Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 24, 2022 - Louder with Crowder

02:58:44

ROE OVERTURNED!!! LIVE Coverage From Outside the Supreme Court | Louder with Crowder

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Oh yeah, baby.
	Supreme Court decision is in.
	And here I am, right in the nick of time.
	Are you excited?
	Yes, I'm as excited as I can be for feeling like I've just serviced a device from 7.
	I have strep.
	There's bigger news than that today.
	I have strep.
	There's bigger news than that.
	And you know why I have strep?
	It's a beautiful thing.
	Because my son went, and then punched his fist into my mouth, and I said, I'm gonna get sick.
	And so I think it's viral, and then strep is bacterial.
	I don't know, but it's developed into something.
	And the reason I say that's beautiful is because, hey, you know what?
	In a lot of states, my son, my twins, could have been aborted up until the moment they were born, because they were born early.
	Twins often are.
	And seeing their face, seeing that ultrasound, seeing what they're becoming.
	They're about to come up on their first birthday.
	There's no denying this is life.
	Sorry, let me just spit out this.
	This is going to be gross for you guys, but that's not even the argument anymore.
	It hasn't been the argument for a while.
	Before I get into this, we do have the promo code SAVESCOTUS.
	MugClub.com slash, sorry, lighterwithcowder.com slash MugClub.
	I'm excited.
	I'm excited.
	We're very excited.
	Because this just came down, and we do have our people on the ground, on location, so we'll be going down to Washington, D.C.
	with Ginger Snap.
	Roe v. Wade, right now, in this case.
	has officially been overturned.
	There we go.
	Yeah! Woo!
	Yeah!
	Celebrate.
	Come on!
	Let's celebrate.
	That one...
	It doesn't seem like enough considering the millions upon millions of lives
	that have been lost that will now be And by the way, this just means, for people who are freaking out, this just means that the laws can go back to the states, that the restrictions they were not allowed to place on abortions beforehand
	are now going to be permitted, like a heartbeat bill.
	Right, exactly.
	Where it should have been in the first place, and that's the ruling that we see today, is basically that it was wrong to begin with.
	So, let me lead.
	Marley was dead to begin with.
	The ruling here, this is taken straight from the ruling, page five.
	It says, we hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled.
	The Constitution makes no reference to abortion.
	Yep.
	Boom.
	And no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely, the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.
	For people who don't remember, we have a card right here if you're watching on YouTube and it's archived.
	It was basically a right to privacy clause, which some people argue isn't necessarily a right either.
	That's a whole different discussion, but that is the basis for Roe v. Wade.
	There is no constitutional right to an abortion, unlike the constitutional right to both keep and bear arms.
	We'll get into that.
	Specifically spelled out.
	Now chiefly rely the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.
	That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be deeply rooted in this nation's history and tradition and, quote, implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.
	The right to abortion does not fall within this category until the latter part of the 20th century.
	Such a right was entirely unknown in American law.
	Indeed, when the 14th Amendment was adopted, three quarters of the states made abortion a crime at all stages of pregnancy.
	The abortion right is also critically different from any other right that this court has held to fall within the 14th Amendment's protection of, quote, liberty.
	Roe's defenders characterize the abortion rights as similar to the rights recognized in past decisions involving matters such as intimate sexual relations, contraception, and marriage, but abortion is fundamentally different, as both Roe and Casey acknowledge.
	That's pivotal.
	That's pivotal.
	It's saying, look, oh, what about contraception?
	No, no, no, hold on a second.
	If you look at the case, Case Law Matters with Roe v. Wade, and you look at Casey, these cases that were brought forth, these suits, they acknowledge that abortion was different.
	They never started this with saying abortion was just, you know, treating a child as a nuisance or medical condition.
	That's very new.
	So a lot of the opinions that are being expressed right now that you'll see on CNN and that no doubt will lead to violence, keep your head in a swivel, churches, please.
	Protect your flock.
	I do not mean go out and be vigilantes.
	What I'm saying is protect your flock, crisis pregnancy centers.
	We have a lot of good people, good friends, good family members who work there.
	Make sure that you are safe.
	Yeah, Catholic Church is battening down the hatches essentially right now.
	They're planning for people to be mobbing their churches, to be graffiti, to do more than that, to firebomb.
	Also, Jane's Revenge just called on people to have like a day of rage.
	Actually, we're calling for it before the decision, anticipating that it would be like the leaked document.
	Right.
	Right, so night of rage or day of rage, whatever it is.
	It's going to be a crazy weekend.
	And that'll just be a day of nagging and whining until the men show up.
	Well, and running out of breath.
	Abortion is fundamentally different, as Roe and Casey acknowledged, because it destroys what those decisions called, quote, fetal life, and what the law now before us describes as, quote, an unborn human being.
	So this is important.
	Look, the ruling here, and it's very similar to the ruling yesterday on the Kerry law in New York, it's based on constitutionality.
	And it's telling us that even the arguments the left has made.
	Now, we know culturally it was safe, legal, and rare to now, on-demand, taxpayer-funded, period.
	Yeah.
	Right?
	No vagina, no choice.
	No uterus, no choice.
	And then it changed to, uh, uh, no uterus, no choice, one transgender.
	It was like, uh, menstruating persons have the choice, we just, we can't keep track of it.
	So we know culturally the arguments have changed, but legally, the terminology, the terminology has changed.
	Again, that matters.
	Precedence matters.
	Called fetal life, Those decisions, this just because it destroys what those decisions called fetal life and what the law now before us describes as an unborn human being.
	Meaning that it's different.
	Meaning that back in the day, when we're talking about Roe v. Wade, you know, they still tried to argue, well it's not a life because it's not viable.
	But when you see the shrieking and the protests that go on because of states that put laws into place where it's no longer an issue, it's no longer deniable that it's a life.
	Whether viable or not, in some cases, yes, viable.
	That's change, and so the court has said we now have to make sure that we recognize this change as it's codified into law.
	This had to happen, there was no way for it not to happen, and leftists, you have no one to blame but yourself.
	You have no one to blame but yourself.
	You went from safe, legal, and rare to, you know, within a few weeks after pregnancy, which I don't agree with, but guess what?
	You had a lot of people on your side, to all the way up until and including nine months, even birth period, and we see that in certain states.
	It's your fault.
	It's your fault that your guy has the lowest approval rating of any modern president.
	It's your fault that people are now going to vote against you en masse, including Latinos, including people under the age of 30, including black people.
	It's your fault that the court said, we've got to do something about this Roe v. Wade shit.
	Even Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said it was bad law and it was doomed to fail for this reason.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Well, and I think, too, what you said is that it just goes back to the states.
	This is what you want the Supreme Court to do.
	You want them to look at the Constitution and say, is there a right that is recognized by this Constitution that is being infringed upon?
	Or are we trying to create something brand new?
	Nothing was being infringed upon.
	By saying, hey, a state has the right to make abortion illegal at a certain point.
	And states had different laws.
	Across this country had a lot of different laws.
	Right now, states will still have different laws.
	California and New York will be advertising, fly here for an abortion vacation.
	I guarantee you, you'll see those exact words at some point.
	Probably in Colorado, too.
	There'll be a shrooms and abortion deal.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	A picnic package.
	Is the ability to come and kill an unborn child, right?
	Something that is different.
	And the court just said, look, we don't have any say on this.
	The state has a say on this.
	That's what you want.
	You don't want the Supreme Court making laws.
	You don't want the Supreme Court fabricating things out of thin air.
	That's what Congress is for.
	They are the elected representatives of the people.
	The court is not elected.
	They just interpret.
	And guys, let me know, get me more of the bill when you can, I don't know if you want to put it in the show map at the top there, and let me know when Gingersnap is ready.
	By the way, Gingersnap, our on-the-ground reporter, was in front of CNN's cameras, so hopefully we'll be able to get him to broadcast in front of CNN's cameras, since they're okay with all the disruptors there right now, maybe they'll be okay with our disruptor.
	But it's just very important to contrast yesterday, you know, New York didn't allow people to carry firearms, and that's worked like a charm in New York.
	Now, the reaction to that, which is a constitutional right, So in this case, it said this is a constitutional right.
	And this is very easy for people who don't know, this is remedial.
	What is not a state issue is in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights.
	Right?
	That's something you cannot affect in the states.
	The right to keep and bear arms is there.
	Period.
	Just like the right to speak is there.
	Period.
	And they said states cannot infringe on your constitutional right.
	This is a constitutional issue.
	The left freaked out, said we need to dissolve the Supreme Court.
	Now today, contrast it with abortion.
	Excuse me, again, like I said, I am very sick.
	Where they say, hey, hold on a second, there is no constitutional right to an abortion, so we're going to leave that to the states.
	Both of these, if you're going to talk about middle ground, both of these are very moderate decisions.
	It's, well, this is in the Constitution, so the states can't infringe upon it.
	This isn't in the Constitution, so states have the right to create their own laws.
	They're not saying that New York, as far as, I haven't had time to read the full bill, it came down five minutes ago, sorry, the full ruling, they're not saying that New York can't allow abortion up until Eight months.
	Or Colorado up until 30 plus weeks.
	They're not saying that here.
	They're just saying that Texas can put in a law that says it a heartbeat.
	Yeah.
	And you may not like it, but it's not your body if you're ending another heartbeat.
	You don't have two hearts.
	You're not a trout.
	Many of these broads over here, no doubt, smell like they just came from a long day working at the fish hatchery.
	Hey, we're good to go with Lane.
	He's already been on CNN and NBC as well.
	Wow, okay, really.
	So, let's go live, and as you guys pull more from the bill, then I want to talk about yesterday's bill and contrasting it and why we predict violence, unfortunately, and unrest this weekend.
	It's time to go On Location.
	Go to Swatch with Gingersnap.
	Can you put him up there too, man?
	Hopefully, yeah, it looks like we have a better connection than yesterday.
	How have you been doing?
	Same shirt, though, so I guess you just packed in overnight.
	No, no, it's just my different Hawaiian shirt.
	You know, I want to mix it up a little bit.
	But, yeah, right when it dropped, the pro-life crowd went crazy, and then immediately the pro-abortion crowd started chanting, illegitimate, take to the streets.
	We had people coming up with antiques to get up saying, who do you work for?
	There's tons of police, way more than yesterday.
	It's pretty wild out here.
	This is the pro-life people right here, and then the pro-abortion people are over here.
	They're kind of quiet now.
	It seems like they're dissipating.
	I don't know what they're doing, but there's a lot of calls to take to the streets, you know, by whatever means necessary, overturn, illegitimate, you know, all the catchphrases that the liberals love to shout.
	I mean, they're shouting them, and they were playing Rage Against the Machine for a little bit, so I knew that would make you really happy.
	Oh, yeah, because Tom Morello's a piece of shit.
	He rages against the machine by wanting to increase the size of the machine.
	Yeah, and, well, the machine got a little bit smaller today, and they don't seem to be too happy about it.
	Hey, you know what?
	Also a good way to ensure the machine doesn't grow when you can rage against it, being allowed to keep your guns.
	I think if you move to your right a little bit, you will get in the CNN shot, and we can show live.
	Hey, Ginger Snap, Ginger Snap, there's a giant black man in a red shirt.
	Go stand by him.
	There he is, right there.
	Go stand right in front of him.
	Go talk to him.
	Yeah, talk to that.
	No, they just moved it.
	Stick right around there.
	Stick just loiter right around there because they're on CNN but right now it's an Aveeno commercial.
	So you are right in the mix there.
	Is this man security?
	This large African-American in a red shirt?
	Yeah, yeah.
	He's just helping out.
	Okay, good.
	Yeah, he seems like he's there being pretty peaceful.
	What are they chanting right now?
	Um...
	Rise up for abortion rights!
	One sec.
	Rise up.
	It's very creative.
	Yeah, rise up for abortion.
	It's got a rhythm to it.
	Right.
	Well, I don't know how you rise up for abortion.
	You have to sit in stirrups.
	Well, that's a fair point.
	Yeah.
	It should be lay prone for abortion.
	What are they chanting there, Ginger Snap?
	That's true.
	Hey, by the way, the whole world is watching and including European laws that are far more restrictive on abortions that people don't quite understand.
	We have the loosest abortion laws in the country outside of Canada.
	Even people in Europe don't understand that.
	Right, and like you were saying earlier, it's not illegalizing abortion across the country.
	Nobody here gets that.
	Like, as much as they're protesting, nobody understands what the decision means.
	Right.
	Have you talked with people there?
	Have you talked with the pro-abortion activists and gotten a feel for what they understand or what they think this ruling is?
	Like, a good portion of them think that nobody can get abortions anywhere, ever.
	Some are a little more well-versed than others, but generally people kind of don't know what's going on.
	They think no one's going to get an abortion ever again.
	Okay.
	Ginger Snap, we'll go back to you.
	Stay in that general area to keep in mind kind of where the CNN camera is.
	And then once they come back, I want to show them live with you.
	But just stay in that area.
	See if you can speak with some people.
	But stay in that general area because you're going to be on CNN's camera.
	And then maybe we can have you doing jumping jacks on CNN.
	That'll be your moment.
	Yeah, there we go.
	Yeah, yeah, see what he has to say.
	Alright, we'll go back to Gingersnap.
	You can just bring him down low but kind of keep him on standby.
	I think that was the same guy from yesterday.
	We were like, wow, that guy off camera left is jacked.
	I think it's the same guy.
	Right, yeah.
	Someone mute my mic really quickly because I'm going to blow my nose.
	This is very disgusting right now.
	But we do this for you.
	Steven had to run into the studio and get everybody going this morning because we thought this was going to drop.
	I'm so glad it did because any more time on this Just would lead to worse situations.
	Now, dropping on the weekend.
	Bad idea.
	That's a rough deal.
	Hey, and can you guys pull up there in the control room some of the tweets and some of the calls to violence that we already see going on?
	It should have been on Wednesday.
	Like, do it on a Wednesday.
	No, not the calls to violence, I mean the ruling.
	Yeah, the ruling, of course.
	No, violence is fine on Wednesday apparently, just not on Thursday, Friday, Saturday, right?
	Right.
	Well, here's the thing.
	They try to say that Donald Trump doesn't believe in rule of law, that Republicans don't believe in rule of law.
	And when they don't like the rules of the game, they change them.
	They want to pack the court.
	And it gets worse than that, by the way.
	Let's bring this up.
	Keith Olbermann, for example, and he's not an outlier, called for what I think is sedition.
	He said, it has become necessary to dissolve the Supreme Court of the United States.
	This is after the gun ruling, the concealed carry ruling.
	The first step is for a state.
	The court has now forced guns upon to ignore this ruling.
	Great.
	You're a court?
	Why and how do you think you can enforce your rulings?
	Ignore the court.
	What?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	So in other words, let's take the most extreme example.
	Let's take the January 6th, you know, worse than 9-11, horrible domestic terrorists who were saying, hey, we want to re-examine the election, right?
	We don't want to certify it right now.
	They weren't saying overturn it at that point.
	They were saying, we think we need to wait to certify because we have a lot of unanswered questions.
	This is not a Wait and find out.
	This is ignore one of the three branches of government.
	Yeah.
	Which by the way is an important check and balance because they are not elected.
	That's important to note.
	How is that not sedition?
	And by the way, this is not just him.
	So you have him saying we're just going to ignore the court.
	Yeah.
	This is what happened yesterday and we'll get to what's happening today as it unfolds.
	New York and California both proposed basically just workarounds to ensure that your constitutional rights just recognized by the Supreme Court to carry firearms will not be recognized in their states. So right here we
	have, I think it's New York AG proposing workarounds for the concealed carry law. Let's
	watch that.
	In light of today's ruling by the United States Supreme Court in this case,
	we cannot idly stand by and just watch our streets be flooded with guns due to more people
	being permitted to legally carry firearms in public. Our proposed solution encourages the
	state to tailor a law that accounts for New York City's high population density as a factor in
	establishing specific parameters for the designation of sensitive areas where legal
	firearms are prohibited from being carried by members of the public.
	Sensitive areas like your hairdresser. Okay, let's, um, they'll just declare anything a
	sensitive area too. That's the thing. Sidewalk, sensitive area. Your car, a sensitive area.
	Yeah. Public streets, sensitive area. Grocery stores, sensitive area.
	We have so many people, that's your defense?
	Yeah.
	We have population density?
	Would that mean there's potential for crime?
	There's more opportunity for people to come up and accost you on the street, rob, beat, whatever?
	Alright, let's go back to Gingersnap because CNN, let's bring up, let's have Gingersnap and CNN.
	Gingersnap, can you hear me, sir?
	Alright, so Ginger Snap, again, right on CNN, the African-American gentleman in the red shirt, he's there, and if you walk a little further, so if you walk a little, walk right next to him, and then walk a little closer, sorry, further away from the steps there, you'll be getting, so now turn to your left, turn to your left, and walk forward, and I think we're going to see you here on CNN, walk forward, walk forward, walk forward, I don't see him there.
	Do you see him there yet?
	No.
	Let's see.
	Hold on a second.
	Are you right next to the African American gentleman?
	Yes.
	Just follow him because he's right in front of CNN.
	And then get in front of him.
	Are you talking about the red shirt guy?
	Yes, the red shirt guy.
	Yeah, no, they took off.
	No, no, the red shirt guy's right there.
	He's right there.
	I see him.
	He's moving away now.
	There you are.
	I see him.
	Turn to your right.
	To your right, Ginger Snap.
	This is my right.
	That is not your right.
	Your back is to the camera, CNN.
	Just turn around.
	Great.
	Now turn around and now let's bring it up.
	Let's bring up CNN.
	Ginger snap.
	Start doing jumping jacks.
	Jumping as high as you can.
	Jumping jacks for life.
	That must be delayed just a little bit.
	Jumping jacks for life.
	As high as you can do them.
	Big arms like you're waiting for a...
	I can't jump that high.
	Oh, come on now.
	You played sports.
	Oh, we see you right there on CNN.
	Yeah.
	There you go.
	It's delayed.
	That's why.
	There was a little bit of a delay.
	Yeah, there's a bit of a delay because they're afraid that conservatives might start doing jumping jacks, you know, as opposed to burning down cities.
	Oh, yeah, there he is.
	I see him right above the W. Yeah, I'm just planning to do some calisthenics in celebration.
	I don't really want to burn down anything.
	Well, this is wonderful.
	It would be great if you could walk right up to the CNN.
	There he is!
	Put him on CNN.
	Put him on CNN.
	There you are.
	There are his jumping jacks.
	There you go.
	There you go.
	Jumping jacks for life, baby!
	Jumping jacks for life!
	If you can find the CNN camera, again it's further away from, I'm trying to see, it's a small monitor, are they in front of the Supreme Court?
	How about this, I'll describe it.
	In the middle of the Supreme Court, they are directly centered on the Supreme Court pillars, straight back.
	So they're behind where you were just a little bit, and basically Dead center on the Supreme Court.
	Maybe just a hair offset to the right.
	That's their camera.
	The black guy in the red shirt right now on CNN?
	They're at the Supreme Court's kind of 7 o'clock.
	Yeah.
	So if you get there, then we can just talk with you and they can watch us broadcast with you on CNN.
	And we get free advertising.
	I think I got it.
	If you stand right next to the guy in the red, you'll be in a perfect shot.
	It's like a 10 second, 15 second delay, it seems.
	But the guy in the red is consistently close to CNN camera.
	He might be trying to steal a little bit of your shine and your snap.
	He's got like an Instagram page.
	He's trying to just get some work done.
	Oh yeah, he's right there.
	He's right there.
	It's a 30 second delay.
	It's a 30 second delay.
	You should be pretty close.
	He's been standing there for more than 30 seconds.
	I'm probably 3 seconds away.
	Yeah, we can see him walking up right now.
	If you can stand right behind him, I think that's the best camera angle for you.
	Yeah, I think you're being obscured by him right now.
	He's a large human being.
	If you can step to your right, Ginger Snap, just a little bit, you should be able to see the camera.
	There you go.
	So step to your right a little bit, step to your right a little bit, and come forward a few steps.
	So step to your right, because you're being covered by the... There you go.
	There he is!
	It's almost like Where's Waldo.
	Right, and then walk forward a little bit.
	Okay!
	Start doing, you know what, start doing some jumping jacks.
	Flip the bird to the camera at CNN.
	Flip the bird to the camera.
	Give him the middle finger for life.
	I would rather not do that, but I will do some jumping jacks.
	There you go.
	I'll do some jumping jacks for life.
	Do a few jumping jacks.
	Just say jumping jacks for life.
	Just yell out jumping jacks for life and do them.
	We're doing jumping jacks for life!
	Jumping, go, go, but you gotta do, gotta jump, come on!
	You're happy, lives are being saved!
	Ginger snap.
	I don't care.
	You have to do it.
	You have to lead it.
	You're the hero.
	You're the hero these people need, not the one they deserve.
	I'm neither.
	I'm probably neither to be honest with you.
	Crying out loud.
	I'm out here doing my best.
	Yeah.
	Alright.
	So you are on CNN, and with us... There you go!
	Yeah, baby!
	Wonderful.
	Wonderful.
	You're right there.
	Stay right there.
	You're beautiful.
	You're right in front of CNN right now, so stay right where you are.
	I love it.
	Put him on here, Tokenon.
	Sorry, on here, Toolman.
	So, what else is happening?
	What are they yelling?
	Do you feel it escalating at all there, Gingersnap?
	He's spreading the Jumping Jacks for Life!
	Yeah, I'm trying to spread the Jumping Jacks for Life going, but it's not catching on.
	It is catching on.
	He does not want to talk to me.
	30 seconds ago.
	What are they yelling?
	What are those cackling witches yelling?
	Abortion on demand.
	Oh, there you go.
	Well, see, that's exactly why this ruling came down.
	Because it's not about safe, legal, and rare.
	They want all abortions up until nine months on demand, and they're still there yelling it.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, it was never about safe, legal, ever, ever, ever.
	It just, now the facade's gone.
	Can you try and talk with one and see, I see that reporter behind you, but try and talk with one and see, ask them what they expect to do this weekend.
	You know, what they expect to happen.
	Do they expect protests?
	Do they expect marches?
	There's a lady behind you with that bandana.
	Hey, can he do it like this?
	What do we do next?
	Yeah, what do we do next?
	Ask them, what do we do next?
	Don't tell them from us.
	Yeah.
	What do we do next?
	How do we fight this?
	What do we do next?
	We do legal abortion on demand, I guess.
	That's what we do.
	Okay.
	What about that guy right there with the, uh, holding the bandana over him?
	Maybe you can ask him.
	Legal abortion on demand!
	He's talking to Univision right now, so.
	I think they're doing Spanish language interviews.
	I don't know if I'm going to be much help there.
	Oh yeah, because those Telemundo viewers, they're really pro-abortion, those types.
	Yeah.
	Those Mexican Catholics.
	It's in the Catholic Bible.
	It's just before Genesis.
	What we are watching right now, people, live, and again it's Save SCOTUS as a promo code, what we are watching is the left turn off yet another demographic of voters.
	All that's required right now is education, right?
	We're going to read more of this bill.
	Guys, get it to me.
	And all that's required is for them to see the protests, for them to see the riots, and for us to say, hey, why do you think they're rioting?
	And they'll say, well, because, you know, they think abortion is being banned.
	And you explain to them, it's not being banned.
	And these people are protesting, they're rioting because they want abortions, all the way up until and including nine months period, without the states having the rights to restrict them.
	When you communicate that to black Americans, as you saw when I just did the talking with people segment, when you communicate that to Latino Americans, Hispanic Americans, when you communicate that to nearly all demographics of Americans, they say, oh well that's unreasonable.
	We need to make sure that this message is communicated, that this is just about giving the states the right To ensure that they can regulate abortions so they don't have to be New York, Colorado, or California where you can have an abortion all the way up until and through the third trimester.
	Yeah, and most Americans agree that the states should have the right to make their own laws.
	I understand people that would be on the left that say, well then that's going to make it oppressive for women that live in Texas to be able to get out of the state.
	If you're in a large state, you're not close to a border with a state that you can go get an abortion in, right?
	But my argument back would be like, OK, well, let's say that that's true.
	Let's just say that it is going to be more difficult for people to get an abortion now.
	Maybe what we do is try to prevent the pregnancy in the first place.
	Can we all agree that maybe that's probably the place to start now?
	And there are a lot of different ways to do that.
	Right.
	Can we just do that first instead of saying, hey, let's just kill the child?
	Oh, hold on a second.
	Junior Schnapper is speaking with some people.
	Let's listen in.
	OK.
	What do we do?
	Like, obviously that overturned it.
	What is left for us to do?
	It's a scary future. I really don't know.
	So vote, vote different.
	Vote codifying. If you have a majority, don't cast.
	Do you think anything's going to happen in the more immediate future?
	No. I think it's going to be very slow.
	I think more people will show up, throughout the day.
	But people are at work, I don't know.
	What about like this weekend, tonight, do you think DC is gonna, like is anything gonna happen in DC?
	Or is it just...
	I don't know, there's not a whole lot of people who are gonna be there.
	Okay. What do you mean yet?
	I think more people will show up throughout the day.
	But people are at work, I don't know.
	Okay. Alright, well, what is...
	Let me, ask him this, ask him this.
	Are they gonna legalize abortion in DC?
	No way.
	So right now we have this on Twitter.
	This is from AngryBlackLady.
	It says, Roe and Casey are overruled in a 6-3 decision.
	Time to get to work.
	And there's a meme with a finger pistol.
	So a meme there showing some kind of violence implying using a gun.
	Blue check, by the way.
	Blue checkmark.
	Ask him what he thinks about that.
	Blue checkmarks on Twitter alluding to using guns and violence.
	So what do you like, what would you say to the people?
	Oh are we losing them?
	Oh we are. All right we'll go back to him later. Come on.
	You can take him.
	Let's go back to Ginger Snap later.
	Let's continue reading here some of the law.
	Right here you have Albert Foxconn, who's an NYU law professor.
	He says, this is how democracy dies.
	Not with a bang, but with legal ease.
	If you're a professor of law, how do you not understand this?
	How do you not portray this in an accurate way?
	Like, hey guys, I understand that everybody's freaking out right now and you want to be able to have abortion and I get it.
	You know, my body, my choice.
	I'm on your side.
	This is what he's saying.
	All this does is kick it back to New York.
	You're in New York.
	New York's not going to change their laws related to abortion.
	Right.
	By the way, we also have multiple tentacles into some of these leftist groups online, so you guys are in control and you know what to do.
	Let us know what they're discussing, especially if it can help keep people safe.
	My life has been saved on multiple occasions from that, just kind of keeping tabs on them.
	So this is from the decision right now.
	I'm just going to read you a little bit more.
	Um, stare decisis, the doctrine on which Casey's controlling opinion was based, does not compel unending adherence to Roe's abuse of judicial authority.
	Roe was egregiously wrong from the start.
	Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences.
	And far from...
	Far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have inflamed debate and deepened division.
	You think?
	It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives.
	The permissibility of abortion and the imitations... Let me just hit that real quick.
	Because you just looked at the NYU law professor saying, this is how democracy dies.
	This is what the left means when they say democracy.
	They mean mob rule and exactly what they want.
	Because just read this, this is pivotal from the decision.
	It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives.
	So what is the Supreme Court saying here?
	They're saying, hey, we shouldn't be the ones in charge of this.
	It should be the people's elected representatives in their state.
	That's how democracy dies?
	By giving, by removing power, by recusing yourself as Supreme Court justices and giving that power to elected representatives according to the bill?
	What is democracy?
	In other words, their issue here is not that the Supreme Court has taken more power.
	Their issue here is that the Supreme Court has not, with an iron fist, ruled in an authoritarian fashion that abortion is to be allowed, on demand, taxpayer funded, up until birth, up until the end of pregnancy, including birth, period.
	By the way, that is what their platform is.
	That is what the DNC platform is.
	These aren't extreme fringe activists.
	Look at Joe Biden.
	Look at Kamala Harris.
	Look at Elizabeth Warren.
	Look at Bernie Sanders.
	Not one, not one was ever willing to say when restrictions should be placed on abortions.
	Not one.
	So here's the issue.
	When they have a problem with Supreme Court justices, they have a problem with conservative Supreme Court justices, originalists, they have a problem with these justices consistently saying that we don't have this authority.
	What was the ruling yesterday?
	The Constitution gives you the right.
	We don't have this authority.
	They say they're thrusting guns upon us.
	No, they're not.
	No, they're not!
	They're saying, hey look, abortion, this was bad law.
	We don't have the authority to say that people's elected representatives can't create laws regarding restricting abortions.
	We are going to return the issue of abortion to people's elected representatives, to which NYU law professors you just saw now live say, this is how democracy dies.
	Democracy dies by the unelected judicial branch.
	Giving more power to the elected representatives of people's direct states and communities?
	Yeah.
	What's democracy?
	Can you guys comment below?
	Let's define democracy and thank God we're a representative republic, a constitutional republic, but this is the court literally giving more power to you democratically in your state!
	What they really mean is this is how democracy dies because I didn't get exactly what I want.
	Yeah, exactly.
	And I want to make sure that everybody understands that when we have riots, which we will have depending on the size and the scope of the riots in different cities across the country, we'll have them.
	Are we going to go back to these comments like we did with Donald Trump and say, see, they were inciting violence here.
	This is how democracy dies.
	When you put it like that, when you start to tell people that the democracy is dying and really what's happening is the power is going back to the states, you're telling them that now's the time to fight.
	Now is the time that if you don't take to the streets, you won't have a country again.
	Donald Trump was making comments because he believed, whether you agree with him or not, that he was defrauded and that democracy had been stolen.
	And that's what he was talking about.
	At least if he had been right, that would have been true.
	In this case, if they're right and Roe has been overturned, it's not true that democracy is infringed upon at all.
	It just goes back to the states.
	There is no place for There is no argument to say that this is a hit against democracy.
	There is none whatsoever.
	And very, very little will change in regards to abortion law outside of places like Mississippi and Texas can now say, hey, there's another heartbeat.
	I want to end it though.
	Bitch, it's not your heartbeat.
	Them's the brakes.
	And then in New York, as perverse as it is, they can say, hey, yeah, you can terminate it.
	You have 20 fingers, 20 toes, two hearts, two brains.
	You have 20 sets of fingernails, toenails.
	You, as one human, have two different sets of DNA, genetic code.
	You can kill it whenever you want.
	Or in Colorado, sure, eight months.
	Think about it.
	What I want you to do is when you see this, when you see this protest out there, these are people, any moms out there, any dads, ever look at an ultrasound?
	Any of you have a baby born two weeks early, three weeks early?
	They can already be aborted in states.
	They'll say, well, not many of those occur.
	Still in the tens of thousands.
	I think one is too many?
	You're going to tell me that wasn't a life?
	These people are protesting.
	They are furious that states have the right to say, we're not Virginia.
	We're not going to make a baby comfortable if it survives an abortion and then decide what to do with its life.
	That's the governor of Virginia, Ralph Northam, that former governor, that's what he said.
	They're protesting that Texas can say, we're not Colorado.
	You cannot have a seven, eight month old abortion.
	And we're gonna limit it at, depending on the state, 20 weeks, 16 weeks, 12 weeks, 8 weeks.
	Which should be a non-issue if the argument is true.
	Well, the vast majority of abortions occur within the first 12 weeks anyway.
	Great!
	Well then, who cares?
	Hey, it looks like Lane has a couple of people and then we also have a quote from Obama in the map for you.
	Oh, wonderful!
	That's not going to make me want my shotgun with a tow trigger.
	Okay, Ginger Snap, are you there?
	Can you hear me, sir?
	Yeah, can you hear me?
	Yes, I can.
	Okay, who are you with?
	So, I'm with a couple of the pro-life crowd here, and they were just talking to me a second ago.
	Of course, they're pretty.
	Yeah, right?
	They don't look insanely hideous, so obviously they're pro-life.
	But they were just talking to me a second ago about threats being made against them, actually.
	So, what did... if you could just speak kinda loud, maybe.
	Okay, well, the lady with the megaphone and the shaved head said, do you want me to hit you with this megaphone?
	And I was like, no.
	And she's like, I'll hit you with this.
	Well then why did she ask?
	I guess she asked politely?
	That's very... And you said you got hit in the face?
	So, they're very friendly, you know, you can see.
	This is peaceful.
	Ask her on a scale from 1 to 10, how surprised was she that this abortion activist had a shaved head?
	So, Stephen wants me to ask you on a scale of 1 to 10, how surprised were you that the abortion activist had a shaved head?
	Minus two!
	Minus two.
	And let me ask, was she overweight?
	He's guessing she wasn't in good shape, true or false?
	They're too nice.
	Yeah, they're too nice.
	I'm like the lady who wanted to hit them on the head like an acne cartoon.
	soon.
	I don't want to tarnish your reputation.
	So they're very nice.
	They're very nice people.
	Yeah.
	Well tell them thank you that we do appreciate that they're out there doing that work and ask them how, if they were to set odds, what are they willing to bet that things get violent over the course of this weekend based on being on the ground?
	Yeah, so what do you guys think are the chances that violence breaks out?
	That there's, I don't know, I guess like George Floyd type stuff.
	What was the specifics?
	No, they'll get too winded.
	An insurrection?
	to practicing when it's even up and that hasn't even been to overtime so there's no doubt that
	it will now. They also said they were going to like storm the Supreme Court and like jump over
	the gates and I don't see that happening. Yeah I hope not.
	No, they'll get too winded.
	An insurrection? That sounds like an insurrection, Ginger Snap, doesn't it?
	That does sound like threats of an insurrection.
	I don't think they should do that.
	That sounds like a bad deal.
	It's okay.
	I might not get in trouble, because you know.
	Yes, but nobody... I don't know.
	It's a bad deal.
	Alright.
	They should not do that.
	Alright.
	Okay, but Steven, they want to say thank you very much for being out here, and we appreciate that.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	So just tell them to go be pretty in front of the abortion activists, and that in itself will enrage them.
	It will piss them off.
	He just said just go be pretty in front of them, and that's going to kind of ruin their day, so.
	I think he's probably got something there.
	Alright, we gotta go Junior Snap, we'll be right back.
	Let's go to Nancy Pelosi, who is of course entirely sober, on CNN.
	Her faith, her family, not some right-wing politicians that Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell packed the court with.
	Wait, hold on a second.
	Pack the court?
	Fuck you!
	How about that?
	He didn't pack the court!
	He appointed within the number that has been the same number for, for, for, uh, go back to the 1800s?
	And by the way, this is the reason that the number was settled upon was because originally it changed.
	People make that argument because district courts change and because people would have to travel.
	And finally said, OK, this is how we are going to organize and design the Supreme Court.
	And there have been many, many legal briefings that have issued statements and opinions regarding the reasoning behind the Supreme Court justices, the numbers that we have right now, nine, and why it should not.
	Packing is expanding it because you don't like the ruling, like you said.
	Like Keith Olbermann said.
	Like your representative said.
	Appointing a justice because someone else retired is not packing the court.
	See how they use language and they lie right now?
	Nancy Pelosi is lying.
	Let's go back to completely sober Pelosi, who's about to blow a .24.
	They respected, sorry to say, the precedent of the court.
	That they respected the right of privacy in the Constitution of the United States.
	Doesn't apply here.
	Did you hear that?
	Were they not telling the truth then?
	They were.
	Again, just getting to the gun issue, because really, in preparation for this morning, I was really in an exalted state about what happened in the United States Senate yesterday.
	Who exalted you?
	Yourself?
	Counterpoint to the dangerous decision of this Trumpian Supreme Court that they made yesterday for a way to take us to, as the bill is called, community safety.
	Were you in that state when armed guards were around you escorting you to your car?
	Right.
	And then to your office?
	Right now, and I'm going to have to leave momentarily because we just finished voting on the rule.
	With more armed guards around you?
	Yeah, right now she's surrounded by armed guards, of course.
	And we expect a good bipartisan vote on it in the House.
	We congratulate the Senate on the work that they have done.
	And the timeliness of it to be passed in the Senate in a strong bipartisan way on a day when the court made such a dangerous, dangerous decision.
	It's been a two martini morning.
	Go put on your Desmond Tutu scarf, you weirdo.
	conservative Refrain are that keep deadly weapons out of dangerous hands
	by encouraging states to establish extreme risk protection order laws
	Erpo otherwise known as red flag law We don't need to hear anymore from go go put on your Desmond
	tutu scarf you weirdo so let's read the
	President Barack Obama statement who by the way, you know served as president under current former vice president Joe
	Biden Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	This is what he said.
	Gonna be hard with a sick voice.
	Now, today, the Supreme Court not only reversed nearly 50 years of precedent, it relegated the most intensely personal decision someone can make to the whims of politicians and ideologues.
	Attacking the essential freedoms of millions of Americans.
	Now, hold on a second.
	The whims of politicians and ideologues.
	By allowing these politicians who are changed out regularly to create laws that are representative of their voting constituents?
	I would say that Roe v. Wade put this in the hands of ideologues on the court because it strips the states of that right.
	It stripped the states of the right to make decisions regarding an issue that isn't a fundamental right!
	Right.
	And the most intensely personal decision?
	Hey, hold on a second.
	Why is it always the most intensely personal decision when it comes to an abortion?
	Isn't it an intensely personal decision when you decide who your mate is going to be?
	This is the problem with all of this.
	Sex is not inconsequential.
	We act like abortion is an intensely personal decision.
	But choosing who you mount is not.
	We're not animals.
	We're not animals.
	And we shouldn't create laws to accommodate human beings being animals.
	This is their mindset.
	The most intensely personal decision.
	No, it's not.
	It's not the most intensely personal decision.
	Not as intensely personal as the bathhouses you decided to attend.
	It's unbelievable.
	This is democracy.
	Those people can be voted out.
	Yes!
	At the state level.
	You know what's not fair?
	Is having a Senate vote on something and a House vote on something that the majority of Americans don't agree with just because the Democrats might have a majority right now.
	That doesn't feel fair on a local issue.
	An issue that's not supposed to be federal.
	So let me be clear.
	It's not supposed to be done at the federal level.
	Having them decide for you.
	You know what's great?
	Having a state that makes a law that you disagree with and then you organizing a campaign to get them voted out because you live in that state and you can affect local politics.
	I thought you were going to say Junior Mintz.
	Well, I was going to go that way, but this was next above it.
	I was thinking about Junior Mintz.
	That's what's great!
	You went in a more substantive direction.
	No, you're absolutely right.
	And this is just the issue that we are dealing with right now.
	The most intensely personal, I think, here's a conspiracy.
	You guys can comment below.
	By the way, please hit like, share.
	We have Ginger Snap on the ground.
	I don't know how long this is going to be going, this is an impromptu stream.
	I think they're scared, because for as much as states like Arizona, states like Texas they're claiming are going purple because of a Latino vote, well now they've seen that's actually not exactly what they expected.
	Now this is not a justification of open borders, of course not, that's not what I'm saying.
	But they know!
	That if the 10% who they're hoping will vote, the 10% of illegal immigrants who they're hoping will vote to swing elections, they know that if just that same percentage of legal Hispanic voters vote, and they're educated on the issue of abortion, that there's going to be a red wave of abortion laws.
	You will be hard-pressed to find more pro-life people than Hispanic Americans, notably Mexican Catholics.
	And they're afraid of that.
	They're afraid of this monster that they have created, going, oh my gosh, we didn't think about this.
	And really, the reason they're afraid is because this is giving authority back to the states.
	Look, look, here's what I'm saying.
	I think that abortion, I think it's murder, and I think just like murder is federally illegal, I think that it should be illegal.
	That's not where we are today.
	This ruling today just said, you know what, some states say that it's not murder, and some states say that it's murder at a certain point.
	Like when there's a heartbeat.
	Right.
	Or like when it's viable.
	Right?
	They're just saying, that's what the court said.
	Here's the issue.
	If you think that murder should be legal, you can still do that in your state.
	You can still do that in New York.
	You can still do that in California.
	You can still do that in Colorado.
	This is not a reason to get violent.
	And by the way, seeing what is happening right now and seeing these calls to violence, is it any wonder That it's your constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
	And by the way, one of the stupidest, funniest clips that I saw on, I think it was MSNBC yesterday, they were saying, well, the Supreme Court ignored that well-regulated militia, the first part of that clause.
	Again, this is the lie.
	Well, regular militia being necessary to secure the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
	And then you have auxiliary documents.
	Who is the militia?
	Anyone, any male, able to serve.
	That's the militia.
	That's what they meant.
	They meant well-regulated, meant effective, meant people who are familiar with fighting, trained, hopefully, meant if you are a man of legal age, and at that point I was pretty damn young, that's why they had like 10 kids, because they were more coach hands, they're saying any man who can pick up a gun and fight off the king, or throw some Tetleys in the harbor, has the right to pick up that gun.
	It's very, very clear.
	The left is lying when they say, well, regular militia, that means the U.S.
	National Guard.
	No, it doesn't.
	That doesn't exist.
	That means, oh, hold on a second, when we're talking about the right to privacy, that means abortion.
	What?
	No, it doesn't.
	No, Donald Trump packed the court.
	No, he didn't.
	He didn't expand the number of Supreme Court justices.
	If you actually look at what, again, what the left would have today, this is an important day, what would the left have?
	If unchecked.
	Yesterday, we have the Supreme Court striking down New York saying that you can't carry a firearm.
	Saying people have the right to carry a firearm.
	And by the way, it's not nearly as wide-reaching as you think.
	I'm a little concerned when you read Kavanaugh's opinions, where he's allowing for restrictions that I would argue are unconstitutional.
	And I think what's more important is the dissenting opinions, like Breyer's.
	I'll get to that in a second.
	But yesterday, they said, you have the right to carry firearms.
	Okay.
	And now today, they're saying, well, you know what, the states have the right to... states have the right, the elected representatives have the right to say, you can't have an abortion after this point because those people there consider it murder, and this unfortunately has not been defined at the federal level.
	They want to change the rules to all of that.
	What would they do?
	Well, California and New York tell you.
	They won't let you carry firearms.
	What would they do if unchecked?
	Well, they've told you.
	Abortion up until and including nine months period.
	That's what they do in their states!
	And they just want to make sure that that is enshrined at a federal level.
	Let me ask you, I don't know, you watching right now, I don't know, I don't feel, I don't feel authoritarian, Charles.
	I don't feel authoritarian in that I believe if you have the right to own a firearm, I can't Stop you.
	I don't feel like that makes me authoritarian.
	I don't feel like an authoritarian in saying, all right, okay, look, states, you can murder babies up until nine months.
	Texas chooses not to.
	That doesn't feel, is it just me?
	That doesn't feel authoritarian.
	You know what it feels authoritarian?
	Ignoring the court's rulings.
	And ensuring that only some justices decide all of these laws, as it relates to your rights.
	Giving them more power.
	They're saying democracy dies while their proposed solution today, we just read you these quotes, the proposed solutions are to give the courts Exactly.
	The court was never given that power by the Constitution and so here's, I've got two solutions to this problem.
	One is fantastic for us and the other one will just show you how stupid you are.
	Please tell me one is a fumigation tent.
	Well, they're gonna need it.
	Mostly for Gingersnap when he gets done talking to some of these people.
	Hey, we actually just got someone to talk to.
	Oh, Ginger Snap?
	Okay, hold that thought.
	Do you need a note to write it down?
	You got good short-term memory.
	He plays his dueling back.
	Alright, Ginger Snap, you are there, sir.
	Okay, I'm gonna listen in.
	You do your thing.
	Okay, so I'm talking to, um, what's your name?
	Edwin.
	And Edwin is a anti-abortion Democrat.
	Catholic.
	So, a rare breed.
	I haven't met anyone that fits that description at all.
	So, how do you feel?
	Can you ask Edwin?
	Ask Edwin really quickly.
	I feel very happy.
	I feel very excited.
	Now we have to take the battles to all things safe.
	Ask him his ethnicity.
	Where is he?
	Is he Hispanic American?
	Ask him.
	Do you have a Hispanic background?
	Yes, I am.
	How do you think most of the Hispanic community feels about this?
	Well, there was actually this poll about 5%.
	More or less, Hispanics, when they're called, they're actually the only ethnicity that tend to be against abortion.
	They either want severe restrictions or just ban it entirely.
	And it's only about between 40-45% of Hispanics that actually are pro-choice.
	So when it comes to demographics, Hispanics tend to be pro-life versus just being pro-choice.
	Ask him what would make him a Democrat.
	you know, they're Hispanics and also in other countries, you know, you really don't talk
	about, you know, abortion or a lot. I mean, as right now, it's only feminism in Latin
	America that is really pushing that abortion. Right. Yeah, abortion debate. But most Hispanics,
	well, most people in Latin America, you know, really aren't bothered by it. Yeah. Ask him
	what would make him a Democrat. What would make him vote Democrat if he's pro-life?
	So with something like an issue as big as this, pro-life generally tends to be more
	more of like a Republican position.
	Yes.
	So what makes you a Democrat that holds this position?
	Well, you know, first off, I come from a county, which is Robson County, North Carolina, which is actually very racially diverse.
	We have actually have been Democrats.
	Well, we actually I actually checked the demographics.
	For every three Democrats, there is one Republican.
	And we also don't have the abortion clinic, which, you know, if it's a county that's heavily Democratic, you would expect to see abortion, but that's not the case.
	So, you know, there's this thing in which, you know, there are still, you know, pro-life Democrats, just that it's in the rural communities that are controlled by Democrats versus, you know, But is it going to be hard for you to support an administration that is very against this view that you hold?
	Well, actually, to be quite frank, I actually did vote for Biden for President.
	However, I also did vote for Republicans at the federal level, which is either the House of Representatives or the Senate.
	You know, because I'm like, I just didn't like Trump at all.
	And that's the thing with a lot of Democrats, they do not like Trump.
	However, you know, they do want abortion restrictions, so sometimes you have to play along.
	But ask him if he's glad that because of the appointees from Trump to the court that we
	have this ruling.
	I really have that much control.
	However, after this, I really fear that the Democratic Party will be more for abortion
	than anything else.
	Which, you know, I actually hate to say it, but Dane Trump, you know, only for once, that's the one good thing that he did.
	Out of the whole mess, that's the really, really good thing.
	That's the one good thing.
	Out of the whole mess, that's the one good thing.
	I'm glad we did it.
	Okay, well we Well, I mean, it is.
	It's the whole economy.
	The economy was going to help you a little bit.
	Just gas prices.
	Ask him, can you give him two good things?
	This, abortion, and gas prices.
	Okay.
	Well, can you give us two good things?
	Abortion and gas prices.
	They were a little bit lower before.
	Well, you know, the abortion gas prices.
	Just two things.
	Well, I mean, everything it is, it's the whole economy,
	the economy was going to hell.
	COVID, I do partially do blame, you know, the shutting down of businesses.
	I mean, I understand, you know, why they did it, but come on, it's been two years.
	I opened the country up.
	You sound like a Republican.
	Yeah, I was gonna say.
	I'm not a Republican, but I still love, I still support social welfare programs,
	which is now, which is gonna be in the, now the bottom line for pro-life,
	you know, for pro-lifers.
	You know, some Republicans, they're like, well, you know, let's not focus on the government, but focus on non-profits.
	However, the way I feel is that still government has an important role to play and help the lives.
	Now, I'm not saying to have a complete takeover of the government.
	However, what I am saying is that the government should just be there to support people.
	Okay.
	Like, that should be the role of the government.
	You know, some Republicans have a different view.
	Right.
	You know, that's, yeah, I have my different view, which is why I'm here.
	Like I've always said... We do appreciate you taking the time to talk to us today.
	Really.
	Thank you.
	Thank you, Ginger Snappin'.
	This is, like I've said, the Latino and the Hispanic and the Black...
	Voters in the Democrat Party, they are the only moderates left.
	And so you give me, you know this, you give me half hour with that guy, he will never vote Democrat again.
	I guarantee you.
	And the same thing happened when we went and we spoke with black Americans in the streets of Deep Ellum in Dallas.
	It just requires a little bit of education.
	That guy right there is a man precluded from voting Democrat if he fully understood the depth of their depravity.
	Alright, I'll check back in with Ginger Snap.
	He looks a little bit like a ginger in the headlights.
	He saw another girl he wanted to go interview.
	Ginger Snap loves the ladies.
	He loves the ladies.
	He likes them a lot.
	Let me go back to the points that I was going to make.
	Constitutional amendment.
	If you think that there should be, because it's not in there, and that's what the Supreme Court just said, this is not something that is protected by the Constitution of the United States or the amendments.
	So, you can do a constitutional amendment for a right to abortion.
	Go for it.
	The bar is really high.
	What you'll find is you'll never get anywhere close to it.
	Wouldn't that have to be at a convention of the states?
	Yeah.
	So they would have to go through an entire process.
	They don't want to do that.
	They don't want to go through a difficult process.
	They want to power grab through authoritarianism.
	I know.
	That's what they said.
	They said, look, we're not going to get every single one of these things right.
	So we're going to leave a mechanism in place to make sure that you can adjust this as you see fit.
	But it isn't going to be at the whims of nine people.
	It's not going to be at the whims of Congress.
	It's going to be a much harder process.
	The other thing that you can do Get the hell out of our states.
	If you want abortion on demand, please move to California.
	Move to Colorado.
	Move to New York.
	Move to Illinois.
	Move to Michigan.
	I don't want to move to New York.
	The economy is so bad though.
	Well then don't vote for it here!
	Don't vote for it here!
	Leave!
	Leave now!
	Yeah, guess what?
	Leave right now!
	Because we have, because of our election system, right?
	Because we have an election system that doesn't just use the popular vote, I don't care if you stay, I would rather you leave.
	You brought your stupid policies with you when you moved here, and you're screwing up a good thing.
	Get out.
	There's your two solutions.
	Yes.
	If you're in Texas, and you don't like carrying firearms, you might as well just get the hell out.
	Well, yeah, that's true.
	America, you don't like spaghetti and meatballs.
	Researchers, do me a favor really quickly.
	There's a lot of stuff going around right now about Justice Clarence Thomas writing in a concurring opinion that he released that some people are saying that it's calling for a reconsideration of protection for contraception, same-sex marriages, and same-sex relationships.
	There seems to be a lot of BS floating around right now being pushed by the left.
	Find that if you can, his concurring opinion, and let us know kind of what it says.
	That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if Clarence Thomas was like, gay couples getting married?
	That's just weird.
	That's nasty.
	That is weird.
	Or it's completely reasonable.
	It's completely reasonable, yeah.
	I'm just saying it could go either way.
	I like that guy.
	Let me read you another quote here from Hillary Clinton.
	This is a reaction from the left.
	We're doing this live.
	You can use a promo code SAVESCOTUS.
	You'll get $20 off Mug Club.
	As you see right now, there are no ads.
	That's what keeps the lights on, is actual viewers like you, not a foreign caliphate.
	Hillary Clinton said, AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH Yes!
	Yes!
	End phrase!
	Exactly!
	Period.
	This is what has happened since the beginning of time, is you either sit two lives become one, two fleshes become one, and you say we want to have a child.
	The term used to be, I am with child.
	Right?
	Or, oopsie, and you've got a kid on your hands, but either way, the decision has been made!
	This is the language that they try and turn.
	They act as though the only decision takes place after contraception.
	There are many decisions before that.
	Many decisions before that.
	Let's be clear, there are decisions in how you approach dating, or courting as it used to be known.
	There are decisions in how you decide on your future mate, partner.
	There are decisions on whether you want it to be a one night stand or not, which by the way is something I think is very corrosive to our society.
	Then there are decisions on if you decide that this is the person, whether it's a one night stand or your significant partner, Which form of contraception?
	Are you using hormonal birth control?
	There's now male hormonal birth control.
	I don't know if it's out on the market yet.
	It's basically just enough testosterone to ruin your boys, but not enough for performance enhancing benefit.
	Wonderful.
	Do you want to use a rubber?
	Hey, when it comes to rubber, what do you want?
	Do you want ultra sensitive?
	Do you want lambskin?
	Do you want ribbed for her pleasure?
	You can get a French tickler.
	Or there's a diaphragm.
	There's an IUD for some of them.
	And I know that's a whole different, but my point is there are many decisions that you make.
	You know what women can also do?
	Sorry to interrupt.
	They can track their ovulation as well.
	That's a very effective way to limit.
	It's a somewhat effective way.
	It's a somewhat effective way.
	It is.
	Let's be honest, it's not a very effective way.
	Tracking ovulation is a very effective way to limit your chances.
	Yes, to limit your chances, but it is not a foolproof system.
	No, no, no, not at all.
	Also, especially after a couple of Zimas, that app isn't getting checked for notifications.
	All right.
	Says, this is one of the most sacred decisions there is and that such decisions should remain between patients and their doctors.
	Today's Supreme Court opinion will live in infamy.
	They use this language.
	Do you know what that's from?
	Do you know what that's from?
	A day that will live in infamy.
	Comment, do you know what it's from?
	It's a speech of Pearl Harbor.
	Giving the states the right to put some limitations, or the states the right to have no limitations on abortions, they are comparing to Pearl Harbor, which before 9-11 was the most devastating attack on American soil.
	And some people are going to be surprised why it gets violent this weekend.
	We'll live in infamy as a step backwards for women's rights and human rights.
	Well, I think, sorry, you misspelled whores.
	Yeah.
	It'll be a step backward for whores.
	Pronounce two syllables.
	Whores.
	And what do I mean by that?
	I mean women who aren't sexually responsible and then decide that they are going to abort a human life.
	Yep.
	Yep.
	May not like it.
	Not saying all women are whores.
	But people who think that it's a necessity.
	Abortion.
	Otherwise you cannot be a responsible female adult or someone is violating your rights.
	It's science.
	We used to value pregnancy.
	It used to be a beautiful thing, like, for you to be able to get pregnant and bring a child into this world, and now it's an inconvenience because we want you to pursue a career and then wake up at 35 and realize, holy crap, I'm not happy with this.
	And I'm not saying that women can't be happy in a career and be happy in a CEO role or some other position of power and authority in business and that they can't start businesses.
	Not at all.
	What I'm saying is you will never experience joy like bringing a child into the world.
	You alone get the privilege of doing that.
	And what you're saying is it's an inconvenience.
	It's an inconvenient time.
	You know who's going to celebrate this law?
	The almost 1 million kids who will potentially be born this year that would have been aborted.
	Hey, let's go to CNN right now because they have someone live on location.
	Let's see what she's doing and what kind of a job they're doing at CNN here, how they're portraying it.
	It's grown a lot.
	I'll introduce you to two people that we're speaking with.
	This is Lori Miller.
	She's come from California.
	Oh, that's a bad start.
	Uh-oh.
	Sorry.
	Sorry about that.
	So this is Lori Miller.
	She's come from California.
	They're arguing.
	She's worse than Ginger Snap.
	Lori, can you talk to me about what brings you out here today and how you feel?
	Our video kind of looks better.
	Well, I have a 17-year-old daughter, so it's very important to me that she has a right to choose when she becomes a mother.
	She does.
	When she's ready.
	Just don't have sex.
	There you go.
	Done.
	What you saw out of the Supreme Court.
	You live in California, bitch!
	I don't know what's next.
	I don't think we have the systems in place to support young women having children when they're not ready.
	Well then, don't have sex.
	So here's what it comes down to.
	And now it's the broad, and now it's the boodle, and nothing is safe.
	Name that movie line, comment below.
	It started with, I want her to have the right.
	And then, we don't have the systems in place for these children that we don't want.
	So what does it come to?
	Another expanding of the social safety net.
	That's always the pivot.
	The argument is, I want my daughter.
	By the way, you're in California, okay?
	You're in the land of abortion on demand.
	And by the way, I don't know the stats.
	I'm pretty sure some of the highest number of welfare recipients, certainly in urban areas, Out of the country.
	I know if you talk about some people in the hills of West Virginia, right, people who are very poor.
	If you're talking about urban areas, I'm pretty sure that Los Angeles and San Francisco are up there.
	So it's not like California is affected by this.
	California has the social safety net she's saying that they don't have.
	And by the way, California can still have their outrageously silly abortion laws.
	Let's continue with CNN because now she's speaking with, I can't see, it's a small thing, a Swiffer?
	She didn't have the means to have a child at this moment.
	And I was the only person that was there telling her, we didn't know each other very well.
	We were only a couple months into our senior year.
	And I told her, I was like, you know, I don't know why, but I feel as though you are meant to be a mother to this child.
	And I am going to be here for you.
	I am going to support you every single step of the way.
	You know, no matter what you decide to do, but just know that you are strong enough.
	Well, she ended up booking the abortion appointment, and the morning that she was going to take the two-hour drive to our nearest abortion facility, the night before, she had actually filled up her tires with air just to make sure that it was all good, she could make the drive, and she woke up in the morning.
	She called me while I was in class, and I said, I have to answer, obviously.
	And she said, she's crying.
	And she was like, I didn't go, I didn't go.
	And I was like, you didn't go?
	And she goes, no, the air in my tire was flat.
	My tire was flat this morning when I went to leave.
	I feel like this is my sign to keep this child.
	And she has gone, she has taken her circumstances and just achieved so much.
	Not only is she an amazing mother to a soon to be three-year-old, beautiful little boy,
	but she is now living in her own place.
	She's starting school.
	She has a great job and she did it.
	I want women to know, I want everyone to know that women are stronger than their circumstances.
	And no matter what situation that you find yourself in the post-dope generation,
	the pro-life generation is here to say, you can.
	Abortion tells women, you can't.
	You can't go to college.
	You can't achieve your dreams.
	You have to have the right to end the life of your child so that you can live your dream.
	And I think that's misogyny.
	I think that is disgusting.
	And I think that we're better than that in 2022.
	She's not going to ask a follow up.
	Watch.
	Savannah Craven, I appreciate your time.
	There you go!
	Fair enough!
	We saw her ask a follow-up to the California broad who was dumb as a bag of hammers, and then this lady starts getting on a roll.
	She's like, oh my god, I can't say anything because she's black!
	Cut the feed!
	Cut the feed!
	No, no, no, no!
	Go to camera two!
	Abort the feed!
	Yeah, abort the feed.
	Look, this is just, this is a, so, this is one of those situations, um, well, let me read this to you right now.
	Can I read this quote?
	Do you mind if I read the Reverend?
	Yeah.
	Okay, go ahead, and you can mute my mic because I have to blow my nose again.
	This is gonna piss me off here.
	Alright, so, Reverend...
	Raphael Warnock, I'm outraged by the Supreme Court's decision as a pro-choice pastor.
	Remember that.
	I'll never back down from this fight.
	Women must be able to make their own health care decisions, not politicians.
	I am sorry.
	It is impossible to read the Bible and be pro-choice.
	The reason that I say that is the Bible is very clear on when that baby can understand what's going on in the world outside of it
	when God knows it as it knits it in its mother's womb, right? He or she. There
	is no room. The Catholic Church doesn't provide room. Jewish culture doesn't provide
	room for this.
	Christian faith doesn't provide room for this because the Bible does not provide
	room for this. For you to be a pro-choice pastor, you have to not. This shouldn't be
	a surprise though because we talked about this guy...
	He's the one that tweeted, No, you're not.
	No.
	This guy is not a reverend.
	No, this guy's not a pastor.
	Easter is more transcendent than the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
	Whether you are a Christian or not, through a commitment to helping others, we are able
	to save ourselves.
	No you're not.
	No.
	This guy is not a reverend.
	This guy's not a pastor.
	This guy's a false...
	I think he's not even a prophet.
	He's just a charlatan.
	He's a snake oil salesman.
	By the way, we have Amy Klobuchar.
	I mean, just serial mediocritist.
	She's great at being mediocre.
	No one is better at mediocre than Amy Klobuchar.
	She said, what the Supreme Court just did is an outrage.
	A woman has a right to make her own healthcare choices.
	Did she say choices twice?
	Choices, choices, choices.
	From now until November.
	Yes, she did.
	She wrote it twice.
	Oh, so we can see that she's had a three martini brunch.
	Her and Pelosi.
	You know what I love to do?
	I love to tweet after Cosmos.
	Her own health care choices, choices.
	From now until November, we fight.
	Wait a second!
	Fight!
	Isn't that inciting violence?
	Isn't that inciting violence?
	Which, by the way, fight like hell, the shirts are a veil.
	I don't care.
	You can say fight.
	I know what you mean.
	But you impeached a president for saying fight like hell.
	After, unlike you, Amy, aggressively mediocre Klobuchar, he had the qualifier of make your voices heard peacefully.
	I didn't see you just say that.
	I saw you only say fight.
	Time to start using their rules against them.
	Time to start taking their rules, rolling them up, and grabbing your shovel, your screwdriver, whatever you have, your mallet, and shove it down their mouth.
	We can't keep playing by a different set of rules.
	You said fight!
	Impeach!
	Yeah, absolutely.
	By the way, this is why it's so important for us to go out and vote.
	She's saying, all right, we've got to fight all the way until November.
	Make sure you go out and vote because they're going to try to do every single thing that they can to overturn this, to pack the court, to use this as a pretense.
	Oh, they're expanding gun laws.
	No, they're not.
	They're just recognizing a law that's already on the books in the Constitution, the Second Amendment.
	You have this right.
	They're giving you the ability not to get an abortion anymore, right?
	They're prohibiting you from getting—no, they're not.
	They're sending it back to the states.
	They're going to use it Go out and vote.
	We were this close.
	If Donald Trump does not get elected president, this day never happens.
	Yep.
	Just think about that.
	In fact, this day probably never happens.
	We probably have like a 7-2 court or a 6-3 court the other way if Donald Trump does not become president.
	Hey, by the way, do you think if that happened they would be calling to add seats and pack the court?
	Of course not.
	No.
	To end the filibuster, to get rid of democracy, all the things that the Democrats want to do right now to protect democracy are ending democracy.
	And you know what?
	Let's read some chats and we can read them live, but I want to read some more from the bill and then to some more reactions which are absolutely... Alyssa Milano is just... pee your pants funny.
	So, page 37 in the bill, and all references are available at lottowithcrowd.com.
	The opinions are up there to read, and I believe we also have the bills in which the opinions are based, just like yesterday with the New York concealed carry law.
	Page 37 says, The most striking feature of the dissent is the absence of any serious discussion of the legitimacy of the state's interest in protecting fetal life.
	This is evident in the analogy that the dissent draws between the abortion rights and the rights recognized in Griswold's contraception, Eisenstadt, the same, Lawrence, sexual conduct with a member of the same sex, and Obergefell, same-sex marriage.
	That view is evident throughout the dissent.
	The dissent has much to say about the effects of pregnancy on women, the burdens of motherhood, and the difficulties faced by poor women.
	These are important concerns.
	However, the dissent evinces no similar regard for a state's interest in protecting prenatal life.
	Is that the Clarence Thomas?
	Is that what we're talking about?
	That people are bitching about?
	Is that Clarence?
	Can someone tell me?
	Is that Clarence Thomas?
	Because he was discussing the legal precedent there of Obergefell.
	Is that what they're saying?
	That was at least the list right there for sure.
	I don't know if that's the concurring opinion.
	I know, but is that what Twitter is trying to say?
	Means that Clarence Thomas is coming for your sword fights?
	That's probably where they're pulling it from.
	Yeah.
	That's what I'm guessing.
	Can you guys tell me?
	30 seconds or less, guys.
	Let's go.
	Lane has a pro choice.
	Yeah, so what do you think is going to happen in North Carolina?
	Let me know if that's Clarence Thomas.
	Let's go to Ginger Snap down there on location.
	Again, the promo code is SafeScotus.
	Ginger Snap, go ahead.
	Yeah, so what do you think is going to happen in North Carolina?
	Oh, well, you know, it's going to be a lot.
	We need you to lean in.
	Lean in, lean.
	We have a Democratic governor and a, actually no longer a majority, a bigger majority than
	either House or State legislature.
	So that is going to have an impact.
	And our Democratic Governor is definitely moderate to, you know, somewhat to the left.
	And he's been holding the line against you.
	But we've got some constitutional amendments to go through.
	So do you think this abortion issue is going to have downstream effects on transgender issues?
	It may.
	by transgender people and that's been a big issue.
	Wait hold on, ask him how the abortion issue affects transgenders.
	So do you think this abortion issue is going to have downstream effects on transgender issues?
	It may.
	It's a bad because there will be...
	What the fuck?
	Although we had a very large pride parade and festival last Saturday in Winston-Salem
	and a lot of the major urban areas in North Carolina have been fully supported by gay rights and so...
	A lot of transgenders have abortions?
	Do you think that this ruling, is it constitutional?
	Like, do you think this follows the rule of the Constitution?
	That's very interesting.
	It was quick to answer the other one.
	And of course the constitutional framers had no idea that this would become an issue, any more than they had any idea that gun rights were such a major issue.
	So is he suggesting that the founders would have been supportive of modern abortion?
	So do you think if they would have known this specific issue would arise, do you think the founders of the country would have supported abortion rights?
	Just say bullshit.
	Just say bullshit.
	I'm not going to serve time. Although, again, abortion was a fairly common practice throughout most Western cultures
	back in that day and age.
	You know what? Jumping off a ladder probably wasn't the way to do it, though.
	No.
	Just say bullshit. It was not common practice.
	So, and I didn't save my infusion.
	So, women, before we talk about the issue of the law, the fact that they want to do it,
	Who's they?
	Ask her, who's they?
	Who's they?
	Who's they?
	When you say they, like, who are you?
	No, who wants to do away?
	Who are the people that want to do away with this?
	Specifically, do you think?
	Well, right, because they're Christian, so it would be very... No, you're not.
	I'm really curious.
	Where in the Bible would you find support for this?
	When people ask that question, you're like, you're a Christian, how do you believe in abortion?
	How would you answer that question?
	Well, there is no support anywhere.
	In fact, I'm sure it was widely practiced in the ancient world.
	One thing that the apostles said was that there would be a couple of Muslim women in the Muslim community.
	They both indicated that there is not widespread support for the pro-life position in the Muslim community.
	You're not Muslim, you're Christian!
	Tell them also the Muslim belief is to killing Christians and Jews and infidels is okay.
	And gays.
	And gays.
	So, are you saying the Muslims support pro-life, support pro-choice as a whole?
	Pro-choice.
	The Muslims are pro-choice?
	A lot of them are.
	They also are very pro, like, killing people that don't... Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So... But, uh, in some parts of the Muslim community, it's not, it's not considered, uh, as absolute as, as un-Christian.
	Right.
	Because he just acknowledged that Islam is a culture of death across the board.
	Alright.
	Okay, so what do you think is going to be the immediate result of this?
	Nothing?
	Right.
	I just mean like on the ground today, do you think anything is going to... Yes.
	No.
	No, no, no, like I didn't know if like you thought there was going to be like people taking to the streets, huge marches, violence.
	I'm watching this, but I can't even pay for this.
	I can't pay for this.
	My only concern would be if pro-lifers demonstrators met a large enough counter protest.
	So the pro-life people are the dangerous ones?
	No, no. But if we get huge numbers on both sides, that could be a problem.
	So let's blame the pro-lifers for fighting back.
	All right, Lane, we'll go back.
	GingerSnap, we'll go back to you.
	We can't really hear them so much.
	Which, not hearing that old broad is probably a good thing.
	Apparently her husband is into pilgrim sex.
	Hey, what you were reading before, that was still Alito.
	We have Clarence Thomas further down.
	Okay, we have Clarence Thomas.
	But here, let me just go, let me just address what we just heard.
	He acknowledged, think about this for a second, think about how scary it is.
	He acknowledged there's no constitutional basis.
	He acknowledged, I'm a Christian but there's no biblical basis to support abortion.
	They acknowledged it's going to affect them zero because of the states, because of the state in which they live.
	I didn't hear which the state in which they live.
	I think he said North Carolina.
	Did they?
	Yeah.
	They said nothing's going to change in many of the states is what they said.
	They acknowledged that and they're outraged anyway.
	Yeah.
	There's no common ground with, I'm sorry, demonic ideas.
	It's demonic.
	It's demonic to abort, to kill a 7-month-old, 6-month-old, 5-month-old.
	I'm sorry, it's pure evil.
	And these people support a platform.
	And what do I mean?
	Fringe?
	No.
	Everyone.
	Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Amy Klobuchar, Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren.
	None of them are willing to put any limitations on abortions as part of the democratic policy.
	There's no negot... we don't negotiate with terrorists, which isn't really true, we negotiate with terrorists all
	the time.
	But! There's no finding common ground with evil.
	Yeah, we have Ocasio-Cortez on...
	Oh, let's see what she says.
	...cementing of minority rule in a lot of ways.
	What?
	And we're gonna have to fight a long road to get it back.
	Fight!
	She said fight!
	Well, I mean, that's a good question because certainly the Dems have been trying to use this as an issue over the last two months since you saw the leaked opinion.
	And it does not seem to have moved the needle.
	If it has, not much.
	Again, I think most people are pretty entrenched with what they believe on this particular issue and what ought to happen.
	What I think a lot of folks... Alright, let me read you guys a Clarence Thomas concurring opinion.
	This is what the left is freaking out about, just to be clear.
	So, because, like we said, I guess we've been seeing on Twitter people saying that he's trying to ban gay marriage.
	I guess that, what's his name, H3, Ethan Klein?
	Oh, Ethan Klein.
	Yeah, he was saying that.
	So, this is from Clarence Thomas, his concurring opinion on the subject here of substantive due process.
	I'll read directly from it.
	It says, because the Due Process Clause does not secure any substantive rights, it does not secure a right to abortion.
	The court today declines to disturb substantive due process jurisprudence generally or the doctrine's application in other specific contexts.
	Cases like Griswold v. Connecticut, that's the right of married persons to obtain contraceptives, Lawrence v. Texas, the right to engage in private consensual sexual acts, Obergefell v. Hodges, the right to same-sex marriage, are not an issue.
	They're not an issue for this.
	Are not an issue!
	Not should be underlined.
	Are not an issue!
	Can someone bring up the tweets about Clarence Thomas?
	Guys, grab the tweets that Gerald was talking about or where they're writing about Clarence Thomas saying they're going after your gay marriage because, let me read this, he says that these are not an issue and then he goes on to explain why.
	The court's abortion cases are unique.
	This is almost like, again, they'll look back on this, sort of like the left tries to look back and twist the right of A regulated militia.
	Those commas matter.
	And the auxiliary documents matter.
	The supporting documents that say, what is a militia?
	It's every man.
	Right here, it's not just, are not an issue, meaning same-sex marriage, meaning contraceptives.
	There's another part.
	He says the court's abortion cases are unique.
	Meaning, unique!
	What does that mean?
	Separate and apart from these other issues.
	It couldn't be more clear that he's saying this affects these other cases None!
	At all!
	He writes C-Anti.
	And there's some numbers here as far as pages.
	And no party has asked us to decide whether our entire 14th Amendment jurisprudence must be preserved or revised.
	For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell, because any substantive due process decision is demonstrably erroneous.
	We have a duty to correct the error established in those precedents.
	So he's saying this is different, those are not at issue right now, and he's saying we will need to take these cases On a case-by-case basis as to whether they fall under due process.
	Right.
	Now, can you imagine if they don't fall under due process?
	This is the problem with the 14th Amendment.
	It's been used as this umbrella of, you can do anything you want.
	Why?
	Uh, privacy.
	And that's not really even what the 14th Amendment says.
	So it's, we can have sex, uh, we can do whatever we want in our bedroom.
	Well, sure.
	And by the way, I don't care.
	Of course you should be able to do whatever you want in your bedroom.
	That's one that seems appropriate to me.
	Yeah.
	Why?
	Because of privacy.
	Okay.
	We have the right to speak.
	Okay.
	Understand.
	But then they say we have a right to privacy abortion.
	That's not a privacy issue.
	And I would even argue the same-sex marriage issue at a federal level is not really a privacy issue.
	So that's one that may require reconsidering.
	And again, it would go to the states, where if you just say, well, hold on a second, this can't be filed under the 14th Amendment because then the 14th Amendment doesn't mean anything.
	It would need to be brought before us in another case.
	Right.
	And that's how I'm reading this.
	I'm not reading that he is saying we need to overturn the actual decisions in those cases.
	No, he's not at all.
	I'm reading it as saying, if you're basing this on the 14th Amendment, like the court, and right here it says it, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this court's substantive due process precedents.
	Right.
	Meaning in future cases when they come we can't just depend on the precedence we have for substantive due process because we've just said that we got one wrong.
	Right.
	And we're not applying this correctly.
	The 14th Amendment isn't being applied correctly here.
	So in future cases we need to keep that in mind.
	So it has to be brought under a different standard.
	It would have to be a case that goes to the Supreme Court on one of these issues where it was decided based on the 14th Amendment and what he is also saying by the way is we need To observe the precedence.
	Meaning that that would be included in how they rule.
	And whether that precedence, whether it makes sense, because we did get one wrong here.
	But right now, today, he says these are not an issue.
	The court's abortion cases are unique.
	The context is the abortion cases are not the same as these other cases.
	Right.
	And he could be strengthening that.
	So the reason I bring that up is because R.G.B.
	said the same thing.
	She said the 14th Amendment and I think you read a quote from her earlier.
	Don't say R.G.B.
	I want to punch you in your face so bad when you say that.
	Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
	She's not a hip hop artist.
	Former Justice.
	Not Judge Chris Cross.
	She's not ODB?
	Okay.
	She said that the 14th Amendment would not sustain Roe in the long term.
	Yes.
	That it would be overturned.
	That's exactly what Clarence Thomas is saying here.
	That if you wanted to strengthen it, you need... Oh, hold on.
	Let's see Elizabeth Warren with her Parkinson's shakes.
	The fact that this now goes back to the states, your home state of Massachusetts, the highest court, they're upholding the right to an abortion, passing laws to protect abortion rights.
	We're seeing more of that in a number of bluer states.
	The reality of what can happen, you tried the legislative route not too long ago.
	That failed.
	An executive order isn't going to reinstate this, and even if it did, it could be overturned by another president, as you know.
	So, realistically speaking, when you say there is work to be done legislatively... Can someone bring me up the Massachusetts abortion laws?
	Put it at the top of this document?
	What does that look like?
	What the limitations are?
	It looks like getting two more Democrats in the United States Senate who are willing to support both filibuster reform and making Roe versus Wade the law of the land.
	It means hanging on to the House of Representatives.
	And it means passing Roe into law.
	That's what November will be all about.
	No, it's not what it's all about.
	It's about gas prices.
	It's about inflation.
	It's about people not being able to find a job.
	It's about people not being able to afford housing.
	It's about people not able to afford rent.
	It's about the fact that you have, pardon my language, fucked up at every single aspect of your job, your entire party.
	And you screwed up Roe v. Wade, you screwed up the precedence here.
	You had a ruling that you didn't like, and so you want to make it about this, and all of your calls, we've heard every single leftist representative we have seen on television, and if you read their tweets, use the words, fight.
	You want to stir up violence just like you did with Black Lives Matter.
	And within the first four months, there were $2 billion worth of damages.
	And not just money.
	There were thousands of officer casualties.
	Dozens of murders.
	Largely black neighborhoods.
	Largely black people.
	You want to do the same thing now.
	That's what you want to do because there's no way you can win the election on the issues.
	None.
	Whatsoever.
	You know it.
	We know it.
	The Latino Democrat out there in front of the Supreme Court just now knows it.
	And so she says, this is what it is all about.
	It's not what it's all about.
	You can keep saying that because you want it to be that way, but it's not what it's all about.
	This is done.
	This is done.
	Take the L like a man.
	Oh, that's right, you can't do that.
	It goes back to yesterday.
	Is there any accountability?
	Women should have the right to make their decisions.
	Hold on a second.
	Are women ever held accountable for the decisions that they make before we get to abortion time?
	Just like that black lady, she could have been biracial.
	Who we aptly said, you know, compared to a Swiffer that was just, you know, for jokes.
	But I love what she had to say.
	Hopefully she has a sense of humor.
	I think she does.
	She just said, this is misogyny.
	Saying that women do not have...
	Any accountability for their decisions.
	Hey, we know that men do.
	We know that men do.
	Now, we don't have any choice.
	This is the issue here right now.
	I'm going to give you a male's perspective.
	Because I'm not a female.
	Okay?
	So we're giving you the legal perspective and we hear from woman after woman after woman after woman after woman after woman.
	That's all we've heard on CNN.
	As though it's the only opinion that matters.
	Let me speak here.
	By the way, this is important for women.
	Okay?
	More important than women talking about their choices?
	is how it affects the sexual dynamics, the relational dynamics between you and men.
	If you have a guy who says he supports your right to an abortion, he's probably a piece of shit, just to let you know.
	But you know what?
	Guys don't have a choice, but we do have the bill.
	We do have the bill.
	You want to know why 40-something percent of young men don't want to get married?
	You both choose to have sex.
	Okay, maybe it's an accident.
	I hate to use that word.
	Maybe you didn't plan on the pregnancy.
	Or maybe you did.
	But you both choose to have sex.
	A man and a woman.
	Takes two.
	There's a baby.
	The man has no say in the decision.
	You can terminate his son.
	That man can go to an ultrasound in the state of Colorado.
	Have named his son.
	See his face.
	See his fingers, toes.
	See that he's a man.
	See his penis.
	Not assign sex.
	Recognize it.
	And that woman can make the unilateral decision to kill it.
	That man cannot make a unilateral decision to not pay child support.
	Think about that for a second.
	You think it's going to be good for women?
	Do you really think that abortion has been good for women?
	Do you think it's bred better men?
	Do you think it's bred healthier relationships?
	And you can argue until you're blue in the face.
	You know what else?
	This is one thing, women.
	When you're sitting there bitching about choice feminists, by the way, I know the women who watch this are just as tired.
	And you know how I know?
	Go to lodderworthcrowder.com slash tour.
	Right?
	You have thousands of people at every show.
	And it's half women.
	And they're the biggest crowd cheering.
	When we take a steaming dump on feminism, okay?
	So let's separate that.
	But feminism is a problem.
	It's choice without accountability.
	As feminists shriek about choice, men don't have a choice.
	They don't have a choice in the life of that child.
	They don't have a choice if they have to support that child.
	But even more, when you're a little girl, When you're told, right, all little girls, you can be anything you want to be.
	What are you told if you want to grow up and you want to be a mom?
	You want to be a homemaker?
	You want to be a stay-at-home wife?
	You're told, hey, you can be a working woman or you can be a mom, right?
	The lie is you can do it all.
	You can't.
	You do have to break up time.
	You'll probably have to work part-time.
	You'll have to prioritize.
	But they tell you that you can do anything you want to do, right?
	You have the choice.
	And they complain about this.
	And the choice, women aren't given a choice because it's generally a man's world and work.
	And work, you know, it's tough to become a CEO.
	That's because men never have a choice.
	If a young man says, I want to be a dad.
	Let me ask you this, comment below.
	Comment below.
	Any man out there, remember when you were a boy having parents say, Yeah, you can be a stay-at-home dad.
	You can do whatever you want.
	You can go to school.
	You can be a scientist.
	You can be an engineer.
	You can be a fucking deadbeat.
	No, if we want kids, we don't have a choice.
	As soon as we are old enough to know that we want a wife and or a child, we have never been taught that we have the choice to do whatever we want to be.
	And you know what, women?
	You know that you are being honest.
	If you are dating right now, If you are dating right now and you walk into a blind date and you say, what do you do?
	And the guy says, well, you know what?
	I'm working, whatever it is.
	I'm working in Arby's right now.
	Or even if he says, I'm a civil engineer right now, but I really just want to be a stay-at-home dad.
	You keep going on down that dating trail because it's not a deciding factor for men.
	Men don't have a choice.
	We don't have a choice and a responsibility.
	To provide, and by the way, that's because it is a man's role.
	I understand that.
	Even in a time of dual income households, I'm not saying that a man shouldn't be a protector and provider.
	My issue is with applying it only when it's convenient.
	There's a give and take and a compromise.
	Where's the give?
	How about that it has to be a joint decision?
	Why didn't you start with that when it came to abortion?
	Ah, no vagina, no opinion.
	Really?
	Well, do you know how I know that's bullshit?
	Let me read you some more commentary here.
	Uh, from, um... From, uh, let's see, who do we have?
	We have, uh...
	Alyssa Milano of Amy Klobuchar.
	We have, uh, let me... I saw Pocahontas there and Swallow.
	Elizabeth Warren.
	She said, six radical Supreme Court justices have overturned nearly 50 years of precedent.
	They've decided that the government, not the person who is pregnant, should make a private health care decision and deny women the right to control their own bodies.
	Hold on a second!
	50 years of precedent?
	Let's take these two things that she just said.
	Deny women the right to control their own bodies.
	She's upset about that.
	Interesting.
	Elizabeth Pocahontas Warren.
	You're also upset about 50 years of precedent.
	Who set that precedent?
	Who was in the court in Roe v. Wade?
	You didn't have a problem with judges with dicks back then.
	Now you do!
	You love the dicks when they pass the laws you want.
	You vilify the dicks when they say, you know what, you can't kill a baby.
	Just be honest.
	Just be honest, feminists, Elizabeth Warren, AOC.
	You want no accountability for your actions whatsoever.
	Just in the last three days, AOC shouldn't be responsible for her own student debt.
	AOC shouldn't be responsible for her own meals and travel because she's a public servant.
	Women shouldn't be responsible for using contraception or picking their mate carefully and doing their due diligence.
	Amber Heard shouldn't be responsible for hating Johnny Depp because he made her do it.
	These people, meaning radical, and by that I mean feminists, including the white knighting men who go, oh yeah, I have a penis so I shouldn't have an opinion, should not be in control at all in any form of government.
	That's a dangerous thing.
	Someone who refuses to take accountability for their own actions, do you know what we call that?
	That's a sociopath.
	Feminism is simply, I guess you could say, philosophically codified sociopathy.
	That's all it is.
	You know what's a little crazy here too?
	Seven white judges put Roe into effect.
	Four white judges, a black man, and a woman.
	voted that it should go back to the states.
	A woman did have a voice in this.
	Are you forgetting that?
	A minority had a voice in this.
	Are you forgetting that, too?
	Right.
	We have one of those radical feminists with land right now.
	All right, Ginger Snap, let's go to the Shrieks, the Dementors.
	...to get medical treatment, which they can't get now for an abortion.
	Where are you from?
	I'm from Kansas City, Missouri.
	Okay, so what are the laws in Missouri like now?
	They just passed a new law, which First state.
	So that was the first state to do so, correct?
	Today?
	Nope.
	Nope.
	Does she have a car?
	No, no.
	I also had that issue.
	I don't know if they called me.
	I believe Missouri was the first one, but.
	Does not surprise me, no.
	So.
	Does she have a car?
	How, when did you get here?
	I got here Wednesday for a family vacation.
	I heard the news.
	I jumped into an Uber and I came down.
	I was that moved.
	She must be fun.
	To just stop what I was doing and come down here because this was just too, too overwhelming.
	I'm 72 years old.
	I remember girls in my high school dying from illegal abortions.
	And to have that come back in my lifetime is the most shameful experience that I can have.
	Ask her.
	Over 800,000.
	Per year.
	Why not?
	Of course!
	And then to play devil's advocate on the other side people that were like, okay, but that's a living baby that is
	No.
	being killed Over a hundred thousand. They're losing their liberties.
	Well, like eight hundred thousand per year a year. That's what they would say
	Are they?
	Why not? Of course No beating heart
	Grab the fetal chart Ask her where it's okay.
	Grab the fetal chart, Ginger Snack.
	Someone stole it.
	That has been grabbed by the anti-abortion movement as a communications hook.
	The woman has control of her body.
	It's a separate heart.
	What if there's two heartbeats?
	Is that the woman's motto?
	Tell her that's the policy of the Democratic platform.
	That's what people oppose.
	I want to address the person who has been working in a fast food restaurant and Walmart
	on the weekends.
	They can't make rent.
	They already have three children.
	They cannot go on.
	Why are they having so much sex if they can't afford children?
	Okay, that's you.
	Just put your finger on it.
	What?
	No!
	Wait, does a woman have a choice to have sex?
	What?
	No!
	Ask her if she believes in any accountability for women's decisions before abortion.
	Ask her if women are responsible for anything that they do.
	So do they have any responsibility at all?
	Do the women have any responsibility?
	have the same amount of responsibility as men have.
	So do men have a say in abortion?
	So what if you said men have to pay child support forever and they have to take care of the baby without,
	would that be okay?
	From the point of inception?
	Yeah.
	Well, when I see that, we can talk.
	But if you think that's going to pass, you're wrong.
	So, does a man have a right to have a say in the child living or being aborted?
	So, the man helps create the child, right?
	Does the man have any say over what happens to that child?
	It's under the control of the woman Ah, froze
	I think she was gonna say woman I am going to go with that versus this.
	So you're not going to get, you're trying to see the perfect solution.
	I just want to make sure I understand.
	Is abortion on man, anytime, any reason, because it's the woman's decision?
	I am going to go with that versus this.
	So you're not going to get, you're trying to see the perfect solution.
	I am trying to see the just solution for the great majority of women.
	Do you know what I do for a living?
	Nah, you're just a bitch.
	I'm a forensic expert in death penalty cases.
	I have seen hundreds of clients who have committed heinous crimes
	and they're facing the death penalty.
	My role is to look at their histories and find mitigating circumstances.
	So you're saying people that have abortions should get the death penalty?
	I am saying that.
	Nice.
	How about you don't neglect and abuse them?
	How about that?
	Is there responsibility for that?
	No fucking responsibility.
	I'm sorry.
	Sorry for the language.
	It's just, this is everything that's wrong with our country.
	This broad right here taking her vacation to Cackle in DC is everything wrong with America.
	Want to go back to it?
	Go back to it, I guess.
	Many times, they come from families with incest issues, sexual abuse issues.
	No, it's less than half a percent.
	They end up being in a very damaged, wounded, situation overall. So that 1% of rape and incest abortions
	that happens about 1% that's where abortions come from is rape
	and incest. If we ban or we allow that you say that's cool. If
	you were raped or it's an incestual thing, yes, you can get an
	abortion. Can we ban the rest of it? You know, I'm gonna let you
	find someone to talk about.
	Tell her you're gonna go look for someone rational.
	And show that women are second class citizens now and that's a
	Oh shut up.
	That's why I'm here.
	You're a shameful lady.
	Is that Fox?
	Who is that?
	Who are you with?
	I'm sorry.
	I'm with DCW.
	They're at the local.
	Do it.
	Is that Fox? Who is that?
	I, uh, who are you with? I'm sorry.
	I'm with DCW50 World Open Station here.
	Yeah! They're with DC, they're with the local. Yeah.
	Do it. Let's do it.
	I gotta go to a place right now.
	Yeah, let's do it and let's keep rolling.
	So once they get set up, Ginger Snap, we'll keep our camera rolling so we can get you both going.
	Try and froth her up before that if you're going to do it together there, Lane, so that people can really... I am from Texas.
	All right, let's see.
	Our organization called the Powder of Conference.
	Yeah.
	If you guys want to buy a phone, we can get it for you.
	All right, we'll check back in.
	Just let me know as soon as they start getting set up.
	And who did he say he was with?
	What local?
	Some local D.C.
	channel.
	Some local D.C.
	channel.
	Well... Somebody see if we can... Local D.C.
	channel is about to go national.
	That woman... Ah, women are second class citizens because there's no answer.
	This really is the problem.
	No accountability.
	Women, you are better than this.
	Do you know who's better than this?
	Every woman.
	Before the modern abortion movement, who, if they had a child, let's say, that they didn't plan for, raise them and love them.
	Yeah.
	That's a better person than someone who aborts them.
	Don't care if you... I'm getting away from the idea of it.
	Oh, being codified in a law and packing the courts.
	That's a better human being.
	Okay?
	You're worse if you believe that you aren't responsible.
	Think about every answer.
	Well, what if they're poor?
	Is there any responsibility for that?
	That's economic circumstances, okay?
	And then they'll neglect the child.
	Is there any responsibility for that?
	Hey, I know people who were poor, who had children, and didn't neglect their child.
	You know who was one of them?
	You know who was one?
	Abraham Lincoln.
	You know who claims he was one of them?
	Doesn't really fully check out.
	Barack Obama.
	Right?
	There are a lot of people.
	You're saying it's not your responsibility.
	So if the woman is poor, she can't be held responsible for not being cruel?
	Women, you're better than that.
	If she didn't plan for it, well first off, there should be accountability in planning for it.
	If she didn't plan for it, she can't be expected to deal with curveballs of life.
	You're not accountable for that?
	If then the baby's born, she can't be responsible for paying for it.
	Are you not accountable for that?
	When they say codify Roe v. Wade, what they mean is codify women reaping the financial benefits from the taxpayer and from the male who has helped create this life, benefiting from that without any accountability.
	That's what it is.
	Yeah.
	That's what it is.
	You either have to allow, it has to be a joint decision, An abortion or keeping the life, or you forfeit alimony.
	Sorry, you forfeit child support.
	And by the way, I think a guy who would have a child and not pay child support, probably not a great guy.
	Just to be clear.
	I hate that we have to have that mandated because I think you should support your children.
	Now, I understand a man who gets screwed by a woman who leaves him, takes a lot of his stuff, and then also racks up a child support bill.
	I understand the problem with child support that right now, the way it exists, it doesn't necessarily have to go to the child.
	I get all that.
	Believe me, I understand all that.
	That's not what I'm talking about right now.
	I'm saying that a good man should want to raise and support those children.
	A good woman should as well, regardless of whether she's poor or rich.
	It doesn't matter.
	You have student debt?
	You don't have student debt?
	You have a child in your life.
	Grow up!
	Exactly.
	I'm a little surprised, though, that we're going back to my body, my choice.
	Especially given the vaccination mandates that we saw.
	Right.
	I'm so surprised that it's a private health decision between a doctor and a physician.
	Don't come to me, I'm blowing my nose.
	Yeah.
	I thought that was done.
	I thought that argument could never be used again.
	Because these were the same people that were pushing that you had to be forcefully vaccinated to be able to do anything in life.
	Right?
	In other countries, it was literally to go to work, to own a business, to get out of your house.
	Any of that stuff.
	I'm a little surprised we're going back to that argument.
	But here's the other thing.
	In high school, I had sex with my girlfriend before marriage.
	I was already offered a scholarship to the University of Notre Dame.
	I had already accepted that scholarship.
	She came to me and said, hey, I'm late.
	And it scared the hell out of me as a 17, 18 year old kid.
	I think I was 18 at the time.
	And I was just like, oh my gosh, my life may have just changed.
	And I'm not saying this to toot my own horn or anything.
	I am saying this because this is how the conversation should go.
	You're a man.
	You made a choice.
	Yep.
	I told her, okay, if you're pregnant, I'll go to a local college.
	And that's exactly what I was going to do.
	That wouldn't have ruined my life.
	It would have been different.
	Right.
	I would still be able to go to a university that was great and that was close to where I was so that I could take responsibility for the decision.
	Remember, decision that I made.
	But right now what people are telling you is...
	Athlete comes to you and says, no, no, no, no, I've got a career ahead of me.
	I've got an NFL contract potentially.
	I've got a chance to play at one of the best universities.
	No, you have to abort.
	You have to abort that child because you can't ruin my life.
	That's what they would say.
	This allows a tremendous backdoor for abusive men towards women.
	That's what I understand.
	You don't think that men who think they can have an out won't try and gaslight the woman?
	Won't try and convince her that she doesn't want to have that child?
	Won't try and pressure that woman?
	It's far easier to pressure a woman into an abortion.
	Then it would be, especially if you're in a state where it says you have that child, then it is to say, alright, let's do the right thing.
	Raise this kid.
	There are far more men out there who would rather you have an abortion after an accident.
	Yeah.
	And I'm willing to bet that there are a lot of women who are pressured into those abortions, even when the man has no say in it.
	Right.
	So you have to think of the unintended consequences.
	By the way, that broad who we interviewed was from Massachusetts.
	Massachusetts.
	I always have a problem saying that.
	It's difficult.
	Their laws restrict abortion at 24 weeks.
	And it generally requires that one parent or guardian or judge consent to a minor's abortion if the young person is under 16.
	So a 17 year old can have, or a 16 year old seems like can have an abortion in Massachusetts at 24 weeks, which is?
	Up to.
	Is that six and a half?
	24 out of 40.
	It's a little over halfway, right?
	It's over halfway, yeah.
	Halfway, so over halfway.
	I think, what, the earliest preemie now that's been boarded is 21 weeks?
	22 weeks?
	Yeah, because of modern technology, you know, putting an incubator, but still.
	So in other words, the viability argument goes out.
	So a 16-year-old, hey, can have a 24-week abortion in Massachusetts.
	I've lost my rights!
	And I've never even understood the viability argument.
	I understand it's like, hey, if I take away life support from this child, it can't survive.
	So therefore, I should be able to kill it.
	A 16-year-old can kill a 24-week-old baby.
	That's not enough.
	That's not enough?
	You think you're under the thumb of oppressive men for crying out loud?
	Does accountability, does it kick in at week 26?
	That's why they don't want to answer.
	They're complaining that in Massachusetts, abortion at 24 weeks for a 16 year old is a violation.
	Of constitutional rights.
	This is where you pull the sling.
	It's a violation of a woman's constitutional rights.
	I read the Bible.
	I ain't read all of it, but I read a good deal of it.
	Those stories you and mom told me, they ain't in there.
	Constitution.
	You can put it on a page if you single space it.
	Unbelievable.
	Unbelievable.
	Alright, does Ginger Snap, is he doing the local DC hit yet?
	We got disconnected, but I think I found their livestream.
	Oh!
	They're on a delay because I saw the guy that reached out to him, and now they're in a standby for stream.
	Oh, okay.
	Oh, that's interesting.
	And what is the name of their livestream?
	DCW50.
	DCW50.
	Do they have chat enabled there?
	No.
	There's no way for people to comment or rate it?
	No.
	Because I was going to say, if you're watching right now, you can go over there and, you know, leave some chat.
	By the way, if I can read this, Senator Manchin's got a quote here.
	This is what it is.
	Oh, there you go.
	They were just showing him where it said, standby for stream and never tweeting.
	Let Gingersnap know to let it rip.
	I hope he goes on with that woman.
	Yes, absolutely.
	So, Senator Manchin, I trusted Justice Gorsuch And Justice Kavanaugh, when they testified under oath that they also believed Roe v. Wade was settled legal precedent, and I'm alarmed they chose to reject the stability the ruling has provided.
	One, it didn't provide stability.
	It basically just allowed 800,000 plus people to be killed every single year.
	And what they said was true.
	This case has been decided.
	Courts don't give you an opinion on cases typically until the case comes before them.
	Right.
	So they can say, hey, I understand that that's the precedent that's been set.
	But they can also hear a case and go, you know what?
	We made a mistake.
	Do you never want the court to overturn anything?
	Because if that were the case, I think right now there would be a lot of people disenfranchised in this country still if the court never overturns precedent.
	Sometimes it happens where you go, you know what?
	We made a mistake.
	Yeah, you know what, and this actually brings me to, I want to talk about, because we're going to have more information coming out today about this, the opinions, dissenting opinions.
	So yesterday was the concealed carry law.
	And I didn't have that much time, obviously, to go through it because it happened while we were live on air.
	But then I did go home and I did read the opinions.
	And what stuck out to me were a couple of things.
	First off, sort of like Roe v. Wade if you look at it here today, or sorry, Dobbs-Jackson.
	Um, it's not how it's been represented.
	There were actually some issues that were very alarming to me from, uh, Kavanaugh in his dangerous interpretation of the Second Amendment.
	But what also stood out to me is the dissenting opinions on that.
	So kind of like I talked about in the past, Heller versus DC, this was the right, basically determining that private citizens have the right to own firearms.
	If that one went the other way, you wouldn't have any right to own firearms.
	It doesn't matter what kind of firearm, shotgun, hunting rifle, handgun, revolver, nothing.
	The dissenting opinion said, according to our interpretation of the Constitution, regulated militia doesn't mean the citizens of this country, that private citizens have no right to own firearms.
	I always say that dissenting opinions are just as important.
	Okay?
	And in this case, with the New York law, what's so telling is none of them, from what I was reading, cited the Constitution.
	They're not interested in it.
	They really aren't.
	So let me read you some quotes here.
	This is from an MSN article.
	In a dissent joined by his liberal colleagues, Justice Stephen Breyer focused on the toll taken by gun violence.
	And you can read this in the bill.
	Since the start of this year alone, 2022, there have already been 277 reported mass shootings, an average of more than one per day.
	That could not be less relevant to the constitutionality.
	Right.
	It says backers of New York's law had argued that striking it down would ultimately lead to more guns in the streets and higher rates of violent crime.
	The decision comes at a time when gun violence is already on the rise during the coronavirus pandemic.
	Has spiked anew.
	That was also great there in the article.
	Yes, it's spiked anew.
	There's no care about constitutionality.
	There have been more deaths.
	There have been more people using guns.
	Does the Constitution say they have the right to own guns?
	There have been more people saying horribly offensive things, I can't believe it!
	Does the Constitution say they have the right to say horrible things?
	You have one side saying, the Constitution says, right to keep and bear arms, and by the way, every able-bodied American is a part of the militia.
	That's how it's recognized.
	So, good or bad?
	And by the way, it's mostly good.
	Again, 2 to 3 million defensive uses of firearms per year versus tens of thousands.
	Of acts of violence committed with firearms, not including suicides.
	Mostly gangs.
	Mostly gang violence.
	So it's mostly good!
	But that doesn't matter about the Constitution!
	Hey, guess what?
	You do have neo-Nazis.
	Very few.
	You do have racists who use speech.
	And by the way, that includes black racists like Farrakhan.
	Just to be clear, you do have racists who use horrible speech to breed anti-semitism or, you know, for example, in the black community, anti-Asian hatred, where we've seen a spike in hate crimes.
	You do have some speech out there that's pretty terrible.
	You know what else?
	Every single major civil rights advancement came through speech.
	Some of it through sitting.
	Rosa Parks, but I'm pretty sure she spoke while she was sitting.
	My point is this.
	Speech is the only way allowing freedom Absolute freedom of speech, the First Amendment, is the only way for good ideas to combat bad ideas, just as surely allowing absolute freedom of law-abiding Americans to own firearms is the only way to allow law-abiding Americans to protect themselves from the evil that exists in this world.
	You can never do away with evil in this world.
	You can't.
	The best you can do is afford the good.
	The right to protect themselves against it.
	The right to fight back against it.
	That's all you can do.
	So this is really important.
	We have the references available at lightearthcrowder.com.
	It's just interesting to me that yesterday, the opposition was not based at all on constitutionality.
	No.
	Not at all.
	From the justices.
	From the justices, the opposing, the dissenting justices.
	It is very important that you read the dissenting opinions to see just how close you were to some really messed up stuff.
	Well, and to understand how they approach the Constitution, it goes to their whims.
	They can go, oh, well, we had a lot of shootings, and so therefore we need to change it.
	That's not how this works at all, and that's what you said, but when they said we're going to go based on the text and based on history, And based on the kind of the precedent that's been set with this and how people understood this initially, that was exactly the way that it was supposed to be interpreted and then any changes could be made through a different process.
	Let's watch CNN because they just brought up the Clarence Thomas issue and I think they're trying to say that he wants to kill all the gays.
	So, Steve Vladeck, if I wanted to challenge same-sex marriage, if I want to challenge the right to contraception, I'm either in court today or tomorrow, right?
	Thinking this court might give me, you know, in a year or two I'm before the Supreme Court?
	They're not going to give you a pass.
	Okay.
	Obviously there's one step before that, which is we would need to see states, presumably red states, adopt laws that
	go after these precedents.
	But that's not a hypothetical. I mean, we know there are legislators in Mississippi and Idaho, for example, who want
	to introduce legislation to restrict abortion.
	And, you know, John, Jessica read the line from Alito's opinion about how this is not a hypothetical.
	He didn't say deeply rooted in traditions.
	I'm talking about Clarence Thomas.
	has a pretty good response on this which is that the analysis is not limited to abortion.
	The notion that the constitution doesn't protect rights unless they're deeply rooted in our
	traditions, that's not limited to abortion. So what the joint dissent said...
	He didn't say deeply rooted in traditions. I'm talking about Clarence Thomas,
	a deeply rooted in the constitution.
	... additional constitutional rights are under threat.
	It's one or the other.
	And John, it's not hard to imagine red states moving quickly to try to push the envelope on these other rights.
	We're already seeing it.
	We're already seeing it.
	You can't just say that we're already seeing it, and you quoted something about abortion, which is what we're specifically talking about.
	You can't say they're going after same-sex marriage.
	You can't say that they're going after the right to contraception, and they go, yeah, we're already seeing it with abortion.
	Yeah.
	By the way, I think that states should have the right to regulate same-sex marriage.
	You know why?
	Because states have different divorce laws.
	State issue.
	Oh, it's no-fault divorce, which by the way means that in many of these states, if a woman cheats on you, she leaves, she takes half.
	So, no fault.
	It's the fault of the man.
	I was about to say.
	And that's why, look, you can argue until you're blue in the face.
	Even the women who separate yourself from feminists.
	Well, she is entitled to 40%.
	40% of young men don't want to get married.
	Thins out the hurt a little bit.
	What do you want?
	Do you want to be able to get married?
	Or do you want to be a live-in hussy for the rest of your life?
	There's going to have to be a compromise.
	There need to be changes to marital laws.
	And I'm not even talking about same-sex marriage.
	Talking about divorce laws.
	Talking about alimony laws.
	Talking about child support laws.
	Men now don't want to get married.
	It's a raw deal for a lot of them.
	And I'm not on board.
	with the the men's rights activists who believe that they shouldn't be held
	accountable for any certainly not on board with the pickup culture the idea
	of one night stands not at all but i am saying that there does need to be a
	give-and-take to all legal contracts that's not the case in many of these no
	fault divorce states so i don't know why it's outlandish to say well this state
	can make it no fault and this state can say that if you cheat
	you forfeit your right to the division of property and states can't say by the way these are the
	qualifications for marriage Namely, a man and a woman.
	I don't know, again, legally, you may not like it, but it seems to me that it should be a state issue.
	I want the state as uninvolved in marriage as possible.
	Yes.
	You know, I honestly, it's a covenant.
	It's a covenant between you, your wife, or your husband, and God.
	It didn't say, and thou shalt go to the courthouse and give half.
	Thou shalt have joint ally bank accounts.
	You know what I mean?
	It ends up, unfortunately, it's destroyed the institution of marriage for young Christian men.
	How many chats do we get?
	How many emails do we get?
	There hasn't been a show that's been more pro-institution of marriage than this program.
	And how many messages do we get from young Christian men going like, yeah, but I'm really afraid to do this because I live in a state where even if she cheats on me and she leaves, I have to pay half and I have to pay alimony.
	And we go like, I get it, it's a raw deal where I'm almost at the point of advocating you get married in the church as a covenant and just ignore the state at that point.
	Because you guys should be together because you make a covenant before God, which should be stronger than the state.
	It shouldn't be about property and tax benefits, unfortunately.
	I understand why it is.
	Because we wanted to create a nuclear family as a building block for society here.
	But I don't understand.
	You know, people act as though it's this travesty.
	If states can determine all kinds of marital laws, why can't states determine... They can determine what qualifies for a marriage in many other facets.
	They can say, well, you can't marry someone.
	Why?
	Because you're already married.
	So you can't marry a second one.
	Oh, okay.
	That's fine.
	They can say, hey, well, you can't take half.
	Why?
	Because you cheated.
	So you don't get to divide half at this point.
	Okay, but then another state says, I don't care that she cheated.
	She can take half or he can take half if she's the primary earner.
	They can do that.
	Why can't they say, well, you can't get married?
	Why?
	Because you both have dicks.
	Okay.
	Your rules, Missouri!
	I think what you would find is that most people would say, look, I may not approve of what you're doing, I may not like that, but I want to make sure that in the state's eyes, you're treated the same as I am.
	Right.
	Most people would be willing to say that right now.
	And honestly, people forget in the debate, most people before same-sex marriage was legalized That's what Elton John said.
	Elton John agreed with Rush Limbaugh saying civil unions, not the marriage issue, and marriage should be a church issue.
	that there are rights to those people that are afforded that are the same rights that I get.
	That's what Elton John said. Elton John agreed with Rush Limbaugh saying civil unions,
	not the marriage issue, and marriage should be a church issue.
	It always was a church issue.
	Oh, you want to trample our rights? Oh, in Massachusetts, oh,
	a 16 year old can only have an abortion up until 24 weeks.
	Come on now!
	Whereas you know what the right is saying?
	A state can say that they can restrict an abortion after a heartbeat!
	When conservatives are saying, hey, you don't have the right to tell me that I cannot protect myself and my family because the document says you can't!
	One's whining for a right that doesn't exist and one's saying, get your shit together, I'm gonna do it anyway!
	It's amazing.
	It's the same people who will send Leah Thomas a trophy.
	I forgot her name, the girl who we just interviewed yesterday.
	She tied her.
	They go, oh, that's the beautiful woman is Leah Thomas.
	You call weird looking at best beautiful, and then you call beautiful third place when it was a tie, and what you call a violation of rights is actually constitutional right, and what you call a constitutional right isn't in there!
	You're going to love some wording to one of your favorite governors.
	Who do you think I'm talking about?
	It better not be Newsom.
	No, no, no.
	Oh, no.
	Whitmer?
	Oh, careful.
	Hold on, hold on.
	Careful.
	Hold on a second.
	Wait.
	You need a second?
	You need some booze or something?
	Take a swig.
	Actually, honestly, with my throat, this will help a little bit.
	Yeah, that'll help.
	Okay.
	Just a little swig.
	There you go.
	By the way, I don't think I haven't noticed that this was an entire bottle of Wild Turkey like a week ago, guys.
	That was not me, but it was me.
	We're not waiting for a Supreme Court decision.
	This is 20 hours ago, right?
	Oh yeah, I tweeted at her.
	Hold on, you'll like these words.
	I'm taking action and fighting like hell.
	Hmm.
	Wait!
	I thought Fight Like Hell was insurrection talk.
	Let's send her a shirt.
	Yeah, let's send her a shirt.
	Let's literally send her a shirt that says Fight Like Hell.
	Yeah.
	But she won't like the person who's on it because he's the guy who was part of the group that wrote the documents that you hate.
	Right.
	You can go buy the shirt at Lotto's Cradle Shop.
	Cridershop.com.
	The Fight Like Hell shirt.
	I don't think she's calling for an insurrection.
	By the way, two days earlier she said menstruating persons.
	She did, which is the funniest thing I've heard.
	I'm gonna protect abortion rights for any... Has there ever been a male transgender, meaning male who claims he's a female, has there ever been a successful abortion?
	There have probably been, you know, unsuccessful abortions where he jammed a coat hanger in his taint, but have there ever been Board medically qualifies an abortion for a man who identifies as a woman.
	Has it ever happened?
	Trick question.
	No.
	I know the answer.
	Here's another fun thing that you're going to hear, and you're going to hear this a lot, right?
	I've heard this from a lot of people.
	Robert Reich, one person I tend to hate a lot.
	Gerald's favorite.
	Robert Third Reich.
	This guy has way too many people listening to him.
	He needs to be brought down a notch.
	Five of nine Supreme Court justices were appointed by GOP presidents who entered office without even winning the popular vote.
	Just keep your eye on that.
	Because are you saying that they're illegitimate presidents that didn't win the popular vote?
	Are you saying that that makes them illegitimate?
	And that five of the nine justices that are on the court right now were appointed by these guys?
	Isn't that guy an NYU professor?
	No, no, no.
	He is actually at West Coast.
	Uh, Berkeley.
	Oh, Berkeley, Berkeley, Berkeley.
	Sorry, it's that other shithole that you should never attend.
	He's an economist, you know.
	People put on the planet to make astrologers look intelligent.
	I stole that.
	Totally stole that.
	Let's see what this guy's talking about here on CNN.
	Manu Raju.
	Nope.
	No it's not.
	Manu Raju.
	She was one of the decisive votes here and she just put out a statement John in which
	she said that the decisions is inconsistent with what justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said
	in their testimony and in their meetings with me.
	She goes on to say she's very disappointed by this ruling.
	Joe Manchin, also a key vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh, said similar, inconsistent with what Kavanaugh and Gorsuch had said to them privately about allowing this precedent to be upheld.
	Now, nevertheless, Democrats are vowing to make this an issue come November.
	Of course, because it's the only issue.
	So what are they going to do?
	They're going to lie to you.
	They're going to lie to you and say that abortion has now been banned across the country, when it has not.
	You most likely have zero differences right now in your state.
	Maybe there'll be some changes.
	You can go to another state.
	They want to make this an issue because they cannot discuss any... Jan, let me ask, and I want you to be objective.
	You guys can comment below when you're watching this in the archive or take some chats.
	I've tried to think of this.
	For the average American listening, watching, what can a Democrat argue has improved?
	Is there anything?
	Honestly, I'm trying to think.
	Okay, the economy?
	Obviously not.
	Inflation?
	Obviously not.
	Crime?
	Obviously not.
	America's standing in the world.
	You may say you didn't like Donald Trump, but obviously, come on.
	After Afghanistan?
	Ukraine?
	Come on.
	I mean, Ukraine likes us a lot right now.
	Yeah, Ukraine likes us a lot.
	They like everybody right now.
	International policy?
	No, obviously not.
	No.
	Division, right?
	He was going to unite America.
	Obviously not.
	Build back better.
	How's that going?
	Build back better.
	Obviously not.
	What else can they argue if they don't just go to the abortion issue and lie to you?
	I can't think of anything.
	And I try to look at it objectively.
	I know they try and say we have a booming economy, but poll after poll after poll shows that people don't believe them.
	And maybe people don't believe we have Clipseed.
	People don't believe Jean-Pierre.
	He's supposed to speak soon, by the way, Biden.
	accept this decision? Because of reasons like this? Even if he disagrees with it?
	It's going to come from the Supreme Court so it's going to be a decision that we're certainly
	are going to respond to. So I'll leave it at me. It's just like any other Supreme Court decision,
	just like the one that they did today on guns. Huh. He's supposed to speak soon by the way,
	Biden. The bigotry of low expectations. Yeah. Like the one on guns and stuff.
	What?
	What?
	Okay.
	You know.
	All right.
	And stuff.
	Well, here's kind of an interesting thing, too.
	I don't want to steal somebody's stuff, but you see stuff on Twitter all the time, right?
	It's like, you know, just joking around about this stuff, but it's like, I haven't seen Democrats this mad since we freed the slaves.
	That keeps popping up.
	But I love that it's just taking credit for something that Republicans absolutely 100% did.
	But it was interesting to me, too, that you have politicians of all people on the planet saying they said something that they spun.
	When they came before the hearing, they said something I thought it was settled.
	And it was like, yeah, it's settled, but that means you're going to vote for it.
	No, it just means it's settled until we hear another case.
	You're a politician.
	You do this for a living.
	You lie to constituencies for a living.
	Yes.
	And now you're calling out somebody who actually spoke truthfully, but just not in the way you wanted it to be?
	Are you serious?
	That's your reason for saying, oh, if I'd have known this, I would have voted differently.
	Well, again, it's just that these people, are you not held accountable for your vote?
	No.
	It just really does.
	That is the fundamental problem, is we have a problem of a complete lack of accountability in this country.
	That's where people like Jordan Peterson, Jocko Willink, and some of these other probably people who would be considered more radical on YouTube or wherever, wherever they're broadcasting, TikTok, could find some common ground.
	I think a lot of people are tired of the complete lack of accountability, and so we're all supposed to go on with it.
	Let me see if I can find the Alyssa Milano stuff, just if you guys are looking for a laugh.
	Is that still in here?
	Yeah.
	I saw it in there, yeah.
	Alright, hold on a second.
	You guys wanna laugh?
	Yes.
	I definitely do.
	Alright.
	Is she gonna wear another mask that she crocheted?
	Alright, Alyssa Milano.
	Okay.
	That was the best.
	Alyssa Milano.
	By the way, having a rough go since Charmed.
	Even that was a rough go.
	It was the 90s.
	It was not aptly named.
	Lisa Milano, I don't think.
	Lisa Milano, that charming, silver-tongued fox.
	Cursed.
	So, yes.
	Hexed.
	So, today's Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade will have deadly consequences.
	Hold on a second.
	Oh boy.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Deadly consequences?
	Deadly consequences?
	Okay.
	Here's the irony pre-alert.
	The next part is the full irony alert.
	With the harm falling hardest on people of color who already face disproportionate discrimination in our country and grapple with a severe maternal mortality crisis.
	It's borderline a genocide against black Americans by design if you look at the history of Margaret Sanger.
	She didn't just, by the way, she didn't just set up in poor areas.
	She didn't set up in poor white areas.
	She specifically said poor urban black areas.
	She was a eugenicist.
	It's going to have deadly consequences, particularly the people of color.
	Well, hold on a second.
	People of color in this country, and I feel racist saying people of color.
	Honestly, I hate that that's a term.
	Black people in this country are the most likely to have an abortion because you have sold them on a bill of goods that they've subsequently found out isn't true.
	That it's the way out.
	And for crying out loud, Sherry Shepard, when she was on The View, she talked about, you know, she was taking morning-after pills like they were M&Ms.
	She said she had four abortions.
	Gosh!
	Classy broad.
	It's like Reagan's jellybean change dish.
	By the way, I do have a question.
	Are you saying that people of color or black people are more incapable Of preventing pregnancy?
	Is that what she's saying right here?
	It gets better.
	Okay, let's keep going.
	Banning abortion will disproportionately impact people of color.
	Okay.
	LGBTQ plus communities.
	I'm sorry.
	Okay, hold on a second.
	Let me break down because there's so much to get to.
	Let me break this down.
	LGBTQ plus.
	We're going to have to ignore the plus.
	Well, we have to get rid of the L and the G because it won't happen.
	That's what I was going to say.
	Let's go through it.
	Okay, this will disproportionately impact lesbians.
	Gays.
	Bisexuals, sure, but 50% less than heterosexuals.
	They're only getting half the reps in.
	Trans.
	Queer or questioning, depending who you ask, doesn't really mean anything.
	They clearly would be affected less.
	Why?
	Because too broad scissoring will never run into the problem of an unplanned pregnancy.
	The G's Don't abort butt babies!
	The B's only have 50% of the Repsin that could result in an unplanned pregnancy.
	The T's are out of their mind if they're trying to get abortions done.
	And the Q's don't mean anything at this point.
	Honestly, I don't even know how they're included.
	Maybe they are disproportionately affected, depending on what it means.
	I'll give you that one.
	Maybe they're more promiscuous than the rest.
	Yes, yes.
	Maybe, yeah.
	Could be.
	That says people struggling to make ends meet.
	Oh, come on.
	Young people and those living in rural areas.
	What?
	Because the farm girl can't say no?
	What are you talking about here?
	I don't understand.
	She doesn't need to say no.
	She's a shotgun.
	Poor people can't have kids?
	Poor people can't make good life decisions?
	Are you saying that poor people are mentally incapable of saying sex bad?
	It gets better.
	Okay.
	This is an actual... These words that I'm about to read We're actually written in the sequence.
	I'm about to read them.
	To form the phrase that you are about to hear from Melissa Milano.
	Banning abortion is about controlling women and trans men!
	Ridiculous!
	Yeah, I'm pretty sure that that's what Clarence Thomas was thinking.
	Yeah.
	He was thinking, how can I mess with some, how can I mess with some trans men today?
	Just really, really mess with their mind.
	Let's stir shit up.
	I know!
	Trans men, what do they care about most?
	Something that they cannot perform on themselves.
	Is this a penis on my Diet Coke can?
	Is this a penis on my Diet Coke can?
	Can somebody chop off their penis and put it on my Diet Coke can?
	They speak English in trans men?
	And she says, it's about white supremacy, the patriarchy, and misogyny.
	It's a sad day for America.
	Really?
	You think so little of women.
	Yeah.
	And you think far too much of the trans that you think they can get pregnant.
	Yeah.
	White supremacy.
	A black judge voted for this.
	A patriarchy.
	A woman voted for this.
	You've got issues with your theory.
	Come on.
	This isn't us trying to control anything.
	This is trying to save lives.
	By the way, I just want to do some quick math.
	If I gave you a hypothetical situation, right?
	Good people that you're defending.
	I can say, hey, it's possible that 2,000 people could die from this.
	OK?
	Your decision.
	One way or the other.
	You get two options.
	Possible this way, door number A. Possible 2,000 people could die.
	Guaranteed in door number two, door B, 800,000 people will die.
	Per year?
	Which one do you choose?
	Guaranteed 800,000 plus are going to die every single year.
	Yeah.
	Option two, option one, maybe 2,000, maybe 10,000, maybe 15,000 people are going to die in option one.
	But it's a maybe.
	Well, I guess especially if, without any other context, but if the 2,000 people who die are involved in an attempted murder at that point.
	Well, and they're not pedophiles, either.
	You know what?
	I would still have to say, if I have to pick, I would go...
	I would go with a 2,000.
	That's what we're talking about right now.
	They're making the argument that women may die.
	I don't want women to die.
	Nobody does.
	By the way, you're being very generous with your argument of 2,000.
	I know.
	800,000 plus per year are guaranteed to die.
	How many of them will- Okay, and if somebody's out there fact-checking me saying
	there's been a lower year, 600,000 plus.
	How many since Roe v. Wade?
	35, 40, 45 million people?
	Stalin wouldn't know what to do with that number.
	But you know what they say?
	And this is why it's evil.
	They say, well, guess what?
	Our social welfare system can't handle it.
	You don't need the social welfare system to handle it if people are held accountable.
	If the exp- You know what I have found in employing many people?
	And speaking to many people, by the way, you watching right now, that you have some who won't, but the expectations you set are almost universally, almost, it's almost always the most important metric in how somebody else performs or behaves.
	The expectations you set, the expectations that you set as a society, the expectations that you set in a relationship, It's almost always the most important contributing factor.
	If you expect someone to be sexually responsible and let them know beforehand that there are consequences, more will be.
	If you expect someone, whether they are rich or poor, to not be abusive, they're less likely to be abusive.
	If you expect women to be incapable of being held responsible for any and all of their decisions They won't hold themselves responsible.
	And you're also letting men off the hook, in a lot of ways.
	This is just... I mean, if you don't understand the overarching issue here, what kind of a society do you want to live... Do you really want to live in a society where half of them have no... And by the way, it's not just... This is the same issue with the Black Lives Matter riots.
	Half this country was not held accountable for rioting, for looting, and not only that, but after that, stealing.
	In San Francisco, right? If you're stealing less than what was it? 900 something dollars at a Walgreens?
	How many videos have we shown you laughing? It is hysterical, but
	Why because they know the expectations. We're not gonna do anything. We're not gonna do anything if you steal this so
	I'll do it. I think the guy that was interviewing lane is talking right now live on their channel
	All right. Let's see. Uh who this man is. Maybe he just abandoned lane
	Ginger snap for almost 50 years. We're talking about roe versus way. They were just talking about the shameful lady
	That really okay. Can we bring it up a layer of federal protection if you will of abortion across america
	That was completely wiped away today. And now the baton is being passed back to the state legislatures
	So that way, you know governors and state delegates and state senators can make that decision on their own and
	their respective you know jurisdiction their respective state the 50 states
	of uh, Of I think this guy's auditioning for a norelco ad
	Oh, here we go.
	Here it is.
	Ginger snap, ginger snap, ginger snap.
	Ginger snap and jump on, lady.
	This is not live.
	Oh, this just hasn't been finished.
	Let's see how they edited it and then we'll have the unedited.
	Oh, because they have to edit it.
	and jump on lady. This is not live. This just hasn't been finished. Let's see how they edited it and then we'll have
	the unedited.
	...after the news that broke today. We will have that conversation later on in our newscasts throughout...
	Oh, because they have to edit it. ...for that. But right now reporting from...
	He's doing a stand-up. Well, you know what? Let's go to Ginger Snap and ask him how it went so he can tell us how
	it actually went and then in real time you can watch and see how they
	present it on their local news.
	That'll be interesting to see.
	Why are they waiting?
	Why didn't they just stream it live?
	Probably stuff was said that they're like, yeah, we can't say that.
	Like they never went back to that woman on CNN because she was making good points.
	Right, exactly.
	I'm willing to bet that it is not the entire context of the conversation.
	And this is the value of doing it without a net.
	You guys are seeing this.
	This is all live.
	We have someone there on the ground.
	Next time we'll definitely have a better connection.
	Sorry, this is kind of the best we could do last minute, but Lidothcredit.com slash MugClub, enter in the promo code SAFESCOTUS, you get $20 off Monday through Thursday, 10 a.m.
	Eastern is when we usually do the show.
	This is just kind of a special live stream.
	A day that will live in infamy, said Shaking Elizabeth Warren.
	Yeah, we got the hashtag too.
	I want to put her Happy Pills bottle in her hand so she can be used like a maraca.
	I don't think she has Parkinson's, I just think she has rage.
	She's just constantly, it's like the nagging misery just trying to escape her body.
	Like Palpatine, it's gonna be like electrical shocks of just nagging bitchiness.
	You know her husband every time that he hears like, hey sweetie, you know that his heart just goes like.
	The kind of guy who would, if he finds himself in a coma, he would fake remaining in that coma if he woke up and saw Elizabeth Warren's face.
	He would just be like...
	How long till he gets a DUI and goes to jail just to escape?
	Oh, you mean NOT go to jail?
	Oh, uh, Pelosi's husband didn't go to jail?
	I don't believe that he went to jail.
	No, I'm not sure that he went to jail, but Elizabeth Warren's husband probably won't get a DUI.
	He'll probably wrap his car around a tree.
	Wow.
	Yeah.
	That's the way he wants to go, I guess.
	Like, oh my god!
	There was a brick on the accelerator!
	No stopping that one.
	He just tapes a poster of Elizabeth Warren on his back window so that if he looks back, that's just what he sees.
	Sure, why not?
	Yeah, let me grab a little bit of a... What do you got there?
	He's got some energy drinks here.
	You want some?
	No, I'm good.
	Are they saying we're good?
	We should keep going?
	Yeah.
	I'll keep going for a little bit.
	I mean, obviously at some point... Well, you missed it.
	They just said they're going to go back to Lane.
	Oh, are they?
	Yeah, so they said they need to edit it.
	So what we want to do is get Gingersnap on, him inform us of what the conversation actually transpired.
	I know Beto has come out and issued a statement about this.
	If we can pull that up.
	I know Abbott and Beto have both issued kind of counter statements.
	What did he kickflip his way into a woman's uterus?
	The only tweet that I see, this may not be the statement, we will overcome this decision in Texas by winning political power.
	Okay.
	He's going to perform his famous 180 snatch flip.
	Snatch flip to click grind.
	So elect me and I'll change all this.
	There is a video online that maybe we want to go to.
	I have no idea the content.
	42 minutes ago, this moment demands action.
	Do you want to pull that up from his Twitter account?
	Sure, yeah.
	Does anyone want half this energy drink?
	Usually Ginger Snap is the one who drinks half the energy drink.
	Alright, hold on a second.
	I'm going to go put this in that cup.
	I'll take it.
	You want to take it?
	Oh wait a second, I'm sick.
	Oh, that's true.
	No wait, I poured it.
	I didn't drink from here.
	Okay, I'll take it.
	But lick it, just to be safe.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Do we have the ability to pull up the Beto thing?
	Yeah, this moment demands action.
	Yeah, that's the tweet that he... It's Governor Candidate Texas.
	He's a candidate, Steven.
	For getting his butt kicked a third time.
	Yeah, I got it right here.
	Okay, go ahead.
	No, I can't go right now.
	I meant him, go ahead, sorry.
	Because when it's only you on screen, we lose half the viewership.
	It really is rough.
	The Supreme Court has overruled Roe vs. Wade.
	This is devastating to women across this country, but nowhere more so than in the state of Texas, whose trigger law will go into effect 30 days from now.
	Let's pause this pussy boy.
	Let's go to former Vice President Joe Biden.
	Let's see what he says, and if he respects the law of the land or sedition.
	Constitutes a right from the American people.
	That it is already recognized.
	They didn't limit it.
	They simply took it away.
	That's never been done to a right so important to so many Americans.
	What right?
	They didn't strip it away.
	But they did.
	They gave it to the states.
	It's a sad day for the court and for the country.
	50 years ago, Roe v. Wade was decided and has been the law of the land since then.
	Be the great uniter you said you were gonna be there, Joey!
	This landmark case protected women's right to choose.
	Her right to make I'm sorry, what?
	Hey!
	Intensely personal.
	That's Obama's statement.
	The most intensely personal decision.
	interference of politics. I'm sorry what? To reaffirm basic principles of equality
	that women have the power to control their own destiny. Hey!
	And a reinforced intensely personal. That's Obama's statement. Right. The
	most intensely personal decision. Yeah. Joe Biden bring up the Obama
	Twitter. Yeah. They all want to talk about a Manchurian candidate?
	It's literally from the Obama Twitter statement.
	The most intensely personal decision someone can make.
	Those were his exact words right now.
	As Vice President and now as President of the United States, I've studied this case carefully.
	I've overseen more Supreme Court confirmations than anyone today,
	where this case was always discussed. I believe Roe v. Wade was the correct decision
	as a matter of constitutional law and application of the fundamental right
	to privacy and liberty in matters of family and personal autonomy.
	It was a decision on a complex matter that drew a careful balance between a woman's right to choose earlier in her pregnancy and the state's ability to regulate later in her pregnancy.
	No mention of either life.
	Wrong!
	Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg said it was bad law!
	Yeah.
	The most Americans of faith and backgrounds found acceptable.
	Wrong.
	Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg said it was bad law.
	Americans today.
	And it was a constitutional principle upheld by justices appointed by Democrat and Republican
	presidents alike.
	They were white guys.
	Roe v. Wade was a 7-2 decision written by a justice appointed by a Republican president,
	Richard Nixon.
	Thank you.
	In the five decades that followed Roe v. Wade, justices appointed by Republican presidents from Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, George W. Bush were among the justices who voted to uphold the principles set forth in Roe v. Wade.
	And 65 plus million people were killed.
	It was three justices named by one president, Donald Trump.
	We're the core of today's decision to upend the scales of justice and eliminate a fundamental right for women in this country.
	Duly elected presidents who had the right to appoint justices.
	You just don't like it.
	This decision is a culmination of a deliberate effort over decades to upset the balance of our law.
	Oh boy!
	It's a realization of extreme ideology and a tragic error by the Supreme Court in my view.
	The court has done what it has never done before.
	Correct the wrong.
	He just gave license, right now, this just gave license to the riots that you are going to see and the violence that you are going to see.
	The most extremists have, for the first time, stripped you of a constitutional right.
	If that is not a justification to violence, which we are already seeing, that is so much worse than fight like hell.
	That is so much worse than Fight Like Hell.
	He just gave you license to go hog wild.
	Churches, crisis pregnancy centers, families with pro-life bumper stickers, protect your kin.
	The child, the consequence.
	It just, it just stuns me.
	So extreme that doctors will be criminalized for fulfilling their duty to care.
	I thought it was first, do not harm.
	What about the harm of the life that you're ending?
	I love how he just ignores, by the way.
	It was 50 years ago.
	Hold on a second.
	At one point, black people weren't considered the same as a white person.
	And then through actual progress, we said there's equal rights, we fought a war for it.
	Hey, we've advanced.
	We've advanced medically.
	You do realize that, right?
	We didn't have the same technology to recognize a heartbeat, to recognize genetic material, unique genetic code.
	We know that now.
	We know everything that I am.
	Everything that Gerald is.
	Everything that Toolman is.
	Everything that Tokunawa is.
	Everything that Keegan is, who's in here because Yakuza had a doctor's appointment.
	Everything that we are.
	Was already there at the point where they could have an abortion.
	That genetic code that determined who we are.
	I was not something else.
	How I would grow, when I would grow, what my hair would look like, what color eyes I would have, to my skin texture, to the fact that I get worked up and some of you find it mildly entertaining so I'm able to make a living.
	All of that genetic material was there.
	We know that now.
	We didn't know that then.
	Must elect more senators and representatives who will codify women's right to choose into federal law once again.
	Elect more state leaders to protect this right at the local level.
	We need to restore the protections of Roe as law of the land.
	We need to elect officials who will do that.
	This fall, Roe is on the ballot.
	Personal freedoms are on the ballot.
	The right to privacy, liberty, equality.
	They're all on a ballot.
	Forget about the economy.
	Until then, I will do all of my power to protect a woman's right in states where they will face the consequences of today's decision.
	How?
	Well, the court's decision cast a dark shadow over a large swath of the land.
	Many states in this country still recognize- Please tell me you guys pulled that clip of him copying Obama.
	I want to run them side by side after.
	So, if a woman lives in a state that restricts abortion, The Supreme Court's decision does not prevent her from traveling from her home state to the state that allows it.
	That's correct.
	Does not prevent a doctor in that state.
	I haven't seen everything in the bill, but I haven't seen that yet.
	Research team guys, you can tell me if there's any restriction on people being allowed to travel.
	To another state to seek care they need.
	My administration will defend that bedrock right.
	If any state or local official, high or low, Nobody's saying that right now.
	That I know of.
	exercise in our basic right to travel, I will do everything in my power.
	Do you?
	Nobody's saying that right now.
	That deeply un-American attack.
	That I know of.
	Do you?
	I think Massachusetts actually had something, but it was an executive order signed today
	by Governor Charlie Baker.
	It prohibits extradition to other states for violation of that state's law.
	Yeah, but I mean, in the, in the thing... So that means, I think, you guys can explain that to me.
	I think what it means is that if someone were to come into your state and get an abortion... Right.
	...that other states wouldn't be able to punish you, but he's... Right.
	...he's creating that executive order so that it implies that other states are going to do that.
	Yeah.
	...tried to ban or severely restrict access to these medications.
	But extremist governments and state legislators are looking to block the mail or search the
	person's medicine cabinet.
	Good!
	You understand that having a vaccine passport and tracking sick people is wrong and it's not good!
	Joe Biden, welcome to the Republican Party!
	You mispronounced, go fuck yourself.
	These laws are not based on evidence and asking us to act to protect access to care.
	They say by limiting access to these medicines, maternal mortality will climb in America.
	What about baby mortality?
	What critical medications?
	Abortifacients.
	What about baby mortality?
	Take steps to ensure these critical medications are available to the fullest extent possible.
	What critical medications?
	And the politicians cannot interfere in the decisions that should be made between a woman and her doctor.
	And my administration will remain vigilant as the implications of this decision play out.
	By the way, let's also think of that language.
	Her doctor.
	Are you really getting your abortions performed at your general practitioner?
	Let's go a step further.
	Your regular OBGYN.
	It's not your doctor.
	It's a merchant of death.
	Those are the people who perform abortions in this country.
	Let's be clear about it.
	It's not your doctor.
	Women aren't having abortions performed by doctors who know them, which by the way would be important, understanding not only their personal health history, their psychiatric history.
	You have to seek out a merchant of death, who does that almost exclusively.
	We say it's her doctor, like it's a general family practitioner.
	To reconsider the right of marriage equality?
	Nope.
	The right of couples to make their choices on contraception?
	It's a lie.
	This is an extreme and dangerous path the court is now taking us on.
	Let me close with two points.
	Better be able to count.
	I call on everyone, no matter how deeply they care about this decision, to keep all protests peaceful.
	Okay, good.
	I'll give him that.
	Peaceful, peaceful, peaceful.
	No intimidation.
	Well, no, Trump said the same thing.
	Trump said the exact same thing.
	So he's following Trump.
	Threats and intimidation are not speech.
	We must stand against violence in any form.
	How about you say you're going to use everything in your power to prosecute those people?
	You said you'll use everything in your power to make sure women can travel across state lines to kill babies.
	Right now you just requested pretty please don't be violent.
	I know so many women are now going to face incredibly difficult situations.
	Of not having sex.
	I hear you.
	I support you.
	Of only having four choices.
	Abstinence, motherhood, adoption, contraception.
	Oh, the humanity.
	Only four choices.
	The plight of the modern feminist woman.
	of the rule of law. Yeah because there's nothing more dignified than forceps up
	your snatch. With this decision the conservative majority of the Supreme
	Court shows how extreme it is. How far removed they are from the
	They can't possibly be expected to do that.
	How dare they?
	It is the final word.
	Deal with it.
	be expected to do that? How dare they?
	This decision must not be the final word.
	It is the final word, deal with it.
	My administration will use all of its appropriate lawful powers.
	But Congress must act.
	Good luck.
	And with your vote, you can act.
	Wait, are you saying that the justices who were appointed by a democratically elected president are illegitimate?
	Is that what you're saying, Joe Biden?
	I just want to be clear.
	Because the people elected Donald Trump, right?
	And Donald Trump had the right to appoint these justices.
	Are you saying that was illegitimate?
	It can't be the final word that we will go against this court?
	I just want to understand.
	Are you saying that the people's representatives, the elected officials of Texas, are illegitimate?
	Sounds like sedition to me!
	Help us out.
	Sounds a whole lot more seditious, if that's a word, than, uh, hey, uh, check the voting records for that 165,000 vote flip that took place in 20 minutes in Wayne County.
	Sounds a whole lot more like questioning the institutions than just saying, I don't know, there seems to be something fishy with the poll workers and a pipe breaking.
	I would talk about voting machines being open to attack, but I would be quoting Hillary Clinton and I would be quoting Democrats pre-2016 saying that.
	I wouldn't want to do that.
	I wouldn't want to raise concerns about the legitimacy of elections because I would be quoting Democrats.
	Right, right, right.
	I don't want to do that.
	Or there was that film, I forgot what it was called, something, uh, Blockchain.
	Yeah.
	That existed in, uh... It was on HBO.
	It was on HBO, where the guy literally hacked the Georgia Dominion voting machines and bitched about those machines!
	In front of them!
	In front of them!
	And said, hey, do me a favor, you go vote for your candidate, and he flipped their votes.
	And then afterwards he said, oh, no, no, no, it seems like they fixed it when he was talking about the 2020 election.
	Yeah.
	People said, how did they fix it?
	Are they still using the same machines?
	Yeah.
	He said, yeah!
	But, uh, I wouldn't be able to hack it now.
	They're like, well, why don't you let us try?
	No, no, no, no.
	Go watch it!
	Go watch blockchain!
	The point is this.
	I'm not saying that I certainly can verify all of these issues.
	I'm not saying that.
	What I am saying is, well before this election, you had commissions on election integrity.
	Jimmy Carter, Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar.
	Hillary Clinton, I believe, was involved in one capacity or another.
	You had documentaries that existed.
	Where they were hacking Dominion voting machines.
	So the idea that questioning it is sedition, whereas this man just said that these Supreme Court justices, who by the way, it entirely went through a process that has historical precedence.
	Right?
	Yeah.
	People elected a president, he appointed justices.
	That works.
	To say this is extreme and I'll go against it.
	Also people elect their own state representatives and they have the right to make these decisions.
	To say I will do everything to stop them.
	I don't know.
	That seems a whole lot more severe to me.
	Yeah, it does.
	So put this in context with what we already know, right?
	So he's saying that, right?
	These guys are illegitimate.
	He also is the same president who did not ask his Justice Department to enforce the law about protesting in front of a justice's home to try to sway their opinion, which has been going on since the memo was leaked in May.
	Yep.
	So what is he basically saying here?
	These guys are illegitimate and you can kind of break the law and we're not going to enforce it.
	Yeah.
	There's no protection.
	Can you imagine being Kavanaugh or Amy Coney Barrett right now?
	Or Alito?
	Or any... Oh, wait, hold on a second.
	Look at CNN.
	Look, they're literally using AirPods like us.
	Are they?
	Yeah.
	We made it cool.
	Do we have Ginger Snap, by the way?
	No, we're having Skype issues.
	GingerSnap, Yakuza just came in.
	So that's your name now, Casey, after I saw your tattoos.
	It's Yakuza.
	That's your new name.
	Yakuza does work.
	It's actually a pretty badass name.
	It is!
	You should hate it, that way it'll stick.
	It's the worst.
	So Yakuza just came in.
	By the way, how was your doctor's appointment?
	The guy with the rubber glove was surprisingly gentle.
	Do you now have a vagina?
	Was the process a success?
	I don't want to talk about it.
	By the way, you may need to change where you keep your spare keys.
	That's a personal issue between a patient and a doctor.
	I want to see a Trump flag out here with this, because thank you, Trump!
	Were they able to pull that clip of Biden just saying that?
	The exact quote from Obama's?
	I don't know that anyone else has caught this.
	So I want to read to you.
	Were they able to pull that clip?
	Did they get it to us?
	Yeah, they're working on it now.
	So let me know when they have it, because I want to read the Obama statement, okay?
	Right there.
	And then show what Joe Biden just said.
	Because a lot of people have suspected Suspected.
	Allegedly.
	Allegedly.
	That former Vice President Joe Biden is as former Vice President Joe Biden does.
	And by that I mean, there's a reason that I use the term former Vice President Joe Biden.
	Because that's what he is.
	Respect the office.
	Yes, respect the office.
	And he was just speaking live.
	And he said the exact same thing.
	Word for word.
	That Barack Obama released on Twitter as a statement.
	Let me know when we have it because I want to read the Obama statement and then have that right next to it.
	If you're watching right now, hit like.
	If you want us to do more of these streams live as we experience this with you, hit like.
	Share, because you're the only thing that helps us through the YouTube algorithms.
	And by that, I mean all of you combined help us maybe get 3% of what other average channels get these days.
	But not the ability to make a living based on... No, no, that's zero percent.
	Zero, yeah.
	Your work does nothing for that, but we love you anyway.
	Great.
	Do we have the clip?
	No.
	Still getting it.
	How are they still getting it?
	We just watched it live.
	By the way, I bet what you'll see, you'll see that exact phrase.
	So they've used that phrase before, right?
	The most intensely personal decision.
	I haven't heard that exact phrase used before.
	I have.
	I have heard it before.
	We can look it up.
	But I guarantee you, whether that's true or not, you will hear it from every single Democrat now on the Sunday shows, on every interview they give.
	They're going to try to use the most, like, flowery language they can possibly say.
	Well, they're circulating talking points.
	I think even Clinton's Twitter tweet, whatever she sent out, was very similar, too.
	Did you guys see, by the way, can we pull this up from yesterday, Joe Biden, the card that he came out with?
	Oh gosh, yes.
	With the instructions, you take your seat, you say... And the your is capitalized, and the you is like, what?
	Because they knew if it just said, you take a seat, he was just going to go out and sit with the press.
	He was going to grab a chair.
	He was going to Chauncey Gardner that shit.
	It was like when Bill Cosby, you know, back before he was a rapist, he used to talk about, uh...
	He's like, because when you have young boys, you have to describe everything!
	And I cannot say, go upstairs and take a shower, because I'm standing upstairs, fully clothed.
	So what you have to do is say, go up the stairs, take off your clothes, go in through the shower, turn on the water, This was his bit.
	And that is what they have to do with Joe Biden.
	That is exactly what they have to do with Joe Biden.
	You shall take your seat!
	You shall not take the seat of the Press Secretary.
	That is not you.
	Or the Secretary of Defense.
	Neither take thou the seat of CNBC Correspondents.
	The seat being taken is that of your seat.
	And I guarantee you the seat that he takes has the words your written on it because he wouldn't understand POTUS.
	The seat of Pro Temporem of the Senate is right out!
	Good Monty Python.
	Taking your seat, your seat being the seat taken, I wonder, we gotta be able to read that.
	Oh yeah, I think the Daily Wire actually was the one they did a Zoom in and so they saw what it said.
	It said like, take your seat, um, what does it say?
	You take your seat, then what does it say?
	You enter the Roosevelt Room and say hello to participants.
	You take your seat.
	Yeah.
	Press enters.
	You give brief comments.
	You is always capped.
	A certain amount of minutes.
	Press departs.
	There's a T in parentheses.
	I don't know why.
	You ask Liz Schuler, president AFL-CIO, a question.
	And then what does it say?
	You... You thank participants.
	Don't forget to thank people!
	Because if that's not written there, it's like, you ask a question from AFL-CIO.
	There's nothing left.
	Go fuck yourselves.
	You were supposed to say thank you.
	Oh, you should have told me.
	I was just, you know, I was riffing.
	Like Chaz.
	Cue cards are fine, but can you just... Can you just make it to where it doesn't sound like he's a bumbling idiot?
	Like you enter the room and thank people for... I mean...
	I'm sorry, my language is a little salty today, because F's are easier than anything in the back of my throat.
	It's true, yeah.
	It's easier to think through that word.
	No, it's just because of my sore throat.
	Like, L's are hard.
	Oh, for you and Asian.
	H's are hard.
	Do we have that clip?
	From the speech that we just watched?
	Struggle is real.
	Let me check.
	We don't have it yet.
	Guys, the speech we just watched, it was very early on in his speech.
	They have it, they're just cutting it.
	We don't need to cut it, just send it to you with a timecode.
	We can play it right there on the video.
	We don't need to cut it.
	What I'm saying is send you the link and we can just play the clip.
	It was within the first minute and a half.
	That is a faster way.
	Yeah.
	It doesn't have to be.
	You know, this is one thing.
	We're actually playing jazz right here.
	I'm trying to see if there's anything else that we need to know that's been going on with this, Bill.
	Can we go back to Beto's clip?
	Oh yeah, you know what?
	Play Beto's clip while we're doing that.
	Can we not because... I'm going to be going back and forth between the two.
	Because Tokunawa has to find that other clip.
	No, I have Beto's clip.
	Okay, cool.
	Alright, okay.
	Let's play Beto's clip.
	That's one minute of hilarity from Beto.
	The Supreme Court has overruled Roe v. Wade.
	This is devastating to women across this country, but nowhere more so than in the state of Texas.
	I was going to say nowhere more southern than my bedroom.
	This trigger law will go into effect 30 days from today, meaning that abortion will be
	illegal in the state of Texas with no exception for rape or incest.
	not the plank bill.
	Now, we have to focus on the way in which we are going to overcome this and ensure that
	every Texas woman can make her own decisions about her own body, her own health care, and
	her own future.
	The only way to do this is to win political power.
	We must win on the night of November 8th.
	I need you right now in this race with us.
	So that I can stay somewhere other than La Quinta.
	Every single voter across the state of Texas ensure that they understand what's on the line.
	It's a woman's right to choose and it's the very lives of Texas women.
	A state that leads much of the developed world in the rate of maternal mortality, This is what they're trying to say.
	You have to allow abortion up until and including birth period, which is what codifying Roe v Wade the way they want to interpret it would do, just to be clear.
	You have to do that.
	Or women, you will die.
	Yeah.
	Is anyone buying this?
	Honestly, is anyone buying this?
	Or even liberal women?
	Just be like that woman with Ginger Snap, the shameful woman who said, I don't want to talk about that because I want to kill whatever hasn't come through my snook yet.
	Yeah.
	By the way, and I mean this 100% right now, if you are a conservative Republican voting person, right?
	I almost sound like I'm describing a person who has a womb.
	If you are a person who's going to vote for Republicans, you had better mobilize for this election.
	Do not sit idly by and think that we've got to win because the economy is doing poorly.
	That's probably going to help us.
	But if you are in a state right now that has any chance of electing somebody who's going to overturn this, don't think they stop with this.
	It's guns.
	It's this.
	It's every other right.
	It's the ability to speak freely on the web because we've seen that.
	We can't even speak freely here.
	That's why we have Mug Club.
	Right.
	So we can actually say what we want to say.
	Well, today we're just taking the risk.
	They're taking the rights away, not us!
	I'm saying today we're just taking the risk here on YouTube and keeping it, and by the way, we love that you guys are watching on Mug Club, of course, on Mumble.
	But also, keep in mind, people say, oh, it's just the two sides of the same coin with Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
	You really think this would have happened with Hillary Clinton?
	No.
	Let's be clear about that.
	Yeah.
	And for people now who say, oh, they rigged the elections so there's no chance.
	You can't rig them that badly.
	No.
	Get out and vote.
	Not when it comes down to all of the local elections.
	Keep in mind, there are also judges in your state.
	You know that, right?
	You know they have circuit courts.
	You guys know that, right?
	You know these kinds of things happen all the time in your state before they get kicked up to the Supreme Court.
	Yeah.
	That's one of the problems we have with the NRA.
	Often they just sort of let things go through the difficult cycle and just sort of swoop in the last minute and say, oh, put my name on there.
	Like Ben Affleck with the Goodwill Hunting script.
	Yeah.
	We did that.
	He didn't write that.
	We got that clip and then the Obama quote.
	Okay, so let me read the Obama quote first.
	Okay.
	Oh, I have an Eric Swalwell quote.
	That's hilarious.
	Is it about a Chinese spy?
	Yeah, you know he's convinced Chinese spies to get abortions.
	There's so many Chinese babies that I would have right now.
	Why are you doing Trump?
	I'm not even trying to!
	You disgust me.
	I did a poor Trump, so there's nobody that would think that was an actual Trump.
	Your mediocrity rivals Amy Klobuchar.
	Oh no, she's number one.
	So he said, Barack Obama said, Today the Supreme Court not only reversed nearly 50 years of precedent, it relegated the most intensely personal decision someone can make to the whims of politicians.
	The most intensely personal decision someone can make.
	Now let's go to former Vice President Biden's speech.
	To choose a right to make intensely personal decisions with their doctor, Free from interference of politics.
	That's when he went off Obama's script.
	Obama's saying it into his ear.
	You should just walk up and just have an image of Obama's tweets and say, what he said.
	That's gonna be the talking point now.
	I cannot wait to watch the Sunday shows this week because you get and I watch stuff that really pisses me off because CNN is I mean we've just we've exposed them for who they are right right they're a mockery to news but MSNBC and the guys at NBC Chuck Todd still thinks that he's by God actual news right he's come out and said that this was the Supreme Court taking away your rights Yeah.
	None of these people seem to understand what a right is.
	It's not found anywhere in the Constitution, this right that they keep pointing to, because justices who agree with them have said the same thing, and they've just ignored it.
	Yeah.
	So they have no idea what's going on, but they're gonna actually have panels of people lining up to say how bad this country is.
	I want to do something here, which I know could get us in trouble, but I want to do it anyway.
	Okay.
	I mean, I want you guys out there to find, picture by picture, The common act of performing an abortion.
	What it is.
	What happened in this country.
	Let's pick a cartoon one.
	You know, one that isn't real because that'll get us an animation.
	There's plenty of them.
	Because it's relevant here.
	So Control Room, get that for me.
	Particularly, you know, the most common practice with the forceps.
	Yeah, there's probably, I've seen some that are around like 20 weeks or something like that.
	Yep.
	Because, let me read Eric Swalwell.
	Oh, the irony train.
	It's not stopping here.
	This is the guy who, by the way, was having sex and revealing secrets to Chinese spies.
	Extreme right-wing judges on the Supreme Court just issued a death warrant to women in America.
	They have decided that a piece of metal designed to end life Is more valuable than the health and safety of women in America.
	Hold on a second.
	A piece of metal designed to end life.
	You talking about forceps there, sweetheart?
	More valuable than the health and safety of women in America.
	1.6 million last year, defensive uses of firearms.
	2 to 3 million on average, and we know that's an undercount.
	A lot of them women.
	I think that has something to do with the health and safety of women in America.
	Because, by the way, we're not talking about a third party.
	We're talking about a woman saving her own life in the face of an attacker.
	So, a piece of metal designed to end life is more valuable.
	The irony.
	You have determined that the piece of metal designed to end life is a constitutional right, and it doesn't exist.
	It doesn't exist.
	He's trying to save the gun.
	It's not about importance.
	One is a right.
	Let's just let's just separate this.
	Okay.
	Let's just this is a piece of this is a gun.
	Perfect.
	I was gonna say my pencil.
	Let's see.
	I was gonna say let's use my pen.
	We have firearms here.
	I have a gun here.
	Make sure that people know.
	Okay.
	All right, everyone see?
	Okay, no Alec Baldwin.
	All right.
	Just to be clear.
	So this is a piece of metal.
	All right.
	Design and life.
	Okay.
	So let me read you his tweet one more time and then I want to go to, uh, hopefully we have the infographics there.
	They've decided that a piece of metal designed to end life is more valuable than the health and safety of women in America.
	A piece of metal designed to end life.
	No, it's not designed to end life.
	It's also designed to save life.
	Let's be clear about that.
	That's why it exists.
	That's why swords exist.
	So people learn how to fight.
	Is everyone, are we going to condemn everyone for, scale it back, takes martial arts?
	Do we assume that they're all going out to commit assaults?
	Now here's the thing, when he says health and safety, he's talking about abortion, right?
	It's an inanimate object versus a legally defined procedure.
	Okay.
	A piece of metal designed to end life.
	Here's a little experiment that I want to do.
	This is said piece of metal, a gun, designed to end life.
	Is it possible for there to be a scenario where this inanimate object does not take innocent life?
	End life, Walther PPKS, go!
	Do it.
	Hold on a second, it's gonna get to it.
	Okay, okay.
	Come on!
	Alright, so that inanimate object there, designed to end life, seems that it's not a requirement.
	Seems that it doesn't end life unless I go through a procedure.
	To take someone's life.
	And by the way, it can end the life of someone who would cause mass damage to other lives.
	Now he says, this piece of metal we just saw, most scenarios, meaning nearly all, it doesn't end life, then the health and safety of women in America, and he goes on to substantiate this if you read his subsequent tweets, he's talking about abortion.
	Is there a scenario in which abortion doesn't end a life?
	We've just established this doesn't have to end a life.
	Is there any scenario in which the process of abortion does not actually end a life?
	Do we have the infographic?
	Yeah, I sent one too, just in case.
	I knew somebody who had tweeted.
	Let's bring this up.
	This is the most frequently performed abortion technique, and it's usually typically performed between 5 and 13 weeks of pregnancy.
	So this would be the earliest one.
	After administering anesthesia, usually sedative, The abortionist uses a speculum like this.
	This speculum is placed inside the vagina.
	Is that a piece of metal?
	Looks like it.
	Has a specific purpose.
	Allowing the abortionist to see the cervix, the entrance to the uterus.
	The cervix acts as a gate that stays closed for the duration of pregnancy, protecting the baby until it is ready for birth.
	Gotta remove that protection!
	The abortionist uses a series of metal rods called dilators, like these, which increase in thickness and diameter, and the abortionist inserts them into the cervix progressively to dilate it, gaining access to the inside of the uterus, where the baby resides.
	At this stage of pregnancy, the baby has a heartbeat, fingers, arms and legs.
	But its bones are still weak and fragile.
	After the cervix is dilated, the abortionist will insert a suction catheter similar to this.
	This is a plastic, clear plastic.
	Alright, so I think the point is made here.
	There's that hunk of metal.
	Here's another hunk of metal.
	By the way, Tool Man, I think you have a hunk of metal on you right now.
	of this nature.
	All right.
	So I think the point is made here.
	There's that hunk of metal.
	Here's another hunk of metal.
	By the way, Tool Man, I think you have a hunk of metal on you right now.
	I think everyone in this office consistently does.
	Has never ended a life.
	.
	you.
	None of these firearms, I gotta say, what, there's probably, there's gotta be at least 15 firearms in this office at any given moment.
	At least, yeah.
	Probably more.
	Call it 20.
	It's a conservative estimate.
	Not one of them has ever ended a life.
	There has never been a health and safety procedure, known as abortion, that has not ended a life.
	Using hunks of metal.
	Yeah.
	Well, unless it was on accident.
	Yeah.
	Like, oh, we accidentally... Yeah, we accidentally survived, in which case Ralph Northam, Governor Ralph Northam, former governor, would say, well, then we would allow it to be born and see what we want to do with it afterwards.
	Yeah.
	And I mean, just so you know, watch, if you watch the rest of that video, I'll just briefly tell you what happens.
	That thing starts—so this is 11 weeks, right?
	Let's say that you think, oh, okay, I didn't know.
	Like, sometimes it takes women a little bit of time to understand that they're actually pregnant, to take a pregnancy test, to see that they've missed, maybe wait a couple of weeks after that.
	I understand that.
	This is 11 weeks.
	This is probably a pretty good approximation of an early abortion, right?
	About as early as you can get.
	Maybe you can shave a few weeks off of that.
	They turn the suction machine on.
	Limbs start pulling off.
	We have that part if you want to see it.
	Pieces of that body start being pulled in.
	Now, you can see this, and again, this is an animation, thank God, but you can see what's happening.
	Alright, let's show it.
	Let's show it.
	Sorry guys, I know some of you don't like this, but this is the reality.
	If you haven't seen it, if you don't know, and I'm always kind of amazed if people don't know, but again, this is the most common procedure, because it's the procedure that's necessary as early as possible.
	It's about as good as it gets.
	It's about as good as it gets.
	Right?
	And that is terrible to say.
	Alright, let's show it.
	has a force 10 to 20 times more powerful than the usual household vacuum cleaner.
	And using this technique, the baby is rapidly torn apart by the force of the suction
	and squeezed through the tubing, down the suction tube, into the syringe or vacuum.
	That's what you're trying to defend.
	At 11 weeks.
	Do it at 20.
	24.
	30.
	35.
	24 is Massachusetts, which we just talked about.
	Six months.
	Six months.
	I cannot believe that we're not having an honest conversation about this in this country.
	It's not a woman's right to choose to kill.
	They can't have an honest conversation about it.
	Once you have an honest conversation about what the process is, about what abortion is, the left loses.
	So that's why they have to obfuscate.
	That's why they have to say, I don't want to.
	Every single abortion activist who we had ginger snap ass could not answer the question.
	Yeah.
	Well, I don't know, and I don't want to talk about that.
	I wonder why.
	I wonder why the president doesn't want to talk about it.
	I wonder why Elizabeth Warren doesn't want to talk about it.
	I wonder why the vice president doesn't want to talk about it.
	I wonder why the former president doesn't want to talk about it.
	I wonder why Hillary Clinton doesn't want to talk about it.
	No one, none of them are willing to stake their claim and say, that's where we draw the line.
	That's where we draw the line.
	None of them draw a line.
	And you want to say we're extremists for drawing a line anywhere?
	You draw a line nowhere!
	All this does today, and we can go to Mug Club briefly here and take some chats so that, because I know Mug Club people are like, hey, what are we doing?
	So let's take the chats on Mug Club because it'll probably just get ugly on YouTube anyway.
	All that happened today is a Supreme Court who, by the way, justices were appointed By a democratically elected president, and by the way, the most diverse Supreme Court that's ever existed.
	More women and black people involved in this decision than Roe v. Wade before.
	The Supreme Court just said, hey, this is something that should be left up to the local democracies of the state.
	That's not how democracy dies.
	That's how democracy flourishes.
	That's how a constitutional republic flourishes.
	And not only that, it's just a step in the direction.
	I'll be honest, my bias, I think it should go much further than this.
	It's just a step in the right direction, just even compared to Europe, compared to every other country outside of Canada that have far stricter abortion laws.
	And by the way, they don't have Republicans.
	They don't have conservatives.
	They have liberals and extra liberals in Europe.
	But even on the issue of abortion, they look at what happens just in a state like Massachusetts, which isn't even that severe, and they say, come on, that's a little severe.
	This is not how democracy dies.
	It's how it flourishes.
	It's how it's protected.
	It's the process we have that has gone through many checks and balances.
	It's also a step towards allowing our humanity to return.
	This is how humanity flourishes.
	If nothing else comes from this, Nothing else.
	Look, everyone right now, if you're watching, if you're listening on audio, they are going to make this.
	The issue going into it.
	Why?
	Because they think it's their only potential winning issue.
	You see, they even tried to brush past the gun issue pretty quickly because they know it doesn't bode well for them.
	The economy doesn't bode well for them.
	International policy doesn't bode well for them.
	They're thinking, well, we can use the abortion thing because, just as Joe Biden tried to say, it's extremist, right?
	They just stripped you of your rights because they think this is their only chance.
	To set a narrative and lie to you.
	And the reason they expect that is because abortion is so ugly that even the advocates for it look away at the process.
	They don't really want to know what it is.
	So, this is my call to action to you.
	And it's very very simple.
	What you need to do, this is the only issue that they think is their winning issue.
	We've already won on the economy issue.
	You can kind of do remedial, right?
	If you say inflation, they'll go, okay, yeah, I understand.
	Yeah, it's been pretty bad, right?
	The approval on the economy is in the low 20s for this former vice president.
	Give them a remedial on that.
	And then when it comes to abortion, your job is to educate them on the lie.
	That's all you need to do.
	What they think is their only winning issue this election?
	You make their Achilles heel.
	You do that by simply telling people the truth.
	You tell them what this law is, that states can do whatever they want, and you tell them what abortion actually is.
	A fetal chart helps.
	Sending them a link to something like that video helps.
	That's your job.
	Take that today.
	This is not something that, unlike spineless Republicans, they think it's a political liability.
	This can be turned into a tremendous winning issue.
	That's what you do going forward.
	Then there is no quarter, politically, for them to win going into November.
	And you better vote!
	You better vote, because I know it's not perfect.
	Underestimating your opponent is a cardinal sin.
	Overestimating them is just as bad.
	If you're saying that your votes will all be wiped out and there'll be a blue wave, well, you know what?
	Shame on you.
	Vote and turn this one issue today, this historical landmark, as I think Amy Klobuchar said, a day that will live in infamy.
	They're always trying to look for some speech.
	Booker, this is like my I am Spartacus moment.
	No, it's your I'm a douche moment.
	Just educate people.
	This does not have to be an issue we shy away from.
	Lean right into it.
	All right, YouTube, we're gonna discuss this more.

▲