In this installment, Dan and Jordan go on a time travel episode for a special listener request, and end up in 2012. They encounter an appearance by the most important figure in modern history, Steve Piezcenik, and a special report about board games that they covered over 700 episodes ago.
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| I'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys, saying we are the bad guys. | ||
| Knowledge fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Dan and Jordan, knowledge fight. | |
| We need money. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Andy in Kansas. | |
| It's time to pray. | ||
| Andy in Kansas, you're on the air. | ||
| Thanks for holding. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hello, Alex. | |
| I'm a first time caller. | ||
| I'm a huge fan. | ||
| I love your word. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Knowledge Fight. | |
| KnowledgeFight.com. | ||
| I love you. | ||
| Hey, everybody! | ||
| Welcome back to Knowledge Fat. | ||
| I'm Dan. | ||
| I'm Jordan. | ||
| We're a couple dudes like to sit around, worship at the altar of Selene, and talk a little bit about... | ||
| Alex Jones. | ||
| I'm having trouble just because, as you know, and now listeners can be filled in on, my headphones broke a little bit before we started recording. | ||
| So I'm using different headphones and it's completely fucking me up. | ||
| Chaos. | ||
| Absolute chaos. | ||
| So I mumbled over the altar of Selene and couldn't come up with who we talk about. | ||
| Who do we talk about on this show? | ||
| We talk about Alex Jones. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| Hey, what's your bright spot? | ||
| My bright spot, Dan. | ||
| Wait, was that... | ||
| Actually, you know what? | ||
| You flipped it on me. | ||
| Now we have to roll with it. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| My bright spot. | ||
| Is traveling home yesterday. | ||
| We celebrated our family's whole holiday on New Year's Eve. | ||
| You flipped it. | ||
| We flipped it. | ||
| We got rid of the X-mas day. | ||
| We got rid of New Year's and we put them all together. | ||
| And that way we don't have to... | ||
| We all go to bed at 10. That's the idea. | ||
| You open presents and you go to bed at 10. You should have done New Year's on Christmas and Christmas on New Year's. | ||
| Well, maybe. | ||
| But my bright spot is not that. | ||
| It is the driving home. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I... | |
| Swear to you, I have never driven through Chicago with no traffic. | ||
| Not even on New Year's Day before. | ||
| This is my first year of truly driving through the city of Chicago. | ||
| Do you know how fast you can get through this place if there aren't other people around? | ||
| Especially you cops. | ||
| It is nuts out there. | ||
| It is not that much space. | ||
| No? | ||
| You can drive the whole thing in like five minutes. | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| End to end, Chicago. | ||
| Five minutes. | ||
| Five minutes if nobody's here. | ||
| It turns out all of us, we're the problem. | ||
| We're the ones that... | ||
| Did you know the traffic is like the people? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| When they're not there. | ||
| Oh, so quick. | ||
| Did you hit all the lights? | ||
| No! | ||
| No! | ||
| We only had one red coming up on Dusab, too! | ||
| I mean, it's nuts. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Congratulations. | ||
| Nuts! | ||
| That's a New Year's miracle. | ||
| I'm telling you, it shouldn't make me feel as good as it did, but it made me feel great. | ||
| Wow, congratulations. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| What's your bright spot for the new year, Dan? | ||
| That was my way of announcing it was the new year also. | ||
| I went and got a toaster oven. | ||
| I moved not too long ago, but it's been a little while now. | ||
| And you gradually get things in the house. | ||
| Maybe you take six months to get a cutting board or something. | ||
| It can happen. | ||
| It can happen. | ||
| But yeah, I got a toaster oven replaced because I got rid of my old one when I moved last time. | ||
| And I've been missing a toaster oven. | ||
| And I got one that has an air fryer. | ||
| Nice. | ||
| That's the wise way to do things. | ||
| I guess. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I've never used an air fryer before. | ||
| I don't know what it does. | ||
| I don't know why it does it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| And I still have not... | ||
| I haven't broken the toaster oven out of the box yet, so I have no review on it. | ||
| Gotcha. | ||
| Air fryer? | ||
| It's great. | ||
| Start putting stuff in there, air fry it. | ||
| See what happens? | ||
| You're going to love it every time. | ||
| But see, here's the thing. | ||
| I understand how oil frying works. | ||
| You heat that oil up and it fries stuff in there. | ||
| Air frying, I don't know what the air is doing. | ||
| Well, you heat the air up and then it'll fry the stuff for you. | ||
| The oil in the air? | ||
| I mean, you know, whatever's in the air at the time. | ||
| Could be nitrogen. | ||
| I don't know what our atmosphere is made up of at any given moment in time. | ||
| Just don't understand the mechanics. | ||
| Silicon. | ||
| Is that part of our air? | ||
| No, it can't be. | ||
| That'll kill us, right? | ||
| Well, anyway, I don't know. | ||
| I don't know how it works. | ||
| I don't trust it, but I understand that it'll make things crispy. | ||
| Do you know how an oven works? | ||
| Sort of. | ||
| It heats up a rock. | ||
| That's kind of what I was wondering. | ||
| There's a little flame. | ||
| Right, right, right. | ||
| It heats up a rock. | ||
| The little demon man holds the flamethrower towards the food when you close the door. | ||
| Yeah, that makes sense. | ||
| It's a lot like that. | ||
| So, Jordan, today we have an episode to do, a special episode. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| And we'll explain that in a moment, but before we do, let's take a little moment to say hello to some new wonks. | ||
| Ooh, that's a great idea. | ||
| So first, Muppie says if she hears Jordan yell, thank you very much, one more time, she might lose it. | ||
| Bad news, babe, this is your life now. | ||
| Thank you so much, you're now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Thank you very much! | ||
| Next, Yossarian McBalansky's favorite Englishman. | ||
| Thank you so much, you're now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Next, Timothy Policy Wonka Chalamet. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| You're now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Chase and Devin from once-occupied Richmond, Virginia. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| You're now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| And Lindsay, my raven queen, we're finally paper doctors and we never have to go back there again. | ||
| Love your grouse ninja. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| You're now a policy wonk. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Thank you very much! | ||
| And we got a technocrat in the mix, Jordan, so thank you so much to Cindy Harer, pronounced hair-air, that was close, from Occidental. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| You're now a technocrat. | ||
| I'm a policy wonk. | ||
| Four stars. | ||
| Go home to your mother and tell her you're brilliant. | ||
| Someone sodomite sent me a bucket of poop. | ||
| Daddy Shark. | ||
| Jar Jar Binks has a Caribbean black accent. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's a loser little titty baby. | |
| I don't want to hate black people. | ||
| I renounce Jesus Christ! | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| Yes, thank you very much. | ||
| So, Jordan. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Today, like I said, we have a special episode to do. | ||
| So, I got a little bit of a message from somebody informing me that one of the original members of our Facebook community, one of the members of the group, Dr. Harry, We'll be entering hospice care soon, and they're having a fun going-away party. | ||
| They're having a going-away party. | ||
| Having a blast. | ||
| Which is the way to do it. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| It's just the way to do it. | ||
| I did not inquire about the menu. | ||
| I did not inquire about what sort of games are going to be taking place. | ||
| Non-denominational, I would imagine. | ||
| I would assume so. | ||
| But yeah, so Sarah Beth reached out to me and wanted us to give a shout-out in celebration of this fine person. | ||
| And as is our want. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Decided to say, nah, nah, nah, fuck you. | |
| We're going to give you a special episode to celebrate. | ||
| Yeah, what's that you want? | ||
| We'll see you in hell! | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, literally, but not this time! | |
| So yeah, I decided, why not? | ||
| Jump in, do a little special episode for you, Dr. Harry. | ||
| Love it. | ||
| And so what we decided to do was go back to one of your birthdays, celebrate a little birthday celebration. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| So today, August 8th, 2012, is what we're going to be going over. | ||
| And there's one reason I decided to do this episode. | ||
| This one specifically. | ||
| Yeah, I chose this year's episode of that date. | ||
| And it turns out to be a bust. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But! | |
| All right. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Fair enough. | |
| When we get there, you'll know exactly why I chose this. | ||
| Right, right, right, right. | ||
| It will be like, you're like, oh, this was catnip. | ||
| Completely irresistible today. | ||
| Had no choice. | ||
| He couldn't stop himself. | ||
| But a bust. | ||
| Just a tragic, tragic bust. | ||
| So we start the episode out, and Alex is hot out of the gate. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| He's coming in swinging. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, we are locked and loaded, and we are ready to explode in defense of liberty. | ||
| I don't just want free humanity to awaken to the globalist threat. | ||
| I want you to come alive, and I want to get aggressive in the info war and expose the globalists. | ||
| Okay, I want to shake the show up. | ||
| We've got a special report, a week in the making, by Aaron Dykes, who absolutely is incredibly dedicated. | ||
| In fact, if I had to give an award to the most dedicated person in our operation, I don't know if I'd have to give it to Paul Watson or Aaron Dykes. | ||
| Probably for total hours spent, it'd have to be Watson. | ||
| This is a fictional award. | ||
| You could just give it to him. | ||
| He's probably the hardest working. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| They both have to get the gold medal. | ||
| It probably is a tie. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Woo! | |
| What praise? | ||
| That's one of the ways you can really tell a narcissist. | ||
| They have no concept of how to praise others. | ||
| It's like, okay, if I'm going to give it as an award, first of all, we have to think about how I feel. | ||
| And I obviously can only give an award to the best person. | ||
| So even if this fictional award does not exist, this time... | ||
| Even though I was trying to compliment you, Aaron Dykes. | ||
| Gotta give it to Paul Joseph Watson. | ||
| Fuck you, Dykes. | ||
| Anyways, we're gonna get that show up. | ||
| What? | ||
| There's a part of me that kind of respects the impulse to split hairs. | ||
| Of course there is. | ||
| But in a situation like this, just fucking say Dykes is the best. | ||
| Just give him the compliment. | ||
| I worked on this thing with Aaron Dykes. | ||
| He's the best. | ||
| Nah, fuck him. | ||
| Screw him. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Fuck him. | |
| No one's better than Paul. | ||
| Dude, just let it go! | ||
| Yeah, very strange. | ||
| Very strange. | ||
| So Alex talks about this special report that he and Aaron have put together, and I'm confused on what Aaron did. | ||
| It's a radio special report, but it has video as well, which is extremely powerful. | ||
| It's award-winning, in my humble opinion. | ||
| What Aaron and I have put together, I came up with the concept and the information, but Aaron just presented it. | ||
| Oh, he did. | ||
| So it's a special report. | ||
| I'm not going to even tell you the name of it or what it deals with until right before we air it, coming up in T-minus 30 minutes, 50 seconds, to be precise. | ||
| Very exciting. | ||
| I guess Aaron did the editing of it? | ||
| I will. | ||
| Put visuals to it? | ||
| Because Alex did all the information and came up with the idea. | ||
| Yeah, I'm going to go ahead and give you this one. | ||
| I'm going to interpret this one for you. | ||
| Aaron did B-roll. | ||
| Aaron did the entirety of the thing. | ||
| After Alex went, hey, you should do it on this, about this stuff. | ||
| No, because Alex does all the talking. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| It is like a speech that he's giving. | ||
| Sure, sure. | ||
| I doubt he wrote it. | ||
| Yeah, no, he did. | ||
| Oh, really? | ||
| It's real dumb. | ||
| It's very dumb. | ||
| Well, I mean, wow. | ||
| That's a good question. | ||
| I'm pretty sure Alex wrote it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Because it's fucking stupid. | ||
| All right, I'm listening. | ||
| You don't think Dykes could come up with something like this? | ||
| It has an Alex Jones-ian aroma to it. | ||
| It feels like him. | ||
| All right. | ||
| You'll be able to tell when we get to it because we're going to talk about this special report. | ||
| Gotcha. | ||
| So Alex is like, you heard it at the beginning. | ||
| He's like, I'm fucking loaded for bear. | ||
| We're coming out of this. | ||
| He wants to flip this show on its head. | ||
| Hell yeah. | ||
| He's going to play this special report, but also another twist. | ||
| Let's just shake the show up. | ||
| Before I even tell you what's coming up or what's in the news, I want to hear what you'd like to talk about. | ||
| I think Neil Boards calls it rapid fire. | ||
| I've always talked about, you know, trying to have radio graffiti. | ||
| I think that's what Alan Combs calls it. | ||
| Back when I was first on air 17 years ago, I would actually do news blitzes and cover like 100 articles in 30 minutes. | ||
| Or 50 calls in an hour. | ||
| I've never done that in like five, six years. | ||
| But we got a little bit better, as you know. | ||
| So the toll-free number to join us right now, the phones are open. | ||
| 800-259-9231. | ||
| We come back from the break. | ||
| I am going to control myself. | ||
| No matter what year you go to, no matter what period of time, you will find Alex saying, I'm going to blitz through these calls. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| We're going to get to all these, we're just going to radio graffiti this thing. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I... | |
| Okay. | ||
| He couldn't do it, and it wouldn't be interesting to watch him try. | ||
| To news blitz 150 stories in 60 minutes or whatever. | ||
| No, I mean, like I said, how could you even? | ||
| What kind of context could you give for anything? | ||
| You could just say, bah, here's this thing. | ||
| Well, that's what I'm thinking. | ||
| How could I find a way to make it both entertaining and informative to just scream as many words as possible about the news in as short a period of time as possible while reading headlines and stuff? | ||
| I can't think of any way to do it. | ||
| That doesn't turn into an auctioneer. | ||
| Having a heart attack. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Bears outside! | ||
| Bees coming at ya! | ||
| You would learn a lot, I think, for sure. | ||
| That's the environmental news. | ||
| I'd like to shout out to Neil Bortz, too. | ||
| Neil Bortz. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| Another right-wing talker. | ||
| What's Bortz up to? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| He might be dead by now. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| But, yeah, I used to listen to him on 93.9 The Eagle in Columbia, Missouri. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Yeah, Neil Bortz, like the flat tax. | ||
| That was a big thing for him. | ||
| Man, I love those flat taxers. | ||
| He had a co-host named Royal. | ||
| God bless him. | ||
| Royal. | ||
| It was his producer. | ||
| There was a lady. | ||
| I can't remember her name, too. | ||
| That was the crew. | ||
| It was actually Robin. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The Bortz. | |
| She was doing double duty with Stern and Bortz. | ||
| I feel like there's a natural overlap. | ||
| Yeah, obviously. | ||
| Neil Bortz. | ||
| Yeah, morning and evening stuff. | ||
| I feel like it goes a long way in radio to have a name with a Z in it. | ||
| I think Neil Bortz was... | ||
| Was it a Z? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| A Z does help. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So Alex does not get to the call blitz immediately. | ||
| Instead, he decides to ramble a bit about race. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| There's calls in the media now about the dangerous white male. | ||
| White males... | ||
| All right, the second most nonviolent low crime rate group, if you look at statistics, and I don't get off into race stuff, but it's all over the media today. | ||
| I get off on race stuff. | ||
| I was a man gal this morning and he was covering the different stories. | ||
| So I'm going to get to that later, where they're saying white males are the threat and are the source of all evil. | ||
| The number one least dangerous group is white women. | ||
| Then it's Asian women. | ||
| This is Justice Department's own crime statistics. | ||
| Kurt Nemo's written articles about it. | ||
| And then it's white men. | ||
| Great department that, Justice. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| The least violent people are white women and then Asian women and then white males. | ||
| I mean, that's just a fact. | ||
| This is complete nonsense. | ||
| I don't even know what that means. | ||
| What Alex is saying is what he feels like the statistics would show, where white women are essentially the most harmless creatures on Earth, Asian women wouldn't hurt anybody, and then coming in a close third is white men. | ||
| Obviously. | ||
| White men do almost no wrong, but it's hard to compete with the nonviolent tendencies of white and Asian women. | ||
| Well, we would be as nonviolent as white women, but we have to protect white women from all the other... | ||
| I assume Alex might retreat to that excuse. | ||
| I guarantee that's exactly what he would say. | ||
| I guarantee it. | ||
| Like a million, billion percent. | ||
| Yeah, so I consulted the FBI crime statistics for 2012. | ||
| You might be surprised to learn that none of this matches up with what you find there. | ||
| White people are committing quite a bit of violent crime, but stats don't matter to Alex. | ||
| Especially when he's talking about stats. | ||
| It's about how you feel. | ||
| It's about vibes. | ||
| He's doing vibe talk about crime stats. | ||
| Why would you even say that? | ||
| What would you even have? | ||
| What could he possibly think positive could come out of being like, eh, you know, as we all know, white women can't hurt anybody. | ||
| Well, I think it's what the audience wants to hear and what they feel too. | ||
| Weird. | ||
| So I think it works. | ||
| He's given vibes that the audience wants to vibe back with him. | ||
| Weird. | ||
| So the media, like Alex had already sort of suggested in that last clip, they're trying to scare everybody about the idea of lone wolf white terrorism. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| And so he talks about that a little bit. | ||
| There is a flotilla of news articles talking about the lone wolf evil white person. | ||
| So it's gone from, as I'm... | ||
| Told you a few years ago that we saw an internal Homeland Security report. | ||
| That it's the Muslim extremists give up all your rights. | ||
| They're hiding in your underwear. | ||
| The TSA has to check right now. | ||
| To white males are everywhere. | ||
| They're vicious. | ||
| They're racist. | ||
| They're murderers. | ||
| They're criminals. | ||
| Lock up your wives, your daughters, your children. | ||
| They're everywhere. | ||
| We've got to take their guns. | ||
| Some of this is, I think, probably the result of the Batman Aurora shooting just having happened. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure, sure, sure. | |
| So I think some of that conversation might be part and parcel of that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| But also, this is of note. | ||
| You notice the way that Alex is saying that they're trying to take this stuff, they're applying on Muslim terrorists, and then now pivot it to the white man. | ||
| Right. | ||
| He does this all the time. | ||
| He's saying that, like, the Biden Justice Department is doing that now. | ||
| This is constantly something that is in the present happening. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's weird. | |
| Well, I mean... | ||
| I think it's fairly easy always to rely on that because... | ||
| Anything that, you know, you've always got for the paranoid libertarian that, like, Caesar crossing the Rubicon, like, any pointed action towards outside the country that then gets pointed inside is the next step is we got a new Caesar, right? | ||
| So, if it's like, oh, yeah, no, it's fine, you can torture people off the, oh, Iraq, who cares? | ||
| You know, but if you do it here, then you're gonna be Caesar. | ||
| That kind of concept, right? | ||
| Right. | ||
| That's the basic reason that that works. | ||
| Now... | ||
| Mix a little bit of white identity into it. | ||
| Ooh, now you got the sauce. | ||
| That's the InfoWars sauce. | ||
| Now you got the juice. | ||
| Which I'm surprised Alex hasn't sold. | ||
| I would be surprised. | ||
| InfoWars sauce. | ||
| It would be a cream sauce. | ||
| It would be a mayo. | ||
| It would be some sort of a mayo, I think. | ||
| It wouldn't be an aioli, because that's too highfalutin for the InfoWarriors. | ||
| I think there's no way around that. | ||
| I agree. | ||
| So Alex, he's like, you have this transition from focusing on Islamic terror. | ||
| Now it's white people. | ||
| It's all the white people. | ||
| And Alex could see behind the curtain, and he knew that this was coming. | ||
| Basically, John Wayne is the enemy. | ||
| And I told you that that was going to be the public rollout. | ||
| We could see the rollout being prepared behind closed doors, because first they get their minions ready for the new enemy. | ||
| And I told you, okay, coming out of that gate is going to be this particular gladiator. | ||
| Because, see, here's the analogy. | ||
| I've been behind the gates. | ||
| I saw they were getting suited up and ready. | ||
| I walked out and said, okay, coming out of that gate is going to be a guy with a trident and a neck, because I saw him getting suited up. | ||
| People are like, oh no, you didn't see that. | ||
| Boom! | ||
| Gates open. | ||
| Charging out right at us is the false flag terror attacks to be blamed on the evil whiting. | ||
| Because it could be anybody. | ||
| I mean, the terrorists could be anybody who's a Muslim, anybody who's got brown skin. | ||
| They've all now been properly demonized as terrorists, and now... | ||
| Who do you get? | ||
| Oh, now the John Deere cap person. | ||
| Yeah, the John Deere cap person. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Prior to MAGA, we had John Deere. | ||
| John Deere caps. | ||
| Who would have guessed? | ||
| So Alex can't see behind any curtain, and there is no man with a trident and net that he accurately saw coming. | ||
| But this clip is pretty important context to consider for the next phase of Alex's career. | ||
| We're in August 2012, just a few months before the Sandy Hook shooting, and then only a few more months before the Boston Marathon bombing. | ||
| In both of those cases, Alex was deeply invested in covering the stories as if they were false flags being blamed on a white patsy in order to take guns. | ||
| And that's because that was the storyline he went in looking for. | ||
| He'd already determined that this was what the globalists were going to do, so he forced his coverage into fitting that mold, instead of learning about the events and covering them as they exist in reality. | ||
| For Alex, reality is second to narrative, and his narrative about what these majorly traumatic events will be about was clearly set in advance. | ||
| In Alex's world, everything appears as if predictions are coming true, not because they are, but because Alex distorts reality to make it fit the shape of the predictions and narratives he establishes as being what his imaginary enemies are planning. | ||
| This is a parlor trick. | ||
| And for those who might be thinking the Boston bombing was carried out by the Tsarnev brothers, according to Alex's coverage, the globalists originally planned to blame it on a white guy, but they had to change patsies because Alex called them out and ruined their plans. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, yeah, yeah. | |
| Don't worry. | ||
| So that still fits. | ||
| It still fits. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| They retconned that one to be, yeah. | ||
| I think what I find really fascinating about this is that this is doubly the wrong conversation. | ||
| Do you know what I mean? | ||
| That conversation about lone wolf stuff, we know that that was going on. | ||
| There were those conversations about all of these lone wolf terrorists and shooters being ideologically individuals, as opposed to now we realize that the conversation should have been, this was a conversation from the beginning. | ||
| This was a network from the beginning, not one that was well thought out or anything like that, but this is a conversation. | ||
| And so, for them to be wrong, and then to have Alex wrong on top of that, it is like, of course the conversation cannot... | ||
| Move forward. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| We're still digging back through three levels of wrong. | ||
| Yeah, but the way that Alex is wrong is intentionally to run cover for the people who he wants to commit terrorist acts. | ||
| Right! | ||
| That's what I'm saying! | ||
| Like, even if we're kicking ass through Alex's shit, we have made it to being wrong on only one level. | ||
| You know? | ||
| Because of the conversation that Alex has derailed, we can't even talk about the way that we're already on the wrong path. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| You know? | ||
| Yeah, it is a limitation. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So, you know, this notion that they had was that there's the sort of Tea Party type and the hard right wing, the militia folks, and that they were going to work with Al-Qaeda. | ||
| Like, Al-Qaeda was going to, or... | ||
| Conversely, Al-Qaeda was going to use and infiltrate some of these groups in order to hide in plain sight and then commit terror through that. | ||
| Alex has a rebuttal to that that I think is sort of pointing the finger at himself a little bit. | ||
| I mean, Business Insider and others have the headlines of Firestorm after Colonel's report prepares for Tea Party insurgency. | ||
| That's not the Firestorm. | ||
| It says Al-Qaeda is going to infiltrate into the U.S. from Mexico and link up with the Tea Party. | ||
| I mean, ladies and gentlemen, ladies and gentlemen, the Tea Party is the most Islamophobic group. | ||
| It's unbelievable how dumb they think. | ||
| But I told you, they're going to blow stuff up and claim patriots work with Al-Qaeda. | ||
| I told you that a long time ago. | ||
| I know these people. | ||
| I eat, drink, and sleep, and I'm inside their mind. | ||
| Or I imagine I am. | ||
| But also, the Tea Party, which I am the leader of, is far too Islamophobic to ever work with Muslims. | ||
| I mean, I feel like the irony now is how often we hear them being like, well, I mean, sure, but at least they're in control of their women! | ||
| You know, like... | ||
| Certainly, you hear that from Alex from time to time. | ||
| There's a lot of ideological overlap that Alex is throwing away. | ||
| Certainly, Alex has now come around to, like, I like how much they hate gay people. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| Muslim fundamental... | ||
| Mentalists hate gay people. | ||
| So he's made a little bit of peace there. | ||
| Yeah, apparently. | ||
| These people are so stupid. | ||
| Yeah, and also another thing that Alex has sort of made peace with is he's scoffing at the idea of Al-Qaeda coming in through the border. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| His whole narrative now is so much of these Hezbollah sleeper cells. | ||
| They're coming in through the border. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| They're all coming in through the border. | ||
| His only gripe, really, I guess, is the idea that his Tea Party friends would ever associate with Muslims. | ||
| Yeah, I guess that is the problem. | ||
| Well, 10 years changed a lot, hasn't it? | ||
| So Alex does take some calls. | ||
| And he has a bit of a prediction for one of these callers that I think is a little bit... | ||
| I mean, we're 11... | ||
| Well, now 12. It's 2024. | ||
| Oh, my God. | ||
| 12 years past this. | ||
| And I don't think this has come to pass. | ||
| Police aren't even driving in normal police cars anymore. | ||
| They're driving in these huge kind of... | ||
| I mean, they're marked as police cars, but... | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're huge, and they look like the Homeland Security kind of truck. | |
| No, no, no. | ||
| They have giant black trucks, the new Homeland Security trucks going in nationwide. | ||
| Yes, the police will roll around in giant tanks because the foreign banks took over. | ||
| These are collaborators. | ||
| Most of them don't know it. | ||
| And they are training the military, not just the MPs now, but general military in police work. | ||
| Before they deploy Brigade Homeland to every city, every major city. | ||
| A city the size of Austin will have 4,000 troops in it. | ||
| A city the size of Dallas will have about 12,000. | ||
| A place like New York will have about 50,000 troops in it. | ||
| And we're going to be fully occupied by the foreign New World Order Army. | ||
| And they expect a lot of military, once the gun confiscation begins, to rebel. | ||
| So they'll simultaneously be purges in the military of active duty. | ||
| But then the hunting down of veterans they have files on for extermination. | ||
| Yeah, so that didn't happen. | ||
| No. | ||
| At all. | ||
| No, not even a little bit. | ||
| And I think one of the things that clip illustrates really well is how you shouldn't associate with Alex even with things that you agree with him about. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I think that you and I can both agree that the militarization of police is a problem. | ||
| Huge problem. | ||
| But that doesn't mean that the military is taking over the police in order to gun confiscate and then kill everybody under globalist orders. | ||
| Big difference. | ||
| This is a distortion of the conversation around the militarization of police. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, the conversation really is like, okay, if an organization starts as slave catchers and then you turn them into a military, didn't you just make the Confederacy again? | ||
| There you go. | ||
| Well, certainly not the way Alex would want to cover it. | ||
| No, probably not. | ||
| He's Confederate royalty. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| So we had to tease at the beginning of this episode that there was a special report made by second best info warrior Aaron Dykes. | ||
| Poor guy. | ||
| Couldn't even get one compliment. | ||
| No. | ||
| Nope. | ||
| He got a qualified compliment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So close. | |
| So close. | ||
| Qualified compliment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| So Alex introduces this and he reveals the big name of it. | ||
| We are titling this. | ||
| Video. | ||
| Full spectrum evil. | ||
| Full spectrum evil. | ||
| All right. | ||
| You're facing full spectrum evil. | ||
| Say it one more time. | ||
| They create al-Qaeda, use al-Qaeda against Russia, the Serbs, moderate Muslim countries. | ||
| They use... | ||
| Al-Qaeda against the United States, or Al-Qaeda takes the blame for globalist attacks, is a pretext to take our liberties. | ||
| It is a key set piece they move around the board to wherever they want to invade. | ||
| And they think you're so stupid, they can tell you Al-Qaeda are heroes. | ||
| Go look at the Council on Foreign Relations latest report they put out last Friday, where they praise CFR.org. | ||
| Bar and Affairs. | ||
| They praise Al-Qaeda. | ||
| That's how dumb they think you are. | ||
| And now they're flipping the script to domestic terrorists and creating this fear that there are white terrorists. | ||
| They're now sitting on the news. | ||
| The last year you saw the Homeland Security training videos where all the terrorists are white, blowing up shopping malls, movie theaters, sports stadiums. | ||
| And then it starts. | ||
| Then it begins. | ||
| And then the people are all government-run. | ||
| Air Force top psychiatrists, multiple shooters, witnesses say. | ||
| Army psyops, connected. | ||
| The witnesses see four shooters. | ||
| The head of the Sikh temple sees men casing the joint. | ||
| I mean, white supremacist groups, more than half of them are feds. | ||
| The members, it's come out. | ||
| They're run in almost every case by the feds. | ||
| What do you do? | ||
| You just kill one of your operatives. | ||
| After your operatives shoot people. | ||
| They infiltrate, then they bug out. | ||
| And then you put it on the news. | ||
| Very simple. | ||
| This is how a black op is run. | ||
| And so the globalists are now dropping the hammer on us with these false flags. | ||
| And this is the summer of false flags that will lead into the fall and the winter of huge wars. | ||
| Even if they get away with this. | ||
| We are in grave danger. | ||
| Hearing stuff like this, it's really easy to see the headspace Alex was in during the months leading up to the Sandy Hook shooting. | ||
| He was deeply invested in this narrative that the globalists had taken all of the demonization that they'd built up around Islamic terrorism and projected it onto the right wing so they could start doing false flags to blame on white people. | ||
| Alex was obviously going to filter every single story that he came across through that lens, regardless of what the reality on the ground was. | ||
| What I'm saying is that there was never a chance he was going to report on Sandy Hook honestly. | ||
| He was far too deep into this narrative to let a prime tragedy like that go to waste. | ||
| Also, if you have the mentality that Alex has about white supremacist groups, sure doesn't seem like you could ever really think any of them are real. | ||
| Seems like every act of racist violence is conveniently excused as not really actually being racist violence, but in fact just the globalists trying to make white people look bad. | ||
| Doesn't seem like a healthy perspective. | ||
| Seems cowardly. | ||
| Here's what I've always found funny about that. | ||
| What's that? | ||
| Okay, so when you think about it, Alex's point... | ||
| Ultimately is like, okay, so these white supremacist groups are created by the government and, you know, controlled by the FBI and so on and so forth to make white people look bad. | ||
| And it's like, I mean, it makes them look bad already. | ||
| You know, like the government already. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| It doesn't make white supremacists look so much bad as everybody. | ||
| All of them. | ||
| They all look terrible. | ||
| You know, like when you find out that the second in command, like the Michigan kidnap thing. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| When you find out the second in command was the FBI guy and you're like, come on, man. | ||
| Second? | ||
| You can't do that. | ||
| What do you mean? | ||
| You can be like a guy. | ||
| You can infiltrate and you can be a guy who's like listening. | ||
| But you can't be like, and here's my thoughts. | ||
| No, that's not cool. | ||
| That's not cool. | ||
| That's you telling them to do stuff. | ||
| Maybe. | ||
| You don't know the organization. | ||
| Maybe they had a really strong unitary leader. | ||
| You are just a figurehead in second-in-command. | ||
| Plus, what if you're really great and you just accidentally stumble ass-backwards into being second-in-command? | ||
| That's the problem! | ||
| You didn't do anything? | ||
| Is that the guy they would hire to do awesome undercover fieldwork is probably a guy that they want in the white supremacist group. | ||
| To be the leader! | ||
| Look, I agree, it's messy. | ||
| It's a bad idea. | ||
| But I also think that you could make an argument that nobody looks good, because even if a group is fake, you're still getting people to join a group. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Totally, yeah. | |
| And those people don't look great. | ||
| All of you look terrible. | ||
| This is a terrible idea. | ||
| Yeah, even if it is a fake thing that says white supremacists come here. | ||
| The white supremacists keep going! | ||
| People go to it, and they look bad. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, yeah, yeah. | |
| Also, Alex brings up the CFR in Foreign Affairs calling Al-Qaeda heroes, which he attributes to a report they allegedly put out last Friday, which would have been the 3rd of August 2012. | ||
| It took quite a while, but I was able to find what Alex was talking about. | ||
| The CFR wasn't calling Al-Qaeda heroes, and in fact, you can find a great deal of fairly negative coverage of that terrorist group on their site. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, yeah? | |
| This was an opinion piece written by Ed Hussein, who is a senior fellow for Middle Eastern Studies. | ||
| Hussein was making the argument that the Free Syrian Army, Sure. | ||
| The Syrian wing of Al-Qaeda was called Jabhat al-Nusra li 'alhi al-Sham, and Hussein says, quote, Al-Qaeda is not sacrificing its martyrs in Syria merely to overthrow Assad. | ||
| Liberation of the Syrian people is a bonus, but the main aim is to create an Islamist state in all or part of the country. | ||
| Failing that, they hope to at least establish a strategic base for the organization's remnants across the border in Iraq and create a regional headquarters where Mujahideen can enjoy a safe haven. | ||
| If Al-Qaeda continues to play an increasingly important role in the rebellion, then a post-Assad government will be indebted to the tribes and regions allied with the Jabhat. | ||
| Hussein isn't praising al-Qaeda. | ||
| He's bringing this up as something to be very concerned about. | ||
| He makes this very clear when he goes on to say, quote, the unspoken political calculation among policymakers is to get rid of Assad first, weakening Iran's position in the region, and then deal with al-Qaeda later. | ||
| But the planning to minimize al-Qaeda's likely hold over Syrian tribes and fighters must begin now, as the Obama administration ramps up its support to rebel groups. | ||
| Alex is just making shit up to serve his purposes. | ||
| There's never been a person who is more fortunate to have an uncurious audience than Alex. | ||
| This is not saying that Al-Qaeda are heroes. | ||
| No. | ||
| This is a, the enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend conversation, right? | ||
| It's 180 from what Alex is saying. | ||
| Yeah, it is like, hey, listen, I know you might think this is helpful, but this is not helpful. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| This is a thing that is happening that we need to also plan for. | ||
| Yeah, if we are accepting the idea that al-Nasra fighters are... | ||
| We are backing the Free Syrian Army. | ||
| We need to plan on a contingency of what to do to not allow a post-assiled world to be run by Al-Nusra. | ||
| That should inform our decision-making in the future. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Exactly. | |
| But they're heroes. | ||
| No, that makes more sense. | ||
| Fuck it. | ||
| Report a fake version of this to your audience because they'll just hear CFR and be like, oh, Alex knows all about them. | ||
| I mean, reading is hard. | ||
| It is. | ||
| It is. | ||
| That is inarguable. | ||
| Much more satisfying just listening to this dum-dum. | ||
| Anyway. | ||
| Alex is getting to the special report. | ||
| So he brings it. | ||
| All right. | ||
| And he starts it off. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Full spectrum evil. | |
| Here it is. | ||
| Full spectrum evil. | ||
| The secret of the New World Order Takeover program. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The secret of the New World Order Takeover. | |
| Alex Jones here to cover a topic, an issue, that is one of the most important I've ever discussed. | ||
| This information is very closely held by governments and elite corporations. | ||
| They do not want you understanding this. | ||
| Now, many of you that are already aware of this, it'll seem simple. | ||
| But large swaths of the global population have no idea the real geopolitical paradigm that we're living in today. | ||
| What's that? | ||
| Today we will look at the real forces, the real players in the battle for 21st century global hegemony. | ||
| I'm going to break down who really rules the world, how they control the planet, and how they are trying to usher in a world war that is really pointed at the general population. | ||
| It seems like every third or fourth piece of media Alex puts out involves a promise that he's going to reveal who runs the world and all their evil plans, and yet here we are. | ||
| I don't think we have more specific answer than the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and Bilderberg group, and then... | ||
| Their plans are whatever conspiracy I want to scare you about this week. | ||
| I would be happier if he said for the time being, or for like, in the moment we exist in now. | ||
| You know, like, I'm going to reveal to you who's the, for the time being. | ||
| He can't, though, because this plan is supposed to extend back. | ||
| I know. | ||
| All the history of our country, history prior to our country, and then now we know it goes back to the time of the fucking devil. | ||
| Yeah, see, that's the thing. | ||
| So, like, he can't have, for now. | ||
| It does feel like the enemy changes so frequently, and yet... | ||
| The rules say that it's the same one every time. | ||
| Mysteriously no Klaus Schwab, no World Economic Forum. | ||
| Very odd. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Weird. | |
| So this kind of grandiose language Alex is using, he uses it pretty consistently because on some level he knows that material like this is meant to indoctrinate new people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| This is meant to excite people with the promise that he knows who runs the world and all their secrets. | ||
| That's why you hear that little dip into his dramatic voiceover mode in the middle when he's talking about the dark forces. | ||
| First taste is free, come on. | ||
| It's like he's doing a movie trailer voice about it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In a world where I tell the truth. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| So this starts, and I was so fucking disappointed. | ||
| To begin my illustration, I have three different board games here. | ||
| The classic game of Risk, as well as Monopoly. | ||
| We're going to look at these systems of stylized warfare, and between these three systems, we find the truth. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| As I was listening to this, it struck me that it sounded familiar, and I could have sworn that we covered this already. | ||
| I went back through our episodes and found that on episode 119, we covered this special report because Alex played it on a different episode. | ||
| I decided that because it was 700 episodes ago, maybe we'd hear it differently. | ||
| I remember it clearly. | ||
| Maybe we'd hear it differently this time, and honestly, I have no idea what we said about it, and I don't believe you remember this. | ||
| None of it! | ||
| Yeah, of course. | ||
| Come on! | ||
| So what the hell? | ||
| Let's listen to it again and see what we can learn about how the world is like a board game. | ||
| Let's roll those dice! | ||
| I feel like Alex is going to be talking about how excited he is about the special report later in the episode, so we should have some context. | ||
| So let's just dive in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We got chess, risk, monopoly. | |
| None of the other fine games. | ||
| No Go, no Chutes and Ladders, no Settlers of Catan. | ||
| I'm certain all of these references were made the last time we talked about this. | ||
| To begin with, I'm going to use a Lego chess set as an illustration to break down primitive forms of government, warfare, and domination. | ||
| If you look at this set, you notice there are two sides. | ||
| There is the red and there is the green, or there is the black, there is the light. | ||
| Christmas Legos. | ||
| From the beginnings of civilization more than 6,000 years ago until about 1700, this was the model of warfare between nations. | ||
| There were occasional alliances, but by and large, warfare and politics was carried out in a very two-dimensional way, like a chess set. | ||
| You have the ruling class. | ||
| That's the bishop. | ||
| The military elite, the generals, and in front of them, you have basically their conscripts or the lower class fighters who can also represent just the general population. | ||
| That's nice of it. | ||
| And these two groups are engaged in warfare and base domination. | ||
| That's the horse. | ||
| For 6,000 years, you had to take the queen. | ||
| I mean... | ||
| So this is something that feels like it was, like it probably feels real, but nothing Alex is saying connects with actual history. | ||
| He's infantilizing ancient cultures and pretending that everything they did was just one-on-one conflicts. | ||
| I mean... | ||
| If you go through history, you'll find countless examples of very complicated alliances and multi-sided conflicts. | ||
| I think what Alex is trying to get at as an idea is that war from 6,000 years ago to about 1,700 was strictly bilateral. | ||
| There were two sides in the conflict, and each side had their elites like kings, queens, and castles, as well as their riffraff like the pawns. | ||
| But this is kind of dumb. | ||
| And one would just need to look at the history of China or Italy to get a sense of how off the mark Alex's analysis is, just from the jump. | ||
| This has no connection to reality. | ||
| What war of blank kingdoms included a number higher than two? | ||
| There certainly aren't two examples of that in world history. | ||
| At least. | ||
| So... | ||
| I think I get sort of what he's trying to start off with, but it's erroneous. | ||
| I mean, I think the most fun version of that, though, is just like... | ||
| Think of the conflicts on the Polynesian islands. | ||
| Right. | ||
| During that, during so many time periods of, like, multi-polar war at all times, and then your enemies are your friends, and then, and there's no, sometimes there's a king, and sometimes it's just a bunch of guys, you know? | ||
| It's a fun, fun way of looking at human history. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| All scrunched up, you know? | ||
| Or city-state times in various European areas. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| Oh, no, no, no. | ||
| We're mad at that dude from there. | ||
| The end. | ||
| I mean, I get it. | ||
| Chess is a very basic... | ||
| War facsimile game. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| And I think that's what Alex is trying to pretend the world is like, too. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Because the globalists have been running things since, like, you know, forever. | ||
| So that was their model back then. | ||
| That's their chess, yeah. | ||
| So Alex says something else about chess that I think is really weird. | ||
| Interesting. | ||
| One area that we see from the ancient chess model that is still used in statecraft by the globalists is the fact that sometimes wars were launched, in the case of the French and the British. | ||
| against each other when they had rebellions at home. | ||
| They soon learned it was a way to turn inner anger at the state against a foreign state and to reduce the population of young males, Is that a part of chess? | ||
| I haven't played chess in a while, but I don't feel like that's a primary objective or even secondary objective of chess. | ||
| Alright, a lot of times people aren't thinking. | ||
| You know, while you're thinking about your moveset, you're like, oh, four moves ahead. | ||
| That's really cool. | ||
| But what you're not thinking about is how to feed your pawns. | ||
| Where they're going to stay after the game is over. | ||
| What it is that they are going to do. | ||
| Like, you know, what's their leisure time activities? | ||
| What are you talking about? | ||
| You're going to have these pawns here and you're just going to play the game? | ||
| I will say that I have never gotten into a game of chess with somebody. | ||
| And then we, you know, we go through a little bit. | ||
| I take a couple of their pawns. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| And they're like, all right, I'm done. | ||
| I was just trying to lose some pawns. | ||
| You're not even playing the right game. | ||
| There are times where you'll take some pawns, right? | ||
| And then the pawns will be like, oh, thank goodness, that guy's not feeding me over there. | ||
| And then you have to have a conversation with the guy. | ||
| You quit playing the game, and you're like, man, you can't treat people like this. | ||
| This is unacceptable behavior. | ||
| There's no jobs over on my side of the board. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're just sacrificing people like they don't matter to you. | |
| So anyway, that's all a thing of the past, the two-sided warfare. | ||
| The two-sided fight is a bygone era. | ||
| In truth, for more than 300 years, the globalists have been financing multiple sides of wars knowing that conflict destroys nations and gets countries deep into debt. | ||
| And that is the key. | ||
| They're financing both sides. | ||
| And we see this being pioneered by people like the Rothschilds, starting in the 1700s and 1800s, where they would finance sometimes three or four different factions, and it didn't matter who won because all of them were in debt to them and had societies that were wrecked after the wars. | ||
| Next, let's look at the game of Risk. | ||
| Yeah, let's. | ||
| Why? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I feel like we're not done with chess. | ||
| If this is your... | ||
| This is your even basic metaphorical understanding of chess. | ||
| I'm mad at you. | ||
| We need to spend more time there. | ||
| Nope. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| We're moving on. | ||
| To risk. | ||
| This is our discussion of chess. | ||
| That was it. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Also, Alex has a lot of ideas about Rothschild's controlling all sides of wars and stuff that he has not substantiated at all, and I know was part of his, you know, I mean, we talked about it in the Endgame documentary about his quite elaborate claims about these things that in his bibliography says, Insert here evidence of Rothschild's funding both sides of war. | ||
| So no citation in the bibliography outside of I don't have one, I'll find it later. | ||
| You know what is an interesting chess thing that I definitely didn't know about when we talked about it is that Magnus Carlsen... | ||
| Grandmaster. | ||
| Best chess player human ever to live, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whoa. | |
| So he's studying all the machine learning algorithms that play chess that are like a million times better than any human being has ever done it. | ||
| And the big strategic change that he's learned from them is to use the king more aggressively in the endgame. | ||
| So the idea is, that's metaphorically very, very interesting about this, is that for thousands of years... | ||
| Human beings have played with this kind of inherent risk avoidance with the king. | ||
| Obviously, it's the most important game, you know, that kind of thing. | ||
| And it takes a machine to go, eh, it's just another fucking guy if you're playing the game to win. | ||
| Yeah, let's not be precious about the king. | ||
| Exactly! | ||
| We're trying to win. | ||
| We're not trying to do anything else. | ||
| I don't care if you live, I don't care if you die. | ||
| We win, you know? | ||
| So that's a really fascinating thing. | ||
| So is this revolutionized optimal chess playing? | ||
| I don't think it has revolutionized... | ||
| Right. | ||
| So... | ||
| I do think that that's helped Magnus Carlsen in, like, Blitz Chess and the ultra-rapid stuff. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Because he's better than anybody's even ever considered those. | ||
| You know another amazing chess thing? | ||
| What's that? | ||
| Bangkok. | ||
| Oriental City. | ||
| The city don't know what the city is getting. | ||
| Creme de la creme of the chess world and a show of everything but your brainer. | ||
| I want to say that one was definitely... | ||
| Time flies. | ||
| Doesn't seem a minute. | ||
| I don't remember the rest of this song. | ||
| That is One Night in Bangkok from the musical Chess. | ||
| I really want to go back now. | ||
| I almost guarantee you said that one. | ||
| There's almost no doubt. | ||
| Anytime Chess comes up, gotta talk about Murray Head. | ||
| So, we're introducing Risk. | ||
| Here we go. | ||
| Next, let's look at the game of Risk. | ||
| These are primitive attempts to distill down human conflict and domination into a game you can play in a few hours. | ||
| The militaries all have basically equal resources, equal numbers of troops, and to enter into the equation some type of random probability, we have dice and we have carts. | ||
| There is no discussion here on looking at the real model that we are under today. | ||
| We're going to come back to risk here in a moment, but first let's move to the game of Monopoly. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wait. | |
| That's all? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| That's all. | ||
| You're introducing Risk, and that's all you got to say? | ||
| Just skip. | ||
| You just described how you play it. | ||
| Just redo. | ||
| There's cards, and you roll dice. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Also, you can't play it in a few hours. | ||
| I mean. | ||
| Not usually. | ||
| I've never played a game. | ||
| I've never finished a game, I don't think. | ||
| Oh, I've finished plenty, but they were like all night affairs. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| They would go forever. | ||
| Yeah, it would be like, at best, you would have to plan a second day. | ||
| For my, in my history. | ||
| Me and some folks. | ||
| Fernandez, Joe Fernandez used to like to play Risk. | ||
| Sure, sure, sure. | ||
| And it would just be like, you gotta expect, you're probably gonna be there till like 4 in the morning, 5 in the morning. | ||
| Yeah, but never have a second day unless you're counting like the sunrise. | ||
| Right, right, right. | ||
| Yeah, I got what you're saying. | ||
| But yeah, it's not a few hours. | ||
| Unless you're playing bad. | ||
| Well, there's that. | ||
| There's a lot of people who play bad. | ||
| True, true. | ||
| And I do think that most of the time Risk games... | ||
| They'll often end up in a situation of, like, two people getting dangerously close to saying, let's fucking call it. | ||
| Because they keep going back and forth, killing each other's armies and not finishing off getting all the countries in the world. | ||
| The best, the most accurate war simulator, or war simulation aspect of Risk is the eventual disgust for the game of Risk. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| And war itself. | ||
| This is meaningless. | ||
| War is hell. | ||
| And people and your friends. | ||
| You don't even know if you like those people anymore after a good game of Risk. | ||
| And then you realize that if a good game of Risk makes you hate everybody, don't fight wars. | ||
| That's probably the best outcome you can have at playing Risk. | ||
| So Alex brought up Risk, didn't really say much about it, says we're going to get back to it, I guess. | ||
| Do you think we do? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I've listened to it and I don't know. | ||
| So he's going to talk about Monopoly. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| In the game of Monopoly, you have different economic groups, or four players, that attempt to engage in economic warfare against each other and then be able to create a Monopoly or a single... | ||
| entity that is in control of New York City. | ||
| To understand the real system we're under, it's important to combine monopoly and risk with an overlay of strategy from chess. | ||
| What the fuck are you talking about? | ||
| Now I want to play this game. | ||
| I want to figure out how to play... | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So you've got a chess board. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| When you move a pawn, or when you make a chess move... | ||
| Alright, that has to correspond to a move in Risk, which also has to correspond to a move in Monopoly. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| No, because there's an overlay of chess. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| It's a combination of Risk and Monopoly with an overlay of chess. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Which I don't even know what that means. | ||
| I don't even know what that means. | ||
| I think you want a Risk board, is what Alex is saying. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| So you got the globe. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But then you want Monopoly in terms of like... | ||
| Paying rent if you land on Irkutsk. | ||
| Sure, sure, sure. | ||
| So you put your army there, but you have to have a constant resource built. | ||
| Yeah, and instead of battling, it's like you have to pay rent for landing there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Or something, maybe. | ||
| But then the overlay of the strategy of chess, I don't really understand. | ||
| Oh, so in 2012, Alex Jones created StarCraft. | ||
| Man, he's going to be pissed. | ||
| He's going to be pissed he doesn't get residuals. | ||
| Also, Monopoly is famously set in Atlantic City. | ||
| Small point. | ||
| Also, canonically, as the player, you're not so much a financial group as you are a landlord. | ||
| It was based off a prior game called The Landlord's Game, which was very anti-landlord. | ||
| Charles Darrow came along and stole that idea from the woman who created it and made the goal more strictly capitalistic, which is spiritually fitting, since he stole it and made a ton of money off it. | ||
| Metaphorically, it just doesn't get more on the nose than that. | ||
| Yeah, I don't know about the you're a financial group. | ||
| Tiny little pieces of things that are kind of like, oh man. | ||
| It's like, this would fly amazingly at a bong circle. | ||
| Oh shit, yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Dude, the world is just like Risk and Monopoly with an overlay of chess. | |
| If you're in the common area, everybody's high, and everybody's just kind of suddenly noticing all the board games that have been in the dorm room common area for a while, somebody pulls one out and then starts going, you could see a bunch of people listening to a boring, boring monologue about this shit. | ||
| We all live in Candyland. | ||
| Oh my god. | ||
| You know who Klaus Schwab is Lord Licorice? | ||
| I am 19 and it feels great. | ||
| Oh, man! | ||
| I would love to put this side-by-side with the time we talked about this 700 episodes ago and see, it's freaking me out. | ||
| Well, we were definitely... | ||
| Were we still drinking? | ||
| Probably. | ||
| I think we were still. | ||
| But it still freaks me out, the idea of there's probably one-to-one. | ||
| Like, just comparisons of, like, Lord Licorice Joke, Dan Sings Chess, all the exact things. | ||
| I think that is less something, that's more a hallmark of we are exactly who we are. | ||
| We are not putting on airs. | ||
| We are not pretending to be people we are not. | ||
| Or we are not really profoundly creative. | ||
| We're not very interesting either. | ||
| One input gets one output. | ||
| We're not very interesting. | ||
| Nope. | ||
| So Monopoly is the closest thing there is to our system. | ||
| In board games. | ||
| So out of these three board games, Monopoly best describes our modern system. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's fair. | |
| But in itself is only two-dimensional. | ||
| You see, the private Federal Reserve that's owned by six private banks, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, and others. | ||
| Others. | ||
| They always win. | ||
| All three others. | ||
| You're playing their game. | ||
| You think you're battling it out for houses and apartments and for Park Place and for the electric company and for the railroad and for the top hat and for the fashion show. | ||
| But it's the bankers that control the politicians. | ||
| They've got to get out of jail free cards. | ||
| So you do understand the basic game. | ||
| Of the money. | ||
| The treasury works for them. | ||
| But one of the players is the banker in Monopoly. | ||
| And in Monopoly, you are playing to get the properties. | ||
| There aren't politicians and the bank above the... | ||
| I understand. | ||
| I understand what he's trying to project real-world stuff into this, but that's not how Monopoly is played. | ||
| Well, I mean, it's like he understands the landlord's game, the original. | ||
| He understands the concept of like, oh, they're playing with us! | ||
| We're the... | ||
| Oh! | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| And instead he's like... | ||
| Well, the implication... | ||
| Right. | ||
| If you're playing Monopoly. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Hear me out. | ||
| I'm listening. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So you, let's say you're playing a four-player game. | ||
| All right. | ||
| You are not the only four people that exist, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whoa. | |
| In the world. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whoa. | |
| So hold on. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Let's say you have all of the orange properties and you put a bunch of hotels on them or whatever. | ||
| Raise the rents up real high. | ||
| So obviously if a player lands on it. | ||
| They have to pay the rent for all this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| But what about all the unheard, unseen people who also land on it, who aren't players in the game? | ||
| All of the other people who are walking down Illinois Avenue. | ||
| That's a good point. | ||
| They're all getting screwed by you playing this game. | ||
| You know what I don't like? | ||
| All the imaginary citizens of Atlantic City walking around. | ||
| Here's what I don't like. | ||
| As a capitalist, I don't like that you're not maximizing the amount of rent you could be getting knowing that there are pedestrians. | ||
| Sure, I see your silver dog land on my fucking thing, but I know in my mind that there's probably like 30, 40 people walking down New York Avenue, right? | ||
| And I need your constant upkeep for that. | ||
| So I'm going to prefer to have at least $2 per turn from you. | ||
| Fair. | ||
| Just because people walk on this orange property. | ||
| So, I think Alex should get deeper into how these games are played. | ||
| That's, I think, what we're getting to. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| So, basically. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Here's the world. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| The globalists want to play Monopoly. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Right? | ||
| They want to play Monopoly with all the countries in the world. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| But sometimes, other countries don't want to play Monopoly. | ||
| So the bank only wins. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But what happens if a country won't sell? | |
| What happens if an African nation won't play the Monopoly game? | ||
| Or what happens if a Middle Eastern country doesn't want to be part of the modern bankster system based in London and New York? | ||
| Well, then that's where risk comes in. | ||
| Because they want to be able to take you over through economic espionage, as John Perkins has written in his bestseller, Confessions of an Economic Hitman. | ||
| But if they can't... | ||
| This is in all the official CIA and State Department documents. | ||
| All of them. | ||
| Then come and finance your neighbor to attack you. | ||
| That doesn't happen at risk. | ||
| The movie is not playing ball. | ||
| It's building up and industrializing all of Africa. | ||
| Does it happen in chess? | ||
| You want a global monopoly. | ||
| Does it happen in a monopoly? | ||
| You just play countries off against each other. | ||
| You're a globalist. | ||
| You've made yourselves exempt with diplomatic immunity at the United Nations. | ||
| Who set that up? | ||
| Is there a diplomatic immunity at risk? | ||
| You just have al-Qaeda come out of Egypt, into Libya, ethnically cleanse, blow up most of the infrastructure, knock out Gaddafi, and now they have to come to you and borrow money out of your bank to rebuild and you own and control everything. | ||
| And guess what? | ||
| If you want to get that welfare check, well, you've got to take the vaccines, which, by the way, start away. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| What does that have to do with anything? | ||
| Look, I get he has things he wants to say. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And I think he had some vague idea that, like, I'm going to compare this to board games. | ||
| But it is just completely detached now from any kind of connection. | ||
| No. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| If I understand correctly, here's what it's like. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| So you're playing chess, right? | ||
| Yep. | ||
| And then I use my bishop to put your king into check. | ||
| Right? | ||
| That's when you hire the Polish to kill the black pieces, and that will give you a monopoly over Park Place. | ||
| And, if you don't want to do it, I'll blow dart you with a vaccine. | ||
| Right! | ||
| Exactly! | ||
| I appreciate that the vaccine got in there. | ||
| I was going to be disappointed if we didn't realize that the vaccine is truly behind Monopoly's faults. | ||
| A little strange. | ||
| So, I would say at this point, the special report is essentially... | ||
| Totally off the rails. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, yeah, yeah. | |
| Complete chaos. | ||
| And here we get, just going further off the rails, into strangely familiar territory. | ||
| We think about nations and continents and cultures, but in truth, the globalists, the bankers, who have unlimited money... | ||
| They're waging war against anyone else that has any assets, because they want everyone to be impoverished, so you have to go to them, and so that you have to follow all of their orders, so they can control human development and society. | ||
| In the past, they would brag about their real political system in fictional accounts, in movies like Network. | ||
| Let's analyze a clip of that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There is no America. | |
| Oh my God! | ||
|
unidentified
|
There is no democracy. | |
| There is only IBM and ITT and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, Union Carbide and Exxon. | ||
| One vast and ecumenical holding county for whom all men will work to serve a common perfect in which all men will hold a share of stock. | ||
| Oh, there are no more peoples. | ||
| There are no more nations, Mr. Beale. | ||
| Each one of us has one piece of stock in the global system. | ||
| One ecumenical, giant global government. | ||
| Except one thing. | ||
| That big global corporate system they've been selling us on doesn't want us to even be alive. | ||
| It's designed to consolidate control and then slowly cut off the resources while the banksters themselves pose as the saviors. | ||
| When at the end of the tunnel is nothing but global extermination and eugenics so that these selfish, greedy scam artists can have the world and all of the incredible technology and life extension for themselves. | ||
| And that's the big secret here. | ||
| What? | ||
| The ball is in your court. | ||
| The rest is up to you. | ||
| Please get this presentation out to everyone you know. | ||
| We've got to understand the enemy we're facing if we have any chance of defeating these people. | ||
| Humanity hangs in the balance. | ||
| Humanity hangs in the balance, man. | ||
| I understand so much less than I did before, and somehow I'm angrier because humanity hangs in the balance. | ||
| Humanity hangs in the balance, and the only way we're going to get people to save themselves is if they understand these board games. | ||
| I genuinely... | ||
| I don't know what the point was. | ||
| I don't either. | ||
| I think, I mean, obviously the point is like Alex's standard blah blah blah talking points and stuff packaged in a way that's like, I don't know, maybe interesting to a new viewer. | ||
| I guess. | ||
| Hey, the world is like these board games or some shit. | ||
| But, like, even when he's getting there at the end, when he gets into the network thing, he then... | ||
| Rambles about other things that are disconnected from the network thing. | ||
| I know! | ||
| He's like, ah, the globalists give away their plans in movies like Network. | ||
| And then he plays a thing from Network, and then he says something completely different. | ||
| Yeah! | ||
| No, go back to the thing! | ||
| Right. | ||
| I mean, if you want to use that as the globalists giving away their plan, you can't then be like, and actually what they meant is this. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Man! | ||
| You know... | ||
| Why use a source? | ||
| Now I'm getting even more annoyed at Network. | ||
| I was already annoyed. | ||
| I already hated it. | ||
| I'm already furious. | ||
| It's a great movie. | ||
| But they stole it. | ||
| They stole it and ruined it. | ||
| And that's what happened. | ||
| It's like the opposite of Boondock Saints. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| They ruined it and then... | ||
| I didn't care. | ||
| I didn't mind. | ||
| Yeah, goodbye. | ||
| Whereas Network's actually a good movie and it's been ruined by these ding-dongs. | ||
| But you know, now that I think about it, now it's like, man, he was overreacting. | ||
| Citizens United wasn't going to come for another 40 years. | ||
| That dude didn't know shit about what corporations would really control. | ||
| So calm it down, face... | ||
| I thought you meant Alex in 2012. | ||
| He didn't know that Citizens United was coming in 40 years. | ||
| Wait, that's in 2052? | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| Shit. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| No, I'm telling you. | ||
| I think he was overreacting. | ||
| Maybe a little drama queen. | ||
| Not sure I've ever heard Alex talk about Citizens United. | ||
| It's probably come up at some point. | ||
| I mean, considering it's probably the most important thing that... | ||
| Well, maybe... | ||
| How about this? | ||
| If there was anything that proved that the world government is very similar to a board game, I think Citizens United made it a very lot like Monopoly. | ||
| So we have this special report. | ||
| Aaron Dykes did a great job. | ||
| I'm sure he added a lot of that background music and noises. | ||
| Post-production effects. | ||
| Maybe provided the Lego chess set for Alex. | ||
| That would be a special thing. | ||
| Maybe that's why it was a Lego chess set. | ||
| It's the only one Aaron had. | ||
| Or, reel it this way, maybe Aaron and Paul do the exact same amount of work, but that Lego chess set is Paul's. | ||
| You know he loves a Christmas chess set. | ||
| Bumped it up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| But how did it get over here from England? | ||
| Merry Christmas? | ||
| So, we're done with the special report. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| I don't feel like we've had anything illuminated to us. | ||
| I really disagree. | ||
| I know everything about board games. | ||
| Risk plus monopoly. | ||
| Times chess. | ||
| That's the vaccine! | ||
| Equals globalists. | ||
| Vaccines. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There you go. | |
| Minus vaccines. | ||
| Minus vaccines. | ||
| What's the order of operations? | ||
| Please excuse my dear aunt Steve Pachanik, because guess what? | ||
| Who's the next guest? | ||
| Oh my god, you're joking. | ||
| We get a little visit. | ||
| Of course you had no choice. | ||
| Yeah, from the one and only Steve Pachanik. | ||
| Dr. Steve Pachenik, M.D., Ph.D., is going to be our guest. | ||
| He was the head of psychological operations for the State Department, advised the Pentagon, has been involved. | ||
| We'll just look up his name and takedowns of governments all over the world, you name it, but not with armies, with psychological warfare. | ||
| He's an expert in false flags. | ||
| He's exposed on this broadcast. | ||
| 9-11 is a false flag. | ||
| In other events, he said that the shooting in Norway... | ||
| Was not an inside job. | ||
| That's good. | ||
| I don't know his take on the new shootings, and I wanted to get him on because he said like over a year ago, he said on this show, you all heard it, that he thought Petraeus would be in the running for vice president. | ||
| And I've always found Drudge and his sources. | ||
| Drudge doesn't go with something when Drudge writes an article maybe once every two weeks or something. | ||
| Or his sources there in D.C., some of which I've met with and know, they don't go with something unless they've got it from the highest levels. | ||
| And their word is... | ||
| Obama was concerned that Petraeus may be picked as the VP, that that would be a strong VP pick to Roman Romney. | ||
| Petraeus just said that's not the case, but they always say that. | ||
| But Dr. Steve Pachynik showing his inside knowledge, I was saying that a year ago here. | ||
| So Steve doesn't talk about this much, but does say that's not going to happen. | ||
| And Petraeus is needed as a great general. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, boy. | |
| Oh, boy. | ||
| There's not a lot of awareness of the ways in which Alex will hate General Petraeus in the not-too-distant future from this. | ||
| Wild. | ||
| They're really into him. | ||
| Steve loves him. | ||
| Thinks he's one of the greatest generals. | ||
| But, yeah, he would be a great statesman, but he's not going to be the vice president. | ||
| So this is not an inaccurate... | ||
| Well, I guess it was an inaccurate prediction when Steve made it a year ago. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| But he is not on that tip here in 2012. | ||
| Right. | ||
| That is interesting. | ||
| It's interesting to see the way these people change and how it can be, like, on the drop of a hat. | ||
| Well, Steve fucking loved Fauci and Alex loved Fauci because of Steve and then, oop, that fell apart. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, it's just like, oh, we'll just make it up today. | ||
| I hate this person or I love this person. | ||
| And I've always loved them. | ||
| Yeah, exactly! | ||
| Wait, twist. | ||
| I always hated them. | ||
| I keep trying to think of, like, okay, what was the thing? | ||
| You know, I've changed my beliefs on a lot of stuff over the years. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| But not the... | ||
| The beliefs have changed because the reason was I was trying to be blank. | ||
| And so as I get more information, I realize that the way to be better blank is through this, right? | ||
| Not because I've been like, aha, I've decided that everything's completely different than it used to be. | ||
| Yeah, and I never believed those things to begin with, and I didn't say them. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, wild. | ||
| It is, it is. | ||
| But shifting allegiances and all of this, like... | ||
| Character stuff is such a big part of the way that you build these cosmologies of conspiracy. | ||
| So characters have to kind of always shift. | ||
| You have to retcon things in order to make whatever you're doing today work. | ||
| Because whatever you're doing today is the only thing that matters. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| Character writing is very, very difficult. | ||
| It's not when there's no expectation of consistency. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So speaking of character, Steve Pachanek has a character. | ||
| And true. | ||
| Humble. | ||
| So he's a super insider, and he's very humble, like most big insiders are. | ||
| But he has incredible courage to come on and say 9-11's an inside job. | ||
| Now I'm going to try to sit back and shut up, because I am obnoxious, and let him start with wherever he wants to start. | ||
| The shooters, Petraeus, coming up, his recap of the Bin Laden fable. | ||
| Dr. Petraeus, great to have you with us. | ||
| It's always a pleasure, Alex. | ||
| Great to see you, Steve. | ||
| It's been a while. | ||
| Not humble in the least. | ||
| Oh, yeah? | ||
| This man has done everything. | ||
| What hasn't he... | ||
| Is there a country that he has not affected their government in some way, right? | ||
| Not a chance. | ||
| There's no way that he could... | ||
| You could not ask him, like... | ||
| Like, you could do the Animaniacs. | ||
| What have you done for Burundi? | ||
| Yeah, exactly. | ||
| He would have to come up with something. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| He has to. | ||
| And he would have an elaborate story. | ||
| Oh, about how great he was. | ||
| I saved them. | ||
| Yes, you did! | ||
| Yeah, and in this episode, they're talking a bit about Al-Qaeda and stuff because Alex has that CFR article that he didn't read. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And Steve apparently was the one who was like... | ||
| Don't use Al-Qaeda to fight against the Russians. | ||
| Of course Steve said it. | ||
| Vindicate it. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| If everybody had listened to him, we wouldn't even have 9-11. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So a lot of what is going on on this conversation that they're having has to do with Syria and Al-Qaeda in Syria. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And so Steve has a point on this, and that is that you just kind of got to defend Assad. | ||
| So basically, our national security interest, from the point of view, what do we have vested in the Middle East? | ||
| At this point, honestly, the best thing we can do is to get out of there because it's not to our interest. | ||
| It's a war between the Shiites and the Sunni. | ||
| The major interest that's here is an issue of Christianity. | ||
| I'm concerned, and I've said it repeatedly, to the Coptic Christians in Egypt, in the United States, that you are in danger of having Sharia. | ||
| You are in danger of being killed. | ||
| It's an original Christian sect. | ||
| And the same issue for me is in Syria, where Bashir Assad is literally, and so are the Soviets. | ||
| The Russians are protecting the Christians. | ||
| They're in the millions. | ||
| So the issue of Christianity is becoming paramount, and no one is discussing it. | ||
| I'm quite frankly tired of keeping on saying Christianity is a problem here, and we don't We do have an interest in maintaining the viability of the Christians in Syria and in Egypt. | ||
| We can do that by supporting Assad. | ||
| Unfortunately, we don't have a choice as to democracy or non-democracy, and quite frankly, Russia, who I work against, is also protecting the Christians. | ||
| From my point of view, the Christian viability is far more important to our national interest than any financial interest. | ||
| There are no bankers who are interested in it. | ||
| We are owed $10 billion now by Syria, and Syria's not paying them for the armament. | ||
| So Russia is going into debt and being tied down in the Mediterranean, which from a strategic point of view, I'm very happy. | ||
| But I'm also pleased that at least Putin is willing to protect the Christians. | ||
| So this is a bit of a propaganda line of the time. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Myriad examples of Assad oppressing the Christians in Syria. | ||
| I don't even know where to begin. | ||
| And it's the sort of, you know, there's no other way I can really put it. | ||
| It's just the propaganda narrative that he has is that he's the one protecting Christians against the extreme fundamentalist Muslim groups. | ||
| And that is why he should be supported by other countries. | ||
| It's always weird to hear Steve go into that mode where he's so, like, real politic about it. | ||
| You know, like, I'm the grown-up in the room here. | ||
| I understand you don't want to eat your vegetables. | ||
| To be fair, he's talking to Alex. | ||
| So he is the grown-up in the room. | ||
| Obviously, obviously. | ||
| But there's still so much of, like... | ||
| All of what you just said is absolutely insane. | ||
| You know that, right? | ||
| You're a crazy person, and you're acting like, oh, so... | ||
| Listen, I understand that it's difficult, that we don't want to support this, but at the end of the day, you're going to want to see a lot of those people gassed. | ||
| That's just the way we've got to live our lives. | ||
| If you want to be safe, you, some asshole in Missouri, if you want to be safe, you've got to let Syria gas, people! | ||
| You've got to support Assad! | ||
| I say this to the Coptic Christians in Egypt. | ||
| Or the United States from Egypt. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, you're a very rational person, you lunatic. | ||
| Well, here's the thing, though. | ||
| Here's what you've got to take into account. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Steve knows Assad. | ||
| And, get this, it's not just like they went to a dinner party and it's like, hello, I'm Pachenik, I'm Assad. | ||
| Hello, how do you do? | ||
| It's not that. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| Steve was arrested by Assad. | ||
| I'm sorry, what? | ||
| And interrogated. | ||
| No. | ||
| Personally? | ||
| Well, that's right. | ||
| I read that he had you arrested, didn't he? | ||
| That's correct. | ||
| He did for six hours, and then he asked me how we could do business together. | ||
| But the point in fact is that even when you're arrested and you spend time, and I was willing to go there on my own, and I knew what the consequences were, you know, this is not an issue of a government. | ||
| This is an issue of my personal choice. | ||
| I made the choice. | ||
| I knew what the consequences were. | ||
| Well, quite frankly, I had a very good relationship with the Assad regime, even after they knew who I was. | ||
| Okay, so if I'm to follow this, Steve took it upon himself in no official position to go over there, go over to Syria. | ||
| Possible consequences. | ||
| And do what? | ||
| And then he got arrested by Assad. | ||
| I'm gonna go and I'm gonna fix shit. | ||
| I'm gonna go over there and run a PSYOP or some shit. | ||
| And then Assad asked... | ||
| What do we gotta do to get business going? | ||
| After interrogating him for six hours. | ||
| Personally, apparently. | ||
| Listen, one, you gotta show, Steve, you mean business. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Otherwise, and it's not because you think you're going to get Steve to change his mind. | ||
| It's because Steve won't respect you if you don't torture him first. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Steve doesn't respect people who don't try and steal him. | ||
| And you can't send an underling to do it. | ||
| You've got to do it yourself. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, no, no. | |
| Otherwise, fuck you. | ||
| We're not going to do business. | ||
| I don't do business with underlings and I don't do business with people who don't torture me just because I show up randomly in their country for no reason under no auspices or government office. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| You come in. | ||
| You interrogate the guy for six hours, and then that guy sees that you protect minorities. | ||
| That guy sees it in you, the integrity, through your interrogation. | ||
| I love Steve in a way because I can listen to a bad lie this boldly, this brashly, from a distance. | ||
| And, like, in another room. | ||
| It's cartoon shit. | ||
| If somebody tried to do this to my face, I think I might stab him. | ||
| I think I might stab Steve. | ||
| We're only, like, a few months, really, away from him going to the DMZ and pretending he's going to, like... | ||
| Rendezvous with high-level contacts in the North and South Korean governments. | ||
| Oh my god. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Steve. | ||
| Steve. | ||
| Lunatic. | ||
| So Alex wants to talk to Steve about 9-11. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Because... | ||
| Right on time. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| He's a good source for 9-11 stuff, except that he's not. | ||
| Here's my next question. | ||
| I've never asked you this. | ||
| From your research, knowing how this stuff works... | ||
| How did they pull off something that big? | ||
| I mean, I understand you don't know the full operation. | ||
| You just know they did it. | ||
| Well, I know the full operation because I taught it at the National Board. | ||
| Okay, keep testing. | ||
| What did they do on 9-11? | ||
| What they did on 9-11, I don't want to go back into it, but basically they realigned everything that we had in FEMA. | ||
| They had everything in terms of the FAA. | ||
| We don't have to go into specifics. | ||
| Yeah, let's not get into specifics. | ||
| Hey, listen. | ||
| I literally know everything, but why are we going to specifics? | ||
| We're still talking about this? | ||
| Yeah, how did they do it? | ||
| Listen, I don't just know how they did it. | ||
| I taught them how to do it. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Well, I didn't teach them personally. | ||
| I taught the people who taught them how to do it. | ||
| That's why they didn't even do it as good as I could have done it. | ||
| Right. | ||
| That's how good I could have done it at it. | ||
| Frankly, I'll do a 9-11 on you right now. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I'll do it. | ||
| How do I do it? | ||
| Let's not get into specifics. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I can't get into specifics. | |
| Come on. | ||
| Then I won't be able to 9-11 you. | ||
| Come on. | ||
| I know everything. | ||
| No, no, no, no. | ||
| We're not going to talk about it. | ||
| We'll have somebody else explain it for the silly people later. | ||
| So Alex is like, no, no, no. | ||
| We have to talk about this. | ||
| We need to kill the myth of 9-11. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| And Steve is kind of trying to give him the, like, let's not look backwards. | ||
| What's the point in all this? | ||
| He has no interest in having this conversation. | ||
| Well, I mean, it's 2012. | ||
| Right, right. | ||
| I have to look at the Air Force, who was in charge of the Air Force, what the false flags were, who were the generals at the time. | ||
| This is not what we have right now. | ||
| What we have is exceedingly responsible generals. | ||
| No, I understand, but people need to know historically. | ||
| No, people have to understand that if they want to go back and spend that time now, we're losing time to really understand where we're heading in much faster time, Alex. | ||
| I know, but they used 9-11 to have the military-industrial complex start setting up a police state here. | ||
| We need to kill the myth of 9-11, not just to get us out of Iraq, but to get the TSA out of my pants. | ||
| Well, if you want to kill the myth of 9-11, then bring Cheney and Bush Jr. before a trial and jury and a prosecution. | ||
| I want to be able to take my kids to Disney World without a fat pedophile abusing them. | ||
| Look, let me tell you. | ||
| Let's get it clear. | ||
| The feds have been doing their job, and they've been doing it very effectively. | ||
| What happened recently with the killer who has been accused of, where we went into the Sikhs, and it was said that he was trained by the Army to be a killer. | ||
| It's nonsense. | ||
| The Army didn't train Mr. Page to be a killer. | ||
| The Army had him in. | ||
| He was in there. | ||
| He was a neo-Nazi. | ||
| The feds, the FBI in particular, have been exceedingly good at breaking up neo-Nazis. | ||
| Wait, I thought they were fake. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| However, thanks to 9-11, and Cheney in particular, and Michael Hayden, General Hayden, who monitored everybody during 9-11, we had, the FBI had to pull back. | ||
| Mueller's a very, very responsible director. | ||
| What? | ||
| Goddammit. | ||
| We have to kill the Metro 9-11 briefly. | ||
| I have no problem with the TSA being disbanded and Homeland Security. | ||
| No, I know. | ||
| Here's the deal, then. | ||
| Briefly, I mean, obviously, yes, Cheney took the power for NORAD to do shoot-downs the month before. | ||
| I thought it was wrong, sir. | ||
| Back after 9-11, they had drills of the targets being hit, so that's how... | ||
| I mean, we know about the stand-down, but basically, from what I know, correct me if I'm wrong, the hijackers were doing drills of infiltrating airports and getting on board for the Department of Defense and CIA. | ||
| They were set up. | ||
| Nerve gas was released on the aircraft because the people said there's smoke, we can't breathe. | ||
| Then remote control flew into the buildings. | ||
| Let's get back to the issue. | ||
| Do we need the TSA? | ||
| No. | ||
| I've had problems with them. | ||
| They rip off the luggage. | ||
| You have the lowest level quality employees coming in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'll take it. | |
| They literally ripped off and stole a Class 3 drug that I had, which was a sleeping pill. | ||
| You have the worst of the worst being brought in, thanks to the shirt off. | ||
| What? | ||
| Yeah, they robbed me. | ||
| Alex, I want your audience to address that issue. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Secondly, do we need them? | ||
| No. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wait, what? | |
| Is that an issue for us? | ||
| No. | ||
| No, that is not an issue. | ||
| What? | ||
| Alex is so desperate to like, let's talk about 9-11. | ||
| I want to get my conspiracies out there. | ||
| They put nerve gas into the planes and then they remotely put them into a building. | ||
| Listen, Alex. | ||
| Does it matter? | ||
| They stole my sleeping pills. | ||
| You're wasting everybody's time. | ||
| I mean, listen, they stole a bottle of whiskey from me. | ||
| I'm fine with that. | ||
| Let's get rid of the TSA. | ||
| There is such a desperation on Alex's part to be like, come on, we've got to do this. | ||
| You're here. | ||
| We've got to do the 9-11 conspiracy things. | ||
| We've got to lay this out. | ||
| Also, I think Alex probably doesn't stand behind any of these things anymore. | ||
| Nope. | ||
| He's forgotten a lot of his 9-11 conspiracy narratives. | ||
| They've been lost to the sands of time. | ||
| But Steve, not interested. | ||
| It is so funny. | ||
| Is the problem with the TSA that they should have also that they have poor hiring processes and sometimes they steal things from banks? | ||
| I thought it was more to do with liberty. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, let's not even do that. | |
| Let's not even bring in abstract concepts of freedom. | ||
| They don't do anything. | ||
| Good! | ||
| It's been studied over and over and over again. | ||
| They don't do the thing that they're supposed to do. | ||
| So that's... | ||
| Why can't we just agree on like, hey, I don't care what your ideology is. | ||
| If we have a thing, it should do the thing that the thing is supposed to do. | ||
| And if it doesn't do that thing, then it doesn't get to be the thing. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Like, okay. | ||
| If you're the TSA, and they're like, okay, here's what we do. | ||
| We keep knives from getting on planes, right? | ||
| And then every year, they show me a shit ton of knives that got on planes. | ||
| Then we have to be like, okay, well then you guys suck. | ||
| You have to also assume that there's a lot of knives that didn't get on planes. | ||
| I don't have to assume that. | ||
| I don't have to assume that because I don't care. | ||
| The problem is not the knives that don't get on the planes. | ||
| The problem is the knives that do get on the planes. | ||
| I'm looking at the problem. | ||
| I'm not looking at not the problem. | ||
| This is a fine point, and I think that you and Steve would find common cause. | ||
| I think we've got a lot to talk about here. | ||
| I need you. | ||
| Get on a plane, go to Syria. | ||
| I'm going. | ||
| I'm going to get Assad finally. | ||
| See if you guys can do business together. | ||
| It's only going to be, listen, it's going to be me or Steve. | ||
| Those are the only two. | ||
| So, like I said, it's a little bit of a bust. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Not a great Steve appearance. | ||
| No. | ||
| I think the getting interrogated by Assad is probably the high point. | ||
| That's a high watermark. | ||
| Agreed. | ||
| And then also the, you know, I don't want to talk about your 9-11 conspiracies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| There is that freedom that Steve has, unlike anybody else in Alex's show, that I do enjoy. | ||
| I do enjoy the Alex has a mission. | ||
| I'm driving towards this, and Steve's like, come on. | ||
| Stop it. | ||
| Screw you. | ||
| Stop it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're not interested in this. | |
| Not all time. | ||
| But we did get the two things that we like out of Steve. | ||
| We got the big swing, and we got the slap. | ||
| Yeah, but they weren't great examples of them, but they were there. | ||
| They were there. | ||
| It was a bad episode of a show that you love. | ||
| So Steve's gone, and Alex gets back to rambling, wants to talk about that CFR article that he hasn't read. | ||
| Guys, will you print me the Council on Foreign Relations report that was in Watson's article yesterday, so I can actually read those quotes, or it's over in the other studio. | ||
| From last night where I read the quotes of the CFR going, oh, Al-Qaeda is so brave and good and doing such a good job. | ||
| Listen, if Al-Qaeda is brave and good, I'm a monkey's uncle and I want pot-bellied pedophiles to not put their hands on my genitals, okay? | ||
| I don't want checkpoints. | ||
| I don't want all this stupid paranoia, okay? | ||
| And let me tell you, the military is gearing up for martial law in this country in a giant Iran attack. | ||
| Just that stuff. | ||
| But that's just always on the... | ||
| And they stage 9-11, they can stage anything. | ||
| We're in a lot of trouble, and I'm tired of it. | ||
| So that counts as kind of a prediction, I guess. | ||
| They're gearing up for martial law and a big Iran attack, and that didn't materialize. | ||
| Man, that is maybe... | ||
| It's a sentence that he just tossed offhand. | ||
| If they can stage 9-11, they can stage anything. | ||
| But if you stop and sit with that for a while, Man, if you really believe that, stay home. | ||
| What are you going to do? | ||
| I think they do. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, like, what is there to do? | ||
| That's terrifying. | ||
| Sure, sure. | ||
| Yeah, if that's your engagement with reality and the world around you, then, yeah, of course you probably would be primed to think that Sandy Hook could be fake. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| Why wouldn't you? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| They're crazy out there, man. | ||
| Yeah, he's set his audience up to... | ||
| Basically buy anything he sells them. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| I mean, once you truly accept, like, oh, the absolute craziest thing that is possible is not just possible, it's the only truth, then anything else sounds crazy. | ||
| Yeah, and anybody who tries to tell you that, hey, maybe some of this is a little bit crazy. | ||
| You're in on it. | ||
| They're crazy. | ||
| You're a nutbag. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So Alex takes more calls, and he gets a call from a guy who weirds him out. | ||
| Give him a shout-out. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
| Thanks for holding, brother. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Yes, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I had some comments. | |
| I don't quite understand. | ||
| I've been a citizen for a constitutional republic since 1990. | ||
| And it just seems to me that if we take a dog license from the federal government, that we shouldn't be surprised how they treat us. | ||
| Why do you sound out of breath? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you familiar with the power of visitation? | |
| All right, you're getting into a bunch of patriot legal stuff about what type of citizen you are versus being part of the whole corporate globalist fiction. | ||
| I know there's a lot of truth to that. | ||
| The problem is the globalists don't care. | ||
| So Alex has no idea what this caller is talking about, but he knows a sovereign citizen when he hears one. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, your heckle's raised. | ||
| Yeah, so he just assumes this has to do with patriot legal ideas about what kind of citizen you are. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| Alex is careful not to let this guy talk, but also not fully shut him down. | ||
| He wants to be sure to leave room in there where he's kind of endorsing sovereign citizenship, like saying there's a bit of truth to it, because if he doesn't do that, he's gonna lose a lot of his audience base. | ||
| I want them to like me. | ||
| I don't like them, but it is what it is. | ||
| And also, I can't possibly say that all of these specific nonsense things they believe are true. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But also, the power of visitation isn't about that stuff at all. | ||
| It has to do with what some have theorized is the root of the government's oversight and regulatory power over corporations. | ||
| In olden times, kings had the power of visitation over companies where they could dictate how they operated, and there was no need for courts or legal proceedings. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
| The king had the visitory rights. | ||
| You'd just walk up and he'd show up and he'd be like, hey, you do this, and then you did that. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| That's being a king. | ||
| Some on the right wing have proposed that this is where the government's regulatory authority derives from, and they use that as a sort of argument against the idea of regulations as a whole. | ||
| Alex has no idea what the caller is bringing up, but he's not going to risk it, let him get to the point, because he's going to end up in over his head and not be able to defend himself if the guy starts talking about how, you know, we all live in ocean law. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Stuff like that. | ||
| Okay, so if I understand correctly, then the idea is this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because... | |
| Governments believe they are able to tell corporations what to do because they used to be based around kingdoms and complete authoritarian power. | ||
| That means that laws aren't real. | ||
| Yeah, or that the government doesn't have any of those regulatory authorities. | ||
| Okay, but I mean, the kings don't have any of those regulatory authorities either. | ||
| They did. | ||
| Like, they're all pretend. | ||
| No, no, no, they're all pretend. | ||
| Like, the king's just a dude. | ||
| Right, but this is an angle to make an attack on the credibility of this. | ||
| Like, we don't have kings anymore, so why should we still have this? | ||
| Oh, man. | ||
| Good argument. | ||
| I'm gonna go. | ||
| Solid. | ||
| But also, yeah. | ||
| Anyway, Alex promotes a new product that he has. | ||
| And it's a product that has a lot of potential. | ||
| It's InfoWars magazine. | ||
| Like, they could just have shot the king in the face. | ||
| Like, the king shows up at their factory and they go, oh, fuck you. | ||
| I don't care. | ||
| You're just a guy. | ||
| Like, it's all pretend. | ||
| It's all in our heads. | ||
| It's just a guy! | ||
| They couldn't have done that. | ||
| Yes, they could have! | ||
| There would have been consequences, but it's just a guy! | ||
| That's what I'm saying. | ||
| But again, it's just a guy. | ||
| You can kill him and then they'll be like, oh no, we don't have a king anymore. | ||
| And then they'll just get their own... | ||
| We will swiftly get another king. | ||
| They'll do their own thing, you know? | ||
| But again, it's just a guy. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I'm not sure what this... | ||
| I'm just so mad. | ||
| I get that. | ||
| I get that part. | ||
| But how does this implicate regulation? | ||
| That's what I'm confused about. | ||
| No, but I mean from your perspective. | ||
| I don't know anymore! | ||
| The fact that you can commit regicide. | ||
| Does that mean we should or shouldn't have regulations? | ||
| I'm just worried that I don't know what even is the starting point for reality anymore. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Hear me out. | ||
| Where does it begin? | ||
| Is everybody a guy or what? | ||
| Hear me out. | ||
| Chess. | ||
| No! | ||
| Just think about chess. | ||
| Okay, now they're... | ||
| I'm screwed. | ||
| So anyway, Alex has InfoWars, Mike. | ||
| Everyone who's part of the InfoWars Insider, on or before September 1st, you will get the first issue of InfoWars Magazine. | ||
| I think it's going to be around 60 plus pages long. | ||
| It is just going to be full of exclusive articles, but also boil-downs of our top stories of the month. | ||
| And the graphics, the work in it, it looks world-class. | ||
| It's going to blow people away. | ||
| I'm going to put... | ||
| I've now upgraded it from $50,000 to $70,000. | ||
| I'm putting $50,000 on the streets of Austin. | ||
| And I'm going to have $20,000 here for people to buy in bulk in groups of 100. | ||
| It comes out to like... | ||
| How much is $100? | ||
| What do we come up to? | ||
| $50 for $100 of these to hand them out. | ||
| I mean, what a weapon. | ||
| What a weapon. | ||
| And we'll have some smaller lots available as well. | ||
| Or we're also going to have a subscription to where you can sign up and have it mailed to you every month, like five copies of it. | ||
| So you can have one for yourself and give it for others. | ||
| Because as print dies, print will actually come back. | ||
| I mean, I know this. | ||
| I'm calling it Print 2.0. | ||
| But it doesn't matter. | ||
| Print's dying, not just because of the internet, but because of the perfect storm of the bad information they've got. | ||
| The disinfo. | ||
| People are sick of it. | ||
| This is going to be hard-hitting. | ||
| Wait till you see the cover of the first magazine. | ||
| Alex's InfoWars magazine is going to save print because it's so hard-hitting and people are tired of the bullshit. | ||
| There's no bullshit in there. | ||
| No bullshit. | ||
| Just the good, hard-hitting, true, factual information. | ||
| It did not save print media. | ||
| I mean, print's doing great. | ||
| Well, it was neither helped nor harmed by Infowars magazine, and it's something around 20-issue run. | ||
| It did not last very long. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| Alex took a bath on that. | ||
| He lost a lot of money. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, yeah? | |
| Yeah. | ||
| I can't imagine that in 2012 the answer wasn't vanity printing. | ||
| Yeah, and also the person who was involved with the, I believe like some of the graphic design and stuff on it was... | ||
| Determined by the Infoars audience to be a CIA plant, it caused a bunch more drama and shit that Alex would have ever wanted. | ||
| Yeah, that sounds about right. | ||
| So yeah, it was a big mistake on his part. | ||
| Huge mistake. | ||
| But I do have a number of the issues, and one's on the wall somewhere, the one with the dinosaurs. | ||
| It's right behind you, I think. | ||
| Oh, yeah? | ||
| Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, there it is. | ||
| It'll be a terrible, terrible magazine. | ||
| It really is. | ||
| Observe one last clip here, and Alex is promoting something else. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Get a little heavy into the ads towards the end here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| And I will do this for everybody watching on TV. | ||
| I'm doing so much, if you're a Prison Planet TV viewer. | ||
| I've got my well-stirred Beyond Tangy Tangerine, and then I add this, because it has a little bit of green tea extract in it. | ||
| Okay, coffee won't do it sometimes for me. | ||
| This does. | ||
| You just dump that in. | ||
| And I don't know... | ||
| I don't know what you call it when you mix the two of these. | ||
| We need to make a name for these. | ||
| I learned this from pharmacist Ben Fuchs. | ||
| This is his favorite drink. | ||
| It's a polymer mixed with a beyond tangy tangerine. | ||
| And I've got my essential fatty acids. | ||
| What happened is I lost 42 pounds doing this for a few months, and I've never been a guy that drinks stuff and takes stuff and takes pills, so I got off of it a little bit and kind of didn't lose any more weight. | ||
| Now, for about a week and a half, I've gone back on it full-time, and I'm not hungry anymore, and I've lost seven pounds. | ||
| In just about the last week and a half. | ||
| You can probably see that on television right now. | ||
| And I fully committed to the office and my wife to make me take my longevity from InfoWarsTeam.com. | ||
| And you will see me lose all the weight like Aaron did. | ||
| 92 pounds. | ||
| Get ready. | ||
| I'm doing it. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| Another wonderful time of taking his products on air. | ||
| It's going to burn that fat right off him. | ||
| Also, he's talking about a mix. | ||
| You know, you've got to come up with a name for something like that. | ||
| You know, it's kind of like an Arnold Palmer. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| So I figured maybe, like, the Fuzzy Zeller. | ||
| I was trying to think of some racist golfers. | ||
| Golfers had a racism controversy. | ||
| I get what you're saying. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, yeah. | |
| So that was the best I could do for a combination. | ||
| All right. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Oh, man. | ||
| I just... | ||
| Can't we just make meth legal? | ||
| If this is what people really want, you know. | ||
| Then just do meth. | ||
| Well, I think there are some ripple effects that you're going to see from that that may be unpleasant. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Well, I mean, maybe. | ||
| Lawsuits would go up considerably based on companies selling meth. | ||
| Possible. | ||
| Possible. | ||
| Let me throw this out at you. | ||
| Does Alex need to be on Infowars if he has a successful meth operation? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I mean, look, I don't know a lot of stuff about meth operations. | ||
| Me neither. | ||
| But I did watch this documentary. | ||
| Yeah? | ||
| It's about this teacher. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And it didn't go well for him. | ||
| Did it go bad? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It broke in a certain direction. | |
| I don't know. | ||
| I don't feel like meth operations are the most stable. | ||
| Of Enterprise. | ||
| See, now that I have noticed in the past. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| They're often appearing and then disappearing in an instant. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Many times literally. | ||
| I don't know if there's any Walmarts of meth. | ||
| I don't know if there's any legacy businesses that have really stood the test of time. | ||
| So for Alex, I think it would be an imprudent investment to put too much into a meth empire. | ||
| Whenever I went home, there's a dispensary now. | ||
| On the main street of my hometown, which is like all of the crimes, you know, like so much. | ||
| And now it's just on main street, you know, like that's nuts. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| But then to think, to think the idea that there would be like a place next to it that's like, also we do meth, you know, that. | ||
| That might be too far, even for me. | ||
| I'm permissive as fuck, man, but no meth. | ||
| You want a meth shop? | ||
| No meth on Main Street. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| That's my fucking campaign proposal. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| You can do meth wherever you want, but you can't have it on Main Street. | ||
| Someone who pretends to be permissive doesn't want a meth shop. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Never thought I'd see the day that this kind of a hypocrisy would be. | ||
| Just pathetic. | ||
| I know. | ||
| I'm disappointed in myself. | ||
| Well, I think, honestly, Honestly, this episode is a little strange, because obviously you had the Steve Pachanik of it all, which was the lure that drew me in. | ||
| And a little bit of a, not his finest outing, a little bit milquetoast in terms of a Steve. | ||
| And then the other thing that's really, like... | ||
| Fantastic is the board game thing, and it turns out we've covered it already. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Amazing. | |
| I don't know. | ||
| I mean, give it another 700 episodes. | ||
| Let's cover it again and see what we got. | ||
| Let's see. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think third time we'll really finally get a hold of it. | |
| It may be time to revisit the secret of 2017. | ||
| See if we've figured that out. | ||
| Yeah, could be. | ||
| So anyway, Dr. Harry, wish you all the best. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| As you pivot into a sales pitch towards... | ||
| The divine. | ||
| You do what you do when you do it. | ||
| Have fun. | ||
| Hey, alright. | ||
| Everybody have a great time at the party. | ||
| Please do. | ||
| Enjoy it. | ||
| Celebrate! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Celebrate! | |
| Don't know the rest of the lyrics. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, you don't. | |
| Don't need to. | ||
| That's the only one that matters is the one that you remember. | ||
| Indeed. | ||
| So, we come to the end of this, and we'll be back for another episode. | ||
| But until then, we have a website. | ||
| Indeed we do. | ||
| It's knowledgeright.com. | ||
| Yep, we'll be back on social media at some point. | ||
| We'll figure it out. | ||
| But until then, we have a boop boop with Neil. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whoa. | |
| It's the headphones. | ||
| It's the headphones. | ||
| They've thrown you off. | ||
| Yeah, I've got to take those back with me. | ||
| I'm Neo. | ||
| I'm Leo. | ||
| I'm DZX Clark. | ||
| See, what I was doing, I was stalling to try and see if I could come up with another song to launch into, and it just didn't happen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And now here comes the sex robots. | |
| Andy in Kansas, you're on the air. | ||
| Thanks for holding. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hello, Alex. | |
| I'm a first time caller. | ||
| I'm a huge fan. | ||
| I love your work. |