Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 25, 2021 - The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters

01:31:08

The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters #139

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hello and welcome to the podcast of the Lotuses for the 25th of May 2021 and And I'm joined by Josh.
	Hello.
	And today we're going to be talking about the BLM activist who was shot in the head a couple of days ago, the rise and fall of the Black Hammer Commune, and also that Florida has banned big tech censorship.
	So, good on Florida there.
	But we're going to go through all of that.
	First thing I wanted to mention, though, was the new article we have on Lodicees.com, which is a home office response.
	So the open letter Ella Hill published on our website.
	So Ella Hill being a victim of the grooming gangs in Rotherham.
	She's now an academic.
	She does great research on this sort of thing.
	And she's an activist for obvious reasons, which is this needs to stop and you guys aren't doing enough.
	So she wrote an open letter to the Home Office accusing them of institutional racism against white and non-believers, which...
	Fair argument.
	I think she argued it very well.
	And the Home Office has responded on here, so you can go read the full thing.
	The most depressing part is when, right at the end, they're just like, please don't contact us again on this issue.
	Just sod off.
	And it's like...
	Great, great.
	So don't worry, she's written a second response in which she lays out some data, which is...
	I'm not going to spoil now, because it's...
	I want to lay it all out, hopefully tomorrow.
	And...
	Yeah, the Home Office.
	They're more guilty than they're shown to be, but we'll go through all that tomorrow.
	But go and give the Home Office review a read, especially if you read the initial open letter.
	I wonder what the Home Office had to say about themselves.
	So the next thing is something you wanted to mention.
	Yeah, sure.
	So we had a, I think it was a British Army officer, write an article for us, and it's titled Reflections of a Citizen Soldier, and I actually read through it all, and did all the proofreading of it, so I've read it through quite a few times, and it's very good, and I think it's worth checking out.
	It talks about Thank you.
	and it's a very useful insider perspective from that point of view.
	And it's also very long, very detailed, lots of great stuff there, great examples.
	So it's worth checking out, I think.
	Did he have examples of like wokeness infecting the British military?
	Oh yeah, loads.
	Yeah, it's awful.
	You should see some of the advertising campaigns.
	There's a poster where it's just, like, Snowflakes, the army needs you, or something like that.
	Yeah, the famous one.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, I'll go and give that a read after, but everyone definitely should.
	So, without further ado, let's get right into...
	No.
	Anyway.
	So the first story here is kind of sensitive, but it's important.
	So it's Sasha Johnson here.
	So Sasha Johnson, black, equal rights activist in critical condition after being shot in the head in South London.
	So this was two days ago, this news broke.
	So you can see her there with her beret and her Palestine flag on her side there, the body armor she wears.
	This is her getup.
	And she was out and about and got shot in the head.
	So in case someone's watching who's been drinking paint thinner or something, this is horrible and I hope she recovers.
	But we don't have a duty to censor the truth, so I'm going to lay out why she is famous, regardless of your feelings on it, because that's what's true.
	So the thing she is most famous for is from some pretty disgusting comments that I massively disavow.
	So the first one here is just the thing that got her banned from Twitter, apparently.
	So this is her Twitter account tweeting, So the next one here is a video of her in which she was invited to...
	I think this is Lord Voldemort's house, British Voldemort, and he was hosting a debate about BLM. I don't know the full details of it.
	But she turned up to give the BLM argument, being a representative of BLM UK, and was really rotten to the other side of the argument.
	So we go to the first video, she just starts calling the other guy a coon.
	Let's play.
	Why do you think kneeling on a man's neck for 8 minutes and 46 seconds wouldn't come in?
	That's a legal hold, by the way.
	You just need to shut up, man.
	You're a coon.
	You just need to shut up.
	Get angry some more and threaten you some more.
	Get angry and threaten you some more?
	I promise you, I don't threaten you.
	I promise you.
	So come out there.
	Let's live through the promise.
	Come out there, let's live through the promise.
	Come out there, we'll live through the promise.
	I can promise you now.
	Come out there, we'll live it through.
	You're a coon.
	Dude what?
	What do you mean?
	Because I'm a girl, you think I'm going to you up?
	Come on, man.
	Because I'm a girl.
	We're here to...
	You're here to drive this side out to make it look like all black people are ignorant.
	Yeah, I'm angry right now because of what's going on.
	It's made me angry, yes.
	Just like when he was angry when he thought that his town was being destructed, his city statues were going down, I'm angry too.
	Of course you're angry.
	Yeah, so why are you calling me dude?
	What does a dude mean?
	And you also said you don't believe stats and facts and data.
	What does a dude mean?
	You said that earlier.
	It's recorded.
	What does a dude mean?
	What does a dude mean?
	You're one with him.
	I'll be honest.
	How am I?
	You are what we're dealing with.
	You are what we're dealing with.
	Overly emotional, angry, quick to violence.
	Are you calling a black woman angry?
	You're a coon.
	Yeah, I mean...
	It's absurd, yeah.
	That got 16 million views or something like that, so that's why I'm mentioning it.
	These are the things she is famous for.
	So then the next thing is obviously her response to the race report.
	So the race report from the Conservative government showing that there was no racial discrimination within the systems of the British government.
	And she responded by saying that they need hanging, these house Negroes.
	Yeah.
	So if you scroll down, there's the post in and of itself.
	I think it's on Instagram or something, because of course she's banned from Twitter.
	And then you can see her posting.
	So she says that these kinds of house Negroes, they send to take down the movement.
	And someone says, we have them in America.
	And she responds that they need hanging.
	Yeah.
	What a horrible moment.
	Yeah, I mean, really, really rotten personality.
	I mean, not to justify the fact that she's been shot, obviously, but this is what she's famous for.
	And a lot of people are thinking, well, you know, she's very...
	God, outspoken.
	I'll be charitable.
	Therefore, you know, maybe it was some white anti-BLM guy who went down and shot her.
	And you can see from the reporting, that is what her party and her organization tried to put out.
	So if we go to the next link, this is Russia Today here, and I've clipped a little bit of them laying out what the argument is from her party.
	So let's play the first clip.
	Yeah.
	50 people have gathered, not only to show their support in terms of her recovery, but also to take a stand against what they call a senseless and reckless violence.
	Throughout the last 60 minutes or so, we've been hearing chants like, no justice, no peace.
	But to make matters worse, the political party that Sasha is a member of, that's the taking the initiative party, claimed that actually she was gunned down after numerous threats as a result of her activism.
	And Russia today there are reporting facts her party did try to claim this so if we go to the next link there's an instagram link from her party and you can read in there they say the attack happened in the early hours of this morning following numerous death threats as a result of her activism so her organization trying to play out that yeah she's been given death threats and then she's been shot she's in critical condition Must be, I don't know, the far right or something.
	So we go to the next one as well.
	This is BLM UK posting in Solidarity, I guess.
	Any attempt to intimidate or silence her is an attack on all of us.
	Touch one, touch all.
	We pray that she will pull through this, and those who threatened her life are held accountable.
	Our thoughts and prayers are with her children, family, and impacted by this senseless attack.
	Certainly those who've done this should definitely be held accountable.
	So if we go to the next one as well, then the MP started chiming in.
	So this is former Labour MP. She's been kicked out.
	I think it was from lying to the police or something.
	God knows.
	I can't remember.
	So Claudia Webb, shocking to hear that the gunshots into the head of Sasha Johnston.
	All women should feel safe.
	Sorry, all women should be safe on our streets.
	Sure, they should be safe.
	Wishing her a full recovery, sending her love and solidarity to her family, friends and loved ones.
	There are still too many guns and violent weapons damaging too many lives.
	Hashtag BLM. Bit tepid.
	She didn't do the silly, silly thing of what Diane Abbott did.
	So if we go to the next one, it's Diane Abbott.
	This is still up.
	up.
	I don't know why she hasn't taken this down.
	Black activist hashtag Sasa Johnson in hospital in critical condition after sustaining a gunshot wound to the head.
	Nobody should have to potentially pay with their life because they stood up for racial justice.
	Hashtag BLM.
	So she's drawing the line actively there saying that she was shot because of...
	What she was advocating for before anyone actually knew the motivation for it, if I remember rightly.
	Because I remember when this actually went on, everyone was speculating what had happened because no one had actually found out yet.
	And she seemed to already be like, yes, it was because of her racial justice advocacy.
	We saw this story yesterday, and you do the wise thing of just shut up, wait for the facts.
	It's that easy.
	It's not even hard.
	If something happens, just wait for the facts.
	It's not difficult.
	So, no, we have the facts now.
	So, her organisation, Diane Abbott, trying to say that it was definitely because of her activism.
	It seems, no, it seems it absolutely was not.
	So, we go to the next link here.
	There's this reporting, her friend, who went on BBC and gave evidence that, no, they resorted to driving past and shooting into the garden.
	One of those shots hit Sasha.
	Gang violence.
	Gang violence in London.
	So yeah, she was collateral damage to someone else being targeted, right?
	It wasn't even intentional that they shot her.
	It was just that she was in the wrong place, or...
	Yeah, her organization said it's because of death threats or alluded to being death threats.
	I mean, Diane Abbott being the worst there of just saying no one should be shot for their beliefs.
	She wasn't.
	So why lie?
	Politics, I guess.
	Just want to push Marxist agenda.
	So again, the next one, the responses from those Labour MPs have been pathetic.
	So Claudia Webb trying to claw back and be like, hang on, no, no, no, this is still about Whitey.
	How?
	How are you going to get the big brain take?
	The black community are not responsible for the manufacture, importation, or distribution of firearms.
	Black man shoots a black girl, white man did this.
	I mean, it's just pathetic.
	It's the gun's fault, didn't you know?
	It's the evil white man giving them the guns.
	That's clearly the problem.
	Yeah, there's no one to say about Claudia.
	Claudia, go to hell.
	So let's go to the next one, which is the report here from the Times saying that, yeah, Black Rise activist Sasha Johnson shot by four men in Peckham.
	So it's not that she was just walking around or something.
	Weirdly, they say in here that four men were involved in the shooting of the leading black rights activist.
	Scotland Yard said this morning, Sousa Johnston was shot in the head after four black males dressed in dark clothing stormed the garden in the house in Peckham, Southwest London officers said.
	Police said there was currently no evidence to suggest that it was a targeted shooting.
	No evidence.
	So there's no, you know, evidence of them making a threat beforehand or whatever.
	It's just gangs.
	It's just gangs being gangs.
	In London, held by Sadiq Khan.
	For how many years now?
	How many more years?
	Wonderful.
	So Diane Abbott, being the snake that she was, she tried to defend this.
	So she went on LBC and Ian Dale, who I think is an alright guy, to be honest.
	He did a good job of challenging her on this and saying, look, you should have kept your mouth shut like any sensible person and instead you went mouthing off about how, no, this is definitely because of politics.
	You absolute scum.
	So what's Diane Abbott's response to this?
	Well, I might be wrong, but at least I'm black.
	I'm not joking.
	Let's play the clip.
	Haven't you actually inflamed racial divides by tweeting something when you hadn't done your homework?
	And if you raise issues of race and you're accused of inflaming tensions, that doesn't really get us anywhere fast.
	This woman is a mother.
	She had a bullet in the head.
	We need to take that seriously, not try and divide people who mention it.
	You are creating a division there when you don't know that that's true.
	No, I think it is so wrong.
	To accuse people of colour who raise issues in relation to race of somehow inflaming feelings.
	We don't know, actually, whether it was a gangland killing.
	It may have been that she randomly took a bullet, but we don't know for certain.
	No, exactly, which is why you shouldn't have tweeted what you did.
	Yes, but when you accuse people of colour of inflaming feelings because you raise issues about race, as I say, that doesn't take us anywhere.
	Where's it meant to take us?
	What do you mean?
	He's pointing out that you've lied.
	You told a lie.
	You told a falsehood.
	And he's like, yeah, you shouldn't have done that.
	And you even ended up agreeing with him in there, saying yes, yes.
	But at the same time, you're like, yeah, but that doesn't take us where we need to be.
	So what?
	The truth is what is important, not your Marxist agenda of where we need to be.
	But just utterly pathetic and disgusting that she can go out on national radio, say that.
	I mean, I would just kick her from the party immediately if I was Keir Starmer.
	For just that, I mean, never mind all the two left feet stuff she's done throughout the years.
	She's absolutely useless, isn't she?
	I can't believe that people actually voted for her.
	As well, just saying, oh, well, you can't criticise me because I'm a person of colour, but I lied.
	It's like, oh, great.
	You may have lied, but don't worry, I'm black.
	What?
	That's not an argument.
	It's just, don't worry, if I'm black, I'm allowed to lie.
	Diane Abbott.
	Vote Labour.
	Even a child comes up with a better argument than that.
	It's ridiculous.
	You know, it's just one thing and a long list of dynamics.
	Stupid moments.
	That one's particularly horrible for me.
	Because it's just openly, yes, I'm a liar, but at least I'm black.
	It's pathetic.
	Anyway, so that's not the only piece of nonsense surrounding all this.
	So, of course, her being an activist for BLM, there was some other BLM stuff over the weekend and whatnot.
	So, this is Norwich City Council here, saying that the city hall will be lit up in yellow, pink, and turquoise tomorrow evening to commemorate the first anniversary of the death of George Floyd.
	George Floyd.
	What's he got to do with Norwich?
	Norwich.
	Norwich.
	England.
	Was he a big fan of Norwich City Football Club or something?
	Had all the jerseys or visited on occasion?
	No.
	Nah, just the people in Norwich really wanted this.
	So, just to mention, this would have been the, at the same time they're celebrating this, well, celebrating, memorialising, it would have been the 8-year anniversary of the Lee Reby beheading.
	So they could have done that, didn't do that, did George Floyd instead.
	Could have done the 4-year anniversary of the Manchester Arena bombing.
	Didn't do that, did George Floyd instead.
	Because he's got much more impact on the people of Norwich.
	Pathetic, isn't it?
	It is, yeah.
	You just look at the political breakdown of this particular council and you get your answer.
	27 Labour councillors, 8 green, 3 Lib Dem, 1 independent.
	Labour controlled.
	Well, you get what you vote for then.
	Yeah, they'll spend your money celebrating George Floyd, a man who has nothing to do with your town.
	Why?
	Because Virtue Signal.
	And they're not the only one either.
	Rochdale Council apparently also did the same thing.
	So they're lighting up the thing here.
	Rochdale.
	Has to be Rochdale as well, doesn't it?
	Of course, yeah.
	For people who don't know, it's one of the towns that's most known for basically being a hive of grooming gangs.
	So, of course, they're Virtue Signalling endlessly.
	Because, I mean, why deal with actual issues?
	So, one of the members of the Norwich City Council decided to go on the radio and try to defend this.
	Presumably, the Green Party were the one that brought this up, or members of the Labour Party.
	Either way, they all voted on it and agreed to it.
	And she tried to argue in here that it was the right thing to do to celebrate, sorry, to memorialize George Floyd's death by putting up lights in Norwich.
	As if his family even give a toss or anything.
	It makes no sense whatsoever.
	But also that she kind of got BTFO'd by the host here, pointing out that, well, you're saying this is all about systemic racism and whatnot, but there was no racial aspect to the George Floyd case.
	I mean, it's just a lie.
	It is a huge lie that's been perpetuated throughout the entire Anglosphere and beyond that that death was all about race.
	It wasn't mentioned in the court case, it wasn't mentioned in the documents, because there was no aspect of it.
	It was a nada, it was a fiction.
	It was only because people were screeching about race that anyone's even paid any attention to that aspect at all.
	It wasn't relevant to the court case, so they didn't even really mention it that much, did they, in the actual court proceedings?
	No.
	Because they knew it was a dead end.
	They weren't going to get anywhere with that.
	It's a transparent dead end.
	I mean, as this guy points out later on, but we'll get into this one now.
	So this is the Green Council getting BTFO'd.
	Well, sadly, George Floyd is not alone in having been murdered by the police.
	What makes him unique, or almost unique, is having been filmed being murdered.
	And so...
	My thoughts go out to everyone who's been bereaved and who is breathing.
	But another thing that died on that day is the ability of people not affected by racism to imagine that people who...
	to deny the systemic racism that allows such events to happen.
	What's racism got to do with it?
	This was nothing to do with racism, Leslie.
	Sorry, George Floyd's murder was everything to do with racism.
	No, it wasn't.
	There was no racist component to it at all.
	I would dispute that.
	In whose world is it okay to treat anybody like that?
	Well, it's not okay to treat anybody, but the issue is whether there was a racist element.
	If you look at the court papers and follow the case, this wasn't a racist murder, it was a murder.
	There wasn't a racist element to it whatsoever.
	There was no accusation of it or no suggestion of it.
	You ask any family where kids are taught to keep their heads down and avoid trouble from the police?
	Any family where they're frightened to call the police when they're in danger?
	Sorry, what's the point?
	What are you talking about?
	She had absolutely no argument to counter anything he said there, which is just that there is no evidence of racism in this court case, and you know it.
	And that's why she had to just be, like, rattering all about God knows what.
	So that's the people who run our country.
	That's the people who runs Norwich City Council there, one of the councillors.
	These are the people you're dealing with.
	You meet them in the streets, I mean, you'd be expecting them to be selling pencils or something.
	Not in any positions of power ever, but good God.
	And he also highlights the fact that this is definitely not a racist murder, in case you've also been drinking paint thinner and think it still is, by pointing out that exactly the same circumstances happened to a guy in 2016.
	He was white, so no care, because why would you?
	There's no Marxist agenda to push on the lines of race there, is there?
	So, again, it's obviously not about race, but let's play.
	You're importing a story that never actually happened from America.
	You're not alone, by the way.
	It's not you.
	The American president joined in with this hysteria as well by pretending it was a racially motivated crime when it absolutely wasn't.
	But of course, there are other people.
	You know, 500 white people have died since 2020 at the hands of the police in America.
	Twice the number of blacks that have died.
	Now, I know there's a percentage difference in terms of population.
	There's also a criminal difference in that same percentage as well.
	I mean, do we look and...
	Are we going to have a day in Norwich for Tony Timper?
	I doubt you even know who Tony Timper is.
	Would you like to tell me?
	He's a white guy that died under almost the same circumstances as George Floyd.
	In 2016 in Dallas, he could hardly breathe, he said.
	30 times he called out for his life before he took his last breath.
	Nobody lit up a town hall in Norwich for him.
	Great point.
	It is a great point, yeah.
	And that's that.
	That's what it's about.
	There was no accusation of racism in the courtroom.
	There was no attempt to even mention it or bring it up.
	Because they knew it was a dead end, as you say.
	Great way of putting it.
	Dead end.
	Anyway, so how is this playing?
	How is all this stuff kind of playing for the left?
	Well, if you look at the latest polling in the UK, Conservatives, 46%.
	Labour, 28%.
	The rate this is going, the Conservatives are going to be double that of Labour.
	I mean, it's literally just a one-part state at this point.
	But not because of unpopularity of the Conservatives and their corrupt practices or something.
	No, just Labour is that bad.
	There's just that much of a waste of space.
	Love to see it.
	28%.
	We're not even polling in the 30% anymore.
	Good god.
	Like, didn't UKIP have almost that at one point?
	Like, I swear they had, like, what was it, like, 20% or something?
	It was something close.
	It might have been something like 21.
	That's the figure that comes to my head, but I might just be misremembering.
	Sorry.
	It's getting to that level, isn't it, a little bit?
	It's like 18 points behind.
	I also love the whole argument you see from the, you know, I've got sympathy with the Corbynistas on this point, in which they're like, oh, if, you know, people would argue, if you get rid of Corbyn, we'll be 10 points ahead of the Conservatives, and then they're like, oh, we'd be 10 points ahead, would we?
	Look at us, we're 18 points behind.
	They're like, yeah, but you're kind of missing the point here.
	Like, no, the whole party's ruined.
	Everything there, like, to the down, to the right base of the activists, everything is rotten in the Labour Party.
	And to demonstrate this, I mean, you look at all that, the lights being put up and all that nonsense.
	Well, what's the late party doing today?
	Just out of interest.
	You go to the next link.
	Late party.
	Twitter account.
	George Floyd's murder sparked a global movement from Minneapolis to Manchester to Milan.
	Just kill me.
	Just kill me.
	Like, they're just going on about George Floyd for God knows what reason.
	Hashtag BLM. They learn nothing.
	They never will learn anything.
	They're a pointless organization.
	They deserve to live in the grave.
	They don't deserve to be anywhere near politics.
	I mean, look at the kind of people they bring out as well.
	I mean, like, doing the lights and whatnot.
	Good God.
	It's all virtue signaling in the UK, because it's not a problem here.
	Like, sure, there's lots of black crime, but there's no one really being killed.
	Sure, it happens very rarely.
	But that's the point, which is, like, you can argue about the fact that, oh, BLM in the UK, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, and then the lady that's most known for being the face of BLM in the UK gets shot.
	Who by?
	Racist cop?
	No.
	By a far-right activist?
	No.
	Black gang.
	I mean, it really is just like something out of a fictional universe where you're writing it in a way that makes BLM look the most ridiculous.
	But no, it's just modern Britain.
	That's just how things are.
	That's all.
	On to something a bit lighter.
	So you might know that I covered Black Hammer's Commune in the Colorado mountains recently.
	For those of you who don't know, I was going to read out just their main four principles to sum up what they believe.
	So, their principles are as follows.
	One, we believe that the colonised proletariat should have dictatorship over our lives, labour, land and resources.
	We believe all colonised proletariat are equal, no matter gender, sexuality, age, skin tone, body type, location, religion, language, mental or physical differences, and or bi or multiracial identity.
	Bit of a mouthful.
	God.
	You remember the Labour Party conference video we showed?
	It was like, comrades, comrades, transgender comrades, LGBT plus comrades.
	And it's just like, you could do that for each one of them there.
	They've completed the full list.
	I think they get full marks for...
	Gender comrades, sexual comrades, age comrades, skin tone, body type comrades, fat comrades.
	I suppose the guy at the end of that is doing the thing.
	So, Muslim comrades, Spanish speaking comrades.
	Well, they only like the colonised people, which supposedly is only...
	Black and Native American.
	That's their exclusive group.
	Maybe they accept Latinos.
	I haven't seen any mention of it.
	It's difficult to find out because they're pretty elusive about their discrimination against anyone other than white people.
	Who they clearly hate.
	So their final two principles are, we believe all problems the colonised face are from colonialism and the submissive neo-colonial...
	I can't speak, there's too much gibberish.
	We believe that, and this is the final principle, we believe that the colonised proletariat is the only true proletariat.
	Only through our leadership can white power, capitalism, colonialism, imperialism, and all its symptomatic offspring be smashed.
	So that's a little window into what they believe.
	They should really release a CD that's just called White Noise and just list stuff like that.
	It just puts you to sleep, doesn't it?
	Just, yeah, all of the demographic details, and then all the things they want to destroy about the West.
	It's so cookie-cutter.
	Like, in 1984, there's a section that I think is undervalued, in which George Orwell writes that there's a guy from the party who's just listing off stock responses, right?
	And he calls it duck-speak, because it's like a duck, where they're just, you know, quack, quack, quack, quack, quack.
	So yeah, this is what they believe, and they originally tried to set up a city about 10,000 feet above sea level in the Colorado mountains, and obviously it didn't go very well.
	These are the mud huts we were walking, which are not mud huts, they're the earthbag cities.
	Don't worry, I'm going to get back onto that.
	I'm going to get loads of hate mail again for you.
	I've never got so much abuse on the internet.
	The earthbag advocates came out in force to have a go at me.
	So we're going to double down.
	Definitely Mudhuts.
	I'm going to disavow myself later because I actually looked into it because the criticism was so strong.
	I could have said something awful and it would have been fine, but if I criticise earthbags, my god, it's just...
	I couldn't believe it, but never mind.
	So yeah, this commune...
	They tried to make a city, and for some mysterious reason, it didn't work.
	And they fell at the first hurdle, because actually the buying the plot of land fell through, and they were kicked off.
	Hang on, so I predicted that they'd just taken the money and run.
	So did they actually go through with trying to buy the land, and then that failed?
	So it's not just that they ran, they did actually try to do it, and then they failed.
	I've got a quote here from the San Miguel County Sheriff here saying, Deputies responded Monday evening to a trespass report on a property south of Norwood where a group of 8-12 people from the Black Hammer organisation were camping prior to a property purchase that ultimately did not occur.
	When deputies arrived, they advised the group of the trespass and they left the area without incident.
	Deputies found some individuals were legally armed and posing no threat to public safety.
	They have been No reports that the group has since been in the area.
	Black Hammer Organisation states on its website that it is a revolutionary mass organisation dedicated towards building a sustainable future for all colonised peoples worldwide.
	So that's what the sheriff said that kicked them off of their land.
	That's their leader there, Ghazi, who we will talk about later.
	I just love that they pose no threat to any of the public.
	There's that, yeah.
	I wonder how many no-fly lists they're on.
	I don't think the county sheriff posted that picture along with their statement.
	I don't think they pose no threat would really go down well.
	That.
	I mean, for anyone who's listening, it's a guy with white face kind of Joker makeup on, but with a big fluorescent orange beanie on, and it just looks weird.
	Yeah, like the hammer in the center of his shirt.
	Communist symbols.
	It's really unnerving.
	But the comments from locals on the post that the sheriffs put out are just gold.
	So here's the first one.
	I've not named anyone because it's on Facebook and they might be using their own personal accounts.
	But I've picked out the ones I thought were the best and the ones that were the most upvoted.
	So these are some of the most popular ones.
	If these whack jobs had bought land next to mine, I had a farm south of Norwood.
	I would have been very upset.
	They sound hateful and dangerous.
	glad they blew town.
	In any case, the old-time Norwood ranching locals are not the crowd to screw with.
	There are plenty of well-armed, enthusiastic folks around the mesa.
	My neighbour shot two of my dogs right between the eyes.
	First shot, both times, just for grabbing a piglet.
	What the fuck?
	What?
	So this is their neighbours that they would have had around them.
	You know him.
	He still shoots your dog because you grabbed a piglet.
	I like how as well he's praising the guy that shot his dogs by saying he's such a good shot that he shot his dogs between the eyes first shot both times.
	It's not quite clear.
	I assume he was stealing a piglet and then his neighbour shot his dogs for it.
	Not him personally, his dogs were like...
	Oh, he picked up the pickler and then shot the dog, right.
	And he's just like, thanks bro, that's a really good shot.
	It's a different world.
	I mean, if someone shot my dog, I would be furious.
	But there's another good one here.
	I'm guessing by the content of some of the comments that folks who condone this squatting or take over someone else's property don't own a damn thing and have the leftist notion of entitlement...
	Where is the lie?
	Absolutely.
	I mean, it also raises the question, these people raised all their money through donations, and they're meant to be communists, and they're relying on this kind of capitalistic structure of donations, and they also had the reparations.
	I really don't want to do devil's advocate, but I mean, they would argue that, well, there's no other way of us doing it in this capitalist system.
	Yeah, I can kind of understand.
	They're not going to raise money any other way, are they?
	I mean, they're not going to work hard.
	Ideally for that, they'd just take it, wouldn't they?
	What, just steal?
	Well, expropriation.
	What do you think it means?
	Are they really going to be able to steal enough to build an entire city, though?
	I mean, the Soviets did it for an entire country.
	Yeah, but that's an entire country.
	It's not just a group of 12 larkers in the middle of the mountains.
	Sure, but I'm just saying, you know, if they weren't living in a capitalist system, they would just steal it like the good socialists they are.
	Yeah, yeah, I get it.
	So they say, another commenter says, that stinks only because I was looking forward to watching them farm at 6,000 feet in their self-described fertile soil.
	I mean, you'd set up a camera, wouldn't you, and live stream it?
	I would love to see it.
	24-hour socialist cam.
	If they actually succeeded, I was more than willing to just go out there and film a clandestine documentary, looking in at the settlements, building their mud huts and all that good stuff.
	So, final few more comments I'm going to go through really quickly.
	These guys were a scam and any of you taking them or their politics seriously are wasting your time.
	These commies aren't coming for your bodily fluids, they're just grifters.
	So what's happened to the money?
	Because you said they put it up to buy.
	The buying fell through.
	Did they blow on coke or not?
	I don't know about that, but they've reported that they've kept it in a pot somewhere, but I'll get onto that later.
	So, final two comments.
	For revolutionaries, they sure as hell didn't put up much of a fight for the land they liberated.
	And the final one is, where's going to be the new Jonestown?
	As in, this was meant to be the new one, then.
	Where's the next one going to be?
	So, it's great to see that the locals were completely critical of this.
	They weren't going to get on with their neighbours.
	No one's falling for the Nazbols over here.
	So, here's the new and improved Hammer City, as you can see.
	It's not just the same image, but a new logo.
	Yeah, there is a new logo.
	Is that the only difference?
	Yeah, it's the only difference.
	They've also got a donate cash app and Venmo.
	So they've got the ability to actually donate money to them in the image now.
	But they've already got 60 grand.
	Well, it's actually more than that now, because they've set up a fundraiser, which I'll get onto in a second.
	But I would like to move on to the picture of the earthbag homes that they had on their website and issue my sincerest apologies, alright, for insulting earthbags.
	I didn't know a significant portion of our audience were such huge earthbag enthusiasts.
	Mashallah, please forgive us.
	Now go back to your mudhuts.
	But to be fair, these ones that they've got pictures of on their websites don't look too bad.
	And I was just laughing at the idea that they're creating their communist utopia and they were calling them earthbag homes and it just seems like a huge juxtaposition to say...
	I must say, it is a terrible name.
	Yeah.
	I mean, I get why they're called earthbag homes, because they're made of bags filled with earth, but it's not the best marketing, is it?
	It's like, come to our communist utopia, but you're going to live in an earthbag home.
	That's what I was getting at.
	I mean, sure, those homes look nice enough, and I didn't realise there were so many fans of this style of home, and I apologise.
	I don't.
	Unapologetic.
	Sort off your mudhuts.
	Should be unreasonably combative for no reason about it.
	I don't blame you.
	I mean, do we really need to be charitable to these people?
	Talk about the activists with my earth back home.
	Oh, right.
	So, as we were talking about earlier, there's been a new fundraiser on their website, and so far they've raised $69,948.77.
	So is that new money or is that £60,000 plus a new £9,000?
	I think that's a new £9,000 because I think they originally had £64,000 so it's actually just about £5,000 roughly.
	So yeah, they've got this set up on their website and it's clearly slowed down the donations a little bit because it's not on the...
	I can't remember...
	It must be people in California or something because you saw the locals, they don't give them money to it.
	No, definitely not.
	They're going to be shooting their dogs.
	Well, they clearly don't care.
	So it must be like people in the coast or whatever who live in a nice neighbourhood and they're just like, yes, communism.
	Let me pay more money for it.
	It's just like a tax on idiots.
	Just like, if you're going to donate your money to this, which is clearly not going to work, you probably don't deserve it in the first place.
	Yeah, silver lining, that's a good way of putting it.
	So, they're also looking to recruit new members if you're interested, if you're a colonised person.
	They are looking for people to join their teams of sustainable farming, water conservation, holistic healthcare, renewable energy, design and engineering, and laws and city planning.
	So, if you're a colonised person and you want to help the cause...
	If you're a fellow Kekistani, let's go down there.
	LAUGHTER Wouldn't it be funny if just loads of white people just turned up and were able to, like, deliver all of their dreams, but they're just...
	Just don't say you're Jewish, whatever you do.
	Oh, yeah.
	We shall get onto that again later, because there's some more stuff which is...
	Rather amusing.
	So I'd like to get on to the founder of this group, who is Garzy Kodzo, who we might actually be having an interview with soon.
	So they saw the segment I did on the podcast covering this originally, and then they reached out to us asking if we wanted to interview Garzy, and obviously we said yes.
	So we're just in the process of Sorting that out at the minute.
	I think Karl is pretty delighted.
	You were ecstatic about the whole thing.
	You were like, yeah, go for it.
	Why not?
	Karl is very keen on doing it, so I'm going to let Karl do it.
	Although, initially, I was very keen on doing it myself.
	So, who is this Ghazi Kodzo guy?
	We're going to stopantisemitism.org.
	Alright, so that's where we're starting.
	That's a good starting point.
	So, he's a racial activist from Atlanta, Georgia.
	He is the leader and founder of Black Hammer, dictator, general secretary, whatever you want to call him.
	He wasn't elected, let's just say.
	So he's kind of been circulating in the public sphere since around 2007.
	And as you can see on stopantisemitism.org, he's gained some notoriety, to put it lightly.
	So his general cause is that he wants black power over Americans, who he views as colonial white oppressors.
	So, his views are so extreme that even the African People's Socialist Party kicked him out.
	So...
	So is that Communist Party as well?
	You'll soon find out.
	So, the leader of this party that kicked him out, Omali Yeshitile, stated that the Holocaust is being used against the African Revolution...
	What?
	Yeah.
	And that Jews are exaggerating the Holocaust because the claim that six million Jews died by the Nazis.
	Well, okay, I can see some deranged Arab arguing this and being like, you know, the Jews are using the Holocaust to found Israel or something.
	What have the Jews got to do with Africa?
	Well, supposedly they were somehow involved in some degree of colonisation, according to them, in Africa.
	Where?
	Through Germany, ironically enough.
	That's what they're saying.
	I don't believe it.
	And they're...
	Don't I just name the Jewish colony?
	Like, where?
	Like, where is it?
	I mean, you can point to Israel.
	You can point to that section of Russia where the Soviets deported them all to.
	You know, Jews exist here.
	But saying that the Jews are trying to colonize Africa or something...
	It's ridiculous, isn't it?
	So this leader that kicked out Ghazi also praised terrorists, police killers, and also falsely blamed the Jews for the German Empire's crimes in Namibia.
	Okay.
	Are they going to blame the Jews for World War II in a minute?
	I mean, they're about that close, aren't they?
	There's not much.
	Did you know Hitler was a Jew?
	Oh, boy.
	So, the APSP also blame Ghazi for a plot to destroy their revolutionary leadership and manipulate their followers.
	Because, you know, they're such down-to-earth, reasonable, nice people, these followers of this party.
	So, this is Ghazi Kodo's Twitter account here as well, talking about Anne Frank.
	Yeah.
	So we mentioned previously, what was it, they tweeted out Anne Frank's diary and then we burned this for firewood or something?
	Yeah.
	So he says, Anne Frank, as a black child in America, all throughout school I was propagandised to mourn a Becky, which I think is just a, it's like a denigrating term for a white woman, isn't it?
	Okay.
	You're saying isn't it, like I know.
	Yeah.
	You know this sort of stuff, right?
	No, I don't.
	I don't hang around black nationalists all day.
	Nor do I. I wasn't told about the countless black girls America genocided, indigenous girls America genocided, and Palestinian girls that Israel is killing through genocide right now.
	And Anne Frank did this.
	This is Anne Frank's fault.
	Apparently, yeah.
	I don't really see how that correlates.
	I mean, even ignoring his nonsense claims.
	Even if they're all happening, and Frank did this.
	Like, the girl who was killed by the Nazis, yeah.
	Killed by the Nazis 60 years before, I don't know, even Israel exists or whatever.
	Well, I looked at the justification for it, and it's not even anything that she herself did.
	It's that her father was some way involved in something.
	Surely he was killed as well.
	No, he published her diary.
	Oh, he got out?
	Yeah, I think so.
	Well, therefore it's his fault?
	Is that his argument?
	I think so.
	It doesn't really make sense, so there's no point trying to understand it.
	So, the final thing I wanted to point out about this guy is that he has a quote from Franz Fanon, if you're familiar with who that is.
	He's an African revolutionary.
	Not a very nice guy.
	And he had this In his About Me section on his Facebook.
	And the quote is, And that was in his About Me on his Facebook.
	I'll just Tinder profile as well.
	Yeah, so very concerning, obviously, that that is the quote, but you're clearly dealing with a very extreme person here, and I look forward to hearing from him when we interview him.
	You're really hyped for that.
	It's because of your psychological background, right?
	You're interested in that.
	He seems a little bit crazy, yeah.
	They're there for good fun.
	Exactly.
	Because what a nutjob ideology.
	Especially with the money as well.
	I'm still not convinced they're going to end up using it for buying the land, because who's going to sell them the land for one?
	After you just Google his name and find out who they are, they're essentially a bunch of Nazbols.
	National Bolsheviks.
	I feel like they're probably a little bit more dedicated than you're giving them credit because I've looked at some of their stuff and although they're pretty crazy, I think they do believe what they're saying and they're going to try to put that money to the causes that they believe in.
	I'd like to see them set up some kind of separate commune just so they're kind of isolated from wider society for the good of pretty much everyone.
	If they can just soak up all of the worst extremists into one place, the world would be better.
	I thought that's what Portland was for, but okay.
	I mean, why create your own city when Portland exists?
	Too many white people, I guess.
	So the last thing I want to talk about was Florida has decided to ban big tech censorship, which is amazing.
	I love it.
	So we're just going to go through it.
	It's just a little bit of fun, because this is neat.
	Because we covered this before, like it being proposed in the House and whatnot.
	Apparently it's finally got to DeSantis' desk.
	I think it was the governor of Florida.
	And he's now signed it, so it's now Florida law.
	And it's pretty good.
	There's one bit in it that's just really weird.
	I don't get why this bit's in there, but we'll get to it in a minute.
	So this is just them saying...
	What the bill is going to be and whatnot.
	The Republican governor says the bill is designed to stop social media companies like Facebook and Twitter from deplatforming or removing individuals from their sites.
	If they do, they say that those companies will be required to provide a detailed explanation as to why they took such action.
	So this is to differentiate because, of course, it's super simplistic and wrong to just say that they shouldn't be able to kick people off these sites because...
	Pedophiles, terrorists, so on and so forth.
	If it conflicts with US law already, no, you need to go, because that's a pretty good standard, in my mind.
	If the US government has it banned because you're a terrorist organization or a pedophile group or something, no, no, no.
	There's no debate.
	So they still need that right to be able to get rid of people, obviously, but if they're going to ban someone, they should give an explanation.
	And it's also, because it goes into politics, when you have people like Lord Voldemort or Alex Jones or so on and so forth and they get banned, give us the reason why.
	Come on, explain it.
	Because you remember the one they gave to the BBC, Facebook, in the case of British Voldemort, they said that he made a post that doesn't exist.
	It's not there.
	They should have to do that for everyone.
	Every time they ban you, tell us why it is.
	And they just look embarrassing more and more every time they ban someone for something so stupid.
	It would disincentivise it, wouldn't it?
	If they actually had to publicly say, well, we banned this person for this reason, then...
	Yeah, Zuby said, okay, dude.
	And that's why we banned him.
	Hold it up and stand by your statement.
	That's why you banned Zuby from Twitter, for example.
	He eventually got it back.
	That's because he literally just wrote, okay, dude.
	Who was that to then?
	Was it to someone who was transgender or something?
	It wasn't even to a person then.
	Dude can be gender neutral as well.
	You can use it for men and women in English context.
	So there's that.
	The new law will also enable the state to fine large social media companies $250,000 a day if they remove an account of a statewide political candidate, and $25,000 a day if they remove an account of someone who is running for local office, and it takes effect on July 1st.
	So, I mean, fundamentally here, it's about politics, and that is the kind of speech that definitely has to be protected.
	Libertarians speaking, just wrong on this, in my opinion.
	Like, if the state has one place to spend to operate, it's to defend the rights of the citizens.
	Political speech being the most valuable speech of all in a society, especially a democracy.
	And in this case, well, if you're running for office, you should have access to the public forum.
	The public forum in the modern world is Facebook, Twitter, so on and so forth.
	I mean, when we ran for MEP elections with Carl, for example, we set up an account.
	Carl had no access to it, because we know, okay, you're banned from Twitter, I'll just set it up, and then we'll just have the updates from the campaign, right?
	Banned.
	We got banned from Twitter.
	Just for the updates?
	Just for hosting updates from whatever we were doing.
	They suspended the account.
	Did they provide any reason for that?
	Don't have to.
	Presumably it's just because Carl's banned from Twitter, therefore anyone around him is banned from Twitter in that case or something.
	Guilty by association.
	Yeah, because it was his campaign and therefore he's banned.
	And this isn't the only person it's happened to.
	I'm pretty sure it happened to British Voldemort as well when he ran.
	Twitter, Facebook, everyone also banned his campaigning accounts.
	Even YouTube banned his campaigning account, even though they only quarantined his initial account.
	Disgusting.
	I mean, just disgusting to see.
	Like a political candidate runs and you can't even hear what he has to say because Silicon Valley disagrees with him.
	Is that really the world we want to live in, or do we want to defend political speech?
	And this is a good way of doing it, saying no, you will let them be on there, or we're just going to find you.
	And once they're not candidates or whatever, then we can have another conversation, but whilst they're candidates, you certainly should not be banning them from being able to talk to the public.
	Absolutely.
	It's getting to the point where you've just got to question whether there's even any reason for people using these social medias anymore.
	If they're deplatforming people to the point where they're shaping the political narrative in your country, which isn't even the country that they're based in...
	They have no idea what the zeitgeist is here.
	And yet they'll just ban candidates because they don't like them.
	And it's the same for the Canadians as well.
	I remember Ryan Hartwig, great guy, who is with Project Veritas, who did a leak from Facebook.
	He spoke to Ezra Levant from Rebel Media, and one of the complaints Ezra Levant had, which is a very good complaint, was, look, the North American market is how they do their moderation for Facebook.
	So it means Canadian candidates, Canadian citizens who are running for political offices giving political speeches and whatnot, they are censored by Americans.
	So it's not even a local office who understands anything about it.
	I mean, then take it even further with the examples of European elections, which they don't have a damn clue what we're talking about.
	They have no idea what's acceptable here and what's not acceptable here.
	They just have their own moral standards from the most left-wing place on the planet.
	To use their own terms against them, it's Californian cultural imperialism.
	Yeah, it is.
	It really is, isn't it?
	Almost unironically.
	No, ironically, it is.
	That is what it is.
	They're just saying, this is our culture, you will abide by this culture, or you won't be able to run for office.
	What else do you call that?
	Anyway, so this is obviously taking a book out of Poland's works here, so Poland being the most based place in Europe by the sounds of it.
	Just every news that comes out of Poland for British people is just like, oh, the Polish is being based again.
	Yeah, based.
	I'll just move on.
	So this was a while back in which they introduced restrictions.
	So they said, Poland targets big tech with anti-censorship law.
	Social media companies that remove posts they deem offensive could face fines, Poland's justice minister said on Friday.
	As a government that allied itself with US President Donald Trump enacts a move that says it will guarantee free speech.
	I love that wording from Royce's there.
	It's like being allied with free speech means allying with Trump.
	Nice.
	Thanks for telling us.
	Good compliment to Trump, really, isn't it?
	Anyway.
	So, as I said, it's about offensive posts here.
	So, the ruling, Laura Justice Party, which has a conservative Catholic social agenda, argues that big tech companies exercise a dangerous level of control of the public debate, censoring opinions out of line with their own liberal worldview.
	True.
	I mean, Silicon Valley and the Law and Justice Party in Poland, do you think they have the same politics?
	Do you think Confederation in Poland has the same politics as the Democrats in America?
	No, of course not.
	They actually said that.
	I remember writing an article about this when it first came out.
	I think it was in January of this year.
	And some of the Polish ministers were saying that it's absolutely absurd that these Californians are dictating to us what we can say in Poland because our cultures are so different.
	So why are they saying what can and can't be said?
	but even if you localize it it's still absurd because i mean let's say you set it up in warsaw and you have i don't know the socialist party people essentially running it because it'll be the same problem you'll have the built-up centers where you have massively left-wing people and they have people from more rural areas and whatnot so like with other people in warsaw who will get hired for content moderation what will they think of corvin mickey well they just start censoring corvin mickey because they don't like him and confederation like yeah of course they will You'll have exactly the same problem.
	So it's absurd.
	So this law is a good way of dealing with it, in which they say, users will be able to appeal to a free speech council, and if social media companies block counts or remove posts that do not break Polish law, they will be liable for fines up to 50 million slotties.
	$13.35 million.
	Perfect.
	If it doesn't break Polish law, what's the problem?
	Like, we have laws against pedophile stuff.
	We have laws against terrorism stuff.
	We have laws against glorifying terrorism, violence, and law enforcement, blah, blah, blah.
	So what's your problem?
	I mean, in Britain, we have laws against offensive posts.
	So, I mean, if British law isn't enough for you either, then I don't know what will be.
	Because we're just tyrannical about the whole thing.
	So, perfect solution.
	Look, your stuff will apply with our law.
	If you start censoring people that have done nothing wrong, you'll get a fine.
	I actually found that the Polish solution was very good because they're not being unreasonable with the fines either in that they give them a period where they can correct the mistake and I would imagine that the social media company will set up some kind of department that will deal with these and as long as they deal with them in kind of...
	The time they're allotted, then they're not going to be fined.
	And this is kind of a very reasonable approach, I'd say, in dealing with it, because they're not necessarily going to fine the companies.
	It's more of a threat if they don't comply.
	And I imagine they probably would, which would just mean that they have actually got the protection of free speech in Poland.
	Yeah, it's also the same, obviously, for Florida there.
	The fact that you will essentially have a period to correct your mistakes.
	It also, in fact, actually helps social media companies.
	So it'll end up helping Twitter and Facebook and Bidshoot and whatnot and everyone else who has a platform like this.
	Because it means your content moderation department no longer has to do loads of nonsense that was unnecessary.
	You just have to apply the law in the country that you're in.
	Nothing more.
	Because if you go beyond that, you're getting fined.
	So it's like, right, okay, so our content moderation department, we can fire a whole bunch of people because we no longer have to police people calling each other a cow.
	I'm not joking.
	Ryan Hartwick said that to me.
	Like, one of the things they have to police on Facebook is whether or not you call someone else names, and some of the names can just be calling someone an animal.
	That's considered an insult that's banned on Facebook.
	So if I go on Facebook and just write, you're a total cow, that's that comment in and of itself.
	If it gets flagged and goes before a human, they're meant to delete that.
	But what if you're Indian and cow is a sacred animal, then...
	Don't ask me.
	Censorship is a weird world full of disjointed problems.
	So if we go back to the US for the next article here.
	So Florida governor signs bill to ban big tech to platforming.
	I love how they use an image of Donald Trump here.
	I'm trying to make him look bad.
	And it's like, why don't you choose Ron DeSantis if you want to do...
	Just standard reporting, but as you can see, BBC San Francisco, so there's your answer.
	So former US President Donald Trump was banned from Twitter and Facebook and suspended by YouTube after the Capitol Hill riot in January.
	Unjustly.
	Absolutely.
	I mean, it's always been proven at this point.
	There's no criminal charges against him for this.
	He was acquitted in the Senate because of exactly the point that he didn't call for violence.
	In fact, he literally said, peacefully and patriotically, make your voices heard.
	And if people don't listen to him and break the law, not his fault.
	He did the opposite, didn't he, really?
	He was telling people to be peaceful.
	Yeah, so he was banned for essentially not saying something.
	So it wasn't even that he said something that got him banned.
	He didn't say a thing.
	He didn't say, go and be violent and overthrow the US government or storm Nancy Pelosi.
	He didn't say any of that, and yet they still banned him.
	So they banned him for a thing he did not say.
	So it's not just speech that can get you banned because it's hate talk or something, but it's also speech you don't say that can get you banned.
	Didn't Facebook even remove his message where he was telling people to go home in peace?
	Yes.
	Like, while it was still going on, they deleted it.
	Awful people.
	Absolutely corrupt system.
	Anyway, sorry.
	Earlier this month, Facebook's oversight board decided to uphold the platform's decision, but ask the social media network to review the decision within six months.
	So, again, all of their systems in place in which they're taking consideration...
	All smoke and mirrors.
	They will continue to ban Donald Trump.
	They will continue to ban everyone else they just don't like.
	I mean, the sitting president of the United States.
	Gone.
	Why?
	Didn't say something.
	Pathetic.
	Yeah, I bet they haven't.
	Alright, this is about the law.
	How do you feel about being fined every time you ban someone for saying SJW bad?
	No comment.
	Pathetic.
	So the legislation includes a clause that exempts a company, quote, that owns and operates a theme park or entertainment complex.
	Disneyland Florida.
	That'd be why.
	Funny, isn't it?
	Isn't that funny?
	So Disneyland in Florida, so therefore the Florida law exempts anyone who owns a theme park.
	I don't know what Disney is planning.
	Like, if they're planning on lynching, you know, Disney book, in which we're all going to start using their social media.
	They're going to take over the world, you know.
	So this is a really weird kink in the law there.
	And I love that a Democratic member of the House actually made a great point.
	He said, if Facebook buys a theme park, does that prevent us from being able to regulate what happens on Facebook then?
	Yes.
	The Republican responded, so if they brought a theme park and named it Zuckerland, and he met the definition of a theme park under Florida statute, then yes.
	LAUGHTER What?
	So if Mark Zuckerberg sets up Zuckerland in Florida, he can ban everyone to his heart's content and he won't get these fines?
	What a mess.
	What a stupid kink in the law there.
	In other news, Mark Zuckerberg announces launch of New Park.
	Like, Twitterland doesn't work.
	It doesn't even have to be anything.
	You can just read, like, the minimum standards.
	It'd be like, we admit one person a year, and it's me.
	It's just, like, a games room or something.
	Oh, man.
	So if you go to the first image there, this is just what, you know, I imagine Zuckerland to be.
	So just, like, Rimmerworld.
	For people who know Red Dwarf, it's just, like, theme parks of Zuckerlang looking at Zucker's face all day.
	Because, I mean, what?
	If it's not Facebookland, it's Zuckerland.
	So it's just Zucker, Zucker.
	Anyway...
	Anyway, let's go on to the next one here, which is Ron DeSantis tweeting about this, being very happy about the whole thing.
	Pointing out here, we know there's a problem with big tech deplatforms.
	The president of the United States, but they let the Ayatollah Khomeini talk about killing Jews.
	That's wrong.
	In all caps as well, because using the Trump-style tweet in there.
	I mean, true point.
	There's no small amount of problems wrong with the modern big tech system.
	But if we go to the bill itself, so the next link, and you don't have to find the quotes in here because it's long and I don't know how you find it, but I'm just going to read out some of the stuff that I think was interesting.
	So they say in here, a social media platform that will not willfully platform a candidate for office who is known by the social media platform to be a candidate, beginning on the date of qualification and ending on the date of the election or date the candidate ceases to be a candidate.
	So, for that period, you will have a grace period in which if you are banned from Twitter or Facebook and whatnot, and you're running in Florida, they'll have to let you back on or face that fine of a lot of money.
	A social media platform must provide each user a method by which the user may be identified as a qualified candidate and which provides sufficient information...
	To allow the social media platform to continue the user's qualification by reviewing on the website, division of elections, or the website for the local supervisor of elections.
	So, shorthand saying, the Twitter and Facebook will have to provide a way of you telling them, and they will have to provide in a reasonable time.
	Yeah, way of doing it.
	Works.
	I mean, people have always wondered, how do you actually put this into action?
	Well, we're seeing in real time now.
	I mean, history is being made.
	Upon finding a violation of subsection 2 by the Florida Electorals Commission, in addition to other remedies, the social media platform may be fined £250,000 per day for a candidate for a statewide office and $25,000 per day for the candidate of other offices.
	I love this.
	Everyone who's banned from social media, just set yourself up as an independent.
	Sure, pay the deposit or whatever it is, just for the local office, and all run.
	And when they all ban you anyway, because they'll try and subvert this law, all make complaints, you could bankrupt Silicon Valley overnight with like 2,000 people running or something, couldn't you?
	Great.
	So they say this section may only be enforced to the extent not inconsistent with federal law, though.
	So I wonder how that turns out in law, because there are going to be arguments about the free speech of Twitter to ban you and all that, but let's not get into that now.
	The term does not include any information system, internet search engine, or access software provider operated by a company that owns or operates a theme park or entertainment complex.
	That's right at the bottom there, so that's a reference to Disneyland.
	It's almost like every bill in Florida must be...
	There's a stock version of it.
	And I bet that quote in there is just there.
	If this applies to a theme park, it doesn't apply.
	Because I have no other way of explaining how on earth that made it in there.
	Disneyland's just going to be a lawless land where they govern themselves.
	Essentially.
	But just like, I doubt Disneyland was lobbying DeSantis on the basis of like, nah, we have this social media platform we're going to launch next year.
	It's got to be exempt.
	I don't know how this got in there, but I'm just guessing it's...
	I wouldn't underestimate Disney.
	They want to take over the world, I'm telling you.
	I'm going to set up a Disney book.
	All you can do is talk about Disney.
	Soon you'll be eating Disney food, driving a Disney car, talking on your Disney phone.
	It's like eat the bugs, live in the pod.
	So it's all just Disney brand.
	Eat the Disney bugs.
	Anyway, yeah.
	But I thought it was really weird.
	It's good to see.
	I'm looking forward to Disney book, though, and also Zuckerland.
	Anyway, let's end that there.
	Oh boy, that was fun.
	So let's go to the video comments.
	Good question, Carl.
	The answer is the lying to God is worse.
	I'll explain more about that in Season 2 when I break down the meaning of life.
	So, yeah.
	Look forward to it.
	As well as I'm going to resubmit the Jihad videos for Monday.
	Anyway, see you guys then.
	Bye.
	Well, thank you for turning in.
	Shame Carl's not here.
	Carl watches the streams to make sure we're not eating bread anyway, so don't worry about that.
	For people who don't know, Carl's on holiday again because he's having a second holiday because he's a hobbit, and he'll be back on Monday, coming Monday, and then we'll be back to where we were.
	But otherwise, let's go forward.
	So I have a theory on why Nancy Pelosi is pushing so hard for mask mandates.
	If you have ever seen her talk, her teeth are just as tired of the crap that comes out of her mouth as we are.
	They're always trying to get out of dodge.
	So wearing that mask is kind of like a shield for that.
	So I feel like she wants the rest of us to continue to wear them with her, just to distract from the fact that she was born in 1940 and is still an elected official.
	I mean, I love that.
	It's the same with Joe Biden, where it's like, this country's broken and I'm going to fix it.
	You've been an elected official for like 25% of the United States' existence.
	Is that really true?
	It's almost that.
	It's ridiculous.
	Like, for a quarter of the country's existence, you've been in power, and yet you're like, yeah, the country's broken.
	I think it might be you, mate.
	I think you might be the problem here.
	I'm just googling Nancy Pelosi's teeth.
	Isn't she like 81 years old?
	She should just have a mask that covers her whole face for the benefit of the American people.
	Well no, her being old isn't the problem with her.
	The problem with her is her beliefs.
	The worst thing obviously being her pandering to whoever's in front of her.
	Like, you know, some gay person walks in and all of a sudden she's got dildos all over herself and then, you know, some black African walks in and then she's putting, like, the black shawl or whatever the heck it was that she did and taking the knee.
	You know, you know, anyway, there's a good splitting image sketch about the whole thing, but god, she's pathetic.
	Anyway, let's go to the next one.
	G'day, Lotus Eaters.
	No comments about my teeth today.
	I wanted to shout out this great guy, Daniel Street.
	Hey, how are ya?
	He's a really, really good artist with really culture-conspired artwork.
	As you can see here, tell us a bit about you, man.
	Hey, mate, I'm Daniel Street.
	I work as a full-time freelance artist.
	I work for film companies, game companies, and book illustrations.
	I specialize in steampunk within the London and Scottish era.
	So, if that's your thing, give me a follow and a like and a share, whatever bibs and mobs you do, and I will see you soon.
	Yep.
	Excellent Celtic and English-inspired artwork, so go and check them out.
	Thanks very much, guys.
	That's awesome.
	That is awesome.
	I really love the wholesome stuff.
	That was wholesome as well, yeah.
	I can see the chat joking about Nancy Pelosi as well with the pandering, like the Ku Klux Klan walking and she's putting on her hood.
	Anyway, yeah.
	Let's go to the next one.
	With a big payday on the horizon, the pharmaceutical industry is excited to begin rolling out the first COVID-19 booster vaccines this September.
	Are you tired of people asking you if you got your vaccine yet?
	Well, get used to it because it's going to be a regular topic of conversation for years to come.
	Why?
	Because pharmaceutical companies are planning to roll out their COVID-19 vaccine booster shots.
	Indeed, during an interview with Axios, the chief executives of both Pfizer and Moderna said by September the first COVID-19 vaccine recipients will need to get their booster shots.
	You are so beautiful, my Baron.
	Your skin loved to me.
	Your disease is lovingly cared for for all eternity.
	What was?
	I don't even know what that movie is.
	I don't really get the reference.
	I mean, I'm not looking forward to talking about vaccines 24-7.
	That's true.
	What a boring conversation.
	Have you had a vaccine?
	No.
	Yes.
	Where does it go from there?
	But also the fact that you're going to need them endlessly.
	I'm really worried that the government will just use this as like, oh no, the pandemic's still not over.
	We still need all these powers.
	You don't know it could come back at any minute.
	There's been three cases in the last year.
	No.
	Isn't it just convenient that all of these companies all of a sudden have got these huge orders of vaccines and all of a sudden they're like, yay, we need regular boosters.
	Never mind the fact that we're kind of sitting on this massive pile of money.
	The inability to just take the win, like you've beaten it.
	Open up.
	Anyway, let's go to the next one.
	Hey guys, I wanted to discuss people that just follow the rules.
	So I have a colleague at work who will not sit within two metres of someone else.
	Even though he's been vaccinated and the other person has also been vaccinated.
	And I ask him, if you've both been vaccinated, why won't you sit next to each other?
	And his response is, it's the rules.
	Same as my boss, who won't walk into his office because it means he will pass within two metres of somebody else's desk, even though he's obviously perfectly happy to meet people, cross them in the corridor, go to the smoking area with people.
	They're not afraid of COVID at all, but they still won't break the COVID rules.
	It's really, really weird, and I wonder what we can do against these lawful idiots.
	I suppose the only argument you could give them is essentially just point to history and be like, is this following the rules?
	Like, take the Catian Massacre, for example.
	Look, the rules are we have to kill 20,000 Polish people.
	Yeah, but that's horrible.
	Yeah, but it's the rules.
	And just sort of point out to them that it's a nonsensical way of thinking, but...
	I think most people don't really realise they're following the rules.
	They kind of do it subconsciously a little bit.
	Sure, but I mean, he's talking about the kind of people who are, you know, both vaccinated and still, it's the rules.
	We have two metres apart.
	God, insufferable.
	I support the two metre rule.
	Generally speaking, COVID or not, just stay two metres away, please.
	Well, you know, it's the old Finnish thing.
	Have you ever seen Finnish people lining at a bus stop?
	No.
	They're, like, a mile apart from each other.
	I'm exaggerating.
	Don't come near me.
	Yeah, no, they just, like, everyone's really weird about spacing, though, I guess.
	But, yeah, it's a good rule for just, I just don't want to be around people who, you know, at a bus stop, I don't want to be around, but...
	Otherwise, yeah, people who follow the rules, there's something wrong with them.
	But, you know, for no reason.
	I guess I'd just say, you know, give them the Holocaust, give them Katian Massacre, give them the Maoist Revolution, and be like, look, it's the rules.
	You've just got to kill loads of people.
	Yeah, you've got to kill babies.
	It's the rules.
	And then just point out that, yeah, it's an obvious non-tentacle worldview.
	Otherwise, I don't know.
	I think that might put people off a little bit if you're just like, yeah, if you follow the rules, you've got to kill babies.
	Well, no, because if you say, well, look, if the rules were killing babies, would you like that?
	Yeah, I know the point you're making, but even so.
	Anyway.
	Thanks for the well wishes, but no, I actually graduated with a mechanical engineering degree.
	I'm not, like, formally trained in imitations or something.
	I just quoted a lot of stuff growing up as part of my sense of humor, so I just developed the skill.
	So there's not really much of a process, although I'm having to use some sort of process with Vosh because I hate him so much that it's throwing off my accuracy, but I'm trying to nail it before Carl gets back.
	That's awesome.
	I'm glad you got your degree as well.
	It's really good to hear.
	For Vosh, what's irritating is recently he actually had a bass take as well.
	He did?
	Yeah.
	I think Sean Head essentially brought up in BreadTube.
	Hey, you know Pride Parades?
	Maybe we shouldn't have fetish parades.
	Maybe we shouldn't have people in dog costumes and getting peed on in front of kids at these Pride Parades.
	And BreadTube is split along these lines.
	A bunch of them are like, no, no, this is totally wholesome.
	No, it's not.
	It's just idiots.
	And then you've got, amazingly, Vosch came out on the side of, yeah, you guys aren't being oppressed because you wear leather.
	This is not something you can argue.
	Get out of Pride Parade, you bunch of pedo creeps.
	I was like, yeah, alright, babe.
	That's a pretty low bar for a base take, but it's progress.
	You know, from Vosch, yeah, alright.
	I mean, there are people in BreadTube who have actually gone with the opposite opinion, saying, no, we should keep this at Pride.
	So, I mean, what are you expecting?
	So, I mean, even if it's that small of an amount of progress, it's good progress, at least.
	Progress for kind.
	So...
	But yeah, I mean, go and watch that, I guess.
	But I don't know what else.
	What would you do for the speech if you were to imitate Vosch?
	God.
	I mean, the amount of things that just get you in trouble for some of the things he said.
	I need to put on a lot of weight.
	Yeah.
	Anyway, let's go for the next one.
	Hey guys, I just wanted to bring to your attention an article I found from a few weeks ago where they are calling into question basically the credibility of Dr.
	Fowler and his colleagues and the autopsies that they've done, in particular the ones for people who died while in police custody.
	So I'm going to link it in the comments on the day that I upload this so you can take a look through it, but it's just foolish what they're trying to do.
	Like, there's even one of the families for...
	One of the people that he did an autopsy on that are trying to sue Dr.
	Fowler now.
	I also have a question about going forward, showing you guys and explaining some of this stuff.
	Some of the things I'm going to touch on and show are less than pleasant.
	And I'm going to use a little bit of footage here and there from the body cam and the bystander camera that was used.
	And I just want to make sure that I'm not using anything that will...
	Cause you guys any problems uploading this anywhere.
	I just wanna get you guys in trouble.
	So just let me know what I can't include and I'll do my best to work around it.
	As far as I'm aware of using the body cam footage, as long as it's in an educational context, YouTube treats that as okay and whatnot.
	We don't usually upload the video comments to YouTube or anything.
	We usually just have them on the website.
	Usually it would be fine if it's just the body cam footage to explain a thing, as long as you're not being gross about it, let's say.
	Sounds good to me.
	So let's move on to some written comments.
	So Alex Bradbury says, I hope even when Carl gets back from his holiday, in quotes, that you two still regularly host the podcast together.
	You have great chemistry and always fun to listen.
	That's very kind of you.
	Thank you.
	And he also says, also, despite not agreeing with her, I hope Sasha Johnson pulls through.
	Typical of safe London.
	Safe London.
	I think it's saying it ironically.
	It's always London as well.
	I got a message from one of our friends, let's say, who we've met, and he was just like, man, if this is going to be some white guy that shot her, it's going to blow up and it's going to be a massive thing in the United States and UK. I'm like...
	Yeah, maybe, but I mean, looking at the situation shot in South London, I mean, how many far-right white people live in South London anyway?
	Never mind access to firearms.
	I mean, this is Britain, for Christ's sake.
	It'd be their hell, wouldn't it, if they were far-right?
	What do you mean?
	As in South London...
	Oh, well, they wouldn't be there.
	No, exactly, yeah.
	Anyway, it was doubtless going to be gangs, and it seems, yeah, it was gangs.
	It's just so clan world.
	It's the thing you'd say is just, oh, what do you want to bet?
	And then it is.
	Anyway, sorry.
	The Carbohydrate Crusader.
	The new's obsession with race until it's unhelpful to a narrative they're trying to shape.
	In the words of Laurie Beetlejuice Lightfoot.
	I saw her name trending and whatnot and everyone talking about it and then...
	snap snap It's very evident that the one story they don't mention the race of is black on black violence for the black supremacist lady.
	Even global warming and being on time to things is racist, yet this race campaigner being shot in the head by people she claims to be helping gets no mention of the irony.
	Yeah.
	Isn't it Thomas Sowell?
	No, Larry Elder always makes this point as well.
	He's like, if you actually cared about black lives, you cared about the statistics of who's getting killed by black people, and it's gangs.
	In the United States, and apparently also in the UK. I don't know why anyone wouldn't want that to stop, and the fact that they're focusing on police violence, which is a very small statistic, like the unarmed people killed by police.
	But dealing with gang crime doesn't help socialism, so no interest in it.
	Chad Koala, in the same way the left will blame white supremacy for a black person bashing an Asian person, it's not too much of a stretch to assume Sasha Johnson being shot by a gang member will be too.
	Yeah, I mean, literally.
	What was it, Claudia Webb there?
	Like, black people don't own the firearm business.
	Like, what is it, white people?
	White people did this.
	Yeah.
	Pathetic.
	So if I went out and stabbed someone with, like, a Japanese cooking knife, Japan is to blame.
	Japanese did this.
	It wasn't me.
	Well, essentially, yes.
	Oh, God.
	I'm not going to do that, by the way, just to throw that out there.
	No, but if Labour get to power, I mean, it's legal then, I guess.
	Mostly peaceful stabbing.
	Rob Tal, I'm sure that this will be heavily used as a political tool, just as she would want, but to be honest, I struggle to care when horrible things happen to horrible people.
	I don't care what happens to her, but whoever shot her should be arrested.
	yeah uh ignacio yuncara um if sasha recovers good for her if she dies well i'm not going to cry if she survives maybe she'll think twice before blaming whitey for all her problems but of course we know she won't i mean i'd rather she didn't just die um Yeah, we don't want people to die.
	But it is just one of those things where it's like...
	Because I have to wonder as well, the circumstances, we don't have the details yet, but you saw with her personality, I can imagine her getting into a fight pretty easily.
	I mean, I don't know what, you know, what was the gang connection to where she was?
	Like, she was in a house in Peckham.
	She was in London.
	No, but like, was she connected to the gang?
	Was someone in the house connected to the gang?
	I imagine that she was kind of accidentally shot, targeting someone else, or indiscriminately shooting.
	Did the guy owning the house have a connection to the gang?
	Should she know that or whatnot?
	I'd just be interested.
	There's got to be some degree of connection there, otherwise she wouldn't be there in the first place.
	You just say.
	Henry Ashman.
	I hope Sasha Johnson makes a full recovery and rethink some of her positions about black-on-black crime and defunding the police.
	But hearing her prior work, I doubt she'll change her mind.
	Also, Diane Abbott is taking the Jussie Smollett line on white supremacy.
	Two Nigerians for him and four black men for Sasha.
	White supremacist and racist at all.
	Maybe she should take some PTSD leave like her fellow race grifter Labour MP Nadia Whittam.
	Although I wonder, the police are now investigating to try and find these four guys who have opened fire and put her in the hospital.
	Should we defund the police now?
	I mean, should those police officers be defunded?
	Are they part of the racist white supremacist system that's trying to find the guys who put you in the hospital?
	Apparently so.
	Maybe they should give up.
	Just like, yeah, well, sorry.
	No, that would be racist for us to find the killers.
	Well, not killers.
	Obviously they shouldn't stop.
	Even regardless.
	It's just Marxist nonsense.
	It's Marxist nonsense.
	Although Nadia Wittem, I didn't know whether or not to mention it today, but people might know Nadia Wittem because she's my favourite Labour MP that we like to feature.
	Because she's just such a race grift to the communists.
	It's so funny.
	She has no off switch whatsoever.
	And she's also lost like 15% of the vote in her own constituency after running once.
	So it's such a mess.
	She has decided to take leave with PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder.
	Presumably being an MP. Who'd have thought that she wouldn't cut it?
	It's convenient timing as well.
	Most people might not know, but she got in trouble recently.
	I think it was the Daily Telegraph or something had released her returns.
	So remember the scandal with the expenses for MPs.
	Some MP spent £500 on Duck Pond.
	Yeah, I remember that.
	She had spent £700 on an Influencer Toolkit.
	Which included a light so she could light up her face when she's using the camera and whatnot, and then claimed this as a parliamentary expense for her working as an MP. No, that has nothing to do with you as your job as an MP. That is you for partisan campaigning.
	You're not making these videos to tell people about, oh, I'm passing this law today or something like this.
	No, no, no.
	It's you for partisan campaigning.
	Tory's bad.
	Labour good.
	Vote me.
	So, no, you should not be demanding that the taxpayer pay for that.
	It is your money you should be spending.
	Who'd have thought Labour would be taking taxpayer money?
	They've never done that before.
	But just for nonsense purposes.
	Like, she gets paid £81,000 a year and she can't afford a light for her own partisan campaigning.
	Ugh.
	Horrible people.
	Alex Ogle, do my eyes deceive me or is that Rochdale picture of the monument in purple actually a cenotaph?
	I doubt that'll go down well in the next election.
	I don't like my memorials to the war dead being used that way.
	Additionally, Marxism on race lines is Nazism.
	Look up TIC's channel on YouTube for the history and evidence.
	True, I think it was a war memorial.
	Just a little shame to Rochdale there.
	You're getting the two bad ones mixed up there, aren't you?
	Yeah, Rotherham and Rochdale.
	Basically interchangeable in my mind as well.
	Yeah, Talford.
	God, there's so many.
	So, Dylan Tucker.
	Funny thing about Blackhammer Commune.
	San Miguel County is the literal ass end of nowhere.
	If they had gone to a remote plot, set up a homestead and kept quiet about it, chances are nobody would have found them for a very long time.
	But they didn't really want to have a commune.
	They just wanted to post all over social media about it so you could live larger after solicited donations.
	Seems perfectly reasonable.
	I mean, obviously they wanted to advertise it to get more donations, but...
	I mean, what are they going to do if no one sells them the land?
	Are they going to give that money back?
	How?
	I suppose they'd look for another plot of land, wouldn't they?
	Yeah, they'll keep looking.
	Yeah.
	They'll be looking for a very long time, I imagine, because I doubt many people are going to be keen to sell to a bunch of actual communists.
	Who wants to live next door to the Nazbols who are burning Mein Kampf.
	Sorry, not burning Mein Kampf.
	Praying to Mein Kampf and burning Anne Frank's diary instead.
	I wouldn't like them as my neighbours, let's just put it like that.
	So, Adria Della Fuente.
	Oh, the Marxist commune didn't pan out for the radical apartheid peddlers.
	Imagine my shock.
	I mean, it stumbled at its first hurdle.
	It didn't even get as far as I thought they would, to be honest.
	I thought they'd at least buy the land.
	But no.
	They can't even buy some uninhabitable mountain lands that you can't even grow stuff in.
	It's like 10,000 feet up.
	Unbelievable, really.
	So, student of history.
	Hammer City's got issues.
	Hammered out.
	I'll see you myself out.
	That was a dad joke.
	Paul Roach, the Discovery Channel should fund Black Hammer's commune in exchange for rights to a reality TV show.
	Keeping up with the KKK communists.
	That would be amazing to do.
	Just go with some extremist group, like neo-Nazis or radical communists like Black Hammer and whatnot, and just film them.
	And say you're making a documentary, do the whole thing proper, and then just in the end, the editing, do a voiceover and make it like a nature documentary.
	You see here the communists building their mud huts and starving to death in natural water.
	You know...
	I wonder if David Attenborough would do it.
	If you pay him enough money, I'm sure he would.
	Yeah, I mean, why not?
	Richard Jones, following on from the Earthbag Homes, lonely leftists, I live in an eco-hole, points a hole in a cliff, normal person, you live in a cave.
	Yeah.
	Very true, that's kind of what I was pointing at.
	It's like the tiny homes and whatnot.
	Like, I only see this stuff in the United States, and it just comes off as like, I've rebranded the thing.
	So, like, tiny homes, it looks like a trailer park.
	So...
	It's just using a nice name for something that's horrible, really.
	I don't know.
	I wouldn't buy it.
	That's all.
	Maybe you love it.
	That's great for you.
	I'm not going to stop you buying it.
	I wouldn't buy it.
	I mean, if you own a property, good on you at least.
	So, Henry Ashman...
	I own this hole in the wall.
	Sorry.
	This is my hole in the wall and I'm very proud of it.
	What do you want to...
	Henry Ashman, is there a cut-off for non-colonised peoples?
	Given the Romans, Saxons, Vikings and Normans have colonised Britain and varying degrees of Europe, the large parts of the Mediterranean were colonised by the Persians.
	I think...
	Most whites and Jews have a decent claim to being colonised at some point.
	Not sure about the Arab world, though.
	Maybe one for Carl and Beau to confirm.
	I mean, there's a reasonable amount of colonisation in the Arab world as well.
	Were they?
	Were they ever colonised, the Arabian Peninsula?
	Goodbye.
	I mean, the British turned up pretty late.
	Other Muslims.
	Lots of borders have shifted around.
	It's not the people who were the first to settle there.
	What is colonisation?
	Where do you draw the line?
	We certainly took Kuwait, Oman and Yemen, and Qatar.
	Based.
	No apologies.
	I mean, better.
	We were talking about this earlier, weren't we?
	Benjamin Charles.
	I just pulled my tractor-trailer off to the side of the road to implore you not to lend a scintilla of your hard-earned credibility to Garzy Kodze by interviewing that huckster.
	He is Ruby Rod from The Fifth Element, a shoddy Marxist bigot, and his every breath is a pointless reduction of the planet's oxygen supply.
	It's fine, Carl's doing it now anyway, so I'm not even doing it anymore.
	He certainly is a nut job, but it's, I don't know, that's Carl's problem, not my problem.
	He can maintain and contain the toxicity for that hour-long interview.
	Yeah, Carl likes the combat.
	He's going to turn up in a hazmat suit for the interview.
	Angel Brain, definitely talk to Garzy.
	That is going to be satire of the highest form.
	The only thing funnier than him is going to be watching Carl trying to maintain a sense of decorum whilst also thinking this guy is bonkers three times a minute.
	Sorry, I'll be on hand to give him any kind of post-interview therapy if he needs it.
	I'm going to put him on the couch.
	So, George Happ, based Florida man's legislation, reminds me of Poland's.
	It's amazing how simple it is to counter censorious policies of these private companies.
	Now, if only the rest of the states and a couple more countries joined in, but I guess most governments see big tech as a tool to suppress speech.
	I mean, we have a cookie-killer solution now.
	Everyone's been arguing for ages.
	I mean, how do we deal with this?
	Well, I mean, Poland's shown the way, and Florida's following it.
	Poland, the leading light of Europe.
	Literally.
	How many terrorist attacks?
	Zero.
	That's how many.
	Harry G-Man.
	This just in, Florida man wrestles alligator, breaks into a home and sucks on a sleeping man's toes, sets hospital bed on fire to get nurses' attention, arrested after giving aggressive wet willy, sexual assault stuffed Olaf dolls at Target and saves internet.
	More at 11.
	I'd love to hear.
	I assume that's a reference to the meme I said a while back.
	Same Florida man.
	It's all the same guy.
	He's had a hell of a weekend.
	It's all Ron DeSantis.
	Just Ron DeSantis the whole time.
	I'd wait for him to be president.
	Why not?
	Dan Taylor, if Zucka Zucka Zucka's dimmer...
	What?
	Zucka, zucka, zucka.
	Oi, oi.
	I didn't realise it was to a tune.
	Dimmer than a leftist with a broken strimmer.
	Zucka, zucka, zucka.
	Dimmer than a leftist with a broken strimmer.
	Oh, okay, yeah.
	It's just like a football chant.
	No, no, no.
	It's Arnold Rimmer.
	So the Red Dwarf.
	Everyone should go watch it.
	Just type in Rimmerworld or Arnold Rimmerworld or something like that on YouTube.
	And he's the most irritating member of the crew because he's a stuffy rule kind of person who follows the rules no matter what the rules are.
	And he makes his own theme park dedicated to himself because he's a narcissist.
	And it's just like you ride through it in like a cart and there's a song playing going, his name is Arnold, Arnold, Arnold Rimmer.
	Yeah.
	Student of history.
	He's more sharp than a trickstrimmer.
	I'll show you after.
	Students of history.
	Florida man.
	He might smoke meth and go at you with an assault gator, but he protects your rights.
	Yeah.
	He's a symbol of America.
	It's like the Ken and Karens.
	If you go around to their house, you might get shot, but at least they'll stuff in your right to own a guy at your house.
	Absolutely.
	My favourite Florida Man story is the one where they tried to rob a bank with an alligator as a weapon and just held the alligator.
	It's like, give me the money.
	Don't put it in the mouth, though.
	I like to think he was just some homeless guy who's like, I can't afford a gun.
	Plenty of alligators around.
	Shake Silver.
	The biggest issue with big tech at a federal level is Section 230 being outdated.
	It doesn't even cover algorithmic manipulation of content and gives the platforms massive leeway for moderating content that they deem obscene, even without being illegal.
	This allows them to be a soft form of Publisher without being held legally liable for speech on their platform like a real publisher.
	States needs to have protections for users that challenge this.
	Yep.
	I mean, it's most transparent.
	I mean, there are a lot of arguments about the shadow banning and whatnot, which they used to deny and now they admit it exists.
	I mean, Jack Dorsey literally saying this to the House after being called out for it.
	But the best example has to be, I think, Susan Wojcicki at YouTube and her promotion of authoritative sources on things.
	So if they're...
	I mean, Carl's a great candidate for this, which is he's a guy, he makes his, you know, life on YouTube as a political person.
	He then decides to run for office.
	And because she's made authoritative sources, the ones that get algorithmically boosts, if you Google his name, you know, Carl Benjamin, on YouTube, what'd you get?
	Do you get his channel?
	No, you don't get his channel.
	Do you get his videos about him so you can see what he's about?
	No, of course you don't.
	You get Sky News and BBC and ITV, like, hit pieces on him, because that's how she wants this to work.
	It's horrible.
	Theodore Brewer, Disney World is effectively a small country within Florida.
	Sounds great.
	Yeah.
	I see people calling it Ancapistan.
	I'm like, yeah, all right.
	Ancapistan's got good food by the sounds of it.
	Yeah, I've never been to Disney World, but now it's its own country.
	I'm tempted.
	I've seen, like, clips of people hanging around.
	It does look great to be in.
	Complete anarchy in Disneyland.
	No, no, no, they've got their police.
	They've got their ANCAP police force, so I'll come and get you.
	They're dressed up as stormtroopers.
	Yeah, they're just dressed as stormtroopers with, like, AR-15s.
	Craig Gorman, just applying the current law for publishers against them would be enough.
	I think any form of challenge by Big Tech could eventually end up as an interesting case in the Supreme Court.
	Yeah, very true.
	Joseph Woodland, Callum, you ever read about Disneyland in Florida?
	It is a totally separate authoritarian state.
	Some of the stuff they do there has to be illegal.
	Yeah, I read some of the accounts of employees who are spilling the beans about some of the working situations.
	So the fact you have to always be on, for example.
	So if you're playing a character in Disneyland because you can't ruin the illusion for the poor kiddos, you have to always be in character, is what I've heard.
	So it makes really weird situations and also really creepy conditions in which you've got to pretend.
	Apparently they also have a really good way of dealing with stuff that shouldn't be.
	So let's say there's a crime or someone's done something or whatever, they just walk them off and then suddenly they're out of frame with everyone else.
	So it doesn't ruin anyone else's day.
	They're sort of masters at it, but it does sound like something out of 1984 or something.
	Brave New World, actually.
	He just, like, yanked them out of the way from the sightline of anyone else, just like, yep, nope, not today.
	And he beat them up in the back room.
	Well, I heard a story about some guy, I think he tried to steal something, and he got grabbed by the cops and then, like, thrown into the security room.
	It was just weird how quickly it happened and how out of the limelight he got, but I can't remember all the details, so...
	They throw him into, like, the Pirates of the Caribbean prisons.
	You will earn the money back by playing the role as a prisoner.
	They dress him in rags.
	Well, he stole it.
	He has to pay it off.
	Imagine that Disney just has its own law and order.
	It'd punish you by making you work for them until you pay off your crimes.
	Portland or Disney and Capistan?
	Pick one.
	I mean, without a doubt, it'd be Ancapistan.
	Could Josh do a podcast about the psychology of simping?
	I personally am thankful to the Twitch streamers.
	Natural Selection is a thing again, thanks to them.
	If the simps worked on themselves, they would have a shot at reproducing, but they'd rather spend their time and money on thoughts that wouldn't even look at them in real life.
	I mean, that's very true.
	I'm certainly no expert on the psychology of the simp, but I suppose I could look into it for you.
	I might do contemplations, just like an hour and a half of me just moralising, just like, thou shalt not simp.
	Just seeing the chat with a mouse room 101.
	Everyone goes in, no one comes out.
	It's like Clockwork Orange, they just keep your eyes open and you've got to watch every Disney film in one sitting.
	And then you can leave and you'll never come back.
	Nitrocellulose doormat.
	A lot of friends, lucky to still work at an office, have been sharing photos of the pets, mostly dogs, that share their workspace.
	It's been a while since I had a pet, but I recall working deadlines at home and occasionally having to suffer our retriever's displeasure at seeing me sat at Sat stationary at the kitchen table for long periods of time.
	He found me working from home.
	Sat on a laptop, extremely boring and intrusive to his day.
	So we're trying to steal my paperwork or socks for a bit of fun.
	Does Lotus Eaters have office pets?
	If not, what office pets would you like to have if the boss allows?
	I think the building doesn't allow anyway.
	Yeah.
	Not going to be happening.
	But I've always grown up with cats and dogs, so...
	Favourable to them, at least.
	Yeah, it's always going to be a dog.
	Anyway, we're out of time, so we're going to end here.
	But we'll be back tomorrow at 1 o'clock.
	If you want more content from us, go to the Lotus Eaters channel, the second one, not the podcast one, in which we have the video Eat the Bugs from Carl, which is great.
	We have the premium Epochs with Carl and Bo about Alcibiades to go check out on LotusEers.com, and also the response from the Home Office, as I mentioned, and the new article about...
	This perspective of the military of these workers that's taking over.
	Without further ado, we're off.
	Thank you for tuning in.
	We'll see you again tomorrow at one o'clock.
	Thank you.

▲