, when I was a child, but thinking back on it now really does put it all into perspective.
	These people, I don't doubt they think they experience real racism, but frankly, I don't think they've really experienced anything outside the little bubbles.
	And that makes them easy to lie to.
	I feel bad for them.
	For more weird and wonderful stories, hit me up.
	I'm in Stroud.
	Yes, I live that close.
	I even voted for Carla as a local MP. Well, thank you, Sam.
	But no, I agree.
	I think they do get lied to.
	The whole narrative of white privilege and black oppression in America.
	I think it's just a giant lie that is foisted on them by the Democrats to keep them as a pliant voting bloc.
	You know, keep them supplicated.
	And, like I said, it's not that the individual black people who we see acting in terrible ways aren't responsible for the way they act.
	It is that they are, of course.
	But, like, there is a system, a giant machine, that is devoted to keeping them in this degenerate state.
	And it's awful.
	Like, the idea that a black person votes Democrat, to me, as a foreigner, is monstrous.
	You're voting for the party of slavery segregation in the KKK because they say they've changed.
	Whereas the Republicans founded the new party, fought the war, ended slavery, and had the first black Republican senators and congressmen.
	And they're the party of racists, aren't they?
	You're insane.
	It's like Jewish-Germans voting socialist.
	Yeah, it is.
	And it's just madness to me.
	I can't see why a single black person...
	The black community should be all Republican.
	All Republican.
	To an end, you know, anyway.
	Bart says, the reports on disadvantage point specifically to white working class boys being left behind, the failure to highlight the sex disparities they offer in the room.
	Well, I did bring it up, didn't I? Because that was the point.
	There's no question the education system is, frankly, geared against young men and boys.
	They mention that of the poor boys, all of them perform less than any group of poor girls.
	Yeah.
	But they didn't really have anything to say about it, because they were just like...
	Who knows?
	But Christina Hoff Summers, I think, is correct about this, where she says that boys are being treated like defective girls.
	I've had to intercept this line of thought with my own wife, because she's like, oh, well, Daniel's just not sitting still.
	I think he has ADHD. It's like, no, he's a boy.
	Of course he's not sitting still, you know, but I'll go and shout at him and then he'll sit still.
	And that's how it works.
	You know, a man shouts at the boy and the boy does what he's told because, you know, it's the lizard brain kicking in.
	It's not that he's got ADHD. He's bigger than me, he must be right.
	Well, that's exactly it.
	Orcs, orcs, orcs, yeah.
	Hey, look, I didn't make the rules, okay?
	I'm just playing the game.
	But that's absolutely right.
	The boys are being treated as if there's something wrong with them because they don't sit quietly like the girls.
	They should be treated like orcs.
	Yes, they should.
	Actually, they should be treated like orcs.
	The teacher's like, I'm the biggest, so I'm the best.
	That's how it works, yes.
	Matthew says, culture war is just the Western media framing of ideological subversion.
	Ironically, it's actually a war.
	Yeah, and like said the Conservatives, you can win it, fight it.
	MEP Flyboy says, Yeah, and it's great to see, actually.
	I'm so glad.
	I was really worried that GB News would get like 30,000 viewers or something.
	I was like, oh no, you know, that would have been a catastrophe.
	Because then they're like, ha, not only do you suck, but your audience figures are tiny, there's no demand for this, the woke agenda would have full license to go ahead.
	But in hindsight, that was never going to happen because there's no alternative.
	Well, that's true, yeah.
	Like I said, I'm so glad that GB News exists.
	Yanala says, Hamza Yusuf must be sweating buckets about those neglected white kids.
	Maybe he shouldn't try to put them down so much from getting those positions of power in government.
	Omar says, it seems to me the real sin of white people, quote unquote, is more of a result of what they haven't done rather than what they have, not enforcing standards, consequences, or otherwise treating everyone equally as the true oppression.
	That's a good point.
	Literally saying, look, we don't care that you're black.
	These are the standards.
	Deal with it.
	Or you get punished.
	It's like, oh, they're being punished disproportionately.
	Then stop behaving in that way.
	Yeah.
	We did this with the Indians.
	These are the standards.
	You can't burn your wife.
	Deal with it if you don't hang you.
	You are disproportionately hanging Indians.
	Well, they're burning their wives.
	And look where it is now.
	Indians are the highest earning group in the UK. You're welcome.
	The standards worked.
	Exactly.
	The standards worked.
	Pakistani, British.
	One of the lowest.
	Hmm.
	There's the cultural difference, though.
	Hmm.
	Sorry, I'll just mess this up.
	Kevin says, Carl, I don't think the improved performance of girls over boys is entirely due to feminism.
	I teach...
	Sorry, I messed this up.
	I teach 13 to 15-year-olds and find the girls far better at students as the boys when asking them why it is usually because they want to do a good job and not just end up barefoot and pregnant.
	With the welfare system in the UK, boys seem far happier to live at school and live off the state for their lives.
	Yes, I agree that that's the case, but I think that is a consequence of feminism.
	So I think that the...
	Essentially, how to frame it?
	The removal of the honour of being a man has made boys kind of lost.
	It's kind of untethered them from a life trajectory that they're supposed to have.
	You're not meant to be a man.
	What are you meant to be?
	Exactly.
	And they turn into coombs, right?
	And so they'll do minimum wage jobs that allow them to get beer and Xboxes and an apartment they can share with their mates and spend their 20s and 30s just playing video games and getting drunk.
	Don't get me wrong.
	It's an enjoyable way of living.
	I did it during my 20s, but it's not very good for them and it's not helping them in any way, shape, or form.
	It's not improving society or anything like that.
	And I think this is all a consequence of feminism.
	Marcus Horne says, according to the BBC, they have 16% BAME employee representation, but the UK has 13% BAME community.
	So when they say this job is only available to underrepresented people, they mean white people.
	Right for equality and fairness.
	Right for equal representation.
	Right Hmm, what about representation in Bristol?
	Or even when it's overrepresented, they'll be like, what about the representation on Hearthwood Road, where the building is located?
	If it's based on London representation, or Birmingham representation, then you're literally going to have, like, a third of the people being white.
	But that's what a nonsense standard is.
	Think about it.
	The BBC is meant to represent the whole country, therefore you use the country standard.
	But then when you say that you're applying this job in London, they'll be like, no, no, no, we're talking about London standards now.
	You see how they move it.
	And then they'll move the goalposts again and be like, yeah, but the local area of this part of the city.
	But then, okay, let's say it is on the London standards.
	You've got affirmative action for the majority.
	That's what you do.
	You've turned it into South Africa.
	Anyway, Edward of Woodstock says, impoverished white families.
	We're failing schools, surrounded by crime, and there doesn't seem to be a way out of this horrible crab bucket.
	Race communists.
	Hey, it could always be worse.
	You could be black.
	That's actually a good point.
	That is their opinion.
	Marcus says, just for a laugh, can we start calling the white population of Britain as the indigenous peoples of Britain?
	I want to watch a lefty blow a gasket when their unstoppable nonsense meets an immovable object.
	Well, this is something that they have desperately tried to undermine from day dot.
	Oh, there's no indigenous people of Britain?
	There are, of course, indigenous people of Britain by any standard that we could use for the word indigenous.
	So if there are indigenous peoples of, say, the Polynesian Islands and New Zealand, those people arrived there in the 14th century.
	The English had been in Britain for a thousand years.
	And if that doesn't make the English indigenous to Britain, then the Polynesians are certainly not indigenous to the Polynesian islands.
	Someone just sent me a link of apparently Owen Jones and Ash Sarkar and whatnot talking about the fact that Muslims have lived here for centuries.
	So, I mean, this is the kind of thing we're dealing with.
	When you start talking about indigenous people of Britain, they might just make people up as well.
	Yeah.
	Like, Muslims have been living in Britain for centuries.
	Okay, well, the English have been living in Britain for millennia.
	Now what?
	Yeah.
	But anyway...
	Do you have more questions?
	Oh, no, we're out of time.
	Okay, so the things you should go and check out, definitely go and check out, as you mentioned, the Eaton interview with Will Nolan, because he's a great guy.
	Also, check out Nolan Knows, his YouTube channel, if you want to go and give him some support.
	And Ji-Yoon Park, the interview Josh did with the North Korean defector, who really did go through hell.
	Like, she escaped, she got to China, ended up having a kid with someone she didn't want to, sold into slavery, ended up going back to North Korea, got gangrene in a prison camp, broke out again, managed to get her kid, got to the Gobi Desert in Mongolia, failed to get into Mongolia and get rescued, had to go back to China, and then got in contact with a priest, and that managed to get had to go back to China, and then got in contact with a priest, and that managed to get God, that's awful.
	I mean...
	Whatever you're going through, it can't be as bad as that.
	That's what they're saying.
	So she's gone through all that, and then has come through and now lives in the UK, and she's an amazing individual.
	And her perspective on what's going wrong in the West is interesting that she comes to exactly the same collusions as everyone else, really, which is what earthy people are doing.
	Why are you destroying your own civilization?
	Anyway, so go and check that out.
	Otherwise, thank you very much.
	We'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.

▲