Knowledge Fight #1016 dissects Alex Jones’ February 3, 2025 episode, where he falsely ties Trump’s early policies—like $3T NGO freezes—to a "globalist collapse," misrepresents Panama’s port deal as anti-China, and peddles debunked USAID riot claims. Dan and Jordan expose his apartheid-era South Africa comparisons as racist, mock DEI conspiracy theories about pilot Rebecca Lobach, and critique his 2022 Soros-funded radio hysteria as baseless fearmongering. Jones’ desperate, unfounded rants reveal a man clinging to irrelevance, weaponizing paranoia while ignoring actual governance failures. [Automatically generated summary]
And I'm thinking maybe it's time, maybe I should, I've always, I don't judge other people for accessorizing, but I've always felt like an internal sense of like, this is fake, this is false, this isn't me.
Next, Remus, thank you for introing me to being a wonky goof that falls down political rabbit holes with you and creates PowerPoints to debunk things as well as Dan and Jordan, your gem.
So today I will, early in the hour, get a little bit more into what the Trump grand strategy really is.
I'll do it at the bottom of the hour.
Coming up in about 25 minutes.
But first, I want to talk about the big picture.
Trump's been in exactly 14 days.
14 days ago, at 12.08 Eastern, 11.08 AM, 12.08 PM East, he was inaugurated.
And in 14 days, he has way outperformed because of the people he's got helping them, Suzy Wiles and Elon Musk and many others.
And they understood that they were boldly taking on the corrupt, evil, but also collapsing neoliberal globalist world order.
And that order's done.
It'll never be reconstituted, no matter what they do.
But if Trump doesn't succeed, and if we don't relaunch the American system as an example worldwide through soft power, direct, to a great extent, the trajectory of humanity, society and civilization will break up into a bunch of feuding groups and power blocks.
And it will constitute a very dangerous global destabilization of its own.
Musk, in the last week, got partial control of the financial records and systems of the federal government.
Saturday morning, They had a rebellion at the Treasury Department and over the administrators that control the Treasury's payment system and records system.
So they had those people removed.
Others resigned and Musk got control a little bit before noon Eastern Time Saturday.
Since then, they have released hundreds of thousands of documents and thousands of data dumps and just pointed out a selection of the fraud and crime, and that itself is an avalanche, a tsunami, a...
So, I know Alex is aware of the old Stalin quote that goes like, one death is a tragedy, a million's a statistic, because he's repeated it a ton of times on his show.
He knows it.
The gist of that quote is that when you have a large number of deaths, you begin to lose the ability to see the details of each specific death, and your mind detaches from the reality that it's a ton of dead people you're thinking about.
One person's death can be grappled with as the loss of an individual, which your brain struggles to do with large groups.
This dynamic is something that Alex exploits pretty regularly for his content.
In this case, I would change that original quote to something along the lines of, one case of fraud is discussable, but a thousand is not.
If Alex were just to report on a specific case of fraud that Musk has allegedly uncovered, it would be pretty easy to debunk the case he chose, and it would threaten to collapse this whole story under its own weight.
Because when there's one example, your brain can hold onto the details as an individual case, whereas your brain just can't process the image of a thousand examples of shit that you're supposed to assess.
Alex is trying to sell you a pile of things because it's a really large pile, and that's kind of impressive on its own.
He doesn't want the audience to look closer and realize it's a pile of shit, so we'll see if he actually provides examples of this fraud that Musk has supposedly uncovered, or if it's just...
That in and of itself is irrevocably discrediting and devastating the entire globalists, not just here but worldwide, money laundering, political control system of the tax-free foundations, the NGOs, the CIA, the State Department, and their counterparts in other Western countries.
So that in and of itself is seismic, historic, And we could do 24 hours a day, non-stop, just covering what's coming out.
It's all over-the-top insane.
And we knew what was going on, but the specific receipts are even worse than we thought.
Trump didn't just freeze the $3 trillion in the NGO slush funds last week, and then some low-level federal judge blocked it for now.
And Musk and Trump said, that's fine.
We're already in control of the payment systems, and almost all this is totally illegal.
And so we're just blocking all these payments ourselves at the executive level.
And we're just going to expose it all to the light of day.
See how you vampires like that.
So that is a huge area we'll be hitting.
And as I speak, so much more is coming out.
You couldn't cover that in a day.
So we have that.
Then we have the big enemy counter-strikes.
That, oh, Trump's tariffs are going to cause a stock market crash and a new Great Depression.
But really, it's the corporate media and their BlackRock private central bank Rothschild owners who are desperate to stop this recovery that will then vindicate Trump and have the whole world adopt the American system again.
And there goes their neo-feudalistic, tyrannical...
You will eat the bugs, post-industrial hell.
But when you actually go in and look at what's happened, the United States gets less than 5% of its goods from Mexico, and less than 5% of its trade is with Mexico.
So the way Alex is describing Trump at the beginning of that clip seems to be basically a judge said I couldn't do what I wanted, so I took over the accounting department and then started whining on Twitter.
It doesn't come off very strong or like a noble strategy, but I do think Alex is doing the best with what he has to work with, because it's sad.
As we've seen since Trump came into office, he's an unstable and unreliable actor in terms of trade.
It's only been a few months and he's already promised giant tariffs only to walk them back when the leaders of the targeted countries make it clear that they won't just accept the tariff without imposing their own.
Three times now he's made a big show of announcing tariffs, which he would then go on to postpone or limit in some way after backlash.
This is all going to lead to chilled trade relations, less trust in the U.S. as a trade partner, and increased prices for consumer goods.
When those inevitable results come, Alex will be able to portray the consequences of Trump's actions as the globalist counterattack.
And that's what he's doing here.
He's getting ready for an explanation for bad times.
And stop shipping the fentanyl and agree to put your troops on the border.
He's already gone out and deputized the Texas Guard.
He's deputizing other guards.
We got a problem.
He's saying, help us.
We'll help you.
And she says, screw you, F you, just like the Colombian president, and then he shut up within a few hours.
The Panamanian president just last week said, screw you to Trump.
Our deal is, we built it.
You're supposed to give our military ships free transit.
And give U.S. ships a discount.
Nope, you don't get that.
We're going to give China free transit and let China come in with their Belt and Road Initiative and take over the country.
Well, less than 24 hours after Trump announced these sanctions on Panama, the president, we have the video, did a national address yesterday afternoon and said, we're ending the Belt and Road Initiative.
So Panama did recently announce that they wouldn't be renewing their participation in China's Belt and Road Initiative, but the exact amount that Trump's trade war has to do with that is unclear.
There's been a trend internationally of decreased interest in that initiative as investment from China into these other parts of the world has gone down.
Italy withdrew from the infrastructure agreement in 2023, and there's been some talk of other countries going that direction as well.
I understand that Alex has complained about China owning the Panama Canal for a long time, like...
way back into his early career, so it makes sense for him to celebrate the idea of China's influence waning here.
However, he really needs to read past headlines of these stories, or else he runs the risk of sounding like a real dum-dum.
China operates most of the business at the Panama Canal through a company called C.K. Hutchinson.
They run the Balboa and Cretobal terminals, which are on each side of the canal, through an entity called the Panama Ports Company.
The PPC was sold for $14 billion recently to a US consortium.
And Alex should know that that's largely funded by BlackRock, the people that he really, really hates and who are the kings of the globalists.
Alex doesn't know any of the details of these stories, so when he reports on the Panama Canal no longer being influenced by a Chinese port company, he only sees a victory, because that's all there is on the surface.
If he dug even the slightest bit deeper, he'd have to address this story as really being about a Chinese company selling the port to the literal devil, which isn't really progress at all from his perspective.
I think this is a good illustration of the kind of information that you can get from Alex and sources like him.
He can pump you up about the feeling around a piece of news, even if the reality of that news should give you the opposite feeling.
All he has to do is, and all he can do, is decide.
distract you from any of the details in order to get you on the road that he wants.
And so Trump said, well, I'm going to put sanctions on your ass to their communist government.
Their president literally gets up and says, kill all the white people.
Well, there ain't many white people left there.
And so Trump just said, nope.
We're not putting up with that.
And again, the globalist left went in there, set it all up, exploited it, destroyed the system that was there, that we're not defending apartheid, neither was Trump.
But then you put a communist state in where the whole thing collapses, but the globalists have their military camps and their diamond mines.
And that none of the society gets any of the money, only the globalists.
So that was a master class on how to not sound like someone who supports apartheid.
If you want to convincingly say that you're against apartheid, it's critical that you refer to one former apartheid state by its old name and imply that another was better off when apartheid was going before it was overthrown.
It's cool.
He sounds great.
Trump released a statement that was supposedly in response to South Africa's Expropriation Act 13, which was passed in 2024.
This act allows the government to take certain narrowly defined property in order to serve the public good.
It's kind of like eminent domain laws in the United States where the government can seize your hands.
It's not a great thing, but that kind of...
And the further issue with this particular statute is that it was specifically meant to replace the Expropriation Act 63 from 1975, which was a piece of apartheid state legislation.
The new act from 2024 was an attempt to take this bill and make it more in line with the actual constitution of South Africa.
It's impossible to understand any of this outside of a broader context, and the fact that black people in South Africa were subject to the Native Lands Act of 1913, which restricted property outside of specified reserves.
The result of this and other discriminatory legislation passed over the following decades was that a very small white minority in South Africa owned upwards of 85% of the land in the country and controlled pretty much all of the wealth.
This was a radical expropriation of land in and of itself, and the ripple effects of this are what people are still dealing with today.
The white supremacist movement and white nationalist groups worldwide have never been happy that the states that operated with full-on white supremacy like apartheid-era South Africa and Rhodesia aren't allowed to be that anymore, so they have a habit of misrepresenting stories around the subject in a way that's meant to argue for a return to apartheid without directly saying that.
Also, it's probably important context that Elon Musk's wealth originates from his father owning multiple emerald mines in Africa, and that he grew up in South Africa during apartheid.
Musk's dad described Elon's mother's side of the family as being, quote, very fanatical in support of apartheid.
This is all very relevant context that's missing from Alex's analysis because there is no analysis.
An apartheid state run by white people that steals the land in a country, that's just freedom and the market.
While people asking for white people to give that land back, that's evil communism.
It would be more intellectually honest for them to just be like, we took it by murdering people, so I guess it's okay if they take it by murdering us back, but that means it's okay for all of us to murder each other?
Panama says it won't renew Belt and Road Agreement, which totally turns over their infrastructure to China and the Panama Canal.
The announcement came after a meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, during which Rubio tackled the issue of Chinese influence over the country, and particularly the Panama Canal.
The Panamanian president made the announcement on Sunday, saying that although the agreement is not due for renewal for another two years, his administration would be looking to terminate it sooner.
We are going to study the possibility of whether it can be finished earlier or not.
I think it is due for renewal in one or two years.
Now, again, the globalists who are running China made a deal decades ago to hand over Panama to them.
Then the Chinese double-crossed the globalists.
Trump's come in and pushed the globalists aside and saying, we're going back to the American system.
Would Alex be able to present this as a big victory for Trump if the audience knew that Trump and Rubio were essentially turning the Panama Canal over to a BlackRock-funded consortium?
Like, they're the big villains of the conspiracy world now that Klaus Schwab is kind of a little boring.
Of how they're taking everything that the globalist policies did and created and...
Then trying to do a pull, fast one, a shell game, where they then suddenly go, oh no, eggs are record high and in shortage because of Trump.
Here's a short clip.
Nice to see a press secretary actually answering questions for once with real answers.
The press secretary burns reporter with a brutal reality check.
When he tries to blame the price of eggs on Trump, and this is important because this is the type of snapshot that gets Americans' attention when they try to bait and switch and say, oh, Trump's the reason since he got in, egg prices have exploded.
No, they've been growing for four years and ramping up because of the direct policies.
And, of course, they blamed Trump saying he was going to cancel DEI.
For the helicopter crash last week.
Then they wouldn't tell you who the pilot was and try to keep it secret, but it came out.
She was a Biden official who was just in ROTC a few years ago and is now commanding missions in COG.
And you saw the rest of the story.
And she's a big LGBT person or was.
Boy, no wonder they didn't want us to know about that.
So there were three people in that Blackhawk helicopter at the time of the crash that Alex is talking about, and only one of them was a woman, so we know that Alex is referring to Rebecca Lobach here.
Alex says that she was a Biden official who was just in the ROTC a few years ago.
She was not a Biden official, although she was a social aid for the White House in the capacity of helping with Medal of Honor and Medal of Freedom ceremonies.
That does not make her a Biden official.
She was in ROTC when she was in college, while she was simultaneously training with the North Carolina National Guard as an active member, until she was called up to the Army, graduating in 2019 in the top 20% of her class.
Alex is saying that she was a Biden official to smear her as the enemy, and saying that she was just in the ROTC as a way of saying that she was inexperienced and she shouldn't have been in that helicopter.
Isn't it suspicious that she's in that helicopter?
Underneath it all, he's just saying this because she's a woman.
He has nothing to say about the other two dudes in that helicopter because according to Alex, they belong there.
She was just there because of DEI.
No one was trying to keep her identity secret as part of a conspiracy.
Her family had requested the military not release her name initially, which was honored while the family prepared a statement.
I'm not sure what Alex means when he says that she was a big LGBT person, but I suspect...
It's in response to her obituaries mentioning that Rebecca was a passionate victim advocate in the Army Sexual Harassment Assault Response and Prevention Program.
I don't know anything about her sexual orientation or anything, and I don't...
It's not relevant, but this is something that's brought up a bunch in her...
Metaphorically pissing on people's graves in order to make a quick buck.
Like, this is disgusting shit.
I don't even really care that much about, like, you know, patriotism or the military or, like, show some respect for the military or anything like that.
But, like, the person who just died, you're just shitting all over them.
Even she's a big LGBT promoter that they've scrubbed all her social media and her family's social media really quick that we got it.
It's that a smaller pool of women try to go be pilots.
That's just something that they're doing.
So you take a smaller pool, you lower standards.
So you can put more of these people in.
Doesn't mean there aren't fabulous women pilots or fabulous snipers.
Women are just as good of shots as men, statistically.
It's that there's less of them, and then they go and recruit women who really don't have the skills, and then they lower standards, and then you see what you get.
So they tried to blame Trump for going after DEI, even though he hadn't even put the policies in yet.
And then this lady is DEI all the way.
For folks that don't know, in five years, you don't go from ROTC to commanding COG missions over the busiest airport in the world.
I've studied COG missions and the types of people they have doing it, and they are the best of the best of the best.
There's no evidence for any of the stuff that Alex is saying.
He sees a woman in a position that he feels like a man should be in, and his explanation for that is that they must have lowered the standards in order to get a woman into that position because of woke.
Alex hasn't reviewed Rebecca's track record.
He knows nothing about her qualifications.
All he knows is that he's seeing a woman where he doesn't think she belongs.
So he's created an entire social narrative about why that's happening, about lower standards, all of this shit.
That's just from his head.
Pete Hegseth, noted piece of shit and Secretary of Defense, said that the helicopter was on a routine training mission involving COG, or continuity of government.
This makes some sense in that plans are in place in case of an emergency that requires senior members of government evacuating from the D.C. area.
If you're part of the military, you wouldn't want that emergency to come up and then everyone is just kind of winging it.
I don't think that it's at all suspicious that a person who graduated from military training then rose to the rank of captain would be involved in a COG-type exercise within five years.
She wasn't planning who would be the designated survivor.
She was practicing flying at night in case that was necessary in a crisis.
The only thing I actually think is kind of fucked up about this whole aspect of the story is that Hegseth publicly said that the accident happened because the helicopter was doing COG training.
He said it was part of, quote, routine annual retraining of night flights on a standard corridor.
That seems like if you're trying to protect the continuity of government, like, and the possibility of the U.S. Capitol coming under attack, it isn't the best idea to say, like, we practice using the same corridor for evacuation.
There's hundreds of these articles I see every day.
Trump launches a baffling trade war against Canada and Mexico.
Yeah, I mean, it's totally one-sided.
They won't let our goods in, particularly Canada.
Won't even let U.S. banks operate there.
But then we're wide open to them.
Same thing with Mexico.
Very protectionist.
And then all Trump wants is them to stop letting fentanyl pour in and let them manufacture it there.
I mean, Trudeau lets them manufacture it, lets people use it up there.
He's super unpopular.
And so the media is just demonizing Trump like he's crazy.
It makes no sense.
Why would he say we built the Panama Canal, don't give it to China?
Why would he tell the Mexican government, hey, you better put troops on your border and stop this invasion operation that they've been running with the UN, or I'm going to put tariffs on you, and then...
Oh, their president talked big, but as soon as the rubber met the road and Trump called her bluff, she rolled over.
Donald Trump says America could feel pain thanks to tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China.
And he went on to say, yeah, it doesn't mean we won't feel something, but you've already been feeling the trade war you've been under.
Here's another one out of the Wall Street Journal.
The dumbest trade war fallout begins.
So now they tell you the economy's going to crash, hoping you buy into it, when they're the ones that already crashed the economy.
Trump's move to put tariff hikes ahead of tax cuts has spooked almost everyone.
Partially because the terms of his threats would have violated the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement that Trump signed in his first term, but also because it's very clear that imposing those tariffs broadly would destroy U.S. car companies.
He makes threats, and he usually gets his way because he's a super-rich asshole who doesn't care about other people.
This is the style he's cultivated over the years as a big— And then the problem seems to magically go away.
Like, you know, it's the episode of The Apprentice, and the credits start rolling.
Everything is good.
But governing doesn't work like that.
Trump is trying to bully all these other countries with these threats of giant tariffs, and they're just saying, like, all right, we'll tariff your stuff back.
Everyone knows that the threats being made only work if the other side relents, and the other sides here aren't really relenting.
And to the extent that Alex is saying that, like, they rolled over or whatever, a lot of times it's...
Symbolic concessions and stuff they're already doing that Trump is then repackaging as a win.
But am I to understand that tariffs are functionally like sanctions in a sense that it's like we make the people feel like shit so they'll put pressure on their government to not do the thing?
One person says, okay, we tax this, and then they go, fine, but you guys buy a lot of this, so we'll tax it, and then we're just going to wash, except for you're fucking with real people's lives.
But also, I think Alex is really, really thrown off by the headline that he read where Trump said that Americans are going to feel pain from the tariffs.
To globalist corporations and to their operatives and to themselves.
Talking about fomenting riots anywhere in the world where somebody doesn't do what they want and overthrow governments, including ours.
That's coming up next hour.
And so John Podesta said again in the fall of 2020, before the election, in a big war game the Democrats had, and the New York Times reported on it, that they were going to have blue states secede, create a civil war of Trump, One, calling it a race war.
Now, obviously, they're going to need to kill a bunch of brown people and blame Trump.
Well, they came back again and said, if he wins this time, we're going to do it again.
And then I said, you'll have the illegal aliens protesting with the Democrats en masse.
You've got governors and mayors saying, stand up, fight back.
You've got Pritzker up in Illinois signed a law just last week.
To change the name and give new identities to illegal aliens, including felons.
You got the governor in New Jersey just came out and said, you know, we're going to house these people.
It's true that Alex isn't very smart, but it's cool that he loves federal law now so much.
The rest of the nonsense that he's talking about there, it's all bullshit and it's all disconnected from reality.
We've talked about those talking points that he's hitting in the past, but that New Jersey one is new.
I don't know if you know about this one.
So the governor of New Jersey, Phil Murphy, was at a speaking engagement and he said, quote, I don't want to get into too much detail, but there's someone in our broader universe whose immigration status is not yet at the point that they're trying to get to.
We said, you know what, let's have her live at our house above our garage, and good luck to the feds trying to come in and get her.
Obviously, he was speaking at a left-leaning event with mostly college-age attendees, so he wanted to seem a bit more confrontational than he really is.
There was backlash on right-wing social media, and the story made it to Fox News, where boarders are Tom Holman threatened to investigate the governor for hiding an undocumented immigrant.
But then stuff got really weird.
Murphy began to walk back his statement, and his spokesperson said that his comments were just a hypothetical.
The woman in the story didn't really exist.
Or maybe she did.
As the New York Times reported, an aide to the governor clarified on Monday that the woman in question was in the country legally and had never lived on the Murphy family's property.
The aide did not make clear what sort of relationship, if any, the woman had with the governor or his wife.
To be clear, the headline for that story in the New York Times is, quote, a governor's bizarre comment made him a target of Trump's border czar.
The top line of that story is how weird it is that Murphy seems to have just made up this hypothetical situation to pretend that he's more defiant than he actually is.
Then the truck bomb mass shooting of the illegal aliens protesting that are now, as I said in the last few weeks, going to get more and more violent, more and more intense as the NGOs give them the orders and the Soros radio stations tell them to go out and be violent.
So this traces back to a 2022 right-wing social media hysteria about two Spanish radio stations in Miami, which were purchased by a group called the Latino Media Network, which is not run by Soros, but has received some funding from his affiliated groups.
The big issue was WAQI, or Radio Mambi, which is an AM station that's primarily attracted a Cuban-American audience.
In Florida, the Cuban community is a fairly anti-communist and Republican-leaning group, so naturally there was outrage at the possibility of a non-right-wing-aligned radio group buying a very prominent radio station that caters to this community.
The fear was that it was an attempt to sway politics and hurt Trump's 2024 chances in Florida as well as Marco Rubio's run for Congress.
Complaints were made to the FCC, who looked into the sale and found no problem with it, and it went ahead.
To be clear, I'm opposed to big companies owning a bunch of media entities.
I think that media consolidation is largely a force of ill in the world, and that no one should own multiple radio stations or newspapers.
So I'm not in favor of Soros owning a bunch of stations.
I'm just saying that Alex is not really reporting this story accurately, and I think part of the reason he can't do that is because if he did, he'd have to talk about how his entire worldview is essentially propped up by that very same force of market consolidation.
If it weren't for the widespread ownership of radio stations all over the country by groups like Cumulus Media and Salem Radio Network, right-wing talking head shows wouldn't have had the market saturation that they did in the 80s and 90s, which is directly responsible for creating the atmosphere where shitheads like Alex can thrive.
In some ways, Alex is afraid of the idea of Soros buying up a bunch of radio stations because he knows that's what his guys did, and it's pretty effective, or it was...
In that era of time.
And I think that he knows that, and that's why you can't really...
Yeah, it makes you despair of ever learning a lesson.
Because it feels like that whole maybe don't give all of the media to a very small group of people with all the money and then also let them own other stuff.
I said I would get into what the Trump grand strategy is last hour.
And I got into it some, but I think it's really important to spend a few minutes on it.
Because I haven't really seen it defined by anybody properly.
I know the American system.
I've studied it.
Trump has made a lot of references to it.
You can see it's in everything he's doing.
When he commissioned the last four years expert historical societies to have his 1776 project, which I really agreed with and thought was great, he said, I intend to implement this.
And people seem to think, oh, that's 1776, that's 250 years ago, that's an old system.
No, it was the renaissance and the very best thinking that the world ever produced.
And those philosophies applied to modern times work even better than they did back then.
So it's back to the future.
It's the latest best system.
We've just been abandoning it since the end of World War II.
And then didn't just completely abandon it, became, to a great extent, the opposite of it.
We've just been abandoning it since the end of World War II, and then didn't just completely abandon it, became, to a great extent, the opposite of it.
But...
Pulling out of this suicide death cult is not going to be easy.
And I saw a Babylon Bee joke piece that Elon retweeted, reposted yesterday.
And it basically said, you know, MSM begs Trump to slow down because he's exhausting them.
It's not exhausting me.
I'm frustrated that I can't fight as hard as I want to.
And that's because I don't have a big enough crew.
And I want to work 18, 20 hours a day, and I expect people can't do that all the time.
The crew's been working 12, 14, 15, 18 hours a day.
I have a lot of big, original research stories that are extremely important, and I just can't release them.
Like, he's supposed to be crystallizing Trump's philosophy, and so far we've got blowhard platitudes about the Renaissance, and then Alex complaining that his staff doesn't work hard enough.
And when I get up here over the years and say we've done one of the best jobs fighting the bad guys, that doesn't mean I'm saying I've done a great job.
That scares the fucking shit out of me.
I mean, we're up against horrible, open demons that want to kill everybody.
And have a plan to incrementally cut everything off until we're to that point.
And wherever they get control of a third-world country, they outright do it.
And the fact that I've done one of the best jobs and the fact that more prominent people didn't join us in this fight is insane.
Now you've got Elon and Trump in there wrecking them, and I see the enemy coming in with their counterattack, and I see so many conservatives.
And populist and people that want to live, you know, good people, celebrating and, oh, everything's fine and we're unstoppable.
And that enthusiasm's great.
And we should be thankful.
But, I mean, they're getting ready to crash the stock market.
And they're getting ready to blow up and shoot up a bunch of illegal aliens.
So, you know, people better get their heads out of their asses and get that straight.
But, I mean, I got these federal documents.
And I'm not even going to release them.
We'll fuck it up.
Doesn't matter.
Fuck it.
I mean, seriously.
I mean, I just, I got total proof of the whole deep state.
And that's a big part of why the folks who were seeking power thought he was useful enough to put up with.
In case the stock market crashes, it's good to have a guy like Alex around who is screaming about how it wasn't your fault.
If there's a domestic terror attack against people defending immigrant rights, it's really useful to have a guy like Alex yelling about how a false flag was coming.
When you need him, it's good to have him around, but on the day-to-day, it's really embarrassing to act like this.
And I think that this is some of the tension in the aftermath of the inauguration.
Alex has to know that his team doesn't need him now, that they have real power to work with, and his only real value is to continue to yell that the sky is falling and that it's all the globalists' fault, so he can be used to help make a scapegoat for the consequences of what they do now when they have real power.
I feel an emptiness, and that shot out to break is grim.
Gone is the Alex who was ready to go pretend to get arrested rather than give his fingerprint at the DMV, and now here we have an Alex who has secret federal documents given to him by the president that would blow the lid off the deep state and prove all his conspiracies, but he's not going to cover it because he would just fuck it up.
He's right, in a hypothetical sense.
There isn't a big story here, but if he did have a big story...
Yeah, I mean, it does feel like he should be living in a moment, the moment that I think I've had, where you realize I am making my own position obsolete.
That was a huge mistake, to not have negotiated a next thing.
Even though it's full of shit, and he's faking all this, and it's mostly bravado, there's still something that is enticing about this character.
The guy who has proof of the devil that the president gave him, who is too whiny to fucking get to it, that's not interesting.
That is a pathetic husk of a person.
Yeah.
I don't know.
I mean, I have another clip here, but I don't even know if you need to play it.
It's just when he comes back from break, he tries to self-soothe by describing violent fantasies and then accusing that New Jersey governor of being a pedophile.