All Episodes
May 15, 2025 - Louder with Crowder
01:07:18
🔴 Trump's Huge Qatar Deal Launches Major Shift In US Policy - But is That a Good Thing?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'm John Rooktacarrararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararararara Welcome
to the lineup live here on Rumble every day, 9 a.m. Eastern to 4 p.m.
We have some announcements coming next week.
You don't need to change the channel.
You go right into the next show.
We're free speech.
Actually, it's the only place where it doesn't die at this point.
I guess it lives on, but Rumble, we own live, and YouTube is dead.
Rumble did it.
Welcome, viewers from Vince, of course, Bongino Army.
Vince comes from Vincente in Latin.
The Romance languages are based in Latin, and it translates roughly to...
Muy caliente.
So it goes, if you go several steps, it goes Latin and Spanish.
So we're going to talk about today, Ben and Jerry, I can't remember which one, the one with a lot of back hair, is going berserk because of RFK, which is crazy because they both would have a lot in common as hippies, you know, non-GMO, but something, something, Gaza, Medicaid, I don't know.
We're going to get into it.
Donald Trump, President Trump, has been doing his tour there in the Middle East and...
You know, securing the bag, as it were, in Qatar.
There's a little bit of misrepresentation out there, but a lot of investments coming in.
And we're going to compare that with the policies in the Middle East of previous administrations.
No matter where you line up, this is a significant departure.
And we wanted to take some time here today.
This is an older article, study, but it's being recirculated where these feminists have tried to assert this new historical record, saying that women were actually just as much hunters.
Of big game as men throughout human history.
Of course it's untrue.
We'll point out why it's untrue.
And of course these ladies would never receive any constructive criticism because that would require accountability.
Let's get on with the show.
Sure.
I'm living large here in the slammer.
I got me a nice cigar, snazzy hat.
Call the place Alcatraz.
I kind of like the sound of that.
Sounds familiar.
Al Capone, Al Capraz.
This is my joint, see?
They named the place after me.
But how exactly did I get pinched?
Well, we didn't have Tax Network USA back then.
I ended up getting caught having to pay $215,000 in interest on back taxes.
That's like $4.4 million in today's bucks.
That kind of scratch can buy a lot of fedoras.
So if you don't want to get pinched by the IRS or the feds and get locked up in an island in California next to the fruitcakes, do yourself a favor.
Take a shot of Hooch, calm your nerves, and go to tnusa.com slash crowder.
You'll thank me later.
Hey Al, you done yet?
Yeah, when's chow time?
So don't let the shame happen to you.
Go to tnusa.com slash Crowder and let them take care of business by taking care of your business.
We'll be right back.
Spiritus.
you *sad* Tool Man could see the panic on my face.
My headphones got all tied up.
What?
I almost hung myself.
My headphones got all...
I missed all of them.
It was like a Disney film where the objects hate me.
So...
Happy Death Day!
Hey, question of the day.
If you were to create a new...
No, you know what?
I don't want to do that.
At what point do you balance your boycott, your boycott, with sheer overwhelming quality?
Because we all have to agree that there are some flavors from Ben and Jerry.
And or Jerry.
You just can't get anywhere else.
It's true.
And that's a tough one.
That's a tough one.
I have to boycott them.
We're going to get into that.
But what about you?
And what's a good alternative?
Don't say Bluebell.
I do not like Listeria Crunch.
All right.
It's only a few times.
Quite a few.
A lot of times.
Quite a few.
Hold on.
I'm getting a little bit of echo on my headphones.
We don't have any other mics on.
Do we sound guy Billy?
No?
Okay.
Captain Morgan, CEO.
How are you, sir?
Fantastic.
You?
I know who is not fantastic because it's getting on a flight right after this.
Oh, no.
But the people who will be having a fantastic time are those who go to the show at Zany's Comedy Club in Rosemont, Illinois, tonight and tomorrow for this man, Funniest Man Alive, Nick DiPaolo.
How are you, sir?
Good.
How are you doing, Stephen?
I'm good.
Too bad it's College Zany.
It's a really nice club.
I know.
The name just doesn't do it justice.
I know.
You expect someone with, like, a spinning bow tie.
Hey, Nick, do you still fly first class on Spirit?
Is that a funny joke?
Is that it?
Yeah!
Great, great.
Clapper Gerald.
Zanny Gerald.
You know what they call his house?
The Chuckle Hut.
I got a great name for a comedy club that nobody's...
I'm going to franchise this.
Well, don't say it.
Now people steal it.
I don't give a shit.
Skid marks.
M-A-R-X like the Marx Brothers.
Yes, no, that's perfect.
Derby, fart, asshole, everything.
That's perfect.
It's perfect.
Isn't it really?
It is good, honestly.
I mean, I think you probably negate the female clientele, but who wants them there anyway?
Well, that's the whole idea.
They ruin it, and they get mad.
I don't need a girl going, that was mean.
Suck a bag of cheese.
Okay.
Women, don't get scared.
Don't dump that either.
Speaking of women, speaking of women, you're going to love this, Mr. Dip.
So, in case you wonder why we can't have nice things anymore, and why Gen Z is very conservative, I'll present to you exhibit...
A 452.
This is a mother at a Pittsburgh area school here.
She's praising a teacher for encouraging her daughter, who learned nothing throughout the school year, to act like a cat.
I would like to recognize Ms. Mansfield, especially who is the best teacher my daughter has ever had.
Why?
She lets her be as weird as she is, and she encourages it, and she enjoys it.
And that is really meaningful to me and my family.
He's tech support.
She calls my daughter Ellie Cat because my daughter meows instead of saying here.
And she doesn't make her feel bad about it.
She just embraces it and she loves it.
And that's really cool for me as a parent.
And it's really cool for my daughter to feel seen in school.
So I really appreciate that.
And that's all I have to say.
Oh, we thought you were going to get to standardized test scores.
Go back and grab just a screen.
Just a frozen image right there.
It is odd that she is...
Presenting this in front of boy band Dave Smith and the guy behind her who clearly is the one that checks the genders.
Turn your head and say yum.
Calling your daughter an alley cat.
A woman who's an alley cat is somebody who sleeps around.
I know!
That's great.
She treats my daughter like the whore she is.
So she's thrilled that this teacher teaches her daughter things about being a cat.
They see this as teaching.
They see this as imparting wisdom or knowledge.
Yes, you can be a cat, which means that her dad also must be a giant pussy.
I'm gonna be like you, Dad.
You know I'm gonna be like you.
Oh, literally.
Okay.
Yeah, I didn't know...
How are we going to do that?
Morris.
You can expect more of this today.
Cats and Harry Chapin songs.
Ben and Jerry.
Okay?
And this one is, this is one of those where you talk about sort of the reshuffling of parties and alignment.
And we're going to get to the Middle East, by the way.
What happened to Code Pink?
What happened to all the people saying, hey, these folks are freedom fighters.
Rosie O'Donnell.
Now they're going to be pro-war on terror.
We'll get to Donald Trump in a second.
But Ben and Jerry, can you think of anyone more granola or hippie?
And can you think of anyone who has been in public office, in any capacity, who would be more sympathetic to the idea of, you know, no artificial dyes, fewer GMOs?
I mean, he's basically a libertarian granola hippie who eats meat.
They should have a lot in common.
But now the goalposts move...
With Ben and or Jerry, because it's about Medicaid or something, and then it's about bombs in Gaza and children.
So here you go.
Ben Cohen, one of the co-founders of Ben and Jerry, he went absolutely insane during a Senate testimony yesterday over RFK Jr.
The audience are reminded disruptions will not be permitted while the committee conducts its business.
Capitol Police are asked to remove the individuals from the hearing room.
Oh, it goes on.
Move down the hallway.
Ben, why are you getting arrested?
Move down the hallway.
Congress kills poor kids in Gaza by buying bombs and pays for it by kicking kids off Medicaid in the U.S. Keep going down.
Keep going down the hallway.
Those kids need Medicaid because you give them diabetes.
Yeah, I was going to say, he kills more kids with his 78 grams of sugar a second.
By the way, was it a congressional hearing or a Senate hearing?
I just want to make sure they got that right.
That was a town hall.
It's one of...
Okay, something about...
It doesn't matter what you do.
You guys need to understand.
You have a president right now who has basically started no new significant wars.
Certainly the least pro-war president ever.
And the left still calls him a Nazi.
In this case, you have RFK Jr.
He got rid of red dye!
Was it number three, number four?
Don't quote me on that.
Either three or four.
He's going in.
He wants to call pharmaceutical companies to the mat.
This is the guy who refused.
To say that he would never sue pharmaceutical companies because he said there needs to be accountability for the consumer.
That he's not anti-medicine, but he is pro-health and he is pro-transparency.
This is the kind of stuff that Ben and Jerry would put on their label.
Organic.
Natural.
No added artificial whatever.
Whatever that means.
It doesn't matter.
Then they'll move the goalpost to Medicaid and Gaza.
And it's also, it's not nice to do that at a hearing with a Kennedy involved.
Those guys are jumpy for a reason.
You're right.
They made a loud noise.
We didn't show that part of it.
Oh, yeah, he did jump.
He came out of a seat about 11 feet.
He said, put up the hood.
I guarantee you that guy double checks with a rental every day.
It's not a convertible, is it?
It's got to be going through.
Last time they gave me the Mustang, and it wasn't even the eight.
Cylinder, it was the sex.
Are you kidding me?
And RFK Jr. was obviously upset.
And this man was upset.
It was just a crossfire going on.
They were upset with RFK Jr. for blaming Ben and Jerry's for his health issues during his campaign last year.
The New York Times reporting on a 2012 deposition during which RFK Jr. said doctors once found a parasite, a dead worm, in his brain.
Tonight, what his campaign is now saying about this, and here's Kena Whitworth.
Kennedy testified in a 2012 deposition that he experienced memory loss at the time, saying, I have cognitive problems, clearly, all because of a damn worm in my Ben and Jerry's ice cream.
And that was the last time I ever touched Junkie Monkey.
So I understand...
I understand the gripe.
First of all...
He's a Kennedy.
That worm's from tequila.
I mean, come on.
The crabs are from a Monroe.
Yeah, that's right.
Cheap balls.
She told me she was clean.
She's so unclean.
Alright, so...
Here are some other times that Ben& Jerry's have sucked, where I just can't buy Ben& Jerry's anymore.
And it's tough, because I used to love them.
You know, I was raised in Montreal, so Ben& Jerry's right over the border there.
Oh, yeah.
In 2024, they came out with these flavors.
Remember, Kamala's Coconut Jubilee.
Oh, jeez.
Unburdened by what has vanilla bean.
Ugh.
And fight for a right sorbet, which they just seem like they got lazy.
Are these real?
I can't even tell.
These are real flavors.
I know, because we've done two or three 7 plus ones, and it's hard to tell the real ones from the fake ones.
I like the yeast infection with nuts.
Strawberry abortion.
No.
I need something.
Just let me know.
Then I can find out what I can and can.
In 2023, he posted this message about the stolen indigenous.
He said, this is the 4th of July.
It's high time we recognize that the U.S. exists on stolen indigenous land and commit to returning it.
Okay, let's start with your farms, your dairy farms.
Yeah.
How about that?
This is one of those things I've said, sort of my litmus test for environmentalists, celebrity environmentalists, is perfume or cologne.
If you decide to slap your name on a product that is completely unnecessary with packaging that is entirely wasteful and chemicals that require unbelievably corrosive processes, something that nobody needs so that you can make a few extra million bucks, you don't care about the environment.
Ice cream is about as definitionally as non-necessary as I can think of.
Let's start with your dairy farms that are reserved exclusively for making an expensive, You give it back first before you talk about people living in a 1400 square foot home.
These people don't believe it.
And what they always do, they always blame the system.
Well, I would, but it wouldn't make a difference because that's the same reason you don't pay more on your taxes.
There's a little box there.
You can just pay as much as you want.
They never do.
They don't live what they believe.
I tell you what, I live what I believe because I will use every loophole in the book to pay as little to Uncle Sam as I humanly possibly can, and I make no apologies for it.
What else do we have for me?
They're all legal, though.
They supported the defund the police after George Floyd.
They came out with pecan resist flavor to oppose the Trump administration.
Like, what does that even mean?
And what do they think they're doing?
Like, oh, wait a second.
Let's release pecan resist for $8.99 a pint.
That'll really turn this country around.
Not only is the dairy farm on stolen land, I'll take it a step further.
The last time I checked, it was cow farts that were ruining the ozone.
Right?
That's what they say.
But now the ozone hole is closed, so your guess is as good as mine.
Remember that one?
Yep.
Couldn't use hairspray?
Yeah.
Because you were going to get melanoma?
Turns out, the hole just closed up.
Oh, okay.
We completely restructured our lives with many modern products, but...
Oh, you were wrong about it?
All right.
Yeah, cow farts.
Okay, Ben, let's start with you.
And he'll say he's not...
Styrofoam cups were the problem, I thought.
Only if you break them, though.
That's true.
Yeah, then we went to paper straws.
Yes.
Paper straws?
Maybe all that ice cream has been bad for his health.
Maybe instead of yelling at the Health and Human Services Secretary, he should see a real doctor.
Like you, Gerald.
Like me?
Well, yeah, didn't you need to go see the nurse here in the office last week?
Let's check your oha!
Come aboard.
Thanks for seeing me, Doc.
Absolutely.
Now, tell the old pirate doctor what be anchoring down your day.
It's kind of embarrassing, to be honest.
Fear not.
These carters are judgment-free.
Well, I have some swelling down there, like in the back.
An old case of butt barnacles.
I guess you could say something like that.
Your poop deck's covered in sailors knots.
I've never heard anybody refer to it.
You've got a bloody porthole, son.
I have hemorrhoids, okay?
Yes, hemorrhoids.
Is there anything you can do to help me, please?
I...
I can help you.
And there's no need for shame, son.
Now, drop your trousers and bend over.
No, no, no, no.
Can we do, like, a head thermometer or something?
I wish it was that easy.
That'd be nice.
Now push those barnacles back into stern and let me check you out.
Plus, this'll help with the dysentery.
I don't even have dysentery at all.
Is there anything modern that you have that can help?
Well, there be but one other possibility.
But it's never been successfully executed.
And that's if ye can find and drink the ink of a kraken and spit on the wound for a time.
The legend says ye will be cleared forevermore from swollen butt barnacles.
And it happens to be your lucky day because I have tracked the kraken right here.
What's that?
The Kraken's lair.
Oh, no, no, no.
Next to the Kraken.
What's that?
That's...
Hydrocortisone.
Hydrocortisone.
That's what I'll take.
Thanks.
Appreciate it.
I'll suit yourself.
Take your chances.
But that still leaves me without the ink from the old Kraken.
My white whale.
Let's check your hoo-ha!
Yeah, he actually really helped me with the thing, so he's...
I'm good now.
I'm good.
This is a weird way to make a wedding.
I was thinking the same thing.
Yeah.
All right.
Let's go on to President Trump in the Middle East here, because this has been going on all week.
There have been quite a few wins.
But there also has been a little bit of misrepresentation out there where I think it's right to try and have sort of a critical eye and see the potential pitfalls.
But overall, it's been pretty good.
Remember, keep this in context.
Before President Trump came into his second term, he was going to bring World War III, right?
We all in agreement on that?
It was going to be World War III?
World was going to end?
And certainly the Middle East was ground zero.
Everyone thought that's where the war was going to be breaking out, World War III.
But on his trip...
He's continued and intensified nuclear talks with Iran.
We know where he lines up on that.
We don't have the details of the private conversations right now.
He's moved to normalize relations with Syria and it's, according to him, attractive leader.
How did you find the Syrian president?
Great.
Great.
I think very good.
Young, attractive guy.
You know, strong pass.
Very strong pass fighter.
But he's got a real shot at pulling it together.
People are getting mad about this.
Let me be really clear.
Donald Trump always compliments international leaders, to be clear.
He did it with Kim Jong-un.
He always tries to start off with compliments.
So if you have experience, very good businessman.
He was very successful.
And with a leader in Syria, he's just down to like...
Nice mustache!
And he's like, hey, it looks nice.
Good tan.
So he'll start off with a compliment.
Of course, the guy's a terrorist.
But he'll start off with a compliment.
Strong fighter, Stephen.
Strong fighter.
That's dangling the carrot.
Yes!
It's a little bit of flattery.
And then, you know, he moved on to calling Kim Jong-un fat.
Yes.
And saying that Putin was...
Being childish and bragging about winning World War II.
Like, you see, which he did, by the way.
He just did again.
So you see this with him.
He compliments you first.
It's called being a salesman.
Exactly.
They did it as a door-to-door salesman.
Yeah.
I told some fat housewives, that's a nice ass you get.
How do you like pork chops?
And then they found themselves like, I don't need three Hoovers, but that guinea was so nice to me.
So, he's also secured nearly, and there's a little bit more to the numbers, Two trillion dollars in economic deals.
Dang.
Arabian Trump is getting his name.
And I want to hear from you.
Look, here's one thing.
You may like what's going on.
You may not.
You may have a problem with a plane from Qatar, and I understand that.
But what is undeniable...
Is for people who bitched about neocons for a very long...
This is the first time we've had something different.
You certainly would be hard-pressed to argue against this statement.
Democrats, including Barack Obama and certainly Biden, were more neocon than Donald Trump as it related to foreign policy.
Is that a good thing?
You think maybe we try a different direction?
Because, hey, back in the day, I lived in Canada.
I was more supportive of George W. Bush back then than I am now.
Hey, you know what?
I was wrong because it turns out there's...
No changing these countries with these people.
And I'm willing to say, you know what?
Hey, you guys keep your country over there and we'll keep ours over here.
I think it's time to do away with nation building.
And that brings us to some Trump wins.
All right.
So, before we get to this Wednesday, what went down, do download the Rumble app if you're watching right now.
We do not stream live to YouTube anymore.
Just here on Rumble, 11 a.m.
Weekdays, follow this channel, and you get notified when we are live.
That's it.
You don't get a bunch of other bullcrap like you do on YouTube.
Like, oh, PBS is talking about female hunter-gatherers.
Who cares?
So, Wednesday in Doha, President Trump signed a new economic agreement.
And I feel...
You're pissed off about this.
Like, there's a trap.
With this, no matter how I say it, someone's going to say wrong.
Qatar.
And then people are like, it's Qatar.
And then you'll see in this video, they go, Qatar!
I don't even know what they're saying, and I don't care.
But $1.2 trillion secured in economic agreements.
It's my honor to announce the signing of a joint declaration of cooperation between the state of Qatar and the United States of America.
Just think Qatar.
Signed on behalf of the state of Qatar by His Highness Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani.
Amir of the state of Qatar and the Honorable Donald J. Trump, president of the United States of America.
Hannah Navarro?
Yes.
That's the pin.
I'm waiting for the dust to explode.
Well, don't worry.
We'll get to that.
My pager's going off.
Netanyahu's people.
So, a couple of things here.
People are saying $2 trillion.
So according to the White House, the deal is going to generate $1.2 trillion in economic exchange, including about $250 billion or so in economic deals.
And the Qatari Prime Minister even clarified that this would take place.
It's good.
But people on social media saying $2 trillion immediately.
That's not accurate.
The Qatari Prime Minister said this is going to take place over 10 years.
And I will say, Qatar, for one of the prominent terrorist-supporting organizations, countries in the world, they put a good face on it.
Well, basically, it's very simple.
1.2 trillion is the expected value of the economic partnership between the two countries for the next 10 years.
And this is basically either it will be...
Through the investment, the investment to the Sovereign Wealth Fund, which is the commitment that QIA is going to do throughout the next few years.
So the deal includes a billion dollars to Raytheon for a drone defense system, potentially $38 billion as far as an investment to the Ula Deid Air Base, $97 billion in contracts for Parsons Engineering, $96 billion in orders from Qatar Airways, including 130 787s from Boeing, some other Boeing aircraft.
They also have, what, they have 50 additional Boeing aircraft, 30 Boeing 7779 aircraft, because Islamists have never done anything bad with an airplane.
*Booing*
Well, that wasn't really even a sketch.
That was just a sad historical incident.
Way to take the worst moment of my childhood and...
Well, I think it makes a point.
I stand by it.
So, some potential problems with these deals.
Look, Qatar is not a pro-free, certainly not an America-first type nation.
They do have interests that are diametrically opposed to ours sometimes.
So since 2017, we've talked about China quite a bit.
We have to call balls and strikes.
References are all available.
Link in the description.
They've spent nearly $100 billion trying to influence.
The United States.
So when people talk about APEC, and yep, it's a promise.
It's the only organization that lobbies on behalf of a foreign nation.
Just lobbying from Qatar, $224 million.
Universities, the last number I gave you was $2 billion.
We have an updated number.
Since 2017, $6.3 billion spent in influencing universities.
Investments, weapons, there's another $60 billion there.
And there are a few President Trump cabinet members who've worked on behalf of Qatar receiving lavish salaries, including Pam Bondi, Susie Wiles, Kash Patel, to varying degrees.
So, my thing is this.
If you have a problem with lobbyists, if you have a problem with foreign interests, if you think that there are people who sort of dwell in the swamp, okay, well, this would be cause for concern, to be fair.
Now, it doesn't mean that we should not have a friendly relationship.
It doesn't mean that we shouldn't negotiate.
If we know who they are, and we know what they're about, okay.
Keep them at a safe distance, and it would be better to have some investments coming in from them than not.
Right?
That sort of money clarifies.
Yes?
Keep your friends closed, but your enemies closed.
We need to get Josh to do the...
I like his Godfather.
His voice is so good for that.
You're right.
I was lazy on that one.
I like Josh's.
What about you?
Hey!
Yeah, yeah.
I don't know who it is unless he has the hands.
It's like a Pizza Hut commercial.
I like it.
I'm a pizza...
I'm a deep-dish guy.
So...
But right?
Keep your friends close by your enemies closer.
Yeah.
Sort of...
There's also the issue of the plane, which the Qatar Prime Minister discussed with a CNN reporter who is a Sharon Stone lookalike.
Can we take a moment to get to the bottom of this offer by Kata of a multi-million dollar Boeing 7478 to President Trump?
When did your government first start talking to the U.S. about this aircraft?
And who broached the subject first?
The U.S. or is it Qatar?
Well, actually, it's, you know, I know that there were a lot of speculations about this topic.
I don't know what is the reason that instigated this.
This is a very simple government-to-government dealing with Ministry of Defense and Department of Defense.
Are still exchanging the possibility of transferring one of our 747s, Dash 8, to be used as Air Force One.
And it's still under the legal review, so there is nothing really...
I don't know what was like why it became like so big as a news that this is something that, you know, considered, you know, very in a very strong way.
Now, he seems a little flustered, right?
He seems like he's Eddie Haskell-ing it a little bit, but it should be noted that there was some controversy with the female interviewer in question, taunting him, at least violating Islamic decorum.
Yeah, you can't do that over there.
You said Sharon Stone.
I thought he looked like Governor Newsom.
A little bit.
Or Gordon Gekko.
Oh, there you go, yeah.
Yes, she does.
She does.
He's good.
I agree.
We have no problem.
No qualms for me.
The falcon teaches the falconer.
I don't judge a man's character by the size of his wallet!
I love that line.
Oh, you're doing sheen?
Okay.
So, were you about to say something there, Jill?
I was about to say, look, with Qatar, I understand the problem.
Listen, I lean towards not trusting them.
I don't think they're our friend.
With the airplane, he shouldn't be accepting a gift like that.
And hopefully what happens is he's letting them save face through a legal review, basically saying, oh, I would have taken it, but the legal review, so he doesn't offend them.
I hope that's the way that we go.
But Qatar has their hands in so many things in the Middle East right now.
They seem to be kind of the broker of all these different relationships.
And some of that's really bad because they're putting up the Hamas leader's face on a building whenever he died.
And so it's like, oh, okay, well, you're promoting Hamas.
And then on the other hand, this is where we're going to negotiate and try to find these solutions in these countries.
So I don't like the ties to Qatar or really any other country like that.
But I'm just wondering, what is Donald Trump going to do with this?
Is he going to be manipulated by this, or is he using it for his own benefit?
So far, it seems like it's our benefit.
Well, I do think that it is important to note the difference in Donald Trump's approach in foreign policy.
Look, for example, you go back to Code Pink, you go back to Rosie O'Donnell, people talking about in the Middle East, right?
Donald Trump, when he was speaking in Saudi Arabia, he gave a landmark speech.
Basically, the way forward is, we're not going to tell you how to live your life so long as you don't try and do that here with us.
If we know that there's no threat, We keep ourselves safe.
We need to be done with nation-building, right?
That was the basis of a lot of these wars.
And I'll tell you this.
Back then, I was relatively pro-war in Iraq, and that's because I was Canadian, and everyone just talked about how they hated America, so I had to be a contrarian.
But not because of the—I would say it's a lapse in judgment now, not because of the WMDs.
Those existed, by the way, just not nuclear weapons.
You can read about it in the New York Times.
Because there's no winning.
There's no winning in these other nations.
So the best we can do is, okay, if we're not going to do that, let's try and let you know that you can have your way of life so long as you don't try and intrude on ours.
That means being tough on terrorism, but we're going to take a different approach.
And by the way, he steals this issue from the left because they weren't doing what Donald Trump is doing.
They were calling them freedom fighters.
Just two days ago, here we have a clip, Saudi Arabia, he gave this speech making really clear the departure from our foreign policy path that we've been taking.
Before our eyes, a new generation of leaders is transcending the ancient conflicts of tired divisions of the past and forging a future where the Middle East is defined by commerce, not chaos, where it exports technology, not terrorism, and where people of different nations, religions, and creeds are building cities together, not bombing each other out of existence.
We don't want that.
This great transformation has not come from Western intervention.
Western interventionalists who are flying people in beautiful planes giving you lectures on how to live and how to govern your own affairs.
In the end, the so-called nation builders wrecked far more nations than they built, and the interventionalists were intervening in complex societies.
That they did not even understand themselves.
Peace, prosperity and progress ultimately came not from a radical rejection of your heritage, but rather from embracing your national traditions and embracing that same heritage that you love so dearly.
*Cheering*
He played that!
That's real!
He got people in Saudi Arabia to celebrate the gayest song ever.
And I heard four guys were tapping their foot, they were shown to the top of the building.
Yes, but I will say that song has really gained some traction in the Arab world.
It's fun to stare at the YMCA.
It's fun to stare at the YMCA.
You have everything for a month to enjoy.
You can hang out with all the moon.
Hello, Akbar.
No.
Well...
Well, you're not supposed to be on your phone driving anyway.
So...
That was beautiful.
I will say this.
He's speaking to the people of the Middle East, of Saudi Arabia there.
They are going to embrace that.
Okay, you want us to keep our way of life?
We're not just talking about the politicians here.
We're talking about the people.
They do feel as though...
Whether it's true or not, that the United States has tried to be this sort of nation-building empire.
Not colonizing, but trying to thrust our Western way of life upon them.
And you need to understand that a lot of those people...
Now, I think it's backwards.
I think it's perverted.
I think Sharia law is awful.
I think most of the values are reprehensible.
But if those people embrace that...
The alternative is what?
Is destabilizing?
Is more war?
So this is actually, I think, going to resonate with those people quite a bit.
It's why you saw a lot, by the way, of Middle Eastern Americans, Arab Americans voting for Donald Trump because...
Ultimately, they don't want war, but they didn't trust the Republican or Democrat party that there was going to be war no matter what.
Yeah, for the last 40 or 50 years, one of the complaints that we've heard over and over again is because they're attacking us because we've attacked them.
Right.
And I'm not saying that that's necessarily even true in every case, but this starts to remove that.
It starts to say, hey, we want you guys to be successful and we'll work together on partnerships, but we're going to kind of let you do your thing.
And it gives you a leg to stand on where it's like, hey, hey, weeks into that olive branch, if anything happens...
That goes away, right?
That's the leverage.
Also, Donald Trump, again, just sort of like when we're talking about made in America, manufacturing the United States, the working class, he stole that base from the left.
Right now, Governor Whitmer, Michigan, the worst governor in the country.
They nationally went for Donald Trump.
Locally, they'll go for Democrats.
Nationally, he stole that issue from under them.
He's doing the same thing now with the left's anti-war narrative, but he's making it pro-American.
As I said, my country, this eight years, as under the banner of women rights, human rights, democracy, has been occupied.
So as long as these occupation forces will be in Afghanistan, the worst civil war will be.
Because their government, US and NATO, supporting these terrorists, these warlords, and also these now negotiating with Taliban.
If you want to liberate Afghan women and Afghan men and Afghan children, you stop the war.
You end the war.
Okay.
Arrest, can we kiss the church for war and crime?
Arrest, can we kiss the church for war and crime?
It's a form of protest.
It happens to be a violent, slightly violent one, but that's what we went to Iraq for, to create democracy.
We have protest here, so mission accomplished.
Okay.
Your wish is his command.
There you go.
Really quickly, let's go to Governor Whitmer.
She's live on, you guys know, you guys know, I hosted a rally at the Capitol to protest her.
COVID policy with nursing homes.
Let's see.
They're grooming her for a national run.
700,000 people could see their health care terminated as a result of these changes.
We know that, as I've talked to people in my state, there are a lot of moms who've got...
Children who get their health care through Medicaid, they're worried that they won't be able to take care of their families if they themselves as the parent lose their health care.
I mean, this is going to have profound ramifications.
And people will die as a result of this.
Oh, there it is.
People will die.
Lock down or people will die.
This is the lady who wouldn't let you go out on your own boat in the lake, but you could go to the weed shop.
People will die.
Gotta get the jab.
People will die.
Shut down mom and pop shops and local farmers, grocers.
People will die.
We'll die, but keep Costco open.
People will die.
It's always the sake of the children.
People will die.
Okay, why would they lose their health care?
These new changes would specifically affect career unemployed people who have the ability to contribute.
You know, the goal of Medicare, by the way, should be to get as many people off of it as possible.
Not include as many people as possible.
That's a fundamental difference in worldview.
They're not talking about pulling They're talking about making sure that we verify the address, making sure that no one who doesn't actually exist or non-citizens receive benefits, and making sure that people have some kind of an incentive to get back into the workforce, not remain perpetually unemployed, including, in some instances, by the way, for decades, for decades.
But let's hear what she says, because people will die.
It's not food benefits.
I mean, do you have the means to fill in the gaps with state funds here?
The state can't supplant the federal dollars.
That's the problem here.
That's part of why we're calling on our Congress people on both sides of the aisle to fight this.
It means that their constituents will lose their health care or their food assistance.
It means that their constituents...
So hold on a second.
She just talked about SNAP.
Can you fill in the gap?
Hey, hold on a second.
Weren't some people, that's right, myself included, saying, hey, you got to trim the fat like Coca-Cola?
From SNAP?
Oh, sorry.
You said that was a violation of fundamental human rights.
Twinkies?
Ho-hos?
Fruit roll-ups?
If you can't cut that from SNAP, then guess what happens?
Fewer people get SNAP.
They believe there's a never-ending supply of you, the American workers' tax dollars.
So, no, you can't cut Coca-Cola from SNAP.
No, you can't cut jug food from SNAP, which is meant to be a very temporary, necessity-based program for nourishment.
Right?
Oh, no, no.
Hold on a second.
You can't have work requirements.
You can't have drug testing requirements.
You can't have some kind of a time limit on able-bodied Americans collecting their check or health care at the public.
Well, what happens?
What happens?
Something like $35-plus trillion debt?
Why don't you work with us and cut some of this fat?
From Snap!
Coca-Cola has to be there?
So now you're going to lobby your Congress people, as you see, to make sure that Snap doesn't go...
So you're holding us hostage, and I mean at gunpoint, meaning that if we don't pay our taxes, people with guns come and take us away.
If we don't fund luxury items and junk food that we don't buy for ourselves for Snap recipients, or if we say we don't want to fund with our tax dollars as we go to work, you know, 40, 50, 60-hour work weeks.
Able-bodied Americans who choose to suckle at the teat.
You're saying, no, no, we have to do it.
It has to remain in perpetuity with no changes, and we have no say in it.
What are they proposing?
Soda and snap, and no rope requirements.
Or, in some cases, proof of citizenship for some of our social safety nets.
And you better do it or people will die.
It's your fault people die.
It's your fault if you don't give your child puberty blockers.
They're gonna commit suicide.
You don't want your child to commit suicide, do you?
It's your fault that this person might be kicked off Medicare.
Hey, it's your fault if this person can't get their RC Cola.
You don't want them to feel shamed for living in poverty for 15 years, do you?
Why do you want to kill people?
It's all so tiresome and she's a bitch.
It's also a very bad argument to use.
People could die.
You let people drive in cars, people could die.
You let people fly in airplanes, people could die.
You let people have firearms, people could die.
Everything involves the potential for people dying.
You do that all of the time.
That's a really bad argument.
It doesn't make any points at all worth considering.
The media ran with their cutting these programs.
That's not the same thing.
Making a work requirement, yes, it will reduce the number of dollars going in, but that's not going across the board and saying everybody's getting a cut.
That's not what they're doing.
They're just saying, hey, you have to make it sustainable.
Fine.
How about this?
If we don't make changes, people could die.
Because it will go away.
We won't be able to fund it forever.
Right.
So, we need to make changes, otherwise people will die.
Your turn.
Yeah, Governor, you slept around in college.
People could die.
Ah!
Bitch!
So, hold on a second.
We can't cut SNAP benefits, meaning Coca-Cola, meaning Funyuns, meaning Swanson's.
Who are they aiming with that?
Yeah.
We can't have work requirements.
We can't have drug testing.
We can't have time limits at all on all of our social safety nets, which, by the way, we can't have closed borders.
We can't prevent illegal aliens from getting on said social safety nets and welfare benefits to the tune of $150 to $450 billion a year.
Now you're opposed to Donald Trump.
Taking the position of ending nation building, and that's funded wars to the tune of $8 trillion.
Well, let's add it all up.
What's your solution?
Oh, that's right.
More taxes?
Okay.
Yes.
Okay.
Tax every dollar over a million dollars earned.
Every single one.
You still can't pay it.
It's not even close.
What else you got?
Because you still have Dr. Pepper in Snap.
It's almost like...
It's not about politics.
It's like they really hate Donald Trump.
It's like they really hate the American worker.
And Trump is for what the American worker is.
Right.
Yeah, so they hate...
It really is.
I laugh at that phrase, Trump derangement center, but it's a phenomenon.
The hatred.
They really do.
It doesn't matter what he does.
It's really insane.
And I always say it's because...
He embodies everything the left sees as evil, as being a white, Christian, blonde-haired, blue-eyed billionaire old man.
Right.
All those.
Nobody brings that up.
That is the human form of their devil.
Yeah, there's this revilement scale from them where it's like, okay, you look at the left.
How much do they despise you?
All right.
Do you work for a living?
It directly correlates with your usefulness for them.
When the left says work for the working class, what they mean is people below the poverty line.
Who are happy working minimum wage jobs with no ambition.
And let's be honest, there are people like that.
Doesn't mean they have less value as a human being, but they have less value to society in contributing.
Is that okay?
Is that okay to say because we build society based on agreed upon value that our members contribute.
Their hatred for you correlates directly with your usefulness to them.
And the more useful you become in your own life.
To your actual community, the less useful you are to Democrats, right?
Do you work for a living?
Well, you're a little less useful to them.
They need that voting base.
They need the people they can scare with.
People will die.
Medicare, Medicaid, people on welfare.
Okay, they need to be able to pay into those votes.
Are you here legally?
Okay, they don't like you.
20 million, that's a whole new voting bloc.
They want to give them a direct path to citizenship.
Do you pay taxes?
Oh boy, if you pay taxes, that means that you are working, that you are contributing, that you are on the books, and you very, very likely at this point vote Republican.
You're less useful to them.
Hey, have you, do you have a family?
My God, is your family, my God, heterosexual with children?
You're less useful to them at this point.
That's cisnormative, heteronormative, patriarchal oppression.
Okay?
Let's look, hey, do you own a business?
You're less useful to them.
Look at COVID, right?
They're going to shut down your business.
We're going to keep Costco open because those people are useful to them because they're too big to fail a lot of these companies and they pay giant taxes and of course they're subsidized by the welfare system.
Coca-Cola loves the welfare system, by the way, because your tax dollars...
Send them how many?
$10 billion a year?
We had the numbers that go through SNAP.
All right?
Have you done better where you're in a higher income bracket and you can provide for your family more effectively?
Meaning, are you more useful to your household?
Are you more useful to your community?
Is it a quarter million dollars a year?
They hate you more.
And if you hit all of these, you are a white, self-educated male who has a successful family.
You pay taxes.
And now earn a six-figure income?
My God, you are completely useless to the Democrat Party, and the likelihood of you voting for them is next to none, so they hate you.
They don't care about you.
It's crazy that they have those on welfare, those abusing the system, that's the Democrat, okay, base, and then the ultra, ultra wealthy.
Everyone in between who's actually struggling to get by and actually living paycheck to paycheck, paying taxes, or running small businesses, It is overwhelmingly conservative.
They overwhelmingly reject the Democrat Party.
Why do you think that is?
You could set your clock to it on election day.
You know who's going to be voting for Democrats versus Republicans.
It'll shift a little bit in that middle group, but that is the base.
Of the Republican Party.
That is the base of the conservative movement, is you, the American worker.
That's why we say, hey, you know what?
You shouldn't be funding SNAP.
Hey, you know what?
You shouldn't be funding inmate transgender surgery.
Hey, you know what?
You shouldn't be funding the ad for the army with Amy and two moms.
That seems like an overreach of government.
They always tell you, yeah, you should.
Yeah, you should, because you can afford it.
They hate you.
They hate you.
I tell you what, we don't hate you.
We love you so much.
We've actually been doing some.
We're going to bring it back.
We call this...
You've heard of Super Chat.
It's where you send us money.
This is reverse.
It's reverse Super Chat, where we give you money.
Alright, explain this one, Gerald, because...
You're the CEO, and I'm not the math guy.
Well, look, so the folks at Pure Talk, they wanted to give back to our audience, and so we thought that this was the perfect way to do it.
So our reverse Super Chat, we're giving away 50 free Rumble Premium subscriptions right now, just gifted in the chat.
Thanks to our friends at Pure Talk.
So go to puretalk.com slash Crowder and get 50% off your first month.
And you actually...
You're very picky when it comes to phones.
I will tell you this.
I don't do libraries in the show.
We cut all kinds of silly commercials.
But I will say, I use them.
And before them, I can say, I was with Verizon.
It was terrible.
I have much better service.
I pay far less.
Well, in this case, I'll tell you, I don't pay anything for the monthly.
You would pay far less.
I would pay.
And I will say, we're going to do this one.
You call, you get an American on customer service within the minute, and that is worth its weight in gold.
Don't make the mistake that I made, though, when I was transferring my phone from Verizon to Pure Talk.
Don't do that while you are on your Verizon phone.
Yes, you have to use a different phone or otherwise, because they're transferring that line, and it goes dead.
They're going to hit this setting and...
Hello?
Lyle?
I have a friend nearby.
Lyle?
Hello?
Bob?
Really quickly, so if you are one of the people who got the gifted sub, make sure you take a picture of it, throw it up on Instagram on X, and make sure you tag us in it.
We want to see that.
But welcome to the party, pal!
You don't have to go anywhere when we go to Rumble Premium.
There you go.
That's been like inception of Super Chat.
It's Reverse Super Chat.
Yeah, I always have to specify.
It's not Pure Talk's fault that I'm an idiot.
No, it's not.
Do you remember how angry I was?
I went back to her and was like, I can't change my phone!
And then I think it was you who said, wait, you weren't calling them from your only phone, were you?
I'm like, I see you.
And then I see the little three dots about to text for about five minutes.
Like your grandmother who got her first phone learning how to text.
Just get back a text, M. What does that mean?
What is this?
Okay.
Here's something I definitely wanted to talk about.
So this is being recirculated.
We talked about this.
It's an older study.
But this is about the fact that science now, and by the way, a lot of different sciences, and certainly even if you look here at these scientists who study the archaeological record, but you guys have lived this.
Science is a religion.
And they trust the science crowd is a cult.
It can so easily be perverted and warped.
I mean, it was science.
These are soft sciences that said the virus came from a wet market.
It was science that said that if you took the jab, you couldn't get the virus.
It was science that said children are going to die en masse because of COVID.
It's science that said Florida would no longer be a thing.
As far as global warming, we went through some of those biggest myths that have since been debunked.
Just by still being alive, you've seen that Al Gore was full of crap.
A lot of science where people say, if you don't trust it, then you're anti-scientific.
I am pro-scientific method.
I am anti the science cult today.
Because many of these people, they've built a new idol.
And they will follow it blindly.
And a lot of this is anti-God, and I will get into exactly how feminism is anti-God, anti-view that you were created in God's image, anti the idea that men and women are fundamentally different, right?
It's science that says gender is a social construct, even though every single scientific study that we have conducted shows there is no such thing as someone born with a male brain and a female body and vice versa.
It's not a thing.
And that, of course, is anti-human.
And it's anti-your Christian worldview.
So this is a two-year-old story that has been recirculated, and it supposedly upends this notion that men hunted and women gathered.
So even the things that you've accepted just are like, well, yeah, that makes sense.
No, no, no.
You're wrong because there's some new science foreshadowing here.
It sucks.
It's a crappy article.
And that's why we're picking it.
Because it has been presented to the world.
I think this recirculated on Reddit as though this is now settled science.
It is the exact opposite of that.
The article argues that we should basically upend gender roles because some women at some point happened to maybe hunt.
And by the way, the numbers they present are wrong.
I will flat out dishonest.
You could argue a lie.
Here's a quote from NPR.
The popular narrative of man is the sole, or at least almost exclusive.
Hunter has also been used implicitly and even explicitly to argue for policies that prioritize men's role as the natural breadwinner.
Your rights, fundamental civil rights, are rooted in human rights.
Human rights are rooted in natural rights.
Nature says that men have historically been the primary breadwinner.
You can also see it today by the fact that the huge majority, overwhelming majority of women, will not marry a man who makes less than them.
There are exceptions.
Understand that we're going to be speaking in some generalities here.
I'm not saying that there was never a woman who threw a spear at a rabbit.
That's not what I'm saying.
I am.
They're hard to hit.
By the way, I've never heard that argument before in my life from anybody in modern times not making it in kind of an academic kind of way.
I have never heard somebody say, hey, why do you believe in traditional gender roles?
And go, well, we were the hunters.
I've never heard that argument before.
The point, though, is that men have procured resources and women refined them.
And so back in the day, that might be a wildebeest and the woman cooks it.
And today, that man goes out and earns the primary income and the woman takes care and manages that income with the household.
I get it.
And that makes perfect sense.
But for me, that's...
That conversation is not happening online.
People aren't going back that far to kind of figure that out.
What they're saying is, well, you can have kids and you have qualities that make it to where you can be a phenomenal mother and raise these kids in a way that man can't.
That argument I hear a lot.
Well, the argument now from feminists, if you were to believe this, here's the conclusion that many people are presenting.
Yeah, just so you know, almost half, like 30% of the hunting was done in tribal society were actually women.
I'll get to why that's entirely wrong.
But that's what you would believe if you believed this was science.
Yeah.
Well, they're not only rewriting history, they're rewriting biology now.
Yes, exactly.
You know what I mean?
Enough is enough.
Every time I see a trans, what is it, woman, a guy run over a girl, run over a girl athlete, I laugh my ass off.
Yes, yes, exactly.
I laugh, my apotomy loves it.
You know why?
Because we all know that's a guy running over a woman.
And I've changed my opinion on that.
Andrew Wilson, I will say this.
People say, have you ever changed about a lot of things?
I'm like, I think it's wrong, and I'll point out that it's wrong, but I think that the women who voted for this, you guys have to live with it.
You have to police your own ranks.
The only reason you have biological men in your sports is because of this kinds of science, and women are tricked by it.
And feminine has been on that trajectory forever, to the point it went full circle, and now it's anti-woman.
Yeah, absolutely.
So this gives us, that's a good point, this brings us to the who in this, the people behind this study.
No surprise.
Very, very, very woke professors.
So the article is, it's mostly an appeal to emotion sort of fallacy.
One of them, Kimberly Hamlin, she's from Miami University.
It says, this idea that somehow women are naturally preordained to be caretakers and maternal figures, whether they like it or not, most do, often underlies policies that effectively, quote, force motherhood on women.
Oh no.
Including policies that restrict access to abortion and contraception.
Okay, a couple things here.
First off, can you smell the horse shit?
Second, force motherhood on women.
Force the single unique biological function.
It is the only one exclusive to women about which there can be no argument.
Our only equivalent is to pee standing up without it dribbling.
Assuming, you know, you're young enough.
Force motherhood on women.
Okay.
Let's start with that.
And then restricting access to abortion and contraception.
Wasn't this about setting tribes and cave people?
What does that have to do with Hobby Lobby?
By the way, name me a policy that does that.
Remember the giant outrage over Hobby Lobby?
They're restricting contraception for their own employees.
It took me about 40 seconds.
I go, wait a second, they're offering 16 out of the 21. Not only was it not true, there are, I think, 21 available birth...
And they said, we don't want to, as a Christian company, provide what we believe are abortificants.
So, you can go work someone else, or you can pick one of the 16 that is being funded through your insurance.
A very generous insurance program at Hobby Lobby.
They saw that as a violation of women's rights.
So, because the present is a lie, and people are waking up to it being a lie, including young women, they have to lie about the past.
Hamlin also said, I think that next to the myth that God made a woman from man's rib to be his helper, the myth that man is the hunter and woman is the gatherer is probably the second most enduring myth that naturalizes the inferiority of women.
What a catch.
Yeah, she seems like a real sweetheart.
Yeah.
This is what happens when all you do is go to school.
Right.
And you don't get a job and go out in the real world.
Absolutely.
You can come up with all these horse shit theories.
Yep.
And feminism, you ran out of it.
You went as far as equal pay.
We agree with all that shit.
But now, see, now your mission's over.
Now you're making up shit.
Yes, exactly.
Okay?
So shave your mustache.
Sit down and shut up.
Yes.
And you know what really bothers them?
When they say, the naturalized, the inferiority of women.
We're going to get to cavemen.
We're going to get to tribes.
And you can see it today.
Here's the thing that does often bother feminists.
And I had this conversation with my current woman, who has a fiery attitude.
Current woman?
You said that like P. Diddy?
Well, that's not what he means.
Let's hope they don't get the hotel footage.
Now, at first she didn't like this, but she understands it and actually sees it.
I see it as more romantic.
I said, yeah, I don't need you for anything.
Men don't need women.
Now, we need a woman if we want a family.
And by the way, as a Christian, I believe that's a great thing.
A family.
A marriage.
That's a wonderful thing.
A man finds what is good.
Outside of that, men don't need women to take care of themselves.
This isn't naturalizing inferiority through patriarchy.
It's a biological reality, right?
That's why men will have a mattress and a TV and they'll live in a studio even if they're wealthy.
Women, historically, if you look at the right, they needed men to survive.
Men need women if they want to find what we believe reflects What God wants for us, the image of God, a family, right?
Be fruitful and multiply.
We need a woman to do that, and I think you should pursue that.
Women need a man to protect them and keep them alive through the winter.
Let me ask you this.
George and I were talking about this, George the Greek.
You see a shack in a mountain where someone lives by themselves, right?
What do you assume?
Ben and Jerry.
You assume, to be honest, you assume men, perhaps a witch.
Outside of that, you never once go, that must be a woman.
Living off the land by herself.
If someone says this person lives alone in the woods, you assume it.
Why?
Because a man can do it.
Women can't.
Add to that marauding rapists, women need men to survive.
Not in the modern world.
You're slightly removed from it.
You're only a few mils away from us going back to that chaos.
Men only need women if they want a family.
Here's another one.
Randy Haas involved with this study.
We're going to go through all of this.
Wayne State said everybody had just taken this man-the-hunter hypothesis for granted, so no one really decided to evaluate it.
That's not true.
People have.
You didn't.
You cherry-picked, and you lied.
So the study was also led by this professor, Kara Wall.
This is from Seattle Pacific University.
And this person, again, I'm just showing you the who, before we get to the info, retweeted these posts from other woke professors.
Going to take a short break tomorrow from thinking about the impending Supreme Court ruling that fetus rights are greater than the rights of fully grown women, girls, to talk about the fact that patriarchy is not natural.
Hey, by the way, scientifically, how do you make the argument, scientifically, that a 6-, 7-, 8-month-old fetus Does not have rights.
Does not have human rights.
How do you make the scientific argument that that is not a human go?
You can't use a single textbook from biology, can you?
Size, okay.
That's what determines rights.
Level of development, okay.
That's what determines rights.
Location.
What is it?
How do you make the scientific argument?
No, no.
It's an emotional one, and you know it.
Also posted, I am launching the revised, now all online version of my race and racism course today with a race, racism, and health in the COVID-19 era segment.
Here is your regular reminder that patriarchy is not natural.
It is completely natural.
It is what's best.
It is what protects you.
It is patriarchy that feeds you and clothes you.
And this kind of horseshit is why my transgender alter ego, C. Matheson, was published at an academic conference.
I wrote the dumbest thing I could possibly think up.
Fat pride is a method of self-care in the era of Donald Trump.
And they praised my thesis and my sweater.
You can go and watch it.
And this is why we shouldn't be sending young people to college.
This is also what this person, this professor, scientist in question, has posted.
This person...
Called this video of a woke January 6th speech at Vine's inauguration perfection.
Oh, shit.
I can't hit the play.
Oh, no.
You can't hit play?
No.
Did we freeze?
All right.
Well, there's a black chick who's wearing the visor that LeVar Burton wears in Star Trek.
And she's like, white men.
So there you go.
All right.
Yeah, I lost control of the system right now.
Really?
I can't hit any buttons.
You can't even switch cameras?
No.
All right.
Look, guys.
I'm doing this without a net.
Can we still hit overlays?
No.
We lost everything.
I don't care.
I hit this button.
Are we still going out?
Yes.
We're still going out.
Hey, guys.
You show your support.
You let us know.
We can't stop now, can we?
This train's just...
It's just Steven right now.
We can end the stream, though, eventually, right?
Yes, I can end the stream.
Okay, okay.
So hold on a second.
Let me go through this.
Here's the what.
Here's the study.
They try and argue that 33%, and if you can't see the overlays right now, the links are in the description.
We just do that so you can visually see it, but you can always click the link.
They try and argue that 33% of women, Throughout human history, according to the archaeological record and people who study anthropology, 33% of women hunted big game.
Okay, that's not true.
They make that claim in the article.
They omit the fact that most of the profiled societies are missing hunting data altogether, and they manipulate the sample size.
So, look, if you want to argue that you think women should be in hunting roles...
If you want to argue that you think women are more effective, I would present to you weight classes.
But you can make that argument, but you cannot argue that the historical record in any way substantiates this claim.
But they do.
And people believe it's science.
It's a cult.
Let me give you the numbers here.
So 391 societies were profiled.
63%, sorry, 63, meaning only 16% had any data on hunting.
So that's 16% of the 391.
So it starts with 391.
If they were to give you a number, 391 societies profiled, what is the evidence that women hunted big game?
It's about 3% of women ever hunted big game.
But what they do is they say, we're only going to take the ones that have data on hunting, so now we're down to 16%.
And only 50 of those had any data on women hunting.
That's about 12%.
I think it was 21 of them had 5% of women hunting small game.
You get down to the number, 3% of women.
The starting point.
391 societies profiled.
3% of women potentially hunted big game.
But they tell you 33% approximately hunted big game.
Oh, we're back in business?
Oh, hey, buttons are...
Hey, maybe now we have...
Hey!
There you go.
Hey, there we go.
All right.
By the way...
This is science, where they go, by the way, we know that these women were hunting big game because some of them were buried with arrowheads.
Are you shitting me?
What if that could be a chieftain's wife?
That would be like 8,000 years ago.
They're like, yeah, that sounds about right.
Yeah.
Now, the reason for this, of course, the reason, like they say, patriarchy...
It's evil.
It's unnatural.
And most people think, they've been very effective.
You go, patriarchy?
Oh, isn't that where like a man beats his wife's ass because, you know, she didn't make a ham sandwich?
No, no.
Patriarchy is how societies have existed for a long time, where it's based around a primarily male figure who makes decisions, you know, the male chief, right?
And it's usually, here's something else, if they don't tell you about patriarchy, it's the reason that over 90% of workplace deaths are men.
Men are largely expendable.
So men go out and hunt because it's a dangerous endeavor.
They do it to protect the women.
And they're expendable because especially if a woman is going to continue the tribe, they're going to be pregnant for nine months.
Let me also, before I get to this, if females hunted big game throughout society, just as much as men or as prevalent, there'd be no prostitutes.
You've heard that, right?
The oldest profession in existence?
This has been going on for a long time.
Women trade sex for protection, for resources.
Because they can't procure them if forced to compete with men.
If women could go out and just bag a bear or a deer as effectively as men and protect it as effectively as men, protect it from other men, there would be no prostitutes.
It's that simple.
But here's why.
They say, we did this because the hunter-gatherer paradigm has prevented the recognition of contributions by women.
To hunting.
Well, first off, that's not true.
You're being dishonest.
And second, there is some more modern-day evidence indicating the opposite as well.
A woman steps out of her car, and then look at that.
A tiger.
Gotcha, bitch!
To be fair on that one, most men wouldn't fare.
Better.
Yeah, that was a blindside.
The only way that men would fare better is they wouldn't indignantly get out of a car on a safari with signs saying tiger presents.
Don't get out of the car.
Don't get out of the car.
I'm going to do it.
That's why we don't ask for directions.
Or maybe that conversation was like, I can't even live.
I'm going to get out there.
Yeah, take your chances with the tiger.
I was joking!
Proving a point and mauled by a tiger.
Man, I got a feeling she didn't get away.
Actually, well, you know what?
This is a perfect opportunity.
We have more to talk about with this and chat Thursday.
If you are not...
Hey, we need a new TriCaster, so please do consider.
Join Rumble Premium right there.
We're funded by viewers like you.
See, look, that didn't even work.
This is pure crap.
You click that button below.
Try it one more time.
One more time.
All right, we're going to Rebel Premium.
Everyone else, just go to Tim Pool.
Go to Tim Pool.
Now, now, end it.
No!
Set your o'haw!
*Pewds*
Captain Morgan.
I think you should try these tampons to fix your broken part-hole.
I whittled them just this smart.
Thanks.
Aye.
Put him in bed with a captain, Sean!
Put him in bed with a captain, Sean!
Let's check your hoo-ha!
Export Selection