All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 16, 2025 - Louder with Crowder
01:00:37
🔴 The Lies are Sick: Charlie Kirk's Legacy Separating Fact from Fiction 2025-09-16 18:07
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Text messages.
But my friend was shot in the neck.
And um I'm just not really in in the state right now to be polite when it comes to the answers that I am demanding, okay.
That was you polite all this time.
And here's the truth.
And far be it for me to defend everybody else involved.
I don't know Bill Ackman very well.
Uh I'm familiar with Blumenthal, don't like him.
The truth is, Bill Ackman did respond in detail.
Charlie's producers responded in detail.
And the only receipts that Candace provided were texts that she sent to Seth Dylan that he never answered.
That's just proof that she texted him.
That's what is a proof of.
I know.
But in the internet sphere, people take the headline and go, Candace Owens brings receipts.
And this whole thing was about how the Jews, the Jews, and he he was he was turning against the Jews, and so they might have something.
The implication, I don't know if she's outright said it.
The implication is that the Jews took out Charlie Kirk.
Yeah, there's there's no she's dancing around it, Ian Carroll says it much more clearly.
And even people like Dave Smith are having a hard time with this going, like, listen, this is why people say you're crazy.
Yeah.
There's no evidence whatsoever.
And to say that because Charlie started to notice that he just started down that road.
Because that's all they're really claiming is that he started to kind of do that and they killed him for that?
Well, they could do the same thing about me if I were to be taken out.
That's the thing.
He he had the same type of issues and criticisms of the Israeli government as we would have.
But before we get to that, uh I just love how I know I don't usually share texts, private texts.
That's literally your thing all the time.
And here is the message chain between me and Skylar, my producer.
This is how it happened, Blake.
Lean in.
Get your lawyers in.
You're you are unlocking this smear campaign girlfriend.
You got this.
Here we go.
You can use this.
No, it's gonna be like he's gonna be someone at me.
Anyways, I write because guess what?
You're gonna not believe this.
I come up with my own ideas for the show.
And can someone pull this?
She shared private texts with Nick Fuentes.
Nick Fuentes and Charlie Kirk, I believe, by the way.
Yeah.
Like, hey, this is us when we were we were it was innocent.
We were scheming to get him and Erica together.
Like she shares, that's her thing.
That's what she does.
And then she'll tell you, I'm not, I by the way, I am not anti-Semitic.
By the way, I am and I'm not just using it as a broad label.
Like it it is you do have to ask yourself, okay, is this an irrational position to hold uh in blaming the Jews?
The idea that the Jews um backfilled, backlogged Discord channel, social media accounts with a 22-year-old somehow got him to become gay and sleep with a trans furry boyfriend.
Engrave the casings with the anti-fascist uh uh trans saying whatever the trans furry bulge shit is and equip him with an antique 306 mouser with a poorly mounted scope that's a bolt action.
I uh yes, I would argue it's irrational.
That doesn't mean that criticisms of Israel are all irrational.
But if it's always the Jews, if it's always the Jews, yes, it's irrational.
Now, another truth on the flip side, I believe there is truth to this because we have dealt with this.
I've told you, I've been invited on trips to Israel.
I've not gone.
Well, if ever I go, it will be on a private trip.
It will not be for a photo op.
And Charlie Kirk uh did discuss this with Megan Kelly.
He said, hey, look, the problem is for someone who's done as much as I have, Charlie's saying this, I'll still get labeled an anti-Semite if I criticize them at all.
That is true.
Doesn't mean the Jews took him out, but here you go.
The behavior by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me away.
Not like we're gonna be pro-Hamas, not like we're gonna, but we're like, honestly, the way you are treating me is so repulsive.
I have text messages, Megan calling me an anti-Semite.
We have funded, we have supported, and they're up against a sea of Islamic totalitarianism, and we should be cheering for them, right?
Because they're up against the variants and monsters, and we want them to win.
However, here is Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk combined, probably 30 million social media followers, like pretty right.
And you and I have been holding this down, and you you probably get the negative, oh, you're just shilling for Israel, whatever.
I'm like, okay, I'm gonna do what's right regardless of the feedback, right?
But then all of a sudden, like I host a person that I do I moderate the debate of my right?
And I give equal time to Josh Hammer, equal time to a pro Israel advocate, and my moral character is being put into question.
And I can imagine that that would be absolutely infuriating for Charlie Kirk.
Yeah.
But he reiterated many, many, many times that he wanted Israel to win.
And if you follow uh his the, I mean, the the span of his career, he was one of the strongest advocates for Israel, more so than than most of us here.
And that's that's his right.
And if you disagree with him, it still doesn't change the fact that he was, and it doesn't change the fact that there are people trying to grift off of his name and death.
Look, I want to be very, very clear here.
Charlie Kirk and I, we're not close friends.
I'm not really close friends with anybody in this movement.
We're kind of an island, that's by design.
Big part of that is because I don't want anything to do with donors.
I know how that goes.
I know that's very difficult.
I don't want anything to do with people who claim to be nothing but a sponsor, but really it's not a sponsorship that is um that is commensurate with what they're doing for the show, right?
It's a little bit of you have to do this, you have to play ball.
I want nothing.
When I say this, we weren't close friends.
I want nothing to do.
I know everyone's jockeying for the position at TPUSA.
It I would never even attempt it.
I don't want to be involved with any nonprofits.
I don't want to be at any other media company.
The guy who turned down a $50 million contract over five years to pay everything here, including security and salaries.
Because we want to be independent, I have no dog in this fight.
Other than the truth.
And people out there who are saying I'm going to be the ambassador, who may not align with all of Charlie Kirk's views.
Maybe TP USA is fine with it.
I think the decision will be with whatever board they have, donors and Erica Kirk.
But people then trying to profit off of his death through misrepresentation, claiming that they were close friends when they were no longer close friends, claiming that they have been approached or should be the next face of I have no interest in it.
Because that's what Charlie did.
And I will I will tell you this.
Charlie Kirk, look, there is no one out there who is going to be as as good as Charlie at fundraising and organization through the nonprofit grassroots network in that sector.
He was the best that I have seen.
I I would be terrible at it, okay?
Different paths.
Nonprofit TP USA outreach, right?
It's a mission.
It's an entertainment show.
It's a business.
Both things are needed.
The difference is I'm not telling you that I should or could do it.
So many people are.
And it's dishonest.
I think it's pretty gross.
And I think, look, and there also could be a kernel of truth to it.
Look, I hate APAC for the same reason I hate Act Blue or the SCIU.
Because they give a huge amount of funding to Democrats.
And I think the same should apply, by the way.
They should have to register some kind of a foreign entity along with and I get that it's a group of Jewish Americans.
I understand the technicality there.
But you gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to Hakeem Jeffries.
Let's do the same with Qatar.
Let's do the same with China.
I get it.
And I understand that in the nonprofit world, Charlie had to deal with some struggles that I that we wouldn't have to deal with here.
They're different.
And he would hand he handled those really well.
And so, hey, why wouldn't Candace Owens come in and shit all over it?
And let me read you actually also the producers.
Um the producers responded saying Bill never yelled at Charlie, never pressed him on BB, never gave him a list of Charlie's offenses against Israel.
And I know that many of you will say, well, they have to say that because uh, you know, for optics, and that's the problem, isn't it?
That's the problem with people like Candace Owens and Ian Carroll just throwing stuff out there that has no basis in truth.
None whatsoever.
The idea, you know, too, that you have people say, hey, look at this, one conspiracy out there with Charlie Kirk's shooting is someone was there in a crime scene removing cameras.
Sure, it was it's probably the camera guy, and it probably had to do with them being very expensive cameras that were running amidst an assassination that would count as evidence, and they'd want us that was remaining in an unsecured location.
People saying, look at his, look at his guard giving a signal.
First off, he could not be giving a signal, or I don't know if you know this.
Those who work in security often have signals amongst themselves.
So people throw out mistruth and mistruth and mistruth, and then go, by the way, I'm the only answer.
I'm gonna tell you, I am not the only answer.
I'm not even the best answer.
I'm one of many.
And I ask that you check the references.
What bothers me is people going out and misrepresenting it, seeking to profit off of it.
Because as much as much as it we're all mourning, you need to know that behind the scenes there's a game of thrones thing going on.
And that doesn't mean that nobody is qualified or should should take that spot and could do a good job.
I'm sure there are some possible candidates.
Just as surely there are plenty of people who have no business even getting close to the kind of role that Charlie Kirk had.
And so they just throw some chum in the water.
Just some lies.
Here you go.
Very effective.
The left would love it.
My problem with Candace too is that every time something like this happens, we always go back to the same place.
Anything crazy that goes on in the world, we always go back to the same place.
I've got receipts, I've got evidence that most people don't have to.
She never has for a fact.
What happened?
And then Bill Ackman comes out.
And for people who don't know exactly what they're talking about, it wasn't some like backroom meeting.
This was them putting on a kind of a conference essentially of other creators and influencers to talk about what's going on in the world.
And one of the topics centered around Israel, actually, it wasn't completely about Israel, but it came up inside that topic.
I think there were four.
Yeah.
Bill Ackman was there for some of them.
He moderated some of them.
Then they had conversations about it.
It was spirited on both sides.
People were pro-Israel and people were not really fans of Israel, but not pro-Hamas.
They were just saying, hey, we don't like how this war is being prosecuted.
We don't like how this is being done.
And there were conversations that happened around that.
And then there was a meeting afterwards with some of the principals to say, hey, what did we learn?
Are there any people in this group that we can identify as people who maybe can start these local chapters and do these things on campus themselves?
Is that what we want to do?
To then go from that.
It's like because we've had conversations about Israel that have been spirited.
And then to go from that and say, Well, the Jews, BB basically is threatening him.
They're offering him a lot of money if he'll just change his opinion on the Jews.
And even Bill Ackman was there, he was not happy.
Let me tell you, I know he wasn't happy.
How do you know, Candace?
Is this ever going to get old for you?
Where you think you know everything and you're just gonna go out and say it and you provide zero receipts on this stuff?
Is it ever just eating away at your gut?
Like I mean, can you blame the people?
Some people are people are eating it up.
It's not gonna last.
I want fewer people to gobble that crap up.
You still have some people.
You still have some people who think she should have TP USA.
You still have people out there who are like, oh, Charlie would want because they don't know what's happened.
That just shows how uninformed, yes, there are some people on our side.
How uninformed some of them are, but you're right.
They will I'll make them it's not gonna last long.
It's not gonna last long.
I mean, what Nashville Manifesto?
She said we were wrong.
She had her sources, she never she she never provided any receipts whatsoever.
I thought you got someone fired.
Remember, they said, Yeah, she said I got someone fired.
You got a police officer fired.
Never got anyone fired.
Um she does that all the time.
It's wait, she wakes up, goes, what's trending?
How can I inject myself regardless of accuracy or honesty?
Right.
That's what she's doing right here.
It's not honest, and she's been invited on the show.
Uh, because she said she wants to debate everybody so that people can see the bad ideas she has been invited in the past.
She has not.
Okay, fine.
I just I this is all pretty pretty gross.
And I get that everyone's going to be talking about Charlie Kirk because he it's a huge inflection point.
There's a huge difference between talking about or correcting the record as we've attempted to do today and lying for profit.
Let's be clear.
Let's be clear.
People they'll come out, by the way, they'll come out and know the discipline, I I don't make any money by saying this.
Well, do you get clicks?
Do you get more clicks?
Mm-hmm.
Okay, let's be honest.
So saying that Charlie was taken out by the Jews will generate more clicks.
You can do that for a while, but please don't be led astray.
Even if you vehemently oppose the Israeli government.
And I think there's a case to be made, certainly as it relates to uh Benjamin Netanyahu.
Charlie Kirk asked some questions.
Of course.
On October 7th, I think he asked, hey, was there a stand-down order?
Because everyone in the country is IDF.
You can't walk around a corner without seeing a rifle.
And it went six hours without them showing up at a music festival.
He said this is a people have this question and I'm going to present it.
That's what he did.
That's what he did.
And people will show this just like we showed you this Megan Kelly clip, just to show I could show you a 10 to 1 ratio of him being passionately supportive of Israel.
How you feel about that position is irrelevant.
Was it his position?
Yes.
Was he clear about his position?
Yes.
So if someone is presenting to you a different position with no receipts, that's what we call lying.
Sorry, I don't mean to infantilize the women.
I would have preferred a audible stutter.
So uh right now we do have lying.
Yes.
We do have some clips of the Cash Patel hearing right now.
Um Ted Cruz is is talking to him right now, but this is more of like the softball port uh portion of it.
But apparently he's done some trolling.
He's been trolled a little bit, and Cory Booker tried to have an I am Spartacus moment, it looks like with him again.
Oh, really?
I think Corey's in the like if I seem angry that that'll play well with my base kind of thing.
Yeah, he's in he's been finding success with that.
Did Corey start it with like, by the way, did you see my girlfriend, Rosario Dawson?
Isn't she pretty for a woman?
What?
Why am I talking?
Let's uh let me guess it gets angry and looks two different ways.
Yeah.
And uh so I don't even know where we want to start.
We have Clobachar, we have him trolling Dick Durbin, or we have the Corey Booker.
Uh I don't know which one is.
Guys, this is where I get to do a couple for me and have a little surprise me.
All right, let's do it.
I'll just take them as they come, guys.
Here we go.
Requiring applicants.
Hold on, please.
We're gonna have to restart this because I can't hear her voice and not think of when she in fact has been on this show.
Yeah, yeah.
Uh you getting are you getting a little uh excited down there uh behind the desk?
I didn't know we were gonna lead with the one and it was a memory trigger.
All right, start it back from the top.
I promise you I will be mature enough to handle this.
But you are not requiring uh applicants to be able to do a certain kind of pull-ups, uh, which uh a lot of women cannot because of physiological differences.
Are you requiring Pause Did you just acknowledge physiological differences?
Yes, we win!
Check me.
Women cannot do, especially not me, because I'm skinny fat Yes, Torono, I agree with you.
Good point.
Let's continue.
These kinds of pull-ups.
We are requiring a physical program at BFTC equanico because FBI agents carrying guns in the field have to chase down bad guys and do really hard work.
The physical fitness standards of those agents.
So are you requiring these signs of uh pull-ups?
We're requiring everybody to pass.
And that hearing it's a good thing.
Excuse me, and put him in handcuffs, you better be able to do a pull-up.
Which by the way, until the year 2017 would never be seen as controversial.
No.
Yeah.
But she she wants you less safe.
She wants you less safe.
Think about that.
So you're saying if somebody jumps over my fans.
You want to chase them over the fan.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yes.
But uh, Mr. Patel, it is a fact that I cannot do it, but I don't care.
Why do you not care about my polypee?
Are we having this conversation?
Mr. Pateau, did you know that I wear pull-ups?
It's for accidental bowel movement.
I'm a big thing.
Yeah, I was gonna say Mr. Patel.
I'm a big sentence.
I saw please let the record show that I am uh stuck on Danny Brands because don't stick on me, your floor.
It's nervous.
She would never say your floor.
No, she would never say it.
It's on my floor.
And I'm going right.
You can test my gift.
Oh my gosh.
I can't believe that she palaps.
You know, people have said that I'm sexist when I go, Yeah, women can't do pull.
She just acknowledged women can't do pulling.
Yes, yeah, she just did it.
All right.
I don't want to hear shit from her ever.
About men in women's sports ever again.
I don't want to write back to that clip every single time.
Yeah.
Are you suggesting it isn't in yet?
What about pull-ups?
Oh shit.
Go and spam you stupid bitch.
She sucks.
I'm sorry.
She really just a like a 30,000 foot question.
Like, is there a controversy over the FBI's handling so far of the Kirk case?
Like I don't I haven't seen anything.
I mean, obviously we've we've gotten some information and put it out there and they've you know I think there was controversy over the fact that he said the shooter and then the suspect in question was released because at first I think he labeled him the shooter and then uh so people thought that he made like requires a hearing from the Senate.
Like Yeah, I don't I don't aside from that, I don't really know.
Um Wonder if this was sc maybe the guys hadn't researched, maybe this was scheduled and they've now taken in to ask questions about this.
I mean CNN's headline right now says they question him on the firings of top FBI agents.
I don't know if that's the reason for the whole hearing.
Okay.
All right.
Surprise me with the next clip.
All right, here we go.
Sto it.
Mr. Patel.
Oh, geez.
You're not gonna be around long.
I think this might be your last oversight hearing.
Because as much as you supplicate yourself to the will of Donald Trump and not the Constitution of the United States of America, Donald Trump has shown us in his first term and in this term, he is not loyal to people like you.
He will cut you loose.
This may be the last time I have a hearing with you because I don't think you're long for your job.
What?
Whoa, what?
I don't think you're long.
I think you're probably medium.
Average girl.
Based on your height.
Change my mind.
Did he show up?
Yeah.
He's the one with a diamond.
Yeah.
I have the right.
Yeah.
Now that's wrong.
I said yes.
Um angry.
I just I just lost it.
How angry he was.
It's also like it's like interrogation 101, like, hey, your friends told us that you ratted you out.
Like, you know, your friends don't like you.
They're turning on you.
He's like, go fuck yourself.
You go fuck yourself.
I don't think I'll be able to sit here.
He's like trying to son him.
I know.
I know.
You know, you come come here, come here.
Yeah.
You know he's gonna just ditch you, right?
Right.
Yeah.
Come in Mama's arms.
Yeah.
Because I care.
I care too much.
I care too long.
He looks like he's on the verge of a rage cry.
Always.
Yeah.
Always.
Always.
Or I was gonna say rave cry.
Like he looks like he's on the verge of going to a rave with sweaty naked men.
His eyes look like he's been raving.
Yes, he does.
Yeah.
I can't even get them that wide open.
I know.
It's bizarre.
He looks like something you'd catch in River Monsters.
Let's throw back promptly.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Too bony.
You said there's another uh there's another clip.
No, no.
I thought you said there was another book.
There is another booker thing that I'll ask them to get to that.
I think it was towards the end.
I could I was trying to read lips when they were saying it.
It almost looked like he said from Patel said to Booker, you're making a mockery or you're um something like that of this, you know, thing.
They were going at each other a little bit.
So did Booker say, read my lips.
Tried to speak Spanish to how did you know, Steven?
Maisie Corono knows it well.
But I still can't do pull up.
It is my cross to be.
But I can't bear it because I can do pull up.
Alright, next clip.
All right, next.
Stating there is no incriminating client list.
Why was this July 7th memorandum unsigned?
Would you prefer I've used autopen?
Ha!
Memorandum had the insignia of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
And in our wow.
That was a good troll.
That was great.
I don't understand.
I'm not that quick on my feet.
Wait, uh, what are you doing here?
You're not supposed to turn this.
I don't even know if that's the right voice, but it's fun.
Yeah, it is fun.
That's why that's why I love uh uh RFK Jr. at his hearing.
Like it was he treated it the least prepared, like you was just gonna give them answers.
Yeah, no, no, I didn't say that.
Like my voice, I heard you did.
Didn't I No!
That was it.
My favorite was when they asked him a question, he'd go.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Because he didn't even have the voice when he says yeah.
It's so weird.
It's like Yeah.
Like, are you saying yes?
Do you know how much it hurts to talk?
In the leaning back to you from RFK just Yeah.
All right, next uh clip.
I just can't believe this is this is the best they have to offer.
They're conceding the territory and the war of ideas.
They have nothing.
The left has nothing to offer this country at this point in time.
They just sent us another book or book.
Here, this one's infuriating.
Conservative think tank published a study just last week uh that found from terrorists from the right were responsible for six times more deaths than people from the left.
I actually don't want to go tit for tat on this, but what I am asking for is that this rhetoric of blaming one side or the other, stop if you could convey that to the president and that we actually work on things uh that are solutions.
So could you commit to me, Mr. Patel, director of TAL that you will do that?
Absolutely, Senator.
Okay, thank you.
That's a cop out.
I'm sorry.
He had a perfect opportunity there to kind of push back on the narrative a little bit.
He could say, listen, absolutely, I I think it's it's helpful for us to make sure that we uh we don't condone any violence, but uh and then just lay out yeah the case.
Yeah, I don't know what she's actually well.
It'll be interesting.
Let's uh if peep people will probably be circulating circulating that guy, so let's uh let's be ready to guarantee you they're gonna be like everything that they deem white supremacist is gonna count into that number.
Yeah, and listen, the the the point, and I just want to make this really quickly.
We've made this before.
People are lasering in on it now, so I think that's good.
It's not saying that people on the left and people on the right don't get attacked.
They do.
What we're saying is name me one of the left's Charlie Kirk.
Yeah.
Name me one person out there from the left that was having an impact that was targeted because of their beliefs like this.
This is the kind of stuff that is happening.
For because of that.
And you can prove it verifiably, like these cases that we're talking about.
That's a different thing.
For crying out loud, do you give an idea how little they're targeted?
They have to fake it.
Congressman Clyburn had to fake that someone screamed the N-word at him walking up the Capitol steps and was spitting on him.
And Andrew Breitbart back then had footage 360 degrees.
This was when iPhones were relative to smartphones were new.
He offered a hundred thousand dollars to the United Negroes College Fund.
I had a Negro, United Negroes, I don't know.
It's still the name.
Uh if anyone had footage of someone screaming the N-word at him, we had plenty of footage every single step up to and up those capital steps.
We had every single one of his steps.
Not one time did we hear it.
AOC fake arrested herself.
That's true.
Remember there are no cuffs.
And then put her hands up.
It said she was at the insurrection.
I know.
Yeah.
Like they have to fake it.
They have to fake it and then they dismiss it when, for example, hey, in my case, violent assault.
Many, many times.
Like, well, you're fine.
Yeah, but you faked that someone put handcuffs on you.
Whitmer's kidnapping, fake kidnapping is recorded as right wing extremism.
Yes, exactly.
Exactly.
It's just, it's not even close.
It's not even close.
All right.
Next, do we have another clip?
Is that what you said?
Uh yeah, well, I I think we well, we'll get back to it really quickly, but there's uh I guess so there's something out right now.
So this college student was asked.
Is it breaking?
Uh it kind of I think it's breaking, it's kind of going viral right now.
So a college student was asked by our professor for a hot take on Charlie Kirk's death and said, quote, or is it in the video?
It's in the video.
This is the professor video.
So this is the student.
I believe this is the student saying this, correct?
Yeah, we know the school.
Uh I'm trying to see that right now.
I know, but they have the this person has they them pronouns.
I I see on her thing says choten Oberlin 27.
I don't know if that's okay, guys.
Get me that information if you can.
I'm watching this live with you for the first time.
I'm breaking and we were sure to use the right pronouns.
Yes, we will.
Yes, of course.
Okay, here we go.
So the day after Charlie Kirk died, I was in class.
My teacher said, I'll give you five minutes for hot takes about Charlie Kirk.
I was the only person who raised their hand.
I said, I've been saying we need to bring back political assassinations.
I don't feel bad.
And I don't think that everyone deserves the right to free speech.
I think some people should be afraid to express their opinion in public.
So this class is literally about revolution in China.
All of our readings for this month have been talking about how violent revolution liberated millions of people and liberated women.
And then our reading for that day was specifically about democratic dictatorship, where Mao writes about yes, people deserve free speech, but there should not be free speech for reactionaries and imperialists and like capitalists and all these people who are enemies of the revolution because that would reverse the progress that was made.
Free speech for the obedient.
Yes.
And by the way, I will tell you no, there has never been a violent revolution on behalf of women that granted them rights.
It's not a thing.
You wouldn't be able to do it as heard by Maisie Harono, who can't do pull-ups.
Okay?
Let's be really clear.
You were granted rights by men who were not required to, because they are the enforcers of said rights and laws.
Let's be very, very clear.
Is this the same liberated women who had their uh female babies taken and killed?
Yep.
Exactly.
Okay.
Yeah.
Eva liberation.
Yeah, they listed a lot of rights for people that they liked.
Right.
It's basically like except for, except for, except for, except for, you know, obviously capitalists are thrown in there because this is a communist.
This is not new.
It goes back.
That's what we did that segment on Cuba.
It goes back to Susan Rotolo, uh, Bob Dylan's bitch, saying, uh saying, you know, and these, what was it?
What was the term she used to be?
Gusanos.
Gusanos, referring to them as worms.
These worms meaning people who are protesting the communist fascist government.
So they're allowed to, so long as it just remains words.
Yeah, well, tell that to all the people who were imprisoned in that country simply for speaking out against the government.
Those aren't people, those are gusanos.
Right.
And she's calling for, she's like, I think, you know, these these political assassinations are fine.
I I what I don't remember the word that she used.
So we need to bring it back.
So basically just condoning political assassinations.
If we feel like somebody is out there saying something that we don't agree with, and God forbid they're getting traction on their idea in the marketplace of ideas.
We have to stamp that out and make sure that that doesn't happen.
She's supporting the only way she knows how.
In China, they don't allow ideas.
It is stamp it out.
It's it's killed them.
I think that's Japanese, but I'll allow racism right now because she's a bitch.
Thank you.
What were you uh saying, Noodle?
Yeah, I was just gonna say, so on the Cho-n-Oberlin thing, uh, show uh sounded familiar to me.
It's a boarding school in Connecticut that I'm familiar with, but that's a high school.
The Oberlin appears to refer to Oberlin College, so I would assume that's where she's at.
Uh if research can be.
Which I lived right next to for a second.
And just think about this too.
They'll say, you know, people like Destiny, they'll go, yeah, that's right.
We do have kids, we do want intel intelligentsia in charge.
We want smart people in charge.
How many times do you need to see these professors to understand that it's propaganda?
It has nothing to just saw Cornell West, this whatever her name is, who supports communist China.
This goes back to the 60s, guys.
And I will tell you what really bothers me is you will see people on the right say that they agree with what we're saying, yet do everything in their power to ensure that their children also go to Harvard or Princeton or an Ivy League school.
That's that's got to stop.
It's got to stop.
By the way, the person just made their account private.
Comrade Julia's not a she's not really thinking the comrades are gonna come support her.
Me, that's why they need the mob.
That's why they need the government.
They do not have courage.
They don't have courage by themselves.
There are very few people who know what it's like to sit in that chair with that kind of that that Charlie Kirk did, and I'm one of them.
And I'm gonna tell you, people on the left won't do it.
And they certainly won't do it once it gets to the point where there's a significant amount of risk.
It's why we've never seen it.
It's why we've never seen it.
And if we do see it, they still won't need security.
They still won't need security.
It's just not a thing.
They're not afraid of it.
These pe it's a death cult.
Look, let me give you the examples.
China, death cult.
Thirty to sixty million people killed.
That also tells you how difficult it is to gauge because of all the collateral of the starvation, not just the direct killings.
Stalin, death cult, national socialists, death cult, eugenics, abortion, planned parenthood, Margaret Sanger, death cult.
Ensuring that people can no longer reproduce through trans mind-altering, either physical surgeries or hormone blockers.
Cross-sex hormone intervention.
Death cult.
Curbing population in this country.
Because Mother Earth.
Death cult.
Not using energy, not going forth being fruitful and multiplying.
Death cult.
Charlie Kirk.
President Trump.
Death cult.
It is a death cult.
We are conservative.
We believe in liberty.
Not because we want you to die, but because we want to live.
That's why we believe what we believe.
They believe what they believe because it is required of you.
Subservience or death.
That's why they're not unlikely allies with Islam.
It's the same philosophy.
You go, how else do you have people who are LGBTQAIP?
How else do they have a have a rainbow flag and a Hamas flag?
What they share in common is a worldview of a death cult.
Let's be clear about it.
They don't even like the part of the Constitution that says the the first the right to life.
The very first one.
And they'll argue with you about it.
And put no limitations on abortion whatsoever.
And then when you say, well, you literally have babies that are being born that survive abortions.
People in your party who still want to kill them.
They just say that you're lying, and then you play them.
The Ralph Northam clip, and they go, I've never seen it.
They cannot win in any form of open ideas because they have to hide it.
But the truth is they know that when people find out, when people finally figure out that they are leading a and championing a death cult, they won't win.
So what do they do?
They lie and they take your lives.
We're conservative because we actually want to live.
They're liberal because their only method of enforcement is death.
It's that simple.
Any more clips of these assets?
Not of these.
We have uh the Corey Booker clip that I was talking about.
I'm not sure how spicy it is.
Okay, all right, let's see it.
All right, here we go.
If you want to work on bringing this country, it's my time, not yours.
My God.
My God.
If you want to talk about fighting this country, it is.
I follow you on your social media posts that are part to address your unified.
Oh, you're on a couple of things.
You can try all you do.
For one hand of sex.
Sir, you're a mocking of this committee.
Sir, you don't tell me my time is over.
You can't lecture me.
You may be the target.
But I am not afraid of you.
Mr. Chairman.
Not afraid of you.
Mr. Chairman, point of order.
I am not afraid of you.
I'm afraid of shadows under my bet.
I'm afraid of water that is deep.
That is deep.
I'm afraid of birds with angular faces.
I am afraid of vaginal intercourse.
Yes.
But you, sir, I do not fear.
Mr. Chairman, please.
Please.
Mr. Chairman, come on, guys.
Let's just go here for a moment.
Bang bang bang.
Cooler has blown.
Yeah, what you just saw was someone acting like a man for the first time.
These people aren't used to it.
I'm not afraid of you.
Uh bet you are.
Well, he didn't first of all, he didn't uh say you should be afraid of him.
No.
No, that was your that was your defensive.
You said it's my time.
Said it's my time.
You took that as I'm not afraid of you.
I think you are afraid of him.
I watch your social media.
Yeah, what about your buddy who pulled the fire alarm?
Yeah.
Really quickly.
Thanks for the clicks, bro.
One uh final clip for you, unrelated, but related to a student on campus at a Charlie Kirk vigil.
Charlie Kirk, I mean that's welcome.
Everybody has to be a good idea.
Oh, Probably have someone doing clicks for the TikTok, right?
Oh, spits on the visual.
I'd say his dad must be proud, but I know he doesn't have one.
You know what I I hate about that?
It's not just the person doing it, it's the culture of people there going.
Oh, oh, it's the world star culture.
Mm-hmm.
Like that's edgy.
And by the way, I don't even think that's mainstream in a lot of black America.
I think it uh a lot of black Americans were surprised that this because you know, gang violence for a lot of them is something they understand, but something like this.
That's why the left tries to pivot to this is white on white crime, white on white violence, and it's more common.
Um I'm not gonna say that that guy's indicative of the entire black community, but uh he's a piece of shit.
Um, and uh I would be willing to bet that he was never taught uh how to be respectful of anything.
So I'm not just saying it as a dunk.
I'd be willing to bet that he does not have a father or at the very least, not a strong father figure in his life because of the way that he's acting.
I'd also be willing to bet that when he goes home, it's very sad.
Yeah.
Probably.
I try to think about that with people like this.
I I try to go, uh I won't get too outraged because they probably go home alone.
Mm-hmm.
And they're sad.
Yep.
And I don't like any of that, and I I agree with you a hundred percent, but a lot of people have it tough.
Yeah.
Okay.
Well, I'm not saying I feel bad for him.
No, no.
I'm just saying he's a fucking loser.
Yeah, these guys, like the the people on the left, they'd be like, oh, well, you know, you don't know what's going on in their lives, too.
And I and I think your your point is fair, Josh.
We always have to temper kind of our frustration so that it isn't just like raging on all these clips, but a lot of people have it rough.
Yeah, you don't have to go and go to a vigil.
You don't like what's going on at the vigil, keep walking.
Right?
It's not bothering you.
You probably took time out of your day with your friends and said, hey, somebody film me.
I'm gonna do some stuff.
Oh, hey, they they think it's funny.
This guy's filming me.
Yes, I'll go and I'll stand up there and I'll act like I just got shot, and then when I'm coming down, I'm gonna spit on this vigil that this guy is just there kind of talking and and and maybe just talking to people about what Charlie Kirk believed or talking about the issue.
Yeah.
You think that's funny?
You think that's how like life is supposed to be lived?
I get you're a college student, you're gonna do some stupid stuff, but guess what?
The world of responsibility is about to kick you in the teeth.
Life comes at you really, really fast.
You have to grow up sometime.
It won't kick him in the teeth.
That's the problem.
It won't kick him in the teeth.
Because he'll be she shielded by the left.
I'm talking like that.
Did you see how violent they got when he when he got down?
Yeah.
You see how violent everyone got?
See how they all jumped him?
Yeah.
Yeah, a hail of white fists.
No, but I mean responsibility.
That is what is gonna kick him in the teeth.
It's responsible.
He never has to be responsible.
He doesn't have to work for a dollar for the rest of his life if he doesn't want to.
I I he needs it.
He can get his soda on snap.
Somebody needs to there needs to be a consequence, whatever that the appropriate consequence would be in that situation.
Cisco goes, oh man, I can't just act like an idiot all the time.
That would be the very best thing that could happen for the rest of his life.
Yeah.
Because then he'll know my actions have consequences, and I better be careful.
If I want good outcomes, I need to work for them.
And by the way, they'll try and draw a false equivalency.
They'll say, and uh Charlie Kirk, you know, reveled in the he said that George Floyd was a scumbag.
He was a scumbag.
He was, absolutely.
They'll say you did that at uh Char at uh Garrett Foster in Austin at his well, first off, it wasn't an actual vigil.
It was some people put up a few pieces of PVC pipe in plywood.
And Garrett Foster um advocated on camera for violence, and Garrett Foster aimed a loaded AK-47 at a man driving through and the man shot him in self-defense.
Yep.
And at that point it wasn't about reveling in the death of Garrett Foster.
It was about seeking justice for the man who was put in a position that he never should have been put in, to be clear.
There is no equivalency.
You cannot find someone, an innocent person who advocated peace being slain in plain view for having differing opinions that we simply supported and laughed about.
You can't.
It's not even close.
It's it's it's not.
Sorry.
We're not gonna Yeah, but you said, well yeah, Mike Brown was a piece of shit.
Here's the thing.
Mike Brown was the bad guy.
Darren Wilson, the police officer, was the good guy.
Okay?
In that one.
Shovin, you may want to say, okay, not a good guy.
Fine.
George Floyd, bad guy.
George Floyd did a lot of bad, hurt a lot of people.
Charlie Kirk didn't hurt people.
Oh, that's right.
Words are violence.
This is how they warp it.
And this is why people act that way.
They don't the left does not face the consequences for their actions and they really need to start.
Yeah.
That's that's what I'm advocating.
Yeah, he robbed me and mugged me, but he didn't denigrate my identity.
Yeah.
By the way, how much you want to bet?
How much you want to bet George Floyd's opinions on men and women's sports will be the fucking same as Charlie Kirk.
How much you want to bet?
Right.
I bet a fake $20 bill on the guest right there.
What does he think about Israel, though, Steven?
I'll bet you a speedball and a surgical glove.
Were the Jews at the cup of soup?
Is that anywhere?
How much you want to bet that if you heard George Floyd's views, they'd be a lot more misogynistic than Charlie Kirk.
That's true.
How much you want to bet that you could hear a whole lot more homophobic rants coming out of George Floyd's mouth after a few, after a few grains of fentanyl than Charlie Kirk.
So we can even hold the exact same standard, but they don't, because the left has none.
Let's grab some chats unless there's something else breaking.
We go.
All right.
First chat from Cryer 89.
First, thank you all for your dedication to truth.
My question is what do I say to my daughter who sees me using the us and them?
She sees it as wanting to separate versus uniting us.
That's the problem with feminism.
And I mean it.
The problem that permeates this idea, it's this idea that we can all get along.
To give you an idea, that communist, that communist broad who we just showed uh at uh Comrade Julia.
Comrade Julia, she thinks it's uniting.
Now, her uniting is you do what you do what government says.
She actually cited, right?
The communist party in China saying uniting.
Now, what they really mean, though, is unite, except for capitalists.
You mean you mean people who want to be free to earn what they've worked for.
So they'll use this and it'll they'll prey on women's um on women's sympathies.
And that's why men for a very long time.
That's a big reason why men uh didn't want and many women didn't want the vote.
Because it was men's job to protect women from themselves as far as making emotional decisions in the face of far more preferable rational ones.
I understand where your daughter's coming from.
I understand that her heart is in the right place.
Okay?
Her mind is not.
Her mind is not.
And that's what you need to drive home.
Because they are told every Disney movie, every romance novel, every book they read that, oh, follow your heart.
No, no, in this case, don't.
You do not.
Your heart leads you astray.
And your heart is warped by your own selfish desires.
That's why we have a prescription in the Bible.
I don't know.
I'm just speaking to what an I don't know how someone does it without that prescription.
Where it says, this is what you are to do.
It's your duty, it's your obligation.
Do we have a duty to protect the innocent?
Yes.
Okay, Zarutsk, we failed her.
Okay, Charlie Kirk, we failed him.
Let's all unite under what?
How do you unite with people who are still saying that Charlie Kirk was the best you'll get is people saying, I don't support the violence, but he was a fascist and a Nazi.
Let me ask you this.
Okay.
If we all agree, if we all agree that fascists, Nazis, and I kind of repeat myself, bad.
Right?
If we all agree, bad.
Let's take Stalin.
Let's take uh let's take uh Mao, let's take Pol Pot.
Whoever, take your pick.
Okay, we all agree, bad.
Tell me how those people have ever been dealt with successfully without violence.
The answer is never.
The answer is never.
And the left is still going to that well.
You know where it leads.
Sometimes they say it out loud.
But even when they don't say that, say I don't support violence, but fascist, Nazi, okay.
How do you deal with fascists?
Here's the thing.
You can't beat fascists at the ballot box.
Did you guys know that?
Yeah, they will they won't allow it.
It's part of their thing.
I don't know if you know that, which means okay.
It's their sharing text messages.
Right.
It's their thing.
Yeah.
The F stands for free and fair elections, though.
Right.
Fascist.
See, you can't deal with them with the ballot box.
How do you deal with them?
Give me an answer.
Hey, left.
Liberals.
You accuse me, you accuse Charlie Kirk, Gerald, everyone here at some point, at one point or another, everyone on the right has been accused of being a fascist, of being a totalitarian.
So let me ask you this.
We know beyond any shadow of a doubt that you can't deal with fascists or totalitarians at the ballot box.
It's not a thing.
It doesn't happen.
So, considering that you believe we are fascists and totalitarians, how do you deal with us?
How do you fix it?
Ask your daughter that question.
That is what one side is saying.
Get her to put her heart in the shelf for a bit and use your mind.
Next chat.
Well, it's a perfect segue into McNeil 516.
Question for the crew.
Isn't calling people Nazi and Hitler a call for violence?
I don't want to stop free speech, but we've been saying calling people Nazi is telling people they can be killed.
Yeah, uh I think there's a difference between a campaign as the left has done versus saying, like, okay, an analogy.
For example, I understand why Hitler can be used in an analogy just because he's a universal figure that people recognize as bad.
Right.
That's why I say you can use Hitler, you can use Pol Pot, you can use Stalin right because they're all one and the same.
Um so I don't want I don't want us to get into the word policing where um just the word itself, like naughty word can't say that.
But I do think if people are out there running a campaign to portray someone as a totalitarian national socialist genocidal maniac dictator, um there should be some there should be some consequences for that.
There should be some consequences for that.
And what's funny is you see people on the left now going, see this is what they're doing.
They're trying to silence us.
Look, people are getting fired.
Whereas what happened when uh, you know, they where they they supported uh they supported the people who weren't getting the vaccine.
They said they shouldn't be fired.
Do I need to go through the the difference here?
Um mandatory and voluntary?
You guys understand?
Do you guys under the the government shouldn't be firing you or forcing businesses to fire you against their will because the government came up with a policy that actually is fascism.
A private business can decide that you don't align with their values or they don't want you working at their company, they have the right to fire you.
Now I know that you don't believe that.
You don't believe in the fire at will laws.
You don't believe in the right to work, which by the way is also fascist.
The only time you don't believe in a fascist policy is when there's an exception for you.
Bake a cake.
Right.
So yeah, I think there should be some serious consequences.
Next chat.
Final chat, because we gotta go and then uh or is is is uh is Russell uh streaming today, Russell Brand?
Uh I will check.
Okay.
All right.
Uh final chat from the maybe we'll take two chats because I want to take them into uh time.
Uh yeah, next chat then from Casually Filthy.
Question for the crew.
Are y'all going to do a segment on the many people picking up Bibles for the first time in the aftermath of Charlie's assassination?
I believe that Charlie is looking down, ecstatic about this.
Yeah, uh, I don't believe that Charlie's looking down, but that's my uh theology.
Um I don't believe that because I don't believe that heaven could exist if they're looking down, uh living in the same spectrum of time as we do.
That would be incredibly painful, and we're told that there is no pain, there is no yearning, there is no wanting in heaven.
So I get I I get why it makes for nice novels.
I don't believe it.
Uh and people can disagree with me on that.
I think that Charlie Kirk uh has far more fulfilling um.
I mean, just I guess I would say completing things to do that are would be way, way more joyful than anything we could comprehend, certainly not looking down at us and seeing us mourning and crying.
Um as a matter of fact, it's my belief that uh when Charlie Kirk walks through the gates of heaven, he's going to walk through at the same time as his wife and his children because otherwise it would be painful and in heaven you know no pain.
And we don't just think of how think of it this way.
You ever dream and think for sure you must have been asleep for 10, 20 hours and you find out it was 10 minutes?
Think of heaven that way.
It's a different experience of time.
Also, I don't want my dead relatives to have been watching looking down at me in my teenage years when you know my soccer was the Vatican.
Oh, geez.
So uh that's just my belief.
But I understand where you're coming from.
Um because it gives us comfort.
I just don't believe it would give someone like Charlie comfort uh to be in heaven looking down because there's a lot of pain and suffering that he uh shouldn't experience at all in heaven, we're told wouldn't.
Uh that's a great thing.
Um I guess we could, you know, it's it's like drinking from a fire hose where we felt today we wanted to get to the biggest lies uh uh of Charlie Kirk out there to help correct the record.
Um that would be kind of tough.
We'd have to aggregate and see how many uh people are, but I think that's a great thing.
Yeah, your churches were packed on Sunday.
They were not go personally, but I heard from many people that it was packed out.
Yep.
Yeah.
And I I I want that.
And I think the point really, and and your I think your theology is very accurate on that.
Um I think it's helpful to to just clarify that too.
Like we don't really believe in that.
But would Charlie, if he was aware of the situation right now, be happy that that's happening, that people are coming and checking out the faith because of this, and there's maybe some potential silver lining in their life throughout this.
Yeah, absolutely.
I mean, as Christians, like that's our goal.
Like that is the kingdom that we serve.
We are citizens of heaven that happen to live on earth in whatever country we find ourselves in around the world.
And so that is our ultimate goal, period.
There is no higher calling.
Yeah.
And so for Charlie as a believer in Christ who shared his faith openly and talked with people about that openly and called them to repentance and called them to check out the claims of Christ and to read their Bibles, like, yeah, absolutely.
I think he would be thrilled that people are taking this opportunity to do it.
Um obviously you all you you prefer another method.
Yeah, right, every time.
And and certainly every martyr throughout history has preferred another method.
But God has a plan for all of this stuff, and I think you're right.
He's gonna show up and he's gonna show up at the exact same time.
It's outside of time.
God exists outside of time.
Yeah.
And so it's it's I think you'd be thrilled that this is happening right now.
Right.
And uh but the good news is we don't have to guess.
You don't have to guess because Charlie uh talked about what he wanted his legacy to be and it to be his faith.
And he he discussed that, I know publicly, and I guarantee you that if Charlie's like anyone who has accomplished great things or is at least even attempted them, he didn't he would have wanted to ensure that his death was not for nothing.
And I think uh there is no doubt that, again, like we said, you always would prefer another method, but um this meant something to a lot of people, galvanized a lot of people, and it galvanized a lot of people to move the kind of direction that Charlie would have wanted them to move, and we don't have to guess about that.
So if people are picking up their Bibles, if people are waking up to the evils of the left, uh we know that Charlie, Charlie would have wanted that.
Charlie said so.
And the big thing for the most important thing to him was his faith.
So I think that's a great thing.
Let's uh let's grab another chat.
All right, and we do have Russell, so final chat.
Okay, final chat, and then we'll send you on to the Brit.
All right.
Final chat from Archangel.
I believe Democrats intentionally dumbed down the populace.
Are we seeing the Democrat Party losing control of the mentally ill sect of their party?
Well, um a couple of things.
I understand where you're coming from.
If you set out to dumb people down, even if you really, really wanted to, and that was the battle plan, it it still would be near impossible to do on a large scale.
I do believe, you know, I've used this um example in the past.
I've said if they say the Republicans are the party of the rich, and of course it's not true, billionaires vote Democrat, and those who pay no income tax, federal income tax vote Democrat.
Everyone from poor middle class, lower middle class to wealthy in between, statistically vote more Republican conservative.
Meaning if you're a contributor.
Um so I think that they want people complacent and they want people dependent on the government.
So the Democrat Party, you would have to acknowledge as a strategy, would not want people to advance their lives and truly become independent American citizens.
Because the further an immigrant or the further a welfare recipient, the further someone in Section 8 housing, the further they get along the trail toward being independent, successful, autonomous, self-sustaining, further down the path they go, the more likely they are to vote conservative.
That's an inescapable reality.
So the Democrats would not want that.
They would want you to be complacent.
They would want you to be dependent on the government.
Because unless you are dependent on the government, or unless you're one of those giant corporations that is too big to fail, one of the big banks, one of the big tech companies.
The Democrat Party has nothing to offer you.
And I mean that.
And not that that should be why or how you vote.
You shouldn't just vote in your own selfish interests.
I think you should vote in what is right and what is the original intent of this country.
But if you're talking about it selfishly, okay.
Again, take out the tech oligarchs, the Zuckerbergs who are afforded legal protections that nobody else is, the Bezos is of the world, um, the the uh obviously alphabet Google of the world, right?
The vanguards of the world, the too big to fail, the Goldman Sachs, take that out.
Okay.
Now take out people who pay nothing in federal income tax, meaning they receive social safety, net benefits, SNAP, EBT, welfare, um, disability, unemployment, but perpetually, chronically.
Okay.
Take those people out.
All right.
You are a working American who pays taxes.
I don't care what you pay.
What is left offer you?
Lower taxes?
No.
No.
They'll say lower for middle class, but what they really mean is raise taxes on everybody, just raise taxes on the middle class less, even if you look back to not a perfect president at all, but the Bush tax cuts benefited the middle class just as much.
It just benefited wealthier class, the wealthier class of people more because they were paying so much in taxes, right?
So, what does the Democrat Party offer you if you are a working American getting rid of those two extremes?
Lower taxes?
No, higher.
Hey, do you get Obamacare, the affordable care at the health care exchange?
No, you actually don't, and you're still funding it.
But unless you're below a certain threshold, the price isn't even all that competitive and the care is even worse.
Do you get SNAP, EBT?
No, you don't.
Even if you're paying a few thousand dollars, a few hundred dollars a year in income tax.
It's very difficult.
You're probably not getting that.
Are you getting a bailout?
No.
Your business may be shut down at will as you saw during COVID.
You have worked really hard and you live in a small house.
Do you get no, you don't get mortgage forgiveness?
No, Section 8.
No, you don't get Section 8, and you better pay your mortgage or your house is going to be foreclosed upon.
Unlike rent forgiveness.
I mean, do are you the kind of person who's going to get an EV credit on a new vehicle, or are you driving a used vehicle that likely uses gasoline?
Uh okay.
So no, so as far as direct benefits, they really offer you nothing.
And then when you look at the culture and as country at large, historically, have you seen lower gas prices?
Historically, under Democrat rule, have you seen better inflation rates?
Have things been more affordable?
Has the labor force participation rate been better?
Have there been more economic opportunities?
The answer to that is invariably no.
Quite literally, unless you are too big to fail, or dependent upon government for your day-to-day in one form or another.
The Democrat Party and the leftist ideology that stems, it's rooted in Marxism, there's no escaping it.
It offers you nothing.
It offers you no net benefit.
And of course, there are plenty of net demerits as to how it affects your life.
That's the truth.
Another equally inescapable truth is that it's wrong.
It's not compassionate, it's not empathetic, sympathetic, good hearted, to take from someone that which you have not earned, to give it to someone else who has also not earned it.
I cannot hear a moral argument in defense of that.
I can hear a pragmatic argument in defense of it.
That's what all great fascists and communists and totalitarians have have done, right?
But I can't actually hear someone.
I've never heard someone make a moral argument other than you should do, because I think it's moral.
They offer you nothing.
So are they intending to dumb people down?
No.
They're intending to keep you dependent.
And then that result ends up being the same.
Because if you wanted to create a dumb, defenseless, spineless percentage of the population who would go along with everything you say and not think about it critically, well, I don't really know that you could come up with a plan much more effective than telling people to not get married and have kids so that they can make more money,
to not have to worry about paying for their own food or even making healthy choices because a taxpayer will foot the bill To not have to worry about seeking employment because they can perpetually be unemployed in the name of some kind of social justice or equity, to not accept biological realities that have existed since the beginning of time because they feel a certain way and it hurts their feelings rather than telling them to buck up and to accept that life sometimes throws you some curveballs that you don't like.
And to tell people that smoking 90% THC vape pens in the middle of your non-workday is my god, medicine.
And everyone else out there hates you and is a fascist and a Nazi.
Oh, let's add on top of that.
Spend more money than on any other entity that we have t in in total, collectively, between federal government and states on a public education system that has no prerequisites.
That 50 years later could result in net lower literacy math scores The result Look, of the left, and I know that we've had Republicans, but the institutionalized left is constant as far as education, as far as media, as far as Hollywood.
As far as government programs and benefits, it has resulted in, even though we're in 2025, and it should be the greatest time in human history because you have more access to information, technology, convenience, where you should be able to maximize your time and be as productive as humanly possible.
And the good news is you can choose how productive you are when you want to reach a point of leisure.
The net result is a country, in spite of trillions of dollars, that is fatter, sicker, dying younger, and less capable of reading or doing fundamental math.
Oh, and also more hopeless than the generation who stared down Hitler.
So I get why you think it was all part of a plan.
With the left, I guess they just call it a happy coincidence.
▲
Export Selection