Dan and Jordan of Knowledge Fight dissect Alex Jones's March 28, 2026 broadcast, critiquing his claims that Donald Trump is a CIA puppet manipulated by Israel into an Iran war. They debunk Dark Journalist's theories about Elon Musk's lunar base, Texas flaming orbs linked to Chris Bledsoe's vague 2013 prophecies, and the disappearance of General William McCasland, clarifying that "cosmic clearance" is a NATO classification unrelated to space conspiracies. Ultimately, the hosts expose Jones as a financial prop for sponsors like Jason Burress, clinging to relevance through esoteric myths while his actual power wanes at Infowars. [Automatically generated summary]
I am sweating knowledge fight.com It's time to pray.
unidentified
I have great respect for knowledge fight knowledge fight I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys knowledge fight Dan and Jordan knowledge fight I need money Andy and Kansas and the and Kansas and it's time Pray Andy in Kansas.
So, if Alex truly believes what he's saying, that Trump has been compromised, then it feels like he should be treating it a little bit as more of an emergency than this.
The guy has the codes to the nukes and he's compromised and presumably doing someone else's bidding, but there's always time to do movie trailer voices over Limp Bizkit.
It's fun to think that the last Mission Impossible movie came out last year.
And the series has been going so long that there was a time when Limp Biscuit got tapped to do the theme song.
At a certain point, Alex and his audience need to entertain the possibility that maybe Trump isn't constantly getting tricked by these guys.
Maybe he was on board with the COVID response and actually wants to have a war with Iran.
The idea that Trump is getting fooled all the time is something that's really only useful from the dramatic storytelling perspective, like what the chronicler is pretending that he's doing.
Well, for anyone living in the real world, it doesn't matter if Trump wants to do all this stuff or if he's getting tricked into it.
We all have to live with the consequences of his actions.
The story that Alex is telling here is interesting because it's exactly what you'd expect him to say, but if you think about it for a second, It starts to make him look really bad.
He's saying that Trump had a brilliant plan to save the country, but got tricked into taking COVID seriously during his first term, which derailed everything.
Leaving aside the fact that COVID happened towards the end of Trump's term, even if what Alex is saying were accurate, then Trump would have a proven record of falling for globalist schemes and would be partially responsible for millions of deaths.
So then he loses in 2020, and Alex takes on a religious crusade to overturn the election results and pretends that Trump is still the president, which seems strange considering his complicity with COVID, but let's not get lost in the weeds.
Now we're here in 2026, and Alex is saying that even before Trump got sworn in, he knew that the globalist plan to derail Trump's brilliant plot to save America was going to be getting him into a war with Iran.
And now, here in 2026, Trump is knee deep in trying to get this war going with Iran.
If Alex wants to hold on to the idea that Trump got tricked by these globalists, then he needs to also accept that he failed.
If Alex was warning that this was the globalist plot to derail Trump, then neither Trump nor anyone who Trump listens to took Alex seriously.
Pretending that Trump is compromised or that he keeps getting fooled by these globalists is a tactic Alex uses for one reason, and it's because it maintains the illusion that Trump was operating from a place of good faith in the past.
It was so obvious that Trump was a malevolent liar this whole time.
And now it's gotten to the point where Alex can't even really pretend that he isn't, but he still needs to protect his own image.
If Trump is just recently becoming a malevolent liar, then it doesn't necessarily reflect poorly on Alex for carrying all that water for him up till this point.
This is, if you understand what he's doing, a rhetorical cover your ass tactic.
And I said 28 days ago when it started, right here in this chair, I said, I hope this is successful and I hope I'm wrong.
And I said, I will literally go get Dom Pernon champagne.
Trump thinks it'll last a few days, it's what he's been told by his political advisors, if it works.
But he was emboldened by Venezuela.
Snatching Maduro and all of that was a daring, incredible mission and super dangerous and a huge roll of the dice.
But I said, for the first time in 32 years on air, constitutionally, I supported that regime change because they're in our hemisphere working with Cuba and China.
If you study the Constitution, the Barbary Wars precedent with Thomas Jefferson, and then on through everything else that happened, William McKinley, the Monroe Doctrine.
One of the most obvious things you see if you listen to multiple episodes of Alex's show is that he doesn't know anything and everything is just talking points.
He didn't accept the overthrow of Maduro because he studied the Constitution and he knows all the angles.
He just got a couple of talking points to bring up whenever the subject comes up to give the appearance of depth.
He just knows the words like Barbary Wars and Monroe Doctrine, probably because Roger, one of these other dipshits, told them these are the things to say.
Also, why are we still pretending the Constitution matters?
This is such a dumb farce where Alex is saying that the attack on Venezuela was cool because of his knowledge of the Constitution, but the attack on Iran wasn't.
But Alex would have been fine with the attack on Iran if it worked out okay.
I think that when you make your life and your career about, like, you know, kind of fetishizing a rule, a set of rules, a set of rules, which ultimately is all it boils down to.
It's a little silly when you're, you know, in the place that Alex is in.
Shutting down the border, getting 20 trillion investment, 10 trillion already here.
They tried to crash the stock market, it didn't work.
All these great things he was doing, trying to shut down the Ukraine war.
And so, on the Iran situation with the huge Israel AIPAC lobby, the most powerful lobby, they're able to isolate Trump, bubble wrap him, get his good advisors away from him, and sell him on the idea that they had nuclear weapons imminently and that they were going to be using those weapons and that he had to take action.
Then he gets the intelligence report five days before.
He decides to back off for a while.
Iran comes to the table.
Israel strikes first because they've got all their moles in the White House and in the negotiations and they knew Trump was thinking sanely.
Understand that when Alex says that Trump meant well, all that means is that he really doesn't want the audience to think that he was lying to boost Trump in the past.
If the audience lets the Trump of the past off the hook, then Alex did nothing wrong.
But if they start to understand that Trump was a piece of shit this whole time, it becomes way too clear how much of a fraud Alex's past decade has been, and they were the people being conned.
If what Alex is saying is true, that Israel attacked Iran to force Trump to join in, that doesn't make Trump's actions any more justifiable.
And we now have to deal with the fact that Trump has directly contradicted this in public statements.
If what Alex is saying is true, then the president is lying to the public repeatedly about his acts of war.
It's fun to hear that, you know, Alex saying that Trump is compromised, and it's cathartic to watch him try to get off this sinking ship, but it's also important to notice that he's not calling for Trump to be impeached.
Based on what he's supposed to believe, Alex needs to be treating this the same way he treated Obama, because they have both violated the Constitution, according to him.
It's like the idea of anybody saying, like, oh, no, we're not for Trump anymore or anything like that means nothing until it starts with, ah, fuck, we were conned.
He conned us.
We will not be conned the same way again.
Anything else is just, oh, well, right now we fucked up.
Even if Trump tries to stop now, and he's given them all these deals that were way better than offered before, the Iranians said, screw you, because in six months, you'll just disregard the agreement.
You'll just reload with weapons.
You've already killed our leadership.
We are in total war with you.
We are not backing down.
So Trump keeps announcing they want to negotiate.
They're begging.
We're blowing them all up, on and on and on.
And the opposite's happening.
This is going on weeks and weeks and weeks ago.
And I point out people say, oh, you're a liar.
You're an Iranian agent.
They're trying to give up.
But now you see, that's not the case.
I just report the facts.
May the heavens fall, justice be done.
And the Democrats in the polls are going to win the midterms.
We talked for like an hour and a half before the show about jury duty and how it would not be surprising if one of the people on that show ended up killing someone in like five years.
I remember in 2019, I told you that they're building a base already on the dark side of the moon for the main Martian launch, and that's where Elon Musk would launch his base from.
Because I was told that by an Elon Musk representative and told, We just want to give this to you.
We want you to say it as part of disclosure.
And I said, Are you sure?
And I did that on record.
We're going to find that.
Daniel Lutz remembers when I did it.
The point is, we have a lot of sources, and it's really weird how this stuff works.
If we accept anything in that clip as being true, then Alex met with the representative of a billionaire who told him to say that said billionaire was building a base on the dark side of the moon, and Alex said yes.
I'm not hearing any proof being provided by the rep in this story.
I don't believe any of this story is true, but if it is, Alex is painting himself as a functionary trying to help a billionaire who hung out with Epstein colonize space.
I think it wouldn't be as popular, but to people who think about it often, the idea that there is one side that never gets light is kind of fucking crazy.
I remember one time we'd had a party at our house.
I'm like 14, barbecue.
Everybody's leaving at like 10 o'clock at night.
I'm standing outside with my parents by the pool, and this giant fireball comes in and does, you know, huge.
And then the next day was in the newspaper that was part of the International Space Station.
They decoupled.
Now, we know now from the time when I was 14 that there are 20 times the satellites, 100 times.
I mean, my God, Elon's launched thousands.
And we know that they can be, when they're gotten rid of, they can be sent into the atmosphere to be destroyed.
But these look bigger than Starlink systems.
And then we know that China has satellite killing systems.
We know the U.S. has it.
There's a real huge space war going on.
We know we're already in a kinetic war with China and Russia right now.
And I know that in CONUS, we have more systems to shoot these down on the ground and above, or that's what they want to do it, is where we have more radar and other tracking systems to do it.
So I would tend to think we're shooting down satellites over CONUS.
We could shoot them at other places too, but it would be here because we've got better analysis from the ground and air on it.
Or could it be something else?
We've also seen all these other orbs, these things are going on.
So, I want to make a very important point here, which is that this is brokered programming.
I don't know if Dark Journalist is paying Alex to come on for exposure or what the exact arrangement is, but he just sent a blog post to Alex about some guy predicting orbs back in 2012, which is why Alex is covering it.
This is killing time, and it might be because Dark Journalist is paying for the appearance, or it's entirely possible that Alex just doesn't want to do any work.
So, he's willing to let his guests fully lead the coverage.
So, this is about a guy named Chris Bledsoe who claims that he was visited by a UFO and then had a spirit encounter with an entity that he calls the Lady, who gave him a vision of the future.
If you believe his retelling of the message from the lady, Israel and Iran are going to be a war, and then thousands of orbs are going to appear out of the sea to stop the fighting and bring everyone to their senses.
So the thing is, this guy didn't predict that this was all going to happen on Easter 2026.
In his book, he says the message was When the red star of Regulus aligns just before dawn in the gaze of the Sphinx, a new knowledge will come into the world.
So, to give some background on the conversation Alex and dark journalists are having, this is in the context of dark journalists trying to tie together some missing persons cases.
A retired general named William McCasland disappeared on February 27th, 2026.
And his wife's 911 call hinted at being worried that he didn't intend on being found.
According to reporting, he left his house on foot with a gun, and the police put out a silver alert for him, which is like an amber alert, but for senior citizens, generally in situations where there's a concern that the person might not know where they are.
The sense that I get from the stories I've seen is this is a tragic situation, and I don't think anything about it necessarily points to conspiracy or aliens.
This 2026 disappearance is being connected to two other disappearances from 2025.
One is a woman named Monica Reza, who went missing while hiking in June.
She was a scientist who co developed a nickel based metal alloy called Mondoloy back in the 90s, who most likely had some professional connections to General McCasland.
It seems like she did some research as part of a project that received funding from departments that McCasland was in charge of, so you can make a connection there.
The other woman is named Melissa Cassius, who disappeared.
She also went missing in June.
She was last seen dropping off lunch for her daughter, then was caught on a surveillance camera walking down the highway about an hour later.
She was wearing a backpack but had left all her IDs and devices at home, along with her keys and her car.
Police have gotten nowhere with the case, but interviews that her daughter and husband have done seem to strongly imply that they have reason to believe that she ran away.
She worked at Los Alamos, so naturally she's connected to everything space weirdos love to connect things to, but it kind of feels like there was a bad domestic situation here.
And each of these stories aren't that suspicious, but if you're able to force connections between them, they start to look funny.
I've seen so many blog posts and dipshit articles trying to say that Reza and McCaslin disappeared in similar ways, which isn't true and is a ham fisted attempt at making the stories seem more connected so these people's pain can be more easily exploited by folks like Dark Journalist.
Anyway, Dark Journalist and Alex are trying to pretend that all these people had cosmic clearance, which is the level higher than Q. Cosmic clearance is a real thing, but it has nothing to do with space programs or even the U.S. government.
And so he admitted this is very interesting because he talked about weather warfare, and everyone thought at the time, oh, it's just a conspiracy.
You know, HARP is a joke or whatever.
But as it turned out, Cohen, who was in an interesting position because he's working for Clinton, but he's a Republican, you have to wonder if he wasn't letting things out to sabotage Clinton at that point.
And he's saying, well, you know, we have these weather warfare weapons.
And he says it on the record.
That's the first time that we get it.
If you go even further back, you're going to find LBJ talking about who controls the weather.
This is 1962 in a speech that LBJ gives.
Who controls the weather will control the future.
Well, he's looking directly at this entire situation and seeing the technology spread out because what they used to call LBJ was Senator NASA.
This is somebody deep in the technology programs.
That's not often brought up about him.
You know, when people talk about him, you think about Vietnam or food stamps and the history, but he was right in the heart of scientific innovation.
So these guys are just credulous idiots, and the strain of idiocy that they're weak to kind of helps make sense of the world that we're in right now.
Nikola Tesla was a very gifted inventor, but was also a shit talker.
For every story that can be confirmed about him, there are a hundred obviously fake stories that get passed down as lore.
The story about him causing an earthquake is one of these lore ones, and these dudes just accept that as gospel fact.
This illustrates the first strain of idiocy, which is falling for scammers' hype when they feel like there's something they stand to gain personally from it.
They're fundamentally scammers, so on some level, they know fully well that Tesla didn't build an earthquake machine.
Believing this part of Tesla's shit talk is useful to them, so they're happy to buy into it to the point where it's kind of indistinguishable to a viewer if they actually believe this stuff or not.
The stuff about LBJ and weather weapons gets to the second strain of idiocy, which is the need to believe fun explanations over obvious ones.
LBJ wasn't talking about some kind of weather weapons that we had, he was giving a speech to Congress arguing for them to approve more weapons research funding because we needed to keep up with the Soviet Union.
If they developed weather control weapons, we'd be at their mercy, so we needed to outspend them no matter what.
When Trump's NASA head is saying that we aren't going to give up the moon again, this is just the same shit.
It's a politician insisting that we need to divert huge amounts of public spending towards stuff that doesn't directly impact anyone's lives, because if we don't, the enemy will get the upper hand and use it to directly impact our lives negatively.
China isn't going to take over the moon, just like LBJ wasn't talking about real weather weapons that the Soviet Union was building.
But those are more fun explanations for this stuff than saying that politicians like to scare us so we don't notice that it would be possible for us to demand that these public funds be used to actually help people instead of feeding huge contracts for weapons manufacturers and creeps like Elon Musk.
Yeah.
So this is the weakness that these people have the two major strains of it.
One of these scientists who was working on the Los Alamos project came out and said, We had what was rolled out to the public in 2012 with computers and this level of technology.
You got it on Project Mars, and there's two of them.
But this one has the deep dive in it.
And it says he will be leader of the Committee of 20, and he will be overlooking this entire government on Mars, and he will be the Elon.
And then you have this very interesting background of Musk and the fact that his mother was very involved, his mother's family was very involved with searching for ancient relics in South Africa.
I don't think that that's what Alex is talking about buying because the version that was released pre 2006 didn't include the narrative portion of the book.
It was just like a bunch of technical specifications and shit.
So I don't, you wouldn't have the Elon part.
In that, I don't think I don't believe any of this.
If there's one thing that I can say about these guys, though, it's that they love to have a good time and they don't let inconvenient details get in their way.
Sure, this book mentions a leader called an Elon, and Elon Musk is named Elon, but they neglect that von Braun's novel is set in a world where the US and Russia had a nuclear war that ended with a decisive victory and the creation of a one world government.
Yeah, but you know, if you apply that kind of thinking to one absurd, ridiculous Nazi prophecy, then you might apply it to the next one, and all of a sudden you might think these Nazis don't know the future.
I think once you're in a position where you control time and space and you're in a whole other type of conversation you're having with people, this is way above cosmic clearance.
It's very interesting to note, and this is just my own theory on this, but I also seem to notice that your legal troubles and all these other things went through the roof as soon as you started getting into the other aspects of space and the UFO file.
Suddenly, they were like, you know, this is very dangerous on their side because they see someone coming forward who's not going to be in that.
I've heard Alex tell this story about the richest man in the world thing and trying to get bought off and whatever, but I don't think I've ever heard him be specific.
This time he said that Dark Journalist had said the guy's name earlier, so I know that it's Jeff Bezos.
He used to run ads for magic cancer cures sold by people who ended up being convicted of fraud.
He said that Reset Wars was the culmination of his career because a get rich quick YouTube guy paid him to.
He's one of the most embarrassingly naked scammers in the modern media, so there's no way I believe that if someone offered him $50 million, he would turn it down unless he was making more than that.
They could have literally predicted it through remote viewing because what happens with remote viewing, and it was explained to me by the person who was the father of remote viewing, Russell Targ.
He's been on my program many times.
He got out of the business because the CIA co opted it.
I like to imagine dark journalists interviewing a guy taking a drag off a cigarette and just muttering about how he got out of the remote viewing scene because it went corporate.
Ah, time traveling with your mind just wasn't the same after the man got involved.
You just are you telling me that I'm just an evil government organization with a nigh infinite power and the ability to control time and space, and I'm just going to let this motherfucker walk away?
So it's funny to remember how Alex used to insist that he didn't cover stuff that he can't prove.
And all of this stuff is in the documents and the white papers.
And now he's yelling at a dipshit blogger about how remote viewers looked into the future to see that he was too dangerous to their plans, so they changed Facebook's rules so you could be mean to him.
It's so dumb.
And let's also not forget that Trump is starting a war with Iran and has been compromised, and this stupid shit is the best use that Alex can come up with for his time.
It seems to me like Trump has gone ahead and fulfilled all the globalist plans that Alex was always worried about, so if the globalists had remote viewers that could actually see the future, it feels like they wouldn't have minded Alex supporting Trump.
It actually kind of feels like he was instrumental as a part of their plans coming together.
And this introduces a terrifying possibility, which is that the remote viewing globalists did see the future.
And they knew that the only way to get their desired outcome was if Trump was in office, but they tricked everyone into thinking he was their enemy.
The only way for them to succeed was to get their mortal enemies, the Patriots, to rally around Trump, and the easiest way to do that was to pretend to attack him.
The Patriots would see the globalists not liking Trump, and they'd be suckered into thinking that you only get flack when you're over the target.
If that's the case, then Alex's entire past decade has been him playing a perfect role as a Judas goat, leading the Patriots to slaughter, but thinking he's taking them to freedom.
I like to think that Doctor Strange is looking at all these possibilities, and he's like, oh my God, the only one that works is the one where we fucking mess with and antagonize Alex Jones for a decade?
But I think that if you look at what Alex is saying, there's no way to see the past decade of his career as anything other than a tragic mistake on his part.
Either he got tricked into it by people who saw the future, or he was a useful tool for someone else who saw the future.
That whole thing about the case of Voronezh, which was The first major Russian case that went around the world, you know, these beings actually came out of the craft.
And the Voronej incident in 1989, in fact, the first thing that happened during this Ukraine war were some of the most high end Russian planes that went down in the beginning of the Ukraine war went down right in Voronej.
An idea is introduced into the masses' minds, and now that's a possible explanation for something that would otherwise be ignored.
What you might have thought was just some uninteresting wildlife in a bush that you didn't get a good look at can now be seen as a big, yeah, that could be it.
It's so exciting.
What's interesting is that now social media is ubiquitous and people can just make fake videos so easily, so we're kind of at a point where there probably won't be waves with this stuff anymore.
It's just Another way that the modern world is kind of sucking the fun out of all this crazy shit.
So, Dark Journalist fails to point out that the only witnesses to the alien encounter in a public park that he's talking about were children who were clearly lying.
Okay, so if you've got interstellar travel, right, and the ability to manipulate time and space, but in the 60s, you're only throwing around CD ROMs, this is a problem for me.
Because that means that we should conceivably have had interstellar travel congruously with CDs and such.
I didn't even say this yet because it sounds wild.
I get up at like 5 a.m., and I don't have my phone on me.
So I go get a cup of coffee.
I go out on the back porch by the pool.
And this was just I took a vacation for like seven, eight days.
When did I come back?
Came back Tuesday.
It should be Wednesday morning.
It's Wednesday.
I'm up there at 5 30 in the morning with a cup of coffee, and all of a sudden, like, there's a square of red drones flies over really fast, like, three here, three there.
So I guess it was nine.
And all of a sudden, they merge into one white light.
And I'm like, my phone, my phone.
And then it just disappears.
That's what I'm saying.
We're in another, like, there's fireballs every day.
Yeah, like people who live, like the audience is probably largely maybe rural, sure, live in smaller communities, sure, away from they just assume, like, oh, yeah, Alex lives in Austin, there must be orbs there all the time.
Second, and far more importantly, Alex seems to think there are a bunch of gods and now they're called the Watchers.
Yep.
In the past, he's been very clear about who's giving him these predictions and late night performance reviews.
It is the Christian God.
Alex suggesting that maybe he's being talked to by someone that he refers to, like they call themselves we, and who he says might be the Watchers, is literally heretical.
Alex doesn't get scolded in the middle of the night by angels, and it's not angels that recruited him to take out the devil over chicken fried steak.
The way Alex is talking makes it very clear that he knows that Dark Journalist is an idiot who will go along with his dumb stories about being a psychic, but Alex isn't sure that he's religious.
Someone who's making a vague future prediction wouldn't be pulling this kind of thing out of thin air.
Saying that Iran and Israel might shoot missiles at each other isn't a bold prediction, and unless something major is happening right now while we're recording this episode, orbs haven't shown up out of the ocean to stop wars.
Also, I want to play you a little clip of the video Alex just played on his show, which is a meme edit of an interview that Bledsoe did on someone else's podcast.
Wait, Alex is hanging out with his friend Dark Journalist doing blatantly sponsored content that includes him.
Having to lend credibility to a lunatic who thinks orbs are coming out of the ocean on Easter to accompany the return of Jesus.
And in order to navigate the interview, Alex has to pretend that it might not be God who sends him on missions.
If he tells one more story about this magical power that he has without attributing them to God, Alex might fuck around and end up the first pope of the new Christianity that he strikes.
Alex does not need to ask Dark Journalist why he knows the future.
Alex already knows this perfectly well and has expressed it with certainty on this show a bunch of times.
If Dark Journalist actually listened to Alex's dumb show, he should be really confused by the way Alex is handling this interview because this isn't a question.
It is wild to hear him denied in this way in a direct, I guess, defiance to the things that he told you to do in that book that you care so much about.
If you go all the way back, I'm going to take this right into Mesmer just for a second.
If you go back to his experiments, what he was doing was communicating with the unconscious of the people involved.
And in some of the cases, he was dealing with peasants and he could telepathically communicate with them and have them do incredible scientific equations, even though they were illiterate peasants.
Well, that's a whole different communication, human to human intuition, et cetera.
And when you look at people like Edgar Cayce, they're the living embodiment of that.
And what did they have to say?
They said, this is the era of.
Where we're going to rediscover our own Atlantean past.
And by the way, when you get into that, you're going to find it was a high tech past.
And the whole thing about UFOs and high tech and all that, we've been through the whole cycle before, including destroying the Earth, according to Casey, with the two eyed stone and the whole crystal power grid that we had in that era.
So we're kind of reimagining, redeveloping, coming back into this.
And when I saw that incredible thing with Melania Trump and the Plato robot the other day, all I could think about was Casey and the automatons.
And when Alex was gone for that stretch where he may or may not have been drying out, you know how I described it as like a shotgun mic kind of thing where hosts would cycle through?
And he's one of like Tucker's buddies who Tucker went to bat for, which is one of the reasons that it was a point of division between him and like Nick Fuentes and those more overt Nazi types.
Yeah.
Is that they felt that Joe Kent was not hardcore enough.