Know More News - Adam Green - Jesus Crucified to 'Save the Nation' (of Israel) & Fulfill Prophecy | Know More News w/ Adam Green

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 2, 2023 - Know More News - Adam Green

01:35:38

Jesus Crucified to 'Save the Nation' (of Israel) & Fulfill Prophecy | Know More News w/ Adam Green

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Adam Green here with no more news.
	It is Wednesday, February 1st, 2023, and today we're going to be discussing a article and a video, two different rabbis.
	Rabbis reveal Christianity is a deception.
	And they do this not by outright saying it's a deception, but from their exegesis, from their Kabbalistic analysis of Christianity, their explanation of Christianity, they are unintentionally revealing that Christianity is a deception.
	I'll show you guys what I mean here and get a total different perspective on the way.
	Basically, the rabbi says that the Jews had to kill Jesus because that's fulfilling the prophecy of the Messiah because the Messiah had to die.
	He had to atone for the nation of Israel.
	He had to be the scapegoat according to the prophecies.
	And basically, Christians should be thanking the Jews.
	There's been Christian anti-Semitism throughout history hating the Jews because they supposedly killed Jesus.
	Well, the Gentiles wouldn't be saved if it weren't for them supposedly rejecting their Messiah.
	So we're going to get into it.
	Special thanks to Primordial Chaos, the Edomite himself, who's one of my friend and followers.
	He maybe is in the chat right now.
	He sent this over to me.
	It comes from web.archive.org.
	It is an article written by Reb, so Rabbi.
	Reb is kind of like Rebbe, almost like it's ultra-Orthodox.
	Reb Yaakov Jacob Lieb Hakohain.
	Kind of like a Cohen.
	Founder and spiritual director of Don May West.
	Don May is the Sabbatean Frankist Turk, right?
	As originally published in the Priest, a Journal of Catholic Theology, April 1996.
	So this has been around for a while, and it is a truly fascinating article.
	I have it all highlighted up.
	And then we're going to be doing some clips from this rabbi.
	I forget his name right now.
	Let's see.
	I have his name here.
	It is.
	He also wrote the article, The Legend of Armalis, Kosher Torah, Rabbi Ariel Bar Zadok.
	I think that's the same rabbi.
	I'm pretty sure.
	Almost positive it is.
	And he's got some very interesting things to say in this video about Jesus and the Torah of Yeshua, one of the secret rabbinical books about the true, supposed true history of Jesus.
	So we're going to be getting into both of those today.
	Appreciate you all for being here.
	This video is brought to you guys by you guys, your support in the super chats and the monthly subscriptions through Odyssey is the best way.
	Everybody that supports on Subscribestar, thank you.
	Everybody that sends letters of support to my P.O. box, the address in the description below.
	Appreciate you all.
	You guys make videos like this possible.
	So here's his Twitter account, Don May West, a virtual community for the practice of Neo-Sabbatean, like Sabbatean Frankist.
	He comments about that in the article too.
	Kabbalah, as taught by its founder and leader, Rebbe Yaakov Hakohan in the tradition of Zabbatai Zevi.
	And let's get right into it.
	Let's see.
	If I erase this, is it going to disappear?
	Close the toolbar.
	There we go.
	Prologue.
	Originally published in a Catholic journal is not to convert Jews to Christianity or Christians to Judaism because they don't want that.
	That's why they created Christianity because they didn't want Gentiles, God-fearing Gentiles, to convert to Judaism because their holy seed must be kept separate.
	But they do want the nations to worship their God.
	So they want a clear distinction.
	That's why they believe the secret teaching that Peter secretly made, even though it's Paul that more did this, secretly separated Christianity from Judaism to not tempt them from idol worship and to set up a Gentile religion.
	So this is nor to prove or disprove the validity of the Christian faith by virtue of its roots in the Judaic, but simply to correct the commonly held beliefs among Christians and Jews alike about the role of the Jewish people in the crucifixion of the man later to be called Jesus, as documented in both Jewish and Christian scripture.
	Over the last few years, the publication, which I couldn't find, to die for the people, has offended Christians and Jews alike.
	Christians, because it seeks to disprove one of their most cherished popular beliefs, that is that the Jews called for the death of Jesus out of malice and rejection of his divinity.
	And because the article written by a Jew from a Jewish perspective even takes the matter of Jesus seriously at all.
	Ever since Vatican II, the church has actively pursued a dialogue with Judaism.
	I heard a really interesting conspiracy theory from a rabbi.
	I'll probably play.
	It's this rabbi we're about to play today.
	He says that they found in Nagamati, they found a scroll that disproves that Christianity is real and that the Jews have it.
	So they're blackmailing the Vatican to be pro-Vatican II, pro-Judaism.
	Otherwise, they will reveal this.
	I take that with a grain of salt.
	I haven't seen any proof for that, but it's an interesting theory.
	It says, the church has been actively pursued a dialogue with Judaism, but a major impediment has been a continuing popular myth that the Jews of Jesus' time rejected him.
	However, the thesis in what follows is that the vast majority of Jews and the Jewish authorities of his time not only accepted Jesus as the Messiah, but for that very reason, intentionally precipitated his death.
	The Jews are, and this is a myth.
	Jesus didn't exist.
	This is all mythological, but it shows that the Jews had to kill him because that's what they're supposed to do to their Messiah.
	He has to atone for their sins.
	He has to be rejected like Joseph was sold by his brothers and goes and rules over the Gentiles.
	So they fulfilled the prophecies by sacrificing their goat, Jesus.
	For example, the fourth gospel, John 11, 49, indicates that the Pharisees and high priests ultimately accepted Christ when they became convinced that he embodied the resurrection and acting on a Jewish oral scripture that the Messiah must, quote, die for the people.
	Zohar 5, they instructed their followers to call for his death and thereby inaugurate the millennium.
	And that's the age of the Gentiles.
	Bjorknis believes it's the age of Pisces with the two fish, the twin Messiahs.
	They instructed their followers to call for his death and thereby inaugurate the millennium.
	If so, this could explain why the Jews are said to have shouted Hosanna on one day and crucify him a week later.
	Various Hebrew texts support such an interpretation and will be discussed later.
	Jews believe in Jesus.
	According to Luke, the common Jewish people flock to Jesus.
	For example, the first 5,000 Christians were Jews.
	That's in Acts 4.
	Moreover, there was the requirement that Gentiles had to convert to Judaism before they could join the Jerusalem church of Peter and James, Acts 15.
	Even some Pharisees acknowledge Christ, albeit grudgingly, Nicodemus, a leading Jew, hailed him as a teacher who comes from God.
	Rabbi Gamalil, a member of the Sanhedrin and later Paul's teacher, declared, if Christianity comes from God, you, members of the Sanhedrin, will not only be unable to destroy it, but you might find yourselves fighting against God.
	Elsewhere, the Sanhedrin itself concluded, it is obvious to everybody in Jerusalem that a miracle has been worked through Christ's disciples in public, and we cannot deny it.
	And it says also, the Midrash, the Talmud states, the son of Rabbi Joshua ben Levi had a choking fit.
	He, Rabbi Joshua, went and brought one of the followers of Jesus to relieve his son's choking.
	This is in the Midrash.
	And according to medieval rabbi Menachem of Speyer, a Christian may be permitted to heal a Jew even if he invokes the aid of Jesus and the saints.
	So, in other words, kosher healings from Jesus are kosher to rabbis.
	Even Maimonides, the Rambam, top authoritative rabbi in Judaism, says, quote, ultimately, all the deeds of Jesus of Nazareth will only serve to prepare the way for the Messiah's coming and the improvement of the entire world.
	Mishneh Torah, the top, I can't underestimate this.
	You hear so many Christian anti-Semites online saying, oh, Jesus, they hate Jesus so much.
	No, it's not true.
	It's not the full truth.
	It's only a half-truth.
	And it's disingenuous to frame it that way.
	The top rabbi in all of Judaism, Maimonides, says that Jesus is serving to prepare the way for the Messiah's coming and the improvement of the entire world.
	The official Orthodox view of Jesus is that Christianity was not an accident.
	It's part of God's plan.
	It's creating Noahides of the world and preparing the world for the Messianic age.
	Even Rabbi Tovius Singer says the same thing, that their prophecies wouldn't be able to be fulfilled if not for Christianity.
	Furthermore, a closely guarded rabbinic tradition holds that Paul was a devout rabbi who initially paganized Christianity by bringing it to the Gentiles in order to alienate it from his fellow Jews, thereby saving them from its supposed heresy.
	So, yes, this is a closely guarded Jewish secret that Paul, the founder of Christianity, and they believe this about Peter as well.
	I've got lots of clips.
	I've showed them in past videos recently saying these things, that they believe Paul and Peter on purpose created Christianity for the Gentiles to fulfill this messianic agenda and make them Noahide compliant.
	Despite the naivete of this later belief, so he believes, he says all these other beliefs are pre-Christian, but this one he says is later.
	I'm not so sure about that if he has the actual proof for that.
	Of this later belief, it indicates the extent to which early rabbis acknowledged the widespread acceptance of Christ among the Jewish populace.
	It started as a Jewish movement and it was innovated and evolved into a supposed rejection by the Jews and go to the Gentiles.
	The Talmud states, on the eve of Passover, Jesus of Nazareth was crucified.
	It doesn't say crucified, though.
	It says he was hung on a pole.
	For 40 days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, Jesus of Nazareth is going to be stoned.
	He was not stoned because he is guilty of practicing sorcery and enticing the people to apostasy.
	Anyone who can say anything in his favor, let him come forward and plead on his behalf.
	But since nothing was brought forward in his favor, he was crucified.
	Notice that that's not actually in the text.
	On the eve of Passover.
	Rabbi asks, do you suppose that he was one for whom a defense could have been made?
	And then he answered his own question by stating, no, because the Jesus of Nazareth, it was different.
	He was descended from royalty.
	The Talmud says that Jesus was descended from royalty.
	And then it says, at least one Jewish scholar suggests that historical reference to Christ in the Talmud may be historically accurate.
	I've also seen lots of arguments made that like in the Jesus the Jews never knew, talks about how they actually, the Talmud is not any good proof for an historical Jesus.
	According to the passage in the Talmud, Jesus was condemned for sorcery and apostasy and not for blasphemy, as the gospels contend.
	Charges that are far more probable since claiming to be the Messiah or even the Son of God did not constitute blasphemy in rabbinic law.
	I've heard lots of Jews say that.
	For example, the Talmud states, if a man say to thee, I am God, he is only a liar.
	If he says, I am the Son of Man, in the end, people will laugh at him.
	Now, the thesis of this essay, that's just the background knowledge.
	Now we're getting into the thesis, that the Jews of his time condemned Jesus to death in order to facilitate his messianic destiny.
	If this Kabbalah wanna be Sabbatean frankist rabbi is saying that the Jews had to kill Jesus, and this is what they did in the story, because they needed this to happen to fulfill the messianic agenda.
	Because there's prophecies about Mashiach bin David ruling the world, but they believed in two Messiahs back then.
	And there's also prophecies about the first Messiah, Messiah, son of Joseph, who is a heavenly high priest, dies and atones for the sin of the people of the nation of Israel.
	They refrain from testifying on Jesus' behalf, not out of fear or hostility, but in order to assist him in the fulfillment of his messianic destiny.
	And they say he proposes the final stage of this scenario, the decision of the Jewish elders to, quote, kill Jesus took place not out of hostility, but as an effort to fulfill Jewish prophecy that the Messiah must die for the people.
	I realize that this thesis flies in the face of Everything Christianity has taught for 2,000 years, but I believe there is valid evidence in it for it in the scriptural data.
	After seeing Jesus raise Lazarus, some of Mary and Martha's guests went to tell the Pharisees what he had done.
	And as a result, the chief priests and Pharisees called a meeting in John 11, 45.
	I cannot emphasize strongly enough for the importance of this meeting to our thesis that the Jews of his time called for Jesus' death, not as we are told out of hostility and rejection, but out of recognition of his messianic role and an attempt to precipitate it.
	So the Jews are just fulfilling their prophecies that the Messiah had to die.
	Even Jesus said this.
	And it's funny that this is written in 1996 because I first learned about this in one of Bjorknis' book.
	Christopher John Bjorknis' Beware the World to Come cites this same verse in John, same exact verse in John, and makes the same exact interpretation of this and what this means and how this means Christianity is a deception.
	And it's this verse right here in John.
	Then the chief priests and Pharisees called a meeting.
	Here is this man working all these signs, that signs of the Messiah.
	They said, and what action are we taking?
	If we let him go on this way, everybody will believe in him and the Romans will come and destroy the holy place of our nation.
	One of them, Caiaphas, the high priest that year, said, You don't seem to have grasped the situation at all.
	That's a hint there right there that this is what's really going on.
	There's some esoteric stuff going on here.
	You fail to see that it is better for one man to die for all the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed.
	He did not speak in his own person.
	So he didn't actually say this.
	And this is all mythology.
	There's no eyewitness that explained this to John or Mark, any of the gospels that was here on the inside of the high priest meeting of him saying these things.
	This is all written from scripture, fake fulfillment of the prophecies.
	So Caiaphas, the high priest, he did not speak in his own person.
	It was as high priest, he made this prophecy.
	And they believe that the high priest has the power of prophecy.
	That Jesus was to die for the nation.
	What nation?
	The nation of Israel.
	And not for the nation only, but to gather in unity the scattered children of God.
	From that day, they were determined to kill him.
	So it says even in the New Testament that they decided to kill him in order for him to die for the nation, the Jewish nation, and to gather the lost sheep of Israel, scattered children of God, and to go to the Gentiles also.
	So Bjorknis writes this in his book, Beware the World to Come.
	I think it came out in 2020.
	And now, once again, one of his theories vindicated the proof found that this is indeed what Kabbalah Jews really do believe.
	Now it gets even deeper.
	Thus the high priest and all the Jewish leaders assembled with him agreed that Jesus must die not only for the salvation of Israel, but to gather together in unity the scattered children of God.
	In other words, to fulfill the messianic commission.
	It is for this reason to actualize the Jewish prophecy that the Messiah must die for the people and gather the scattered children of God.
	That the Jewish leaders determined to kill him, kill him in quotes, because they didn't actually kill him, and not as we have been told by 2,000 years of Gentile Christian history, because they and the Jews whom they led despised and rejected him.
	Now, I want to show some of these verses now.
	John 11, 47 to 53 says here, you do realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish.
	He did not say this on his own, but as high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus would die for the Jewish nation.
	Jesus died for the Jewish nation.
	And not only for the nation, but also for the scattered children of God to bring them together and make them one.
	Now, in Bjorknis' book, Beware the World to Come, right after he shows that verse, he shows this verse, Matthew 1, 21.
	She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus.
	And that's a prophecy from, it used to say, it's from, I think it's Isaiah.
	It says his name will be Emmanuel, but they change it to Joshua.
	Joshua is the Amalekite slayer.
	And because he will save his people from their sins.
	So Jesus is to die for the Jewish nation, and he will save his people.
	Who are Jesus' people now?
	Who are his people?
	Who did he come for?
	Matthew 2.2 saying, where is he that is born king of the Jews?
	He came for the Jews to save the Jews.
	And the rejection in Christianity and all of it is ultimately benefiting the Jewish messianic agenda and prophecy.
	He is born King of the Jews, King of the Jews.
	These deliberations by the Jewish leaders are notable for several reasons.
	First, it was not the signs Jesus performed to which they objected, but rather their possible effect on the Romans.
	Indeed, the Pharisees and chief priests were not at all concerned that everybody will believe in him or even if he was deserving of their belief, which implies they felt he was, but rather that as king of the Jews, i.e.
	the Messiah, he posed not a threat to them, but to Roman rule and therefore this political stability of the Jewish nation.
	If they accept him as they are beginning to think they should based on a tat ha-Mashiach, signs of the Messiah, which is another book, they run the risk of provoking their Roman rulers.
	The dilemma is resolved by Caiaphas, the high priest, speaking.
	It should be noted as a prophet, he proclaims that Jesus must be executed, not as punishment for claiming to be the Messiah, but on the contrary, to fulfill his messianic destiny.
	Jesus, he says, must die for the nation of Israel and not for the nation only, but to gather together in unity the scattered children of God.
	Caiaphas is calling on the authority of Jewish oral scripture.
	The first part of his prophecy that Jesus must die for the nation parallels the Jewish pre-Christian oral scripture.
	And notice he says Jewish pre-Christian is from the Zohar.
	When God desires to give healing to the world, he smites one righteous man among them and through him gives healing to all.
	A righteous man is never afflicted save to bring healing to his generation and to make atonement For it.
	This is also what it says in Daniel 9 that the Messiah must be cut off and the temple destroyed.
	And then in Isaiah 52 and 53, the suffering Messiah has to die, be rejected, be mocked, and atone for the sins and inequities in one day.
	The plan all along was for him to die.
	So to get mad at Jews for Jesus dying is being sucked in to their paradigm and getting upset for the wrong reasons.
	A righteous man is never afflicted save to bring healing to his generation and to make atonement for it.
	Significantly, the atoning Messiah of Judaism not only dies for the people, but also rises from the dead after three days, as shown in another Jewish oral scripture, the Atat HaMashiach.
	The Messiah ben Joseph will be slain and lay in the streets for three days.
	Then the prophet Isaiah will go and revive him.
	The whole passion narrative comes from Psalms 22, 23, and 24.
	The death, the burial, and the resurrection is derived completely from the Psalms, completely from the scriptures.
	Wisdom of Solomon, Daniel, Zechariah, Isaiah, it's all there in many other verses.
	This is Kabbalistic, Pesher, Midrashic, creating a new myth from the old prophecies.
	Mishnah by Maimonides states: if a king will arise from the house of David who gathers the dispersed of Israel, as Caiaphas believes Jesus could do, he is definitely the Messiah.
	So Caiaphas, when deciding to kill him, also acknowledged that Jesus was going to fulfill the role of gathering the lost sheep of Israel.
	Yeah, Romans 11:11 rebellious Goy says, salvation was extended to Gentiles in order to make the Jews jealous.
	That's a great point.
	And it says, Paul also says, all of Israel will be saved.
	You're just second fiddle, Gentiles that worship Jesus.
	Oh, we're grafted into the Jewish covenant now.
	We're like the dogs getting the scraps of the table from Jesus.
	I say, have they stumbled?
	Have the Jews stumbled, says Paul, that they should fall?
	God forbid, Duvid.
	But rather, through their fall, salvation has come unto the Gentiles for to provoke them to jealousy.
	So the ultimate reason that the Gentiles are allowed to even supposedly get this new covenant is to only for the larger purpose of provoking the Jews to jealousy.
	So it's still ultimately about them.
	Jesus has fulfilled the signs of the Messiah, and therefore, according to Jewish oral scripture, he must enter the next stage of the scenario, which is to die for the people in order to make atonement for his generation and unite the scattered children of God.
	Consequently, they determined to kill him, not as a punishment for his claims, but to catalyze his messianic vocation.
	In at least three passages from the Gospels, we're going to show these.
	Jesus alludes to some, alludes to the same Jewish messianic prophecies that may have prompted Caiaphas, whoever wrote John is what influenced this, and the elders to sentence him to death in order to fulfill his messianic mission to the Jewish people.
	These were he must be killed by the pagans.
	That's what they say, that he was handed over to the Gentiles.
	That's why they changed it so Rome was involved in the death also.
	And so they can later switch it and stop blaming Jews and start blaming the Romans.
	Lie dead for three days and later be resurrected as the conquering Messiah.
	He also seems to have known in advance that these Jewish leaders would sacrifice him to atone for the people, which suggests that he may have intentionally provoked them into doing so by his actions at the home of Mary, Martha, and Bethany.
	And these people that are so desperate to keep Christianity alive by keeping the myth of the historical Jesus alive can't see clearly and understand clearly what's going on until you realize this is all mythical.
	So here are these verses Matthew 16 20 and 20 through 19.
	Matthew 20, 17 to 19, Jesus predicts his death a third time.
	Now, Jesus was going up to Jerusalem on the way.
	He took the 12 aside and said to them, We are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be delivered over to the chief priests and the teachers of the law.
	So in other words, it had to happen.
	Mythologically, to fulfill prophecy, this is what had to happen.
	It didn't actually happen.
	This is all a ruse.
	This is all contrived, the contrived narrative.
	Is the chat frozen or something?
	I'm not seeing the chat.
	Refresh.
	odyssey's not even reloading now Hmm.
	Looks like I'm streaming green, pure green in OBS, but my Odyssey is not loading.
	We'll just continue, I guess.
	The Son of Man will be delivered.
	Oh, there it goes.
	There we go.
	Still not synchronizing.
	Jesus said, the Son of Man will be delivered over to the chief priests and the teachers of the law.
	They will condemn him to death and will hand him over to the Gentiles to be mocked and flogged and crucified.
	On the third day, he will be raised to life.
	So it's all fulfillment of the prophecy.
	Never actually happened.
	All part of the Jewish plan.
	This whole rejection is a ruse.
	It's a gambit that they took.
	Acts 2, 23, this man was handed over to you by God's deliberate plan and foreknowledge.
	And you, with the help of the wicked men, i.e.
	the Gentiles, the Romans, put him to death by nailing him to a cross.
	God's deliberate plan.
	So really, like most Christians do, Christians should be thanking the Jews for sacrificing their goat so they could have their scapegoat and their atonement and they could be grafted in in all these things.
	It's completely illogical to hate the Jews or blame the Jews.
	You're just getting caught up and playing their controlled opposition that turns assuming the role of Esau in Christianity that turns us into the villains that is a red herring that discredits us and makes us lose the moral high ground and acts as a shield for Judaism.
	And also, oh, wait, we're not there yet.
	Here, this is a top scholar, top Christian scholar, says the narrative to blame Jews for the death of Jesus is a, quote, literary device to fulfill prophecy, i.e., it didn't happen.
	This is fake prophecy fulfillment, and it's a deception.
	The Christian anti-Semitism trap blames Jews in the story, but scapegoats Esau, i.e., Gentiles, in the real world.
	Anxiety, right?
	I think it kind of anachronistically reads into those texts, political ideas that I find reprehensible today into texts of antiquity, where the nuances of the distinctions between Jewish groups, intra-Jewish dialogue, and even dialogue between God fears between Romans, people we would call pagans and Jews, is much more complicated.
	And the rhetorical aims of these literary authors often, you know, they can't anticipate what's going to happen, you know, in the mid-20th century that would cause exactly.
	But the truth is, we didn't have to wait to the 20th century for anti-Semitic wars.
	Passion play performances in the Middle Ages would routinely cause mob violence against the local Jewish community.
	Oh, in Spain?
	Yeah, conversion.
	I mean, the history is long and it's horrible.
	And it seems to me hard to deny that a good deal of Christian anti-Semitism over the last 2,000 years is rooted in that fashion narrative.
	Yes.
	I mean, Matthew has the crowd actually say his blood is on us and on our children.
	His blood is on us and our children.
	And even without reading this article, it came to me that that esoterically means that his blood is atoning for them.
	Like in Yom Kippur, they sprinkle the blood all over the place, and that's what the blood has the magic power that heals them of their sins.
	So by the blood being on them and their children, what they're really saying is they're healed for their sins from Jesus.
	This is like messing up.
	I don't understand.
	Every time I want to stream, my Twitter videos don't work.
	You know, if we look, it just doesn't even play at all.
	This is ridiculous.
	We point out in the mid-20th century that would cause exactly.
	But the truth is we didn't have to wait to the 20th century for come on.
	It's just really not going to play, huh?
	Annoying.
	I'm going to bring it up in another browser and see if it works.
	Although I don't think this worked last time.
	Anxiety, right?
	You know, if we point out with vigor.
	Unbelievable.
	If we point out with vigor the degree to which we anti-Semitism over the last 2,000 years is rooted in that fashion narrative.
	Yes.
	I mean, Matthew has the crowd actually say his blood is on us and on our children, the very generation that would suffer in the first Jewish war.
	And anti-Semites for centuries have used that.
	Absolutely.
	In fact, that's one of the curious things.
	It is, I absolutely agree with you.
	These authors definitely perceive themselves and at the time would have perceived themselves as Jews.
	And yet what they're doing is they're blaming that generation.
	In fact, that's what's sort of singled out in the literature.
	This generation is corrupt and awful and killed Jesus.
	And boy, they got their comeuppance in the Jewish war.
	Well, but sometimes there's also been the interpretation of, I don't know how quite to put this, but it had to happen that way for the prophecy to be fulfilled.
	So it's almost like, you know, we, we, that the intentionality we ascribe to that group, you know, that they did this maliciously.
	Well, they had to do it because if they didn't, the prophecy would not be fulfilled.
	And so as literary device, what I mean by that is as literary device to indicate, you know, how this remains an intra-Jewish movement and one that had to come to fulfillment, you know, it was required that this took place for it to, you know, you know, align the prophecy, right?
	And that's not an indictment on the Jewish people.
	That's right.
	A literary device to fulfill prophecy, so it had to happen.
	Does it get any more clear?
	It's exactly what this rabbi is saying, too.
	This is what they did, except it didn't actually play out in real life.
	It's fake.
	Read on the historicity of Jesus or nailed 10 myths about Jesus.
	It is a very strong case that Jesus never existed.
	And I see that my chat on Odyssey is just frozen, so that sucks.
	It says, they may have done so for their eternal salvation, viewed from the perspective of Caiaphas' prophecy and the Jewish oral scriptures that may have prompted it.
	Their assertion, his blood be on us and our children, can be taken to mean, as Paul later wrote, through his blood we gain our freedom, the forgiveness of sins.
	Moreover, the Jews who cried, crucify him and let his blood be on us, may have done so because they believed, as their oral scriptures had told them, that his sacrificial death would free them from sin and initiate the messianic era.
	We accuse this man, they said, of persuading people to worship God in a way that breaks the law.
	Notice that they are here condemning Paul and not Christ.
	But what was he teaching that was so seditious that the Messiah abrogated the law or Jesus was an incarnation of God?
	Unlikely.
	And what is this?
	The Talmud says, in order to give all of mankind the option of living according to the Torah precepts, the Lord offered it to each nation of the world, Gentile nation after nation, refused to accept it.
	Finally, the Lord approached Israel.
	Will you accept my Torah?
	This is their myth about how they got the Torah.
	Not only were they willing to receive the Torah, but they did so even before knowing what it contained.
	Not very Jewish to sign on the dotted line without reading the fine prints.
	Okay.
	Uh-oh.
	Oh, cloud fair timed out on Odyssey.
	Come on, man.
	we're getting attacked Odyssey is failing.
	I can't log in or super chat.
	Can't speak in the chat.
	That's what Saino to Yahweh just told me.
	Great.
	Great.
	Well, this will be up on archived and on bit shoot.
	So I can't speak in the chat.
	That's what it is.
	We're back up.
	Come on, Odyssey.
	We need you to work.
	Hey, it'd be nice to be on YouTube like everybody else, but I've had five channels banned for exposing the Judeo-deception.
	All right.
	Moreover, the same Gemara continues, the Gentiles will eventually regret their decision and plead, offer us the Torah again, and we shall obey it.
	But the Holy One, blessed be he, will say to them, you foolish ones among the peoples, He who took the trouble to prepare on the even on the eve of the Sabbath can eat on the Sabbath.
	But he who has not troubled on the eve of Sabbath, what shall he eat on the Sabbath, i.e., the Gentiles will not be around in the Messianic age.
	That's what that means, because they didn't keep the Sabbath.
	In other words, Gentiles are forbidden by rabbinic law from practicing Judaism because they rejected the Torah when it was offered to them.
	This belief was and is so strong that the Talmud and Midrash states: if a Gentile is learning Torah or keeping the Sabbath in the manner of the Jews, he is liable for capital punishment by the rabbinic court.
	That's how much they don't want you to become a Jew.
	On the other hand, according to the same sources, the proper observance of Torah for righteous Gentiles is Noahidism, in which they join the community of Israel by following the seven laws of Noah.
	It was within this belief system that the Jewish leaders brought Paul before the Corinth tribunal, not because he taught Christianity, but because he taught it to the Gentiles in a manner that was permitted them to worship as Jews.
	For that reason, I submit, and not because he taught Christ, they accuse him of persuading people to worship God in a way that breaks the law.
	This may have been another way of saying Paul is encouraging Gentiles to break the law by worshiping God as if they were Jews rather than Noahides.
	And in Acts, it does say that Peter and James made the ultimate decision that yes, Paul should teach to the Gentiles, teach them the Noahide laws, teach them these things and to stay away from idols.
	And it's basically the Noahide laws.
	Everybody interprets it that way.
	Christianity was set up to make the nations be Noahides.
	And they use Maimonides says Christianity is preparing the world for the Messianic age and Islam by making them Noahides, by making them worship the God of Israel and believe the Hebrew Torah is the word of God and the power of the prophets of the Hebrews.
	Paul's calling as apostle to the Gentiles opened Jewish Christianity to the Greeks and Romans.
	Two groups, this is important now, two groups notoriously hostile to Jews at the time.
	And what began as a Jewish sect under Peter and James in Jerusalem and was extended by them to the Gentiles in Antioch, if they either converted to Judaism or became Noahides, now became a distinctly Gentile religion.
	They set it up on purpose to make you Noahides, Christians.
	That's what it is.
	Cope with it.
	It's a deception.
	As the numbers of these Greek and Roman converts to Paul's church began to grow and outnumber its Jews, so did a gradual purging of its Jewish Christians and a distinctly anti-Semitic attitude ensued.
	And they've changed all that around now as it was always meant to be.
	Popular myth began to replace gospel truth among the Gentile members.
	New and better covenant Paul proclaimed to them.
	In their minds, some Jews became all Jews.
	For example, rather than some Jews having rejected Jesus out of hostility, which was true, this is a myth, it's not true, all of them did.
	Rather than some of them having called for his death out of blind malice, all of them had.
	Rather, some Jews having persecuted the apostles after the crucifixion, all of them did.
	As a result, it was not the Jews who rejected early Christianity, but early Christianity that rejected the Jews.
	And they were just following the doctrine that the Jews gave them.
	Had this not occurred, many traditional Jews today probably would be Christians.
	There are a lot of Christian messianic believers in Jesus, Jews for Jesus today.
	It's growing a lot, as it was always intended to at the end of the age.
	This is not as modern Gentile Christians who mistakenly believe in the divinity of Christ.
	That's like their main, only hang-up, their only difference, but as disciples devoted to the teachings and persons of a particular Zadok or Messianic figure.
	A little more here.
	One modern Hasid speaking for many Orthodox Hasidim stated, listen to this, this is important too.
	One Orthodox Jew speaking for many Orthodox Jews, I don't know how, I guess he's a leader or something, says, quote, we believe that Jesus was taken away from the Jews by the Gentiles.
	He was a great power.
	He could have been a great Talmudic scholar or Zadok, but he was drawn to the other side of the fence.
	In other words, he is gone over to the Citra Atra.
	He's with the Gentiles on the evil other side, the side of Esau.
	He is like this is what Messianic Jews believe, Rabbi Ariel Cohen, that Jesus is the Moshiach ben Joseph of the other side.
	He's on the other side.
	He's imprisoned in the foreign land, as return of the Kosher Pig author Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira says, imprisoned in the foreign land, that he is coming out of Edom.
	He's with Esau.
	He's with the Gentiles.
	He's the leader of the evil other side.
	The anti-Semitic prejudices of early Gentile Christians alienated Jesus from his later fellow, his later fellow Jews.
	It was not to mend this rent in a fabric of God that Zabbatai Zevi and later Jacob Frank made holy apostasy to Islam and Christianity respectively.
	This is so important now.
	In an archetypal sense, the breach between Jews and Gentiles goes back even further than the New Testament times to conflict between Jacob, the Madrashic father of the Gentiles.
	He means of the Jews.
	And now he quotes Genesis: Esau said to Jacob at their first and last reunion following the incident of the birthright, let us break camp and move off together.
	But Jacob replied, May it please my Lord to go ahead of his servant until I join my Lord in Seir.
	So that day Esau resumed his journey to Seir, but Jacob left for Sukkoth.
	And Seir is where Edom is, is where Esau supposedly lives.
	And there's Ovadia is all about Seir being destroyed, the mountains being slaughtered, everybody dying in Seir.
	So they claim like, oh, we're going to come together, but also they believe Esau was beheaded by Jacob's descendants.
	Seer also means goat, which likens the scapegoat Jesus to Esau, meaning if Esau is the scapegoat, Gentiles are the scapegoats of the sin that the priest puts on the scapegoat and gives off to a bribe to Satan.
	Thus, the descendants of Jacob, the Jews, and they make it seem like, oh, we're going to come together.
	You know, that's his nice way of putting it.
	But what else does it say about Esau and Jacob?
	Here's the Genesis 3.
	And I will put enmity between thee and Halsha, which is Yeshia.
	And 7, 14, and between thy Zarah and Herzer, it shall crush thy Rosh, thy head, And thou shalt strike his heel.
	So Jacob is to crush our heads, like they say, tread the wine press, tread on the skulls, and we only hit at their heels.
	And the idea is Jacob wrestles with Esau.
	Judaism wrestles with the Roman Empire, which they imposed basically through deception and manipulation, Christianity, a Judaism for Gentiles on the Roman Empire.
	Okay.
	Now, this is big.
	I really wish the chat was working.
	This is very annoying.
	I feel like I'm just alone recording a video instead of having a live stream.
	Really wish the chat was working.
	This is very annoying.
	I feel like I'm just.
	Thus, the descendants of Jacob, the Jews, and Esau, the Gentiles, again, another rabbi that believes this, which is just, this is what Judaism teaches: Jews are Jacob, Esau is the Gentiles, and Esau everywhere it says is going to be destroyed.
	Not everywhere.
	Some places it says there's going to be a tokun, and Esau is to serve Jacob, but also that Edom and Esau will be destroyed, especially in Kabbalah.
	Oops, come on, get out of the way.
	So it says: the Jews and the Gentiles, Esau and Jacob, have a long, unkept appointment to meet in Seer.
	And the Messiah is to go and destroy Seer.
	That mutual spiritual ground on which they are destined to be reconciled with each other and God.
	Some early Jewish leaders sought to bring about this mystical Toukun Tukun Olam through the radical conversion of their followers.
	And he's talking about Zabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank.
	Frank said, brought thousands of practicing Jews into Christianity.
	They basically infiltrated Islam and Christianity with their crypto Sabbatean frankist to shift it in the direction that they always wanted to.
	When you are fit to come to Esau to become a Christian, then the curse will be lifted from the earth.
	Centuries of, oh, and Jacob Frank promoted, said, oh, the Jews are so, hate Jesus so much, which led to Christian anti-Semitism pogroms on the Jews because of Jacob Frank.
	Almost like that's what the Jews actually wanted.
	Anti-Semitism benefits Jewry.
	Individual Jews suffer, but the whole, it makes it stronger and it's instrumental to their dialectic.
	Centuries of Christian misconceptions about the Jews continued to restrain Jacob from keeping his appointment with Esau.
	And now here's the end, final closing.
	This is big, too.
	You Gentiles that used to be so far from us, Jews, have brought very close to us.
	Oh, and who said this?
	Jacob Frank.
	You Gentiles that used to be so far apart from us, Jews, have been brought very close to us by the blood of Messiah.
	Oh, thanks to Jesus, the Jews and the Gentiles are all together now.
	Isn't it beautiful?
	For all according to their prophecies, where they're chosen, we're worshiping the God that chose them.
	For he is the peace between us and has made the two into one and broken down the barrier which used to keep us apart.
	This was to create one single new man in himself out of the two of them, to unite them both in a single body and reconcile them with God.
	Herein, I propose, lies the ultimate dialogue between Jacob and Esau.
	Each of us is called upon to create one single new man in himself out of the two of them and thereby unite them both in a single body and reconcile them with God.
	By this, his intervention, Jesus, the Jew, with the help of his fellow Jews, attempted to do just that by his sacrifice on the cross.
	God alone knows when and how the true meaning of that offering and the role of the Jewish people in it will be fully understood.
	In other words, only the insider Kabbalah fully understand that Christianity is a deception.
	And there was one other thing.
	There was a verse about that I wanted to elaborate on.
	We'll skip it, though.
	Maybe it'll come to me.
	So there you have it.
	Kabbalah rabbi says Jesus was just the Jews were just following their role, which is what the prophecies called for.
	That they want to unite the Noahide Christians for the end times with Esau and Jacob.
	It's all there.
	All there.
	Now, let's get into the.
	I would go to super chats, but Odyssey is broken.
	That sucks.
	Let's listen to some of these highlights from the Torah of Yeshua.
	You know, before we go there, let's read some of these.
	Jesus Armalus, written by this rabbi.
	Throughout biblical and later Torah literature, Rome, Europe, is always referred to as Edom.
	Edom is the biblical names given to Jacob's twin brother and sworn enemy, Esau.
	Therefore, all references to Edom.
	Oh, and you just think it's a coincidence.
	The Jacob and Esau dialectic makes it so clear that Judaism and Christianity are a Hegelian dialectic, that it's a dualism, the light and the dark.
	The thesis and antithesis creates a predetermined outcome.
	Christianity is part of the Judeo-paradigm, and it was set up to do that.
	Full spectrum dominance.
	Roman Catholicism has stood at the pinnacle of worldwide Christianity for nearly 2,000 years.
	In spite of it not being the only church, it is nevertheless the greatest, wealthiest, and most powerful church.
	As such, it was carried out the mission of its Edomite ancestor Esau and has mercilessly persecuted Jacob, the Jewish people, in the most cruel and unyielding ways, fulfilled their prophecy through Christianity.
	So sadistic.
	Let's see.
	Jesus, he is said to be the head of Edom, the king of Rome.
	Oh, we're talking about Armalus, an ultimately enemy of the Jewish people.
	Armulus thus is taught to both sit as head of the Catholic Church and the head of the nations of the United Europe.
	Armalus will represent the world body, the church which claims to represent the true Messiah of Israel.
	Armalas is thus said to be the anti-Messiah, or as the Christians refer to him, the Antichrist.
	How ironic.
	Okay, hold on.
	What makes the Christian term Antichrist so ironic is that Armalus, Antichrist, is to be the one who is to confront God's true Moshiach.
	The Christians who believe their Christ is, and also this could just be a retelling of Rome, Romulus, Rome killing Jesus.
	If this apocalypse of Zerubbabel story where they get this Armalus and Moshiach ben Joseph story was pre-Christian, which it very likely could be, even though it only showed up in the later documents, this could be where they were influenced that the Romans had to kill Jesus.
	Because I believe the Gospel of Peter is before the other Gospels, and the Gospel of Peter was in Hebrew and said it showed Jesus as the scapegoat.
	It had Herod and the Jews killing Jesus, and Pilate let him go.
	That was probably the original story because you wouldn't make up that story after the fact of the, if the real historical Jesus was actually killed by the Romans.
	How ironic that the one whom the Christians believe will lead them to world dominance will be none other than the archetype antagonist of both God and Israel.
	ahem
	Let us review the matter of Yeshu, Jesus, who he really was and is, and how is that he is to return to lead his church in the final and ultimate battle against his brother, the Jews.
	And it says, in Kabbalistic literature, it is explained that the soul of Yeshu, the soul of Jesus, whom the Christians embrace as their Messiah, had a number of previous incarnations prior to his famous life in second temple times.
	Yeshu is revealed to be the reincarnations of both Esau, Jacob's brother, as well as Cain, Abel's brother.
	And Cain came from Satan and Eve getting together.
	And this is what top reincarnation Kabbalist Isaac Luria of Lurianic Kabbalah that influences Chabad Lubavitch.
	They believe that Esau and Cain were men of violence, and so was Yeshua.
	They believe Jesus is the reincarnation of the satanic other side firstborn sons.
	Like he's the first coming of the Messiah.
	Yeshu exemplified the worst of what a human being was supposed to be.
	Our holy rabbis witnessing this in Yeshu's personality and behavior clearly saw within him the incarnate soul of the ancient enemy, Cain and Esau.
	Yeshu's soul and behavior revealed him to be Edom.
	The church throughout history has indeed remained faithful to the true intent and message of their founder, Yeshu.
	As Yeshu was a man of violence, he said he came not to bring peace but a sword, turn brother against brother, nation against nation.
	So has the church followed in his footsteps.
	Yeah, the church has done the dirty work of the Jews, eradicated paganism, giving the divine persecution to Jacob and spreading the Torah by the sword.
	Jacob lives by the sword and he serves his brother Esau lives by the sword and serves his brother Jacob.
	There has not been a more violent body in the history of mankind responsible for more death and suffering than the Catholic Church, he says.
	And then Armalus is none other than Yeshu himself reincarnated.
	But Moshiach ben David is going to destroy Edom and Esau also.
	So he's leaving that part out.
	Judging from this Midrash, the Christians will have their long-awaited second coming.
	Only their Christ and Antichrist will actually be one and the same person.
	Yeshua Esau will sit upon his throne as in the past, lust to usurp the position of his brother Jacob.
	I don't know where he's getting that because it says, in here, and then now we have top pope saying the mark of Cain is upon the church's foreheads.
	They've assumed the role of Esau, essentially.
	And they're going along with this Kabbalistic interpretation that the Jews have.
	They set up Rome to do this.
	Peter and Paul, they believe, were secret agents that went and set up the church and targeted the Gentiles.
	This fake rejection goes to the Gentiles, fake prophecy.
	Look at how it's all panned out.
	Look at how effectively this worked.
	All right, now let's get into these clips.
	Right from the start, let me just tell my Christian listeners: Merry Christmas to you.
	How can an Orthodox rabbi who's about to talk about Yeshua from historical point of view wish you a Merry Christmas?
	Honestly, because I mean it.
	You know, if you look into history, look at the development of humanity.
	Christianity played a very important role in humanities' evolution.
	Even Monmonides made a point of this.
	Hold on, what did he say?
	That's very important right there.
	Listen closely, Christians.
	Important role in humanities' evolution.
	Even Monmonides made a point of this.
	So, well, regardless of relationship of church to synagogue or Yeshu to Jesus, the church came on to the scene of an ancient world where in which things like human sacrifice and the like were still all too common.
	Oh, hello, crypto.
	Yes.
	His dog's name is Crypto.
	Don't ask why.
	Don't ask why.
	My canine son is here.
	Yes, boy.
	How are we?
	Crypto.
	The rabbi named his dog Crypto, please.
	You want to wish everybody a Merry Christmas, too?
	Okay.
	Merry Christmas from myself, the Rabbanites, from Crypto, Sierra, and even little Lovana.
	Okay?
	Okay, I just found the verse, the main thing that I've been thinking about that I wanted to share, the esoteric, deeper meaning of this verse now.
	Think about this concept.
	Oh, the chat's back up.
	Awesome.
	Now, back to this verse.
	Caiaphas, the high priest, said, you don't seem to have grasped the situation at all.
	You fail to see that it is.
	So think of it not as the high priest saying this, but as the Jews who came up with Christianity that wrote the gospels.
	It is better for one man to die for all the people than the whole nation to be destroyed.
	They were scared that the Romans will come and destroy them.
	In other words, they couldn't defeat the Romans by saying, here is our Moshiach.
	Here is our king, Moshiach ben David.
	He's going to help us rule and defeat the Romans.
	They knew they couldn't defeat the Romans.
	They knew that they weren't powerful enough.
	So that instead they said, we need to kill a Messiah and Get the Gentiles to follow this Messiah.
	That was the deception.
	It is better for one man, the Messiah, to die for all the people than for the whole nation to be destroyed.
	So they pretended to create a passive, non-violent Jewish movement to infiltrate Rome with psychological operation, with theological warfare.
	They knew that they couldn't have an actual kingly Messiah that would come and reign and defeat the Romans.
	They couldn't fake a kingly Messiah or a military Messiah that would destroy Rome, but they could come up with a mythical Messiah that they rejected and then coerce the Gentiles into following this Messiah, which is what they did.
	Jesus died for the nation of Israel, the Jews, and he came for his people and only for the lost sheep of Israel.
	Anyway, that's the concept there that I forgot that I wanted to get to.
	Think of it not as in, oh, this really happened and Caiaphas really said this, but the people that came up with this myth, it's better for us to kill the Messiah and seem like we're against him to set up the controlled opposition leader and get the Christians following like sheep, the Jewish Messiah.
	The objective and the goal of the Messiah all along was to conquer the nations, which was to make them his footstool.
	Make him his footstool, right?
	Let's see, where's the footstool verse?
	To make enemies under his feet, like 1 Corinthians 15, Paul says, then the end will come when he hands over the kingdom to God, the Father, after he has destroyed all dominion, authority, and power.
	The goal of their Messiah and Jesus, according to Paul, is to destroy all Gentile authority and power, for he must reign until he has put all his enemies who were the enemies of the ancient Jews that wanted a Messiah to redeem them, the Gentiles, the Romans.
	That's who the enemies are.
	For Jesus must reign until he has put all his enemies, i.e., the Gentiles, under his feet.
	Make them his footstool.
	Rule them with a rod of iron.
	Rule in the land of thine enemies.
	Make them trembling and prostrating themselves before you.
	Every tongue will confess and every knee will bow.
	That's the goal is to rule over the Gentiles.
	And the Christians are the willing slaves of this Messiah that was meant to conquer them all along.
	Behave yourself.
	So anyway, getting back to this, what I was saying here, you go back into ancient times, and people were like doing really bad stuff like human sacrifice.
	Everyone wants to talk about the deplorable invasion of the Europeans into the native Americas.
	Well, yeah, you know, the Aztak and the Mayans and all the rest, they weren't exactly.
	The idea that like all the Europeans and all the Gentiles would be doing human sacrifices, if not for Jesus and the Jews and for their moral law, supposedly, like we would have never grown out of that, or if maybe it's even exaggerated worse than it was.
	Christianity is a religion built on human sacrifice, built on the sacrifice of God's son, built on the Yom Kippur sacrifice of the two goats.
	Jesus represents the two goats of Yom Kippur, the day of atonement, and the Passover lamb, which they cooked in a meal and put the blood in the shape of a cross over their door so that the Holy Spirit would pass, the Holy Death Spirit would pass over all the Jews, all the Hebrews in Egypt.
	And another fake story.
	Exactly what we would call bastions of morality and go look up their history.
	And when Christianity came in, yeah, it was pretty nasty, but it got them to stop all those disgusting things that they were doing.
	Human sacrifices and the like.
	Even Mel Gibson, I believe even with Christendom.
	He's going to talk about apocalypto.
	Even with Christendom and our brothers and sisters in Islam, with all the political problems and infighting back and forth.
	Brothers and sisters, at the end of the day, they're ultimately brothers and sisters.
	They're all brothers of Abraham.
	Father Abraham had many sons.
	I used to sing that song at Bible Church.
	I am one of them, and so are you.
	So let's all praise the Lord, Yahweh, God of Israel.
	Jealous, genocidal God.
	Christians, Muslims, Jews are all Abrahamic brothers.
	Abrahamic conspiracy.
	Our two younger siblings have really brought a lot of evolution and development to the world.
	That's not my opinion alone.
	That's Monades, amongst many others.
	So when a Christian references Christmas, they don't argue and debate whether the historical Yeshua was born in the 25th of December on the Saturn El Yeo or whether it was some other time of year.
	I mean, you go with the Christian websites, even the Vatican, people will tell you that they know that 25th of December probably was not the birthday.
	So what?
	It's the message that counts, not the historosity of it.
	And Christianity.
	It's the message that they're worshiping the Jewish Messiah.
	Imagine thinking that Jews are upset that their prophecy has been fulfilled and all the nations worship their God and follow their Messiah.
	It's like they have a mock pretend hatred of this.
	It's so superficial.
	Makes Christians better human beings.
	I'm 100% all for it.
	So if you talk about Christmas and you say peace on earth and goodwill towards men, which is what Christmas is supposed to represent, not just presents and Santa Claus and the, I have always said, if you are a Christian and Jesus has meant something in your life, then I encourage and applaud and support your faith, regardless of who or what you are.
	If Jesus makes you whole and if Jesus makes you a better human being, then by all means you stand by Jesus.
	Dennis Prager says this.
	Ben Shapiro says this.
	This rabbi says this.
	Maimonides says this.
	The official Orthodox organizations say this.
	They don't hate Jesus.
	They love the fact that the nations are worshiping Jesus.
	Tovia Singer loves this.
	They don't like it when the Jews go and worship Jesus.
	They're meant to be kept separate and follow the commandments.
	And Jesus, in effect, is as Esau, as a reincarnation of Esau and his oversoul, Samael, Satan.
	He is the tempter.
	He is the prosecutor.
	He is seducing the Jews to fall away and do idol worship because Christianity is only considered idol worship, not because Jesus, but because they say Jesus is the Son of God or he's the same as God.
	Some of these missionaries I have found were very Jewish anti-Semites.
	And this is a problem because not all Christians are anti-Semites.
	Not all Christians teach anti-Semitism.
	Does anti-Semitism and Jew hatred continue to this day in certain circles of Christendom?
	But of course.
	And in case you haven't known, this is great.
	No.
	You have anti-Gentile, Gentileism in certain circles of Jews as well.
	I love that this rabbi admitted that.
	Anti-Gentilism in circles of Jews, i.e., Chabad Lubavitch, Kabbalah, other like them.
	You know, as they say, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
	Things go both ways.
	Most people aren't going to confront Christian anti-Semitism or admit to Jewish anti-Gentilism, right?
	Because the level of power between the two is so overwhelmingly off that who's going to pay attention.
	Well, we're going to pay attention.
	We in Judaism acknowledge Yeshua is historical.
	Yeshua lived.
	Not even a question about it.
	They want you to believe that Jesus lived.
	I just, Botiak wants you to believe that.
	He wants you to believe that.
	This book by Hai Maccabee, a Talmudic scholar, the mythmaker Paul and the invention of Christianity, they say, Jesus was a Pharisee.
	He was a real person.
	He was against the Romans.
	All these things like that.
	They don't want all the academic gatekeepers, they want the idea of some kernel of some historical Jesus has to be true.
	Otherwise, the whole thing looks like a lie.
	And then you see what was the motive for this lie?
	What agenda were they fulfilling with this lie?
	And then tugging on the thread of the sweater, the whole thing unravels.
	But when I, you know, like the Christian detractors try to say, oh, you're doing the work of the Jews saying Jesus didn't live.
	No, actually, they're all trying to get you to believe that he did live.
	Sora, Lord, the teachings about Yeshu that are brought down in the Talmud are far, far after the fact.
	The teachings about Yeshu in the Talmud.
	I'm not the first rabbi to mention this.
	Many others throughout all of history.
	Acknowledge and admit they're polemic.
	They are intentional, legendary stories, midrash, specifically intended to be derogatory.
	Why would Jews want to be derogatory against Christians?
	Oh my goodness.
	Are you familiar with the writings of the Christian fathers and what they wrote about the Jews?
	How Jews were dirty, rotten scoundrels, were all sons of the devil, all deserved to be damned to hell, were abandoned and cursed by God, on and on and on and on.
	Well, how do you think people are going to respond to such attacks?
	When you read the church fathers' attacks, this is first century, second century, vicious, vile attacks, which later became crystallized from the Catholic Church.
	Well, Jews in all the respect responded in like kind.
	So you have tit for tat, but from a scholarly point of view, we recognize that most of the stories, specifically those that have been organized in the, you know, the nefarious books like Toldoth Yeshu, the stories of Yeshua, this is all derogatory slurs, tit for tat.
	Now, you might remember recently, recently it's 500 years, I guess, Martin Luther.
	Martin Luther, famous founder of Protestantism, is renowned for his vicious anti-Semitism.
	I was quoted by Adolf Hitler all the time.
	He's the one who said, rather than convert a Jew, I'd rather tie a millstone around his neck and drown him in a well.
	Lovely, lovely Christian love.
	And the history of Christian hate for the Jews has created this narrative where they're the God's chosen suffered martyrs.
	They've always been persecuted.
	They're the eternal victims.
	And now nobody's allowed to criticize them and anybody gets censored and everybody sympathizes with them.
	Poor Jews, we shouldn't allow mean no more news to expose their religion and expose their influence because they've been persecuted so much by the Christians.
	It's created this whole narrative where anybody that, and then they write off actual things they do, dismiss it by saying, oh, that's just Christians, irrational anti-Semite Christians hating us for these ridiculous reasons that we killed God or that we're the synagogue of Satan.
	It's all played into the whole dynamic to where you can't criticize them in the end times, which is one of their prophecies that nobody will be able to speak their mouths at them.
	The historical Yeshu.
	Who was he?
	When you look at Matthew and what he wrote about the virgin birth, Matthew didn't mean a virgin birth.
	He never met the virgin birth.
	He is making the reference to Isaiah 7.14 in a traditional Jewish way of what we call Midrash.
	Again, the gospel writers were using Midrash, taking Isaiah 7.14 out of context and making up new stories from old prophecies and verses of the Jewish scriptures.
	It's Midrash.
	That means it's myths.
	It didn't actually happen.
	They know this.
	Where in which it is meant to give a symbolic representation and association?
	The child who is referred to in Isaiah 7.14, behold, a woman is pregnant.
	She's going to give birth.
	That child was born in the next chapter in Isaiah chapter 8.
	It was meant to be a sign of the day.
	But it was a special child to be born, a special symbol.
	That's what Matthew, the Talmud of Yeshu, is trying to say.
	He called Matthew the Talmud of Yeshua.
	This is how kosher these rabbis think Christianity is.
	He calls it the Talmud of Yeshu.
	Matthew, the Gospel of Matthew.
	Yeshu, born, raised a Jew.
	All of his tongue, them were all Jewish.
	They lived in Israel.
	They spoke Aramaic.
	Oh, by the way, for the record, his name, according to our Masorah.
	So, speaking of another really powerful point to prove that these are all myths and didn't happen is the Gospels are written, and Paul, they put words into Jesus' mouth, but they really are coming from the Old Testament, but not the Old Testament in Hebrew.
	They're coming from the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Tanakh of the Old Testament.
	If the New Testament is written in Greek, and they're using the Septuagint in saying that these things happened, and this person said this, or this person said that, but they're not citing it from Hebrew scriptures or Aramaic, which supposedly these things were really said in their actual tongue.
	If they're written from the Septuagint, this is proof that it's new myths from the old myths, not that this is historical things that actually happen.
	We should know because it was our nation was not Yeshua.
	It was not Yehushua.
	He had an Aramaic name, which was common in the day, and it was Yeshu.
	Now, some later hundreds of years after the fact came and made of that an insult.
	Yudhinvab stands for Yamashimova Zichrono.
	Okay, that's an after-the-fact thing.
	It stands for may his name be blotted out.
	He says it's after the fact.
	I don't know about that because they also say, May his name be blotted out about Haman and the Purim story of Esther, who was also hung, crucified, essentially, like Jesus.
	They use the same word in Greek for both of those.
	And may his name be blotted out is what they say about Amalek.
	And Jesus is Esau/slash Amalek, basically.
	That's not the history of it.
	That's not where it came from.
	This is the Messora.
	This is why we call him Yeshua.
	Yeshua wasn't exactly the greatest tadik that many people want to make him out to be.
	We'll skip that one.
	The Bianjay Lee Lincoln book, Holy Blood.
	The historical Yeshu was a very violent man.
	And people, where's the proof of that?
	Well, think not that I've come to bring peace.
	Yeshua said I've come to bring a sword.
	Oh, that's symbolic.
	Well, here's an example of the symbolism.
	You might remember the fact that it's not that Jesus is violent.
	It's that the Messiah is violent.
	He treads the wine press.
	He smites the nations.
	All these things like this.
	He's a conqueror.
	Jesus, the rejected Messiah, was the theological mind control conqueror.
	And when they roll out whoever this second coming character Moshiach figure is going to be, he's going to be the one that really cuts off Esau and Edom and Gog and Magog, Ishmael and Esau, Islam, and Christianity.
	Famous story when Peter is in the Garden of Gethsemane with Yeshua and he's on guard.
	Talks about how he cut off his ear, right?
	He's got a sword.
	And he gets pounced on, according to the story, by the temple guard.
	Peter takes out his sword, cuts off the ear of the servant of the high priest.
	Let me tell you something.
	Any of you know martial arts?
	And this is so dumb because he's acting like all of this really happened.
	That, oh, the Romans and the Jews really showed up to Jesus and Peter pulled out his sword and cut off his ear.
	That did not happen.
	That's a prophecy.
	In that verse, it even says, oh, and let the scriptures be fulfilled.
	And it's a prophecy.
	I just was reading it in a book yesterday about some obscure verse about an ear being cut off.
	That's what they pulled it from.
	Every bit, every little tidbit of the story in the Gospels, the passion narrative, the nativity, it's all derived not from historical events, but from the Hebrew scriptures, from the Greek Septuagint scriptures, actually, to be more specific.
	This is what Yeshu says.
	Quote, but bring here these enemies of mine who did not want me to rule over them and slaughter them in my presence.
	That's what Yeshua said.
	Remember, that's not part of that's what they wanted the Christians to do because they wanted everybody to when you look at Yeshu's teachings, they were pretty much Jewish.
	There was nothing greatly significant in what he taught.
	Most Christians are not familiar with the Judaic origins of what Yeshu taught.
	And therefore, when they hear some of his profound and wise teachings, they don't know that he's quoting our sages.
	He's quoting Rabbi Yakiva.
	Well, not Rabbi Kivite afterwards.
	He was quoting Rabbi Hillel.
	He was quoting some of the other great sages of the day.
	So Koshus.
	He was at that time.
	If Yeshua was not of the violent character that he was, he might very well have just been another Tana and reading about him in the Mishnah, like Rabbi Yossi or any of the others.
	Could have happened, but it didn't.
	What was known and understood?
	What was known and understood about Yeshua was known because of the oral traditions.
	Judaism's a big oral tradition guy.
	This is what we are.
	And somebody also, the missionaries today want to make an association to Yeshua with the character called Mashiach Ben Yosef, the suffering Messiah who comes before Ben-David.
	I think he's wrong about this.
	Oh, that's all very well and nice.
	But if you look through history, I don't think that the concept of Mashiach ben Yosef existed in the day of Yeshu historically.
	He's wrong.
	It did.
	Carrier proves that.
	He has a chapter proving that in his book.
	There was also in the Qumran schools, there was a Messiah of Aaron and a Messiah of David.
	Also, Melchizedek Scroll plays into the Messiah that has to die.
	Daniel 9 and Isaiah 52 connects those.
	And because Moshiach ben Joseph is in the Talmud, the Jews would have not put that in there after the fact when Christians were already saying that Jesus was the suffering Messiah character.
	They wouldn't be putting verses in their Talmud that the Christians could point to and say, hey, that proves Jesus after the fact, which proves that that must have been their oral law even before Christianity.
	And it's very clear to see the suffering Messiah character that dies, especially from Daniel 9 is the big one and Isaiah 53.
	And Psalms, what is it?
	Psalms 22, 23, and 24.
	It's all there has the Messiah dying.
	Even Zachariah, the Messiah, Zachariah 12, 10, he'll be pierced and scourged like the scapegoat.
	Let's read some super chats here real quick.
	I see the super chats are back up.
	Upside down with $25.
	Thank you so much.
	Says, can you contact Jaron at Jaronism on Telegram and co-host a show already?
	Jaron is very knowledgeable on the Bible and so forth.
	I'll talk to him about the Bible, but I don't want to discredit my work with flat earth stuff.
	I'm sorry.
	A Disposable says, today's my birthday, so life and luck in the Gematria of my donation to you.
	I'm literally holding Luther's book in my hands as he talks about it.
	Was wondering if you've read it.
	He brings up many issues, yet strangely neglects mention of Amalek, Esau, and Edom.
	Sounds woefully oversight.
	Yes, I actually do have his book and have read it.
	And I find it disgusting.
	I find the things he says about Jews disgusting and discrediting and indefensible and doing more harm than good.
	And it's so indefensible that now the Jews get to go, oh, they've always hated us.
	We've always been the victims.
	You guys have been so mean to us.
	So now nobody's allowed to criticize us anymore.
	And we're justified uniting and fighting like hell to fight against you.
	That kind of stuff.
	Woo-woo says: if anyone's interested in Aura Linda, you know, I looked up Aura Linda and it says it's a fraud and it's a forgery.
	But I will check out Asha Logos's YouTube channel if he's covering it.
	Our subverted history.
	I'll get that safe for later.
	Thank you, Woo-Woo.
	Jojo, Nora, says nothing but $5.
	Thank you.
	Garrett Masterpiece McCluskey says, Bro, have you seen Europa the last battle?
	Haha, just kidding.
	Yes, I've seen it many years ago.
	Say no to Yahweh says, Anatoly Golitzin, New Lies for Old.
	I've got that one too.
	I've read that one.
	It's been a few years ago, but I read that one too.
	I don't see it on my shelf right here.
	Oh, yeah, there it is.
	New lies for old.
	I don't know why you're saying that, but thanks to say no to Yahweh.
	Upside down guy, already read that one.
	Liam T. Jarrett says, Yes, figuring out Jesus is strictly myth is the biggest threat, I think, to this whole Judeo-Abrahamic ruse, and they do not want that.
	I watched a really good video.
	I think the YouTube channel's Jesus Never Existed.
	He sees it exactly like I see it with all these academics.
	See, biblical academia has been dominated by Christians and religious people for a long time.
	And only now they have like the new, the new age Christian scholars, where it's like they still kind of admire Christianity and they still admire Jesus and they still like to keep the idea of some kernel of a historical Jesus alive.
	Richard Carrier has smashed it.
	Richard Carrier has Bart Ehrman's number and all these other guys, Dennis McDonald, all the rest of them.
	A disposable mail, we read that.
	And Variety Channel says, Great stream, a suggestion, make many videos showing the true meaning of the quotes that Christ Cucks like to use, such as the millstone around their neck, blood be on our heads and our children, etc.
	And people can link them to your vid.
	They only have a dozen or so.
	That's true.
	That is a good idea.
	Thank you, Variety Channel.
	We hold, right, by the Midrash of Shimon Kepha that Paul was actually sent by the Sanhedrin to infiltrate the movement, to neutralize their messianic military movement by spiritualizing it.
	Pretty much, he went into a militant movement with the equivalent of New Age teachings and tried to Gnostic teachings.
	They knew that a military approach wasn't going to work, so they tried the passive approach, the nonviolent approach, so that it will be adopted by the Romans and that they could Noahide and Judaize the world through theological warfare.
	And this is the, what did he call this book?
	This is him explaining how they think Peter and Paul are secret agents of the Jews.
	We hold, right, by the Midrash of Shimon Kepha that Paul was actually sent by the Sanhedrin to infiltrate the movement, to neutralize their messianic military movement by spiritualizing it.
	Pretty much, he went into a militant movement with the equivalent of New Age teachings and tried to soften it up.
	Little did he know where it went.
	But if you actually read in Paul, read Romans, reread Galatians.
	He wasn't this anti-Torah guy.
	Not at all.
	You really got to understand Paul from a rabbinic point of view.
	He's doing traditional Talmudic pillpool if you really pay attention.
	But people without the Judaic background don't know how to pay attention to this.
	The esoteric secrets go right over the heads of the little babes, the little Christians that believe things, believe all this literally instead of the esoteric secrets.
	Stand Paul from a rabbinic point of view, he's doing traditional Talmudic pillpool.
	Paul's doing traditional Talmudic pill pull, creating the gospel of Jesus, the crucifixion of Jesus, the heavenly Messiah.
	And all of the gospels are based on Paul.
	They're all Pauline in nature, especially Mark and Mark, Matthew, and Luke copied Mark.
	And Paul's letters all came before the Gospels.
	If you really pay attention.
	But people without the Judaic background don't know how to pay attention to this.
	Doesn't matter what you want to believe about Messiah.
	But in Torah, in our Judaic tradition, we have a whole ocean of ideas and beliefs about the Messiah.
	Most of them are what we call Kabbalah or Angada or Midrash.
	In other words, they're the ideas, the beliefs of their individuals.
	So Christianity is Midrash, and it's very similar to Kabbalah, like I've always been saying.
	Authors, and they're mostly symbolic and representational as opposed to literal.
	In the days of the Second Temple, there's a lot of guys like this who wrote within that context.
	And symbolic stuff, Midrashic stuff, all got interpreted literally.
	And that's a problem.
	Question here: who was Yeshua's father?
	We don't know.
	Son of Joseph.
	No.
	It could have been this guy, Pandera.
	It could have been Joseph.
	We don't know.
	It's irrelevant from a Jewish people.
	Yeshua is just a small footnote in our history.
	Yeah, right.
	It makes them better people rather than sacrificing to Molech or worshiping Baal or doing human sacrifices.
	All the better.
	Let them believe in Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, whatever they wish.
	Let them worship Yeshua.
	That's what he says.
	Oh, they hate him so much.
	Let them let the goi worship Yeshua.
	And like Rombaum says, God used Christianity for the purpose of elevating humanity.
	I don't got a problem with that.
	I think that's pretty good.
	God used Christianity to elevate humanity, Judaism's top rabbi.
	You are out there to attack Christianity.
	I'm going to fight you.
	Oh, he'll defend Christianity.
	Actually, correct within Torah?
	Of course not.
	We all know that.
	We're different faiths.
	Deal with it.
	It wasn't supposed to be Torah compliant.
	It's supposed to be a form of idol idol worship for the goi.
	The book of Revelations was originally a Jewish book.
	Clear as a bell.
	It was a Kabbalistic visionary stuff.
	It's, of course, been edited over and over again.
	And to try to get to the bottom with the original authentic Jewish form was next to impossible.
	Righteous Christians, Righteous Jews, we have so much in common.
	Yes, you do.
	Disagree on theology?
	So what?
	Minor disagreements over Jesus.
	Wish my fellow Christians out there.
	Merry Christmas.
	Okay?
	My fellow brothers and sisters, that's what I really should say.
	Because I have faith.
	I have faith in the hand of God.
	I have faith in the path of God.
	And anybody who wants to walk with God and is going to be righteous about it and decent and moral and honest.
	You're okay in my books.
	And you're always going to be welcome here at our kosher Torah school.
	Kosher Torah School.
	All right.
	Want to finish off with one last verse.
	This is a great one from ReligioWatch to top it off.
	Rabbi Tovia Singer says, Without Christianity, their prophecies couldn't have taken place.
	Without Caiaphas in the story, Caiaphas, the high priest, deciding to kill Jesus to fulfill the prophecy of the Messiah dying, their prophecies would not be fulfilled.
	It's all part of the plan.
	It's all a deception.
	It's all a midrashic mythology.
	Christians just need to deal with it.
	So why prior to the destruction of the Second Temple, all religions were very dissimilar to Judaism.
	All religions were pagan.
	So it's interesting that two religions based on Judaism would emerge as soon as the temple would be destroyed.
	Why?
	The central feature of the Mashiach is that the Gentiles will immediately, when the Messiah comes, recognize their error and they'll turn to the Jews and say, you're right, and we were wrong.
	So let's take Christianity as an example.
	If there was no Christian in Islam and the world would just fill today with the worship of Jupiter and all Mercury and all that, all that kind of those kinds of religions, that means that prophecy could not unfold.
	Prophecy could not unfold without Jesus.
	Exactly what is going to happen.
	And so, but without Christianity and Islam, both having an idea that there is one God, that God was acting with the Jews, but for some reason, the Jews did something terribly wrong.
	But what is key is they both will recognize, they recognize the idea of a Mashiach.
	Both Islam and Christianity recognize the idea of a Moshiach.
	These dumb Christians are like, you're just like the Jews.
	You don't believe, you reject Jesus like the Jews.
	No, you believe in a Messiah in the first place, like the Jews.
	You both want Moshiach ben David to rule the world according to the Hebrew Torah.
	You guys have everything in common.
	You're the Abrahamic brothers.
	You're the Noahide-compliant, or not totally compliant, but Noahide stepping stone religion.
	That there were mitzvahs, and there's a one God monotheistic orientation.
	The epic of the Messianic age now could be triggered at any moment.
	The kinetic energy is now all in place.
	Well, that means everything has to shift.
	It gets the world into a monotheistic orientation with the idea of believing in the Torah is the word of God and so on.
	And that the Jews were at one time right, but they just blew it.
	They missed the boat.
	What happens when Mashiach comes?
	They go, the Jews, after all this time, we realize now were right.
	And then we have Jeremiah 16.
	And the Gentiles will come to you and say, surely we've inherited lies in vanity.
	There's no truth.
	Without Christianity, these Messianic prophecies could never have taken place.
	Without Christianity, these messianic prophecies could have never taken place.
	And this is an Orthodox rabbi, Tovia Singer, who does videos every day exposing Christianity, but yet he still believes that it had to take place, that it's part of God's plan.
	Like the Kabbalah rabbi article we started with, that the story of the Jews killing Jesus had to happen to fulfill the prophecy.
	This is all a deception.
	It's a Judeo-conspiracy.
	Wake up.
	Let me know what you guys have to say in the comments below on BitChute and Odyssey.
	Support the channel.
	Sign up monthly donations on Odyssey.
	I can't do this without you.
	Thank you so much to everybody with the super chats.
	If you see anybody online or anybody saying the Jews hate Jesus, there's nothing they fear more than Christianity.
	Send them this video.
	Send them the playlist, Christianity Deception Exposed from My Odyssey as well.
	Don't let these false talking points keep spreading all over the internet.
	We got to wake people up to this lie.
	And one more super chat.
	Runa says, I'm hoping to see Adam's last debate on Crucible.
	I missed it.
	Are you able to post it soon, Adam?
	It's on D Live.
	I don't know if it's still up on D Live.
	I need to do a screen record.
	Andrew at the Crucible said he was going to send me a copy of it.
	He didn't want to put it up on YouTube because we talked about Jews so much.
	He thought it would get censored.
	But I beat the guy so bad that they kicked him off, is how it went down.
	But anyway, I got to end the stream.
	Love you all.
	See you all again very soon.
	Friday, Friday night.
	I'm having on Ed Zoll, formerly of True News, to have a Bible study.
	You guys will all want to be there.
	It's going to be a good one.
	Ed's my buddy.
	He's a good guy.
	True Earth, a little shuckle for the Adamites.
	07.
	And my channel, thanks again, Adam.
	This is so important.
	Thank you, my channel.
	You're awesome.
	All right.
	Love you all.
	Everybody have a nice night.
	I will see you again soon.

▲