Knowledge Fight #992 dissects Alex Jones’ December 24, 2024 broadcast, where he exaggerated "victorious truth" vs. "globalist lies," falsely credited Trump for exposing Epstein while promoting his own merchandise, and claimed Fauci funded animal experiments as "gang rituals." Jones pivoted to self-aggrandizing leaks, divine mission rhetoric ("God’s bitch"), and calls for executing Alejandro Mayorkas—while mocking his paranoia about sex operatives. Guest Naomi Seibt, a German AfD-aligned YouTuber with libertarian ties, echoed state-media conspiracy claims, though her credibility was dismissed due to past Heartland Institute work. The episode exposes Jones’ pattern of unfounded theories and far-right alliances, revealing a mix of delusion, performative piety, and opportunistic outrage. [Automatically generated summary]
I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys knowledge fight
Dan and George knowledge fight need money Andy in Kansas Andy in Kansas stop it Andy in Kansas Andy in Kansas Andy in Kansas it's time to pray Andy in Kansas you're on the air thanks for holding us hello Alex I'm a big fan Hey, everybody.
And anti-globalist pro-liberty groups are winning and surging everywhere.
The establishment corporate media run by the big think tanks and intelligence agencies are in total conniption fits and are generating and creating and exacerbating crises and attempt...
To bring humanity to our knees, but the vast majority of people are awake and not going along with it, and many of the minions are starting to wake up very, very quickly.
But that great news is extremely paradoxical because the bad guys are not going to give up.
They're launching all of their virus hysteria and fear-mongering.
They are...
Using anthropologists and sociologists to create as much cultural division, depending on the divisions in the area that they're dividing and conquering or attempting to.
They are trying to escalate and exacerbate military conflicts.
They are waging war with their private central banks against any independent local business or farming infrastructure.
But every day that passes, Exponentially, they are losing ground.
The tide has violently, and I mean that as if waves crashing into the shore turned against them.
They are being thrown against the rocks.
They are having their political bones and backs and skulls shattered and smashed into bloody pulp.
I don't know if this is a white-hot font of truth, but, I mean, this show is such protracted, long, we're winning, but also they're scary and they're losing, but blood and skulls upon the rocks, we're strong, we're also weak, be scared, but we're so strong.
Senator Paul is not just doing referrals, as he's done twice before, calling for criminal investigations and saying it's clear that Fauci's committed crimes.
He's saying, damn it, I want him arrested now, cut and dry, illegal, get a function, all the documents, all the admissions, all the witnesses.
This is a fun headline for Alex because he doesn't actually have anything to report, but he still needs to make this feel like there's been an escalation.
Not the type that brings presents down the chimney, but brings you bioweapons and deadly shots that turn off your immune system and are filled with cancer viruses.
That is a man that would make Joseph Mengele, the Nazi angel of death, blush.
If you graded evil by its height, Fauci is a trillion feet tall and is evil.
So I just want to say this before we get into anything.
If you're a person who has misgivings about the very idea of testing things on animals, you have a respectable position, and that's not the conversation I'm going to get into here.
It very well may be that we're wrong as a society to run tests on animals, but that discussion is separate from the one that Alex is trying to evoke here, where scientists...
It's like Fauci just do evil experiments to see if people will do them, like some kind of a weird gang initiation process.
I know that's how things work in the comic books Alex has studied, but this is very dumb.
So those Beagle studies that Alex is talking about, the removing of the larynx, that happens in some lab settings with dogs that are there, which I think we can all say is...
Pretty fucked up, but also it is partially for their own safety as well.
If there's a bunch of dogs that are all around each other barking, it's dangerous for themselves and for the people there.
But the ones that he's specifically talking about, the bag and the flies and stuff, that has to do with the 2021 expose put out by the White Coat Waste Project, a group that opposes animal testing but is also a bit on the irresponsible side with the way their messaging ends up getting packaged.
For instance, some of their work was used to give credibility to the panic from last year about an Ebola outbreak happening in Colorado because they had highlighted a lab that works with bats in the vicinity of the place where the healthcare workers were getting an Ebola vaccine.
I may find some underlying agreement with them about the mistreatment of animals, but I also really...
Only see their name come up when it's in relation to dumb, fraudulent right-wing meme campaigns that aren't fundamentally about the treatment of these animals.
The lab bat hysteria wasn't about the treatment of those bats.
It was about stoking fears of a possible Ebola outbreak.
And the hysteria around these beagles isn't about the dogs themselves.
So there were two studies involving beagles in Tunisia, one of which the NIAID sent funding and the other which they did not.
The one they did not was accidentally credited as having received NIAID funding because they were both around the issue of leishmaniasis, a parasite mostly spread by sandfly bites.
According to the World Health Organization, there are about a million new cases of it every year, and it's a condition that has outbreak potential.
There are some good treatments for moniasis, but the preventative measure is something researchers are obviously looking for, including a vaccine or a way to address animal reservoir populations.
In the case of Tunisia, one of these reservoir populations was dogs.
The study that the NIAID was involved with was a test of a potential vaccine on dogs who would get the shot and then be let roam in high sandfly areas.
The one that they weren't involved in was the one that caused the most uproar because...
It involved the images of dogs with their heads in mesh enclosures.
That was not just a pure exercise in barbarism, though.
It was studying if sand flies were more drawn to dogs that were infected already or not.
Sure, sure, sure.
There's a scientific reason to do these studies as much as they may be off-putting.
And the way that Alex engages with this is fucking childish.
But, that being said...
I'm not trying to say that concern about animal testing is off base or wrong.
And I think that it doesn't justify testing on animals, but a lot of medical breakthroughs that have allowed your pets to survive probably involve some things that you're not happy about.
So, Alex is off on this weird tangent about how all of these medical tests and studies are really just about trying to get people to do really weird things.
And I was told that when I was seven years old by my dad.
Because, again, he won a Texas competitions and stuff in science, and his mom was a principal and school teacher and stuff.
She got him involved in all the different things, and they said, oh, there's a thing, you know, Eisenhower's program, he was already out, but it was the program he started, the WizKid thing, and told the story before, but it's important, and you can look up the WizKid thing that continued by Kennedy, and that's what my dad was involved in by then, and they said, well, you're joining this thing, it's by the National Institutes of Science and all of it, and your first job when you're 15 is, we're going to sit you down to...
Houston.
At MD Anderson Cancer Research Facility.
And I'm sitting there seven, eight years old.
My dad's explaining this to me.
And he went back to me after about a year of that and said, I'd like to be transferred.
I don't like this part of NASA.
Of course, it wasn't NASA.
And I was Department of Defense doing that.
And so, and then he wouldn't tell me the other things, other little things he did.
My grandfather would have been a principal and a superintendent at the same time as Alex's grandmother.
It's entirely possible that if principals were solidly in the realm of, we gotta recruit people through the people who have paddles that have holes in them.
Well, here's something that I think is, you know, with Batman, with all the origin stories, there are some things that are, like, consistent throughout.
And Eisenhower, when he left office in early 61, gave his farewell address and warned of the scientific technological elite controlling 90% of the funding and policies and not even following his own directives.
And how they were in control of the military-industrial complex.
But everybody always hears about him saying, beware the military-industrial complex.
But in the full 21-minute speech, he defines it as controlled by a technological elite of technocrats who were forming a coup against America and freedom.
So in the speech, he warns about Russia and communism.
But he goes on to say, he pulled the transcript up, an equal threat.
Is our own scientific technological elite who are in control of science and technology and the universities and the research and the government agencies and the military.
So you've got to beware the military-industrial complex.
It's on YouTube.
Eisenhower's farewell address is 21 minutes long.
Memory serves.
Guys, pull up.
Eisenhower's full farewell address on YouTube.
Type in Eisenhower's full farewell address from the White House.
We probably just played again today.
So, yeah, there it is.
How long is it?
My memory says 21 minutes.
How long is it?
16. I must have seen a version that added some more stuff.
Maybe there's a commentary track that you were listening to that went along with it and that had interspaces of people going, this is what he actually said, and then maybe you cared more about those people than you did the speech.
At the bottom of the next hour, Naomi Zeidt, a great citizen journalist out of Germany that Elon Musk reposts every couple days.
She gets hundreds of millions of views a week.
She's very eloquent.
I've been watching her for about a year, and she's going to be in studio with us next week.
She's going to be joining us remotely.
I think she's in Kentucky right now, traveling the United States.
And, boy, the national government of Germany's been demonizing her.
She's a German citizen.
How dare her criticize the tyranny where...
Just recently they gave a woman a longer prison sentence than the rapist that raped her brutally because she criticized him and said that he was a migrant and that he was bad and that they shouldn't have opened borders.
This shouldn't be too surprising since her mother is a lawyer for AFD politicians, and she claimed in 2020 that she was inspired to get into activism by watching Stefan Molyneux.
When asked if it was a problem that he'd done that whole trip to Poland where he decided that life is better with only white people around, Naomi pretended to think that was taken out of context and said, quote, The bottom line here is that she's continued on with her Molyneux-esque politics and has now become a leading voice supporting the AFD, which is the extreme right-wing hyper-nationalist party in Germany that has at least some neo-Nazi ties and affiliations.
Naomi tweeted something about how the CDU party should align with the AFD instead of the Green party and Elon Musk replied, quote, only the AFD can save Germany.
But if you think the stuff the Justice Department did to Infowars since May 31st was bad, it's even worse now.
I mean, I am dealing with weaponized government because they hate.
Every cell in my body because I'm standing up for you.
I'm in their way, as Trump says.
And it's important for that to sink in.
I don't say this so you love me.
I don't say this so you go, oh, that's a great guy.
I'm saying it because it's the truth.
I am a soldier on the wall defending you and your family and my family that lives in the same village.
The enemies come in.
They burn the farms.
We've all run into the castle.
And, you know, the auxiliary men that are all the farmers and the bakers and the cobblers that live out in the town and out in the farms, when the vandals or the Visigoths or the Huns or the folks come in to the valley and start attacking and burning, everybody runs to the castle to defend as long as we can.
Under siege.
Well, that analogy is not even the best, though it's accurate.
I'm a sentry of the village, of the little kingdom.
And my job is to stay out at an outpost at the mountain pass into the entrance to our little fortress.
They hadn't even really started using carrier pigeons yet.
So you use the Lord of the Rings analogy that's, you know, fiction, but based on medieval war systems.
And when they see the army of Mordor marching hundreds and hundreds of miles away from Midas Tirith, the capital of Middle Earth, the capital of the good guys.
They light the watchtowers and people 30 miles away see another watchtower on fire and they light the watchtower and then they will light the watchtower.
And you might sit up there for a decade as a watchman on the watchtower until you see the enemy start coming in and you run and you light the watchtower.
Well, that's what I do.
And as new attacks happen, as the enemy attacks and as they pull new scams, I'm studying, no exaggeration, seven, eight hours a day.
Not just on air.
I mean, I am studying.
Six, seven, eight hours.
Some days, ten hours a day.
And I'd like to be doing other stuff.
I'd like to be hiking or playing pool or going to dinner or barbecuing my family or doing arts and crafts with my seven-year-old daughter.
I think from our current point of view, from within, it would be hard to argue this.
But if you step back and you look at the evolution of humanity from ape to whatever we are now, I might argue that government is a weapon no different than the invention of the spear.
You know what I'm saying?
It is a weapon against not being human, if you will.
You know?
It's a weapon against every other species on this planet.
The invention of government allows us to become apex predators by pooling our resources together.
He said that he was dealing with weaponized government at the early part, and it made me stop and think of whether or not that government is not itself a weapon.
People that are compartmentalized at the mid-level officer corps, because a lot of them are good, the top people are pretty much all bad.
General Flynn will tell you that.
They've been getting mainly globalists in for 30, 40 years, and now it's almost complete.
But the colonels down are good people, some of the best, and the enlisted folks are great.
But the general public always, I see it everywhere, and people say to me on the street, they go, oh my God, the Navy SEALs, they know everything.
The Delta Force, they know all the secrets.
Well, they know compartmentalize who they were sent to kill or who they were sent to, you know, torture.
They know the secrets of their little mission.
I'm not saying their little, but, you know, that little piece.
They don't know the 35,000-foot view because they're not read into it.
Well, I've reverse-engineered it.
My guests are reverse-engineered it.
This is all I do.
I have...
The 35,000-foot view, and I have the one-inch view and the microscopic view.
And all I do is read the globalist-owned internal documents that leak and come out over the years.
And they don't like the fact that I'm up here decompartmentalizing people because even most of the top people in the managerial class of the globalist are not generalist experts in this.
You've got to have a general knowledge of everything and then understand the globalist larger real plan versus the plan they give their minions versus the fake plan they give the public.
And so I'm here raising the curtain up behind the little man behind it.
I'm just Toto.
That's who you are as well.
But we have courage, the little dog.
And so that's where we are.
And understanding that is understanding how to beat the enemy.
They cannot survive exposure.
They wouldn't be going through all this hell to try to intimidate and sue and deplatform and debank and kill and imprison pro-human moral patriots around the world if they had it all sewn up.
And I know most of you are saying, well, that's common sense.
We know that.
Well, the public's starting to wake up, but they don't understand the big picture yet.
Because it is scary and it's hard to believe, but it's there.
It's real.
So, the propaganda would not be necessary if the situation was hopeless.
And I remember even reading in Financial Times of London, where the establishment was being honest about things a decade ago, and they said, if Trump wins, it'll be the end of the world government.
And they said, well, if he wins again, for sure.
And you see, it's their end.
I mean, these guys have committed such financial crimes that, again, they make Bernie Madoff look moral.
They make Ponzi look like an amateur.
Sam Beekman Freed look like a choir boy and And...
I understand why people don't want to admit this.
It's really hard to read all the official documents and admissions and plans and programs that they even put in movies like V for Vendetta or TV series like Utopia where they tell you.
Three and a half minutes, the thrust and the point of it is just that Alex is smarter than everybody else, and he sees through everything, and you just can't get it.
Even the experts aren't generalists, you understand?
Even if we weren't having these big victories right now, I know the Holy Spirit tells me to do this, that it's going to be a victory in the future, and that the Lord works mysterious ways.
I just have total faith in God.
I could pull up a red light today and they send some assassin.
It rolls down their window and I see a gun pointed at me and the flash and my head's blown off.
In that millisecond, I'm just saying, I love you, Jesus.
Because I know it's God's plan.
I don't believe in God.
I don't trust in God.
Those words are too weak.
I am fully committed, 100%.
No questions.
It's God's plan.
I love God.
I am with God.
I am literally interfacing with God.
And whatever God does, it's God's plan.
And I am absolutely, totally, beyond 100% committed to it.
I never blame God.
I never get mad at God.
I never ask God, why are you doing this to me?
Because God is teaching me.
And teaching others.
And it's part of a larger plan.
So we don't surrender to Satan.
We don't surrender to Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates.
And it is the most empowering, perfect, delicious thing I've ever experienced.
Nothing, nothing, nothing even comes.
1% close.
And my only frustration is that I am a fleshly fallen creature and I slip out of gear, like everyone does, back into the sinful nature, back into the flesh, but less and less, and for shorter and shorter period of time, I'll catch myself.
And I ask, whoa.
Holy Spirit, I can't do this.
I need you right now.
And it's just, I don't have control.
God has control.
He who is in me is greater than he who is in the world.
I believe if you follow his line of his closeness related to God, I'm going to have to go with that's horrifying blasphemy on the level of taking God's name in vain.
I guess if I were, I don't know, somebody who's in the business of fucking with people for a government and, you know, I'd made multiple attempts.
To sway Alex with money and women.
And I realize that this man does not need money and women.
It would become very obvious that he needs validation.
And so maybe I would go that tactic.
If I were Alex, I would really start to think about that as opposed to bragging about these kind of tinged with misogyny stories that he has about turning down alleged honeypots.
I know it's fun to...
Reenact this bravado kind of story for the audience, but this just seems incredibly stupid.
I feel complicated about this clip, and I'll tell you why.
First thing is, maybe, maybe, this clip is actually incredibly good in a practical sense, because this is a man with a massive power imbalance over his female fanbase.
Who is not taking advantage of them simply because he's insane.
So in certain ways, there are many women who could have been taken advantage of in that exact fashion that many people have done in the past, let's be honest, that were not, but not in a morally righteous way.
I invested all my efforts in speaking up for free speech in Europe and Germany in particular on X mostly and it apparently caused a lot of Media uproar internationally, especially in Germany, because the mainstream media in Germany is quite brutal, as it's mostly controlled by the state.
We even pay so-called GEZ taxes for the state media propaganda.
Not all of them, but it's just very hard to even compete with these mainstream channels in Germany.
And also in connection with our German guild, as you know, it's been very...
I think it's very problematic to inspire people to be brave.
And look into the side that is denounced and demonized as the alleged Nazi side.
But now the lies are becoming so obvious in the mainstream media that more and more people are just so fed up with the establishment.
And at this point, there are only two ways that you can vote.
You can either vote for the AfD, which will mean change, and finally abolishing everything that has been destroying your lives in Germany for the past, I would say, over nine years.
I am blown away by how kind of on the nose this is.
And also...
I can't imagine how difficult it must be to try and sway people with similar arguments and tones to what the Nazis said when they rose to power with the national guilt, as she calls it.
Remember when I mentioned the Treaty of Versailles earlier, and there was maybe a speech given about how we need to do something about that, and it's ruined your lives over these past few years, and then it could be something there.
Whenever they say, oh, you sound like Nazis, and you're like, no, we don't, and then they put up the words that we have said next to the words that Nazis said.
It is bravery that keeps you continuing to believe you're not a Nazi.
Donald Trump's victory has inspired countless people, even in Germany.
To look behind the lies of the mainstream media.
Because until the very end, even days before the election in America, when it was basically clear for everyone in America that Trump was going to win, German media still spread the lie that it was looking like Kamala Harris was going to get into office.
And over 70% of Germans still believed that Kamala Harris was going to win.
Not that they supported her.
Simply that based on what they got from the mainstream media...
They thought she was genuinely going to win.
And then after Donald Trump's victory, suddenly they realised, wait a minute, what else have we lied to?
That's why this had such an international impact, and this is also why German politics matters to America, in my opinion.
I think we should form better relations between Germany and America.
They're refusing to extradite him for a bunch of reported crimes in Saudi Arabia, and then he goes and does this.
And it's exactly what AFD's been warning about with all these other Christmas attacks with cars in Germany and France, the freedom barriers they put up, the Orwellian term, and then magically he supports Alex Jones and Elon Musk.
They are putting a target on my back as well because apparently he followed me too and he, well, the media say that he was a fan of mine.
I don't buy it.
Because he did speak a lot of German on X as well, and he communicated with a couple of my friends and colleagues in the German sphere who are Islam critics.
And I remember specifically, actually, when I was only 14 years old...
I had nothing to do with politics.
I had no interest in politics, and I knew nothing.
But my mother was invited, actually, to a CDU event, so the Merkel party.
Just a small event, but there was this one politician from the CDU.
His name is Ruprecht Polenz.
Germans will know who he is, and he doesn't like me either.
But he was there as, like, the star guest, and I...
I guess I didn't look up to him, but I knew that he was famous kind of in the CDU and he was standing right behind Merkel, basically had a big impact.
And I remember when I was 14, 13, he said at this event, we need to do everything in our power to eliminate the AFD.
And in that moment, I got chills and I was thinking something is wrong.
That has nothing to do with democracy.
And as the years went by and then the migration crisis started in Germany, that's when I was truly red-pilled because I started asking questions or criticizing the migration crisis simply because, yeah, I didn't realize there was so much stigma against anything that could be denounced as racist in some way.
And I was wondering, why are my questions apparently politically incorrect?
Why can I not ask questions?
Why can I not be critical of government structures and anything that is restricting our freedom in Germany?
And then I looked into different political ideologies and I found out a lot about libertarianism due to people like Stefan Molyneux, for example.
You may still know him.
And that's how I got into your shore as well.
And that truly red pill me and I kept following what the AFD was doing.
And I realized that they were the only ones standing up for our sovereignty and our freedom.
So Naomi is 24 years old and is a YouTuber whose only real claim to fame is that the Heartland Institute tried to use her to fight against climate change activists when she was 19. This led to her doing things like speaking at CPAC and becoming a darling for white identity movement leaders like Martin Zellner.
She's out here pretending she has no connection to AFD, but her mom's a lawyer for multiple party members.
So she is who Elon Musk decides to reach out to so he can find out about the whole AFD thing.
It seems like a guy who has a legitimate and sincere interest in finding out the truth.
That's who you would ask, right?
I mean, a YouTuber who was just a counter to Greta Thunberg?
Yeah.
That's who I would reach out to if I was like, hey, everyone seems to be calling these people Nazis.