Knowledge Fight dissects Alex Jones’ December 31, 2024, segment where he falsely ties a WHO malaria report to "globalist" pandemic funding schemes, ignoring Club of Rome cherry-picking and vaccine misframing. The hosts debunk his claims linking New Orleans’ ISIS-affiliated attack and Las Vegas’ Cybertruck explosion as deep-state PSYOPs against Trump, mocking his profit-driven fearmongering while Andy from Kansas abruptly cuts in to demand prayer. Jones’ patterns reveal how conspiracy narratives exploit tragedy to sustain engagement over substance. [Automatically generated summary]
No, there's something to be said for creating the special experience of exclusivity while at the same time creating a certain realistic understanding of the world through the loss of exclusivity.
It kind of sucks because the idea of having like three or four what's your bright spot buttons, that is exclusive to a level that's like, you can't really expect that this is going to show.
You know, when you're talking about, I get that a few is different, but I mean, 5% still has an expectation of there's a 95% chance you're not going to get one.
Over the week of America Fest, he was in the desert, likely hanging out around the festival trying to make sure all the cool kids on the scene like Tucker don't forget about him.
I just keep flashing in my mind to all of these stupid rants that he goes on about how he can't accept Rogan's invitations to go to the comedy club because he's in straight-up war mode.
Nothing is working because the vast majority of people see three If the globalists have an elaborate plan that involves releasing a bioweapon and doing all this pre-scripting on TV in advance, I really don't think they would leave it all down to a last-minute spending bill that could pass or fail.
Alex is imagining the globalists are these arch-villains, but they also have grand plots that sound like a teenager came up with them.
Like, I'll take over the world, but only if Dad lets me borrow the car.
If you're saying that they're doing it during the regular course of a presidency that they have control over, right, and there's a bill and it could pass or fail, then you could be like, oh, this is just to show the masses that the system still works, it's all an illusion, that kind of thing.
Now, if they have a bill that fails, that just means they suck, right?
So in the case of the illnesses in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Alex misreported that story initially, and because of that, he's now acting like the globalists are walking back their virus hysteria because this spending bill failed.
In reality, there was an undiagnosed condition in Congo which caused symptoms that applied to 406 people between October 24th and December 5th.
This set off alarms because there were higher rates of this condition than would be expected from seasonal When the World Health Organization made an alert about this, they called it a, quote, undiagnosed disease.
But in their report about this very thing where they're calling it an undiagnosed disease, they said, quote, Malaria is a common disease in this area, and it may be causing or contributing to the cases.
Laboratory results are underway to determine the exact cause.
This was an alert about a condition that was hurting a remote population of people in a rural area, which is about a 48-hour drive from Kinshasa.
It was about how health services can address this issue that's killing these people, not really an alert about something that posed a severe outbreak potential.
As the report itself says, quote, Alex and his dipshit media space ran with this and exaggerated it out into being the new Ebola-type illness that the globalists are rolling out to be the new COVID.
They whipped up a hysteria in opposition to the imaginary hysteria that they were pretending that the globalists were engaged in.
And now, more information has come back in, and those laboratory tests that the WHO was conducting in early December have come back.
They've found additional cases that match the disease symptoms and that 430 out of 891 cases tested positive for malaria or common respiratory viruses.
Thus, they made the assumption that, quote, these findings suggest that a combination of common and seasonal viral respiratory infections and falciparum malaria compounded by acute malnutrition led to an increase in severe infections and death, disproportionately affecting children under the age of five.
Alex and his world are ready to pounce on any public health related news in order to sell it as the next thing the globalists are trying to make you afraid of.
But all they're really doing is trying to make you afraid of what they're pretending the globalists are doing.
Nothing that the World Health Organization said was fake.
They were clear that malaria and other seasonal illnesses could be contributing to the situation that was at that point undiagnosed, and that they were seeing more severe cases and deaths than you would expect if it were just the case that it were malaria.
They noted that, did further testing, and came to the conclusion that a lot of it is in fact malaria and common respiratory viruses exacerbated by malnutrition.
And here's the important point.
The World Health Organization's conclusion isn't, oh well, it's no big deal because it's just malaria.
They're still working to address logistical issues about how to help people in this remote area, because their alert wasn't about kicking off a virus panic, it was about responding appropriately to an epidemiological signal.
It's not a bust because it won't be able to be used to force Alex and his friends into a lockdown, but that's how Alex relates with the story.
He doesn't care anymore, so he's pretending that the globalists don't care anymore because they don't get to use it as the new COVID.
I wonder, okay, let me throw this idea out at you, okay?
Instead of having just press conferences where very clearly educated and experienced people do their best to explain very difficult concepts to the rest of us, we have varying levels of educational press conferences, right?
So up here at the top we have medical experts who are explaining all these specific things.
But then we also have a broadcast down here that's like, we don't know for sure, but in a non-worrisome way.
What Dr. Peter McCullough and others have broken down, and we've shown these graphics, we'll show them again, and we posted them on Infowars.com, and at Real Alex Jones on X, you can check it for yourself, is they have the history of these mutations, and we know that that was being researched at these labs.
And then virologists are able to look at that and see that it's clearly been accelerated in its evolution.
And then if you give people these experimental shots while the wild viruses are out there, it will cause them to have more accelerated evolution or the popular parlance leaky vaccine.
So this is the worst thing they could do, even if they weren't the ones that made this new H1N1 that they're now sitting back saying is about to jump into humans in a really bad way because they've got the next version clearly on the shelf, which they admit they have.
I mean, these people aren't even hiding this stuff.
And if they don't start going to prison, they're going to release something far worse on us.
Basically, the way that large percentages of unvaccinated populations can lead to resurgences and mutations of conditions that are vaccine-treatable, we're probably going to see that in the not-too-distant future with polio.
Well, there is a certain amount of reality to that with, like, polio vaccines.
You know, like the...
The oral vaccine, people will get it, and they can extrude it in feces and other ways.
And if there's large enough populations that are unvaccinated, they can be very affected by this in the same way that they would be by wild strains of polio.
And this could be a very big problem.
Now, choosing to describe you as leaky because you got vaccinated...
Is a little stupid, but that's what he's trying to evoke.
Now, a lot of people ask me the question, if this whole biomedical system is being used by the globalists, as they admit it is, to try to bring in total control over society and depopulate and take control of our bodies, why, if it's been exposed, are they still running their operation?
Because they built their whole globalist architecture at the UN and the WHO and these corporations.
To take control using a disease axe.
That's how I predicted it all.
Decades ago and laid out the lockdowns and the six feet apart and the mask and the shots and the quarantine camps because they'd wargamed it.
They'd said they were going to use it for total control.
And then when they collapse the third world from the lockdowns and people starve to death and we get flooded by the third world, they say, oh, it's global warming causing it.
And when they say, oh, about 2030, there'll be mass depopulation from global warming.
No, that's because of their policies cutting off the resources, cutting off the energy, cutting off the fertilizers.
And that causes a collapse.
And they say, oh, look, global warming, man-made, you caused it.
This is their plan.
This is the Rio de Janeiro post-industrial 1992 meeting.
And this is limits to growth and the Club of Rome and their own admissions.
Go watch the WHO or the WEF.
I mean, go the World Economic Forum and all of them.
And they admit all of this.
And so finally people are going, wow, these people really are evil.
This is a prime example of Alex having stupid imaginary enemies.
If they've been trying to use biomedical shit to kill off like 90% of the population, there's literally no reason they couldn't just...
Push forward with it, no matter what Alex and his dumb friends do.
The only possible explanation for the world that Alex describes is if he and the globalists are collaborating, and this is pro wrestling shit.
They have to be enemies that don't actually want to win, but want to provide just enough opposition to make a good story out of the fight.
When you watch wrestling, you have to forget that if it were a real fight, one of the people in the match would probably die.
If very strong people throw each other around and hit each other in the face, one or both are going to suffer serious injuries really fast, and you just have to kind of ignore that in order to get absorbed into the story.
Alex's fight with the globalists involves the same kind of kayfabe.
If the globalists are these minions of the devil and they have plans to take over the Earth, there's no feasible reason why they haven't just done it already.
They have nukes, control of the world's money supply, the ability to see the future, they control demons, they have the ability to make weather weapons, they have access to and willingness to release bioweapons.
The list goes on and on.
The only way any of this makes sense is if the globalists are playing the heel, acting like they have all this control in order for Alex to play the role of the babyface, the underdog who wins against all the odds stacked up against him.
The reason this dynamic exists in Alex's narrative is because he's making all of it up.
He sees himself as this plucky underdog who's going to take down the comically evil demons, so that's the way the enemy gets characterized.
They don't make any sense in terms of motivation and their own internal reality because they're just props for him to fight against to get the audience to cheer for him.
Alex has a lot of things there that look like sources that he points to, like the Club of Rome, Limits to Growth, the 1992 Rio de Janeiro meeting, but what does any of that mean?
Mm-hmm.
Just the main report from the 1992 Rio meeting is 492 pages long.
So some people have no sources for the things they say, but Alex kind of has the opposite problem.
He has a shitload of these sources that he can rattle off, but citing them means nothing.
A source is only as good as you use it.
Like, for example, an expert would probably look like an asshole if they just yelled the name of textbooks instead of trying to make specific points about the subject they're discussing.
Like, if an anthropologist were trying to make a controversial point about human history, and when they needed to provide any backing for their claim, they just said "it's all admitted!" and yelled a bunch of textbook titles, most people would be able to see that they're bluffing their expertise.
In serious conversation with somebody, it becomes really obvious that this is dumb, but because Alex is by himself in this cloistered bubble of idiocy, he somehow gets to pretend like these references mean anything.
Right, because you don't have the space to argue with the things that you inherently disagree with, and the way that you work is you're willing to forgive the things you disagree with so you can focus on the things you already want to hear.
I am your host, Alex Jones, and we are about to break down the latest intel on what's really happening with the two terror attacks we saw yesterday and what's coming next.
Now, as we have precisely predicted in the last year, as soon as Trump became president-elect, the globalists would escalate war with Russia.
They would launch a new pandemic hysteria.
They would also try to pull the rug out from under the economy.
They would then activate the ISIS-Al Qaeda cells that Biden, in the last three years, has resupplied.
With 80-plus billion dollars from the Afghan withdrawal and other funding.
Then you saw the overthrow of Syria using al-Qaeda, actually putting al-Qaeda in charge of that country.
So we know that the Democrats, that whole arm of the deep state, is openly running and controlling these groups.
That doesn't mean that the useful idiots, the Islamists from...
Overseas and that they recruited here domestically, like the attacker on the New Year's Revelers in New Orleans yesterday morning at 3 a.m.
And now we know that the man that blew himself up in Vegas out front, Trump International Hotel, was also a bomb specialist from the same military base as the man who attacked and who was ISIS.
There in New Orleans and his accomplices that have escaped.
And the ongoing manhunt for that.
We're about to break down what all this really signifies right now.
So in the recent past, I've pointed out that Alex is predicting a giant attack on immigrants or a black college because he's very concerned about getting out in front of a potential racially motivated act of domestic terrorism.
I probably haven't been as specific as I could be about the fact that he's also laying the groundwork for this more general way to exploit tragic events that happen.
The fundamental difference is that Alex is just exploiting these events.
In the case of a racial or xenophobic act of terror, he would need to play defense, which is why he generally gets more into specifics about those kind of predictions so he can invalidate their validity immediately.
In the case of events like this, the only goal is to mold whatever happened into existing storylines so they can be made profitable.
But there's no threat to him that this attack in New Orleans or Las Vegas had.
Which is why it's just, Kind of convenient for me.
In New Orleans, around 3 a.m. on New Year's morning, a man named Shamsuddin Bahar Jabbar drove a white pickup truck into a crowd and then started shooting, ultimately killing 14 people and then dying in a shootout with the cops.
He had an ISIS flag in his truck.
But was also a U.S. citizen and served as an IT specialist in the Army until 2020, although his active service ended in 2015.
He was from Texas, and at this point, it's unclear a lot more detail about what was up.
At about 8.40 a.m. in Las Vegas, a man set off some explosives in a Tesla Cybertruck parked outside of the Trump International Hotel before shooting himself in the head.
Seven people were injured, but that guy was the only fatality, and there's been no concrete connection made between these two incidents.
The Army identified the guy was Matthew Allen Livelsberger, who's a Master Sergeant in the Army Special Operations, which is upsetting.
There were a few commonalities between these events, probably largest among them being that the two were both in the Army.
Beyond that, they also both used rental cars, procured through Turo, which is a peer-to-peer car rental app.
Neither of these connections are necessarily meaningful, but they're the kind of things that Alex will latch onto and call anomalies in order to push conspiracy narratives like he does about every tragic event that he feels like he can profit off of.
And it's important to be careful with ascribing meaning to things that happened prematurely.
For instance, the Las Vegas car bomb guy, he used an Elon Musk connected car at a Trump connected property.
Is this a statement that the attacker is making, or is it possible that that was the car that was available on Turo at the time, and it's a coincidence?
I don't know.
It's possible, but whatever the case is with these things, whatever the reality that we we end up learning when more information is known.
It's tragic.
These are tragic things that happen, and they suck.
And that means that Alex sees dollar signs in them, which is why he's breaking into his vacation to make a little video trying to create conspiracies out of what are just tragic events.
The first thing that needs to be said about the New Orleans terror attack using the truck and the accomplices.
And the state police and the FBI saying that there were other people working with the attacker that tried to plant and detonate bombs, who then again escaped and are believed to have run to Texas and the ongoing manhunt in Texas and other areas of the country, is that they themselves probably don't even know that they are cutouts of a larger globalist crime syndicate that we know.
Is funding al-Qaeda and ISIS, and that directs their leadership.
And of course, this has come out for decades after decades.
It goes back to Jimmy Carter, who's been to Brzezinski in the late 70s.
Alex has no evidence that the New Orleans attacker had accomplices.
The police say that there were two, quote, possible IEDs found in the French Quarter, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they were IEDs, nor does it establish that someone else was involved.
The FBI is investigating the possibility of accomplices, but have indicated that they're pretty sure he acted alone.
And yet, Alex is up here doing this reporting.
And keep in mind, he knows nothing.
He's just recording a video on his phone from the ski resort because he knows that it's a hot topic for the audience and that Chase can't transition sales to Alex Jones' store.
He's not good at the call to action.
So you need Alex to show up because, obviously, maybe we'll get an increase in viewers.
If they just tune in and see Chase, probably going to turn it off.
Next, I'm going to get into the big picture and who I see behind this and strategically where these moves are going.
So there's thousands of data points that go into this, but I'm going to try to just break them all down so that we can put a warning out to the public and a warning out to President Trump because you can better believe the deep state is heavily involved in these attacks and more are coming.
Big picture, I see this as an ongoing PSYOP destabilization campaign, just like the UAV hysteria, just like the escalation of war and the bombing inside Russia with heavy cruise missiles.
And we have the feds, still run by the Democrats right now,
saying that there are plots to kill Trump and that the Iranians are behind it and that we're going to have to attack Iran so that, again, they can start staging these attacks as a precursor to assassinate Trump with a larger, more professional truck bomb or shoot down his plane with a service-to-air missile and then be able to blame Iran and get full war with Iran, who's allied with Russia and China, at the same time taking out Trump.
It's also come out that the ISIS sympathizer that led the attack in New Orleans had been in trouble repeatedly when he was in the Army for...
Radical Islamic affiliations and statements, but nothing was done.
Again, continually, the intelligence agencies, the leadership of the U.S. military is protecting these individuals, just like we see the FBI leading these different white supremacist groups that they're trying to get to go out and blow up power stations.
This is all part of creating the narrative ahead of a cascade of big events either before Trump gets in or after he gets in.
A Click to Houston article describes this guy's military service as including three army commendation medals, four army achievement medals, and a ton of other distinctions.
It fails to mention these alleged incidents of his Muslim extremism, though.
I think Alex might just be saying this guy was a Muslim and no one stopped him from being a Muslim when he was in the army.
I'm not sure.
But because he doesn't provide any specifics, it's very difficult for me to assess what he's even talking about.
Well, the only thing that I thought is that perhaps he's thinking that we should have some sort of racially and religiously homogenous army, and I can't think of any situation where that's ever gone wrong.
Right now, I want to look at what they said in the first few hours after the attack in New Orleans, where they brought out the DEI lady who could barely talk with a nose ring to say, this is not terrorism, and then Senator Kennedy pushes her aside and says, look, I already know what's going on.
So, I mean, like, honestly, I think a lot of people have made the point that, like, saying something like DEI lady in this case, you're just trying to say the N-word.
Rose on the Bulls, and then the game where LeBron James, he hits a three-pointer in the corner, right?
Hits a three-pointer in the corner to win the game.
Even while fucking David Black was calling for an illegal timeout that should have been called, that would have thrown out the three-pointer, they would have gone up three to one.
A trusted law enforcement source in Texas reached out to me just about an hour ago and said that there had been an investigation already into This individual and others.
And the last known address of one of his family members, his brother, is there in College Station, there in Bryan.
And that the police chief and others are aware of this and concerned.
But so far, the feds haven't reached out to them and they don't see any federal activity there.
So this is a big deal.
At least three accomplices running around, planting bombs, detonators.
All of this, I'll play the little Fox News update on that in a moment.
But I already cut reports this morning saying I bet more of this is going to happen than you've got the cyber truck.
Now, clearly an explosive blowing up, reportedly with the driver inside, probably detonating it.
That's a message to Elon Musk and President Trump as a threat.
19 days till the president gets in.
And so we've been predicting that we'd probably see some Islamic terror attacks connected to ISIS and al-Qaeda here very, very soon.
I think that, I don't know who this source is that he has, and I don't know what the veracity of the information is, and I can't even pretend to engage with it as anything other than Alex is saying this.
But I mean, if it turns out that he's wrong, you can guarantee this will not be corrected, and it'll probably be...
An anomaly where the media covered up that there were three other accomplices who were running around planting bombs everywhere.
What I want to say, though, too, is this idea that Alex has, this urge to tell stories, applies to this Las Vegas Cybertruck that blew up at Trump's International Hotel.
If we want to just play around and play games with storytelling, we could say that this is a warning to Elon and Trump from the left or from some radical Islamists.
Or you could look at it and say the weapon that was used is Musk-associated on a property that is Trump-associated.
People have been really mad about Elon supporting immigration in a way that is an abandonment of what the Trump racist base wants.
There are a hundred possible explanations, but Alex's obviously is going to be that Elon, it's an attack on Elon and Trump, a warning in 19 days from the inauguration because that serves his interest.
And I think the way to consider these acts now is considering where we are, you know, far past where we should be.
In any realistic terms, the way that you want to deal with this and the way you want to see it is ineffective because you saw it that way 20 years ago, you know, and you tried to, we quote-unquote tried to deal with it as it was 20 years ago, and here we are.
I think...
Now we have to look at it as part of a conversation.
They are part of a conversation.
Whether or not there's something that can be done about it.
And I think that unless that conversation is somewhat altered, that we don't really have much of a chance of not ending up in pretty similar cul-de-sacs.
What the conversation needs to evolve, part of it is the way that Alex monetizes and has an incentive to play these games in the wake of tragedies.
It does not allow anyone to deal with the reality that this is a tragic event that has impacted a ton of people, both in New Orleans, Las Vegas, wherever people are related to those people.
It's awful.
It doesn't allow us to deal with...
Them as insulated or isolated events.
What the particular circumstances of A and B are, are being molded into one in service of telling this Trump danger narrative.
And if we treat it as something that you need to respond to as like, no, this isn't a Trump thing, you're just going to ping pong back and forth.
And I don't know exactly what the answer is, but...