Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 21, 2024 - Louder with Crowder

01:04:47

BREAKING: Russia Launches ICBM for First Time in History - What Happens Next?

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Do you experience anti-Soviet thinking, overvaluing freedom, or the Lucians of reformism?
	This is telltale signs of sluggish schizophrenia.
	Ask your doctor about Gulag.
	Do you have hopes of freedom?
	Gulag.
	Do you believe that life matters?
	Gulag.
	Do you have dissenting opinion?
	Take Gulag.
	Do you say right now to yourself, I have broken no law, nor am I political dissident.
	You get extra Gulag.
	Side effects may include a Gulag.
	And in rare cases, moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
	See if Gulag is right for you.
	Click Rumble Premium and join now for $99 annually or $9.99 a month to get the entirely ad-free experience and exclusive content from Lotter with Crowder, Nick DiPaolo, Mr. Guns N' Gear, Donald Trump Jr., and an ever-expanding roster of content, creators, and free speech.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Busy morning.
	Busy morning because we have a lot to get to.
	We have Mark Mitchell on the show today of Rasmussen Reports, Rasmussen Polling.
	You may be familiar.
	He's the head honcho over there.
	Got it closest in this last election and then, of course, was immediately accused of colluding.
	From the leftists who got it wrong.
	I haven't heard that yet.
	So we're going to talk with him, and he actually believes that there are some people.
	He has a strong case to be made.
	He'll be on the show today to talk about how some other pollsters may have actually been colluding Iowa.
	And we also have an exclusive, Malcolm Undercover, a leaked email from NASA. Today you'll see it for the very first time where they are very, over there at NASA, afraid of Donald Trump and what will happen in our space program with DEI. That's a real email.
	Still.
	So we'll get to it.
	Russia, Ukraine, some stuff is going on.
	Some people are saying World War III. As a new development, did you know this, when we talk about this, that Putin has said, this is according to Reuters, he may be able to sit down and de-escalate and talk about a ceasefire, but only with Donald Trump.
	So let me ask you, do you think that that means Donald Trump is a puppet of Putin, or does Donald Trump deserve some credit if he helps us avoid World War III? Thank you very much.
	We have some predictions to make.
	We also have a 7 plus 1 because David Hogg has hosted an actual conference asking young men what they want and trying to woo them back to the Democratic Party.
	They said more Hogg.
	Yeah.
	Wait, no.
	I'm not a young man, so.
	He's the leader.
	So we'll be talking about David Hogg.
	He is of age now, so it's perfectly fine to insult him, which means at some point today you may see this.
	Head on over to Rumble.
	I don't know why you're watching on YouTube.
	It's a live show, weekdays, 10 a.m., nothing up our sleeves, and including tomorrow, if you're on Rumble Premium.
	All right.
	Captain Morgan, number two, CEO, how are you?
	I'm doing well.
	How are you?
	I'm good.
	I'm good.
	We have so much to get to.
	We'll just go fast, then.
	And then we have, of course, you know him, you love him.
	You hear this?
	December 1st, Avenue Tattoo Studio, Lawton, Oklahoma.
	Mr. Feierstein, how are you?
	I'm good.
	I like it raw.
	Let's go.
	Hey, hey.
	There are kids watching.
	By the way.
	Onions.
	This is a strong...
	I hate vegetables.
	You're crazy.
	I only like onions if they're grilled or sauteed.
	Comment below.
	Raw onions?
	Ugh.
	Ugh.
	You have pickles?
	Sauteed sucks.
	No, I like pickles.
	I said raw onions.
	I was very specific, and I chose my words carefully.
	Josh and I are aligned on this.
	Sauteed sucks, bro.
	What's the matter with you?
	Yeah, well, go form your own raw onion-nado, which is at least two worse, too, on that show.
	And pay your fair share.
	I won't.
	Right off the bat, we have an exclusive here.
	This is an email that we captured circulating from NASA. This is Mug Club Undercover.
	All right. - Right.
	Why are you laughing?
	It's not like Jay Varma locking you down while he's having sex parties, or the DOJ representative saying, yeah, we're simply trying to weaponize the DOJ against Donald Trump.
	We have the Diddy Party list?
	But this is a lot of fun.
	This is, yeah.
	So, this is an email that was sent to employees at the Johnson Space Center, and it included a section titled, What Trump's Second Term Could Mean for DEI. And I believe...
	And they're very concerned about DEI. They're very concerned about people being on the chopping block.
	They're very concerned that some people will be negatively affected.
	And actually, we can confirm, most heavily affected immediately were the promptly fired, not-so-hidden figures.
	They were...
	We didn't even change it.
	No, we didn't change it.
	I don't even know...
	Wait, what?
	I don't even know if I believe that there was that much discrimination.
	Someone's going like, everyone knows fat black women can't do math.
	Like, what?
	Is that like a stereotype of, like, engineers?
	Yeah, I don't know.
	Or, you know, astrophysicists?
	Are they racist?
	We got rockets!
	Maybe they just didn't want to be yelled at.
	Imagine them as a challenger, like, I told you, it's about the thrust, mother!
	You get what you get!
	That's what you get!
	I told him.
	I told him.
	Ugh, go back to your graph calculator.
	Mine smells boobs.
	Now, this is from the actual email circulating at NASA. In case you wondered, like, hey, we've told you this week, $500 billion a year lost in fraud.
	Now, I don't mean $500 billion a year maybe misspent or maybe over budget.
	I mean...
	Vaporized.
	Gone.
	Every year.
	You may not know this in the United States budget.
	A lot of it with the military, too.
	When you take that into, and then you sort of cross-reference that with what you're about to hear being circulated from NASA, officially, off the record, I think.
	You go, oh, maybe the government's priorities aren't in the right place.
	So here's what they wrote.
	They wrote, those who support the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion are rightly concerned about the impact of Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. presidential election.
	I love how they have to specify like which election in which year because they know how disengaged some of their career lackeys are.
	Okay.
	It is clear the incoming Trump administration will almost certainly escalate the growing backlash against DEI in the workplace.
	Hold on a second.
	The backlash is from the American public because they cannot, I would imagine, comment below, can you imagine a place or think of a place where Where race or gender could be less relevant than NASA? What percentage should it enter into the equation?
	Let me ask you, if you're the one in the rocket going up, how much do you care about the melanin and the level of the skin to the guy or woman or Z hitting the button?
	That's the backlash.
	The backlash, this is when you see all these emails, when you see all these statements, when you see these freakouts, they are freaking out against you.
	You're the backlash.
	So good for you.
	Keep it up.
	Even under the most pessimistic scenario, Many forms of DEI will remain lawful under a Trump presidency.
	DEI programs that do not confer a preference on legally protected groups are likely to remain legally safe for the foreseeable future, which means they are going to do everything they can to still try and implement DEI. By the way, something that's very important when you're talking about DEI, that also means doing away with performance metrics in the workplace.
	You understand that, right?
	You can only have one or the other.
	You can't have DEI. You can't have enforced outcomes and also base it on performance metrics.
	It's not possible.
	For proof, see affirmative action.
	Email also told people about some special DEI-focused events and upcoming workshops, including, this is NASA, Parents of Transgender Kids.
	What is that?
	That's an event?
	Yeah, that's a workshop.
	That's a workshop?
	Okay.
	And then this one, belonging with beverages and allies.
	I don't even know what that means.
	Sounds like we're getting drunk, though.
	It does.
	It sounds kind of cool.
	With parents of transgender kids.
	The drunker I get, the more like a lady you look.
	Yes.
	Wait, this is NASA? This is NASA. I want fierce competition over performance.
	You know what?
	How about this?
	Whatever SpaceX is doing, do that.
	They're catching rockets, okay?
	Like, do whatever they're doing.
	And by the way, it's the first African-American rocketeer.
	One small simple man.
	One giant leap.
	Four mankind.
	Just keep it in my baby.
	Damn, that thing looked flat from the bottom.
	Think this thing really made of cheese?
	Hey man, listen to this!
	Okay, so I still...
	That's funny, but I wasn't able to set it up because Tool Man...
	I was talking about Elon Musk as the first African-American.
	I thought you skipped that.
	No, that was...
	Should I admonish myself?
	That was, yes, you should.
	I don't know.
	He paused.
	He paused.
	No, no, I think admonished because there's a little setup with Armstrong and it's...
	That was the whole historical footage of when they retroactively tried to change Neil Armstrong with Louis.
	Louis Armstrong.
	When I said African-American, I was talking about Elon Musk.
	The point is, NASA... SpaceX is kicking your ass.
	Research also said it's very important to note that if you go to Stephen's X account, you can see the entire memo.
	Yes, you can see the entire memo on my X account.
	Of course, you can go to ladderwithcredit.com, link in the description, where you can read the memo.
	It is...
	Why are you laughing?
	Sorry.
	That tool man screwed up?
	I'm seeing video of a ballistic missile over here from CNN. It's hilarious.
	That's not what people say.
	No, that's sarcasm.
	Did you guys miss that?
	Are we not a comedy show anymore?
	What do you lose your mind laughing over?
	Stillbirth?
	You're a really disgusting...
	Wait, let's not promote the full letter being on social media and watch CNN. Yes, I didn't want to bring up CNN. Have you seen Gerald's favorite comedy, Oppenheimer?
	I laughed until I cried.
	He does a great Schindler's List.
	He named one of his kids Enola Gay.
	His other one's named Mangala, which is weird.
	So, this is a testament to the great work that you do and the tips that we get at Mug Club Undercover, but you may not remember this.
	This is a win.
	I want you to celebrate it.
	And it's only supported by Rumble Premium, those of you who are members.
	That's what makes the trains run on time.
	I shouldn't say that when we're talking about Joe.
	The train's office run on time here.
	By the way, by the way, Sam from HR is actually glad that we brought Nazis into NASA, because he said that of all of his gripes with the Nazis, being disorganized was not chief amongst them.
	Write that one up, New York Post or Daily Mail.
	This is by definition an abusive work environment.
	We're not even going to deny it.
	Is that semantic semantics?
	Yes.
	It's a new segment we should make.
	I swear to you.
	He's like, well, they did calculate down to every Jew who they killed was worth $40 when they could sell.
	I'm like...
	Go dig a tunnel or something.
	And of course...
	He hates the Nazis.
	But you know what?
	That's what you did.
	Oh, you guys are really good at building rockets?
	Well, guess what?
	You work for us now.
	You enslave them and you feed them enough so that they don't run away.
	Congratulations!
	You have Nazis on the payroll at NASA. So, Mug Club Undercover.
	Here's the win for you guys.
	We have an update on one of our stories that went viral on social media.
	For those of you who don't remember, last week we infiltrated a Zoom meeting for the Democrat activist group Blue Victory USA, and they had this post-election war room.
	So for those who don't remember, I'm going to roll this clip for you.
	It's difficult to understand what they're saying because they are incredibly inarticulate, but just do your best.
	And I still believe that, you know, what we're really experiencing right now is a very balkanized, selective recession, where certain regions of certain sectors are hammered.
	Just say split up.
	Makes me sound smart.
	But the issue wasn't addressed that way in the national press.
	Like, for example, even in very high income areas, like my own in Silicon Valley, you know, 35-40% of the jobs have I could go to sleep in the last three years of very successive waves of layoffs.
	And a lot of these people were having very high income positions well into, you know, $200,000, $300,000 a year.
	But, you know, right now, they just kind of want to, like, you know, I think the party messed up in that they just wanted to constantly express, you know, broad metrics, right?
	Why is he in front of an early 90s food court?
	Even the Department of Labor relied on some of those payroll I mean, which that was later uncovered, that like 80,000 of these jobs that were created were flubbed.
	This is key.
	And so I think that in the deep underlying feeling of the electorate, they knew this was going on and they did not appreciate the Dems doing this, right?
	I mean, they were smarter than that.
	So the reason they were upset at the infiltration is because you see behind closed doors, they acknowledge, and by the way, these are, I mean, use the eyeball test, these are clearly dyed-in-the-wool leftist activists, you know, radical leftist progressives, you know, the Democratic Party.
	And they were saying, yeah, the numbers were not true, the employment numbers, and we weren't happy about the fact that, I get, you have to win an election, but these employment numbers, they were just fluffed up.
	I mean, these were puff pieces out there, and we knew it wasn't true.
	So they don't like you being in the other team's huddle.
	So on Monday, Blue Victory sent out an email to their members addressing the infiltration.
	It's kind of like Media Matters actually has a Rumble Premium membership just so they can...
	If he's linked his account, please link your account.
	So this is what Blue Victory sent out.
	They said, I wanted to warn you that last week's meeting was recorded by a troll and posted on X by Steven Crowder, who has a big following on social media.
	I have removed the troll account, but I don't think I have the ability to stop random people from recording the meetings and posting them anywhere.
	No, I want to make one.
	You've removed one, maybe two troll accounts.
	We have not removed the troll account.
	And here's the thing.
	Our eyes and ears are everywhere.
	That's because you, what you do, your support.
	And by the way, if you see something, or you hear something, fraud, waste, abuse, corruption, funny stuff, like this, like a walking anime character, send your tip.
	To lwctips at protonmail.com.
	It is encrypted.
	We will track down all of these leads, and we will protect our sources with our life.
	We'll go to jail to protect our sources.
	Not that this one really matters.
	I don't think anyone's going to jail, but, you know, it's worth a laugh.
	You can send us any kind of a tip.
	Any good story, dating tips, investment tips.
	Oh, hey, that reminds me.
	I just got approved to purchase a new house.
	Oh!
	Nice.
	Congratulations.
	That's a good time.
	They hooked me up with a great interest rate.
	Did you get a good rate?
	Yeah.
	If you don't mind me asking, what did you get?
	Well, I don't want to make anybody jealous.
	Oh, come on.
	I don't want to make anybody feel bad about the rate they got.
	You got a good one?
	Yeah.
	You can tell us, yeah.
	Hey, go ahead.
	12%.
	What?
	Yeah.
	12%?
	Yeah, my mortgage guy hooked it up, so, you know.
	No, I don't think your guy hooked up anything.
	That's clear.
	Gerald, what did you get?
	Like around five.
	What?
	Yeah.
	Dude, that's so weak!
	No, I don't see, Josh, I don't think you know.
	Only 5%?
	I don't think you know how this works.
	That's so little.
	What'd you get?
	I got like two and a half.
	Dude, what a sucker!
	Wait, Josh, are you negotiating up?
	Yeah, I learned it in that new book I got.
	The Art of the Deal or Art of the Steel?
	Is it?
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah, it's the Trump book.
	Yeah, that's the wrong book.
	Josh, you really need to go to American Financing and get a better book.
	You're clearly the one who would most benefit from the service of our sponsor.
	Go to AmericanFinancing.net slash Crowder.
	You can finance a home.
	No upfront fees.
	Close in 10 days.
	You save $800 a month on an average mortgage out there.
	You can call 1-800-974-6500.
	AmericanFinancing.net slash Crowder.
	Don't get the number.
	The NMLS. Well, I don't understand.
	I just need to say...
	Yeah, you just have to say the...
	I need to say it for legal purposes?
	You have to say the number, yes.
	Do I have to explain why I have to say the number?
	No, of course not.
	Just...
	NMLS 182334. There you go.
	See?
	Now you're safe.
	Was that so hard?
	That's all I need to do?
	You did it.
	Why do I have to do it?
	I don't know.
	I don't even know what it means.
	You have to say NMLS 182334, I guess.
	Americanfinancing.net slash Crowder.
	Hey, do you think I get a discount for this tattoo?
	Yeah, I don't know.
	Maybe they'll raise it to $13.
	So, let's go to Russia and Ukraine.
	We're getting some updates right now.
	A little bit of a change?
	Okay.
	We're fine.
	So this is something I want to, and before we get to Mr. Mitchell of Rasmussen Reports and David Hogg, is it Rasmussen Reports or Rasmussen Polls?
	Because I know, I want to make sure that I get it right.
	But this guy is the head honcho over there.
	He really knows what he's doing.
	Before we get to that, Russia, Ukraine.
	Okay.
	There's a lot going on.
	We're going to give you the timeline because I don't believe we discussed this a ton yesterday.
	We gave you a pretty thorough rundown Tuesday.
	A lot has happened since Tuesday.
	We'll go through that timeline.
	But let me tell you what I think is most interesting here, okay, is that Putin, according to Reuters, has said that he would be open to a ceasefire talk or de-escalations, but only if the conversation takes place with Donald Trump.
	So we'll go through what has led us to that point and what that means.
	It's time for Insane in Ukraine.
	Insane of the Ukraine.
	All right.
	Let me...
	It's a good singer.
	Good.
	Why do people say the Ukraine?
	Well, it used to be the Ukraine.
	Now it's Ukraine, I believe.
	Oh, I see.
	Wait a minute.
	I don't think it was ever the...
	No, I know.
	People just used to say the was okay, and now it's not okay.
	It's like, go to the Facebook.
	No.
	You can still say it.
	No, you can't.
	Yeah.
	It's technically Ukraine, but I'll accept both.
	So let's go through everything that happened since Tuesday.
	Ukraine launched those ATACMS, is the abbreviated ATACMS, the ATACMS missiles, to Russia, right, for the first time.
	Putin did say that in September that would be a dramatic escalation.
	Okay.
	We'll just go through the order.
	That's one.
	Two.
	Russia updated its nuclear doctrine after that, lowering the threshold for using nukes.
	Okay, so that's basically saying, like, we may, we may, look, we're changing this, we may be, and I wrote this on my biggest, my longest table.
	We may now use nukes.
	We don't know.
	I don't want to smack you.
	Really quick, people making a big deal out of this.
	They made it public.
	This has pretty much been somewhat the policy they've had for a while.
	This is for show.
	Right.
	But I just want to make sure that no one feels like we've left anything.
	All the references available link in the sidebar as we do every show.
	So then on Wednesday, Ukraine launched long-range British Storm Shadow missiles.
	That's a cool name, too.
	Into Russia for the first time.
	Really cool names for the...
	Storm Shadow.
	You gotta have cool names for a missile.
	You can't have a weird...
	Yeah.
	The Falange.
	It's not a good missile name.
	Get prepared to be buried by salami sandwich!
	That's actually a cool name.
	It actually would be, wouldn't it?
	Don't forget your pepperoncinis!
	Yeah.
	I think it's cloudy with a chance of death!
	And the meatballs.
	I like it.
	Yeah, well.
	Not everything from West is better.
	Number four, this morning, a pretty significant escalation may have happened when Russia reportedly, and you can give me an update.
	Reportedly is fine.
	So there's some debate right now.
	Ukrainian officials are saying it was an ICBM, and there's an unnamed Western official, is what it was just appearing on CNN, said it was not an ICBM that was launched.
	Well, that does matter because, let's say, if Ukraine is lying, then they're lying about something that would be a very serious escalation.
	Correct.
	If it is an ICBM, and this is why people are mistrusting of both sides.
	Like I said, I've said in the past, I have no love or sympathy for Putin.
	I think he actually is a totalitarian prick.
	Both countries are very, very, very corrupt.
	Ukraine was one of, if not the, money laundering capitals of the world before this, depending on the year.
	And of course, Russia is as Russia does.
	So, we don't know who's telling the truth.
	But Ukraine's saying ICBM. Okay.
	Other reports saying, no, it wasn't.
	But there was, we do know, some kind of a missile fired at Dnepra.
	Ukraine says that Russia fired an intercontinental ballistic missile at a central city in Ukraine.
	It'd be the first use of an ICBM in combat since its development in the Cold War.
	If it's confirmed, it shows that both sides are starting to up their tactics in the run-up to when Donald Trump is going to move into the White House.
	And I think that you are seeing an understanding that if there is going to be any kind of a conversation down the line about a ceasefire or some kind of broader settlement, each side wants to have the best possible negotiating position.
	They want to be in the strongest possible place.
	And just because it's really cool, here's a reported look at scary.
	ICBM or not, the re-entry.
	ICBM or not, the re-entry.
	Looks like Stranger Things.
	Now, the reason that this is pivotal, and hopefully we can get some updates while we're here, because we don't know what's true.
	Two sides are giving us two different stories here, Ukraine and then the Western official.
	It would be unprecedented if it is, in fact, an ICBM, because this would be the first time that, basically, this has been developed as a technology to carry a nuclear payload.
	It can travel up to, I believe, 18,000 miles per hour.
	When they're coming down, good luck stopping that.
	18,000 miles per hour.
	Very, very difficult to intercept.
	So that's the update.
	I get that it's pretty complicated.
	Yeah, it is kind of complicated.
	but I can simplify all this conflict for you guys if you don't mind.
	All right, so the kangaroos like Russia, right?
	And they're holding on to Ukraine's land, that's the dog.
	And then Ukraine runs over like, hey, let go of my land, dog.
	Let go.
	And then Russia's like, what are you going to do about it?
	And Ukraine's like, pow!
	That's what I'm going to do about it.
	I'm going to hit you and go back.
	And then Russia's like, oh yeah?
	Oh yeah?
	Alright, watch me then.
	Watch me, I'm going to go get my nukes.
	And Ukraine's like, no you won't.
	You won't do it.
	And honestly, sometimes you just need to take a bird's eye view.
	That is probably the most accurate distillation of what's going on there.
	Yeah, they call me the...
	The thing.
	So...
	Just full of Biden?
	Simple Jack.
	They come with a great philosopher.
	Yes, yes they do.
	Hey, by the way!
	So this brings us to what I think is very interesting here.
	here according to reuters i believe this uh this was released last evening and it was trending everywhere putin has said that he is open to peace negotiations but only with trump so um why is that so funny Because he's going to negotiate with Biden.
	Yeah, exactly.
	He'll forget whatever we talked about.
	The guy's sleeping.
	He's there for two more months.
	Oh, Joe!
	Somebody wake up, Joe.
	So here is...
	Here's what the Kremlin is proposing.
	To freeze the conflict at the current front lines.
	To divide control.
	And this is the pivotal one.
	It's very broad, so we'll have to know how this plays out.
	divide control of the four eastern regions, that Ukraine abandons all plans to join NATO.
	And then they're going to be asking, most likely, that Ukraine limits the size of their military.
	And they do want, again, this is all just sort of reportedly, they want to ensure unrestricted use of the Russian language in these areas of Ukraine, which, look, again, I feel like you always say, oh, don't absolutely despise Putin.
	Yep, absolutely.
	But the fact is, that right there tells you, there are enough ethnic Russians in areas of Ukraine who, if they were living under the oppressive rule of punishment for language use, I know this because I was raised in Quebec.
	It's an English country, but in Quebec...
	They have French language laws.
	They actually have the language police where you can be fined, your business can be shut down.
	If the French writing is not, I think it's now at 2.5 times the size of your English writing, even if you're in an English city with mostly English customers.
	Because I had one mom born, sorry, one parent born, not two moms.
	My mom was born in Quebec.
	If you have one parent, even an English-speaking parent born in Quebec, you have to go to French school.
	They thought I was slow.
	They switched me to English school later on.
	Turns out I was still slow.
	But...
	I had an English-American father and one Canadian mother.
	And that law was, okay, you have to go to French school.
	So it is something that you will have people in that region going, hey, look, we do feel oppressed.
	And that tells you that it's not just Putin who's been orchestrating the protests and the rebellion.
	That there are people there.
	Enough for it to be a problem.
	These do outline some terms.
	Some of these are reasonable.
	Some of them may not be.
	But it's important to note, like I've said, this only ends...
	This conflict, it only ends with some kind of a compromise or the complete devastation of one of these countries.
	There really is no in-between.
	And that compromise is where you just have to pick the compromise that you're willing to live with.
	And the issue here is Ukraine has been turning down compromise after compromise.
	But they basically said no compromise whatsoever.
	I'm not saying the offers that have been made are necessarily legitimate or one that should be taken.
	But Ukraine has made it quite clear they won't take any.
	And why would you if you have a never-ending supply of funding?
	That does not create a scenario for peaceful talks, and maybe that's why Zelensky said that he actually believes that Donald Trump could help end the war.
	I believe that the war will end, and it will not end in the abstract, but there's no exact date.
	However, the war will end faster with the policy of this team that will now lead the White House.
	This is their approach, their promise to their society, and it is also very important to them.
	So, a small update.
	So, the only thing that we'll say is that Russia has not come out and denied that this is an ICBM right now.
	So, we're scouring kind of that.
	Like, Russia, basically, I don't even know if they would, though.
	That's my only problem with this, because let's say that you didn't fire an ICBM, right?
	They had multiple re-entry vehicles.
	Obviously, you could see the different, you know, kind of explosions or lights.
	Yeah.
	If I was Russia, I'd be like, yeah, we did it.
	Did we do it?
	It doesn't matter.
	Well, they don't have to say anything.
	An unnamed Western source already said, no, it was not ICBM. Do not worry.
	No, I really don't know what to believe on that, other than I would believe the reporting initially and say, okay, well, okay, if Russia's not denying it, then maybe it really was.
	Here's the thing, though.
	There is escalation going on.
	Of course.
	And we're not to, whatever, 1,010 days ago.
	Sorry, we're almost, you know, this giant, almost like, what, going on three years into a war.
	Yeah.
	So we can't just turn back the clock.
	You're right.
	It has to be a negotiated settlement.
	People want to act, and I get it.
	You want to kick out an invader.
	I totally understand.
	If Mexico invaded, you know, Texas, it's the exact same way.
	It'll never happen, though.
	But that's...
	I know.
	I... Oh my god.
	I would feel the same way.
	Can you just imagine the terror?
	All the gun-toting Texans against the army of weed whackers?
	Oh, I know.
	All the gun-toting Mexican-American Texans.
	Yes, exactly.
	We beat them when we weren't even a part of the nation.
	Anyway, so nonetheless, I understand that people want that, but that's not what...
	I'm sorry to say that, but that is not where we are.
	And it's not like we haven't had these ethnic groups in other countries get kind of tied into a country after some kind of a conflict in the past.
	This has happened multiple times, a lot of times in Europe.
	There's a lot that we don't know.
	There is one thing, though, that I know...
	For certain.
	And I want you to hold me to this.
	I can tell you exactly what the left is going to do with an incoming Trump administration dealing with this conflict.
	It's time for a prediction.
	All right.
	Call me to the mat if I'm wrong.
	Remember, this election was Donald Trump, World War III. That's what the left said.
	Democracy is at stake.
	He's a Putin puppet.
	So, here's the thing.
	It's very clear that Putin doesn't want to talk or negotiate with Biden.
	He doesn't respect him.
	Now, for all of Putin's flaws, and there are many flaws, He does revile a lot of the West for the same reason that the West reviles Putin.
	So here's what I think really bothers him, and he's communicated this a few times, where people go, hey, this is a guy, all of his financial gain is ill-gotten, right?
	You don't become a billionaire like that when your people are still oppressed.
	This is not honest.
	This is corruption.
	And what he's doing is going...
	Yes, but you too.
	The Bidens are not.
	So he doesn't have a problem with, I should say, I don't think he's as bothered by being accused of corruption where he goes, yeah, but you're basically oligarchs in the West too.
	It's an entirely corrupt system.
	He has said that there is a swamp.
	There is an establishment in D.C. And he doesn't believe that Donald Trump, he believes that Donald Trump is uniquely not a part of it.
	And you know what?
	You believe that too.
	Even those on the left.
	Because you said that he was a maverick.
	You said that he would go rogue.
	You said that he was unpredictable.
	Well, that's something that I think other dictators kind of see as a positive in the sense that they can negotiate with someone.
	I believe that Putin thinks if he sits down with Biden, if he sits down with Harris, it doesn't matter what they say.
	They're just going to line the pockets of defense contractors no matter what.
	And so it's a fruitless endeavor.
	So...
	He's clearly not going to do anything significant with Biden.
	He clearly is hoping for something better with Donald Trump.
	If Donald Trump comes in and this conflict de-escalates, or my God, if there actually is a ceasefire.
	The same people who said that he would bring us World War III, I guarantee you will say, see, he's a puppet for Putin.
	If there's any kind of a compromise, which we all know there has to be, there has to be a compromise for there to be peace.
	Ukraine will not be happy with everything, neither will Russia.
	The left will accuse Donald Trump of being a puppet for Putin if any land is conceded, if any concessions are allowed.
	They will say, look, this is a man who does the strong-arming of dictators.
	He's just as bad as them.
	Keep in mind, they said that Donald Trump was going to bring us World War III. Those same people will then condemn Donald Trump for effectively avoiding World War III in a way that the Democrat establishment couldn't.
	Call me.
	Call me to the mat on that.
	I guarantee you that's what will happen if we end up with some kind of a peace agreement.
	Yeah, and I think it's plain to see.
	Now, there have been some people that have gone over to Russia and have done a very bad job of representing the United States interests, and they've looked like a little bit of a puppet for Russia in some ways.
	But they were called a puppet before they went.
	Right.
	So I don't believe the argument as well from the left.
	You can point out specific actions and say, doing this specific thing.
	You know, like, I hated when Tucker Carlson was like, these groceries are great in this train station!
	Yeah, they've got great train stations in North Korea, too, if they show you the right ones, okay?
	Like, I'm not saying, like, the entire country's gonna be like that, okay?
	So maybe you should know better than to go and extol the virtues of what the country's doing.
	Now, Not anymore!
	No, what we are living through right now is McCarthyism with no basis in fact.
	A lot of people don't realize that McCarthy was right.
	There were communists, right?
	History has proven him to be right.
	He may have been bombastic, people didn't like to work with him, but he was right about communists and communist sympathizers infiltrating our institutions, largely media, Hollywood, and education.
	He was right about that.
	In this case, they're just, it's McCarthyism where they just go, oh, you must be a puppet for Putin.
	Oh, you must be a Russian spy.
	It's the worst parts of McCarthyism.
	And there's no basis in fact.
	If you just look at this reasonably and pragmatically and go, look, do we want destruction?
	Do we want nuclear war?
	Or is there some kind of a compromise that needs to be made here?
	They will accuse Donald Trump of being a puppet for Putin if peace is struck.
	That's where he is.
	Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't.
	Because, my God, imagine.
	Imagine Donald Trump comes in, this guy who's the dictator, this guy who's going to destroy democracy, and he ends a conflict.
	And saves Americans hundreds of billions of dollars.
	They've got to find a way to vilify him.
	It must be that him and Putin are hand in hand.
	And we're only able to talk about this, by the way, because we're not beholden to YouTube.
	We're not beholden to the advertisers there who force you to push the Ukraine talking points or the free and fair election talking points, which we'll get to with Mr. Mitchell as it relates to Rasmussen.
	And that's because of you, Mug Club.
	Thank you so much, everyone who's been a member all these years.
	Mug Club is now Rumble Premium.
	Rumble Premium is Mug Club, where you get everything on Rumble Premium, including the whole ad-free experience for $99 annually or $9.99 a month.
	You get this.
	You get the Friday show.
	You support Mug Club Undercover.
	This is what keeps the doors open.
	This is what keeps the lights on.
	You wanted an alternative to YouTube.
	Hey, you have the alternative to Facebook out there with X.
	You have the alternative now to YouTube.
	And it is growing, and you can help it grow.
	You can watch this two years from now.
	See it take 30-40% of the share from YouTube and say, hey, I helped build that.
	Let's get off the Patreon.
	Let's get off the PayPal.
	Let's get off the tip jars and let's get everyone on the same side here because I'm telling you, the left is absolutely regrouping and it's going to get ugly.
	Yeah, fun fact, the British are the ones that built the subways that Tucker was exploring.
	The Russians brought in the British and said, could you help us design this fantastic subway?
	And then they're like, look at what we did!
	It's really hard to navigate this because you have to walk around the giant tables all the time.
	They're everywhere.
	I don't know what it is there.
	They're even on the train.
	Why do you have a table?
	We don't know.
	Do you want to go to dining carts?
	No, the whole cart is dining cart.
	Large table.
	We have stools.
	Now, you want to know how out of touch the left is?
	Remember David Hogg?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So, okay, before I get to that, there was an opinion piece on USA Today titled, Gen Z voters were the biggest disappointment of the election.
	Why did we fail?
	Or...
	And they were really upset that there was this huge shift toward Gen Z, sorry, Gen Z toward Trump, right?
	It was 46 Trump, 52 Harris, which is really close and occurs nowhere in nature.
	No.
	With the youngest voting bloc in a country.
	And with Gen Z men, Trump won them 56 to 42. Wow.
	With Gen Z men, Trump won them.
	I wouldn't have been able to fathom this as a millennial, like in the Bush years or the McCain or Romney years.
	I didn't have a single, aside from family.
	Green Day told me not to vote for him, dude.
	Yeah.
	No effects.
	Everything.
	They said don't do it while they got rich?
	Yep.
	Everything.
	It was just Democrat.
	And it tells you that, first off, I guess the left doesn't have a corner on cool at all.
	By default, people aren't going, yeah, yeah, I don't want to be an outcast.
	I'll vote Democrat.
	That's a big deal.
	But it also just tells you that the Democrat Party, the DNC, has completely ignored young men.
	And they've been saying it for a long time.
	And no one's been listening.
	So, to save the day, coming in riding on his...
	Gender-neutral horses, David Hogg, and he tweeted out or X'd out, today I'm meeting with a group of researchers and activists to discuss how Democrats win back young men.
	Hold on a second, David Hogg.
	Aren't you one of them?
	Yeah.
	Imagine, how out of touch do you have to be to be a young man and you need a focus group to figure out what young men want?
	It's like if Mel Gibson was a woman the whole time in What Women Want.
	Yes!
	A woman turned into a woman.
	What questions would you be most interested in asking?
	And I believe he did like a video chat on Instagram.
	Now, to be clear, he's considering running for vice chair of the Democratic National Committee.
	Please let that happen.
	Um...
	Oh, wow.
	What a great career path that is.
	From school shooting to job.
	And by the way, this tells you that, of course, if a young man who was the face of the Democratic Party, and of course, was he Sandy Hook or Newtown?
	He's Parkland.
	Parkland, that's right.
	He was Parkland.
	That's his rise to fame.
	If someone who has been seen as the face of the youth movement for the Democrats cannot understand why other people his age broke in record numbers for a Republican, that tells you that...
	The Democrat Party, it's not listening.
	And it's not only not listening, they are proactively cutting out young men.
	They've vilified young men.
	It's bad enough to say, we can't hear you.
	It's worse to say, hey, anytime I hear the voice of a young male, shut up.
	And that's what they have been doing.
	And this is why I've always said, too, look, the right does this with tokenism.
	I had to introduce conservative wunderkinds at CPAC who are 13 years old.
	I'm going, you guys don't understand this.
	This is gimmickry.
	Just a young person does not equal a young demo.
	David Hogg is more out of touch with young male voters than Jon Stewart, who, by the way, has had better demo numbers than Trevor Noah, than Stephen Colbert.
	It's not about being young.
	It's about being relevant and being able to listen.
	The left is incapable because young or old white men need to shut up, and young white men largely are the ones going, you know what?
	Hey, I'm not going to be condemned for the rest of my life for an immutable characteristic, to use your term.
	I still have some ideas.
	I still have some wants and needs.
	And you know what?
	I pay my taxes.
	Imagine how out of touch you have to be.
	David Hogg is a young man who needs a focus group to ask young men what they want.
	They picked him based on his victimhood status.
	Well, they did, basically.
	But I think that's exactly the point.
	It's exactly the opposite, David, of what you guys have been selling.
	That's what they want.
	They want nothing to do with you.
	And think about this.
	You're a young man.
	You have borne the brunt, other than economically, of all of the bad DEI policies, of all of the shut up and sit down, of all of the Me Too crap because you're a kid and you're going on a date with a girl at 17 and you're like...
	I don't know if something's going to happen.
	You've got these kids basically just having to deal with all of this crap, and now they have alternative media.
	They're not going to the mainstream news outlets.
	They don't have to hear the spin.
	They just have the David Hoggs and the Harry Sissons that are just paid activists, essentially.
	They really are.
	And they've turned away from them.
	I love it!
	It's complete astroturfing.
	So, David Hogg, and comment below if you think it's all that complicated as far as what young men want.
	David Hogg needs a focus group to help him out, and that's why we actually have David Hogg's What Young Men Want focus group, the 7 Plus 1 Most Heard Answers.
	This week's 7 Plus 1. You'll forgot to find in the chamber!
	Seven plus one.
	Answers heard at the What Young Men Want conference by David Hogg.
	Number seven.
	You know what, Josh?
	Number seven.
	Hey, remember George Michael?
	Yeah, I bet he'd kick your ass.
	Yeah?
	Okay.
	Well, that doesn't seem like they're really listening to him.
	I don't know.
	Number six.
	I've met trans women on hormone replacement therapy with more testosterone than you.
	Number five.
	What men want?
	Tits.
	Number four.
	Number four, Gerald.
	On the contact sheet phone number, I actually gave you the number to a Bennigan.
	Oh!
	This doesn't seem like they're answering the questions.
	This just seems like they're trolling David Hogg.
	It's a little bit, yeah.
	Number three.
	C-response number five.
	Oh, that's right.
	It was tits.
	Number two.
	David, maybe you'd understand this better if you cosplay as a submissive cuck dominated by a strong female figure and I cosplay as the guy who leaves you tied up and goes to Hooters.
	Number one.
	Four.
	Number five.
	Number one, Josh.
	I bet you think we want a 2025 Jaguar.
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, you know what?
	They seem a little upset.
	And the plus one response heard at the What Young Men Want focus group from David Hogg.
	You've heard of the dog whisperer?
	How about the horse?
	You forgot the van in the chamber!
	My gosh, you know, we went through this quickly.
	Remember, we were so worried.
	We had so many stories together.
	Like, ah, we gotta cut it down.
	Lane, the brain's losing his mind.
	Sorry, Lane.
	He was like, I don't want to talk about this with Russia.
	I'm like, I know, but we have a guest, and we have to, you know, the guest has a hard out.
	We only have so much time.
	He's like, ah.
	Like, I spent six hours on this, and you just cut it down in ten minutes.
	And we wrote that other 7 plus 1. That's true.
	We do have another 7 plus 1. Hey, Gerald, catch!
	That was close.
	It was.
	It was better than I do.
	Well, I guess if he's getting...
	You know what?
	We probably do have time then to get to the segment we were going to...
	Yeah, you want to do it?
	Yeah, yeah.
	Let's go to this really quickly.
	Jasmine Crockett, who's also a representative of...
	of laying the brain in your snap.
	Before we get to Mr. Mitchell of Rasmussen, Wednesday, this Texas Democratic representative, so Jasmine Crockett, went on not just a racist tirade, but a very dumb one.
	It's because you can then misuse words like oppression.
	There has been no oppression for the white man in this country.
	You tell me which white men were dragged out of their homes.
	You tell me which one of them got dragged all the way across an ocean and told that you are going to go and work.
	We are going to steal your wives.
	We are going to rape your wives.
	That didn't happen.
	That is oppression.
	We didn't ask to be here.
	We're not the same migrants that y'all constantly come up against.
	We didn't run away from home.
	We were stolen.
	So yeah, we are going to sit here and be offended when you want to sit here and act like...
	And don't let it escape you.
	That it is white men on this side of the aisle telling us, people of color on this side of the aisle, that y'all are the ones being oppressed.
	That y'all are the ones that are being harmed.
	Well, for starters, I think the white men there understand that if they yelled at you the way you yelled at them, they would be charged with a hate crime.
	So, we're talking about today, and your behavior is, well, let's just put it this way.
	It's unadult.
	It's unbecoming on your character.
	Also, you're a stupid person, because you don't seem to understand the fact that the United States is not uniquely responsible for creating slavery.
	We didn't invent it, and we didn't steal people.
	We weren't even the best at it.
	No, this is according to the New York Times.
	You go to Cornel West, he will tell you it's a much higher number.
	At least 90% of slaves...
	We're sent to the New World, already enslaved by Africans and sold to European traders.
	So if you want to take it up with someone, like, in other words, before evil Westerners who ended slavery, if early on in this timeline you went back, they would have said, good, oh good, more slaves.
	That would have been the reaction in the homeland that you talk about being stolen from.
	They kidnapped you.
	There.
	They enslaved you.
	Slavery is wrong.
	But to act as though you were stolen from a peaceful life, you of course not, but I mean even your ancestors is simply inaccurate.
	And by the way, just so you have the number, 90%, that means that Africans themselves had already enslaved and traded around 11 million slaves.
	To the Islamic world.
	And you may not know this, but over a million Europeans were actually enslaved off the Mediterranean coast largely as part of the North African slave trade.
	That's why a lot of these towns are built up with defensive walls.
	So it wasn't just racially based.
	Slavery was simply the law of the land.
	Here's another fun fact.
	You may not know this.
	According to Herbert L. Byrd Jr., who's a black man, the Irish preceded Africans as slaves in the New World, meaning the Irish were slaves before.
	In fact, we didn't say African Americans.
	We didn't have the same little respect.
	They were enslaved before black people in this country.
	And many people don't know.
	That was actually the original marketing campaign ill-fated for enslaved charms.
	It did not go well.
	It was taken very long.
	The marshmallows are potatoes.
	They're after me lucky chains.
	They're gonna take our chains and our jobs.
	I hope they do a made-for-TV movie about me roots.
	Now where's my wife?
	I like to punch her in the face.
	Yes!
	Can you imagine?
	Can you imagine the Irish slaves?
	They moved on from the Irish.
	They're like, no, screw this.
	Well, they used to pay slave hands, especially in beer.
	And that just made the Irish more feisty.
	And it's like, what are we doing?
	Guys, y'all are fighting all...
	Whoa, okay.
	Who the f*** is that guy?
	I know!
	Oh, yeah, so I say, could you go to that field?
	I don't give a f***!
	Tell your own damn failed you're giving me bear what you think would happen.
	The entire...
	All of us are gonna fight you now.
	The other slave owner's like, what are we supposed to do?
	Every time I threaten to kill him, they just say, do it!
	Do it and I won't have to listen to this hag nagging at me all night.
	Save it for me if you're a kind man.
	What do you call this?
	You call this plowing?
	I don't know.
	What do you call your wife giving me a handjob in the black of a buttock horse buggy?
	No, it's a good one, Seamus.
	You're like, I'm not...
	Almost as good as a handjob.
	Huh?
	Yeah?
	What's that?
	Oh, he's gonna beat me now.
	You hear that?
	He's gonna beat me.
	All right, let me take the most impractical fighting stance ever.
	This is okay to make fun of.
	It is.
	It's okay.
	Because they're white slaves.
	Because they're white.
	They're white slaves.
	And they're Gerald's mascot.
	Yes, exactly.
	Listen.
	Oh, it's a pale...
	It's like the Irish slaves.
	Notre Dame replaced the Irish players with black players.
	That's not true.
	It's partly true.
	I guess there's no place for an Irishman like me anymore.
	I do run a 5.840.
	That's not quite fast enough.
	You can play quarterback or tight end.
	That's right.
	Well, we know what I was.
	My vertical is four left out.
	Can we get different slaves?
	So, anyway, there you go.
	Somebody clip that.
	Yes.
	Come on!
	You can let Crockett know.
	It's just this...
	I'm sorry, it's just...
	I'm just not gonna go with it.
	Like, you can't use something that you didn't experience that you're wrong about as far as the premise for the statements you are making.
	You can't use that to treat people abusively.
	Especially when your great-great-grandfather's name is Davey.
	Yes!
	Oh!
	It's just, it's, there you go.
	So Kroc, alright, you can expect more of that grandstanding.
	And now it is time to actually get to our guest.
	But before that, look, let me just set this up for you, okay, for people who don't know.
	There were some big misses in this polling cycle, the polling in this election.
	Because remember, the conversation was, well, there was a secret Trump voter, and then even though, you know, allegedly Donald Trump lost in 2020, he still outperformed the polls by significant margin.
	So the pollsters got a lot of that wrong.
	And the question before this election was, well, are they going to get it wrong with Donald Trump a third time?
	The answer is unequivocally yes.
	There were some huge ones that were wrong, like the Ann Seltzer Iowa poll.
	By the way, she's since retired.
	It was off by 16 points.
	Morris, very respected, was off.
	They had Harris plus four.
	Morning Consult had Harris plus two.
	And all along the trail, Morning Consult, which I believe is highly rated by a lot of these other pollsters, sort of aggregates, they had these outlying polls of Kamala Harris winning.
	It was always Morning Consult.
	Yes.
	Always.
	Morning Consult, Marist, Bloomberg is one of the really bad ones too.
	And Rasmussen, who the left is accused of being right-wing extremism, I guess.
	You just see it all the time.
	They were the closest.
	They were closest to predicting the actual result.
	The margin for error with their polling was only 1.9 points.
	That's less than half of most of the others.
	Yep.
	Nate Silver made some accusations, so we wanted to have this man on the brains behind the polling outfit of Rasmussen.
	You can follow him on X, Mark underscore R underscore Mitchell.
	Let's bring on Mark Mitchell.
	Mr. Mitchell, how are you, sir?
	Doing really well.
	Yeah, we nailed it.
	Yes, you did.
	We really nailed it.
	You really did nail it.
	And for people who don't know, I just want to make sure that I didn't get anything wrong that I just said.
	We always make the references available so people can go and see your polling data and see the RCP average.
	Nate Silver questioned your findings, right?
	538, this used to be the guru.
	What did he try and accuse you of or suggest?
	Yeah, let me just talk about accuracy first.
	We're at 1.7 points in the national popular vote.
	We've been putting out for weeks and weeks and weeks that the race was two points, and everybody measures their own accuracy with their final call.
	But we were all alone in August and September when the pollsters were at peak lying, peak psychological operation to create a fake lead for Kamala Harris.
	What was different this time, the pollsters actually weren't as bad as they were before and it's because I decided to be a loudmouth back in July and August and call all these people liars and they didn't take it well.
	So you got Nate and you got FiveThirtyEight.
	They're actually two separate entities now.
	FiveThirtyEight kicked us out because of ideological reasons a year ago.
	Can I have a quick question?
	Is FiveThirtyEight now, is it under the ABC umbrella or is Nate under the ABC umbrella?
	So Nate now has a little newsletter he puts out, and it's basically the same numbers, and 538's ABC News, Disney, and quite frankly, they're probably on the chopping block right now, because it looks like all of a sudden on ABC, it's no bueno to talk bad about people in the Trump circle, and literally, they're ideologues.
	Okay.
	So 538 kicked you out, and I just wanted people to know, because it's not just 538, that's ABC Disney, right?
	That's really what you were cut out from, so...
	Yeah, yeah.
	The same ABC Disney that just had Sonny Hostin read that apology about Matt Gaetz on air.
	So they're the new sheriff in town.
	Definitely.
	So yeah, these people were basically shilling for Democrats and Nate's no different because real clear politics just takes all the polling and puts it into an average and reports it.
	Very straight, unbiased guys.
	And yet Nate Says that they're going to try and take all the polling and unskew it and make it less biased.
	Well, if you look at the numbers, they actually added more left bias.
	So he's bad at the one thing that he thinks he's supposed to do.
	And at this point, it's just embarrassing.
	He's just a complete clown.
	He's like a lolcow now.
	Well, did he accuse you or suggest that you were colluding with the Trump campaign or something like that?
	Because your polls obviously were more favorable toward Donald Trump.
	And by the way, you didn't have Donald Trump winning in every state.
	There were some times where there were swing states where you had him down by one.
	But what was it that Nate Silver leveled at you?
	Because I do have your response here.
	Yeah, we had no bias.
	In fact, if anything, we leaned a little bit to the left.
	We were about.7 points too favorable to Harris and the swing states.
	And I was telling people that in our videos, I thought Trump would outperform.
	There are no right wing pollsters.
	There are none.
	There are accurate independent pollsters and everybody else that shills for Democrats.
	Nate put this piece out in the New York Times, the same New York Times, by the way, that a week before Election Day attacked RealClearPolitics.
	That's like attacking the Pope in the industry.
	It's just absolutely ridiculous.
	And he talked about how the pollsters did better this time.
	Well, yeah, because I was shaming them into trying to save their own credibility.
	And he didn't mention us at all about accuracy.
	And then when he did mention us, he said, oh, well, there's these right-wing pollsters that were caught coordinating with the Trump campaign.
	Well, here's the deal.
	This is media.
	I produce content.
	I give results to people under embargo.
	It's like, hey, this poll's coming out.
	We have a whole subscription model around it.
	And the only rag that ran with that story was the New Republic.
	AP, Reuters, none of them would touch it.
	And so he used that when I think what we've seen is that Ann Seltzer may have been colluding with the campaign.
	No mention of that in his article.
	So it was basically just the most ridiculous thing.
	And, you know, so I decided not to take it.
	Can I ask you, beyond being 16 points off, which is almost embarrassing for Seltzer, do you have any other anything else that would suggest that she actually did actively maybe collude or was in communication with the DNC? That's the problem with the industry is that it's impossible to know for sure.
	There's no matter of transparency that can make up for unethical or lying pollsters.
	There's just not.
	You never know.
	Even somebody that puts their data out there, they could have deleted data points.
	But what I will tell you is that she did have a poll out in July that had Trump up 18 points.
	And basically, Rich Barris found out about it and shamed her because she was spiking the poll.
	So right there, absolutely no bueno.
	We would never do that.
	We release every number we get.
	And so even there alone is enough to say, well, there's an ideological reason she probably suppressed those results.
	And we know she was, I mean, the Iowa poll she put out that was Harris Plus 3. The whole internet was buzzing about it for two weeks.
	I mean, everybody was chuckling about this poll that was coming that was going to save Kamala Harris and show that the polls were Underemphasizing their support.
	When a poll is the number one trending thing on Twitter, like, there's a problem.
	Yeah, no, absolutely.
	It makes no sense.
	And when you look at, you combine it with the fact that, I don't know if you're as aware of this, but after the election, when Donald Trump won, Leftists and a lot of independent creators on YouTube, they saw a massive drop in their subscriptions, right?
	People have said, I'm done with this.
	And so what you do see is that liberals, as a group, are frontrunners.
	They don't do well with adversity.
	Because in 2020, when that election happened, we saw a spike in Mug Club subscribers.
	Because people got mad.
	They got galvanized.
	I said, okay, well, what do we have to do here?
	The left quit en masse.
	And so it makes sense that they want to give themselves that lift.
	Go, no, no, no, look, look, look, look.
	You're not an underdog.
	You're winning.
	You're winning.
	That's their mentality.
	Yeah, a lot of social validation and proof needed.
	I think there's not a lot of confidence because they don't embrace reality.
	I think that's really the big key.
	One of the major stories, I think, from this whole election was how completely ideologically different people who watch CNN and MSNBC are from just, say, Fox News and Newsmax viewers.
	They had totally different issue sets.
	The number one issue of MSNBC viewers was protecting democracy.
	Number two is abortion.
	Three quarters of them.
	And those are basically like, oh, Trump's going to take this away from you, whereas the prices and the border really are things that Biden did take away from people.
	So they're just literally tapped into this fear of missing out, and that's what they were trying to do.
	Listen, Kamala Harris was never trying to change any voters' minds.
	They were just trying to bully people into social proof to follow the movement.
	Like, she went on Fox News.
	She could have changed people's minds.
	Not a single word she said was coordinated to that.
	Yeah.
	You know, she was running, you know, the campaign of 15, 20 years ago, and the people don't want Barack Obama anymore because they hate the government.
	Yeah, I know.
	It was incredibly poorly conducted.
	Not conducted.
	She just gave a piss-poor performance, let's be honest.
	But this is one thing to, you know, look, I came at this.
	You can go back to 2008 and see, like, I was a kid with a blue bed sheet.
	I was a stand-up comic really before that.
	Come to this as an entertainer or a comedian.
	But we provide all of our references.
	We have an undercover unit, so we've really expanded the operations here.
	And on election night, You know, we wanted to make sure that we had all the data that anyone else had at CNN, at Fox News, you know, AP, all the stuff, Reuters, AP News, why are we paid for all of it?
	We had an election integrity map.
	So this is a big undertaking, cost us millions of dollars.
	And so we had access to analytics in real time.
	And so it mirrors what you experienced quite a bit because I think you said they left you out of some of their articles as far as including pollsters.
	Well, the same thing if you look at actually a lot of these articles afterwards about numbers on election night.
	Number one with a bullet was actually this program.
	It wasn't even close, and certainly as far as ours watched.
	But more importantly, we were doing this for the first time, and we made calls 75. For example, this was the first place here to call Georgia.
	We didn't just call Georgia.
	We called Georgia and the change and the margin at which it would end.
	So we didn't do any polls beforehand, but that night, and I'd like to show you a clip of what happened that night, and then talk about how it mirrors what you've been going through with the blackouts of coverage.
	We are calling Georgia right now.
	Tell everybody.
	For Donald Trump.
	Yeah, baby!
	Just so you know, this is the first place to do it.
	Share this on social.
	Let people know.
	We feel confident.
	You can hold us to this, Georgia.
	We're doing the opposite of Brett Baer because we're looking at some trends that we see that I know legacy media sees, but they're too nutless to make the call.
	Guys, you're supposed to include the number in there where we said it was a three-something percent, but we predicted it was going to close between 2 and 2.5.
	So we said this is actually where it will close.
	It's exactly where it closed.
	Look, it wasn't that complicated to do, Mr. Mitchell.
	We just did the work.
	How much of this do you think is ideologically motivated versus maybe these people also just suck at their job?
	A little column A, a little column B. I think there's so many different levers in which, like, bias and lying can be inserted.
	You could put out a perfectly good poll and then have a lying mainstream media cherry-pick your results like The Hill did with Fairleigh Dickinson University.
	Or, like, I think in New York Times' case, they have a good pollster, but he reports up, I think, to a flaming leftist managing editor that will not let him put out things positive to Trump.
	I think it really comes down to it's the status quo and they can't stand a non-status quo candidate and they have to array against them.
	And quite frankly, I'm surprised the polling was as good as it was.
	You mentioned like some of these people weren't in consult.
	Reuters Ipsos was even worse.
	They went from Trump plus one when Kamala Harris got anointed all the way out to Harris plus six.
	Right.
	And luckily, when they picked Harris, I said, you know what, they're going to lie a lot.
	And we did something we never did before.
	We started putting out daily results in the middle of July.
	And because of that, I can tell you the race did not change.
	This wasn't like a 2016 where people don't know the candidates and stuff gets dropped left and right.
	There was not a single thing that moved the numbers, not Trump getting shot, not even the debate.
	And so just to see these massive shifts to the left and then be able to go in and look at the polling results and the crosstabs, And say, oh, it's because they're definitely oversampling Trump deranged Republicans and they're not getting independent.
	The number one issue among independents is abortion.
	That's not true.
	It's kitchen table issues.
	So they create the world that they want to see.
	And they, again, got clowned by Listen, we have a super small team.
	Morning Consult's got hundreds of millions of revenue, and we put out almost as much polling as them, and their polling is just absolutely ridiculous.
	Like you said, I mean, we were saying Trump was going to win comfortably in July and August.
	We were the first ones saying that Trump would win the national popular vote because our polling said it the whole time.
	Yeah, I remember.
	But the betting markets kind of saw it coming, too, in the middle of September.
	Even, like, you know, Atlas, Intel, okay, yeah, sure, they're accurate, they're great.
	The betting markets already said the race was Trump's before they even dropped their first set of state polls.
	So, yeah.
	Can I ask you something?
	Do you think that considering the shellacking that the left has taken, do you expect them to correct it all if only out of self-preservation where they go, okay, we can't just bury our head in the sand.
	We've been wrong three major election cycles.
	The midterms there were an outlier because of COVID and all the stuff that had kind of happened.
	We need to get this right because we're doing nobody any favors by giving them a false sense of confidence.
	Do you think they'll course correct or do you think they're going to continue smashing their wiener in the door?
	The theme of the next four years is because they're all flaming ideologues.
	Not all of them, but every single one of these companies has problems.
	They're having a hard time fixing.
	Look at Disney.
	They want to make money, but just the way they're set up right now, they can't.
	And what you were talking about on Election Day is very true.
	The mainstream media was driving the narrative the entire time.
	For the last month, everybody was responding to them like a laser pointer, but they were losing those battles on Twitter.
	Basically, everybody was fighting an infowar for Trump on Twitter.
	And then on election night, the mainstream media died.
	Because just like you said, I was on a dozen streams.
	I didn't hear anybody talking about any news channel calling any race at all.
	And now all of a sudden, look at them.
	They're all just absolutely dead.
	MSNBC is probably going to get spun off and sold.
	CNN is on the chopping block.
	I think Disney is going to probably spin out some stuff.
	And so it comes down to, do they dig in or correct?
	And I don't know if they can correctly.
	CNN started to get other voices on.
	It was not good for their ratings because it needs to be an echo chamber.
	And so that's what we have to see.
	But I'll tell you right now, it's all on Twitter now.
	It's just a totally different paradigm in just two weeks.
	And now everybody is...
	What's great about it is the Trump picks that we're just putting out, pulling out today, like 81% of Republicans rate Trump excellent or good in the pick, 83%.
	That's a massive number.
	It's because they're finally getting what they want.
	And, you know, they're saying, oh, Matt Gaetz is crazy.
	Oh, Heggs has got a nasty tattoo.
	Nobody cares.
	Nobody cares at all.
	No, exactly.
	Nobody really cares.
	And by the way, all charges were dropped.
	There's nothing credible.
	But people are like, wait, wait, so you mean he went to a Broadway show with a hooker?
	Even if that happened, I still don't care.
	That's where we are, and it didn't happen, but I still wouldn't care.
	We're going to continue this here on Mug Club Rumble Premium, if that's okay.
	I know it's RasmussenReports.com.
	You are Mark underscore R underscore Mitchell on X. Can you stay with us for another few minutes?
	Yeah, I'd love to.
	All right, people watching right now, you click that button.
	That's what allows all of this to continue.
	Oh, that's right.
	Mr. Mitchell, before he came on, he was like, if this is on YouTube, can we discuss election interference?
	Oh, yeah, you can discuss that because we don't really care.
	We just dump it on YouTube.
	Click Rumble Premium.
	Let's go right now.
	Bye!

▲