In this installment, Dan and Jordan check in on Alex's return to studio to learn a bit more about his plan to sue the CIA and FBI, about how islands are growing, and about Roger Stone's predictions for the 2024 Democratic ticket.
My bright spot, we talked a little bit about it before, but the show, Fallout, really good.
Really good show.
You know, they get what people like about the games, and then they didn't do that thing where they're like, let's just only make people watch a bad version of the game.
Well, we've survived deep state attacks by the FBI, the CIA.
In coordination with the rest of the deep state, corporate media, PR firms, and Democratic Party law firms.
And it's all coming out in congressional hearings in the last few days.
And more hearings set specifically focusing on the revelations against Infowars.
And you would think that would be our top story today.
We have some big guests joining us to discuss that and so much more.
But we're going to table that for now because the big news is Iran has been working...
Very closely with the Democratic Party for a long time.
But even before that, it's been partially declassified that in the early 1980s, in 1979, 1980, 81, Iran doesn't work for the CIA, but the CIA clearly helped the Ayatollahs take control and take power over the Shah.
And so there's been a lot of cases where there's backroom deals made where Iran will attack at a key point for the deep state for political gain, and then the deep state will not launch.
Massive retaliatory strikes against Iran, and that gives Iran a lot of political power domestically.
And so with all the things happening to Biden and the globalist operations falling apart, they need a big political distraction.
They need an October surprise.
And here we are.
The CIA and the Defense Department are saying they believe in the next 48 hours...
Iran is going to attack Israel directly with its massive arsenal of missiles and other weapons.
The CIA was involved in overthrowing Mohammed Mosaddegh, the prime minister of Iran, in 1953.
Alex says that they helped the Ayatollahs overthrow the Shah, but the U.S. government was firmly behind the Shah.
In 1979, the Shah was overthrown, which led to the Islamic Republic of Iran forming.
But it's going to be a bit harder for Alex to prove that the CIA was involved in that one.
If he's just trying to abstractly say that the meddling in the 1953 coup had ripple effects that inadvertently led to the 1979 revolution, That's probably fair enough, but I think he's making a bit of a stronger claim here that I don't think he can back up.
When Alex says that Iran's been working with the Democratic Party, that's just about how Obama made the Iran nuclear deal, which Trump then pulled out of and Biden recommitted to.
That deal was originally made in 2015, but interestingly, if you go back through Alex's career, he used to be super opposed to sanctions against Iran because he was a Ron Paul guy.
Big numbers out how inflation is hurting Biden's progress on the economy LA Times.
You've got all these former top economists who are Democrats coming out saying, oh, inflation's terrible, Biden's terrible, but that's being done to maneuver him to step down sometime before or during the DNC this coming July.
Top economists, including Barack Obama's Treasury Secretary, discover the real inflation number under Biden reached 18% and is still hovering around 40-year high, and it's actually much higher than that.
So it's never enough for Alex to just accept something that looks like a win.
It's not enough that Biden's inflation number appears to be 18%.
It has to secretly be even higher than that.
So what's going on here is that Alex is taking the cumulative inflation number for the years Biden has been in office, which is admittedly high.
If you look at more specific month-over-month data, you can see that a lot of this is due to the pandemic and that things are trending in the right direction, but it's still not good.
I would dare say that anyone being in office during this time would have a terrible number on this front to deal with.
Something that I thought was interesting here, though, is that the headline for the LA Times article is not, quote, how inflation is hurting Biden's progress with the economy.
The headline is, quote, Why Biden is getting little credit for the economy, especially in California.
What Alex reads is, as best I can tell, a tweet that someone posted linking to that LA Times article.
Yeah, that is one of those things where it is like, you know, I understand that we have to care about the politicians that we have in office right now.
You know, that's really important.
But with stuff like inflation, we should all be able to, like, stop and go like, nah, dude, this is that guy from 20 years ago's fault.
Islands that climate change alarmists have said in the last 40 years would soon disappear due to rising sea levels have been found to have grown in size.
We're going to be looking at all of that information.
So if you look for the exact wording, he's just reading a tweet posted by Zero Hedge.
The Zero Hedge article links to an article published in the International Journal of Digital Earth titled, quote, Evolutionary Dynamics of Island Shoreline in the Context of Climate Change, Insights from Extensive Empirical Evidence.
This is a study about island shorelines.
And one of the reasons they end up saying that some islands, like those in Tuvalu, have grown in size is because of human-driven land reclamation efforts in response to climate change.
The study says that, quote, the data results suggest that sea level rise has not been a widespread cause of erosion for island shorelines in the studied region.
Presently, it's considered one of the contributing factors to shoreline erosion, but not the predominant one.
However, it's critical to understand the context of what they're saying.
This is from their conclusion.
Quote, As they had pointed out earlier,
quote, Through analysis of current data and consideration of future sea level rise scenarios, we believe that sea level rise will continue to pose a significant challenge to island communities.
So I guess when you just read the tweet, it kind of comes off like a dunk against climate change alarmists.
But when you actually look at the underlying actual information, it doesn't really work as well on that front.
Then, of course, we've got a lot of bizarre statements out of the White House and out of mainstream media concerning the death by cancer of O.J. Simpson.
We know from major studies.
That the so-called COVID vaccine, that's an mRNA gene therapy, has been causing massive increases in cancer, the accelerated growth of turbo cancers.
So I simply said, hey, he took the shot and he was dead.
He bragged about taking the boosters.
Poor buddy, you should take your shots.
We know the numbers are there that it is triggering massive increases of cancer.
And the corporate media weighed in and said, Jones is making it up, saying O.J. was killed by the shot.
I just pointed out that a lot of people are being killed by the shot, and that is a major indicator of it.
Powerful video that we're going to be playing coming up.
The great COVID cover-up.
Shocking truth about Wuhan and 16 federal agencies.
And that was Senator Rand Paul on with the Fox News host, Laura Ingram.
It's an excellent five-page article from Fox News.
And what are they talking about?
They're talking about this.
The New York Post is finally covering it.
Three years ago, a lot of these emails were already public, but now even more emails are public.
Whistleblower shares more COVID origin emails.
Fauci advisor allegedly concealed on private account House panel.
Now, we had emails less than a year into this.
This has been going on four years.
Plus, wow, it's hard to believe.
We had emails in late 2020.
So over three years ago, we've covered it at nauseam, from the EcoHealth Alliance, and a lot of that is because what Dr. Huff, who was the vice president of it, was giving it to Tom Renz and others, and later testified to Congress and others, that they were developing COVID-19 for the CIA and the Defense Department, and they were developing the vaccine before they ever released COVID.
It does seem like he was a computer guy, as a 2015 article from the University of Minnesota School of Public Health was celebrating a $4.6 million grant he'd won for EcoHealth Alliance, quote, to continue the development of the Global Rapid Identification Tool System, a software program that is designed to monitor early warning signals.
So all of this story is about a letter that Representative Brad Wenstrup sent to the associate director of the National Emerging Infectious Disease Laboratory Institute because they found reason to believe that a senior scientific advisor at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases may have used a personal email address to conduct.
Bastard.
Sure.
revelation of stuff that's in any of those emails, only that the representative is requesting them.
So we don't have a ton to go off of.
But hey, man, you know, if you're using the personal email address and people have requested those records and, you know...
Sure.
It's not to say that there's anything in them that's damning.
They're not going to take the couch now, because Alex is going to sue the CIA and the FBI, and it's going to come out that they were behind everything.
And he's been trying to get some inroads, trying to figure out if he should do this.
And I got the sense, listening to this, that maybe he's trying to talk himself out of it.
He was acquitted in the state senate, but he was suspended from his duties between May and September because of the impeachment, which was over 20 articles ranging from dereliction of duty to abuse of public trust.
And according to the Texas Tribune, the securities fraud trial starts today, on Monday.
This is exhausting, this stretch of the show, but it does add two interesting new wrinkles to Alex's folklore about everyone loving him everywhere he goes.
The first is that character in the story who vouches for how real the story is.
It's much easier to pretend that everyone is just saying that Alex himself did it because then he could be like, I can't believe they're making this up about me.
So, yeah, this goes on for a long time, and there's more stretches of the show that is dedicated to him talking about how much everyone loves him, and it is exhausting.
Now, he can't do it, and these people can't do it, because they can't trust, right?
But if you're Alex, you're staring down the barrel of being bankrupt and broke for the rest of your life, hopefully, from my point of view, not his, why not take, you know, you've got plenty of money, why not take like $20 million?
$20 million, cash it up.
Take it to Hawaii with you and just start giving it around, right?
And then all your money is gone.
Fine.
They've got all your actual money, but you can go to Hawaii and people there know that you're the one who gave them like $20 million in the community.
So you just go, you get free drinks.
You know, you do the thing.
You know what I'm saying?
You live on the largesse of others because you have given it to them first.
I thought that you were going to say, like, the strategy should be take $20 million or a much smaller amount of money and invest in a camera to follow you around.
To illustrate all of these people who love you so much.
So it is definitely true that since Naib Bukele's election, the murder rate in El Salvador has dropped dramatically.
From 38 per 100,000 people in 2019 to 7.8 in 2022.
That's an impressive feat.
However, Alex should really, really have a problem with how he's achieved it.
Bukele launched a push against organized crime after 92 people were killed between March 24th and March 27th, 2022.
He put in a state of emergency that was supposed to last 30 days, but is actually still in place now over two years later.
According to Human Rights Watch, this emergency involved, quote, suspending a range of constitutional rights, including the rights of freedom of association and assembly, to privacy in communications, and to be informed of the reason for arrest.
According to the New York Times, quote, Since March 2022, when Mr. Bukele declared a state of emergency that suspended basic civil liberties, security forces have locked up roughly 75,000 people.
A staggering 1 in 45 adults is now in prison.
Bukele has been able to very seriously attack El Salvador's organized crime problem, largely for two reasons.
The first is that he's essentially suspended...
The second is that El Salvador's gangs were a problem that he could fight.
From the Times, No.
No.
So yeah, Alex has talked a little bit in the past about being excited about Bukele.
You know, I find that fascinating because it does suggest something, which is that if somebody tried to go after one of the good cartels, Then other countries would fight on their behalf.
You know what I mean?
Like, you can't fuck with a good cartel because the United States will actually be like, no, no, no, no.
Yeah, through these crackdowns on civil liberties, which is worrying because there are some indications that this model is something that other countries would want to replicate.
And then we'll spend some time on your persecution and mine, not because we're whining, but because it's a window into their strategy and stratagem and calculus against us in this bombshell development.
Now brought up in FISA hearings, now they're calling five members of Congress already that I know of calling for hearings.
On this FBI, CIA agent, a bunch of publications said he wasn't real.
They had to admit it, retract it.
Raw story hasn't.
No, the guy's real.
It's on record.
The CIA admits he works there as a contract manager.
I mean, this is really amazing, and I've confirmed major shoes are about to drop, not on Alex Jones, some on me, but on other people.
And I'm not at liberty to tell anybody yet.
We've had similar operations, but this isn't a clandestine video being shot of one of these operatives.
These are whistleblowers now approaching Congress that have already tried to approach other groups that are about to expose operations run against medical doctors that expose the COVID shots, political patriots, populists, and others.
So, including targeting members of Congress.
With the deep state.
So this is really already exploded, and it's coming to the service in a big way.
Alex, I was up at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach night before last.
And there was a small reception to celebrate the fact that Truth Social, the president's great social media platform, which I truly love, was going public.
First of all, the judge in question gave a campaign contribution to Joe Biden's presidential campaign.
He should recuse himself for that violation of the of the violation of the canon of ethics for judges.
We also now know that his daughter, who's an adult.
Is a Democrat political operative, a fundraiser, who's raised $93 million on this case, using this case as the hook for her fundraising for various Democratic candidates.
That's an egregious...
Conflict of interest also would be grounds for appeal.
And we still can't identify an underlying crime, even if Trump did do the things that he's accused of.
And I'm not sure that he did.
I don't believe he did.
We saw the letter he released from Stormy Daniels in which she flatly denies being paid for her silence because she had an affair with Donald Trump.
She says flatly that never happened.
So you've got two liars here as the major witness.
You've got fat Alvin Bragg.
The feds wouldn't bring this case.
The career prosecutors in his own office didn't want to bring this case.
It's an extraordinarily weak case, but they're so desperate.
They don't care if they get reversed, you see, because the appeals process takes months, maybe a year.
They're desperate to have...
Some conviction, any conviction in any court, Alex, because then you see if there are election irregularities, if there's election fraud, they can then justify their win by saying, oh, well, it was the trials.
So Justice Juan Marchand consulted a judicial ethics committee about his small donations to Democrat politicians as well as his daughter's career, and they determined that these things wouldn't be a threat to his impartiality and that he didn't have to recuse himself.
So all of this stuff is not the big issue that Roger's making it out to be.
Trump has continued to attack the judge as well as his daughter and has been given a gag order, which he seems to just be ignoring.
Trump did release a picture of a letter from Stormy Daniels denying that they had an affair, but she's since come out and said that...
She wrote that letter because she was made to feel like she had to because of an NDA.
And Roger's not even bringing up the second woman that Trump is accused of paying hush money to.
Roger's got a good spin here, though, I think.
And that is that this case is just to give a plausible explanation for how Trump could have possibly lost so the globalists can steal the election more smoothly.
If they prove he committed a crime, I'll finally change my mind about this man who I watched commit crimes over and over and over again before my eyes.
I never believed that he would resign as president.
I did believe that they would pull him from the election, that he would announce after accumulating enough delegates to be nominated, he will ultimately, I think, be pressured into announcing that he's not running again.
That would allow him to remain as president so that after the election he can pardon himself and his brother and his son and other members of the Biden crime family.
So what would happen technically is I never said that Michelle Obama would run.
That's not what I've said.
What I've said is she will be the candidate, meaning I believe that if he releases these delegates and the convention is allowed to work its will and draft the candidate that is most popular, that I think she would ultimately be imposed upon to run.
I think what amazes me most about this is that Michelle Obama is currently one of the richest and most powerful people on the planet and would only lose wealth and money and power by becoming president.
You said he becomes a duke, and that's exactly what this feels like.
This is Larry Nichols in 2015 giving a story about some sort of magical deus ex machina where Obama's going to run again and turn the United States into a Muslim caliphate and all this stuff.
Ideally, of course, they have to figure out how to solve their Kamala Harris problem, because it would normally be her turn if Joe Biden decided for reasons of health that he wasn't running again.
normally the sitting vice president would move in to be the nominee, but they know that's a disaster as well.
So I figure they promise her a Supreme Court justice to see if she sits down.
If they were successful and they don't control the Senate.
If the whole Democratic Party's demons, or aligned with demons, or working directly with the devil, what does it matter which one is the vice president?
And so Alex has to backpedal his support quite a bit while talking to Viva Fry and do a bunch of like, you know, hey, he's the lesser of two evils type stuff.
Like, he's not as bad as Trudeau.
And it's pretty funny.
Because the whole thing is him not even really being able to fully back the person that is being attacked for Alex supporting them.
If we were getting our asses kicked and losing, I'd still do this.
Ladies and gentlemen, we're not losing.
I should spend the whole show.
In fact, I'm going to do it.
I'm going to wear a secret camera, and I'm going to go to the grocery store, and I'm going to go to church, and I'm going to go to the shopping mall, and I'm going to walk down the street, and I'm going to let you see what happens.
Sure, you should go to the grocery store, shake a few hands, almost never get yelled at.
Now, I go six, seven, eight months until I get yelled at, and I probably shook when I was on vacation for a week and a half.
No exaggeration, a thousand hands.
A thousand hands.
And they'd all say to me, I'm sorry to take up your time.
I'm sorry to bother you.
For a picture, I say, you're sorry.
I love you.
I'm trying to reach you people.
We're in this together.
And they were every color, and they were male and female and old and young, and it was beautiful.
There's no information that solidifies any of the things that are being said in the video.
There's no confirmation of, like, how did you confirm he worked for the CIA or any of this stuff.
There's no indication of, like, what were your practices that involved vetting this information other than this guy said it at a coffee shop and we just said okay.
I just appreciate, just remember, the next time you think about Alex Jones' parents, think about a weird old lady shouting, yeah, go get those Sandy Hook parents.
Myself, my crew, my organization, and my family have been the victims in the last seven years of a CIA, Justice Department, FBI, globalist attack.
Now, I didn't understand the full scope of this until just the last year, but listeners and viewers have heard me break down the fact that it was a CIA-FBI coordinated operation.
It's now begun to come out in just the last week.
There have been congressional hearings.
There have been documents.
There have been operatives who've been caught in clandestine recordings.
And even more is set to come out in the next week to two weeks.
GOP lawmakers condemn CIA, FBI attack against Alex Jones.
And this is in congressional hearings and in interviews.
Breaking.
Republican congressmen and women call for official investigation to FBI, CIA setup of Alex Jones.
Representative Troy Nels.
Representative Paulina Luna, Representative Mike Lee, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and more are now calling for official hearings and criminal investigations of the information that's broken in the last week.
So Troy Nels and Anna Paulina Luna both made comments about this on Benny Johnson's show, the same show where Alex was initially a guest discussing this undercover video.
Mike Lee tweeted about this, but notably did so from his personal Twitter account.
Based Mike Lee, as opposed to his official Senate account, which made me sad.
Also, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Alex, shows a tweet.
You know, it's not the strongest way to start this thing off, unless the point is really about how much attention this is getting, as opposed to how strong the case is underneath it.
If you're just trying to capitalize on that attention, then this approach makes total sense.
It's important to understand that the information that broke four days ago, the former FBI and current CIA operative Gavin Oblemis' revelations, that indeed the agencies were working in tandem against myself and my operation to "cut our legs off" and attempt to dial back or suppress the reach we have warning the public about the globalist operations.
unidentified
You can kind of put anyone in jail if you know what to do.
It's important to recognize that what Alex has done here is remix that undercover footage, which is already edited to begin with, so making it so it fits the narrative that's being pushed.
This is deeply unethical stuff.
I'll demonstrate what I mean here.
A little section from that bit that Alex just played.
So this was edited in order to retain the part where the guy appears to affirmatively reply to the question if the case against Alex was a CIA thing, but remove the part where he clarifies that it wasn't and it was actually a civil case.
These are very intentional things that Alex is doing in order to massage this video so it fits as proof of the narrative that he's putting forth when it doesn't actually work as well as he wants it to.
And you know how fucking wrong you have to be where even a doctored undercover tape still says the same thing that we said over and over again, which is, this is a civil trial, not a criminal trial.
That is how wrong you have to be.
That for years, years after this shit, people are still, even in undercover videos, that are deliberately designed to do the opposite of what you want.
Hillary Clinton and her opposition research decided to target then-candidate Trump by claiming that I was his brain and that I was directing his campaign, which was not true.
Then they misrepresented what I had said and what I had done in the past and claimed that I'd done all these terrible things so they could then try to attach that to Trump.
And now we know that huge PR firms We're involved taking things I'd said out of context, exaggerating them, lying about them, and then running thousands of news articles and hundreds of national TV programs, late night comedy, PBS, CNN, ABC News, NBC.
There was literally not one news channel.
National or local or even international that did not run with the story in 2016 and 2017 every day.
Every day.
That I was sending people to Sandy Hook families' homes.
That I was sending people to urinate on graves.
Never any proof of that.
Never any proof of anybody urinating on graves.
And that I was doing all this somehow at the direction of Trump.
So this would be an amazing opportunity to reveal this PR firm's name, or to point out all the admissions of them being behind the Sandy Hook case.
Alex is prepared.
This is supposed to be a revealing special report, so you'd expect that information to be here, especially when he's talking about the PR firms.
Instead, as he's talking, Alex flashes up on screen a series of headlines.
One is from the Washington Post on November 17, 2016, notably after the 2016 election.
With the headline, quote, How Alex Jones conspiracy theorist extraordinaire got Donald Trump's ear.
This article doesn't back up any of Alex's claims.
It's just an article about how Donald Trump was on Alex's show.
Then there's another headline from The New Yorker from June 23rd, 2016, quote, Donald Trump and the amazing Alex Jones.
These are both articles about how ridiculous it was that Trump went on Infowars, but none of it backs up the claims Alex is making.
And, like, Alex even said that he and Trump have, like, a...
Psychic meld of some sort.
So, like, he's the one who was saying that kind of shit.
So far, he's proved that two outlets ran op-eds about how Trump went on his show.
This is serious stuff that he's presenting here.
These memes!
Then there are short images of people talking about Alex on MSNBC, John Oliver, Fox, CNN, and Colbert.
None of these instances of coverage indicate these people were accusing Alex of sending people to Sandy Hook, nor does it show that there was coverage of him every day.
Most of it appears to be from about the time when he was kicked off social media and them covering that story.
So far, nothing has been proven, and Alex has fully convinced me that maybe he doesn't have as solid a grounding for a lot of these claims as he's making.
Would you prefer to be the guy who's complaining about, oh, the CIA's getting me because of this meme about the hipster senator, or would you want to be the guy who's like, I didn't fuck that horse!
This analysis that we made of the CIA's media operations disclosed, among other things, that they deliver through CIA couriers ready to print or ready to broadcast.
So they go in, focus on Alex Jones, lie about what I've said and done, claim I'm attacking families of dead children, put it all over the news, and then claim that Trump is directing it, and then file lawsuits against me, get all the discovery.
Find no evidence of what they were claiming, and then they had judges in Austin, Texas, and in Connecticut rule that I was defaulted, so I was already guilty.
So this clip is unnotable, but it's just the standard stuff that you hear from Alex about his case.
However, while he's saying this stuff, he popped up on screen a headline that has the outlet that it's from cropped, but it reads, quote, Berlin Rosen's calm strategy behind Sandy Hook family's victory over Alex Jones.
This is from an outlet called PR Week from October 18, 2022.
The article does say that Berlin Rosen was a PR firm that worked with the families in the Connecticut case.
It doesn't do anything to prove that they're the CIA or that they're behind the suit.
And so now we know that it's Berlin Rosen is the name of the PR firm that Alex is accusing of being behind everything, planting literally all of these stories, creating a fake Alex Jones in order for him to be persecuted.
And this article, I mean, it does say that they worked with the families and the lawyers and stuff.
But like one of the quotes from the EVP of legal affairs, Andrew Friedman, he said, quote, Jones plunged three of his companies into bankruptcy a matter of weeks before the trial was supposed to start.
A lot of our work was helping reporters see that for the legal tactic that it was his umpteenth attempt to delay facing these families in court.
So it's kind of, you know, I don't know if I...
Buy Alex's version of it based on this.
And I think that if you were somebody who was suing Alex, crisis PR would be something that you would involve.
Because clearly you're not saying their name because there's one thing that you have learned, which is that if you defame this particular group of people and those in their orbit, you're going to get fucked with, right?
Let's look at the open evidence of the FBI being involved in my targeting from day one.
First, let's look at William Aldenberg.
He was already a senior FBI agent in Connecticut when Sandy Hook happened.
He reportedly responded to the tragedy.
William Aldenberg was already a senior agent when Sandy Hook happened, but shortly after, he was made the head FBI agent lawyer in the state of Connecticut.
unidentified
In January, did you assume a new position?
I was put into a position they called Chief Division Counsel, which is the head attorney for that FBI division.
You give legal counsel to the leadership of the division.
I was put in that position temporarily, and then about a month later, I was appointed to that position.
So you were the top lawyer providing advice to the FBI in Connecticut?
That he went to the Costco firm, and that they developed this system, and that they filed this lawsuit, and that they came after me, and I've never even said his name, never even talked about him, didn't even know who he was.
How can something like this happen in America?
How can we be denied a real trial where we're innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven how guilty?
unidentified
When's the first time you watched a video of Mr. Halbig on Mr. Jones' show?
I would be guessing, sir, I would say approximately like 2016.
Where were you when you saw that?
I was sitting in my office on the second floor at FBI New Haven.
He's definitely accusing him of being the FBI consigliore who's connecting a conspiracy in order to persecute him and overthrow the First Amendment and all this other shit.
Because if I understand correctly, if Alex is playing that last clip in particular, that means that this guy went to the deep state first, and they said no.
No, I mean, well, I mean, that's essentially what we're dealing with now, is once you have tried to destroy a man monetarily and failed, there is no other recourse but criminal, and if it's not criminal, he can fuck with you all he wants.
So, Alex is established in the special report, and I use established loosely, that they were trying to smear Trump by associating Trump with Alex, and now they're doing it in Canada!
They're now doing the same thing in Canada with Pierre Polyev, who is leading by massive numbers against Trudeau in the race to be the leader of Canada right now, claiming that secretly he gets talking points from me and that I'm running the Conservative Party in Canada.
They're running the exact same playbook they ran in 2016 against Trump, against the Conservatives in Canada.
History is repeating itself again.
Take a flamboyant individual like Alex Jones, take what he said out of context, totally make stuff up, rig court trials against him, and then set the precedent to take down whoever you want, whenever you want, however you want.
And I knew that the deep state was running this going back six, seven years ago because I wasn't that important.
Thousands of news articles, hundreds of national TV programs lying about me.
I knew they were setting the precedent to deplatform me, to use lawfare to try to shut us down, to set the precedent for others.
That was obvious.
This was a level of propaganda you only see before the U.S. invades a country.
So what does Alex mean that he wasn't that important?
Like, he's supposed to be God's selected warrior designed in the womb to fight the literal devil.
Like, according to his own lore, Alex is supposed to be literally one of the most important people who has ever lived, and only...
He's one of the few people on Earth who can see the demons that walk among us.
Even if you take that stuff out of it, he was still bragging that his audience was like a billion people before he got sued, so by no estimation could you imagine that he would think he wasn't that important.
It's ridiculous.
Also, this stuff about Canada is really funny because Alex recorded this before today's show.
And on today's show, he had to be all wishy-washy about Pierre-Paul LaFerre because he was talking with Viva Frye.
There's only one whistleblower I want, and that is the person who is looking for stuff to prove what Alex says and then just saw the Jesse Waters episode and called it a night.
I want a whistleblower from that person to explain to me what they did for the rest of the day.