All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 20, 2024 - Louder with Crowder
01:05:42
It’s Deportation Time: Liberals Conspire To Sabotage Trump's Plan
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
. Glad to take your questions.
Please, in English this time.
Will you pledge never to lie to us from that podium?
Can we get a guy to ask a question?
Because the girls here are retarded.
No questions about sexism, racism, uh, homophobia.
Is it the president's stance or the White House's stance that whoever these border agents are using, what seems to be whips on migrants, that they would be fired or at least never be able to do that again?
Trump said to me, and I'm going to say this, I shouldn't say it, he told me to keep it confidential, but he said that whips work.
Whether in the bedroom, at the border.
Worked in 1856 for a while.
I don't like the ones that snap real loud.
Somebody's got to work on that.
Come up with a quiet whip.
A silent whip.
Come on, Jews, it's a joke.
Come on, Jews.
Mr. Guns N' Gear, Donald Trump Jr., and an ever-expanding roster of content, creators, and free speech.
We'll be right back.
Question.
Question.
On a scale from 1 to 10, how tired and haggard do I look today?
Wait, is 1 or 10 good?
Right, yeah.
Which one?
5, just to be safe.
What do you think?
Let's rate me.
Hot or not?
Not.
I get it.
That's not why you're...
I remember that hot or not.
That was, you know, Zuckerberg before he went all woke.
But now he's not.
So, you know, trust him.
Hey, let's bring up the rundown.
We have a lot to get to today.
Blue sky is a new lefty paradise.
That's a lot of fun.
We're going to show you what kind of echo chamber the left creates when they have their content moderation guidelines in play.
Contrast that with Rumble and X right now.
One's free speech, one's an insane asylum.
We're going to be spending some time talking about deportation.
It is deportation time, deportation time.
And the left is circulating some rumors, outright lies, as far as what kind of authority Donald Trump does have.
I'll give you a hint.
He has a lot.
And the sanctuary city thing, actually, is not what you believe it to be.
And some of the promises that these people, these mayors, these governors are making, are actually illegal, in violation of federal law.
So we'll get into that.
So you can expect some deportations.
You can expect them fast.
Not as many as Barack Obama.
You may not know that.
Pick a guess.
Comment.
How many people did Barack Obama deport?
More than any president in at least modern American history, I believe, ever.
That's usually a shock.
Also, Jaguar.
Well, at some point, you're going to have the YouTube dump button.
Jaguar.
Quite a bit.
Dump that?
Thank you.
So there you go.
That's already.
So you guys, if you're watching on YouTube, you already saw the dump button.
So head on over to Rumble.
It's a weekday show, 10 a.m.
Eastern, including Fridays, if you're a Rumble premium member.
Captain Morgan, number two, how are you, sir?
I'm doing well.
How are you?
Good.
Other than being a little bit tired, I bought some of that purely marshmallow cereal.
No, did you?
No, I had to say, come on.
I almost did.
I was at the store and I was like...
No, because then once you cross that line, you never go back.
Which store?
Kroger.
Alright.
I lied.
I lied.
I was at Sprouts.
I was at Sprouts because the truth is, I was...
Okay, here's the true story.
They didn't have that.
Okay, here's the true story.
I was at Sprouts and I was looking to see if they had anything similar because they did not.
Of course not.
So the truth is, it wasn't self-control.
If they had it, I would have purchased it.
They did not.
You caught me.
Admonish me, alright guys?
I'm not perfect.
Must be great to be so perfect.
Well, I think we should admonish you for shopping at Sprouts in the first place.
Sprouts is way better.
You can get in, you can get out.
I don't care.
They allow you to return anything.
It's for affected pricks.
Check our sources.
Check our sources.
I like sprouts.
And when you hear this, you know him, you love him.
Sunday, December 1st, go and see him live at the Avenue Tattoo Studio in Lawton, Oklahoma.
Mr.
Feierstein, how are you?
Good.
I'm going to get inked up.
Yeah?
Yeah, I'm going to get a tattoo.
That sounds like a bad idea.
No, not wild.
I've got jokes to tell.
I'm a big baby, I'm going to cry through the tattoo.
Well, here's the thing.
The reason that I don't have any tattoos, I'm not against tattoos.
I just don't know that there's anything that I want that permanently.
Also, my body, I fully acknowledge, in a decade or two, will not be a wonderful canvas.
You don't want to put your favorite sports team on your right shoulder?
Right.
Yeah, I couldn't name you one.
If you saw my tattoo on my shoulder, you'd be like, why do you like electricity?
Yes.
What is your thing with electricity?
Would you like a Tesla guy?
I don't even know enough about sports to know what it is.
Oh, okay.
Well, see, that's why I don't like tattoos.
Now, you could make a mistake is the issue, right?
Yes.
And Jaguar knows this quite well.
So Jaguar, the car company...
Just unveiled.
And what you're about to watch, Gerald has not seen this.
I was told not to.
You know how many posts I had to skip on X because of this?
This just tells you, you know, when people say, hey, do you think the left is going to straighten up and fly right and ditch this woke agenda, to use that term?
They can't.
They can't because, just like we talked about how in Washington, D.C., the swamp is not the elected officials, it's the unelected appointments in many cases, certainly with intelligence agencies.
You have the same problem in not only Hollywood, but all of media.
You don't realize the brand managers, the content managers, the publicists, that they have just been infiltrated by people who unironically use the term DEI. Behind closed doors, they use it as a virtue, and we'll get to a clip of that.
So watching Jaguar here create this commercial, I want you to think.
There was a whole boardroom meeting.
And everyone said, yeah.
This will help us sell cars.
This will help us sell cars.
Here you go.
Bah!
What the heck?
That was bad form with the sledge.
Wait for it.
We're gonna get to the...
the car.
Oh, it's a stone!
So, a swing and a miss.
A lot of people would say, of course, this is not the first time Jaguar's screwed up.
People have pointed to this thing.
Actually, it reminds them of some shades of their previously ill-fated campaign, the mascot, Sodomize Me Jaguar, which was more...
Honestly, I don't see that much of a difference.
It's not a very effective gimp either.
By the way, and that Jaguar is notoriously unreliable.
Really?
Yes, it spends all the day in the shop.
Gerald, because the video was ratioed.
It has 30 million views, allegedly only 6.5 thousand likes, 46 thousand comments.
They were overwhelmingly negative.
So one Twitter user asked, where are the cars?
And they said...
Is this for fashion?
And Jaguar replied, think of this as a declaration of intent.
To do what?
I don't consent.
Declaration of what, though?
I don't understand.
Elon Musk tweeted, do you sell cars?
Apparently not many.
And they responded like, yes, we would like to talk with you about it sometime over coffee.
So I'm like, they're still, they're going to die on this HIV riddled hill.
Listen, from fragrance ads, I expect it to be weird, right?
Every single fragrance ad that you've ever seen in your life is weird, right?
Yes.
I would be weirded out by that being a fragrance ad.
If somebody sprayed cologne on themselves at the end of it, I'd be like, well, this is super weird even for a fragrance ad.
Yeah, yeah.
Plus, it would make you gay.
Also that, yes.
None of those people in that commercial would drive a Jaguar.
No.
What you don't understand is all the people in that commercial identify as cars.
Yes, exactly.
Oh, really?
Some of them identify as Jaguars.
Screw you, because that's actually possible, Noodles.
Well, which one of them is the Titan?
That's the intent.
This is where we are at this point.
Think about this for a second.
Someone actually said, this is a good idea.
This is how we should run our advertising campaign.
Somebody paid money to show people this.
We had something similar.
We had some distillers of a famous American bourbon company on the show, and then afterwards we said, hey, you know, we'd love to talk to you about a sponsorship.
But there was someone who was a brand manager, as queer as a $3 bill, like, no, no, no, we're going in a different direction.
It's American bourbon.
Yeah.
You don't think that people would love an American bourbon company?
It's the people who are in between.
And you see this everywhere in this industry.
You have to understand the cavalcade of, and I mean this, absolute freaks.
They share nothing in common with you, and they are the people who dictate the cultural wing of the left.
And it makes a lot more sense When you listen to Jaguar's director of marketing, a guy named, and I don't know if I'll get his name correct, it's Santino Petrosanti.
Here he is.
This is the person talking about Jaguar without a hint of irony.
And at Jaguar, we are passionate about our people and we're committed to fostering a diverse, inclusive and unified culture that is representative not only of the people who use our products, but in a society in which we're On a bicycle.
This is Gabe and Schaub.
Thank you guys for coming.
Women in engineering and neurodiversity matters.
We've launched major policy revisions such as transitioning at work to drive equity and support for our communities embracing individuality as our superpower.
And we can grab another one.
He goes on to specifically mention the DEI initiatives that they have...
No, he said it.
Oh, he did right there?
You were talking over it.
We've got 12 DEI initiatives, including Pride that is here.
I was too confused by his wardrobe.
Yes, the weird thing is he has a rugged face.
He looks like he could potentially be a fighter.
Like he was a D1 wrestler who fought his gay urges and lost.
He did.
Well, he's the spokesperson by day and sodomize me Jaguar by day.
It's a hard life.
It's a long hour.
You know what your superpower isn't?
Selling cars.
Or producing cars.
They have taken all of the year off from producing cars.
Yeah.
They announced that in August 2024.
They're saying, yeah, we're not going to be producing cars because we need to transition to the fully electric line, which is funny because all these companies just, they vilify Elon Musk, the only guy who's actually made the electric vehicle thing work.
Yes.
And he had to move from California to Texas.
That tells you how unsustainable the woke movement is.
And by the way, a video of one of their prototypes for the new electric vehicle line has been linked online.
Hey, boys.
I'm Jaguar!
Hear me roar!
That wouldn't be bad.
At least it'd be a combustion engine.
I'm just happy we finally got Transformers on the show.
My job is done here.
Yes, yes it is.
Bye, Gerald.
Gerald has to go masturbate, I think.
It's one of those things where you watch it, is it silly?
Sure, but you have to understand, these are the people who are advising the Harris campaign.
These are the people who are in charge of content guidelines on big tech.
It's the same group of people.
CNN can't change.
They can't change.
They can't balance out their programming.
Not because they can't put some talking heads on air, for example, who are more conservative.
It's the wardrobe stylists.
It's the makeup artists.
It's the executives.
It's the cameramen.
It's the interns.
It's the associate producers.
It's the people in charge of marketing, CNN. It just cannot be undone.
And these people, and by them I mean these progressive leftists, and really dogmatic leftists, they will not allow it to change.
They will not.
There's going to have to be a civil war in the Democrat Party, and this is just an example of that.
You don't think there are enough people, the James Carville's going, what's going on?
You're putting damn queers in the car.
They're riding a bicycle to work.
Ain't nobody gonna wanna buy a car if you're not making cars.
Winning's everything, stupid!
At the end of the commercial, it says, copy nothing.
But did you notice when the commercial started, the first thing every one of us thought was gay?
Yes, yes.
Because they copied everything that's gay.
It copied every gay thing.
What is this, a fashion show?
It looks just like one.
Yeah.
You copied so much in this.
You made it look like some dystopian future or some kind of planet with a weird rock.
It looks like interstellar.
Dude, you're a copycat.
Yes, it is absolutely awful.
Let's move on to something else, though, which is very nice.
Because the left is obsessed with, They're obsessed with sex, but not like sex regular.
They're obsessed with perverse sex.
Ah, I thought you were going to say sex light.
Yes.
No.
Well, me, well, sex is light.
Now, this is a real, all references available.
It's a real story.
It's a real story.
Colder weather, this is Daily Mail, means that you need to check, of course, like your furnace, your car, your water, all that, your pipes.
Daily Mail offered some helpful tips for women to winterize their vaginas.
I'm sorry, what?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
How to winter-proof your vagina.
Huh.
Okay.
Like for salt roads?
And I thought, what are they going to do?
You know, like, okay, are you supposed to, like, shut the valve off?
I don't know.
Are you supposed to let it drip a little bit so it pipes?
Yeah, what a...
It's just, it's drinking a lot of water, balancing your diet, and for some reason wearing natural fiber underwear.
Like, I don't understand how any of this winterizes your snatch, but...
I, uh...
This is an actual article.
This is why people don't necessarily trust legacy media.
It's like, well, you're wasting our time.
When they say, well, some blogger wrote about this.
You're writing about winterizing your vagina!
Seriously, you're going to blame people?
You're going to blame, say, Joe Rogan's not professional?
You're a walking circus.
So a nutritionist wrote this in the Daily Mail saying, the combination of colder temperatures and multiple Christmas parties can actually have a detrimental effect on the health of your vagina.
Pause.
What goes on at your Christmas parties?
What?
Is there a fishbowl with a bunch of geese in it?
What's going on here?
Okay, it's time to play Pin the Frosty in the Vagina!
What?
Do they butt chug eggnog?
No, the vagina chug it, obviously.
This is an actual article at Daily Mail.
It should be noted that the writer of the article was this guy.
Always winterize your p***.
Yeah, it worked.
Hey, hey!
Office bitches, chill!
Wow, this is a real article, huh?
It's a real article.
How did we find this?
I just want to know who was searching.
There's not enough of an explanation for the Christmas party.
The five people that read Daily Mail posting on my accent.
Hey, at least we know for sure, according to this article, that Jewish women...
Yes.
All set.
No Christmas parties.
That's because they wear muff muffs.
Colder temperatures I get.
Christmas parties, I don't.
I don't understand.
What is it?
Why do they want us not going to Christmas parties?
COVID, there's no more Christmas parties.
It's the vaginas.
They don't want the vaginas going to Christmas parties.
What if I grow my bush out?
Or she grows her bush out?
I don't think that's enough protection.
Do we go to parties then?
I don't know.
I don't know.
I mean, I'm not the expert.
You better have a bush passport?
It'd be like me saying, you know, you gotta be really careful to, you know, worry about muscle strains on your pecker.
You know, wear supportive underwear.
And of course, be careful when you go fishing.
What?
What happens when you go fishing?
Uh, the fish that gets bait.
Yes.
Oh, really?
Okay, then.
I'm going twice.
Here's the point.
They're assuming that most women are whores.
That's the problem with leftist publications.
They're assuming that if you go to Christmas parties, you're going to sleep with a lot of people, which, look, do you want that promotion?
It's not the worst idea in the world.
Now, I think it's the food, but they don't really lean into that much.
No, that's definitely about sex.
That was definitely, there's no other thing.
No, it's gotta be about food.
Going to Christmas parties?
They could have said going to PTA meetings.
Yes.
But they didn't because no one's having sex at the PTA meetings.
Yeah, it came from a nutritionist, so it's definitely about sex.
It's about sex.
Wait, no, it's gotta be about diet then.
No, it's not.
Look, and this is the thing, these aren't the issues affecting everyday Americans.
We saw this play out with the election.
For example, you may not be able to afford...
Christmas.
Yeah.
This year.
If your taxes aren't in order, right, that's what affects everyday Americans, something our old friend Colonel Slanders knows all too well.
Howdy!
Colonel Slanders again!
You may have heard about my brother, who we jokingly call the chicken man of the family.
More of a cock to me.
But I'll tell you what's not a laughing matter.
All the taxes he had to deal with growing a business.
Turns out that...
Turns out that those 11 herbs and spices cannot legally be declared as dependents.
Oh, okay.
Okay.
Yeah, the cameraman's got notes.
Okay.
I've been making chicken longer than you've been alive.
Turns out those 11 herbs and spices cannot legally be declared as dependents.
Now he's fixing to trade his seersucker for an orange biscuit-lit jumpsuit.
If only he had Tax Network USA at the time.
Luckily, you can.
Go to TNUSA.com slash Crowder.
It's finger-lickin' good!
Y'all think Dave from Wendy's ever did this s***?
This ad's paid for by the Colonels for Harris Family Pack Bucket.
Oh, it's just a regular pack?
So go to tnusa.com slash Crowder.
Don't let the tax man take advantage of you.
And a lot of people think you can just do it by yourself without help.
You will be amazed as to the loopholes, the technicalities that people can help you with, and how much money it will save you.
Legal loopholes?
Yes, yes.
Yes, of course.
That's what a loophole is.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I don't mean anything untoward.
No, of course not.
Look, we just covered this yesterday.
$500 billion a year in fraud, the government.
$500 billion a year in fraud.
I believe we covered it on Rumble Premium, so maybe you didn't see this.
That's admitted to it.
The low end is $230 billion.
The high end is $520-something billion, I believe, in fraud every single year since we've been tracking this, since 2018 to 2023.
But that's yearly, annual.
You know what?
Hey, save some money.
You don't need to give the taxman anything more than he's asking for at this point.
When they fix their $500 billion annual fraudulent spending or wherever it just disappears, it seems like we should have some agencies that could investigate that.
That'd be great, yeah.
Maybe an audit of sorts.
Yeah, but those agencies end up wasting $300 billion a year trying to search for the $250 billion.
Right, yes.
My point is, pay as little in taxes as you possibly can.
Let's move on.
Well, if you've used any of the illegal loopholes, call them as well.
They can help.
Yes, exactly.
If you find yourself in a quandary right now, I don't know if they can help.
We have to be careful.
They might be like, hey, don't advise criminals to come to us.
I mean...
So here's something.
Turn yourself in.
You know, people talk about this quite a bit, and we try and solve this issue on this program as best we can.
That's a big part of what we do is providing references.
I get it.
There's always going to be echo chambers.
People are going to gravitate toward the kind of content that they find congruent with their point of view.
I would argue, however, that the left is far worse at this.
And let me make a case really quickly before we get to Blue Sky, this sort of lefty alternative to X, formerly Twitter.
If you look at Rumble, you look at X now.
Really, liberals are allowed.
They may not go there.
Liberals are allowed there.
You are not seeing liberals.
You are not seeing leftists removed in massive numbers.
They really are just platforms that are gravitating toward open speech, freedom of speech, and so you see a higher percentage of conservatives.
When leftists create platforms, there are no conservatives.
They are proactively removed.
And so what you really see with these platforms, or really publishers, I should say at this point, What you see playing out is what people at YouTube and Google want to do.
What their content guidelines were designed to do.
You're seeing them play out.
You're seeing less conversation.
And you are seeing it descend into a circus of madness.
So, the newest one, or at least the one that people are paying attention to now is Blue Sky as an alternative to X. Just listen to this report from the Demon Tate Brother.
What hasn't been around for a long time is Blue Sky, the social media platform which is gaining users in recent weeks as an alternative to X. On Thursday, the platform reported more than a million users had signed up in a single day.
The platform's CEO says the site is growing by 10,000 users every 10 to 15 minutes and has more than 18 million users right now.
It really feels reminiscent of the former era of Twitter when it wasn't owned by Elon Musk.
Aliens are real.
He's changed the name of the platform to X. It looks and functions a lot like Twitter, but it doesn't have maybe...
Elon puts a little bit of his thumb on the scale, it seems like, sometime on what you see on X. And Blue Sky feels much more open and has a really exciting energy right now.
Very open.
As long as you're using the prep pill.
Now, it was created, or developed, I should say, by Jack Dorsey in 2019.
Remember Dorsey was CEO of Twitter, then left, then came back, and then left, and he just always torches everything behind him and burns all the bridges and then says, this place sucks!
So, he then left Blue Sky in May, and the new CEO is Jay Graber, who went on CNN just last night to boast about the success of the site.
But the tone and the environment and the community that you seek to create through Blue Sky, is it intentionally distinct from, say, an ex?
Well, our goal is to give users an experience where they can have fun and feel safe.
And so we've already always focused a lot on trust and safety, making sure that users have an ability to have experience that's free from bots and harassment and spam.
And then that's, I think, really core to the experience.
But then beyond that, we want a place where people can express their creativity.
And so they can come on and, you know, explore a app store, basically, of all these feeds.
It's like a marketplace of feeds.
And then you can subscribe to the ones that you're interested in, sort of like subscribing to magazines.
And so people who like cat pictures are just looking at the cat feed.
So it's just like people get really creative and discover their communities and find the places that they want to be within Blue Sky.
You've just described how to make a society dumber.
I Yeah, I don't think she understands what creation is.
You realize that?
Just subscribe to the feed.
It's like a magazine.
Okay.
Pick a dead medium.
And you can just look at cat pictures.
Okay.
So pick a trend from the early aughts.
All right.
So you want people to be dumber.
You want dialogue to regress.
Now, what she says there is safe.
Ah, that's a key word.
Harassment.
Everyone wants to do it with bots and spam.
No one's done more for that on X than Elon Musk.
It's not perfect.
Correct.
The words there are harassment and safety.
We will see their policy and what kind of an environment it leads to.
So their content policy, pretty generic with language about, you know, hate, abuse, all that kind of stuff that you see everywhere, all the gay stuff.
But here's the thing.
In practice, what you see is one user was immediately banned for posting.
Hello, new platform litmus test.
The perspective, most of those statements that would be in line with the vast majority of Americans.
As far as two genders, as far as biological men being a thing, as far as at least a certain percentage, a high percentage of Americans who believe the COVID vaccine was largely ineffective, also the science.
So, that person was banned.
Well, probably because litmus tests are banned.
It's not the other things.
Yeah, exactly.
I think you guys are getting confused.
And what needs to be contrasted is what's banned, what's impermissible, when the left has control, versus what is permitted.
What kind of environment does it create?
So when the left talks about a toxic environment from the right and they want to actively ban Rumble, not just ban people like us from YouTube, but then ban Rumble from even existing entire governments, right?
Progressive governments.
Let's compare the two, the kind of environment that you see when the left actually has what it is that they want unfettered.
The site, to give you an idea, the top 10 users, AOC, New York Times, The Onion, Mark Hamill, Mark Cuban, Washington Post, George Takei, Midas Touch, for some reason.
The marketing agency?
Yeah.
Let's look at some of the posts that you can find on Blue Sky.
So you can't say 2020 election was not the most free and fair.
You can't say COVID vaccine was ineffective.
You cannot say that there are only two genders.
But here's what you will find.
These are the kinds of posts that gain popularity on Blue Sky.
This is a user, Jen Rubin.
She's a Washington Post columnist, MSNBC contributor.
Democracy Defender.
Oh, she's a veteran.
Very cool.
That's what veterans do.
So, she posted this video on Blue Sky about RFK killing Americans.
This is a disaster.
Make polio great again?
Is that what the United States is going to be all about?
Are we going to reduce the availability of not only abortion medication, not only vaccines, but any kind of medication this crackpot thinks is undesirable?
It's an outrage.
Maybe some people who voted for this guy.
I'm going to die.
So, let's compare that directly.
Just, okay, what RFK has, just what we know thus far is suggested.
For example, we talked about this yesterday with clinical trials for the hepatitis vaccine being administered to infants.
That's offering people information and choice.
She wants him to not be able to speak.
And what they always do, and that's why that word safety is key in harassment.
It's under the guise of safety.
It's unsafe.
He's putting people in danger.
You know what I think put people in danger?
Forcing people to lock down in their homes.
Children not be allowed to attend school and businesses to be forever shuttered.
Destroying the livelihoods of America.
I think that that was dangerous.
How about putting COVID patients in nursing homes?
Maybe that was a little bit of a dangerous policy.
But in their perspective, it's no, no, this is good.
This is bad.
This is why they don't have a dialogue.
You can't have the dialogue on a place like Blue Sky.
You can do it in the rumble comment section underneath this very stream.
You're free to do so.
You may find a disproportionate number of conservatives, but that's because they gravitate toward free speech platforms.
You can say whatever you want, provided it's not actually a crime.
Illegal.
Let's go to another user here on Blue Sky.
This person calls himself Bonnie, a transsexual with four degrees.
Pigeon fan?
What was that?
Can you bring it up?
Number one pigeon fan.
Oh, yeah.
She might have balls, your honor.
Everything about this is unhealthy.
Huh.
This person posted this take on marriage.
I'm sorry, but traditional marriage in the 1950s was just a game of chicken to see if the wife would poison the husband before he sends her to get a lobotomy.
And honestly, extreme kinks.
Like that just aren't for me.
So first off, they think this is funny.
Second, these are the relationship dynamics that the left...
Do you see the left?
What they do is they destroy the male-female dynamics, where it's not about romance, that dance of hard-to-get cat and mouse, right?
Making sure that you dress up, you pursue a woman, you know, things that women like, things that men like doing.
It's all some struggle for power, right?
Where a man wants to abuse a wife and she wants to kill her man.
I don't know if they realize this.
That's actually not most relationships.
But it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy because of the left spearheading culture.
Everything is about control.
Everything is about abuse.
Same thing, you can even just take it to rape.
They do the same thing.
Well, if a woman is inebriated, then it's rape.
What if he's inebriated?
What if he's had a couple of drinks?
What if both of you have had a couple of drinks?
What happened to drunken screwing with a married couple?
Oh, everything has to be an imbalance of power and abuse of authority.
It doesn't seem as pernicious, but it is.
Let me go to another user here.
Sage.
Who identifies themselves as a trans NB woman into tech.
I'm sorry, what?
I didn't know.
I forgot what it was.
It means non-binary.
It's another word.
NB means non-binary?
NB. So it's an uncolored colored person.
I guess.
I don't know.
That's what that's...
It's like...
It's a total...
And they want us to just go along with it.
It was just like, oh, yeah, sure.
Yeah.
Yeah.
NB. No!
No!
No!
You made it up!
You made it up, and I don't respect it.
She works for Jaguar now, so that's...
Yes, exactly.
And people go, oh, no, this is just the radical wing.
Really?
The Prime Minister...
Of Canada unironically used two-spirited.
By the way, so did Tim Walz.
It's not some radical fringe.
That's the vice presidential candidate of the Democratic platform.
That's the prime minister of the country of Canada.
They use these terms.
Today's NB is tomorrow's two-spirited, which heads of state will use.
Do not let them get away from this.
This is the post from this person, this NB person.
Again, the kind of stuff you see on Blue Sky when they get an echo chamber on trans kids.
Attacking life-saving health care for children in hope of temporary personal comfort is abominable.
There is a ring of hell reserved for any quizlings willing to feed children to the fascist wolves at our doors.
Protect trans kids.
This is what they do with language.
And again, the language where you're just...
Can you comment if you see this, if you're a liberal?
Even if you disagree...
With the litmus test that was banned from Blue Sky.
The 2020 election was stolen.
Or there are only two genders.
Can you at least acknowledge that that is honest?
It is proactively honest?
It is making an affirmative statement that they are willing to defend.
That's the kind of language that is used from the right.
Hopefully they continue to use that language.
Protect trans kids.
What that actually means is allow the government to take children from their parents to transition them surgically or hormonally.
That's what protects trans kids.
When they say fascist wolves at the doors what they mean is the parents on the inside of the doors Saying, no, no, the government can't come into my house and take my 8-year-old child away because they're confused.
So to them, the fascists at the doors are the parents protecting their children in their own house, and they are protecting trans kids by basically abducting them from a private residence to surgically alter their life forever.
This is the kind of language.
And so that doesn't get banned.
It's good to see that this person also believes in hell.
Yes.
Apparently in their text, I think they might be acquainted with it if things don't turn around.
Well, you best start believing in hell, NB. You'll be in one.
Now...
Here is something else, too, that you see.
And again, it doesn't exist in a vacuum.
Contextually, it's a lot worse than with other sites.
They have been inundated with complaints for child sexual abuse material.
Well, it includes that, but there's other complaints, too.
But really, liberals complaining?
Oh, no.
I would never see that coming.
Yeah, now it's just falling apart.
It's become a circular firing squad.
I say, I say, just let it happen.
Let it happen.
So this is actually from, I believe, Blue Sky.
It says, we're receiving about 3,000 reports an hour.
To put that in context, in all of 2023, we received 360,000 reports.
We're triaging this large queue so the most harmful content, such as child sexual abuse material, is removed quickly.
Now, if only the CIA would do the same thing.
And this is the same thing when you see child sexual abuse material.
Again, all references available at lottowithcredit.com.
Link in the description.
You saw this with other leftist alternatives like Mastodon.
It's been a consistent problem.
Now...
Do we have the numbers of every platform where we can definitively say that they are higher here than everywhere else?
No, but let me ask you, do you think it's more likely that the political echo chamber, which even allows for the possibility of minor attracted persons being accepted into their ranks, is it really that much of a logical leap to say, yeah, they might have a bigger problem with pedophile pornography?
You can comment if you think, logically, you have to make an inference here because we don't have all of the statistics available.
We just have theirs.
And also worth noting is that a post on Blue Sky is unofficially called a skeet.
What?
Or skeeting.
Don't Google it.
No, first off, Lil Jon will have something to say about that.
Yes.
Second off, it's ironic to me that they created a platform called Blue Sky for them to cordon themselves off from the rest of society so they could only hear their viewpoints and smell each other's farts.
I didn't know that it was a scratch and sniff site, but okay.
Yeah, that's what the butterfly is.
It's the tramp stamp tattoo on the internet.
Ah, that's nice.
So I guess it's a blend of sky and tweets, but they turned it to skeet.
It's stupid.
The entire thing is stupid.
So after we talk about it today, I hope what happens is that it is never mentioned again, that nobody cares about this site.
But here's a point that I want to bring up that CNN brought up.
And guys, please bring in that overlay if you can, if there's a screenshot of it.
Where basically they were showing like before Elon Musk bought X and after or I think some other comparison maybe from 2022.
It's basically even now as far as ideology, right?
So if you're a conservative or a liberal, liberals I think is 48, conservative 47% of people identify there based on the polls.
It's gotten more equal.
That's what liberals are fleeing.
That's what they're saying is too filled with right-wingers.
I can't believe that I see this stuff.
You don't want to see any.
You want to go to your liberal ghetto and just sit there and talk about what you want the world to be and not have anybody critically assess your thoughts and challenge you.
Or you have the ability to challenge them.
You have the ability to change minds by being on X. If you want to see any conservative people, good luck calling the police.
Yeah.
Or the fire department.
When your house is on fire, you're having a heart attack.
Good luck.
They're running away.
They don't like their ideas.
They want to go to a safe space where everybody agrees with them and nobody's going to challenge.
Well, here's the thing.
You see it with YouTube and you see it with YouTube, Google, right?
You saw it with Facebook.
I guess Mark Zuckerberg is claiming he made some mistakes now.
Okay, trust being given to him remains to be seen.
But with Google and YouTube, to give you an idea, I was there in 2008.
I think my channel was created in 2006.
First political videos, 08, maybe 09, maybe 07.
And there were no conservatives.
There were no really prominent Christians.
It was all liberal by default, right?
It was all liberal.
It was all atheist.
That was a cool, edgy thing to do.
But back then, you were allowed to post your content.
And then what happened, and the left started complaining about this and decrying it, is conservatives started creating content, and it started winning.
Back before the algorithms pushed onto you what they want you to watch.
Back when the algorithms were a reflection of what you wanted to watch.
Back when the subscription box on YouTube knew people, you may not know this, once upon a time, your subscription box on YouTube was kind of like, to use Jay's example, a magazine.
You subscribed to channels that you wanted to watch, and you were actually notified of their content.
It would show up in your feed.
If you searched for a video by name, you could find it.
That's not the case today.
That's how it used to work.
Why?
Because the left complained that conservatives were being successful at all.
And so they started purging them, started demonetizing them.
So conservatives go to a place like Rumble, and maybe a place like X, and it allows them to fight back.
By the way, Rumble Premium is the best investment you can make in fighting back.
$99 annually.
Just try it.
$9 a month.
Mug Club is Rumble Premium.
Rumble Premium is Mug Club.
You get a 100% more show every day.
A full Friday show.
Nick DiPaolo.
Mr.
Guns and Gear.
Donald Trump Jr.
It's going to be a one-stop shop as we continue to grow this thing where you also get it ad-free, of course.
Very much like YouTube.
So you look at these platforms.
And it's not just conservatives.
You see gamers.
You see people who just, you know, see athletes.
You see sporting events.
When the left gets what they want, this is what they wanted for YouTube.
This is what the government was asking Facebook and Meta to do, by Mark Zuckerberg's own admission.
YouTube, if they had their way, if they weren't just having to kind of fake like they're skirting the law on Section 230, YouTube would be blue sky.
Google already is blue sky.
Let's be clear.
Facebook would be blue sky.
It's not what do they do right now with the powers they have.
What would they do if their powers were unfettered?
Go check out blue sky.
Tell me what you think of it because that's what your future would look like.
Yeah.
Another thing to keep in mind, too.
So Rumble is about, they've done a study on this, is about a third, a third, a third, right?
So liberal, conservative, independent.
It's about thirds.
Everybody thinks Rumble is just like this place where conservatives ran to.
Nope.
It's where free speech ran.
And free speech, there's a lot of people that actually believe in free speech in the independent category, right?
Obviously.
And some liberals kind of do it as well.
But then bring up the overlay that I sent you on this.
This is what they ran from, guys.
In 2022, 65%.
This is party ID among those who regularly use X for news.
65% dim, 31% GOP. Now, 48-47.
That's what they're running from.
They do not want a platform.
They don't want a company.
They don't want anybody successful who does not toe the line for them completely.
Look at Musk with X. Not with X, but with Tesla.
We've made that point a million times.
He was the darling.
Twitter was the darling of the left.
They loved Twitter.
Of course they loved it.
Until it became a level playing field.
And by the way, I don't think you've ever seen me call for anyone to be removed.
You've seen me insult them.
If you break the law, yes.
If you don't break the law, no.
Apparently it's a problem as far as, that's why this show is rated dead last as far as untruthful bias because if you insult somebody that changes the factual nature of your statement.
What?
What if you call someone Hitler?
What if it's funny though?
That's my, yeah.
Remember, second to last.
Second to last.
Oh yeah, that's right.
We're right neck and neck with Alex Jones.
They updated.
Yes!
We're right below.
I will eat your ass.
Yes.
Yes.
Stelzer.
So, which brings us to the next topic.
There's all kinds of misinformation out there.
Donald Trump has a mandate.
It's not about Donald Trump.
It's about the mandate that's been given by the masses.
And a big part of that is, yes, the majority of Americans, including the majority of Hispanic voters, believe that it is time to start deporting people.
So, let's get into how that happens, what kind of, and I said this before the election, look, Donald Trump can do two things of significance immediately upon beginning his presidency.
He can sign executive orders or executive policies that will reduce the cost of energy, that'll help inflation, that'll change the economy quite a bit, and start dealing with the immigration problem.
Meaning enhance border security and at the same time start deporting illegal immigrants.
He can do that immediately and those would be big wins and they would have a direct impact on your day-to-day life really within a matter of months.
That's not hyperbole.
So let's get to how this is done and if he can do it, it's deportation time.
It's deporting time.
Border jumpers.
Human traffickers.
Drug dealers.
Rapists.
Cartels.
Anchor babies.
We're ready to get them out of here and send them back.
Fact check that, bitch.
Now, Donald Trump.
The point.
Donald Trump posted this on Truth Social, so this was this week, that he is going to use the military to carry out mass deportations.
And I want to be really clear about this because the left will say, look, Donald Trump wanted to use the military or National Guard for the George Floyd protesters.
That's correct.
That's correct.
100%.
Yeah.
No, no.
Hold on.
We're not talking about protesters.
We're talking about arsonists.
We're talking about rioters.
We're talking about people who were executed in the streets.
We're talking about billions of dollars in damages.
Yep.
I don't want martial law.
I don't want a surveillance state.
But yes, I certainly do think that people actually harming Americans need to be dealt with.
And that's where the military organized police force...
National Guard.
These would be appropriate.
So Donald Trump said he would use the military.
And then Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch, wrote, Good news.
Reports are incoming that Donald Trump, the administration, is prepared to declare a national emergency and will use military assets to reverse the Biden invasion through a mass deportation program.
To which Donald Trump replied, True!
LAUGHTER Thank you very much.
I give this no Pinocchios.
LAUGHTER So here's the deal.
Most Americans support this, including Hispanic Americans.
But in case you wondered how out of touch the Democrat Party is, because they're radical leftists, they are pledging across the country right now, losing their minds, they are going to resist the will of you.
I do think one thing you're going to find here is that...
Pause!
Go back three frames.
Go back three frames.
And I know I'm being a child.
What is that lady on the left doing?
Is she preparing for a stag film?
That's what I was thinking, too.
It looks like she's trying to seduce her college professor.
She's skeeting.
Let's talk about ice!
She just had her vagina winterized.
I see.
I see.
There's a storm coming!
It's been permanently winterized.
Come on.
All right.
Okay.
Sorry.
Let's restart the clip because I'm a child.
That's distracting.
She's looking at the guy on the right.
That's who she's looking at.
No, she's looking at the girls due to the right.
Okay.
Let's play it.
I do think one thing you're going to find here is that All sorts of different networks of military officials are going to question the legality of them being enlisted in this mission.
The idea of calling out the army into the domestic confines of the United States seems uncalled for and may in fact be unconstitutional and illegal.
But what we can do is make sure that we are doing our part to protect our residents in every possible way, that we are not cooperating with those efforts that actually threaten the safety of everyone.
If the Trump administration requests it, would the Massachusetts State Police assist in mass deportations?
No, absolutely not.
I will not tolerate actions that harm Arizonans, that harm our communities, and quite honestly, divert resources from providing real security at our border.
Oh yeah, divert resources.
Hey, what have you done?
What have you done to make Americans more safe?
Let's ask two questions to these leftists.
You couldn't have a more clear example of Monday morning quarterback.
What have you done and what are the results?
I listen to far more left-leaning podcast shows, news, than I do right-leaning.
I want to know what it is that they're saying.
And the talking point that they have used repeatedly is, well, actually, actually, they did take actions to secure the border, Biden.
And actually, they were very...
Okay, let's just look.
Three million, Donald Trump, 15 to 20 million.
Biden.
So what have they done and what are the results?
That's the reason that the majority of Americans, including the voting bloc you tried to buy, Hispanic Americans, through your pandering, support mass deportation.
Something else that's lost in the shuffle here.
Who do you think is most affected as we get to sanctuary cities?
Legal immigrants here who are trying to assimilate.
Well, they're afraid to call the police because their neighborhood is run by gangs.
I don't know if you know this, if you live in a society where the criminals are willing to be violent and the law-abiding citizens actually remain law-abiding citizens, the criminals win.
Violence wins out.
We can't protect the kinds of immigrants who we want here to be safe.
So let's go through some key facts here as far as what it is they can resist and what it is they can do nothing about.
Key fact here, number one, is that Donald Trump does have the authority to mass deport.
Sorry, libertarians, he does.
The president is the chief law officer responsible for enforcing the laws written by Congress.
He can and said he will declare a national emergency which would give him the powers to carry out deportations.
You can reference the National Emergency Act of 1976.
He said, and again we said this is the best way to start, he's going to start with It's at least 1.4 million.
Right.
Illegals right now with deportation orders to start with.
And by the way, if this doesn't count as some kind of an emergency, then nothing does.
Yeah.
Right?
So people are like, oh, he's declaring an emergency.
No, no, no, no, no.
We've declared emergencies for far less worrisome causes.
Right.
Okay?
We should be able to do it for this.
Yep.
There are other things he can do, too.
He can use the emergency orders, by the way, to divert money.
For example, to hire more judges to process asylum claims, there's a lot that can be done.
The six or seven year wait right now for asylum claims is they just like, hey, run around the country for a little while until we get back to you.
And it's not like this is unprecedented.
You need to understand, since it's been politicized, really that kind of started in 2016 when they said, oh, Donald Trump is a racist, where he said they're not sending their best.
Before that, it wasn't all that controversial to say that, yeah, we need to deport Criminals who are here in this country?
Give me an idea, in 1954, Eisenhower deported about 1.3 million illegals under, and we don't need to hit the dump, it's the name, it was Operation Wetback.
We used to have a better sense of humor.
We were better at naming things, for sure.
And you may not know this, it's not only is their president, but Barack Obama deported over 3 million illegal immigrants over the course of his presidency.
The most ever!
Good.
That's incredible.
I had no idea.
The most ever.
Over 3 million?
Over 3 million.
And then Biden filled that hole right back up.
In the first few months.
Yeah, he did.
I understand we typically focus on the southern border, but look, if there are any illegal Canadians, I want them out too.
Yes.
You know?
Scandinavians, out as well.
If you have not come here legally, you can either go back to a warm place or a cold place.
It's fine.
Either one.
Yes.
And this brings us to the resistance.
Key fact number two.
It's actually illegal.
For Democrats in their municipalities, in their states, to harbor illegal immigrants.
Okay?
Let's be really clear about that, because this may get lost when you're watching, like, well, I guess they have the right to do that as a sanctuary city, and what federal powers does Donald Trump have?
No, no, no.
It's really, really clear.
He does have the authority to do this, rightfully so, by the way, and there's nothing inconsistent about holding that position as a conservative, and leftist mayors or governors do not actually have the authority To block it and to protect illegal immigrants.
So last night, Los Angeles passed a sanctuary city ordinance with a unanimous vote.
Well, this vote was unanimous.
Council members voted 13 to 0 to adopt the sanctuary city ordinance.
Now, what it does is it officially prohibits any city resources from being used to help federal immigration enforcement.
Immigrant Angelenos are facing their gravest attacks.
And those attacks are coming from the incoming administration that has said to us a very clear threat.
Mass arrests and deportations.
Those attacks.
To be fair, she was actually referring to this Los Angeles gang, the administration.
So that is...
Oh.
Yeah.
Los Angeles is not the only place that is trying to do this.
You have San Francisco, Chicago, Seattle, Denver, D.C. And the list goes on.
Look at that.
All the cities where legal immigrants have to live in perpetual fear because of their drug cartel overlords.
You can go back to the Change My Mind.
Remember where we had a lady come up and say, hey, in Austin, what can I do?
I have these people in my neighborhood, but I can't call the police because there are so many of them, and I know that I will be the target of retribution.
And it broke my heart.
Do you realize that's what these people live under?
This idea, when you try and create, again, I've said this, when you try and create a culture of fake victims, you actually victimize real people.
In this case, people who are trying to follow the law, who actually have a dream of making it here in America.
So, let's go to what sanctuary cities actually can do and what they cannot do.
Just so you're not caught flat-footed when you have some liberals say, well, actually, the federal government, the president doesn't have the authority.
You can tell them, no, that's incorrect.
So sanctuary cities, they can prevent local law enforcement from reporting on immigration status, okay?
They can prevent local law enforcement from cooperating with federal law enforcement.
What they cannot do is prevent federal law enforcement in any sanctuary city or municipality from carrying out immigration policies Period.
In other words, federal law enforcement can grab people and deport them.
The local law enforcement may say, no, no, no, we're not going to be a part of this.
Federal law enforcement absolutely, under orders that come from the United States president, can say, well, we're going to do our job anyway.
Think about that.
The local law enforcement, the people that are there to serve the communities, will actively fight against the interests of the communities that they're trying to serve.
This is the inverse of how we set this thing up.
The local authorities were supposed to be taking care of the cities and just give very little power to the federal guys because they have no idea what's good for us.
How can you have a city that, like, if you don't go into a city with guns, not a blazing, but like, get out of the way because people have broken the law and they're in your jails and we're taking them and putting them back where they came from.
How is that not an issue that people go, yeah, yeah, you go in and you overthrow the idiots in charge of this city and you put in new people by electorate.
Vote for them.
Well, the thing is, people in positions of power, they're actually fighting against the will of the American people at this point in time.
Boy, if local law enforcement could have done, they could have done a better job with Blake and Riley.
They were just talking about that on CNN. Yeah, did a bang-up job, didn't they?
Here's why, look, even when the left, they'll lie to you and they'll say, actually, this is a group of people who are twice as law-abiding as natural-born citizens.
It's not true.
They'll cite Cato or whatever it is.
It's not true.
Immigrants as a group.
Sure.
Tend to commit crimes to less immigrants as a whole.
You actually can't find the numbers on illegal immigrants because they don't tend to answer polls and it's very hard to get an accurate number when people are here off the books illegally.
What you do know is they represent a disproportionate number of inmates in federal prisons.
They should represent 0% in federal prisons because they need to be deported.
So when the left tries to say, actually, these people are just coming here and they're not breaking the law, it's not true.
And you know what?
Every single person who dies is mugged, Raped by an illegal immigrant is a tougher pill to swallow for that family because it's one that shouldn't have happened anyway and was entirely preventable.
And we have laws for it.
This is the law, actually.
USC 24A, Section A, it says...
This subsection prohibits alien smuggling, domestic transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts.
So, there's a lot out there that these sanctuary cities can't do.
They're basically saying they are going to break the law.
Let me give you an example.
In 2018, there was a Massachusetts judge.
This person was charged with helping an illegal alien escape ICE. This illegal alien was in court over drug charges.
The judge knew that ICE was waiting for the illegal alien to leave the courtroom.
Likely to deport him.
The judge let the illegal go through the basement to escape out the back door.
What?
So this judge, knowing that this person was enough of a problem that ICE was saying, okay, this person has to go, helped an illegal alien escape.
By the way, I don't know if you noticed, really tough to track, said illegal alien afterward.
No idea if he went on to harm anybody else.
We can't possibly know.
The Biden administration, right, the DOJ, completely dropped charges against the judge.
Oh, that's criminal.
Oh, really?
Wow.
What point is that treason?
Yes, that's what I mean.
These people are actively working against the will of the American people.
And by the way, research, do me a favor.
I just saw this scroll across.
in that bill that was signed by all 13, 13-0 in Los Angeles to kind of do that.
They actually tagged on sanctuary status for LGBTQ persons, people, whatever, in schools as well as just in the city in Los Angeles.
Was that cover?
Was that like, hey, probably not going to get it passed if it's just sanctuary city for people who shouldn't be here illegally.
Let's tag on the LGBTQ community and schools and everything else to make sure that it passes.
I don't think so.
The city that's named in Spanish, I don't think that's cover.
No, no, no, I know, but I mean, why would you do that?
Why would you tag that on to things that seem kind of unrelated?
I'm excited.
Well, let's go find out.
Yeah, we'll have them find out, but let's go on to New York because even Eric Adams has acknowledged that this is a problem.
And it's surprising because it's Eric Adams.
You're like, oh, this guy's probably going to say something bad.
On The View, you go, oh, it's definitely going to be bad.
Actually kind of stated some truths in agreement with Donald Trump and how illegal immigration has affected New York City.
I don't believe in mass deportation, but I don't believe in mass saturation.
220,000 migrants and asylum seekers came to the city, cost us $6.4 billion.
I'm not allowed to let them work.
I'm not allowed to have them be participating in a tax space of this city.
We can't deport those who commit crimes in our city.
We are not allowed to connect with mice.
This is a failed system.
We need to fix it.
And if we don't fix it, we're seeing what's happening in Chicago, what's happening in Houston, what's happening in Denver.
This is wrong for cities to pick up this course.
Only when Donald Trump in 2016 said we needed to fix it, you said it was racist.
Yeah.
The left, they politicize everything while accusing you of politicizing.
Barack Obama deported three million more than anyone ever.
It wasn't the same political until Donald Trump said, okay, we need to fix the immigration issue.
Then it became, all right, this is a wedge issue now.
It's a racial thing.
They want to die on that hill.
By the way, Eric Adams, don't be a sanctuary city.
Yeah.
Hey, you know what?
That's a good start.
There you go.
Otherwise, I screw you.
I don't care how much it costs you.
Here's another one, too, and I want to be...
This is a key fact three here because there's a lot of discussion around this and a lot of people aren't necessarily clear on this.
President Donald Trump can actually go a little bit further here and end...
Outright birthright citizenship.
Now, before we show his clip, I want to be clear about this because it's kind of like one of those no-cash-bail things where people don't fully understand.
What we're talking about with birthright citizenship is the idea that anyone born on American soil is automatically a United States citizen, regardless of the immigration status of their parents.
This, of course, manifests itself in anchor babies, where they'll have a child here, illegal aliens, to try and gain status, or there's even something called birth tourism.
This is how the system gets gamed, where you have foreign nationals go, oh, okay, she's eight and a half months pregnant, let's get to the United States.
It could be a visa, or it could just be touching soil here, go, oh, they're born here.
So it's their equivalent of wet foot, dry foot, kind of, only it's actually not constitutional.
We'll get into that.
And Donald Trump does have the authority to end this interpretation of birthright citizenship, which he said he would do.
Here's the video.
As part of my plan to secure the border on day one, My new term in office, I will sign an executive order making clear to federal agencies that under the correct interpretation of the law, going forward, the future children of illegal aliens will not receive automatic U.S. citizenship.
Okay, now that we've explained it, let me sort of deconstruct this claim from the left.
Their claim is that birthright citizenship as we know it, and as it has been practiced, like we said, baby tourism, anchor babies, all of this, That it's protected by the Constitution and the 14th Amendment.
That is what the left wants you to believe.
Birthright citizenship guarantees that people born in the U.S. receive citizenship, regardless of the parents' nationality.
It was adopted after the Civil War to secure citizenship for former slaves.
The Supreme Court later confirmed the interpretation of the 14th Amendment that birthright citizenship is unequivocal in the 1898 Wong Kim Ark case.
Was that done, Bongino, in black and white?
In 1898?
So, here's the truth.
No, it's not unequivocal.
That's a misstatement.
This is a complete misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment.
Let me read this for you.
Section 1 of the 14th Amendment makes it pretty clear.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States.
So, according to the Michigan Senator, Jacob Howard, who drafted the 14th Amendment, he said this meant that citizenship should not be extended to people who share any loyalty to another country.
It's even broader.
Oh, so when you see one of those flags on a car or on a bedroom window.
Any loyalty.
In other words, if you are not subject to the jurisdiction here in the United States, no, you are not a citizen.
And you don't simply automatically get citizenship because you happened to come here when your living girlfriend was eight and a half months pregnant.
It would make no sense, like, logically.
Yes.
People could just fly in and do it all the time.
So what you have is a 14th.
No, I know.
I'm saying they shouldn't be able to.
So I want to make sure that you guys really understand.
Because this is something the left is trying...
They'll just throw out the term birthright citizenship, right?
Well, he wants to end birthright citizenship.
That's as American as apple pie.
First off, no.
And American...
Apple pie isn't all that American.
We kind of co-opted it.
But that's beside the point.
You are incorrect...
I just read the 14th Amendment.
I told you about the man who drafted the 14th Amendment, who clarified it, and we have another truth, the Supreme Court rulings on this issue.
Really, there's only been one major ruling, and it ruled Exactly how we have described this to you.
It's the United States versus Wong Kim Ark.
The court actually ruled that a child born in the United States of parents of Chinese descent, but have a permanent domicile and resident in the United States, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, become at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States by virtue of the first clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
So...
To be clear, this child's parents were legal residents, which granted citizenship according to the 14th Amendment.
What that means is, again, you have to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
If you are not and you have a child, it doesn't change it.
You're not just all citizens.
Time after time after time, this has been crystal clear.
For some reason, Americans have just accepted this idea that, oh, if you're born in the United States, then everyone gets a pass.
Right.
If people have literally been here for four days and happened to drop a baby on American soil, that's absurd.
And it's not how it works.
It's not how it works in countries across the globe throughout human history.
Logically, nobody should expect it to work that way, too, because there is a cost to this, right, to your citizen of the United States that comes with benefits.
Right.
Right?
So it's not just a random thing that happened.
And by the way, the Wong Kim Ark judgment or ruling...
Was exactly what the person cited in that video saying Donald Trump didn't have the authority to do it.
And it's like, I don't think you're following this.
If they're here legally, yes.
If they're not, no.
This should be very cut and dry for people.
Yes, exactly.
So the Taliban should just have a kid over here and be like, alright, we're going to have a little cell there.
It's going to take 20 or so years to mature.
But we'll get it.
Parents are not here legally?
No.
No.
They're here legally?
Yes.
Clear enough?
So here are some suggestions as to maybe what can be done.
Donald Trump could issue an executive order instructing federal agencies to not issue government documents to children of illegal aliens.
That could be done.
Congress could pass a law clarifying that only children of citizens and legal permanent residents could be citizens.
Again, just to undergird what we already know to be true.
So that could be used when the left tries to push these talking points, which are factually incorrect.
And making it very clear there is no constitutional right that is protected to this idea of birthright citizenship.
There is no right for a city to say, actually, we're not going to allow the federal government or the president to deport criminals.
And more important than that, think about this.
The left is not, I've said this before, they're not just fighting for anchor babies right now.
They're fighting for the first 1.3 million people.
Illegals who are scheduled to be deported who are criminals.
They've chosen to fight right now.
Gavin Newsom, Los Angeles City Council, they didn't say, alright, let's get rid of the criminals, let's do that first, and then we'll talk about the anchor babies.
No, they have chosen to make the stand, you will not deport.
A violent felon from our municipality.
What does that tell you?
Why?
It begs the question, why?
And how do you find common ground with that kind of evil?
Genuine question.
Why?
It cannot be on behalf of you, the American people.
It can't.
So, is it to buy a voting base?
Is it control?
Is it simply because orange man bad?
There are a multitude of answers, but none of them lead you to the path that, yeah, these sanctuary cities, these leftists are looking out for you.
And you have said it, including Hispanic Americans.
This is a very odd time in history, but it's an exciting time for some insight on what all of this may look like.
Oh, I guess we have Ignacio.
Yeah, we got him on the phone line.
Okay, our immigration correspondent on the line to weigh in.
Mr.
Ignacio, can you hear me, sir?
Right.
My apologies, Nacho.
Do you have any plans now that Trump has floated using the military to deport illegal aliens?
Who?
It sounds kind of personal.
Something about an Xbox?
Are you joining the army so you can avoid being deported and simultaneously someone stole your Xbox?
Is that what happened?
That's right.
I'm gonna be alright, eh?
Because I still have my PlayStation and Call of Duty, so I can learn how to do my military duties and still have a little fun.
Coyotes make a lot of money.
Maybe I could try that.
Coyotes walk in a sideways pattern to camouflage their paths, eh?
You know, they're lightweight and they can hide their tracks.
Like one of those pinchy zombies in the Circle K parking lot.
Okay, Tim, you can cut it.
I think that we've gotten everything we need.
I think he said enough, yeah.
Ignacio.
Cussing.
Sometimes very oddly racist.
Yeah, that's Latinism.
Yeah, they get a little passionate, I think.
And like we said, you can click that button to join Rumble Premium as we continue to do the show.
I do believe that we had something come in from Mission Control, which we need to deal with.
Oh, yeah.
▲
Export Selection