All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 1, 2024 - Louder with Crowder
01:08:51
Who’s Lying: Trump, CNN or Black Journalists?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Bye, boys!
Cheers!
Bye, boys!
Thank you guys so much for having us.
This chicken is delicious.
Oh yeah, y'all are welcome anytime.
And what does Daddy get for all his hard work?
The big piece of chicken!
I always get to laugh when we're eating that.
Chris Rock.
I haven't seen that.
Oh my gosh, I can't believe you haven't seen that, honey!
Yeah, I love Chris Rock.
He's so funny.
Did you really see it, Ricky?
Especially since you're the big comedy fan.
I don't think so.
Why not?
Well, I'm a racist, so...
Uh oh.
So, you think black people are... Inferior.
Right.
And that'd be because of their... Skin color.
So it's not, um... Cultural?
No, not at all.
Well, don't make this dinner all about me.
You guys have any plans for Halloween?
Yeah, well, we'll go to Jeff's parents with the kids.
I'm sorry, I feel like I need to say something.
No, really, it's fine.
It's not okay, Jen.
Ricky, if you really feel that way about the blacks, I just don't feel like I can be in this relationship anymore.
Wait, so you didn't know I was a racist?
Of course not.
What?
You didn't notice how I don't have any black friends and I don't listen to rap music?
You never noticed my oversized exclusively white dog?
Remember that time I said I wanted Tyler Perry to get waterboarded?
I thought you just hated Madea.
Oh, you mean Big Mama's House?
No, Madea.
Okay, so the movie where the young black guy dresses up like a spunky old black woman?
Yes, Madea.
I think it's fair to say that I'm pretty uncomfortable.
I think we should probably go home.
Oh, Jeff.
Honey, let's all just take a deep breath and try and enjoy our dinner.
I totally agree.
Do ya?
Do ya?
This pineapple fried quinoa is fantastic.
Oh, Jeff and I just got around to seeing the new Ocean's movie.
Ocean's 8, I think it was?
Have you all seen it?
I loved it.
Really?
Really? Of course, I'm not a sexist.
Join Mug Club today for $89 annually or try it Mugless for $9 a month.
You can sign up at ladderwithcreditor.com slash Mug Club for the entire catalog including
Nick DiPaolo, Brian Callum, Mr. Guns and Gear, and of course, Alex Jones along with 100%
more of this show.
Mug Club.
It was a short sip because I already see Toolman concerned.
Was there a little flutter that just happened?
All right.
Look, I love being with you every day.
That's the truth.
It's certainly one of the highlights of my days.
But some days are better than others.
I see a butt.
Seldom do I look forward to sitting in this chair as much as I do today.
Really?
So, we'll give you the rundown, but of course we're going to be talking about Donald Trump and his interview at the Black Journalist Summit.
Because I don't want to mispronounce the N-A-B-J.
Wait, N-A-B-J.
N-A-B-J, exactly.
This is the problem, is we were writing jokes, and then the joke stays in your head as opposed to...
National Association of Black Journalists.
It's Black BJ.
The point remains.
NBA Jam.
I was listening to it.
And he was on fire.
I was listening to it on the way home yesterday.
I was driving in the car.
I had to pull over.
I was laughing so hard.
I was pissing myself.
I thought it was so funny and please comment below if that was it and so we're going to get to the highlights but we are of course going to fact check the fact checkers because as I was hearing it in real time I'm going oh I know exactly how they're going to try and fact check this I know how CNN is going to fact check this incorrectly how they are going to lie slash fact check it don't think it was necessarily all positive I think overall though there were some there were some uh Swings, some big hits, some misses.
We're going to focus on the hits today.
Yeah.
Because they were hilarious.
We're going to talk about that, the Olympic insanity.
We have that as a quick segment for you.
If you're watching on YouTube, we're going to have to hit the YouTube dump button to go to Rumble.
Well, at some point you're going to see this.
Head on over to Rumble because the IOC, the most woke organization in the world, I know what you're thinking.
GLAAD?
No, it's the IOC.
And they will remove anything that we cover, including biological men beating the hell out of women, but there are more highlights as well.
And, uh, cancer!
Cancer is making a comeback with Gen X and Millennials, some new studies that are incredibly alarming, but here's the good news.
There is something that you can do Just very practical steps that you can take to avoid it.
To actually reduce your risk.
They didn't necessarily talk about that.
And by didn't necessarily, I mean not at all on CNN.
Take a guess why, what the risk factor is.
So I'm looking forward to today.
And you know, it's a day where we actually get to help you.
Captain Morgan, number two, CEO, how are you?
What are you running?
Well, I'm asking, I'll just ask them guys.
I just have the water bottle tightening clip ready to go here in just a little bit.
When you say funny stuff that happened, picking up the lady's water bottle next to him,
tightening it and putting it back down.
That's like walking over.
That's exactly what, I don't know if that's what happened necessarily, but if it is, I'm like.
Some are saying that it was his water bottle that he opened it, but yeah, I don't think it was.
I don't think it was either.
Maybe he was confused like, oh no, I grabbed her bottle and puts it back.
But either way, it looks like something funny that Trump would do.
And backstage he rolled up a newspaper and spanked her dog.
He did, yes.
Vagina!
How are you doing?
Sorry, I didn't even answer your question.
I'm fine.
I'm looking forward to it.
I feel good.
I feel energized.
It was a lot of fun.
Also, you guys can count, here's the thing.
Some people are saying, this won't play well with, sure, white women.
I think it's going to play surprisingly well with black men.
I think people are going to be surprised by the reaction from mainstream black American men.
If you're watching right now and that's you, hey, please comment below.
When you hear this, you know I'm going to love him.
He's here in third chair.
You can follow him on Instagram at Josh underscore Firestein.
How are you, sir?
Good, good.
And I agree with you.
Watching that thing, I was laughing too, but what I noticed was like, it felt like a comedy show because the crowd was laughing.
Yes.
The whole time I was like, oh, if this was all white people, they wouldn't be laughing at any of this.
They'd just be grumpy.
Yeah.
And they were laughing.
They were laughing.
And even things they didn't want to laugh at.
You got a point!
Because things are funny sometimes, whether they agree or not.
They're just like, oh, that's funny.
Or like, he's so wrong, they're like, oh my god.
I wish there was a reverse shot where you could see the faces and I'm like... Well, the magician was later.
Yes, exactly.
That was at a Kat Williams.
No, it wasn't that one.
They reacted to him about, and by they, I mean black people.
I mean they, black people, because here was a summit with black journalists.
That's appropriate.
What do you mean, these people?
I mean the people there who are largely black, because it's black journalists, okay?
They were reacting like they did to a David Blaine special.
It was just a lot of fun.
But before we get to that, speaking of magic, I don't know if you know this, with the IOC, you can be a man for your entire life, go in, answer a questionnaire, and abracadabra, you're a chick.
Questionnaire magic, I love it.
The Paris Olympics, obviously you guys have seen how woke this organization is.
It's also a scam as far as fleecing athletes out of dollars that they earn.
It's a multi-billion dollar entity, and everyone makes some money except a significant portion, of course, does not go to the athletes unless they have sponsorships.
So, as of today's show, the United States leads with 31 medals, only have six golds.
China leads with 11 golds.
It should be noted that most of those come in sports with weight categories.
And we're going to show you a highlight reel.
If you're watching on YouTube, you have to go to Rumble, but of course everything else will be here.
We wanted to actually share before this which events we were disappointed in that didn't make it into the Olympics, like the Omaha Beach metal detecting event, you would think, over there.
Yeah, it's a... Oh, jeez.
There was... They're still up there.
Gerald wanted... The 100 meter twerk as well.
That's fantastic.
What's amazing is there's no fans.
It's a skill, guys.
It's a skill.
That's more than 100 meters.
That reminds me of, like, the water shooting gun at the carnival.
Yes, yes.
The horses.
And your personal favorite?
I'm disappointed that they didn't have javelin catching.
Yeah, that one could have been.
Yep.
It's just such a fun game, you know?
Oh no!
I am in a quandary.
I want to look back to avoid javelin, but then I will run slower, more likely get hit.
He doesn't look ready to catch it at all.
It's almost as though he's incidentally there.
After Mao's China, that's a surefire goal.
He's thinking it's going to be falling sparrows.
So here are some of the moments that you may have missed.
Some are just funny, and then of course the one that is trending right now is, I believe there are two transgender boxers.
Uh, if I'm not mistaken, there's- but I know there's one who- They're not fighting each other.
No, they're not fighting each other.
Are there two this year?
There were two who applied?
I think there were two, but the one is kind of making a lot of news for, you know, beating the crap out of women.
Yes, exactly.
And we'll break that down afterwards, but here's just a highlight again.
If you are on YouTube, Head to Rumble will be right back, but you're going to see the fallout from it.
The Olympics.
They were all so mad at this.
Oh Supposedly that they against they start fight news and then
the very next match Dirty.
For a century, swimming was banned.
end.
Mouth, mouth, mouth, mouth.
Is that upside down?
And this is good!
you.
Between Angela Carini and Iman Police.
And just look at the guys holding his hand like, WE DID IT MA!
Yes!
You hit a woman.
And if you break that down, it's the reaction time is the big difference there.
Let's play that again.
Look, the actual, the biological lady, I believe from Italy.
No, no, no.
Yeah.
So yeah.
Biological lady from Italy.
Yeah.
Biological lady from Italy throws her punch here.
Let's start playing.
before This is incredible because the Italian broad she drops to
the mat afterwards sobbing not because she lost She had to fight a man.
Yeah.
That was the problem.
And I'm reminded of the Change My Minds, where we had Smug Journal.
Remember that Smug Journalist who came in like, oh, so there's this epidemic of men competing in women's sports?
It's not a problem.
So why are you talking about it?
It's not a problem.
So why are you talking about it?
Just because it's not a problem because we haven't allowed it.
It doesn't negate the reason that we have disallowed it.
We've disallowed it because we know that it will be a problem, namely that men can beat up women quite easily.
I don't know if you know that.
It's not an accomplishment.
It's pretty easy to do.
It is.
And by the way, just so you know, I believe this boxer was actually not allowed to compete in the World Championships because he's a guy.
Yes.
And it's a women's event.
It's a man, baby!
Yes.
This is unbelievable.
But everybody is talking about this right now, and if you think that this isn't something that's going to visit us soon, Olympics, here you go.
It's supposed to be the biggest sports venue event in the world every two years, I get it, summer and winter.
But still, it's happening.
It has to stop.
I remember getting a lot of backlash when Fallon Fox was also beating up Women in Chill's son who was on the show.
You know, UFC fighter for a very long time.
And he said, I am telling you, there are men right now.
Okay, look, people are talking about this.
I'm telling you, there are men right now who will identify as women if they believe it will help them win a world championship.
I said, even people who wouldn't necessarily be transgender?
He said, correct.
And everyone said, that's absurd.
Well, here we are.
It's certainly a path to a medal.
And a lot of people will do a lot.
You don't think that people will compromise?
Compromise themselves for glory?
Is there any greater glory than winning an Olympic gold medal?
Kale just changed his name to Chanel.
Yes.
This might sound petty, but I'm glad that she didn't shake hands after the fight.
Yeah.
We didn't really see that, but the hand raised, and then tried to go over and shake her hand, and she just brushed her off.
And then she went to the mat crying.
The guy came over to try to console her.
She's like, don't touch me.
And then she saw the camera, and she was like, yeah.
The guy's like, come on, don't be a poor sport.
Come on, were you crying, baby?
Gonna go home and cry, baby?
And there were some people who were chastised and won for not shaking hands in a show of poor sportsmanship.
Those are the same people who didn't mention that the Moroccan wouldn't shake the hand of a Jew.
That's true, yes.
And by the way, that's not the first time that that's happened at the Olympics.
No, it's happened all the time.
So quickly to have karma come knocking on your door though, that's just interesting.
Maybe next week we'll do an in-depth segment on the IOC.
I know we have in the past, but their transgender guidelines are actually the most liberal, progressive evil that you have seen in the world.
That's why you have people who can compete in the Olympics who can't compete in their dedicated sport within their own governing bodies or organizations.
There's an exception to the rule because they want to be extra woke, and I don't believe that it's a coincidence when you're talking about an international event, of course, that makes or stands to make people billions of dollars when you take into account the WEF and the idea of a new international global alliance?
I don't know if I'm allowed to say that?
Do you remember the guy, the power lifter?
In 2020?
No, it was an Olympic lifter, but yes.
Yeah, that's what I mean.
In 2020, she squatted her balls off, you know?
It's the first testicular injury ever to cancel a men's participation in a women's event.
Like, it's so freaking hilarious that these things are happening, but it's also sad.
These people spend so much of their life training and trying to get to the Olympics just to qualify, and then to get there and go, you have to do something that's completely unfair because it's a clown show and we can't say that this person's a man.
It's like, you just ruined part of their life.
Yeah, and imagine- Be fair!
You may not even know that you're competing against this individual because you're competing in a sport where this person is not allowed to compete within your own actual yearly international or national federations and then you show up to the Olympics and you go, son of a bitch.
So, literally.
Alright, let's move on here.
On Kamala Harris, this is something I get a lot of people asking.
Hey, is Kamala Harris winning?
Is she going to win?
Has the tide really turned?
And I've always maintained the same position that Kamala Harris is a more difficult election, a difficult person for Donald Trump to run against than Joe Biden.
I'd put the chances of Kamala winning somewhere around 40%.
I still think it's likely that Donald Trump wins, but certainly not a deadlock.
Whereas with Joe Biden, I would have put his chances closer to 20%.
That's been my opinion.
You can comment below.
However, you need to understand that as people have said with polls, they're not designed to reflect public opinion, but sometimes designed to shape public opinion.
That may be an argument that people can have.
I think now there is no doubt that big tech, and particularly Google and YouTube, are absolutely trying to shape opinion.
And so a lot of people feeling as though Kamala Harris has this momentum, a lot of people who believe that, they're believing it because of the censorship, the search algorithms, and it is being pumped into your brain 24-7, and we have the receipts here.
So here's actually Joe Rogan, sort of echoing the sentiment that we've seen from a lot of you in chat or in the comment sections, where he's Sort of rationalize why he thinks Kamala can win in November.
She's gonna win.
We are in this very bizarre time where people are giving in to the bullsh** in a way that I never suspected people would before.
And this is one, they just want no Trump, no matter what, and they're willing to gaslight themselves.
Now I understand where he's coming from, but is it accurate?
Is there a bunch of enthusiasm?
Is she going to win?
More than Joe Biden?
Sure, it's not a tough act to follow.
Right.
But no, it's incorrect.
However, Google, YouTube, will ensure that you believe it's correct, and that shapes public opinion.
Remember Monday we covered how Big Tech and the mainstream media, they were completely memory-holing Trump's attempted assassination, and of course a Facebook representative said, yeah, yeah, it was a mistake?
Again, that's the most impactful picture that I can think of of a presidential candidate, or honestly, a president in recent memory, and so for that, for the left to just poke a hole in it and go, no, no, actually, In combination with the FBI so we don't know if he was shot we don't if you're not following the news you may still think that he could have been hit by a fragment of glass and by the way this picture is being fact-checked as misleading that leads someone to believe oh hold on a second I guess I guess it was it was a ruse but it just places a little bit of doubt and that's all that's needed for people to start working their propaganda in so
We have that with the assassination.
Now, this comes to the Kamala enthusiasm myth.
I believe it was Greta Van Susteren in this next clip showed you, and then we tested it for ourselves.
If you Google Trump rally, and by the way, they're still not even close, Trump and Kamala, if you're to average them out.
Google Trump rally.
You're saying, hey, hold on a second.
Let me paint you a picture.
You're going.
Alright, I'm hearing there's a lot of enthusiasm for Kamala, but I just, down the road, there was just, wasn't there a huge Trump rally?
Yeah, doesn't he still seem to have more support?
And you search it, but this is what you find.
On Elon Musk's tweet, I thought, that can't possibly be true, it says that if you Google Trump rally, that something about Vice President Kamala Harris comes up, so let's see.
He's right.
Vice President Kamala Harris campaigns in Atlanta.
It's wild.
Harris holds raucous rally in Atlanta.
That's clearly what I was looking for.
She and Trump battle for Georgia.
Why in the world, when you Google Trump rally, does it turn out to be Vice President Kamala Harris campaigns?
I guess Elon Musk, he was right about that one.
Now I know some people say, hey, that's anecdotal.
I would encourage you to try these and send in your experiences, your examples.
That's been a huge, by the way, that's been a huge mover of Facebook, for example.
You have created an impact where Facebook had to admit, no, no, no, okay, we made a mistake.
If enough of you do this, this is what happened with Alexa when you asked Alexa about Jesus Christ versus Muhammad.
One was a fictional character and one was the holiest of prophets, peace be upon him.
By the end of the weekend, because enough of you uploaded your own videos and your experiences, they changed it.
So don't think that you cannot have an impact.
Try this yourself.
We did.
We ran into the exact same result.
I'm sorry, but we're not at a point now where you can have a cutesy response like, oh gee golly, why would Google do that?
This is election interference.
You should look at that and go, what is going on?
I searched for something, Google is doing something completely nefarious and making sure that the election goes one way.
That should be the response, Greta.
I'm sorry, I'm not trying to pick on her, but the media has to be outraged over this.
This is not a cutesy thing.
By the way, let's just cut this off at the pass.
If Donald Trump wins, I know that people say, well, okay, so you have a problem with it, except for your guy winning when he beats his opponent.
Let me be clear.
If Donald Trump wins this election, and I believe he will, it will be in spite of it being stolen before your eyes.
It'll be him snatching it back.
That is my opinion.
It will be my same opinion after this election.
There's no going back.
There's already been enough thievery at this point.
That's my opinion.
The undemocratic process?
The manipulation?
Do you have any idea how many hundreds of millions of dollars in advertising that would be the equivalent to as far as all search results?
You wouldn't be able to afford it.
That is election rigging, and I would love to see your experiences.
This is The Thing.
Look.
An example is going back to the Olympics.
A lot of people would say, oh, well, Phelps, he's won all these medals and he eats McDonald's every day, so that must be the... No, he won because of a gift from God in spite of eating McDonald's every day, okay?
He has the wingspan of an albatross, a size 19 shoe.
He didn't win because he ate McDonald's.
He would have probably done better and he said so now if he had a better diet.
President Trump will win in spite of all The thievery, the lies from mainstream media, from the Kamala Harris campaign, the DNC entertainment media industrial complex.
Which brings us to the funniest part of my day yesterday and I hope to be the same today.
Is there some breaking news?
People are actually trying this right now and there's dozens of people sending in chats that are still getting the same results.
So they have yet to, you know, realize the error of their ways.
I mean, I'm sorry, they've yet to come out with an excuse about how this was an accident.
People obviously wanted Harris rally information when they typed in Trump rally information.
Our bad.
Hey, let's let's see if it goes the other way.
Did we try typing in Harris rally and see if anything for Trump shows up?
Just a switcheroo.
The mistakes only go.
How do mistakes always only go one way?
Well, Steven, you're just a conspiracy theorist.
And by the way, if you want to send in your chats, you can, of course, the only way to do it is joining Mug Club.
This is child's play compared to what will happen on election night.
On election night, you and Mug Club, you will be able to send in your videos as far as your state.
As far as your city, in your swing state, any election shenanigans going on, and we'll be covering it in real time and put it on the electoral integrity map, and then have boots on the ground investigative journalists who will go in real time to check it out.
That's right, they're sending me to Oahu for the election.
Yes, for the swing state.
They want me to watch the election.
Well, that was by personal request from Hirono.
Which we thought was a little weird.
Well, I'm alright with it.
I just thought it was the state fruit.
This is, uh, I'm looking forward to this.
And we could, I know some people...
You want us to be objective and call, you know, balls and strikes?
I'm not going to do that today because CNN has been calling it as all strikes and so has the legacy media.
And you know what?
There were some there were some home runs with President Trump at the National Association of Black Journalists.
Before we get into the substance of the interview, this is going to be a fact check.
Well, we're going to fact check the fact checkers.
Here's a quick highlight reel just to give you the flavor of why this man is considered the funniest president and presidential candidate of all time.
Why should black voters trust you after you have used language like that?
Well, first of all, I don't think I've ever been asked a question in such a horrible manner.
You don't even say, hello, how are you?
You invited me under false pretense.
And then you said, you can't do it with Zoom.
Well, You know, where's Zoom?
She's gonna do it with Zoom, and she's not coming.
Are you with ABC?
Because I think they're a fake news network, a terrible network.
It's very hard to hear you for whatever reason because of the fact that they have bad equipment, because I guess, you know, this woman was unable to get the right equipment.
And then you were half an hour late.
Just so we understand, I have too much respect for you to be late.
They couldn't get their equipment working or something was wrong.
Mr. President, I would love for you to answer the question on your rhetoric.
I think it's a very nasty question.
How do you define DEI?
Go ahead.
How do you define it?
Diversity, equity, inclusion.
Okay, yeah.
Go ahead.
Is that what your definition?
That is literally the words.
Give me a definition then.
Would you give me a definition?
For you to start off a question and answer period.
He's going back to it?
Key point.
Let me just ask a follow-up, sir.
He, you know, has a lot of opinions about childless women like myself or divorced people like yourself.
Do you think... Well, I mean my point is here...
And of course, CNN reacted predictably.
So did MSNBC.
It will never have my builder. I know about this stuff.
Thank you. Thank you everybody very much And of course CNN reacted predictably so did MSNBC CNN just
sort of you know, they volunteers tribute And we just have the audio because I listen to these news
briefings in the morning from every Left-leaning source that I can find and one of them is Reuters
and I think that Reuters created the perfect encapsulation of
The tone that we are about to fact-check here Here is how they represented it.
This is Reuters.
So, I don't know, is she Indian or is she black?
This is the question Donald Trump asked about Kamala Harris.
So that brings us to this week's Fact Checking the Fact Checkers.
Tweet Check.
Fact.
Trump.
Trump.
Fact.
Check.
Tweet.
Fact Check.
I love that movie!
So that brings us to this week's Fact-Checking the Fact-Checkers.
Tweet check.
Fact.
Trump.
Trump.
Fact.
Check.
Tweet.
Fact.
Check.
News!
All of the available references will be linked in the description.
We do that every day, or go to ladderwithcrader.com.
Let's go first to the issue of abortion.
These aren't necessarily in chronological order, but this one is very clear that CNN will not even allow, and by the way, when I say CNN, you of course can attribute this to Google, their search manipulation, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, just CNN is fun to use because they still act like they're not the most trusted name in news.
A trusted name!
Abortion.
Here is what President Trump said and then we'll get to the CNN claim versus truth.
The Democrat Party is really the one that has the problem.
I think they're radical on abortion because they are allowing abortion in the ninth month.
They're allowing the death of a baby after the baby is born based on the governor of Virginia.
Based on the governor of Virginia, they're allowing the death of the baby.
After it's born, they're allowing abortions in the eighth and ninth month.
And they certainly don't want to see, in the case of the governor of Virginia, the former governor, I might add, who said, we set the baby aside and then we decide what to do.
Meaning, what do we do?
We execute the baby.
And the crowd gasped.
I can't believe, if you believe that Donald Trump's a liar, you would think, oh, I cannot believe that he said that.
And of course, here's the claim that you'll see from CNN.
You talk about Democrats allowing the death of babies after birth, suggesting that there's some sort of post-birth abortion.
Again, not true, illegal in every state.
Okay, so that's the claim from CNN.
Here's the truth, is, well, first off, a couple of things that they actually said.
That's illegal, it doesn't happen.
Over 10,000 every single year, according to the CDC.
Over 10,000 third-trimester abortions, or 22 weeks or later, 10 to 20,000 every single year.
Okay.
Also, that was a direct quote?
Ex-Virginia Governor Ralph Northam?
Well, you know what?
Here's him saying, surprisingly, exactly what Trump quoted.
If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen.
The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.
FACT CHECK!
That's exactly what he said!
Isn't that scary?
What?
That guy?
He is an enemy of free people.
The only purpose that the press would serve is to arm you with information, to permit you to make educated decisions.
They are actively working against you.
It couldn't be more clear.
Is it me?
Yeah, so is the ABC reporter that's basically saying like, sir, that is illegal, that is illegal, not addressing what she knows to be true.
She knows those comments were made by Northam.
She knows that video was out there because it was talked about by everybody in media.
Yeah.
He addresses it specifically, no, no, no, trying to talk over him.
And the other lady, her response, well, isn't that about freedom?
Trying to interject, are you kidding me?
Hey, it's about killing a baby at nine months.
That's not freedom for anyone.
Six months.
They also said it's illegal.
They didn't say it's wrong.
Right.
Or that it doesn't happen.
And you say when we're fighting to stop something, prevent something, well just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean they're not trying.
And they're also wrong about that because it's ten to twenty thousand a year.
Nothing they have said is correct.
Hey, comment below.
Do you want to bet that they don't ask Kamala Harris when she Zoom calls them what limitations she would place on abortion or what limitations she supports as a self-professed Christian South Asian slash black person?
Depending on the day.
So let's go to DEI.
Here is what President Trump said, then we'll get to the CNN claim.
Well, I can say, no, I think it's maybe a little bit different.
So, uh, I've known her a long time indirectly, not directly very much.
And she was always of Indian heritage and she was only promoting Indian heritage.
I didn't know she was black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn black and now she wants to be known as black.
So, I don't know, is she Indian or is she black?
She is always identified as a black woman.
She went to a historically black college.
I respect either one.
I respect either one, but she obviously doesn't.
Always identified.
Yes.
Not always identified.
How he has to add that.
Yeah.
I obviously, she, look, I love both, I have black friends, I have Indian friends.
She hates all of them.
It's weird.
The black part of her hates Indians, the Indian part of her hates blacks.
Civil War.
And so this is the issue.
Donald Trump is not fighting a candidate.
That whole panel, with the exception of Harris.
And then, afterward, you have the exact same talking points being parroted across ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN.
We'll just use CNN.
This is their fact check.
This is their claim on CNN of Donald Trump's comments.
The controversialness of the claims about Vice President Harris' identity will probably make the most headlines, but I think it's important to note that his claims on that subject are also false.
You know, he said that Vice President Harris has only turned black a couple years ago, and before that, she was only promoting her Indian heritage.
That is just not true!
I've quickly, just via Google, and with the help of CNN's K-File team, Andrew Kicinski and Emstek, found multiple examples of her talking about her black identity Going back decades.
Mm-hmm.
Well, here's the truth.
Okay, little column A, little column B. But you, CNN, sold her as the first Indian candidate.
CNN!
Double fact check!
So this is the problem with identity politics.
Now, of course I knew that Trump knew he was kicking a hornet's nest with this.
There's shock and there is laughter.
It's so funny.
wants to be a black lady.
He was suplexing Hortenses.
What are you talking about?
I was laughing so hard.
It's almost a crowd.
There was shock and there was laughter.
It's so funny.
Do I think this will necessarily play well?
I don't know, but pointing out the obvious that she has put her
South Asian hat on or Indian hat on and then Indian hat off and black hat on
it's true.
And there are people out there who may be confused, largely because of CNN and other mainstream outlets, your own content.
My mother, who raised me and my sister, was a proud woman.
She was a brown woman.
She was a woman with a heavy accent.
And her mother, Shyamla Gopalan, was also the biggest influence in Kamala Harris' life.
So what we're gonna cook today is an Indian recipe.
Yes.
Because you are Indian.
Yes, yes.
Fucking you are fucking you fucking fucking you That was a very intense
Yes, exactly.
Again, she's like, she's hopscotching over her blackness.
She's like, yes!
Yes, Indian!
It's uncomfortable.
We cut right before Mindy Kaling said, get out of my face.
Yes.
Get away from me.
Thank you.
It's about the pandering.
It is only about the pandering.
I don't care if it's a mixed race person, a black person, 100% Indian.
None of that matters.
The problem is that Kamala will say whatever she needs to, to whatever group she needs to say it to, to get them to vote for her.
That's what he's calling out.
Sometimes he doesn't do it as well.
He should.
Sometimes he kicks the hornet's nest, like we've said.
Yeah.
But he's just calling out the pandering, the hypocrisy.
That's it.
Well, she has no policy to stand on.
None.
That's the issue.
So it's just Indian, black, and of course the media is saying, and there have been many racist and sexist attacks, hey, you think it's racist for me to say she's pandered as both an Indian-American?
And?
A black American?
I don't think so.
I think it's pointing out the fact that she's just a chameleon.
She's a shapeshifter.
Not a lizard person, though she could be.
Here's what Donald Trump said as it related to, and I actually, he used an example.
I wish he would have dug into this a little bit more.
I know a lot of people disagree.
I think that Kamala Harris is a fundamentally unintelligent person.
Agreed.
And I say this as no member of Mensa, to be clear.
But here is what President Trump said.
I said Joe and I will go and take a cognitive test.
Now, I'd do it with her too.
I would do it with her also.
You know what?
She failed her law exam.
She didn't pass her law exam, so maybe she wouldn't pass the cognitive test.
Mr. President, are you saying she wouldn't pass?
Just to be clear.
I'm just giving you the fact.
To be clear, you don't think you're a person who's giving you the fact?
How do you intend and...
It's a fact.
You don't like it.
Now, my only disagreement is there are other relevant facts as well, but he lasered in on that.
He has to fit it in.
So maybe she wouldn't pass.
I don't know.
She seems to not pass tests.
And this would be a test, so history would inform us that she probably won't pass.
These are facts.
I don't know.
Maybe you would say, you said the same thing like, uh, J.D.
Vance did very well, became a senator.
My endorsement, I believe, helped.
I endorsed him, then he became a senator.
You decide.
It's so funny.
So, again, what I hope you're seeing here is the media following lockstep.
He walked into enemy territory.
But keep in mind those people on that panel, with the exception of one, they work for these mainstream outlets.
And then the mainstream outlets in unison echo the points.
Here is CNN's claim.
This one's not necessarily a fact check because even they can't do it, but they're like, well, I mean, you know, uh, uh, second time's the charm.
Well, he said she didn't pass the bar exam.
You addressed that.
She passed on a second try and was admitted to the bar a year after she graduated law school.
Truth.
Okay.
That's actually true because it's true.
Extra fact check!
With some context, in California, half of all applicants pass the bar on the first try.
Half.
She's in the bottom half.
I heard she's more of a top half.
There are exceptions to the rule, as we see here.
And then she still became the San Francisco DA and California Attorney General.
That doesn't typically happen with people who don't make the cut of—this is not the Navy SEALs of lawyers.
It's just, you know, being in the top 50%.
Oh my gosh.
I think George the Greek here basically had the best way.
People that fail that the first time basically go on to be traffic lawyers.
They're not necessarily going on to be the DA or the Attorney General or Vice President or God forbid President.
But Daniel Dale trips over himself instead of going, it's true she didn't pass.
Because Donald Trump said something that was objectively true.
She failed.
Yeah.
Then she later passed.
He wasn't addressing that.
Right.
And Daniel Dale couldn't even bring himself to say, well, what he said is true, but... Well, here's the thing, is they know that it'll be too easy for people to find that she failed, but they still will flat out lie.
For example, earlier when he talked about abortion, they just will act like the Ralph Northam clip doesn't exist.
Exactly.
Genuinely, they look at the information.
They have this information available.
You think they can't find that clip?
And they go, let's just lie.
Yeah.
This is not ignorance.
This is absolutely malice.
And you know what?
The reason this is relevant, the reason he's pointing to that is because it begs the question, well then, hold on a second, how did she become San Francisco D.A.? ?
Just like with Barack Obama with his academic record sealed.
Well, hold on a second, hold on a second.
How did he end up being the senior editor of the Harvard Law Review, I believe never published?
How did that happen?
How did we get there?
We're all told that he's brilliant, but we don't have any evidence of this.
Well, if you do a little searching, you go, okay, she doesn't seem like she's the most supremely qualified lawyer.
Oh, BJ's.
Black journalists?
But then that's sexist.
That's sexist.
He can't point it out.
Well, it's relevant if that's how someone got their job, if their major qualification is what they have hanging in their sex closet.
Let's go on to something here.
Allegedly.
Allegedly.
I don't know if she has a sex closet.
Who knows?
We don't know if she has a sex closet.
We absolutely know that she slept her way to her job.
That's not allegedly.
Willie Brown was like, yeah, I did it.
I was just saying the closet was alleged.
She would like middle of the pack.
She didn't even stand out there?
No, she didn't even stand out.
Um... You call her Vice President, I call her Vice Grips.
Yes!
Wow.
Or Kamala Hairlips!
You should have seen that thing.
Actually, more like Hairlip.
Looks like she grew up next to a radiation plant.
No, you're not ugly, you're just retarded.
That's a new one.
Yeah.
So Donald Trump went on to say, he clarified his question in case you're wondering, the very clear answer, but I want to show the funny answer.
He says, well, we were talking about how you've been for black people.
And he said, I have been the best president for black people since Abraham Lincoln.
I will tell you that coming from the border are millions and millions of people that happen to be taking black jobs.
You had the best... What exactly is a black job, sir?
A black job is anybody that has a job.
That's what it is.
Anybody that has a job.
And they're taking the employment away from black people.
Okay, now when he was saying anybody, obviously in the context he's saying any black person who has a job.
This begs the question, is it true?
Or is illegal immigration disproportionately affecting black employment?
Okay, so again, following lockstep, here's CNN's claim with their fact check of Donald Trump's statement that Donald Trump is trying to pit black people against brown people or something.
You touched on this point, a comment made by Trump doubling down or trying to explain the so-called black jobs comment.
You described the pitting against brown and black people.
Frankly, this is a tale historically as old as America and the idea of trying to alienate and create division among those who have been similarly situated in America.
Okay, that word salad, be it as useless as it may.
The question is, does illegal immigration in this country affect black American workers, statistically, more than other workers?
Here's the truth, CNN.
Yeah, it does!
Excuse me.
Fact check!
According to the United States Commission on Human Rights, about 6 in 10 adult black males have a high school diploma or less, and black men are disproportionately employed in the low-skilled labor market, where they are more likely to be in labor competition with immigrants.
You can check the references at louderwithcrowder.com.
This is something that has been known for quite a long time, and I would wager a big reason that he's gained a lot of momentum with black Americans, largely black men.
They're most affected.
Well, it's also, it's a stupid rebuttal.
Like, when they say, sir, excuse me, can you define black jobs?
And he's like, what?
I'm not saying that there is a black job that only a black person can do.
What I'm saying is that there are jobs that black people have that they are losing.
Period.
That's it.
He's not saying that there's some category of jobs that's reserved for black people.
Right.
And that's what they're trying to make this out to be.
Oh, that's a black job.
That's not a white person job.
job. White people don't do that job. And by the way, they also have been talking about
this for quite a long time when they talk about inequity in labor, right? They will
say, well, black people are more likely to be affected.
They'll say black people are more likely to be affected by climate change because they
live in low income neighborhoods.
Now they do tend to live in more low income neighborhoods, unfortunately, as a percentage
of the population. And a big part of that is when you look at Lyndon Johnson's policies
and you look at Section 8 housing, right?
So, look, we agree.
The problem is when they say, but you using that exact same premise in a valid context is racist.
A valid context here is they're in greater competition with illegal immigrants, for example, than people who may become lawyers despite not passing the bar the first time around. 50%.
I miss the old days when it was racist to assume they didn't have jobs.
Right.
Yes.
Well... Now it's racist to assume that their jobs are in jeopardy and they have them.
They're trying to catch him.
Everything is... I think you do.
Isn't it funny they say he's trying to... He's showing up at a black journalist organization.
There's summits, right?
He's showing up where the entire deck is stacked.
The cards are stacked against him.
Kamala Harris doesn't show up.
I told you.
The black candidate doesn't show up.
It's too... To give you an idea, this is too tough.
For her to show her face.
I told you the media is going to carry her water.
This is what you are seeing.
Her strategy is be seen as little as humanly possible.
He showed up there to speak directly to a black audience that he knew was going to be hostile.
And if you look at his actions, certainly with HBCUs, when you look at his actions as president, he certainly did do a lot for the black community.
You look at his gains with black voters.
These are all observable facts.
And then they try to say that he's the one trying to divide black and brown America.
As they jockey for position as to who gets to make the accusation of racism against Donald Trump because he said that Kamala Harris seems to be largely Indian.
You see, they accuse you of doing exactly what they're doing.
Divide and conquer.
Hey, I will tell you this.
Making jokes?
About white people, about black people, about brown people, as we do here, about Asian people.
You know, for some reason I feel uncomfortable saying yellow.
Brown, black, I'm fine.
Yellow seems racist.
I don't know why.
That's my own hang-up.
That is not Divide and Conquer.
What was that?
I think it is.
Yeah, I think it is.
But black and brown doesn't sound like brown.
It's more descriptive.
What about white?
I'd prefer to be called European.
Not me, I'm American, dog.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
If we're going back ancestrally and America didn't exist, you know, prior to 17-something, then, you know, 1776, obviously.
You realize you're in a hole and you're digging yourself into it.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I have a cough.
Please go away.
Sorry.
He's got the COVID.
And they will then accuse you of dividing and conquering.
That's what they will do.
Yeah.
And they will accuse you of lying and then fact check and say, no, that's not true.
There are no late term abortions.
And Governor, well, let's just not talk about that.
By the way, all the proceeds of the Fight Like Hell Donald Trump shirts at CrowderShop.com will go directly to the Trump campaign.
And of course, you can support us in style by buying any other clothing at CrowderShop.com.
Hats.
I don't know.
We have a lot of things there.
Pins.
Socks.
Flags.
Flags.
This hat's pretty nice.
I like this one.
I got the strange animal hat I wear a lot.
It's a nice flex-fit hat.
It's a freak flag fly, baby.
It's Mug Club and CrowderShop.
That's why we don't have to do like 19 live reads for largely companies that you don't want.
Oh here is one that people are really, they're really jumping on him and I want you to just stay with me here because we have a clip of him talking about police immunity when, or qualified immunity is the term, later on in providing context.
Now, I want to be clear.
They also try and frame these questions without clarifying to people.
When you're talking about qualified immunity for police officers, you are talking about qualified immunity from being sued by people you've arrested, let's say, for traffic violations or someone who had to be subdued on drugs.
These civil suits, right?
If you commit a crime as a police officer, you, of course, are still criminally liable.
No one is arguing that, and Donald Trump has not argued that.
That context is important when you hear the answer here as it relates to police immunity.
Immunity?
Immunity.
I don't know the exact case, but I saw something and it didn't look good to me.
It didn't look good to me.
Are you talking with the water, right?
Yeah, well, police unions are not backing this person either.
Are they going to be charging the officer?
I guess they're charging the officer.
So why should he receive immunity?
Well, he might not.
I mean, it depends.
It depends on what happens.
I'm talking about people that are much different cases than that.
We need people to protect ourselves.
If I felt or if a group of people would feel that somebody was being unfairly prosecuted because the person did a good job, maybe with crime, or made a mistake, an innocent mistake.
There's a big difference between being a bad person and making an innocent mistake.
But if somebody made an innocent mistake, I would want to help that person.
Also, let's just put this in context before I get to the CNN claim.
It's always funny to me that people on the left believe that police should not have immunity from having to make executive decisions, right?
Split-second decisions!
Split-second decisions when their lives are on the line, but wholeheartedly support pharmaceutical companies being granted complete immunity from any potential adverse effects of an experimental mRNA injection.
So, immunity for thee!
Something something me.
Here is the claim.
That you see from CNN, again following lockstep, that Donald Trump didn't know about the recent case.
Also, I want to be clear about something.
He repeats when he's doing this interview that he can't hear them because the mics are muffled.
And he's obviously not faking because at one point they asked him about J.D.
Vance.
They said, why did you pick J.D.
Vance?
Why did I?
Why did I?
Oh, pick J.D.
Vance!
And he kept going back, your microphones are horrible!
Just crap!
Uh, and for you to understand what that's like, I've been in that exact scenario.
Have you ever been in a phone call where you have that echo where you're interrupting yourself?
That kind of loop?
And you have to hang up because it messes you up?
That's probably what he was going through at that point in time, and you even saw it with some other reporters.
I could see that he was trying to answer broadly because he couldn't hear the details.
And that's probably why I said I'm not fully familiar with the case, because they could have said something specific that he didn't hear.
So CNN claims he didn't know about the recent case, though he clearly did, and Donald Trump seems like he's suggesting he'd grant the officer immunity.
He didn't know about the case, and he seemed to suggest that the officer involved might qualify for immunity.
So, there were a lot of moments that I don't think were very beneficial to Donald Trump in this interview.
Well, here's the truth.
President Trump never once said that the officer would have immunity.
Fact check!
Fake news!
Fake news.
The closest thing that he said, and I went through it, I scrubbed it, is, well, he might not.
It might not.
Doesn't look good.
It doesn't look good.
See you then.
Again, do you believe that they are in good faith interpreting that as Donald Trump said, yes, he'll have immunity?
Because that's what they... Do you believe he even suggested that?
What is the purpose of the media?
And we'll get to, by the way, the rise in cancer rates and them not telling you why this is the case.
And no, it's not some crazy conspiracy thing.
It's not where it's not Jenny McCarthy.
We have the results.
They just don't tell you about it.
So that's the truth.
And by the way, here is President Trump in his own words, in context, discussing immunity for police officers last weekend.
She endorsed defunding the police and she sponsored a bill to strip police officers of legal protection.
She wants the police officers to go out and protect themselves and defend themselves and hire lawyers.
You got to go hire a lawyer.
These lawyers would take what they make in one year.
They'll take it out of their hides.
You can't do that.
We're going to give immunity to police so they can do their job.
I'm giving federal immunity to police officers so they can do their job.
I think it's good.
I think it's good.
Right?
That sounds good.
I love that.
It's like telling your friends your plans for the weekend.
I think it's a good idea.
Yes!
There really is a Tony Clifton vibe with him.
Absolutely!
Look, here's the scenario that he sees playing out right now.
The BLM movement that sparked the defund the police, which Kamala Harris fully supported, go look it up, right?
Defund the police.
Do you think that if they stripped the immunity away, that the communities around the country just being pissed off at a single officer or a single incident wouldn't start suing the hell out of every single person that they could, making it completely impossible for somebody to be a police officer?
It doesn't even matter if they're right.
Right.
They don't care about being right.
What they care about is saying, you're wrong and you're going to have to hire a lawyer and pay $50,000, $100,000.
That's his point.
More than they make in a year just to defend themselves, even if they're right.
Bog down the justice system even more.
Completely.
It's already backed up.
It is untenable.
If you knowingly commit a crime out of malice as a police officer, you are still criminally liable.
That is not the debate that is taking place.
Let's be clear about it.
And of course, Kamala Harris's background on this matter.
All references available at loudearthcreditor.com.
Let's go to the next one.
And I actually really appreciate this, because people on the left consistently want to point to January 6th and say, what about January 6th?
What about January 6th?
What about January 6th?
As though it's 9-11-2.
And if I were in this position, I'd just point out, like, billions of dollars in damages, thousands of officer casualties, people shot dead, Just because they were wearing a Trump hat in the summer of love, entire city blocks taken over.
It's not even close.
Okay?
It's not even close.
It's about weaponizing the political.
It's about weaponizing the judicial system.
I do wish that Donald Trump would have clarified and just said, people who actually committed crimes.
If someone asks me, hey, if you ask me, hey, should these people be charged?
Anyone who committed an actual crime, if they committed assault or vandalism, sure.
Anyone who didn't commit a crime, for example, making a phone call, should not.
And anyone who was welcomed in to the people's house, being people, should not.
This is a politicization of the system, and it's not even close to the violence from the left.
That being said, President Trump, I do appreciate here that he doesn't back down from this when a lot of conservatives do.
And that's just because they feel like it's a losing issue?
I understand politically if something is a losing issue if you're just talking about numbers on a paper.
Not when you're talking about actual innocent people, the majority of them, who spent months to years in jail.
For no crimes.
Nope.
Sorry.
I don't care if it's a losing issue.
That's a crime against the American people.
In my opinion, here's how President Trump actually answered.
My question is on those rioters who assaulted officers.
Would you pardon those people?
Oh, absolutely I would.
If they're innocent, I would pardon them.
They've been convicted.
And by the way, the Supreme Court just under...
Well, they were convicted by a very, very tough system.
How come the people that tried to burn down Minneapolis, how come the people that took over a large percentage of Seattle, how come nothing happened to them?
Good point.
By the way, there's going to be a part two, but we wanted to segment this because this is really just sort of a pet cause of CNN and people on the left.
Here is the claim from CNN that they disguise as fact-checking that Donald Trump said he would pardon people specifically who assaulted cops.
He was asked about whether he would pardon January 6th rioters.
He said that he would, including the ones who assaulted police officers.
Do you believe this is ignorance at this point?
Okay, that's clearly in bad faith.
Here's the truth.
And it was reiterated, but he never said anything to that effect.
So what has he said in the past?
He's been very consistent.
Even in April, President Trump's team told NBC that they would look at all pardons on a quote, case by case basis.
Fact check!
That means, oh, you assaulted an officer.
Well, you should be charged with assaulting an officer.
Right.
Oh, you were invited in, and you took a stroll.
You shouldn't have been jailed.
Oh, you were invited in, and you said, everybody, please remain peaceful, but you had some weird body paint on.
As far as I know, weird body paint's not a crime.
You don't go to jail.
That's a case-by-case basis.
You know, how all crimes should be treated.
Right, you certainly don't put people in kind of this jeopardy of terrorism charges, which they did, and cause them to commit suicide, which they did.
Mm-hmm.
Because of that.
After a plea deal was pretty much worked out where it would just be like, okay, I'm gonna bargain my way out of this because I didn't do anything wrong, but you guys are gonna do this.
And then they go, oh, but maybe we're gonna add terrorism to this.
Yeah.
A guy lost his life because of that.
Guys are like, what the hell are we doing here?
You're right.
If they committed a crime, charge them for that crime.
Seditious conspiracy and terrorism charges just to try to make a political point?
Yeah.
Ruining people's lives?
Come on!
And by the way, we did an entire special, uh, on January 6th.
You can go and watch it.
Type in January 6th.
I believe it's live stream- or mega, mega stream.
Something like that.
We did it because there was a hurricane, so there was supposed to be a hearing, and we decided to stream anyway.
There was a hurricane in Florida, not Washington, D.C., where the hearing was supposed to be.
Right, exactly.
It's, you know.
So all the footage that you could want to watch, all the links, of course, available to you, a timeline of events.
We were talking about this very, very early on, and I'm glad to see some other people finally waking up to the fact that, hey, there were some people who were hooligans.
Sure, not anywhere near the level of the left whenever they congregate, but it was a crime against a lot of American people.
And here's the last one, just because I want you to see how petty.
You've seen the direct examples.
of CNN they're fact-checking where they'll flat-out lie.
When he said this, when he responded regarding January 6th and who died,
I knew it. I said, oh, they're gonna fact-check and add that to the list of
lies that they then trot out and say Donald Trump has lied 472 times in this
campaign alone. But again, if you watch this clip, he says, you had a girl, you had a girl who was shot in the
face for protesting.
And then he goes on to say, and nobody died that day, but people died in Seattle.
So in other words, he's saying, that notwithstanding, the only person who died, nobody else died.
He was saying that in response.
But I knew they were going to take his words.
I said it out loud.
They're going to say that he lied, saying no one died that day, even though he just addressed, he just addressed the one person who died.
Here's what he said.
140 police officers were assaulted that day.
Their injuries included broken bones, at least one officer lost an eye, one had two cracked ribs, two smashed spinal discs, another had a stroke.
Were the people who assaulted those 140 officers, including those I just mentioned, patriots who deserve pardons?
You would pardon those rioters?
They shot a young lady in the face.
who was protesting, they shot her in the face.
You know, nobody died that day, you do know that.
But people died in Seattle.
Nobody died, but people died in Minneapolis.
You know people died in Minneapolis.
And nothing happens, and nobody ever talks, and nothing happens to those people.
But you went after the J6 people with a vengeance.
And he went on to say that you can't have one judicial system for a group of people
and a different one for another group of people.
I actually thought that was a pretty strong answer and I think that it needs to be said.
And I know people will say it's a losing issue, it's not going to be popular, but you know what?
I actually think that's a pretty strong counter-argument to people saying Trump will just say whatever he needs to to get elected.
Does anyone believe that he benefits politically from that?
He's saying it because he believes it.
He's taking a stand there, whether you agree with him or not.
And I agree with him.
I certainly agree that people who didn't commit crimes, who were falsely prosecuted, yep, I agree.
But of course, the claim from CNN, disguised as a fact check, just to show you how petty they always are, and they will put this on a list of the lie.
Actually, someone was shot.
In this appearance, his campaign now says was meant to unify the country.
He said this about the people convicted for attacking the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
The woman who was shot and killed, Ashley Babbitt, is seen here on the front line of a mob inside the Capitol trying to break into what's called the Speaker's lobby of the House, just moments after Speaker Pelosi and other members of the House leadership had been escorted away from that mob.
Okay, fine.
Okay, here's the truth.
Babbitt was unarmed, wasn't actively threatening anyone when she was shot.
Extra fact check!
And as far as what you actually saw on the panel, officer, I believe it was Brian Sicknick, died of a stroke the next day because of a blood clot.
And keep in mind, they also listed Sicknick, and I believe at one point they had a total number of seven officers, it went down to five.
I know it was five officers died that day, and then every single one kind of had to be ticked off the list.
So them trying to say, so many officers were assaulted that a man died of a stroke, blood clot.
Beaten with a fire extinguisher.
Remember that?
I believe it was Sicknick.
They said he had his head beaten in with a fire extinguisher, which of course turned out to be untrue.
So they just shift the lie.
Five officers dead.
Well, no, that's not true.
Well, one was beaten with a fire extinguisher.
Not even close to true.
Well, now it's, he died of a stroke because of what he encountered.
Okay, but now we're at the point where it's actually a blood clot.
It was a blood clot that led to a stroke.
I don't know if you know this, that's one of the primary causers of strokes.
blood clots. It's just confusing with like a heart attack or something. Yeah. But I love how she had
an exact number 140 officers. I wonder how many officers were there. Was it exactly 140 officers
that were on duty? That seems like a lot. I mean, if you're if you're gonna do like that,
then how many officers in Minneapolis? How many Portland, Seattle, Los Angeles, New York? How
many officers I mean, a couple weeks ago, New York and Washington, DC, how many officers were
there and got assaulted? Yeah. Yeah. Hundreds.
Hundreds and thousands.
Across the BLM riots just that summer was thousands as far as officer casualties, meaning severe injuries and deaths, and you had many, many deaths.
And you also had deaths of people who weren't officers.
Yeah.
David Dorn!
There's a name that a lot of people don't remember.
Hey, is that a blast from the past?
That was a man from St.
Louis.
I don't remember if he was off-duty.
I believe a retired.
He was retired.
He was retired and he went to help a friend's store because they were looting his TVs.
He was a black man.
Shot dead in the street, just for doing the right thing.
There are plenty of examples, by the way.
And not to mention the Compertor family, I hope I'm pronouncing it correctly, I've heard it pronounced different ways, but who lost a husband and a father at the attempted assassination.
So, if you want to compare the numbers, it's not even close.
It's not to justify everybody's actions on January 6th, but you also don't get to ruin the lives of people who did nothing wrong.
So I think that overall, it was a net, maybe a wash for Donald Trump, but a net win on some of these answers because it'll encourage people to go and search for themselves.
Of course, you won't find it if you're using Google, as we already covered.
And it was important to show that, hey, you know what?
He's willing to go into enemy territory because he wants to demonstrate his solidarity, which I believe is genuine, with the black community.
And Trump is even squeezing a stage production into his busy schedule.
Pretty sure of yourself, ain't ya, Virgil?
Virgil, that's a funny name for a f***** up boy that comes from Philadelphia.
What do they call you up there?
They call me... Mr. Tibbs!
I don't know that many people call him that.
I don't think they do.
Tibbsy.
Tibbsy!
But Kamala's going to do a Zoom in September.
Oh that's good.
And of course I'm sure she won't be fed the questions and there won't be softballs anyway.
Yeah.
And I'm sure she won't go, what's the comparable interview that she could do?
A panel.
A convention.
What's the comparable one?
The NRA?
I guarantee you she won't go into that kind of an audience and try to stand on her ideas.
Donald Trump went in there, and like you and I have said, it wasn't 100% great.
There were some things he could have done a little bit better.
There were some answers he could have given that were a little bit sharper, a little bit more crisp, and he opened himself up to a few attacks.
But ultimately, he went in there and he said exactly what he always says.
He didn't pander to that audience.
He said, here is what I believe, here is what I've said the entire time, and you guys identify with it.
You guys hate having a two-tiered justice system where it's justice for some people and not for others?
I kind of think you do!
Right.
He understood his audience and he knew the panel was going to be after him from the get-go.
What's funny to me about this, I don't know if we have, I know we've gone late, should we still do the cancer segment?
If we can hold it until next week, that'd be good too.
I don't know if it's a timely thing for you or not.
Uh, let's ask Mission Control if we want to hit the can, because I know I teased it, and I know that gets people worried.
They're like, whoa, what's going to get me cancer?
Sorry, sorry, sorry.
Well, everything.
So they'll let me know.
But you know, something that I do find, uh...
I just find puzzling.
I don't want to be facetious.
I don't find puzzling.
I understand exactly why they do it.
It's gaslighting.
The left says, you know, we need to come together and they're the party of extremists as though they want to reach across the aisle.
By the way, still an upstanding open invitation to Kamala Harris or Pete Buttigieg if he wants to come on the show or whoever her running mate is right here on this show.
That invitation is open.
Donald Trump just appeared at a conference that he knew was going to be hostile with activist journalists who were sandbagging him, who were hoping to try and torpedo his presidency.
And he did it anyway because he has a message for black Americans who, by and large, have not voted for him in huge percentages compared to the general population.
He went there anyway so that he could speak directly to a demographic of people in the United States who might not otherwise hear from him.
Kamala Harris?
We'll never do that.
She won't even appear on her own political platform, her supporter shows, if it's not guaranteed to be a softball, let alone go straight into the lion's den.
Donald Trump has spoken to groups of Hispanic Americans.
He's gone and spoken to many groups of black Americans.
He's gone on left every time he goes on ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN.
He's already done that himself.
Hillary Clinton called Trump supporters a basket of deplorables.
They dismiss half the country.
You can say whatever you want about Donald Trump.
Is he bombastic?
Sure.
Is he always eloquent?
No, not necessarily.
But saying that this is the guy who's not attempting to reach across the aisle or not attempting to bridge that gap, it's simply inaccurate.
The left has no interest.
No interest in you watching right now if you are a conservative, if you are a Republican.
They have no interest in changing that base.
Donald Trump's doing it.
I think that he should be commended for that.
I think he should be commended for doing exactly what it is that nobody, not one person at the DNC has been consistently doing in the last three election cycles.
Thank you very much!
Are we going to talk cancer?
No, we didn't title around it so I don't think they're saying no.
All right.
Well, we'll talk about it.
There's a huge increase in cancer.
We'll talk about it next week.
It's a mystery.
The media acted as though it was a mystery.
Well, it's not.
And the good news is, look, I'll just leave you with this.
Exercise, lose some weight, your chance of cancer goes down significantly.
They don't tell you that at the end of their reports, but I have some data to back it up, and it involves fat pride.
If you're watching right now, click that button on Rumble.
Spoiler.
Join Mug Club.
We're going to continue speaking with you.
It's a spoiler, but it's funny how they present it.
It's funny that cancer's going up so dramatically for the generation that drinks less and smokes significantly less.
Still a good segment.
Yeah, yeah.
Fat.
And we'll also find out which kind of cancer I have.
Oh, no.
Or will have.
It's skin.
It runs in my family, I don't know.
And this is going, by the way, of course you can not only join Mug Club to continue watching the show, we have a show tomorrow that is always available to Mug Clubbers, but hey, election night, we have a setup here that nobody else I can't even imagine would dare to attempt.
It's something we're proud of, that we're working on, and we need your support.
We are going to be here with you.
We have been here with you the last several elections.
I don't know how many more elections we'll be here with you because they come around every four years.
But we want to make this one a fundamental shift in how the media has to treat you, the American voter, the American people.
▲
Export Selection