#1019: February 6, 2025—Dan Friesen and Jordan Holmes dismantle Alex Jones’ baseless USAID-CIA claims, including $68M to the WEF, while debunking his recycled conspiracy theories about bot farms and Georgetown’s past attacks. Jones pivots to Elon Musk’s rocket explosions, dismissed as weak defenses amid regulatory scrutiny, then twists Bill Gates’ virus warnings into a "veiled threat" and falsely attributes cyberattack rhetoric to Klaus Schwab. His preemptive blaming of globalists for Musk’s failures and Trump’s Social Security audits—despite contradicting his own anti-surveillance stance—exposes predictable deflection tactics, revealing how his narratives prioritize ideological loyalty over evidence or coherence. [Automatically generated summary]
And one of the things that's so great about it, and I don't know if you've experienced this, but, like, really, I think what makes it good is that it's so woke.
And I think that that's probably good because you've now also created a landscape where if you want to add content, there's all these places where shit could fit in.
So I see the possible benefits of it, but yeah, it's a lot of fun.
I have gotten in the zone today because there's so much news.
It's also incredibly important.
I have a tendency with each.
Big story to try to connect it to everything because it's all connected and it just makes the top of my head blow off.
I've been doing okay.
Doing a B plus lately.
Most people think I've been doing great, but I don't.
I'm going 100 today.
I'm getting a total A plus.
I am massively prepared to chronicle all the good things that are happening, how the enemy's striking back, and then to drill into the genius of what...
But he's talking a little bit about the USAID conflict, which is that Musk is trying to basically get rid of it, and other people are saying, no, don't do that.
And, of course, the biggest news, which if you're a listener, you already know this, and a lot of you knew before you ever tuned in to me, there's been a real CIA coup since 1963 when they killed Kennedy.
But now in the USAID documents alone...
We have the multiple impeachments funded against Trump illegally.
That's total election meddling.
What they claim the Russians are doing with no evidence.
And it is a coup against the 2020 election.
Massively involved there.
Massively involved in pushing lies and disinfo covering the Fed's direction.
All of it.
And so these are multiple CIA coups against Trump and the American people in our...
Election integrity.
Now, I've been saying that forever.
I've been saying that yesterday and said that the day before, specifically with headlines.
But now it's mainstream knowledge.
It's all over the news, and the Democrats are saying, yeah, well, Trump's a bad guy.
We did that.
Sending money to Ukraine, directed by the CIA, through USAID and other groups, back to the Democratic Party, back to the corporate media.
And then back specifically to Democrats and lobbyists to direct the propaganda and the mechanics of multiple impeachments, but particularly the fake Ukraine impeachment that failed, and then massive election meddling in 2020, and then ongoing into 2024.
So now that USAID is the bad thing that all the cool kids are attacking, you start to see it's getting blamed for all sorts of old conspiracy talking points that don't really have a good villain face.
The 2020 election one here is perfect, since blaming Dominion or the other voting machine companies, it comes with the possibility of giant defamation lawsuits, and the other options that they've tried to pitch just really haven't been all that compelling.
Alex has no USAID documents that he's pretending to base this coverage on.
He's just seen a bunch of idiots tweeting stuff and formed a storyline out of that.
He's going to need to do a whole lot better in order to justify the claims that USAID was behind overthrowing the 2020 election and leading multiple impeachments.
I mean, each little factoid I'm giving you is a whole story, obviously.
That's why it's hard to cover it.
It's just so devastatingly amazing.
Look at this.
Bombshell.
Michael Schellenberger exposes shocking U.S. aid and CIA connections to Trump's impeachment.
Yeah, that's a CIA-attempted coup.
And they were involved in all three elections trying to stop him.
2016, 2020, 2024.
Wait, USAID was involved in Trump's impeachment?
Yes, Town Hall.
And Schellenberger's published all it on X and on his substack.
We have it up on Infowars.com.
As well, and of course, you see all this, you go, wait, Alex, you've already told us all about this.
Yeah, you can read the New York Times and CNN 2017.
Alex Jones claims the CIA's illegal spying and running a slow-motion coup inside the administration.
And of course, it's all there.
And I name the names.
And so we're going to be going over that, and then we've got this incredible news.
This is the international angle of it.
Why would the CIA, that's USAID, that's just their funding mechanism, it's their payroll program, why would USAID give $68 million to the World Economic Forum?
Well, it's a NATO-slash-CIA-created group that's been made co-equal with the UN by a UN order a year ago to advise the UN.
Politicians and corporate leaders elevates them, puts them in as their operatives, penetrates the cabinets, and then they engage in covert coups over nation states.
So here we get to Alex attempting to get into more detail about this story that USAID was behind the impeachment, and it turns out it's just something that Michael Schellenberger posted on his sub stack.
But even still, we have no idea what Schellenberger's argument is.
If you're just listening to Alex's show, there is no context for this at all, which you need in order to assess information that you're being presented with.
What is this?
What did he say?
So, Schellenberger has suggested that USAID is mixed up in the Trump impeachments because one of the whistleblowers who alleged that Trump was trying to pressure Zelensky to investigate Biden cited a source called the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project.
The OCCRP has been a long-standing critic of some of the current right-wing's favorite people like Putin, Viktor Orban, Bolsonaro, and Trump.
They've also received some funding from USAID.
They're not fully funded by USAID, nor is there any evidence that this money they did receive affected their content, but this is what the claims that Alex is making are based on.
A source that was cited in a report by the whistleblower in the impeachment case received some funding from USAID, therefore USAID was basically running the impeachment.
This is thin stuff, and that's why Alex is hiding behind not getting into the specifics, because the case is dumb.
And then Alex moves on to someone else tweeting about USAID giving money to the World Economic Forum.
And he has some fascinating ideas about how it's meant to get enough money to take over the world's governments.
So interestingly, in 2017, the WEF published an article discussing their use of investment from USAID.
So that was a while ago.
That was like eight years ago.
Sure.
It was about how this money wasn't income.
It's USAID investment in projects that are run by the WEF.
For instance, there was a $13.3 million payment for a project aimed at helping smaller farms in sub-Saharan Africa and at job creation in the region.
In the first three years of that program, they estimated that 10 million small farms gained contracts thanks to the project and over 88,000 jobs were created from it.
Another project USAID donated to is the Global Alliance for Trade Facilitation.
This is a WEF-helmed initiative meant to enable less developed countries to modernize their trade abilities, so they're able to handle the logistics end of a lot of that stuff on their own without third-party companies.
companies and from other countries need.
Sure, sure.
This includes things like investing in digitalization of some border processes, particularly like in landlocked countries, where it's really hard to move cargo through.
This project in particular has been wildly successful, since the investment needed is fairly small, and the benefit to the businesses in these countries is really high.
So USAID investment in it makes a whole lot of sense.
Anyway, if any of these people were curious about why USAID was giving money to the World Economic Forum, they could look into it themselves and get the answers, or they could just post fake curious conspiracy bait on Twitter and keep being idiots like this.
There's all kinds of things where people explain why we need this money, how much we need, and then the USAID people talk about it and they do the thing and then there are dinners and people...
Everything's in writing like three times over.
If you want to know the answer to this, it's actually all very straightforward.
I'm going to drill into this more after the break, but I wanted to play a short 2-minute, 35-second clip from this morning because I thought that when I was watching it, the Harrison Smith on the American Journal did a really good job pointing this out nicely and succinctly.
We posted this on X at Real Alex Jones.
Remember, this is a participation blood sport.
Battle for the whole future of humanity.
You're not important.
You're everything, viewers and listeners.
When you decide to go get this and share it, or you decide to go to Real Alex Jones and share the live feed, or at AJNLive, and you follow us there, or you decide to grab clips yourself, the show belongs to the world.
So if you're paying attention to what's happening here, Alex is taking time on his show to play a clip from Harrison's show where Harrison is covering something Alex tweeted.
There's no information here.
It's just cyclical.
It's like a one- or two-person circular human centipede.
It's so hard because you're like, yes, tens of millions of dollars is a ton of money, but also it is zero dollars in the relative world of the government, right?
Like, it is no money at all.
I understand we should care about that tens of million dollars.
Tens of million dollars is so much money, but also it's no money.
Imagine what it's like for people that stuck with the Democratic Party and believe their lies who are actually decent people and they do exist.
They're brought up in it.
They're around it.
Their jobs depend on it.
They can barely pay their bills because they're not in on the scam.
They actually believe that...
The Democrat leadership really is trying to create prosperity, and then they see all the facts laid out to them and realize it was worse than they could have ever imagined, worse than Alex Jones said, and worse than Tucker Carlson said, and worse than Elon Musk said, and they realize, wow, we were on the wrong team.
And it takes courage to do that, but...
Once you make the decision, you realize it didn't take courage at all.
It was just being in reality, and that's how we heal.
So I saw a very powerful post that Elon reposted this morning.
I woke up at 4 in the morning, went immediately to Elon Musk, you know, greatest feed in the world.
So this Isaiah Carter guy was a dude who filmed himself complaining about the Democratic Party, which was reposted by Elon.
It's supposed to come off as a guy who's finally seen the light and realizes that the party he supported was bad and Trump is good, but it really just kind of feels like someone faking that.
Like, he drops a bunch of right-wing media talking points to the point where it really comes off as an attempt at branding more than anything else.
I left the left kind of stuff.
Basically, I don't believe that this person who throws around the kind of shit that he's throwing around in that video, I don't think he cared about left-wing ideas all that much.
Probably unsurprisingly, just after that video went viral, he launched a podcast called Appastate Radio, which I guess it's called that because he's a black guy who's an appastate because he left the Democratic Party.
I'm fine with anyone having whatever political beliefs they want, but I think this just comes off like a little bit inauthentic.
So he's saying that there's an email with Hillary Clinton about how they need to engage in the culture wars and get black players in the NFL to take a knee and make everyone trans.
Escalate the culture war!
This came out in the WikiLeaks.
According to Alex, there's a full database of all of the...
So in the real world, there was an email from 2011, which was declassified in 2015 from Cheryl Mills to Hillary, with the subject line, quote, segregation and harassment of women increases in Israel as ultra-Orthodox community moves into secular cities.
There were two incidents where women were harassed by ultra-Orthodox people in public, one who refused to move to the back of a bus, and the other was an 8-year-old who got spit at for dressing...
So that's where, you know, that culture war...
That's where it comes up in one of Hillary's emails.
The only other time the term culture war appears in Hillary's emails is a 2009 message from Sidney Blumenthal titled, quote, Latest Articles on Iranian Election Fraud and CIA Torture.
The words culture war appear in one of the copy and pasted articles that Blumenthal is sending Hillary, and the context of it is that Obama was inheriting a regime that was torturing people in carrying out the war on terror.
When he became president, he had to do something, but it wasn't clear how to proceed.
On the one hand, it made sense to form a commission so he could distance himself personally from the process, but he and his advisors thought even that could be seen as him going after Cheney and Bush, like he was trying to be vindictive.
The article says, quote, So these are the only two places where the culture war comes up in Hillary's emails.
But in the sake of being complete, I also looked through the DNC emails that WikiLeaks published, and there were eight of those that used the term culture war.
One was copy and pasted from a Wall Street Journal article that was talking about Pat Buchanan's 1992 speech at the RNC, which was titled Culture War.
Another was a copy and pasted op-ed from the Washington Post, which discussed Trump's ideological approach to fighting groups like ISIS and how it doesn't really make sense.
One is an email from someone named E. Walker, not addressed to Hillary or even Podesta, just some people at the DNC.
This was a bunch of notes that this person had taken watching a panel on the show this week featuring Matt Dowd, Donna Brazile, Cokie Roberts, and Bill Kristol.
In the notes, Dowd is said to have made the point, quote, focus on gun shows.
Huge culture war will be litigated in 2016 election.
I think this is what Alex is probably referencing.
There was someone passing along a transcript of the press secretary taking questions, one of them being about an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal suggesting that the administration's opposition to the North Carolina bathroom bills was, quote, an effort to start a culture war to drive voter turnout in November.
He replied that, quote, it's a curious observation by the Wall Street Journal that I don't think stands up to a lot of scrutiny.
One email was a Politico news blast with a bunch of links to their articles, including one headlined, quote, the right has been consistently losing culture war fights during the Obama era.
Another is a copy and pasting of a Politico article about how the GOP had set off an internal culture war over the North Carolina bathroom bills, with Ted Cruz calling Trump no better than the, quote, politically correct leftist elites because he didn't care enough about the issue.
The last two in this section, they were both Washington Post link roundups called The Daily Trail, which included headlines that included the term culture war.
So it seems like Alex is really just making this up and then pointing to a vague source that he calls the WikiLeaks.
This is basically what he does with every source that he cites, because he knows that the audience is never going to check or hold him accountable on any of this.
The hard part of his job, or the job that he pretends to have, which is a rogue truth-telling investigative journalist, the hard part is finding the truth and demonstrating it.
with sources.
In a genius move, Alex has eliminated this step of the process.
And as long as he can confidently point at what appears to be a source, enough people are tricked into thinking that he's proved something and he can keep the CMOS business open.
And it ties into USAID and the CIA not just spending billions the last eight years, nine years.
They really got scared and put the big money in.
Or it was hundreds of millions a year.
Now it's billions.
into the corporate media to put out lies.
They spent billions to create the list at the universities and the think tanks to then go out to the government and the law firms and sue everybody and surveil everybody and debank everybody and kick conservative media off the air.
And I mean, infiltrate your employees, have PIs follow you around.
I mean, again, if I told you all, it would take the whole show, so I'm just not going to tell you.
It's been quite the experience.
I mean, every time I start thinking about it, so much pops in my head, I could go for hours.
It's been wild.
James Bond movie, except it's like retarded clowns you're dealing with.
And they'll go pay off an employee who's been here 10 years to go around the office and say, I don't like black people.
Start saying the N-word.
People are like, don't say that.
We're not into that.
And then you let the person go, and then they're in a newspaper attacking you.
That you were saying something racist, but they couldn't get it on tape.
And I bet USAID paid Paul Joseph Watson to get caught in a recording saying, quote, I really think you should press the button to wipe Jews off the face of the earth.
And also, quote, I care about white people and not...
Or, like, in the last few days, Alex's newly freed compatriot who was convicted of seditious conspiracy against the United States and released by Trump, Joe Biggs, he's been expressing some views that must be funded by USAID.
Yeah, maybe all of Alex's people are bigots, and their entire industry is based on pretending that they're not, so they can insinuate themselves into normal society and Trojan horse their toxic ideas.
That's probably more what explains how all of his employees seem to end up being big old bigots.
The Department of Government efficiency did not exist before Elon paid Trump over a quarter of a billion dollars for the election and was compensated with a fake government entity that he can use to protect his businesses and rob all the public funds.
Trump did this all by executive order.
There's been no approval from Congress.
Doge has made a habit of releasing fraudulent and incorrect information about government spending, which is then amplified by Musk on Twitter, the social media platform that he owns.
This is a billionaire taking over the government and reforming it to serve his...
Yeah.
I think Alex would have supported the business plot.
I mean, you saw that what happened if you allow FDR to do his whole thing, it's going to take you at least 80 years to then kill the president and install a dictator.
So I feel like if he's doing something somewhere that's illegal, there is probably somebody at like a low-level just inspector general or attorney general or like lower-level position who could be like, oh, I'll just file a warrant and then arrest him.
I bet they could do it, but you would have to do it.
So, at the bottom of the hour, I'm going to explain what all the signs are, because they always pre-program what they're going to do to try to stop Trump, Musk, and us.
And some of the other things they're pulling.
And I'm going to hit one of their big attacks now, but I'm going to hit the key attack at the bottom of the hour.
They're going to launch a cyber attack on the government payment system and claim Musk did it.
Guaranteed.
They're probably already trying.
So I'll elaborate on that critical over the horizon information, but not too far over the horizon.
It's with their behavior and how they always try to prepare the ground.
We know it's It's important to understand how these predictions that Alex makes, they don't mean anything.
But they're designed to be defensive.
This is a good example of how that works.
Elon Musk is breaching all kinds of government systems, and we don't really know who's working for him.
They tried to claim that naming the employees of Doge was the equivalent of doxing them, and there's been a clear air of secrecy over a lot of the actions that they're taking.
Congress isn't overseeing what they're up to, and the courts can only react so fast, so this is an environment that is rich with danger.
Any one of the people who work for Musk could have nefarious intentions.
They could put a virus into these systems or just scrape sensitive data for any number of reasons.
Like, they could want to sell it.
There's all kinds of shit.
That's a scary possibility, but even without the need for any malice, we don't know who's doing stuff and what they're doing.
The potential for mistakes is high, and in this area, a mistake could be catastrophic.
For instance, Elon joked at a meeting with Trump that when they shut off USAID, they'd accidentally shut off programs that helped contain a current Ebola outbreak in Uganda.
It was just accidentally cancelled.
Musk said that they restored it quickly and that there was no impact, but that's been refuted by people in the field.
That's high stakes for a mistake.
Shutting off aid to contain Ebola could result in Ebola spreading further, which would be catastrophic.
And these kinds of mistakes are inevitable, because they're not really mistakes.
They're the unexamined but obvious results of the things that Trump and Musk are doing.
Alex knows that there's a pretty good chance of them doing something that causes massive social backlash, like taking down the Social Security payment functions.
And Alex needs a story ahead of time to explain why it's a false flag.
Alex's storylines are largely based in trying to preemptively pitch alternative explanation for things he's worried about derailing the extreme right-wing takeover of the country.
When he says that he's worried about the globalists that are going to do a big false flag racist car bombing, it's because he's concerned that if a big racist car bombing happens, it risks revealing to the center and the moderate types in this country just how bigoted the GOP has become.
It could be a wake-up call that would be meaningful, and it would hurt Alex's business, which is either full of racist or people who have been paid to be racist by the USAID in order to make Alex look racist.
When Alex says the globalists are going to do a cyber attack to stop Musk, it's because he knows that there's a good chance that Musk is going to fuck something up majorly.
And this could be the impetus for him losing all public support.
And that could end up with Musk being required to get congressional approval for his actions, and then before you know it, he can't do any of the destructive shit that he's trying to do.
The gamble Alex has is that the narrative and the conversation guide politics.
And if he and his side can control that narrative, they control political power.
This is Alex's largest market value.
He tries to identify possible problems to the narrative and come up with alternative explanations for them in advance.
So when a problem happens, he's there to be like, no, it's not their fault.
It's not their fault.
And you can see that.
I think that dynamic is important to understand.
Because he's saying that there's got to be this big cyber attack.
And guess what?
If that doesn't happen, he doesn't give a fuck about, like, well, I was totally wrong.
I misread all the signs about how there was going to be a cyber attack.
Yeah, it is strange because the only people really in position to do a false flag and to benefit from a false flag are the people he's saying are going to be false flagged.
So in the last hour, first 30 minutes, I broke down with the documents and more how the CIA runs USA, which is even debated, that's admitted, and uses it to overthrow governments and manipulate systems and destabilize countries and cultures and go after the family unit and push pedophilia and everything else.
To make society weak so it can be overtaken.
And how they also funded dirty tricks in election meddling against all three of Trump's campaigns, successfully stole the 2020 election, financed and quarterbacked all of the impeachment operations.
This isn't something Alex has done on his show today.
He skimmed some tweets about Michael Schellenberger making a dubious claim about the Trump impeachments, and then he just filled the time with his usual fare.
Alex tries to make it as difficult as possible, but it's important to remember what he's basing his claims on when you hear his claims.
The key to assessing a claim someone makes is how they defend or support what they're saying.
And every time, you will find that Alex greatly exaggerates his sources in order to pretend that he's proven things that he hasn't.
With government funds to create these giant bot farms and attack systems and research databases on who to target and who was the most effective in the conservative, populist, pro-human media.
Now, I already knew this because Georgetown University, working with the Democratic Party and the Democrat Party law firms, Did all this crowdsourcing and data mining on myself and then packaged the narratives and lies with the PR firms to open up on me for about two years with a bunch of lies to turn me into this demon straw man before they had their
lawsuits and show trials and all the rest of it.
But you have to understand, it's not just money going into these groups to target and lie about.
File stuff and then create reports that are given to the government and corporations and to the, quote, fact checkers of then who to go out and attack and say is bad and say is a liar and create the straw man.
While you're already been deplatformed so you can't respond, they don't just shut you down.
They shut you down so you can't respond and build a straw man to attack populism.
Like, we started before the lawsuits were filed and have created what Alex probably wishes was a strawman version of him and have done a thousand episodes of a podcast.
So weird that he's concerned about this mischaracterization of his life and work and won't address thousands of hours of criticism of how he's full of shit.
So Alex's University's targeting patriots thing is about a social media hysteria that broke out about grants that went to the Stanford Internet Observatory, a branch that engages with online misinformation, which puts it squarely at odds with the current right wing, which functions almost entirely on weaponized misinformation.
If they put the major players that can cover that stuff out of business, there's less opposition to their manipulation of the public through Twitter, and that means more C-boss sales.
So, I mean, obviously, like, following misinformation is going to be targeting the Patriots.
Yeah, I mean, I want to say that since I was a child, the conservative, mainly Christian-driven, or not Christian-driven, mainly patriarchal-driven, if you will, attack on...
Higher education or universities or the like is just so successful.
They've just fucking nailed it.
You know?
Like, if you stop, you look back and see what they tried to do, what they set out to do, how they set out to do it, and then that they succeeded, there's something admirable about it.
Cold reading headlines and then improvising defenses for Elon Musk.
That poll thing is whatever, but Alex's response to the rocket thing is pathetic.
Is no one complains about other people's rockets polluting really the best angle he can come up with?
In case you didn't keep track of all of this, this was the January rocket explosion, not the March one.
This was a test flight SpaceX was conducting, which they lost contact with, and then it exploded near Puerto Rico, resulting in a bunch of flights being diverted and general confusion.
Alex is reading a headline from a month later about how scientists estimated that this explosion released 45.5 tons of metal oxides and 40 tons of reactive nitrogen into the upper atmosphere, which is a bad thing.
It's not good.
Then in March, their next launch also blew up, causing chaos for air traffic controllers and people just trying to fly places.
The angle that no one complains when the globalists blow up rockets feels really stupid, because no one else is blowing up rockets with this much regularity.
We have no idea what kind of damage these explosions may have had from an ecological standpoint, but you can be pretty sure that we are going to be the people dealing with those consequences, not Elon.
When, you know, you reference Whitey's on the moon, and you think to yourself, ah, Whitey's on the moon, but a rat is biting my sister.
Now, you see the difference in strata, you know, the inherent inequality of the United States barefaced right in front of your eyes, because there's a man on the moon, right?
But at the very least, there was a man on the moon, you know?
You know, there's a certain part of me that's like, wow, man, I guess we're at the very least, you know, sure, I'm starving, but at least there is a guy on the moon in that poem.
The Democrat Seacoast Commission that can control what people can do in California say a few months ago, they said, yeah, we don't like Elon Musk's politics, so we're banning him.
So the California Coastal Commission ruled that Elon couldn't launch a bunch of rockets over the state, most likely because they were pretty sure a bunch of rockets were going to blow up.
Space Force had requested the state dramatically increase the number of annual launches, which are done through SpaceX, and would directly profit Elon Musk.
The commission was pretty uncomfortable with that, partially because of environmental concerns, and partially because Elon's a total dipshit.
So they rejected that plan, and then Elon sued them for political discrimination.
Just recently, a judge who was appointed by Trump rejected that suit.
So, Alex is making an argument that ended up being heard in court and determined to be wrong.
Yeah, there's a guy walking down the middle of the street near my neighborhood the other day.
I was taking the train and I walked by and there was a guy, he was having a very long conversation with himself about how he has been diagnosed with something nobody's ever seen before.
And it was a very loud conversation that nobody else was allowed to participate in while he was walking down the middle of the street.
And it was, it's amazing.
When you've lived here long enough to see 40 people on a nice day just walking by, listening to this guy, just going like, not my problem, and just keep going around the way.
They have forecasted it to a level of ridiculousness where it's not even veiled.
Now...
Right on time, as I predicted.
Wasn't hard to predict.
Bill Gates surfaced on Tuesday, like an enemy submarine, and said, if you keep investigating U.S. aid, I'm afraid a new deadly virus will arrive and kill tens of millions of people.
And Elon Musk, oh, he's involved in fraud.
He's getting bribes.
He's paying bribes.
Then we knew this would happen.
I said it an hour ago.
Judgmentally blocks Trump's plan offering incentives for federal workers to resign.
The law says he can do that, and then if they don't take it, he can fire them.
So this is the kind of news, this is how it works on Alex's show, and I think that he thinks that this is what doing a good job looks like.
He reads a headline, makes up some stuff about it, and if he gets inspired, he rants about it until a break comes.
If there's no spark, he moves on to another headline and the process repeats, which is what you just saw there.
This isn't like a situation where there's a thematic connection between these stories.
There's no editorial process.
It's just an idiot seeing pictures and making noises.
Obviously, Gates didn't threaten to release a bioweapon.
He just made the very obvious point that reducing the U.S. investment in foreign aid will increase the danger of public health crises, and the result of that could be millions of deaths.
He's very right, especially considering that, according to his own words, Elon accidentally shut off Ebola containment aid.
This is another in the pile of these preemptive narratives meant to reduce the damage caused by the consequences of Trump and Musk's actions.
Slashing public health funding and stigmatizing things like vaccines will lead to problems.
And Alex knows that.
The problems will come.
It's just important that you have a story in place that blames someone else for them when they happen.
And so, the question is, have they already tried to crash the computer systems?
Or are they just going to attack the power systems themselves?
Because, remember what Klaus Schwab said, a cyber attack will make COVID look like a minor inconvenience and will help get rid of the old system and bring in our new system.
So, yeah.
The question is, has Musk, with all of his incredible people, been able to go in and lock him out, which they did, but they all built back doors, according to William Benny, the director, not the political director, the actual technical director, number two at NSA for decades.
This is a new low for Alex in terms of being a worm.
He's created an imaginary cyber attack that he thinks that maybe Elon Musk is actually protecting the United States from by taking over the government.
It's just pathetic.
There's no other word for it.
Amazing.
Did you know that Biden saved us from an alien invasion that didn't happen?
So that Klaus Schwab thing is a really good case illustration for some of the ways that Alex lies.
In his book, The Great Reset, Schwab mentions the possibility of a cyberattack happening and says that the consequences of that would make COVID look small.
That on its own isn't really suspicious.
You could argue whether or not you agree with his point, but it's just a perspective that's either a good warning or a bit alarmist, depending on your perspective.
But Alex has created that second part of the quote that's fake.
He's added the part about a cyber attack being used to get rid of the old system and bring in a new one.
That's just made up.
Alex made this up because the actual source he's using, the real Schwab quote, isn't good enough.
It doesn't really make the point that he wants to pretend he's proven.
And when you're somebody who's built up your entire, like, whatever goodwill you might have around you is based on opposition to things like the surveillance state.
And things like that.
When that is who you are, the only redeeming quality that you have is at least you believe some of these things.
Yep.
It's kind of glaring when it turns out those things were fake.
The middle class and the working class paying or not paying taxes doesn't really matter that much when there's such wealth consolidation and the rich have found ways not to pay.
So if the solution that he has is excessively tax the rich and leave middle and working class people alone, I guess that makes sense.
But I mean, you know, now that we understand all about metadata and shit, you know, whenever you're...
If you open Instagram, there's a good chance all of the things that you've ever been afraid somebody was spying on you was, is just like routinely tracked through Instagram.
I think that there's really something instructive, though.
But the ways that you can see, he has these preemptive storylines that are built specifically to protect and create deflection for the people that he wants to build those shields for.
And Elon Musk is...
Pretty primary to him right now.
Yeah.
So there's a lot of preemptive defense building for Elon Musk and the really irresponsible and illegal things that he's doing.