All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 28, 2025 - Louder with Crowder
59:02
🔴 Total Failure: Unpacking The Media's Evil Reaction to the Minneapolis Church Shooting 2025-08-28 18:07
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Deserves.
Do you feel like there's, well, would you make the same argument for a third-party candidate that would just steal votes from a Republican?
No, it's not a third-party candidate.
No, no, no, no.
In this case, there are third-party candidates, essentially.
Yeah.
But I guess a Republican is a third-party candidate right now, right now, today, in New York.
So overall, I agree with you.
But in this specific case, yeah, but they've perverted the system.
So I'm not going to go along.
I don't accept their premise.
Yeah, I think there should absolutely be a Republican candidate.
I'm just advancing to that.
I get it.
There's still plenty of Republicans in New York.
Plenty.
They should have some representation.
Keep the Republican there and say, listen, we will all know when you pull that lever for Cuomo, you meant it for me.
Good to go.
Make sure Momdani doesn't become your mayor.
I had something to say about Eric Adams dropping out.
Yeah.
He'll probably go.
He seems weird.
Well, people don't like him.
It's crazy.
Momdani would lose 52-41, according to this poll by Tolchin Research.
If all candidates remain in the race, Momdani still has the lead 42, followed by Cuomo at 26.
So that's the thing.
It looks like if everybody stays in, Momdani wins.
If everybody else drops out and it's just Cuomo, Mamdani, Cuomo wins.
Yeah.
I think that they've gotten their pecker in a ringer and you just have to let it go.
How does that ever happen?
How do you get a position?
There could be some positive that comes.
I don't like to have that opinion and be like, hey, you know, you made your bed.
Now you got to sleep in it because it is American.
I care about Americans everywhere.
Sure.
But there is some positive that could come from that.
You know, you put this guy into power and then these people have to deal with the policies and then you see the backlash.
Yeah, you see exactly how terrible it is.
I mean, we saw Eric Adams change his tune when he saw how much of a mistake being a sanctuary city was.
Right.
Yeah.
There's something to it.
Maybe it's something where you go, like, you know, it's an interesting thought.
Well, I just hate because, too, I lived in, I grew up in Quebec where you basically had to vote liberal or separatist.
There was no conservative option, really.
And I know what a crisis of conscience that is for Christian voters.
We're like, do I have to vote for the super radically pro-abortion candidate or the super radically pro-abortion candidate who also wants us to separate from the country?
Well, I agree.
But here's the way that I would look at it.
I would look at it as kind of a baby steps kind of approach.
And no, not to go back to the movie.
But baby steps is like, okay, well, look, I don't have any good options here.
And so my option right now is to vote for a Republican and feel good about myself when only 17% of the vote is going to go to that guy by current polling.
Maybe it's double that.
Call it double that.
He still loses, right?
That's my problem with it.
It's like, okay, well, yes, it's a vote, but you end up with a socialist person.
You're hoping that what happens is that this guy can't take enough of other people's money to make the socialism look like it's working.
He can take a lot of people's money for a handful of years and make it look like it's working.
I would rather them go, okay, fine.
Look, I'm going to pull the hammer for Cuomo right now.
Everybody's good.
But we're going to get an actually good Republican candidate into this race for the next time around.
That's what I would like to do.
I understand.
Let me ask you this.
I understand your point.
I really do.
No, and I understand yours.
I get it.
There's a like, your medicine is what you deserve.
Well, no, not only that, I just, I think that when you add the dynamic of stripping people of their ability to vote for what should be a mainstream, which is mainstream across the rest of the country, I think it's a real problem.
But let me ask this: we talked about how this election was the most important election of our lifetime.
Do you believe that if we continued on the path, for example, of Obama, Biden, and Harris, that we would be a decade from our country as we know it's ceasing to be?
Absolutely.
At least close.
Yeah.
Okay.
There may have been some stuff that you could not undo.
Yes.
Okay.
So we agree with that, right?
And that's why it was so pivotal, and that's why we spent so much money and resources to be able to call the election night and make sure that nothing was going on that was foul play.
So that was kind of the option, right?
All in, we either have to correct this or this country ceases to be.
That's where New York is.
Yeah, but they're overwhelmingly liberal.
But here's the point, though.
Our country was.
Obama was a savior.
And now you see an entire generation of people because they saw how corrosive and awful it was that we actually have pulled that handbrake now in this country.
And so New York needs to experience it.
For them, it's going to have to be way, way more severe.
But Gen Z Men is the proof.
Like, I've been, we've been here for so long.
There are a lot of Johnny come lately, and it's great.
I'm glad there are more people involved, but we see the fruits of, or we see the harvest of the seeds that we planted for so long.
It was never a thing.
The Republican Party wrote off young people forever, and it was a shock to a lot of people, even to me.
I thought you'd make some gains, but I didn't think you'd actually get a majority of you.
Yeah, no, New York needs to eat.
They either need to finally realize the ruin, the wreckage that their place has become and cease to be, or correct it.
I don't think anymore, because we already had Cuomo during COVID.
It was one of the most corrosive, he was one of the most corrosive leaders in the country.
So I don't even think he's unless he's the governor of the state.
Yeah, governor of the state.
So he determined COVID policy.
No, and trust me.
I don't think he'd be good for New York, but I think Momdani would be significantly worse.
Right.
But could be a catalyst to make people change their minds.
I hope.
So here's the only problem that I have with that, and I think it's good logic.
I just think that the general election, there was hope that you could get a Republican to win against any of those candidates that you put out.
If we'd have put out a stronger candidate against Obama, he would have performed better.
I still think Obama probably wins first time around.
Second time around, he was definitely capable of being beaten, right?
That's not the case in New York.
It's not the case at all that it's close.
It is a walk-off.
But that was the case, though, with Michigan and the case with Pennsylvania.
And what I'm saying is you're going to see a population decline.
You can only take so much money until people leave and people are already leaving.
And they had Giuliani.
We're not that far away from it.
It'll be people with the money, too.
That are leaving.
So you can't have any money to pull from.
Yeah.
And we don't have any money to pull from.
The poor people don't have any money coming into their programs that they supposedly were supposed to get from voting for this guy.
And then they're going to go, oh, that makes some sense.
But it's New York.
It's the financial capital of the world.
It's not like people are just going to pick up and move quickly enough to keep that city from going anywhere.
So you're probably the financial capital of the world.
It still is.
It was.
Whereas was.
This is what we'll be saying.
Oh, yeah.
Okay.
That's your slogan.
Six months to three years from now.
We'll see what happens.
I understand.
It's a tough one, man.
I just don't believe in principles.
I just don't believe in shielding people anymore from their own bad decisions.
And that would definitely be doing that.
Let men and women's sports go.
I don't give it.
I'm not, you're not going to hear me protesting it.
You'll hear me point out why it's silly and it's wrong, but I think feminists who voted for it should have their way.
That's where I am.
It seems like there are some people who only learn by dealing with their consequences.
And you see that with younger Americans.
I'm like, yeah, this is bad.
This didn't work.
And I just think that New York has been shielded from it for so long.
And they took it for granted when they had someone like Giuliani.
But it is Thursday.
And I'm sure you guys have a lot to say.
You know what to do, Toolman.
And we had some subscriptions given away.
That's right.
So 10 Rumble Premium subs from Gippity and another 10 from Darth Orlina.
Thank you, Darth Orlina.
Thank you, Gippity.
We appreciate it.
That's what allows us to keep doing what we're doing.
And, you know, anytime you guys, if you want to and you think that we're worthy, show some support out there on social.
You know, let people know.
We very much appreciate it.
Thank you.
Thank you.
We are actually beholden to viewers like you.
What a crazy thought.
Serving the audience as opposed to a corporate.
Isn't that crazy?
Yeah.
Serving the audience instead of Colgate or whatever.
That's what we should be doing.
You know, maybe we'll talk about this a little bit more, but how people do the super chats.
We'll try to make, if you guys are giving subs away during our live show that's free to like, if you guys are giving subs away, we'll start categorizing that, putting it there, and we'll start addressing that in Rumble Premium and thanking you for that.
That's the way.
Give back to other people, not just giving money to us the creators.
You support us with your subscription.
So we appreciate that.
What did you say, Tony?
Pay it forward.
Oh, I thought you said, hey, Forbes.
Well, he said something, but he said it in kind of monotone.
So it wasn't.
I was like, was he reading an article?
Like, hey, Forbes.
Hey.
It's like, yeah, we read Forbes all the time.
We have a subscription so we can.
No, pay it forward.
Sad movie.
Haley Jalasman and Kevin Spacey, right?
Yeah.
Pay it forward, Kevin.
Sorry to spoil it, but at the end, the kid gets raped by Kevin Spacey.
Oh, come on.
Now we know why Spacey ended up like that.
Actually, I will tell you, I think Kevin Spacey was done dirty.
Okay, sure.
Kevin Spacey, I think that there was a lot of discomfort in the pederasty that was openly practiced and consensual.
And if you look at it, like he maintained his innocence and the guy didn't accuse him of raping him.
There's a lot of weird stuff.
Well, maybe, okay, so there's degrees to that, but yeah, Kevin Spacey's still a piece of crap.
I don't know.
He's a dirtbag.
Come on.
He's 16.
He's Kevin Spacey.
Oh, he's just a homo.
Well, you know, you repeat yourself.
Still one of the greatest actors.
He is phenomenal.
He's so good.
And I don't think he's particularly woke.
I think he's a bitchy fag who's tired of it.
That's what I think.
You see him interview with Pierce Morgan?
He's like, these faggots.
They came after me.
They wanted a scalp.
Very good.
This is one of those things where I hope you're right.
So it comes out as a big hit job.
Yeah, he did an interview with Pierce Morgan.
I know, but I'm not convinced.
Oh, yeah, okay, fine.
I need other stuff.
But at the same time.
And you think OJ did?
Phenomenal.
O.J. did do it.
What?
He did.
No.
God.
Don't gaslight me.
He stole that memorabilia from that person's house.
He said if he did it.
That's not an admission.
That's true.
I'm talking about different crime.
No, no, he didn't kill those people.
He was a Heisman trophy.
That's what it was.
Is it Heisman Trophy?
Yeah.
He melted his head.
No, no, no, he didn't do it.
Brodney King.
All right, chat.
Brodney King.
Rodney King.
Chat.
All right, Chris Chat from your Uncle Tito.
Question for Stephen and the crew.
My fiancé is a die-in-the-wool liberal.
She's anti-Trump and says the U.S. has always been the villain.
Any advice?
She was your fiancé.
Next question.
I'm not joking.
I'm not joking, man.
Goodbye.
I am not joking.
She will leave you.
And I, yes, and I know that this is hard to take because I'm sure that you love her.
And it's a lot easier said than done.
You want to have kids?
You want to raise kids?
Not just what will you teach them.
You want to raise kids?
Do you want to homeschool kids?
That's going to be a hard no.
What about guns?
What about having a firearm to protect yourself or making sure she does when you're not around?
He's not wrong.
And that's not a bad thing for us to tell you just straight up.
You cannot mix these two things very well, if at all.
So be very careful on making that decision.
And it's way better to say, hey, let's put a pause on this to figure this out than to get married and get divorced.
I honestly, it was hard for me to read because I know the words liberal and I know the words my fiancé, but in tandem, it was like reading hieroglyphics.
It doesn't make sense to me.
Well, he wants a liberal to raise his kids, is what it sounds like.
Let me be really clear.
You need to protect your kids against the world.
What chance do you think if the enemy is in the house?
What chance do you think when you get some, and it will happen?
I guarantee you this will happen.
At some point, you're going to have some blue-haired, dyed-in-the-wool, gender-queer, feminist teacher teaching your child and trying, by the way, to groom your child into accepting the perversion that is today's left.
And how are you going to guard against that if you have someone who's fighting against you in the house?
They're going to actively support it.
And even if you don't want to have children, you think you're ever going to have peace?
It's just going to grow as more and more resentment.
And I really do.
This is a perfect example, right?
You may not like what I'm saying, but I would like to hear the follow-up from whatever this person was.
It wasn't Gippity.
That was the person who gave.
What's this person's name?
Screen name.
One sec.
Oh, sorry.
You already heard that.
By the way, not today's liberal.
Tomorrow's liberal.
What was the name?
Even more left.
Sorry.
Can't find it.
We're all tired.
Yeah.
I'll keep looking.
You know who you are.
You know that I say this out of love.
That's why people say, oh, I do hate trans people.
No, no, I just don't want them to be a 42% attempted suicide rate.
I don't want you to have a life of misery.
And that is what you are in for guaranteed if you make this decision.
It's one thing to have liberal views.
Tino.
If your fiancé has liberal views or she leans liberal on certain things here and there, but to be a die-hard liberal person, yeah, that's, you know, you can be friends with these people, but you're going to expect to have her at home raising the kids.
Grown all day and not fight.
Yeah.
You want to argue about one thing you're doing to raise the kids or you want to put your foot down about something?
You think she's not going to fight back on it?
That's the thing is you can have somebody with different views that you can talk things over with and co-parent successfully and healthily.
But whether it turns out fine for your kids or not is not the point.
It's going to turn out terrible for you.
Yeah.
Because you're going to be, I don't know the word, miserable.
Walked on.
You're going to be dead.
You're going to be walked on.
And this, you know, we.
And you're telling her it's okay right now, by the way.
If you put a ring on that, you're telling her you're okay with it.
Do you understand that?
Emasculating.
Is he like, are you a, would you consider yourself completely conservative or would you say that you're more liberal, but you like the show and you like supporting the content that we do?
That may be different.
But, you know, it's kind of the same thing.
Like, if somebody doesn't believe in God and you believe in God, you don't get married.
Yeah.
That is, that is a really bad idea.
And so if you are, and this, this is what it does come down to.
My wife and I talked about political leanings, not because we are like team red, team blue.
That's not what it was.
It was morality and where do you get your kind of truth from when it comes to political and how we interact with the world?
Not God, and God obviously influences that.
But it's like, okay, now that we believe in God, we both do that.
How do we view the world and how we interact in it and how we apply these things?
Okay.
One says God doesn't really matter.
The other side at least embraces God and the ideology matches up much better.
And so that's not going to work out if you're a staunch conservative and she's not a dyed-in-the-wool liberal.
It just won't work.
I'll make an extreme example.
Here, I'll take an extreme example.
I'll make a point.
You want the woman you commit the rest of your life to, okay?
To, if you ask her, she will bury a body with you, no questions asked.
Do you understand that?
Let alone question you on how to raise a young man or a young woman or opinions on OnlyFans.
Like, you need someone who is going to, yes, yes, I, this is the team.
This is our family.
You against the world.
Because it may, sometimes it may come to that.
It'll come to you against a system, you against a school board.
You again insert whatever here.
At some point, you're going to need to be able to come together and you can't have that doubt in your mind if this person has your back.
And you're always going to have it if she's fighting with you about everything.
And if she is a die-in-the-wool liberal feminist, it's a guarantee.
Please tell me that you understand we're saying this out of love.
Like if you have a daughter and she's like 10 years old or whatever, and she has a friend at school that she really likes and their friend, they hang out a lot and she wants to go have a sleepover at the other person's house.
And then you find out that the other person, the other kid, lives with some guy who's just not part of the family.
It's just been living there forever.
And then you find out the mom's a dominatrix professionally and that the guy that they live with them is also a dominatrix and they make videos in their backyard and in another room of their house.
And then you're like, you know, I don't think I want our daughter to spend the night over there.
This is oddly specific.
And then the wife goes, well, I think that she should be able to.
Oh.
Now you have a fucking problem.
Yeah, you do.
You want your wife to be like, yeah, that's kind of fucking weird.
No, she can't do that.
Yeah.
I tell you what, though, if that is a problem in this oddly specific hypothetical, the solution is you go dominatrix hunting.
What?
Air sauce.
I don't know about that, but the solution is, you know.
How do two dominatrix work?
Is it like Dragon Ball Z where you two spitting in each other's mouths?
I'm not sure.
I'm not sure.
I don't think they dominate each other.
I think they dominate other people.
Okay.
Ah, okay.
They dominate strange passers-by.
They think they dominate other people.
I don't look too much into it.
I think they're good people.
This is not me, by the way.
No, no, no, no, no.
I think that ultimately that they're good people, but I'm not going to take a fucking risk.
No, I get it.
I understand.
I think they're good people.
I don't think anything nefarious is going on, but I'm not going to take the risk.
My wife was like, yeah.
I mean, she would have.
She would have been.
She would have been.
You know what?
That's probably a good idea.
Yeah, for the love of God, someone take another chat.
Sorry, I can't get the visual of a Super Saiyan Dominatrix out of my head.
What is his name?
Piccolo?
Ah, little sweatbeat.
12 minutes of screaming.
Yeah, exactly.
I'm pretty sure they're not premium members.
All right.
Well, the call to action seems to have worked.
We've got a bunch of new Rumble Premium subs.
Oh, wow.
So 10B Baker gifted 10.
Wow.
Did they do it right now or did they do it in the right?
MEJ gifted five.
Triton 08 gifted one.
And America the Greatest gifted one.
Nice job, you guys.
America the Greatest.
Is that that guy's fiancé?
It's ironic.
How does that work, by the way?
How do you gift a sub?
Maybe people don't know how this works, how they can get one or how they can give one.
So you can gift a sub to anybody in Rumble Premium.
Essentially, you can give them a one-month subscription.
If they enter in a bunch of information and create the profile, then they actually get an additional month typically added onto that if I remember all their programs.
You just hit the little present.
Yeah.
The little present button.
You just hit the present button and you could gift a sub.
Do you give it to you?
Select somebody to give it to or do you just give out random and then people receive it?
What if somebody doesn't do it?
Is there a way for them someone to go, oh, I don't know.
Can they gift an annual sub?
Just a mug?
I don't think so.
Oh, come on.
We got to be able to gift annual subs because then you're giving the gift of mug.
True.
I'll go call Rumble.
Yeah, okay.
Or they're all to call Rumble.
Yeah, call them.
I've been silenced.
I won't give you any extra subs anymore.
You'll call them because I've told you to call them.
No.
I'll call them because I wanted to.
He was going to call them anyway.
That's fair.
No, he's going to.
He was telling me about that earlier.
He's like, I have to make so many calls of Rumble today.
Yeah.
No, I know, because he's a big boy.
Next chat.
Well, we've helped you out, Gerald.
We've opened up the floodgates.
They just keep coming now.
So this is what I'm saying.
Pause, everybody.
Listen, listen, listen.
No, don't pause.
Keep giving them.
Shut up.
Everybody.
Sort of you, not you.
You won't even talk to me.
So here's what I want you to do.
Pause that.
Save it for people who are watching who have not signed up.
People who don't know what Mug Club really is.
Save it for tomorrow.
They'll still be distributed, Gerald.
No, I know, but he's saying you want to announce it.
People that are watching and streaming right now.
Okay, okay.
So guys, look, look, look, how about this?
Tomorrow we will stream wide at the beginning of the live show and make it a mug club gift.
Sorry, a Rumble Premium Mug Club is Rumble Premium.
Make it a Rumble Premium subscription gift extravaganza, and we'll make sure to highlight you.
The Labor Day special.
Do we have a Labor Day?
No, it's not a special, but it's just a special thing.
Okay.
I should have said that.
Yeah.
I'm very confused.
All right.
I appreciate you giving it to people that are subscribers only.
Yes, we really do appreciate it.
No, it doesn't get to subscribers only.
Guys, shut up.
Let's drop it to you.
Next chat from Charles Prince One.
Nerdford, the crew.
Recently, you mentioned men not being leaders in the home anymore due to overbearing/slash controlling mothers.
What would you tell a man who was raised with an abusive dad who is scared of becoming him?
I will tell you that it's irrelevant.
It's irrelevant as far as your actions.
I understand that it could be in the back of your mind, but what is a good man?
What are you called to be?
That's why, of course, I can't see any way to do this without being a Christian.
It doesn't matter what your dad did.
And by the way, it doesn't mean that you won't fall flat on your ass trying sometimes.
A much greater disservice to your family is to allow yourself to be a doormat or spineless and not lead the family in the way that you know you are called to.
And by the way, that also includes the selection process in ensuring that the person you marry, the relationship you're in, that they are okay with it and they expect that of you and very resolutely accept the expectations that you place on them.
That's a healthy relationship.
And I wish that I had learned that much younger, to be clear.
So I try to do the best to teach you to learn from mistakes that we make here.
But yeah, I get it.
By the way, usually a man who's abusive in the home is usually a pretty, usually a pretty weak guy, right?
He's usually looking for helpless victims.
That's not tough.
When I talk about leading, I'm not talking about coming home and being abusive and being a prick.
I think that being capable of supreme violence, being powerful, and bridling it, is what a man needs to be.
We talk about it like with Joe Lewis.
We live by Joe Lewis's mercy, and Joe Lewis is the sweetest dog ever.
The very few times where there is something weird going on at the house, business is going to pick up shortly.
The hair in the back of his neck, and I'm reminded, oh my God, it's like a lion in the house.
And he will defend the children with his life.
You have plenty of people who go, ooh, I don't know a big dog.
I'd rather have a Yorkshire Terrier.
Guess what kinds of dogs bite kids far more often?
Little dogs.
Little dogs, yeah.
Because they're constantly scared.
It's harder.
It's a much more difficult path to train a very large, strong dog who's stubborn.
He's not that stubborn.
He's pretty easy, but they can be stubborn.
It's harder, but it's actually a lot safer and it's better for the family in the long run.
You need to be Joe Lewis, put it that way.
Yeah.
He will routinely stand between me and the kids when I'm talking to them and giving them a hug or something.
He's just reminding me.
Yeah.
Reminding me that he's like, these are mine.
Rightfully so.
He saw you bench.
Yeah.
Well, and if you're if you're worried about that, you know, I say you have to continuously remind your family that you love them.
And it's not just telling them, it's showing them.
By smacking them around, you know, like that's a real way.
Yeah, like an Italian.
Hey, you're such a good boy.
Hey, look at you.
Make your father proud.
You didn't burn the castle.
Ba-bang.
No, but it's lucky your mom's around or you need an orthodontist.
You do it through actions, right?
You're a leader, not a boss.
We all know that that compares.
We've all seen that meme, right, of the leader.
It's like the tug of rope where the leaders in the front tugging and then the boss is on the chair telling them to tug.
You know, it's not a trend down.
Yeah, you definitely want to tug sitting down if you can.
You get a lot more power.
That way you get something on your feet.
But yeah, lead.
There's so many things you can do.
Anything you ask your family to do, you'd be willing to do yourself.
It's showing them the right things to do, not telling them the right things to do.
There's lots of books and stuff on leadership.
I'm not going to say it right here, but yeah, I think that's always important to remember in the back.
I always remember that.
Luckily, it was instilled in me in the military that you lead, you don't boss.
And so I have to remind myself sometimes that, hey, if I'm telling my daughter to do something, well, shit, I didn't show her how to do it.
That's why she did it wrong.
I remind my wife, my wife's too, sometimes, like, hey, we calm down.
Yeah.
We haven't shown him.
Oh, that often.
He's three.
We haven't shown him.
That's right.
Okay.
Yeah.
Okay.
Let's go show him how to do this.
The two most dangerous words in the modern domestic relationship: calm down.
All right, next chat.
Yeah, that's fine.
Deep thoughts with Josh Feierstein.
Next chat from Damio Knight or Dame O'Knight or whatever.
How can we push back against the left legislating from emotion, pushing for gun control after a shooting by logic if their emotion blocks their ability to see logic?
You don't need to.
Well, first off, it's by being steadfast, resolute, consistent.
I mean, you see that now like we talk about with Gen Z males, like we talk about with Hispanic males.
These changes took a while.
And so hopefully you understand that we don't deal in instant gratification.
That's not the nature of living a righteous life or conservatism and what it is that we seek to conserve.
So over time, it wins out.
I mean, I will tell you where after Columbine, everyone just thought, okay, well, that's it for guns.
Over time now, you have more ability to protect yourself than ever.
It's actually improved quite a bit.
It's not perfectly there yet.
And there's some awful cities, right?
There's some pockets, but there are more people with firearms and carrying firearms, just to use that example.
You can't change people who've already dictated, well, to their, I should say, to their constituents who've already decided, predetermined in their heart, that they're going to simply operate off of emotion.
What you can do is highlight and point out that they are operating from the perspective of emotion by using logic to the people they're trying to convert, the people to whom they're proselytizing.
In other words, it's not about the Gen Saki.
It's about the people watching.
It's not about the Amy Klobuchar.
It's not about the mayor of Minneapolis.
It's about the people who are listening going, does that seem right?
So make sure you identify the difference.
We've talked about that a lot.
And then understand that it may take some time.
I think a big part of this, a big part of these changes generationally is that people have kindly, have finally seen the kind of chickens that have come home to roost and they don't like it.
Sometimes that takes time.
So that requires a little bit of faith.
Next, chit chat.
All right, next chat from JLo McCack.
Do you think the rise in a godless kingdom?
J-Lo McCack has led to the majority of these attacks we've seen lately.
Thank you all for your service.
It's the root cause of all of it.
For sure.
It's the root cause of, look, and I know people say, oh, you know, the times throughout history were far more bloody.
Yes, I get it.
And I also understand that people would raid villages and rape the women and enslave.
I get it.
But the taking out your own children is not something that has ever been acceptable in any culture.
It's happened.
You've had crazy people.
The targeting and mutilating of your own children systemically is a very new kind of evil.
And that's because we've gotten so far off the beam, starting with feminism and then the same sex, marriage, and the swapping of genders.
That's what's led us here.
And of course, all of that is rooted, deeply rooted in communism, which sought to destroy the idea of God and was very, very clear in his prescription of separating people from God because people who have faith in a higher power and believe that they are subjected to a higher moral authority are more difficult to govern, replace that higher moral authority with the state.
That's what today's left does.
Yeah.
Difficult to control.
Yeah.
They're way more difficult to control.
And I think that's a point that we have to remember in all of this stuff.
Like this is a godlessness problem.
You can just suppose that people understand that, and that's not true.
Right.
And then it was like, we were talking about this before the show.
It's not just an ideology with feminism problem either.
That's a big chunk of it.
Where did that come from?
It's a power grab.
This is just plain and simple, a power grab, because when you remove God from the equation, people can grab power pockets in a lot of different places.
Yeah.
Absolutely.
And then you even see it, by the way, in the church, unfortunately.
Yeah.
So, all right, next chat.
Next chat from Iman Do9.
Question for the crew.
Why are trans terrorists not targeting mosques?
How are they turning a blind eye to what Muslim countries do to trans and LGBTQ plus with Sharia law?
Well, it's a valid question.
You would think that they would.
But again, they are governed by emotion.
And they have been told that they are all marginalized classes.
And the people who are marginalizing them are largely white, cis, heterosexual Christians in this country.
None of it is true.
And the media suppresses those stories.
Thank you, Josh.
Yes.
They're not, I mean, we talk about it here.
You see this here.
You watch this show.
Maybe you watch Ben Shapiro's show.
Maybe you watch the court, whatever you watch.
You're watching these programs.
They're not watching conservative programs.
They're not watching people online talking about stories that the mainstream media is not covering.
They suppress these stories.
They don't want to talk about it.
And they want to keep them marginalized, like Stephen said.
Yeah.
It's insane, too, because you would think, based on what the media says, that Christianity hates LGBTQ people.
Hates them.
Talk about that all the time.
There's the reason we talked about that stat.
500 attacks on Catholic churches in the last five plus years.
Yeah.
One in every 3.65 days.
Got it.
I was corrected yesterday on that.
It's not three.
It's 3.65, roughly.
It's absolutely insane because the media doesn't cover what Islam thinks about anything, unless it's a local station because some girl was honor killed by her family.
That's what it does.
That's about all we get.
But nationally, anybody says anything against anything gay.
And you see it on CNN, MSNBC, and Christians are hateful.
And I can't believe there's anybody.
Actors better not stand up and say anything about their faith, though now it's like kind of possible.
But they still, I think Chris Pratt got in trouble for going to a church that actually says, by God, what the Bible says about homosexuality.
And he was raked over the coals for that.
There's a reason they target these churches because if you watch mainstream media, you think that that's where all the hate comes from for LGBTQ.
So it's pretty easy to make a connection, whether it's the connection or not.
Yeah.
It's pretty easy to make that connection.
You're not talking about mosques.
They don't have the balls to do that on CNN.
Right.
They would never.
Oh, of course they can.
And by the way, hashtag not all Muslims, not all Muslims.
Not all Muslims, but Christian white males.
Here's your privilege test.
Let's grab another chat.
All right.
Next chat from Renpedi.
What is the timeline for when this lunatic started transitioning and when his mother retired from the church?
Could they have forced her to retire?
It's possible.
Yeah.
I looked at that.
It's possible timeline.
I was wrong.
It wasn't April 15th.
That was a one that was drawn on the line, so it looked like a four.
So it looked like January 15th of 2020.
A little over a year.
Yeah, a little over a year.
I think it was in like August of 21 that she did the ceremony or at least the post came out.
So it's possible that they could have asked her, you know, to resign or parted ways because of ideology, like not understanding how to accept it.
Which would further fuel that.
That hate towards a specific church.
Yeah, I mean, it is.
So it does, and this is where things do get sticky, Josh, because in the Catholic church, it does come down to statement of belief.
And if you all of a sudden believe, okay, so this is sin.
This is what God says.
You all, all of a sudden, you have a trans kid.
That's not a disqualifying factor necessarily, I wouldn't think.
But now if your ideology now matches up with that and you no longer believe what we believe, then it does make sense to part ways.
Yeah.
Because you're no longer in line with what we believe.
And it's not mean.
It's just saying like, hey, you know, we still love you, but this, this, you're representing us.
Yeah.
You're teaching our children.
Yeah.
Yep.
Yeah.
I don't know.
We've had that at this point.
We've had that at this company.
We're like, oh, wait, wait a second.
You believe that?
Well, we don't.
It's going to be pretty hard for you to work here because everyone here kind of has to have some buy-in.
And it's going to create an uncomfortable situation because other people need to trust that you're all rowing the same direction.
So I don't want you to go complain to the post about a Photoshop that I suggested.
Yeah.
Sometimes I cross the line.
Everyone here knows that I'm crossing it.
And they go, all right, Josh was a little on one this morning.
Remember when someone had the brilliant idea to record run-through?
They were like, I thought this would be a great documentary.
The very first day we saw the blinking light, we're like, you're going to have to turn that off now.
We literally just took a handler.
No, no, no.
This is where we have room to make mistakes.
We broke four cameras then.
Yes, we did.
We did.
We were like, that's not how it works.
I know.
And then I was upset because I'm the one who has to pay for them.
Next chat.
Next chat.
Next chat from Fire Eater 9107.
Question for the crew.
I'm a young guy and have fallen hard for a girl at work.
I've never dated, so want God to direct me and have asked him for a sign.
Is this biblical?
Can Christians ask for signs?
I mean, sure, you can ask for signs, but you've already been given a handbook.
It's called the Bible.
So it's kind of like, if I was, you know, God is a loving father.
And if I was your dad and I was like, okay, I spent years teaching you what you should look for in a woman and how a relationship is supposed to work.
And I go, you know what?
Hold on a second.
I don't want to just do this by, I just don't, I don't want to just do this orally.
Let me write this down for you.
Okay.
I'm going to write this down so you remember it.
So you have this.
And if you have questions, you know, be sure to check this out.
And then you have more questions, like you can reach out to me.
But the truth is like most of it isn't here.
And then you were like, hey, hey, I didn't read all that.
Or maybe I did, but can you give me a sign?
I'd be like, what?
I already spent all that time teaching you this.
I wrote it down.
Yeah.
It's pretty, but just I wrote it down for you.
Follow that.
Now you might.
You might get a sign.
And of course, you know, the Holy Spirit, if you feel, I would say if you feel really unsettled or not at ease, that could be a sign to pray further and to read scripture further.
But I don't really like this whole idea of like, oh, praying for a sign from heaven to say that she's the one because God gave you the tools you need.
And I think it's good to clarify that.
The real quick answer that's going to piss people off, do not ask for a sign.
I'm just going to say it definitively.
Do not ask for a sign.
Now, let me tell you what I mean by that.
Stephen's saying kind of what I'm saying too.
Like, you've got the playbook.
What was a sign supposed to do?
A sign was supposed to authenticate what the teaching was from the person.
Are you really from God?
And the Old Testament a sign is that now there's some times where God, people are asking God for direction, right, in a little bit different way.
But we have the power of the Holy Spirit now.
So what you really need to do is to say, God, through the power of your Holy Spirit, will you just please guide me along this track to make a good decision?
Pray for wisdom.
And then, yes, exactly.
Pray for wisdom.
Make sure that you understand what a biblical wife prescription looks like for a man and a woman, your role, their role, like what you should be looking for, prioritizing those things.
Have you fallen hard because she's hot?
That's a different thing.
Like you want to make sure that's not the deal.
It's very a lot of time.
Okay, attraction is fine.
They'll be going like atheist and I'm praying for God for a sign.
I'm like, I think he might have already gotten it.
You know what I mean?
Yeah.
Like she just might be a hot communist atheist that you don't want to do anything with.
So don't look at it as I'm praying for a sign.
Look at it much more clearly as I am praying for wisdom.
And I'm also praying that your Holy Spirit would guide me in this process because that is, it's just so easy to fall into the, well, I saw this and that must be a sign.
People convince themselves of a lot of things when they're thinking of it that way.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I say go for it.
Sign and all.
I like it.
No, go ahead.
Jesus said.
That's it.
I like it.
Ask her out.
You know, maybe she says yes, and then you can give her a smooch later.
I mean, we all like boobs.
We all like boobs.
That's a smooch.
I would say don't give her the blueprint, too.
Don't give her the blueprint on how to, you know, like Taylor Swift did.
Because this is very common in relationships, especially as people get older and they're like, oh, I really wasn't prioritizing this and now I want to settle down.
Let me morph into what I believe this man wants me to be or vice versa.
Travis Kelsey did it for Taylor Swift.
Men do it too.
Maybe.
Women are coached how to do it as a strategy, right?
How to get that ring girl.
Like, ooh, get that.
Think Trevor Bauer, get that bag.
Men do it sometimes.
Don't give her the blueprint.
Ask her questions.
I would be close to the best and find out where she lines up and if it is not only if she shares your values, but if you two are compatible.
And don't give her the answers.
Don't give her a cheat sheet.
That's pretty important.
And that'll help illuminate it more than some turtle doves or whatever the hell.
Next gen. All right.
Next chat from DX99.
I don't know.
I was trying to think of a sign.
I was trying to think of a sign and I was thinking Duncan's toy chest.
I don't know why.
I went to Home Alone 2.
I would have gone with struck by lightning.
Yeah.
Well, you end up dead.
So, I mean, the sign, you'd be like, well, you're dead.
What do you mean, not always?
I will tell you this.
If you get struck by lightning twice while on a date with her, she's probably not for you.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Run.
All right.
Next chat from DX9S.
Unless she's your good luck charm.
Okay.
Unless she's your good charm.
Apparently not.
She gets struck by lightning twice.
Oh, there you go.
Sure.
Anyways, DX9S.
How do we make the focus/slash narrative as to why they tried to hide the shooters' videos?
How do we make the focus?
That's what we're trying to do.
That's what we're doing.
That's what we're doing.
And I would say, too, the problem with that is you look, there are some great people.
And we referenced some people yesterday.
Forgive me.
It was a Chris something or something.
Oh, yeah.
Okay.
Doing great work.
And there are a lot of people just wanting to go, look, look, click, click, click.
So that's what we're trying to do.
I think there are some good people.
And support the people who are actually doing their due diligence.
Follow them, support them.
I think just like you voted with your dollar as it relates to brands, whether it's Bud Light, you saw us recently like with Cracker Barrel or whatever it is, just trying to pull some examples.
Disney, do the same thing with the creators and the people online, right?
In other words, it's important to replace what it is that you hate, legacy media, with what you want it to be.
Yeah, Bycott.
We did it with Chick-fil-A.
Do the exact same thing that we did with Chick-fil-A.
We bought all that we could, right?
We supported them.
We did it with Hobby Lobby as well.
Same thing.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And we're going to fork in the road.
This could go, you know, there's a real opportunity now where you have young people who are voting.
And I would tell you this, if young people who are saying, okay, we're open to at least what you have, we're receptive to what you have to say on the right, what it is you're looking to conserve.
And they just see clickbait, clickbait, and, you know, skin deep, you know, hot takes, they're going to go, well, there's nothing, there are no answers for me here either.
So I would say, yeah, the Bycot, support the people who are very clear with that narrative because that is important.
I mean, the fact that the channel was nuked.
I don't know what this story looks like if we didn't get a tip, pick it up, rip the videos before the channel was nuked.
Someone else may have gotten that tip too at that point in time.
We're the only ones who are running it.
Could be very different.
I know what the world looks like if we didn't have a source and dig and expend so many resources on the Nashville story.
The world is as it existed before that, where you wouldn't know.
And that's something people often point to.
So you take that and now you add this and you add really the preponderance of evidence here.
People go like, okay, there's a trend.
That changes the narrative again over time.
It's a chip.
So I don't know what the world looks like if we hadn't, if these people here hadn't done that work yesterday.
They try and bleach its existence from the internet so that anyone claiming that they saw any of this is just labeled as crazy.
It's like, oh, that's just a theory.
Yes.
Spirit.
It's worse than that.
It's worse than that.
Let me tell you where it starts.
Because that's what we're experiencing in the moment.
But it starts with, and by the way, you can't cover shooters' manifestos or give their name on YouTube as policy, even though they allowed people to do it with Christchurch and anything that labeled a right-wing extremist as a threat, right?
It starts with, okay, and we're going to remove you if you do that.
And then conservatives saying, the money's too good.
We not only have to be on YouTube, we have to make sure that our contracts ensure that we're on YouTube, as a matter of fact, that actually preclude us from going to other platforms like Rumble.
You can watch some clips on YouTube, but we're never going to do the bidding of YouTube.
So it starts with that, that policy and conservatives saying, okay, okay, okay, okay, I give, I give, I give, I give.
They establish a narrative.
It then goes to legislation to silence journalists, to silence alternative media, right?
To make sure that to prevent that information from getting out, sort of a generalized quote of Gen Saki, but that was a reflection of it.
And then we get to that moment in time and it gets nuked because now it's nuked.
And if you cover it, oh, well, my God, now all of social media policy says that you're not allowed to actually cover it and the media is going to black out.
How does that get fixed?
And I tell you how it doesn't get fixed.
It doesn't get fixed with clickbait and people who post stories, whether on the right or left, that are knowingly they know are false or they don't care to verify if they are true because they give ammo to the left when they do it.
It is pervasive.
It is systemic.
And I don't know what the world looks like.
I don't know what the world looks like if you didn't have people who were really doing some of the hard work.
And I know there are other people out there, but I can certainly attest to the people in this office.
So support the ones who are creating the kind of atmosphere, environment that you want to see.
Two final challenges.
Can I just make a highlight real quick?
Yes.
Because it's not something I want to go back to, but it was one of the pages has some potentially trans regret on it right there.
I know you translated.
Yeah.
New York Post translated that only highlight because it's, or keep along here, because it's pretty much my last shred of being trans.
I'm tired of being trans.
I wish I'd never brainwashed myself.
And that's, again, by the New York Post.
So just continuing to dive into this, it's important to understand where this arc came from.
You know, like understanding, like, oh, I went into the trans ideology.
Maybe hate yourself even more because you did.
Like, there's no peace.
There is no quarter.
Like, would it have been better for mom and dad to just say no?
The overall embrace.
The society is to say no.
This ideology is really messing with these young people.
Yeah.
Exactly.
And it's not just the ideology.
It's not just them saying, oh, I think I'm a man or I think I'm a girl.
It's the drugs that they're giving them and the affirmation that they're giving them.
Yep.
The doctor at such a young age.
It's one thing if they're like, I'm 25 years old, Doc, and I want to be a lady.
And he's like, hey, your body, your choice.
Here, take this drug.
But when they're 18 years old, 17 years old, and you're giving them hormones that are blocking the natural hormones.
I mean, yeah, I was talking about this person.
I don't know how old they were.
I know they changed their name at 17, I think.
But yeah, even worse.
I mean, at 12, you're totally altering how their brain works completely.
They're not just going to have different opinions about their gender.
They're going to have different thoughts about everything around them.
Yeah.
Well, the big difference I would say when people say, ah, people used to be able to have disagreements.
And again, I think it's always based on a lie.
I think it's a veneer.
I think that the left in this country and the Democrat Party for well over a century has been subversively communist socialist, to be clear.
That is my belief.
But they at least had to pretend as though we all found common ground in the descriptions of problems.
And we differed on the prescriptions.
Like you've heard me say this with the red pill community.
People out there, I mean, they were here, like, for example, Fit and Fresh.
They're right in the descriptions, the problem of disenchanted young men and the relationship dynamics being destroyed and there not being many good prospects, so people aren't getting married.
That is a correct description.
The prescription to bang a bunch of bitches to find out who's a hoe, I completely disagree with.
It's you.
Right.
Yeah.
It's like finding out somebody who's a witch.
Yeah.
So it's like, yes.
What?
And in many cases.
In many cases, they'll still pretend that with the descriptions, they'll go, well, we need to, you know, obviously the middle class is struggling in this country.
There's been a, they won't acknowledge a great wealth transfer, especially since COVID that's accelerated it.
But what, okay, what, and then the solution for one is, hey, we need to lower taxes.
We need to actually allow the market to create more homes that supply increases.
We need to enact this policy to reduce inflation.
We need to, of course, curb illegal immigration.
And one side says, give everyone everything for free and the billionaires will pay for it.
So you have a starting off point of a description that you could at least, let's say there's some type of veneer of agreement and then just a radical disagreement on the prescription.
With the trans issue, it is wrong and dishonest in both its description and prescription.
Meaning they didn't even try to because there was no headway that could be made.
Like, hey, our description is you have kids who are confused and they need help.
No, they said, no, the description is people are born in the wrong body.
Yeah, but science proves the exact opposite.
That's the description.
And the prescription is to correct it with mind-altering hormones and sex changes and to allow children to be taken away from their parents and given to the state and drag queen story because drag is an art.
Both the description and the prescription for the LGBTQAIP is wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, evil.
You can't even say that about guns.
You could both say, hey, there's a gun violence problem because anytime there's violence against innocent civilians, sure, it's a problem.
So we would maybe agree on that description.
I would say most of it is intercity gang violence, right?
Very little is committed by legal gun holders.
We'd get to different prescriptions.
The left knows that it is so fundamentally dishonest, they've just decided we're just going to lie about the description.
We're just going to say they're born in the wrong body.
We're just going to say, listen to kids should be allowed to make decisions regarding everything.
You literally had that person, was it in Minnesota, that lady, I don't remember what her role was.
I think she was a lieutenant governor?
Was she a lieutenant governor?
Yes.
Yeah.
So the description now is just trans is a thing.
You can be born in the wrong body.
And kids should make all their own decisions regarding their permanent sexual function, even though they're not at the age of sexual consent.
And so the prescription is even more evil.
Everything about it is wrong.
It's evil.
It should be given no leeway.
It should be fought at every single turn.
It's that important.
Final check.
All right.
One thing first.
Gerald said that people die when they get struck by lightning.
And we looked up a fact check.
They don't always.
They don't always die.
No, I told them.
I tried to 90%.
90% of the time they survive.
80% of the time they survive.
90.
90%.
Well, I would say that that is factual.
Hold on.
Pull it up.
You know what?
Save that screenshot.
I want to read this.
Well, you don't want them to because 90% of the time you're wrong.
Yeah, that is insane.
Let me just say that.
You just flex my intellectual prowess over here.
Josh knew it.
And even further to go against the people who say climate change is a thing, over the last 30 years, it averaged like 43 people.
And the last 10, it's now gone down to 27.
So it's even lessening.
Okay, fine.
Oh, the world's not.
It also probably helps that kids aren't playing lawn darts in a thunderstorm anymore.
It's debatable.
All right, so I did think most people that got struck by lightning die.
I was wrong.
It just means that you're completely incapable of life afterwards almost.
So that's fine.
I don't know.
We can find some stats on that.
Check that out.
Disabilities.
Look at that.
Oh, come on.
That guy looks awesome.
That guy looks cool.
He for sure.
Dude.
Dude, I would be struck.
Looks like, what?
I have a great story to tell.
My back looks like Joshua Tree.
Sign me up.
He walks into a room and the microwave turns on.
Okay.
So it's a little bit of a problem.
Oh, yeah.
It saves you time.
I want to get struck by lightning.
Look at that.
He doesn't even need a tribal tattoo.
It's like henna that never leaves you.
All right.
Final check.
All right.
Final chat from, let's see, Hannah C.I. Question for Stephen.
Why do you think everyone is supposed to just think being trans is normal?
It's never been normal.
Curious to hear your thoughts.
Hold on a second.
Can you bring it back up again?
I just want to make sure I'm very clear.
Why do you think everyone is supposed to just think being trans is normal?
I'll tell you what.
Why?
The description and prescription is wrong.
And I will tell, here's what I really do think.
And this is going to be the craziest you'll hear me sound, okay?
Because I often say, don't attribute to mental evidence, what can be attributed to ignorance.
And you can't get enough people in a room to agree on something for most conspiracies, right?
But usually conspiracies, as you see them and you think there was premeditated effort, it usually ends up being people make mistakes and human nature is to try and cover your tracks, right, and save your ass.
With this one, though, you did touch on something.
Why are they surprised?
Again, if you could bring it up, surprised that they just want, if we could bring it up one more time, because there was some wording in the- I'm sorry.
I know you have so many windows open, noodles.
You're reading about lightning.
Just to disprove me.
What?
Lightning.
Yes.
There you go.
Why do you think everyone is supposed to just think?
Okay, there you go.
That's what's why are you supposed to think?
Because it's several, it's people don't think that it's normal.
Why do you think everyone is supposed to think?
Which means you feel the external factors, which means you feel the external pressures, which means that you know there is a peer pressure that is unnatural that didn't develop organically.
It's almost like cultural astro turf, where people are being pressured and to just go, yeah, yeah, sure, it's normal.
Like think Bruce Jenner, Caitlin Jenner.
That happens so fast.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, sure, woman of the year.
You know, miss, whatever it was, universe, Ms., there's so many, like, yeah, sure, of course.
Yeah, we've always been this way.
And everyone knows that that's not the case.
Everyone knows that this came on so rapidly.
Like everyone knows that you could line up 20 random people.
And if you hooked them up to a lie detector test and said, does Drag Queen Story Hour make you uneasy?
The majority would, of course, be uncomfortable with it.
We all know that.
And that's why I think this is one of those things.
Why people say, oh, the trans thing.
It's a shit test.
It really is.
I really do think that the left has tried to use this as a bellwether to say, how far can we push people?
How far can we push the lines of reality?
And someone at some point said, you're not going to get them to say that you can transition kids.
Come on.
It's like, oh, I bet you we will.
Let's see how far we can push something like this.
We know that the feminism worked and we doubled the workforce and that now we have no fault divorce.
We know that we said love is love and that was presented as always compassionate.
And they've all, what has everyone always been saying?
Hey, hands off our kids, even liberals, right?
We've all been saying there's no LGBT agenda with your, no one's coming for your kids.
I think now we can push a little further.
Just think of those people you saw singing that song at the parade that we covered.
We're coming for your children.
We're coming for it.
Not only did they do that as a test, but the media never condemned them.
The same people who were saying, oh, the slippery slope fallacy of your children, none of them even tried to distance themselves from it.
You know what they did is they tried to make you out to be hateful.
Because it's, let's see how far we can push people.
This is a really severe one.
Like I said, it's really hard to get people on board with people who say, trust the science.
Okay.
To get people on board with the idea that there is a scientific basis for this because there isn't.
This is the closest that we have seen to out in the open a dogmatic religious practice that is not even being hidden by the left.
It is a religious cult.
It is a worldview of whatever the current progressive party says goes.
It has to be taken entirely on faith.
People to believe it have to willingly be ignorant or more likely completely put on blinders to all evidence, scientific data, and even their own rational logical process to go along with and find themselves at the conclusion, yes, we need to transition children.
This has been something that has been pushed for a long time.
And that's why they kind of would test it out, right?
In a small speech, before we had social media, I bet you once upon a time, you'd have a focus group where someone like Kamala Harris could say, yeah, yeah, and I think it's necessary for us to provide transgender sex change operations to inmates on the taxpayer dime.
And sort of, hey, how do people react to it?
Oh, not that.
Okay, let's push a little bit softer.
Let's bring that one out when we think people are ready.
But now you can see it.
It's one of those things where, again, I've tried to make sense of it.
And any, it's one of those things, right?
Because if you look at how we prepare for, for example, like change my minds or debates, I go, okay, what are the most likely arguments that they'll make?
What are the strongest arguments that will be made?
What level of understanding can I apply to that argument where it makes sense?
And often I'll come up with something and go, okay, I can see here's where there is a little bit of warping, or I can see how here there's maybe a false moral equivalency.
So I can address that, but I can understand it.
And that's why Change My Minds are actually pretty productive.
They're not combative.
You see the ones that are combative because of the ones that go viral, but there's hours and hours, far more of good discussions.
But with this one, I go, okay.
I try and go down every single trail of an argument that might present some semblance of logic.
It's just not there.
Let's go.
Okay, first one.
All right.
Men can be, a man can be born to the wrong body or a female can be born to the wrong body.
So basically, it's a man born with a female brain, a female born with a male brain.
Okay, so right off the bat, that negates your very argument because you're existing in a binary saying there is a male brain and a female brain.
But the good news is you're starting off with some science there.
Okay, Rometi study, sweet.
Nope.
The exact opposite.
Hey, you know what?
Maybe they'll conduct another study with better, oh no, every time they actually conduct a higher quality study, we see that the brain only changes after cross-sex hormone replacement therapy is administered.
There's no, okay, all right.
But maybe, at the very least, maybe we can argue that these people are so conflicted in spite of biology and science.
Let's go down this one, okay?
That it's still, you know, it's still worth it statistically because these people will feel better and it'll save lives.
And nope.
Nope.
Same attempted suicide rate no matter what they do.
Okay, hold on.
Let me try another one.
All right, but maybe we can argue that that's really important with kids, that if we get to them young, right, because we have a 42% attempted suicide rate.
This is pretty new.
Those are adults.
So maybe if we foster an environment we support them when they're children and they feel as though they have a strong support network community behind them.
Well, no, no, no.
You come to the same attempted suicide rate and mental illness.
And if you don't intervene, 98 to 99% grow out of it.
But if you do intervene, none of them do.
And you find, okay, all right, well, you know what?
Maybe let's go down this path.
Hey, even in spite of all this, whatever people want to do in their own bedroom, in their own life, it doesn't affect you.
Wait, no, women's sports and bathrooms and women's only spaces.
All right, okay, we're going to find one.
We're going to find one.
I know, I know, I know.
We're going to find one.
We're going to find one.
Well, this is, you know what, we're just saying that this is reserved for adults and maybe no one's going for the kids.
And let's just say that this is kind of like a sexual proclivity, which is a very, it's not really an argument that they make.
No, state policy, sanctuary states where trans kids can be taken away from their parents.
Like there is no, it's just to see, it really is to see if you will buy a lie.
That is my opinion.
That is, at least maybe at some point some people believed it, but you cannot.
You cannot make the argument that those in charge of the DNC and MSNBC and ABC and CNN and the DSM-5, that at this point in time, they don't know any better.
We now find ourselves in 2025, the numbers are in.
We know, and they've decided we're going to push it anyway.
Let's go one more path.
Best case scenario.
Best case.
Okay, all this, that's true.
But at least there's, you know, people are going to kill themselves no matter what, right?
It's not good if they do, if they don't.
But at least, you know, who are you to say what someone does with their own money?
We're past the taxpayer thing, which is where they are right now.
But hey, you know, with their own money, they can transition.
And you know what?
At least, right?
It's neutral.
It's benign.
No.
Estrogen into the male body and altering the hormones guarantees an exponential increase in cancer and cardiovascular risk.
It's harmful.
It's based on a lie.
The results are worse for the individual, undoubtedly.
They are far worse for society.
There is no reason for us to be doing it.
It was not asked for en masse by the public, but it was thrust upon you anyway.
And when you see the results of it, right, smack dab in the middle, thrust into your face in the form of dead children, and not the first time.
Even then they say, how can we make sure that people aren't able to point out the truth?
What policy can we enact to make sure that this information doesn't get out?
Because we can't nuke the channels, the evidence, the truth quickly enough.
That's still their solution.
It is all predicated on suppression of truth, on suppression of any type of moral framework for a society, and on suppression of you for pointing it out.
We are living in real time in a societal test from evil people to see how far they can push you and how long you'll take it.
You may say that sounds crazy.
That's my genuine opinion.
We can talk about it more tomorrow.
We'll see you then.
That's what I know.
▲
Export Selection