Jordan Holmes and Dan Friesen dissect Alex Jones’ December 2, 2024, episode, where he hyped a "New World Order transhumanist death cult" countdown to Trump’s inauguration while promoting debunked claims—1.7M childhood heart attacks from Pfizer vaccines (no evidence), weather control conspiracies (repeatedly disproven), and a "Marshall Law Plan" to stop false flag attacks. They mock his performative punditry, inconsistent opposition to Trump’s picks (like RFK Jr., Elon Musk, or Dr. Oz), and profit-driven fearmongering, including human trafficking allegations without sources. Jones’ California secession claims and Irish sea moss supplements further highlight his detached, unhelpful rants, proving his emotional noise drowns out facts—undermining real discourse while reinforcing his own myth-making cycle. [Automatically generated summary]
I don't have kids for very good reason, and I'll give you, like, I imagine if you go to the birthing chamber, which is what I call it, and your wife gives birth, and you see the horrible spectacle of pain and blood and misery that it is, and then two months later, she's like, oh, let's have another...
You've clearly already been wound up for a while to the point where you're like, alright, well fine then, if everybody wants me to describe this snuff film.
Remove all the context from this about who you wanted to win the election, and just imagine someone acting this way.
If some pundit on the left were opening their show with an overly theatrical countdown to when Harris was going to be sworn in, I think I would feel the same way about it.
Like, it reeks of unseriousness, and it makes me suspect there isn't a lot of depth to what we're gonna cover.
Now let's put up on screen the live show Feeds from X so everybody can see the headline and so everybody can share it if you want to continue to win against the tyrants.
Massive bombshell developments.
Trump pledges to prosecute Biden administration, UN NGOs, for human trafficking and sex slavery.
So, to the extent that Trump would actually arrest human traffickers, that's a good thing and an appropriate function of our government.
I have no qualms with taking human trafficking seriously.
My problem is that folks like Alex and Trump don't actually care about human trafficking.
It's just a proxy that they use to make their attacks on other groups look defensible.
Human trafficking isn't a serious issue for Alex.
It's an emotional cudgel and shield.
We can all agree that human trafficking is bad because it involves trafficking humans.
You aren't going to find somebody who's willing to get up and sincerely argue that human trafficking is good and fine.
So when you label all kinds of things that you don't like as human trafficking, you're attempting to For instance, if Alex presents the idea that all or most immigration is human trafficking, then what he's doing is trying to force you to defend human trafficking if you want to defend immigration.
This is all just a game to him because he doesn't give a shit about the underlying issues that he covers, just how the feelings around those subjects can be used to create the world he wants to live in, which is one where he feels that society is built around his desires and preferences, which he believes is his birthright as a straight white Christian.
Oh, all the big new administration officials are announcing that indeed they're going to be prosecuting not just the low-level human smugglers, but the NGOs, the non-profits, the for-profits, and the Biden administration officials.
Like...
Alejandro Mayorkas and others.
But in response, they're all scrambling around asking for blanket, total, open-ended pardons like Hunter Biden just got.
So we'll get into what the actual officials in question are when Alex covers this, but it's been a while since we did an episode, so I wanted to touch back on the subject of Trump's administration picks and how bad they are.
Even Alex should be against a fair number of them.
There were a few that were announced before we went on break, like Matt Gates as the Attorney General.
Alex should have been opposed to that given the credible accusations of sex crimes against him, but Alex's concern about those issues isn't sincere, so he was all for Gates.
Then Gates dropped out after it was becoming clear that he was in some deep shit, and he was replaced by former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Alex has liked her enough in the past, so that's not a huge issue for him.
Trump chose Marco Rubio as Secretary of State, which Alex should be fucking furious about.
In the past, Rubio has consistently been characterized as an anti-gun, open-borders globalist, so Trump picking him should be a huge red flag, particularly for that important of a role.
Then there's Pete Hegseth at the Department of Defense.
Hegseth has been a Fox News host for the last decade, but before that he ran a group called Vets for Freedom.
That was a group with ties to noted arch-globalist Bill Kristol, but for the most part Hegseth is the kind of character that Alex likes, so that association isn't important.
Also not important are the credible accusations of sex crimes against Hegseth and the letter his mother wrote him about how he was a piece of shit.
But he's been a Trump fan, Fox News host for 10 years, so put him in charge of the military, I guess.
Who cares?
And then we have some entirely insane picks that Alex would be fine with but are completely unacceptable, like Dr. Oz being chosen to lead the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or RFK Jr. being chosen as the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
And you have Elon and Vivek heading the new meme bait organization called the Department for Government Efficiency, which is a thinly veiled propaganda mouthpiece to enable vast privatization of government functions.
Tulsi Gabbard was chosen as the director of national intelligence, which is a bad pick because she sucks generally, but is a serious issue because in the past she's amplified deceptive anti-Ukraine narratives and has been very friendly with Syrian President Assad, going so far as to not take formal procedures to set up a meeting with him in 2017, a time when she was in Congress.
Beyond that, she has close ties with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Hindu nationalist movement that his government is a part of.
She's a horrible pick, but Alex loves her, so he should be cool with it.
Susie Wiles was chosen as the Chief of Staff, which is great for Alex because she's an old-time Roger Stone associate.
No problems there.
The same is kind of true of a lot of these other picks, like Elise Stefanik for UN Ambassador, Tom Holman for Border Czar, and Kristi Noem for Homeland Security.
One that he should be a little concerned about, maybe, is Linda McMahon, wife of deeply disgraced former WWE Chairman Vince McMahon, being chosen for Secretary of Education.
Her husband is an almost comically disgusting criminal, and she's alleged to have been complicit in a number of his schemes, including the steroids controversy of the late 80s.
A lot of these issues can be better covered elsewhere, but if you're a McMahon, I think you're unqualified to be anywhere near a seat of power.
Putting Linda McMahon in charge of the Department of Education is essentially a parody of government, but she's a Trump fan, so Alex doesn't have a problem.
And then there's Kash Patel being nominated for FBI director.
He's a Q-leaning weirdo, but he's a Trump supporter, and he's a right-wing ding-dong, so that's cool.
The ways that the justice system could be abused against Hunter, I think maybe if you're his dad, you might want to be like, I'm going to bend the rules for you because otherwise you're fucked.
Yesterday, I got particularly prepared for the show.
I mean, I probably prepared six, seven hours yesterday.
And then I did an hour on the biggest news.
And then I just, I hit a wall.
And this doesn't happen very often.
Where I've done so much preparation.
And it would take probably five hours to cover it all that I just, every once in a while, I just go like Robbie the Robot when he has too much information.
Cannot compute, cannot compute, smoke coming out of my ears.
But I'm refocused, prepared.
I don't just have all the other news I didn't get to yesterday that I prepared for.
I prepared a lot for all this other stuff.
So I've cleared the deck of guests.
I may take calls, but it won't be to the third or fourth hour.
Because I need to cover all of this.
And again, the problem is each article I can do an hour on easily.
Because it's full depth understanding of something that really gives us victory.
I mean, like this story I've had since Friday that I meant to cover.
And it didn't cover Friday, didn't cover Saturday, didn't cover Sunday.
It's so spectacular.
The U.S. government came out and admitted basically to all their weather control.
To stop other countries from attacking us with it and keeping other people from being able to do it individually or through a business, a corporation.
And, I mean, you talk about a deep dive.
I mean, this is...
Beyond geoengineering, beyond terraforming, beyond just what's going on there and how massive that is, the fact that they're coming out with it, why is that?
Alex is trying to express that he has too deep of an understanding of the news to cover it in a way that your idiot brain could grasp without taking five hours.
He wants to sound wise and enlightened, but if you have any experience watching his show critically, all he's saying is that he can't focus.
For example, he wants to talk about this story where the U.S. government had admitted that they have weather weapons, but on Infowars, that's not news.
In any other context, a person could cover that story as a big deal, but for Alex, he's reported that the U.S. government admitted to having weather weapons like a thousand times in the past, so this has no impact.
So what if the government admitted to having weather weapons again?
Because he's already pretended to cover this story, he instinctually knows that he needs an angle on it, which is where all this dancing is coming from.
He tries to connect every possible dot he has in his head because he wants to distract the audience from realizing there's no substance to any of this.
And he's already reported this story a bunch of times in the past, and he's never proven shit.
In an effort to create the illusion of having too much to say about a subject, Alex Free associates whatever he can think of that sort of connects.
Like, in this case, maybe it's not a story about the government admitting to what it's like.
You don't need any actual information to do coverage like this, and you don't even really need to read the articles you're covering.
Alex's real skill is in that ability to free associate stuff that kind of sounds like he knows what he's talking about if you only pay half attention.
So he can basically do this shit in his sleep.
The problem is that even a master of this game can't hit every time when he gets up to bat.
Sometimes he's just not feeling it or the riff doesn't come together properly in his head.
In those cases, Alex can pretend to be overwhelmed by how much information he has in his head and have a meta blow up about how he's too smart and informed like he must have.
I wonder what that actual underlying story is about a weather agency.
Yesterday, I spent about an hour just reading that and printing documents and thinking about it, and I wrote more than 30 notes just about it, and each note would take five minutes.
So every episode, I could probably rant for a couple extra hours about stupid thoughts I have about how dumb Alex is or how I'm mad about some really niche concern, but I don't because I prepare for the show.
There's a lot of information in my head, oftentimes that connect in some ways to subjects that we're talking about, but for the most part, I don't suffer from this brain pain that Alex does because I do a little bit more than skim- I do things that facilitate that.
I read articles and bills when necessary and seek out context so I can understand the things that we're covering in order to convey a point.
Conversely, Alex's goal is to create exciting entertainment that makes his audience mad at vulnerable populations in society, so he has no reason to actually cover a point.
He's just that Jesus lizard running across the surface of the pond, and if he takes time to explore anything, the momentum gets lost and he falls in the water.
He has 30-something stacks of paper in front of him, so his point better be some good shit that he's dancing around avoiding getting to.
And I get why a lot of people don't want to know about reality, because it's complex, and it's wild, and the deeper you get into it, the more deep it gets, and the more you want to know, and woo, it's wild!
And it's fulfilling!
But it's like sometimes, it's like driving in a race car, 250 miles an hour, it's like...
Alex has 30 odd stacks of prop paper on his desk, but it's not really doing him much good here because he can't figure out what he wants to cover.
He doesn't know really anything about the stories, the headlines that he's seeing, and likely they're just not inspiring him towards an easy path.
So instead of just picking one and diving into it, Alex has descended into a meta-commentary about what it's like to have to choose from so many amazing stories that you could cover.
This is a fraud.
If Alex is being sincere, then I'm supposed to believe that he spent hours preparing these stories, and now that he's on air, he can't choose one to start with because he's too prepared, and they're all so huge.
This implies that if he covers one story, he won't be able to cover the others, and what if the other ones are actually bigger news?
Can he live with himself if he covers one bombshell, but in the process, forgets to cover three others?
This is dumb, because Alex has unlimited airtime, and can cover whatever the fuck he wants for however long he wants.
He has theoretical radio commercial breaks, but he skips those all the time, and there's nothing stopping him from keeping the show going as long as he wants on his own streams.
He doesn't do that because the news he has to cover actually isn't important, but it's important that he make it feel super important.
The show isn't about the stories he's covering, it's about how important his stories are, and that feeling is created by doing this whole game about how he can't get to anything because it's all too massive.
This is all bullshit, and if Alex wanted to, he could judiciously prepare and do dry coverage of any story that he wants on his show.
But he knows that if he did that, there would be no substance there, and he'd bore the shit out of the audience.
But I guess now that we've switched from this huge news about weather weapons to some huge news about martial law plan, like...
This is also not news to Alex's audience.
He's been yelling about Rex 84 since before Chase was born.
So I'm just sitting here waiting when Trump gets in, and they're going to have white supremacists mow down a bunch of migrants to set up Tom Homan and Trump and all of us.
This is a big deal.
And all of this is a big deal.
Y 'all like the U.S. government's going to create a weather control bureau.
I still have no idea what this weather weapon story is, but now we have a story about Democratic senators wanting to limit Trump's ability to use the military as a domestic police force.
And Alex is against that.
Alex, the king of posse comitatus, supports a president using the military as a domestic police force.
I get that he has this dumb false flag racism angle that he pretends justifies having that position, but that's fucking insane.
The premise of Alex's entire career is built on the opposition to the feds, and the inciting incidents of the Patriot movement that he's made millions off of were things like Ruby Ridge and Waco, where federal forces were used against civilians in a way that Alex and his cohorts believed violated the Posse Comitatus Act.
There was no principle here to begin with.
It was just marketing and branding, and it's important to understand.
The story here is that Elizabeth Warren and Richard Blumenthal wrote a letter to Biden asking that he put out a policy statement that clarified how the president could use the U.S. military and the domestic police force in times like when the governors asked for help.
You know, stuff like federalizing the National Guard with the governor's permission.
They were concerned because Trump has said repeatedly that he wants to use the U.S. government for domestic policing in terms of things like mass deportations and dealing with the radical left.
He's been pretty clear about his intent, so Warren and Blumenthal wanted Biden to say, hey, not cool, before leaving office, knowing fully well that Trump wouldn't be bound by that, and he could reverse Biden's directive the second he was inaugurated.
I would understand Alex being against Warren and Blumenthal's letter because they were asking Biden to just assert things that are already law.
It's kind of a waste and it doesn't really change anything.
So it ultimately comes down to like an optics thing or making it look bad when Trump goes back on it or whatever.
I would accept that Alex has that kind of a problem, except like 20 percent of his political activism before Trump came around.
Like he was trying to get state governments to assert already established laws, like saying the secularists.
His career was built on empty performative gestures, so I'm left with little choice but to believe that Alex is mad about this because he wants Trump to use the U.S. military as a domestic police force.
He's never believed in posse comitatus.
He just doesn't want the Yeah, yeah, it is fascinating to me, this part.
Because from what I know of military members and the people that I've met and talked to and their experiences, is that they are infinitely more interested in the Constitution than the regular police.
So I kind of, and in fact I would make a very large bet that if they made the military a domestic police force, we would have a more constitutional police force than the one we currently have.
Well, I mean, on some level you could make the argument that, you know, obviously police forces have already militarized and, you know, they have access to a lot of...
And just because he has his notion of, like, oh, the left is gonna do false flags and make Trump use the military on the public, and then they'll make him look bad for doing it.
You've got exactly what we called for, exactly what I was told was going on.
The new borders are Tom Homan saying, I'll play the clip coming up.
That they are going to criminally not just go after the NGOs, not just go after the human traffickers at the ground level, where the rubber meets the road, at the tire asphalt level.
That's important.
But they're gonna go after the NGOs and the for-profits and the State Department and Alejandro Mayorky I I don't normally revel in things, but I really don't like these people.
One builds strength and beauty and honor and life and power and success.
The other, destruction and death and betrayal.
But there are ways you can do things.
And see, good people don't really have knowledge of evil.
Which you can say is good at one level, because when no one has knowledge of it, no one does it.
And you just operate on as God designed you.
But since evil's been introduced and evil systems developed and set up as perpetual motion machines, we need to stop being naive and face the horror.
If you want to dismantle the horror.
You don't make a friend of horror, as Colonel Kurt says in Apocalypse Now.
You make it your mortal enemy so that you can know it, but then understand it and put yourself in its shoes, in its boots, so you can understand why it's doing it, because killing people is just part of it.
In the real world, Alex is just a delusional bullshit artist who's stumbled onto a really profitable game where he pretends that his enemies are cartoon villains and literal demons, and he rambles to his audience about what he would imagine they would do and how scary their imaginary plans are.
And then he points at large stacks of paper and headlines of articles he hasn't read as props to trick idiots into thinking that his insane ravings are based on some kind of information or research.
Alex doesn't have a study that all new cases of childhood myocarditis are caused by the COVID vaccine, but I guess we'll get to that after he covers the big weather weapon news or whatever.
Without him providing any context for what he's talking about with this study, I'd like to propose a suggestion for how it might be possible for there to be some numbers that incidences of myocarditis could be higher among vaccinated children than unvaccinated children.
I'm not saying this is the case, and I'm relying on no data to back this up, but here's a spitball.
It would stand to reason the children whose parents got them vaccinated are more trusting of the medical system and doctors in general.
Not every case of myocarditis is captured by data, and in most cases it's self-resolving.
If you were a child whose parents were strongly distrustful of doctors, It's possible that you could have a case of myocarditis that your parents just thought was exhaustion and they just told you to go lay down.
You never got diagnosed and you just moved on with your life.
Not all cases are severe, but parents who have more trust and openness with the medical system might be more likely to take their kid in to get their symptoms checked out and that would lead to a diagnosis of myocarditis which would have otherwise been missed.
I don't know if this is the case, but I'm using this as an illustration to show that even if Alex had some numbers that myocarditis cases were higher in vaccinated children than unvaccinated children, there could be another explanation for that data that calls into question the causal relationship between the vaccine and the myocarditis.
Also, I was lying.
I did look into this, and Alex is totally wrong.
And if you get COVID, you're much more likely to experience myocarditis from getting that than you are from the vaccine.
Incidentally, on December 1st, a fake story about a UK study finding that 1.7 million children got heart defects from the vaccine that was circulating all over dipshit social media.
Alex just saw a random post on Twitter.
He's pretending he's some kind of a sleuth.
He's got a big COVID bombshell.
But the point I want to stress is that even if Alex weren't just skimming social media and yelling about how mad he is about fake shit he saw there, even if there was a statistically higher incidence of myocarditis in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children, his conclusion's still not earned.
It's still not worthwhile even if he wasn't lying.
So this, what Alex says there at the beginning, though, I think that's actually probably...
For sure.
What he hears from listeners.
He says that he's most convincing when he just keeps going.
Oh, yeah.
Because they're describing him wearing them out.
Unless you're putting a ton of effort and attention into it, the human brain isn't designed to take in information the way Alex conveys it.
He rattles off a ton of bullshit and jumps from topic to topic so frequently that a passive listener would have very little chance of even keeping up with what he's saying from moment to moment.
It's a bad way to convey information where it matters if what you're saying is true or not because it's meant to overwhelm your critical thinking skills.
However, it's very good as an emotional trigger where Alex rants and then he just keeps going, bringing up emotionally painful shit and fake crying and describing snuff films and that's where he can get you.
He could never win an actual information and fact-based debate, but he can do a hell of a tent revival speech.
And those are dependent on momentum and inertia.
You have to keep going, which is why Alex likely hears from listeners frequently that his long-winded free association rambling was what gave them the They Live Glasses experience.
His manipulation of their emotions overtook their interest in critically assessing the And poof!
The reason I'm so successful at getting corporations and governments to listen to me that aren't committed to evil, and the bad guys listen to us, they already know all this, they're just not paying attention.
They get distracted.
My job.
Is to get people back on target.
What are the bad guys planning?
What have they signaled?
What have they telegraphed?
So that we're waiting for them when they try it.
Or the bad guys get smart and run up that white flag.
Which I'm seeing a lot more of.
And so instead of getting depressed, just focusing on the evil, I have prayed about it.
I've decided to be very happy and appreciate the victories we're having.
And that's why I'm...
Probably going too far the other way and having a little bit of reveling and shortening.
So, if you think this show, exposing the enemy's next moves and winning is important, I humbly ask you to do the right thing, get incredible products, and keep us on the air.
So you need to go to the AlexJonesStore.com, not owned by me, not Infowars, no matter what happens to Infowars, the attempt to shut down, this will continue on.
So what Alex said there at the beginning about why he's successful is such a wild distortion of reality, and it's meant solely to bolster Alex's self-image.
He talks a ton of ridiculous shit on the show, and that makes it so the patriots are ready when the globalists arrive to carry out their plans, or if those plans never actually come into effect, that's because Alex's shit-talking stopped them from doing the thing that they were totally going to do.
There's no fail state in Alex's shit talk.
In effect, he's created a perfect self-reinforcing profit simulator.
Nothing that happens can prove that he was wrong.
And great!
That's a lot of fun.
But, I mean, where's the globalist proboscis right now?
And it's gotten much worse and is now out in the open.
With almost no resistance to it other than conspiracy theorists like Alex Jones and Kash Patel.
Yeah, Kash Patel was the deputy head of one of the most important intelligence agencies.
Oh, but he's a conspiracy theorist about releasing the Epstein list that they admit they have, they won't release?
That's not a conspiracy theory.
Or going after the NGOs that did the record-level human trafficking here in America?
Or Tom Homan saying, we're going after the NGOs, the UN, and the administration operatives?
Yes, yes, yes.
And if they just do that, because the Globals are coming after us anyways, and I say that to people in government, that are not bad people, they're like, if we really do this, the public can't handle it.
So you have to really take a step back to fully appreciate how much of a child Alex really is.
Like, this is a 50-year-old man sounding like a middle schooler arguing at recess.
It's fascinating that anybody could hear a fully grown adult talk like this and not really start to worry that they're listening to an idiot.
At the beginning of that clip, Alex was lamenting that the only people who are actually talking about sex trafficking are people like himself and Kash Patel, who then get branded as conspiracy theorists.
This isn't true on any level, but I can explain what is happening here.
Serious people and organizations are and have been doing difficult work against human trafficking.
It's a real problem and there are real people fighting against it.
However, since 2015, it's become a bit of an obsession for the conspiracy theorist communities in a deeply unhealthy way.
Pizzagate was one of the first high-profile flare-ups of this since the last Satanic Panic, and that really demonstrated to a lot of shitty people how powerful and profitable it could be to sensationalize stories about crimes against children.
Since then, right-wing social media has essentially been a carousel of nonsense human trafficking panics, like when they thought that Wayfair was selling kidnapped kids on their website.
This particular segment of the conspiracy world has an impossible standard, where they demand that the authorities play these games with them.
Unless the Department of Justice arrests all the pizza shop owners in D.C. and shuts down Wayfair, then they must not really be taking the issue of human trafficking seriously.
Folks like Alex and Kash Patel are able to exploit this mentality, promising to take these concerns seriously, and in the process, normal people rightly come to view them as conspiracy theorists.
Over time, this community has become more and more loud, particularly in comparison to people doing actual work against human trafficking.
Alex and all his shithead friends couldn't stop tripping over their own feet trying to promote the sound of freedom.
But don't say a goddamn word about any of the actual on-the-ground organizations trying to provide resources and safety to people who are trying to flee dangerous, exploitative situations.
They aren't interested in actually addressing human trafficking, its causes, and its reality, but...
It's that voice that's the loudest, and it won't be satisfied unless we all get into addressing...
Enochrome conspiracies and all that other stupid shit.
And so, in the real world, there are these people fighting human trafficking, but their efforts will never be enough unless they take the insane fantasies of idiots seriously.
This makes it appear like the only people talking about human trafficking, they end up getting called conspiracy theorists because the conspiracy dipshits are super loud and they're not helping anyone, so they often get told to please just shut up.
And so that's why that perception exists, which is what Alex is actually describing when he talks about how him and Kash Patel are the only people who are talking about this, and they get branded conspiracy theorists.
That's not true, but that's the dynamic that's underneath it.
Because I need to scan through it some more before I get to it.
I mean, we already know everything in it.
Because we already know this up one side and down the other, but this is a big step towards putting Bill Gates and Fauci and Peter Daszak and the rest of them in prison if they're lucky.
If you go through their hearings, you'll notice that they weren't really so much an investigative body as much as they were a government-funded publicity stunt, or as Alex might call it, a show trial.
I don't know how anybody could ever claim there's a slow news day.
It's the opposite.
I'm like a guy that loves steak, and there's like a hundred perfectly cooked, delicious, mouth-watering ribeyes, porterhouses, New York strips sizzling in front of me, ready to be gobbled.
But at the end of the day, I'm like, wow, how am I going to eat all this?
Because I really, you know, I just want to eat one.
I want to eat like a 25-ounce ribeye.
Or maybe a 30-ounce porterhouse.
And I, because, you know, this is all coffin nails in the water.
This is what it looks like when they are in free fall collapse.
But at the same time, I did pretty good.
I took a few deep breaths at the start of the show, I told you, and I did a good job.
He already made the exact same simile earlier in the show when he said there's all these beautiful women in front of you and you got a day to fuck all of them or whatever he's saying.
He's already done this exact same thought path, and now he's just rambling about steaks.
So we still have no idea what the stupid weather weapon story is that he started the show off with, and in the intervening time, we've mostly just got stream of consciousness bullshit about human trafficking and how highly Alex thinks of himself.
And now, we've looped all the way back to him insisting that the problem is he's got too many juicy stories in front of him.
If I say nothing else, I will say that this act is unconvincing.
Also, that report that he's talking about, the 600-page one, it wasn't put out by the Senate, it was put out by the House, which Alex should know, because his idiot friend Marjorie was a part of it.
By the way, I'm not doing this to be dramatic right now.
I've still got such a big adrenaline, endorphin rush.
I would imagine if Star Wars was real, you know, when they're, see the Death Star blow up, 10 seconds before they get blown up, imagine, I think you'd kind of get a little high for a minute.
I mean, this is like, Death Stars, Death Stars.
It's like, oh, oh.
And then I start thinking, extrapolating out what that means, and I'm just like, oh, oh.
And also what I'm doing is usually I look at the stack and I already have this big database of info I want to go over, and then now I just got off into this high-as-a-kite thing, and I'm only on coffee and water and haven't even eaten a day.
And I'm not a hard drug user.
I can't really say.
I'm high right now.
High on life.
High on victory.
High on the excitement of being a man in the arena.
Engaged with all these other men and women in the arena.
Okay, so if I'm teaching, my wife's a teacher, and she's alright, so she doesn't do book reports, but imagine I'm doing a book report, and I have a student who's trying to filibuster all the way to the bell, and he reaches the bell, and he goes, ha ha, suckers, gives me a little salute and walks out.
I'm just saying, like, we're doing this next period.
The next time you come into this classroom, you are going to continue going.
Because even a kid, I think, would be embarrassed by, like, this is what you look like when you're wasting this time and not getting the assignment done.
Quote, he has endeavored to prevent the population of these states for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners, refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising conditions for new appropriations of lands.
The writers of the Declaration of Independence were mad that the king was preventing immigration to the colonies, mostly because he didn't want a population drained from England.
The colonists wanted more immigration, Alex wants less, but they do come together in their desire for the immigrants to be white.
Their definition of white would probably be a bit different, though, but let's not get bogged down.
It's an amazing thing for Alex to say that the Declaration of Independence is mostly about controlling illegal aliens.
You have to really think that your audience is stupid or really racist to feel comfortable saying something like that.
Also, while we're on the subject, why did Eisenhower do what he did exactly?
When he sent federal troops into Arkansas, why was that?
It's because the Supreme Court had ruled that public schools had to be desegregated, and the governor of Arkansas was trying to use the National Guard to score political points by blocking black students from entering Central High School in Little Rock.
This was for the 1957-58 school year, and black students were allowed to go to public schools thanks to the federal government, stopping the governor from stopping them.
And then the governor, Orville Forbus, just closed Little Rock high schools for the next school year.
I'll tell you what, the fact that no one got a free public education that year certainly didn't help bring people together.
Anyway, Alex would absolutely not have supported Eisenhower's actions at the time, and most of his intellectual and political inspirations were directly on the side fighting for segregation.
Most of his heroes are John Birch Society weirdos who had a fair amount of overlap with the George Wallace supporters and his campaign staff, so this is a load of bullshit.
They're going to have Democrat governors, Newsom's already said this, even secede.
And by the way, I talked, I didn't break this last week because I wanted to make some more calls.
I talked to some folks in Silicon Valley that are well-placed, and they told me specifically about mayors and city councils that they've been in the meetings with, that have been in the meetings with Newsom, where they are planning to basically have California secede.
They won't call it that, but that's what it'll be in the fine print.
But does that mean, like, when they get sued by somebody for being too much a part of the United States, they'll be like, ah-ha-ha, we seceded, actually.
The people listening are not going to be better...
For the rest of us, if they have a cursory surface-level understanding, if they have no understanding of anything but noises, that's probably for the better.
So, I think that if you can competently deal with sound, what you're saying is that the emotions your sounds evoke are true to what you're trying to grunt out.
I mean, no, that's fair, but see, I'm just saying that once you can control the weather, there's no legality or illegality that's going to stop man from getting crazy with it.
Alex is so close to getting that the sample he's generalizing on with his kids, they all have one thing in common, and that is that their dad is a fragile-ass chauvinist who clings desperately to the way that he publicly demonstrates his masculinity.
Maybe in that scenario, his son would be discouraged from embracing anything that his angry father considered feminine, whereas his daughters would be encouraged to respect and revere traditionally masculine things.
Maybe he's laying out an amazing case that his influence is driving his children away from valuing feminine things.
So the California Attorney General put out a press release that did warn holiday shoppers that they are welcome to report stores that don't have gender-neutral children's sections.
This isn't because of some woke agenda or anything, though.
If you read the press release, this is part of AB1287, which banned businesses from engaging in what they call a, quote, pink tea.
This is the practice of taking identical products and marketing one to women at a higher rate, which you do see a lot if you pay attention.
As an extension of this bill, they passed AB1084, which required department stores to have gender-neutral children's departments so consumers could more easily identify instances of these price differences.