Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 21, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:32:30

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #158

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotus Eaters for the 21st of June 2021.
	I'm joined by Carl.
	Hello.
	And today we're going to be going over how Labour are debating about being anti-Semites, whether they should give that up or not.
	Is it worth it?
	Weird debate to be having, but okay.
	Also, failing CNN, which fall against the ground, Joe Rogan.
	Yeah.
	Might as well enjoy CNN, crashing and burning.
	And also, jobs in which whites need not apply, because this is modern Britain.
	Anti-racism.
	Yeah, anti-racism means that white people can't apply for jobs with this state.
	Anyway, sorry, that's a real gripe of mine.
	But before we get into that, there's just a few things to mention.
	So first and foremost, some of the premium content we have at loadofseeders.com.
	So this is some of the stuff from the weekend.
	So we have Contemplations, the UN Sustainable Agenda.
	So...
	I love that there were some comments on here talking about, like, I can't wait for the UN army, and it's like, yeah, but it kind of already exists.
	Yeah.
	I mean, one of the funny things is the war in North Korea, actually.
	The North Koreans are technically not at war with the Americans, or the South Koreans.
	They're at war with the UN. Based.
	Because the UN at the time passed the resolution, because the Soviets boycotted it, and the Communist Chinese weren't in the Security Council.
	So, like, literally they're still at war with everyone, technically.
	So we're still at war with them as well, because our troops weren't there.
	Anyway, good to know.
	So have we go to the next one?
	We have the Epochs as well, the film review with, I don't think he says his name, Mueller?
	Mueller.
	Mueller on Glorious Bastards.
	Yes.
	Sorry, I'm not familiar.
	Yeah, no, no.
	Beau has done a nice long conversation with Mueller about the film in Glorious Bastards, and this is obviously historically themed.
	I haven't actually had time to watch the interview yet, but I'm really looking forward to it, because I really like Mueller's content, and it'd be interesting to hear.
	But yeah, these are all things you can sign up and get access to on lotuses.com.
	We will be recording the book club, Neither Left Nor Right, about the French origins and fascism tomorrow.
	And I guess next week you'll be able to listen to what it's like to be a Roman legionary, which was the epochs that we did last week, but obviously haven't gone up yet.
	Okay, last thing to mention is also 3 o'clock after this podcast, I think the Ji-Yoon Park interview is going up.
	So that's the North Korean defector who has come all the way to the UK and has then stood for elections.
	And I'm going to send her the link after I ask the question you had, which is, what is the West doing wrong?
	There's also one other thing.
	On Friday, we're doing the monthly Zoom call.
	So at 4pm Friday, we'll be here to just hang out and chat with Gold Tier members.
	So if you're a Gold Tier subscriber, don't miss that.
	I can see the chat talking about the mics.
	We're trying to get rid of the mics.
	Tell us how it's going, I suppose.
	It's nice not to have a stupid big mic in front of your face.
	Yeah, for some reason Carl is...
	For some reason.
	For some reason, yeah.
	For some reason.
	For some reason being...
	Because.
	Let's carry on.
	Anyway, so let's get into the first story.
	So...
	Labour.
	Labour are discussing whether or not to be anti-Semites.
	Weird thing to discuss, but okay.
	I mean, this is going to be good fun for us, because it's just another one of those episodes where the Labour Party's killing itself and you just throw popcorn at them.
	Yeah, it's the scorpion and the spider fighting, and I'm just like, yeah, go, go, go.
	Yeah, so first thing here, Dan Hodges.
	So Dan Hodges being a former Labour activist, and I think he's out of the party now because he got sick with Corbyn.
	And he's written an article for the Daily Mail in which he speaks about him going to Batley and Spen, this current by-election that's going on.
	And it looks like Labour's going to lose.
	So he says, This isn't the one the Lib Dems just won, then?
	No, no, that was another by-election.
	This is the one in the constituency that's heavily Muslim, let's say that.
	So we'll go to the next link.
	So this is the article itself, and this is glorious.
	So he says, who's seeping the poison, sorry, spreading the poison that could put the final nail in Keir Starmer's coffin?
	So he takes a quote from a Labour official who says, That is so good.
	So, A, what I like about this is it basically reframes Jeremy Corbyn, as in Jeremy Corbyn, the anti-Semite's choice, you know?
	And now that Jeremy Corbyn's got a kiss, I was like, look, we don't hate the Jews and we're not going to persecute them.
	The Labour Party's just hemorrhaging votes in certain key demographics.
	Hmm.
	Okay.
	So that's the quote that's caused all the big comeuppance, but there's some other stuff in here that's worth talking about, I think.
	So George Galloway is interviewed by Mr Hodges, and George Galloway says he's going to get about 13,000 votes, which would put Labour third, George Galloway second, presumably.
	So, I mean, good on George.
	Let's hope they get more votes than party members.
	Yeah.
	So he says, and it's true that he's hoovering up the Muslim votes.
	Quote, I'm hegemonic in Asian areas, he tells me.
	It's the benefit of 50 years of work, speaking out on Palestine and Iraq, standing up for Muslims at home and abroad.
	George Galloway's a weird guy.
	He is a weird guy.
	He's not wrong there, though.
	That's true.
	That is true.
	So at the start of the campaign, Galloway was spending time exclusively with ethnic minority areas.
	Now he's targeting Labour's traditional white working class support.
	Quote,"'The white working class despise Labour,' he tells me.
	"'They think Labour just don't like them.
	"'Things like the whole LGBTQI agenda.
	"'The working class don't like that.
	"'They're tired of Labour's identity politics.'" Good on George.
	Good on George.
	Labour has got a wonderful coalition at the moment.
	It's so awful, and all of the people inside of it kind of hate each other.
	Like, none of them mesh together.
	I like George Galloway as a...
	As a public figure, let's say.
	As a speaker, he's interesting to listen to.
	I don't like his socialism, I don't like many of his foreign policy views, but he's certainly interesting in the way he speaks, and also I love the fact that he sees through the woke agenda, at least.
	That's fantastic.
	Yeah, but he is a communist, and he does pander to, like, various identity blocks, so it's...
	I know.
	I would never want him as PM or running the government, but I'd love him as an MP, just in there for a laugh, if nothing else, because he's able to call them out on things that do matter, but the rest of the time, of course...
	And he does seem prepared to actually say things that they don't want to hear, so there is that.
	So, Dan Hodges says, I was forwarded a message circulating on WhatsApp groups within the Muslim community, listing, quote, five reasons why every citizen should not vote for Kim Leadbeater, the Labour candidate.
	It says, one, she's a lesbian and will push the LGBTQ agenda in our town.
	Okay.
	Two.
	Her party leader, Keir Starmer, is pro-Israel and pro-Zionist.
	He needs to get a clear message in Batley and Speck.
	Amazing.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	All right.
	That's what's going on there.
	So he says Galloway's campaign staffers also claim members of the Muslim community have been expressing concern to them over the fact Starmer's wife is Jewish.
	What?
	And that their children are being raised in the Jewish faith.
	Local concerns.
	Of whoever is currently knocking on doors of Batley and Spen and quietly whispering, quote, By the way, you know that Keir Starmer, his wife is Jewish, and their kids are Jewish too.
	Okay.
	Okay, that's the constituency.
	There are some problems for Labour, because Keir Starmer is too much of a zio.
	That's what's going on there.
	That's what's being said on the ground, according to Dan Hodges.
	Oh boy.
	Oh boy, oh boy.
	So this is the bombshell, which is that Labour's got to pick, apparently, between, I don't know, 3 million votes or anti-Semitism, and they're currently having that debate.
	I mean, I don't know which one they're going to go for.
	Not sure where they're going to fall on that.
	Yeah, and this is the point Dan Hodges also makes, which is, you can see this image here, which is the Palestine flags at Labour Party conference all being flown, and you'll never see them with hordes of British flags, because that's not how this works.
	There's a certain demographic that awards them about 3 million votes, and that's what's important.
	So...
	They will do anything and everything, including throwing their entire ideology under the bus sometimes, for flags that are not British, or for beliefs that are, good God, quite out there.
	I just love the fact that the Labour Party's been forced into a position where they have to say, look, we don't hate the Jews, but we don't want to lose the Muslim vote.
	Like, we have to publicly say we don't hate the Jews, but also at the same time, don't leave us Muslims, which...
	Hmm, okay, so I mean the Labour Party is calling all Muslims anti-Semites by that standard, which apparently is Islamophobia.
	The Labour Party has committed that.
	So the next link here is Zahra Sultana taping this quote in which...
	Oh, my favourite is my leftist.
	Yeah, Zahra Sultana, she, her, in the bio.
	She's going to use that forever now.
	So this quote from a, quote, senior Labour official in the mail must be called out.
	It is pitting Muslim and Jewish people against each other, demonising communities.
	It is racism and should be condemned as such.
	When have Muslim and Jews ever had a crossword with each other?
	What are you talking about, Zahra?
	I don't know what you're talking about.
	The Labour official is like, yeah, getting rid of anti-Semitism is upsetting a load of local Muslims, and that's racism against the Muslims, but the racism against the Jews I don't care about.
	Is that her position?
	I don't know how they got themselves into this situation, but I have no idea how they get themselves out of it.
	I can't imagine being in a worse trap than this.
	Anyway, so we're going to the next link.
	This is the narrative coming out of the left on all this, which sort of reinforces the point.
	So, The Guardian, he's never spoken up about Muslims.
	Keir Starmer leaves Batley voters disaffected.
	So, they say in here, Kim Leadbeater received a hostile reception from voters who were unhappy with the party's stance on foreign policy issues such as Palestine and Kashmir, amid a perception that the party takes some forms of racism more seriously than others.
	So the party, realising that they're full of anti-Semites, thanks Corbyn, and then being like, we should get rid of them, that's upsetting the Muslim voters, according to the Guardian and the Mail.
	I mean, the left and the right here both coming to the same conclusions from what's happening on the ground.
	It just cracks me up how Labour think they can have this coalition, as in, you know, have the cake and eat it too.
	It's like, look at what you've done, look at what you've invited in, and look at what you've become, and where do you think it's going to go?
	I don't know, like, the Democrats are inviting the NAACP and the KKK. Oh, wait, they did that, never mind.
	It's the same thing!
	Yeah, so they say in here, with turnout estimates, the Muslim Council of Britain says that about 8,600 voters in the July 1st by-election will be Muslim.
	Labour is defending with a 3,525 vote majority.
	So the Muslim vote being able to swing it.
	And if George Galloway can take enough of those chaps to his position, then yeah, they will lose.
	Well, this is how he won in Bradford with the Respect Party.
	Because he just nakedly pandered to the Islamist bloc, basically.
	And that's obviously what he's going to be doing here.
	So, you know...
	Okay.
	I mean, Godspeed, I guess, because this explains why the black flag of Labour has been rising in Batley in Spain.
	I'm not joking when I say that.
	Here's Calvin Robinson putting out, and we mentioned this before, the campaigning materials of the Labour candidate.
	And what does she say?
	She's just honestly talking about conflicts in the Middle East.
	Because, you know, local issues.
	Can we get that second picture up, John, just so we can see it just a bit more clearly?
	Because this is amazing.
	Look at these local issues.
	Palestine, Kashmir, Islamophobia...
	Like, Kim Leadbeater, your local Labour candidate for Palestine.
	So, she says in the first image there, as Batley spends Labour MP, I will be a strong voice for Palestine, human rights and statehood.
	That's right, that's got my vote.
	I mean, Conservatives always put, I'll be a strong voice for Reading East, or whatever it is.
	They don't put for, I don't know...
	Israel?
	Russia?
	That's not really what you're meant to put on campaign leaflets, but okay.
	So she also says, What?
	Wait, is she going to convert on the spot?
	She's calling the site the holy site, the holy month of Ramadan.
	Mashallah, these Zionists are attacking us.
	It's just a weird thing to put in there.
	You can also see her there saying, Azure MP, I'll give you a strong national voice on Kashmir.
	Important stuff.
	Really resonating with local concerns.
	Could you get any worse optics on this?
	Just like my entire campaign leaflet is about foreign Islamist conflicts.
	I mean, at least it wasn't written in Arabic.
	Yeah, I mean, no shot.
	Thank God's small mercies.
	Yeah, so the Labour Muslim Council have said that this allegation that voters on the ground may have views on the Jews...
	Is Islamophobia.
	So saying that they have these views is Islamophobia in and of itself.
	So the first part of this tweet is them saying, over the past week, Labour Muslim Network has submitted numerous complaints to the Labour Party complaints procedure as a result of Islamophobic tropes used by members online when discussing the upcoming Batley and Spen by-election.
	As a reminder, it is a breach of the Islamophobia definition adopted by the party to make stereotypical allegations about Muslims.
	This includes the common trope that Muslims are inherently, and as a community, more likely to be anti-Semitic, homophobic, and or misogynistic.
	Right.
	So Pew polling data is Islamophobic.
	Because they asked Muslims, hi, how do you feel about the moral status of being gay?
	And 90 plus percent of them said it's wrong.
	I think zero percent said it was morally acceptable among British Muslims.
	British Muslims.
	What an Islamophobic poll that was.
	I mean, you couldn't get a better example of what the right, the liberals and the conservatives have always been wanting.
	Do not buy into the idea of Islamophobia.
	That's nonsense.
	Use anti-Muslim bigotry.
	Because otherwise you will find any criticism of Islam as Islamophobia.
	Any contradiction of Islamic doctrine is Islamophobia.
	As if it was an accusation of racial hatred instead of just obvious criticism or pointing out the obvious contradictions.
	So the Labour Muslim network being like, hey, if you point out that we have Islamic views, you're an Islamophobe.
	So...
	But that's what it is, isn't it?
	It's like McFuse.
	That's true.
	So, I mean, I retweeted this just to get the headlines here.
	I mean, the first one there is a Guardian headline.
	Half of all British Muslims think homosexuality should be illegal.
	And then the next one's from, I think it's like the Jerusalem Post.
	It's like, I think it was 44% of UK Muslims back anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
	So, I mean, what do you want?
	Just labour sweating nervously.
	That's Islamophobia.
	Okay.
	And then you have just the quotes from the Hadith.
	So if you scroll down on this one, John, there's the quotes I've got down here.
	But I'll just read them out for the sake of time.
	So they say in here, the first one, on homosexuals, If you find anyone doing as lots of people did, kill the one who does it, and kill the one whom it is done.
	So, kill the guy...
	Kill the top and the bottom.
	Yes.
	That's the Islamic standard, according to the Hadith.
	Sayings of the Prophet.
	And then the next one, just on Jews, in case you're wondering.
	The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight the Jews.
	And the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree Jewish trees.
	I just, I mean, like, I'm sorry, but Islam is just such a meme.
	Like, there's just so much of this that's so absurd.
	Like, the trees are Jews.
	But this is about to bring about the final judgment of the last day, isn't it?
	Yeah.
	So in sort of Muslim theology, this can't happen until all the Jews have been killed.
	So, I tried to find an Islamic defense of this, but I mean, it's pretty cut and dry.
	Like, the day of judgment will come when we kill the Jews.
	Uh-huh.
	You mean, you would have thought that would be the end of the ideology in public, but okay.
	I mean, well, at least the end of the discussion of whether Islam is anti-Semitic.
	Yeah, so the defense I've seen is that this is a prophecy, not a command.
	I'm like...
	What?
	How does that make it any less or more moral?
	Like, that's just as bad.
	When the stones are crying out, there's a Jew behind me, kill him, then the final day will come.
	Yeah, that is prophecies, and it's predicting something that happens in the future.
	But also the start there.
	The last hour would not come unless the Muslims fight the Jews.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	So if we go to the next one, I mean, there are cartoons of this situation online, you know, in type of days.
	Well, it's good because this is cartoonishly evil.
	Yeah.
	I mean, like, this is a cartoon shared by New Jerusalem Online showing exactly that, which is...
	The trees crying out to some Islamist.
	There is a Jew behind it.
	I mean, this is not hard to find, Labour Muslim Network.
	You can just Google it.
	I just Google Memory TV Jews if you want some examples on anti-Semitism in the Muslim world.
	But okay.
	So, we're going to the next link.
	This is Angela Arena jumping in here, the deputy leader to defend.
	Oh yeah, let's see what this noted Islamic scholar has to say about this.
	Yeah, so she says the comments are completely unacceptable and are not condoned or sanctioned in any way by the party.
	Pointing out that local voters are not too keen on Zionist Keir.
	Anyone who has...
	You're married to a junior.
	They're raising the children.
	What a thing.
	What a thing to play on the doorstep.
	I can't imagine it.
	She says anyone who has made these comments should and will be dealt with with our disciplinary procedures.
	But she doesn't deny the comments, nor does she say that untrue.
	She just says anyone who states that publicly should be disciplined.
	I'm sorry, it's just that...
	I didn't want to tell you.
	Holy...
	This party is just...
	Rotten.
	I mean, just everything about it is broken.
	So we go to the next link.
	This is something we reported on before, which is that previously...
	I'm not laughing.
	I know.
	Just two Muslims just hanging around in Batley, just being like, well, I don't mind Labour, but Keir Sama's just married to a Jew.
	His children have been raised Jewish.
	Like, that's just the conversation they're having.
	But I imagine people with Labour rosettes knocking on the door and saying that's true at this point.
	Well, I don't even know.
	But this is what we reported on before, which is the late party issued an Islamophobia report into themselves, because they were being accused of anti-Semitism, so their solution was to accuse themselves of Islamophobia to get away from that issue, which...
	What an absolute...
	What a pro-gamer move.
	What an absolute car crash the Labour Party has become.
	So this is the findings I want to go through here, again, just because it's relevant all of a sudden again.
	So this is internal documents showing that we've got different faiths, how they vote, and you can see the difference between Jews and Islam there.
	And Jews, overwhelmingly conservative, along with the Anglicans.
	Islam, pretty Muslim.
	80-something percent Muslim.
	Labour?
	Yeah, I think that's 90% actually.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	I mean, this is internal documentation.
	This is what they use in their report.
	Okay.
	So, I mean, when someone raises concerns and is like, yeah, we're losing the Muslims, that might be a problem.
	Yeah, it looks like it might be for you guys.
	Hmm.
	Good luck.
	So if we go to the next one, this is examples of Islamophobia that they have in here and also the definition, which are comical.
	So the first one being their definition of Islamophobia.
	Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.
	So racism that's rooted in racism.
	So they then give a bunch of examples.
	The first one, saying Muhammad was a pedo or that Islam was spread by the sword.
	That's Islamophobia.
	Islamophobia.
	So, Islamic history.
	Let's just sidestep the Muhammad thing.
	Because we could probably formulate an adequate defence to this, saying he wasn't real.
	So, you know, that's something...
	A hell of an Islamic defence.
	Don't worry, all our religion is nonsense.
	I'm not saying they could formulate, I'm saying the labour activists could formulate this.
	But the idea that Islam wasn't spread by the sword, I mean, that's total nonsense.
	You can't describe Islam without describing the Islamic conquest from the early period after the death of Muhammad.
	There's just no way of doing it.
	So the next one is denying Muslim populations self-determination.
	That's Islamophobic Muslim population.
	Self-determination?
	What?
	Yep.
	So, Han, are they saying that Muslims in Britain are not, say, citizens of Britain?
	They reference, as an example, Palestine or Kashmir, but then they define them as Muslim populations.
	Right.
	Okay.
	And then the next one is, stereotyping Muslims, such as Muslim entryism into politics, is also Islamophobia.
	What happened to the last one?
	The last one, where self-determination was on the basis of your religion, but if...
	Muslims get into politics, they're going to make it on the basis of Islam, and saying that is also Islamophobic?
	So again, they've accused themselves of Islamophobia within their own report.
	God, they're nailing down absolutely everything, aren't they?
	Yeah, the entire party is trash.
	So the next one here is the Conservatives not accepting this definition, because, I mean, why should you?
	So the next link.
	So this is just good news.
	And then the next one is Sadiq Khan accepting it.
	So if they'll be getting power, that's going to be accepted.
	So even the Labour Party will be criminalised.
	Yeah.
	And this is why when they moan of Islamophobia rather than anti-Muslim bigotry, it's empty.
	Empty accusation.
	Which is why when we get the next one, which is Labour Muslims urge Keir Starmer to take urgent action over the party's official vile Islamophobia.
	So the next one, John, after this.
	This is, you know, the Independent trying to argue that there's vile Islamophobia in the party.
	I agree.
	And they're referencing someone saying that loads of them are anti-Semites.
	That's what they're referencing here.
	So, yeah.
	How's the voting doing?
	So, the last link here is the polling.
	And not good for Labour.
	No, not good at all.
	Conservatives, 47%.
	Labour, 41%.
	Workers' Party of Great Britain, 6%.
	I see the Progressive Alliance is holding there, though, as the Lib Dems are getting virtually nothing.
	But this is actually going to fall to the Conservatives, isn't it?
	Why, that's what's going to happen at this point.
	I hate to be rooting for the Conservatives, but yes, unfortunately.
	Anyway, yeah.
	Labour Party's not sure if they're anti-Semites or not yet.
	Still having that debate.
	I guess we'll find the results soon.
	But anyway, what are we doing with the sound?
	Because I don't want to...
	It's fine now.
	It's fine now?
	Okay.
	Okay, great.
	So, let's talk about the failing CNN, which I love to talk about failing, because, of course, after the political demise of the bad orange man, CNN... I've got very little say, and nobody really wants to hear them.
	And so they have to go after, say, Tucker Carlson constantly, which is what Brian Stelter recently did.
	Now, Brian Stelter is my favourite fat CNN gremlin.
	He obviously is someone who is just a corporate mouthpiece, a total shill, blah, blah, blah.
	I don't want to hammer the point home too hard.
	But this is the sort of...
	It really makes you wonder, like, whose interest is Brian defending?
	So this was him complaining, because as we covered last week, Tucker Carlson had pointed out that actually, if a load of people who are involved in the capital riots haven't been charged, that makes it sound like they may well have been collaborators, and this is something that should be investigated.
	And Brian Stelter...
	Wasn't happy with this.
	He whines that Tucker pointed out that a bunch of people from January 6th were likely feds.
	Prove him wrong, Brian, if you don't like it.
	This completely bogus conspiracy theory is everywhere.
	How is it bogus?
	It's not bogus until you prove that they aren't feds, right?
	Because otherwise the implication is either the Biden government just has a particular reason to not prosecute any of these people, or there's some other thing going on.
	But Fox just replied to this saying, just shut up.
	It's an opinion show.
	We don't answer to CNN. And so this had Brian Stelter going, oh, Fox is rotten from top to bottom.
	It's a propaganda operation, which I find a highly ironic charge coming from CNN. But as you can imagine, this is all informed by the desperate jealousy that they have against Fox News, because Fox News are smashing it.
	And again...
	Honestly, I never thought I would have reason to praise Fox News or Fox News hosts, but it's just the weird way that politics has gone, that Fox News are actually saying things that are sensible, sometimes, occasionally, Tucker Carlson in this particular case, and CNN are just full of nonsense.
	And so it's amusing to watch them fail.
	And fail they are.
	I mean, CNN's reliable sources with Brian Stelter failed to attract even 1 million viewers for 11 straight weeks and averaged 752,000 on Sunday, last Sunday, for their smallest audience of 2021.
	So it's just a downward decline for Brian Stelter.
	And the whole network.
	Yeah, we'll get to the...
	Trump's gone, so...
	Yeah, we'll get to that in a second, but specifically for Brian Stelter, doing his level best to defend the great and powerful in the Democratic Party, it turns out it's not very popular.
	Stelter, who claims to cover media industry but often ignores stories that would tarnish the reputation of a fellow liberal, lost 5% of his viewers compared to the previous week.
	So he's just going straight down.
	And in the same time slot, which is Stelta's direct competition, is Fox News' Media Buzz, which averaged 1.1 million viewers, which beat CNN by 41%.
	What are you doing wrong, CNN? Fox News aired 12 different programs on Sunday alone that attracted a larger audience than Brian Stelta.
	What are you doing wrong?
	So yeah, this also fails to attract in what they call the crucial demographic of adults.
	He's 25 to 54 for 10 straight weeks.
	He doesn't even get 200,000 viewers in that demographic.
	So it's a bunch of old Democrat boomers who are watching Brian Stelter.
	Half a million of them.
	Just...
	Anyway, so this, of course, was dismal turnout.
	And he gets, you know, I was going to say popular figures, but that's not the right way to put it.
	Acceptable.
	No, no, important figures, like Jen Psaki, who he did a very nice chummy interview with, and that didn't even break 800,000 viewers.
	So, sucks for him.
	And this drew the ire of Joe Rogan.
	Now, it's because Brian Stelta had criticized Joe Rogan.
	I think Joe Rogan paid attention to this, but apparently on the latest episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, I don't use Spotify so I didn't see it, the Rogan basically...
	pointed out that youtube personalities like him were getting more viewers than cnn and they were complaining that this was some horrible thing he says they were describing it as if they're entitled to viewers uh this is because the market has spoken and your show's effing terrible uh brian stelter's show keeps slipping and slipping in the ratings uh and same with don lemons it's the same thing everybody knows they're not real they're not real humans I mean, that's physically true in the case of Brian Stelter, who's obviously a goblin.
	But Don Lemon might well just be a corporate puppet.
	But he's making a good point.
	They have an artificial position, because what they have to defend is this kind of...
	Left-leaning, neoliberal corporate consensus.
	And it doesn't appeal to anyone.
	It only appeals to the people who are directly involved in that sort of, I don't know, I don't want to just say cathedral, but that is essentially what it is.
	And anyone outside of that, just living a regular life, just looks at Don Lemon and Bernie Stelter and what's the Chris Cuomo.
	They're so obviously bought and paid for men.
	Who do they appeal to?
	They appeal to nobody.
	But Rogan particularly singled out Stelter, failing to ask any pressing questions in his interview with Jen Psaki.
	How about Brian Stelter talking to the press secretary saying, like, what are we doing wrong?
	What are we doing wrong?
	Hey, mother effer, you're supposed to be a journalist.
	Is he, though, meant to be a journalist?
	Does anyone think of Brian Stelter as a journalist?
	Brian Stelter, to me, seems like a containment man.
	Someone who's got to desperately rebuff and, like, diffuse any allegations against the ruling power.
	Anyway, don't get me wrong, right?
	Fox News did the same thing for Donald Trump and the Republicans, and he does that for the Democrats.
	There's no question of it.
	It's just partisan defense at this point.
	But Fox doesn't lie about it.
	Yeah, Fox doesn't lie about it.
	It's like, yeah, we're a right-wing machine.
	Yeah.
	No, no, no.
	When do they ever deny that allegation?
	Yes, yes, that is the case.
	But they're proud of that.
	Yeah, anyway, this said...
	I mean, Joe Rogan makes a good point.
	He was an interesting guy if he had his own podcast, and he could be himself.
	But let's be honest, who else did they hear from Brian Stelz's podcast?
	No one.
	Anyway, so this all came because Stelz had a pop at Rogan.
	I love this.
	He said, Rogan's going anti-woke for the ratings.
	It's like, really?
	Yeah.
	What an endorsement of being anti-woke.
	Yeah.
	People watch you.
	Everyone loves it.
	Yeah, the woke position.
	Really unpopular.
	Why?
	Well, the purse segregation would have won.
	There are so many reasons.
	But the point is, if that's the case, why are you going woke?
	What master are you serving by going woke?
	Because you'd think that a media company would be like, okay, we've got to work on our ratings.
	Okay, well, what are you going to do?
	We're going to brown people for being white and male.
	And not being losers, actually.
	Homeowners, various other things.
	I mean, this in particular was when Joe Rogan pointed out, look, if you follow this line of logic to its inevitable conclusion, they'll literally say that white men won't be allowed to talk, which is, incidentally, the sort of theme that we're going to be covering in the third segment in a bit.
	Because that is where this is going.
	There's, like, literally no whites, because they're racists.
	But yeah, so didn't really help out Brian Stelter.
	And there's been interesting news with Don Lemon as well.
	And I love watching the desperation here.
	So Don Lemon tweets out this announcement when he's on his treadmill going, oh, I've got a big announcement, something big's going on, it's important.
	And it's like, okay, your ratings are going down as well.
	Got it.
	You need to tease something out.
	And he, on his show, put up a clip that implied that he was leaving.
	And it was, oh, my God.
	And so you can see, like, people clip this and put it on the internet going, Don Lemon announces he's leaving CNN tonight.
	Oh, my goodness.
	And it turns out it was a very impressive fake-out.
	Don Lemon puts up another clip going, oh, I don't know why you think I'm leaving.
	Why do you think I'm leaving?
	I'm not leaving.
	Don't be silly.
	I've got an announcement to make on my show.
	And it turned out that the announcement was he's renaming his show.
	I mean, I was gutted.
	I was looking forward to him leaving CNN to see what he did next.
	But as USA Today reports, Don Lemon caused a stir on the internet and said, yeah, this was just a really cheap ratings grab.
	They did a family guy.
	Really cheap.
	They killed Brian as a border bag.
	Yes.
	Unbelievably cheap.
	But yeah, so he's not being cancelled, he's being renamed.
	I didn't mean to set the internet on fire.
	What I said last night was true, he wrote.
	CNN Tonight with Don Lemon is no more.
	I'll be back on Monday with my newly named show, Don Lemon Tonight.
	Bravo, Don.
	I can see why CNN is failing.
	But anyway, yeah, so Fox News have been reveling in the failure of their, well, I suppose their primary competition.
	And every time their ratings come out and they're bad, Fox News puts up a nice article saying, hey, their ratings suck.
	And they don't even mention their own ratings as the thing.
	Because everyone knows their ratings are way better.
	But to be honest with you, it's probably due to the media ecosphere and the fact that Fox News is the pretty much only major right-wing news source.
	And it's going to be the same in Britain with GB News.
	Sure, that's a good advantage they've got.
	But also, when you add up all the corporate media, it doesn't actually equal them either.
	That's a problem they've got.
	Like, just on a base level, they're not popular.
	Like, that's the problem CNN and all the rest of them have got.
	Well, again, they have to ask themselves, what constituency are we defending?
	And it's, of course, the sort of woke internationalist Democrat position that everyone hates.
	But no, sorry, they don't hate.
	They love in overwhelming numbers.
	Just look at Joe Biden's...
	Voting.
	Anyway, yeah, so Fox News reveling in CNN failing.
	Don Lemon tonight averaged an easily 816,000 viewers, so at least he's doing better than Brian Stelter, which was an 11% decrease.
	And this overall, from when...
	Oh, no, I'll go to the next one, actually.
	So, yeah, this has been a steep decline since the beginning of the year, when his show averaged 3.48 million viewers during the week of the Capitol Hill riot, marking a 77% decline in his viewership.
	From January.
	Without Orange, man, no one wants to hear from you.
	77%.
	Man, that's awful.
	I mean, that's huge.
	I mean...
	That's the power of Orange Man.
	That's his power.
	He is the most entertaining man on planet Earth, and Biden is just not.
	That's not true.
	It's not even entertainment.
	It's the inspiring nature and all the rest of it.
	He's got no characteristics whatsoever, in my view.
	He's got the cringe things of touching children and whatever else.
	Sniffing.
	Yeah, all of that stuff.
	But otherwise, he's just nothing.
	He might as well be a ghost.
	But they're really feeling the hit is the good news.
	But this just comes as an overall ratings decline for CNN, which is nice to see.
	As Adweek points out, CNN shed 11% in average total primetime viewers, minus 21% in the primetime demo for the previous month.
	That's interesting as well.
	There's no reason to watch CNN. No.
	Just when something's up, that's when it's in.
	What does corporate America think?
	Well, ask CNN. What's their opinion?
	Don't read these WikiLeaks leaks, you know, but they've got special dispensation.
	What was the quote?
	It's illegal to have access to this.
	Yeah, it's illegal to have the WikiLeaks documents, but we can do it.
	You have to come through us to get them.
	It's like, Chris, come on, that's such obvious, transparent cope.
	Frankly.
	But anyway, so, yeah, so compared to the news heavy month of May 2020, which was CNN's most watched May ever, the network was down by 45% in average total primetime audience and 53% in its, you know, the prime demo audience.
	And so that's really, really bad.
	Really bad.
	So failing CNN is a completely true way of categorizing it.
	Donald Trump probably right overall.
	And they've got nothing to talk about without the evil orange man.
	Sucks to be them.
	I mean, just imagine your entire platform, everything you talk about, I mean, literally your entire world, depends on Orange Man.
	Or a massive race grift.
	I mean, if George Floyd dies, you're thinking, great, that's brilliant, that's ratings for us.
	That's propaganda, as their own guys called it.
	Yeah.
	Remember the Project Veritas leaks.
	They did.
	Oh, boy.
	And without that, CNN have got very little to do or say.
	Yeah, I remember there were some, let's say, left-leaning commentators who were all giddy when 6am came in, and it looked like Biden was going to win, and they were like, haha, all of the right's going to be destroyed, because without Trump, they've got nothing.
	They're just going to wither and die.
	No, the opposite.
	Literally, all of the corporate left is going to wither and die, because there's no reason for them to stick around.
	Yeah, I mean, you can always listen to Rachel Maddow's conspiracy theories on MSNBC. They're probably more entertaining, to be honest.
	You know, if I work there, I'd start leaving, like, just Russian gifts around the place.
	Just start freaking out.
	Like, buying Russian chocolates or, like, old notes.
	Just notes written in Russian.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Oh, that would be funny.
	We're not saying do that, though, if you work at MSNBC. Oh, come on, it'd be fun, though.
	Like, when you get fired, it'd be worth it.
	We're going to fire you for, as well, for having Russian stuff.
	Yeah, but we're definitely not advocating that people gaslight, uh, what was her name?
	Rachel Maddow into going mental.
	Which is really mental.
	Exactly.
	So no work is required on our end.
	But I mean, if you did that, what would they fire for?
	You've got this Russian note and this Russian chocolate.
	Yeah, and?
	Reds in the beds.
	Anyway, let's go on to the last segment.
	Whites need not apply.
	This is a real thing, and it really annoys me.
	I've had personal animosity against this issue because of the civil service.
	I applied back when they did the, what was it, the internship, the diversity internship.
	It's still up, still there.
	They were taking it down.
	And it literally says, no wise.
	Yeah, you have to be brown-skinned, disabled, or poor.
	Which, weird to put those in the same category.
	Right.
	Civil service.
	But they're not the only ones.
	So the most recent example of this is the BBC. So we archived this just to make sure it's there forever.
	So this is a BBC trainee researcher position in which they've listed on some website for jobs.
	£17,000 per Adam.
	Required experience.
	One year's.
	To go and work in Bristol for the BBC to do research for various TV shows.
	I mean, who cares about the...
	The job itself, except for the fact that you don't need to have a certain skin tone to do it.
	Well, let's go back up a second, because this is fine.
	Do you know a kestrel from a kingfisher or a gannet from a goldfish?
	If you love watching wildlife documentaries and can't wait to kickstart your career in TV, this researcher opportunity with an award-winning team in Bristol could be the one for you.
	doesn't require you to have a certain type of skin. - Yeah.
	How is my ethnicity relevant to this? - Yeah.
	They continue so on and so forth and none of it, none of it's on camera, you know, you're not playing Anne Boleyn, for example.
	So there's no reason for that, except at the bottom there, this opportunity is open to black, Asian, and ethnically diverse candidates.
	I mean, how is that legal?
	It's not.
	Right.
	I spoke to a friend of ours, who's one of our supporters, who works at the Civil Service, and he tried to explain this to me.
	So, apparently the Equality Act has a section in which it tries to legalise positive action, is what it's meant to do.
	So this is how it's meant to be understood.
	Right.
	Which is that you can make an advertising campaign, for example, or say at the bottom, you know, we especially love to get some, you know...
	Diversity.
	Is that the PC way of saying the M word these days?
	Because that's what I imagine these people at these offices.
	Essentially that's what they're saying.
	You know, we'd like to get people with brown skin involved.
	Like, that's allowed.
	But what's not allowed is for you to just say, nah, if you've got a certain skin tone, you're not allowed in.
	Except the BBC does it openly.
	Well, I mean, they literally, this opportunity is only open to non-white people.
	This isn't the first time, even, that this has happened before under the BBC, if you remember the internship they did for the London headquarters.
	That's also got a lot of shtick.
	But there are people who have gone to court over this.
	You remember the police officer who went to court over the police doing this to him?
	And he won!
	But has anyone sued the BBC over this?
	To my knowledge, no.
	But I just can't get over how they do this in public.
	They've been caught before.
	I sent them an email at the time when I got caught, actually, and they defended it to me, being like, no, we stand by our decision to exclude whites.
	I was like...
	Okay.
	Of all the horrible things the BBC does, I mean, sure, the statue and the rapist stuff is all there.
	Jimmy Savile, but now it's just open racism.
	That is historical, in a sense, but this is now.
	This still goes on.
	This job is still posted.
	You can go and apply if you want.
	This is a job that I'm literally racially excluded from.
	Yeah, no whites.
	Whites need not apply.
	And they're not their only ones, as I mentioned.
	So if you go to the next link, this is just a compilation of a bunch of jobs I found online which have a similar tension to them.
	So ITV, BBC, QI, and The Discovery.
	So this is ITV, some research job, and they say this opportunity is only open to individuals from a group that is underrepresented.
	That's really interesting, because I bet if you were to do a sort of tallying up of, like, ITV or BBC presenters, because they're very London-centric and London is a very diverse city now, then I bet the white English would be considered to be underrepresented there.
	Oh, even if you take the national figure, ethnic minorities are over-represented in media.
	Someone sent me a link to that.
	But that doesn't matter, because then they'll just say...
	Because they've predefined under-represented as just meaning non-white.
	But then they'll just say, like, oh, maybe under-represented nationally, but this is mostly in London, so we've got to use the London number for ethnic minorities, which is, like, you know, 40% of whatever it is.
	And then if they, I don't know, what about the representation in Tower Hamlets?
	Like, they'll just localise it and localise it until they feel like they're away from it.
	And as you can see there, they say underrepresented groups.
	This includes, but is not limited to, black, Asian, and ethnically diverse candidates, people with disabilities, okay, and individuals from a lower social economic background.
	Listen, if you're poor or disabled, you're basically black.
	That's what being black is.
	Being a disabled poor person.
	Okay, Joe Biden.
	It's so awful.
	I can't get over it.
	These jobs are all online.
	You can go search them yourself.
	So this is the one I mentioned from the BBC. This opportunity is only open to brown-skinned people.
	And then the next one here being QI. Oh, yeah, this was a researcher, wasn't it?
	Yeah.
	Again, this opportunity is open to applicants from a group that is underrepresented.
	This includes, but not limited to, black, Asian, blah, blah, blah, blah, or disabled.
	And then Discovery being the same thing here.
	I mean, this is just the standard in media now, I guess.
	If you want a job, it's got to be a certain skin tone.
	It's just absolutely horrible.
	Sorry, I hate it so much.
	The fact that it goes on in public and there's no like, oh, could you imagine if this happened to white people?
	It is happening to white people.
	Yeah.
	There.
	So the next link here is at least the Daily Mail have picked up on this, of all people, to praise.
	They usually hate the Daily Mail, but okay.
	BBC bans white people from applying for £18,000 trainee job on Springwatch and The One Show.
	This is another one they found that's in Glasgow.
	And as they mentioned, it says the position is only open to black, Asian, and ethnically diverse candidates.
	And this is not a nothing burger.
	I was able to find the link for this job.
	So if we go to the next one here, this is the link of Creative Access, in which you can see they're hiring.
	Same position, except in Glasgow.
	Eligibility.
	Positive action scheme.
	Positive.
	Hmm.
	Positive.
	Positive.
	No, you're just racist.
	You just hate white people.
	That's why you're doing this.
	I just can't believe that racial hiring policies are just something the media does.
	These are the people who lecture you about racism every goddamn day.
	Especially the BBC. I mean, how many documentaries have we shown and they'll be like, is uni racist?
	Oh, everything.
	Go on BBC iPlayer and it's just like, this is racist, that's racist, the other's racist.
	Is the BBC racist?
	Yes!
	We've got the evidence.
	Anyway, so we go to the next one.
	This is NonsFlix.
	NonsFlix have decided to get in on this, because of course they have.
	So this is a £22,000 internship that excludes white applicants.
	We are looking for applications from writers of Black, Asian, and other ethnic, racial or ethnic backgrounds that are underrepresented in high-end TV and the film industry.
	Specifically, given Netflix's choice of when they decide to change the race of characters for no reason, I'm going to say that, yeah, they're probably over-represented there as well.
	But that doesn't matter, does it?
	Reality never matters to these people.
	They just don't give a toss.
	Okay, so let's assume that for some reason the law doesn't apply to the private companies and they can just be like, yeah, no whites.
	Browns only, thank you.
	Or disabled, because they're basically the same.
	Okay.
	That's fine, but can the Conservatives, that's not fine, but you know, it's monstrous, but okay.
	But let's assume that for some reason they've got a legal out in having racial hiring policies.
	Why can't the Conservatives do something about the BBC doing this?
	And that's, you would think, okay, you know, I mean, they're the government.
	They could say, look, you're not allowed to have racial hiring policies, surely.
	And I don't think that'd be a very controversial position with most of the country.
	But why can't they come down hard on the BBC going, no, what are you doing?
	This isn't the first time.
	No, of course not.
	There's a bunch of them here right now being advertised.
	Yes.
	They've done this before.
	Remember the issue in London.
	Yep.
	Conservatives, do something about this.
	There's a spectacularly strong moral argument from the classically liberal position about non-discrimination on the basis of race.
	It's phenomenal.
	Literally everywhere in the country would agree with this position as well.
	No one's going to criticise it.
	And it'll just be the black flag of Labour that's waving in the background complaining.
	And you don't have to care because they're failing everywhere.
	It's so weird that this just goes on under a Conservative government.
	It's been a Conservative government for ten years.
	More than.
	What are you doing?
	The easiest argument in the world.
	The right thing to do.
	Yeah.
	I mean, what more do you want?
	It is improper that they have racial hiring policies.
	It's just wrong.
	You don't need to go any further than that.
	No one's going to challenge it.
	Apart from, obviously, the Labour Party members who are staffing the BBC. But then you can make a good point about them being immoral racists.
	They should be fired.
	And they should be fired.
	If not for an excuse to get rid of the whole BBC. At least get rid of other people doing this.
	So I thought that would be a nice intro to a tale about the scum who won't attend diversity and inclusion involvements.
	So the scum here being the white, cis, hetero men.
	And I'm not joking, she actually lists that in this article.
	So this is an article in which they're claiming about this.
	The number one reason white men give for not getting involved with diversity and inclusion.
	God.
	A few years ago, at the company picnic, I joined a handful of colleagues, helping to haul boxes of sandwiches and soft drinks through the park.
	All of us had signed up for this manual labour a few weeks prior, back at the office.
	And all of us, it turned out, were women.
	No men.
	No men came to the company picnic on diversity and inclusion.
	Big shock.
	What is in it for them?
	Just out of interest.
	So we've got a worldview that basically says that straight white men are evil and everyone else is good because they're being oppressed by straight white men.
	And for some reason the straight white men just aren't showing up to be berated by us.
	But we brought sandwiches.
	Yeah, I don't care.
	Don't want to be called a bad person because of my skin colour or gender.
	She says, Must be nice to have a flexible schedule.
	Out of sheer curiosity, I asked a couple of male co-workers why they hadn't helped carry items for the picnic or responded to some other recent calls for volunteers.
	None of them said they had anything against the idea of helping out in theory, they said.
	They just thought I'm too busy.
	Yeah.
	They've got a job.
	They've got a job to do.
	And the women here who presumably work in the HR diversity department don't.
	Don't have a job, do you?
	That's why you've got this to do.
	It's why their minds are occupied by questions of identity rather than work.
	So she says, I'm too busy.
	It's a seemingly innocuous thought that can wind up having major consequences for equality in the workplace.
	As a reporter...
	No, that's right.
	That's absolutely right.
	You're absolutely right.
	If one group of people aren't working very hard and another group of people are working very hard, that's inequality.
	That's right.
	Equality has been destroyed by the hard-working group not shuffling things around for the picnic.
	Yeah, and this group of SJWs who are doing the picnic instead of working.
	Yeah, you're not producing.
	You are the cause of inequality.
	Get to work.
	As a report from the Non-Profit Centre for Talent Innovation shows, researchers from the Non-Profit Think Tank asked white, straight, cisgender men with white-collar jobs in the US about their views on diversity, equity, and inclusion in the workplace.
	Only 10% of the respondents thought DEI, and I've heard basically DI, if you move it around as well.
	I mean, diversity, inclusion, equity.
	That spells DI. And there's no particular reason that they couldn't have had diversity, inclusion, and equity.
	They mostly do, if you see the wording usually.
	They've moved it around, presumably because they realised it spells die.
	And when they talk about white men, they didn't want that kind of messaging.
	So they said 10% of the respondents thought die wasn't important at all.
	The most common reason those men gave for not being involved in such efforts was that they don't benefit me.
	Yeah?
	Well, I mean, you are the villain of the piece.
	Like, why?
	What?
	You're the problem that's causing inequality.
	You're the problem that's the oppressor.
	You're this, you're that.
	It's like, why don't you come to our meetings?
	Why would I? 10% of black guys don't join the Klan because they wouldn't benefit them.
	Yeah, no, no, no, no.
	No, no, it's basically it.
	You basically have a new version of the Klan being formed in front of our eyes.
	And it's like, well, why aren't you black people coming in and joining our Klan rallies?
	Don't want to.
	Why would I? So, for far more white men, thought that dye was at least somewhat important, 48%, and 42% thought it was very important.
	And the thing I want to mention here is this very much reminds me of East Germany, in which people would join the Communist Party because they saw it as a sign of just, like, special privileges.
	And the East German security services took that as a sign that they were safe communists and not going to rebel.
	So the people filling in these surveys, I think, are in the same situation where they're like, no, I've been having this form, and my name's going to be on it, and they're asking me whether or not Dai is important.
	I'll just put yes, I'll just put yes, and I don't want to have to deal with this.
	There's also the other angle, it's like, well, I mean, it's everywhere, so, I mean, it is, important isn't an endorsement, you know?
	Like, the Chinese Communist Party is important, but I'm not really in favour of them, you know?
	But they are important, you can't deny that, you know?
	Oh, man.
	Because the stated preference, of course, being that none of the men came to the picnic.
	Yeah, the revealed preferences showed that they're not into it.
	Yet even in the latter group dubbed the True Believers by the researchers, only 56% said they were actively supporting DEI at their jobs.
	The most common reason both groups gave for not being involved?
	I'm too busy.
	That's right, I'm too busy being the pillars that hold this whole thing up.
	I know you've got important busy work to do, like question the racial gender composition of the workforce, but someone has to actually do the labour, don't they?
	Someone's been working sales.
	Might want to sell some stuff to keep the business around.
	The report further drew from National Survey of More Than 2,000 Men, conducted in February 2020, as well as a focus group of more than 500 participants and one-on-one interviews with 40 people.
	Some of the quotes from those interviews.
	Quote, Just white man.
	Just white man.
	I mean, it's just really, it's the complete negative image of how slave owners in the South must have, one Negro said this.
	But also, it's just like, yeah, I just want to do my job.
	That's what he said.
	I'd actually rather just do some work.
	The next quote.
	The ability to just get regular work done is so hard that there's rarely interest or time to work on the higher-order tasks that promote a healthy culture, another respondent said.
	So this guy...
	No one else is working hard enough, and I've got to work hard to make sure everything keeps running.
	Well, you SJWs keep spending all your time on, like, picnics to talk about your feelings.
	You leave loads of work, so I have to do it, in which case I can't come to the picnic.
	Perfectly valid response.
	To be honest with you, he's probably having more fun doing the work.
	I would be.
	So it's, quote, still seen as kind of extracurricular, says Julia Taylor Kennedy, the lead researcher on the project and executive vice president at the Center for Talent and Innovation.
	It hasn't been positioned as a core competency to driving business or individual leaders' careers forward.
	That's because it doesn't achieve anything.
	No.
	It bills nothing.
	You know, all of these people are actually doing the labour of putting things together.
	Talking about their diversity isn't advancing anything.
	And so Julia's like, well, I mean, it's not positioned as a core competency.
	It's like, yes, because it's not.
	It's very obviously extracurricular.
	What would happen if we devoted 100% of the company's time to picnics to talk about my genitals?
	Exactly.
	How many sales would be made that month?
	Exactly.
	Zero.
	Zero.
	And the point of it being extracurricular, duh.
	I mean, if all of this dropped away and wasn't indulged in and no one cared about any of it, the business would still thrive.
	In fact, it would probably do better because it's now just had a big weight on its budget cut and that money could go to something that's actually useful and productive.
	But instead, you get this.
	It hires more workers.
	It'd lower poverty.
	Nah.
	Rather just spend $100,000 on it.
	People talk about...
	I'd rather just call black people disabled.
	Thank you very much.
	So says the diversity officer.
	Yeah.
	And when white men who continue to hold a disproportionate amount of senior level positions believe that they're too busy to help with something as important as equality in the workplace, it's no wonder that little progress gets made.
	That's amazing.
	Little progress.
	Oh, you think you're so busy running the company.
	Yeah.
	But have you considered that that productivity is a prime driver of inequality?
	Have you white man?
	This is ridiculous.
	The people of the BBC. We could just hire people and get the job rolling.
	No, but we need to hire browns or disables.
	I was not going to go over how they actually write that.
	In order to get white men truly on board with dye, the report argues that companies need to...
	Look, white men, we want to whip you for a bit, okay?
	While you're piling the fields and pulling up the con, we just want to whip you for a bit.
	But for some reason, you're not turning up, right?
	Come on, we need to get you on board.
	To get white men on board with killing themselves.
	Look, we're just racially profiling you and discriminating against you.
	you why aren't you on board with this the report argues that companies need to show them that building a diverse inclusive teams isn't something that takes time away from their real work real in quotes like that laughter The real work.
	Yeah, the selling and making things.
	Can't do that.
	I've got actual work to do, like talking about goddamn genitals at a picnic.
	And instead, a fundamental part of their jobs.
	As essential as hitting sales targets or bringing on new clients.
	But that's so revealing.
	If, look, we have to persuade you that diversity is a fundamental and real part of your job, then it's obviously not.
	Like, oh, no.
	God.
	Embarrassing.
	Like, you could sell ten more cars this week, or you could do two seminars on diversity and inclusion.
	But the thing is, like, they're completely avoiding the fact that all that's going to be said in these seminars and these workshops and these picnics are the white people bad.
	That's the premise upon which they're all grounded.
	You know, you're right.
	We should never use the term seminar or conference or anything like this to give it any kind of credence.
	From now on, it's just picnics.
	Diversity picnics.
	Diversity picnics.
	It's all you people are doing.
	Companies can demonstrate the weight that DAI efforts carry throughout any number of practices, from tying compensation to leaders' ability to recruit, retain and promote people of colour to give weight to the inclusive leadership behaviours during performance reviews.
	But that has absolutely nothing to do with performance.
	We're going to give money to a white guy who can keep more brown people around.
	Okay?
	And how does this help us shift cars?
	Shift cars?
	What are you talking about?
	Kennedy says that senior executives can serve as role models in changing the perception that supporting Dai has no personal benefit for white men.
	During town halls and other internal events, she says, they should include what they have learned from teams that were diverse.
	How it helped them identify previously overlooked markets, or what they have gained as leaders by sponsoring women and people of colour.
	As if they're puppies.
	That's got nothing to do with the job.
	The goal to create an environment where it's clear that dye is a core value I'm sorry, but it's just like, yeah, we kill our employees.
	That's the core value of the company here.
	One that no one who cares about their professional success would claim to be too busy to support.
	There is, however, one thing that it's perfectly fine to be too busy for.
	Changing the minds of the 10% of white men who don't care about diversity at all.
	Not all white men will want to join the movement, the report notes.
	So let's have a moment to respect the 10%.
	10%ers.
	Who tell them to get bent.
	The thin 10% line.
	We laugh, but these are the men who build empires, so let's show them some respect.
	The 10% who apparently run that company.
	They were doing all the work.
	It's like an advanced new reformation of the Pareto principle, isn't it?
	I can't remember.
	I don't remember the numbers.
	What's the Pareto distribution?
	20% do 80% of work.
	20% 8%.
	Yeah, yeah.
	So these 10% are doing, I don't know, presumably 60% of the work.
	Well, no, to be fair, the other 10% is probably like, you know, women and people of colour.
	Yeah, they're not radical leftists.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Just normal people who are there to do a job.
	If an employee is being discriminatory or bullying others, they need to be held accountable.
	Otherwise, Kennedy says, you can waste a lot of energy trying to change their minds.
	And research suggests that a hard sell on diversity can actually entrench bias rather than mitigate it.
	Just screaming in their face, white men at the problem is just entrenching their bias.
	Their bias.
	Bias against who?
	Brown people?
	No, against you.
	Against you and your nutjob picnic, friends.
	Yeah, I didn't come out of it hating brown people, but I really was anti-communist.
	The unspoken part of the knee-jerk response, I'm too busy, is I'm too busy to help someone else.
	Meaning, my main responsibility is to myself.
	Privileged people are often brought up to think that way.
	What the...
	Like, literally running the company.
	No, no, no, no.
	Look, right.
	A normal person thinks that their job is their responsibility to help themselves.
	A privileged person is someone who thinks that it's your job to help them.
	Right?
	That's what that is.
	That's an expectation.
	That's so unbelievably, like, arrogant to think, no, no, your job is to help me.
	You're my assistant.
	Why?
	Because I'm brown and you're white.
	Right?
	Stop thinking it's all about you, Mr.
	White Man.
	It's unreal.
	That's why I read through all that, because that's beautiful.
	I mean, you could not get a better summation of what they really think.
	So I just wanted to end on a little bit of white pill for the last link.
	So this is Nguyen, Priti Patel has scrapped unconscious bias training for the Border Force officers.
	Good.
	Something good.
	I mean, the Conservatives do do good things on occasion, and they deserve applause when they do it, because otherwise, probably they do it.
	And so, getting rid of this unconscious bias nonsense, great, great news.
	Plenty more of it.
	And if you want a better example, go to the BBC, look at their jobs, look at them saying whites need not apply, and then decimate them.
	Yes.
	Get rid of the 10% in there who are causing such problems.
	Or the whole thing, if you're having a polite way.
	I mean, literal decimation, in fact.
	Yeah.
	I mean, get rid of all of them.
	I'm sorry.
	It's unacceptable.
	It is the easiest way on the planet.
	Get to work.
	Thank you very much.
	Let's end there.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Well, let's go for there.
	According to socialists, the end result of capitalism is socialism.
	Now, also according to socialists, capitalism is evil.
	So, does that make socialism inherently evil, according to the socialists admitting it to themselves?
	It's a very good question, actually.
	Do you say the end of socialism is capitalism?
	No, the end of capitalism is socialism.
	So Marx has got a materialist and deterministic view of theory.
	It's entirely based on economics.
	And the idea is that a civilization comes out of feudalism, goes into capitalism, and from capitalism, necessarily transitions into socialism.
	This is why Marx has toast me on scientific, because that didn't happen.
	And the crisis, in fact, in the beginning of the 20th century in socialism was like, okay, why didn't that happen?
	It turned out the proles weren't a revolutionary force.
	And it's like, yeah, no, they're the most resistant to change, in fact.
	Why did Marx think for a second they would just rise up?
	What were you doing?
	You know, this whole thing was built on total nonsense.
	And he was absolutely right.
	If capitalism is evil, why isn't socialism also evil if it gives birth to it?
	But I've actually been doing a lot of work on the crisis of socialism in the beginning of the 20th century, which we'll be talking about in the book club, in fact, for Neither Left or Right, which we'll record tomorrow.
	But there's a huge amount to talk about there, and I don't want to waste everyone's time with it now, but it's really interesting.
	Because, of course, liberalism just doesn't have these crises.
	Liberalism's like, oh, there's a problem, okay, we'll just change.
	We don't have, like, you know, an authoritarian dogma.
	There wasn't a received prophecy from the holy marks about, you know, like, the economy's chosen prophet has not come down and been like, right, you must do this.
	John Milton, show me the light.
	Yeah, exactly.
	It's just like, well, then, like, Henry Ford's a great example, and they complain about Henry Ford, because one of the reasons, oh, why aren't the workers revolting?
	Well, because he's paying them well.
	What a monster.
	But that won't achieve the socialist revolution.
	No, it won't.
	No, that's right.
	But you will have happy, healthy, well-fed employees who can buy cars and drive around in cars.
	And that was a significant step up from what came before, which was nothing.
	So why are you complaining about it?
	But of course they're complaining because it doesn't bring about the glorious socialist utopia, because nothing will.
	We don't get to kill everyone.
	Yeah, that's the fault in this system.
	Yeah.
	Let's go for the next one.
	As I'm 26, I received an automated text from the NHS saying I was entitled to my Covid job.
	In fact, I actually received three texts within 15 minutes.
	As I was trying to enjoy my lunch, I did what any mature adult would do and responded to the text.
	You are entitled to, quote, suck my ass.
	Now, this third text was actually from my GP and it was actually from a human being rather than an automated bot.
	This resulted in me receiving a letter from my GP saying I must apologise or I could be removed from the practice list.
	Now, I will apologise.
	It was a genuine mistake.
	However, it raises the question, would this not be denying people healthcare?
	Oof.
	Yeah, wouldn't they?
	Yeah.
	Your right to healthcare ends you insulting the NHS. I'm not going to make any jokes, I'm just going to...
	Okay, next one.
	I endorse that text message.
	Hey guys, just a super quick one on social decline.
	Oh my god, come on.
	It's a car park of my local Asda.
	Actually, this little car park is the local Dry Slope Ski Centre.
	As you can see, more over here, more over there.
	Maybe 30, 40 trolleys around this area.
	This is a poor area.
	It's very disappointing.
	Disgusting.
	Honestly, I'm surprised you didn't follow around people with trolleys going, you're going to put that back properly, right?
	But you know, the trolley issue is definitely a sign of a civilisation in decline.
	If you can't voluntarily put the trolley away where it should be, then you're part of the problem.
	I'm in agreement.
	Oh good, we're going to get another medical lecture.
	Hey guys, allow me to add some further clarity to what I showed you before.
	So what we're looking at here is the anterior or frontal view of the heart.
	And I want to direct your attention to these here.
	These are the coronary arteries.
	These are the blood vessels that supply oxygenated blood to the heart muscle itself.
	Now, if these become blocked, it would be due to a buildup of plaque and blood clots inside the artery.
	So when these get blocked, they cut off blood supply to areas of the heart beyond them, and those areas will then be deprived of Oxygen and nutrients, and over time they'll become damaged, and eventually these tissues will start to die.
	This is what we refer to as a heart attack.
	Now, what Dr.
	Tobin has said in his testimony is that if your hypopharynx, which is this area right here in your airway, becomes blocked, this disease process here will occur within seconds.
	And that's bull****.
	I mean, that actually lays out very clearly, and it's obviously nonsense.
	That part of it.
	I think he was also arguing that it would stop, what is it, the flow of oxygen to the brain, and then you would see death.
	I don't know if that's true or not, though.
	I don't know anything about the medical side of it.
	All I know is that a massive dose of fentanyl won't kill you.
	Get your fentanyl vaccine, kids.
	Keep your safety of 50.
	Let's go to the next one.
	Afternoon chaps, try and help me with this one.
	Normal people see that there is to be a harmonious balance between the public sector and the private sector.
	Ideally the smallest possible public one because A it's cost effective and B it supposedly would mitigate the chances of corruption.
	Now the useful idiots of the progressive left think that the private sector has too much influence on the public one and in order to combat this you need to massively increase the size, scope and power of the public sector.
	The problem of it is this doesn't solve anything.
	This doesn't diminish the power of the private sector.
	This just means there's more public power for them to buy off.
	How does nobody see that?
	I'm going to assume it's because the progressive left don't know much about the systems that they're talking about.
	And so they don't really think...
	I mean, they say on one hand lobbying bad, but then they say on the other hand big government good.
	And so their only solution then is to say, well, we need to abolish corporations.
	And their desire is to tax them out of existence.
	But then they all work for these corporations.
	And then the corporations are like Pride Month, Pride Month, and then they're all genuflecting towards them.
	So it's like there's no real will and nothing happens.
	It's kind of this circle that spirals, goes around, and is never resolved.
	And it's an effective way of, frankly, keeping the sheep on social media, just moving around in this circle.
	One thing I've really loved about Pride Month, you know, corporations, is you're slowly seeing more and more leftists get to the point where they're, like, you know, very black-pilled about the whole thing.
	And they're black-pilled in a very special way, I think, because they can't say it's bad, of course.
	Yeah.
	So you can see, like, I'll give an example of Hassan Paik, for example, talking about it.
	Which is, like, they're obviously just pandering to us because they think, oh, Pride Month, and then, you know, kill Brown.
	Because you're stupid enough to buy it.
	But then he sat there in a corner, he's like, I can't say it's bad.
	You can see him being able to be like, I can't really say don't do it, but I can't say it's the wrong thing to do.
	I've been outmaneuvered on this chessboard by the corporations.
	You can see the cogs are so close to just clicking, and then it would start turning, in which they realise that, yeah, you're the control opposition.
	Yes.
	That's all.
	Well, I mean, look at the people that Hasan Piker has had to support.
	Joe Biden, like all these various woke corporations, like, you know, the establishment, like YouTube, Twitch and all this.
	He's on their side.
	And it's like, okay, well then you're defending the power structures.
	So for the group that has, you know, apparent criticisms of the power structures, it's weird how you're all genuflecting towards them.
	Just saying.
	Let's go for the next one.
	Carl, at the end of Friday's podcast, you described...
	A form of happiness that transcends the pleasure in the now.
	With a rambling but accurate description, the English language has a word that encompasses what you've said.
	It is joy.
	Someone said that to me before.
	I think it might be this chap.
	But the word joy is an interesting word.
	Because it has...
	Almost childlike connotations, at least, you know, when I heard it growing up.
	But there is a sort of thicker use to the word that I think he's appealing to there.
	I don't think he's wrong, either.
	Right, so Omar says,"...the left probably wouldn't have to fight themselves so much if they stopped acting like the white supremacists they pretend hate so much.
	They seem to argue less about righting injustice and more about who gets to hold the whip." Yeah, that's exactly how they seem to feel about it, isn't it?
	The horseshoe is getting so tight that we already have neo-segregation.
	The Family Guy colour swatch isn't far from reality either.
	No, the BBC are using it.
	How long before the leftists try to bring back phrenology to detect whiteness, and do you think they'll be using metric measurements or thetans?
	Well, I mean, I think they'll just go to drops, won't they?
	One drop rule.
	If you have one drop of white blood, you're white, and that's not good enough.
	If one drop of brown isn't good enough to apply for those jobs?
	I can apply and see if I can find out if I want.
	I'd love to do that, like if there was a British Project Veritas, and you just get a squad together of volunteers, of like shades from clearly white to, you know, and then get them all to apply for the job, and then get them all into the interviews, and just like film them secretly, and just see how it goes.
	It'd be so much fun.
	George says, Yes, I think that is basically the fact...
	It's the identity relation that it has with...
	There's also the aspect of do you agree with the American hegemonic global order or not in it?
	Because you'll see people who have no connection to this wanting to help the Arab cause, let's say, because it's F you America.
	You know, that's a quote in which they'll say it's a way of saying F America.
	Yeah, death to America and all that nonsense.
	Student of history, but I mean...
	Which doesn't make any sense.
	Like, we're going to kill Israel to hate the Americans, isn't it?
	You could just bomb America, but okay.
	Yeah.
	Well, they can't, that's the point.
	But I don't care about Israel or Palestine.
	I don't want either of them to be destroyed.
	I just think they should get along, but they're not going to.
	So, what am I going to do?
	Never visited.
	Yeah, I mean, I haven't either.
	I mean, I'd like to at some point.
	I'd like to go to the Middle East, but it's a bit of a dangerous place.
	And I haven't really felt the need to go to a massively dangerous place.
	It's not that, it's just too weird.
	And just that, yeah.
	Student of History says, the black flag of labour and the left-wing tendency towards hatred of hard work and success and them being pro-importation of anti-Semitism says now they're going to get woke air from the Jewish question.
	Well, that's the problem, isn't it?
	I mean, Keir Starmer is married to a Jew...
	I mean, I'm telling you, the word woke used to mean something among the white supremacists before it became part of the woke-left lexicon.
	It was, have you become understanding the Jewish question?
	Yeah.
	That was what woke used to be.
	And now it's a left-wing thing.
	And the Muslim community is like, yes.
	Well, I suppose it was always a left-wing thing.
	It's become a, you know, common left-wing thing in the public sphere.
	You still see, like, people, unfortunately, are using it on occasion.
	Oh, really?
	I swear, I can't prove it, but I'm damn certain that the term...
	The genealogy of the term comes from the white supremacist...
	The term woke comes from, have you figured out the Jewish question?
	It is inherently from the anti-Semitic position on that.
	Oh, okay.
	Keir Starmer's going to get his black flag soon, then.
	Yeah, so are you woke?
	I mean...
	Matthew Wilson says, if an old-school Trotskyist like George Galloway, who drove eight convoys that occupied Palestine, can't get Muslim votes in West Yorkshire, well, no one can.
	Well, that's the point, though.
	He probably will, won't he?
	He's got 6% already.
	Yeah, he'll probably do quite well.
	Paulie P says, the Labour Party.
	Britain is too racist, and it's all the fault of the Jews.
	LAUGHTER Israel Hayes.
	Dan Hodges is an idiot.
	Cummings recently went on a tirade against the media and used Hodges' past predictions as prime example of how media pundits constantly get everything wrong.
	Yeah, we covered that, didn't we?
	Dan Hodges was literally wrong about everything.
	Embarrassingly so.
	But it's the reporting on the ground.
	So you've got Galloway there as well, quotes from Galloway, in which they're saying, well, this is the information we're getting on the ground.
	But then it's also backed up by The Guardian.
	The Guardian's saying that that's also the problem they're finding.
	So it's not just a partisan thing or a pundit thing.
	This seems to be universal among left and right wingers who are discovering that there's a debate to be had about three million votes on anti-Semitism.
	Pick one.
	He also says, by the way, I'm uploading a video tomorrow that's a little longer than usual, but it's so insane I have to share it with you guys.
	Okay, well, that'd be interesting.
	But I find the allegations of bad predictions to be hilarious these days, because, I mean, for the last, like, five years, everyone's predictions about everything have been wrong.
	Like, who's predicted anything accurately?
	Cummings don't break it right, I guess.
	What did he say?
	Well, he ran the Vote Leave campaign, didn't he?
	Sure, but that's not so much a prediction, and that's activism.
	You know, there aren't any...
	It used to be that political pundits would act as sort of oracles, and they would have a reasonable degree of success, but now everything is wrong.
	Would they, though?
	What's your basis for that?
	Well, that was the impression that you were given.
	Oh, okay.
	But when you end up sort of doing this professionally, you realise that nobody has any idea, and everyone is just spouting their own personal bias.
	They're just saying, oh, I'd like it if this was the case.
	And everyone's wrong about everything so often that there's just no point putting any stock in any predictions at all.
	So I just don't make any.
	I just like looking at the stock instead.
	Yeah.
	Jack Williams says, There's a Jew behind this tree is the equivalent to there's Jews under the floorboards.
	No.
	Muslims would have made the perfect Nazi collaborators.
	Oh, they were.
	I was going to say, we won't talk about that anymore, because in the same way that Hugo Boss is not interested in talking about their past...
	Yeah, look up, what is it, Hitler and Grand Mufti.
	Google that.
	Yes, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.
	It was very interesting.
	Dan says, I hope the Batley Labour Office are displaying the LGBT pride flags in full for this holy month.
	Yeah, that's the question, isn't it?
	You know, how do the Muslim community feel about the pride flags, especially the transgender and racial pride flag?
	They're not going to say I'm included in that.
	That's not going to come out of that now.
	But one of the things I did read about is apparently George Galloway's headquarters.
	Apparently it's covered in Palestine flags.
	Not LGBT flags?
	No, no, no.
	He planted Palestine flags all around the building, so he's really going for it.
	Yes, I'm very anti-Zionist too, fellow Muslims.
	Like, Zionist is being used as just a cipher for the word Jew.
	Oh yeah, it does all the time.
	All the time.
	I mean, Zio, for example.
	I mean, we saw in the Labour leaks loads of Labour members being like, I think he's Zio Scum.
	That would be the tweet they'd send to each other.
	Okay.
	That's how you keep your talk, is it?
	It's definitely just being used to being Jew.
	And there's no irony in it at all?
	No.
	It's spiteful.
	History is Islamophobic.
	Sorry, history is Islamophobic.
	Muslims have more right to self-determination than others, and politics based on religion.
	That'll go well.
	It's going brilliantly in the Middle East, and it always has done.
	And also in the Middle East of England.
	Yeah.
	Chad Kuala says, I wouldn't bet on Labour giving up antisemitism.
	That would be like Scientology, giving up on e-meters at this point.
	Good point.
	Colin says, CNN's programming decisions don't add up.
	They're not unsophisticated people.
	They know what they could do to boost numbers and to make more money.
	If a capitalistic organisation's first goal isn't to make money, then what is their first goal?
	Yeah, that's the thing.
	CNN are very obviously the first line of defence for anything that sort of...
	Democrat industrial complex does in the United States.
	Any time that someone from social media or the Democrat Party or a left-wing organization, an NGO, any of these sorts of things, any time they do anything, the point of CNN, I think, is to be the front guard to defend them.
	Yeah.
	I mean, we've seen this from the leaks in Project Veritas.
	Yes.
	It's not even a debate.
	No, yeah, exactly.
	It's not even a debate.
	This is just what they do.
	Matthew says, Don Lemon only professionally hates white men.
	Personally, he's married to one.
	Yeah, I know.
	It's really amusing, isn't it?
	Henry Ashford says...
	Oh, is he gay?
	Yeah, he's gay and he's married to a white guy.
	I wonder if he's going to do the Chicago Mayor thing of being like, no interviews with white people.
	Good question.
	Honestly, man, Chicago is just the worst thing.
	We should have covered it today, but it was too much going on, so we'll probably cover it tomorrow.
	But there was a Puerto Rican family who were just accosted in their car by a black gang.
	The husband just pulled out and just shot in the head in the street.
	Is that the reason we're in?
	Yeah.
	Not getting any media coverage.
	Because what are you going to say?
	No white people involved.
	Gang of black people.
	Shoot a Puerto Rican man.
	Just in the head.
	Execution.
	For no reason.
	And it's like, okay, the implications of that are staggering, so I'd sweep it under the rug too.
	Don't talk about that.
	Have you seen the footage I saw from security guards?
	Look at the security camera footage, and you can hear them talking to each other, and the guards say to each other, quote, I think it's, he's a spic, he's one of yours.
	To one of the other guards as well, it's just like, oh, God.
	Like, Why would you record yourself and put that online?
	He was a Hispanic man.
	But the security guards are saying that to each other about the whole thing?
	Yeah, but there are also a bunch of leftists on Twitter going, oh no, he's white, that's okay then.
	Are they white or non-white?
	Can we settle this?
	Well, they're non-white.
	They're Hispanic.
	But why are they half-time white?
	Well, they didn't know, so they didn't know they're Puerto Rican, so they just saw a light-skinned person who's our white.
	Yeah, you also get the argument.
	I mean, they're colonisers.
	They're from Spain, therefore they're whites.
	That's right.
	Mexicans are colonisers because they're from Spain.
	Look, Americans.
	Spain is not white.
	End of conversation.
	It is European, though, unfortunately.
	And they are colonizers in the Americas.
	Yeah, but not a little bit white to begin with, so don't worry about it.
	Well, yeah, no, this isn't a white violence thing.
	But anyway, Henry says, if I know precisely what someone's going to say on any possible issue, what's the point in watching them?
	You're not thinking human, you're essentially no different to Woody from Toy Story.
	Pull the cord and what do you know?
	There's a snake in their boot.
	This is why the NPC meme rubs them up the wrong way like nothing else.
	Yeah, I mean, I know exactly what position Chris Cuomo is going to take on any given issue.
	You know, which one supports the Democrat hegemony?
	And that's the position he takes.
	Long Talks on the Neat says, the Clinton News Network ratings are failing.
	I guess Trump wasn't the only one who thought they were fake news.
	They might be better at gaslighting if their disdain for their viewers wasn't so palpable every time they opened their mouths.
	Yeah, and what's amusing as well is they've come to the point where literally their narratives are just indefensible and they can't say, bad orange man, bad orange man.
	And so there's no grit and there's no substructure to it.
	Nothing's holding it up.
	They say it and it just kind of deflates and it's not very impressive.
	Levi Bailey says, so I've gotten some of these Whites Need Not Apply jobs and grants over the years.
	Just say you're not white.
	I have actually much, much higher success rates with these jobs and grants because the competition isn't the same.
	Good point.
	Kevin says, Yeah, but I mean, at least we could have someone held to account over the fact they've got an active racial hiring policy.
	That's just awful.
	There shouldn't be any active racial hiring policies.
	I don't know why I have to say that.
	I've been saying this for years, and it's still like, okay, it's still the same point, because it's still the right thing to do, isn't it?
	Yeah, I mean, to take Steve Bannon's point, metaphorically, take the person who's responsible for this and put their head on a pike, in the sense of, like, here's the person who did this, they're fired, anyone else who does this, they're fired too.
	Yes.
	No thank you says, imagine these bigots thinking spreading hate and misinformation about identity groups and all the discrimination between them is what leads to a healthy work environment.
	Yeah, can you even imagine what it's like to then?
	Okay, so you applied to this job because you're not white and they were hiring only non-whites, and you go into the job.
	I mean, what's that job going to be like?
	It's going to be an expressly politicized workplace, isn't it?
	Did you see the pictures circulating of Kamala Harris' little lunch she had the other day?
	No.
	And it was a table like this, right?
	And there's two rows of people.
	It's all, like, women in white suits.
	And all of the women are white as well.
	And Kamala Harris is not brown, let's be honest.
	You're looking at her compared to anyone who's got brown skin.
	She's not brown.
	And then you've got, like, the waiter and the waitress, who are black.
	The image is just fantastic.
	That's what I imagine that job is like.
	You walk in, and it's just like all these white people from the BBC where progressives turn around and look at you, and you're like, Hey.
	I forgot.
	Adria says, ah, but you see, Adria de la Fuente says, ah, but you see, us whites do not deserve jobs.
	I get a check from my local patriarchy friend, Tien, every month, unlike those minorities who definitely get no help from anyone.
	Hola, my fellow whites.
	Chris says, "Two years ago there's a story about a theatre company putting up calls for actors of any race or ethnicity except white people.
	I tried to argue this was racist, but my friend thought it was just a creative decision.
	I understand the desire to portray western stories with diverse actors, but when your goal is to have anyone but a specific group, it becomes racist.
	I'm now quadrupling down on this.
	The weird thing is, like, when it comes to, like, film productions and things like that, I could actually understand and accept a kind of racial hiring practice.
	It's like, look, we're going to do a play about the Anglo-Zulu wars, so we actually need a specific kind of person to play the Zulus, a specific kind of person to play the white.
	Yeah, sorry, you know, like a bunch of Mexican Zulus turn up, you know?
	It would be weird, and it would take you out of the sword, right?
	I'm glad you could speak some Spanish.
	But that's the point, though, isn't it?
	So there is an actual genuine sort of aesthetic and creative reason behind that, but when it's a researcher, there's no reason, no justification.
	I look forward to the white George Floyd movie.
	That's going to be good.
	Yes.
	I love the memes.
	The Imam of Dibley says, I create a lot of internal artwork for the company I work for.
	I recently made an image of a mechanic.
	After handing it in, I was told to make it a woman, as there are too many men that do that job.
	Followed by the comment, sorry, there are too many white men.
	As a white guy, I found it pretty racist and sexist.
	Any advice on what I should do about this?
	Yeah, you should file a complaint with HR. That's what you should do.
	Yeah, you should, actually.
	Any time, any of this kind of racial or gender profiling, just go and follow their procedures, please.
	You have been racially and sexually discriminated against and harassed in that case.
	So make sure that you explain that this made you feel inferior, it made you feel less than.
	Use their terminology, use their buzzwords.
	So you felt humiliated, you were considered less than.
	You felt like you were being put in a subordinate box or something like this.
	You felt unsafe.
	Good, exactly.
	Good one.
	And, you know, make sure that you ladle all of their terminology on and then just hand it and say, this is my complaint.
	Thank you.
	Don't cause a big stink.
	I'm in full endorsement of using every weapon these people have against themselves.
	Absolutely.
	There's no reason not to.
	It's going to be on the field.
	Fine.
	It's going to be used.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Exactly.
	And so, yeah, I want to see white men giving very well-written and very polite complaints about race and gender discrimination.
	Do it.
	Just do it.
	And the thing is, the best part about it as well is it plays into their own internal logic so powerfully that you will see responses from this.
	As long as you keep a straight face on the whole thing.
	Yeah.
	I mean, no giggling about how obviously stupid this all is.
	Yes, just be sincere.
	Be sincere.
	It's going to be difficult, but it's worth your time, I promise you.
	Chris says, so we've come full circle back to the racism of the 50s, but flipped.
	This is a weird year.
	Well, it's been going on for a little while now, but it is a weird year.
	Spadroon Overapius says, I've already applied for the BBC position.
	I'm white.
	It seems to be the easiest 10k I'm ever going to make.
	Go on, tell me I didn't get it because I'm white.
	Then pay me.
	Yeah, apply for all these options.
	Apply for all of them.
	You know, do it.
	Like, engage with them in their weaknesses.
	That's what you need to do.
	North Antonia Knight says, It's strange how relatively recently there was a report saying institutional racism doesn't exist.
	Now that it actually does against whites.
	Clown world continues.
	Yeah, I mean, just...
	Life.
	And we don't have to argue, like, oh, we're being discriminated against in the ether.
	Applications in which you're saying no whites.
	That simple.
	This will stand up in any court on planet Earth with a reasonable judge.
	Yeah, and if it doesn't, then you don't have a reasonable judge.
	But I find it interesting as well, because I would normally say, okay, let's not say white, let's say English, but that's actually not what it is.
	So if you're a German person and you happen to be living in London, you can't get that job either, even though you're not an ethnic majority or anything like that.
	But you look at the colour of your skin and judge you on it.
	What a world.
	Like, if they class them as ethnic minorities, though, then it's like, the Germans have privilege over the English.
	Oh, the Germans are an oppressed minority now, are they?
	The oppressed Germans, yeah.
	God damn it.
	Matthew Wilson says, if you hire underqualified TV researchers, you might get a researcher recommending something mad, like a black Amber Lynn.
	I don't know who that is.
	Chris says, so what would happen if a white person who is native of, say, South Africa were to apply?
	They are white, but also a minority.
	Well, that's the thing.
	I don't think that the non-white...
	Sorry, the non-English status of you is going to count there.
	I used to live in Reading, my next neighbour.
	He was a white guy from South Africa.
	He lost his job in South Africa as a police canine unit because of black empowerment, in which they just fired him.
	Affirmative action for the majority.
	Yeah, so he left.
	He was like, well, screw this place.
	This place is going to hell in a handbasket.
	Came to the UK. And yeah, he's not going to get any.
	Places going to hell in a handbasket.
	Good.
	Nick says, even at my office, I got involved in diversity and inclusion conversation.
	I decided to chime in because I have ADHD and I feel like my needs are not being listened to.
	Working in a quiet environment being my only request.
	And I also expanded it to the whole autistic spectrum and people being aware of neurodiversity.
	It looks like I've got my foot in the door, good man, because being autistic actually affects work performance compared to being gay or black.
	Yeah.
	I did see a good point made online as well, which is if you're going to have an internship and you say you have to have brown skin or disability, it's like, well look, if you're saying on the basis this internship's only with people who are retarded, what does that say about the internship?
	I mean, not to mention all the racist stuff of comparing black people to being retarded, but...
	Well, when they say disabled, they don't mean necessarily mental disabilities.
	But that would count.
	Sure.
	So, if it can be done by that person...
	Yeah, but they would argue, well, I'm afraid that person doesn't have the capacity for the job, and therefore we're not going to hire them.
	Oh, really?
	Well, I'm sure they would.
	I just love the idea, yes, but there's higher IQ Brown, man.
	LAUGHTER They do sound like southern slave owners though, don't they?
	We're looking for three.
	Hi guys, I want to share a recent story that infuriated me.
	A woman suddenly died in her home, and the first thing the police did was take away the husband straight to a cell without any previous reports of violence.
	He got lambasted by the media and the radical left politicians as a violent male killer, claiming yet another female life.
	His wife died of natural causes.
	As determined by the autopsy report, he was jailed for two days right after his wife died.
	Feminism might have faded out of the forefront, but the consequence of that cancer still remains.
	Yeah, that's the thing.
	Like, when ContraPoint's asking, well, feminist discourse used to be in the mainstream five years ago, and it's disappeared.
	It's like, yeah, because all of the assumptions that feminism made just got folded into the left-wing position.
	Like, they all just assume them now.
	You know, now they're not even up for debate.
	So it's like, okay, well, there we go.
	Jalen says, Sweden outed their Prime Minister this morning with a successful motion of no confidence.
	As far as I know, he got a week to rebuild confidence on his election in the future.
	Odds are, if it isn't fortified, that it would end up in a heavy right-wing government.
	The question is, if it's our Tories or our UKIP that's going to be in charge.
	Yeah, but when you say your UKIP, I mean, it's going to be fairly wishy-washy Swedish UKIP, isn't it?
	Well, Swedish Democrats.
	They seem to be pretty solid, to be honest.
	Do they?
	I mean, we met one.
	Call me cynical.
	No, no, no.
	We went to Warsaw.
	We actually met one, didn't we?
	Oh, I can't remember.
	From what I've seen, they seem okay.
	But, I mean, I'm not Swedish, so tell me if I'm wrong.
	Anthony says, Hi, gents.
	You mentioned on Friday that we need a list of woke companies to boycott.
	One already exists, which is cancelthiscompany.com.
	Ooh.
	I've not seen this before.
	The definitive list of left-wing companies that you should boycott.
	Okay.
	That's great.
	Yeah, yeah, that's fantastic.
	So can we go down the list and see if we've...
	I think it's...
	I assume there'd just be a long list of...
	God, the layout I'm not a fan of, but...
	No, it's a bit 2003.
	Oh, okay, so they've got, like, different symbols, so it tells you whether or not they hate America, or if they're pro-black nationalism, or so on and so forth, or anti-gun.
	Right, okay.
	Interesting.
	Good.
	Okay.
	It's great.
	Yeah.
	Trevor says, I finally made it to a live showing of this podcast.
	Been watching since day one.
	I'm from California, and it's really hard for me to do so.
	Keep up the great work.
	Wah!
	Well, thank you very much, Trevor.
	I really appreciate it.
	We've worked very hard, obviously, and we're glad you're enjoying it.
	Glad everyone's enjoying it, actually.
	Everything seems to have been going fairly well, so, you know, vindicates the decision to do this.
	If it sucked, then it'd be like that.
	Got what we do.
	Yeah.
	Something else.
	Yeah.
	But thankfully we get to do this.
	Let us know how you found the mics.
	Because I really enjoyed not having...
	That's the one thing that's in my head that's why I've been stuttering.
	I'm just like, I can already see the chat being like, yeah, but mics.
	Yeah, but they're awful.
	They're un-aesthetic.
	Why?
	Why though?
	Because they look boring and grey and boxy and they look wrong.
	See, in my mind they look professional.
	They're just, you know, they work, they're there.
	Totally unprofessional to have a big fat mic in your face.
	Okay.
	Just saying.
	Something we disagree on.
	Anyway, let's end it there.
	I'm glad I'm the one who gets to make the executive decision on this.
	Well, you're the boss.
	Exactly.
	That's why I'm sat in this chair.
	You made me.
	So the GEM Park interview should be up in, what is it, half an hour?
	So go and check that out.
	When it comes out, We've got like five something clips as well in case you're not a premium member that should be on the YouTube channel or the website as well actually I think it comes up.
	But please do go and sign up to get access to the full thing.
	She's an amazing character.
	She went through hell and back to get here and is now living a relatively decent life let's say.
	Good.
	And just really thankful for her for coming in.
	An actual refugee who actually likes the country into which she's gone.
	Yeah, I mean, this is one of the things that makes me, why I get so upset when covering the stories of the chances coming over and over.
	It's not necessarily just because, ah, damn foreigners or something like that.
	No, it's because you guys are goddamn chances and you take up a position for someone like that.
	Yeah.
	I mean, someone who's gone through hell and ended up here.
	And you're just like, yeah, but there's no jibs in Morocco.
	Well, they are stuck in France as well.
	Sorry.
	So go check that out.
	Otherwise, we'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.

▲