In this installment, Dan and Jordan find Alex basking in the afterglow of his interview with Tucker Carlson. He decides to spend his time interviewing a recently-released-from-jail Owen Shroyer and then explaining what Heaven is really like.
And then anytime I think of William H. Bacy, I think of that time he shot himself in the fucking head halfway through the movie and ruined my whole night!
And we're going to do that because it's the day after the Tucker Carlson interview.
And so we'll get to see how Alex's headspace is at, what's going on, and what show people would be tuning into if they had seen that Alex is on Tucker and then jump in here.
Yeah, I think I mentioned this on our last episode, that the notion of Alex getting back on Twitter is kind of overblown a little bit, I think, because of how bad everything else is on Twitter.
He's going to be another shitty voice on there, as opposed to being somebody who's actually leading a conversation or anything.
He's going to be another shithead.
And that sucks, but it doesn't really fundamentally alter what Twitter is.
I mean, it'd probably, I think, ah, man, if it was me, and I'm Alex, and obviously, I'm sure Alex, we're gonna find out Alex would be very happy to come back on Twitter.
I will say that the one thing about this that I think is underappreciated...
And it's something that I would hope that the media could handle but will never deal with, which is that they are just now functionally a mouthpiece for Twitter.
Like, they're just doing press releases.
Why would you write a thing and then aggregate a thing and then have every publication write a thing about how Alex is let back on Twitter?
You wonder if there is some sort of an idealistic impetus behind it that is asking, well, if we spread this news far and wide, maybe there will be enough pressure to change the decision.
That's absurd, and if you don't understand that at this point, then fine, the media should be going where it's going.
Yeah.
I mean, I just feel like they not only did not learn from the past eight years of Trump, but they have hyper-not learned to the point where now they're actively running towards more and more Trumps.
By the way, just to show how deceptive the corporate media is, a whole bunch of publications, I think I left them out there in the printer, those stories I printed out for online live, give them to me, guys, said, Jones is making up that Biden is mean to his dog.
It's come out in mainstream news, and he's been caught on video kicking it, and that it attacks the Secret Service.
I mean, we talk about all these things that are real, and they sit there and deny that they're doing it, down to Biden.
But, the...
Establishment's backing of Biden has come to an end.
Hunter Biden faces 17 years in prison after spending millions on lavish, hard-parting lifestyles while dodging taxes.
Yeah, a bunch of hookers and cocaine.
House Republicans unveil resolution to authorize Biden impeachment.
Inquiry, and the speaker says he's going to let that continue.
Understandably, the beginning of this show involves a fair bit of navel-gazing about the Tucker interview.
Apparently, part of the stretch of the interview where Alex was complaining about Biden involved an allegation that Biden hits his dog, which I didn't even include in our breakdown because it didn't rank.
As it turns out, some other outlets tweeted about this section of the interview, and now Alex is getting defensive about it.
Alex doesn't have evidence of Biden kicking his dog or any of that.
It's just something that Tom Fitton has claimed a source told him.
Tom Fitton is the guy who runs Judicial Watch, the legal harassment outlet that was founded by noted lunatic Larry Klayman.
The entire thing is based on creating imagery surrounding context for the real-world stories about two of Biden's dogs, Commander and Major, having to be removed from the White House because they bit people.
As for the stuff about Hunter Biden, I'm not sure how any of that indicates that the vaunted establishment has turned against Joe Biden.
He's being charged with a crime, but this is supposed to have a higher meaning for idiots like Alex.
According to Alex, if you're in the establishment's good graces, then all of your relatives and people associated with you are protected from any kind of criminal prosecution, so the fact that a prosecution is moving forward means that the man has removed his...
of protection from joe biden right to steal a favorite alex phrase this is really dumb though man like jenna and barbara bush the children of george w bush were arrested for having fakeids and drinking underage in 2001 while their father was president yeah we could delve into the escapades of billy carter and roger clinton but i'm afraid we don't have time for that right now more to the point though alex should not support this prosecution one of his fundamental beliefs is that taxes are illegal and the 16th amendment wasn't properly ratified he uses that excuse when
unidentified
one of his right-wing buddies gets into trouble for tax fraud but mysteriously that belief doesn't apply to his political enemies this is because he doesn't actually believe this as a core principle or as a truth he believes it just enough to use as an excuse to pretend his buddies are all being persecuted But that's about it.
And the GOP trying to get an impeachment going, that's also not evidence that the establishment is turned against Biden.
They released their impeachment inquiry resolution the other day, and it's a dud, and it fails to prove any of the major claims that are the talking points on shows like Alex's.
The strategy is to take this resolution and put it before the entire House for a vote, and if it passes, it'll give the inquiry greater investigatory authority, which they can then use to expand their fishing expedition that they're going on.
This may pass, but even if it does, that doesn't mean that the House is going to vote for impeachment.
And even if they do, there's zero chance that'll pass in the Senate.
But the primary goal here has been fulfilled, which is to feed the right-wing media narrative cycle.
So, Alex is saying it's bad that Western aid to Ukraine has decreased, but when the most aid was being sent, he was furious that too much aid was being sent.
You can kind of see how, no matter what is happening in the world, Alex can find a way to be mad about it and claim that it's proof of something nefarious.
Cool.
Alex is failing to mention an important detail about that headline, though.
He's reading this headline, quote, Western aid to Ukraine falls off a cliff, a German monitor.
That's from RT, the state media outlet of the country that's the one invading Ukraine.
So in a case like this, what a serious person would do is dig into the underlying information the article is based on instead of just skimming the headline published in a belligerent country's media outlet.
This comes from the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, an economic think tank based in Germany.
The institute runs a Ukraine aid tracker, and their latest data set showed a steep decline.
However, this is not indicative of a collapse of all aid being sent to Ukraine.
It's specifically data showing new commitments to provide aid.
That has taken a large dip in the past few months, and the reasons are pretty clear.
The first is that the U.S. and the EU have pending aid commitments that have stalled, but are likely to be passed soon.
That will bump numbers up considerably.
The second reason is because in May and June of this year, Ukraine received a flood of multi-year aid commitments that more than make up for the dip in new commitments seen in the last few months.
Year over year, October 2023 saw about 2 billion euros of new commitment compared to about 4 billion in October of last year.
Compare that to the difference between Junes.
In 2022, new commitments were just under $5 billion.
This year, it was almost $55 billion, with over $50 billion of that being in the form of multi-year commitment arrangements.
So you can see this is being skewed a little bit.
Further, their newest dataset shows no drop-off in heavy weapon commitments in the same time frame, and in fact shows increases from EU countries on that front.
The point is that the actual data doesn't show a complete cratering of the support for Ukraine, but that is how a headline in a state media outlet of the country invading Ukraine might want to present things.
And Alex is on the same tip, so he has zero investment in figuring out what the story actually is here.
It's enough for him to just parrot the talking points of the side that he's on.
Also, Tucker is entirely mischaracterizing what Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said.
He was speaking to Congress, and he made the point that if Putin...
Right.
They're trying to hold the aid hostage so they can apply pressure to pass anti-immigrant border security legislation, pretending that they may be open to aid to Ukraine talks if they can get their xenophobic shit going.
Anyway, Austin made a very reasonable statement that Putin is unlikely to stop with Ukraine, and if there is a threat to NATO countries, we are obligated to send troops.
Tucker and most of the right-wing media misrepresented that to be some kind of a threat, because at its core, the right wing of this country supports Putin.
Yeah, it is kind of interesting that we are pretty consistently trapped in this space, wherein you and I, and people, I suppose, let's say, high attention span, high attention space kind of...
Look at people like this and say, this will not stop.
There is no way for this person to stop themselves.
They will only move forward and only escalate.
That is how they function, right?
And then you have people who are enabling that and they're like, yeah, we love that shit.
That's the way we do it.
And then you have the people who are like, okay, well, what if we tell him, please stop this time?
So this is a headline Alex is reading from the Epoch Times, which is a bad sign.
Even so, when you read a little into the article, you find that maybe the headline is not actually capturing the data that it's supposed to be reporting.
This is about a South Korean study looking at the data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service.
They examined various diagnoses compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated people and found that there was a higher rate for things like menstrual disorder, ear disease, and bruising among vaccinated people.
One issue right out of the gate is that the study hasn't been peer reviewed yet.
As a society, we need to make a policy that we're not going to take any reporting seriously when the underlying information comes from unreviewed studies.
It's jumping the gun out of a desperation to feed the narrative cycle.
The anti-vax folks are wrong, and because of that, they need a constant flood of stories telling them that they're right in order to preserve the position.
One of the main tricks that's being used in the time after COVID has been the use of med archive studies.
most of all would never pass peer review because they're flawed.
I don't remember this being so prevalent in the times before COVID.
And I really think that if this one trick was eliminated, it would fundamentally disrupt the COVID talking point factory.
All of the unpeer reviewed studies that have been the basis for like, can you believe hydroxychloroquine does work and shown it?
No, I don't think it should be against the rules, but I think we all need to grow up to the point where we realize what this information is and how seriously to take it.
If the vaccinated group includes a much higher percentage of people who are likely to get these conditions due to comorbidities or just aging, then you have zero reason to make the leap to thinking that any of the higher incidents seen in the data has anything to do with the vaccine.
When I say that the data is very skewed by age, I mean that the vaccinated group was approximately 74% over the age of 50, whereas the unvaccinated group was 67% under 49. That's probably an issue.
This is a factor that you can't just look past super easily.
The second thing that's of note is that the comorbidities the study did track and how heavily they skewed towards the vaccinated group.
They included hyperlipidemia, which is an elevated level of lipids in your blood, which is associated with heart attacks and strokes.
10% of the unvaccinated group had this compared to almost 33% of the vaccinated.
They also included hypertension, which 9.5% of the unvaccinated group had compared to 29.5% of the vaccinated.
If one of the things your study is looking at is like incidents of heart issues and you have this stark a difference in the groups, it's very unlikely that the result you arrive at is going to be of much use.
Anyway, the point is that there's no reason to take this study seriously.
Obviously, it's wise for doctors and researchers to stay vigilant to test hypotheses, even if they are unlikely to be proven correct.
But this is not that.
And the reporting in the bullshit ass Epoch Times is further not good.
It's one of those things where I feel like people understand in that kind of like almost surface level explanation of like the scientific method.
You know that idea of like, oh, we test, we do all this stuff.
But the actual studies, they don't quite make the next step to like, it's only useful if you can isolate information to one data point so that it's useful.
You know what I'm saying?
You have to get rid of all of the noise.
All of the noise to find one valuable thing.
And there's so much noise in that stupid thing.
When you're dealing with that much noise, you're wasting everybody's time.
Very hard to respond to alleged facts when the person presenting them intentionally jumps all over the place from one right-wing grievance talking point to the next when there's no connection between them.
But I'll try.
The first part is about declining fertility and life expectancy in the countries that took the shot.
I presume he means mRNA shots because that's supposed to be such an important part of the conspiracy, but Alex isn't clear, so I'm not sure what to do with that.
If we just look at life expectancy, this isn't true.
Australia is one of the main countries that Alex says lived under complete COVID tyranny, and between 2018 and 2021, their life expectancy actually increased slightly.
The same is true of Canada, another country that's supposed to have been ruled by Klaus Schwab drone dictator Justin Trudeau.
On the flip side, Russia, the country that's rejected the shot, according to Alex, has a life expectancy that's dropped four years since 2019.
That's a real problem for Alex's conclusion.
Life expectancy in the United States has also dropped, but that's because of COVID.
Same for Russia.
If you look at the countries that suffered the most COVID deaths, you see similar dips in life expectancy.
Conversely, if you look at countries with the highest rates of vaccination, you don't see similar trends.
This is because COVID is driving dips in life expectancy, not vaccination.
In terms of fertility, there's been a downward trend in this since the 1960s of decreasing births per person who can get pregnant.
It has nothing to do with COVID or vaccination.
It's just a decades-long trend made possible by the advent of easy access to birth control and family planning and increasing standards of living in many parts of the world.
The less individual control a person has over their reproductive capacity, the more children they will end up having.
I wanted to know more about that, because I'm interested in hearing anybody's idea if it begins with, we're going to go in and we're going to kill all your cows.
So I don't think the things Alex is saying are true, because he's known to make shit up and exaggerate, but there is a real issue going on right now with the Dutch agricultural sector.
The government of the Netherlands is obligated to protect certain areas of nature, thanks to regulation passed by the EU.
Some of these areas they need to protect happen to be pretty near large, highly polluting cattle farms, and the only way to resolve that issue is for the government to buy out some of these farmers.
Right.
unidentified
This has been a huge deal in the Netherlands since 2019, and Alex hasn't really talked about it much, but it's a great option for something he can yell about now since the latest Dutch election saw a rise of extreme right-wing nationalist parties, so this is ripe for Alex to glom onto.
Well, it's interesting because they're, like, I obviously am not an expert in Dutch politics, but you have that going on with the Wilders, the Freedom Party, whatever the fuck it's called.
And then you also have the BBB, which is a farmer-based party that gained a bunch of seats in the other House of Congress.
And so they emerged, I think they won, like, 16 seats out of nowhere.
And so there is this other side that doesn't appear to be as fanatical, but is motivated heavily by the situation with the agricultural sector.
So you have a confluence of those two things that I don't know how alive they are.
So since the most recent elections, the government has already decided to push the date.
that they want to hit emissions decrease goals from 2030 to 2035.
So Alex is already wrong on that front.
The proposal to reduce livestock numbers by a third was an old proposal that they had, which Alex doesn't realize has been replaced by a voluntary model where the government is offering to buy out farmers who would like to be bought out.
Yeah.
unidentified
According to the Associated Press, as of November 30th, over 750 farmers have signed up for this plan.
It does have the vibe of, like, Alex is describing the Vietnam War restarting, and people are taking tanks through the Dutch jungles to murder their cows, you know?
I remember like two years ago, the document came out of the Department of Energy.
They said, yeah, we're going to have regulations in 2023 to ban the new production of gas range stoves.
They went, oh no, that's a conspiracy theory, even though it was a real memo, and now they're saying, yes, we want it, and New York just banned them or began the process.
I mean, it's just...
It's always the same tactics.
Like, oh, we don't want illegal aliens to vote.
And then over 100 jurisdictions have passed laws that illegal aliens can vote.
They just banned them in new houses and new homes that are being built.
There are good environmental and consumer health-related reasons to make such a regulation, but it really doesn't matter to someone like Alex.
To him, climate change is a non-issue, so anyone trying to make some kind of change based on concerns about climate change, they must be doing it for some other nefarious reason.
Because Alex knows climate change is a hoax, the people pushing changes based on climate change must also know that it's a hoax.
And since they know it's a hoax, it It must be a big power grab predicated on a lie.
Discussing these kind of issues with someone like Alex is pointless.
Cynthia lives in a fully constructed alternative reality that you're never going to get any traction.
Alex is wrong, also, about the non-citizen voting.
He says that a hundred jurisdictions have passed laws allowing non-citizens to vote, but that's...
In the real world, there are three states that allow non-citizens to vote in local elections.
But that does not mean the entire state allows it.
For instance, California is one of these states, but non-citizens are only allowed to vote in Oakland, where they passed a charter amendment that allowed parents and legal guardians who are non-citizen residents to vote for school board director.
Maryland includes 11 municipalities that allow non-citizen voting, and Vermont has three.
That is it.
That's what Alex is exaggerating out to be.
Hundreds of jurisdictions allowing undocumented immigrants to vote so they can be used to rig future elections.
It's a load of shit for a number of reasons.
The chief of them being that most of these laws specifically only allow legal residents to vote in those local elections.
Non-citizen permanent residents are a real group of people Alex pretend don't exist.
And I'm not sure I've ever heard a persuasive argument for why they shouldn't be able to vote in these local elections.
As of the matter of the caravans thing, it wasn't so much that people were contesting that there was a large group of immigrants and refugees headed toward the border.
It was that people contested the conspiracy narrative that people like Alex were constructing about it and how it was being used to incite racism and xenophobia.
I mean, he did it on Tucker's show.
They're brainwashing for five years these immigrants to be used as a mind-controlled underclass and all this shit.
That's the kind of stuff that people are like, this is ridiculous.
Every three to six months, there's a brand new, completely massive, huge thing that's coming to our borders, and it's going to happen, and then the day that it's supposed to happen, it doesn't, and then the next day, it never happened in the past, and we never talk about it.
You can recognize that a group of people is heading toward the country's border while at the same time rebuking the narrative that these people are an invasion force or waves smashing against the border with a goal of overwhelming the country.
People rejected this racist framing that people like Alex used to cover the story, and for Alex that means that they're saying that no immigrants are coming.
He's incapable of responding to rebuttals that his content is inherently racist and his framing of stories is dishonest.
So instead, he just creates straw man criticisms of himself to respond to, and you just see that over and over and over again.
I hope when you go on Tucker next week, because it will reach tens of millions of people, that you don't just talk about your experience, Owen, but this is a larger persecution going on.
They're trying to put Trump in prison.
They're trying to put everybody else in prison.
They're trying to put me in prison.
And people need to understand that the judge said, and I want you to send that to Tucker.
I got you on the phone with the producer today.
Say, call me.
I wanted you on.
To show people the sentencing document where the judge says, well, I have three examples the FBI gave me.
Or the Justice Department, where Owen in the last few months said the election was stolen.
So because he's not remorseful, you're at the Capitol trying to stop people going in, but because you believe it was stolen, which is overwhelming, and the majority of Americans believe in major polls, they're sending you to jail.
They want you to know, we're criminals, we're going to put you in prison for your speech.
I mean, they have indicted themselves.
They are tyrants naked.
Wanting us to know they are, thinking that will then intimidate us, Owen, and that's really the gauntlet they've thrown down here.
Well, and of course, in the sentencing memo, and part of my sentencing was, well, if not the majority, was my speech.
And one of the speeches cited was me saying death to tyrants, which, by the way, is the logo on the Virginia state flag, so what are they going to ban that next to?
But, I mean, it's a pretty simple question and answer.
Who would be offended by saying death to tyrants?
Well, tyrants would be offended by that.
Now, I would suggest, if people want to get the background, if you're just hearing about this for the first time, go look at the press conferences my attorney and I, Norm Pattis, have done.
We did another sit-down.
We did an interview with you, Alex.
We did another long-form press conference, if you will, showing the sentencing memo, how they're punishing me for speech.
How they're punishing me for not being remorseful, for not believing that the 2020 election results were legitimate.
Oh, yeah, I don't know.
Trump just gets 30, 40, 50,000 people at a rally.
Joe Biden can't fill a broom closet.
But hey, let's just go ahead and go with that.
Joe Biden gets the most votes of all time.
We won't pontificate on that too much.
But when people read the sentencing memo, it's exactly what you said.
This is a speech crime.
We are now living in an age in America where speech crimes and thought crimes are being punishable.
But they don't just want to say, oh, we're going to throw you in jail for your speech.
They want to be able to make you change your speech in a 1984 Orwellian news speak manner to say, no, no, no, no.
Not only are you going to go to jail, we're going to force you to apologize and retract your statements, which, by the way, sad to say, a lot of Trump's attorneys And a lot of Trump's team did just that, in case you didn't notice in the last month.
I'm also sure that he would want death for all the fake Republicans who don't support Trump enough, too, because that's tyranny.
Owen got in trouble because he didn't do his community service for a previous deferred sentencing agreement, and because he failed to uphold his part of that agreement, he was still bound by his own agreement to not engage in any disruptive or disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.
It was his own fault.
and then he pled guilty to the charge in front of him that sent him to jail for a few weeks.
The fact that Owen's words and actions since January 6th clearly illustrate a person who takes no responsibility for his actions that was a factor in the sentencing guidelines, as it is in every prosecution, but it wasn't the reason that Owen went to jail.
The sentencing memo very clearly discusses free speech objections that could be made to Owen's incarceration and flatly rejects all of them, citing Supreme Court decisions and past case law.
As the Supreme Court has decided, quote, the Constitution does not erect a per se barrier to the admission of evidence concerning one's beliefs and associations at situations These dudes are absolute babies.
So, I'm not going to play this clip, but there's a part where the mics, there's a bit of an issue with the mics, and it really sounds like Alex is snorting something.
But I think it's actually just like his chair moving or something.
Well, it is the Streisand effect, there's no doubt, because as far as we can tell, and my attorneys and I are still looking into this, I think I'm the only person ever...
To be in a federal prison with a misdemeanor, ever.
Nobody has ever heard of somebody with a misdemeanor in a federal prison.
None of the inmates that did long time, none of the guards, nobody's ever heard of that.
unidentified
So what happens is people say, why are they putting this guy in prison?
There's an issue that I'm definitely going to be taking up now, and as far as the capacity or the level of it, I'm not quite sure yet, but prison reform is a major issue that we need to address immediately in this country, and I know that my name got brought up.
During the BOP hearing when they're requesting $2 billion more, and it didn't go so well for them because the whole thing is incompetence, ineptitude, and I would say at least half the people that are in the prisons right now probably don't even belong there.
You mentioned this earlier.
You go into major inner cities, Democrat cities, Soros DAs, they release the most violent criminals in the country back out onto the streets, but they have all kinds of political prisoners.
Rotting in jail cells every day that most people don't know about.
And now I'm going to be able to have their voices be heard, and a lot of people inside are really encouraged by this because nobody's gotten this much attention.
Your life's work, Alex, 20-plus years of doing this, I've seen you go through highs, I've seen you go through lows, I've seen them try to destroy you, and still you're here on air today giving me this platform for my first statements.
I mean...
How do you feel seeing this?
Do you feel like your life's work is starting to finally be manifest and the fruits are starting to grow?
I don't know what kind of mileage you're going to get out of that.
Then Owen gets out and calls into the conspiracy propaganda radio show on which he made a ton of the inciting comments that contributed to January 6th and on whose behalf he was at the Capitol illegally in the first place.
I don't understand how Owen could think it was his speech that's the problem there.
This is an abuse of his ability to use a phone.
I'm opposed to most aspects of the carceral state, so I don't think this is good, but while he's in jail, he doesn't have the freedom to make There's some good bars that have been released
Yeah, so obviously I get out of the solitary confinement quarantine.
It was seven days in there.
And I make one phone call thanking people for all their love and the support and the mail and the prayers.
And then I get thrown right back into solitary in the SHU, as it's known, the special housing unit, which is basically like a high-security prison situation.
No movement, locked up all day.
Three showers a week.
You get cuffed every time you go to the shower.
It's a whole thing.
And so I have no connection with the outside.
I'm not able to make phone calls.
I'm not able to talk to you or anybody.
I'm not able to talk to friends, family, lawyers, nothing.
I'm just sitting in there rotting way.
I have no idea what's going on.
And so after a couple weeks of that, the warden comes by and he pulls me out and I have a meeting with him.
And he's looking at me like he's looking at the reincarnation of Moses or something.
And I don't know what's going on.
And he's like, tell me, what's your agenda here?
What are you trying to do?
And I don't know what's going on.
And I just say, oh, well, I just made a phone call to thank people for the letters.
Like, did you hear it?
I wasn't trying to cause any trouble because I don't know what's going on.
And then I realized at that point, he's like, okay, he really doesn't know what's going on.
But then he brings up, he's like, I'm getting all this political pressure.
I'm hearing from lawyers.
We're hearing from Congress members.
We're getting brought up during congressional hearings and all this stuff.
And I guess they thought somehow I was running it from my cell.
I guess they thought somehow that I was...
The man pulling the strings on all of this.
And I had no connection with the outside world.
And I think it kind of hit maybe him at that point like, oh, this is all organic.
This is the American people.
This is people trying to get the truth out.
And this man really has been treated extremely wrong.
We're out here running the country, actually plowing the fields, driving the trucks, taking care of the kids, stopping the criminals.
You know, busting our ass, and we're in the real world, and the left, and they're minions, and this guy's probably not a leftist, but he works for them.
They don't get, we know what's going on.
We're watching.
We're pissed, man.
They don't get that they've wrongly attacked.
We see the attack.
The country's being destroyed.
And when you're locking up journalists and filing fake federal filings that, you know, that you did all these horrible things, people see that, and they know they're next.
They have empathy because...
They care about themselves.
See, evil people don't have empathy because they're dumb.
Empathy is the most selfish thing on earth, folks.
When you have empathy, it's because you care about yourself.
And that's by extension, you care about others, but that's improgrammed in you, so we all take care of each other.
And Owen is not directly causing it, although he did call into the radio show, which, whether or not it was all just, I love Jesus, thank you for your support, I remember that, and it was actually a little bit more, hey, go to freeowenshroyer.com and donate to my money fund.
You're going to have to get really attacked and hurt, and it's going to feel really bad for a long time, and you've got to be ready.
At a certain point, you're going to spur, and your audience is going to spur, a whole movement against this.
You're going to see all these great new leaders pop up.
You have to be ready to support that and not want to be the leader.
And I was like, absolutely, I don't want to be the leader.
God said, well, that's why I chose you.
You accept this mission.
I said, I accept this mission.
I said it out loud.
I said, I accept the mission.
And God went, all right, you think you just got to download?
Get ready for this.
Bam!
Like an anvil.
A thousand pound anvil got dropped on my head like Wiley Code or something.
And it just all opened up from there.
And I couldn't even understand the data I was being given.
It took me years to even be able to understand what?
That's how this works in like third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, twelfth order responses and how this would happen and how the enemy would hit here and it would do all this.
And I'd start like gibbering on air.
This is going to happen.
That's going to happen.
And I'm like, how do you understand this?
Because I just, it's like so much data and I'm here trying to explain it all to you.
How do you describe what you're now living in 25 years ago?
And people would make fun of me, other talk shows would call me and say, you got a vision from God that you're going to spark with your audience the global resistance, and that they won't listen to you up front, but a remnant will, and then that will trigger the global awakening.
You're a megalomaniac.
And I'm like, hey man, you weren't there.
And God's done things like, here's a dream that's going to come true.
And they're going to tear down the golf course, and they're going to build a house right where the ninth hole was, where I grew up in Dallas.
And like three years later, they say, we've decided to change the golf course, and they bulldoze it.
And then I'm sitting there one day, and there's the dream with only the scaffolding and the outside of the house, the wood built, and it wasn't built yet.
And I'm sitting there on the back porch looking at this house that's been built.
I'm remembering the dream.
And I remember in the dream, a cat walks up to the top window of the house, and I'm sitting there, and then the cat walks up to the top window of the house, and I'm staring.
It's 50, 60 yards at a cat at night at 10 p.m. on no drugs, nothing.
As you're telling that story, and you're describing the feelings that you're having that should, like, lead you to be like, well, this is unacceptable behavior.
But it's God saying, all right, get up, go in the kitchen, or go in the bathroom, and then you go, and it's a digital clock, and it's always the exact number.
And that's God telling me.
You want to know how real I am?
God doesn't send some angel.
I don't see Jesus in my bedroom.
None of that.
God just says, okay, get up.
Walk out there.
And you're about to.
And every time.
It doesn't happen when I wake up and go, okay, go look at the clock.
You know the exact time.
And God's like, yes, I'm God.
And I want you to know right now, this is 100% real.
This guy that you want to take seriously about analysis of politics and concrete worldly things believes that evidence of God speaking to him is that he knows what time it is when he wakes up sometimes.
And he can't prove it to you because it's like the observer effect that when you ask him what time it is, he can never tell you because God doesn't work like that.
I actually feel like I have significantly more respect for someone who's expressing a belief in God that doesn't come along with all this magical bullshit.
I also don't have a whole lot of respect for faith that leads people to the politics, the worldview, the decisions, the outlook, the prescriptive ideas that Alex does.
Sure.
Because if that is the result of his interfacing with a god, that god is cruel.
That god is awful.
Sure.
And so, you know, you know somebody by the fruits, you know, Alex likes to say that, and Alex's fruits are terrible.
And so if that is the result of him being on this mission from God and he's doing what he's supposed to do, that's, I mean, you've made the point many times that maybe it's the devil.
Well, I mean, I don't, I wouldn't even go so, you know, I mean, the devil is kind of our point of view on it.
I think it's really, like, the idea that Alex could never handle.
And I don't think it's possible for him to handle this.
Is that God could very much be in Alex's point of view wrong, but Alex would have no choice, if that makes sense.
Do you know what I mean?
Just because you can say, you know, God could tell Alex to fucking do the opposite of what Alex wants to do and be like, hey, listen, you have to vote for Joe Biden.
And Alex can be like, oh, no, I disagree with you.
I think that's wrong or anything, but he has to do it.
Just like Deepwater Horizon, it came out in the court.
Transcripts of the phone calls, the emails.
BP was worth like $45 million there, and they said, well, we're drilling all these deep wells in the Gulf of Mexico.
Our executives say in the next month, if we just stop having 20 ships a day with concrete show up to dump those in the holes after they drill, we'll save hundreds of millions a day, and we'll be a $48 million company.
And they told the engineers in Houston to do it, and they called the engineers on the drilling rigs and said do it.
And all the engineers said, this is mathematics.
The seawater under the pressure is not going to hold those drilling holes down, and the gas and oil is going to come out at pressure.
We're not sure at what level, but it's there.
We're drilling in rich areas.
30,000, 40,000 foot deep wells, it's going to explode.
unidentified
And the email's like, we're a $44 billion company.
There's a meme that's been floating around dumb shit right-wing social media that misrepresents this quote, and Alex is...
His workflow is mostly movies and memes, so this is how he covers the news.
Anyway, at this point, Alex is going to go to Kohl's, and if the guy who has this information and is downloaded from God, all he can come up with is movies and memes, I don't know if I care about what the people who think he's a genius have to say.
And I have a lot of these dreams that have come true.
Dreams I haven't wrote down.
You know, dreams that were amazing.
And some were good, some were bad.
I mean, I've told this story many times, and we'll go back to Thomas and finish this story.
I looked older than I was, and I wasn't a drug guy, but I was an alcohol guy.
And so even the 16-year-olds when I was like 14, you know, they're my friends, but they'd come get me because I would go into the liquor store and for whatever reason they would sell liquor to me and not to them.
And so we'd drive into Dallas because there weren't even liquor stores where I lived.
It was a dry county outside Dallas.
We'd drive in the county right next to Dallas into Dallas.
We'd drive into the worst neighborhood, and I probably did this 100 times or more.
And, you know, your kids, you don't have a lot of money, so you want it ever clear in Milwaukee's Best or whatever for a party, you know, high school girls or whatever.
I had a dream that I woke up all sweaty from where I'm getting beer and a guy comes out and pulls a knife on me and whatever and he has a purple and polo shirt.
It was a white crackhead.
A purple and green striped polo shirt.
And I remember in the dream I was like in an alley behind a building and I had the beer.
For whatever reason, we'd pulled in behind it.
And sure enough, I walk around.
The guy tries to mug me.
It happens.
I defend myself.
And I think it was God warning me so when I saw the guy was ready and was able to not have him, you know, stab me and was able to get out of there with the beer and the Everclear.
I'm going to give him more visions and make sure that he gets home to have sex with those underage teenage girls drunkenly, I'm sure with their consent.
I think it's like a subconscious collective fear that, you know, we're being invaded and, you know, we could have an invasion like that with such weak leadership in our country.
But I also, you know, have dreams of passed away loved ones that come and visit me and I have vivid, in-depth conversations with them.
And they're giving me, you know, instructions in life on how to, you know...
Carry on and carry on legacies, and it's just so profound, and I just give it all up to God that we're able to have that kind of extra sensory perception.
And to the other point of the guy's call about having these dreams about nuclear subs and stuff like that, I don't know if that is a prophetic dream or any kind of, like, united consciousness or something.
I think it might just be the kind of media that you take in getting into your subconscious, and you feel...
Like, you have all these people who obsess about this shit all the time that has become part of what your fantasies are.
It's not a secret, but what they teach in the mainline Christian church is, you go to heaven, skip the break, coming up, we'll get all the calls, and you float around in a cloud and play a harp.
If you're Alex, and you're thinking about the Great Replacement Theory, my first worry, are all these reptilian people going to take my spot in front of God?
Yeah, if there was a bunch of songs that I think are really, really good, but not infinite songs, not forever songs, to the point where you would hate them.
I'm going to, I guess, represent the potential atheists or people that have different faiths or non-faiths, but I've, for whatever reason, maybe the Tucker Carlson thing last night, but I was told by a friend today is the day to call, and after three years, I finally got through.
I have a story that I should have told three years ago.
Oh, no.
In November of 2019, I have a friend who is a private chef, a very high-end private chef out of Charleston.
This person gets hired by politicians and royalty.
This person was employed at that time in the Netherlands, feeding a large contingency of people who are politicians and royalty, including their children.
Why are you talking weird?
They were offered a shot, and they believed it to be a flu shot initially, but it wasn't.
As the night went on, everybody was being inoculated with a virus that was to come, an unnamed virus that was not the flu.
And I've known that I should have told that story for whatever reason.
Maybe it'll result in someone else telling a story, but that's my story, and that's the end of it.
We have a call that is revealing presumably connection to inside information about a bunch of elites for hours vaccinating people against a coming disease in the end of 2019 in the Netherlands.
If you're a private chef, and you're chefing for the richest blah blah blah politicians or whatever, and they're giving out a secret special vaccine, you take the vaccine!
You have, like, a discomfort being on the phone, and then Alex bum-rushes you with this, why are you an atheist shit?
unidentified
Here we go.
Not like that you might traditionally say, but I just knew I was supposed to, you know, today was the day I got through to tell you this story, and I'm going to go because it's crazy.
But that, you know, that idea, whenever you're outside watching, if I'm God, and I'm looking at this, I'm looking at my representative here having a customer service call.
That if I were somebody who saw that Alex was on Tucker, and then I jumped over and was like, I'll check this guy out, the interview with Owen maybe would have kept me around and been like, this is interesting, I should look into this more, or something.
If I'm a sane person, after that point, everything else would have been a deal breaker.
Everything else would have been like, oh no.
Alright.
I see what's going on here.
This is a lunatic.
I need to get away from this.
And I don't understand how anybody could have any other perspective, quite frankly.
Unless you are sincerely somebody who is on the same page as Alex, and you believe that God is enlisting us for a cosmic war against the devil and the renegade angels and all this other stuff, and Alex has been chosen by God over chicken fried steak to be the leader of his forces against the devil here on Earth.
Unless you already believe that stuff, I can't imagine tuning into this and thinking like, wow, Alex pulled a fast one on Tucker getting that interview, huh?
I mean, what I find just so incredible, what boggles my mind, and because this is going to be true, I don't even want to pretend that there's a time to wait to figure it out.
How none of that, how Tucker sent so many people to Alex, they listened to that, and then none of that's going to blow back on Tucker.
I don't know if we'll ever be able to quantify it in any way, but I do wonder what the percentage of people who could have come from Tucker over to this and been like, is there a retention rate issue?
I can't imagine that the retention was high.
But again...
This is the strategy that people like Alex use, which is the, we'll get a million people in the door, and a hundred of them will become new customers, and that'll be really huge.
So, maybe it's not a success, even if you run away almost everybody with your extreme religious nonsense.
Yeah, that is like the one thing about, like, oh, simulation, I don't care.
But if it was...
That's the type of information that I would be so interested in, is that minute, person-to-person, what was it like to exist through this, through your eyes?
And seeing as we've been recording this that apparently Alex Jones did a Twitter Spaces with Elon Musk and Vivek and some other folks, so maybe we'll cover that on the next episode.