"Knowledge Fight" dissects Alex Jones’ Patrick Bet-David podcast appearance, where he peddles debunked Epstein conspiracy theories (e.g., "glowing pizza," California’s fake 12-year-old consent law) while demonizing victims as willing accomplices. Jones also repeats Roger Stone’s 2015 recruitment claim, undermining his "independent truth-teller" persona, and deflects from InfoWars’ March 7 court-ordered shutdown, despite financial receivership. The episode exposes his exploitation of trauma for partisan narratives—highlighting how his rhetoric mirrors crisis actor tropes while ignoring Trump’s ties to Epstein. Ultimately, it reveals Jones’ unchecked conspiracy-mongering as a cynical, fact-free performance, more cartoonish than credible. [Automatically generated summary]
So, you know, today's podcast is a special one because never in the history of my life have I started a podcast with taking a shot of olive oil, but we did that today together.
And like, I hate to like keep sticking on this meme, but like, Kirby, if you're going to include Kirby and Link, there are better choices for like Trader or Eugenesist in the Nintendo canon.
Once you have opened it up past the Mario universe, then you're in the Nintendo universe, which means you should have either more variety or no variety.
Bondi is not even a bad person, but we knew when she first got in, she's a talking head.
There's so much complexity going on in the DOJ.
That's why she came out at first and said, oh, yeah, we have all these millions of files and hundreds of kids getting raped, and it's Epstein doing it.
And then later we learn she was told that.
And then she has to reverse it and say, well, actually, that's not what it is.
It was about child porn.
So we don't really know the truth about all that because there's so much over the almost 20 years of investigations about Epstein that's been slurped up.
And also, last year they had a, last two years, a hotline where anybody can just call in to the FBI or just send in paperwork and any of that gets thrown in there.
So that's why Trump is in there about a million times.
Pam Bondi has made an absolute joke out of her investigation of the Epstein case, including a ton of PR stunts that Alex has enjoyed and played along with.
When all the right-wing media dipshits were at the White House getting fake binders of hot new intel that turned out to be old, that was a pretty fun time for all of them.
Alex hates what Pam Bondi is doing now because it's very unpopular with the base.
And if the base goes away, then forget about ever winning another election.
The GOP essentially has destroyed itself so it could be reborn in service of worshiping Trump.
So if that falls apart, don't expect them to just start getting really excited about some other Republican.
It's not going to work.
They're going to be disillusioned.
The Trump audience is a conspiratorial audience.
And if you aren't careful in how you manage that kind of an audience, that conspiratorial attention will end up being pointed at you, which is what's happening now.
Bondi has mishandled the Epstein stuff so badly that it's led to a not insignificant number of Trump's fans, considering the possibility that Trump's been the deep state the whole time.
And it's inevitable.
So what's going to happen?
Alex, he has to deal with a certain amount of his audience being like, oh my God, you work for the globalists.
Like that's just a part of the game.
And now it's just becoming too big to ignore and they're in charge of the government.
Yeah, I mean, historically, whenever you have a openly fascist government that realizes that it can't maintain power through one form, it tries to maintain power through another form.
So Alex is right on a certain level here, though, in that it's very difficult to discern what's real and what's out of context in almost all of the public conversations about the new Epstein disclosures.
Social media has been washed with fake screenshots and a lot of real ones that are being presented with no context or inaccurate context being added to it.
There's also a lot of horrible shit that's real and in proper context.
But when the water is so polluted with bullshit, it's very hard for someone who's just trying to live their lives to take the time to know the difference.
And there's a lot of people who are exploiting that in a way that, you know, it's monstrous.
Once we're unable, like that's the problem with the Epstein files is that if you're going to release them, it should be released the same day you arrest the people in the files.
It needs to be like a surprise attack, right?
Because if we get used to it, the longer it goes with no consequences, the more everybody gets inured to the idea of even giving them consequences.
So it's like, well, I guess just because you were in the Epstein files, I guess that doesn't mean anything now, you know?
I think a measure of, like, if I were talking to anybody who I disagree with politically, a measure of rationality or like a sign that we're able to have a conversation would be like just saying, hey, everybody in the list can go fuck off and die.
I didn't know this until the Bannon interview came out that was not released by Bannon, but was in the Epstein Files, the two-hour interview from 2017 or 2018.
Everybody's got to watch it because I thought, oh, this is going to be boring.
I watched it.
My mouth was standing open.
I knew that Epstein was part of the Trilateral Commission, but that's like saying you're the head of value attainment and then you've got a secretary or something.
It's important, but they're not the head of it.
I thought, okay, he must have always heard he's in the triad commission.
No, I'm watching that show, that interview, and he's like, no, David Rockefeller approached me to be his right-hand man for systems analysis such as I can integrate all these systems together.
And because they had too many experts at just one level, and he knew about my work with some other groups, being the CIA.
So he brought me in to be his representative.
And so they put him on the board of the Trilateral Commission, which is one of the most powerful globalist elite or super organizational systems, precursor to the World Economic Forum.
So Larry thinks they have the World Economic Forum today.
It was Klaus Schwab.
It's the equivalent of a 30-year-old being on the board of the WEF today, okay?
Which has co-voting rights with the UN.
So he is the protege and attaché and basically imperial legate.
That's a Roman term for someone who can speak for the emperor.
David Rockefeller set up the UN, set up the modern globalist system.
He's on record doing it all.
Here is a 30-year-old man that is literally given the control to fly around the world and be the representative of David Rockefeller.
So this is another great opportunity for Patrick to continue down a line of follow-up questions.
And as an interviewer who's covering material like this, I believe he has a responsibility to do that.
You can't just allow Alex to make whatever claims he wants and just be like, oh, my God, wow.
It's irresponsible.
Alex is claiming that in the Bannon interview that was recently released, Epstein says that he was on the board of the Trilateral Commission and was given the power to speak for David Rockefeller.
This is an outright lie.
And if you take the time to watch the interview, you would know exactly what this lie is based on.
Epstein discusses being put on the board of the Rockefeller University, not by David Rockefeller, though the school is named after his family.
Bannon is surprised by this because it's a prestigious research university, and Epstein wasn't a guy from some aristocratic family, so it's strange that he'd be given this position at a young age.
Epstein tries to explain why he was qualified for the position.
Like, I understand money in a way that other people don't.
Later, Epstein is discussing being invited to join the Trilateral Commission, partially because he and David Rockefeller hit it off as friends.
He doesn't say that he was put on the board, and Alex is intentionally conflating these two things in order to sell a conspiracy narrative around this.
Patrick has the instinct to say, hold on, is that true?
But then, as soon as the person lying to him reassures him that they're not lying, he just gives up.
At best, he's an incompetent interviewer selling a liar to his audience.
And at worst, he's complicit and only pretending to push back on Alex's claims in order to make it look like they stand up to scrutiny when they're bullshit.
Also, another good follow-up question might be that Alex's claimed that Epstein mostly worked with Democrats, but then we have an example of him being interviewed by Trump's former campaign manager and senior counselor.
That was not an adversarial interview that they did.
If you go and watch it, the two of them seem to be pretty friendly, and it's clearly meant to make Epstein look good, which is a big part of why I'm not playing clips from it.
You can find it on YouTube.
I'm not playing them because I think he comes off quite well, honestly.
Great.
Because of the way that Bannon is trying to present this.
I mean, it's the most effective, it's the most effective two-man game in this kind of thing to have somebody who is at the very least credible enough to say, like, hold on, I'm skeptical, while at the same time, credulous enough to be like, I can't believe you proved me right.
They're posted right now on InfoWars.com today where I'm saying, no, it's a cult.
It's Satanism.
It's black magic.
This is what they really do.
Because it's not just Epstein.
It's the people up above him to be able to do the horrible stuff they do.
They have worldviews and world models that we're just animals, that we need to be sacrificed, that they're the Uber mention because they're willing to do this.
We're weak.
They're not.
And so you have to understand, this is a standardized system.
Before they called it mind control, before they called it intelligence agencies, before they call it that, they called it secret societies.
And really all secret societies have been, some have been good, some have been bad, some have been a mix.
But the bad ones, the dark ones, as they call it, the occult ones, the hidden ones, they have always used torture and drugs and sex and what you'd call mind control, trauma-based mind control.
Tell everybody that it's far worse than 14-year-old girls.
They've just focused on them because here's the thing.
I'm not against these women.
They are victims.
They were under Stockholm Syndrome.
But Elon Musk is right.
Here's the big secret.
What everybody, when you're growing up, tell you what the FBI is putting bulletins.
You know, ice cream truck pulls up.
There's a kid in the back.
I got a puppy.
Come see the toy.
They use kids, the other kids.
The women that they've settled with and that are the victims and all this stuff, almost all of them are the women that ended up working for Epstein for years and years and years.
Some were bought at age, this is public, at age nine or 10 from their Eastern European parents, flown here and then worked for him for decades.
And so exactly, they're the ones that manage and run the women.
And so when you see these women up there, you have to understand that in many cases, you're looking at people that for five years, 10 years worked for Epstein and were part of it.
But see, that's how they stop it.
Those women then tell a limited story about what was going on.
But then you read the names of some of the women.
They're in all the emails preparing the beef jerky, walking the beef jerky up.
They're in the things preparing it to be sent to the labs so it'll be broken down and sent to people.
Let's get to the IV bags.
They're there.
I'm not trying to put this woman down.
Just saying, notice in the hearing yesterday or two days ago, they asked Bondi, they said, have you ever interviewed any of these women?
I imagine so many people who believe themselves devout Christians, you know, and who are living through this time period who will eventually go to their pearly gates and have St. Peter just fucking laugh at them.
Like, dude, you carried so much water for Epstein.
But because there are so many big bankers and British royalty and all of it, he has been told.
That's what I was told.
Again, I've said this probably 100 times.
I said, Trump has been convinced that it will crash the economy if all these bankers and people, if this stuff comes out, and he thinks it justifies the means, it's too dangerous.
And look, Trump, I'm not pushing this.
I'm saying, let's look at his perspective.
The carbon tax is estimated by top experts.
They put him in in the next decade to kill 2 billion people by starvation or war.
As soon as I saw that Alex was going to be on Patrick's show, I knew that part of it was going to be an announcement that Alex was on Manect.
We discussed this a little back on the episode where Patrick had Nick Fuentes on, but Manect is his platform that allows you to reach out to experts to give you advice for exorbitant rates.
The only people who are stupid enough to pay that kind of a rate for someone like Patrick Bett David's time is not, they're not going to be able to afford it.
And anyone who can afford it could probably talk to him because they're really rich and they would be able to get a meeting with him.
I think that, well, my first thought in the most benign version is that Patrick charges that much because he doesn't even want to go on anyone's shows.
It's almost like some kind of rich backer could just give a bunch of money through this platform that wouldn't be traceable unless you were already investigating them for a different crime.
Consulting and advice type shit like this isn't always a scam, but it works great for that.
I'm sure that some of the people who have Manect accounts, like for them, it's just a situation where they're too racist or not famous enough to be on cameo.
So like I bet that they aren't getting money funneled to them through this.
Well, I don't know if the number that got him to the point on the leaderboard is all those interviews or like a couple thousand dollars for a text message from him or whatever.
But whatever it is, it's too much.
Yikes.
I'm sure there's fraud.
And this next clip also kind of made me think that.
Alex has almost no awareness of what's in the Epstein files that got released.
And one of the big tells is how much he needs to rely on old memories of Pizzagate in order to fill out these rants.
And the tranche of Epstein emails that got released, there was one that was discussing beef jerky, which idiots like Alex have decided must be about cannibalism.
The justification for this is that the person emailing with Epstein discusses freezing the meat, which social media dipshits pointed out isn't done when you're making jerky.
You just leave it out at room temperature and let it dry.
We've all seen alone.
The issue here is that that isn't true.
And that you can freeze meat as part of the jerky process, particularly when you're trying to make higher quality jerky.
Sure.
Also, these are emails between Epstein and a professional chef.
What Alex does is he takes things like this and lies about them so they look like there's no plausible explanation for them other than his narrative.
We will not get better as a society until we understand that people who use information like this are exploiting horrible tragedy and pain in order to sell their shit.
And no sincere person would ever act like this.
We can't move forward until we all recognize that.
You know, I was listening to that, and I was just thinking, like, if you go through the plot of the Dark Knight, maybe 75 to 80% of the Joker's victims could have been canonically in the Epstein Files, which changes my opinion of whose team I'm on, because I'm pretty sure Wayne is definitely in the Epstein Files.
unidentified
Well, I mean, do you count like the judge is totally in the Epstein files?
But everything Roger Stone told me back when he was trying to recruit me to support Trump, that Trump was going to win, which I've vetted and got into, he explained how it all worked and how they're going to attack Trump for this.
But it was really Trump first exposed it.
And then now all that stuff has come out because Roger lives here.
I mean, he's been at Marlato since Trump got it.
He's been the Trump's trip to hear it.
I mean, everything Roger's ever told me has been accurate.
Either Alex doesn't understand what he's saying or he knows that it doesn't matter and that anyone who likes his show is an idiot at this point.
He's literally saying that Roger Stone showed up in 2015 as part of trying to recruit Alex to support Trump.
Alex is supposed to be his own man and he's above the bullshit.
Just a guy who calls balls and strikes, not somebody who's recruitable.
If Roger showed up to recruit Alex, then it stands to reason that all of their interactions were part of that.
Roger's early on-air interviews were trial runs where they tested out if he could convince Alex to support Trump and checked how the audience reacted to that idea of the show making that leap.
There's another piece of this that's really damning, which is that Roger knew that Alex was recruitable and that Alex was willing to engage in the process of being recruited.
Roger and Alex knew that Infowars wasn't a news platform and it wasn't a rugged independent media operation.
They understood that this was a sales platform where Alex had a captive audience that he could sell bullshit to.
It was mostly boner pills at that point, but Roger saw the potential that Trump had as a product that Alex could sell.
There's one side of this that is a complete invalidation of Alex's self-mythology as a guy who just tells the truth and goes where God tells him to.
But there's another side of this that's probably a crime.
Previously to him working to recruit Alex, Roger was Trump's campaign manager.
And it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to understand that he was still operating as an extension of the Trump campaign when he went to recruit Alex.
There's a whole raft of election and campaign finance laws that they probably broke if what Alex is saying is accurate.
I know it doesn't matter anymore, but in previous times, this would probably get you sent to jail.
And he knew that Trump was a crook prior to Roger ever coming around.
The idea that he could run a media operation and humor Roger trying to recruit him to support a crook means that InfoWars was and probably always was for sale.
If Alex was the guy he always pretended to be, then the immediate response to Roger coming around and being like, hey, I want to get you on board would have been, fuck you.
I can't be bought.
I'm not interested in you trying to convince me that your friend, who I know is a crook, is actually secretly a good guy.
Epstein wasn't saying that Alex was crazy, and there's no indication from this email that he had an opinion on Alex.
This was an email to Epstein from Paul Krasner about an article that was published on Alternet about Alex claiming that Robert Mueller was a demon and he was going to take him out or die trying.
Also, it's pretty clear that Alex has no clue who Krasner is, but he probably should.
He was a big counterculture satirist in the 60s and 70s, and he was a part of the Merry Pranksters.
I've tracked this out of the people that got involved talking to Massey.
Emerald Robinson and so many others literally just got him asking questions a couple years ago, even before Trump got back in.
And Massey was on this because the American people want it.
That's why we're covering it.
And then Trump gets in and says, yeah, we're going to go look at it.
And then says, no, there's nothing there.
It's a hoax.
And we're like, what do you mean?
And now there's all these documents.
And then Trump starts saying we got to get rid of Massey.
He's a traitor.
Trump started that.
Trump is committing political suicide again with little cuts.
He ran off MTG.
I know the inside baseball on that.
And I still support him.
I've been nothing but persecuted, supporting him.
I don't get any money supporting him.
All he gets attacks and lawsuits by the Democrats.
Because overall, it's good what he's doing on so many fronts.
He's dismantling the globalists.
He's really bringing 20 trillion in jobs back, already about 8 trillion is invested.
He's already got energy prices down substantively.
But I have a responsibility still to report.
He went and started a fight with Massey.
Why?
And made weird statements about his wife after she died.
And then he attacked MTG.
Listen, MTG isn't running for senator, governor.
She's always been a successful woman in her own right.
Had a very successful construction company making tens of millions a year.
I talked to her, good friends with her.
I knew she was going to resign five days before she did.
She said, I think I'm going to step down.
I can't handle it.
And she said, Alex, this is off record.
But then later it came out.
She said it again.
So I can say it.
They had a deep fake AI saying that was called, though, from real statements she made, basically.
She goes, the last time I really talked to him at E-Link, he just said, you know, listen, we can't have these files come out because it'll hurt the stock market.
It'll discredit America, the faith of credit, basically, and it'll embarrass my friends.
You may start to notice a little bit of a pattern here.
When Trump wasn't in power, folks like Massey and MTG were incited to make a huge deal out of the child trafficking and Epstein stuff as a way of attacking the Biden administration.
They were crusading heroes trying to get to the bottom of this case, and their reputations were impeccable in Alex's dipshit media circle.
Then Trump got back into office, and there was a bit of an unspoken expectation that they cut that shit out.
It's pretty obvious that a full accounting of the Epstein case and the people who were complicit or even just financially entangled would threaten both Democrat and Republican figures.
So it's only advantageous to act like you're taking it seriously when Trump is not in power.
With Trump in power, if you get all this stuff released, you're going to get some Democrats in trouble, but you're also going to have some Trump allies taken out in the process.
Ultimately, it's a net negative to the party in power for this stuff to come out when they're in charge.
So the idea was supposed to be that you use this stuff to get into office, then let it go.
Bondi tried to do the binder PR stunt as a way of pretending you had a big win, which she clearly hoped would pacify the folks on her side of the media who were still asking questions.
But Massey and MTG are two examples of politicians who didn't get the memo that they aren't really supposed to care about this story.
They continued pushing for release and transparency after Trump got back in office, which made them traitors to the GOP.
The party exists as a means of maintaining Trump's hold on power.
So if you're acting in a way that threatens that, you are a traitor.
Alex could act like this, and his career is based on pretending that's who he was, but it's all an act.
He got recruited, and his job is to defend Trump, which is how we end up here.
Alex is still pretending to care about this story, but he really just cares about a fictional version of it with all the stuff about beef jerky and all that shit.
He's made his choice to just accept that his chosen leader is a willing participant in the cover-up of this shit.
So the best option he has available is to just do Pizza Gate stuff all over again.
Pretend you really, really care about a fake thing in order to distract people from the real stuff that your hero is involved in.
No one would act like this unless they had a very strong reason to.
It makes total sense to attack your allies if they're trying to investigate and publicize the crimes that your best friend committed with a bunch of your other friends.
It makes total sense to play nice with the other Epstein friends who may know stuff about your friendship with him and who might speak up about some of that stuff if you're too mean to them.
Trump's actions all make sense if you view him as someone with a lot to lose from this shit going totally public.
But even leaving that aside, just based on what Alex is saying, Trump should be deposed and thrown in jail.
He hasn't entirely corrupted the Department of Justice and politicized this investigation in a way that makes it probably impossible to undo any of this stuff.
And it's probably made it impossible to prosecute some of these cases in the future.
Just based on what Alex's description of his actions are, Trump is covering up a child trafficking and cannibalism ring that's run 99% by his enemies because if he were to let the information come to light, it would be bad for the economy.
This is the definition of someone who is captive to a conspiracy.
If we take what Alex is saying seriously, then any conspiracy can be justified so long as it would be bad for the economy to reveal it.
He thinks Trump is covering this up, but he still supports Trump, which means that covering up a satanic cannibal cabal is not a deal breaker, so long as you can argue that not covering it up is bad for the economy.
I feel like everything in Alex's career involves trying to demand public accountability for things that would result in damage to the economy.
If it came out in 2004 that Bush did 9-11, does Alex think that that wouldn't have hurt the economy?
Assuming that Alex was right about that conspiracy, why wouldn't you just say that revealing that information would be bad for the economy?
So you should still, you're still obligated to support Bush.
No, the idea of somebody being like, oh, I mean, you know, if Obama had actually gotten the public option and still was here, I would be like, yeah, fuck that guy.
Seems like Alex doesn't want to answer that question.
And I think part of the reason, the little clue you can get, is from the answer that he does give to a different question.
Essentially, he's saying that Trump isn't firing anyone because personnel doesn't matter anymore.
The people he has in his administration aren't substantial people who even have the ability to think for themselves or disagree with him.
They're all rubber-stamp sycophants.
Everyone who could be up for one of these positions has experienced the past 10 years of history, and they know that Trump only values loyalty.
They know that acting as an independent public servant is just going to get you fired and likely will lead to tons of death threats from Trump fans.
Basically, the answer to this question is that the government isn't a government anymore, and Trump doesn't need to fire a ton of people because the only people left who would take these positions are people who already understand that they work for Trump.
They don't work for the United States or for the public.
Trump signs their checks, and he's created an environment where everyone there understands that.
This is an amazing question because I put myself into this space and like I would need to have a meeting before the interview to process he was going to ask this question.
Because if you surprise me with this question, even if I'm in Alex's shoes, my job is to carry water, you know, that whole thing.
My first instinct is still, what are you fucking dumb?
Or do you want me to make up an answer that sounds plausible?
Also, if Alex believes this to be true, it's grounds to impeach Trump.
He refuses to fire incompetent people in charge of government agencies because he's worried that it would make him look bad, which means he is not serving the public interest.
Yeah, I wonder if there is like a who are you talking to moment these people have, you know?
Because I worry, I genuinely worry about the health of people who look at what's going on and don't understand at least most of it.
Right?
Like, how can you, I don't know what our edge, our education system is fully broken if you can convince yourself what's happening is not what's happening.
Well, we know that's down there about Joint Task Force 6, and it was our own Breonna Morello over at InfoWars that actually broke this early yesterday morning.
She is a Pentagon liaison to the Pentagon.
And when she called, they said, you know, we really can't make a comment.
And then she first got the news that, yeah, it was Mexican drones.
So the airspace around the El Paso airport was reopened hours after it was closed.
Although initially, the FAA announced that it would be closed for 10 days.
What happened here is that the Department of War wanted to test a high-power anti-drone laser, but the FAA didn't think that was safe to do around commercial aircraft.
The two agencies were supposed to be negotiating a time and place that this could be done safely, but the Department of War went ahead with their plans to test the laser, so the FAA shut down the airspace around the El Paso airport.
I appreciate the feelings of, because, you know, we say the FAA and the Department of War, but actually what happened, what had to have happened at some point, was one human being said, we're going to shoot a laser.
It's technically, from what we've seen, not true that this was a drone attack.
And obviously that big line of bigger drones.
Although that's the drone protection grid that they've got on ground and in air, they've got a bunch of new systems.
Israel has some really powerful ones too, but whatever you're being shown is not the really good stuff they've got.
And so from what I've been told and from our sources, they're doing at least a 10-day drill on controlling that airspace and that they're going to be launching their own simulated attacks by cartels or by even foreign governments or terrorists for control.
And that Trump then wants to get the money, because it's pretty inexpensive comparatively, to put up drone defense network systems over every city.
And that's the lower level integration to the higher level anti-missile defense system, Golden Dome.
Alex is very defensive, particularly about how he's not defending the idea of the Trump administration doing a 10-day military drill that shuts down the airspace around an international airport.
When Trump talks about, and he has his science are talk about we've taken control of matter in time and space, they have a lot of theoretical physics systems where you over a wide area can create an effect that the Germans in World War II discovered that dealt with anti-gravity.
The problem was when you turned on this effect, they have different names for it.
It would make everybody completely nauseous.
And if you kept turning up, he'll kill people.
So that's why they were waiting with anti-grav.
They need computers and robots because it doesn't affect silicone.
Yeah, there's the Nazi bell and it was de Glock and all those effects.
You know, before Obama came along, I never tried to get in that.
And then people said, hey, you want to do a voiceover for this?
So they taft Hartley.
My voice is out right now.
I can do better ones.
But Taff Hartley, when they put you in movies and stuff, you're automatically the Screen Actors Guild.
And so I got to where right as Obama got in, I had some voiceovers because I was in the Screen Actors Guild where it was being aired on TV over and over again.
I would get like $500,000 checks.
One ad.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I would.
I swear to God.
And then they found out, wait a minute, you don't like Obama.
When an actor says that they got Taft Heartley, that doesn't mean that they got made part of the Screen Actors Guild.
If a production that's in compliance with the union wants to hire a non-union actor for a role that they believe no qualified or available union member can fill, then they have to fill out a Taft Hartley form.
This allows them to hire a non-union actor and allows the actor a free pass to join SAG for 30 days.
This is one of the ways that an actor can get into SAG and make themselves available for SAG productions.
The other main ways are being dependent on getting booked for a major role or paying dues for a year, which most people can't do.
You'll often hear stories of struggling actors getting a job and getting Taft Heartley, which is kind of a blessing and a curse.
It means that you're working, but it also means that you probably need to join SAG and start paying dues, which can be a huge burden on you if you don't end up getting more work.
I'm certain that the only times Alex might have gotten Taft Heartley would have been on the two Link Later movies he's in, Waking Life and Scanner Darkly.
And it seems insane to me that an anti-communist zealot like him would join the actors union.
Now, this clip I find very fascinating because it sounds like Patrick Bette David and his friends are laughing at Alex doing silly voices, but they're not.
So, the idea is that a receiver had been holding Alex's assets and InfoWars assets.
Up till now, they've just allowed Infowars to be funded, even though he does not have control over these things that are held by the receiver.
Now, the receiver has said, No, we're not going to, we're not allowing this.
So, if what Alex is saying is reflective of the truth, then there's just no money to do Infowars anymore after this month or whatever the receiver is allowing.
So, what I'm hearing is Alex, you know, when Patrick says you couldn't join Manect before, maybe that maybe this has a little bit to do with feels very connected.
I have no funding now.
I am screwed, except for the Alex Jones Network, which is going like gangbusters.
Well, that's the thing is they have, they have, they have, they've never wanted to settle.
So the courts keep telling them settle, settle, settle, but they'll never settle because they want to keep the protracted fight going because it's about pinning me down.
It's about, they say on TV, we want him off the air.
You know, there was a really interesting interview they did with Nelson Mandela where they were like, you know, you did the whole thing and all that stuff, but do you have one regret?
And Nelson Mandela was doing, said, like, going to prison in the first place.
I really wish I hadn't hadn't resisted.
I really wish I would have just let sleeping dogs lie.
So there's this anime called Jiu-Jitsu Kaisen, right?
Very popular.
Not great storytelling.
What do they do have?
Action.
Fucking kineticism.
The apotheosis of it, right?
And one of the most recent episodes had this character who was abused and hated and all of these things because she wasn't like them, all of those stuff.
And then she goes kill Bill on everybody, right?
And like, literally, it's a reference to Kill Bill.
She does it.
And I just keep thinking, like, listen to all those people laugh.
Like, I can't be in a room with all of those people hearing that without, like, is there a baseball bat?
Anybody?
Like, there's, you just have to spin around and hit these people.
I'm concerned that we're more in the ape phase still.
You know?
Like, I listen to that and I go, oh boy, a few hundred thousand, maybe a couple million years will really evolve into a thinking ape species any moment now.