#993: December 27, 2024
In this installment, Dan and Jordan try to untie a twisted web Alex has spun about an article he read in the Hill, and view a troubling moment in the Musk-MAGA Alliance.
Dec. 30, 2024 - Knowledge Fight
01:35:32
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys. | |
| Knowledge fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Dan and Jordan. | |
| Knowledge fight. | ||
| Need money. | ||
| Andy and Kansas. | ||
| Andy and Kansas. | ||
| Stop it. | ||
| Andy and Kansas. | ||
| Andy and Kansas. | ||
| It's time to pray. | ||
| Andy and Kansas. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I love you. | |
| Hey, everybody. | ||
| Welcome back to another episode. | ||
| I'm Dan. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm Jordan. | |
| We're a couple dudes like to sit around, worship at the altar of Selene, and talk a little bit about Alex Jones. | ||
| Oh, indeed we are, Dan. | ||
| Jordan. | ||
| Dan. | ||
| Jordan. | ||
| Quick question for you. | ||
| What's up? | ||
| What's your bright spot today, buddy? | ||
| My bright spot today is it was brought to my attention that the first episode of Celine's Family Adventure came out. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Kudos on YouTube. | ||
| Made a delightful anime type of thing. | ||
| Yeah, I don't even know how to describe it. | ||
| Starring my cat and her family of adopted animals. | ||
| And this first episode features quokkas. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| Which is fun. | ||
| It's a nice trip down memory lane of when people from Australia called in and yelled at us about how to pronounce quackas. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| What fun. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Listening to some of those, I was like, oh yeah! | |
| Yeah, people were really letting us know. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| A lot more calls than even that. | ||
| Than even we played on the show. | ||
| That was a nice memory and such a sweet thing. | ||
| So thank you, kudos, for making that and Dan Arkey. | ||
| Kudos and Dan Arkey for scoring it and such. | ||
| Just so cool. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| What a delight. | ||
| What's your bright spot? | ||
| My bright spot, I hesitate to let this turn into the puppy update corner. | ||
| No, you're a wife guy and a puppy update. | ||
| I'm a wife guy and a pup date. | ||
| It's going great! | ||
| That's awesome. | ||
| It's going great! | ||
| The unity, the harmony is there? | ||
| Everything is great. | ||
| Fanny's a little grumpy. | ||
| She doesn't like a new edition. | ||
| Jake is a little bit scared because he's scared of everything. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But I was expecting full on like, oh, we gotta clean up everybody's pee as they fight over everything. | ||
| Everybody's pooping inside now. | ||
| There's fights over territory. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| And who's gonna... | ||
| Nope. | ||
| No attention fights? | ||
| No! | ||
| Everybody's just been cool! | ||
| Nobody's peed inside! | ||
| It's been amazing! | ||
| Wow! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah! | |
| I think you should pee inside just out of spite. | ||
| See, the problem is, this is too good. | ||
| This is too good. | ||
| Something's gonna go real bad. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| This can't be... | ||
| They're planning a heist. | ||
| The center does not hold, my friend. | ||
| The only reason they would have this kind of good behavior is if they're planning a break. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| They've been digging a tunnel outside your house. | ||
| Sunny's too smart to get just stuck in this. | ||
| She's gonna lead the troop into Valhalla. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, until then, I'm glad that you have a happy home. | ||
| It's going great. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's nice. | |
| Sweet. | ||
| It's awesome. | ||
| So, Jordan, today we have... | ||
| Not a nice, sweet episode to go over. | ||
| That sounds about right. | ||
| We have a December 27th, 2024 episode of Alex's show. | ||
| Post-Christmas. | ||
| This is Friday. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Things have... | ||
| There's some weird stuff going on in the right-wing world. | ||
| You're not online, so you might not know some of this stuff. | ||
| I don't know any of it. | ||
| Oh, man. | ||
| It's been chaos. | ||
| I'm so happy I'm not online. | ||
| Shit is turning bad for Elon Musk fast. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| Yeah. | ||
| Already? | ||
| He has worn out his welcome to a large group. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How is that possible? | |
| Well, he's super annoying. | ||
| Well, I mean, no. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| I mean, how is it possible now, but also... | ||
| Whatever. | ||
| I get it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Yeah, he sucks! | ||
| Nah, according to some. | ||
| So we'll talk about what happened on Alex's show, which is only partially related to that. | ||
| But before we do, let's take a little moment to say hello to some new wonks. | ||
| Ooh, that's a great idea. | ||
| So first, dedicated to my dog Fern or Fernanda now that we're in Spain and she's living her best life. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| You're now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Thank you very much! | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Next, I'd rather give knowledge fight my money than Hasanabi. | ||
| He's rich and Jordan's funnier. | ||
| Ooh, shots fired. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| You're now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Thank you very much! | ||
| Next, Toby and Maxine, you're both globalists, and I will prove your involvement in a certain space laser. | ||
| Thank you so much, you're now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| And we had a technocrat in the mix, Jordan, so thank you so much to its pronounced Reiki. | ||
| When you read my wonk shout-out, you reminded me of Reich, which is a bit touchy in German. | ||
| Thank you so much, you're now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Four stars. | |
| Go home to your mother and tell her you're brilliant. | ||
| Someone sodomite sent me a bucket of poop. | ||
| Daddy Shark. | ||
| Jar Jar Binks has a Caribbean black accent. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's a loser little titty baby. | |
| I don't want to hate black people. | ||
| I renounce Jesus Christ. | ||
| I believe it's pronounced quokka. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| I mean, I remember listening to my voice go, I think it's Kuwaka. | ||
| And I was like, no, he did not say that. | ||
| I was about to call into our own show. | ||
| Well, now that you know. | ||
| Yeah, it's pronounced Kuwaka. | ||
| We've been corrected on this. | ||
| So we start off the episode here with Alex, and he's got a headline that he is like a dog with a bone. | ||
| He's very interested in reporting on this headline. | ||
| Dog bites bone. | ||
| I have been warning and warning and warning and warning, shooting up the red flags, lighting the watchtowers, and so is my great crew of researchers and journalists and pundits, that the globalists have announced how they will try to either kill Trump, stop him from getting into office, or hand him such disasters. | ||
| That he's unable to reverse their planned collapse of civilization for the post-industrial world great reset that we're fighting with the Great Awakening. | ||
| And we've talked a lot about the way they're trying to do that. | ||
| Escalation of war with Russia and others. | ||
| That's the big one, obviously, trying to launch new hysterical psychological warfare pandemics. | ||
| Civil unrest. | ||
| Billed as a race war to lead into a national emergency. | ||
| And more. | ||
| And all of those tactics are on the fast track right now. | ||
| But yesterday at 8 a.m., The Hill, the main publication in D.C., there in Mordor on the Potomac, Democrat Party lawyers, backed by Jamie Raskin and others, came out and said, well, here's the headline. | ||
| Congress has the power to block Trump from taking office, but lawmakers must act now. | ||
| And I shot a report on this yesterday afternoon, and when I went back and I was sending the article to the crew to print it up for today, I noticed that last night it changed to this headline. | ||
| And they even edited the article some. | ||
| Congress does not have to accept Trump's electoral votes. | ||
| So they're introducing the idea of this, but this caused such a giant backlash and trended number one across the internet that Congress has the power, what, to override the votes of the people? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So much for peaceful transfer of power. | ||
| So to be clear, the headline of this article didn't change. | ||
| It's still, quote, Congress has the power to block Trump from taking office, but lawmakers must act now. | ||
| Alex is confused because the headline that generates for the article when you post it on social media is, quote, Congress does not have to accept Trump's electoral votes. | ||
| So he's pretending that they've gone and changed the article over some kind of a MAGA backlash. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| He's saying that he sent it to his people because he probably put it in a Twitter message. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right, right, right, right. | |
| And then it changed. | ||
| That's what generates for that format, whereas the headline is still exactly the same on the actual article. | ||
| In the real world, this is an op-ed that was written by Evan Davis and David Schult on the Hill's Congress blog, which clearly states in bold letters at the top, quote, the views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of the Hill. | ||
| The two writers make the argument that Trump has very clearly committed acts that constitute in against the United States and is therefore disqualified from holding office by the 14th amendment. | ||
| Sure. | ||
|
unidentified
|
However, they also recognize that nullifying Trump's electoral votes and handing Harris the election is obviously not. | |
| Sure. | ||
| That still leaves the constitutional question, though. | ||
| They think that it really needs to be answered, this question. | ||
| And if you read the op-ed, it becomes clear what they think the plan could be. | ||
| Quote, Democrats need to take a stand against electoral college votes for a person disqualified by the Constitution from holding office unless and until this disability is removed. | ||
| No less is required by their oath to support and defend the Constitution. | ||
| The key here is, quote, unless and until this disability is removed. | ||
| They believe that Trump is ineligible to be elected based on being an insurrectionist, but that according to the technicalities of the Constitution, if two-thirds of each House of Congress votes for it, this ineligibility, it just disappears. | ||
| So this becomes a moot question. | ||
| That's something they say in their op-ed, more or less. | ||
| Okay, so if I understand correctly, what they're saying is... | ||
| The Constitution says this, but since we can't do it, we should probably amend the Constitution so it doesn't say that, otherwise it looks like we're insane. | ||
| No, you don't have to change the Constitution. | ||
| The Constitution, as it is written, definitely describes Trump as someone who engaged in insurrection, is therefore uneligible to be president. | ||
| But that is meaningless. | ||
| So we can remedy that by saying he's cool. | ||
| That's what Congress needs to do. | ||
| Because otherwise we have a real serious, open constitutional question here. | ||
| This is amazing. | ||
| I like that. | ||
| The Constitution is real, bae. | ||
| But if we treat it as real, we must go far out of our way to declare him first an insurrectionist and then say it's all right. | ||
| This is pathetic. | ||
| More than advocating for Trump's votes to be ignored and Harris be made president, these op-ed writers are saying that the case that Trump is ineligible is not without some merit. | ||
| And if we want to just skirt any possible constitutional problems, the House and Senate can just vote to say that Trump is not ineligible. | ||
| But unless they do, that's going to remain an open question to some people's minds. | ||
| This is a provocatively titled headline for an opinion piece in one of the Hill's blogs, but it's not that big of a deal, and Alex is going to turn it into the biggest fucking deal in the world. | ||
| Right, right, right. | ||
| That has strong clickbait for, I suppose, nerds. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Well, I mean, you want people to read your blog. | ||
| I get it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| I understand the motivation to title things like this. | ||
| No, I understand too. | ||
| It's just, you know, like, what an amazing thing to think is cool. | ||
| Well, I think the sense that you get from reading the op-ed is, like, obviously a, like, hey, Trump is an insurrectionist guy. | ||
| He shouldn't be the president. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| But that ain't gonna happen. | ||
| That's great. | ||
| So let's resolve this. | ||
| I mean, boy, that's... | ||
| I mean, the amount of groveling that you have to do to get there, amazing. | ||
| It's a commitment to the system, for sure. | ||
| So Alex says that Jamie Raskin is somehow involved with this op-ed, but she is not. | ||
| Absolutely not. | ||
| And then that just expands. | ||
| So they edited the article and watered it down, but Raskin said in August of this year... | ||
| That they were going to launch this plan. | ||
| And it just so happens we have the details of the plan. | ||
| Not just him saying we've got a plan we're going to launch. | ||
| They war-gamed this plan in August four years ago. | ||
| He said it in August six, seven months ago this year. | ||
| But four years ago they said we have a plan. | ||
| And the top's the Democratic Party, the head of the DNC. | ||
| They all war-gamed with Obama. | ||
| The New York Times wrote about it in August of 2020. | ||
| That they would not accept the election of President Trump in 2020. | ||
| And how they would have a civil war and secession. | ||
| I'm going to show you the quotes. | ||
| So Alex is lying about Jamie Raskin, who was demanding that the Supreme Court weigh in on the case that was in front of them about whether or not Colorado could disqualify Trump from the ballot. | ||
| Raskin wanted the court to make a ruling on it because if they didn't, then the question would end up falling to Congress during the certification process, and no one wanted that. | ||
| The court did make their ruling, so Raskin's hypothetical about Congress having to make decisions about eligibility during certification was resolved. | ||
| It's a null... | ||
| Right. | ||
| The war game that Alex is talking about was done by a group called the Transition Integrity Project, and the title of their document is Preventing a Disrupted Presidential Election in Transition, dated August 3, 2020. | ||
| You can easily find the 22-page report from their project if you want to read all the details. | ||
| They set up four different scenarios and did scenario exercises on each, looking at the likely events that could play out. | ||
| The situations were an ambiguous result in the election, a clear Biden victory, a clear Trump victory, and a narrow Biden victory. | ||
| Their goal was stated clearly to quote, examine some of the unknowns. | ||
| How far might candidates go in contesting negative election outcomes or disrupting the normal transition process? | ||
| How well would American institutions hold up if one or both candidates refused to play by the rules? | ||
| They were trying to explore challenging questions, but let's not pretend that this was about creating some master plan. | ||
| The participants were split into seven different teams. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| There was the Trump team, the Biden team, Republican officials, Democratic officials, career federal government employees, the media and the public. | ||
| Quote, teams presented with the initial scenario could take any action they wanted. | ||
| The chances of success of each team action were determined based on robust argumentation among all teams and the adjudication of a white cell, as well as randomizing factor-based dice rolls. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| So who's... | ||
| Okay. | ||
| There's a dungeon master. | ||
| Essentially we've got a paladin, we've got the bards, we've got the... | ||
| The bards are the media. | ||
| The bards are the media, obviously. | ||
| Oh my god, alright. | ||
| So we're doing that. | ||
| Okay, fine. | ||
| Trump's the Berserker. | ||
| Fine. | ||
| Class. | ||
| I mean, whatever. | ||
| So some of the stuff that ended up happening in their D&D session sounded a lot like things that played out in the real world, but a lot of it also doesn't. | ||
| Because it's a role-playing game meant to spark insights, most of which could actually just be boiled down to, let's get ready for a messy couple months. | ||
| Probably smart. | ||
| Shit's gonna be bad. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| None of this means anything, and none of it is like the globalists' plan for a civil war. | ||
| It's all just a collection of little props that Alex is waving around to present a fake conclusion to people. | ||
| It's fascinating. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| But also, I know about, like, you know, I've read a bunch of these... | ||
| War games and stuff. | ||
| And I've even read a little bit about this one. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But when I was going back over it, I was like, wait a second, dice rolls? | ||
| Hold on. | ||
| I didn't realize that it went down, it was that. | ||
| You know, there's no better way to simulate the randomness of life than to dip into the true randomness of life. | ||
| Everything is a dice roll, my friend. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So, like, you know, Trump, let's say one of these scenarios, Trump ends up winning the election, right? | ||
| And so the Biden team makes a move, and their move is, we're just going to say no. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Roll. | ||
| If you get a critical... | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| If you get a natural 20, you become king of America. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's no other explanation. | |
| This is how the globalists plan. | ||
| That's how it works. | ||
| Duh! | ||
| I mean, we did a little Dungeons& Dragons show for a while. | ||
| This is obvious. | ||
| That's how I would have played it. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| So, this becomes like... | ||
| This is the whole... | ||
| Crux of what Alex wants to talk about. | ||
| But unfortunately, the issue of Elon Musk has come. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| And Alex cannot ignore it. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And so what ended up happening is that there was a bit of a fight online about H-1B visas. | ||
| Oh, my God. | ||
| And whether or not we should deport all immigrants. | ||
| Why not? | ||
| Right? | ||
| Yeah, throw it out there. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| It's the internet. | ||
| Somebody throws out an idea. | ||
| Other people... | ||
| Workshop it. | ||
| It's the marketplace of bad ideas. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| And so Elon Musk might have been a little bit too on the side of some migration is good. | ||
| Right, right, right, because he's not from here. | ||
| And he runs a business. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Well, that's also helpful. | ||
| And this got him in some hot water, and Alex needs to address things. | ||
| We also have the controversy of these HB1 skilled visas. | ||
| And Trump being critical of them, his constituency being critical of them, myself being critical of them, because the program's been massively abused by the Democrats. | ||
| And there still is a place for it for truly highly skilled people, but not for the whole BlackRock globalist movement to replace people in Europe and the United States with foreigners that they can fully control so that you don't get any type of... | ||
| Worker power within these companies here in the United States. | ||
| You've got people they can send back anytime they want. | ||
| It really takes a lot of bargaining away from Americans. | ||
| And we know American workers have been targeted for annihilation. | ||
| Alex loves collective bargaining. | ||
| He's a big fan. | ||
| Huge fan. | ||
| So at the end of last week, an underlying tension in the right-wing alliance between big tech folks like Elon Musk and the grassroots racists like Laura Loomer came to the surface in a spectacular fashion. | ||
| It all started when Musk tweeted some dumb shit about his fake Department of Government deficiency hustle, and Trump's new artificial intelligence advisor, this venture capitalist guy, Sri Ram Krishnan, he replied, quote, anything to remove country caps for green cards slash unlock skilled immigration would be huge. | ||
| He wasn't calling for more green cards or unlimited green cards, but for a change to how the system works now with caps on how many applicants can be accepted from a particular country each year. | ||
| Sure, sure, sure, sure. | ||
| However, noted lunatic and former person who handcuffed herself to a door because she got kicked off Twitter, Laura Loomer, misinterpreted Krishnan's tweet and replied, quote, She went on to say, Quote, it was white Europeans who created the American dream. | ||
| Don't talk to me as an American citizen about innovation when we actually have running water and indoor plumbing here in America. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| That's astonishing on so many levels. | ||
| Not really. | ||
| I mean, it's Laura Loomer. | ||
| Sure, sure. | ||
| No, I mean, just the fundamental misunderstanding of the everything. | ||
| The everything. | ||
| Yeah, but this is not even impressive for her. | ||
| That's fair. | ||
| That's fair. | ||
| She's staggeringly dumb and bigot. | ||
| No, she's got a gift. | ||
| She's got a gift in a way. | ||
| So this was obviously a response that was dripping in racism and xenophobia, and it got the desired response. | ||
| Tons of racist attacks focused on the fact that Krishnan was an Indian American and how it's a problem that there are too many folks from India here taking up all the jobs. | ||
| Who's heard that before? | ||
| Very quickly, this turned into a debate about H-1B visas, but it was immediately clear that this had stirred up something that's a real problem with the right wing coalition. | ||
| Some of the people in it are zealots. | ||
| And some of the people are using those zealots to accrue power and those people have lost That'll happen. | ||
| So Musk tried to do some damage control, arguing that we need to import high-talent workers to make the American labor pool better. | ||
| Vivek tweeted out an insane theory about how stigmatizing Screech on Saved by the Bell has stopped our country's youth from becoming engineers. | ||
| I take back every negative thing I've said. | ||
| Appoint that man to whatever he wants now. | ||
| So here's part of his post. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Quote, the reason top tech companies often hire foreign-born and first-generation engineers over, quote, Native Americans isn't because of an innate American IQ deficiency, quote, a lazy and wrong explanation. | ||
| We have to confront the truth. | ||
| Our American culture has venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long. | ||
| At least since the 90s and likely longer. | ||
| We've awoken from slumber before and we can do it again. | ||
| Trump's election hopefully marks a new golden era in America, but only if our culture fully wakes up. | ||
| A culture that once again prioritizes achievement over normalcy, excellence over mediocrity, nerdiness over conformity, hard work over laziness. | ||
| I think he thought this was supposed to be inspirational, but unfortunately the message that folks like Loomer took away from this is that American culture sucks and we're fundamentally lazy and mediocre. | ||
| Or at least that's... | ||
| That's what this Indian tech guy was saying. | ||
| It does feel like that's a lot of what he was saying. | ||
| A lot of what he was saying was somewhere along the lines of, do you not like the 669 process in China? | ||
| What's wrong with six days a week for 12 hours per day for whatever, you know? | ||
| Like, why not? | ||
| And a lot of it is, like, clearly he's being like, I can't hire you. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And that, I don't think he meant to come off as insulting to... | ||
| The entirety of the base. | ||
| You'd think. | ||
| Of MAGA folks, but it was. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It was pretty offensive to them. | ||
| Sounds right. | ||
| So Laura had posted some racist stuff, quite clearly targeting Krishnan. | ||
| And in the process, she posted some FTC records that included his personal information. | ||
| Great. | ||
| Her account was locked because she had doxed this guy, which sent her on the warpath. | ||
| A bunch of accounts that were associated with her got demonetized or restricted, which led to her being on a Twitter space with a... | ||
| Big old group of idiots, including our friend Owen Troyer, complaining about how she did nothing wrong and this was all clear oppression. | ||
| Oh my god. | ||
| Oh my god. | ||
| One of the participants in that space was Adrian Dittman, the dude who's famous because he sounds like Elon Musk. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh my god. | |
| And people like to think that he's secretly Elon Musk. | ||
| Why not? | ||
| In a rambling, mostly unproductive hour or more of back and forth, Loomer and her cohorts vented their frustrations at a guy who sounds like Elon Musk, who argued with them pretty aggressively and clearly thought it was hilarious that they all believe him to be Musk. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It was embarrassing for everyone involved and for Elon, whether or not that is secretly him or not. | ||
| Definitely true. | ||
| If it's him, embarrassing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| If it's not... | ||
| Can't believe he's allowing this charade to go on. | ||
| I mean, ridiculous. | ||
| There was a clear division that this issue had opened up, and the back and forth continued on Twitter. | ||
| In response to Musk getting some criticism about his support for H-1B visas, Musk said, quote, The reason I'm in America, along with so many critical people who built SpaceX, Tesla, and hundreds of other companies that make America strong is because of H-1B. | ||
| Take a big step back and fuck yourself in the face. | ||
| I will go to war on this issue, the likes of which you cannot possibly... | ||
| This is naturally a Tropic Thunder reference, because Elon's super cool, and it's important to be reminded of that from time to time. | ||
| He's very cool. | ||
| He's good at Diablo, I've heard. | ||
| Yeah, and funny. | ||
| In due time, Trump chimed in that he supports H-1B visas and uses them at his companies, which probably came as a surprise to his fanbase since he ran in 2016 on opposition to them and how he was going to shut it all down. | ||
| Yeah, you'd think. | ||
| The king had spoken. | ||
| And it became clear that he sides with his rich friends. | ||
| So this was a bit of a moot point to argue after this point. | ||
| Loomer's Twitter account was unlocked and she accepted that she had doxed Krishnan and she apologized. | ||
| Most of the internet's burned out on Elon drama so the whole is he Adrian Dittman thing only moved the needle so much. | ||
| And MAGA influencers realized that their god king wasn't as into creating a white ethnostate as they might have hoped. | ||
| He also really just likes money. | ||
| It's unclear how this will all shake out in the big picture, but this episode definitely highlights a tension that's gonna pop up again and again. | ||
| With the appeals to fake populism, Trump has created alliances and expectations with some really fucked up people who expect him to follow through on the really fucked up stuff they support. | ||
| Meanwhile, Trump has created actual alliances with super rich creeps who have their own agenda, and he's given them power and proximity to power in ways that will run contrary to what these fake populists want. | ||
| It has the potential to be lock her up all over again, except that because it served his self-interest at the time, Trump has spent the last eight years building up the people who would be mad at him for not locking her up. | ||
| He can't satisfy both the Musk side that wants skilled labor to immigrate to the United States and the Loomer side that wants all non-white people thrown out of the country. | ||
| But pandering so much to Laura's side of things, he's really made disappointing racists a problem for the coalition. | ||
| It's going to fracture. | ||
| And here's the thing where it gets a little tough. | ||
| Laura Loomer has the position that Trump had in 2016. | ||
| And he's expressing what he has led his followers to believe his position should be. | ||
| She's wrong and awful, but it's very difficult to imagine being part of this extremely xenophobic, anti-immigration media space, and then siding with Elon Musk and not recognizing that you're way out of step with who you've pretended to be. | ||
| And that's what Alex seems to be trying to do. | ||
| Here on this show. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| He's trying to side with Elon and say that there are just some problems with the H-1B visa system that have to be, you know, these problems are exploited. | ||
| We need to fix that. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| It's lukewarm bullshit to hear from him. | ||
| Alex and Infowars have been clear for the last, like, 30 years on air that they don't believe in H-1B visas, and they think they're an attack on the white middle class. | ||
| He's been perfectly clear about this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| He's making it obvious what his allegiance is, which is to some form of power. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And it's not that he's not racist enough. | ||
| It's that he thinks he can exert... | ||
| That racism more fully. | ||
| He can change the things from the inside of the system, man. | ||
| It's what you're talking about. | ||
| You've got to make compromises. | ||
| Listen, I told you that we could get this thing, but you don't want nothing, do you? | ||
| So what I'm going to do is I'm going to go to him and we're going to get slightly fewer H-1B visas. | ||
| Isn't that what you asked for? | ||
| I mean, sure, we said that we were going to get rid of all non-white people and it would only be white people here. | ||
| But how about if it was like 4% difference? | ||
| And don't get me wrong! | ||
| I do want to tell me to be white people around. | ||
| Trust me! | ||
| Oh, we all do! | ||
| I do! | ||
| It's just that's not realistic. | ||
| Sure, I've been lying to you for 8 years or 20 years or 30 years or whatever, but now let's get down to brass tacks. | ||
| A 4% reduction in immigration is fucking great! | ||
| Right. | ||
| Well, that may be where the Musk side is more. | ||
| I think Alex is in the middle, because I think his heart is with the, I want to kick everyone out. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| And his reality and who he actually is is, I love the money and the adjacency to power. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| I can probably do more work for the agenda that is white identity, Christian nationalism. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| If I'm closer to Musk. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| He's lying to himself. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| No, he's like a dark... | ||
| A reflection of the idealist who rails against the centrist government and then, once getting a small modicum of power, realizes that perhaps by cooperation they can have more tangible change as opposed to just talking about it all the time. | ||
| And then here you go. | ||
| Here we are. | ||
| It is the story of an idealist becoming a negotiator, except from the side of, like... | ||
| A racist zealot becoming a racist negotiator. | ||
| We make peace with our enemies. | ||
| We don't make peace with our friends, Dan. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| So anyway, Alex, he's on that tip. | ||
| He's on the tip of like... | ||
| Yeah, come on. | ||
| Come on. | ||
| What are we, silly? | ||
| Right. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Come on. | |
| We said close the borders and kick everybody out, but they didn't. | ||
| I mean, come on. | ||
| What, did you take the white and the nation serious in the white nationalist part? | ||
| But Harrison, he's on the other side. | ||
| He's like, no. | ||
| Yeah, that sounds right. | ||
| Stop it all. | ||
| Shut down all immigration. | ||
| We got Harrison Smith coming in here with me later, who you could say is completely on the other side. | ||
| He wants nobody allowed in. | ||
| Until we've built up America again and stabilized the country and just doesn't trust this HB1 process. | ||
| And I agree to that. | ||
| I mean, I agree to that to a great extent. | ||
| But I also understand the perspective of people like Elon Musk, who's not flip-flopping. | ||
| He's always been for bringing in a lot of skilled foreign workers to get the job done. | ||
| I mean, he himself is a foreign, highly skilled engineer and brain. | ||
| So certainly nothing hypocritical from Elon. | ||
| No betrayal from him. | ||
| He really helped get Trump elected once the wide-open border shut down, once all these unskilled people and criminals deported. | ||
| And that's the leg cutoff that we're bleeding to death from. | ||
| And then everybody's talking about a scratch on our cheek that's got a couple drops of blood coming out of it. | ||
| So yeah, we need to fix the scratch on the cheek. | ||
| But at the same time, there are some skilled workers. | ||
| That you can't get enough of here in America. | ||
| And I think the whole argument, well, Americans are lazy and dumb, so that's why we've got to bring them from overseas. | ||
| Vivek kind of came out and said that, and I don't really agree with the way he put it, very ham-fisted. | ||
| And so that's been reflecting on Elon. | ||
| I mean, I still really like Vivek a lot, but I thought we almost got kind of a leftist answer from him. | ||
| So I think there's a lot more to the story here, so I'll give you my take on that coming up as well. | ||
| First, I want to hit the big enchilada in front of us. | ||
| Now, when Jamie Raskin, the head of the J6 Fraudulent Committee, came out in August and promoted this of this year, I said, this is serious. | ||
| They're going to make this move. | ||
| People said, oh, no way. | ||
| That's too crazy. | ||
| They're not going to not have Congress certify Trump. | ||
| Benny Thompson was the head of the J6 committee, not Jamie Raskin. | ||
| However, Alex has this prop to wave around about Raskin, and that prop is far more fun to play with when Alex pretends that Raskin was in charge of that committee. | ||
| This is all just a sandbox of Alex's imagination. | ||
| But you see what happened there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, yeah. | |
| And that is a bus being thrown over. | ||
| Beautiful. | ||
| Beautiful. | ||
| Loved it. | ||
| We gotta maintain that. | ||
| Yeah, he said all white people are lazy and racist, but whatever. | ||
| That sounds like a leftist to me. | ||
| Right, but he's trying to lick a little boot with Musk and then be like, Vivek, you're on your own here. | ||
| And you might notice that Alex does know how to say Vivek. | ||
| He knows how to pronounce the guy's name. | ||
| He said Vivek there, and I think it's somewhat intentional. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I think that there might be a lack of courtesy that he gives towards pronouncing people's names. | ||
| When he's not kissing ass. | ||
| Yeah, it does always... | ||
| What would I say? | ||
| It's cold comfort, but comfort nonetheless whenever you actually see how quickly they're willing to toss each other aside to the wolves. | ||
| Where you're like, you guys, I told you this was going to happen. | ||
| And they're like... | ||
| But we've seen it a hundred times with, you know... | ||
| Any number one. | ||
| Ron DeSanctimonious. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| Remember him? | ||
| Dance with the devil, you might get tossed into the wolves. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But also, this is a completely incoherent position for Alex to have, just on its face. | ||
| It makes no sense, based on his worldview. | ||
| If I were Harrison Smith, I would call Alex a sellout to his face. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| I'd quit, maybe. | ||
| This is absurd. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| You can't have these positions. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It's not a thing you can do. | ||
| Nope. | ||
| But what you can do is talk about Jamie Raskin. | ||
| And how you're mad about things you've imagined about him. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And how you read a Hill article that you didn't really read. | ||
| That's way more fun, and it also jangles keys away from the people who can actually make decisions about anything and how they've betrayed you completely. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| This headline goes up 8 a.m. yesterday on the Hill. | ||
| It was also pushed by CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, Washington Post. | ||
| Had similar articles, but not with a headline this strong. | ||
| So they're making their moves, so they start their propaganda offensive first, 24 days out from the inauguration. | ||
| 25 yesterday. | ||
| Congress has the power to block Trump from taking office, but lawmakers must act now. | ||
| Now, last night, this went up at 8 a.m. | ||
| Last night, they changed the headline to Congress does not have to accept Trump's electoral vote. | ||
| And they actually edited the article, too, so they spun it. | ||
| So that shows there's major opposition to, yeah, openly stealing an election after someone's won it. | ||
| But that's what NATO just did a month ago in Romania. | ||
| They elected a popular anti-globalist that doesn't want war with Russia. | ||
| So NATO just said, through your intelligence agency, we null and void your election. | ||
| And there's basically a dictatorship now, just like Zelensky canceled elections a year ago and is a dictator. | ||
| And has outlawed his political opposition and the Orthodox Church and everything else. | ||
| This is a big deal, and I'm going to break this down in detail. | ||
| There's been more detail since I shot this report yesterday afternoon, but we did a good job laying it out. | ||
| When I say we, I shot a lot of it, but then Rob Du and I worked on the documents, the research, the background, and this is the best analysis of what's currently going on and why this is so serious. | ||
| It's about 11 minutes long. | ||
| Then I'm going to come back. | ||
| And give some more details of this and how we stop this next desperate move by the globalists. | ||
| Here it is. | ||
| Well, the Democrats were unable to steal the 2024 election, and now, just as Jamie Raskin promised, they are moving to block Congress from certifying the election, claiming Trump was convicted of insurrection, something that never happened. | ||
| We're about to lay it out right now. | ||
| As we take a look at this, it's important to understand that the only actual thing that's happened here is that there was an op-ed published on the Hill that argues that Trump isn't eligible to be president because he participated in an insurrection and that the Constitution provides a solution to that whereby Congress can vote him eligible. | ||
| It's a pointless argument since it's just the op-ed writer's opinion that Trump is ineligible. | ||
| That clearly isn't the case. | ||
| He won the election. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Well, I mean, the question is asked, was he possessed by the spirit of Jefferson Davis? | ||
| If so, does that make him ineligible to become president? | ||
| What do you mean by spirit? | ||
| This is a good question. | ||
| What's the two-thirds vote on spirits? | ||
| I'm not sure. | ||
| We'll have to call in ghost experts. | ||
| We're going to need an amendment for that. | ||
| So, I want to just look at that clip. | ||
| Regardless of... | ||
| Whatever those op-ed writers, whatever they think. | ||
| If you look at that clip, I want to look at the ways that Alex has turned this op-ed into a really big deal. | ||
| The first thing he does is he implies that there's a ton of other articles in other unnamed, unspecified outlets that are pushing the same thing with just less blunt headlines. | ||
| These articles aren't cited, but it's important to pretend they exist and that they're all written by the same people with the same talking points because that means there's a conspiracy. | ||
| In the real world, you have an op-ed that was written in The Hill, but if you pretend there are a ton of identical and parallel articles, now you have a constellation of imaginary data points. | ||
| The second thing he does is inform us that the article's been edited due to backlash of how brazen the plot is that they were laying out. | ||
| Alex's evidence for this claim is the two different headlines for the article, but that doesn't reflect an edit that The Hill made. | ||
| It's just one headline for the article and another that populates in search engines and social media. | ||
| Alex works in media. | ||
| He doesn't not understand how that works. | ||
| He's feigning ignorance because otherwise there wouldn't even be the appearance of evidence for his claim that this article was edited. | ||
| And the idea that the article is edited and watered down is important, because if we have that in place, then Alex can claim whatever he wants about the article, and if we say it doesn't match up with the posted version of it, he can just pretend that he's talking about the original, unedited version. | ||
| That's a rhetorical sleight of hand trick that he uses a lot, because it frees his imagination to just make up whatever he wants, and then apply the authority of a primary source to it. | ||
| The earliest archived version of this article is the same as it appears online now, and there's no revisions noted in the post, so it's up to Alex to point out what's been... | ||
| Right. | ||
| So now, as a reminder... | ||
| In the real world, you just have an op-ed in The Hill. | ||
| But through two strategic lies and how Alex is covering the story, you have an unspecified number of media outlets rolling out and pushing the same story, which they went too hard with, so they had to try to cover things up by editing the original article. | ||
| Weirdly, they didn't edit all of the other thousands of articles that are out there that Alex is claiming exists, but whatever. | ||
| There's a shocking level of coordination and behind-the-scenes plotting that's being imagined into existence by Alex when all there seems to be is kind of a mild op-ed with an attention-grabbing headline. | ||
| Alex also has zero idea what happened in the Romanian elections or what the developments have been on that front but I don't want to get lost in those weeds. | ||
| I think what's interesting here is the way that Alex is using Yeah, I mean, I guess... | ||
| I guess this is, you know what? | ||
| How about this? | ||
| I'll write my own little op-ed about this op-ed. | ||
| And it'll go something like this. | ||
| Because you can't solve the problem, we're just going to pretend it's not a problem. | ||
| So you can't write these headlines anymore. | ||
| That's the problem, right? | ||
| I think that people, we've been saying for a long time, people would be wise to be more careful with headlines. | ||
| I mean, you know, it's similar to the op-ed. | ||
| Right? | ||
| It's, uh, look, this is a problem, and they could change it, or we could do something about it, but we're not going to, and they're not going to change, so you can't write those headlines anymore. | ||
| I wouldn't. | ||
| So, Alex plays his video of Raskin, or his report about Raskin. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And so we'll start here, uh, we just listened to this, but let's hear it again, like, as a little bit of, uh, just a reminder. | ||
| Gotcha. | ||
| Well, the Democrats were unable to steal the 2024 election, and now, just as Jamie Raskin promised, they are moving to block Congress from certifying the election, claiming Trump was convicted of insurrection, something that never happened. | ||
| We're about to lay it out right now. | ||
| In that 17 seconds, Alex says three majorly false things that are structurally essential to his argument. | ||
| The first is that the Democrats tried and failed to steal the 2024 election. | ||
| That's not something that he's proven. | ||
| It's just taken as a tenant of the Trump faith because their media has repeated it enough times and pretended that they've proven it over and over again when they have not. | ||
| The second is that Jamie Raskin promised to block the certification of Trump's election victory. | ||
| Raskin didn't say that. | ||
| It's something that Alex and his media sphere has intentionally taken out of context and just repeated over and over and over. | ||
| The third is that this op-ed claims that Trump was convicted of insurrection. | ||
| The article makes no such claim. | ||
| This is just Alex creating a fake point to try to argue with. | ||
| The op-ed argues that, quote, The article argues that the second impeachment of Trump was based on an article of incitement of insurrection, though the vote wasn't there in the Senate to remove Trump from office over it. | ||
| The other contested forum that the op-ed cites is the Colorado Supreme Court ruling that, quote, The U.S. Supreme Court did not overturn this ruling when they made their decision. | ||
| They just, quote, So they didn't overturn the Colorado Supreme Court's Ruling that Trump had clearly participated in insurrection. | ||
| Right. | ||
| The third forum in question is the January 6th committee. | ||
| None of these involve Trump being convicted of insurrection, and the article isn't claiming that he was. | ||
| That's Alex creating a straw man. | ||
| Right, right, right, right. | ||
| You can not be convicted of stealing a car, but... | ||
| If you have broken into that car, hotwired it, and then taken it to another location, it could be said that you have stolen that car, regardless of your conviction status. | ||
| Yeah, it could. | ||
| Especially if you did get, like, in trouble for something else. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| There, and then it's described in the court documents how you got there in this stolen car, but maybe it just didn't charge you with it or something. | ||
| Right, right, right. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Look, Alex has created a foundation of these three fake points in order to introduce this video that he claims is the best analysis out there, and it all really just boils down to he saw an op-ed in The Hill. | ||
| That's nuts. | ||
| He's overdoing it. | ||
| Yeah, you could take it down a notch from there. | ||
| But at the same time, it is a good point, though. | ||
| If you think that they have tried and failed to steal the election, it is not possible to think that they are done. | ||
| No. | ||
| Because if you're willing to try and steal the election and you fail... | ||
| You're willing to try and continue to steal the election, right? | ||
| They're trying to kill Trump with, like, a chemical weapon attack at a fucking speech in Arizona. | ||
| Yeah, so there's always got to be a new way that they're trying to steal the election. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Because why would they stop? | ||
| Right. | ||
| It never ends. | ||
| We couldn't just have won. | ||
| Because if we've won, then now we have to do things. | ||
| Nobody wants to do that. | ||
| No. | ||
| So the report goes on. | ||
| Well, so much for a peaceful transfer of power that the Democrats were making such a big deal about because they thought they'd be able to steal the 2024 election like they were able to do the 2021. | ||
| No, Jamie Raskin, who helped head up the fraudulent January 6th committee and a bunch of Democrat Party lawyers have been writing pieces in places like The Hill today and other publications saying Congress Quote, unquote, other publications. | ||
| Coming up in the next few weeks for his certification on January 6th to be the 47th president of the United States. | ||
| They want to block the popular vote that Trump won and, of course, the Electoral College that he won in a landslide despite the entire establishment coming after him and the American people. | ||
| And why this is such a huge concern is They don't have a leg to stand on, but they don't care. | ||
| Ooh, that is a concern. | ||
| So you can see again there, as you even pointed out, that Alex is continuing to report that there are a ton of articles about this in a bunch of outlets, but there's only this one that he points out. | ||
| And he does that because he's a liar. | ||
| He does this all the time. | ||
| It's how you create this appearance of this broad thing when it's just, I'm mad about this headline and I'm fucking lazy and I'm gonna stick on this. | ||
| I mean, it's just... | ||
| It is too easy. | ||
| It is. | ||
| Frankly, there should be some sort of cosmic penalty for doing something this easy. | ||
| Yeah, well, I mean, look, if you're talking cosmic penalties, I don't think he's that happy. | ||
| That's fair. | ||
| There we go. | ||
| So that's something. | ||
| So he goes on and he talks about the claims of Trump being convicted of the insurrection. | ||
| They cite in the Hill article, basically exact stuff that Jamie Raskin, that fraud's been pushing, that three times he was found to have committed an insurrection in the first impeachment. | ||
| Well, actually, their, or their first source is one of his impeachments, for insurrection, but he was found not guilty by the Senate. | ||
| They didn't have the votes. | ||
| Then they mention a judiciary hearing of judges in Colorado when they tried to take Trump off the ballot that was overridden by higher courts, as well as completely unconstitutional. | ||
| Trump was not convicted of that. | ||
| And then again, they cite the fraudulent January 6th committee that was not voted for by Republicans and was not even legal, and where Jamie Raskin and others produced fake documents, and now they're under criminal investigation for that. | ||
| We're about to break it all down right now. | ||
| So you can tell here that Alex is just cold reading that article, and he kind of panicked, so he had to find a dismount edit point, which is what you just heard at the end there. | ||
| We're breaking it down now. | ||
| We'll get right into it. | ||
| It cuts. | ||
| It's not the end of this report, but they do a cut there. | ||
| Didn't know what I was about to say. | ||
| I have no idea what I'm saying. | ||
| Should have prepared. | ||
| Guys, my bad. | ||
| Actually, not my bad. | ||
| Don't care. | ||
| Next. | ||
| Don't care at all. | ||
| Don't care even a little bit. | ||
| So there were two distinct moments where you can tell that Alex is skimming the article to make blustery response videos. | ||
| And if you listen to him and have the article in front of you, it becomes super clear. | ||
| So here was the first one that three times he was found to committed an insurrection in the first impeachment actually there Or their first source is one of his impeachments for insurrection, but he was found not guilty by the Senate The sentence Alex is skimming is the, quote, the first fully contested proceeding was Trump's second impeachment trial. | ||
| The words first and second being in there confused him a bit and led to that stumble where you could hear him, uh, what? | ||
| So that probably would have been fine, and it doesn't really matter, but then it was followed up almost immediately by this. | ||
| Then they mention a judiciary hearing of judges in Colorado when they try to take Trump off the ballot. | ||
| So Alex calls the Colorado situation a, quote, a judiciary hearing of judges, which makes no sense. | ||
| The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Trump should be disqualified from the ballot, which happened because the judges were all globalists. | ||
| The reason Alex phrases this the way he does is because in the Hill article it says, quote, the second contested proceeding was the Colorado five-day judicial due process hearing, where the court found by clear and convincing evidence that President Trump engaged in insurrection, as those terms are used. | ||
| in section three. | ||
| Alex is skimming this and he gets confused by the quote five day judicial due process hearing thing because he never really cared to understand what that. | ||
| case was about, and these details aren't really gelling with what he remembers. | ||
| I feel very strongly that these two missteps are fingerprints of Alex's cold reading of an article in order to respond to it, because he does no preparation whatsoever for anything, and he doesn't give a shit. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, it's weird to have these in context with this op-ed. | ||
| It's very funny whenever you just kind of step back and you're like, right, the impeachment, I mean, he was never going to be convicted, quote unquote. | ||
| Because that's how the process works. | ||
| Because there's numbers. | ||
| It's impossible to convict him. | ||
| The Denver Supreme Court, it was cute of them to have all of their laws, but it didn't mean anything because the Supreme Court laws don't have any meaning. | ||
| It's silly. | ||
| It's very silly that everybody's... | ||
| I mean, let's have a two-thirds vote where we're like, fine, we'll move on. | ||
| I guess. | ||
| I think that you have some sort of a hope. | ||
| That, hey, you know what? | ||
| The numbers in the Senate are absolutely not there because of party loyalties. | ||
| People will just never, ever, you know, vote enough. | ||
| The impeachment process is non-existent. | ||
| Right. | ||
| You like to imagine that that's not the case until you open up the door, you lift the rock, and you see, like, oh, no, it is. | ||
| Ah, shit. | ||
| Ah, shit. | ||
| And then you should have just assumed there were... | ||
| You know, a bunch of bugs under that rock. | ||
| I mean, you know, it seems like we should have gotten there in the past. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So Alex plays a clip of Raskin within this report. | ||
| And it's that clip that he's lying about. | ||
| It's when Raskin was talking about how the Supreme Court needs to make a ruling. | ||
| Right, right, right. | ||
| We're about to break it all down right now. | ||
| What can be put into the Constitution can slip away from you very quickly. | ||
| And the greatest example going on right now before our very eyes is Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which they're just disappearing with a magic wand as if it doesn't exist, even though it could not be clearer. | ||
| What it's stating. | ||
| And so, you know, they want to kick it to Congress. | ||
| So it's going to be up to us on January 6, 2025, to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified. | ||
| And then we need bodyguards for everybody and civil war conditions, all because the nine justices, not all of them, but these justices who have not many cases to look at every year, not that much work to do, a huge staff, great protection, simply do not... | ||
| Is that why? | ||
| Now, we've seen a lot of fraud and a lot of hoaxes and lies with Democrats, but the idea that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment from the Civil War, that Civil War generals and Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederacy, couldn't be in government. | ||
| It has nothing to do with President Trump, who wasn't ever convicted of insurrection. | ||
| And I've already made that point. | ||
| But notice what Raskin said. | ||
| He said, we implement this amendment and then we go to civil war conditions. | ||
| And they had a plan, and we'll show you the articles, back in 2000 that if Trump won, they were going to have Western blue states secede. | ||
| And they would have their own inauguration for Joe Biden. | ||
| I mean, this is real insurrection. | ||
| This is real civil war. | ||
| So as usual, what they're blaming Trump and Trump supporters and Republicans for is what they themselves are doing. | ||
| And that's what's so dangerous here. | ||
| It is very dangerous. | ||
| That does sound dangerous. | ||
| That Jamie Raskin clip can only be understood in the context that he was responding to a question. | ||
| He was saying that the Supreme Court could not wait to make a decision about the Colorado Supreme Court disqualifying Trump from the ballot. | ||
| If they stalled and waited until after the election to hear the case, they were putting Congress in the position on January 6th of having to decide whether or not it was constitutional to allow Trump on the ballot. | ||
| The duty of the Supreme Court was to give an answer to that, and if the highest court in Colorado had said that Trump was ineligible to be on the ballot, other states might too, and that could create an environment of complete chaos in terms of trying to certify the election. | ||
| If the Supreme Court didn't make a ruling, it could lead to members of Congress having to decide which would spark outrage from the public and possibly civil war conditions. | ||
| It's totally clear. | ||
| Right. | ||
| But... | ||
| The Supreme Court did rule in the case. | ||
| So Raskin's concerns that he was talking about, it doesn't exist anymore. | ||
| He wasn't saying that he wanted to invalidate Trump's electoral votes because it would be fun for him or because that was his plan. | ||
| He was saying, hey assholes, make a ruling on this because I think it would be bad if you don't. | ||
| You have plenty of time and armed guards. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| In that report that Alex is talking about, they don't plan to have the Western states secede if Trump wins, but in the scenario where Trump won the Electoral College but not the popular vote, Biden kind of ends up doing what Trump tried to do in 2020. | ||
| He ends up sending alternate slates of electors to the House of Representatives, who side with him and award him the presidency. | ||
| Mike Pence and the GOP members of the House recognize Trump as the rightful winner of the election, so there are two presidents as Inauguration Day comes, and it ends by saying, quote, it was unclear what the military would do in this situation. | ||
| Which, again, you have to remember, they're role-playing. | ||
| I think we gotta go with Child Pope. | ||
| I know it seems, but like, come on, how much worse can it be? | ||
| We get a Child Pope. | ||
| We dig up some bodies, we put them on trial. | ||
| That'd be a delight! | ||
| Child Pope, president by night. | ||
| It'd be great. | ||
| We've got a lot of leadership ideas here. | ||
| I think we've got a lot of good things to do. | ||
| So this wasn't like a plan that they had. | ||
| And honestly, who knows how much of it ended up playing out the way it did because the person who's playing Biden failed a charisma role. | ||
| The report itself says, quote, it is not clear whether the failure to compromise during these scenario exercises should be viewed as predictive of likely future behavior by Trump and his representatives. | ||
| Or whether the game structure of the scenario exercises rewarded partisan actions. | ||
| We might have just gotten a little into it. | ||
| Hey, hey guys, we had a lot of fun. | ||
| Yeah, the guys playing Trump had a few too many drinks. | ||
| Oh my god. | ||
| This was a bunch of dorks role playing, which I say in the best possible way, it sounds like a lot of fun. | ||
| We've done it too. | ||
| But it's also, it becomes really funny when you realize that this passage is in there and Alex just seems to be ignoring it. | ||
| In the scenario that most closely mirrored the 2016 election results, e.g. | ||
| the Democratic candidate wins the popular vote but loses the Electoral College, Team Biden pushed to overturn certified results in states with Democratic governors and negotiated hard for permanent structural reforms in exchange for recognition of a Trump victory. | ||
| To take this more robust action, Team Biden had to deliver a united democratic front, which meant coordinating effectively with state party officials as well as grassroots and activist organizations. | ||
| While most participants believed that the Trump campaign has the real-life capacity to mobilize and to a significant extent steer and control the actions of Trump supporters, several participants expressed serious doubt about the ability of the Biden campaign to either mobilize or control left-wing activists. | ||
| Even in the grand evil plotting document where the evil globalists lay out all their plans for bringing about a civil war, they're like, Biden doesn't have it. | ||
| Let's be honest, guys. | ||
| He's not got it. | ||
| Let's be honest. | ||
| Maybe this was our fault from the beginning. | ||
| He doesn't have the juice. | ||
| I bet we could retroactively learn something, but I don't think we will. | ||
| It is just really funny to see that passage in there. | ||
| They're like, these guys, uninspired. | ||
| I'm just excited. | ||
| I am just excited for... | ||
| Biden 2028, baby. | ||
| We're running it back again! | ||
| Well, we can't do Carter now, because I just saw right before we got on air that we lost him. | ||
| We lost a real one. | ||
| R.I.P. | ||
| R.I.P., Carter. | ||
| He's up there in heaven building houses for the poor in heaven. | ||
| You gave it a shot, buddy. | ||
| So, Raskin... | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| He's essentially going around bragging to everybody like the Hill. | ||
| It does not sound like that's true, but I will believe you. | ||
| Yeah, he's talking about he's just going to block the election. | ||
| Strange. | ||
| And that's what's so dangerous here, is that they are trying to have the electors not vote for Trump without a conviction, but pretending like in the news, and Raskin's been all over TV for months, as you know, saying this, that he is precluded by law from being the president. | ||
| But notice they didn't make a big issue about that actually during the campaign. | ||
| They just said they had it ready because they knew the public would get educated once that debate happened. | ||
| So they want to sneak attack in and try to confuse people. | ||
| But here's the key. | ||
| They've been pre-programming that Trump supporters are going to kill minorities. | ||
| They need a false flag to legitimize all of this and get this done. | ||
| So a lot of people are laughing at this attempt. | ||
| It's no laughing matter. | ||
| So if you pay attention, you'll notice Alex pulling a familiar trick with saying that Raskin's been all over TV saying their plan is to not certify Trump's election win. | ||
| But mysteriously, the only clip he plays is that out-of-context one from a while back, which doesn't say what Alex claims it does. | ||
| He's doing the same thing he did with the Hill op-ed, where there's one data point that he shows to the audience while insisting that it's a representative of hundreds of others. | ||
| But it's not. | ||
| It's just a single stray data point deprived of its proper context that Alex is then using to build a lie. | ||
| Raskin actually just did an interview on the long-form show The Takeout on CBS News, and he said, quote, We lost an election in 2024 not by 7 million votes but by 3 million votes, and we accept that. | ||
| We've not tried to overthrow the election or the constitutional order. | ||
| In fact, on Election Day 2024, Jamie Raskin tweeted, quote, America is having a free and fair election, and Congress will certify the winner. | ||
| But Alex apparently has seen him all over TV for months saying the opposite. | ||
| And that's weird. | ||
| Because that hasn't happened. | ||
| It is weird that that hasn't happened. | ||
| Alex is making that up. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Because he's a liar. | ||
| I would say it's weird for him to say that, though. | ||
| You know, like, I don't think he should be able to do that. | ||
| No. | ||
| That doesn't make sense for Raskin to say those words. | ||
| Because that suggests he doesn't believe any of the shit he used to say. | ||
| Well, I don't know. | ||
| I mean, you can't really believe in democracy. | ||
| Democratically no longer becoming a... | ||
| I mean, I suppose you can. | ||
| I suppose if you really want to believe in democracy, you have to believe that people can choose to end democracy. | ||
| But you should also tell people that that's... | ||
| Well, whatever. | ||
| It's up to him. | ||
| Look, it's a paradox. | ||
| He lives a strange life. | ||
| The ancients tell of riddles. | ||
| That is a good point. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Which ancients are those again? | ||
| All of them. | ||
| Yeah, that's a lot. | ||
| I don't pretend to understand the mind of a Raskin. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| I do understand what Alex is doing with his manipulation and fraud here. | ||
| And I think that this is actually kind of an interesting point when he says that Raskin's been all over TV in the last few months. | ||
| Because he hasn't. | ||
| This is just made up. | ||
| But there's two prongs to it. | ||
| And one is Alex manipulatively, maliciously lying about this one clip that he's taking out of context. | ||
| But there's another part that he probably has seen that clip on a bunch of dipshit social media Twitter accounts. | ||
| And maybe there's some part of him that actually thinks that he's seeing Raskin all over TV when it's this one clip from months and months ago. | ||
| It wouldn't surprise me. | ||
| I mean, the... | ||
| It's time to remove the concept of the echo chamber and turn it into this horrifying groupthink process. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Yeah, it is a drumbeat into the brains of these people. | ||
| Yeah, and I think for some people there might be more of the delusion. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| But for Alex it's both. | ||
| There's an element of it that he's deluded by the social media diet that he keeps. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And then there's also a part of it that is, make no mistake about it, he knows he's fucking with you and lying. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| To advance his own interests. | ||
| Yeah, the self-aware delusions are delusional in a way that mask the delusional delusions. | ||
| Because the things he knows he's aware of being delusional about, he is delusional about. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So all of this is not really even about this Hill op-ed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| It's mostly about just trying to be like, look, false fags come to men. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Someone's going to kill a bunch of minority folk, and I don't want to feel bad about it. | ||
| See, it doesn't make sense to me. | ||
| I feel like if they were going to do it, they would just do one of the cases that was technically supposed to be on Trump, and they would just keep doing it, even though he was president, right? | ||
| They would be like... | ||
| I guess we're going to still do these cases, and then if you fail, you go to jail, and you can still be president, but you're now in jail. | ||
| And then there would be the whole attack or whatever. | ||
| Well, you know how some of Alex's ideas about religion take the divine away from the divine? | ||
| That's fair. | ||
| I think he also takes away the serious from the serious. | ||
| That's possible. | ||
| And I think if there was actually a real big organization that really wanted Trump dead, I don't think that there would be failed assassination attempts. | ||
| Probably not. | ||
| I just don't think it's possible that the Secret Service could have been hit on a plot. | ||
| I think he deprives... | ||
| The CIA couldn't kill Castro! | ||
| I'm just saying, it's tougher to assassinate somebody than you might think if you're only obsessed with doing it in the same way Wile E. Coyote was. | ||
| That's a great point. | ||
| But I also think that Castro's in another country. | ||
| That's true. | ||
| It would be a whole other matter if you were Cuba. | ||
| That's true. | ||
| But, hey. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| It's all false flags. | ||
| That's all I know. | ||
| This is completely undemocratic. | ||
| It's absolutely un-American. | ||
| And it really illustrates how the Democratic Party is not going to accept this election. | ||
| And that even once Trump gets in, they've got a plan for civil uprisings that they claim are coming because Trump's going to kill migrants, he's going to kill black people, Raskin, Carville, all of them have said that Trump supporters are going to massacre minorities. | ||
| Now, that's coming out of a clear blue sky unless they are planning to stage it or wind up a bunch of crazies to do it, and then that will be the excuse if he actually gets into office to drive him from office using civil war conditions that they've also... | ||
| So this is all just laying out the groundwork to call any potential bigot violence a false flag in the future, and I think that Alex is reading the room decently here. | ||
| This whole Elon H-1B visa stuff is really gonna piss off the accelerationist racist wing of Trump's base, because Trump is going to side with Elon and money over the racist principles that they hoped that he would... | ||
| care more about. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It doesn't mean that one of them is going to go out and kill people, but the temperature rises in a situation like this, and I think that Alex knows that there's a lot of utility And trying to make some false flag predictions. | |
| For sure. | ||
| But then also, the sun rose today, so Alex is predicting a false flag. | ||
| Keeps going. | ||
| So maybe there isn't that much meaning to it. | ||
| Probably not as much as you would hope from a false flag prediction. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Also, the Civil War conditions thing, that wasn't Carville. | ||
| That was from the Raskin clip that Alex played earlier. | ||
| He doesn't care about specifics that much. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Cajun style. | ||
| So, I mean, that Carville clip that Alex is talking about is pretty crazy. | ||
| It is, yeah. | ||
| No, that's got some solid moves. | ||
| Trump's going to fucking kill. | ||
| I mean, it's pretty solid. | ||
| It's a solid clip. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You want swing voters that could be swinging from a rope? | |
| I mean, hey. | ||
| So, why don't you have Alex making these kinds of... | ||
| You made this special report, you know? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| It's very serious. | ||
| It's an in-depth analysis. | ||
| The best out there of this Hill article. | ||
| Rob Dew's involved. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| You're not employed there anymore, though. | ||
| Legally. | ||
| And there isn't a place for him to be working, even if he was. | ||
| So let's not even pretend that these... | ||
| Robdo doesn't even exist. | ||
| No. | ||
| But he did a great job on this report. | ||
| Robdo exists to my dad. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| So, you know, they did a great job on this. | ||
| And you can really tell by the... | ||
| What they tagged on at the end. | ||
| It's not even an ad. | ||
| No. | ||
| It's just fun. | ||
| Oh, good. | ||
| Just throwing in a meme. | ||
| Oh, good. | ||
| That's called a coup hiding in plain view. | ||
| Be sure to follow me on X at Real Alex Jones for breaking news and updates because you are the resistance. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Talk about the fact that President Trump incited an erection. | |
| His various cases of, you know, he's got inciting charges of inciting an erection. | ||
| Donald John, Donald John Trump incited the erection. | ||
| They didn't like Donald Trump. | ||
| They said he participated in an erection. | ||
| I always call it massive. | ||
| Sometimes they say huge. | ||
|
unidentified
|
really large. | |
| Now, we just laid out the facts there. | ||
| Yeah, we just laid out the facts. | ||
| Was that what was just laid out for me? | ||
| Were the facts what were just laid out for me, Dan? | ||
| There's something really fun about, like, Alex throwing to that video and being like, me and Rob Deuce did some real great work on that. | ||
| And then it plays, and he's sitting in the studio, and then there's, like, this erection meme at the end. | ||
| And he's like, what the fuck? | ||
| How can I look in the mirror? | ||
| How can I take myself seriously? | ||
| This is my piece of journalism? | ||
| Like, I'm speechless. | ||
| Go back and watch, like, Edward R. Murrow. | ||
| He does the news. | ||
| Good night and good luck also. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Boners! | |
| Oh my god. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Sometimes you can't do it. | ||
| Sometimes you just can't do it. | ||
| Sometimes it has to happen. | ||
| Can you imagine if there was newsroom footage of some respected journalist talking about Adlai Stevenson's dick and how big it was? | ||
| I mean... | ||
| Actually, I can, because LBJ was famous for having a huge dick. | ||
| But yeah, that's different. | ||
| Because it was that big. | ||
| Right. | ||
| It was jumbo. | ||
| But also, wasn't that something that came out later? | ||
| Wasn't that something that came out in papers or something like that? | ||
| Not to people who... | ||
| We're around him. | ||
| He was very prominent with... | ||
| I mean, people didn't... | ||
| It was back in the time when you didn't talk about the president constantly talking about how big his dick was. | ||
| Yeah, it wasn't something that was on the radio. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It wasn't proper. | |
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| We learned about this in memoirs and shit after he was out of office. | ||
| No, there's recordings. | ||
| Well... | ||
| I mean, I guess they weren't released until after he was out of office. | ||
| Yeah, that's true. | ||
| The public's not discussing it. | ||
| No, that's definitely true. | ||
| It's beneath a newsman. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| I mean, I bet the public would have... | ||
| I wonder if that would have helped him. | ||
| Because clearly, I think people believing that Donald Trump has a huge dick is a bonus for them and for him, I suppose. | ||
| I wonder if it would have helped him get... | ||
| Maybe he wouldn't have had to drop out. | ||
| Maybe he would have been like, you know what? | ||
| Guys, I'm running for a second. | ||
| I know you have problems. | ||
| Jumbo says go! | ||
| Let me introduce you to my running mate. | ||
| So, there's been some big developments in Ukraine. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And Alex wants to get to those because he's done a great job with everything else. | ||
| Very serious. | ||
| So, shifting gears into Ukraine, big developments the last few days. | ||
| Putin said, I believe in God and God is on our side. | ||
| We cannot be defeated. | ||
| Boy, when leaders start talking like that, hmm. | ||
| Lavrov, the foreign minister, Russia's patience on using nuclear weapons is not limitless. | ||
| And it would not hesitate to defend itself by all means necessary. | ||
| So you're saying that Russia is saying we might use nukes and also we are divinely inspired. | ||
| This is bad, right? | ||
| Well, you know, it depends. | ||
| Okay, so if you're a con, you're thinking this guy, look at all this territory we have. | ||
| But if you're, say, not one of those guys and you're from China, you're like, ah, fuck. | ||
| I think objectively, if I'm looking at just take all preconceived notions of countries, all that aside, and you just described to me a leader whose God is on my side, I'm waging a war offensively in another territory, and I'm also saying that maybe I'll use a nuke at some point. | ||
| I think that is a bad sketch of a leader. | ||
| That's a bad character. | ||
| But he's someone who Alex really digs. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I mean, you know, a couple thousand years later, he may be called the great. | ||
| You know, it doesn't take much. | ||
| Your breaking news about the Ukraine war is Putin says he loves God. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| That's a positive story for Russia in Alex's world. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| So we learn in this next clip that Russia is not a communist country, which, fair enough. | ||
| That's true, yeah. | ||
| But it's interesting to hear how Alex does describe them. | ||
| Good. | ||
| And now Russia has said, we don't want to transgender our kids. | ||
| We don't want to eat a bunch of GMO food. | ||
| We don't want world government. | ||
| We want to have our own culture. | ||
| And for that, they're so demonized by the left world. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why? | |
| Because for 85 years, Russia was under globalist leftist control and was a testing ground for their evil and a launch base to take over the world for communism. | ||
| Now it's orthodox czarist. | ||
| It's not communist. | ||
| You hear a lot of right-wingers go, you know, they're still communist. | ||
| No, no, we're the communist here. | ||
| And we're going through the same process Russia's gone through trying to get back control of our country. | ||
| Doesn't mean Russia's perfect, doesn't mean we'll be perfect once we get back control either, but the new world order has got to go. | ||
| So for Alex to be saying this, the king of freedom, who really hates police states and is an expert on state tyranny. | ||
| Doesn't seem to mind religious dictatorships too much. | ||
| Ah, no. | ||
| Because it's not really a religious dictatorship, it's anti-communism. | ||
| But it's an orthodox czarist state. | ||
| Sure, sure, sure. | ||
| What do you want? | ||
| An entrenched group of oligarchs, all wealthy beyond imagine, having some sort of access to a government efficiency office? | ||
| Wow. | ||
| I mean, if these are the only alternatives, this sucks. | ||
| But Alex shouldn't be cool with that. | ||
| No. | ||
| No one should be cool with any of it. | ||
| Yeah, I guess that's true. | ||
| So, you know what we should be cool with? | ||
| What? | ||
| The legacy, the woke legacy. | ||
| Oh, that's a good legacy. | ||
| Of Teddy Roosevelt. | ||
| I like it. | ||
| What? | ||
| What? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Fine. | |
| Another thing they do is the American flag and the founding fathers taking down their statues, even Teddy Roosevelt. | ||
| It was a huge civil rights guy because he's a white guy. | ||
| And so that's where all this is going. | ||
| Now, speaking of that, it's a very complex issue. | ||
| We'll be covering it all more coming up in the second, third, and fourth hour interspersed with other news today. | ||
| But I wanted to hit this right now on this December 27th Friday transmission. | ||
| There are these HB1 highly skilled visas. | ||
| And there's an example of this before they called it HB1 at the end of World War II. | ||
| The U.S. government wanted all the scientists and rocket experts and aerospace experts and experts on the Soviet Union's networks. | ||
| And so 20-plus thousand Nazis were brought over to the United States in Operation Paperclip. | ||
| Now, I think that's a bad example of what HB-1 became. | ||
| But Wernher von Braun that created NASA was one of those Nazis, the head of the Nazi rocket program, space program. | ||
| Silver linings. | ||
| Weapon program. | ||
| Superweapon program, to be technical. | ||
| But they called it in German. | ||
| Translated. | ||
| So... | ||
| So, yeah. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Paperclip is not the same thing as H-1B visas, but let's imagine that they are. | ||
| Shouldn't they make Alex even more against them? | ||
| The Nazis came in after World War II. | ||
| They were a big part of the infrastructure of the globalist deep state, according to Alex. | ||
| So they wouldn't be here if it wasn't for paperclips. | ||
| This makes no sense. | ||
| Also, he's like, paperclip's a bad example of H-1B visas, what they became. | ||
| But that's before they existed. | ||
| What are you talking about, dipshit? | ||
| You're lost. | ||
| You know, I think for a lot of people, cause and effect is... | ||
| Beyond recognition. | ||
| Because there's just too many possible causes for any one effect. | ||
| A lot of stuff's complicated. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| Maybe I choose my favorite cause for this effect. | ||
| And maybe that's not necessarily the cause, but I like that cause. | ||
| And maybe I can argue that it's close enough to the truth that it'll work. | ||
| Or it is definitely a contributing cause to the effect. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure! | |
| And maybe it's the only one I care about. | ||
| The other ones that maybe... | ||
| I don't think he's interested in cause and effect. | ||
| No, but he is interested in... | ||
| Teddy Roosevelt. | ||
| Woke Teddy Roosevelt. | ||
| I think we should all be interested in Teddy Roosevelt. | ||
| Not necessarily for wokeness, though. | ||
| So here's a little snippet from a History Channel piece about old TR. | ||
| Love him. | ||
| Quote. | ||
| He believed firmly in the existence of a racial hierarchy which shaped his attitudes on race relations, land rights, American imperialism, and the emerging and disturbing science of eugenics. | ||
| Roosevelt believed fundamentally that American greatness came from its rule by racially superior white men of European descent. | ||
| In 1906, he wrote to a friend on the subject of black people, quote, As a race and in the mass, they are altogether inferior to whites. | ||
| Of Native people, he said in 1886, quote, I don't go so far as to think that the only good Indian is the dead Indian, but I believe nine out of every ten are, and I shouldn't like to inquire too closely into the case of the tenth. | ||
| This fucking guy, he was big on civil rights! | ||
| He was a huge woke guy. | ||
| I mean, you know what? | ||
| It is a testament to how quickly instituting national parks will get you a good positive cred over the years. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So that's fun. | ||
| Hey, what you gonna do? | ||
| You know, it sucks, but if you, like, look at America, that's all of our presidents. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| One of these articles that I was reading about Teddy Roosevelt, I can't remember what it was in, maybe The Guardian or something, but he was talking to a historian, and they were like, the bad thing about history is that there's no good people in history. | ||
| Yeah, they can't get better. | ||
| Some people have done good things, and then there's some bummers that you end up finding out. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I mean, it is one of those things where you're like, there have been plenty of times people have gone to schools and stuff named after Woodrow Wilson, and then they've looked into him and been like, he did, and said, what? | ||
| Can we not have this called? | ||
| Nah, we're just going to keep calling it Woodrow Wilson. | ||
| Fair enough. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| The end. | ||
| Well, I mean, like one of the, you know, universities in Missouri. | ||
| Not University of Missouri, but there's like Truman State. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Harry S. Truman. | ||
| Drop that bomb, man. | ||
| There you go. | ||
| Bad dude. | ||
| Well, we're just going to name it after him anyways. | ||
| Truman the Tiger is the mascot of Mizzou. | ||
| Does he have the glasses? | ||
| No. | ||
| Damn, that would be fantastic. | ||
| Honestly. | ||
| Rawr! | ||
| I say to thee, rawr! | ||
| So anyway, Alex, you know, Elon Musk, he came out and he's like, I do like these immigration. | ||
| I like these H-1B visas. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| And then all the racists are like, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Bad. | ||
| All of it's bad. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And then Alex came to Musk's defense. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And he got a little pat on the head. | ||
| Oh, my God. | ||
| And I responded last night to what Elon Musk had said, saying, you know, it's 0.1%. | ||
| It is a classic American policy to brain drain the best from across the planet and bring them here. | ||
| Musk has always advocated for this policy. | ||
| Everyone bitching that Elon Musk has flip-flopped are either ignorant or lying. | ||
| Elon, to a great extent, is the poster child for this program working. | ||
| And Elon then responded by, here it is right here, saying, saying exactly. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yay! | |
| Elon responded to me! | ||
| Boy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oof. | |
| Boy. | ||
| It's just a grim picture. | ||
| That is... | ||
| That is dark. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ooh. | |
| I think it wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't, like, the Alex Jones image. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| The fake archetype and persona that he has is, like, this real bold truth-teller cutting through the bullshit. | ||
| None of this stuff. | ||
| I don't care about how famous you are. | ||
| I don't care about kissing ass. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| Just kind of taking time on the show to read his own tweet that was responding to Elon. | ||
| This is not the first time he mentions that Elon approvingly responded. | ||
| He's very excited about that. | ||
| It's very sad. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It's such an indictment of how fake that character was to begin with. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, you should... | ||
| Like, I don't care what beliefs you hold or about what reality you have. | ||
| If you and the Krasensteins are basically the same, you've got serious problems. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Unless, if I'm Alex, and I'm like, I don't give a fuck anymore, I'm old, give me 10 million. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| If he did that, then fine. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Or I don't know what his price would be. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Oh, man. | ||
| I just found out my wife still listens to My Favorite Murderer. | ||
| And I was like, man, I remember listening to it, I don't know, maybe some years ago in the past. | ||
| And boy, I listen to it now. | ||
| And then I was like, what is going on? | ||
| I looked it up. | ||
| Amazon spent $100 million on them. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| Amazon just bought them. | ||
| Wow, good for them. | ||
| I mean, like, that's crazy. | ||
| Alex, get bought. | ||
| If you're going to sell out, they didn't believe any of the shit that they were peddling. | ||
| Well, in terms of the ads and stuff. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| So sell out. | ||
| Nobody cares. | ||
| But I think, for one, I think Alex probably shows that there's a bit more money. | ||
| Through those, like, Alex Jones store stuff than we like to imagine. | ||
| Probably. | ||
| But I'm saying, like, I wouldn't care about selling out at a certain point. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Well, we wouldn't sell out, but you wouldn't care if he sold out. | ||
| I think almost everybody does. | ||
| I like to imagine that I would hold my guns or whatever. | ||
| I like to imagine that. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| No one's ever come up to me with a briefcase full of money, so I can say that, and it's... | ||
| A fine illusion to have. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Not met with Soros. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Sure, sure, sure, sure. | ||
| But, like, even Alex, the great renegade truth-teller guy. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| If he got to B-50, he's ridden a hard road. | ||
| Totally. | ||
| If he was just like, give me the payout. | ||
| I don't give a fuck. | ||
| I think it would make sense, but he's not even getting that payout. | ||
| I was just, so I just read this book. | ||
| I wish I remembered the name of it. | ||
| But it's about Willie Falcone and the Cuban guys who ran cocaine during the 80s and just took over the whole world. | ||
| And all of it, really, like one guy just finally pointed out, like, man, we had enough money in 84. Could have just bounced. | ||
| Could have just bounced. | ||
| We didn't have to, you know, but you keep trying to expand. | ||
| You keep trying to get more money and all that stuff. | ||
| And if it was going to be a sellout, I would think, I'm happier. | ||
| I'm not going to sell out. | ||
| But if you pay me $5 million to go, I'm gone. | ||
| You know? | ||
| I'm not going to sell shit for you, but I'll go live on an island. | ||
| I don't need you. | ||
| You know? | ||
| I don't need to tell you about a new banking app. | ||
| Yeah, and Alex doesn't either. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| What are we doing? | ||
| If I were him, I would be very angrily tweeting at Elon Musk after he says exactly... | ||
| An invoice. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I would be saying, like, hey, dipshit, I'm selling out a lot of my credibility for you. | ||
| There's a lot of racists who are going to be super mad at me in the future. | ||
| I'm carrying a lot of water. | ||
| 100%. | ||
| You're paying by the hour. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| It's going to be expensive from here on out. | ||
| Or you're paying me for a lump sum and I am faking my own death and you will never see any of us again. | ||
| Or I'm going to be a huge problem for you. | ||
| Yeah, you should be, at the very least, you should be trying to extort money out of it at this point, right? | ||
| Like, hey, if you don't pay me, I will cause problems for you. | ||
| Yes, this is Trump's America. | ||
| You can't be doing it for free. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No! | |
| That's insane. | ||
| It's insane. | ||
| So, one of the problems that Alex has, like I said, is, you know, the way that he has, like, he has a delusion, and also is lying to the audience about this information, like, that there's hundreds of articles, and, you know, he is both. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| He is also racist at heart, and he does want to side with the Laura Loomer types. | ||
| True. | ||
| But he also really wants the power and adjacency to power and the theoretical money and all this. | ||
| He wants his racist cake. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And he wants to eat it, too. | ||
| He's a Boromir. | ||
| It's very conflicting for him. | ||
| That'll happen. | ||
| That's where Elon stands, and he's kind of the laissez-faire libertarian over here. | ||
| He said he used to be a Democrat. | ||
| I mean, you know, he's helping us overall now, and that's good. | ||
| Then you've got the American firsters, and... | ||
| The point is we've got to get Trump in. | ||
| We've got to stabilize the economy. | ||
| We've got to get energy prices down. | ||
| We do want to innovate. | ||
| But yeah, all these people that really aren't skilled, highly skilled, super skilled, it's being abused. | ||
| The HB1 visa program needs to be massively curtailed, streamlined, and reformed. | ||
| So that's where I am on that. | ||
| Harris is going to come in and talk more about that. | ||
| But here's an example. | ||
| Apple settling claims that illegally favored immigrant workers in hiring practices for $25 million. | ||
| And that's just the tip of the iceberg. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Are white males targeted? | ||
| Are white males bullied in the colleges? | ||
| Incredibly bad. | ||
| It's worse than... | ||
| Oh, it's so terrible. | ||
| Even hard to believe until you go to the colleges and see it for yourself. | ||
| Is it wrong? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| But is that bleeding over, then, to blame any immigrant? | ||
| What are you doing right now? | ||
| so I get it. | ||
| There's a lot of anti-white stuff. | ||
| So whites have circled the wagons and are pissed off and are saying nobody until, you know, all this anti-white crap stops. | ||
| I think that's a reasonable thing to say. | ||
| Are you racist and said whites are inherently evil and all that stuff. | ||
| But that's why I've said, why can you criticize people like Nick Foyntes that become very race based and say it right back to you? | ||
| Then you freak out about it. | ||
| Well, I mean, he's not saying half of what the ADL and other leftist groups or the Black Lives Matter say. | ||
| I mean, they're they're more Nazi sounding than the Nazis were. | ||
| So I'm just saying you're the ones that put us in this in this arena left. | ||
| So, everyone else is so mean to white people that maybe Nazis are cool and it's a normal response for them to have. | ||
| I'm pretty sure the only person who could make that kind of an argument is a Nazi who's really insecure about people calling them names. | ||
| This is a rationalization as opposed to... | ||
| Anything else? | ||
| That whole thing needs to be shut down. | ||
| Oh, yeah. | ||
| All of that. | ||
| All that shit is just Alex's white victimhood obsession, but I want to touch on the case that he randomly mentions there, about Apple paying out $25 million because it was found to have favored immigrant workers over the U.S. citizens in terms of certain jobs. | ||
| First thing about this... | ||
| Alex shouldn't believe that this case should have been able to be brought against Apple, since it was based on federal regulation that bans hiring discrimination based on protected classes, including citizenship status. | ||
| If he had his way, these non-citizen workers would essentially be unprotected from any exploitation, not entitled to a settlement from Apple, and also probably violently deported. | ||
| Second, this settlement was reached in 2023 under Biden's Department of Justice. | ||
| If the whole globalist plan is to bring in masses of immigrants to take away jobs from Americans, then why would the globalist-controlled Democrats DOJ do this? | ||
| Why would they do it? | ||
| These villains, they really seem to be working against their own plans a whole lot. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Alex wants to have his racist cake and eat it too, and I feel like he's probably about to learn that some of the people he's associated himself with... | ||
| I think he might be in for a rude awakening when he sees a bunch of the people that he likes to buddy up with turn on Elon Musk for wanting to bring in foreigners to fill jobs that they think white people should be doing. | ||
| I don't think this is a big turning point or anything, but what happened around this issue should be seen by everyone in the larger right-wing media of what's to come. | ||
| Their fanbase is made up of two segments. | ||
| Soft bigot libertarian types and legit white nationalist types. | ||
| And their interests have aligned, for the most part, in ways that they can overlook the things that they actually hate about each other in order to reach their shared goal of getting Trump back into power and trying to overthrow the liberal order of society. | ||
| Now that they're back in office and that hurdle has been cleared... | ||
| These cracks are going to start to show unless they find a new version of the deep state to unite against and quick. | ||
| They need to find some new QAnon thing or whatever. | ||
| Or else these kinds of issues where Elon's like, I think we should bring in highly skilled labor. | ||
| No! | ||
| Well, I mean... | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| Ultimately, if you're being sold like we're going to change the way things are done... | ||
| And then you become the people who win. | ||
| You become part of the status quo. | ||
| And then it's you and the status quo against the people who want to change. | ||
| So it's like, what do you mean? | ||
| Now you're siding with fucking whomever you want to say in blankety blank. | ||
| Of course you are. | ||
| They're the status quo. | ||
| They want to maintain their power. | ||
| Why would they want to change it now? | ||
| If they give you what you want, you won't want them anymore. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Dumb-dumbs? | ||
| So we have that Hill article, though, that's been looming in the background. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And Alex wants to talk about that some more. | ||
| If you just joined us, the Democrats, the party, Jamie Raskin, all of them are officially moving in Congress to block the certification of President Trump as the 47th president on January 6th. | ||
| They're writing op-eds everywhere, lying and saying he's convicted of insurrection when he never was. | ||
| They are treating you like you have a 70 IQ room temperature. | ||
| Amazing. | ||
| No additional information has been presented. | ||
| The only thing this reporting is based on is the Hill op-ed, and now the story has expanded to being that Democrats in Congress are moving to block the certification of the election. | ||
| This is just a lie. | ||
| It's absolutely a lie that's grown off this kernel that he started with. | ||
| Beyond that, there aren't op-eds everywhere. | ||
| There's one. | ||
| And it doesn't say that Trump was convicted of insurrection. | ||
| If anyone's treating the audience like they're idiots, it's definitely Alex. | ||
| And you don't do this kind of thing by accident. | ||
| This is conscious fraud or instinctual manipulation and abuse of the audience that he's carrying out. | ||
| It's not like, oh, I got this one wrong. | ||
| It's impossible that this is wrong. | ||
| No, it's a ventriloquist convincing you to be mad at the puppet. | ||
| If I'm holding a puppet and I say, oh, you look stupid, ma 'am, and it comes from the puppet, and the woman was like, I'm gonna kill that puppet! | ||
| I'd be like, ha-ha, it was actually I, a human being. | ||
| The puppet is Alex as, like, Klaus Schwab, and he's like, you'll eat the bugs. | ||
| They're treating you like you have a 70 IQ. | ||
| Well, there's no they. | ||
| That means you are treating me like I have a 70. Do you understand how... | ||
| It's a bummer. | ||
| Yeah, you're... | ||
| The puppet isn't real. | ||
| But who knows? | ||
| A lot of people get mad at the puppet. | ||
| It's true. | ||
| So one thing that is real. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Is real. | ||
| Well, true. | ||
| And also RFK. | ||
| Oh, that's also true. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Two things that are real. | ||
| This clip gave me whiplash. | ||
| We're about to hit some really positive news on this front with RFK Jr. set to get confirmed as the head of HHS and really taking action. | ||
| And he said Trump has taken the gloves off. | ||
| This is a big... | ||
| Part of stopping the globalists is making America and the world healthy again. | ||
| Make America healthy again. | ||
| But remember, the way we continue to make America and the world healthy is first mentally and spiritually with the truth so people know what's really going on and so they know that they're not alone in the fight against tyranny as we completely turn the tide. | ||
| So, be healthy. | ||
| Get Ultimate CMOS, the ultimate superfood. | ||
| All the iodine and other super-violent minerals only produce in special ways where they're all together in the sea moss. | ||
| The Irish sea moss. | ||
| Oh, that moss is good. | ||
| God damn! | ||
| Yeah, that was pretty nuts. | ||
| That's old-fashioned. | ||
| I got hit on the side of the head with that. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Yeah, he's not, you know, I don't know what it is. | ||
| I told you that he's looking more somewhat healthy, but also kind of off-putting. | ||
| I think it might be the C-Boss. | ||
| Or someone mentioned that he's credited this to not drinking. | ||
| And if that's the case, then he was drinking a lot before. | ||
| But then this ability to do an ad pivot may be coming back. | ||
| Because that's a bus that just hit you. | ||
| Woof! | ||
| To the side of the head. | ||
| It looked like he was just talking about news. | ||
| Totally did. | ||
| It really felt like... | ||
| It totally did. | ||
| It's been a long time since he's got me. | ||
| It's been a long time. | ||
| A nice rug pull. | ||
| Man, that one would hurt. | ||
| Maybe CMOS just improves your ability to pull rugs. | ||
| What if... | ||
| That's very possible. | ||
| Also quite funny. | ||
| What if... | ||
| And I'm going to throw this out there. | ||
| The Last of Us, right? | ||
| We're all sitting here like, oh, it's going to be the fungus. | ||
| Wrong. | ||
| What if it's the moss? | ||
| Could be. | ||
| The moss gets inside your brain. | ||
| It starts doing this stuff. | ||
| Now he's looking to get cats to eat them. | ||
| I think that's how it works. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| He's doing something. | ||
| It's not going well. | ||
| All I can think about is, I wouldn't mind some moss taking over me. | ||
| What do you see when you see moss taking over you? | ||
| Just kind of like having a nice, like you can rub on a rock. | ||
| Like a little grass kind of thing on this side. | ||
| Okay, I like that. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I like that. | ||
| Not full covering, though. | ||
| No. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Maybe. | ||
| I mean, eventually. | ||
| Okay, eventually you're talking swamp thing. | ||
| She a pet. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Eventually. | ||
| Okay, okay. | ||
| But then again, I'm a hirsute man. | ||
| So, like, I'm already kind of mossy. | ||
| Sure, sure, sure. | ||
| You're just a little, you'd just be turning green, basically. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Which I don't mind. | ||
| No. | ||
| I like nature. | ||
| I think it'd be great. | ||
| Anyway, also, I think that Moss is chill, you know? | ||
| Moss does give off a chill vibe. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Seeing as how, two things, it is inanimate, and also cannot move of its own volition. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Anyway. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| That ad pivot took it out of me, and I had to go take a walk. | ||
| So we're going to check out here, but... | ||
|
unidentified
|
That was a good ad pivot. | |
| The situation with Musk is still ongoing. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And I think, I'm really interested to see how it plays out. | ||
| Because there is a real potential for a pretty messy break here of two groups. | ||
| What do you value more? | ||
| This Elon Musk and the sort of bizarre ideas of space fascism and all of the billions of dollars. | ||
| And the idea that someone that weird can have power. | ||
| Do you value that? | ||
| Or your principles of white ethnostates and a lot of those bigotries that really underlie the positions that led you to MAGA and Trump in the first place. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| How is this going to break? | ||
| I think Alex is in trouble if this doesn't get resolved. | ||
| Because he wants to have feet in both territories. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I mean, I suppose the question is whether or not they even think it matters to... | ||
| Just cut them loose, if you will. | ||
| You know what I'm saying? | ||
| Like, do you think Musk and Trump and, I mean, all of these people who are now ready to run roughshod over everything with the Supreme Court behind them, you know, like, cheering them on, like, will it even mean anything for them to continue to, like, giving them the dog whistles or where they just go, like, ah, we really don't care. | ||
| There's honestly nothing you can do now. | ||
| You know? | ||
| Well, I guess, you know, we have to consider that how much of those dog whistles is based on pandering to the bigots and how much is from their own bigotry. | ||
| Sure, sure. | ||
| So I don't know if you can answer that question because there's a sincereness to some of the stuff that you might think is like jangling keys. | ||
| Right. | ||
| To play to the racist crowd. | ||
| But some of it probably does come from a place of sincerity. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Or at the very least a place of calculation. | ||
| Like, so long as I don't have skin in the game, oh, I'm very, very racist. | ||
| But, I mean, hey, if there's money involved, there's money, money. | ||
| You know? | ||
| That kind of sincerity of belief. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But anyway, we'll see what happens with that. | |
| But I'm excited to follow the story and see where Alex lands. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But we'll find out in a later date. | ||
| It will be interesting. | ||
| I mean, I think it would be a very interesting turn that I find almost impossible to imagine actually happening. | ||
| But what if he did, like, find a backbone? | ||
| Alex? | ||
| Yeah! | ||
| Like, find one out of nowhere. | ||
| It's made of moss. | ||
| It's time for us to actually lead our own charge against it. | ||
| You know, like, that would be crazy. | ||
| We need to wake the fuck up. | ||
| Yeah, you're right. | ||
| That's not happening. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's the moss. | |
| This has been a ten-year delusion of Trump shit. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's all moss. | |
| Fuck. | ||
| It's moss all the way down. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So we'll find out if he has a spine. | ||
| Answer's no. | ||
| But we'll be back with another episode. | ||
| Until then, we have a website. | ||
| Indeed we do. | ||
| It's knowledgefight.com. | ||
| Yep. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be back. | |
| But until then, I'm Neo. | ||
| I'm Leo. | ||
| I'm DZXClark. | ||
| I am the Mysterious Professor. | ||
| Woo, yeah! | ||
| And now here comes the sex robots. | ||
| Andy in Kansas, you're on the air. | ||
| Thanks for holding. | ||
| Hello, Alex. | ||
| I'm a first time caller. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm a huge fan. | |
| I love your work. |
Export Selection