Christchurch, Gaza/Tel Aviv, & Yellow Vests | KMN LIVE #2
|
Time
Text
And we're live.
Adam Green here with No More News Live.
It's March 16th, 2019.
Thanks for joining us.
I'm joined with my friends Nathan over at Lift the Veil.
Lift the Veil.
And my friend Ryan at The Last American Vagabond.
Both return guests.
What's up, guys?
Thanks for uh chatting with me this weekend.
Pleasure to be here, brother.
Good to be here.
So um we're gonna get into first and foremost, like with the title, the Christ Church shooting in New Zealand, and then a little bit of the Gaza Tel Aviv latest um events and a little bit of the yellow vest and whatever comes up, you know, casual, whatever comes up in the chat.
So uh first, Nathan, I wanted to uh bring up something that you just showed me about, and that is uh, by the way, your channel just got back, you were suspended a week, correct?
And had some kind of ordeal.
Yeah, I was suspended a week.
I I they may have taken down or put in limited state as many as 15 or 20 videos.
Um seven were combined into you know, two strikes.
Um, but the the ban just lifted, so I posted the one video I'd made on my backup channel about Christ Church um so far, but yeah, that's what happened.
A lot of videos gone, and and uh what you're gonna what I showed you is some of the reason for it.
I can tell you about the different kinds of videos and stuff, but you know, mass shootings are one of the things that they definitely knew that.
You know, in our videos, we've already been basically saying, you know, the event that we can't talk about anymore, or else it's just like a known thing that your YouTube channel yeah, hope videos and channel will will come down.
So um you were gone, we covered it, you were on uh about a week ago, and we covered how you got like bot attacked, or not bot attacked, but uh mass flagged, like the algorithms picked up a bunch of videos all in the same minutes like has happened to so many other people.
It's weird how it's just like so random how it'll just attack somebody and then it'll get somebody now, you know what I mean?
It it's bizarre.
I mean, I think I know uh I covered you know what people called a I don't even know what I can say.
There's a shooting that happened on TV that some people had questions about.
This guy, the father of the person who was uh you know, shod allegedly, um, wrote an article about how we need to ban conspiracy theorists you know from ta spreading stories because that's what caused grief for him and his family, and it was just ridiculous and anybody thought this thing wasn't real and all that, and I kind of went over the stuff, and I think they got pissed off.
I think they got pissed off and they just nailed me.
I don't know, it's kind of like punishment or something, but it was one video after another, and then a lot of videos were just straight removed without any strike.
That's a new thing they're doing.
I don't know if you guys have seen this stuff yourself, but for some reason they're combining videos and um multiple videos into strikes.
I've seen that before now.
And then just removing videos without giving you a strike.
I don't know if you guys have seen that, but I had a lot of videos.
They did that too in this time period too.
So it it seemed that when I that my first impression when it first started happening with you is you know, the mass flagging concept, which we know exists, and that it seems like it lines up with how it worked for you, right?
Like one after another, all included like in one similar kind of complaint.
You know, like somebody just got it under their skin to say we're gonna gather our trolls and all flag.
And that shows you the flaw in their system though, that you can do that, you know.
Well, I'd like to think that was it, but the only problem is at least five four at least four, maybe five of the videos that are listed under my strikes were set to private.
So nobody could have flagged them.
Well, maybe that means they just did they dug further based on other people complaining or something.
But I thought didn't you tell me that even the flaggers aren't supposed to be able to see those videos when they're private?
A trusted flagger, if I wanted them to review the video, uh, couldn't see the video.
Yeah.
Even I couldn't watch the video in a lot of cases.
Well when I premiered my documentary, I I it was private or it was scheduled, nobody had seen it, and then they put it in limited state and didn't allow me to premiere it.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's crazy.
It It is crazy.
And they're doing.
Yeah.
So this is the new the new rule that you just showed me.
And this is uh YouTube's website and it says hate speech is not allowed on YouTube.
We remove content promoting violence or hatred against individuals are based on certain attributes intended to praise promote or aid violent criminal organizations.
And then it says videos then it says content that doesn't violate our policies.
That's the weird thing.
Right?
They're like, okay, we don't allow this.
But this is for stuff that isn't even that.
And actually it's not well anyway you can look at the other things they say too.
Um but the one you highlighted is uh one that I could be offensive to some viewers.
Like it's just so subjective.
Any video could be uh offensive to anybody in politics.
Any political side you choose the other side can be offended by that.
Yeah.
It's it's incredibly subjective like the definition of subjective.
Like there, you know, there's no definition to offensive or what's you know some viewers if that means one or twenty or you know it's and they do it this way and it's the same way politics.
Right?
They write they write bills intentionally to be ambiguous so they can use them how they see fit, right?
So look at this without a direct call to violence or primary purpose or a primary purpose of promoting hatred.
So you can still get taken down even if you're your primary purpose of promote does anybody really have a primary purpose of promoting hatred.
I've never seen YouTube channels like that.
But even so it just says without a call to violence.
So it's any kind of supreme what they consider supremacist content.
And they they include that anything to do with violence.
And according to the bill that that they voted on in the House the anti-white supremacy bill uh because of Steve Steve King it said that you can't talk about the Zog, the Zionist occupied government and then a fl inflammatory religious like so you just can't talk about uh any any religions anymore or you get taken down and put in limited state take a look at the next one conspiracy theories ascribing evil corrupt or
malicious intent to individuals or groups based on certain attributes.
So you can't just you can't say corruption is corrupt anymore on YouTube.
Well see they're trying to intentionally use the term conspiracy theory in an in a derogatory way right but see this we we've talked about this the last time we brought this up there are literal conspiracies it's a legal term there are people that go to jail for conspiracy so a theory about a potential conspiracy that might have happened if we're talking about it being evil corrupt or malicious we're just not allowed to talk about it now right like it that is that is astounding.
They're covering for the people that pay their bills right at the end of the day the the intelligence apparatus it's it's unbelievable.
The last one again though that's that one is the the the kicker so groups based on certain attributes so if there's a group and they have an attribute you're not allowed to criticize it or say anything negative about it anymore.
If it stems from a conspiracy theory they're saying which could mean whatever they want it to mean it's it's outs you can't say that politicians are evil because they act that way or even malicious.
You can't imply that a a politician or anybody for that matter in a high position of power secretly went behind the scenes to try to circumvent something legal because that's a conspiracy theory about malicious intent.
Right?
But that happens all the time right it's like that happens literally every day.
It's that's that I that's astounding to me.
It's crazy and well and think about what they say about Ilan Omar.
You know I've heard called the jihadi I actually heard that on Jason Goodman's show Laura Loomer was praising Jason Goodman for saying that they're jihadis in Congress.
I mean they don't take that down you know so it's well they do they I mean she's she's banned off of Twitter.
Well that's true.
Yeah that's true.
That's true.
Um less so yeah yeah you do see you know quite a bit of stuff out there that would fall into this so it just gives them room to be very subjective you know as it suits their political agenda.
And that goes that's and that's beyond the two party paradigm.
That's important for people to remember this is what about that last one though?
That last one that I did you already say that or did I miss it?
That was the one I thought was the big kicker.
Did we?
No.
Oh yeah, we didn't.
Videos denying that a well-documented violent event took place.
So 9-11 was violent, one of the most violent events in American history.
You know, in certain ways.
Actually, in a lot of ways, the the mainstream story is is pushed huge, and same with it's the biggest conspiracy of our our generation.
Well, I don't I personally I don't even think that necessarily fits to that because I don't think anyone's denying that like there wasn't a violent event, right?
We're just we're we're talking about who and behind it.
Like that is obviously in my mind meant to apply to the Holocaust.
I think that's what that's specifically about.
But even even more so, the point is that this can be like we were saying before the show.
Any event that like that we and this stuff does happen, like Duma is the example I used earlier, right?
We now know a BBC producer has openly said that that was completely fake.
They staged everything.
The OPCW report clearly shows that what happened is not what they say happened, and yet that would apply to their logic there because they still claim it happened.
So if we're denying videos, one of the videos that was removed for my channel was a video about Russia saying they had evidence that the attack was staged.
So that's what it was.
It was like it was called irrefutable evidence or something in quotes that Doom a Gaztech was a state was staged, you know, credit Russia, and that video was removed.
And it was a false flag, right?
I mean, I I guess I can't say that.
Yeah, and I wanted to mention um you know that they all said that it was uh uh conspiracy theory when uh Jesse Smollett and not just uh accept you know, with our mouths open, the spoon-fed version that they're trying to use as propaganda.
Right.
And that's a perfect example.
I mean, it's obviously one that's more of the kind of distraction story.
They want you to be, you know, this is the stuff that's meant to get everyone divided, but the reality is we now know that they lied about it, right?
And you Nathan, you were on it from the beginning.
They clearly lied, or he did, and they covered it without question.
And you're right, that's a perfect example.
They would have shut you down under this new law saying, Oh, you're spreading conspiracy theories, you know.
It's like it's just that the Duma one, though, the I think I was hoping you're gonna find the BBC one, the producer, the the article.
Yeah.
Oh, there you go.
Perfect.
Yeah, and it's just you know, the but it's coming from RT, the point is.
Even mainstream media covered this briefly, even they tried not to.
But that's a pr that this is the best example in my mind of a massive story.
I mean, remember, this is the one the US launched weapons because of, right?
Because of what the White Helmets told them, and now we know that this is confirmed to be fake.
From the doctors on the ground, from everybody involved except the mainstream media and the U.S. oligarchy government.
Everybody else admits this event didn't happen.
And they still take you down.
All of them, too.
It's not like this is the first one.
The other ones have been basically proven uh fake, also, right?
Well, I mean, I would agree with that personally, but this is this one more than any other, has been like categorically shown, but even because we have a mainstream media producer coming out and saying, I took part in staging these events, right?
But yeah, obviously the other ones dating back to the first, at least in this case, where the UN themselves said that it was the rebels that did it.
But yeah, this one's the best example in my mind.
Yeah, I had the that video taken down too.
The one where I said way back in 2016 about a chemical weapons attack being a false flag.
They took that what's her name?
Carla DePonte or something like that.
She was the UN she she said on record that it was the rebels that used the the gas they claim they use.
And it's you know, they still pretend that the Assad did it, even to this day.
Yeah.
Well, what do you guys think about uh we'll we'll talk get more into it later.
I want to do the Christchurch first, but I'm I'm dying to know your thoughts on the Gaza and uh Tel Aviv rocket.
Go ahead, Bryce.
You're the expert on this.
I would I appreciate that, but I wouldn't call myself an expert, but I've definitely been talking about it.
It's I mean, it's this one is upsetting more than most we've seen.
You know, uh you're Adam, you're always on these too, like when something like this happens in regard to Palestine.
And it's just so frustrating because the story, the basic story, is that they claim two rockets were launched at Tel Aviv, right?
And and in right in the beginning, you there so far I can't even see real evidence that they even were fired.
But even let's just say they were.
They openly say that they hit nothing and harmed no one, and because of this, they launch a hundred strikes on Gaza.
A very a small civilian area.
And it's now confirmed that we have schools, mosques, all kinds of civilian things that were hit in this massive attack.
And in the beginning, they even said that they weren't sure who fired them.
And they maintained that to this point.
They say it might have been a mistake by other groups.
Hamas was meeting with an Egyptian delegation while this was supposedly taking place.
You know what I mean?
Like there's so many things that happened.
And now they're still maintaining that just because Hamas is like the large organization there, that it's their fault anyway.
Like kind of saying, well, screw it.
We launched them all, we're gonna do it anyway.
It's no big deal, right?
And it's it's just it just shows you how with impunity the kind of actions they can take with the US backing them.
And then right afterward, they went to the UN and they literally had the nerve to tell the UN that they they commit they demand that they unequivocally condemn the two rockets that were launched at Tel Aviv.
Like not even run acknowledging the hundred and they they even said that they knew that they were civilians in these areas, but because Hamas was there, it's justified.
I mean, it's you just can't make this stuff up.
These people are villains in my mind.
Can't say that.
Can't ascribe evil intent to a group because of their uh characteristics.
So are we allowed to question if this if the where these uh rockets came from, or is that uh violate YouTube policies as well?
Oh, as long as it's well documented, you know, if it's well documented that they came uh from uh from Hamas and well the IDF tweeted it, and uh all all the press uh copied that.
So and uh an Israeli journalist even got an inside source from supposedly an Israeli official who opened the flat out said it was not Hamas.
But the what Islamist Jihad, the other group there, they've also denied it.
But they've all they basically said outright that it doesn't matter who did it, they're just gonna blame Hamas because they're the big organization there, which is you know, that's their scapegoat exam answer at the end of the day.
Two two rockets that didn't make do any damage, and then a hundred targets was the retaliation.
It's unbelievable.
I mean, think about the small area we're talking about here.
Someone made this point, like how much munitions that would take and how much damage that would cause for two rockets argue that that they by their own admission didn't do anything.
They landed in open air in the people, and clearly they're making the case that this was because of the election, and I agree with that.
It's likely, even in my opinion, that they manufactured the whole story of the rockets so they could make this large show to hopefully push people in net new Netanyahu's corner.
That's that's what I think happened.
What do you think, Nathan?
October surprise, Netanyahu October surprise.
When are the elections?
How soon are they?
April 9th, I want to say, yeah.
And he's in, I mean, he's in a bit of trouble, right?
I mean, there is some question about whether Netanyahu is is going to win the election because of the um corruption charges and so forth.
So this is helpful.
And you know, I don't know any time, you know, this hap this has happened a number of times in the past.
You'll have one or two rockets come over, not hit anybody, and then they go destroy houses, they go bombing, um, the hitting so-called you know, targets.
So it's it's kind of uh and yeah, I would doubt I always doubt.
I I don't know why they would have fired those rockets knowing the response.
I mean, what would be their motive exactly?
Um, so they don't benefit at all.
They they know two rockets that did no damage, and now they're just you know, bombed a hundred targets all over the place in Gaza.
And they I what I read is that they the uh Hamas representative said that they didn't want any escalation and that they didn't they didn't send them.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, the other thing to consider too is that maybe the same we're talking about, maybe this was an orchestrated, you know, false flag type of event where they they initiated the launch on the other side from somebody that was in Gaza, right?
You know, it's it's in the the but even their main story again to go back, they openly said from the very beginning that it was like you the article you were showing was that it was a mistake, that they they even have information that shows people were working on these in their own locations and they accidentally launched them off, which doesn't seem like it makes sense, does it?
Two rockets accidentally.
I mean, how's that even happened?
So it makes you think like they set this whole thing up.
Yeah, and they're trying to sell the iron dome right now, so So you know, there's like video, they go, oh, the iron dome.
They said that it intercepted one and there was like a video, but the video is sketch.
And then they they said that the other one, like they they uh they could sense where it was gonna land, so they didn't destroy it.
Did you guys read that?
Mm-mm.
You didn't read that?
Okay, well, I read that.
I just I just saw that I saw conflicting reports like right when this happened up until today.
There's been articles saying there were five and we shot down three, and there's no we shot down none.
And all of these sources are coming from the Israeli officials.
So it's like, like I said earlier, I I really think they're reflecting.
And maybe it's intentionally to confuse everybody.
Yeah, so um okay, let's uh we'll get back to that more.
There's more on that.
We have articles up later, but let's shift back over to the uh the shootings.
The shooting, the terrorist attack.
They're so adamant the left, that's all I'm seeing on Twitter is call it a terrorist, call it white, white nationalist w uh right wing extremist terrorism.
Which obviously it's a terrorist act, right?
Wouldn't you say?
Yeah, when is a mass shooting not a terrorist attack?
It's kind of silly.
Um, but in this case in particular, yes, whatever it is.
You know, uh it's a site a psychological operation.
Um no matter how you look at it, whether it was just one guy or whether it was a group, um, you know, it was designed to inspire terror, and then uh this division also, you know.
Um I was gonna come out and make something today just about how much division there is now around this shooting um between people who think you know it was a hoax, you know, people who don't now they're fighting between each other, and then people who genuinely kind of support this white nationalist thing,
generally support kind of what the guy was saying, um, are generally into that stuff, and some cases are a little apologetic.
And then, you know, people on the other side.
Who are you talking about?
People on Twitter or or YouTube?
I haven't seen any of that.
Well, my comments, people in Hand, but people in my comments, you know, under my video.
Um, you know, there's a lot of people with sympathy.
What's wrong with saying we want a future for white children?
Oh, yeah, that aspect of it.
You're right.
Yeah.
I thought you meant like the actual shooting part of it.
No, you mean like some of his uh some of his motives.
Somebody the one person said hail the shooter.
You know, some people say, Oh, this is terrible for a good call, you know, for it's push back white nationalism or whatever.
Um, but yeah, some people actually actively promoting the shooter.
Those could be trolls, but you know, uh this guy, he's whatever he is, and I think it's much more than just some guy.
Um he knows all this meme culture stuff, this 8-chan stuff, he knows how to kind of relate with those people, and uh maybe it's just a way to attack Han and the people who are kind of on this this this new thing, this um kind of white genocide thing.
Um but I'm I'm you know, I I'm afraid people are you know, people are people are getting mad at me because people were mad at me because I was saying that I ban people in my chat for saying 1488, and people saying um uh anyway, so there's a lot of division.
There's a lot of division right now between different groups because of the shooting.
I think that was that was the point.
What do you guys think?
Is there any connection between because that they happen on the same date, right?
The Gaza and and the shooting.
Well, what I said was just there's no way to know for sure, but it's almost uncanny how Israel seems to use big events to launch like maybe they had planned this and they were waiting for something, you know what I mean?
Like, but there it would be a leap to assume that just because of that to say that oh, they're behind it or something, which you know could be likely, possible, whatever.
But they nonetheless clearly made a one of the largest attacks I've seen in in the you know recent time with this happening over here.
And they do that every time, right?
Every time something big happens, you know, they they use it to you know attack Syria while no one's paying attention.
It's it does seem like that.
Yeah, that's why I'm that's why it's worth to mention it that they did have it did uh happen at the same time as something else that would dominate the headlines.
Yeah, but it doesn't really dominate the headlines it for Israel in a positive way too much.
Do you think it does?
Maybe maybe the anti white uh anti white nationalist supreme quote unquote supremacist aspect of it benefits them.
But it's kind of like it's a Zionist guy, right?
Didn't he he liked that uh that other mass shooter who was pro Israel?
He even did the little like MAGA hand sign.
Like, what's that about?
Yeah.
He's a memeer.
You know, that that's my latest video.
I mean, there are a lot of memes in his uh manifesto.
And there are and just the songs he was playing, the things he said, subscribe to PewDiePie, you know, that's a meme.
Um, the song he was playing was this thing called Serbia Strong or Remove Kebab, and he said he's kebab removalist.
That's another meme, the Serbia Strong song.
Um he posted this cop this thing called the Navy SEAL copy paste uh.
I had to learn about all these.
I I knew it was a troll.
I knew it was a troll and soon as soon as he said Candace Owens radicalized him, because doesn't make any sense, right?
I mean, Candace Owens radicalized the guy that killed.
He's either trolling or he's mentally ill.
Because that is just so ridiculous to think that she uh he the only thing he said about Israel or Jews was that he said, I'm not a Massad agent, right?
Right, right.
That was the only reference.
Another call out to like truthers and stuff.
He says, Am I a shill, Mossad, Patsy, glow in the dark?
You know, he was using all these terms again from the chance.
Yeah, and then he said um he was inspired to white nationalism by Spyro the Dragon 3 video game, and then he learned to shoot because of Fortnite, Fortnite.
That's how he learned the floss over his victims.
It looked like a video game to me.
It was so crazy.
Even with the, you know, usually there's like shootings, and we go like, oh, we didn't get to see anything.
Like this one was live streamed, like I've never seen before.
Has there ever been a massacre like this live streamed?
Is this the first time?
Well, no, there was the other incident, I can't remember the person's name.
I was just talking about it where the reporter the person was going around downtown film streaming and like attacking people.
Remember, and the the uh black guy B Rich actually was covering it while it was happening.
He was there on in the same city, and that I made the story about the fact that B Rich was out there live streaming trying to find him because the police were looking for him, and the police found B Rich and shut down his live stream.
And it's like, oh, so you so you're able to pinpoint where he is by his live stream, but you can't find the guy who's hurting people.
That's why we thought there was more of a story behind it, you know.
But this is clearly the biggest massacre.
I sorry I don't have more details about this the name of the story.
Nathan, do you remember which who that was?
Was it a black guy driving around on Facebook Live and he killed the guy on the sidewalk?
Yeah, yeah, I remember that.
Yep.
And then as far as other televised shootings, actually, the the video I think that got me you know take taken down was because of a story where this person was shot on live TV, allegedly.
Um right, the blonde reporter.
Yeah, yeah, that's right.
I remember that.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But it was really bizarre.
That was sketchy.
Anybody get shot, you know.
You don't see anything.
This one though, it's the first time I've ever seen evidence of a mass shooting, you know, being pretty real.
I mean, that's my opinion.
Um, I know there are people out there though who have seen the video and still don't, you know, are still saying that it wasn't real.
Um here's what I sorry, I thought you were gonna here's what I say every time about these things.
It's that you know, to me, I watched the video.
I it looks it looks real to me, right?
I mean, I I don't think it seems I think it's pretty clear that it is, but it could be fake.
I'm sorry, I don't even know I don't know if that's bad to say anymore.
But the point is that we if we can't ask ourselves these questions based on our history and the things we know have happened, the f the fake events that have happened, the false flags.
If we can't question every single incident, you're lying too essentially.
They just said it's never recommended, it's it's gonna be put in limited state, you're not gonna be able to make any money.
Like they they're they're slowly or not so slowly, it's it's intensifying, but they're shutting down independent media on YouTube.
You know, Owen Benjamin starts uh hitting the topics that they really don't want people talking about, and he's demonetized hu huge demonetization there.
Yeah.
This this whole thing with the shooter, like Nathan was saying, look, it's it's basically every single jam-packed in into one event of all the things they're trying to accomplish, Whether we're talking about the second amendment or shutting the big one for me is being able to filter live streams, right?
That's kind of the one thing we're hearing.
So they could realistically filter things we're saying right now and either shut the video down or blit parts of it out.
You know what I mean?
Like it's just more, and then you get all the memes like you're saying the the right and the the white nationalists, it's like everything wrapped up in the one.
The censorship of the internet.
Everything.
Well, it's the thing.
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
Sorry, and I was just finishing.
I definitely think that there was something behind this.
This whole thing, and we can get into more about the suspicious parts once we're done here.
There's parts that I think are definitely suspicious, but there's it's there's something we need to see in this inherently that it's being used at the very least, and and that we have to be able to be open enough to ask the questions about the things that stand out to us without being shut down by YouTube.
Yeah.
I mean, here's the thing about this conspiracy theory thing and the thing you read that says you can't deny a violent, well documented place.
Is there a lot of people who are watch these videos and think that it wasn't real?
And someone can't make you actually can't make a video if your opinion is that it wasn't real after watching the video.
You can't point stuff out that makes you think it wasn't real.
I think it was real based on seeing it, but I know there are genuine people out there who don't, and you you those genuine people uh can't say anything, and all these people who want to see somebody say that can't see anybody say it unless they you know find find somewhere else, uh bit shoot or um for me, Twitch.
I'm allowed to say more things, but that's what it's come to.
I mean, you uh but you can't say what you think, even if what you think is you know, something that they take issue with.
You know, this one really gets me inflammatory religious.
So like any anything could be perceived as inflammatory, right?
You know, I don't believe in your religion.
Can they can is that inflammatory?
Or can you can you say that?
But you can't go, I don't believe in that.
I think that is crazy.
I think you swinging chickens around is crazy.
You that is that violated?
Can does this have to go in limited state now over something like that?
They can justify anything with this language.
That's I think the point.
Yeah, it's not so much that they're gonna take down everything that falls into that category, but they can selectively apply it to just about anything.
And maybe tell me if I'm wrong, and maybe it's just because we see this happening because it is happening, the shutting down of like the discussion of the Israeli government and their crimes, right?
But those all of those things you're showing on that list, I think personally think very clearly apply specifically to uh talking about anti-Semitism, talking about you know, Zionism, like that's what those are about, and because those are being muddled today with the idea of Judaism in general, and that's I think that's what that's meant to apply to.
Well, it's uh you know, ascribing evil intent to a particular group of people because of certain, you know.
I I mean I could understand.
Because of certain tropes, you know, they might as well just said said tropes and canards, right?
Right, their code words.
Canard, that's a good one.
So yeah, you guys want more than shooting.
Yeah, is there any chance that Candace Owens really did influence him?
It was that is there any serious to seriousness to that?
I mean it's possible.
I just don't think it's I think it was clearly a troll.
I think it was clearly a troll and it and to create division.
And you know, I was talking to this this lefty who's interested in the news and everything.
I just happened to have a conversation.
I said, I said, you know, he's trolling with this Candace Owens things.
I mean, that's crazy.
She doesn't ever talk about he said she had views that were even too extreme for him.
What is she talking about?
She talks about blacks leaving the Democratic Party, basically.
She uh she I don't even know if she's ever gotten into Islam as she said that's that was her response.
She says she's never put out any content about Islam, which I find hard to believe considering the circles that she's so welcomed in, you know, it's like the anti-Islam Zionist groups.
She's definitely but she's definitely more on like the the, you know, she's not as controversial as plenty out there.
So I agree.
I don't think I think that in a way is more of an insight that this is kind of an effort.
There's an agenda here, right?
I would agree.
I think it it doesn't anything's possible, but it does not make sense that of all the people we're talking about and the people he's on 8chan and 4chan and Candace Owens radicalized him.
That's that just doesn't make sense to me.
Okay, it's ridiculous, you know, and it and it's just uh it's by Design though.
It's so that the mainstream media picks it up and says, Oh, Candace Owens, and they attack Candace Owens, and then the people that support Candace Owens say, What the hell, you know, the media, and it just creates this kind of divide that he's talking about in the manifesto.
Okay, or what about Putie Pie?
Because it makes sense that he probably could be a fan of PewDiePie, right?
Well, that's a meme, though.
Subscribe to PewDiePie is a meme.
It has to do with his subscriber battle between him and this Bollywood channel.
Okay, well, it's a meme for people that that like PewDiePie, probably, though, because I didn't know that was a meme.
Well, you can look up know your meme, the PewDiePie subscribe to PewDiePie meme.
I guess it's just a bunch of pop culture, like everything he everything throughout this whole thing is all about these little pop culture memes right now that are you know, it's it's almost like he was trying to make send a message with the idea of memes as a more so than what the memes themselves mean.
You know what I mean?
Like it seemed like it was just all so orchestrated.
Or he's just like autistic meme, or or like they just used an AI algorithm to like uh you know do a bunch of data crunching on the internet, and they just threw out a bunch of crazy Cambridge analytics at talking points that confuse us all.
Seriously.
Yeah, well, they call it ship posting.
That was what it was compared to as ship posting, where you throw out a lot of bullshit to that'll confuse people that don't know this internet culture thing, and it's not stuff I would know about, but it's clear that this guy was steeped in this culture and knew all these trigger things,
like playing this song, this Serbia Strong song, which is this weird meme based on uh cell uh uh celebrating him, and then that turned into a meme on this white nationalist side where you know the videos got like 3.8 million views, and then they and that is involved with this remove kebab,
and he says he's a kebab removalist, and that and you know, the claim is that's to ingratiate himself with the people that talk in that language, which is I guess the white nationalists that congregate on 8chan.
Although, you know, I don't hang out on 8chan and 4chan, I don't know all this stuff, but um this guy, man.
You know, what do you think of this guy?
Because uh while I saw the shooting, first of all, I thought he was pretty he's pretty whole-blooded and pretty good.
Uh I don't want to say good, but I mean the guy's um methodic.
Like a pro.
It looked like uh Navy C didn't he say in his manifesto manifesto he was trained as a Navy SEAL.
That's the Navy SEAL copy paste a meme.
It's based or otherwise known as the Tough Guy meme or the guerrilla warfare meme.
It's an exact copy and paste.
Uh there's a song that has exactly the words um to that kind of copy paste.
Uh yeah, it's called the Navy here.
Listen, this is the Navy's message here or something.
Here it I see if you can hear this.
This is uh song of the Navy SEAL copy.
You hear some guitar?
Yeah.
This is a meme, the Navy SEAL copy paste of musical.
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me?
Anyway.
I'll have you know I graduated top of my class.
And weird so that's what do you think he's trying to say with all this stuff, though?
You know what I mean?
Like, there's clearly something, there's a reason behind this.
All the Zionist people, they're like saying two things.
They're saying, Don't look at it, don't say his name, don't share his manifesto, and then and they're also saying that uh this guy was trying to like there's uh I've seen some people speculating that he was a leftist trying to make the right look bad, or they say that this guy was trying to create a war, trying to create it more of a civil war.
Yeah, and I was manifesto said, yeah.
Yeah, I think it's true, man.
Uh I'm worried personally, I don't know if I shouldn't be, but I mean, I'm I'm worried that people kind of agree with them and kind of in some way.
Some people do.
Yeah.
And that's what's crazy is that we've gotten, and this is where you get into all these points about the idea of our media being the radicalizers, right?
The left versus right extremists on either side, right?
The idea of our war propaganda, basically subtly re you know, um confirming the idea that it's okay to kill people for a good reason.
The U.S., we do it all, we're killing people all around the world because We're fighting for freedom, you know what I mean?
And we're war propagandized with everything.
You know, so it's like these it's there's a lot of people that believe that this is really insane troll.
You know, we've all seen them all before.
Sometimes we suspect that the worst of them are bots or Hasborough agents or something, but uh this guy was apparently real, and then he showed himself in the in the real world, and he's just a mixture of insanity and memes, essentially.
See, I don't know.
I I'm thinking of him really as a trained assassin, like a I'm thinking of him really as an asset of some sort.
I mean, he he was just the ultra stand.
Well, he was just in Pakistan for a while with a bunch of Muslims saying how great it was.
He was in Turkey for a while.
Turkey is sending a special delegation to New Zealand to talk to him about this.
That's really weird.
Um a few of my videos that got taken down, by the way, were about Urdeon and false flags in Turkey, which I thought was weird, and then this thing he happens to be connected to Turkey and Erdogan.
He is traveling around France.
I mean, for a guy that says he doesn't have any money, he claims he made his money on BitConnect, which I find kind of unlikely given that most people who have scammed lost all their money, so he had to be pretty lucky to get out of there with enough money to travel around the world to these Muslim countries where apparently he was having a good time, and then come back and do this man.
I mean, you know, he he seems uh uh the what I said is it doesn't seem like the first time he killed somebody.
Clearly.
Clearly.
Like look at the way he was shooting.
Like that's you know, that's what that's why we need somebody to chime in that's like a you know tactical expert that can be like nobody can shoot that way without being trained to do so, you know, because that's generally true.
But I'm glad, you know.
He brought this article up.
That's it's this somebody people are saying that that he left from Christchurch at the same time this was happening.
That this man who was involved in this shooting left Christchurch and traveled abroad right after this supposedly a Mossad ring was unearthed in Christchurch after this earthquake in 2011.
What does that mean anything?
I mean, it's interesting, but you know, it's just there's these coincidences.
You start putting these flags on these little these points that make sense, you know.
I mean, go ahead.
We can talk about this, then I want to go over some of the more the points that really stand out in my mind.
So yeah, this is 2011 Mossad spy ring unearthed because of Christchurch earthquake, and his Israeli Secret Service Mossad has been accused of conducting an intelligence operation in New Zealand because of an earthquake.
So the guy died in the earthquake.
Yeah, died in the damaged van and he had five passports.
And then it says somewhere, I believe, that the the government said, Oh, they they didn't look into it anymore, or something like that.
Big surprise.
I I made the point that, you know, I bet you you could you could probably find CIA and Mossad in most large cities around the world, you know, but it's interesting that this is the same location and that the you know s reportedly the same guy here just happened, the same time frame just happened to leave, right?
When this was happening, you know, who knows?
It definitely seems suspicious.
We should be considering that.
The the one the one that stands out to me though, if you guys seen this on the video, if you saw it, is that there is a clip on the ground before he enters the hallway.
Right?
And you could make there could be an explanation for that, but that's the first one.
Is that not seem like an example of something being staged?
What do you what do you think?
Well, uh, okay, so I'd have to I've seen the video about three times, and I'd have to watch.
All I know is that as he's driving away, he says, Oh, well, sometimes things don't always go as planned.
You see, I dropped that magazine in the hallway and had to go back for it.
So he he does say he dropped the magazine and and went back for it.
So I don't know that I um I'd have to look and see if you see it in the hallway before he gets there.
Yeah.
Titus had Titus actually broke, he has a bunch of this was all shared in that same group.
The drop box video that we were he he he has a whole like screen capture of each thing, you know, like in a slow motion thing.
And you can and first of all, it's the video where you can see him pulling up to begin.
He says the PewDiePie, like this, it's when he's going in.
And right when he goes in the door, right down the left, you can see very clearly a clip with White Riding.
I could actually, I should have I can grab you the the picture.
Um, but it's it's clearly a clip.
And so that but see, does it doesn't mean that maybe there was another shooter that dropped it because we knew there's more people that were involved, it seems like.
The There's video showing that I shared from disobedient media that very clearly shows two shooters in the beginning with two different guns going different directions, right?
Both with ball caps, not helmets, so it wasn't this guy.
So it suggests three shooters right there.
So, you know, but who knows?
But that's what I was just gonna ask.
I saw some video, uh, some cell phone phone footage of like two other guys, and there's others a lot of rifles too.
It's just the video that you saw had just those two guys isolated, but they're actually next to a number of other law enforcement.
And then the guy getting arrested, I believe was in military fatigues and had a firearm.
And so they arrested him because he had a firearm, but then they I think that's the guy that they let go right away.
Yeah, they claim he was helping, like he wanted to help the police, but he's in military fatigues.
That seems like military.
I don't know, you know, maybe he was actually military and he was and he had his rifle or something.
I you know, I I don't know.
But yeah, that's that that's the story I heard.
Um you know, the guy planned to do both of the mosques.
You see him drive away clean from the first one, so I just figured it's definitely entirely possible he did both.
But uh, but there are reports of two shooters at the second mosque.
Um, you know, the image of the guys you're talking about, though, it doesn't first it did they're first of the like street clothes, they're like military uh you know, they don't look like police.
And I think this is this is apparently as the the video saying it was why it was happening.
So either we had military operatives uh that were already on the scene with police, which doesn't really line up, right?
Or and also the gun he was holding was military great.
It was not like a rifle or a police thing.
It was but who knows?
You're right.
It could be.
But it's just suspicious.
Yeah, well, well, it is.
It is, yeah, the multiple shooter angle.
I thought at first it had to be because the shooting supposedly happened simultaneously, but it sounds like there could have been enough time, but I don't know why he didn't keep live streaming.
I guess he could have done that.
Maybe he maybe thought he wanted to maybe he thought that was going to create a security problem for him.
How did he get arrested?
Is there any video of that?
He wasn't live streaming that part.
Um I think he was on his way.
I think they said it today, he was on his way to the hit the third attack, which he said would be like a bonus.
And he got caught with uh couple guns still and then IEDs, apparently, although I don't know if they're just considering those gas cans in the back IEDs or if he really did have IEDs.
Um I think that's what happened.
I think he got caught in his vehicle.
Yeah, that there you can see, yeah, said the suspect planned to continue his attack.
But then I also heard, and I haven't seen it, I hear people saying that he was uh stopped by someone with a gun inside the second mosque.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That was reported by the New Zealand Herald.
And I actually I was gonna say I saved the I archived the original, and I think it's even still up, but they put up new information since then that claims it was like with like a credit card something machine, I don't even know what the claim was.
But right when it happened, the New Zealand Herald reported that a man scared off the the second the person from shooting in the second mosque with a gun.
It was a Muslim man, right?
It was apparently a well-known local.
And this is the part that really gets under my skin is that we literally in this case have 41 people die in a mosque, or it's probably more than that now, but shot in that mosque and killed at the time.
And he goes to the second mosque and a man, a man with a legally held gun, scares this guy away and saves all these people's lives, and yet they're still pushing gun control.
They've already said they're gonna be changing the laws.
And they just don't mainstream media's not talking about this Muslim man with a gun that saved everyone's lives, right?
It's like it doesn't make sense.
And this guy, the shooter had these all legally anyway.
And apparently it's not as easy to get a gun there.
You have to have some kind of special license, and um, but they say he acquired the guns legally, but I still don't understand.
He wasn't on any watch list, supposedly.
I would think that if somebody's collecting that stuff and you're in New Zealand, I would think that they that would put you on some kind of a watch list.
I mean, I don't know how this guy planned this whole attack for years and got away with it entirely and then pulled it off so well.
There was just a guy a couple of weeks ago, too, that was arrested that they said had a big arsenal and when was planning a white nationalist attack, right?
Oh, I hadn't heard that.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
There was a big big arrest.
They're kidding they were showing the photos everywhere of all the uh uh the guns that he had and all the ammo that he had.
No, I hadn't heard that.
I hadn't heard that.
And uh I don't know, it's maybe oh, you you had the picture of him there making the AOK 6, another meme.
They call it white power, yeah, just another meme, right?
So is he really with like because this is what all like the the Zionist MAGA Trump people do, right?
They're they're the ones that do this in all the photos.
Is he really with them?
Because by his ideology of like hating the Muslims so much, like that's that's what the Zionists are are putting out, right?
That's their anti that that's their agenda so much.
Look at Ilhan Omar and all the stuff they've been doing all all week attacking her.
So but it seems like he's he's either doesn't like them.
It's it's so confusing because he's making them look bad by saying subscribe to PewDiePie, he's making PewDiePie look bad.
But you would think that he kind of likes PewDiePie.
By whole by doing this with his hand, you'd think that like he he he must be smart enough to know that they're this is making them look bad.
And that's why all the Zionists are like, don't share it, don't you know, don't listen to him.
He's trying to cause cause trouble.
Well, he's definitely trying to he's definitely trying to cause division, right?
Because he knows that the left is gonna jump on that hand sign and say, Oh, yeah, we told you it was a white power hand sign, and then all the people on the right are gonna say, oh, he's just trolling, and then yeah, that's what I'm saying.
So it benefits his action makes it seem like he's been brainwashed by the Zionist propaganda, but the way his behavior with the the all the trolling is making them look bad.
So he's making his own ideology look bad right now.
So it almost seems like it could be a leftist trying to make the right look bad.
Almost overtly, you're right.
Like what he's doing is like specifically, it's like exactly what you would think.
Like if they sat down and planned what would be best to do to make them look bad, it would be exactly what he did, right?
I mean, it's you're right.
But but that doesn't sound mean he wasn't brainwashed, you know.
It's just pure confusion.
So we're not talking about all the only focus isn't Gaza.
Could be, who knows.
Uh, I'm gonna read a couple super chats, guys.
So um, and you see what they have to say.
I we're getting some input.
Okay, we got uh Adam, are you aware of retired IDF General Danny Gatz?
He despises Arabs more than BB.
He's gaining in the polls.
The rabbis will present before election.
I don't know what they mean, present what, but yeah, uh Netanyahu, uh his briberies bribery stuff.
That's why this latest attack helps him, his relationship with Trump helps him.
He's trying to play that up, but it looks like he may lose.
You guys thoughts on on BB losing or other leadership taking control of Israel?
You know, it's an interesting topic.
I actually thought about reaching out to you about this because we've seen like the what that the dual, I forget their names, the two people running together, kind of a thing.
There that you know, Netanyahu is clearly in trouble with all like what four different corruption scandals.
He's been clearly leaning towards like the extreme right, like the that's not true.
There's there's even more extremists.
His party and in his views are actually more moderate now.
Well, I'm just you no, you're probably right.
But I just you know what I mean.
Like the the groups, there's a specific group that he's been really more associating with that he hasn't in the past, and I think it it's political, right?
Whatever their ideology is.
That's true.
That was in the news that he is uh like a associating with the Kahani group, right?
The Kahani party.
Yeah, and a well, a bunch of there's a bunch of groups that are are what you what they would consider the extreme right, but you're right.
There's probably it's you know, not necessarily the case, but the point is I think that he and that's why he's been coming the that that Israeli star came out actually trying to defend him and said, please would somebody tell you tell everyone that Israel is for all the people, and he's like, No, you're actually wrong.
Israel's the nation state for only the Jews.
And it's like, wow, did he really just come out and say that?
And it's like I've just been seeing him really try to tap with tap in with that supremacist mentality to hopefully tap in with that kind of base in in Israel, right?
So but to get to the point is I think I I th my question would for even for you would be if he doesn't get elected, do you really think that means anything is gonna change?
Because some people would argue that.
These other people are actually arguing for more of a a different non-extremist kind of direction for Israel, right?
I don't know.
It it could change and get worse, or it could or it could change and get better.
I think there's both of those uh uh options are possibilities.
Yeah, what uh my understanding of the guys that are the tea guys that teamed up is that they're not that great either.
That the one guy is IDF, You know, so they bring the same kind of militaristic, you know, anti-Gaza or anti-Palestinian thing to the table.
And that's supposedly his main opposition.
So yeah, I don't know if it's that much.
I don't know what moderates obviously what he's saying is a dog whistle or pandering to the more supremacist element of the Jews in Israel, I guess, which is a big enough contingent that he's you know wants to pander to him, and that could be what the rocket attack is about.
Exactly.
That's what the thing is about, you know, Israel being for Jews only.
So it's really it says it says bad things about the Jews in Israel, to be honest.
I mean, um, you know, I would see those that are that are taken by the Zionist propaganda, right?
I mean, you can there's plenty of Americans that believe we should be invading Venezuela invading Venezuela, right?
Doesn't people just get taken by the propaganda?
But you're right.
I mean, there's a huge element there.
And I agree.
Yeah, they're worried about the youth a lot.
That the youth is against uh Netanyahu from what I've seen in the likuds.
Like goodness.
Same way here.
They're being brought up in these, you know, indoctrination centers.
They control the schooling, man.
That's how you get the next generations to be on your same extremist side.
But I I'm kind of just worried that the whole thing is a way to make it seem kind of like the way Saudi Arabia was like, oh, we're revamping.
You know, it's like, not really.
That's kind of what I was concerned about.
That this the two people, you know, they're arguing for this new direction, but it's just a way to make people think it's changing direction when it's really not, you know.
New new direction.
What?
New direction.
We'll see.
New direction.
No, it's I don't think so.
Uh all right.
Uh next super chat.
Swamp Fox says, look up Parkland kids going to Christchurch before.
New Zealand was shooting Parkland students heartbroken for their friends.
I just Googled it and I don't see anything about them going there before.
Yeah, there are a few things people are saying.
They're pointing out that Skippy was there like five days before John John Podesta, and he said that New Zealand was a juicy target for election meddling, but he said juicy target, so a lot of people are hooking on to that.
I heard the Parkland survivors went there, but I haven't seen the evidence for that.
Then one other thing people haven't mentioned is Christchurch.
The kids from Hampstead were from Christchurch elementary school where there was that satanic cult allegedly.
So that's one little connection to the Christchurch thing.
And then some people are bringing up that Christchurch in and of itself is has some kind of message to it.
Mm-hmm.
Okay, next one, Lazarus says, Who benefits always the same interests?
Uh, I'm not sure if he's talking about Gaza Tel Aviv or the shooting, but why don't we just say say both?
Who benefits most from the rockets?
Obviously, it's Netanyahu and Israel and and not Hamas.
Yeah.
Right.
And then the church is a little more complex.
What do you guys think?
Who benefits most from this shooting?
I'd say the powers that be.
Like I said, I mean, my angle on it right now is the division that it seems to be causing, which was the intention, the stated intention in the manifesto.
So, you know, whoever those powers are, I wouldn't say it's necessarily Zionists or it's necessarily the whatever faction you want to call it, but it's but I the goal of chaos, right?
If if that's what the new world order wants to create, I think that's what's kind of being created at this time because of it, you know, among normies and red-pilled people alike.
Yeah, I completely agree.
I I think that it's it's about it's about the ruling class, right?
I mean, at the end this is where it gets beyond the two a lot of these talking points are pitted in the two-party paradigm, right?
And it's it's bigger than that.
They want they want us to be divided and fighting about these little the nuanced parts inside of this so they can continue invading Venezuela and doing the things, you know, the the greater Israel project and all the things we're trying to accomplish over the world while we're pitted here arguing amongst ourselves about this story, you know, and it doesn't make the story not portant, but I think whether that was why it happened or they're using it to that end, I agree.
The establishment is definitely benefiting from this.
Um, what do you think about like uh whites and and Muslims?
That's kind of playing off that dichotomy, right?
And in and how he emitted any anger or any anything in his manifesto towards Israel or Jews, it's like, how could he have that much anger at the Muslims in his country, but like not the politicians or not uh, you know, any any root causes of the diversity, multicultural, you know, pushing refugee agenda?
He's he's he's brainwashed if this is the case and it wasn't some MK Ultra Mazad CIA effort.
Sorry he's propagandized, yeah, he's propagandized by the the surface level mainstream media from a specific side.
I mean, talking about the the refugees, talking about Europe, like there is a clear agenda, you know, to to make people specifically think that if you're a Muslim, you're this way, right?
And that that specifically pushes a political agenda.
I mean, look at all of his all of his gear and all of his clips, everything that was written on them was all about historical document uh historical dates of people driving out the Ottoman Empire or the Muslims, right?
So I mean, obviously the message is Muslims are bad, they're invading our country, we need to protect the white what you know, whatever, the white culture, right?
I mean, and that that is about the race, he his manifesto is about the racial divide.
He wants to create the race war.
I mean, how does that not fit in specifically with the mainstream media?
You know, that's that's what I see it as.
Yeah, true.
And then he had to expect there was going to be blowback on his asserted point of view, which is this kind of white genocide, um, white supremacist, if you want to call it that, or white nationalist.
You know, he had to know that there would be pushback against that too, which he hopes for because he hopes that that for you know, that the then the white nationalists and stuff become more radicalized.
He wants an escalation.
Yeah, exactly.
And what do you think about people who legitimately espouse these kind of views?
Because like I don't know, uh well, red eyes.
I don't know red ice that well, but it he there are people who genuinely talk about this white pride stuff.
I I don't know how to appropriately address it, and I want to be um I I don't want to dismiss the the concept, but there are people out there who legitimately point push this point of view about having more kids.
I mean, I'm thinking of even that Martina Markova, she's she talked about having more kids and and uh have you know, white people um is that the girl that was censored off of PayPal?
Uh I think so, yeah.
I mean, I think she was one of the ones who were talking about that.
There were other pretty girls that they put forward right to kind of well here, let me ask you something.
So, like um the stuff that he was saying, like uh, you know, mad about all the Muslim attacks, that's what was written on on all of the uh clips and stuff and on the guns, you know it could it be that he snapped, or was this more calculated?
And and if he snapped, it's like could that be because maybe he's got some there is some l legitimate concerns and some truth to some of the stuff that was angering him, and that there's not an honest conversation in the media, and that that's that topic is always you know, taboo and it's excluded and you're pushed in echo chambers and censored and stuff.
So it's almost like they're they're pushing in in trying to corner a rat, hoping that it snaps, because when it snaps, they can benefit on that some more.
It's like it's crazy.
It feels like 3D chess or 6D chess.
That's an interesting point that that because for because the the idea is that to flesh this out, especially for my previous statements, because I know people always, you know, one way or the other in this, that what's happening, like let's say in in Sweden and in Europe, there's clearly a problem there, right?
But we don't address the reality of where this stems from, such as US foreign policy, or even the idea of ISIS and these extremists that they're referring to causing these problems, being funded, protected, armed, and supported by these Western powers, right?
So it's like, but it's it's there is a problem, but that doesn't mean we should go all the way to the other side and say that all Muslims are bad, or it's the same thing I say about all this stuff, right?
We need to find our way in the middle, and they're trying to get us pitted on one side or the other in these extreme mentalities.
But you're right, he may have just snapped and said, you know, and and it does it does mean we should address the problem because there is a real problem.
I mean, such extreme like I wrote an arc we put an article up a long time ago about the idea of weaponized refugees.
That's a real thing.
Like people can create destabilization in order to completely change this landscape of an entire country, and that's happening in Europe, right?
And that is a real thing.
But where does it come from?
You know, that's what we need to be focusing on.
Who are the real culprits?
I I think it's a legitimate uh uh concern, the double standard about how you know you could be you could say, I'm a proud, whatever the the race or the background.
Anyone can say that you can stand up for your country and your people except for white people.
Then it's like white nationalists and you're a supremacist, and you know, that is really it it's stigmatized for white people to stand up, you know, to play identity politics when everybody else kind of plays identity politics.
Yeah, well, that's kind of what I was saying.
I mean, there are people out there, and I just wonder what's gonna happen to them.
I mean, there are channels out there that talk in a in an earnest way about what this guy talks about, and I wonder now what happens to those people if suddenly they're all going to be targeted, and that they're all going to be painted as extremists, and that they're the next people to get marginalized and pushed out of HN and 4chan.
Well, because there are big YouTube channels that are generally you know, white pride or what whatever you want to call it.
I basically say all of the you know, the alt-light and the alt-right care about immigration and or at least the alt light uh pret pretends to, but they care about Muslim immigration.
You know, Lauren Southern does the documentary on Muslim immigration, essentially, and that's what the all the Zionists are always talking about the caliphate takeover and jihadis and stuff.
Yeah.
Well, it's and that again, but where that obviously stems from.
I mean, there's connections to them themselves, right?
But it's it's uh the the story in and of itself is it's clear that there is a larger story behind all of this, and it's being, you know, I mean, look for it's and I agree with you that it there is definitely reverse racism happening today.
I mean, obviously, like we can go on Twitter and talk all you want about basically anybody you know, er in regard to to to anybody being white.
I like there, what is that girl's name from it?
Doesn't matter.
There's funny examples.
Yeah, the New York Times reporter, yeah.
It's like right in your face, but you can you can't say anything on the reverse.
There's clearly that happening today.
But it's I think that what they're trying to do is like what you said, like I don't the white culture as a whole seems like a weird topic to me.
Are you you know, are you from you know France?
Are you from the United States?
Are you from like you can be like I'm have you know American pride, but to be like to it's just different, right?
But it's I think all of it's bad.
Well, nationalism, like I saw people were tweeting Trump saying uh people, you know, that everybody was mad because they asked him, Do you think the white nationalism or or the far right is growing?
Is that a problem?
And he says, No, not really.
And then they everybody was tweeting the video of him saying, I'm a nationalist, Trump saying, Well, really, he said, I'm a globalist sometimes too, right?
Isn't wasn't that what he said?
Which is yeah, weird.
But the idea that being a nationalist, you can be any kind of nationalist, a Chinese nationalist, African.
There's nothing wrong with any other country having pride in their country, except what uh majority white countries.
Then you're considered a white nationalist.
So nationalists is only bad if you put white in front of it.
You know, that's a terrible double standard that is gonna piss people off.
Yeah, you're right.
You're right, completely.
I mean, it's obvious double standard, but at the same time, whether you agree with it or not, the bigger point we should make is people like Nathan was talking about have every right to have those opinions, right?
I mean, that's what free speech is all about.
You're allowed to be whatever you want to be, but today they're trying to tell you, you know, here is the acceptable sphere of discussion, and that's that's the big issue, I think that they're trying to on every issue.
That's how it is on every issue.
You're right.
The Overton window and the the limits of what's acceptable are are shrinking more and more as as we you know move on.
Yeah.
Okay, another super chat.
Uh I am learning on this Zion agenda.
I don't understand.
China will not be servant for Jew.
Who will protect Jew uh Israel when America is weak as South Africa.
I don't see America getting as weak as South Africa.
And they don't need uh they don't need to be uh protected.
I was doing research for a video about Israel high tech, and they've got tons of articles about them having them one of the most advanced militaries in the world and leading the world in in advanced uh weapons technology.
So they say.
Yeah, so they say, right?
I mean, uh most of it is our technology or technology they say.
Including the nuclear technology.
Yeah, I I don't know.
The Russians and the Chinese definitely have some interesting stuff.
Uh I don't know if anything's better than that S400 system, from what you can tell.
So um so I I I would I'm not convinced they have the best military, but I'm I'm convinced that they want to say that.
They definitely all their stuff.
Which is what he does with all the everything everything is all hyperbolic about how good they are.
It's just like Trump is, interestingly enough, right?
It's not best ever of all time forever.
Like everything he says is the most hyperbolic statement of every it's humorous.
Yeah.
Okay, next one non-mirage truth vision says convenient timing on New Zealand.
Israel has been getting a lot of negative coverage lately.
Now everyone is talking about white people, Muslims, and gun laws.
That is true.
Yeah.
The topic last week was Jexodus, and which was a huge fail.
I did a video on Juxodis, and I'm like, all right, they're gonna be talking about you know Ilhan Omar and Apex and anti-Semitism.
It's like, nope, not anymore.
Now it's white uh white supremacy and guns.
Right, right, right.
Yeah.
The fake Jesodist.
Yeah, I was laughing about that when it first happened.
You know, a Trump staffer leading the march to uh of all the Democrats supposedly leaving the the Jewish Democrats leaving the Democrat Party.
Yeah, right, uh right, exactly.
Like, how much more grassroots can you get?
It's not it's not a Democrat who's saying to leave, it's all it's a Trump campaign worker.
Um just just awful too, like she wasn't charismatic or or convincing even the slightest bit.
And she goes on Trump's all-time favorite show, maybe besides Hannity Fox and Friends to push it.
So shameless.
She's an international model.
That's the first thing that comes up under description.
International model.
Yeah, they found a pretty face for it.
Yeah.
Yeah, that was such a dud.
That super chat made me think about an interesting, you know, like something we can all acknowledge, anyone that's been paying attention that you know, we understand that our foreign policy today as the United States clearly relates to Israeli's foreign policy, right?
Always stemming all the way back to 911 to what they're trying to accomplish in the Middle East.
And even they're not even that they're open about that today.
I mean, they just said they're there in Syria to protect Israel, right?
I mean, that's obviously clear.
So we and this this also stems back to 9-11, the create and where I think the large, you know, the Islamophobia and all this stuff that we're talking about today, the the hate inherent about a certain culture being Muslims.
I mean, it all kind of stems back to Israeli foreign policy, right?
It's just interesting that it made me think about that in regard to uh the comment he made about Israel.
And that it connects all the stuff.
Yeah, I was thinking about immigration too.
It's like is it wrong?
I'm thinking, is it wrong to want to have like a foreigner come in and set up a bunch of his religious uh moss in your in your town and then like you know, grow and grow as a population over time.
Like, is it wrong to not want that?
And um uh another point was do you ever see like Christians going into uh m mu strong Muslim areas and having having their churches?
Yeah.
Well, you have the colonization, you know, you have the Spanish Inquisition and you have the uh Americans, you know, taking lands from natives and stuff, not specifically whites.
Well, you have Constantinople, you know, and and the fight over that area.
Um so there were the Crusades.
Uh so there is some history of it, nothing more recently.
Um, but you know, well, there's Israel also taking the lands from the Palestinians.
So there, you know, there is history of it.
I bet the Palestinians are pretty pissed off about the Jews coming in and having babies.
What I mean what's the worst part is that um it is it wrong to let them in when like you're bombing their home countries for illegitimate reasons over support of Israel or you know, Israel's agenda in the Middle East.
Like that's the bizarre thing.
You definitely can't have people let people in when you're bombing their home country.
Which is why the Muslim Bam, you know, it sounds like I'm a proponent of the Muslim ban, but it it makes sense.
But but what I'm saying is we shouldn't be bombing the countries in the first place.
Right.
Right, right.
We're well, you know, and that then that's the whole thing about us creating the uh us radicalizing Muslims, whether it be by bombing countries, by having military bases in their countries, or by straight up funding madrasas to radicalize funding the most radical groups.
Yeah, we could live in peace if we weren't like you know, st meddling and starting a bunch of stuff and and all the chaos in the Middle East, largely all around Israel.
Right?
Right.
Right.
Yeah, absolutely.
And you can't deny the correlation between you know the the this effort, but even even pre-9-11, to the US's foreign policy with Israel.
I mean, it's clearly you can see the rise in terrorism and everything right along with their increase in this mentality.
You know what I mean?
It's it's obvious.
Correlation is not causation, but it's enough.
You know, it makes sense.
Okay, next super chat, Joshua Jackson.
Thank you.
Thank everybody for uh for the support.
It's so great to be uh streaming live again, guys.
Thanks for joining me.
Uh, this is my second live stream back since my three three-month ban.
Great.
Congratulations.
Feels so good to be live and interactive again.
Okay, Joshua Jackson says, in my opinion, the shooter did this to activate the masses.
We have been desensitized to violence and mace mass brainwashing with video games in the social media culture.
He did this to activate millions of Manchurian candidates.
Yeah, he's like this.
Whenever something like this happens, it there's always a psychological effect of copycats wanting to do stuff.
So now there could be a retaliation and then an S an escalation.
You know, anything like this is dangerous.
That's why the Jesse Smolette was so dangerous.
What that could have started if that didn't get proven as a hoax.
Yeah, right.
Well, that's what I'm I'm genuinely concerned, you know, that people are going to be sympathetic to this, think it was awesome, especially with the video.
You know, I can I'm concerned people watch the video and think it was really great, and think that they might want to do it too.
I am concerned about that.
You know, there I took that.
I'm sorry, go ahead.
I was gonna say, no, I just I took what he was saying slightly different.
That that man cheering candidate activation, like, you know, the prem the idea of MK Ultra is so shrugged off by so many people today, but there is very clear evidence that this existed well past the date they said they shut it down, right?
And we know of things like the voice of God, and this is all on record information that they can manipulate the way you think, they can plant things.
I mean, it's just so much going on today.
So, what if he's suggesting that this was like a triggering event for a larger you know, manchurian candidates suggests like some kind of a programming idea of somebody that is in place but hasn't been activated yet?
You know what I mean?
And so it's like what if all the memes and all these things are meant to trigger people that are in you know sleeping cells somewhere around the world that don't even realize that they're programmed candidates for this kind of thing, and we're you know, this that's how I took that, which seems alarming to me and shouldn't be shot down as not possible, you know what I mean.
Yeah, Mar Marshall H. What's up, Marshall says?
Hello, Adam, Ryan, and Nathan.
It's great watching all three of you.
Thanks for being here, Marshall.
It's fun to be here with with these guys talking about this uh crazy stuff.
Uh Central Happenings Network says five eyes did this real event.
His memes were poor used poorly.
I know Memetria and will make a video, meme poser, chameleon, doppelganger, CIA, Gypsy, BB.
Uh that makes me think of a point is that um uh there was articles Netanyahu threaten New Zealand over some kind of UN vote, too.
Yes, that's true.
That's true.
Yeah, that's true, because I guess they vote in support of Palestine generally.
Usually the the false flag that would make sense on that vote and that tidbit is that they would have a Muslim attack that the local population, though you would think that's the normal, you know, blame the Muslims type of psyops, so join with us against internet uh, you know, world um Islam.
Yeah, that's what you normally see.
Um, and the five eyes, they are in the five eyes too, and then there's the spying network from 2011, and uh so there's probably Mossad agents all over that place, just like all the other five eyes countries.
Yeah, most likely.
Maybe he had a Mossad handler that made him uh you know gave him shock therapy.
Who knows, right?
I've seen that in movies.
He he could have easily, you know, I he's he definitely could have been affiliated with some kind of intelligence agency, you know, the way the way the way he carried it out and everything and the manifesto weird.
How can you not think like wow, this this is fishy?
Something about this is is fishy.
This is like one of the weirdest ones that I remember almost.
It's weird.
He showed up on Twitter just in February for the first time, and where has he been all this time?
Because he knows all this stuff about what goes on in the channels.
Nobody recognizes him, he didn't stand out ever.
I mean, who's he what was he doing?
Didn't it look like his tweets were just like the day before?
He posted all his pictures of his guns?
Yeah, it was like two days before I heard.
So where was he the rest of the time?
You know, it's a really bizarre case.
And the fact that he created the social media profile right before it happened.
Um obviously it could have been premeditated by him, but I'm I don't know.
And then he has social media posts of him in Pakistan um saying how great Pakistan is, and he wishes more people would be able to come there and how hard it is to get in there.
So how did he get in there?
You know, I I I don't know.
This guy's there.
Why why did he go to Pakistan?
Yeah, what a weird thing to say for someone who who reportedly hates Muslims enough to kill them all, and yet he's saying Pakistan, what a great place.
Like that there's just so many inconsistencies with this story.
And what was his job again?
I saw that he had a job.
Um oh weight trainer, right?
He was a physical trainer.
Yeah, personal trainer, but then he made money from BitConnect and traveled.
And he went to France, Pakistan, Turkey, North Korea.
He's photographed in North Korea.
Ooh, there's an interesting timeline point.
No, it would have been in 2017 when the market was going up.
It would have because that's when he started traveling, I guess, in France and everything.
So yeah, it would have been 2017, which is when he said he started planning, two years ago.
That's a that's a big one.
Yeah, I don't know.
I just don't know if I believe he made money off Bit Connect and that let him travel the world.
I just don't I agree, but that's the claim, right?
And now we're hearing that he supposedly left in 2011 from Christ Church after that attack on or the Mossad thing was revealed.
And but so you're claiming he says he traveled because he had money from that.
Doesn't line up, right?
So it's just more and more the more you dig on these stories, they when they are these kind of things, this is what happens.
You know, you start to find these little things that don't work.
Yep.
Any other thoughts on this that we didn't hit?
Attorney.
Oh, I wonder if they're gonna do like an interview with him or something.
Probably not.
They don't oh the uh this lady here, what is she, the prime minister?
She said that they're gonna have new gun laws.
She promised new gun laws.
And that's semi-automatics, apparently.
And again, it's the one that's ridiculous after that we're saved from a man with a gun, right?
But it's you know, it's it's and of course he had them legally, so what are they gonna change?
Like it just doesn't make sense.
Like it's clearly they she came out saying this like right after it happened.
Yep, right away, and they're gonna ban semi-automatics and uh what you know, he could have just as easily gotten the guns illegally, it seemed like so.
I I don't know what changing these laws is gonna do.
Yeah, it's problem reaction solution for sure.
And uh and he said he wanted it to spread to the United States, too, but it seems like so far it hasn't.
You know, it's very hard to get much momentum behind getting gun laws done in this country, it seems like, um, especially with Donald Trump as president now.
But um he what he said he wanted to create a second amendment debate to again further divisions in the United States, but so far so far no calls for gun restrictions, have there been not in this country because of this attack.
Not that I've seen no, they're they're just targeting what white nationalists and uh the far right, the extreme far right.
That that's the main target for this.
And again, he's basically uh a Zionist, he's got the Zionist mentality.
Do you think that's fair to say?
Well, in what sense?
What do you what what do you mean?
And in terms of being anti-Islam or in terms of being supremacist?
Yes.
In terms of uh who who was the other shooter that was in the European country, Brevik or something.
He yeah, I saw a headline that he was his views, he wrote huge manifestos, and he was really pro-Israel.
Interesting.
Yeah, well, this guy basically pointed out Brevik kind of as his main inspiration.
And he even said he reached out to him before the attack.
He said he reached out to him before the attack and got his blessing.
And he also reached out to something called the Reborn Knights Templar, uh, which again apparently Brevik also represent uh said Um is that he was associated with the reborn knights Templar, so I don't know if this was just a shout-out to them, but that was another weird thing.
Somebody said he's a Freemason.
I don't know if that's true yet.
Um, but he did do that weird shout-out um to the reborn knights Templar, which I don't know if anybody and said he got their blessing too.
Yeah, the interesting thing is that like people that don't actually research into what their you know a Zionist's ideology and beliefs would be specifically, they just would think of that just Israel, you know, they don't understand that there's nuances there, and of course they the United States and the mainstream media would hide that.
But like I always play this video from the uh the a pro uh member of parliament from Ireland, like has like 14 different documents with things that are directly quoted from Netanyahu's cabinet, and it's extreme racism.
Like these people are less than human.
We should kill them and all their families, you know, on and on and on.
It's like so yeah, I I so regardless of whether they come out and say that they're Zionist or that they're pro-Israel, you can very clearly see an alignment with that kind of mentality from the Zionist mentality.
You know, that's my opinion anyway.
Yeah, that that's what I was saying too.
Like, that's where all of that where is all the anti-Islamic uh info coming out of.
It's all of the you know, the the Zionist media, Fox News and all the Trump supporters, basically.
You know, the left covers up every Muslim attack and wants to bring them all in.
So it's definitely not them putting out the anti-Muslim stuff.
Yeah, no, that's a fact.
You know, people like Alex Jones and and and um man, all the stuff he said.
It just makes me think about if he were still on the air, all the stuff he said about Somalis and Muslims and and all the stuff Paul Joseph Watson.
Oh, I could put together a compilation.
I've got it all saved of him, all of his best highlights, uh uh demonizing uh Palestinians and in Islam, and uh I should put that out maybe.
Now would be a good time.
You'd be a perfect person to ask this, Adam.
I somebody mentioned to me, I don't watch Alex Jones at all.
Um somebody mentioned to me after this event that he flipped on this.
I couldn't confirm that.
I haven't even looked, but that apparently he was going the other direction than you would expect in in like supporting of the Muslim people or whatever.
I can't confirm that.
Somebody just sent me a message saying that, and I just I'm like, whatever, I don't care about Alexander.
Nick Griffin of the Um the BMP talked about, right?
You guys have seen that clip.
No, I haven't seen that.
Only focus on Islam and don't talk about the banking system, the Zionist versus Tommy Robinson.
Yeah.
Yep, exactly.
Yeah, focus on Islam, don't talk about the banks, right?
So that's what they're all doing.
You know, Loomer, Loomer and Jacob Wall, just what they did this week with Ilhan Omar and uh the Republicans that had her next to the photo of her in the the World Trade Center getting hit by the plane.
Yeah.
Yeah, I mean, this could backfire for the this uh Zionist component and the in uh the Senate and stuff because people on the left, there are people on the left who are pissed off about this anti-Semitism stuff.
I just talked to one the other day, and a lot of people on the left are anti-Zionists, and the fact that these that you do have some of this anti-Islam or anti-Muslim sentiment that comes from the Zionist people like Laura Loomer.
I mean, she's gonna be even more marginalized, isn't she?
I mean, her views are much less acceptable today.
Uh it's definitely gonna put some focus on some of these Jews out there that are anti-Islam or anti-Muslim, um as well as the you know, white nationalists or whatever you want to call that group.
That's a good point.
I definitely could blow back on, but you know, that I I I just the more it seems to me, it doesn't I I it feels like this could just be a product of of everything that's happening.
You know what I mean?
Like and and it was used, like maybe it was something more than what we you know, like we're trying to like associate it with one party the other, or the Zionists, or you know what I mean?
Like, I mean, the only thing that makes me take a step back from that is just the shooting.
I just don't believe that somebody could shoot that well that wasn't trained, you know.
So it just feels like it has to be some kind of an asset to some degree.
And then he said Fortnite trained him how to kill or something like that, right?
The video games.
Another troll.
Yeah.
Well, I think it's that isn't she oh, so that was a meme.
Is that what you're saying?
Is that another meme or something?
The next super chat is about him trolling.
It's it from Joshua Jackson.
Thank you, Joshua.
It says social media SEO search engine optimization.
He added popular tags, so I guess the memes to increase viewers and ensure his message would spread.
He knew he would be censored, and he knew most people would not want to watch, so he added an element of pop culture.
That's a good point.
Well, yeah, I mean, subscribe to PewDiePie, the music he played.
You know, I saw I saw at least one thing from Achan where they were like, oh my god, I can't believe he played this song.
That's so awesome.
Yeah, really weird.
Okay, next one.
V Lunk says there's a the three-edged sword says the Jesuits benefit most.
Okay, black sun symbolism on the vest of the New Zealand shooter, black sun symbolism at Charlottesville incident on a shield and flag of white supremacist side, black sun on Himmler's SS Castle on the floor.
Did you guys see a symbol on the new New Zealand shooter's shirt?
Did we see it?
I didn't see one on his shirt.
They might be I thought they were talking about this.
I'll sh I'll share my screen.
I think they were talking about this.
Let me see.
I I don't know for sure what that sun is, but here let me start.
Remember, Nathan, you and I worship the sun god because of uh your pillow in my uh Aztec calendar.
Jeez.
Do you see this thing on my screen?
So the on the right side.
I think that's what they're talking about, although I'm not sure.
This thing in the middle, is that is that it uh yeah.
So yeah.
Okay.
Yeah, I've seen people with that on uh on uh I thumbnails for their for their accounts, their screen names.
Yeah, so that's what they're talking about, I guess.
Interesting.
It's funny you mentioned people somebody literally just unsubscribe to me because they claim I have a Native American mask back here, my grandmother gave me when I was 10.
They say it's a devil, right?
I got this over here that's the Hawaiian statue.
They say that that's a devil, and they have to scribe.
This one just weird picture, somebody my friend drew when I was in high school.
People are ridiculous.
Yeah, I I kind of want to just go get like a huge, like, I don't know, uh, Illuminati all C and I or something and getting that posted on the back so they can, you know, they can do screenshots with arrows and say that it's proof of something.
Yeah, proof secret disposed.
That's funny.
Okay, uh Martin says total absence of criticism of the tribe is telling.
No, yeah, that's the point I made, right?
No, no criticism at all of uh Zionism or or you know, any of the stuff that we talk about about immigration.
And uh it seems like he was just straight watching Zionist propaganda, which makes why is he doing all this stuff to make them look bad if that was his ideology?
It's so confusing.
I think it was intentional.
I think it was to cause blowback and to just create division and get people more entrenched in their own beliefs.
I I think that was the point of it.
And it is weird because when you think about um white uh supremacists, they don't consider Jews to be white, typically.
And so typically that's part of the thing is to you know be critical, also.
And yeah, and who supports mass immigration more than anybody.
I mean, um, so it is interesting he left it out.
Yeah, like like the synagogue shooter, that was his biggest beef about immigration, but he, you know, he actually was uh I don't want to say targeting the right people, but he was closer to the root cause.
Yeah, I don't know.
No, I'm not saying targeting the right people.
I mean you know what I mean.
He's uh he he went farther down the rabbit hole, I I should say, on who is actually being, you know, not blaming the Muslims for immigration, but like the policies of the politicians and you know the the agenda around the world is what I'm saying.
No, I uh it's kind of like what we were talking about earlier, is where do the radicalized Muslims come from and so forth.
So do you guys remember the I'm sure and I'm sure you do the recent story, those the the fake pipe bombs that were sent to politicians, that whole that just kind of fell off because it didn't stick, obviously.
It was like just nothing, but it seems like the same kind of a thing, right?
That was meant to elicit a very specific response on one side of the two-party paradigm, right?
Like they wanted you to think, oh, these people are being attacked because of their political views.
So you're right, Adam, to think this more, you know, it as much as I don't want to say I, you know, you point out Rush Limbaugh made this point.
Like, I don't, you know, that I'm not associated with Rush Limba, but it's it seems likely that that's something that may plu be the case because the more you dive into the story, it does not align.
Like you're right.
Why would he do this knowing that this would effectively hurt the side that he believes in it?
That's the point.
Yeah.
So he's either mentally ill or there's something not right about this.
There's not some there's the lack of sincerity and genuine motive.
Yeah.
And then but again, maybe it's just goes it's the people pulling the strings from beyond the two party thing.
They just giving us something on one side of it to get us yelling at each other, right?
Like that's we gotta I've always tried to go back there.
That even in our arguments, we find ourselves pitting ourselves on one side of an argument, but it's like, you know, they're more than two choices, right?
They they want us inside this sphere, this area of discussion.
Yeah, and the point when I said tar targeting the right group, what I meant was like highest.
That guy was so mad about highest.
That's actually who is pushing for the the open border policy.
So that makes actual like logical sense.
You know, it's obvious that he was falling for the Zionist narrative that it's focus on the on Islam and Muslims as the problem and not the politicians and the policies and the agenda.
Right.
Right.
Yeah, whatever.
Okay.
Uh next super chat.
Total, oh, yeah.
And ju James York says Hamas is beating and rounding up Palestinian protesters, WTF C. Gaza report on Twitter.
Yeah, that was I saw that coming out.
There, the the story is coming out that they're suppressing protests against them, which you know, probably it's probably even likely.
I haven't gone too much further into it, but before we even dive into the story, we should remember that Netanyahu literally just said that they need to continue funding Hamas because it keeps Palestinians divided.
Right.
So it's like Hamas is is clearly Business Insider did an article long time back that showing Israel was part of creating Hamas, if not entirely.
So it's like that's what their job is.
Their job is to create this aspect in in it and to give them the excuse to bomb Gaza a hundred times.
At least that's my opinion.
Oh, we're we're just defending ourselves.
Like, how many times like we've already said this over and over again?
They send a little bottle rocket over, it doesn't do any damage, and nobody's hurt, and then they just retaliate with force.
You know, there's a term for it, uh, you know, way too much force that's equivalent for you know what they did.
It's just so sad.
We'll we'll get into that in a second, we'll finish up with that.
Uh Kim North says, What's your take on the fact that the murder did not once mention Zionist influence in America or Europe?
Yeah, it's a glaring omission.
If he was supposedly on 4chan and 8chan and he's not talking about Zionism or what about his meme?
Didn't his thumbnail meme?
That kind of looked like it was uh uh Nathan, do you know do you know what I'm talking about?
It was like dark skinned, uh had a big nose.
Oh no, I didn't see I I haven't seen what you're talking about, actually.
It was well, what was it?
I think it was an 8chan post that he did where he said something crazy and he's going to go take action or something like that.
I don't want to show any of it, one, because I'm a little too lazy to find it and I just want to chat.
And two, I'm worried that if you show any of this stuff, they'll pull the video.
Right.
Yeah, who knows?
Uh yeah, I uh it's somebody in the chat, I think was saying they're hiding his manifesto.
I don't understand that we're not allowed to look at this stuff.
I mean, you know, why are journalists allowed to watch the video and tell us what's in it?
Why can't we see it for ourselves?
You know, uh I mean, I know we have we figured out do it, and there's no punishment for it in the United States, but why aren't we allowed to see that?
And if we're not allowed to read the manifesto for ourselves, I mean, you know, I understand, I guess, trying not to have people celebrate it and get radicalized, but uh, you know, the um the control of the control of the information, and then you know, also on YouTube, um, if you type in Christchurch, it won't autofill anything close to shooting.
If you type in Mosque, it won't say shooting.
If you type in New Zealand, it won't say shooting.
So they've actually blocked the searches too, or the autofill and the tags.
I saw that because when I put in tags, it tells me popular tags, and when you put in Christchurch, it doesn't come up with anything.
Yeah, the guy's name doesn't come up.
If you put in his first name, it won't fill in his last name.
So I mean, that's how censored right now the information is, is they don't even want people searching.
They're gonna get it so dialed in that they can pull off hoaxes, and in such suppressed like journalism and skepticism is gonna be so suppressed that they're gonna be able to really get away with any kind of a hoax that they wanted if they did want to do hoaxes.
And we can't allow anybody to have the power that if they could do something bad, we we can't even allow them the the the uh opportunity to pull something like that off.
Yeah, I agree.
I mean, you make a good point, Nathan.
I mean, it's they're getting to a point that's the nanny state we're talking about where they're telling us, oh, this isn't good.
And I actually understand the logic, like independent of politics of why we shouldn't care to read this or care to spread or look at it.
There's more to talk about than that, but at the same time, we should they shouldn't be able to tell us no no no, this one's off limits.
It's exactly like they said about the the WikiLeaks things, remember?
Now you guys aren't allowed to look at this, but we can because we're the journalists.
Like, really, like that's crazy.
And we need to step back and recognize how alarming that actually is.
And as much as we don't if we put up with this and don't stand up and exercise our our rights to do all this, they'll just keep getting away with more and more and more and pushing the boundaries further and further.
All for your protection, of course.
Yeah.
So next super chat, Tanya Williams says Ryan.
Oh shoot, it skipped away.
It said Ryan Dawson would be good at talking about this or something like that.
Shoot, I don't know what happened to it.
That was basically it.
I just saw it.
Yeah, Ryan Dawson is the best on this.
Yeah.
Henry Ford says politicians don't serve the people, violence ensues.
Uh pro-truth anti-media says, I got a 25 to 44 like to dislike and a bunch of, yeah.
Well, when what else are we supposed to do?
Comments on my video condemning the shooter, the lack of morality and the short-sightedness of people.
Okay.
So yeah, that's what I'm talking about.
I guess he made a video condemning the shooter and a bunch of people.
Um I'm telling you.
Scary.
Yeah.
I mean, there are trolls, and we acknowledge that in any regard, and especially if this is an agenda or some kind of a psy-off, of course, they're gonna come out with their trolls, but I agree.
There's a lot of people that are radicalized by the mainstream media views that are that are, you know, yay, this is a good thing.
We should be sporting this.
They're fighting for a, you know, which is crazy because people died.
You know, and that's not okay.
Like, they don't care what your lot your mentality is.
You can't just broadsweep an entire culture and say that they should all die.
Like that's that's bad.
That's a no-no.
Michael X. White says the okay, hold on.
The plan we all want to do is to rule them all exposed and shoot.
Okay, the plan of interbreeding all in one Jewish Zionist race to rule them all exposed in shooters' manifesto, exposed nefariously perniscuous Zion type.
I didn't see anything in his manifesto about Zionism or or or breeding.
Did you say anything about breeding or or mixed uh there was that was the big point is about it's about the fact of the the numbers, the breeding that we are being outbred as white culture.
Uh-huh.
That's the point that these people are breeding faster than we are, and we're gonna be gone after a certain that's like the the whole thing.
I think that the root premise of this whole idea was that we need to stop them from overtaking white culture and that they're breeding more than we are.
It's you know inherently racist at the end of the day.
But what if what if there are demographic trends that show that certain groups are uh having more children?
Like that's you know, not everybody has the same amount of children.
That's fair.
Yeah, we should go shoot people that are.
Oh no, absolutely not.
No, no, no, no.
Not even saying you're implying that.
I'm just saying that that's the logic.
Like, so what is yeah, I mean, historically speaking, we all started as one basic, you know, culture, you know, whatever.
Started we everything comes stems from Africa, right?
And we it things grew out and changed.
History's going to change, right?
Historically speaking, even under the United States premise of the melting pot, things will just eventually blend together over time.
And it's like I get that people somehow think they need to defend this specific i idea of white culture.
That's fine.
You can feel that way.
I'm not even right, wrong or otherwise.
You all you can believe what you want, but you cannot go kill people that have nothing to do with that at some random place because you feel that way.
I mean, that's we need to get past this idea that violence is okay if it stems from a good a place of righteousness.
You know, it's like that we're the ages that the time of the the uh like Nathan mentioned, the um oh shoot, I just blanked on it, you know, for doing it for um the not the shoot.
Most like about religious religious peak going around and spreading the word of Christianity, the the crusades, the state inquisition.
Thank you.
Yeah.
The days of those kind of things are past us.
We can't just go say you're gonna believe what I believe or you're gonna die.
Or rather, it's not past us.
Our governments are doing that, but we need to get past that.
Yeah.
Yeah, I mean, that's the that's the whole issue with the whole thing is okay.
Yes, it's I mean, yes, basically, by your math, white people are going to eventually become a smaller part of society based on these birth rates.
But what's the solution?
The solution isn't going around and killing people, certainly.
And the painting and the whole thing of thinking that everyone who believes in Islam is a terrorist or it's just not not a I'm sorry, Nathan, but it's just not not a solution.
It's like the worst possible thing he could that anybody could do.
Right.
Exactly.
Yeah.
I mean, have more babies.
That's fine.
Yeah.
Did he think that going out and shoot and shooting a bunch of uh people that that didn't have anything to do with the policies of them coming there?
Uh, that that that's helping the cause at all.
Yeah.
And what's this final solution?
I mean, is it really that we're gonna go to war and then we're going to what deport all Muslims or eliminate all Muslims?
I mean, that's some people say bomb all of them.
They go nuke nuke all the Middle East.
They don't care, or just let them fight and kill each other.
That's the mindset I've seen so many times online, and and I I feel like is I don't want to say, yeah.
I've I've seen it.
Yeah, I agree.
It's crazy.
I mean, and we understand that the Middle East was quite a different place before, you know, colonialism and imperialism and manipulation, you know, and there's always been bad places around the world.
But I always point out the example of the way around the way Iran looked pre-1950s, was they're like the United States.
They're women in bikinis, and it's not hard to verify that.
It's a very easy fact to look up after the United States operation Ajax, where we overthrew their government, it actually was very the the guy the guy had a picture of himself next to the Liberty Bell, right?
I mean, this is the guy who believed in the supposed democracy, and they put in the Shah, who was a dictator, right?
And that's why they are the way they now, you know, and they're trying to fight back from that since the 70s.
But the radicalization comes from a certain place, and that's something that's been used to you know, I mean, Israel and U.S. foreign policy.
I mean, it's all it's so easy to find, you just need to do the research, people.
Okay, next one, homeless American says, read Albert Pike World War III letter, all of it is happening.
Yeah, that's what I said.
The dialectic of the the Muslims versus the the whites is uh exacerbated with this situation.
And it says, uh we shall unleash the nihilist and atheist, foment war between Zionists and the Arab world, etc.
I thought it was the Christian in the Arab world.
Well, I guess the Christian is basically controlled by the Zionist.
Okay, search Mossad operation Unearth in New Zealand.
Yeah, we did that at the very beginning.
Tap says headshots show no exit spray, strange placement of shoes from women.
I don't know.
I I feel like people are gonna say it's uh and then uh they call it a hoax.
People are gonna say that about anything no matter what, I think that there'll be some people that claim it's a hoax.
I mean, we have video of this.
If they wanted to have a hoax, they wouldn't have faked the whole video, I don't think, you know.
They would have just not put out a video.
Yeah, I mean, I looked at, you know, I think we've all looked at it.
Okay, yes, Hollywood could do it, but the odds, I mean, and the him saying there was no exit spray, oh, yeah, there was.
I saw some in the head, and there was spray all over the place.
And okay, maybe that was a dummy with you know, whatever.
And you could you there you can stretch things, you know, and and say how they could have possibly staged it, but there are so many details, and like he's uh you know, it's just factually not true, but he said there is exit spray if you look at it.
Yeah, um so and well, it's also important to point out that this is the whole problem today.
Nobody knows for sure that it's a fake, and also nobody knows for sure that it's real, right?
We all have an opinion based on what we've seen, and people need to stop saying, you know, oh, it's so this is what it is, and you don't know that for sure.
I can entertain the possibility that even that could be we see deep fakes.
They'll stuff you could make anything today.
So it could be, it could be.
I mean, but it seems pretty clear by stuff all the evidence that it's most likely real, but we don't know for sure.
Nobody does.
Yeah.
And you know, and the point is is we have to figure out how not to fight about that.
Exactly.
Yeah, we have to figure out how to accept each other's point of view.
Because a lot of people are gonna say, oh, we're being shills or what have you, and that's what people are saying about me for saying that I, you know, I think it it looked real to me.
Um, but uh we have to figure out a way to get together.
I mean, that's the thing to me is you know, I people have to realize uh people just can't succumb to this division, and I just have a feeling it's really getting worse.
Um that this thing is gonna make it worse too.
Uh figuring out how we're gonna get beyond all the divide.
Um, you know, it's definitely on my mind.
I agree.
Okay, next one, and I think we're almost to the end of these.
We'll wrap it up, try to keep it right under two hours for sure.
Uh three-edged sword says the Illuminati were created by the Jesuits and infiltrated the Freemasons in 1789.
The person who, quote, revealed the plans of Albert Pike World War III was a Jesuit.
The first, second, and third, uh, we is a Jesuit.
Oh, world wars are a Jesuit plan.
Yeah, reminds me of Titus Frost.
He's always talking about the Jesuits.
You could just make a legitimate case for true.
Yeah, I mean, there's there's plenty of information that suggests, but you know, but again, like you said, like you you could go down a rabbit hole and find evidence for a lot of different things.
It's usually much more complex than one group or one person, you know.
Yeah, I agree.
Yeah, and then uh next one.
Two the 2017 Portland train attack was an organic false flag, and this new New Zealand shooting can possibly be so many now they can do individual false flags.
I don't know what they mean by individual false flags.
I wonder if they're doing uh keyword search for false flag, and all you gotta do is say that magic word, and your video gets taken down now.
I guess we'll find out.
Terry Loder um says, Don't think it was a false flag saying it was is counterproductive.
Well, we're not saying it was.
I don't even think that they might not be saying we're saying that, maybe it's just saying in general that somebody saying that would be counterproductive.
But but whatever, you know, false flag doesn't necessarily mean something didn't happen.
It's just it could be like a false flag is just an attack that's blamed on somebody that didn't do it.
And this guy very well might not be a white nationalist.
It could just be that's what he says, you know, and it's an intelligence operation and it's made to think that he is, and that he has nothing to do with that ideology, and that would be a false flag, right?
If he's not really what he says he is, which is entirely the fact that that's happened and possible, our history is rife with examples of that, right?
And and even more so, like the FBI is caught continuously creating and helping and staging terrorist events, even though they claim like, oh, he was gonna do it, and we just gave him the tools and caught him.
How do we not know that this wasn't something like that?
Right, and we've seen this stuff happen before where the FBI even was involved and didn't let anybody know until well later because they screwed it up, right?
So it's like I think I get what he's trying to say, and I I got a similar comment.
People misunderstand they think false flag means no one died, right?
These are the they're they're they're muddling these terms in the mainstream media, like you said, it simply means that an event happened, and usually that people died, and that they simply tried to lay it at the feet of somebody else and make it seem that way.
So I wouldn't say it's counterproductive to say that something's a false flag ever, personally.
I think we have to always be open to entertaining that possibility simply because of how common it has been throughout our history.
That's my opinion.
But I get what he's saying.
I think I don't know, and and I think maybe they meant calling it fake is counterproductive.
Yes, that's what I think.
And I don't, and I guess I have to say it's not counterproductive because it's okay.
People think it's you know, people think it after watching the video.
Well, what am I gonna say?
I mean, I I I don't know.
I don't know for sure.
I have what I think of what they think, and we just have to figure out how to move beyond that.
But to say it's counterproductive, yeah.
I mean, uh he might be saying the same thing we're saying, like that we need to get past this whole topic in general and just focus on how it's being used, and you know what I mean?
And I I get that point, but you should be able to ask if it's a hoax too, right?
You need to be able to ask these questions.
Yep.
Lisa Dollar, thank you, Lisa.
Davy Croco says two Reddit threads pulled Discords for links.
New Zealand can't access any chance.
Don't mention the shooter.
So yeah, that I saw that they're pulling stuff down.
Uh Tom from RTR Truth said that they Pulled a video file he had of the shooting down off of his Google uh Google Cloud or something like that.
They did deleted it from his cloud.
Yeah, that's interesting because I was thinking about because I have a hard copy of it.
Um, and I was thinking, but there is a copy up right now that I know about, but I but you know, I uh definitely don't want to be known as spreading that information because that would definitely be something they might shut you down for.
But the fact that he said it's illegal supposedly now to watch it in New Zealand is is pretty insane.
And then um and hey Davy Crocco, I know his channel.
I watched some of his stuff.
So um, yeah, it's it's uh you're not allowed to mention it.
See, that's what I wonder.
Uh and it even made me really scared just putting out a video about it, just putting out a video about how it was shit posting and how these were the memes involved.
I'm really worried, you know, they might just take it down just to because they don't want anything about shooting or anything about the shooter, and that's a dangerous situation when you can't talk about it.
And that's what I feel like they're trying to do is make it so that we literally can't talk about it at all.
And that makes people that gets people bottled up.
You know, we have to be able to express our points of view, you know.
Even people who have the fringe beliefs about this, people have to have a place to speak because that's what's radicalizing people.
I mean, I talked to this person on the left, and they were talking about how uh all speech isn't okay, that Alex Jones should be banned and all this stuff.
And I said, that is what is radicalizing people.
You know, the fact that they can't even talk, they can't get this stuff off their chest.
You know, they can't they can't even talk in fantasy or whatever.
I mean when you see that all of your beliefs are being suppressed and they're not being honestly uh portrayed in the media, it it's gonna isolate and echo chamber and and polarize even more and create uh pent up energy in people.
Well, look look at the look at the girl of YouTube, the one you owe the what's her name, Nasim, you know?
Same thing, you know.
You get you get to a point to where you feel like you have no other options, people get desperate, you know, and then you know you add in antidepressants and medication in that mix, and who knows what's gonna happen, you know.
It's it's it's it shouldn't laugh it.
I mean, it's a really it's the situation in this country is incredibly dire when you consider all of these things together and what those things actually do.
You you're talking about getting the the how many people on antidepressants in this country are alarming and the literally like the top side effect is suicide and homicidal thoughts.
It's like, gee, I wonder what's happening in this country, you know, and add all the other things in, they're making people upset and scared, and you know, it's it's not a surprise that these things can and do happen organically.
Does it seem like it's like a frag fragile house of cards and like very easily a couple situations could could occur and in escalation and it could be just like madness.
Uh I'm more concerned than I would normally be because I'm normally a glass half full guy.
I'm normally optimistic that people are good people and that we're gonna get through this, and somehow there's gonna be a light at the end of the tunnel and stuff.
But in this case, I mean I just see the way people are and um I I can see how it is going that it could go that way.
The way things are right now, it could go that way to the full-blown kind of culture war, civil war.
And I know Tim Poole is convinced that that's the way things are going, and that that was that's right.
That's what he said.
But that's what you know, that's his belief is that we're going straight towards civil war.
And now I think that's a I think that is um I I don't think that's necessarily where things are gonna go.
So I his point of view that that's definitely where we're going.
I I think that's a little too far, and I want to give people more credit than that, but I do see the potential, especially with the election coming up too, is that people are really divided.
I mean, there's so many things to divide people right now because I I can't go on my channel and talk about Tulsi Gabbard and Elon Omar and the things I agree with about them without getting attacked from people on the right who say everyone who's a Democrat is evil.
You know, I mean, and Tulsi Gabbard spoke it Koofy.
Uh that's what I heard it.
Yeah, and and that is interesting.
I really need to look into that.
Um, that is the one thing.
People also say she's CFR, and I did see she's on some list that CFR has, but I'm not that doesn't necessarily had an association with Sheldon Adelson too, took some of his money or went to a uh uh conference with him or something.
She spoke at the Christian designists in support of uh what is it, the Christians in support of Zionism.
She spoke at that.
But the only thing I missed the extra everything she talks about is against Israel's policies.
I mean, you know, and she was just she oh never mind.
That was Ilhan Omar said something about Assad and Syria.
She basically said that towed the Zionist line on Syria.
Well, that was I mean, Gabbert to some degree too.
She won't she continues to waver on she doesn't want to outright say that he didn't gas his own people, even though she said in the past that that's not true, right?
She's playing the game and you can see that.
But I I do agree.
I I think she says a lot of good stuff, but I'm I'm you know, that's exactly what somebody would do when they're trying to make that path.
Obama did the same thing, Trump did the same thing, right?
Right, right.
There's definitely a historical precedent for somebody coming in and saying they want peace and then doing the opposite.
So I want to say skeptical, but it's hard to even say anything in support of just something they said, like Elon O'Marr, for example.
I don't know that I support her politics.
I probably don't, but uh what she's been saying recently, you know, I I'm inclined to defend her.
Uh you know, I mean she's calling out um the influence of Israel, so I'm gonna say, and Tulsi Gabber's anti-war, as far as I can tell, she doesn't want us going into Venezuela.
So I'd like to give praise to people when they do say it's just like I praised Alex Jones when he got mad at Trump for sending in those cruise missiles.
That was so fake, though.
That was fake.
You should be able to.
You know what I mean?
Like you should be able to stand up and say, yes, that's a good thing they just did.
It doesn't, it shouldn't automatically mean that you support everything they ever did.
Right.
Like that's just juvenile.
Like we, but this is the propaganda.
You know, this is the two-party divide system.
It's so you can't do that.
You know, you're like self-censoring everything you say.
Okay, um someone in the chat is saying that BitConnect is a meme too.
So whatever he said about BitConnect, he didn't really make money on BitConnect.
That's a meme, apparently.
Gotcha.
Oh, really?
Interesting.
Oh, interesting.
Wow, that makes the how we got his money even more mysterious.
Somebody in the chat was saying, how did he spend seven years traveling the world?
And I don't know if it maybe it was that long, but uh, but I definitely don't know.
There's definitely more to the story.
The truth is you can travel pretty cheap around the world.
Like you could see, I've I traveled for a real long time for nothing.
And you pick up jobs here and there, but still, it's still suspicious.
Some people are able to do it, it's true.
Vagabond is a real vagabond.
So Mr. Zoom Mr. Zucor says that uh having more white children is not a solution.
They'll still become a powerless minority.
It is impossible to maintain a nation with millions added each year.
We want independence.
We think he means white people.
Yeah, I don't know.
What I don't know what country he lives in.
Um who we is.
Yeah, well, I mean, uh I've seen that expressed out there, you know.
I people want a white country and they think that immigration destroys the country and stuff.
I mean is it wrong for for Mexico to want to have a Mexican country or or any other country, or is it only white countries where that's like a stigma and in the double standard?
Well, is it wrong for Israel to want a Jewish country?
No, not uh if there wasn't the issue with the Palestine, no, it wouldn't be.
If they went to uh some of the other places that they decided um they considered going, I think South America or Argentina or something like that, or um don't quote me.
I'm not sure where it was, but they discussed going to other areas, and that would be no problem.
They always go, you don't want there to be a Jewish state.
You're against a Jewish state.
It's no, it's that location and the people that were there before and the way that they're still being treated to this day that were displaced.
It would just be a different, they would just be occupying Argentina.
It would be the same, right?
I mean, it's the same concept.
They're still taking somebody else's territory for themselves.
Well, as long as the the territory wasn't wasn't already people already living there.
But that's what I mean.
And for a religious reason, to say that this is ours because that's what our religion says, that's another problem that makes it – Do you also not find it ridiculous that they sat around and said, where are we gonna go?
And now they claim that this specific location is like the one God gave us this area, but yet they were sitting at A table deciding where they were gonna go.
Yeah, that almost seems fake.
Like they knew all along that they wanted to go back to where the temple mount was.
So I don't see why they even maybe maybe they just floated that idea to make it seem like, oh, well, we weighed all the options.
Maybe.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, I think for white people to say they want their own country.
I mean, it's difficult because we're an invaders in this country, and maybe people don't want to think that, or they think that's an unpopular view.
But I mean, we did that.
We basically came to the United States and made it a white country.
We already did that once.
Um, and I don't think that was okay.
So it's genocide.
So whatever it means, I just don't understand the solution.
Is what are we doing then?
Deporting everybody, killing everybody.
I just don't I don't understand practically what it means.
I mean, if white people want to buy an island or or or just move somewhere where it's all white people.
I mean, if that's the concern, um, I I don't I don't know that we have any more right to this country than anybody else.
Uh I guess well, don't even talk about America.
Just talk hypothetically.
If there was a country that was all white, is it wrong for them to not want to become a minority and a hated minority in their own country?
Yeah, well, the the to address the per the the way they ask the question, like again, to put aside the idea, like you said, of what country or you know, it's the point is like I think either you one of you pointed out that it's a it's a legitimate discussion to be had and it's not being allowed to be had.
Exactly.
That's the problem.
I mean, look, it's actually kind of happening here in regard to like the southern border.
People don't want the like I've been made this point a long time ago.
It became it was about illegal immigrants, and I very clearly saw it morph into just we don't want immigrants, right?
Like just in general.
And and that's and I don't necessarily agree that we should be able to for multiple reasons, US foreign policy, and we're trying to dissect that whole issue, but that we should be able to do that.
But that's okay, you can have that belief and you can argue it.
It doesn't have to be about getting rid of every single person.
But he what he's the argument he made was logical.
That if you're having you can't allow a million people to come in to a country like that every it, especially if you're trying to maintain what you believe is your culture, right?
And I'm not saying I agree with that or not, but that's a legitimate argument that should be able to be had and discussed on an open forum, and it's not.
And maybe that's exactly why it's becoming more radicalized to an extreme corner of a very racist side of the internet, instead of being able to say, here's my logical argument and putting his points out, uh, independent of the idea of you know, an emotional standpoint.
I mean, that's just my opinion, but makes sense.
And most people who want a white nation, uh, particularly in America, want immigration from white countries.
You know, they so it's not anti-immigration, actually.
They'd like white more white people to come.
So uh, but nations have a right to control their borders, you know.
And as far as Europe, um, those nations should have a right to have the people decide what their immigration policies should be.
Uh, you know, I I think that's totally fine.
And and if that's and if they're a majority white country deciding that, I don't think it's racist.
You know, uh, and that's the trouble with the European Union is is that countries are forced.
Yeah, you know, yeah, oh, I'm sorry, I thought I thought you finished.
It's not like uh I'm I'm definitely not to fantasizing all day about wanting to live with only people that look like me, and uh, you know, I live in in California, one of the most uh diverse areas uh in the United States, probably.
So it's not like it's that, but when I when you see that in and you see evidence that there's like actually an agenda that's that's targeting you to become a minority, and you can see it uh playing out, and you can see people actually it headlines in the news and people actually happy about it and saying it's a good thing, like Biden, that's where it becomes a concern.
Like uh, you know, that that's kind of the approach I take it from.
Yeah, again, and and that's a that that's a lot, especially especially when it stems from an agenda to do that, right?
There's clearly a malicious intent there.
Yeah, it should be this is a discussion that should be had, but even bringing this up today, it's you know, that's racist, can't talk about it, right?
It's it's that's that's part of the problem.
Nobody's saying that yet.
Okay, let's get through these last super chats and then and then get it wrapped up.
It says uh avoid AI says bogus banner.
Say bogus banner.
I don't know what that means, but thank you, Martin.
Uh, an organic false flag means an independent in individual attacks and pretends to be his ideological enemy.
Oh, okay, so it's an individual false flag.
I get it.
So he he's not working for anybody else, but he's really, you know, a leftist pretending to be an anti-Muslim Zionist, I guess.
Gotcha.
Okay.
Goylet Green, thank you.
Uh Zucor says, uh, we are not invaders, we are settlers.
There were primitive people with a population, one million, plenty of room.
We build a civilization here from the ground up that is being stolen from us.
So I guess that's responding to the Native Americans.
Yeah.
Who are the settlers we know about right now?
You know what I mean?
Settlements.
I mean Israel.
They're settlers.
Yeah.
Illegal settlements in Palestine.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
The euphemism of calling them settlers instead of like occupiers or or invaders.
Yeah.
Well, what an interesting thing to say that because they're primitive people that we just it's, you know, I know that's how history has worked.
Says Israel deserves it because they were fucking goats.
I mean, you know, so well, I think if if we were, you know, uh hundreds of years ago, we were in England, and some only a small percentage of people were getting on the boat and crossing over to go uh start colonies and stuff.
You know, uh not everybody in England was supporting the colonies and supporting the expansion and supporting what was happening to Indians, and I think if I was back then, I would be against that, just like I'm against all the wars that are going on now, killing uh Muslims and you know people all around the world.
Yeah.
I mean, I guess how it's different.
Yeah, well, I mean, but it's it stems down to the idea again, it stems from this this root idea that they're just lesser than, right?
They don't deserve this, it's ours.
We took it.
And again, historically speaking, that the sense of the ability to, the force, the strength to take it, that meant it was yours.
I mean, that's historically, that's kind of how country seriously.
That's the way power works.
That's just the way the world works, essentially.
Exactly.
But but we're at a point now where we can look back and see this.
You know, we like to pretend we're civilized society today, at least that's what they try to project themselves as, and yet we still think that way.
This it's this tribalist mentality.
And that's again, that's I'm just pointing out an obvious fact.
Whether that's right or wrong is up to you to decide.
But I think from a moral standpoint, you just saying someone just doesn't deserve it because you're able to kill them.
I don't know.
That doesn't that doesn't try to do that.
What about the point of there being plenty of room uh in the United States?
Like it didn't just happen like they just decided we're gonna wipe the whole country away.
Like it kind of happened slowly, and there was battles and stuff, and and uh, you know, it wasn't just America here that was doing it, there was other other countries too.
So anyway, we can talk about that forever.
So we got uh Yeah, I gotta argue some points there, but we can keep going.
Okay.
Uh it was literally almost mostly inhabited in India.
Okay, I don't want to talk about the Indian uh Indian uh history anymore.
Okay.
Thank you, Zucor.
Uh so let's let's wrap it up, guys, and talk about uh possibly if Tim Poole is right, uh yellow vest or some type of uh escalation civil war.
First of all, uh the yellow vest, your guys' take, it hasn't been covered a lot in the news, and it's been going on for like what, eight months or eight weeks now?
Eighteen.
Eighteen weeks straight.
Yeah.
Just the the one today that was the the bit it's basically Macron has been traveling for like a few weeks now, trying to like have these town halls and trying to like basically placate and light everybody, saying we're gonna do this, we're gonna do that, and everyone's just not buying it.
And so the very the very first week that he stopped, we saw all this violence.
It kind of was tapered off the last couple of weeks.
Still there, but I showed all these videos today of agent provocators all over the place.
All black, kicking in windows, hitting, you know, it's it's very clear that it didn't work, so they're trying to try to use the violence to shut them down, right?
And I I think that the civil war aspect is only going to happen if it does because they're driving it, they want that to happen.
I don't think the L of S is the civil war that he's referring to.
I think that's the logical response to them trying to divide us from within.
That's my opinion.
But what do you think?
Oh, I I didn't I didn't watch the yellow vest much, but I think that so now that McCron has finished this question and answer or town hall or whatever thing he was doing, and everybody agrees that nothing good is gonna happen from it.
I wonder if there's gonna be a resurgence now of the yellow vests, and I haven't seen them today, but you know, I'm generally really sympathetic to what they're doing.
It sounds like the French people are still sympathetic to it too, and people are still anti Macron.
So there are a lot of legs to it.
And I hope that they, you know, I in that case, I like the chaos.
You know, I like that they're fighting against the machine, you know, because I don't know how else there's going to be change.
And they're trying to shut them down by calling them anti-Semites.
And obviously, in this article, Paris luxury stores looted, so they're making them look like criminals, saying that it's rioting.
Mm-hmm.
Yeah, they will.
And in many cases, it is, you know, and and maybe there's maybe there's something to it.
Maybe that's what's required.
You know, I I I don't know.
You know, it's I don't agree with violence.
I wouldn't take part in it, but or it's provocateurs, and they're using those those incidents to uh delegitimize the whole thing.
Yeah, it's part of both, though, right?
I mean, the thing is it is I've like Vanessa Bealey.
I she said firsthand she had when she was there during this time, she lives there.
It was all she saw countless examples of clearly provocateurs being the one and and speaking with the actual yellow vest, and they're like, Yeah, we nobody knows who these people are.
They're all dressed in black with masks on.
You know, clearly that's a huge part of it.
And that's a classic idea of the age of provocateur is all over the place.
But then I guarantee you there are yellow vest people that get caught up in it, and oh, they just I want to go up and punch this guy too.
And you know, they they want to get involved.
Yeah, once you get a mob started, the mob mentality, it it can escalate quickly.
Yeah.
But it's stam, I think the idea is that they're that that's how it's being used, and they're definitely trying to defame and and make them look bad.
The same with the anti-Semitic thing.
It was ridiculous.
Saying that the whole thing was anti-Semitic.
I mean, that isn't obviously didn't stick, right?
But I think the the the specific, like the looting of the stores.
I have I have uh the some the stuff I saw today was very clearly people all in black with black masks, kicking in windows, you know what I mean?
And the rest of them are not part, they've explicitly said roundly, this is not the the movement.
This peaceful, no one do anything.
We're gonna stop you if we see you doing anything, and it still happens.
All right, so clearly there's an agenda, there's a an aspect of agent provocateurs there.
It's it's almost like no protest could ever be a success because the the people that you're protesting testing against could always infiltrate and subvert it and do some provocateur and then crack down.
It's it's just such a textbook textbook method that they could do it.
All right, guys, let's let's wrap this up.
Um keep keep it uh not too long.
Thanks for joining me, guys.
Uh Nathan and Ryan.
So uh Ryan's at the last American Vagabond.
All the links will be in the description.
And Nathan is back on uh lift the veil.
And both of these guys got their uh their merch available at truth revolution.
Is that am I getting it right?
Truthrevolution.io.
Truthclothing.io.
Sorry, I think I think Brian has on the yellow vest shirt.
I have my and the fed shirt.
Support them today for sure.
Yep, yep.
Uh, and actually you can support um Adam uh since we're on your show by using your code, by the way.
And then uh Vagabond is still uh supported if you get his shirt.
He has the question everything shirt.
So use um no more at checkout if you want to go to TruthClothing.io.
It actually supports Adam's show.
Cool.
Cool, cool, cool.
And I don't know if you nobody saw this, but I finally got uh one of my Teespring shirts in.
I ordered it a while ago, but no more news channel, Fox.
Nice.
Cool.
All right, guys, thanks for chatting.
It was good.
Uh there's a lot of stuff to talk about, and it's good to uh you know have some back and forth with you guys on these issues.
Uh crazy news to keep up with, right?
No shortage of stuff to talk about.
No, no shortage of controversy.
I can just tell from the chat.
No, no shortage of controversy.
Oh, yeah.
Have you been watching the live chat?
Yeah, I've been dancing, I've been what here and there calling the names.
Yeah, both of us.
They don't like us, Adam.
Oh, it's doesn't matter.
I'm sure if I went on your channels, I'd be getting probably far more.
Trump Army of Kentucky says lift the veil is like Danny Williams, his real father is Jeb Bush.