In this installment, Dan and Jordan check in to see the fallout of the big Elon/Trump interview, which is mostly telling stories about people giving him money at cafes, being disgusting while misreporting stories involving migrant crime, and once again cracking the Trump assassination plot wide open.
You know, when it's Elon Musk interviewing Trump for two hours, if your average viewing is an hour, then it's people who did not watch the whole thing.
So what Alex is saying is based on Elon tweeting, quote, combined views of the conversation with Donald Trump and subsequent discussion by other accounts now around 1 billion.
This is a very deceptive stat, and it's being used by Alex to pretend that a billion people watched this interview.
The tweet that Elon is basing his statement on is from the company he owns, saying, quote, Between 7.47 p.m. and 10.47 p.m. Eastern, President Donald Trump's post received 73 million views.
During this same period, there were 4 million posts about Elon Musk and President Trump's conversation on X, generating a total of 998 million views.
To me, that sounds like people talking shit about your conversation got way, way more views than the conversation itself, but that's probably a bad way to market this in hindsight, especially when it was so fucking boring.
But you'd think for, like, in a vacuum, these are two of the most powerful, or like...
Not powerful.
I mean, like, individuals with agency.
You know, like, Biden is the president, and he's very powerful, but he's got all these, like, hurdles to, like, before he can actually press a button or whatever.
Elon Musk is ostensibly able to press any button he wants.
Very rarely does anything he posts on band.video get a million views, and a ton of the shows on there, other than his, they routinely get under 10,000, which is bad numbers for how popular he claims to be.
I guess he's talking probably about his Twitter feed, but that's not accurate about his numbers there either.
He has 2.7 million followers, but when he posts the feeds to his show, they end up getting like 100,000 views, and that's not even how many people watched it.
That's how many people saw the tweet with a link to the feed in it.
For instance, his show for Friday's link, his live show link on that, got 93,000 views on Twitter and only 753 likes.
The engagement there is not really high.
Alex is massively overstating his reach and popularity, and this is an issue that being back on Twitter has really exacerbated.
He's always lied about how many radio stations he's on and stuff like that, but the immediate feedback of social media and the ability to spam posts and interact with other popular accounts is really something that he's gotten lost in.
So imagine what that means, that CNN has thousands of employees.
It's well over 1,000 still, even though they're downsized.
And contractors.
I mean, just CNN in the U.S., I think International's even bigger.
Guys, look up how many employees CNN globally has.
And I know it's thousands.
So, big, huge buildings all over the world, thousands of employees, hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of writers and reporters, and their top shows might hit a million.
Put that in context, Lou Dobbs would have 15 million viewers back in his heyday on CNN.
Of course, he ran CNN, too.
He wasn't just the top host.
So he knew what to do programming-wise.
He had debates, liberal and conservative, and libertarian.
But I digress.
What I'm saying here is, when you have weekend at Bernie's and you're kind of carrying a dead body around, people finally figure out it's a dead body.
Well, the corporate media has been dead for a long time.
So Dobbs had a long history at CNN prior to this, and it's pretty difficult to figure out exactly how many viewers he had in the distant past, but from a number of sources I was able to find, it's generous to say that he would have, like, half a million viewers.
But Alex is pretending that things are still the same, kind of, and judging these people by those standards, but himself and everyone around his orbit by completely different standards.
Also, let's not forget that before the attempted assassination of Trump, Alex launched his new storyline that the system was trying to take him off the air because he was free from his bankruptcy now and he was too close to the truth on Sandy Hook.
The fact that he knew the real conspiracy was supposed to be why he was still their big target, but then someone shot at Trump, and the story promptly changed to the globalists wanted me off the air because I was warning that they were going to kill Trump.
If you pay attention to his show and imagine that reality has any continuity, this defensive-ass shit shouldn't be Alex's position on Sandy Hook.
This was his safe, damage-control position, which he very publicly abandoned until Trump's attempted assassination sucked up all the attention and gave him a better story to run with.
So rightly understood, Alex is saying that his career, pretending to have any meaning, has been dead since 2016, and he's just been a bizarre PR machine for Trump ever since.
When he asks Joe Rogan why he would care about CNN, what he's really doing is wrestling with the same question inside himself.
If everything Alex is saying were true, why would he spend the first 20 minutes of his show rambling about how popular he is and how his enemies have no viewers?
According to Alex, he's in an information war and his enemy has been dead for eight years.
If you believe him, he lost to a dead enemy in 2020.
I think there's something really interesting that's going on here, and that I think that Alex feels the need to escalate somehow these stories that he tells about how much people love him, because it was like, you know, people would pat him on the back instead of yelling at him for a while, but that's not satisfying.
Now people have to be like, I was wrong to hate you.
And they have to get his check.
And then now we've escalated to just giving him money on the street randomly.
If he doesn't face consequences for long enough, I think it's possible that he may gaslight us all into believing that we're in his lucid dream where whatever he says is true will wind up happening.
I don't even know how to describe somebody saying that people are coming up to them in three different restaurants giving him a crisp $100 bill.
Yesterday, or two days ago, I was in there at like 8 a.m. with my sister and my youngest daughter eating breakfast.
And he just comes over and says, hey, I love you, love the work you do.
He knows my parents.
That's Rocky Erickson's brother, a well-known musician.
Really nice guy.
He goes, you know, am I trying to dox him?
He doesn't mind anything.
He's a listener.
I know my parents have told me that, but the point is, you know, it's just one of the people who gave me $100.
And I don't look at that as like, oh, look, I've got $100.
Aren't I lucky?
The point is, they've tried to make me the biggest devil on earth.
So this billion-plus viewers and listeners of the X spaces with Trump and Musk last night, and the fact that I've been in a restaurant three times this week, the last seven days, and every time I'm giving a $100 bill, it's like magic.
It's like Lucky Charms or something.
It just shows that they've done everything they can to destroy me and demonize me and say I'm all these horrible things that I'm not.
I think maybe that there's some sort of involuntary bullshit reaction that all of us secretly have, where if it gets bad enough, if you spit out enough bullshit in a short enough period of time, your throat literally just clogs for a second.
I was out in San Francisco on business and covering Bohemian Grove a month ago, as you know, when Trump got shot.
And I mean, I'm in the middle of wine country and people on a farm renting a house and people are running out of the bushes that live three doors down that saw me on air and could tell the topography and knew I was there.
You know, I mean, I go at a gas station.
A grocery store.
Almost everybody's a listener.
San Francisco Airport.
Nothing but love except one guy got in my face.
And then literally three people right there getting on the plane go, we love you, we think you're great.
And the guy literally started crying that was calling me a scumbag.
Because he was like, what?
Because he's like, you gotta be ashamed of yourself.
We don't have to worry about watching Miracle on 35th Street in Austin, Texas, where Alex is also Santa Claus and Jesus and the little girl at the same fucking time.
I don't have much news to cover, but just morale-wise, I want people to understand something.
It's not fun fighting these people.
And I got the devil coming after me in other ways.
That's how the devil comes after you.
And, you know, I'm going through major stuff that I don't even spend time on air about.
But I want everybody to realize that...
I'm getting 99.9% love.
I go munch without anybody getting in my face, anybody attacking me.
And when Trump first got elected, if I was walking the dog, the dog died.
About a year after Trump got elected, God, people said, you have a dog.
Well, I got so depressed when my 12-year-old captain, sweetheart, French Bulldog, he was so athletic, he'd jump like three feet in the air and grab frisbees, and he would run and jump over walls.
So there's a reason that I played all of this shit where he's just constantly talking about how much everyone loves him.
Part of it is because there's clearly a...
Lack of interest in talking about Trump and Elon all that much.
Outside of numbers.
And then the second is that Alex says something at the beginning of this clip that I think is really illuminating and helps understand the very disgusting stuff he says towards the end of the clip.
Things are only going to get worse if we don't get close to God.
And so we can't give up.
And look, so much good is happening.
And I'm telling myself that right now.
Remember, so much of the show, folks, is inner dialogue.
I'm being honest about that.
And I just talk about whatever I'm thinking.
That's why I start going off on something about the French Bulldog.
Because that's just where we are.
But the reason I got down yesterday is I look at all this stuff, and half the time I can't even cover it.
Because I've already watched the clips, I've already researched it, and it's like, I'm looking at Joe Biden, I'm looking at Yetting Yahoo, I'm looking at this...
These judge videos where you said migrants rape people.
That's the worst thing you can do.
20 months in jail.
That's the quote.
I have the video.
I mean, I got all the statistics.
They commit over 70% of the rapes in every European country.
They're absolute maniacs.
They come from countries where women all wear beekeeper suits.
And the only woman they've ever seen is their mama or their sister, who's probably their sister or their...
I'm not trying to be mean.
It's true.
I mean, the inbreeding is insane in those areas of Central Asia.
And then they ship in literal inbred cavemen.
And all they've seen online is hardcore porn.
And they've done surveys of the boat people coming in from Somalia and coming in from Afghanistan and Pakistan.
And they literally say, what are you coming for?
We're coming for the whores.
We're coming for the white women.
So imagine, they never even get to see women.
Women wear hoods, but they're watching porn.
And Germany's putting ads out that are seen, saying, come to Germany.
The women want to have sex with you.
I've played these TV shows.
They have them on children's TV for targeting 8- and 9-year-olds.
I've played the clip a lot.
Guys, I haven't played in like three years.
It's still on YouTube.
Just type in, German TV tells German teens to have sex with migrants.
And it says, this is Jenny.
She's 12, and she's having sex with a 22-year-old from Pakistan.
And then they say in German, you can come here and have sex with our...
But it's really helpful in terms of understanding Alex's content.
It's an internal monologue, and if you take it seriously as news, all you're doing is accepting Alex's twisted imagination as something that dictates reality.
The show is a conduit for Alex's feelings and him engaging in self-soothing techniques at the expense of the audience and the public as a whole.
He feels down and like no one appreciates him, so he spends half an hour ranting about how everyone loves him and gives him $100 bills at fucking cafes.
He hates people unlike himself, so he descends into grotesque coverage of nonsensical memes he's skimmed in order to demonize entire populations while pretending that he's researched any of this in order to justify that bigotry that he has and self-soothe, make himself, I'm not the bad guy.
This story about a judge giving someone 20 months in jail comes from a little clip that Alex saw online that's a bit of a fraud.
The clip shows a judge saying that he was being sentenced, and this guy said that the reason he was being sentenced was he didn't want to give his money going to, quote, immigrants who rape our kids and get priority.
However, the clip selectively removes the context that he didn't get in trouble for expressing that opinion.
This man, Jordan Parler, pled guilty, and the charge was the result of him inciting racial hatred, posting, quote, This context is really important because...
There's a difference between getting in legal trouble for expressing a viewpoint that's noxious but is based on where you want your tax money directed and getting in legal trouble for expressing explicitly public planning for racist violence.
Alex is conflating these two because he wants to excuse and justify racist violence and make you think, oh, it's this guy.
He just said that he doesn't like his tax money going to help migrants.
No, he was planning and explicitly the time.
It's hard to nail down exactly what Alex is talking about with Germany, but I think it's him lying about a sex education website that Germany published that was supposed to be for migrants.
I guess the point of it was to help with the cultural differences in terms of sex issues, but most people thought that the approach was a bit condescending and less helpful than it was intended to be.
Whatever it was, it's not what Alex is saying.
All of this is just rooted in classic racist tropes of they're coming for our women.
We've seen this play out over and over again throughout history, and if we were in a different generation, we would be hearing Alex argue and fix.
We were talking about some of the differences between us and how when I'm emotionally overwhelmed, I have a far harder time compartmentalizing it and leaving it where it needs to be.
So you might notice here that Alex doesn't know what the video is that they're playing on the B-roll, and it's not what he asked for.
They didn't find this German video about Boom Boom, but they did find a very low-budget video apparently put together by this group, the Wales Refugee Council.
I don't know how else to put this, but it's fucked up that Alex and his ilk respond to this video the way they do.
It's two young girls speaking to the camera delivering lines about how it can be hard to be a refugee and that Wales is welcoming and offers resources to help people become part of the community.
Many refugees are children or parents of children, and the experience of your child entering a new school is difficult, even if you aren't a refugee.
This kind of messaging is very helpful in a real way to families, but through Alex's eyes, it's somehow sexual.
These children aren't classmates that might befriend your kid.
They're objects that are being offered to these non-white immigrants as an incentive for them to come here.
I can't really begin to lay out how deeply fucked up this is for Alex, like how he sees this or discusses it.
But it's right in line with that inner monologue that he's spewing out on this episode.
I understand that there were some headlines and tweets about Trump slurring a bit during the interview, but is this really the place where Alex needs to be defensive?
Can you just ignore this one?
This seems sad.
He talked over a ton of the interview and was clearly bored by it, so maybe he should just move on instead of playing defense.
Incidentally, while we're on the subject of needing to pay for exposure and how CNN could never get a billion views without paying for it, this might be a good time to remind Alex that the only reason this interview was happening is because Elon Musk literally bought 20%.
This is part of why stuff sucks, and it's nobody's actual fault, right?
So if Elon had the infrastructure in place, the amount of employees necessary, the equipment, all of that stuff, for the interviewer to have gone off without a hitch, he's not going to get headlines of like, surprise, business does well, you know?
What's going to happen is he's going to hire a consultant who's going to be like, hey, you know what you could have done?
The only reason Alex even has a career is because he offered his show to radio stations free to air.
If he'd ever tried to negotiate a deal that wasn't you-can-have-it-at-no-expense-at-all, almost no stations would have ever aired him in the first place.
He wouldn't have been able to make a name for himself.
He never would have had his foot in the door.
I disagree with his point that if something is free, it must not be good, but it's a damning position for him to take about himself.
Also, if he's saying that something being free spread out widely must be money laundering, he might be saying more about himself than CNN.
That it could motivate somebody to be angry or violent.
That's hate speech.
So it's the definition they create.
So you got free speech under the law, except if we say it can hurt somebody.
Oh, you can't tell anybody that these Muslim men are literally in surveys, 90% saying, "I'm coming for the white women." Okay, so Alex's coverage here is based on a false premise because he's just reporting on a clip he saw out of context on Twitter.
That 77% number from Paris is interesting and possibly misleading.
This was about numbers from Paris in 2023.
28 out of the 36 people who were arrested for rapes that occurred in public spaces were of foreign nationality.
It's not specified what foreign nationality, but the most important part is that less than a third of reported cases were solved.
This is to say that 28 out of the 36 known offenders were of foreign nationality, but we don't know if that trend extends to the other two-thirds of the cases that the police haven't solved.
We have no idea about that information.
This isn't good, and there should be more being done to keep women safe and public from sexual assaults, obviously, but using a statistic like this, Fucking hell.
So, referencing a movie to make something relatable is something a cool teacher might do from time to time.
him so I kind of understand why Alex thinks like makes him look hip but you get to a certain point where you have to realize that most of what he thinks is history comes from movies not research or study or any of this bullshit that he tries to pretend also Alex mentions a machete murder in there and I think what he's talking about is something that happened last November but made its way through the court this summer to 12 year old boys were arrested for killing a 19 year old man with machetes in Wolverhampton and I know I probably mispronounced that and I
So because the two 12-year-olds are 12 years old, we don't know anything about who they are or identifying information, but we do know that the victim in that case was a migrant who recently come to the UK from Antigua.
So, like, I think that possibly some of this is what Alex is talking about, but because he never gets any details...
It's really hard to know what story he's talking about.
It's actually probably the case that he's talking about a different story, where an 18 and a 17-year-old guy were arrested for attacking a 14-year-old with a machete.
They were both charged with manslaughter, and one got a greater sentence while the other one was only sentenced to two years.
This guy who was sentenced to two years is named Lawson Natty, and the reason that he was given less time is spelled out really clearly in the court filing if you go look for it.
Quote, Okay, so there were also other people there who a jury was like, you weren't involved.
So Natty lived in the UK for a while, but was from Belgium.
This whole thing really comes down to a rap beef at the bottom of it.
The victim was part of a crew that made a diss track about Natty and his group, which went back and forth over time and then it escalated to violence.
The perpetrators were black youths and the victim was a white youth, so the story more or less writes itself for Alex, but it has no connection to reality.
Natty was up for early release at six months, primarily because he showed great remorse, wasn't directly involved in the manslaughter, was 17 at the time of attack, and in theory they must have seen some potential for rehabilitation in his case.
You can see how Alex has completely rewritten details of the stories that could be used to stir up racist feelings that he wants the audience to hold.
He riles that up, and the payoff to the whole thing is him doing an ad so they can pay to keep him in the fight, screaming racist nonsense that's just his inner monologue.
During the trial, one of the things I thought was really effective was when they'd play clips of Alex saying these horrible things about the families and shit, and then do an ad.
But I could give up like a horse that didn't get given water or food.
And I'm not bitching.
I'm saying I'm asking for aid.
I want to thank those that have given us aid in this war, but I'm asking all of you that sit there.
I mean, I had last night two and a half million conservatively new people on the show, and I got up this morning and checked the numbers, and they're like, yeah, boss, it wasn't a good day.
So the other thing, I just love this dynamic of like, I will never give up, but when I do, it's your fucking fault because you didn't give me anything.
I think, Alex, the whole career trajectory arc of pretending to talk about books and all of this really serious, deep globalist lore based on John Birch society nonsense to joylessly playing memes is really...
Yeah, I thought for the longest time that part of the sales pitch of this conservative movement, or at least the way I understood it in the early thousands, was...
If we win all the way, then we'll also get their fun stuff.
Then all their pop stars will have to do what we say now.
We'll get all the good stuff.
Right now, because we're not in power, we have Hulk Hogan.
But if we win, we're going to get whoever you want, right?
So you can see here how this clip that Alex has of the judge is selectively edited to make it appear like he's sentencing the guy to 20 months for his comments about migrants when in reality it was him inciting violence at a specific place at a specific time.
Alex and his ilk need to play fraudulent games like this because without that trickery there's no content for Alex's internal monologue.
It becomes pretty clear what's going on otherwise.
And it also becomes very clear, once you get him cold reading this story about rapes in France, how full of shit he is.
He has never read this story.
He just knows the headline works for him, and he's written his own version of it that the actual text doesn't live up to.
That actual story, if you go find it, is about 97 cases of reported rapes in public places in Paris in 2023.
But that number is disappointing to Alex.
So you can hear him in real time.
You listen to that clip, you hear him decide that it's 97,000.
The next bit of text in the article explains that two-thirds of these cases haven't been solved, but that 28 of the 36 individuals who were arrested for solved cases were of foreign origin.
That kind of context and detail really isn't working for Alex's narrative directions, so he just completely bails on trying to read the story and he asserts most of the cases are migrants.
If you're listening to Alex's show and you trust him, you'd have every reason to assume that they're...
There were a thousand times more rape cases in Paris than that story reports, and that it was all being done by migrants.
But if you pay attention, you can tell how this is just the internal monologue of a racist liar.
So Alex says 70-plus percent there, but the literal first line of the article he's pointing to says, quote, about 58% of men convicted in Sweden of rape and attempted rape over the past five years were born abroad, according to data from Swedish national television.
So where did the 70-plus number come from?
As always, it's Alex's imagination.
The last story had a 70 number in it, so he's applying it to this one, even though it's a completely made-up number.
This is an article from 2018, and these numbers are out of date and presented out of context, but you can see the direct lying that he's doing.
And as that video came out a month ago, they tried to block on X. You know where else you can get it.
Where this Muslim in Germany is stabbing and killing.
He killed people.
He's just stabbing white people.
And a white guy fights him, and the police run in and tackle him and are putting him in handcuffs and beating him while the Muslims still...
And then he comes over and kills the cop.
Bam, bam, bam, bam.
And the police went apeshit.
And they were arresting people that posted the video.
You're like, how dare you show a Muslim kill the cop?
The cop tried to help.
He tried to defend the Muslim, tried to let him carry out his jolly work.
But he was just trained.
Hey, German defending themselves?
Oh my God, it's because the government's raping you, and the one thing they can't have is you stand up, because if one ant stands up, they might all stand up.
For one thing, this happened at a specifically anti-Islam rally run by an extreme group called Pax Europa.
The main target of the stabbing was a keynote speaker at the event, Michael Sturzenberger, a man who believes he's fighting a counter-jihad and has a long-standing association with a number of...
white supremacist groups like Pegida.
Second, the police didn't try to defend the attacker.
In the scuffle that broke out, another bystander who was a refugee from Iraq tried to help restrain the attacker, and in the process was confused for the attacker and hit by someone which allowed the attacker to get loose.
The Iraqi man would later go on to say, I'm happy to help.
I live here.
I love Germany.
But him being confused of the attacker, since they're both migrants, allowed the attacker to escape, and he ended up stabbing a cop who had mistaken someone else for the attacker And he stabbed this cop who ended up dying from his wounds.
Anyway, the real story is a little bit different than what you hear on Infowars, but that makes sense because this is just one idiot's internal monologue pretending to be news.
So it makes sense that it wouldn't line up with...
I said on air, the day it happened, July 13th, they shot Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania.
And I said it a bunch of days after that.
We have the archivist pull up if you want.
I said, look for him to be handled by feds, to be going to D.C., and to be getting trained at federal installations or federally funded installations, and look for a Homeland Security connection to him, just like we saw with, remember, I didn't kill the kids at Sandy Hook, but people think that.
Adam Lanza had CIA-FBI connections.
Look it up.
And again, the same pattern happened again.
And Fox News has covered it.
Thomas Crooks trained at shooting range where multiple federal agencies reportedly trained, including DHS, visited the club 43 times, including holidays, since last year.
Attempted Trump assassin Thomas Crooks trained at the same gun range used by DHS.
This is about the shooter having visited the Clareton Sportsman Club outside of Pittsburgh.
It's a big gun range covering 180 acres of land with over 2,000 members.
When Alex sits back and asks himself how is it possible that he made such a great prediction again, it's because he never proves anything.
He can talk shit about this shooter being a fed, but this is all it takes for him to claim that he's been vindicated in his prediction, so it means nothing.
More importantly, in the days around and after the shooting, Alex was insistent that the globalists were going to blow up a black college or try to poison Trump.
So how good were these predictions really?
Oh, it came out that the NSA or the DHS has visited the same gun range that he went to.
What does that mean?
Everyone who's visited this place is probably a suspect then, right?
It would have to be.
All 2,000 members, we need to have a Congress investigate that.
Pretty interesting to me, because you have the very obvious the night before disappointment with the interview, and then the need to somehow salvage it.
So just bragging about the numbers, and then this turning into this internal struggle that he has of everyone loves me that becomes text.
The subtext becomes text.
When he says, this is just an internal monologue that I have, I just...
Totally.
And then it just descends into some of the most disgusting, Islamophobic, xenophobic, exploitative of sexual assault shit that I've heard on his show in quite a while.
Like, psychology of it, of, like, the massive disappointment, the hangover requiring him to be like, I am a good person, and then in order to justify how good a person he is, he has to claim that everybody else is a bad person.