#986: December 3, 2024 dissects Alex Jones’ recurring misrepresentations—like twisting Bill Gates’ October 30th remarks on India’s GMOs into vaccine conspiracy claims—while debunking fluoride poison myths and his staged "purple-haired woman" COVID booster encounter. Jones’ reliance on cherry-picked edits, debunked court cases (e.g., Vermont’s accidental PrEP error), and exaggerated stats (100M U.S. cancer deaths) undermines credibility, setting a low bar for fringe media that distracts from real investigative work. His contradictions—mocking federal authority yet misusing Ninth Circuit rulings—highlight a pattern of opportunistic fearmongering, leaving audiences trapped in recycled narratives rather than meaningful discourse. [Automatically generated summary]
But anyway, squashies is great, and I'm sorry that I didn't take responsibility for how much I like them when I was shit-talking the Europeans on their marshmallows.
I mean, I don't know how it's going to go down, but earlier one of my bright spots was D 'Angelo, and D 'Angelo became too sexy, and that just happened, and the world punished him for that.
Kendrick may have gotten too good at what Kendrick does.
And he's going to be defeated for it.
I don't know how to explain it other than, like, this is what we've seen in the past.
Yeah, no, I mean, he literally, he might as well have tilted with God and defeated him.
And on this, he very much has a direct conversation with God.
And he believes whatever you may think.
About that track, Reincarnated, you should listen to it very closely if you're worried about whether or not he's going to go crazy, because he is absolutely going to go crazy.
We're coming up on the end of the year, and we really do need to wrestle with the fact that somebody randomly asked a woman on the street about some sexual techniques.
She made a reference to a blowjob, and she probably has millions of dollars now.
So first, it makes my partner uncomfortable every time they hear Alex say, I love you, and it makes me uncomfortable that I casually refer to Alex by first name to them.
No, the thing that he does is like this, there's like, just like if you think of the news importance on a level of like one to ten, he does like one, one, one, four, four, four, four, four.
Ten!
Four!
You can't get past where you've already been, and you're trying to excite me about something you've already...
So Alex is talking about a clip here from a podcast that Bill Gates did that was released on October 30th.
Okay.
It's over a month old and no one cared when it came out.
Someone posted a little clip of it on Twitter and it took off in dipshit right-wing circles, which is the actual story here.
Alex isn't covering what Bill Gates said, he's covering what right-wing social media dipshits are excited about today, which happens to be a month-old episode of a podcast none of them have even heard of.
They don't know the name of this podcast, they don't know the people who are hosting it, they didn't listen to this whole thing, they don't give a shit.
So, Gates didn't admit that he was carrying out human experiments in India.
He was saying that India is a country that's facing a lot of public health challenges, but is also relatively stable and financially situated, where things can be rolled out, whereas they might not be able to do that kind of stuff in other countries that are facing similar challenges.
It's super clear from the context, but if you snip out this little tiny clip, it works as red meat for idiots on Twitter, which is the pipeline through which Alex gets all of his news, and you're seeing that clearly illustrated here.
Right.
With this big bombshell of Bill Gates making this admission on a podcast that came out a month ago.
When there are countries that have less infrastructure or more external difficulties, you're going to have a tougher time learning from approaches that are taken.
And that's more or less what he's expressing.
And it's just deeply unfair, the way they take this out of context.
There's so many things to attack Bill Gates about.
And these things are just not real.
The things that Alex is mad about are just not real.
I mean, if you were a conspiracy theorist, like maybe somebody like an Alex Jones type, you might think like, oh, these billionaires are buying up false criticism in order to distract people away from the real criticism, man.
The Vermont Supreme Court was hearing a case that involved a parent suing a school for accidentally vaccinating their child.
The school had a vaccination drive during COVID and the courts found that what happened was a mistake and the officials at the school were protected under the PrEP Act and couldn't be sued for their action.
That calculation would almost certainly have been different if they had maliciously and intentionally vaccinated the child.
Then they would likely be open to assault charges and some compensation.
The PrEP Act would not cover them in cases of willful misconduct, which is what Alex is pretending this case is about, but he's just lying.
I think, huh.
I wonder what book that comes from.
And then I'd have to read something by Bertrand Russell to understand what Alex was talking about and taking out of context.
But these days, it's just anonymous accounts stirring up bullshit on Twitter.
And now they've changed the definition in the last four years from vaccine from being an attenuated virus or microbe, bacteria, dead or damaged or altered to not be dangerous, to teach your body how to defeat the wild version.
It works a lot of the time, has a lot of side effects.
The way the vaccines are made and grown in different tissues, you also become...
Resist it and have an autoimmune response to anything else that's basically in with the main pathogen.
They then add adjuvants to make your body overreact so if they grow like they've done for 40 years.
Remember, nobody had peanut allergies until about 40 years ago.
1985 or so, right when they started growing the vaccine materials on peanut protein instead of monkey kidneys.
Which happen to have a bunch of cancer viruses that are communicable, like SV40.
Anything I say, just write it down and look it up.
It's all true.
And then they admit in government reports the number one cause of cancer in the Western world, killing hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of millions, over 100 million in the U.S. alone, in the 1990s report that since the 50s until the 90s, over 100 million people killed by cancer from the polio vaccine.
That had SV40, a highly virulent live virus, that goes in and makes your body grow cancers.
But for one thing, there's no evidence that peanut allergies were caused by vaccines, and vaccines weren't, quote, grown on peanut protein, whatever the fuck that's supposed to mean.
Anti-vax idiots claim that peanut oil being used as an adjuvant for an influenza vaccine is what's behind the peanut allergies process.
people have.
But unfortunately, that was never true of a publicly released vaccine.
Peanut oil was used as an adjuvant in trials carried out by Merck in the 1960s, but it wasn't in that actual flu vaccine that went out to people.
Alex is correct about SV40, a virus from monkey cells contaminating some polio vaccines until it was discovered in 1963.
Up until that point, the vaccine was grown on monkey kidney cells, and then SV40 DNA was found in biopsies of people who developed cancers later on.
What's fascinating about this case is that not everyone who got the vaccine and then developed cancer later had these cells, and some people who didn't get vaccinated but also developed cancer didn't.
did have these sv40 cells wild even more confounding is that there are cases of people who were born after 1963 when this contamination was discovered and ended who had sv40 cells in their biopsies and this is even true of people prior to the invention of the vaccine biopsies that uh predate 19 uh 1955 or whenever it was that Jonas Salk invented.
There's been so much research about this case because it is really an interesting thing and a definite piece of history.
And there's just not definitive evidence that the SV40 contamination of these vaccines led to any increased incidence of cancer.
It's the sort of thing that passes as an acceptable hypothesis in that it's an interesting question and it possibly could be true, but it doesn't stand up to any scrutiny past that point.
This is a case where Alex is descriptively right about something.
the fact that some polio vaccines in the late 50s and early 60s were contaminated with SV40.
But he's wrong about the point he's using that fact to make.
However, he knows that if an audience member decides to get critical and Google what he's saying, they'll find mainstream credible sources confirming the fact that he is correct about, which is the SV40 thing existing, and then they'll just assume that he must be right about the point that he's trying to use that fact to make.
That is the gamble that his entire career is based on, and it's paid off huge.
Okay, now, obviously, there were no statistics to be kept on this prior, but before the king carver figures out peanuts, do peanut allergies still exist?
Bill Gates has confessed that we already knew, but he's bragging, really, about all his illegal human experimentation, Joseph Mingla-level stuff.
Well, it's actually much bigger and wider than that, so Joseph Mingla to infinity.
We have the Supreme Court's ruling, oh, we can forcibly inject your kids, and I even tell you, ha-ha-ha, with experimental things that aren't even vaccines.
You have the Senate report that's 600 pages, but I did read.
The boil-down articles, and check it for myself, and it is 90% of the truth coming out that it's a man-made super virus chimera that Peter Daszak and Bill Gates and the globalists funded it, that they then use the fear of the virus to bring in social engineering and try to create a new society for future lockdowns and to lock you in your home and brainwash children and make hundreds of billions of dollars.
We've got that.
And you're like, well, we already know all this.
Yeah, but it's the Senate.
Judiciary Committee criminal investigation.
So, total vindication of everything we've been saying, like I told you, for 30 years.
So it really sucks that Alex is right 99% of the time, and he had the bad luck of following up, describing how right he is all the time by being wrong about...
So, total vindication of everything we've been saying, like I told you for 30 years, in all the different studies that were there, they knew in 1945 when it started that the type of fluoride they were put in the water is super deadly poison, destroys your immune system, gives you cancer, annihilates fertility, and then three months ago...
FDA says you take it out of the water, it lowers IQ, gives you cancer, and destroys fertility.
Well, I mean, it's frickin' bug poison.
But when they started putting it in the water, they suddenly said, oh, we're not going to put it on store shelves anymore as rat and bug poison.
You have a rat or mouse walks through sodium fluoride on the ground and just gets a little bit on its hands or feet and then licks the paws.
Bye-bye.
Bye-bye.
And that's just sodium fluoride.
They take sodium fluoride and concentrate it into an acid.
And it's called hydrofluorosilicic acid.
And it's the second most deadly acid on Earth.
And it takes every other poison in your body that's also in the water supply and carries it across the blood-brain barrier.
It really sucks how, even though Alex is right 99% of the time, he happens to follow up being wrong about the COVID report by being wrong about fluoride.
Sure.
It happens with probabilities, though.
Like, you can flip ten heads in a row, and the coin will still eventually work out to being 50-50.
So Alex can be wrong all the time repeatedly and still be 99% right.
Anyway, sodium fluoride was sold as an insecticide, but you can also get it in pill form, like over half a million people do every year in order to fight tooth decay.
Ninth Circuit rules in favor of federal deportation.
And of course, that Ninth Circuit is usually pretty leftist.
But the federal law is cut and dry.
And so the federal government has the authority to deport foreign nationals in the U.S. illegally of the objection of local authorities.
A panel of three judges on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled.
The 29-page ruling was written by Judge Daniel Bress with Judge Michael Hawkins and Richard Clinton concurring.
At issue is the April 2019 executive order issued by the King County Executive Dow Constantine, which directed county officials to prohibit fixed base operations on the county airfield near Seattle.
From servicing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement chartered flights to deport illegal foreign nationals.
So it was a blockade of that.
And this just shoots down all the sanctuary obstructionist garbage.
It's going to be really hard for Alex to keep that 99% average at this point, because he's totally wrong about how he's going about this story.
He's reporting this as a story about how the Ninth Circuit Court ruled that deportations are totally cool, but that's not even what this case is about.
This is a case called USA vs.
King County, and it involved King County, Washington, putting out an executive order saying that fixed base operators who want to have a lease to operate at Boeing Field Airport were prohibited from servicing ICE chartered flights, which is...
The district court ruled that the county could not do this, mostly because it violated the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, and the appeal court just affirmed that decision.
This has no effect on, nor does it say anything about whether or not the government can carry out mass deportations.
It just says that a county in the particular situation that King County was in cannot refuse to do business with the federal government.
Part of that is due to the contract regarding the ownership of the airport itself.
The U.S. government bought the airport in 1941 so it could be used in World War II, and then they sold it back to the county in 1948.
One of the conditions of that sale was, quote, The USA, through any of its employees or agents, shall at all times have the right to make non-exclusive use of the landing area of the airport at which any of the property transferred by this instrument is located or used without charge.
It's conceivable that if there were an airport that didn't have this established contract with the U.S. government, you know, like if it was in a county that passed an executive order like this, the court might have ruled in a different way.
But it probably wouldn't have because of the supremacy clause, which Alex is super against.
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution says that when federal and state laws conflict, the federal law supersedes the state law.
That's why you can't bring weed to the airport, even though it's legal in Chicago.
Alex is very, very opposed to this clause, even though it's literally in the Constitution and he loves the Constitution.
And supporting the federal government being able to override the wishes of a state or local community runs entirely contrary to his whole philosophy.
Alex applauding this ruling should be rightly understood as a condemnation of the idea that he has any principles.
If you're a states rights ding dong who's happy about this ruling just because you hate immigrants that much, you really aren't into states rights.
Your politics are just shaped around hating immigrants.
But more to the point...
This case has nothing to do with what Alex is covering it and how he's covering it.
You can hear him adjusting as he's cold reading that article.
It starts with him acting like the narrative is that the court said that deportations are cool, but as he reads on, he encountered a few too many details.
So you heard him say, quote, oh, so it's like a blockade.
He's taking in information and making this up as he goes along.
You could almost feel in that moment him being like, ah, ah.
Before you start suing people in the law, the county should really have double-checked to see if they had already promised to allow the government to do whatever they want with it for the rest of their lives.
Really strange that Alex is positioning on this, and I think it requires him to not understand the story in order to maintain the position that he has.
And the other part of leadership is doing what you know is right and Not just jumping on bandwagons because it looks like that's what's currently going to win.
You do what's right, believing in humanity and trusting in God and knowing that we're all just being tested so even if we lose, we win because God judges the heart.
They think winning is jumping on whoever the winning team is.
But what if you lose your humanity, lose your soul?
And then your children are slaves.
That's not winning.
That's not second, third, fourth level thinking.
It's one-dimensional thinking.
And people that are into one-dimensional thinking that have gotten some power, they think, man, this works really great.
I'm invincible.
And I liken that in the analogy to cancer.
If cancer had a consciousness and it's taking over the body...
And it's like, man, I can take over this, I can take over that, but then the body collapses because it's not working in unison as a colony of organs and cells, and the host of the cancer dies.
But see, cancer is a great parable or analogy or parallel to evil.
What does Joe say about Darth Vader?
Luke Skywalker says, is the dark side stronger?
And he goes, no, quicker.
Easier.
More seductive.
But it doesn't last.
You can have a cardboard building made out of, you know, crap that looks beautiful, but it won't be there in five years.
First storm comes by, it's going to blow over.
It's like the three little pigs.
One built his house out of straw, and the big bad wolf came along and blew it down.
But at the same time, Yoda is, as a force ghost, the only master who is on the side of, let's fucking go, guys.
Even at the end of Last Jedi, whenever Yoda sets all the ancient Jedi books on fire, he's the one who's like, hey, yeah, those guys were a bunch of fucking idiots.
Yeah, I mean, I guess that actually, that reset is kind of getting back to what he was saying, like with Bill Gates flaunting and bragging in your face about how he's experimenting on you.
But I think that this Jonas Salk thing, Alex is like, ah, fuck, I don't remember enough of the details about this, but I'm going to rant on it, and then I'm going to say it's really hard to find, and then I'm going to say I can't remember the name of the deputy, but I'm going to then say that it was on Boston PBS, That was WGN, right?
I would like to submit to you a theory, which is that the success of Infowars and Alex's content model has made it infinitely more difficult for serious alternative outside of corporate channel media to exist.
He's so bad at conveying information and so brazen of a liar that his continued ability to survive will always be a blight on anyone trying to do something serious in this independent space.
When people think of, quote, alternative media, it's impossible not to think of Alex.
And by extension, you think of what a total idiot he is and how he lies all the time and how it's embarrassing.
And it's because there's no standards.
What Alex just did in that clip would get him fired from any legitimate news outlet.
He's played that clip of Gates before and he has every reason to know that he's taking that entirely out of context.
He's playing the clip to imply that Gates was bragging about shooting kids up with mystery vaccines but it's just edited to sound that way.
We've talked about this in the past on an episode but Gates was advocating for more testing around GMO crops, something that Alex is supposed to support.
He's taken that clip that he should agree with and selectively edited it so it appears to say something Gates didn't say just so he can disagree with him and lie about Gates' position.
Right after the part that Alex plays, Gates says, quote, so yeah, I think maybe we should have a safety system where we do trials and test things.
This was a lie the first time Alex played the clip, whatever episode that was on, but he had the benefit then, the benefit of the doubt, of having made a mistake.
He could issue a retraction and not play this fraudulent clip in the future, but instead, he's just continuing to use it to lie.
In any workplace that values integrity or accurate work, he would be fired on the spot.
And then Alex claims that this podcast that Gates was on where he talks about India dropped two days ago.
It came out on October 30th, but it only gained traction among right-wing dipshit Twitter users two days ago.
Alex is lying about basic information about the podcast to obscure from his audience that he's not reporting on actual news or even this podcast interview.
His only real source is anonymous idiots on Twitter.
That's the only thing that he's reflecting back.
Alex is a follower, and he's just telling you what the cool kids on Twitter are mad about, but he desperately wants to pretend that he's the leader of this information space, and it's a pathetic charade.
It's all nonsense.
Also, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was originally called the William H. Gates Foundation.
You might be surprised that this traces back his incorrect information that he gave in there.
It traces back to a short out-of-context video clip that was viral on dipshit Twitter a little while back.
So what happened here is that a person doing an introduction for Dr. Lori Schwab Zabin, who was giving a speech at Vassar, accidentally listed off one of her credits as being the founding director of the Institute for Population Control.
Zabin later corrects this and says it's the Institute for Population and Reproductive Health.
But that part isn't included in the clip that Alex saw on Twitter.
Also, the social media claims were just wrong that this was the original name of the Gates Foundation.
The Gates Foundation, then the William H. Gates Foundation, founded this institute that they're talking about at Johns Hopkins in 1999, which was miscommunicated by these idiots on Twitter, which is what Alex is now repeating to the audience as if it's something that he knows from researching business filings.
This is a pathetic...
Again, it's all just Twitter shit being misrepresented.
If you stop and remember that three times as many people died in the 1990s, why would, after ten years of three times as many people dying as normal, would you set up a population control foundation?
Yeah, and then there's another interesting, difficult question, if you take his line seriously, that is like the, okay, the SB-40 was in, no, UB40 is the band.
Also, why not just straight up, if you're going to call it the population control, just be like...
The William H. Gates, we're going to kill your family foundation.
Just fucking, just go.
If you're going to throw population control in there, there's no way for you to put that in and not know that people are going to take that the wrong way.
Yeah, but the reason that the right-wing shithead idiots on Twitter have chosen the Institute of Population Control is because that's what this person introducing a speaker accidentally said.
And now there's thousands of prestigious studies, including by Oxford and Harvard.
New ones came out last week.
Confirming everyone getting the turbo cancers and the blood clots and the myocarditis and the heart attacks, including children, had the shot in the government database, just like the New Zealand database that came out earlier this year showing the same damn thing.
The only reason we know is New Zealand's small enough that one man, and they confirmed he did it, he came on the show, he's still facing years in prison, deserves a Nobel Peace Prize.
We're battling medical tyranny.
He was the only guy in the country that could see the hospital databases, the government databases, and the so-called vaccine database.
He integrated them together and published it, but blocked out the names.
And everyone having the strokes and heart attacks and turbo cancers was the people taking the shots.
And now you got Oxford, and now you got Harvard last week.
And I'll show you those articles and studies again.
So, I mean, this is premeditated.
And I know most of you know that.
But let that sink in.
I shot a video yesterday because I was hiking in the early morning.
And I literally saw a woman with a nose ring and purple hair.
And then the guy I was hiking with, Sean said, man, we ought to get that on tape.
And I said, well, let's just reenact it.
Have me shoot a video walking by you and say, what do you do when you're a purple-haired woman with a nose ring on your 12th booster and you see Alex Jones?
It's got millions of views, people.
And then there's leftists in there saying, I'd kick your ass.
I'd take my 15th booster.
I mean, they love it.
They enjoy it.
They literally think Bill Gates and Pfizer and Klaus Schwab and King Charles, who literally want them dead, is their daddy.
The only people who I see infantilizing themselves to be parented by their leaders are Alex's friends.
Like, they're the ones doing this.
I don't think this alleged purple-haired liberal that he ran into in the woods with a fucking liberal dog, I don't feel like they're like, oh, I love Klaus Schwab, he's my dad.
So also, all that COVID stuff he's saying just isn't true, and we talked about that new Oxford study he mentions in our last episode.
He's not covering any of these studies or stories at all.
He's just covering memes about them that he's seen on social media because Alex is a lazy liar.
Also, that guy in New Zealand is a man named Barry Young who absolutely did not anonymize the data he released to dipshit sub-stack poster Steve Kirsch.
Young stole data from Health New Zealand that did not show what Alex is claiming, but became active in disseminating and creating that narrative.
And in the process, he released a fair amount of this private medical information to noted lunatic Steve Kirsch.
Seems like Alex had a fun walk through the woods, though, and I...
It's such a bummer to imagine walking around and trying to enjoy a nature walk and then having a boring encounter with somebody and thinking we should recreate that for content.
But now, honestly, there's an interesting space that exists where it almost feels like Alex having to continue doing Infowars might end up hurting his ability to start these other things.
Yeah, because I think the longer that nothing changes when he has said everything's changing and everybody go over to this new thing that I've started, I think the longer that you have that, nothing change.