#904: February 23, 2024 dissects Alex Jones’ erratic shifts—from praising Elon Musk as a globalist nemesis to calling him the "devil," then pivoting to AI-driven cars despite anti-white-genocide claims. A caller mimicking Musk’s terminology ("unregretted user minutes") sparks 30-minute engagement, exposing Jones’ obsession with perceived power. The episode ties his contradictions to white identity Christianity, where freedom collapses under his own ideological rules, while tech-driven misinformation (like the Daily Mail’s unverified "burner account" claim) highlights how data manipulation reshapes reality—undermining his own conspiracy theories. [Automatically generated summary]
Well, I mean, the remake was essentially sticking together with the story, adhering to it closely while, you know, opening up the reality that we're going to change.
This is when it finally goes off on its own storyline, the rebirth.
If you're saying my people are pulling their cars over to tell me how murderous they are, and then you tell me that they, as in the other people, are going to start a conflict.
I mean, I feel like that, okay, it's entirely possible that they may technically start a conflict, but I feel like if you don't need to even light the match to have somebody go, yeah, it's on fire, then it's kind of not on you.
Instead of us agreeing on a set of facts and freedoms in a constitutional republic, in a limited democracy where the minority as well as the majority are protected, this is psychological warfare.
So this is the big narrative that's guiding Alex's coverage at the present.
It's about Google's AI called Gemini, which had some problems with their image generation system.
It was launched, and then they had some parameters for generation that were meant to address inherent biases in the data that the AI was pulling from.
Of primary importance for our purposes, they were aware that the overwhelming amount of data they were pulling from was from the United States and Europe, but that their user base was global.
So they wanted to make the people that were generated from prompts more diverse than they might have been just based on the data set that the AI was pulling.
This went a little off track because an anti-wokeness crusader on Twitter tried to generate a picture of the founding fathers and they were not white people, which of course means that Google and the globalists are trying to erase white people from the internet and trying to rewrite history so you think that white people never existed.
Like, this is, I understand, you may think that you're angry about this for any other reason, but anybody who is not a white supremacist went, ha, that's it.
So the problem that Gemini had was with its programming, it was that they didn't specify when a generated person was arbitrary and when it wasn't.
For instance, when you're talking about specific people, it doesn't make sense that the output would differ from the actual person.
But when you're asking for a general prompt like people walking down the street, it is fairly arbitrary what race the people are and what they might be.
I mean, what's so fun about it is it truly is a stark comparison of just like either you understand and look through that and realize that skin color is nothing.
And if an AI just goes people and it could be anybody, you should probably think in your head, oh, it could be anybody.
Or you go, well, that is clearly trying to destroy the white race.
And the Washington Post reported, quote, before Google blocked the image generation feature Thursday morning, Gemini produced white people for prompts input by a Washington Post reporter asking to show a beautiful woman, a handsome man, a social media influencer, an engineer, a teacher, and a gay couple.
Alex is saying they erased white people from over 92% of searches, and that's a deeply inaccurate and painfully dramatic thing for him to say.
Google is used in approximately 92% of searches on the web, but they didn't erase white people from Google, even if you want to pretend that they erased them from this image generator.
This is really great for Alex, though, and you can tell he's in a great mood about it.
This show primarily runs on the fuel of white victimhood, and this narrative plays into that perfectly.
Alex has spent a lot of his show yelling about this.
Considering covering it more, but honestly, there's not much else to say about it other than this Gemini was programmed poorly in a very specific and understandable way.
They're now trying to address.
Alex and his ilk are exploiting that error that Google made in order to validate their addictive fears that they're under attack because they're white.
And because this Google AI generator was an attack on white people and it is part of white genocide, he must insist that Elon Musk needs to now put out a search engine that will take over for Google.
But he's doing irrevocable damage, reaching hundreds of millions of people a day per tweet, per post, wrecking them with stuff like this.
Okay?
So I'm glad Google overplayed their hand with the AI image generator as it made their insane racist anti-civilization programming clear to all.
I couldn't write that that good.
It's the truth.
And you can say Elon Musk is a bad person.
Well, he shits anti-New World Order resistance.
He shits victory.
So I'm not going to sit there when coming out of his ass is victory and bitch about it.
Maybe he's bad.
I don't know.
Maybe he's super smarter than all of us.
He's got some master plan to screw us.
I don't know that.
All I know is He is the number one, even above Trump, wrecking ball right now on the anti-human, anti-civilization dickheads that don't want humans to do crazy stuff, don't want us to go to space, say we're all crap, get rid of us.
No, I don't believe in that, and neither does Elon Musk.
And he's putting his money where his mouth is.
So I'm glad to be attacked by all the grandpas and everybody else that's purer than thou to say Elon Musk is the freaking devil.
You judge a tree by its fruits, and Elon Musk is wrecking their world.
And so it's super convenient to have the amount of power that Elon Musk does have aimed in the direction that he wants it to be, as opposed to the possibility that it could be aimed against him.
Now, and I'm going to say this because, and I don't know if people in Alex's orbit are capable of recognizing a pattern, but generally speaking, he likes to trade up if possible.
That is like, oh, Rogan's a pretty big deal.
Aha, now I got Tucker talking my shit.
Oh, Tucker's a pretty big deal.
Not as big deal as Elon fucking billionaire ass I own Twitter Musk.
I mean, I'm just never, I'm just never going to call it.
It is one of the more infuriating aspects of the American team sport element of just like, I understand your criticism, and maybe it's even valid, but now's not the time because we're busy fighting those fucks.
So bother with them, okay?
Don't worry about, yeah, Elon wants to put a chip inside the nape of your neck and then he'll be able to control your thoughts.
But that's because you're a loser.
Sure, he dresses up like the devil, and apparently we're unhappy about that.
So it doesn't matter to him that Elon is a walking red flag for conspiracy theorists.
He wants to put chips in people's heads.
He wants self-driving cars.
He's running an AI off the giant worldwide social media platform that he bought and has government contracts that give him incredibly outsized influence in geopolitics in various regions.
He's the person that Alex has warned about for all of his career.
But there's one thing that gets in the way, which is that hating him would be inconvenient for Alex at the moment.
He's clearly just back on Twitter because of Elon's whim.
So Alex has to know that if he started being really critical of him, it would be just as easy for Elon to kick him back off.
Alex is a fool and doesn't see that this is going to be a bad road for him in the long term.
His audience is already skeptical of Musk, and they aren't going to become less so because he's who they've been trained to be suspicious of.
Alex had many of the, he can have as many of these defensive ass whiny, but I like him, diatribes as he wants.
But it won't change the fact that David Icke is taking the correct position in terms of this issue from a conspiracy business standpoint.
I was pretty shocked that he said that, you know, because he's taking criticism of Elon Musk personally because his perspective is wrapped up in fucked up feelings that he has about how people don't believe in him enough.
He's projecting that onto Elon.
So anytime people are criticizing him, it's a criticism of Alex himself.
That clip is some of the most mopey, defensive shit you can imagine.
Alex is basically making a mockery of the idea of criticizing Elon.
And then once he gets through that, he gets himself mad about the idea of people criticizing him.
The part that's really sad is the constant need to pretend that he's not being an apologist for Musk when that's literally what he's doing in all of these petulant rants.
And I don't want to speculate that that is the case because there's other explanations that do make sense.
Right.
When I say that there's something going on here, one element of it is this projecting himself onto Elon Musk and his psychological entanglement or whatever it is.
There's that.
And that's fucked up.
That's personal.
And then I think that Alex, like, he's started to get to a point where he's back to being heavily addicted to social media.
I was about to say the door maddening that you get posting racist memes and then people like liking that.
I want to ask you this question, not because you know the answer, obviously, but just as a speculative question.
Do you think on some like subconscious level they are aware that part of why they can support Elon so full wholeheartedly is because he's a failure and nothing he does will succeed.
So like you can build somebody up and then like if you need to, uh-oh, they're a big villain now.
Like Steve Pieczenik was the greatest expert in everything.
He changed the world.
He single-handedly took down the Soviet Union and then he got out of line with the 2020 election narratives and Alex is like, yeah, I guess he's back to working for the CIA or whatever.
You know, like there isn't a problem now that he's a villain or whatever.
And Alex can take stuff like he said in that globe where he's like, yeah, all right, Elon Musk should be investigated, take away all his companies.
He could take that out of context if you ever need to Elon into a villain.
He could be like, I told you, I warned you that there was a danger.
Yeah, I mean, really weird stuff, especially in the news cycle.
I mean, I was in the news cycle I think for a better part of almost three days.
There's like this, it's kind of funny.
It all started with the troll account basically claiming some nonsense stuff and then deactivating themselves to do rage farming and then having that be misinterpretedly spread by the Daily Mail to literally every single news organization nationwide in America except for CBS and others, the major ones.
So actually every medium-sized publication had something to do with it and just basically spread the information everywhere on the internet.
It was the most funniest shit ever.
And so the AI aspect of this, I'll get to that in a bit, because this actually manipulates data sets as well because some AI is being trained on, say, news reports from these various places because people seem to think that these are reputable in some capacity or another.
I'd like to question that at some point because I think I've definitely heard the right to say I have first-hand experience in saying that whatever they identify as quote reputable sources is highly questionable.
Because the information that was pumped out and distributed about me was so unequivocally false that basically the articles themselves and the repetition of those in verbatim was about 80% false.
And none of them reached out to ever try and even do the remotest amount of adjustment to their articles and to their publications.
I'm there on X. I'm basically there, right?
My DMs are activated.
You can say, hey, we need to talk to you.
We have a problem here.
Is this true?
They never bothered to issue any correction.
They never bothered to actually contact me regarding this.
I contacted them.
I said, here, adjust your bullshit.
That's what I said.
I messaged the Daily Mail and said, hey, fix my article.
And then they said, okay, here, we made some adjustments.
Would you like anything else?
I had to respond to that because I'm like, fuck you.
You ought to have done that way before asking me because the information is clearly out there.
And you should also familiarize itself with the functions of the platform that you're shitting on before you shit on it because you could probably do so more creatively.
What I'm not entirely sure of was the intent behind this and why they did this.
Because I'm pretty sure this was supposed to have some sort of negative effect on me, but the inverse is true.
So this is a highly suspicious beginning to the call for a number of reasons.
Sure.
The first and most obvious reason is that Alex is just letting this guy swear like crazy on the show, which is supposedly on hundreds of radio stations.
I know Alex was swearing a little bit earlier, but that's different.
Now, I have a few problems with the story that Adrian is telling here.
So as it goes, there was an account on Twitter that was making a big deal out of claiming that Adrian Dittman was Elon's burner.
This is not something that person could necessarily prove, but the anecdotal evidence is fairly compelling.
After his initial appearance on Infowars, I wouldn't have felt strongly enough to make a big deal out of accusing this account of being Musk, but I could see how someone could arrive there.
So this account was deactivated.
I guess there's some dispute about whether they were banned for harassment or if they self-deactivated to make it look like they got banned for calling out Musk's account.
I have no idea what happened there, and I don't put enough stock in social media to really care.
I don't particularly care about Adrian's complaints about the Daily Mail.
I have a pretty low opinion of that site based on them constantly being used as a source on Infowars because of their sensational headlines and often fairly iffy coverage.
If you got a problem with them, you got a bigger problem.
I have a few problems, though, and they have to do with this clip.
The first is that Adrian is not at all acknowledging that the last time he was on the show, Alex directly and emphatically said that it was Musk, who was using a fake account for plausible deniability.
David Ike said that the Infowars producers told him during the break that it was definitely Musk.
If he's mad at the Daily Mail for their article, then he should have more of a problem with Alex.
He somehow doesn't, which is selective and strange.
Elon Musk is certainly somebody who has a bone to grind with the mainstream media.
What I'm not entirely sure of was the intent behind this and why they did this, because I'm pretty sure this was supposed to have some sort of negative effect on me, but the inverse is true.
Every lie can be stretched to a certain extent up until it rips.
And I think we've reached a point where the tensile strength of the lie and the context you can put within it simply doesn't hold anymore and just explodes before all our eyes.
So I think we're very close to this, if not already here, where we're seeing the first fibers in the fabric rip.
The idea of a person who is aware enough to recognize that they have been given fame and what comes with that is a modicum of power on a social media platform, purely either because they are Elon Musk or because it is so mystifying to the rest of the human race that a human being would behave like this.
And they would have a social media presence that is entirely about kissing Musk's ass and talking about how great his businesses are.
Yeah.
But that's the problem.
That's where the problem comes in, is that like that is all behavior that is completely understandable from someone who's just obsessed with Elon Musk.
Yeah, there's, I mean, and it's, it is like there's, there's really two reasons, but you, how can you not understand that again?
If you're self-aware, how can you not understand it's because people are viewing you, you know, like this is a freak show.
This is you being Elon Musk, the person who is behaving like this, and everybody's laughing at you because as you sit in your cage like a hunger artist or whatever it is.
There either is interest because people want to pretend or do think that you're Elon Musk or it's that sideshow version of the thing you're talking about.
See, here's one of the things that I wrestle with is that leaning into it is an instinct that mostly derives from some kind of ego, some sort of pursuit of ego.
I don't know about this guy, but I looked at his Twitter feed when I was preparing the last episode, and it doesn't feel like a guy who's obsessed with ego.
It's all about Elon Musk.
So, like, to me, it doesn't feel like, you know, wanting to lean into this kind of attention towards yourself doesn't necessarily track with what I it doesn't seem like this person's a narcissist or like driven that direction.
No, I couldn't, I can absolutely 100% reasonably see a person who is analogous to the person who collects every single Simpsons figurine that's ever been made.
Of just like, this is a person who is obsessed with this thing.
And I understand that this is unusual and out of the more extreme for people, but I mean, you know, you're not harming anybody.
And so as I was going through this, I was like, all right, I'm going to pay attention and try to figure out where there are times where it's like, this seems like Musk, and there's times like, this definitely doesn't seem like him.
Thinking about the multiple CEOs that I've talked to me with in the last couple of weeks, basically explaining to me their problems with, say, these kinds of standards, right?
Having to hire people based on anything else other than merit, which is very, very damaging to the company.
You cannot give them bad positions because then it's obvious that she's just a diversity hire, right, for instance.
And so damages are being created regardless of what is happening.
And this is quite sad.
This is quite unfortunate.
I mean, sure, you could definitely pull it off to hire diverse people.
I certainly talk with people who are exceedingly diverse.
I know several individuals that are, for instance, trans.
That doesn't really cross my mind most of the time because we're just sitting there and we're building cool shit.
It's just, I don't really care.
And they don't really care about my stuff either.
We just look at the information that we generate and we look at that as the only thing that really matters.
And that's what I think humans should go for because you want to be able to choose whatever it is that you want.
It's just that you shouldn't make anyone else choose what it is that you are just because you think that what you are is the truest form of the self, right?
Based on some sort of thing that's going to be a lot of fun.
Well, Alex's definition of freedom sounds pretty great.
Everyone's free to be themselves, but it doesn't mean that you can force others to be you.
Unfortunately, if Alex actually followed that as a basis for his definition of freedom, all of his political positions would collapse immediately.
His worldview is almost wholly based on pursuing policies that require you to adhere to his rules, mostly derived from extreme right-wing white identity Christianity.
I mean, it is, it is like, I mean, but at the same time, you can absolutely see a person obsessed with social media who becomes a person like role-playing Elon Musk all the time.
After regulating how speed is parking, we make everything slower.
We can make things faster on the computer and by basically have the computer drive the car because it can react faster to anything that you can ever even think about.
By the time it has reacted to a certain situation, it has already seen the outcome and has reacted on your behalf before you can even become aware of anything that's happening.
So imagine Alex and Dittman's realities are both happening simultaneously.
In five years, every non-white person will wake up to all white people's cars having run into each other and just a massive countrywide blood out of white people gone.
That's the way that Alex is experiencing this, and it's pretty clear.
There's a couple of other instances where there's like obvious winks that Alex is doing.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But the way that he's treating him, especially as opposed to when you look at the way he's treating these other callers that are just like, hey, great point.
How do you that's the that's the thing that I don't get?
That's my that's my like that's the line that I can't cross for it not being Elon is just like you have to know that the only reason you exist in this space right now pun absolutely intended is because people think you are Elon Musk or because you are Elon Musk.
If you were just Adrian Dittman and everyone knew you were Adrian Dittman and your voice sounded a little bit different, Alex would not give a single fuck about you.
Yeah, anything short of an engineer, like the only engineer would be an engineer who is literally working on Gemini at this exact time and who is willing to go along with having like insider information about it.
Like even if it was somebody who worked for Gemini, they'd be like, maybe you're wrong.
So the absolute mark of freedom is auto-fill knowing that you're trying to swear.
There's a big grown-up kind of thing that's flying around here.
It's great.
Now, at the end there, Adrian says that you can say fuck on Twitter and it doesn't lead to, quote, unregretted user minutes.
That's a very strange phrase.
It's very specific.
And it's one that Elon uses to describe the goal of the new version of Twitter.
When he tweeted, quote, new Twitter will strive to optimize unregretted user minutes on December 29th, 2022, and has referenced this multiple times since.
This is an interesting dilemma that Adrian poses because the use of that term would lead one very much to think this is definitely Musk under a fake name.
He's using the same very specific term Musk used to describe time on Twitter.
But the issue is that Musk's fans are weirdos and they take the terminology that he uses on.
They adopt it.
And if Adrian is a real person, the one thing you can be sure of is that he is an obsessive Elon Musk fan.
It's unfortunate because in many situations, this would be a real compelling piece of evidence.
But in this case, you can really only deduce that this is either Musk or someone who's molded himself around Musk.
You know, you have this person who is presumably one of the more powerful people in the world, richest person in the world, who's spending his time palling around with Alex, spreading bullshit, racist conspiracies on Infowars.
And the implication of that actually being him is very serious.
No, this whole thing, it is like it makes me mad at everybody but Elon Musk and Adrian Dittman, regardless of whether or not they are separate or real.
It's just like all of us should know.
We've got too much history.
We have too much history that we can avail ourselves of at any point in time.
We should all know, like, oh, okay, we can't engage in this.
But that could actually break bad for Alex because that implies more access to Elon Musk, which makes it even more suspicious that Alex isn't asking the kind of questions that the audience has about Elon to him.
It makes it look like he's covering things up even more.
You know, there is a certain part of me that listens to that clip of Alex being like, it's good you can say fuck and that maybe being Elon Musk and just all of that together makes me feel like, you know, we are returning to the Stone Age.
Yeah, it really does feel like this is the moment that we are facing in, like, that we've predicted for the longest time about deepfakes and shit like that.
Like, this is the true confrontation of it, where it is like, it's not like Obama giving a speech where some people want to believe it or whatever.
This is Alex 100% believing, regardless of its truth or whether it needs to be true that this is Elon Musk.
There is no ultimate reality to this, which is jarring and difficult.
Now, I think that the only thing that really drives this into the, ah, this has got it.
We got to do it.
We have to talk about this is the dynamic that Alex is so defensive about Elon Musk at the beginning of this and people criticizing, like, hey, you should, why are you supporting this?
Maybe you should be more critical.
Him realizing, or not realizing, accidentally saying, I take criticism of Elon personally because I look at him and I see me.